Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 17, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:07:37

WARNING: US Approves Israel STRIKES Against Iran! - Stay Free #347

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I'm going to go ahead and get the camera.
	In this video, you're going to see the future.
	Awakening Wonders, thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	As we address escalating Armageddon, the inability to approach conflict from a spiritual perspective, and what lessons might be learned were we able to, and how your tax dollars are funding global conflict that profit your lawmakers, that's if you're American, Whereas if you're British, like me, your country is run by giddy idealists who think of nothing but peace, who want to bring about utopia here for all of God's children.
	We're talking about Trump's trial.
	Is it a distraction?
	As has been asked here in our chat, will future generations think that trumped up charges is a phrase that began here?
	That's not something I can take credit for.
	an interesting piece of punnery right there from one of our awakened wonders like Jude Syke and
	Kellyanne Kach and all those that support our work and get in return an additional piece of content
	every single week as well as joining us for exclusive and fantastic conversations. I want
	to say hello to all of you in the Rumble chat like Ryan Borden that hat color combo looks amazing
	Russell thanks very much.
	That's just such a lovely compliment.
	If you're watching us now on YouTube, we'll be available with you for the first 15 minutes.
	I want you to use the code ISURRENDER.
	We're posting a link right now.
	Join us.
	Become an awakened wonder.
	Get marching with us while you can.
	For surely the agenda is becoming increasingly clear.
	A globalist, corporatist plot?
	Do you want to use the word plot?
	Do you like that in a V for V for Vendetta type way?
	Two, enslave you mentally to create mental environments of fear and compliance that we lose our vital vim.
	Remember your ancestors.
	Remember that through the umbilical chain, through your grandmother and grandfather, you reach back to glory and your feet are touching the ground and your very head is in the sky and you breathe the air of glory.
	Your spirit grow and roar by surrendering the ego that they've tethered to their systems.
	We'll cover a little bit of, you know, normal news, all the sort of silliness that's going on in our crazy, tragic, beautiful, and yet may become free world before jumping into the stories that I've told you about already.
	Did you remember that in the good old days, baby, the deserts used to be places that were defined almost by definition by dryness?
	Arid conditions.
	Not now, the world's gone all unusual.
	Is it a simple story?
	Because you know when that, I tell you what, when that bridge in Baltimore got hit by a boat and people were saying this ain't right, I was like even me, even me, a man whose mind is so open that my brain could roll out but roll right back in again after gathering vital data.
	I said no.
	That can't be a conspiracy theory.
	Who benefits from it?
	Who benefits from it?
	But now people are starting to say, well, it seems dodgy.
	It don't seem legit.
	Dodgy is a British colloquialism.
	It means bogus or something like that.
	You tell me a better one in the chat.
	Let's have a look what's going on in Dubai.
	Why is it flooding?
	Officially an apocalyptic image, the image of a flooded desert.
	Is it?
	Does that qualify?
	Did that happen in the Pentateuch?
	Is that like some old school, wasn't it?
	Locusts!
	What's gonna happen next?
	And is it in any way connected ...to this.
	Dubai grinds to a standstill as cloud seeding worsens the flood.
	So at least it's... I always wonder when people say like that chemtrails is an out-and-out conspiracy theory.
	Tell me, do you think chemtrails, conspiracy theory, C, or conspiracy fact, F?
	C for conspiracy, F for fact.
	You know, but cloud seeding is a real thing and is acknowledged.
	The heavy rains that caused widespread flooding Across the desert nation came after cloud seeding.
	The UAE has been carrying out seeding operations since 2002.
	It's common practice to address water security issues even though the lack of drainage in many areas can trigger flooding.
	Dubai's media office on Tuesday dubbed the downpours rains of goodness.
	They span it despite flooded houses and overflowing swimming pools.
	Overflowing swimming pools I suppose is a You think it's a fact, most of you in the rumble chat.
	I suppose, like, overflowing swimming pools, it's not a problem that's gonna elicit too much sympathy.
	Are you okay?
	It's just my swimming pool!
	Help me!
	It's overflowing!
	My cup runneth over!
	How can I swim in that?
	How can I swim in that?
	The good news, though, is NATO's war, via the vassal state of Ukraine that they're claiming to help but ultimately bankrupt in and brokering brilliant deals for BlackRock, is going fantastically well.
	Russia is doing great, and also their army's stronger than ever.
	Brilliant.
	And in another semi-apocalyptic image, this is happening now.
	An elephant escaped from the circus in Montana.
	The elephant's name's Viola.
	She brought traffic to a screeching halt.
	The handler chasing her through the streets.
	Oh my god!
	Nothing more embarrassing than being reduced to chasing an elephant through the streets.
	Like, you can't protect... Like, I don't like it if your hat blows off.
	It's embarrassing, innit?
	Oh no!
	My hat!
	My hat!
	But when you're an elephant...
	It's just loose.
	You can no longer be called an efficient zookeeper.
	I say revoke his license.
	Mark Zuckerberg, the man who, at school, as I understand from that film The Social Network, invented a little old thing called Facebook, and then a little old thing called Meta, and then a little old thing called looking a bit like... I don't know, he looks...
	I don't judge people by their appearance.
	We're better than that, aren't we?
	We're children of the Lord.
	We're willing to love everyone.
	I was just going to say he's a bit pale and veal calf and stuff like that.
	It doesn't matter.
	It's not relevant.
	Let's have a look at why some people think he might have a little too much AI up his A-H.
	But it is going to bother you, because you're human.
	And I was human.
	I am human, still.
	Sorry, no, what did I say?
	I am human.
	I continue to be human.
	And, oh yeah, Joe Biden, they say, don't they, or at least our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ says that a prophet is never appreciated in his hometown.
	That's why when I go back to Gray's in Essex, The normal town where I grew up, so much as I did grow up, I'm largely ignored.
	And Joe Biden, when he goes back to Scranton out of the office, which seems mad to me and I still can't really make sense of, because I didn't know that it was real and all sorts of stuff like that, but then I'm not American, he ain't greeted like Palm Sunday or nothing.
	He's largely ignored.
	Biden, you ain't no Jesus!
	Oh, like there's no one showing up for that.
	No one's showing up for that.
	Here he is trying to remember the name of the place.
	My grandfather would tell me when I walked out the door in North Washington Avenue in Scranton.
	Look, actually, that's it.
	We're on a ban.
	We're not going to tease him anymore.
	He's trying his best.
	He's got dementia.
	In fact, in our conversation earlier with Dr. Nels, he's written a fantastic book.
	I wish I had a copy of it as a matter of fact.
	Dr. Nels tells us how our mental and neurological environment has been groomed and conditioned to make us compliant for some time now.
	You will love it.
	He is an electrician who earns his money just by looking like Jeff Bezos now.
	Let's have a look.
	He does look like him.
	That's good.
	But would you pay money just for someone to look like Jeff Bezos?
	I'm not sure that I would.
	We've got a brilliant investigation, here's the news, a little later, where we look at the Trump trial and the implausibility and impossibility of finding an impartial and unbiased participant When we live in an immersive hyperbolic environment of constant propaganda.
	It's a brilliant investigation and I think you'll love it.
	And we're also going to show you how war is a scam that you fund and the very people that vote on whether or not to fund further wars literally profit from the wars that they're voting to fund in any other line of work.
	That will be considered a scam, but because these people have been, I don't know, voted for, I don't know how it works, I'm actually beginning to wonder if we, unless we start organising pretty swiftly, I don't know how we're going to oppose these loonies.
	Hey, so I mentioned it before, that bridge in Baltimore I was one of the people who was somewhat sceptical when people said, hmm, something don't look right about this, the way it turns on a right angle, the lights flashing on and off.
	I kept saying, yeah, but who's benefiting from this?
	Who's benefiting from this?
	I still don't fully understand who's benefiting from smashing down that bridge.
	But, you know, why would I know?
	Can you let me know in the chat, please?
	I'm trying to work this out as I go along.
	And that's, you know, what better way to do it?
	We must remain Plastic.
	I don't mean in the sense of fake, I mean mobile.
	We must maintain the ability to be spontaneous.
	We have to do it.
	A lot of people talking about my attire right now, like Frank Daniel, love the Starsky and Hutch sweater.
	A lot of people like the old titfer, which is a British word for hat.
	Let's have a look at that bridge, because the FBI is now open to criminal investigation into the Francis Scott Key bridge collapse.
	Let's have a look.
	We learned today that the FBI opened a criminal investigation and boarded the cargo ship that crashed into Baltimore's Francis Scott Key Bridge last month.
	Six construction workers were killed when the bridge collapsed.
	The body of a fourth worker was recovered from a sunken vehicle on Sunday.
	The FBI isn't discussing the scope of its investigation, but a source tells the Associated Press the ship apparently had electrical problems before it left port, but took off anyway.
	Hmm, I'm sorry to learn of the tragic loss of life of those workers and may God rest their eternal souls.
	This is the book I was talking about a moment ago, written by a friend of the show now, Dr. Nells, Indoctrinated Brain, who shows that how by introducing toxicity and denying nutrition and by certain behavioral experiments, we have been groomed into little more than sheep.
	And I don't mean in a Christian way, like that's a good thing to be.
	I mean, in a kind of, we've become a little too Docile.
	Elastic, says True Chimera.
	Yeah, elastic is a better word than plastic there.
	You're right.
	Thanks for the correction.
	Although, I am a bit hurt by that because, you know, I'm sensitive and everything.
	Okay, so the good thing about Pfizer, there's a long, long list of Of Pfizer.
	How much of the rants donations make it to you and your staff?
	Don't worry, we're doing all right here, 3NAG.
	We're doing good.
	We're doing good.
	The money that we make from the merch, we use to pay for people to go into treatment centres.
	Right now, there are people in treatment centres that are there because you might say, I like, gonna get me, what do we call that colour again?
	There's 25% off this one at the moment.
	25% off this one at the moment.
	They've got really nice colours like Blush and Dickie Dirt.
	Dickie Dirt Green or something like that.
	This is Dickie Dirt Green and this is A-Pipe Pink.
	These are some of the greatest swag bags that the Lord can ever provide and any profits that we make we utilise to help junkies and mentally ill people.
	Get back to normal, if normal is where you want to get back to.
	Now Pfizer, who you'd be mad not to love, remember people got all tattoos and that, it's like they couldn't get enough needles.
	Get the jab, now have loads of jab and have their logos adorning you perpetually.
	Pfizer, They didn't pay no tax in 2023.
	Why is that?
	Well, corporate tax.
	They may have paid some tax.
	This is some reporting from Jacobin which, curiously enough, is a left-wing outlet for those of us that are still bound by old taxonomies.
	Old taxonomies of left and right.
	In our new movement, we are determined, determined to grow.
	Rooster Dink Pink.
	Nice one, Donkey Stink.
	Yeah, that's Rooster Dink's pink.
	I love it.
	I love this.
	You guys, you're so clever, you're so beautiful, you're so glorious.
	Okay, so let's analyze this piece of reporting from Jacobin about the tax dodgery and skullduggery of Pfizer, you know, remember, if you try and dodge your taxes or think, say you were like, I don't want to fund this no more.
	I no longer believe that my taxes are being correctly spent.
	You might win in a minute when we start telling you how your tax dollars are going not only to the Pentagon, who, you know, can't pass an audit if they try, but primarily to the military industrial complex.
	And it isn't helping service personnel.
	Let me know in the chat if you are a serving service person or if you are a veteran and you will know that true patriots now No longer trust their government.
	True patriots now are radicals.
	To love your country is to loathe your government.
	To love your country is to oppose your government.
	The days of compliance are over, baby.
	These are the days of awakening.
	Why?
	Because we can't trust the corporatist globalists and we have to awaken together right now.
	Because of stories like this one, excellently reported in Jacobin, how Pfizer completely dodged the corporate income tax.
	While jacking up drug prices, Pfizer recently reported more than $27 billion in revenue from its U.S.
	sales in 2023.
	But the big pharma titan owes nothing in federal income taxes, despite being one of the most profitable pharmaceutical companies in the world.
	That's largely thanks to existing loopholes and a 2017 tax law signed by former President Donald Trump.
	What do you guys Think about that.
	Does that cause you some reflux?
	Does it cause you to query your allegiance?
	There's no question that the current trial is... Well, there is a question.
	Is the current trial a distraction?
	Is it a distraction, D, or is it justice?
	Justice!
	To cite the brilliant day today.
	Pfizer's tax dodge illustrates how those corporations, in particular pharmaceutical and tech giants, are able to enjoy astonishingly low tax rates by using a system of lucrative tax loopholes.
	While legislation to halt such tax schemes is stalled in Congress, corporate giants often stash intellectual property rights for their drugs and other products in offshore tax havens and force their US-based operations to buy the rights to manufacture and sell those drugs and products here in the United States.
	Yep, it's...
	It's a distraction.
	It's a distraction.
	I sometimes wonder how they coordinate it.
	Do you, nerd far away?
	Do you, lovable rogue?
	Yes, down with this sort of thing indeed, baby.
	Before we leave you on YouTube, sometimes we have to tell you stories that might seem initially quite puerile or odd.
	Not puerile, but Difficult to even believe.
	Nestle, the food giant, are putting sugar in infant milk sold in poorer countries.
	And I know that you lot like to get our infant formula over here because a lot of your infant formula's got weird stuff in it, hasn't it?
	Nestle, the world's largest consumer goods company, adds sugar and honey to infant milk and cereal products sold in many poorer countries, contrary to international guidelines aimed at preventing obesity and chronic diseases.
	Why is that?
	Do they benefit somehow from people being obese and chronically ill?
	Let me know in the chat.
	Obesity is increasingly a problem in low and middle income countries in Africa, which is a continent, of course.
	The number of overweight children under five has increased by nearly 23% since 2000.
	I wonder why.
	Globally, more than a billion people are living with obesity.
	They're living with obesity.
	They're living with it.
	They're with it in their lives.
	That's what they live with.
	Okay guys, now this is my suggestion to you.
	For one month we are giving you the opportunity to have a month of our Awaken Wonder content for free.
	Use the code ISURRENDER and you can join us every single week for live interviews like the one we just had with the brilliant Dr. Nels who will help you understand how on a microbiotic and macrobiotic level you are being conditioned and controlled.
	We have a live book We also meditate together every single week and provide exclusive videos.
	and later on in the show today we are going to be discussing how Christian values or perhaps spiritual values
	more broadly need to be deployed in geopolitics or we are all going to be destroyed. I want
	to hear your opinion on that.
	We also meditate together every single week and provide exclusive videos. This week is one on
	5G, Wi-Fi and I suppose electric magnetic fields.
	You're going to love it.
	You are going to love it.
	So join us if you can.
	We're going to leave you now.
	If you're watching us on YouTube, when we come back, start the counter, when we come back, we'll be talking about the Trump trial and the way that it's being used to distract you.
	And this is my favorite story today.
	Not because of the content, but because of our approach to it, is how you are funding global wars.
	So it's costing you money, and we're going to tell you how much money it's going to blow your mind, and your lawmakers are profiting from it!
	Does this not appall you?
	Does this not make you want to rise up?
	If you're watching us on YouTube right now, click the link in the description.
	Come on over!
	Join us!
	Join the conversation!
	See you in a few seconds!
	Here we are then.
	We asked you a little earlier what you thought about escalating tensions in that region and this is what you told us.
	Obviously we are responding to the US green light for Israel's response to the recent Iranian drone attack and we asked you quite plainly where will this lead?
	World peace?
	A solution to conflict?
	And a surprising number of you said world events are none of my business which astonishes me.
	Because it is your business.
	You're paying for this business.
	It couldn't be any more your business.
	In fact, I'm now going to tell you the story of how your tax dollars are funding the business of war and your lawmakers are profiting from it.
	Obviously we'll do that in the framework of ongoing events and escalations in the Middle East.
	The Israel war cabinet has decided to hit back forcefully at Iran.
	I don't think many of us are surprised by that course of action when Iran sent that missive saying we consider the matter closed.
	It seemed like an opportunity, but it's hardly surprising that a nation would say, no, we want the right to hit back.
	Now for a moment, pause and reflect on the ethics and values of war, retaliation and revenge.
	And remember, you are a person.
	It is your business.
	Remember, I mean, it's literally your business because you are at work, working in a significant amount of of your labor and your labor dollars are going to fund these various wars which have to be looked at collectively because they're funded collectively and pretty soon your Congress is going to be voting to continue to fund them collectively.
	Let's start by just by covering the fact that Israel of course have decided to hit back forcefully.
	Channel 12 claims the war cabinet has made the decision to hit back clearly and forcefully against Iran for its missile and drone attack on Saturday night.
	The response will be designed to send the message that Israel Israel will not allow an attack of that magnitude against it to pass without a reaction.
	The report says the response will also be designed to make it plain that Israel will not allow the Iranians to establish the equation that they have sought to assert in recent days.
	This appears to be a reference to Iran's warning that future Israeli strikes on Iranian territory, including its international diplomatic premises, will henceforth again be met by Iranian retaliatory strikes on Israel.
	It's a tale as old as time in this Biblical, region, redolent, with phrases, language and place names that all evoke ideas of enlightenment and real progress.
	I don't mean progressivism in terms of ongoing technology will provide our kind with a solution.
	No!
	The very spiritual progression that is being demanded of us.
	Have you noted any stories in the news of late that show us that a spiritual paradigm might be preferable to a materialistic post-enlightenment rationalistic perspective that likely will lead us to more militarism?
	This is hardly a novel argument by me.
	It was one that was first advanced by the Dadaists who formed their movement In response to the horrors of the First World War, with the edict, if rationalism leads us to this monumental slaughter, then let us abandon the rational.
	Now, this being a time of the rise of cultural devotion, it created an artistic movement, Dadaism, but perhaps the significant point about Surrealism and Dadaism is that it is beyond reason, deliberately, and isn't that true, too, of spirituality?
	Don't we transcend beyond?
	Reason.
	When we pursue enlightenment and pursue the matters of the spirit, when we pursue values beyond materialism, aren't we trying to transcend the landlocked gridlock of human earthbound territorial morality and mentality?
	By feeding our virtues and pursuing heavenly principles.
	That's something for you to ponder as we consider the perspective that's being currently pursued.
	Now, note this military general in the Israeli army.
	Note what he's standing directly in front of and you will note already that the US has green-lit Israel's response.
	That means that US, the United States, your nation, are not going to use their might, freight and power to bring about peace.
	But to legitimize further war, how do you stand on that subject?
	Let me know.
	Let's have a look first of all at the current perspective and Israeli vow to retaliate after this attack.
	Now to Israel vowing to respond after Iran's attack over the weekend.
	Matt Gutman is in Israel with the latest.
	Good morning, Matt.
	Hey, good morning, Michael.
	We are in southern Israel at a military base, and what you're seeing here is part of one of the 130 ballistic missiles fired by Iran at Israel.
	You can see shrapnel here.
	It was knocked out of the sky by one of those Arrow anti-missiles.
	This is just a section of it.
	Just the fuel tank up here would have been the warhead.
	800 pounds of high explosives.
	An Israeli official telling me their anti-missile shield worked perfectly, but it was also a matter You see this as editorialising and ask yourself this question, have you seen legacy media reporting from inside Gaza?
	And do you consider all life to be of equal value or do you consider some human life to be expendable and other human life to be sacred?
	And have you considered Foucault's position that real power is the power to kill?
	Who do you get to kill and who gets to kill?
	At the moment you know that your state, my state, they hold power over us.
	They implement the law and all law is undergirded by violence, even as we have discussed before, seemingly tertiary laws like traffic violations.
	If you do not abide, if you do not obey, if you become disobedient, if you become awakened, if you become sovereign, you eventually will become, at least in their eyes, a criminal.
	Let's have a look at how this story is conveyed and relayed.
	And in the back of your mind, I want you to hold this question.
	How is this being funded?
	How is this being funded?
	How is this being perpetuated and who benefits?
	Of luck that one of these didn't hit a population center, killing dozens and possibly triggering a regional war.
	The Middle East on edge this morning with Iran vowing a massive response to the slightest action from Israel, as Israel vows to retaliate for that rain of missiles.
	We are closely assessing the situation.
	We remain at our highest level of readiness.
	Just in the Demimonde light of the background of this military official, you can make out the silhouette of an F-35 jet.
	Now, let me know in the chat who you think makes the F-35 jet.
	Is it Lockheed Martin?
	Is it Northrop Grumman?
	And how much each year do they receive in your tax dollars?
	Iran will face the consequences for its actions.
	We will choose our response accordingly.
	The IDF remains ready to counter any threat from Iran and its terror proxies as we continue our mission to defend the State of Israel.
	Now, of course, you can understand perhaps a person who is a national military official having a very clear and deliberate perspective when it comes to matters.
	Marshall, even as he is draped across the hood of an F-35, though it were a calendar girl across a Harley Davidson.
	Those of you that said Lockheed Martin, you are Absolutely right.
	Now would you like US military might to be used to bring about peace or to perpetuate further war?
	Let's go straight away now to John Kirby to see exactly what pose will be taken by the United States.
	Is the administration presenting alternatives to Netanyahu?
	This is an Israeli decision to make.
	Whether and how they'll respond to what Iran did on Saturday and we're going to leave it squarely with them.
	We are not involved in their decision-making process about a potential response.
	We're not involved in their decision-making process, but do you think it's possible that decisions that are being made might be impacted by economic conditions, availability of artillery and military hardware?
	Let me know how you feel about that.
	Indeed, let's consider for a moment where the literal hard cash comes from.
	How are U.S.
	tax dollars being spent?
	This is from Truthout.
	For 2023, the average taxpayer, that's U.S.
	taxpayer in this instance, will have contributed $5,109 to militarism and its support systems, including war and the military, homeland security, federal law enforcement, and veteran programs.
	Now, none but the most hard-hearted among us would deny veterans and brave service personnel They're due.
	They should be supported.
	Those that are willing to put their lives on the line.
	Those that are willing to stand up and fight.
	True patriots ought be supported.
	But are you aware of how many former military personnel take their own lives each day?
	It's a staggering statistic.
	Are you aware of how many active military personnel live in Penury?
	Are you aware of how many former military personnel adorn the streets of your great American cities?
	Are you aware of the crime that's being practiced upon your bravest and boldest even now?
	Are you aware that without us they are truly lost and without them we are truly lost and unless we have unity of purpose between the people and the military we will never be able to oppose the corruption that we will continue to describe right now where it matters, maybe not your heart.
	Maybe not your soul.
	Maybe your pocket.
	You tell me what's most important.
	Let's get into it.
	The biggest portion of that tax bill is for the Pentagon itself.
	Well, at least they can pass audits on demand at $2,974 per person, per year, per taxpayer.
	That's right.
	So just think about, you know better than I do, how long do you have to work for To get $2,974.
	I was going to say sort of like after tax, but of course it is the tax.
	You could pay none and keep it and decide for yourselves how to spend it in a decentralized, truly representative political system.
	If only people would start putting forward manifestos that Focus on true transition, true reform, true change.
	More than half of that $1,748 goes to corporate contractors that benefit from US militarism.
	That's more than the average monthly rent in the United States.
	Isn't that astonishing?
	The average taxpayer gives more to the single largest Pentagon contractor, Lockheed Martin.
	But have you seen their F-35s lately?
	Did you see how beautiful they looked in the half-light?
	I could almost imagine Maverick himself.
	Zipping up his suit and marching over there.
	As long as Maverick hasn't got post-traumatic stress disorder from fighting in these unpopular wars.
	As long as Maverick ain't still grieving because Iceman set himself on fire in protest of these unjust, unwinnable global wars.
	Then you can imagine him just strolling over that.
	I feel the need, the need for speed and possibly for the Pentagon to pass an audit.
	That would be nice as well.
	The average taxpayer gives more money to the largest single Pentagon contractor, Lockheed Martin, $249, than to child tax credit.
	You tell me what you value more highly, children or Lockheed Martin?
	They continue to profit from inflated Pentagon spending with nine billion dollars in dividends to shareholders and stock buybacks in 2023.
	Now that will be okay as long as stock buybacks isn't a practice that is deployed by corporate entities to artificially inflate the value of their stock, practiced by pharmaceutical giants, military industrial complex giants, enabling them to donate to all political parties.
	Perhaps one might argue Capturing their intentions and setting their agenda.
	That would be great as long as there aren't people in your Congress right now earning money on a war that they will vote to fund.
	Let me know who you think is going to be the Top three lawmakers that have got money tied up in stocks and shares for Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Boeing.
	Familiarize yourself with their names, but baby, don't be getting on their planes.
	I pity the fool that gets themselves up on a Boeing because it seems that they put their doors on now with like sort of Pritt Stick, Blu Tack.
	Do you have those brands over there?
	What do you use?
	What kind of gum do you have?
	Tic Tac, Blu Tack.
	Yeah, Nancy Pelosi, Frank Dick.
	You're on it, baby.
	You're on it.
	So, likewise, the average taxpayer gives more for Pentagon contracts with Boeing, that's $87, that's you're paying for those crazy doors, than for the Federal Aviation Administration, that's the body that's meant to regulate them and take care of their safety.
	How Do you feel about that?
	Is it still none of your business?
	Seems to me that it is your business.
	Literally your business.
	Your life, your time.
	Every time I'm working, I think this is time I could be with my two daughters and my son.
	And I resent that my money is going towards funding wars that I disagree with.
	Do you believe you're being protected?
	Or do you believe you're being controlled?
	Let me know in the chat.
	P for protected, C for controlled.
	Let me know right now.
	Let's have a look at this a little more deeply.
	Boeing has had a string of safety failures on its commercial flights in the last few years, from planes crashing to coming apart mid-air.
	Aviation experts and whistleblowers have exposed ways that Boeing repeatedly chose profit over safety.
	Astonishing!
	Almost as if there's an institutional problem.
	We are seeing a whole lot of C's in the rumble stream and in the awaken stream.
	I see you, Chico Kid, Steve One, Sir Fewer.
	Negligent banana.
	Dan Crenshaw is controlled opposition.
	Well, yeah, if you've got the corroborating evidence, we will convey it.
	That's what I've learned from Whitney Webb.
	You've got to corroborate if you're gonna march forward.
	Other choices that fund militarism and control instead of humane solutions are just as striking.
	The average taxpayer contributed more for federal prisons, $32.29, than for mental health and substance use programs, $31.
	And four, mental health and substance use programs, $31.
	So your mental wellness at a time in the post pandemic era,
	where mental health and addiction are reaching true pandemic proportions,
	there are not available funds to support us.
	I'm not suggesting centralized power and the ability of the federal state to tax you.
	I'm suggesting the opposite.
	Minimal ability for the government to intervene.
	Maximal representative democracy.
	Maximum individual sovereignty.
	What's wrong with that?
	What's wrong with that?
	Given that the vast majority of incarcerated people are not in federal prisons but in state and local and jails, prisons and jails, the disparity is actually much wider than that.
	Still the comparison shows that decision makers see nothing wrong with imprisoning people with mental illness and substance use disorders rather than providing treatment.
	Now when you see an analytic like that, that's information.
	It shows you.
	It's a litmus test.
	It shows you the morality of your nation.
	It shows you the true principles.
	Forget the flags.
	Forget the speeches.
	Look at the numbers.
	Look at the numbers.
	And of course, there's the cost of war.
	Since the beginning of the century, the United States has almost always either been at war or has been providing major support to someone else's war.
	The average taxpayer will have contributed $112 to foreign militaries in 2023.
	So you're funding armies in other nations!
	Other nations!
	Let's hope that none of them change their mind, as has happened, well, I don't know, a whole bunch of times.
	I'm sure you guys saw this from Candace Owens the other day, talking about the ongoing war.
	Man, this war propaganda just ain't hitting the same.
	I'm frankly tired of being an economic slave colony to pre-planned wars.
	My tax dollars somehow also my tax dollars.
	Seems extraordinary, Is it possible there could be a better way?
	Not without an informed population, but how are you going to have an informed population when the legacy media essentially acts as an amplification unit for the intentions of the state?
	The New York Times might like to posture and pose Under the auspices of true journalistic integrity, but you know their best journalists are out the door now.
	It ain't all the news that's fit to print.
	It's all the news that suits the powerful.
	Hey, where's that?
	Oh yeah, we're going to show you.
	Oh man, I can't wait to show you in a minute.
	After I've shown you how the legacy media create the conditions for this type of control to stop you rising up and opposing this corruption, we'll show you every single US politician whose stock portfolio will benefit from ongoing conflict, thanks to the brilliant work of Unusual Wells.
	You'll know their work from X, I'm sure.
	But first of all, let's look at how the New York Times control the narrative around unpopular wars.
	Let's have a little look at that.
	So, the New York Times has a policy of systematically censoring words like genocide and ethnic cleansing in its coverage of Israel's genocidal assault of Gaza, according to an internal memo obtained by The Intercept this week.
	Where do these memos come from?
	Where do those edicts come from?
	When online conversation, social media conversation, is extensively and increasingly censored, you know that there are laws being passed all over The world hates speech laws in Ireland.
	Canada has already passed new laws.
	My country, the UK, does anything it can to shut down dissent and isn't afraid to resort to dirty tricks.
	And your country is amping it up big time as well.
	And then within the legacy media, Which appears to me on the basis of the fact that the New York Times got that exclusive from those CIA bases that have been inside Ukraine for the last couple of years and from the arrest of Jack Taschera that they are willing to participate in deep state operations and state agenda while posturing as journalists shows us that in all likelihood they receive the list of words to censor from presumably the same people that economically or otherwise benefit
	Okay, so here's all the news that's fit to print.
	wars. The Times Memo instructs its journalists to avoid using the terms genocide, ethnic
	cleansing and refugee camps. Gonna be a short article when writing about Palestine. It directs
	them to steer clear of referring to areas of Palestine as occupied territory and even
	further discourages referring to Palestine as Palestine.
	Okay, so here's all the news that's fit to print. There's been a... in... and we believe
	that... and if you don't...
	Pay your taxes to the government!
	Have you noticed that Donald Trump is actually orange?
	We're serious journalists, not like those online pundits.
	We point out when someone's orange.
	We don't let people be orange.
	Hey, it sounded like you're criticizing people for being a different color.
	Mind blown.
	Hey!
	Who provided the explosives for that mine bomb?
	I don't know.
	Wasn't Lockheed Martin.
	Wasn't Raytheon.
	Wasn't Northrop Grumman.
	It's all the news that's fit to print once it's been signed off by our bosses.
	The legacy media.
	We have to oppose them.
	They're the enemy.
	They've always been the enemy.
	They always will be the enemy.
	They are to be resisted, ignored, and ultimately, thankfully, They're bringing about their own demise.
	Perhaps soon, I pray to our Eternal Lord, they will collapse into the irrelevance that their lack of principles surely deserves.
	In addition, the memo claims that words like slaughter, massacre, and carnage are often too emotional to describe Israel's bombardment of Gaza.
	I don't want any emotion in the news.
	Let's extract all emotion.
	Well, get ready to have your emotions roused, because while you're spending thousands and thousands of dollars, more importantly, you're spending your limited time on this plane of material being before I pray, returning to the limitless consciousness that we call God, from which we all came, There are politicians and lawmakers in your country and surely mine 48 of them in total that directly benefit from this escalating conflict that to a degree you will be funding.
	Here is the excellent work of Unusual Wales.
	God bless that Little outfit.
	I don't know if it's a person or a group of people.
	Let's have a look.
	So they say, here's every US politician whose stock portfolio will benefit from a conflict in the Middle East between Iran and Israel.
	I've aggregated a list of their stocks like Raytheon, RTX, Lockheed, Martin, LMT and more.
	They're making millions.
	Here are the politicians.
	Now, tell me guys, whose name are you least surprised to see on there right now?
	It looks like, wait a minute, Kevin Hearn, he's up the top, Mark Green, Tommy Tuberville, I'm surprised at you.
	Who's this at number four?
	Why?
	Who's this at number four?
	Why?
	It's Nancy Pelosi, of course.
	I couldn't be more astonished.
	You could knock me down with a feather.
	As long as that feather was made by Lockheed Martin, not if it was made by Boeing, it probably wouldn't function.
	Aerodynamics are Are not their strong suit, it seems.
	So what does that tell you?
	Your tax dollars fund these conflicts.
	They benefit from their investments and their own portfolios.
	Well, at least they don't get to vote on whether or not there should be further funding and further wars.
	Oh, no, they do.
	Of course they do.
	I was being ironic.
	The White House says it opposes stand-alone Israel military aid bill.
	The White House said on Monday that it opposes the idea of a bill that would give additional military aid to Israel without funding Ukraine and Taiwan.
	We are opposed to a stand-alone bill that would just work on Israel, as we've seen proposed.
	We would oppose a stand-alone bill, said John Kirby.
	Kirby's comments came a day after House Speaker Mike Johnson said he would work on getting more military aid to Israel this week.
	The plan is expected to send about the same amount of money to each country and each measure will likely pass.
	Time is not anyone's side here, certainly not the American taxpayers.
	In either case, they need to move quickly.
	So there you go.
	You will continue to fund conflicts in Europe to escalate tensions with China and, of course, contribute to the potentially apocalyptic conflict In the Middle East, is that what you're working for?
	Remember this, next time you're working, next time your alarm goes off, next time you shower after work, next time you have to do your IRS filing, next time you're told that you've defaulted, next time you're told that you have to pay your taxes to be a patriot, I want you to remember That your money is not only going to annihilating children across the world, but it's making Nancy Pelosi and her pales richer.
	You work a little bit harder for Nancy now.
	Nancy wants to see you sweat.
	Meanwhile, Lockheed Martin are having the absolute time of their lives, look.
	Lockheed Martin climbed early Monday after British and Israeli defences on Saturday knocked down a barrage of missiles and drones launched.
	So, like, it's essentially like your team in NFL or NBA or whatever has, like, gone to the playoffs or, you know, progressed.
	Look, I don't know how your sports work.
	In us, it's simple knockout competitions and brilliant leagues.
	And what I will say is that what's happening right now amounts to a boon for some pretty powerful and influential interests.
	For example, Lockheed Martin rose about 1% on Monday and there you go, that's the way it works.
	You tell me, what seems more significant to you now?
	These numbers?
	Your toil to pay tax?
	Or the claims of morality that are made in order to continue to convey Your public money into their private hands.
	All the while, are we being distracted by a trial?
	By the utilization of the judiciary to bring down political opponents?
	I'm talking, of course, about today's other big story.
	Trump's harsh money trial.
	And, uh, guys, alright, so we're at, um, 42 minutes now, huh?
	Nancy's a satanic person.
	Best teacher.
	Taxes can buy.
	Who's that sits up there?
	You lot, you guys, you guys in the rumble chat, how I love you.
	Ray Epps, Trish McLeod, Frank Bigham, Santa Lota, all of you guys.
	So, let me have a look at my little thing.
	Oh, are you all right over there?
	My god, are you okay, mate?
	All right, so listen, I think it's time for us to go.
	Well, not time for us to go.
	We've got so much more content.
	In fact, this is what I want to share with you now.
	You know, yes, we've got a lot of content on Trump's trial because it's a defining event in American political life.
	It is significant.
	It is potent.
	It is important wherever you stand on the issue of Donald Trump.
	The fact is you don't stand in neutrality.
	It's highly unlikely that you are unbiased.
	Who in this climate of hysteria could claim to be unbiased on the subject of Donald Trump?
	It's a ridiculous claim.
	We have got a fantastic week coming up.
	We've got Roseanne Barr on Friday.
	We've got Colonel Douglas McGregor coming up for Awaken Wonders next Wednesday live.
	You're going to want to join us for that conversation.
	Remember, use the code ISURRENDER to get one month free of additional content.
	But today we approach this issue.
	Donald Trump's historic hush money trial has had to dismiss 50 jurors after they admitted they couldn't be fair and impartial.
	But how can anyone be impartial about Donald Trump in this atmosphere of absolute hysteria?
	Here's the news.
	No. Here's the effing news.
	Donald Trump's historic hush money trial has begun but it might take a while to find a juror
	that is impartial on the subject of Donald Trump because we live in a climate of total hysteria
	about Donald Trump where some people think he's the worst person ever to have lived and some
	people think he is the risen messiah.
	So good luck finding 12 people that are like, yeah Donald Trump, yeah he's alright.
	As Donald Trump stands trial in his notorious famous historic hush money case, the process of finding jurors has begun.
	Now, you have to find 12 people that are impartial on the subject of Donald Trump.
	How can anyone have a non-biased, unbiased, impartial perspective on Donald Trump?
	Have you ever met anyone Yeah, I'm just probably going to vote for Donald Trump actually.
	I quite like Donald Trump.
	No, I don't think I will vote for Donald Trump.
	I think I prefer Joe Biden actually.
	We live in a climate of total hysteria.
	The idea that the judiciary is separate from the state and from the media is risible and laughable.
	Completely interwoven.
	The media advocates for the agenda of the sitting government in your country.
	The judiciary is plainly operating at the behest of the government in your country.
	Whether you like Donald Trump or don't like Donald Trump, well, you have to recognize that some weird stuff is going on and the establishment absolutely hates him.
	But even the disclaimer, if you like him or don't like him, seems redundant and ridiculous because I know it's one of them.
	I know it's not.
	I don't think I could find 12 people Like, maybe in Nepal.
	Like, you could go to Nepal or something and go, Donald Trump.
	Like, you know when they wanted to sit with David Beckham?
	We've tried to find a person who doesn't know who David Beckham is.
	It's this tribesman.
	Like, who is he?
	Like, we've got this Watutsi warrior chief.
	It's ridiculous.
	And it shows you something important.
	We're living in a hysterical climate where to be sanguine and to be reasonable and go, well, what is Donald Trump really like?
	And what is the purpose of this trial?
	And is there anyone actually that believes this is about Donald Trump did what?
	He paid money to ask an alleged former lover to not, you know, like, do people really think that's what it's about?
	Or do people suspect, oh no, this guy's going to win the election.
	Nothing we say makes people hate him, or the people that don't hate him and in fact love him, hate him.
	We can't shift the needle.
	Find another way to get rid of this guy.
	Find another way.
	Our establishment is corrupt.
	Our judiciary is broken.
	Our media is hated and detested.
	We are unpopular.
	Even our base voters are starting to hate us as we engage in Genocide.
	We're in serious trouble.
	The only way people are going to vote for Joe Biden is if there's literally no alternative.
	So good luck finding someone who's got no opinion on this because we live in a 360 sphere of endless total media.
	Let's have a look at how the legacy media are covering this and see how they're going to extricate themselves from this ridiculous situation that they've created.
	Donald Trump fought to prevent this day from ever arriving.
	Already biased.
	It's already biased.
	Donald Trump fought.
	He fought like a pig in a ditch.
	Like a vampire spitting in a baby's eye to stop this ever happening.
	He already can't prevent himself from being biased.
	He adamantly did not want to make this historic journey to begrudgingly become They don't need those adjectives!
	The media is so biased, you can't get through a sentence without their bias.
	I know what it's like to be attacked by the media.
	I know what it's like when the media and various other agencies and nefarious ulterior forces work together to try to destroy you.
	So I see what this is from a different perspective, almost from the inside.
	Tell me how you're going to find 12 people that are not biased to adjudicate on this case.
	The first ever former US president on criminal trial.
	This is political persecution.
	This is a persecution like never before.
	Nobody's ever seen anything like it.
	Trump sat alongside his lawyers as prospective jurors entered the room, 96 people in the first round.
	Some 50 were dismissed almost immediately for declaring they simply cannot be impartial.
	Probably as well, because who wants to do jury duty, frankly?
	Oh no, Donald Trump.
	I hate him.
	Donald Trump, I'd do anything for that guy.
	See ya!
	And the others, you know what?
	I don't like my job.
	I think I'd like to be in a hotel and then to do a deal after this to disclose everything that I've learned.
	In all honesty, all 96 of them should have gone.
	Are you out of your mind?
	By day's end, not a single juror had been picked.
	It's going to be a long, tedious process for the judge to make sure that you've got jurors who will actually just do what they're there to do.
	Listen, decide, render a verdict.
	Potential jurors have to answer an unusually long 42 question survey asking, have you ever attended a rally or campaign event for Donald Trump?
	Even this is biased.
	It's not to find people that are impartial.
	It's to make sure no one that likes him is there.
	Oh my God.
	Even that process is not like, Look, have you been watching like Jen Psaki or listening to almost any late night talk show?
	Yeah, I watch that stuff all the time.
	Well, you are obviously going to be biased against Donald Trump then.
	Even when they're dealing with the subject of bias, they're doing it in a biased way.
	Do you have strong opinions about how Mr. Trump is being treated in this case and to identify how they get their news?
	Options include the New York Times, Fox News and Trump's own Truth Social.
	We only watch Stay Free with Russell Brad.
	Come on in and adjudicate!
	So, put plainly, more than half of the prospective jurors in Donald Trump's hush money trial were immediately dismissed after admitting that they could not be fair and impartial.
	On the first day of the criminal case in New York, Judge Juan Merchant oversaw jury selection from a pool of 96 people, of which at least 50 immediately ruled themselves out.
	If you have an honest, legitimate, good faith reason to believe you cannot serve on this case or cannot be fair and impartial, please let me know now.
	Justice Merchant asked the potential jurors.
	One prospective juror was heard saying, I just couldn't do it.
	As she left the Manhattan court on Monday.
	I just can't be impartial.
	I love that crazy little guy.
	His speeches when he turned up a Chick-fil-A that time.
	He's pretty funny.
	You got to acknowledge that dance is pretty good fun.
	You get the Fuck out of my court!
	I don't like him.
	He's too orange.
	And we found juror number one.
	Yeah, I know.
	I see something the other day on CNN.
	And we've got juror number two.
	Is his hands too little?
	Juror number three, etc.
	Mr. Trump's defense team had been expecting around 40 people to be excluded on impartiality grounds, according to CNN.
	Once the impartial members of the jury pool had raised their hands, Justin Merchant formally excused them one by one.
	The remainder were subjected to 42 questions ranging from their news consumption habits to whether they had attended any Trump rallies or read any of the former president's books.
	One man from Manhattan said that he read the Wall Street Journal.
	Another from New York City's Upper West Side said his radio habits included listening to whatever was on when he was in the shower.
	Neither was dismissed.
	I think we should dismiss the shower guy just for the extraordinary passive attitude he's got towards these things.
	Oh well, I'll put up with this white noise or Sesame Street or Elmo endorsing vaccines.
	It's all great for me!
	I'm in it for the sensation!
	A woman was asked, do you have any strong opinions or firmly held beliefs about former president Donald Trump or the fact that he's a current candidate for president that would interfere with your ability to be a fair and impartial juror?
	She replied, yes!
	Like who hasn't?
	And was dismissed by the judge.
	All jurors will remain anonymous due to the high profile nature of the case.
	The trial is expected to last six weeks.
	You know, in my opinion, I feel that the political changes required in your country and in mine are so significant that no single individual will be able to bear the burden of instantiating that change.
	And in the case of Donald Trump, I know that he's already been president before, but I feel that he is the epitome of everything the establishment hates.
	And I don't think that I would be able to be impartial and unbiased.
	I'm like, no, man, I hate the establishment so much, so much.
	I would love it if he got the chance to shut down the establishment.
	So bless me out.
	I'm not capable of being impartial because my loathing of the establishment and my love of freedom is too profound.
	So let's go to MSNBC now to get some impartiality so we can all relax and become a little less biased.
	While you are sitting there in the jury pool, Bob Hope?
	That's what happens when you give a Texan an expense account.
	Listening to the judge describe this case to you, Donald Trump is sitting at the defense table looking like this.
	Well, firstly, I'd say, why are you not moving your face, Donald?
	Should you close your mouth?
	What's he attempting to achieve here?
	Is this unbiased reporting?
	Let's take that back down to a half screen of Donald Trump.
	Now, we normally don't allow Donald Trump to occupy your full television screen during this program.
	Because we're so unbiased?
	But for this one time, as you consider yourself sitting there on Monday in the position of a juror looking at him, let's look at what they will actually see without hearing a word from Donald Trump.
	And for that, we're going to go back to the full screen.
	Why does he have to announce every time there's a show?
	Now it's back to the half screen.
	Now full screen.
	Now heroes in a half shell.
	Turtle power.
	Now back again.
	Leonardo.
	What I resent about the legacy media, I mean there's so many things, but one thing is the sort of pose of rationalism and almost academia, the haughtiness, the superciliousness, the pride, the pomp.
	Here we are, analyzing and scrutinizing Donald Trump.
	We're gonna go half screen for this bit.
	Now full screen.
	Really, what's he adding to the conversation here?
	That Donald Trump's got a face and we've deliberately selected a still that's unflattering.
	Doubling down on the obvious point that legacy media has generated so much hysteria around the figure, character, politics, the peccadilloes of Donald Trump.
	The idea that you would be able to find 12 people that can be rational and calm.
	And by the way, that should be easy.
	There should be any 12 people.
	There should be any 12.
	You should be able to have any 12 Americans.
	You can say, hey, listen, there's a court case we've got to adjudicate.
	Shouldn't even care who the person is because it's the principles of justice.
	That's what it should be.
	The principles of justice.
	This is actually against the law to pay people money in this way because of these reasons.
	You know, this is a thing where it's about.
	It's not about that.
	You don't even know what it's about, do you?
	Like, you know, Stormy Daniels got some money.
	It was hush money.
	It was paid by a former attorney.
	He was working on the campaign.
	Funds were transferred.
	They did it at this time, at this time.
	It's fiddly.
	What you think is the establishment doesn't like Donald Trump.
	And there's some pretty significant evidence that that is the case, isn't there?
	And the reason they don't like Donald Well, could it be because of his morality, his ethics, or does it seem more likely that it's because he's a sort of a berserker, a bull in the china shop, of their neat little racket that they've been running, pretending that they're on the side of fairness, egalitarianism, wokeism even, extraordinarily at some points, even though it's an
	Elderly old dude that primarily cares about the pharmaceutical industry and the military-industrial complex to the point where even his own dedicated voters who have drunk the Kool-Aid of like, this is about progressivism, are like, it's not that progressive, is it?
	Killing all of these children in Gaza, or at least facilitating it, standing by while it's happening, facilitating all of these endless wars.
	The only argument they've got This is the only person, Joe Biden, is the only person you can vote for.
	Don't look at this guy.
	We're gonna go full screen on this guy.
	Do look at him, but only to determine that you would find him guilty if you were a juror.
	What they're essentially telling you is we want a jury of people that are going to claim to be impartial, but actually be quite biased against Donald Trump.
	We don't take the risk of anyone that's actually like, I like him, or genuinely impartial even, slipping into that 12.
	So you can take in what this man actually looks like now.
	Donald Trump is likely to be sitting there as he is in this recent campaign videos, that's a picture of him, when he's trying to look his absolute best in his campaign video, which in his mind includes a face partially covered in some form of homemade bronzer in which he always forgets the ears.
	How is that better than any one of the gossip-oriented salacious platforms like TMZ?
	Donald Trump today forgot to cover his ears when he was applying his fake tan.
	But this is done with the poise of legitimacy and analysis and valued punditry.
	This is just someone saying, look at his face, he's got too much fake tan on.
	Okay, well, does that excuse Joe Biden, then, for pandering to the military-industrial complex and the financial industry and reneging on various promises, whether it's the border, wall-no-wall, cages-no-cages, war-no-war, Saudi-no-Saudi, farmer prices-no-farmer prices?
	Is that what you want us to focus on?
	Donald Trump's ears?
	Is that all you got?
	The only thing he brings to his defence Is that silent discolored face?
	We can't bring you this content without your love and devotion and without the support of our partners so it's so great when we've got a fantastic one like today's.
	Your body is 80% water.
	I know that already!
	Water put in your body therefore affects 80% of your health.
	That's just science.
	Tap water water, bottled water can be dead. Dead water, isn't that
	disgusting, like stagnant pond water. Acidic or poisonous, 70% of our immune system is in
	our guts. Contaminated water, poor diet and pesticides weaken your gut to nearly 20%
	functionality. You can see I'm looking at this little guy, can't you? Hello darling. Air
	Water Healing, Eko Plus, infuses water with hydrogen, ionizing your water and bringing it to
	sweet lady life.
	Life itself, the expression of the divine, that which separates us from endless, limitless death.
	UVC2 light kills 99.9% of harmful germs, bacteria, E. coli, and for all I know, other harmful things that we can't even understand.
	Feel the difference, increase the energy, slow aging, improve muscle recovery, regulate heart disease, diabetes, reduce wrinkles, speed up wound healing.
	Now this comes with a five-year warranty.
	That means you can get it right now, right now, from airwaterhealing.com using my promo code brand for a discount, a mysterious discount that I'm not even prepared to tell you about.
	And you won't have to think about it for five years.
	If it stops working for five years, you just go, what's that darling?
	You want me to drink you?
	And you're full of tequila?
	I love this little guy.
	That means for five years you don't have to think about it.
	So, use the brand discount, replace dead water, fill your energy level surge.
	Am I on a surgeon?
	Go to airwaterhealing.com, use the promo code BRANDT so they know I sent ya, and drink your way to a glorious inner revolution.
	And the outer revolution is coming soon.
	Cheers.
	A face that lies to you without Donald Trump saying a word.
	A face that claims to be a color of brown that is betrayed.
	What a ridiculous metaphor to use that somehow Donald Trump's fake tan is part of him masking himself and how outrageous to claim that they never show Donald Trump's face.
	They do show Donald Trump's face with an agenda to condemn Donald Trump through the Russiagate era.
	It was wall-to-wall coverage of Trump.
	Trump did this!
	Trump did that!
	We've got evidence!
	The whole thing was a total lie.
	They cannot be unbiased about Donald Trump because, many people believe, along with the judiciary, the legacy media are a component of the establishment that will do anything to prevent Trump being elected.
	And wherever you stand on Trump, that is not unbiased impartiality.
	It's ludicrous.
	It's outrageous.
	And the very idea that you can't show Donald Trump's face because it's some mandala of power and anyone who sees it's going to be sort of seduced into supporting him shows you how little they've got in the vault, how little they've got in the bank of morality, ethics, policy, distinction, support, connection, humanity.
	The well has surely run dry when all you've got to offer is this guy's wearing fake tan, We only go full screen on him when it's to condemn him.
	We forget about it when we've broadcast for months and months that he was involved in peace scandals and funding from Russia when there's no evidence.
	And it's proven, in fact, in that case that it came from the Clinton campaign.
	It's an astonishing position to find ourselves in.
	And all in this one story about not being able to find, or easily find, impartial jurors.
	You recognise the crisis that the establishment, and I mean all three components there, have built for themselves.
	No matter how many days those jurors spend in that room with Donald Trump, they will never come to understand why he chooses to look like that.
	What does that mean?
	What does that mean?
	What's that got to do with anything?
	Like, it's meant to be a case about whether or not there are inappropriate misuse of campaign funds, you know, and also, by the way, Steele dossier and the Russiagate stuff plays nicely into that narrative, or at least hypocritically into that narrative, because it's a very comparable event, if you ask me.
	What justice actually demands of us is that we're able to focus on principles and agreed-upon rules and regulations that, as a culture, we have determined.
	And you can't do that because we live in a hysterical state that poses as rational.
	I have what I call the blue liquid doctrine.
	Do you know what that is?
	I mean I think he said I'd rather vote for Joe Biden's corpse than a living Donald Trump, didn't he?
	No.
	I have what I call the blue liquid doctrine, do you know what that is?
	No.
	If it's Trump against Biden, I will vote for Biden's head in a jar of blue liquid.
	I mean anyone who votes for Joe Biden is essentially making that point, aren't they, really?
	He's said that it's ridiculous when you see a CNN, or MSNBC, it could be any one of them, town hall, where the whole of the audience loves Donald Trump, and the whole of the panel loathes Donald Trump.
	It's a bit like those Rotten Tomatoes, where the critics are like, this is a terrible film, and the audience are like, we love it!
	I love it!
	It shows you that the establishment are out of touch with the people.
	And why wouldn't they be out of touch with the people?
	They hate the people.
	Their job is to control the people or render the views of the people redundant so they don't have to acknowledge the system is failing.
	Let's see Bill Maher now.
	Okay, remember the town hall he had on CNN about six months ago?
	And the audience loved it.
	The audience loved it.
	I mean, you can't, you can hate them.
	It was stacked with Trump supporters.
	Well, they said Republicans and independents.
	That's what they said.
	Okay, maybe it was.
	How'd they get in?
	If they did, that's on CNN.
	Yeah, I agree.
	I think it is on CNN and the vetting process was... Well then you gotta get a better audience person.
	You better get better at booking your audiences because these people seem to like Donald Trump.
	The problem remains from day one of the Trump phenomena.
	No one is addressing the problem that has led to the rise of Donald Trump.
	Let's just keep condemning Donald Trump and hope that they eventually start liking this old, mad, warmonger.
	The fact is, is that the Democrat Party isn't able to do anything that Americans, ordinary Americans in significant numbers, care about.
	And that is the problem.
	And until that problem is addressed, and they're never going to address it because they're raison d'etre their entire MO, is to, as you now know, support the interests of various globalist powers and keep people placated by keeping us all baffled and divided around a bunch of cultural issues.
	That's not going to change.
	That can't change.
	That's the same in your country as our country.
	So what they have to do is give us like bogeymen.
	And when we go, I like the bogeyman better, they're utterly bamboozled.
	Here's what happened.
	Here's what people saw in America.
	They saw Trump killing it.
	Killing it with the crowd.
	Then you come to a panel of six people who all just do nothing but dump on him and call him a liar.
	And America goes, oh, didn't you just see?
	If they've lost Bill Maher, they're in serious trouble.
	And like, I'm all in on the negative.
	No one's been harder on Trump than me.
	But I get it and I'm bored with it.
	And there's a different way to do this, I think, which is to...
	So, what is it?
	Not to defend Trump, but to defend the people who still vote for him.
	Because what they see on the other side, to them, is even more dangerous.
	And maybe address that additionally, the ongoing technological dictatorship, the censorship, the passing of the 702 surveillance bill, the constant corruption, the inability to curtail the likes of Nancy Pelosi investing in stocks and shares that it would appear that they have insider information.
	There's a long, nearly endless list of things that could be addressed that won't be addressed.
	Because it's very closer to home.
	My kid is coming home from school and he thinks he's a racist?
	He's five.
	What have you been telling him?
	Those kind of things are what they say.
	That's why I'm voting for Trump.
	A backlash to the pendulum swinging.
	Conservative guy once said to me, what you don't get about Trump is we don't like him either.
	Lots of people, it's like that.
	We don't like him, but he's all that stands between us and madness.
	That's their view.
	I would like that view presented.
	You are never going to get 12 impartial Americans to sit in trial of Donald Trump because America is a hysterical nation.
	I'm not talking about you, the American people.
	I'm talking about your establishment, your government, your judiciary, and in particular, your media, that will not afford impartiality.
	Because if they did afford impartiality, it would sound, I reckon, a bit like this.
	Donald Trump is a billionaire businessman who made his bones and his name and his fame
	in the 80s and possibly carried some of the cultural paraphernalia that was prevalent
	at that time.
	Some of the attitudes around gender and masculinity that were popular in the 1980s if you were
	a real estate entrepreneur in New York City.
	He was celebrated and fated for that.
	Now as American culture appears to break apart, he seems as stable as one of his hotels or
	the buildings that bear his name as a culture dissipates into chaos using the language of
	progressivism to mask the fact that the primary two parties fundamentally exist to support
	globalist endeavors and corporatism.
	The opponent of Donald Trump is such a ridiculous and risible figure so plainly operating at
	the behest of these interests.
	Escalating global wars, potentially endless pandemics, that people see Donald Trump as the solution.
	So the only way to stop people reaching towards that solution is to hysterically claim that he is something that he is not.
	Basically Satan.
	So if you can find 12 people that haven't been impacted or influenced by that one way or the other, then you are better at finding Zen Buddhists than I am.
	Because I can't think of anyone else.
	Transcendent minds alone can be neutral on that subject, I would say.
	Well that's just what I think.
	Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments below?
	Because surely what we have here is a state of hysteria and the tacit acknowledgement that the judiciary is being used to take down a political opponent.
	Who really believes this is about Stormzy Daniels?
	Stormy Daniels?
	And Hush Money at this point?
	You?
	Me?
	I don't think so.
	I don't think they even believe it.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the chat.
	Remember, become a member of our movement.
	More important than any of that.
	If you can, please stay free.
	Man, he's switching.
	Switch on.

▲