BREAKING: NATO Prepares For WW3 As Putin Ready For ALL OUT WAR - 379
Go to https://TryFum.com/RUSSELLBRAND or scan the QR code and use code RUSSELLBRAND to get your free FÜM Base when you order your Journey Pack today!TWC Contagion Kit - visit https://www.twc.health/BRAND use code BRAND to save at checkoutNATO is drawing up plans to send American troops to the frontlines of Europe in the event of an all-out conflict with Russia. This as Russia warns a nuclear war is coming if Russia warns of nuclear war if Western weapons are used to attack Russia directly, saying 'We're not bluffing'
Hello you Awakening Wonders there on Spotify, Apple, Stink Whistle, Gurgle Dot or wherever you download your podcasts these days to remain at least peripherally connected to some tendril of truth in a bewildering miasma of lies and propaganda.
We appreciate you, and we love you.
You're part of our community.
So that's why we're very happy to give you an audio version of our live Rumble show five days a week.
It's on Monday to Friday.
We decipher the latest news stories, we break down current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, and if they aren't, Then we critique why they're not and what they are covering.
Every week as well, right?
We do brilliant conversations with people like Jordan Peterson, RFK, Tucker Carlson, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate.
These things are already up and you can listen to them now.
So remember, this is an audio version of our daily live show.
To tune in live, go to rumble.com forward slash Russell Brand.
You'll find it easily and I hope that you will love it.
Now please enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
Thanks.
Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
We've got some extraordinary things to discuss with you.
But firstly, let me just adjust this microphone so I can speak to you plainly and clearly in a language that we can all understand.
Because what I'm noticing, and I'd love to know if you're noticing this as well, is we're being invited to forget matters and messages given a matter of months ago In order that we can continue to comply.
You can apply that idea to any number of subjects and that's exactly what we'll be doing today.
We'll be talking about border security and Joe Biden's somewhat cynical announcement that border security is a priority for him and for his administration.
I want you to for a moment hold in your mind the level of demonisation applied to Biden's political opponent, currently being criminalised, currently being criminalised while being plagiarised, Donald Trump, when he made comparable measures while in office.
That's one of the things I want you to consider today.
Similarly, I want you to remember some of the pledges that were offered around the conflicts between Ukraine and Russia, that there would never be boots on the ground, that there would never be the deployment of American military equipment.
All of these pledges and promises lay broken and in ashes, as do so many Ukrainian cities.
And citizens.
All, in my view, and perhaps yours too, unnecessarily, because the power of the United States of America and the various bureaucratic systems that surround your great country could have been used to create a diplomatic and peaceful solution.
We'll be talking about all of that.
Hopefully we'll get a chance to talk about UK politics as well, because this is Russell in residence in Rumble.
You will notice that our set is slightly different.
You will notice that my microphone has this lovely little thing on it now.
We are happy to be broadcasting to you, streaming to you live from Florida at Rumble.
You saw us with Chris Pawlowski yesterday.
We're going to have another conversation with him later this week.
We've got Gina, how do I say her name correctly?
Gina Caruso, the great Gina Caruso coming on the show Friday.
We're talking to the head of the Republican National Convention later on this week.
We've got a fantastic series of shows coming up for you over the coming days, and I'm pretty excited.
But let's move into, let's just get An idea of what's going on across the world before we tackle our main theme today, the misleading nature, the manipulative nature of contemporary American political discourse, primarily, of course, in the hands of your current president.
OK, if you're not an awakened wonder yet, Consider becoming one right now.
Join us over on Locals.
Caruso, Caruno, help me out with that name.
Thank you very much.
OK, so first up, we gave you a little poll earlier on today.
We asked you whether or not NATO planning to send American troops to the front lines Will this lead to an all-out conflict?
You seem pretty divided on that subject.
I can't say I am.
Meanwhile, in my little country, this fella's turning up on banknotes now.
Ah, she's gone.
She's truly gone.
It's time to accept it.
And if you had any doubts about the impact of our culture on the people of our planet...
And it's weird to sort of say that, isn't it?
Because I suppose culture is circular.
It's generated by human beings for human beings.
But you've seen the story, I'm sure, of an untouched Amazon tribe suddenly gaining access to the miracle of the internet, being able perhaps to form immediately consensus and democracy, having the ability to convey great ideas to one another, maybe to create God's kingdom here on Earth using tools of technology to elevate the consciousness of us all, No, of course what's happened is they've been given the internet and they're all hooked on porn and social media, their culture's falling apart, and this is something that we are generationally inflicting on every single person on the planet.
It's interesting, isn't it, to be able to watch in real time the impact of our cultural ideals upon the innocent.
Let's maybe review some of our ideas.
Where is Sexy Fauci, says Skyrider.
Send him to Ukraine.
That's in the Rumble chat.
If you're watching us anywhere other than Rumble, you've got to click the link in the description.
Get over to Rumble.
This is where we make this stuff.
And if you're not an Awakened Wonder yet, consider becoming one because every single week, We do meditations together, we do book readings together, and we're going to move towards creating communities together at the earliest convenience.
There's a little menu of some of the things that are available for our Awakened Wonder community.
Let us try to become innocent and renewed again.
Because we're the same as those Amazon tribal people, aren't we?
And we're having that kind of culture inflicted on us continually.
Our children, our loved ones, consuming porn, this little device that could be a conduit for such greatness, doing little but pipe filth.
Into the minds of the innocent.
It seems now that it's convenient that it's an election year because the culture and the administration are devouring themselves.
Look at this extraordinary moment where pro-Palestinian activists and Pride members clash.
It makes you wonder if we're losing clarity and purpose.
And where would you derive clarity and purpose from?
Maybe from these ideas.
Peace wherever possible.
Ensuring that the interests of corporate global elites aren't supported to the detriment of humanity.
Maybe we need some moral clarity.
Maybe we need to re-examine our values.
because otherwise you're going to get extraordinary scenes like this.
Personally, I believe in everyone's individual freedom, as long as we're not harming other people.
And I believe in an end to war.
My lord, I pray for it.
But this is an extraordinary and baffling set of ideals that seem to be entangling here.
All right, so the legacy media continues to lose its grip on reality and to function primarily as
an amplifier for establishment goals. And we can see now why that would be.
Because of emergent platforms like this one, Rumble, and because of the increasing power of online and independent media spaces, Elon Musk is going to host a live stream town hall event With Donald Trump and you better believe that we are feverishly working to ensure that we talk to all presidential candidates.
We've spoke to Bobby Kennedy a couple of times already.
We in Florida are well into our process of securing an interview with Donald Trump and And Joe Biden, I don't know how that's going to go.
I don't know if that's likely at all.
But this is just another indicator that the power is shifting when it comes to where people get their information from.
And it's obvious that you would have to move away from legacy media because legacy media functions primarily to convey to you the message of the powerful.
And when they find themselves in a position of obvious contradiction and hypocrisy, whether that's with Joe Biden changing his perspective on border security, Joe Biden changing his perspective on war, the legacy media obfuscate that fact rather than highlighting that fact.
That is why the categories of misinformation, malinformation and disinformation have had to be created.
Because of the miracle of this type of streaming technology, because of your awakening, it's impossible to tell a lie on Monday and not have it exposed on Tuesday.
You have the ridiculous spectacle of a sitting president simultaneously Criminalising and plagiarising a political opponent.
You can't say that Donald Trump's the worst person in the world and then steal his ideas.
It doesn't make sense.
Unless the whole system is crooked.
And on that note, here's Hillary Clinton speaking at a DC awards ceremony.
What?
Do they keep fighting?
How are they continually awarding this human for droning that wedding?
And for supporting a weird Pied Piper strategy where you supported political opponents with campaign funds in order to make the Republican Party look worse, what is it that Hillary Clinton is being awarded for?
And I want you to watch this carefully in this clip.
Remember that the trial and now conviction of Donald Trump is meant to be simply a judicial matter.
The exposure of criminal Wrongdoing, a felony, the misappropriation of campaign funds, the paying of hush money.
Well, look at Hillary Clinton's evident joy and delight and tell me that it doesn't seem, at least while watching her as a human being, that she is excited to have scored a victory.
This took place the day that the conviction was announced.
Look how excited she is.
Anything happening today, baby?
As if she's kind of, I don't know, you're not Lenny Bruce, Hillary.
Thank you.
Thank you so much.
Anything going on today?
Anything going on, baby?
Yeah, anyone being convicted of felonies when the law was changed to create those felonies a couple of years ago by us through amalgamating a set of different crimes that are plainly not as bad as your husband's payoff of, was it, Paula Jones, or your husband's sex with an intern in the Oval Office?
The level of hypocrisy is extraordinary.
That's why we're confronted with peculiar decisions.
How can it have been so dreadful and awful that Trump imposed that travel ban on Muslim nations while in office if a comparable piece of legislation is being evoked or executive order is being evoked now when it comes to border security?
Donald Trump, if he is evil, as they claim, then you can't steal his policies.
It's one or the other.
CHEERING Tough crowd, Hillary.
Tough crowd that you've got out in front over there.
Smash that glass ceiling!
Smash it!
Here's Donald Trump talking on, I think, Fox News about the criminalisation of Hillary Clinton and the potential of the Commander-in-Chief to use the judiciary and legal system as a weapon against political opponents.
Of course, the portmanteau that has emerged is lawfare.
And who among us now believes that the conviction of Donald Trump was anything other than the utilisation of existing systems to shut down a political opponent?
Who among us believes that soberly choices have been made?
Like what?
The misappropriation of campaign funds?
That sickens me.
Let's cast the steel dossier from our minds where the Clinton campaign did exactly the same thing.
There are no principles now.
There is just a set of institutions being deployed to maintain power all the while calling it democracy and inviting us to forget that what electoral democracy is supposed to be is the will of the people enacted by servants.
Can you even locate that idea in the fog of hypocrisy and corruption now?
Hypocrisy and corruption.
They're so like the name Hillary Clinton, it's kind of satisfying.
Let's have a look at Donald Trump on Fox talking about why he didn't, as he points out, his fans or the electorate or his supporters used to say, lock her up.
I want to follow up on what Rachel asked you, though, because I hear you struggling with it.
I hear you say it's a tough question, a bit unsure.
You famously said, regarding Hillary Clinton, lock her up.
You declined to do that as president.
I beat her.
It's easier when you win.
I beat her.
And they all said, lock her up.
And I felt—and I could have done it.
I could have locked her up.
I could have.
I should have.
But I felt it would have been a terrible thing.
And then this happened to me.
And so I may feel differently about it.
I can't tell you.
I'm not sure I can answer the question.
Hillary Clinton, I didn't say, lock her up.
But the people don't say, lock her up, lock her up.
OK.
Then we won.
And I'd say—and I said pretty openly.
I'd say, all right, come on, just relax.
Let's go.
We've got to make our country great.
Relax?
Let's just relax and run America.
What an extraordinary time we are living in.
Where is the moral centre?
Where is the moral compass?
And is it possible that the moral compass of those that lead us now is directed to hell?
And it would have been, think of it, you lock up the wife of a president of the United States... But they want to lock you up over $130,000 of an accounting thing, and she actually... And a perfectly stated accounting thing.
But, you know, people also say, can you bring the country together?
And the answer is yes.
Success will bring the country together, because I had it together.
I pray that the United States of America can become just that once more.
United.
But with the extraordinary deployment of simultaneous criminalisation and plagiarism of Donald Trump, it seems unlikely that this unity will be achieved.
Due to, in some part, the vindictiveness of the current administration, Let alone its total loss of any moral centre, of any purpose or meaning, other than the desperate clinging to power that seems to drive every move.
And nowhere is that more obvious or evident than in Joe Biden's announcement that he will secure the border.
Now this was one of the points of difference that we were invited to acknowledge as significant in the 2020 election.
Joe Biden was going to bring a different kind of morality, that Trump's policies around immigration were risible and laughable and cruel.
So what does it mean then when Joe Biden uses those policies himself?
What does it mean?
Does it mean that he's conceded that Trump was right all along?
What do we do then with the hysteria that accompanied Trump's deployment of comparable measures while he himself was in office?
What are we learning about Joe Biden?
And note that Here, he even uses the word cynical, claiming that it is Trump that has been cynical, claiming that it is Trump that has weaponised the issue of border security.
I want you to let me know how you feel, whether you're watching this now on the conglomerate that is Google, One of the aspects of the machine that we face, or whether you're on Awakened Wonder on Locals, or whether you're watching this now in the live stream, how do you feel about this move?
And do you not see this as an obvious barometer of where the Democrat Party establishment is heading?
They are trying to criminalise a political opponent, While simultaneously stealing his ideas.
Where must they be, ethically and morally?
And how does this pertain to an even more significant issue, more significant than your national security and national sovereignty, the potential for global war?
Let me know what you think about that in the chat.
If you're watching this on YouTube, we're only going to be available there for a few more seconds.
I'm going to ask you to click the link in the description because we're going to be leaving soon.
Let's have a look now.
I've come here today to do what the Republicans in Congress refuse to do.
Take the necessary steps to secure our border.
cynical but could there be anything more cynical than Joe Biden pretending that
all along he's been the guy that was pro border security have a look at this
click the link in the description if you watch this on YouTube click the link
I've come here today to do what the Republicans in Congress refused to do
take the necessary steps to secure our border four months ago after weeks of
intense negotiation between my staff and Democrats.
I've always been pro-border security.
What's he gonna do next?
Open a hotel with the word Biden on the top of it?
Claim that when your president, women find you so attractive that it's okay to go up and grab them by the pussy?
Where will this plagiarism end, Joe?
Where is your moral and ethical center?
Because it ain't been found anywhere in America, and I don't think it's on the other side of the border either.
The only thing that's lost beyond the border is any notion that these are people with ethics, or morals, or purpose, or a connection to the sublime and the divine.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
Republicans, we came to a clear, clear bipartisan deal.
It was the strongest border security agreement in decades.
But then... I mean, what you could consider doing is, I don't know, building a wall!
Maybe there should be a wall, that's a good idea!
Why don't you do that?
I've been thinking about building a wall.
Why don't you lock Hillary Clinton up?
Yeah, lock her up!
Republicans in Congress, not all of them, walked away from it.
Why?
Because Donald Trump told them to.
He told the Republicans, it has been published widely by many of you, that he didn't want to fix the issue, he wanted to use it to attack me.
No, lock him up.
Lock him.
That is indeed very, very cynical.
Unlike stealing a policy from an opponent that you're currently criminalising, having throughout the campaign to get into office, claiming that those very policies Well what marked Donald Trump out as evil?
This is a level of hypocrisy that is risible, extraordinary, unimaginable even for them.
We'll finish this off in a matter of moments but you know that we bring this to you live from Rumble.
This is Russell in residence in Rumble.
We can't bring you this content without the support of our remarkable sponsors.
Here's a message from them now in audio clarity in all its glory coming at you down the stream.
Have a look.
Fume, award-winning flavoured air device, creating new movement towards better habits.
Flavoured air's not like vaping, you maniac.
Fume draws flavour to your mouth.
Fills a void that ditching bad habits leaves.
Fume.
There's no vapour.
You can use it anywhere.
There ain't no nicotine neither.
And it ain't addictive.
What about batches?
Do you need batches?
You don't need batches.
So you don't need to change them because you don't even got none.
It's backed by doctors in the USA.
I'm talking about doctors.
If you can't trust a doctor, like Dr. Anthony Fauci, for example, who can...
Fume fills your lungs with delicious addiction cures.
There are great flavours.
My favourite.
I want you to guess which is my favourite.
You can join in, Bear.
But you can't fume.
Dogs don't allowed to fume.
You can choose any one of these flavours.
Mint Crisp, Orange Vanilla or White Cranberry.
I'm sticking with Mint Crisp.
I'm not a maniac.
Fume has served over 150,000 satisfied customers.
You can be the next success story.
For a limited time, you can use my code RUSSELLBRAND for 10% off a journey pack.
Head to tryfume.com.
That's try f-u-m.com.
Use the code RUSSELLBRAND or scan the QR code on screen to save 10% off your order right now today.
Fume.
Mmm.
Try saying fume without saying mmm.
Fume.
Yeah, you can just about do it, but it's hard.
Fume.
Thank you, Fume, for sponsoring this video.
Let's watch the rest of Joe Biden's extraordinary plagiarism.
That's what he wanted to do, was a cynical and a... Cynical?
Extremely cynical political move.
Extremely cynical!
That's what I suppose people mean when they say Orwellian.
The inversion of the meaning of language.
Good is bad.
War is peace.
Your opponent is cynical while you criminalise and persecute that opponent while simultaneously utilising, stealing, plagiarising policies that, while campaigning, you claimed were the indicators of the malfeasance of that opponent.
Does this not strike you as extraordinary?
Is this not an indicator that there is something horribly wrong at the heart of this government?
...for us to, not to weaponise the border, but to fix it.
Don't weaponise it, fix it!
Even CNN, a cheerleader for the neoliberal establishment, for the global corporatist machine, can see that this is something askew, that this is an anomaly, a peculiarity, an oddity.
Let's have a look at their reporting on this matter.
President Joe Biden is pulling from former President Donald Trump's immigration playbook, stealing his policies as he tries to stop a flow of asylum seekers from around the world who are crossing into the US at the border with Mexico.
It only occurred to me for the first time earlier today that the point of a border is to control the nation's limits and parameters.
This nation is, of course, built on immigration, successfully handled over generations and some centuries now.
But the point of having a border is to be able to control it and to be able to monitor it.
It's plain that the conversation, the argument, in fact, over border security has been won.
That's why this peculiar strategic move is being made.
It's an indication that the progressive part of the Democratic Party, the most vocal around cultural issues, are no longer leading when it comes to the deployment of policy.
It shows us, too, that there is no moral or ethical centre at the heart of this administration.
They'll simply say what they have to say to remain in power, that they may continue to serve the corporate globalist elite that, in fact, govern the United States of America.
That, in fact, use your democratic power and your tax dollars to deploy their might coming from your spirit around the world.
Unveiled at the White House on Tuesday.
Unveiled.
It's not unveiling if you're just nicking someone else's idea.
Unveiled at the White House on Tuesday, Biden's new plan to all but shut down the U.S.
border to asylum seekers who cross the border illegally uses executive authority Trump once used to bar people from mostly Muslim countries from entering the U.S.
in 2017 and also to bar most asylum seekers in 2018.
This is only a few years ago.
This is like COVID.
You're invited to forget things you were told a couple of years ago.
These vaccines are 98% effective.
Don't take these vaccines, you'll get a blood clot.
You have to forget that these transitions are taking place.
Remember, when Trump used this executive authority, this was the crown jewel.
In the museum of hatred that was erected around Donald Trump.
The righteousness, the condemnation.
Well, Joe Biden's doing the same thing now.
What does that tell you?
Put aside for a moment that we were told that American troops on the ground in Ukraine would mean nuclear war.
That would mean nuclear war for Christ's sake.
We're living in a kind of concertina contraction now, where the time that passes between the lies and the acting out duplicitously is getting shorter and shorter.
Because of the miracle of communication, we can observe and monitor in real time.
Hold on a minute, they told us that about the pandemic and then this happened.
Hold on a minute, they told us this about the conflict with Russia and now this has happened.
Hang on a minute, this is what they said about border security.
This is what they said about Trump using that executive power.
Now they're doing the same thing.
This is an administration falling apart.
Why is it falling apart?
Because it has no moral centre.
It has desacralised all of reality.
It has no connection to a deeper truth.
This is simply about clinging on to power in order to deploy it for forces that I don't fully understand.
But for now, let's just consider them forces of dominion and economic control.
But sometimes I think it's darker than that, even darker than that.
It's an odd election year twist, says CNN, about this hypocrisy and, not corruption, but hypocrisy and contrary deployment of policy, since Biden actually ran his 2020 campaign in part on a promise to revoke those actions.
Not only has he not revoked them, he is deploying them himself and asking us to believe that it's Donald Trump who is cynical.
Which he did in the months after taking office.
Trump's asylum policy was also blocked by federal courts before Biden revoked it.
In addition to slowing the flow of asylum seekers, Biden's action could have the political effect of chipping away at Trump's lead on the immigration issue and triangulating some middle ground support Even if it leads progressives angry.
So that's precisely what this is about.
This is a political move, a strategic move.
They recognise now, I suppose, that on the subject of immigration there is consensus.
People want control of the United States of America's borders, particularly its southern border, most obviously.
And the same is true across the world.
If you really live in a democracy and the majority of people want to control immigration, then in a democracy, the conversation is over.
If you want to continue that conversation, then you have to acknowledge that you're not living in a democracy.
It seems to me obvious that what immigration does, mass immigration in particular, is enables the establishment and powerful economic interests to reduce the power of ordinary people, native and indigenous people, whether they came a generation ago or five generations ago or were born in that land, which in former imperial nations is of course less likely.
It diminishes the power of ordinary Americans, of ordinary native people, of all the nations across the world.
It seems like it offers cultural compromise and creates cultural conflict.
It seems that it doesn't affect the richest, most powerful members of the establishment, but adversely affects ordinary people.
And regardless of any moral or ethical argument that you might want to make, it seems to me that if there is consensus, if there is a consensus, that's the only way that you can derive mandate.
And Joe Biden has clearly realised that, which is why a key component of Trump's campaigning is now being utilised in his favour, Well, all the while, he claims that it's Trump that's cynical.
That's Orwellian.
That's hypocrisy.
That's evidence of atrophy and decay at the heart of the establishment.
But that's just what I think.
Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
Get on over here, you lot.
Now, we're talking about the constant flux and transitions that are taking place amidst the demographics of your nation in an election year.
Here's Charlemagne the God commenting on Biden's hemorrhaging of support among various different ethnicities and various different hues of voters.
Let's have a look.
Why do you think he's falling short among black voters?
I think that, you know, it's not even just black voters as you see, it's Latino voters, it's youth voters.
I think my man Tim Ryan coined the perfect phrase when he said that, you know, most people in America are part of the exhausted majority.
The exhausted majority.
I wonder if that's a fair assessment.
There's a good post from our friend Jimmy Dore.
The establishment is so stupid and afraid, they think they're doing a political prosecution of their number one foe.
Opponent, I guess he means.
They're a foe.
I'm not going to get into Jimmy Dore's typos, man.
Is going to turn people against him.
Unless that's a slang that I don't even know.
He will have the exact opposite effect.
Trump is now a martyr and people will vote for him who previously wouldn't have.
People like African Americans and Mexicans who also feel they got a raw deal from the legal system.
I know this is the result because I saw those people say that when they were interviewed at a Trump rally in the Bronx.
The people who are prosecuting Donald Trump hate him.
But what they really hate is democracy and the rule of law even more.
The rise of lawfare, the rise of hypocrisy and corruption.
Let's have a look at That rally now and MSNBC reporting on it in a state of confusion and bafflement as people simply refuse to do what they're supposed to do according to the messaging of the legacy media.
It's too much crime.
Everything is going downhill.
The economy is going bad.
The food is expensive.
Affordable housing is not for everybody.
It's just horrible.
I want food to go cheaper, the gas, I want gas cheaper.
When I came and he was the president, the gas was a lot cheaper than it is right now.
Now we're becoming, the Bronx, second class citizens.
We have this influx of migrants that are coming in and they're getting everything.
Everyone in the Bronx, in the city of New York is forgotten.
This, yes, it's pretty extraordinary to see that because people aren't saying
what they're supposed to say.
People don't appear to be being led by the cultural arguments that are being offered, by the ongoing condemnation of Donald Trump.
What appears to matter to them are things that are relevant in your own life.
A government can't offer you spiritual ideals, and plainly they can't because they don't have any ideals or ethics or morals.
Then you simply want them to deal with practical and pragmatic matters, don't you?
You just simply want to ensure that you can afford stuff and afford to live.
And it seems that this administration and our government, in fact, in the UK, And indeed, all of the various nodes of the net of corporate globalism are incapable of delivering a standard of life, a standard of living, a standard of resource that is satisfactory.
And that alongside with the sort of dark condemnation of ordinary people that seems to accompany this increasing and incremental control, this move towards technological feudalism that seems to be their true agenda.
And now they're unable to divide us as easily as they once were because the people that they were claiming to protect Why don't we claim we're doing this on behalf of, I don't know, black people or Hispanic people?
They're not buying it either.
Because whatever it is that drives the establishment, it ain't compassion and it ain't kindness.
It wasn't compassion and kindness in a regard for the sanctity of life.
When they wanted us locked in our homes and they wanted us to take experimental medications and it's not compassion and kindness when they allow asylum seekers into the nation.
Arguments might be made about protecting the people of the world that are suffering elsewhere as a result of the marauding piracy tyranny of the baronial class that currently stand astride the globe but It surely shouldn't most negatively impact ordinary people in America and in Europe.
Solutions must be found that don't persecute and penalize ordinary people that didn't create that problem in the first place.
Let's see how MSNBC grapple with some truth they've inadvertently been confronted with while taking the incredible risk of talking to ordinary people.
And Jose, a lot of the people I talked to were first-time voters.
Some had never been to a Trump event before.
Some had voted for Obama twice and voted for Biden and are now saying they are going to vote for former President Trump in November.
Look, a lot is going to happen over the next six months, but this is something I've been hearing consistently from voters, and that's why you're seeing some of the more aggressive push from the Biden campaign to try to As Benny Johnson points out, a pretty clear indication of Trump's rise in popularity among new demographics is his extraordinary rise in popularity since recently joining TikTok.
TikTok, which is in the process of being banned, you understand.
Why?
Because it's another conduit Through which true information, as well as ridiculous dancing and other extraordinary cultural ephemera that could destroy an Amazon tribe in half an hour, it can also be used to tell the truth.
That's why Rumble's interested in acquiring that platform, I understand.
As if that would be allowed to happen in this crazy and corrupt system.
But let's have a look at Donald Trump's rise as opposed to the stagnation of Biden's account.
This was made by the pundit, poster and content creator Benny Johnson.
It's pretty good this, I think.
So there's his post on the subject.
And does it just play out in real time now?
Or do I have to press play?
It's the next asset, is it, mate?
Let me have a look at that.
This is squarely Trump's... I don't know where that comes from.
13, 14.
Excuse me, I'm just finding the asset.
This is it in real time.
Have a look here at Trump's account on TikTok versus Biden's.
It's a pretty sorry state of affairs.
Oh, dear.
Oh, no.
So I suppose what we're witnessing now is a demographic shift and I can feel that from being in America, this time where I'm in residence in Rumble, I can feel that new people are being attracted to Trump because, maybe because they enjoy the charisma, they enjoy the energy, but my sense is because they recognise that above all else you cannot trust the establishment, above all else you can't rely on a single word that Joe Biden, in the rare occasions where he's able to formulate a sentence, you can be assured of this, it's either hypocrisy or corruption or manipulation.
They don't believe in communication, they believe in manipulation.
As Michael Malice said, and as I was reminded by my friend who works here yesterday, So, hey, look at this.
This is an interesting moment.
This is from Piers Morgan, my fellow countryman, interviewing a bunch of people on the subject of Trump's trial and conviction and the potential hypocrisy exists when Bill Clinton didn't exactly carry himself fantastically while in office.
Have a look at this moment.
You'll enjoy this if you've not seen it.
If you've not seen it already, you'll enjoy this.
This is squarely Trump's making.
This has nothing to do with his base.
It has nothing to do with protecting American democracy, like happened on January 6, according to them.
This has to do with Trump making his bronzer-stained bed.
Yeah, bronzer-stained.
And I'm going to focus on that.
It's stained with bronzer.
Now, what's delightful about this, I have to say props to the people that made this show.
Getting this line up, setting this up, Excellent.
And Piers' question is quite brilliant here because he points out that Clinton, while in office, engaged in comparable behaviour, but sexual conduct that is less than perfect, let's face it, in addition to that, paying off a person who was making a claim.
It's pretty extraordinary.
It's pretty astonishing.
But above all else, what it does is it shows that the emotional fervour and moral fibrility of the Democrat establishment is not founded in morality or
principles, it's just weaponised.
There are no core principles now, there are no core ethics.
This is a wonderful moment of exposure.
The porn star trying to cover it up and then getting caught doing it.
And out of interest, before I go to Michael, out of interest, why is Bill Clinton able
to have sex with an intern in the Oval Office when he's president and lie to the American
people about it on national television?
And why is he able to pay off Paula Jones $850,000, four times as much, five times as much as the Trump payment to Stormy Daniels, to get rid of a sexual harassment claim, again, while he's president?
And he has no criminal court recourse for that.
Why is that deemed to be better than what happened with Trump and Stormy?
There's the first pause.
Now that could be a time delay.
Sometimes you get that on Zoom calls.
But I like to think that there's some moral grappling happening here.
That this pundit for the first time is thinking, wait a minute.
If what we're actually condemning Trump for is his actions, not simply for the crime of being Donald Trump and the bronzer and all that stuff that I hate, then this does make sense what Piers Morgan is saying.
Because Clinton did do that while in office.
And Clinton did pay off someone who was making a claim.
Wait, what can I say now?
And you'll note that the subsequent announcements actually don't make sense anymore.
Because there's no sense at the heart of this establishment.
Because all it can express now is the corruption that is its essence.
I don't think anyone is making that case, Piers.
Don't make that case, because if anyone did make that case, that would be a difficult case to argue with, because it's watertight.
What's the difference?
Or any predator.
Michael Knowles, he's loving this.
He looks like he's so happy.
He should use that for a thumbnail.
That could be Michael Knowles' Christmas card right there.
Like, she's fallen apart because of this.
I believe in compassion.
I believe in love.
I believe in justice.
I believe in law and order.
I believe in salvation and I believe in redemption.
And sometimes those values have a personal cost.
You can't just use those things to bring down people you disagree with because eventually it will be reflected at you.
The difference is that he didn't cook the books financially.
Yeah!
Cookin' the books!
A book should never be cooked, even though it rhymes.
Don't do it.
Do not put a book in a pan, or a skillet, or a barbecue, or even an air fryer.
That's the element of this.
Book cookery.
Using back channels in order to pay.
Back channels?
Where were the back channels with the Paula Jones?
So paying somebody off who says you sexually harassed her, paying nearly a million dollars while you're the President of the United States, And then having sex with an intern in the Oval Office and lying about it.
That's fine because he's a Democrat.
Piers, only the leftists in your mind are making that argument.
Some people are going to have to start making that argument because it seems like a pretty significant one as the establishment falls apart before our very eyes, simply because we live in real time now and can communicate in real time.
Whether it is the pandemic and what was said at the beginning of the pandemic and what occurred during it, a wealth transfer, massive over-regulation, centralised authority, Punishment of ordinary people across the world.
How many people do you know whose businesses went under?
Or whether it's the war that we're not supposed to be having that looks now, at a glance, pretty similar to some of the other proxy wars in recent history.
I'm talking about the last half century.
Wars where we're told, oh, we're just supplying.
We're just helping.
It's a humanitarian crisis.
It seems like it's a marketing campaign for Raytheon is what it is.
And now with the deployment of the policies of other, and in this case, literal political opponents, Criminalizing them while plagiarizing them.
How can that be ethical?
How can it be moral?
How can it be right?
That's my question to you.
You know what I think.
Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
And after this, we are going to be talking about global war.
And what could be more important than that, other than access, personal access to the spiritual forces that we're going to require if we are to oppose it.
Let's have a look at a quick message from our glorious supporters.
Then we're going to be back talking about the march towards Armageddon.
The Wellness Company are some of my favourite partners.
Will your doctor even prescribe you either Mectin or Hydroxychloroquine?
Hey, I did it.
The Wellness Company's Prescription Contagion Emergency Kit is unique, providing carefully selected effective medications for COVID-19 and respiratory illnesses.
Either Mectin, Hydroxy... Ah, it was a fluke.
Hydroxychloroquine, which some people call HCQ.
Don't know why.
Z-Pak and Butanide, along with a nebuliser and guidebook for safe use.
Do not muck around with a nebuliser.
This is, of course, backed by research and endorsed by experts.
Specifically, Dr. Peter McCulloch and Dr. Harvey Rich, both friends of the show.
Avoid the chaos, wait times, and price of the hospital.
Get the entire kit for the cost of a single doctor's visit.
It is only available in the USA.
Every American home should have one of these, don't you think?
Visit twc.health forward slash brand and use our code brand to save $30 plus get free shipping on your contagion kit.
Okay, back to the content.
Surely even a child could understand that in a situation where nuclear war is a possibility, the utmost discretion and discernment is required.
One might summons the wisdom of King Solomon himself.
In order to adjudicate the many minds, quite literal, and pitfalls, metaphorical, that bestrew the path ahead of us.
We were told by Joe Biden, troops on the ground, the use of American arms inside Russian territory.
Why?
That would be World War Three, for God's sake.
And it is the Lord's name we must evoke as we assess this situation once again as NATO haphazardly And in a cavalier and lackadaisical fashion, steers you and me and our loved ones to the very brink of nuclear war with Russia for they have said, troops on the ground, the deployment of American arms within Russia, that is a red line and accompanying that red line is a red button.
So why?
Why on earth are you and I and our voices not heard?
Why can't we be assured that diplomacy, a peace process, be brought to the fore?
Here are the words of Colonel Douglas MacGregor, friend of the show, military personnel, I would say key strategist and interpreter, Of geopolitical and military matters.
He's talking now of course about NATO's plan to get US troops to the front lines.
Now listen to this and consider for a moment where it could take all of us.
And consider for a moment that if you lived in a representative democracy, the means and measures that would be available to you to prevent this happening.
NATO are now planning, says McGregor, to get US troops to the front line to fight Russia.
Now you might think that this is in order to support Ukrainian democracy.
Well bear that thought in mind, because what is it we're fighting for in a country that has suspended elections, that has suspended all media, that has significant dissidence and has significant subordination within it?
Where Gonzalo Lira died in prison as he said he would, and that's a word that goes unmentioned at the White House press correspondent dinner because it can't be utilised and weaponised to empower the establishment further.
MacGregor rightly asks, what are they thinking?
NATO has disclosed its preparations to deploy American troops to the European front lines in the event of a full-scale conflict with Russia.
Innovative land corridors are being established to expedite the movement of soldiers through Central Europe, bypassing local bureaucratic hurdles.
This means they are preparing for war.
You thought that the election was significant.
I think the election in my country is significant.
What's significant about it is it could be an opportunity to boot out the kind of globalists that seem pretty clearly keen to steer us into this apocalyptic moment and Winnable what?
And I mean unwinnable for Ukraine.
I mean unwinnable for Russia.
I mean unwinnable for you and me for surely somewhere underneath all of this we are a human family.
Aren't these the kind of morals that are being obfuscated and lost in this giddying conversation of corruption that appears to be controlled, ulteriorly at least, by Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Boeing?
Maybe I don't know enough even to make that diagnosis.
God knows that's probably true.
But it seems that the only way you can make any sense of this at all is by saying that, well, there must be interests outside of the interests of ordinary Americans, outside the interests of ordinary Ukrainians, outside the interests of ordinary Russians, ordinary English, British, Scottish people, because those are the interests that appear to be being pursued right now, because who is being served by this?
By the advancement towards war between two superpowers.
This strategic setup enables NATO forces to swiftly react should Putin's aggressive actions in Ukraine extend westward.
Reports suggest that these plans also encompass provisions for potential Russian attacks.
In such scenarios, troops could mobilize through corridors in Italy, Greece and Turkey to reach
the Balkans or alternatively advance towards Russia's northern border via Scandinavia.
And let me say once again, even though I know CIA carve-outs have literally made content
within Ukraine claiming that I, because of this kind of opposition to war, am a Russian
asset, that I'm aware, as surely you are, that Putin is probably an aggressive dude
with his own imperial and military agenda and I would like the leaders of our nations
and NATO in particular to use their collective power derived from our consensus and our tax
dollars or tax pounds to use that might to ensure that diplomacy and peace are the pursued
solutions and if peace is not offered and augmented, then why?
Why not have the full might of the United States of America and the various encircling NATO forces be deployed?
But supporting Ukraine in order to make them a hollowed-out husk vassal state, in order to continue to support the economic interests of those that clearly are veiled now behind our democracies?
That's a war we can't back.
Surely.
Let's have a look at what British renegade MP, Andrew Bridgen, booted out of our version of the Republicans, the Tory party, for his outspoken views, correct views in my opinion, around the vaccine, has to say on my country, the United Kingdom, already been in.
A war.
This is interesting because there are corollaries in recent history, like Vietnam, etc, where you claim we're just using American equipment or American expertise, all the while advancing towards the kind of conflicts that we have to avoid at all costs.
We are actually at war with Russia now.
I just haven't told you.
I haven't told you.
Say that again?
We're actually at war with Russia now.
I met.
Yeah.
Well, it might be a bit David Brent moments from me.
Yeah, we're at war.
Live with it.
I can handle it.
I can handle Armageddon.
I ain't bothered.
With, uh, Andre Kellen, the Russian ambassador in London, uh, a couple of months ago.
And he said that we know that your people are firing those storm shadow missiles at us out of Ukraine, because so you couldn't, you couldn't train the Ukrainians to do it.
We know you're doing it.
And I mean, everything everybody knows that everybody knows that there are lots of us What is this extraordinary adultery?
We're coaching them how to fire the weapons.
We're just standing at the side.
This is like the geopolitical version of Just The Tip.
I may have guided it in.
Someone else put it there.
That was nothing to do with me.
Where's the morality?
Where's the principles?
Where are the values at the heart of this system?
And Russia ain't daft.
They have their own analysis and they have their own ability to understand what's
happening. They recognize that this equipment couldn't be deployed by
Ukrainian troops. So in a sense what we're witnessing is the inevitable and inert
slide into a conflict that I don't really think any of us want to deal
with.
The French are in there.
I thought it was the Brits were down on the ground and special advisors.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I'm just special advising.
I'm just offering some advice.
You might wanna, you might wanna bomb that territory.
Um, didn't they say there'll be a nuclear war if we do that?
Take my special advice.
Training sessions and teaching them and showing them.
Isn't that how- But they were apparently- That's how we started with the Vietnam War.
Vietnam War, yeah.
Dude, what the frack are we doing poking the bear?
That's really stupid.
They're determined to get us into a war with Russia.
Pretty extraordinary.
Here we have, I think, some legacy media outlet acknowledging.
The phrase I like here is Biden has quietly given the go-ahead to use US military equipment and weaponry inside Russian territory, even though that is one of the red lines that means that all of our lives could be compromised and, well, ended.
Tonight, CBS News has learned that President Biden has quietly given the go-ahead for Ukraine.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
I mean, he talks pretty quietly all of the time, doesn't he?
He can't summon up much vocal energy.
But I think he's saying this quietly, deliberately, because it's a transgression of an accord that was between him and the people to not start a bloody nuclear war.
To launch limited airstrikes with US weapons inside Russia.
Ukraine may use the weapons on the Russian side of the border
near the besieged Ukrainian city of Kharkiv against concentrations of Russian troops, artillery,
and planes.
OK, well, as long as Russia haven't said that those actions would lead to a nuclear war,
former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the deputy of Russia's Security Council,
warned Thursday that the US and NATO risk a direct conflict with Russia
and a full-fledged nuclear war by pouring weapons The pumping of Ukraine by NATO countries with weapons, the training of its troops to use Western equipment, the dispatch of mercenaries and the conduct of exercises by the countries of the alliance near our borders
Increase the likelihood of a direct and open conflict between NATO and Russia instead of their war by proxy, Medvedev wrote.
And perhaps it's no different than colonial imperial wars have always been.
Certainly economic and corporate interests undergirded by nations.
Perhaps this is no different than the East India Tea Company.
Perhaps this is no different than the state imprisoning all of us in our homes to apparently facilitate the agenda of Other interests, a very least pharmaceutical, a very least those that benefited from the wealth transfer.
Maybe it has always been this way.
Such a conflict always has the risk of turning into a fully fledged nuclear war, he added.
This will be a disastrous scenario for everyone.
While it's widely believed that a direct war between the US and Russia could quickly turn nuclear.
That's such a heavy idea.
Quickly turn nuclear this, try not to worry.
The risk doesn't appear to be factored into the Biden administration's Ukrainian policy.
Would you not think that that's a risk that you'd factor in?
Like when I think about how I plan like a drive across Florida.
Oh, are we going to have enough fuel?
If one of the things I was doing could cause a nuclear apocalypse, that'd be right at the forefront of my planning.
Doesn't appear to be factored in, though.
Over the past few months, the U.S.
has significantly escalated support to Kiev in its war against Russia for increased military aid training and expanded intelligence sharing.
Well, that's cause for concern.
Thank God we have the diplomacy and expertise of NATO to help us.
Hopefully, thankfully, NATO is run by a diplomatic and discreet individual that understands the significance of what's happening and doesn't use body language designed to insult aggressive leaders of nuclear superpowers.
Stoltenberg, leader of NATO, shrugs off Putin's warnings.
We're not bothered about your warnings.
Don't shrug them off.
Heed them.
Heed the warnings.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg on Friday shrugged off warnings from Russian President Putin against NATO countries allowing Ukraine to strike Russian territory with Western weapons.
This is nothing new.
It's been the case for a long time.
Every time NATO allies are providing support to Ukraine, President Putin is trying to threaten us to not do that, Stoltenberg told reporters during NATO foreign ministers' meeting in Prague.
And an escalation?
Well, Russia has escalated by invading another country.
Remember, there's a complex history and a complex lead-up to that.
It involves the maiden coup in 2014, the rejection of a treaty, the beginning of this conflict.
Boris Johnson was involved.
We've covered that many times.
His comments come after the US and several other NATO countries gave Ukraine the green light to strike Russian territory.
The very fact that they're given a green light suggests the degree of their involvement.
They're making key strategic military decisions near Kharkiv.
The step marks a significant escalation in the proxy war and could provoke a major response from Russia despite Stoltenberg downplaying the risks.
Is it possible that to them a full-scale nuclear war isn't a problem but an opportunity?
This full-scale nuclear war could be a real opportunity for those of us that have incredible bunkers in Hawaii.
Here's Greenwald, our fellow rumbler and always astute and accurate voice on such matters.
While Western pundits and American liberals with flags in their bios continue to feel strength and purpose by prolonging the war in the Ukraine and forcing Ukrainians to die as conscripts, scenes like this of violent resistance to being drafted are increasingly common.
Now remember, again, like the pandemic, this is all apparently undergirded by compassion, by kindness, by a regard for the sanctity of life, by a love of democracy.
We have to protect democracy, but they're not having any elections.
They've only got one political party.
They have banned all other media.
They're not holding elections for years.
When we say democracy, we mean our will enacted at a global level.
Spare a moment.
To consider the impact on Ukrainian conscripts.
Sometimes I feel like this when I run into Ukrainian people.
But I'm on your side as well.
I'm on everybody's side in these conflicts.
I want us to try and find a decentralized way to live together harmoniously, if imperfectly, in the light of the sacred available to us all.
And when you see a moment like this, a man being dragged off from either his wife or mother, Hopefully not both.
I'm not judging!
I'm not judging!
Who am I to judge other people and how they live?
It makes you question the veracity of this entire project because this guy don't seem to be too happy about Ukraine's ongoing war with Russia and he might like a peaceful diplomatic solution too.
Wouldn't it be best for all of us?
Isn't that becoming clear at this point that we should be looking for peace and harmony together?
Come on, give us more taxpayer dollars for democracy.
Come on, give us more taxpayer dollars for democracy.
We've got to support democracy.
I suppose because I'm always involved in making this kind of content that I forget that it
has real human consequences.
I wish that we could offer something as sincere as a prayer for peace.
I wish we could find, somehow, our common human familial bonds.
I wish that there were a light inside of us and a voice available to us that could protect, conserve and honour the people of Ukraine, as well as the people of Russia.
And all of the people warring now across the Middle East, acknowledging that we are here for such a short while, that whatever our differences are, they're nothing like as significant as our common bond and brotherhood.
And if we don't have any recourse to meaningful values, then we are doomed here.
That's why it's so important that our leaders act in alignment with real principles.
That's why it matters when they criminalize opponents while simultaneously plagiarizing their ideas.
Ideas that while They were in opposition.
They claimed could be used to condemn, in this case, Donald Trump.
It's extraordinary for me to see us moving towards potential nuclear conflict without recourse to reason, without recourse to any meaningful principles.
As man has replaced God at the center of our universe, as they tell us that there is no such thing as nature, as there's no such thing as meaning, that we're just spilling through space and time, just mere entropy amidst the molecular billiard game played across the heavens.
What we're losing is any ability to say, this is right, and these are the people that should lead us, and these are the values that we should look to.
And this is how we can open our hearts together.
Can anyone claim that prolonging and funding this war is better for Ukrainian people?
Or can anyone claim that a better solution would not be a reach out and a spirit of diplomacy and peace and common brotherhood with Vladimir Putin?
Isn't anything better than even that scene of a man being dragged off away from his mother or wife?
We'll find out.
We'll do some research into that.
Because that is merely the tip of the iceberg.
You know that elsewhere people are losing fathers and brothers and mothers and sisters, annihilation and decay.
And for what?
Don't you have the sense that we're not participating in this war for humanitarian reasons?
Not because it's the right thing to do, not because Putin's invasion was criminal, but because certain economic interests are served.
Doesn't it seem to you to be convenient that these wars are beneficial to a certain set of interests, interests that appear to hover above democracy, manipulating it with vile magnetism and dark power, rather than allowing our institutions to serve the people that they were set up to serve?
Extraordinary for me to see this.
All right, you lot.
Well, I think that what we have to... Do you want my opinion on how to prevent global holy war or global war of territory and dominion?
I think to ensure that our leaders speak openly and clearly and that our collective voices are heard and that we are able to prevent these kind of barbaric scenes playing out ludicrously.
And playing out unnecessarily and stop the pretense that this is a humanitarian mission rather than a territorial resource mission.
The evidence is in.
The lies have been discerned.
That's the reason why free speech is such an important subject.
That's why what we do here on Rumble is so significant.
And remember, Russia have kicked Rumble out as well.
So if Rumble and Rumble content creators are operating entirely in the service of nefarious forces and the alt-right, how come China, Russia, Brazil, France are all opposed to the voices of freedom that are available to you for this platform?
Now, we got Don Trump Jr.
on the show tomorrow.
I will be live from wherever the hell in his house he'll have me.
I'll be talking to him.
I'll be talking to Kimberley.
We'll be streaming live tomorrow.
So let me know what you think about that Ukraine story, Ukraine-Russia escalation in the comments below.
Hey, listen, before I leave you, I want to bring you this story from our crazy little nation.
Now, Nigel Farage, if there is a British Donald Trump, Nigel Farage is that man.
He's a populist, he's a nationalist, he's a patriot and he seems to be able to reach the parts that other politicians cannot reach.
I've had very public conflicts with Nigel Farage.
Once I was on a show called Question Time.
It's like a British political punditry show.
And we had spats because at that time, I strongly believed that compassion and love ought be at the heart of all politics.
And I believe it to this day.
Where perhaps my view has changed is that when it comes to anti-establishment voices, we have to find ways to work together.
And I can tell you the same as the establishment hates Donald Trump, the establishment hates Nigel Farage.
He's standing not as an independent, but for a new party in our country called Reform.
And it's my belief That perhaps new coalitions can be formed from people across the political spectrum.
Unusual alliances must appear now if we are to attack the establishment, and it seems that Nigel Farage is going to be a thorn in the side of the British establishment once more.
He's regarded widely as the engineer and architect of the Brexit movement, one of the bloodiest noses in recent British political history, and indeed a bureaucratic blow because it meant that Britain ended up leaving the EU.
And who regrets that now?
Who wants to be part of the EU with its censorship?
Let's have a look at that story now.
that that dude was on the right side of history in that argument and there seems to be a pretty
strong consensus around the world that people in countries like Britain, your country, wants
controls over immigration and if you believe in democracy you do what the people want.
Let's have a look at that story now. So he's been out campaigning recently and you know
you can see that it's already galvanising some considerable support and fear. Both the
Tory party, they're the incumbent political party in my country, are terrified. But I
wonder if the presumed next government, the globalist Labour movement, that are very much
aligned with the WHO, WEF, that are not introducing or proposing any policies that would meaningfully
impact the life of ordinary British people. It's the same as your country. You've got
two parties that are ultimately controlled by globalism and corporatism claiming that
they are a meaningful choice. Well, Nigel Farage...
Well, there are probably a million things I disagree with Nigel Farage on, but what I agree with him on is that we need to oppose establishment corruption right now, and they're terrified of this dude.
So, PJW sort of pointed out that when he had a milkshake thrown at him the other day, national broadcasters in my country seem to take a kind of subtle delight in it because, you know, the one thing they don't want Is people with different political views coming together against establishment corruption?
Listen to the sneering condemnation that is proffered when they are able to sort of talk about Nigel Farage getting hit with a milkshake.
You know, if this was one of their allies, one of the stooges in the political class, if this was someone that represented their centralist, legacy media, hypocritical and corrupt values, if values is the appropriate word for its very inversion, then you can bet they'd be reporting on this differently.
Have a look.
Breaking news now.
The new reform leader, Nigel Farage, has been hit by a drink, possibly a milkshake, while out campaigning today.
These are the images.
Our political correspondent, Gurpreet Narwan, joins me from Clacton.
She's down on his campaign trail, not the first time.
Weird to hear names like Clacton mentioned in this context.
It's a region in Britain near Essex, where I'm from.
Good people.
Been on holiday there.
Clackers.
Clacton-on-Sea!
Proper British people!
He's had what appears to be a milkshake thrown at him, Gerpreet.
Not the first time, and I think quite a humbling moment.
It's quite humbling that I've been humbling.
So it means you've gone back to Earth and sort of connected with reality.
When that milkshake hit me, it really gave me an opportunity to really review myself.
Imagine if that was a milkshake thrown at someone.
More worried about that than the fact that we're arming via NATO Ukraine in order to create, it seems, the conditions for the apocalypse.
Quite humbling when we had that nuclear war, wasn't it?
It was quite humbling because now we're all made of ash.
for Naiful Faraj. He was here in Clacton to launch his local campaign to be an MP after
announcing that he after all would be standing. There were hundreds of people.
The rise of populism, whether it's on the left or on the right, or new spectrums and colours and
hues as yet unimagined is a good thing for all of us because surely what we have to do is somehow
leverage freedom out of the grasp of these corrupt and hypocritical systems that have taken
over our planet, that have taken over our systems, that deny us individual and collective
So I would say the rise of significant opponents of the establishment is beneficial, even if there are things you don't agree with them on.
These are the kind of alliances we've got to look into.
That's all we've got time for today.
Thank you for joining us for this show.
Remember, we've got Donald Trump Jr.
live on the show tomorrow.
If you've got questions for him, Well, let us have them.
Hit us with those questions later on this week.
We've got all sorts of fantastic guests, because, yeah, it would be good to have that guest list available for us, maybe somewhere visible, because we don't have a teleprompter no more, I've just noticed.
Hey, listen, you lot, thanks very much for joining us.
We'll see you tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
