All Episodes
June 27, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:05:14
REVEALED: Shocking US Secret About 9/11 & Alex Jones Forced to SHUT DOWN InfoWars - Stay Free 394

Call 1(800)245-6000 or visit https://taxnetworkusa.com/brand and find your path to financial peace of mind.Order your Contagion Kit today at http://www.twc.health/BRAND use code BRAND for 10% off + FREE SHIPPING.⏰ BE HERE AT 12PM ET / 5PM BST ⏰Alex Jones has been forced to shut down Info Wars, five new US states are suing Pfizer over ‘vaccine misinformation’, the US unveiled new documents revealing Saudi Arabia’s potential connection to 9/11, and doctors are seeing increased heart attacks amongst younger people, I wonder why? Tune in for all this more! Remember to subscribe.Check out social medias and more - https://linktr.ee/RussellBrand

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello you Awakening Wonders there on Spotify, Apple, Stinkwhistle, Gurgledot, or wherever you download your podcasts these days to remain at least peripherally connected to some tendril of truth in a bewildering miasma of lies and propaganda.
We appreciate you, and we love you.
You're part of our community.
So that's why we're very happy to give you an audio version of our live Rumble Show five days a week.
It's on Monday to Friday.
We decipher the latest news stories, we break down current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, and if they aren't, Then we critique why they're not and what they are covering.
Every week as well, right?
We do brilliant conversations with people like Jordan Peterson, RFK, Tucker Carlson, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate.
These things are already up and you can listen to them now.
So remember, this is an audio version of our daily live show.
To tune in live, Go to rumble.com forward slash Russell Brand.
You'll find it easily and I hope that you will love it.
Now please enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
Thanks.
Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
Sorry for being a little bit late.
We were just talking about the audio, but whether or not we are audible, we know that free speech has experienced an incredible victory.
In the last 48 hours Julian Assange is free and I suppose we'll be tackling loads of questions about the freedom of Julian Assange and the deal that was made but there has to be a moment doesn't there where we acknowledge that something extraordinary has happened that most of us probably assumed that Julian Assange was going to die Imprisoned because what Julian Assange did was embarrassed and exposed corruption exactly the level that most of us suspect is beyond the reach of democracy and we're going to be exploring that a little bit what you might call the uniparty or there's loads of ways of analyzing it but the sort of sense that
There are impermeable powers that we cannot access that in fact control the world and there are so many examples of that that are usually dismissed as conspiracy theory when they bubble up into public consciousness.
We're talking about 9-11 because of the revelation that practical and and information that's easy to corroborate has come out
that reveals in a sense obviously the relationship between the Bush family and Saudi Arabia and
the likelihood that the Saudi Arabian government were involved in the 9/11 attacks and in a way...
Oh yeah, the 3rd of July is Julian Assange's birthday.
That's pretty exciting.
We'll be looking at that.
Once Julian Assange is free, we're all given a new opportunity, aren't we?
To look at what we've been told.
What we've believed.
To undertake a little bit of a reckoning within ourselves.
What's possible now?
What's possible now?
Now that Julian Assange is free.
If you're watching this on YouTube, we'll be there for about 15 minutes.
Then we're going to be talking about a few things.
I want to talk about John Oliver's take on the UK election.
We're going to talk about the fact that Keir Starmer, the presumed next leader of our country, was involved in the Julian Assange case and the Crown Prosecution Service has wiped the files that pertain to Keir Starmer's visits to the United States when he was head of the Crown Prosecution Service.
It's pretty exciting stuff.
We'll be looking at all of that.
As well as perhaps to a degree continuing to bask in the glow of Julian Assange's freedom.
Let's get into it.
Let's have a look at Julian Assange's free now.
Let's have a look at that footage of him like you know on the plane and being released and all of that stuff and I wouldn't mind if it's okay I'll watch that on this little screen if it's possible for us to do that if that's okay and if it isn't... Thanks guys, thanks very much.
They freed him as a distraction, says Mikezilla724.
It's a theatre.
John Oliver gave us a dump.
Yeah, well done.
Thank you.
I can't actually see it on the output.
I can see me now.
Thanks, folks.
Am I happy with my hair?
And there it is.
Thank you.
Let's have a look.
Let's have a look.
Me wants to play with Russell's hair, says Brian Zambrana.
No.
So, in a way, these images were inconceivable about two weeks ago two weeks ago the idea that Julian Assange will be walking around free with his smiling lawyer with ad hoc commentary from paparazzi
To see him and Stella Assange embrace again.
To see the eerie ghoul of the Guardian's watermark up in the corner.
One of the legacy media organisations that abandoned Assange after partnering with him for the revelations.
They in a sense changed reporting and formed a significant moment in the advent of independent media.
The legacy media had to form relationships with WikiLeaks and Assange because he had access to information and means of conveying information that were way advanced of what they were capable of.
Subsequently, of course, they abandoned him.
When the establishment came for Julian Assange, when Mike Pompeo said, we should kill him, Mike Pompeo, head of the CIA, when Hillary Clinton said, hey, Maybe we should drone this guy, or can't we drone this guy?
The Guardian, the New York Times, Der Spiegel, Figaro, all those organizations that were happy to use Assange's reporting abandoned him.
What can we begin to interrogate when it comes to our understanding of 9-11?
What can we interrogate when it comes to our understanding of the pandemic period?
What can we look at Differently, now that Assange is free.
And who else is going to be exposed and embarrassed as a result of Assange's freedom?
I'm not saying that Julian Assange may himself have further revelations.
Julian Assange could be forgiven if he spent the rest of his life on a beach with his wife and his sons.
I pray that's what he does.
I pray that's what he does.
If you're watching this on YouTube...
We'll be there for another 10 minutes, then click the link in the description.
We'll stream for about 40 minutes on Rumble.
You, AwakendWonders, join us for additional content.
You've seen our conversation with Jonathan Rumi.
From next Friday, you'll be able to see our conversation with Colonel Douglas McGregor.
I asked him about Julian Assange.
Did Julian Assange's WikiLeaks revelations ever put anyone at risk, or was that always a bogus claim?
Colonel McGregor's response is pretty fascinating.
We also talk about A lot of people are obviously saying it's not the real Julian Assange.
I think it is the real Julian Assange.
We can't be so enmeshed in conspiracy theory and cynicism that we are unable to enjoy even a brief victory in a grim world.
Colonel McGregor also talks about the history of Russia's relationship with the United States of America and the fact that perhaps We're coming to the end of an era when it comes to American supremacy and all of the connotations of that.
Okay guys, what do I want to talk to you about first?
I want to talk to you... This is, I suppose, where I'd like to start.
I'd like to start with this.
Nigel Farage is a populist leader in our country.
Maybe he could be regarded as Britain's Donald Trump.
That's one sort of perhaps reductive way of looking at Nigel Farage.
He recently said in an interview with the BBC that NATO had to bear some responsibility
for their actions and indeed Western powers had to acknowledge their culpability when
it came to provoking Russia into their invasion of Ukraine.
Now many of you will be familiar with the work of Jeffrey Sachs or John Mearsheimer
or actual history and will know that in this matter at least Nigel Farage is simply telling
That's why it's fascinating to see Rishi Sunak, financier, globalist stooge, current Prime Minister, and Keir Starmer, member of the establishment, former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, potential persecutor of Julian Assange, singing from the exact same song sheet.
Essentially a double act.
Being asked to choose between Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer in a general election is like choosing between Morcombe and Wise or Abbott and Costello.
You might have a favourite particular member of a double act, but what do you think the meaningful difference is between two establishment stooges that parrot the talking points of the globalist elites whenever they're questioned or inquired of?
One would say perhaps the fanfare and excitement of a general election and the fervour of pundits is all coming to waste if what you're invited to vote for is one of two sock puppets representatives of the same uniparty.
To illustrate this point, here they both are saying the exact same thing, the exact same thing, on the subject Of, forget for a minute Nigel Farage, I know he's becoming increasingly popular in this country.
And if you are anti-establishment, I recognize that you will look for anti-establishment figures and maybe, maybe you will interrogate that.
Well is he anti-establishment?
Where does Nigel Farage get his funding from?
Is he also a member of the city establishment?
You tell me, you tell me what you think in the comments.
I don't want sovereignty over anyone except for me.
My family, that's it.
That can be my little fiefdom.
My personal little domain can be me and my kids and my wife and frankly I can't control them.
Certainly not on long car journeys in hot weather.
Cast that aside for a moment if you will and look at both Keir Starmer Next Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, current Prime Minister, not only condemning Nigel Farage, but denying the idea that Putin was provoked.
Look at this!
You should be alarmed by this.
It should reveal something to you.
It should show you that you might be excited about getting rid of one government, but if you get rid of a government in order to simply replace them with a set of principles, ideas, virtues, edicts, And interests that are, broadly speaking, identical, you're wasting your time.
And the whole system is a waste of time.
And we will provide further examples of why optimism and Starmageddon do not belong in the same sentence.
What he said was completely wrong and only plays into Putin's hands.
This is a man... It's played into Putin's hands!
Putin will be loving this!
Okay, what's happening today?
Well, Nigel Farage has pointed out that NATO expansionism has provoked us.
Yes!
That goes right into my hands!
And now to poison some people on the streets of Britain!
Who deployed nerve agents on the streets of Britain.
Who's doing deals with countries...
Right, the KGB maybe did kill someone in Britain, but as Donald Trump once said, you think our deep state agents don't get involved with stuff like that?
Think there ain't CIA bases in Ukraine?
Think British special forces aren't involved in blowing up bridges in Crimea?
If it amounts to our espionage, our spying, our skullduggery, our international murders, our corruption is okay and theirs isn't, What kind of government is that?
What kind of ideology is that?
How can we get excited about that?
How will you not find the affability of populists more appealing than this bland, bureaucratic,
cynical, corrupt bullshit?
"It's like North Korea and this kind of appeasement is dangerous for Britain's security, the security of our..."
"Appeasement" was a word that was very popular in the first and second world war
and they are trying to deploy the very same kind of jingoism that they would condemn in their opponents.
Allies that rely on us and only emboldens Putin further.
Farage's comment.
Putin's really emboldened now.
And now to my sidekick, the next Prime Minister of your country and man who had curious meetings with the CIA.
When Jeremy Corbyn was the head of Labour and appears to have taken extraordinary visits that have been wiped from the CPS, records to America that potentially pertain to Julian Assange's ongoing incarceration, Keir Starmer.
Now, if you're considering voting for Keir Starmer, imagine this.
Imagine if, for the last couple of years in opposition, Keir Starmer had been continually visiting Belmarsh, making public statements.
It's a disgrace that Julian Assange is in prison.
It's outrageous.
The guy's a journalist.
Why was he in jail in the first place?
There's not even been a trial.
This is ridiculous.
All he did was expose corruption and you'd go, wow.
This guy is a leader.
This guy is at least opposing the current establishment, but he didn't do that, did he?
He got baffled and befuddled and confused and in a muddle whenever he was asked a complicated question about emerging identity and gender politics, unable to cope with that.
He opened the courts 24 hours a day, seven days a week when there is a little bit of uprising across the United Kingdom because in Sushi, Sushi!
Quick bite, and then he's gone.
In Rishi Sunak, we had a Prime Minister that was a Moderna globalist stooge.
Look into Infosys, his father-in-law's company.
Look into his relationship with the hedge fund that invested in Moderna before the pandemic.
And for Keir Starmer, you have a globalist.
I prefer Davos.
He's on record as saying that Davos is more important than the elected parliament of the country that I'm about to lead.
He is In effect, an authoritarian, centrist, bureaucrat, member of the state, the state machinery.
In Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer, you have the twin, all two local polarities of what global corporatism looks like.
On one hand, financial power.
On the other hand, State bureaucracy.
In both hands, a grip around the throat of freedom.
If you want to be free, you can't vote for people like that.
Don't get all terrified.
Oh no, but then maybe this will happen or that will happen.
Reject the establishment if you don't like it.
Reject hypocrisy if you don't like it.
Reject corruption if you don't like it.
Invite something beautiful into your heart.
Why exactly was Keir Starmer meeting with a CIA?
Why exactly was he opening the courts 24-7?
Why exactly did he deny young people the right to anonymity so they could be prosecuted as adults after some riots in the UK about 10 years ago?
Look it up when he was head of the CPS and why was he visiting Washington and did it have anything to do with the imprisonment of Julian Assange and his presumed extradition?
And if it did, What kind of leader are we electing?
And should there be fanfare and excitement about him?
Woohoo!
We got rid of the Tories to do something barely different at all!
Indistinguishable!
Let's celebrate!
Let's celebrate the tiny gap!
Between these two stooges!
...about Russia and Ukraine are disgraceful.
I've always been clear that Putin bears responsibility, sole responsibility, for the Russian aggression in Ukraine and I think anybody who wants to stand to be a representative in our Parliament should be really clear that whether it's Russian aggression on the Online?
Online aggression?
I can understand concern about Russia's actual invasion of Ukraine, which must be terrifying for the poor Ukrainian people who are being played like pawns like the rest of us in this globalist endeavor.
But what, you're worried about bots now?
When we know that our nations are just as guilty of that same kind of insurrectionist, insidious activity in China, in the Philippines, and presumably in Russia.
That's just standard fare.
You can't condemn them for that.
And if you can't take a little bit of abuse on the internet, well, bloody hell, don't start looking at my XFeed, baby.
That we stand against that aggression, that's, you know, standing behind Ukraine, but also standing up for our freedom.
Right, we've got to stand up for our freedom.
Thank you.
Stand up for our freedom.
Let's have a look then at Keir Starmer's role in the persecution of Julian Assange.
If you're watching us on YouTube, we'll be there for another couple of minutes.
If you're not an awakened wonder yet, consider becoming one so you can be a member of our book club so you get first access to brilliant interviews like the one with Colonel Douglas MacGregor or indeed Jonathan Rumi.
It's up there right now.
Me talking to Jesus is my body double, the star of The Chosen, Jonathan Rumi, who plays our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and God knows we need some alternatives right now.
Let's have a look at what Keir Starmer said about Assange.
Or rather, thank you, thank you mate, see it.
Let's have a look.
Before that, Shree, do you want to see an advert?
You've got to see an advert.
Let's have a look.
This is a quick advert.
Tax Network USA will be with you for a few seconds.
The support of our partners allows us to keep streaming in the face of big tech censorship.
Stay with us.
We're going to come back and we're going to show you that Starmer had four trips to To Washington while head of the CPS, the Crown Prosecution Service, that's like he was the attorney general for our country.
Let's have a look at why those records might have been deleted and what it might reveal.
Have a look at this first though.
Are you struggling with back taxes or unfiled returns?
The IRS is escalating collections, adding, get this, 20,000 new agents and sending over 5 million collection letters to kick off 2024 to spend on things that you probably don't agree with, like wars and measures and a total lack of infrastructure.
In these challenging times, your best defense is Tax Network USA.
Don't let the IRS take advantage of you.
With over 14 years of experience, Tax Network USA have saved their clients over $1 billion in back taxes.
No matter the size of your tax issue, their expertise is your advantage.
They specialize in negotiating with the IRS, aiming to significantly reduce your debt.
Tax Network USA doesn't just negotiate, they also protect your assets from IRS seizure.
and manage your yearly returns for ongoing compliance.
Importantly, they are licensed to help you with all state tax issues,
regardless of where you live in the United States.
The clock is ticking.
Don't wait as the IRS steps up its game.
Seize control of your financial future now.
Contact Tax Network USA for immediate relief and expert guidance.
Call 1-800-245-6000 or visit taxnetworkusa.com/brand.
Don't let tax issues overpower you.
Turn to Tax Network USA and find your path to financial peace of mind.
Alright, let's get back to this content.
This is some excellent reporting from DCUK.
At them when we post this on X. Because, I'll tell you why.
Because in Keir Starmer, you have the emergence of another globalist.
In the release of Julian Assange, you have a potential victory for free speech.
And if Julian Assange can be freed after revealing the corruption of the international establishment, perhaps all independent journalists, perhaps all independent thinkers might come together And apply our shared inquisitiveness, our shared spirit of inquiry to, well, 9-11, the pandemic period, the kind of things we talk about all the time.
Perhaps it's possible that the truth may burst forth the way that Julian Assange's liberty has punctured the bubble of totalitarianism.
So the reason it's important to look at a figure like Keir Starmer is not because I think he's evil, but actually the opposite.
I think he's kind of neutral and potentially simply a tool of the very same kind of establishment that puts figures like Rishi Sunak into positions of power.
So let's have a look at this story and look at Keir Starmer's connection to Julian Assange and the United States of America.
Fascinating.
The Crown Prosecution Service, England and Wales' public prosecutor, has deleted all records of its former head Keir Starmer's trips to the US.
It can be revealed.
This will be their statement.
It's perfectly normal, standard practice to delete all of that.
It's just standard practice that we've deleted all of that.
It's standard practice to survey people online.
It's standard practice to deem, amplify and censor true information online.
It's standard practice to control you.
It's standard practice to move towards authoritarianism.
It's standard practice to hold elections that don't mean anything, where you can choose anyone as long as it's these two people that we already control and these two institutions that are already corrupted by their finance models.
It's standard practice.
Well, have you considered that maybe we need new standards?
Yes!
That's exactly what we're considering right now.
Starmer served as Director of Public Prosecutions from 2008 to 2013, a period when the body was overseeing Julian Assange's proposed extradition to Sweden.
Where Hillary Clinton, by the way, was saying, why can't we just drone this guy?
Hillary Clinton was People were suggesting just murdering him, as was Mike Pompeo, the head of the CIA.
He was similarly suggesting, why don't we just execute him?
Well thank God that man who's currently in Australia with his wife and kids wasn't murdered because he was inconvenient to the establishment.
Remember, remember whoever it is you're thinking about voting for, whether it's next month or in a few months, I don't remember any leading public politician, except I can think of a few notable people on the left in our country, that came out and said, This dude Julian Assange, he should not be in jail.
Did Barack Obama say that?
Did he?
Did Donald Trump say that?
Did he?
You tell me.
You might have seen it.
I don't know.
I don't know.
You tell me.
Did Keir Starmer say it?
I don't know.
Did he?
Who said it?
Because if they didn't say it, you know what side they're on.
During Starmer's time in the post, the CPS was marred by irregularities surrounding the case of the WikiLeaks founder.
Notice how they have to use even this investigative organization that you've got to assume is legit and on it, because they're reporting on an important story right here for sure.
They say, oh, it's an irregularity.
It's just an irregularity.
Well, I suppose because they're being responsible rather than hyperbolic in their reporting.
But hey, man, we've got to get some energy going, don't we?
Do we need to get some energy going, or should we just lethargically just be ushered in?
Oh, look, I'm enjoying this new pastel shade of tyranny we voted for this week.
Oh, this is nice.
This new bureaucrat tyrant's got a nice haircut, I noticed.
I like the nasal voice of this one.
Oh, I like it when we get a different colour one.
Oh, I like it when we have a woman one.
Isn't it wonderful?
The different hues and shades and genders of tyranny that we're free to choose as long as we never expose our question.
The deep, deep homogeneity that is just below the surface of the apparent diversity.
True diversity, true tribal freedom, true individual sovereignty, true decentralization, true ability to live as who you are.
If you're watching this on YouTube, click the link in the description.
In a minute, we're going to blow your mind.
With a story about 9-11.
The kind of stories that have to be revisited in light of the release of Julian Assange.
Wherever you are in the world, you deserve to be free.
Whatever you believe in politically, you have the right to discuss it freely.
Whoever you think you hate right now, you have the right to reach out to them in peace and in good faith.
And that's what we believe in.
And that's why we're here in Rumble.
We will be streaming live for the presidential debates.
Live.
I'll be in my gym jams, baby.
I'm in the UK.
Click the link in description.
Get over to Rumble.
Join us.
During time is the CPS. Oh, yeah, I'll go straight. I'll carry on with the story if that's alright guys
My screen's just got something else If I may go back to the still of the star, which I think
you're on is it go? Thanks me The CPS was marred by irregularities surrounding the case
of the WikiLeaks founder. The organization has admitted to destroying
destroying key emails Related to this sound case mostly covering the period when
star ma was in charge while the CPS lawyer overseeing the case advised the Swedes
in 2010 or 2011 not to visit London to interview Assange
An interview at that time could have prevented the long-running embassy standoff.
This is of course a reference to the fact that Julian Assange was at the Inauguration of his persecution, accused of sex crimes in Sweden.
We all remember that, of course.
Let's have a look at the next... Oh no, I'm in charge of these, aren't I?
I'm in charge of this stuff.
Excuse me, let me... I was wondering who was in charge.
It's like that empty boat thing, isn't it?
You know, like if there's a guy asleep in a rowboat on a lake.
just drifting in and out of consciousness and then there's a boat keeps knocking into him and he's getting all infuriated
about why is this boat banging into me?
Why is this boat banging into me? Then he's all infuriated then he sort of flattens his eyes and looks there's no one
in the boat It's an empty vessel. All of us really are connected and
united On a molecular level perhaps there are abrasive moments and
brushes and bumps between us But ultimately are we not all children of the same source?
Are we not all on our journey home?
Let me know in the chat if you believe in that.
Or you could use your free speech like Sammy the Soothsayer to say, Biden eats and fucks babies.
Vote that sicko and Democrats out.
Save the USA.
For me, it's all the same.
Gym jams.
Haven't heard that in so long, Russ, says Kenzie67.
Assange and Wikileaks began publishing classified U.S.
diplomatic cables in alliance with some of the world's largest newspapers in November 2010 in the same month.
Sweden issued an international arrest warrant for Assange over allegations of sexual misconduct, leading to a protracted legal battle in which the CPS was heavily involved.
I'd like to know what Keir Starmer has to say on that subject right now.
What are the redacted, deleted emails?
What are the visits to Washington?
What is his position on Julian Assange?
Is he happy that Julian Assange is free now?
Does he recognize that Julian Assange should never have been imprisoned in the first place?
For one thing, he never had a trial.
Except for, of course, a trial by media, which seems to be a way that many dissenting voices can be attacked and undermined these days.
We've seen it time and time again.
But while there is no longer any official record of what's Starmer did on these four trips on the British side.
Some information has come to light on the U.S.
side.
U.S.
records show that on the 9th of November 2011, the U.S.
Attorney General Eric Holder met with Starmer at his office at the U.S.
Department of Justice, the DOJ, for 45 minutes.
Starmer's CPS was then handling Assange's proposed extradition to Sweden.
Declassified has previously shown that the UK Home Office deployed eight staff on the secret operation to seize Assange from his asylum at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
This was a highly irregular move as Ecuador is a friendly country and the asylum is a right enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
I visited Julian Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy during that period.
He was obviously extremely weary, exhausted from what he was carrying, perhaps even having an understanding of What trials and challenges were yet to come.
It was curious to meet him there.
I looked around that Ecuadorian embassy and at the time reflected on the ludicrousness that there were oases and sanctuaries to be found in the sort of same actual territory in which he was being persecuted.
We were literally in London but in that building in London they couldn't get him.
Like you're playing tag or hide-and-seek and you're in the base It just made me recognize how temporal and abstract some principles actually are.
I'm not suggesting there aren't universals, but it is peculiar to know that Julian Assange found himself in sanctuary for that moment.
He slept behind a bookcase in the corner and I asked, can I see that?
He goes, no, that's where I sleep.
That's the last bit of privacy that I've got left.
As Julian Assange himself shared, Mark Zuckerberg has become rich by selling your private data to massive corporations and potentially sharing it with governments.
Certainly some of Edward Snowden's revelations seem to suggest that that's precisely the case.
Big tech communications companies sharing our information.
Isn't it extraordinary to learn that privacy in itself has become a kind of commodity?
That technology is supercharging state and corporate power to the degree where new forms of authoritarianism are plainly on the horizon.
No wonder then that people are looking to Britain first, America first, France first, Germany first, whatever nation first politicians to stop this incremental creep of corrupt power from swallowing us All up!
Julian Assange went from the Ecuadorian embassy straight to Belmarsh without trial.
Watch what our political leaders say now.
Watch what Biden and Trump say in the debates.
Tomorrow night, which we will be streaming live, by the way.
You can join us for that, even though it means I'm going to be up late in a dressing gown, all confused, maybe smoking a fag, all baffled and that, maybe in a hairnet with rollers on and everything.
Join us for that.
And watch what Keir Starmer eventually says, what Rishi Sunak says.
What are they going to do?
Oh, he put American military, he's going to take the Mike Pence route through this.
Is that route going to be available to him?
I'm not sure anymore.
I'm not sure.
It will be fascinating.
The CPS's lack of disclosure of documents related to Assange may raise suspicions of a cover-up.
While Starmer was still in charge in April 2013, the CPS rejected Assange's request for the personal data it had on him because of the live matters still pending.
I wonder why Assange wasn't given his legal right to access, under the Freedom of Information Act, to those documents.
Those documents... Do you want a government That's just sort of controlling you and censoring you and surveilling you.
Is there an opportunity for you in the next election in your nation to vote against that?
Are there independent candidates that say that you will run your own life, the government will be your servant, we will end lobbying, we will end donations and we will ensure that you have as much power as possible.
We will pull our countries out of foreign conflicts immediately.
Let's stop this madness.
Let's get out of these wars!
Let's do whatever we can to improve your life, to start supporting infrastructure.
That's the only function of government.
You don't come to us for ideology.
We've proven that we're ideologically bankrupt.
You go to your God, or your lack of God, for ideology, and we'll get on with making sure that the trash gets collected on time, that your streets are clean, that your schools are working, that you can get doctor appointments.
We'll leave you alone and shut the fuck up, which is what we should have done a long time ago, because when it comes to morals, we've got nothing really to offer, have we?
The CPSC's lack of disclosure of documents.
Oh yeah, I told you that.
Even GCHQ, the UK's largest spy agency, had granted Assange's request for the personal information it held on him, which revealed one of its intelligence officers calling the Swedish case a fit-up.
Well, what an astonishing revelation that was.
And that was the end of that.
It was a fit-up.
Let's just briefly...
Hillary Clinton, though, had some interesting views on it.
This is from Fox.
Hillary Clinton inquired, Can't we just drone this guy?
Well, thank God she couldn't just drone that guy.
And whatever Keir Starmer, Hillary Clinton knew or didn't know, whatever these globalist figures, interchangeable, in my view, I don't know how it works.
I'm just another person trying to make my way in this world.
But Julian Assange's freedom and release has told us a lot about corruption.
It's told us a lot about the obligations of independent journalism and independent journalists.
And it's told us a lot about the collective power we share.
Whoever those of you were that were continually campaigning for Julian Assange's release, you won.
The people in Australia, the people in America, people across the world that held faith at a difficult time.
I certainly can't claim to be among the number that held fast.
I was terrified when that dude started getting accused of sexual misconduct stuff.
I thought, woof, that looks pretty dangerous.
It looks like they'll do anything to bring down anyone that dares to speak out against power.
Julian Assange is an incomparable figure, perhaps, in the modern world when it comes to standing up to and exposing the corruption of authority.
It's easy to forget How much he's informed us when it comes to matters of war, what he said about Afghanistan, the purpose is not to end the war, it's to sustain it, it's to drain tax money from public bases and to filter it into private hands.
You can apply that to all of the wars that are going on right now.
The problem is Julian Assange remains relevant and now Julian Assange is free.
And if he chooses to spend the rest of his life with his family and his children, then good luck to him.
Good luck to him and he deserves that.
That should happen.
But!
Let us all remember the lesson of his example.
Now all of us have the opportunity to stand up as he did and oppose corruption and authority.
In a minute we're going to be back with some fantastic revelations about 9-11 and what it means when information is classified and censored and what the truth behind classification and censorship often are.
First of all though, a message from one of our partners on the important subject of your personal health.
Cheers!
The Wellness Company are some of my favourite partners.
Will your doctor even prescribe you either Mectin or Hydroxychloroquine?
Hey, I did it!
The Wellness Company's Prescription Contagion Emergency Kit is unique, providing carefully selected effective medications for COVID-19 and respiratory illnesses.
Either Mectin, Hydroxychloroquine, which some people call HCQ, don't know why, Z-Pak and Butanide, along with a nebuliser and guidebook for safe use.
Do not muck around with a nebuliser.
This is, of course, backed by research and endorsed by experts.
Specifically, Dr. Peter McCulloch and Dr. Harvey Rich, both friends of the show.
Avoid the chaos, wait times, and price of the hospital.
Get the entire kit for the cost of a single doctor's visit.
It is only available in the USA.
Every American home should have one of these, don't you think?
Visit twc.health forward slash brand and use our code brand to save $30 plus get free shipping on your contagion kit.
Okay, back to the content.
I want to tell you something.
I've known John Oliver for a very long time.
I've done stand-up gigs with John Oliver in front of like 10, 20, 30 people, small rooms.
That guy, 20 years ago, I reckon, maybe even longer ago, he is a nerd about politics.
He loved politics.
He's interested in it.
So whatever John Oliver is, he really believes, I think, in what he's saying.
And I also believe he's very, very funny.
And his success in the United States of America is well-deserved.
But I must say that when I saw him saying that a victory for Keir Starmer would be a victory for democracy, even if those weren't the literal words he used, I felt kind of conflicted.
John Oliver said that July the 4th was the opportunity for British people to have our own Independence Day.
That the 4th of July needn't mean a kind of a moment of embarrassment.
Oh God, that was awful, wasn't it?
They kicked us out for our taxes without representation.
You know, it was a good premise for a joke.
John Oliver, I would say, is extremely funny and extremely good comedian.
But this is something I believe is important and I think might be perhaps, you tell me, the most important thing when it comes to politics in countries like yours and ours.
If you're going to vote for someone that's ultimately going to do precisely the same sort of stuff that the previous government did, that doesn't have any real ideas, and just use the Julian Assange example if you want as a kind of thermometer barometer for this one, you know, in Kistama, you're not voting for a leader who's like, for the last four years, We've got to get Julian Assange out of that prison!
This is ridiculous!
It's free speech!
We've got to have a free press!
No!
You're voting for someone who was the head of the CPS that potentially collaborated with, maybe even conspired, to ensure that Julian Assange didn't get a fair trial, didn't get freedom, didn't get to stay in the Ecuadorian embassy, even though that's a very peculiar wish to grant of anybody.
Some might recall that Keir Starmer didn't prosecute Jimmy Savile when he had the opportunity.
So being hysterical, he was a...
Brutal sexual predator in our country for a while that had interesting ties to the royal family and all sorts of charities and powerful figures.
Kind of like a British Epstein in a way.
You'll note that a lot of establishment figures seem to have peculiar sex stuff going on.
I'm not talking about, um, promiscuity.
I'm not talking about being out there, getting amongst it.
I'm talking about weird stuff that involves trafficking, going to islands, and people being sort of maneuvered around, and peculiar, extraordinary, dark shit.
What I think is fascinating here, in this John Oliver video, is the endorsement of keeping politics between very narrow lines.
Again, I like John Oliver as a comedian, and as a human being actually, as from what I remember of him years ago when I used to know him.
But the idea that British people should be satisfied with getting rid of the Conservatives, the Tories, our right-wing-ish party, is laughable, risible and ridiculous and amounts to simply championing and trumpeting for the establishment to get another four years.
This time in the form of another authoritarian, centralist, bureaucrat, prosecutor of the innocent.
I prefer Davos to Westminster.
Marionette.
Let's have a look at that as a sort of an opportunity to examine what people mean when they say that organizations like HBO ultimately parrot talking points of the establishment and even amplify their agenda.
Think of some of Alex Jones's remarks about his HBO streamed trials, which of course extraordinarily continues to use the idea that it's the victims of Sandy Hook that are being supported and God knows anyone that's lost a child they deserve limitless love, limitless support.
But is the ongoing shutting down of Infowars and Alex Jones about that?
It's a question that we can continue to ask.
Let's have a look at this.
Because on July 4th, Britain has a chance to wash itself clean of 40 miserable years of Conservative rule, and it's a chance it simply must take.
If I may quote Bill Pullman, yelling about aliens, if we do this, the 4th of July will no longer be known as just an American holiday, but also as the day when Britain looked at the Conservatives, who've driven the entire country into a ditch, and said in one voice, loud and clear, The thing is though, that the Labour Party will remain in that ditch.
I wonder what single policy could be pointed to as an example of how there will be change for ordinary British people.
I wonder what in particular about Keir Starmer's past or history or vision for the future could be celebrated as bringing about the kind of change that this piece seems to be calling forth, beckoning, celebrating.
Because I don't see that happening.
Keir Starmer is Tony Blair without the charisma, and Tony Blair without the charisma is just a war criminal.
So God knows what kind of globalist nightmares may await us if people happily go vote for Keir Starmer saying, well it's not perfect, it's the best we can do.
The best we can do.
Is what's gotten us in this mess.
We need to become radical.
We need to awaken to new possibility.
We need to look for new alliances.
Anything that's a vote against the establishment, even if that's not voting at all, is better than supporting the ongoing establishment tyranny in the form of interchangeable bureaucrats.
But that's just what I think.
Why don't you let me know what you think?
Can you think of a single political leader that's saying, we're going to end the donations, we're going to end the lobbying, we're going to end the corruption, We're going to end the divisiveness culturally.
We're going to empower you individually.
We're going to do whatever it takes to ensure that your mandates, your referenda, are what we govern by.
We are your servants.
We are no longer your leaders.
We can no longer claim those principles.
We've made too many mistakes for too long.
You're in charge now.
Make your own mistakes.
If you want no more immigration, you go for it!
We'll assess the situation down the line.
If you want no more intervention in foreign wars, you go for it.
Seems like a good idea.
If you want no more enrichment of the corporate class, then that's what we'll end.
If you want an end to financial corruption internationally, and the same sets of interests being able to implement their agenda in various nations through various bureaucracies, we will support your right to do that.
These centralist political systems exist only to facilitate ongoing globalism and corporatism.
We know that.
Anyone that would advance the possibility of another four years of that is on the side of the enemy.
This is what we have to rise up against.
And I say all of that with a great deal of respect for John Oliver as a comedian and a broadcaster.
Fuck off into the sun, you cunts, fuck pigs and weirdos!
You tossers, wankers, dick splashes and cock wombles!
If Britain stands together this July the 4th, it will finally celebrate its Independence Day!
Well, I don't know about all that.
Hillary Clinton's got a new book out.
It's good to see Hillary Rodham Clinton.
She always uses the middle name when she wants to make a point.
There she is, staring out at us from inside her skull and bones club that she probably wasn't a member of.
Bloody sexists.
They let all the Bushes in and the other Clintons and everybody else, but not Hillary.
The title of the book, Something Lost, Something Gained.
One can only assume that that's integrity and money.
These kind of institutionally corrupt leaders are precisely what we have to oppose, and in the wake of Julian Assange's release, let's have a review and reckoning of some of the subjects that have long intrigued and baffled us in equal measure.
9-11, what went on there?
Was it exactly what we were told?
That some undetectable hijacking genii took control of some planes and destroyed some important landmarks in New York City, killed 3,000 people, somehow got rid of all the surveillance footage, were brilliantly funded, didn't have any connection to the Bush family, no connection to Saudi Arabia.
Well, guess what?
Some recently unsealed documents, and I wonder what's In all of these sealed documents, whether they pertain to Pfizer, whether they pertain to the military-industrial complex, whether they pertain to peculiar relationships between political figures, deep state agencies, and maybe people that have their own private sex islands, it's interesting to ponder that perhaps what's in sealed documents everywhere
That once unsealed would radicalize you and make you a little less compliant.
It's an interesting thing to think about.
Certainly this new revelation has damaged my trust in the establishment, which I'll be honest with you wasn't that strong anyway.
So this is the revelation that Saudi Arabia are likely likely have strong ties to the 9-11 attacks and indeed it is 9-11 victims that want this investigated further in the same way that apparently the victims of the Sandy Hook Massacre
And as I never tire of saying, they deserve a great deal of sympathy and they deserve a great deal of compensation.
Surely the same sympathy and compensation is owed to the victims of 9-11.
And they seem to be, at the very least, curious about what Saudi Arabia's involvement was in 9-11 and what, in particular, the Bush family's relationship with Saudi Arabia was.
And whether or not there's more to 9-11 than meets the eye.
And perhaps, Those of us that from the beginning were a little curious about 9-11 and how such an extraordinary plot was enacted, how it was reported on, how Building 7 was reported on as having fallen down while it was still visible in the background of the BBC shot.
So many questions about 9-11.
In fact, it was perhaps the moment that a new world was born.
After 9-11, it became legitimized to surveil.
It became legitimized to inquire, spy, censor, and control.
It became legitimized to go to war in Iraq and in the Middle East.
In a sense, when that tower, those towers, came down, a new world was born of its ashes and we live in it yet.
And thanks to the revelations of the likes of Manning, Snowden, Assange, we have a different understanding of what the function of government is.
It is to censor, it is to surveil, it is to control, it is to prevent us from waking up in our pods like Neo, realising we can't trust them, and becoming radicalised.
And every time an envelope like this one, envelope, is unsealed, more questions come out, don't they?
Two decades ago, the 9-11 Commission found that al-Qaeda acted alone.
But victims' families say that is not true, pointing to this video and other evidence as proof.
They are suing Saudi Arabia, claiming its government provided crucial assistance to the hijackers and planners behind the September 11 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.
60 Minutes correspondent Cecilia Vega reports.
A voice on the video says in Arabic, I am transmitting these scenes to you from the heart of the American capital, Washington.
So this is an unsealed piece of evidence.
You know that classified documentation of various kinds contains information so extraordinary and explosive, whether you're watching me right now in Canada or Germany or Australia or America, wherever you are, you know that if you had access to the clandestine information in your country, let's just pick a few subjects, assassination of presidents, Terrorist attacks like 9-11, your country's occupation and invasion of foreign territories that they probably had no business invading, events during the pandemic, measures that were taken, promises that were given, profits that were made.
If you had access to that information you might become a bit less compliant.
Now it's extraordinary to watch this tape because it seems seems like just someone having a...
At first glance, rather lovely holiday, traveling around Manhattan and enjoying some landmarks.
If we didn't know what was about to happen next, perhaps we would leave it there.
But we now know that this is a significant piece of evidence that ties Saudi Arabia to those attacks.
And who knows?
What other deep state interests and other nations and financial interests and families might be involved in the 9-11 tax?
Let me know in the chat, baby!
We're always interested to hear your opinion.
But what we can certainly testify to as one is that...
The truth, as Julian Assange revealed, would probably make you a little less compliant.
And that's the nature of the dynamic.
You will become ungovernable if you know what they're doing.
This video, unsealed in federal court this week and obtained by 60 Minutes, was recorded in the summer of 1999.
Quite nice the way he talks to them.
Greetings to you, beloved esteemed brothers.
They've got a nice vernacular, I'll say that for them, and seems like a pretty sweet guy.
Right up until the point where, needlessly, thousands of people had to be murdered.
For what?
And by whom?
And how?
You mean, who the FBI says was an operative of the Saudi intelligence service with close ties to two of the 9-11 hijackers.
Time is 6pm.
The video was filmed over several days.
Why do you guys think this is coming out now?
Why do you think we're getting these revelations now?
What do you think this is being used to distract us from?
What do you think it's being used as a vowel for?
How do you think this will be deployed?
How do you think that this will make you annoyed?
Let me know what you believe.
Yup, Inside Job, some people are saying in the Awakened Wonder chat, USA Taxpayer, one of my favourite handles because it sort of ultimately reveals the way that you are regarded by those that govern you.
Entrances and exits of the Capitol, security posts, a model of the building, and... This is the pre-internet age, or at least the pre-social media and complex modern version of the internet.
You just wouldn't do, right, okay, attacking that, blow that up.
It's such a clear bit of evidence, isn't it?
It's such a vital piece of evidence.
Nearby landmarks.
In this portion of the video, Bayoumi points out the Washington Monument and says, I will get over there and report to you in detail what is there.
He also notes the airport is not far away.
Pretty chilling, that bit.
What I see Bayoumi doing is going out and making a detailed video record of the Capitol.
Someone in the chat, Saudi Arabia dropping the petrodollar.
Is this the BRICS revelation?
Is this to do with the growing number of nations that are joining the BRICS de-dollarization movement?
Let me know in the chat if you think that this is about that.
And then conducting that 360 degree panoramic view.
GS11.
Richard Lambert is a retired FBI agent.
Some people say no hijackers, no planes.
You know, like, this is, I suppose, what's interesting as there are further and further revelations on a subject like 9-11 or the pandemic or whatever.
Is that you start with, well, this is what can be corroborated.
This is what they're telling us.
It's definitely not true.
What they're telling us is definitely not true.
What do some of these sealed documents seem to suggest?
Oh, wow, there's some sort of degree of conspiracy, collaboration, other organizations appear to be involved.
Oh my god, what are they holding back then?
And this is when you get tempted to speculate and conject and I, you know, I'm pretty sympathetic to people that go, well this group must be involved and maybe this happened, but when, or we know that the Building 7, where they expected us to believe that the passports were found in the ashes, there were so many sort of ludicrous and extraordinary sort of symbols and moments and titbits in that story.
And I wonder, and I'm going to trust you, in a sense, When even if you go a bit off key with a conspiracy theory, remember like people at the beginning of COVID that were going, it's a bioweapon, it's a bioweapon, it's a gene therapy.
I remember thinking, no, no, you're going too far now.
I bet what it is is they've just not done enough research on it.
But my God, you know, look at what came out.
And anyway, the sort of mood is correct.
The point you're taking to, even by Conspiracy theories that are not true is this.
Don't trust the government.
They're fucking lying to you.
Don't trust the media.
They're amplifying the message of the government.
Unite, oppose, become disobedient.
You get that idea.
What you don't want to get from the conspiracy theories is like, well, there's no point doing anything.
I'm not going to trust anyone.
You're a controlled opposition.
Then you've gone back in a circle to being useless again.
...who led the initial 9-11 investigation in San Diego, where Bayoumi and the two hijackers lived temporarily before the attacks.
He's now a consultant on the case filed by the 9-11 families.
If you've ever flown into Washington, D.C., one of the first things you see on the horizon is the Washington Monument.
So if you know where your other targets are, in terms of the Washington Monument, it helps guide you to your intended target.
Right, sort of like following an umbrella at a theme park.
Investigators believe the hijackers on flight 93, which crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, had the U.S.
Capitol as their likely target.
The lawyers for the 9-11... Someone in the chat, Jim says, Oswald and Jack Ruby were lovers.
Just people, everyone's just getting out of their system now.
Lee Harvey Oswald was bumming Jack Ruby on that grassy knoll?
How does that help us?
How does that help us?! !
...and families and former intelligence analysts we spoke to believe portions of the video show Bayoumi surveilling the Capitol as part of that plan.
And in the video, he references a quote, plan.
You said that in the plan.
What plan?
It was just a plan to go on a nice holiday.
We're looking to go on a nice holiday.
What is the problem?
Why are you so cynical about my lovely home video?
Who is he talking to?
What do you think he's talking about?
I think he's talking to the Al-Qaeda planners who tasked him to take the pre-operational surveillance video of the intended target.
So this video is taken in late June and early July of 1999.
What does that timing tell you?
Well, that means it was taken within 90 days of the time when senior Al-Qaeda planners reached the decision that the Capitol would be a target of the 9-11 attacks.
That's when Osama Bin Laden decided to approve Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's so-called planes operation.
Osama Bin Laden, looking pretty good.
The other dude, a little bit shabby.
A little bit Ron Jeremy.
A little bit of an attack from Ron Jeremy there.
Bin Laden, he's in a cave, he's in camo, looking pretty dope.
The other guy, shabby.
That's after his arrest.
Oh, fair enough.
In the days after 9-11, British police discovered the video during a raid on Bayoumi's U.K.
apartment.
They also seized Bayoumi's handwritten address book that the lawyers for the 9-11 family say was filled with phone numbers of numerous senior Saudi officials who were in the government at the time.
And when Bayoumi filmed the Washington video, he was often with two Saudi diplomats who the FBI says had ties to al-Qaeda, a Walking a bit weird, aren't they?
Why are they marching like that?
Why are they standing so close to each other?
Maybe you're right about Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald.
They're marching a bit close to each other, these two diplomats.
There's no need for that.
God, it makes you wonder.
I mean, again, out of the time when it was just plain, straight, neat.
This is an attack on our territory.
This is the first time American soil has been attacked since Pearl Harbor.
All of that stuff, and then you get these documents.
We need a Pearl Harbor-like event to legitimize all of these foreign wars that then did eventually happen.
Oh, man.
And then what happens to people that report on the lack of morality and downright corruption that did take place during the subsequent wars after this?
Those people go to prison without trial and are only released, well, just about half an hour ago.
And why?
Why now?
Finding the Saudi government disputes.
Well it is another very large brick in a massive wall of evidence.
Casey Jones gaming 18 year old kids died for this.
Oh man.
What happened was this led to thousands of people.
Dying in those towers, people dying on aeroplanes, I know some of you question that.
And certainly in the subsequent wars, just death, death, death, death, death.
You just become inured to it.
And then you have an election and you get all excited.
Which one of these warmongering bureaucrats?
It's not even personal, is it?
They're just nodes in a net.
They're just points lighting up in the circuit.
It doesn't matter.
They're replaceable.
They're irrelevant.
They're redundant.
And until we sort of awaken and take personal responsibility for the trajectory of our kind, then maybe we deserve to be tyrannized in this manner.
At this point indicates the Saudi government was complicit in the 9-11 attacks.
Ken Williams is a retired FBI agent who led the 9-11 investigation in Phoenix, where one of the hijackers attended flight school.
He's also a consultant on the case filed by the 9-11 families.
Would you walk with another diplomat just like an inch behind you?
That I will not do.
I'm a Fed, ma'am.
The hijacker has attended flight school.
He's also a consultant on the case filed by the 9/11 families.
In terms of all the revelations that have come out as part of this 9/11 lawsuit, where
does this video rank?
I think it ranks right at the top of the pile.
The government of Saudi Arabia says, nothing to see here, this is a tourist video.
This is a guy out looking at the sights in Washington, D.C.
I would vehemently disagree with that.
This is not a tourist video.
The British... I think we can agree that.
I'm having a lovely holiday.
Here are my men, my friends, I mean, marching in unison.
Here are some significant landmarks.
There is airport.
This is all good for the plan.
By plan, I mean holiday that I'm having.
Police are believed to have turned over the video to the FBI shortly after 9-11, which raises the question, why, after more than 20 years, is it just now surfacing?
Did somebody really mess this up?
This seems like a really big thing to just being made public.
If that was missed then... I don't know that we just accept that you're supposed to keep all that stuff secret.
Don't tell people that the vaccines don't work!
Don't tell people that the lockdowns were always just a breakdown social cohesion!
Don't tell people that a global cadre is secretly running the world!
Don't tell people that these wars are being used to keep people in a state of fear!
I don't like being told stuff!
60 minutes is meant to be the news!
Nora O'Donnell, who, actually, she's doing a damn fine job.
Shame on us for missing it.
If it wasn't missed, then I would have to ask the question, what was done with it?
That was Cecilia Vega reporting, and CBS News reached out to the FBI, which says it will not comment about ongoing litigation.
Both the Saudi government and Omar al-Bayoumi deny any involvement in 9-11, and lawyers for the government have filed a motion to dismiss the case.
That's cool.
He's actually still alive, Bayoumi.
That's pretty dope.
This is the time of revelations, no?
This is the time of awakening.
Let's have a look at some other information on this story.
Of the 19 al-Qaeda terrorists who hijacked four US commercial airliners on the morning of 9-11, 15 were citizens of Saudi Arabia and, of course, Osama bin Laden.
...was a member of one of Saudi Arabia's wealthiest families.
Immediately after the attacks, the Bush administration downplayed the Saudi connection and suppressed evidence that might link powerful Saudis to the funding of Islamic extremism and terrorism.
Do you remember in, like, Michael Moore's film, Fahrenheit 9-11, it talked about how they were all flown out urgently, that there were these financial ties between the Bushes and Bin Ladens and all sorts of stuff that was baffling?
And that was a relatively mainstream film at the time.
Like, Michael Moore could put out a film like Fahrenheit 9-11 and be like, Hmm, this is interesting.
Like now, you just can't talk about this stuff.
I suppose there's so much information available that it's all kind of just adrift and lost and it's very difficult to get it to coalesce into a pinnacle or spike of potential action.
Action like, don't vote for these people anymore!
Don't cooperate with these people anymore!
Find something in yourself that empowers you to transcend the various imprisonments and incarcerations that impose on you, either culturally or literally.
Surely we can bind together.
But, you know, it's very difficult because the world has sort of gone worse.
9-11... Yeah, Michael Moore's a fucking idiot, you're saying that, man.
But, like, Michael Moore, out of the time, is saying, I don't know what they're telling you about 9-11.
There's some shady shit's going down.
You might say, well, I think it's this degree of shady shit, and I think it's these secret agencies, and I think it's this agenda.
But ultimately, what, you can't get to a point of alliance with other people that are like, yeah, that was dodgy, man.
That's a reason to never trust the establishment ever, ever again.
Immediately after the attacks, the Bush administration downplayed the Saudi connection, of course.
The Bush White House didn't want to upset his relationship with one of the world's largest oil-producing nations, which was also an American ally with enormous political influence in Washington.
And much of what the FBI discovered about possible Saudi links to the attacks remains secret, even today.
The links between, right, he was like, what's that information?
What is that?
What do you imagine that is?
Yeah, maybe some of you are right.
Maybe there are different nations' secret services involved in what went on there.
Let us learn from the release of Assange that it's okay to inquire and investigate.
There was nothing wrong with putting forward theories.
Nothing wrong with conspiracy theories, actually.
Nothing, there's no tangible reason why you should inquire and risk making an error in your hypotheses.
Let's get out there and discuss this stuff.
The links between the House of Bush and the House of Saud are deep, overlapping, and notoriously opaque.
The Saudi investment in the Carlyle Group, the private equity firm whose rainmakers included George Bush Senior, the Saudi bankrolling of Poppy's presidential Library.
The lucrative contracts of the Saudis doled out to Halliburton when Dick Cheney was at the company's helm.
The main law firm retained by the Saudis to defend them against the 9-11 families was Baker Botts, as in James Baker, the Bush family conciliary.
And of course, there's oil.
The black glue connecting all these dots.
Nice work over there at CBL's.
Why don't we call it black glue?
Saudi investment firms poured money into Bush Senior's oil business, and the country provided the US with invaluable support in the first Gulf War.
Bush said you shouldn't have an oil business.
Like, when you've got a president starting a war with an oil-rich nation, and he's got in the oil business, that makes you think, should we have civil servants that don't have a vested interest in these wars?
Yeah, let's write that down.
Have that guy that asked that question killed.
Would you deal with that?
Author and journalist Craig Ungar documents 1.4 billion dollars that has made its way, made its way, from the Saudi royal family to entities tied to the Bush family.
Just made its way, like those two guys, those two Saudis, just marching down the street, like they're in a Talking Heads video.
Ungar contends the documented oil holdings and affiliations of both Bush presidents has led to a policy of inaction in the post-September 11 world.
Two days after 9-11, Saudi Arabia's influential ambassador to Washington, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, met with Bush at the White House and the two men smoked cigars, nothing wrong with that, on the Truman balcony, just enjoying a couple of cigars, you know.
wake of a terrible, terrible, defining, epochal event.
Over the next few days, the Saudis were allowed to collect more than 160 Saudi officials,
including relatives of Osama bin Laden, from around the US, and fly them on charter jets
to Saudi Arabia. Some even received an FBI escort to the airport.
Isn't it weird how Alex Jones is like attacked in the way that he is when he's the dude?
Like, you know, it was mad what he said about Sandy Hook, and he said that wrong.
But isn't it also mad, if you're thinking about victims' families and protecting the families of victims, that Alex Jones went, oh, the Twin Towers are gonna get blown up, and there's some guy called Osama Bin Laden, and there'll be links to the deep state.
Before it happened, and then during that whole period, Saudis are getting all flown out of the country and stuff.
Some weird dark shit went on.
Whatever 9-11 was, it wasn't what they said it was.
And I remember actually going on UK television, and someone goes, do you think 9-11 was... And I go, I don't trust the American government.
Right, and I was like... It was like one of those things, like, you can't say that!
It was when I was sort of awakening to all this stuff, I suppose.
Awakening in the old pod.
The FBI suspected Omar al-Bayoumi was a Saudi intelligence officer.
I went to, yeah, you think, from his holiday videos.
And now for my next holiday, I think what I might do is go to the Pentagon.
I'm turning off these surveillance cameras.
When the two hijackers arrived in LA in January 2000, Al Bayoumi met them in a restaurant, took them to San Diego, probably to go to the zoo, and set them up in an apartment, co-signing the lease, and advised them 1500 for rent.
I'd be hard-pushed to do that for my very best friends.
Will you underwrite my lease, mate?
Well, mate, that means if you don't pay your rent, I'm going to drop.
And you are obviously not going to pay this rent, because remember, What?
What's going to stop you paying the rent?
Well, you're not going to be able to because you're going to actually be committing hara-kiri, killing yourself in a suicide bomber attack.
Oh yeah, no, no, fair enough, actually, yeah.
Oi, where's that money?
Oi, give my money back!
You owe me fifteen hundred!
During 2000 and 2001, Al-Bayoumi received about three grand a month through several intermediaries from Prince Bandar's wife.
What's going on, man?
Many suspect some of this cash was passed on to the hijackers.
Live it up, fellas.
Bandar has also been accused by Zakaria Moussari, the so-called 20th hijacker, of being one of Al-Qaeda's donors in the run-up to the attacks.
Al-Qaeda doing drugs.
We've gone to raise some funding.
It's $500 a play.
George Clooney is coming!
George Clooney is not coming to that one.
He's going to the Biden one.
What goes around comes around.
So there you go.
More information about 9-11.
It might not be conspiratorial enough, but in the wake of the Julian Assange release, we have to look now at all of the pieces that make up our paradigm and scrutinise what we were told and what was true.
Hey, you told us this about the pandemic.
And this turned out to be true.
Hey, you told us this about 9-11 and this turned out to be true.
You told us this about the Middle Eastern Wars and this turned out to be true.
We're coming to one conclusion.
We can't fucking trust you lot, can we?
We're gonna get rid of you and do something entirely different.
Hey, but that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
We're gonna leave you now guys, but if you are watching this in the stream, consider becoming an Awake and Wonder where you gain early access to some of our interviews with brilliant contributors, like Jesus Christ himself, in actor form, my mate Jonathan Rumi, whose interview is up now.
Colonel Douglas McGregor's coming up there soon, and we will be bringing you all sorts of fantastic content.
Remember, on Thursday night...
Join me for the American Presidential Debate Watchalong.
RFK will not be included, although I might try and hit him up during and say, Bobby, what do you think about this?
What would you say during that?
You know, maybe we need a little bit of free speech in a country during the election season.
What do you think?
You let me know what you think.
All right, guys.
Thanks for joining us.
See you tomorrow.
Bring back the tiny hat.
For Thursday, I will be tiny-hatted up to within an inch of my life.
Stoney says, Waco was my wake-up.
Yeah, Waco was pretty crazy.
We should get into that thing.
Disney, what's this?
Building 7 caught fire after it was struck by debris and the sprinklers were all busted.
The fire was over there or it would have stayed up.
I don't know, man.
I don't know about that.
All right, guys.
Take it easy.
See you tomorrow.
Not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
Export Selection