All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 27, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:02:11
Secret CIA Spy Bases in Ukraine! The TRUTH About America’s “Shadow War” With Russia - Stay Free #313
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Alright, so we're going to go ahead and pack this into the car.
We're going to put the sensors in properly.
Alright, so we're going to put the sensors in properly.
Brought to you by Pfizer.
you In this video, you're going to see the future.
We're getting to breaking news.
We've got a live shot there.
There you awakening wonders are that you would bless me indeed.
Glory, glory, what a day it is to be alive and to be free in spite of the endless opposition to your freedom and in spite of the, let's call it what it is, lying that's gone on over the last few years.
For example, the CIA have been in Ukraine for the last couple of years with secret spy bases and provocative missions that seem almost designed to wind poor dear Vladimir Putin up.
A man To whom we're all supposed to have this extraordinary allegiance, a man who's dabbling in every single election and quite a few erections, if the truth be told.
But is he really more of a threat to us than our own governments?
What an astonishing question to even consider.
And are we allowed to even ask such questions in an apparently free society?
We got stories today about Navalny's sad death and what could have actually caused it.
Elsewhere, We'll be talking about unlawful vaccine mandates in Queensland, Australia.
We're looking in some depth later in the show at the tragic death by self-immolation by Aaron Bushnell and what that tells us about war.
You're going to love that actually.
So if you're watching us on YouTube right now, To get the full freedom experience, consider coming over to that sweet stream of freedom.
Phoenix Boy, Russell Brand, come over here with me and Bear and an entire team committed and dedicated to revealing to you as much truth as we can say.
Remember the New York Times we were, all the news is fit to print, now it's just simply all of the propaganda at the appropriate time because there's been a New York Times article About CIA being embedded in Ukraine for 10 years.
It's a really astonishing story, and I'm really pleased with the story that we have about it.
We're gonna go into depth around it.
Holy cow, Russell!
Where's your hairy chest?
It's sort of there.
It's there.
Is that it?
That's where it's supposed to be.
Where else would you want it?
So yeah, that's gonna be a pretty interesting story.
Before we get into all of that, you know, so there's vaccine mandates and how they've been conveyed and recent revelations.
There's Dr. Phil on The View.
That was a pretty amazing moment.
Let us know in the chat if you saw that.
Trish McLeod or iProng or Kenshin24888.
Or Pickled Witch over on the Awakened Wonderstream.
Remember, if you are an Awakened Wonder, by the way, and I consider it vital that you join us, or at least considering it, because later this week we've got Rand Paul coming on the show to discuss his new book, Deception, and I want to pose your questions to him.
He, in this new book, is talking about how he has consistently opposed, for example, Public health edicts that have been less reliable than was first assumed, to put it kindly.
And you can put your questions to him by becoming an Awakened Wonder.
We'll post the link in the description right now.
Now, one of the indications that the global establishment's agenda to control us by controlling all resources, including food, is possible to topple and oppose is The farmers' protest.
And what I like about the farmers protest is that in policing them, trying to curtail
and control them, what is becoming evident is that the forces of the establishment haven't
understood just exactly how farmers roll.
Right, now I suppose that roadblock's not going to work against a tractor, is it?
Hey, listen, have you noticed that Taylor Swift seems to be increasing in global importance?
She seems to be able to determine the outcome of, like, elections.
Her and Putin ultimately are controlling democracy between them, it seems.
There's this wonderful story, although it's actually also quite tragic, in New South Wales in Australia where Karen Webb, the police commissioner, is facing fresh criticism for using Taylor Swift as a reference point when she's defending her response to a murder inquiry in which two people are alleged to have been murdered by a member of her police force and she sort of defends these allegations By sort of citing and quoting Taylor Swift.
It seems like an unusual reference point to go to under those circumstances.
Additionally, in the news report from Australian Legacy Media, you see that this police force has been doing things like tasering old ladies who, on the surface of it, look adorable.
I mean, have a look at this.
As the murder investigation plays out, Police Commissioner Karen Webb has again been forced to defend her leadership.
Three days to speak?
Come on.
It's still a live investigation.
As I said, it's a very complex investigation.
Accused of being AWOL in the case, like last year in the tasering of Kerma grandmother, Claire Nowland.
That can't be right, because look at old Claire Nowland.
She's adorable, isn't she?
What possible trouble could Claire Nowland have been causing that warranted a bloody good tasering?
Right, I've warned you!
I've warned you!
Right, that's it!
Tase!
Tase this little old lady!
There will always be haters.
Haters like to hate.
Isn't that what Taylor says?
Within minutes Taylor Swift memes were circulating among police.
When a commissioner of police starts quoting Tay Tay in the middle of a very serious murder investigation involving one of her own officers, that says it all.
It does seem to imply that our culture has been banalised to the point where it's difficult to detect where the divine may lay.
Not that I am criticising Tay Tay.
You are, of course, free to enjoy whatever type of music you're into.
It's pretty astonishing.
Perhaps later in the week we'll look at the role that Taylor Swift occupies in the culture.
What is she?
Why is it so captivating to all of you?
Hey, listen!
Oh yeah, Warren 121.
Wow Russell, you made a live show on time.
I know we're all sort of a little bit confused to tell you the truth.
Later on we're going to be talking about the reporting on the escalation of tensions between Ukraine and Russia, how meticulously, deliberately and repeatedly it was reported as an unprovoked invasion and now even the New York Times are admitting that the CIA and British actually, deep state interests, have been effectively controlling Ukraine Since the coup in 2014.
So again, it's another one of those stories where what you've known for a long, long time is making its way into the mainstream.
What's the motivation for it?
We'll be talking about it.
An indication that this story is entering into a new phase is this headline.
Let's have a look.
Francis Macron says, sending troops to Ukraine Cannot be ruled out.
Now Macron, I don't know if you... Essex loves you, Russ.
Thanks for that, mate, in their rumble chat.
Like, Macron, I consider him to be one of those globalists.
I'd say he's an early haircut, wouldn't you, Macron?
He was like sort of one of the first... Oh, this person's not a proper politician.
Look at the goddamn haircut!
He was one of the first, now we've got Trudeau, we've got a brilliant story on Trudeau coming up in a little minute.
So here he is.
Macron said on Monday there was no consensus on sending troops to Ukraine, but the subject could not be ruled out.
There's no consensus to send troops, he says.
Nothing should be excluded.
We'll do everything we can so that Russia does not win.
Now, all of this is in a sense a continuation of the narrative that we were heavily invited to believe in, that Russia's attack was unprovoked.
And I say this with all sympathy to Ukrainian people who are doubtlessly suffering because of this escalating war.
Remember, it's been presented from the beginning as an unprovoked humanitarian crisis caused by nothing other than Putin's expansionism.
But every time we hear that NATO impeded on former Soviet territories, every time we hear, as we have now, that the CIA have spy bases inside of Ukraine.
They've had them there for 10 years.
And you wait to hear some of the provocative things they've been doing.
It's astonishing.
It's astonishing.
It causes more trouble than Dr. Phil on The View.
Now, there's a story on Alexei Navalny.
We were told that pretty, again with some degree of certainty, that Alexei Navalny was definitely, definitely killed by Putin.
But let me know in the chat if you know what else might have killed him.
Make no mistake, make no mistake, Putin is responsible for Navalny's death.
Whatever story they tell, let us be clear, Russia is responsible.
The death of Alexei Navalny yesterday, Was a reminder of the extraordinary brutality of Putin and his government.
Okay, so the establishment are pretty sure.
The official Jimbo Slice in our Rumble chat says he's written a thesis on what caused this.
Well, why don't you post it in the chat, mate, and we can all read it together.
Now, let's have a look at what people are saying caused Navalny's death.
Now, this is, I think, Ukrainian special forces.
How did you kill Navalny?
I can disappoint you, but what we know is that he actually died of a heart attack.
It was a blood clot.
Now, let me know in the chat if there's anything that's been causing unprecedented levels of blood clotting around since, I don't know, 2019, 2019 type time, 2020, 2021, that sort of times there's been any clotting.
We've got Ram Paul coming on the show on Friday.
One of the questions I'll be asking him is, is there anything that's been causing a lot of clotting?
Triple 07 says he was vaccinated to death.
No, you are allowed to say that.
It's up to you.
You can't say it in France, though.
As you know, if you saw our piece on France's new article, Pfizer, that prevents people from criticizing all medications, but you can't help but think that there are certain medications that are more protected than others.
Now the New York Times have had to admit that the CIA built 12 secret spy bases in Ukraine and have been waging a shadow war against Russia for the past decade.
What's interesting about this is that the bloody New York Times have changed their tune and they've been championing all of this Humanitarian, why don't you give us your taxes for war claptrap for some time now in an unwinnable war against a nuclear superpower that had, as one of its advantages, the idea that it was unprovoked Russian imperialism that required of all of us that we sponsor that war and, as the people of France are now discussing, potentially send our loved ones, or in my case I'm in conscription age, can you believe it, in our crazy country, go and fight in the bloody thing.
Let's have a look at what the New York Times Right, let's have a little look at how many times we saw this war described as unprovoked before delving into just how provoked it may actually have been.
If you're watching us on YouTube, we'll be there with you on that channel for another few minutes, maybe five minutes, right?
But then we're going to start speaking freely and rumble.
We'll be saying things that the legacy media are going to wait till it's too late to tell you to tell you.
They'll wait till they've drained your taxes, till they've caused a lot of trouble, till you've suffered the
consequences if it's a pandemic, till you've perhaps funded it if it's a war. You know, you
can't trust the legacy media. Here they are telling you again and again and again that the
the Russian invasion of Ukraine was unprovoked. Let's have a look.
Russian military has begun a brutal assault on the people of Ukraine
without provocation, without justification.
On Russia's unprovoked and unjustified attack on Ukraine.
The prayers of the entire world are with the people of Ukraine tonight as they suffer an unprovoked and unjustified attack.
Russia commenced its full-scale, unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.
President Putin has launched a horrific, unprovoked attack on their country.
That ridiculous image of Justin Trudeau, sorry about eating this apple, I don't know, I just sort of put it there, couldn't resist it.
Right, everything in that Trudeau image is bloody ridiculous.
Look, people wearing masks that ain't bloody well doing anything.
He's acting all liberal when we know that he can barely prevent himself evoking an emergency act every time anyone does anything so much.
If you honk a horn in Ottawa, it's an emergency!
It's an emergency!
We are united in condemning the Kremlin's unprovoked aggression.
No justification apart from the fact that he is a warmonger that wanted to build an empire.
Putin is the aggressor.
Putin chose this war.
Okay, so Putin's a warmonger, Putin's the aggressor, all of these stuff, all of that confidence and absolute certainty.
Let's have a look at this.
Now this is from... a lot of you would be astonished by the resources we use.
This is the World Socialist Worker.
Is that... what's the right title, Gal?
Check it out!
It starts to show you that every single peripheral voice loathes the establishment power.
Okay, so check this out.
The Times reported that a Ukrainian unit, the Fifth Directorate, was tasked with conducting assassinations, including one in 2016.
The Times writes, a mysterious explosion in the Russian-occupied city of Donetsk In eastern Ukraine, ripped through an elevator carrying a senior Russian separatist commander named Arsen Pavlov, known by his nom de guerre, his name of war, Motorola.
Childish.
The CIA soon learned that the assassins were members of the fifth directorate, the spy group that received CIA training.
Ukraine's domestic intelligence agency had even handed out commemorative patches to those involved, each one stitched with the word lift, the British term for an elevator.
Now that seems like the sort of thing that's going to provoke Putin.
I don't know much about Putin other than he likes a half hour history lesson at the beginning of an interview and that he don't like being mugged off with assassinations by British and US deep state operatives in a territory that was once part of an empire that his nation controlled that had a coup in 2014 that seemed to have been at least co-sponsored by the CIA.
In other words, the CIA was helping to direct the war, making the US government a full participant, a co-belligerent in a war with nuclear-armed Russia, despite Biden's claim the United States was only aid in Ukraine from afar.
And all this without the American people having the slightest say in the matter.
Doesn't it astonish you still that you are never asked if you want to continue that funding?
Indeed, the story is only coming out now.
This is what I love about I don't love about the legacy media.
What I deeply loathe about the legacy media and I invite you to consider.
This story is only being published now.
They admit that they've had this information for some time.
Check this out.
They admit they've known it for ages.
So they were lying all the time they said it was unprovoked.
Like they always lie.
And they're only revealing it now in order to facilitate further funding.
Check this.
By reporting the virtual control of the Ukrainian regime by the US military intelligence apparatus, the Times is seeking to pressure the Republicans to support the war funding.
Ah, now it makes sense.
It's arguing that this money is not going to a foreign government in a foreign war thousands of miles from US borders, but to a subcontractor of American imperialism Waging an American war in which U.S.
personnel are deeply and directly engaged.
Think of just yesterday when we showed you Victoria Nuland saying, you've got to continue to fund this war.
It's going to create jobs all over America.
We shouldn't be like, all right, it's good to have a job.
But it's also good to not have a war.
And it's also good to be discerning about these globalist establishment elites that are lying to us to engage us in unwinnable wars with nuclear superpowers in order to drain them to facilitate their own unipower agenda, which I believe will also include tyrannizing us through every available means.
Let me know in the chat if that makes sense to you.
Dirty Diana, we're just prisoners in our own lands.
Dirty Diana, I've got to agree with you.
So, in so doing, the Times has revealed its own coverage of the Ukraine war over the past two years to have been nothing more than war propaganda aimed at using a fraudulent narrative to dragoon the American public to support a predatory imperialist war of aggression aimed at subjugating and dismantling Russia, as I just said, for their own Let's see what RFK said.
Is he the best bet for the President of the United States?
Do you feel that yet?
Let's have a look.
The CIA was building spy bases in Ukraine along the Russian border starting in 2014.
I wonder how we would respond if Russia or China built spy bases on the US-Mexico border.
Some of you perhaps would like it, wouldn't you?
It could be used to somehow mitigate that crisis.
With all of their information gathering and newly trained operatives, they couldn't wind down conflict between Ukraine and Russia.
In fact, it seems the CIA only made matters worse.
Indeed, perhaps that was the intention.
Great friend of the show and brilliant legit journalist Whitney Webb had this to say.
She's been saying it for years.
The CIA ignited the Ukraine conflict because they needed a new place to launder millions upon millions as a black hole for weapons to be covertly trafficked after the US pulled out of the Afghanistan war and to create a new blowback boogeyman.
What makes more sense to you?
The words of Whitney Webb?
An RFK?
The analysis of that New York Times article?
Or the argument still advanced to you by Antony Blinken?
The likes of Carmela Harris, the likes of Joe Biden, who are clearly shilling for the military-industrial complex, pursuing a unipolar agenda to generate a one-world government, where all of us are tyrannized now.
That last bit is, of course, conjecture, but maybe the legacy media will be reporting on that from some sort of Burrow somewhere in a decade or so.
We gave you a little poll earlier to ask you what you thought.
CIA bases in Ukraine for 10 years.
Does this mean that Russia's criminal invasion of Ukraine was A. Provoked B. Unprovoked C. A complex geopolitical situation for which a diplomatic solution ought be sought.
Only 3% Went for B. So there you have it.
This is a new revelation about the nature of that war that we all have to consider.
Now before we get to Trudeau talking about Russia, I want to I want to let you know on YouTube we're going to jump off.
We're going to jump off YouTube.
I think it's a good time to do it.
Now listen you lot, we're going to be talking to Rand Paul on Thursday.
You can join us and pose your own questions if you become an awakened wonder.
All our awakened wonders now like Scribbling Beauty and Tiffanel, they'll be there.
They'll be posing questions to Senator Rand Paul.
Presumably about Trump.
Presumably about Anthony Fauci.
Presumably about whether or not you'll get free and fair elections in 2024 when we now know we live in the midst of an AI nightmare Where artificial intelligence is being used to control reality.
We've got some great stories about unlawful mandates.
Click the link in the description and join us over on Rumble now.
See you in a few seconds.
So, hey, where were we?
Oh, yeah, Trudeau in Russia.
Let's look at bloody Trudeau, the soppy sod.
...in every way we can because we know that Russia must win this war.
Sorry, that Ukraine must win this war against Russia.
Sorry, sorry.
Does it make a difference?
Does it matter?
And his mentor in Baffleman is similarly confused.
Where, you know, Putin decides he's gonna just invade Russia.
Nothing like this has happened since World War II.
I mean, Russia's gonna invade Ukraine.
Putin may circle Kiev with tanks, but he'll never gain the hearts and souls of the Iranian people.
He'll never, he'll never extinguish their love of freedom.
We're not waiting for that process to be finished to make the long-term commitments that we're making to Ukraine's security.
Vladimir and I, we...
I shouldn't be so familiar.
Look at him trying to backtrack as if he's being familiar.
This is Zelensky and I. Rather than getting the bloody name wrong.
You know, we're dealing with that for a whole second.
Inflation is a worldwide problem right now.
Because of the war in Iraq and the impact on oil and what Russia's doing.
I mean, excuse me, the war in Ukraine.
Oh dear, oh dear.
It seems that this is yet another global story that's been heavily censored about which we have been deeply deceived by the very interests that purport to protect us in terms of the state and tell us the truth in terms of the media.
How can we ever trust them again, particularly knowing what we know about the mandate period?
Now, Australia, as you know, were one of the most diligent, fastidious, and some would say even draconian nations when it came to their response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Now, vaccine mandates are having to be addressed through legislation because, well, they were illegal.
They were unlawful, as well as a lot of you would say.
I'm talking to you guys on Rumble right now.
Completely unnecessary.
Let's have a look at this story from Australian legacy media.
You know Australia do this stuff well.
It's good stuff.
...ruling in favour of Queensland's frontline workers who took their bosses to court fighting against COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
The decision means directives ordering police and paramedics to get the jab were unlawful and had no power.
They sobbed and cheered inside court and even louder out.
Yeah, how does everyone feel?
Excellent, I think.
I think that speaks volumes for how my clients feel about the decision.
Dozens of police officers and paramedics challenged Queensland's COVID-19 vaccine mandates, arguing they should never have been forced to choose between getting the jab and keeping their jobs.
Today, they won.
It's, you know, been a long time coming after being stood down without pay for two years for a mandate from two years ago.
So there you are.
Could this be the beginning of a series of, I would say, embarrassing capitulations of a global backtrack where it has to be acknowledged, for example, in New York City, didn't 34,000 key workers lose their jobs because they didn't want to get vaccinated?
As it turns out, correctly, because it didn't stop transmission, there are adverse injuries that might amount to more danger than the ...increasingly deteriorating supposed benefits of that medication.
Are we going to see a global reckoning or are we still going to cling to the idea that this was a pandemic of the unvaccinated as was widely claimed at the time?
Remember this?
America right now is a pandemic.
A pandemic of the unvaccinated.
This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
This is becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
This has become a pandemic that is spreading rapidly amongst pockets of people who are unvaccinated.
They're calling it a pandemic among the unvaccinated.
A pandemic of the unvaccinated.
A pandemic of the unvaccinated.
Doctors called it a pandemic.
Prison guard nine, I'd rather have some smack than the vaccine.
Well, yeah, I mean, who wouldn't?
A pandemic of the unvaccinated.
A pandemic of the unvaccinated You can really rely on the old legacy media to tell you the truth and to represent your interests rather than amplifying the messages of the powerful all the way to our graveyard.
D-Day 99 is so scripted, he says in the chat.
Yep, you are right, guys.
And let me know what questions you have for Rand Paul.
And if you lot watching us on Rumble right now, I'm talking to you, Hey, I'm Keiji Mooney, and I'm talking to you, AmericanSun76.
I'm talking to all of you.
Let me know what your questions for Rand Paul are, and join us for that conversation live on Thursday.
Now, one man who's willing to get behind enemy lines and go into the mainstream is Dr. Phil.
Now, isn't Dr. Phil one of those Oprah stars?
Oprah, such a big star, she generated more stars, didn't she?
She was like a star factory and like, you know, Eckhart Tolle, he's one of hers.
I think Deepak Chopra, he one of hers.
Marianne Williamson, she one of hers.
Dr. Phil, he's gone for, he's gone rogue, he's gone rogue, he's gone on The View and he's upsetting Whoopi Goldberg with Well, I mean, I don't know.
How controversial does it sound to you?
Maybe children shouldn't be vaccinated because natural immunity is effective in preventing the COVID infection and children don't appear to be particularly susceptible to coronavirus.
Anyway, is that controversial?
I mean, what's that?
But look at the vibe on The View.
Agencies that knew that are the agencies that shut down the schools for two years.
Who does that?
There was also a pandemic going on, they were trying to save kids' lives.
Remember, we know a lot of folks who died during this.
So it wasn't, people weren't laying around eating pawn, but well, you know what?
We're lucky.
Maybe we're lucky they didn't because we kept them out of the places that they could be sick.
Because no...
I think even at the time, people were saying children weren't particularly susceptible.
And I suppose this shows you how difficult it is to backtrack on a belief like that.
It's going to be really interesting I think the next few years because we're going to see the truth penetrating new communities who are going to have to equip themselves with the understanding that they have been lied to And that they complied.
And I don't blame people who did, because there were probably reasonable explanations for that compliance.
People, if someone says to you, your elderly relatives are at risk if you don't get a vaccine, get a vaccine!
I mean, I did loads of stuff during that period that I wouldn't normally.
Like, you know, you've got to stay in your house.
I mean, fortunately I I quite like it in there, that's where my dog is, my children, all that kind of stuff.
But, let's face it, a reckoning is coming down the line.
You are seeing now, I think, with the release of this unprecedented and large study, an attempt to mitigate the outrage that will be released when people understand the scale of this deception.
And I think, similarly, there will be a problem when people understand that this war, that was described as unprovoked, was provoked.
When a culture starts creating icons like Aaron Bushnell, I don't mean icon in the same way that you might consider Elvis Presley an icon or sort of Maya Angelou, I mean a literal representative symbol of the condition of our time.
Remember, Like most of us, if we have an image of self-immolation, it's normally like a monk or something like that, right?
That's the image that you have in your mind.
People that are in transcendent states, that come from an entirely different culture.
An active service personnel setting themselves on fire is a perfect image for understanding how out of control the war machine and the military-industrial complex are.
So we ask in our investigation today, If the public don't want this war, if service personnel don't want this war, who wants this war?
Now let me know in the Rumble chat, who wants this war?
Who benefits from this war?
Who opposes these wars?
Let me know as well, you Awaken Wonders over on Locals, because this is an important conversation for us to have.
Later on in the show, we're going to be looking at Biden's mad appearances on Seth Meyers, wasn't it?
And a bunch of other stories as well.
So stay with us all the way through this.
But for now, here's the news.
No, here's the effing news.
Thank you for using Fox News.
The news.
No, here's the fucking news!
Active U.S.
servicemen Aaron Bushnell set himself on fire to protest against U.S.
involvement in Middle Eastern war.
If the troops themselves don't support these wars, if the public don't support these wars, who are these wars for and who benefits from them?
Now, we have a martyred man on our hands, Aaron Bushnell, who may have mental health issues, who may be suffering from a variety of conditions.
We're unable to assess that yet.
What we can say for certain is a person who felt strongly enough in his nation, America, to live his life, dedicated to it through active military service, has set himself on fire outside the Israeli embassy in protest against the ongoing Middle Eastern war, which some people would call, of course, and let me know in the chat how you feel about this, a genocide in Gaza.
Now what does it tell us about the military-industrial complex and the state of the unipolar ambitions of the military-industrial complex?
The idea that you cannot have an ascendant Russia or a thriving China.
What you must have is a globalist state backed by institutions like NATO.
Have we reached the point where you can't even use the time-honoured argument that it is Well, what does this event tell us?
support war, that we have to support the troops. Those people that bravely put
themselves on the front line have to be respected and to question wars is to
question their loyalty, is to daub yourself anti-patriotic.
Well what does this event tell us? And indeed, imagine if this protest
that were aligned to issues that the state supports, how this death would be exploited.
Imagine that this could be framed as somehow, oh this guy set himself on fire because he doesn't like Donald Trump in some way.
Or if they have in some way been repressed or damaged by a conservative or traditionalist agenda.
Imagine how this event would have been exploited.
We're not going to show you the footage because I've watched it.
I don't watch things like that, generally speaking.
I found it too disturbing.
You'll be able to find it if you want to watch it.
But here's a still from it that Caitlin Johnston commented was an image that helps you to understand modern America.
A serviceman who has burned himself to death, having a pistol aimed at him.
What an astonishing image that is.
Caitlin Johnston has also written this piece on the broader implications of this tragic, unpleasant event.
Active US airman Aaron Bushnell set himself on fire outside the Israeli embassy in Washington today.
He said he did it in protest of the genocide in Gaza.
Independent journalist Talia Jain reports that a police officer showed up pointing a gun at the man's burning body.
I guess that's just what American cops do when they aren't sure what to do.
Someone who was actually trying to save the man reportedly yelled, I don't need guns, I need fire extinguishers.
I feel sometimes the world throws up the perfect symbol to define our time.
In this instance, a serviceman who set himself on fire in protest of a war supported by the United States of America and therefore taxpayer dollars, ultimately ends up with a police officer pointing a gun at him while he burns himself to death.
Tells you something not only about the conflict in the Middle East, in particular the Gaza conflict, but it also tells you something about the relationship between the state and the military.
The state And all of us, the nihilism, the ridiculousness, the sadness and the hopelessness of the plight of the world when wars funded and perpetuated in this manner lead even to those that are asked to enact what is required of the military to self-immolation, self-destruction, despair and dread.
I think all of us get a sense that the military are exploited, their image, their loyalty, their service used to leverage censorship and compliance from the rest of us who may have many questions about the nature of these wars.
But this provides us with an event and a symbol that brings into stark and stunning reality exactly what's going on in the Middle East, as if the images from that region weren't enough to help us understand the need for intervention, the need for diplomacy, the need for an end to these wars.
This just might be the most American thing I've ever heard of.
It's more American than the fake bald eagle cries that they put in Hollywood movies.
It's more American than monster trucks and mass shootings.
You simply cannot fit more America into a single incident than a man dying a horrifying death in protest of war crimes while a first responder screams at cops to stop pointing their guns at him and go get fire extinguishers.
If you were to pick a single moment in history to sum up the essence and expression of the US Empire, that would be it.
That's why I'll be very surprised if this gets much mainstream coverage.
Of course there is the horror, gore, sadness and tragedy of a human being doing that in desperation and in protest.
But there's also what is implied by the event.
All of us remember the image of that child running away from napalm attacks.
All of us remember the man in Tiananmen Square holding those bags in front of a tank.
Those images were popularized presumably because in some way or another we either had a more responsible news media at that time that genuinely opposed the establishment agenda, or we were just more naive in the establishment agenda at those points.
Required withdrawal from Vietnam, so they started to popularize that image.
Or in the case of Tiananmen Square, you can see why opposition to China would always have been an attitude or an aspect.
Nevertheless, at this point where many of us are questioning the legitimacy of events
in Gaza, the ongoing Ukraine-Russia war, the escalation of tensions between America and
China, a service person doing this outside an embassy is an indication that the appetite
for these wars is waning, even as more and more we're subjected to various advocates
for militarism saying, you have to keep this war going, we're just on the brink of beating
Russia, we're just about to achieve Middle Eastern peace through war, you have to control
Iran, if we don't do this, it's clear that that idea is running out of steam and the
image of Aaron Bushnell ablaze perhaps might be a pivotal moment in all of our understanding
of these wars.
As you know, our channel is continually accused of conveying misinformation.
We are accused of being conspiracy theorists.
You know that our defense is that we try to convey the truth to you and we try to oppose establishment power.
On that basis, here are some facts about actual support support for the war. Here are some facts about the way that
wars are funded and who benefits from those wars and here are some facts about
how service personnel are treated and how they feel more broadly, what
their economic and domestic conditions are, so that you can decide for
yourselves what might be behind these forever wars when perhaps they are not
beneficial to the troops that are being enlisted and compelled to conduct the
business of war. A Forbes 2022 poll showed that only 17% support the United States
doing whatever it can to help Ukraine even if it provokes a war.
This war is becoming less and less popular, even as its funding increases, often tied to other wars and other regional disputes, shall we call them.
There is still an appetite to continue to fund this dispute, not to reach a diplomatic resolution.
A majority of American adults would not be willing to serve in the military were the US to enter into a major war, recent polling has found.
Ought then we not be considering that fact when entering into further agitation with Russia and potentially China and escalating tensions in the Middle East.
That people in America don't want to fight in a war.
I don't know if that has any impact.
No, not really, we can just ignore that.
Okay, what do you mean by democracy again?
I like Mike Benz's analysis.
Democracy now doesn't mean elections and therefore the will of the people.
Democracy means a set of institutions, be they national or global, that serve the carriage of power, that serve the fulfilment of the agenda of the powerful.
It's a brilliant shift.
And they say, we have to do this to protect democracy.
There's no elections in Ukraine.
By democracy, we mean BlackRock.
Thank the Lord we can bring you this content because of the support of our sponsors.
Support them if you can.
Today, I want to talk to you about Fielder Greens.
It's the healthiest thing I do every day.
And I want you on this journey with me, side by side.
It's literally one scoop a day.
It tastes great.
My favorite is the original flavor, and it's completely improved my life.
This is nutrition the way that nature intended, in a scoop.
Here's what I noticed since I started taking field of greens.
Way more energy over the course of the day.
Sleeping better at night like a baby.
As you know they're truculent and difficult at night time so I sleep better than one.
Healthier hair and skin.
It helps with my digestion.
My stomach feels better.
I feel better overall and I think healthier and and stronger. Fielder Greens is radically different. Each
organic fruit and vegetable was medically chosen to support the heart and vital organ
health. I trust Fielder Greens to keep me healthy. I promise you're going to love this
product, but if for any reason you don't, they'll give you 100% money back guarantee. Now
listen, I've got you 15% off your first order, plus free rush shipping. Visit brickhouserussell.com
and use promo code brand. That's promo code brand at brickhouserussell.com.
They'll know I sent you. Okay, let's get back to the story. Quinnipiac polls show that 84% of Americans
worry about getting pulled into a war in the Middle East.
Some 65% want a ceasefire in Israel's war on Gaza, not US military action.
That appears to be a statistic that ought sway the outcome.
President Joe Biden will convene the top four congressional leaders at the White House this week to press lawmakers on passing the $95 billion national security package that bolsters aid for Ukraine, Israel, as well as the Indo-Pacific.
How can those initial pieces of data lead to that piece of data?
No one wants a war.
People don't want to enlist.
People want war to end.
We're going to be funding some more wars.
Well, were you listening to the first bit?
We were listening and actively ignoring.
Congress has passed four spending packages in response to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, $113 billion in total.
As of September 2021, the Pentagon's spending has totaled over $14 trillion since the start of the war in Afghanistan, with one half of the total going to military contractors.
One half of the total going to military contractors.
Are you beginning to suspect there could be an agenda beyond helping different sets of children around the world?
Remember, you may have recently seen Victoria Nuland saying, The good thing about this war in Ukraine is a lot of the money finds its way back to the American military-industrial complex.
And by the way, most of the support we are providing actually goes right back into the U.S.
economy and defense-industrial base.
Yeah, almost as if that's the whole point of this.
A large portion of these contracts, one quarter to one third of all Pentagon contracts in recent years, have gone to just five major corporations.
Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman.
I wonder if they have any influence on these policies.
Again, using Mike Benz's analysis, democracy now doesn't mean elections, it means institutions.
Presumably some of these institutions are the relationships between the state and major corporations, donors and funders.
Let me know in the chat how you would assess that information.
Meanwhile, how are the actual military personnel themselves feeling about these wars?
Remember, just 10-20 years ago, it was considered unpatriotic to criticize wars because it was as if you didn't respect the sacrifice made by service personnel.
And I know that many of you are vets that watch our channel, and I see your comments in there, and I hear how you talk about your time in service.
Look at some of these statistics.
It's an astonishing insight.
Military families are reporting housing, health, and financial challenges, according to a survey released by the Military Family Advisory Network, which found that nearly a quarter of enlisted families are experiencing food insecurity, and that more than 60% of respondents pay more than they can comfortably afford on housing.
Active service personnel cannot afford food and shelter.
That's really near the top of the Maslow Pyramid of Needs.
I'm doing the Pyramid of Needs there.
This isn't some Illuminati thing.
The Pyramid of Needs.
So if you're in the services and you can't afford food and shelter, you know, go America
or not.
One fifth of active service families and nearly 40% of veteran families surveyed reported
less than $500 of emergency savings or no emergency savings funds.
And over three quarters of military families indicated they carried debt.
Almost 40,000 veterans are without shelter in the US on any given night.
Those statistics I find very difficult to listen to and they are brought into stark
clarity by the image of Aaron Bushnell, a blaze outside an embassy in protest of a war
It seems that Aaron Bushnell has identified another conflict for which he is willing to give his life and I would say in that conflict there is an indication that there is a deeper patriotism available to all of us.
What does it really mean to support our tribe, to support our nation, to support our people?
Does it mean the continued funneling of our tax dollars and resources to those five companies or does it mean disobedience and Let me know in the chat and the comments what side of that equation you find yourself.
Once again, Caitlin Johnson has written about how both parties, the Republican and the Democrats, when it comes to this issue of war, and perhaps war is the ultimate issue, you tell me, ultimately agree with one another and tend to simply use different aesthetics when it comes to what legitimizes their war or their pursuit of their agenda.
It's an interesting article.
Have a listen.
The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that if a Republican president were to back a genocide, it will be an evil and unforgivable atrocity.
Whereas when a Democrat president backs a genocide, it's a minor foible that you better shut up about unless you want Trump to win.
The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that the Republicans argue in support of wars, militarism, capitalism, and oppression using right-wing The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that Republicans do evil things for evil reasons, whereas Democrats do evil things for noble, humanitarian reasons.
The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that Republicans facilitate all the interests of the U.S.
Empire because America is strong and godly and should rule the world, whereas Democrats facilitate all the interests of the U.S.
Empire because America is liberal and egalitarian and defends the rules-based international order.
The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that Republicans want to start a world war with China, whereas Democrats strongly favor starting a world war with Russia.
The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that people massacring civilians in the global South under Republican administrations are racist, homophobic, misogynistic bigots, whereas the people massacring civilians in the global South under Democratic administrations are inclusive, intersectional, feminist, LGBTQ allies.
The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that Republicans criticise Democrats for made-up nonsense reasons like wokeness, whereas Democrats criticise Republicans for made-up nonsense reasons like Russiagate.
The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that Republicans are led by demented octogenarian swamp monsters who can't string a sentence together and have spent decades in office promoting ecocide, imperialism, exploitation and oligarchy, whereas Democrats, oh well I guess that one's both of them actually.
The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that liberals feel bad when Republicans are overseeing the imperial bloodbath and feel good when Democrats are.
The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that when Republicans do the monstrous things necessary to maintain a globe-spanning empire, they're the greater evil.
Whereas when Democrats do the monstrous things necessary to maintain a global-spanning empire, they're the lesser evil.
The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that when the imperial murder machine has an R on it, we're meant to frown, and when the imperial murder machine has a D on it, we're meant to smile.
I don't know where Caitlin Johnston, the author of that piece, stands on American imperialism, and it certainly doesn't seem that she's particularly enchanted by either party in the American political system.
And it seems to me that with Aaron Bushnell's death, we should be looking with this further scrutiny, not Only at America's military endeavors around the world, the way it's funding, who profits, who suffers, who dies as a result of it on all sides, whether that's the people dying in Gaza, the people dying in Ukraine, the people dying in Russia, the people that will die in Iran, presumably the people dying in Yemen, the people dying in Syria, the people that might die in Taiwan, the people that will die in China, the Americans that will die, all of the people that will be invited to die as this project continues, as well as perhaps assessing what benefits were gleaned from the Iraq war and who experienced
I can't imagine there's many of you saying Joe Biden because I read your comments, I know where you stand.
How did you benefit from that? How's your food prices? How's your fuel prices?
And who can you vote for right now that will end these wars?
I know many of you will be responding, Trump, Donald Trump.
Perhaps some of you will be saying, Robert Kennedy. But I know many of you have questions there.
I can't imagine there's many of you saying Joe Biden because I read your comments. I know where you stand.
Where we stand on this issue is that perhaps this is an opportunity, a time for us to assess the nature of war,
what our priorities truly are.
If American service personnel, while in active duty, are setting themselves on fire, and even the ones that aren't
driven to martyrdom, are living in peculiar circumstances of poverty and
suffering, does the idea that criticizing the war machine is anti-patriotic even make sense anymore?
And if you, as those statistics show, do not want to spend your tax dollars and your family's lives on these wars, who is benefiting from these wars?
When you see long-term political apparatchiks like Victoria Nuland saying it's necessary to continue the war against Russia, Or when you see various advocacy groups saying it's necessary to further disrupt the Middle East in spite of the ongoing intervention of the West being part of the obvious problem in that region.
When you see people on one side of the political aisle saying we must have war with Russia and on the other side we must have war with China and for those of us that are in other English-speaking nations caught in the tailwind of your great nation debating whether or not our tax money and our children's lives have to be spent on your wars, surely it's time for us to together as people Wherever we stand on the cultural scale, wherever we sit in the political spectrum to say, whose interests are being served by this?
When you see legacy media instruments, even ones of entertainment, refusing to robustly question the integrity of this ongoing global military campaign, you have to ask, how is it that the media are owned?
That the political establishment is owned?
That social media is increasingly becoming owned, censored and controlled in order to facilitate whom?
In order to benefit who?
And if you're wondering about what the benefits of these wars might be, have a look at what the benefits of the last wars were and how they benefited you, your family and your community.
And if to ask those questions is unpatriotic, then I'd have to say that I am becoming increasingly less patriotic.
I say that as an Englishman.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
See you in a second!
Thank you for choosing Fox News.
We're finished.
No.
Here's the fucking news!
The forgiveness of humanity relies on moral love.
Fantastic stuff.
There's some beautiful comments.
Money, Russ, says iProng.
Drakovich.
Monks burn themselves to free Tibetan protest as well.
Yeah, dedicated people with real principles may in the end sacrifice themselves for their beliefs.
Unencumbered.
All the war propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred comes invariably from people who are not fighting.
George Orwell there.
We're going to do an additional 10 minutes on locals today.
We'll post a link in the description.
If you want to come over for an additional little hangout, maybe you'll get a little look at Gareth if you behave yourselves.
Lottie777 talking about Aaron Bushnell says, we've only seen this story On our channel.
Is that true?
The legacy media not covering this?
Why is that?
Imagine if this was someone that had set themselves on fire to protest against Donald Trump in some way.
You would never hear the last bit, would you?
But because it's an anti-war protester, in particular anti...
To quote him directly, anti-genocide in Gaza, to use the terms he used, which I would include in my anti-war stance.
No war.
No war.
What's the point, man?
Mayor Mama, we're never told the truth about war and the reasoning behind them.
We're just supposed to be good little minions, absorb the propaganda, and cheer our country on.
When I say minions now, of course I do remember that I was in Despicable Me, and I Did actually create the minions in that narrative.
Don't know if that helps.
Don't know if that helps with this issue.
Okay.
Hey, listen, um, this is an interesting, like, now, you know, whenever you saw Albert Baller interviewed on Mainstream, CEO of Pfizer, Albert Baller, he was always like, oh, well, it's a fantastic product.
Now Kellogg's Corn Flakes may not be lethal, but the way that the CEO of Kellogg's is advocating for us eating Corn Flakes for every goddamn meal of the day.
Vile slops, I call it.
Someone should make a kombucha called that.
Let's have a look at the CEO of Kellogg's.
We could have, um, thanks guys.
The CEO of Kellogg's Suggesting we eat cereal for our dinner.
Why don't we go to restaurants and eat cereal for our dinner?
Why don't you just put it in a trough and we'll eat like the pigs you think we are.
Let's have a look.
The cereal category has always been quite affordable and it's... Faux Peasy in the chat.
Cereal for dinner.
Grow the fuck up.
Grow the fuck up.
Alright, so sorry.
It tends to be a great destination when consumers are under pressure.
So some of the things that we're doing is first messaging.
We gotta reach the consumer where they are.
So we're advertising about cereal for dinner.
If you think about the cost of cereal for a family versus what they might otherwise
do, that's gonna be much more affordable.
It's a lot more affordable.
It's also a bit more depressing, isn't it, to think of a family sat around for Thanksgiving around a bowl of Rice Krispies.
I'm all for innovati- SNAP CRACKLE AND POVERTY!
...and marketing, but the idea of having cereal for dinner, um, is there the poten- Even a guy on CNBC whose basic function is to support this kind of financially-led story.
But look, I've got a family, and the idea that I'm gonna give a Cocoa Pop to my son on Christmas Day, it bugs me, man!
Uh, we don't think so.
In fact, it's landing really well right now.
No, actually, you're wrong.
Cereal for dinner is great.
Right now, Carl, when we look at all of our data, of course we would... Data?
About cereal for dinner?
What possible data could you have?
Hey, it says here that eating cereal for dinner is not depressing.
Hmm.
Cereal for dinner, then.
We know that breakfast cereal is the number one choice for in-home consumption.
Masturbating?
All day long?
Alone?
In a cell?
Yeah!
Why not?
...understand that for breakfast.
It turns out that over 25% of our consumption is outside the breakfast occasion.
A lot of it's at dinner, and that occasion continues to grow.
As well as the snacking occasion, but... There's a snacking occasion, there's a breakfast occasion, there's occasion to have a look at a deteriorating society where people are eating discarded corn products in a bowl of milk alone at dinner time.
At the dinner time occasion, I call it.
Cereal for dinner is something that is probably more on trend now and we would expect to continue as that consumer is under pressure.
That pressure is leading us into total despair, perhaps the kind of despair that's induced with the ongoing banalization of the culture.
Here's Joe Biden in aviators appealing to God alone knows who through a series of non sequiturs and banalities.
Oh, that's that Kellogg's guy again.
Did I mention, why don't you have cereal for your dinner tonight?
Instead of something healthy, instead of sitting down and sharing a joint, I meant in the sense, the traditional sense, with a loved one, why not just eat some cereals, then eat the box?
My favorite one recently is there are 18% of Americans, according to recent polling, have believed that you and Taylor Swift are actually working in cahoots.
And after the Kansas City Chiefs won the Super Bowl, uh, you, uh, you posted this on social media and wrote... You wrote, just like we drew it up.
Now, can you... I have you on the... Funny, though.
It's not actually funny.
It's not funny like a funny thing is funny, that is.
It's not funny.
It's not a funny thing.
It's not like amusing.
It's sort of weird.
It's creepy.
It's misjudged.
Can you confirm or deny that there is an active conspiracy between you and Miss Swift?
Where are you getting this information?
It's classified.
That'd be less funny if we didn't just find out today that the CIA have got bases in Ukraine and have been provoking Russia into a war for 10 years after the CIA sponsored a coup in 2014.
Where are you getting this information?
No, it's classified.
Yeah, there's some other information that's classified.
The documentation of your financial relationship with Pfizer, the amount of power that the military-industrial complex exerts over your administration, the reason that the Pentagon can't pass a simple audit.
A lot of things seem to be classified.
But I will tell you, she did endorse me in 2020.
She did?
Hooray!
Hooray for 2020.
And how did that work out?
You might be wondering, you think it might come around again?
Totally just classified.
I think now that he's discovered that you can just say things are classified, he's going to be doing that a lot, isn't he?
In like interviews, he's going to say it again and again.
Let's have a look at what Joe Biden proposes to bring us in the 2024 election.
What are the policies?
What's the vision for America?
This is it.
Here we are.
Potentially on the precipice of global conflagration, we are continually told that Donald Trump is a sort of pseudo-Hitler, a new incarnation of populist decline.
So, what's Biden going to do in the event that you spend your hard-earned vote on the Democrat Party?
What do you want to do?
What's your 2024 agenda?
Because I feel like we live in such crazy times that that is one of the things I feel we hear less about.
The 2020 agenda is to finish the job.
What?
Finish the job?
That seems a little phatic, a little empty, and a bit like you might not have any ideas.
Perhaps there's no point voting anyway because it's likely, it seems again, the idea that Russia and Putin are in control of American elections.
It's an idea that just will not die.
A little like Joe Biden.
No, I don't want to say that about Joe Biden.
Let's go now to an exclusive NBC News report.
Russia has already begun interfering in the 2024 election according to former U.S.
officials.
Who's interfering in the 2024 election?
It's Joe Biden by being unelectable, by being ridiculous, by having no vision, by being a visual symbol of the decay and decline of the political institutions that were once the envy of the world.
It's not Russia.
Russia is not the problem.
Moscow has been using fake online accounts and bots to damage President Biden's campaign.
You use bots against me?
How dare you use a bot on me?
Well, actually, no, I think that Vladimir Putin in that interview that he did at the Kremlin after the Tucker interview said he'd rather have Joe Biden.
Now, of course, Putin is capable of lying.
I'm not suggesting that he isn't.
I'm saying that why would he want?
Why would he prefer Trump?
Why wouldn't he want?
Biden or Trump?
Have a look, here he is, you know, in his own words.
I know you're not supposed to take that seriously.
I know there's only one strain of propaganda you're supposed to consume.
Biden or Trump?
Biden.
I like Biden.
He better.
He better.
Now, the other issue is that Russians are deliberately and persistently meddling with the minds of African-American men.
Here's Van Jones.
Did he really get 100 million quid from Amazon?
That can't be right, Will.
I need to fact check that.
Did he really?
Did Jeff Bezos give Van Jones 100 million?
We need to look into that.
In any event, here is Van Jones saying that Russia are the reason That young black men don't want to vote for Joe Biden, but I can think of other reasons.
What's actually happening, though, is that there is an online influence campaign.
Correct.
Some of it, I think, is coming from Russia, China and Iran that is whipping up that...
They're all the countries that we're supposed to have wars with, aren't they?
Is that a coincidence?
Russia, China and Iran are all trying to get us to vote for Trump.
That's the issue.
They're also, like China, a global enemy who there's a unipolar agenda to drain Russia.
The same, Iran got oil.
Conversation, way in, unnaturally.
But let me ask you a question, I want to answer it.
Go ahead.
So, there's a solid block that's not going to move, there is some actual legitimate frustration and fatigue, but there's also, and we have to talk about it more, an online influence campaign designed to depress and distress black voters and to split black voters.
I think voters, indeed human beings, of all races, creeds and hues are in despair because
the culture has no values or principles.
Just hollow, empty and divisive ideas that in fact do seem designed to create more division and more hatred.
The emergence of culture politics, the inability for any political party to represent working people or to oppose globalist interests.
So many reasons that people might not have any faith at all in the American political system.
And I think pretty low down on that list is Vladimir Putin.
Let me just look at poll numbers.
Going back to 2008, seeing some sort of a shift among black men siding with the Republican Party.
I was supposed to, young black men, I was supposed to, ooh, among that, look at them, like young black men, hmm, which one of these old white men should we get into?
We put that up under, for McCain, 5%, Romney in 2012, 11%.
Stupid bit of information, man.
in 2012 11% stupid bit of information man. Donald Trump 2016 13% Donald Trump 2020 19%.
Can I put it out there that it's his black male support and one thing we're
not acknowledging is the growing gender divide that is happening across the
board with partisanship that men in general are trending.
This ain't addressing the significance of our... Yeah, look, Bezos donates $100 million each to CNN contributor...
What?!
That's amazing!
God, what do you have to do to do that?
Tell me what Jeff Bezos requires to be making these donations, and by God, we'll do it!
Astonishing, really.
Okay, listen, you guys.
Now, remember we've got Ram Paul on the show on Thursday.
If you're on Awake and Wonder, and we're going to do another 10 minutes now for you lot, like Beth in Wonderland and Diana Barona, and I like your question there.
Ron Paul's partner of 25 years, Air Force officer Jack Pruett, father of Glenn Pruett, wrote The Grand Deception about the Luciferian Brotherhood.
If you want questions about the Luciferian Brotherhood, that's what's going on.
On the Awaken Wonder chat on Locals right now and Rand Paul is coming on on Thursday to talk about his book Deception.
But we're going to talk about a lot of stuff on there.
We're going to talk about what you decide.
Why don't you join us on there now to look at what happened to the good people of America when cell service ceased for a matter of moments and how the country fell apart.
We'll have a little bit of fun together.
We'll talk about some of our questions for Rand in a little minute.
And also I want to welcome some of our new members like MontanaMax84, you are welcome here, Hepu22, LazGal, New Narratives, BarefootSoldier, all of you are most welcome to be a part of this movement for truth, this movement for individual and collective freedom.
A lot of you, like Kyle Rhino, are demanding release the Gareth.
Gareth will remain in chains until We get peace.
The peace we deserve.
A lot of you saying that perhaps Joe Biden had text on the inside of his aviators and that is a plausible theory if you ask me.
Listen guys, we're going to go over to Locals now for five or ten minutes.
Let's post that link in the description again.
Get on it now.
I think you have to click on it.
Maybe you have to type something in.
It doesn't mean you have to get you don't have to pay us to go on locals by the way you can for additional
Revenue get one extra video a week like the Amy Winehouse one I done
I did a really good Terrence McKenna one some brilliant other stuff so click on that link in the description
Right now see CIA spy bases that one there I've just placed under Stephanie and above M meows that one
click on that and we've seen me now Next step, Russell, all natural cloths.
You will not get me in a natural cloth.
I tell you that, my man.
OK, see you on Locals right now, where we'll prepare for Rand Paul.
And we're also building a community together.
A lot of people are posting real estate that they think we should acquire in order to establish a community.
Don't call it a cult.
Cults are dangerous.
The link is not a hyperlink.
That's what the Kenshin 2488 is.
We're seeing some...
You can't say that about Taylor Swift.
You guys, man.
Hold it together for God's sake.
All right.
All right.
See you.
I'll see you in a second.
Over on Locals.
Stay free.
See you in a few seconds.
And also, see you tomorrow.
Not for more of the same, but for more of the difference.
Till then.
Ta-ta.
Stay free.
Stay free.
Switch on.
▲
Export Selection