All Episodes
Previous Next
May 13, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:09:50
Trump’s RECORD BREAKING Rally “Deep Blue” State! Has He Already Won 2024? - Stay Free #364
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Outro Music In this video, you're going to see the future.
I'm going to be breaking into a federal line back there.
Akeniwandas, thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand, where thanks to the
miracles of technology and whatever miracles created even that possibility, we are able
to communicate immediately.
Those of you that are watching this as a stream, you are joining a movement.
You are joining an army of thousands who absolutely refuse to continue to consume their deception and lies.
You know by now that the legacy media is part of the machine.
You know by now that the state is operating in conjunction with globalist bureaucracies in order to prohibit your freedom using emergency and disaster, whether actual or proposed and potential, to limit your freedom.
That's why the insistence on your ability to openly communicate is absolutely paramount.
That's why your right to religious freedom, your right to individual freedom, cannot be denied to you and we must be willing to take Whatever measures are required to oppose these tyrannical forces that coalesce en masse.
We've got some great conversations coming up for you this week.
Dave Martin is coming up.
He'll help you understand how various global institutions, bureaucratic and otherwise, always have the intention of limiting your freedom.
Bobby Kennedy will be on the show.
And of course, we talk about war as well as the brain parasites.
Also, some brilliant testimonies about religious Spiritual awakening coming to you but today is a day that will be defined because we asked you what you wanted us to talk about and you told us that we'll be talking about the New Jersey rally and the different tactics being deployed by your mainstream political parties this year.
Trump Ever the populist.
And when I say the word populist, I mean it positively.
Because what is government but the service of the people?
What is government but a subordinate to your will and to the collective will of the people?
What is any government official but your servant?
You should be able to see anyone who works for the government anywhere.
Anthony Fauci, the Prime Minister of Britain, a police officer, and say, hey, excuse me, I need your help for a minute.
And they just go, oh, yes, what can I do for you, boss?
What can I do for you?
I am here only to serve you.
Now if you get the idea that they're superciliously and haughtily talking down to you like you are in a basket with other deplorables, if you are some sort of ignorant fool, if you are someone who deserves to be spoken down to, then you know what side they're on.
Unless they can look you in the eye and declare openly that they are in your support, that they are part of a movement that is here to overthrow all centralised authority in favour of your individual freedom, then you know what you're dealing with.
You're dealing with shills and grifters, and there's enough of them out there, but together, we will bring them down through our willingness to throw off our individual prejudices.
We will look to one another in spite of religious, cultural, or racial differences.
We will see what we have in common, and we will become mighty.
Beyond mighty, we will become unstoppable.
And, long-time listener, you better believe Dr. Shiva It's on her way because from around the world the greatest thinkers and communicators are gathering even now as part of a movement that cannot be opposed.
Why?
Because there is too much power.
And it doesn't matter how hard the legacy media work.
And believe me, they are working hard.
Insidious like parasites in gutters.
They roam like the parasites in the mind.
Trying to destroy our freedom.
Trying to destroy our ability to communicate.
Shutting down dissenting voices wherever they find them.
If you can become an Awakened Wonder, if it's within your means and it's within your desire, become one!
We do additional content every single week.
We do meditations together.
We read books together to educate ourselves.
We have interviews with enlightened and brilliant people and we're not afraid to disagree with one another.
We can give you a month for free to see if you like the stuff or not.
We'll post a link that gives you that facility and that ability.
But without further hyperbole or exclamation, let's move into today's stories because we've got some fascinating stuff to talk about.
Of course, Elon Musk is taking on An entire nation continent that wants to shut down the right of everybody to speak and it seems that the democrat party still believe that Hollywood star power is the way to dazzle and I suppose dazzle, glamorize and I mean it in the vampiric sense and distract ordinary people
Whereas Trump is going straight to the Jersey Shore.
Let's get into some of those headlines right away now.
Excuse me, I've just got to find my papers, darling.
Let's have a look.
Elon Musk has won against the Australian government attempting to censor all reality.
Did you see the Australian Prime Minister saying, like, well, you know, he's against your freedom.
The very idea that they won't censor what we ask them to on X, it's pretty appalling and disgusting.
Even though one of the stories they were referring to was Bishop Emmanuel Maree Maree, or Ma Maree, excuse me, who says that he wants the video of the hideous attack that took place on him to remain on X because he believes it's significant and he believes it's true and he believes it's real and he's a man that's following a Significant and important ideology who believes in redemption, who believes in forgiveness, who believes in the power to change and change the world.
What an incredible belief systems have, by the way.
How much better it would be to assume that nothing means anything and that you are just spilled and adrift in the limitlessness and your greatest possible intention could be a little slither of pleasure before you inevitably You don't want people starting to think that if we awoke and came together, we might be able to change the fundamental principles of their corrupt systems.
That would be a problem.
In any event, we have to say that platforms like Rumble and X are doing important work allowing us to disagree, allowing us to communicate.
Just take a look at the stream over on Rumble.
There's people in there with all sorts of ideologies, arguing, Coming up with brilliant new portmanteaus.
I'm talking about cruising buns.
Shills and grifters.
Shilfters.
Hmm.
I prefer shipfers.
I don't know.
We can work on that.
We can work on that, I'm telling you.
So, X and Rumble continue to oppose censorship across the world, whether it's in Russia or Brazil or France.
This is an important battle.
Notice the various ways to legitimize censorship.
Notice how frequently it's been spoken about.
And indeed, in Europe now, and we'll be bringing you this story later, you're going to want to see this.
They are looking to legitimize the censorship of your text messages.
They want to be able to reach right into your phone, even though there's no way to censor individual text messages of, you know, it's to protect you, it's To protect you, of course, from paedophiles.
You know that's what they're thinking in the bureaucracies of the world, at the UN and the WHO.
How?
How can we protect people from paedophiles and meanwhile make a hell of a lot of money and legitimise centralised authority?
For example, the woman that ran the EU vaccine programme, who was caught almost inadvertently doing massive billion dollar deals with Albert Baller for vaccines, And also passed on some of those profits extraordinarily or at least permitted her husband's firm to manufacture certain medical implements and instruments.
Now wants the ability to censor your text.
We're gonna get into that story in detail and I'll have the details in front of me and we'll be able to explain all of it.
While we're still on YouTube though, you have to be careful because of course YouTube, along with the BBC, Along with other legacy media organisations.
They'll claim this is hysteria and hyperbole.
Of course they will.
Because to acknowledge it would be true would do what?
It would bring down their systems.
It would bring down their cash cows.
It would bring down their investments.
And they can't do that.
They're riding on them cash cows.
They're sucking on the teats of those beasts.
They're not about to do that anytime soon, are they?
They still believe that you should be beguiled by elites.
Yes, Joe Biden is holding a number of fundraisers with the glitterati.
Now, you know me.
I used to live in Hollywood for a little while.
I worked in that world for a little while.
Extraordinary.
It's freezing.
Unmute.
There's some stuff going on there in the chat, guys.
Make sure our audio It's under control.
Make sure we're doing everything we can to check on that stuff, because it's very important that I can hear them, and it's very important that they can hear me as well.
Let's have a look at this story.
It's the story that you voted for in our poll.
Did Trump really get 100,000 people at his rally in New Jersey?
And what did it tell you?
When Donald Trump wants the masses, the people, and when the Democrats want You know, Julia Roberts, Barack Obama, essentially figures that it could be argued are members of the establishment.
Let's get into this story.
Let's have a look at that now.
That's a simple headline there that sort of lets you know basically what's happening.
Oh, we'll get to it in more detail in a minute.
Just a few more things to terrify you, just in case you were starting to think, wow, I might be free.
I might be able to live my own life.
I might be able to live free from the shackles of these centralised bureaucratic systems that tell me that they're here for my safety and convenience.
There are superbugs now.
Watch out for them.
Rise of drug-resistant superbugs could make COVID pandemic look minor, expert warns.
Also, subtext, that means we might need a treaty so that we can lock people in their houses and normalise house arrest and make it acceptable to just lock people up and keep people out of human relationships and maybe insist that they take gene therapies.
It's all for your own good.
Did you think that Big Pharma had some interest other than your own?
I'm offended by that.
What made you think that?
Was it the opioid crisis?
Was it the 10,000 out-of-court settlements that Pfizer agreed to because it seems that the complainants believe potentially that, at least this is what they allege, that those drugs were causing cancer?
And are there more stories that seem to indicate that pharmaceutical giants are less than reliable?
But how could they be unreliable?
They're regulated by the FDA and I suppose they do provide 50% of the funding for the FDA.
Yeah, that is odd.
It is odd.
And I suppose if it were corrupt, you would constantly find people that had worked for Moderna working for government, and people that worked for government working for Moderna, and people that worked for the FDA going on to work for Moderna.
You never ever find that right, do you?
Does that ever happen?
Is there any suggestion that people are moving between the porous membrane that separates the state and these corporations?
If there were evidence of that, cast iron, rock, solid, undeniable evidence, why we would have so many questions?
Pharmaceutical giants knowingly sold HIV-infected treatment to the National Health Service.
That's our Medicare system in the UK.
Infected blood inquiry is to report on mistakes that led to 1,200 people in the UK contracting HIV and 5,000 more getting Hep C.
These are only poor people though, probably people that needed blood transfusions.
It was a mistake.
It was a mistake, you know.
For them, socialism and sharing, no?
With their subsidies, with the corporate subsidies.
You know, who's paying for the AstraZeneca payouts if there are indeed to be settlements as a result of the AstraZeneca blood clot trials?
You're paying.
It will be paid for By the government.
And the government's you.
That's your money.
It's your money that funds these wars.
It's your money that funds these projects.
And when they make mistakes, suddenly out comes the compassion.
Out comes the forgiveness.
Out comes the salvation and redemption that perhaps you and I would like in our lives.
But it's not for you.
You are there to be judged and condemned and criminalized and controlled.
And by God, the legislation is coming through to ensure that's exactly how you are controlled.
But there are at least some interesting fluctuations taking place when it comes to policing.
We've all heard about defunding the police.
How about refund the police?
The police in Miami are getting some extraordinary funding right now.
Here they are.
I mean is it right that the police are rolling around in this literal vehicle?
That's a pretty impressive vehicle I mean, at least it will be nice to be bundled into the back of that police car.
Home James and don't spare the horses.
You don't need to protect my head from the back of that thing.
I'm ready to go.
Come join us.
Come join us.
That is some serious investment in hardware.
Whether or not it's the militarisation of the police or the luxurisation of the police.
It looks like there's been some investment made.
Let me know what you guys think about that.
What's the message?
What's the semiotics?
What's the subtext of that?
It's very GTA, and it's very Grand Theft Auto that.
That's very like, is this real?
Is it real that there's a Rolls-Royce police car?
Am I being arrested in absolute luxury right now?
This is an extraordinary transit.
I think you want the police to feel pragmatic.
I think in the perfect world you want to feel that the police force, if there is such a thing, in your community, live in the community, are accountable to your community, are members of your community and intercommunicate with you in a Perhaps answerable to an assembly that's made up of that population, that we're in direct dialogue, that the service and honour and valour of people that work in public service industries is respected, that they're able to unionise, that they have proper pensions, that they're properly looked after and therefore feel invested, not in the power of the state, not in the power of the globalist corporations that run the state, but in your power, in your personal freedom and your personal liberty.
And for that kind of police force, they should be in very bare minimum, Bentleys.
The people of Dublin, they're going to love this.
The people in Dublin are going to love having a Stargate portal to New York City.
But If you are a British person, you know Irish people and you know how Irish people roll and you know that there's at least a slim possibility that Irish people will use that Stargate portal between New York and Dublin to have what they would call the crack and take the actual piss.
I'm gonna take it!
Someone's gonna take it!
Oh my god!
Oh my god!
I'm gonna do it!
AHHHHH!
From Ireland man!
Them people are free.
They don't want to be rolled over.
They don't want to be played.
You give us better fucking technology, will you?
Erase what we're doing.
Hell, how about that for an image?
These are the Irish people.
Amazing sense of humour, amazing literature, and do not like being told what to do.
Not one little bit.
Gotta respect their freedom.
Hey, we're gonna leave you.
If you're watching this on YouTube right now, you gotta click the link in the description to see some, I believe, Pertinent analysis of exactly what's happening in American politics right now as Donald Trump speaks to the 100,000.
Joe Biden summonsings up nothing short of the Hollywood glitter.
I will also be talking about how the bureaucratic unelected state wants out.
Access to your text messages and how they are going to achieve it.
Click the link.
Come on over.
Consider becoming an awakened wonder.
We do additional content like what's going on in Antarctica.
First though, let's get into this story.
Everywhere you will have seen people saying Trump addressed The biggest rally in history.
Then you'll have seen people on CNN and MSNBC saying, there wasn't that many people there.
Actually, there was only about 50 people in that crowd.
They duplicated those people.
Those people were clones.
The real message, of course, is not the number of the not the number of people in the crowd or whether or not
Donald Trump exaggerates sometimes, is the significance of the optics and it's the significance
of the message.
You will note that as this election campaign gears up, there is a clear unwillingness on
behalf of the incumbent administration to address the issues that matter.
And let me take a shot at what some of those issues might be.
Infrastructure within your nation, support and education, available information, lack of censorship, end to all war!
An unwillingness to send Americans and American money into foreign endeavors, national security and sovereignty, particularly when it comes to the border.
Whether or not you agree with those issues, those appear to be the issues that matter to the majority of the people.
And as we've indicated endlessly, surely the role of government is service.
Unless we're being lied to on some extraordinary scale.
So let's look at the difference in the optics between the Trump campaign and the Biden campaign and let's look at the continual theme and ongoing ability of the Dems to mobilize an extraordinary idea.
We can.
We care about vulnerable groups and vulnerable communities.
We're here to protect you.
Are you in some sort of vulnerable group?
Is there a way we can protect you and help you?
Would it help you if we censored you?
Would it help you if we went to some kind of crazy war in some unseen Far-flung land for you, funded by you, spending your money while you're working, you're paying for these wars, and if it seemed like we were profiting somehow from any of this, why?
Wouldn't that undermine our central premise?
The idea that we're doing all of this for you because we care.
Whether you're a governor of New York or the arch-nemesis herself.
The dark figure that is Hillary Clinton.
What is it that the Democrats care about really?
And what is the message that they cannot address clearly?
Let's get into it.
First of all, of course, let's have a look at the conversation around the people attending the Jersey Shore.
Some people saying 100,000 people were present.
Let's have a look at some coverage of that story.
In this instance, I'm not sure what legacy media outlet is.
Let's have a look.
You know, you can't even see the back.
There's so many people here.
There's so many people here.
Man!
Over 100,000 people.
This was supposed to be... You know, they thought they'd hit 40.
That was one of the first things that Trump did in his campaign to become president the first time.
I wish we were moving them the hell back so they'd have...
because they can't see in the back.
That was one of the first things that Trump did in his campaign to become president the first time.
He identified that the majority of people no longer trust legacy media.
That we see the legacy media as our enemy, an opponent.
Now these institutions still think that they're doing valiant work.
They think of themselves as the inheritors of the mantle of civil rights that began in your great nation in the 1960s.
Heroic figures like Martin Luther King, great men like Malcolm X or JFK or JFK's brother.
There are a good number of heroes in your country during that period.
And what's the thing that happened to all of them?
They were all killed!
Dead!
Potentially by their own government.
Certainly there seems to be mounting evidence that that's the way that they went down.
Curiously though, the legacy media that have always had strong ties to the deep state and the establishment, even as they've become more and more professional, not drawn from the Gumshoe, blue collar, working class, Roseanne would have it, communities from which they were earlier drawn, increasingly becoming university educated, so you might say somewhat supercilious, loathing of the ordinary people.
Certainly there seems to be a contempt.
I mean, I don't know.
Do you sense it?
Do you sense if you look at the New York Times or you listen to them legacy outlets, Do you sense that they have a kind of disdain or dislike for ordinary people?
Do you think that they're looking for ways and labels and means to condemn ordinary people?
Well, it's okay to hate them!
I mean, they're in a basket of deplorability!
They're racist!
They're disgusting!
They don't wash!
They don't care for the environment!
Don't they care about climate change?
Lock them in their homes!
Lock them in their homes!
Please, somebody, somewhere, won't you find a reason to lock them in their homes?
We're working on a number of reasons to lock them in their homes right now.
It could be a health crisis because public health has always been a protected area that allows us to bypass the Constitution.
So whenever we're looking to bypass people's freedoms, we'll always look to public health first and foremost.
But let's not forget Climate change too!
That might afford us some fantastic opportunities to lock people in their homes.
Let's not focus on environmental schemes and measures that might somehow penalize some of the most powerful energy companies or military companies in the world or might prohibit the actions of the elites.
No!
Climate change Has to be solved by locking ordinary people in their homes.
It's funny how the solution is always an impediment to ordinary people and never an impediment to the powerful.
It's just a curious, curious solution they always come up with.
I've been indicted four times in a period of about three seconds.
Anytime there's a plane that flies over, if my plane flies over a blue state, the following day I get subpoenaed to go before a grand jury, okay?
There would have been no war in Gaza with me in the White House.
There would not have even been a chance.
You know, Iran was broke when I was president.
I said, if you buy oil, anybody buys oil from Iran, they can't do business with the United States.
They were totally broke.
Now they have $250 billion.
They made it all in three and a half years.
When I was president, we had peace in the Middle East like never before.
And I got the Abraham Accords done when nobody thought it was possible.
When I'm president, we will not allow our colleges to be taken over by violent radicals.
And if you come here from another country and try to bring jihadism or anti-Americanism or anti-Semitism to our campuses, we will immediately deport you.
You'll be out of that school.
Okay, so it seems that the main thrust of that speech is ordinary and expected America First rhetoric, a willingness to shut down on insurgent groups, some other populist ideas.
Now, whether or not you agree with the policies of Donald Trump, and I know that a great many of you do, You would have to say that the rhetoric deployed there is an attempt to galvanise and address issues that Americans care about today.
What's happening on the other side of the aisle?
Remember the side that see themselves as the goodies, the people that if you don't vote for them, you're voting for, well, you're voting for despotism.
You're voting for war, you're voting for meltdown, even though in the last four years it seems like war has escalated and authoritarianism has escalated and censorship has escalated.
It seems that just because they are able to apply varnish and veneer And what's their answer to that?
to their bureaucratic tyranny, they expect you to be duped and fooled by that.
Perhaps it could be argued at this point that if you care about freedom, you can't afford to vote for Joe Biden
and increasingly it seems that even Democrat voters believe that because of the various military misadventures
around the world right now.
And what's their answer to that?
Is it to address it?
Is it to comfort you?
Is it to tell you we're going to work on infrastructure?
We're going to work on a better and safer America?
We're going to end these wars?
We're going to use America's might to bring about peace?
No, it's what about George Clooney?
Now, hold on.
I hear what you're saying.
But how about Barack Obama?
We already had Barack Obama!
That's the son of a bitch that bailed out the banks!
That's the son of a bitch that bombed Syria!
Yeah, but come on.
He's got shows on Netflix now.
You know, and we got George Clooney.
Now, remember, I've been part of the Hollywood establishment myself.
I'm certainly not claiming to the degree of George Clooney who's made many, many, many successful movies.
But what I'm saying is I've seen from the inside how this system works.
How it glamorises, how it captures, how easy it is to believe that you're doing something good by turning up at some fundraiser somewhere if what people are talking about is helping people and the vulnerable and help Haiti.
And then you look into this stuff and you find out, oh my God, the Clinton Foundation aren't helping Haiti at all.
They're making Haiti much worse.
In fact, Haiti hates Clinton more than they hate earthquakes.
And there's got to be a reason for that.
So the Biden campaigns are listing a number of the usual suspects to endorse their campaign,
a campaign that would seem to be in trouble.
And it's now reached such a pitch that even CNN, the cathedrals of the establishment,
where their sole duty is to shut down dissent, where any thought leader or emergent figure
that opposes them, they'll find some way, they'll work for years if they have to,
to find a way to shut down those voices.
Even they have got their doubts.
Even they are starting to question the efficacy of the model.
They are unable to address the issues because to address the issues will be
to dismantle the system itself.
Here on CNN, they are talking about this fundraiser, but what they don't talk about are the issues
that affect ordinary people, and ordinary Americans in particular.
Now, in the chat, I want you to watch what they're doing here.
Notice how they don't address economic issues, issues of the border, issues of war.
What they talk about is fundraisers and billionaires and famous people.
Like, is that going to be the solution?
I mean isn't that actually the problem?
...of this campaign that is ramping up and of course the question is where does this go on the trail?
How do we see it play out on the trail?
You actually have some new reporting not necessarily as it relates to the war in the Middle East but as it relates to how the Biden campaign is trying to really intensify and galvanize its supporters against the backdrop of some of this diminishing support.
And that is the reminder here that we are just months away from this critical election, and the Biden campaign is trying to wage that fight while dealing with this very serious challenge overseas.
But in terms of that fundraising, for a long time, the Democrats, the DNC have had the cash advantage.
That's about to look very different for Republicans with former President Trump.
A lot of people are concerned.
now that he has clinched the nomination, they can fundraise differently.
So that's why you're gonna see the Biden team try to boost some of those fundraising efforts
with some star power.
They're gonna be doing a big fundraiser with George Clooney, Julia Roberts, former President Obama,
in mid-June in Los Angeles.
And there's also going to be a fundraiser with former President Bill Clinton
and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton early.
A lot of people are concerned.
They're concerned about all these foreign wars that are being funded by their taxpayer dollars.
So in order to address that critical, critical problem, we're gonna line up the warmongers of yesteryear, ladies and gentlemen, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, the engineers and architects, that lost us the ability to reach ordinary Americans,
the very people that sanctioned and signed off the misadventures around the world,
the establishment of an undeniable hegemony.
Doesn't it seem odd to you that here, on this legacy media propagandist outlet,
they're unable to say, the Biden administration have observed
that the wars they're engaged in are unpopular and therefore they are going to make pledges
to no longer engage in these wars.
Why is that question not being asked?
Why is that question not being answered?
For a moment, reflect.
If you wanted to win an election, wouldn't you say, hold on a minute, 70% of Democrat voters are in particular concerned about events in the Middle East?
Wouldn't you say then that if you were there in order to serve the people, or even if you wanted to be divisive and polarizing, your own party, your own party supporters are against that particular aspect of American foreign policy.
And I, listen, my position is war and violence and a country in service of endless war and endless pharmaceutical trade and endless oppression of its own people, the American people.
and endless imperial adventures around the world.
That's an agenda that needs to be addressed and opposed.
Why can't they address it and oppose it?
How can they say, you're concerned about America?
America is falling apart?
How about George Clooney?
Will that do?
I like George Clooney.
I mean, he was good in ER, but I don't know how that's gonna make schools any better or the decay of American life any better.
Okay, I hear you.
Julia!
Get Julia Roberts!
Huh?
Hmm?
Now this is not an attack on Julia Roberts or George Clooney who are human beings just like you, I mean in no meaningful way any different from any of us of course, but in this instance what is the Biden administration telling you that you should be dazzled?
By powerful and glamorous figures that we've found yet again, another revolving door that presidents walk out of office and into Netflix and convey their documentaries and messages as in the same beautifully rendered style that Barack Obama delivered most of his speeches while simultaneously failing to protect American people from the financial disaster in 2008.
In fact, doing the opposite.
Protecting globalist financial interests while many many Americans and perhaps America herself has not recovered from the catastrophe of 2008.
The fact is is that there is power in government.
Government that is for the people rather than government that is for some kind of peculiar globalist agenda that's becoming increasingly obvious what it is.
This summer, they see a direct line from huge halls from events like that to being able to build infrastructure,
open offices, hire key staff, run ads in those critical battleground states where yes, some of
those young voters who are so disillusioned with what they're seeing right now with the
president's handling of the war could be critical and it could make all the difference so they're
gonna go all...
This is politics as sport and if you want to frame politics as sport, if you want to frame politics as a kind of gladiatorial
endeavor, a kind of entertainment product, then good luck against the guy who can do this.
Everything they touch turns to what?
You've never seen a political figure do that.
Now, of course, on the establishment neoliberal legacy media amplifying machine, they'll use this as further evidence of moral decay and moral decline.
Why?
Look at those Americans in their red caps with their big beards and their working jobs. They'll look contemptuously
at them from their skyscrapers.
They'll look down at them from their jobs where they do very little in front of their
laptops, sneeringly and contemptuously, vilifying and criminalising ordinary people at every
opportunity. But the ability of a political orator to engage in that kind of discourse
with a crowd and be actually funny, you're in some serious, serious trouble.
I don't know enough about American politics to know whether or not Donald Trump is going to be the solution that your country is looking for, but I do know this, the establishment Fucking hates him.
So that's some information right there.
They're using the judiciary.
They're using the media.
They're using everything at their disposal.
My questions come in this form.
Didn't he support that $95 billion bill to perpetuate various military adventures around the world?
That would be something I'd want to know why that was happening.
I would have some questions.
But my enemies do not want Donald Trump in the White House.
And hey, sometimes that's enough.
Use that kind of language.
Look.
Look, you can't use the word shit.
OK.
Now, also, there's a kid's guide available, by the way, it seems, from the screen.
What I think is very interesting to observe, that while there is this sort of desperate scramble to maintain what they plainly believe is some kind of moral high ground, it's so obvious that what really exists is astonishing corruption.
Let's give you a very clear example of that.
You might have seen recently the time where Cathy Hochul, is that her name?
Cathy Hochul?
Yeah, Cathy Hochul or Cathy Hochul or Cathy Hochul, the governor of New York said, kids in the Bronx don't even know what a computer is.
Those kids are so ignorant and potentially not white that they don't even know what TikTok, because they know they've got phones, don't they?
Like, what a ridiculous and extraordinary assumption.
So what's interesting about this?
...is while very publicly claiming to care about issues like diversity and education and empowerment and inclusivity, which I believe are important issues, what we want is diverse and inclusive and above all else free!
Free societies!
While making those kind of claims, It's actually significant to observe that in private, when it comes to real estate deals, when it comes to housing opportunities, Cathy Hochul operates in a very, very different way.
It seems, in fact, that she is controlled by very different powers.
Let's first of all look at this viral meme of her saying that young black kids don't know what a computer is, which seems a bit odd.
And then we'll start breaking down the way that she made extraordinary deals with real estate companies that seemed like they deliberately made the housing crisis in New York, and in particular the ability of ordinary working people to acquire or even live in homes, much, much worse.
So speaking this way, acting that way.
An interesting theme when it comes to the neoliberal establishment.
But remember, they care for you because, you know, they claim to care.
That's just not enough anymore, is it?
So let's have a look at that viral moment first.
Young black kids growing up in the Bronx who don't even know what the word computer is.
They don't know.
They don't know these things.
And I want the world to open up to them.
They don't know what the word computer is.
This is it.
Computer.
What was that?! !
What the hell was that?
I think that was the word computer.
What?
The word what?
The what what?
This is a really weird claim.
To all of them because when you have their diverse voices innovating solutions through technology, then you're really addressing society's broader challenges.
You gotta have diverse voices.
You gotta have diverse voices.
Okay, well let's see how diverse voices were served when it came to, oh look it's half past crunch time, when Kavi Hochul had to provide housing solutions for ordinary Americans.
We've seen the rhetoric, let's see the legislature.
New York Governor Kavihokal is touting an agreement struck with the state's legislative leaders on housing, long a thorny issue in state politics that became law this week as part of the massive state budget bill.
The governor called the New York housing law a historic agreement that strengthens protections for New York renters.
A lot of kids in the Bronx don't even know what houses are.
They see one, they think they don't know what that is.
Is it a gingerbread house?
But they wouldn't know the word house.
Is it just gingerbread?
They'd say.
The Coalition Housing Justice for All, however, has blasted Hochul's housing deal as a giveaway to wealthy real estate interests.
Governor Hochul did not solve the housing crisis.
Instead, she pushed through a housing deal written by the real estate industry to ensure they keep getting richer off the backs of hard-working tenants.
Well, that doesn't sound fair.
That doesn't sound kind.
That doesn't sound diverse and inclusive.
Unless this whole racket of the neo-liberal apparent left is all about pretending to care over there while taking back pocket deals over there.
That can't be it, can it?
Surely it's not that there's no real point of difference between the old corporatism of 20 and 30 years ago, except now they're pretending to care about vulnerable groups.
It can't be that, can it?
It can't have been since Clinton and Blair that the apparent left became warmonger parties that were owned by the same kind of
corporate interests that have dominated state politics or national politics for the
last 50 years longer much much longer it can't be that it simply can't be
because otherwise otherwise my whole belief system and raison d'etre would be
well it would be nothing it will be nothing but a pointless lie. The group
said in a statement now millions of renters across the state will
struggle to keep a roof over their heads as rent and evictions continue to rise.
Oh, so it's not made things any better.
How odd.
Under the deal, real estate developers would benefit from a new tax credit, 485X, for construction of apartment buildings where a percentage of units are reserved for lower income people at below market rents.
We do stuff like that in this country.
We're going to build a housing estate for affordable housing.
What do you mean by affordable?
We mean whatever we say we mean by affordable.
Do you mean you've done a deal to build some tower blocks and that and to make it look good you've said there'll be some cheap apartments for poor people and we'll deal with that when we get there?
Yeah, so that's what we basically mean.
Since January 1st, 2023, donors in the real estate industry have given HOKU's campaign at least $1.5 million.
It seems that they've written the legislation.
How often do we see that?
How often is that theme repeated?
Do you see a Do you see a Pentagon that is unaccountable, that can't pass an audit, that brokers deals with a military-industrial complex?
Do you see a media that houses military-industrial complex-employed pundits to tell you that you should go to war?
Do you see a pharmaceutical industry with a FDA regulatory body that is to a degree, significant degree, at least 50% funded by the companies that it's supposed to be regulating?
Do you see state media that you're funded, that you're funding, that works in cooperation With the government to ensure you only see information that is suitable for them.
Do you increasingly see corporate media funded so extensively for its advertising model or even its ownership model by pharmaceutical interests that they are unable?
To be objective when it comes to public health crises, which are usually used, or at least we now know, are utilised to legitimise centralised authority.
Do you see any of that?
And do you see in a fractal component here with HOCL how the whole paradigm works?
Yes.
Yes, we do.
HOCL's campaign for governor in 2022 was heavily funded by large donations from wealthy donors who provided more than 9.1 million in campaign donations.
But they just did that for kindness, you see, to protect you.
You're the vulnerable pick.
Why won't you let them help you?
Why won't you let them help you?
Why won't you?
This is a sort of a rare moment of respite and joy.
Our recent guest, Tulsi Gabbard, who we saw rather brilliantly talk about lobbying and how the whole lobbying system works.
If you've not seen that interview yet, you should watch it now.
Here she is on The View, calling them out to their faces.
And it's actually quite a joy to watch.
It's actually enjoyable.
Have a look at Tulsi Gabbard turning on The View.
How's The View from there?
Not good!
Some of you have accused me of being a traitor to my country, a Russian asset, a Trojan horse, or a useful idiot, I think was the term that you used.
Which basically means that I'm naive or lack intelligence to know what's going on.
I want to let- I want to let your- Joy's struggling there.
Now, well, hold on.
That's a Russian term.
The Russians- The Russians, they hacked me!
They hacked my mind!
And they made me say that!
Don't confront me!
I don't have any integrity!
Don't confront- I can't actually deal with this!
You see there, whether you agree with Tulsi or not, it's not what's relevant.
You can see this is a person who has dignity and poise and principles.
Learn to recognize it by their fruits, shall you know them.
This is a person that can look inside herself and say, I've got principles, I've got ethics, I've got things that I believe in.
Not these people who are just units of the establishment!
That is the function of legacy media.
It's not even hypocrisy at this point.
If you operate within it, they own you.
They have to own you.
They wouldn't, as Noam Chomsky famously said, if you were a problem to them, you wouldn't be sitting in that chair.
That is the criteria.
If you work there, hey, you're part of the problem.
Viewers know exactly who I am.
Alright.
Set the record straight.
I am a patriot.
I love our country.
I am a strong and intelligent woman of color and I have dedicated almost my entire adult life She's checkmated him there already.
I'm an intelligent woman of color.
Oh no.
Oh no.
Intelligent woman of color but doesn't agree with our neoliberal authoritizing.
Lock them in their homes.
Make them take the medicine.
If you agree with democracy, you can only vote for one person.
The safety, security, and the freedom of all Americans in this country.
It was the attacks on 9-11.
I guess we're getting a little bit far ahead of ourselves, but Franklin Graham finds you
He doesn't find me refreshing.
Oh God, let me out!
Let me out of here!
Richard Spencer, the white nationalist leader, says he could vote for you.
Joy, this is why I'm here.
Now, a white nationalist likes you, and therefore, Ah, hmm, see?
Because you're obviously able to control everything that everyone says all of the time, and you certainly, you know, should be able to prevent people creating narratives that are deliberately designed to break you down because you are a problem.
Carlson, at least ten times.
Why don't you go on Chris Wallace's show?
This is why I'm here, because you and other people continue to spread these innuendos that have nothing to do with who I am.
Well, Hilary Clinton started it, and then you started back at her, boy.
You called her the Queen of Warmongers.
You doubled down.
Unfortunately, you doubled down.
Queen of Warmongers.
That deserved more from the View audience, didn't it?
What I would say about Tulsi Gabbard is that she has dignity and poise.
I'm sure if you were to look in detail and depth at Tulsi Gabbard's various endeavours within congressional politics, you'd be able to find mistakes, because she's a human being.
That's the thing about human beings, is there are mistakes involved.
It's possible that the whole thing's a bloody mistake, actually, I sometimes think.
Look at her in that environment and look at how she deals with that.
And consider, too, how The View might deal with Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton has been offered as a cultural artefact of both redemption and of progress and of intelligence and almost the success of the entire project of democracy, that to not vote for Hillary Clinton would be foolish, would be stupid.
Here's Hillary Clinton.
This isn't a perfect storm.
It's Hillary Clinton on legacy media being presented how they love to convey and portray her as a kind of example of elevated consciousness, of this is democracy working, but it's a role that Hillary Clinton simply cannot play.
Why?
Because Hillary Clinton's past is not a past with the occasional error.
It's a A very curious and extraordinary and pugnacious and bellicose past filled with war, hypocrisy and corruption.
And this, in a sense, is one of the totems of their system that they're still trying to prop up.
They had the opportunity to have a populist leader in the Democrat Party a little while ago in the figure of Bernie Sanders, and they said no way.
Bernie Sanders was built on, or the phenomena of Bernie Sanders was built on his declarative stance on financial corruption, in particular events in 2008 where Barack Obama had a choice to make, financial institutions and elite power, he went with elite power.
Now, let's see how Hillary Clinton plays out in real time.
You're going to love this MSNBC interview with her.
It's a staggering piece of broadcasting in some ways and there's a lot that can be learned when you see my old friend, Micah, offering therapy to Hillary and Hillary's inability to cope with what I would call, and what many people would call, simple banter.
Um, and we're gonna, believe it or not, as we veer into politics right now, it's gonna veer right back to softs, because it's so related.
But I'd like to call the part of this segment, Therapy with Hillary, if I may.
They're all so pleased with themselves on Morning Joe, when they get to have six screens, each with its own individual larvae in it, like larvae in a cell.
Okay, so we got Hillary on, we're gonna do a segment called, Therapy with Hillary.
Now, I don't know if you've ever been to a casino and worked out what the odds are of knowing a significant number of people who take their own lives, but there are questions I'd like... I would like to know exactly what your foundation did in Haiti.
Are these questions coming?
Because she needs another role, therapist.
I know a lot of people ask you this question, so I want to ask you, for our viewers, about not just abortion, which I'll get to in a moment, and women's rights.
We'll get to abortion and women's rights because we know you're well-versed and well-rehearsed on abortion and women's rights and how we should use this to implement all sorts of forms of control.
But about former president Donald Trump.
That bastard!
Let's get him!
Because that's the problem!
Who is in criminal court in New York City.
Criminal!
Criminal court!
Historic!
Historic criminal court!
And nothing else is happening in the world!
There's nothing else happening in the world.
There are not endless wars that you're funding, some of which, all of which, it could be argued are unwinnable.
There's not the possibility for a real and deep reckoning about how the business of politics globally is conducted.
There's no conversation about bringing America together, ending the condemnation and division, and finding ways that people might experience new freedom Simply through decentralization, people being able to run their own communities representatively, affording the possibility that was enshrined in your constitution of various different states undertaking different ways of being American, and people through consensus and liberty and freedom participate in systems of representation in new ways.
These conversations you will not see.
You will see the amplification of terror, The amplification of dread.
The amplification of division.
They have only one card to play and that card is fear.
Fear Donald Trump.
You know what my position is.
I believe the solution is going to come from within you and from places beyond what we're currently discussing within the limited paradigm of materialism, for want of a better phrase.
But what you will not be offered in any conversation on MSNBC is legitimate conversation about the possibility for actual change, the ability therefore to resist the power of the lobbyist class, the donor class, the military-industrial complex, the pharmaceutical industry.
The problem with independent media is you know the language now and you know the problem.
Even if from time to time all of us get caught up in oppositionism and Cultural issues that we know that we should get beyond.
Because we're human and because we're flawed.
What they want is you mired in stupidity.
So fearful, disoriented, so full of bad food and bad pharma that you can't even think straight.
So weary and exhausted from pointless, pointless soul-crushing work that you can't even think your next thought clearly.
Those kind of conversations won't be facilitated on MSNBC.
for this hush money thing.
Meanwhile, the documents case is delayed.
Meanwhile, Georgia, what's going on here?
Everything seems to be delayed and moving down the road.
And there are even those who argue that this Manhattan case is not as big, it's not serious,
and he might get off anyway or not.
And how do people manage their, especially people who really love this democracy?
Who really, really love this democracy.
Really love it.
Love it so much that they're willing to sell it to globalist elites.
Take it seriously.
Who take the words that you just said on our show very seriously.
That you can't just sit back and let democracy come to you.
That this is, every day, something we all must work on together.
What do you say to people when they ask you about the former president, Can I be Micah for a moment?
What do you say, Hillary, when people say that you used the Pied Piper strategy to intentionally cultivate extreme right-wing presidential candidates, hoping to turn them into the new mainstream of the Republican Party in order to try to increase your chance of winning?
What do you say about that?
Was that wise in retrospect?
And also, using campaign funds to back opposition party opponents, doesn't that seem, in essence, wrong?
Also, just the idea of elevating Trump and, as you describe him, other extremists, isn't that morally difficult?
I mean, that's not the shattering the glass ceiling that you've told us is the image that you want us to believe in.
And what about Bernie Sanders?
What about that?
I'll get to that.
These trials and these delays and the fear that they feel about the upcoming election.
Well, Mika, I'm happy to go to therapy with you any- That was a joke from about a hundred years ago, the beginning of the- You said therapy.
Now, I'm happy to go to therapy with you because our entire system is collapsing and we're gonna need some therapy.
Clearly, the pressure and the stress on our system, our country, our constitution, our future is so intense.
For those of us who understand what's at stake... I mean, because I understand what's at stake, you know?
Do you know that...
Hillary Clinton personally approved her campaign's plans in the fall of 2016 to share information with a reporter about uncorroborated alleged server back channels between Donald Trump and a top Russian bank commonly known as Russiagate.
Clinton's campaign created and fueled a successful years-long campaign of media fraud using government connections and press to generate real criminal and counterintelligence investigations of political enemies.
Those are not the kind of stories that should be attached to someone who's presenting themselves as the solution.
I don't mean that in a You know, a derogatory way to... No, I don't mean to be derogatory about ordinary Americans.
I did that before, when I said that they were a basket of deplorables.
No, I mean to say I like and understand, and in fact am, normal Americans, and... but though I'm cleverer than them.
...others, but if you've been in this world, as you and I have, and you've studied it... We've been in this world, you and I, and we've studied it!
Hmm, there it is.
That's the world.
There's the world there.
We're studying the world.
You've watched it.
It is a very difficult time right now.
One of the reasons... One of the reasons it's so difficult, Hillary, is because of the endless wars.
Wars that you supported.
The war in Iraq, Clinton-escalated wars, Green-elect coups, and generally maintained and expanded US power around the globe.
On most foreign policy decisions, including Libya, Clinton was in favor of aggressive action, but got away with hawkish policies by sticking to the language of humanitarian intervention and Liberation.
That's what it is within neoliberalism, that we talk about, oh, black kids are going to get computers somehow, just based on this thing that I'm saying.
Meanwhile, housing deals that were designed to create affordable housing are created by lobbyists from the real estate industry.
That wars are legitimised using the language of humanitarianism.
The game is up.
The jig is over.
They can no longer claim to be the party of care and compassion while supporting endless war around the world.
They know that.
You know that.
And they know that you know that.
Now what's left?
Censorship and the legitimization of censorship.
They know that you're too well informed, that you are keeping up and getting ahead.
I know because I've been on the journey with you.
I remember some years ago when there was a Facebook whistleblower story and I was like, oh, it's good that It's good that a Facebook whistleblower is going to bring down Facebook.
And I remember when we made the content, it was you that said, no, no, no, no, no.
What this is, is they found someone that will step forward so that they can say, hey, what we should do is we should be able to see everyone's addresses who belong to Facebook.
We should be able to surveil and spy on Facebook users.
That was one of the learning curves for us when we realized that wrapped up in the language of care and concern is the politics of control.
and oppression, the politics of war.
That's why whatever you think of Tulsi Gabbard, she's an interesting figure because she has integrity.
There'll be all sorts of issues you don't agree with Tulsi Gabbard on.
Of course there will. That's the way it goes.
But the simple fact is, we better start looking for new alliances
and new ways of moving forward, and new ways of overcoming our own tendency to bigotry or
prejudice or whatever biases we might have that are preventing us
from participating in a movement that is immediately required.
And a movement that doesn't have as its figurehead the tangerine terror that is Trump,
but the rational, logical, feminist in this instance, or so she declares, Hillary Clinton.
Justice delayed is justice denied.
And the people in our country, it looks as though, will most likely go to vote without knowing the outcome of these other very serious trials.
And the one that is going on now, currently in New York, is really about election interference.
It is about trying to prevent the people of our country from having relevant information that may have influenced Here's some relevant information for you.
Clinton was an enthusiastic supporter of Obama's decision to step up the use of drone warfare in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.
During one five-month period of the operation, nearly 90% of people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets.
What about business with the Clinton Foundation, though?
How did the Clinton Foundation become so successful, so valuable, and so effective?
As Secretary of State, Clinton secured defense contracts for companies such as Lockheed Martin, brokered deals to build nuclear plants for Westinghouse, American military contractors who donated to the Clinton Foundation were awarded some $163 billion of arms deals authorized by the Clinton State Department.
You tell me, what do you think's having a more significant impact on the state of the world?
$163 billion worth of armed deals authorized by Clinton State Department or Donald Trump giving some hush money that was meant to be spent on a campaign to Stormzy Daniels?
Remember, I'm not suggesting that anyone other than you should be free.
I'm not telling you who you should vote for or not vote for.
That's none of my business.
It's none of my nation.
The last thing you need is someone with this accent telling you what to do in that country.
But what I can tell you with some clarity, just by reading these numbers, and believe me, there are Other lists connected to Hillary Clinton that are cause for concern is that this is not the solution.
This is in fact a more serious problem.
That's what we've been discussing for a while.
The real terror, the real problem, the real tyranny is not a rebooted, celebrity-fied version of military despotism As experienced in the 20th century, the strongman leader.
No, it is the kind of insidious and insipid bureaucratic tyranny explored by Huxley, illustrated by Orwell, alluded to by Kafka.
You won't really know where the power is.
Everyone's so Boring!
And so tedious!
And so dull!
And so trite!
And so forgettable!
And so ignorable!
And somehow, like parasites, they seep into your life.
And through organisations like the WHO, they can control your country.
And through organisations like NATO, they can march your children to war.
And through organisations like the FDA, they can ensure that bad drugs make it to the marketplace.
And through big food, they will ensure that you are poisoned.
And through constant materialism and commodification and reductivism, they'll make sure that it's impossible for you to realise that there is something more to your life.
There is something more to your spirit.
There is something more to your soul.
And they will never, ever let you see it because you'll be caught in fear and rage and desire.
And how do I know?
Because I've been there.
And on a bad day, I'm there still.
But together, I believe that we can transcend it.
I believe it's possible through open heartedness, through willingness, through a willingness to transform and change ourselves and be kind to one another to change the world.
And my only worry now is that that speech is possibly out of Rocky IV.
Is that from Rocky?
Was that Rocky IV that said that first of all?
It was either Rocky IV or Hillary Rodham.
Help me through your foundation, Clinton.
Please, can I have an arms deal now?
How they could have voted in 2016 or whether they would have voted.
I think that the defendant, the former president, knew exactly what he was doing when he went to such great lengths to try to squash, bury, kill stories, pay off people, because he understood the electoral significance of them.
I think that this is not, though, about the past, because the other cases are about election interference.
And he's practically promised us, if you listen to him at his rallies, you read his interview with Time magazine, that if he doesn't like the way the election turns out, he's going to do something again to try to prevent the lawful winner from taking office.
lawful winner from taking office because of course when Trump won we were all
about well well done let's just make this work we didn't go into a whooping
hysteria about Russiagate that I started I was Secretary of State traveling
around the world on behalf of our country trying to persuade leaders to
believe in democracy to believe in the peaceful transfer of power to accept
election results after appropriate challenges were made and you know Trump
had all the time in the world to make those challenges and he was shut down by
courts he was denied by Republican as well as Democratic election officials
because there was no evidence This is all about power.
How to get it, how to keep it, how not to give it up.
Oh my god, oh my god, she's actually describing it.
You only need to do a cursory glance of the actions of the Clinton Foundation in Haiti to know how they run their operations.
You only need to look at the funding they've received in their relationship with George Soros.
to know that there are deep investigations that are available to you.
You only need to reflect for a moment on the true origins of the Ukraine-Russia conflict,
or at least the recent incarnation of it, and the Maiden Coup in 2014,
and the CIA bases in Ukraine to recognise that the real power to fear
is military-industrial complex power enacted in order only to maintain
an ongoing economy of war that benefits the very interests that Hillary Clinton truly represents,
while claiming that this is all for plucky little girls growing up dreaming of being president one day.
What an astonishing gambit.
What an astonishing rhetoric to deploy.
What an incredible figure.
I wonder What's going on, man?
If this is what we know, if this is what we can piece together by just using information available to us now, I wonder if there is a deeper truth that's even more nefarious.
That is so opposite of everything we believe or should believe in our country about how we are a nation of law.
Micah and Morning Joe just smile.
Micah just like, this is right.
And Morning Joe like, hmm.
What's the name of the show again?
Morning Angel.
And why the fuck am I not awake?
So just on the $163 billion worth of arms deals that were authorised by the Clinton State Department, governments seeking to buy arms got the same preferential treatment if they sent money the foundation's way, no matter their human rights record.
Clinton's department authorised $151 billion in Pentagon broker deals for 16 of the countries that gave to the Clinton Foundation.
It's pretty extraordinary.
Not of men and they are men who try to put themselves above the law, try to hang on to power.
The other point I would quickly make is that The Supreme Court is doing our country a grave disservice in not deciding the case about immunity.
I read the excellent decision by the Court of Appeals, and the judges there, I think, covered every possible argument.
Again, they are masters on legacy media and in the ordinary political paradigm of ensuring that your attention is maintained in a state of irrelevance, on issues of irrelevance.
Isn't it more rewarding to learn that a CIA carve-out funded the PhD of Larry Page and Sergey Brin?
Isn't it interesting to know that CIA spy satellite technology was utilised in order to give Google the head start when it came to Google Maps?
Isn't it becoming clear now that there is an ulterior power being directed by these interests and all the while we, Through organisations like MSNBC, and you have to say Fox News, the legacy media, regard the forthcoming election as a kind of sports competition, as my team versus your team.
But a far more significant conflict is what are the sets of interests that are able to avoid, negate and obfuscate whatever the outcome of that election is.
When Hillary Clinton says no matter the outcome of the election, Donald Trump will claim victory, Same is true in reverse.
This is extraordinary.
This is an extraordinary set of claims.
And I would say that the greater fear is now clear.
It is a kind of technological dictatorship, not a militaristic, celebratified version, 2024 style.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
So much to talk about.
We've got a lot more to cover, but we'll cover it tomorrow.
We've got all sorts of stuff about the UN finding new ways out.
Before we go, I'm going to show you one more funny thing.
But before we watch that, let's have a look at the one of our partners is going to help you organize and deal with your debt.
Let's have a look at that now.
Debt causes stress.
I've been in debt in my life and it's very stressful.
I recognise that.
PDS Debt has customised options for anyone struggling with credit cards, personal loans, collections or medical bills.
PDS Debt provides options that consolidate your debts into one low monthly payment.
I wonder if my life would have been easier had I had access to PDS Debt.
PDS Debt is a top-rated company on Google with an A-plus rating on the BBV.
I imagine that it might be a good solution to consolidate debts rather than having diffuse, confusing debts.
PDS Debt cares about helping you get out of debt.
Check out reviews, see how many mention PDS Debt employees by name.
It's incredible.
Get free debt analysis right now at pdsdebt.com slash brand.
It only takes 30 seconds.
That's pdsdebt.com slash brand.
pdsdebt.com slash brand.
Apple have accidentally made an advert where they make it clear that what big tech is actually doing is destroying culture.
I don't know who designed this advert, but someone should explain to them that's not a good image system showing people literally the function of this Goliath international nightmare of an organisation whose products we simply cannot ignore.
Let's have a look.
Uh...
Sometimes when I'm down and all alone...
Oh...
Do a focus group, because some people like me would say, no, no, no, don't, don't show, don't show a terrible, evil, unstoppable machine crushing all culture, starting with a beloved trumpet as the way to get people to like your product, because most people will see that and go, that is what Apple are doing.
They are destroying everything.
That's your brain.
That's your consciousness.
That's your freedom.
Why don't you wear this watch?
Why don't you give us all of your data?
Why don't you shut your mouth?
We don't care.
We'll say we care about what the Uyghurs are doing.
shut your mouth.
That is the commercial that you would make if you're saying right let's demonstrate what big
tech are doing visually and vividly so people wake up and understand that technology could be
an incredible useful tool if it wasn't a subset of corrupt systems of power that bypass national
sovereignty and let's face it seldom pay their taxes.
Precious works of art.
Rodin, Van Gogh, they're all going.
There's Nelson Mandela, Gandhi.
Crush them!
Fuck em!
So as the fall of spring all the- Thank you, little thing!
There's your children, there's your sperm, there's your future, there's agriculture.
It's all being crushed down.
We're going to own all of the data.
We're basically going to own you.
We're going to upload your consciousness to some kind of disc.
We're gods now, and if you try to defy us, we'll fucking crush you.
Literature, that's going, art, the whole thing.
Smiling faces and fun. They're going Blast it away in some glorious fart of power
It's what Steve Jobs would have wanted.
The most powerful iPad ever is also the thinnest.
It's worth it though, because it's thin.
It's thin.
You could eat cheese off that fucking thing.
Look how thin it is.
What?
Thin?
That's not... Is that what you're offering us?
Yeah, we've killed God and we've killed Beethoven, but you've got thin now.
What?
Thin?
Yeah, thin.
Things, they're not as thick as they once were.
They're thin, yeah?
Thin.
Yeah, what's thin is the set of values that are left that could potentially save us.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the comments in the chat.
Listen guys, consider becoming an Awakened one day.
You can try it for one month.
You can cancel at any time.
We do an additional video this week.
We're looking at Antarctica.
Oh, damn it.
You know, that bit that's not the North Pole.
Antarctica.
Conspiracies.
We're also communicating with some incredible guests.
We had Dave Martin on earlier.
Do you know Dave Martin yet?
He's another person who'll tell you the grim, vivid history of the WHO and how the League of Nations was set up to regulate the opium trade.
He's Educated!
And it's the kind of education that's going to benefit you.
We do additional content.
We do hookups and meetups and all sorts of stuff.
We have a book club where we talk about Christianity.
By God, it went to work on me.
I'm a changed man, I tells you.
Join us.
Become a part of our movement.
Thank you so much for your support today.
We love you.
We'll post the link in the description to that.
I love you.
Stay free.
Until tomorrow.
Switch on, switch off, do you wanna switch it?
Switch on, switch off, switch it.
▲
Export Selection