Hillary Clinton ATTACKS “Puppy Dog” Tucker Carlson + EU TRAVEL BAN?!! - Stay Free #302
|
Time
Text
I'm going to go ahead and do that.
Brought to you by Pfizer.
So I'm looking for the steel Looking for the steel
In this video, you're going to see the future.
Hello, this is Frederick.
Hi, this is Arthur.
We are getting to the breaking news.
We've got a live spot there.
Hello there, you awakening wonders.
Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand and what a fantastic show it's going to be.
Of course, we're still covering the escalating tension around a journalist interviewing a political leader and how, like COVID and the way that it was handled, it reveals fissures in the way that power operates and the functioning Machinery of the propagandist globalist elite.
What's extraordinary about this story is it's become impossible for them to deny that they have a vested interest in controlling information and even now the legacy media are advocating for the interview to be pulled Have you read that yet?
We'll be bringing you that story in a moment and you can be sure that there are plenty of platforms that will comply if there is an edict to ban this interview and prevent it from being shown.
If you know anybody that's not watching this stream right now, pull them in off the streets!
Get them to join us regardless of their culture, their identity, their religion or lack of religion.
They should be with us now as we unify against this globalist conspiracy to control the information that we're able to consume.
To ensure that we take particular medications if it suits them.
To ensure that we can't freely exchange information that they can censor us at will.
It's vital that we unite now.
Unified but decentralized against the globalist elite.
Tucker's travel ban may yet occur.
The mainstream media are fretting.
As you might imagine, Hillary Clinton, she be sweating.
She be advocating for real change.
It's extraordinary to watch this unfold.
And if the Tucker Putin story weren't enough, we've got some other fantastic information as we continue to awaken together in Canada.
They want to Kill us for being poor!
This story has to be delicately handled, and we are handling it delicately.
But the increasing appetite for euthanasia across Canada is a story... Are you aware of this?
Are you aware that in Canada, medical assistance in dying is being offered not only to people with terminal illnesses, but people with incurable illnesses, which includes mental illnesses, which is now being extended to the illness of poverty itself.
It's an astonishing time to be alive, but if you're in Canada you might not be alive for very long.
If you're watching us on YouTube right now, it's absolutely vital that eventually you click the link in the description.
You join us in the sweet stream of freedom.
Not so that hate speech can be exchanged, but so that we can speak freely to one another, that we may unify.
I want to welcome you Awakened Wonders over there on Locals.
I'm talking to you, Sensitive Hearts 25.
I'm talking to you, Chief 411.
I'm talking to you, Lamal Lamal.
I'm talking to you, Poet of Militants.
I'm talking to you, Haiti80Kid, Shawkeen, Jude the Brain.
I'm talking to all of you guys.
Thank you so much for joining us today.
So, okay, first up, let's get into it.
Let's get into this together.
The European Union is said to be seeking sanctions and a travel ban against Tucker Carlson for his interview with Putin.
Let's have a look at that.
The EU is gearing up to slap sanctions on Tucker Carlson as a result of his upcoming interview with Vladimir Putin.
MEP Ermes Payet said Putin is wanted by the International Criminal Court and accused of genocide and war crimes.
Payet added, so for such propaganda for a criminal regime you can end up on the list of sanctions.
This concerns primarily travel ban from EU countries.
But this is the story that fascinates me.
Tucker Carlson interview with Putin to test EU law regulating tech companies.
Do we have a still for this?
Is there a button for this story?
The EU's far route.
Check this out guys.
This is amazing.
If you're watching this on YouTube, this is exactly the way that things are heading now.
This is what our concern is when we talk about censorship.
And free Assange for truth?
Bear ain't getting no treats.
I don't think Bear's even in the room.
He ain't getting any treats at all.
Not for a while now.
We've been talking about censorship in the EU.
We've been talking about censorship in Canada.
We've been We're talking about censorship in the UK, new hate speech laws in Ireland.
We are now at the precipice of seeing precisely how these things unfurl and unfold.
We're seeing exactly what the type of information they are desperate to control looks like.
The potential that we might get an alternative perspective on a global conflict absolutely terrifies them.
Let's have a listen to this story.
This is in their legacy media outlet from the United Kingdom, The Guardian.
The EU's far-reaching new laws to regulate tech companies including X and Facebook will face their first big test on Thursday night when former Fox News host Tucker Carlson's interview with Vladimir Putin is aired in the US.
A spokesperson for the European Commission said it anticipated that the interview would provide a platform for Putin's twisted desire to reinstate the Russian Empire.
Fact-check that!
Fact-check Putin's twisted desire to reinstate the Russian Empire.
That's the sort of question I want to see him ask, wouldn't you?
I'm not saying it's impossible that Putin does have a twisted desire to reinstate the Russian Empire, but I'd like to be able to look at his eyes myself and see what he says when asked, have you got a twisted desire to reinstate the Russian Empire?
Or is Russian expansion... In fact, leave that up.
It really helps me, guys.
Leave that screen up.
Thanks, guys.
Have you got an expansionist desire?
Do you want to reclaim Ukraine as a territory?
I'm not saying that Putin is incapable of lying.
I'm not saying that, you know, in Russia people don't end up meeting mysterious ends as a result of KGB activity.
What I'm simply asking is might we collectively want to decide how many tax dollars, how many
human lives, how many more Ukrainians must die in the pursuit of what increasingly appears
to be an operation to increase military industrial complex revenue.
We can all assume what Putin might say, I mean he's a chronic liar, said the EU spokesperson
for foreign affairs.
It's becoming sort of essentially gossip now.
We all heard Jens Stoltenberg say that he knew explicitly that if they were to invite Ukraine to join NATO that it would likely escalate tensions.
The interviewers raised concerns within the EU that it will be used as part of Putin's wider information war with the likelihood that clips would spread across social media particularly on Elon Musk's X platform providing the Russian leader with a propaganda coup.
The idea that propaganda is a uniquely Russian phenomenon is extraordinary.
Have a look at this propaganda from the mainstream media.
Can I have a look at where that is, guys?
It's like the MSM thing.
Can you...
He's the leading GOP candidate, and it comes as Kremlin propagandist Tucker Carlson, a leading voice of the right-wing disinformation campaign, is in Moscow.
Ironically, he is there in the name of keeping Americans informed, sitting down for an interview with Vladimir Putin, who's nearly two years into his unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.
All of it, in a supercharged election year, makes this new warning from Nina Jenkiewicz about the coming flood of disinformation all the more timely and dire.
Jenkiewicz served as the head of the now-dissolved DHS Disinformation Board, I suppose this is a perfect storm for them.
Misinformation, disinformation, opportunities to censor and control, legitimately smearing political opponents.
Whether it's this Guardian story here that's looking to prime us to accept that this interview could be censored, or this MSNBC story here that is suggesting that we're going to have to brace ourselves for misinformation.
We're being prepared to reject this information even before we receive it.
Now I'd like to see the other bit that's like priming.
Can I see that other bit of information that's primed?
Is that on button two?
Button one?
Where are we?
I think we need to put this interview in proper context, Alicia, even before we get to see it.
We know some things.
We know that Vladimir Putin has not had an interview or granted an interview with legitimate Western journalists for almost four years now.
Tucker Carlson is neither a journalist nor a reporter but he has played one on TV and now... That's really interesting isn't it?
That's a really interesting attack on Tucker Carlson at this point.
Putin has chosen him so we know that Putin was a former KGB officer He that means he does things when he knows the outcome.
He does things with a purpose and a strategy.
Therefore, we can conclude that he knows what the outcome will be here.
He knows that he can play Tucker Carlson, who has already praised him effusively, both when he was on Fox and now on his ex.
I don't know that Tucker Carlson has effusively praised Vladimir Putin.
What I've seen Tucker Carlson do is question the legitimacy of total censorship and all-out war.
These seem to me to be pretty reasonable inquiries.
A channel and videos and it will be edited by both Carlson and by Putin.
The Russian media is already fawning all over Carlson, following him around to restaurants and the ballet in Moscow during this visit.
And they will use this interview on their own networks in Russia.
Doesn't it strike you as more propagandist and sensorial that we can't watch Russia Today on YouTube?
Like, I'm aware that Russia Today will present news from a Russian perspective.
The clue is in the name of the broadcaster.
It's called Russia Today.
Also, they're talking about things that happened today in Russia.
But the idea that this isn't similarly propagandist ...is what provokes in me such outrage and ire, and ought provoke consternation and concern in you.
Do you know what I mean in the Awaken Wonder chat?
The idea that there's no such thing as Western propaganda at this point is preposterous.
...point clips of how lovely his visit was with Mr Putin.
Let's see if he's really a journalist.
Let's see if he asks the hard questions.
Let's see if he asks Mr. Putin about the innocent men, women and children killed in Ukraine for simply wanting to exercise their freedom to exist.
Let's see if he asks him about the over 20 journalists in prison right now in Russia for simply doing their job.
Let's see if he wants to know the whereabouts.
I'd like to hear some inquiries into the 2014 coup in Ukraine.
I'd like to hear what was in that treaty agreement between Putin and Zelensky that Boris Johnson scuppered.
I'd like to hear these things discussed on Western media.
You know that during the pandemic, true information was censored on the very platform, it's not Rumble that you're watching right now, but all of the rest Deep state infiltrated propagandist legislators appeared everywhere to ensure that only information pre-chewed and beneficial to their intentions was consumable by you.
And here we're watching... What is being presented to us is outrage, but this is fear.
What we're watching here, make no mistake, is fear.
As their grasp on your consciousness is beginning to unwind and unfurl.
It's extraordinary.
Again, What we'll witness probably in the interview that's going to be on in a little while between Tucker and Putin is probably Vladimir Putin presenting a very particular perspective, his own perspective, his nation's perspective, on a conflict that is no doubt complex, that may involve a criminal invasion, that doubtlessly involves the needless and painful death of many, many Ukrainian people.
But what we'll also get is perhaps a route to peace.
Surely, Tucker Carlson will say, under what conditions would Russia end this war, and surely the answer is going to be along the lines of, we don't want Ukraine to join NATO, we've always been pretty clear about that, we want some autonomy in Donbass, and we want Crimea.
And I suppose we as a global population can have our own views about the legitimacy of those claims, and Ukrainian people will have their own views of the legitimacy of those claims, but one of the things we'll all be considering in the West is, How much longer do we want to continue to fund a war that appears to be unwinnable unless it escalates to the degree where British people, Australian people, Swedish people, American people are being conscripted?
What is the preferable outcome?
And what, at this point, is propaganda?
The two dozen people indicted by special counsel Robert Mueller
for messing with our elections, hacking, and social media...
Oh, you're still pushing that, are you?
Propaganda. Let's see if those questions are asked.
How about how many times Mr Putin has decided...
The idea that foreign nations may interfere in domestic elections
is an interesting idea and one I'd like to see corroborating evidence on.
What is an absolute certainty is that the WHO are right now legitimately, with the support of your nation, I'll guarantee it, pushing through a treaty that would further reduce your sovereignty and your nation's sovereignty.
That would mean that if the WHO declare a medical emergency, your country will have to follow measures that they implement.
This is the kind of story that I'd like to see legacy media reporting on.
These are the kind of stories that I would like to see spread upon the mainstream.
What is the reason that these stories are only reported by independent media?
To throw somebody out a window because they oppose him or he's decided to poison one of his opponents.
That's who we're dealing with.
You know that there was a CIA plan to murder Julian Assange, right?
You know that Julian Assange is still in prison without trial in Belmarsh, awaiting extradition because he revealed information that wasn't dangerous.
It's been proven that no one has died as a result of WikiLeaks.
He's in prison because he embarrassed the state and because he empowered ordinary people with knowledge, just how journalists are supposed to.
As Tucker said very plainly in his video, he's just gonna ask some questions and we'll
decide for ourselves whether we all like, oh yeah, let's move to Russia.
...dealing with here, and if it's going to be a serious interview, then that, those are
the questions that will need to be asked.
Don't hold your breath though on whether those are asked.
The legacy media there lecturing us on reasonable and authentic broadcasting.
But if it's irony and hypocrisy you're after, here's Hillary Clinton talking about truth.
Tucker Carlson is in Moscow right now interviewing Vladimir Putin.
The first American outside journalist.
CTW234 in the rumble chat says state media are essentially government stenographers.
Do you agree with that statement?
Yeah.
Free Assange elsewhere in the chat.
To interview Putin since the war in Ukraine began.
What does that tell you about Tucker Carlson and right-wing media and also Vladimir Putin?
Well it shows me what I think we've all known.
Imagine if that journalist speaking to Hillary Clinton went, also I've noticed like a lot of people associated with you come to incredibly sticky ends and I'm not just talking about your husband in the White House.
What if she was to say what about the numerous Wars that you have supported.
The drone strikes that you have sanctioned.
The funding received by your foundation from weapons manufacturers.
All the while these questions remain unasked.
The pose of integrity and authenticity is maintained by legacy media as they continue to cudgel us into compliance.
But this era is at an end and they sense it.
They sense that they are losing control.
They sense the new alliances that are emerging.
They sense that communities like this one are growing even as we speak with thousands of people, hundreds of thousands of people, millions of people around the world uniting, recognizing that we may have different political views and cultural practices and religious ideologies, but when it comes to the establishment, we are all unified against their corruption.
And is there any figure that epitomizes this kind of careerist, professional, ordinary evil?
I'm not going to say that.
I'm not going to say that, it's just because I saw that Hillary Clinton is evil numerous times in the rumble chat and you guys influenced me there.
What I will say is that Hillary Clinton perhaps cannot be relied on for authenticity and truth.
Let's have a look at the rest of this conversation.
He's what's called a useful idiot.
I mean, if you actually read translations of what's being said on Russian media, they make fun of him.
I mean, he's like a puppy.
Krista1974 in the chat.
What was Barbara Waters' excuse for interviewing Putin?
Dog.
You know, he somehow, after having been fired from so many outlets in the United States, I would not be surprised if he emerges with a contract with a Russian outlet because he is a useful idiot.
He says things that are not true.
He parrots Vladimir Putin's pack of lies about Ukraine.
So I don't see why Putin wouldn't give him an interview because through him he can continue to lie about what his objectives are in Ukraine and what he expects to see happen.
It's really quite sad that not just somebody like Tucker Carlson who has, as I said, been fired so many times because... That's such a weird slur, being fired.
He was actually fired from a job.
Can you believe that?
Why was he fired from Fox News?
Was it because he spoke out about the agenda of the military-industrial complex?
Was it because of his insistence on speaking to people from across the political spectrum?
Was it because he's anti-establishment?
Was it because he had people like me and Glenn Greenwald on that channel?
Is it because he's plainly got journalistic interest in important anti-establishment stories?
I'm sure that Tucker Carlson, who I consider to be a friend, would disagree with me on a whole bunch of issues.
And guess what?
That don't matter!
When you respect other people's right to be free, when you expect our collective right to run our own communities, when you respect the idea that we might together oppose this globalist state, the instantiation of global corporatism, WHO treaties, various unelected bodies having undue power and control over our domestic systems of governance.
Extraordinary.
He seems unable to you know, correlate his reporting with the truth.
But also because it's a sign that there are people in this country right now
who are like a fifth column for Vladimir Putin and why? I don't know.
Yeah, because Hillary's never done anything globalist.
Crikey, listen, I'm gonna need a little, a little pep in my step, a little reward from one of our sponsors.
This is, uh, our sponsor today is Black Forest.
Let me declare explicitly to you, these people are our partners, and I'm pretty glad they are, because these NMN derivatives of B vitamin play a vital role in energy production, and if you're gonna oppose globalism, By Jove, you're going to need a little bit of energy.
They also facilitate muscle regeneration, metabolism and gene expression in the body.
NMNs replenish declining NAD plus levels which drop around 1% a year.
And would you believe it?
Big Pharma is trying to monopolize NMN by changing its status from a supplement to a drug.
And they want to charge a bunch of money for that.
They're doing this to corner the market and take it away from you.
Try NMNs, an anti-aging and NAD plus booster.
Use the code RUSSELL for 25% off.
Go to blackforestsupplements.com forward slash RUSSELL.
I've been taking these things.
I think with the pull-ups, I'm getting another couple of reps out of it.
And I think with my vehement opposition to globalism, I'm getting a couple of hours a day of anti-globalism out of it.
So give it a try.
There's a link in the description.
Let's get back to this from Hillary Clinton.
This is astonishing.
I mean, why are certain Republicans throwing their lot in?
Why are, you know, other Americans basically believing Putin?
Why did Trump believe Putin more than our 11 intelligence agencies?
I don't know, do you have a working theory on this?
Maybe because that Steele dossier was funded by the Clinton campaign.
This is a, again, let me say this, you don't have to be into Vladimir Putin or Russian expansionism or whatever imperialist projects may lurk behind the veil of the mystery of Mother Russia to reject out of hand this legacy media propaganda.
But it's more than just the political partisan advantage.
There is a yearning for leaders who can kill and imprison their opponents, destroy the press.
So you'll be campaigning for the release of Julian Assange then, will you Hilary?
In spite of that raft of emails that you found rather embarrassing, let's face it, now you saw yesterday on our show journalist on CNN savagely attacking Tucker Carlson. But
here is the very same journalist interviewing Vladimir Zelensky. She seemed to suggest that
Tucker Carlson is doing a puff piece, the same as Hillary Clinton there. That this
exchange between Putin and Tucker will be little more than propaganda. But have a look at the
very same CNN journalist talking to Zelensky.
As a human being...
Firstly, I love you.
And I don't care if there is only one media organization in Ukraine and there is no actual democracy to speak of.
Because it's been suspended because of this war, I love you and I support you.
Again, I love Ukraine.
I love Ukrainian people.
I believe in Ukrainian democracy.
I just hope that D.A.
Zelensky does.
So many people look up to you.
They rely on you.
No one can imagine how hard that is.
Do you Do you do anything for your- to yourself?
Are you- Oh my god, do you do- Listen, this is what worries me.
Not that you turned up at the Golden Globes thanking Black Rock and J.P.
Morgan.
As a journalist, I just have to ask you, why are you so damn nice?
Ever able to take a minute to- to read or to listen to music or something to sort of give yourself that, uh, a moment?
I have such moments.
Important.
I like Zelensky.
He's a comedian who became a leader of a nation.
What a trajectory, guys.
And I also, generally speaking, support plucky dogs.
Plucky dogs?
Plucky underdogs.
Plucky dogs?
I'm sure they have a value too.
And I think that this war should be ended as swiftly as possible.
And evidently, for a moment, Zelensky thought the same thing.
Because there was a treaty on the table.
And one of the questions that I'm really looking forward to seeing answered is, What was the nature of that treaty that Zelensky signed and was dissuaded from following through on by Boris Johnson, who was sent out there by Joe Biden to scupper that treaty?
Astonishing.
To be in silence.
To be alone.
And early, early in the morning, when... Someone says, when does this feel sexual?
Yeah, it's really weird.
There are no sounds.
Newsflash, we're not at war with Russia, says River Swimmer in the rumble chat.
Now listen, if you're watching us on YouTube, let's start the countdown.
We'll do the rest of this after.
We got so many fantastic stories it's going to send you doolally.
We're going to hit you with so much truth in this stream, you'll be crying out for a lie.
You'll be putting on the BBC and CNN just for a little bit of deception because the truth will be so abundant and surely the truth will set us all free.
This story about Canada's euthanasia laws is, I think it's going to set your heart racing.
Mental illness now is cause for euthanasia.
It's astonishing to watch.
Decide for yourselves if I'm telling the truth because I'm still baffled by it.
Click the link in the description.
Join us now.
Okay, let's continue with Zelensky there being quite rigorously...
Interviewed there really.
I think we had he was sprawling.
He was on there She had him on the ropes there asking him why had where he gets his hair cut.
Let's see where that goes Sounds no people.
No, they're not nobody.
I mean the people people our stuff I mean, no nobody is easy in my cabinet.
Nobody I can just read think think and the music house Really?
What music do you like?
Oh, I like.
I've been wondering about that.
I've been wondering, before JP Morgan funds some potential digital dystopia in the post-war Ukraine, in which trade unions are banned, who's your favourite pop star?
ACDC.
ACDC, I don't understand all the words.
Look, he's a really nice person.
I'm not being critical of him.
From a spiritual perspective, what a guy.
I love everybody.
God is great.
But from a journalistic perspective, there's some questions that gotta be asked.
I like the music.
Yeah, I like energy.
Maybe it's too old music for... I understand.
We're the same.
Okay, this is the sort of thing we've got to report on.
Remember when the Nord Stream Pipeline blew up and we all said, that's weird that that Nord Stream Pipeline blew up after Joe Biden said, we'll find a way of blowing up that Nord Stream Pipeline that takes natural gas from Russia to Germany.
We would find a way.
And Condoleezza Rice years ago said, listen, we need America to conquer the market when it comes to shale gas.
We've all seen it.
And then when that pipeline did blow up, Who did they blame?
It's everyone's favourite lunatic, Vladimir Putin.
He blew up that pipeline himself to make a point, like a lunatic cutting off his own finger in a bar fight.
Well, now we know that it was highly unlikely that Russia blew up their own economically invaluable pipeline to Germany that's a vital part of their war effort.
But more importantly, Sweden are conducting an investigation that seems destined to lead us to the conclusion that it's just one of those things in life we'll never know.
We'll never understand what happened to that pipeline.
Praying for you, Russell.
Appreciate it.
Keep praying for me.
I need your prayers.
I love you.
Sweden on Wednesday dropped its investigation into the explosions in 2022.
There's no point investigating this anymore.
On Nord Stream pipelines carrying Russian gas to Germany, saying it lacked jurisdiction in the case.
Its evidence has been handed to German investigators, while Denmark also has its own separate inquiry ongoing.
But if no conclusive evidence is found by either country, the mystery behind one of the most significant acts of infrastructure sabotage in modern history could remain unsolved.
Oh yeah, well, I think I could come up with a solution.
So, there you go, the North Stream Pipeline being blown up by, I don't know, Navy SEALs.
Do you remember when Jocko Willink was on our show and Jocko Willink goes, would you have been able to blow up that pipeline?
And the Navy SEALs went, yeah.
And I think then they found like some American service people's shoes by the pipeline.
It was almost sort of like 9-11 style.
We found this passport, sir!
Let's have a look at this.
This is another story about rampant globalism.
Another conspiracy theory we were told we never had to worry about was the old 15-minute cities, or as they would have it in Sydney, Australia, 30-minute cities.
Let's have a look.
So, um, not 11?
12?
Let's have a look.
Ah, there we go.
Australia's newest city has set high expectations, promising to be greener and more sustainable while promoting car-free streets and quick access to facilities.
I will say, it does look delightful.
The plan is aimed at decentralising work, shopping and leisure activities into regional areas and reduce car use and travel times for your convenience.
The New South Wales Government is committed to the concept of reinventing city life through the idea of 30-minute cities with 15-minute neighbourhoods.
So extraordinary, wasn't it?
For a minute, it was like it's all one world.
We're all together.
We're all interconnected.
It's, yeah, car-free streets.
What do we need streets for?
It's being presented, dystopia framed as utopia.
What do you think about that, you Awaken Wonders in the locals chat?
What do you think about it, Lightwinds?
What do you think, Firegirl2020?
What do you think about it, PeakG23, all you guys?
If there's a story that tells us dystopia is upon us, it is surely this one.
I myself am staggered by this because as part of this report you see some of the people that are considering this MAID Act.
It's a medically assisted dying in Canada.
I can see that some of you have heard of it because you're talking about it in the chat.
Now while the world is still rightly beguiled by the crack in the machine that is Putin Tucker, which we will be covering extensively tomorrow when we know a little more about it.
We have to look at what the trajectory of globalism also includes and this is one of the most terrifying stories I've seen for a long time.
Canada are only delaying their introduction of the medical assistance in dying program because they can't find enough doctors to implement the measures.
Now, I think all of us that have witnessed someone dying from terminal disease would be sympathetic to the idea that maybe some medical assistance in the last moments of their life, or in the last weeks, I don't know, I don't feel qualified to make such a decision, but the MAID Act appears to be being extended to people with incurable diseases, which includes mental illnesses such as anorexia and depression.
I think, and This story seems to imply that some people are being offered the opportunity for euthanisation simply for being poor.
I really want your opinion and perspective on this, because this for me, I believe, is the sort of story that if enough people are aware of it, will start to help us to recognise what's being masked by neoliberalism, what's being masked by globalism.
Something that seems Truly, truly dark.
I really, please, tell me in the chat what you think about this.
Tell me in the chat how this makes you feel about Canada.
Tell me how this makes you feel about neoliberalism and a certain insidious fear that these kind of ideas could be practiced elsewhere.
And I'm not, you know, if you're in Canada right now, of course it's terrible it's being considered there, but in all likelihood I've noticed that, you know, that hate speech law, for example, in Ireland.
Can you imagine similar legislation going to be coming to the United States or The way that Australia had those internment camps or 30-minute cities, can you imagine that being practiced and applied in the United States of America?
It's pretty astonishing, isn't it?
Let's have a look at this story, which is called the Medical Assistance in Dying Program, but is dangerously close to Nazi eugenics.
And I wouldn't usually use the word Nazi, but it is Canada, and whenever they get one in Parliament, you know, they're like, hooray!
Here's the news.
No, here's the effing news.
news. See you in a second.
So is their medical aid in dying program really a step forward into a brave new world?
Or is it kind of a modern take on eugenics and the elimination of poor and mentally ill people?
Canada!
I've been aware of this for a while, have you?
The idea of euthanasia, assisted dying, and like you, I always thought what they mean is people are terminally ill, they've got a long debilitating, crushing, awful disease, slowly and in anguish and agony, propped up by drugs, eventually we grant them the dignity of an assisted death.
Well, that all sounds perfectly reasonable, but there are all sorts of thresholds we might cross when reasoning ourselves to death, and it seems like Canada has crossed many of those thresholds, because being considered now for assistance in dying, it seems, are people that are incurably ill, which includes things like mental illness could be deemed incurable.
So depressed people, people with anorexia, and guess what's being discussed now?
Poor people!
Yep, you guessed it, it's depopulation, it's eugenics, it's Canada.
But tell me, importantly, has the guy running the country got a nice haircut?
Oh yeah, it's very nice.
Oh well, probably they're really liberal then!
Let's get into this in some more detail.
Today, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau introduced legislation Look at the words, right to die, in the corner of the screen.
Like, firstly it's suggesting you've got the right to die because it's your life, but also that it is right to die.
Of course it's inevitable that we will die and so many of the problems I think we face in the world are because of our confusing relationship with death, our inability to accept it, our refusal to discuss it.
Think of all the complications around wills and legacy and families feuding after death.
Think of our inability to tell one another that we feel deep love and emotion or sadness It's because we're not able to properly compartmentalise, embrace or understand death.
But the idea that death is something that's just another life choice, like, I don't know, getting highlights in your hair or nail extensions, is an indication of where modernity is delivering us to.
It's a deeply personal issue.
physician-assisted suicide.
It's a deeply personal issue that affects...
It's a deeply personal issue.
Leaves us not that far from the sort of things that Harold Shipman said.
Well, sometimes people just don't work anymore and we have to turn them off. People are bad machines.
The bad machines don't know that they're bad machines, but the people at the factory know.
Harold Shipman was a doctor that just liked killing elderly people
because by his verdict, they were too old.
He just decided, that's enough of you now, Mrs. Johnson.
I've heard about all I'm willing to listen to about those corns.
Night, night!
You can't use reason and rationale to start eliminating people, or actually you can, and they are, and it's leading to dystopia.
Some believe it is their only option.
We are very concerned about the exclusion of individuals with mental illness.
No one should be faced with such an impossible choice.
So right, they started it with, of course if you're dying of cancer, oh god, but when you slowly and incrementally
start to go, but what all so bad people are a bit down in the dumps?
I mean like, there's points in my life I'll tell you candidly, in the last few months,
where if someone said, would you like to press this button and die?
I'd go, yes.
Bye!
And I'm pretty glad that that option wasn't available to me.
All of us are likely to feel depressed and suicidal at points in our lives, because guess what?
We live in a depressing and suicidal world, and this is part of it.
The federal government is defending its decision to delay the expansion of medically assisted death to include those suffering from mental illness.
It's the second time they've pressed pause on the legislation.
Like everything is like a game now.
Let's press pause on the legislation and press end on that person's life.
Everything's not a machine.
It's not mechanical.
We don't fully appreciate and understand reality.
There are dimensions or at least aspects to reality and consciousness itself.
We don't I fully appreciate it.
And it's this assumption that we've arrived at the zenith of what it is to be human that's leading to this kind of dystopia, I believe.
The question here is a state of readiness.
And so what I think we're going to be looking for on that basis is the preponderance of reasonable opinion that the system is ready.
And at this point in time, that isn't the case.
What that man's saying is, is the obstacle to activating this program is not a moral, ethical, or existential examination of the issues, but just because they haven't got the death factories fully operable yet.
It's a pragmatic issue that's delaying it.
Once we've got that death system in place, enough beds, enough tubes, enough injections, whatever means they're going to be dispatching people, Then it's go, go, go, because there's no other obstacles.
I mean, the very idea that mentally ill people actually should be able to make that decision is by definition absurd, because, oh, I don't understand reality.
I'm mentally ill.
Well, would you like to die?
Yeah, I suppose so.
And would you like to marry this ice cream?
Why not?
She's gorgeous.
Hey, that ice cream is a boy, and you just misgendered it, which I'm afraid is death.
Currently, medical assistance in dying has two tracks.
First legalized in 2016 with safeguards, track one refers to a request for made by a person whose death is reasonably foreseeable.
Reasonably foreseeable.
Like, you've got liver cancer, it's spread, you're gonna die, it's getting worse, you've got no will to live, you've spoken to everyone.
Reasonable, I suppose.
This is where they get us, isn't it?
It's like, they get you to agree.
Well, under some circumstances, would you agree that a person should have the right to end their own life?
Yeah, I suppose so.
In fact, maybe all of us have the right to end our own life, I suppose.
Because when you start talking about state intervention and facilitation, then we're getting into weird, weird moral territory.
In 2021, MADE expanded to include Track 2.
What about Track 2?
What's on Track 2?
Requests made by a person whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable.
Well, that's everyone!
That's all of us!
Like, look at what the categories are now.
Is your death naturally foreseeable?
Yeah.
Terminal cancer.
Okay, tick.
And then, The other category is not reasonable, but that's everyone!
Also, that's the opposite of one.
It's reasonably foreseeable.
Fair enough.
We're meddling in God's domain.
We'll admit that.
And furthermore, what about the opposite of that?
Anyone?
Or what about this?
We all start taking rifles and picking people off in the middle of the street.
While we're at it, why don't we invade Yemen?
We're already invading Yemen.
Oh, good.
The number of reported May deaths in Canada has seen a steady increase, going from just over 1,000 in 2016 to over 13,000 in 2022.
Whee!
It's the new COVID!
But this time it's good!
thousand in 2022.
Whee!
It's the new COVID!
But this time it's good!
Extraordinary.
This will be regarded as some sort of success, but this is depopulation, isn't it?
Isn't that supposed to be a conspiracy theory, depopulation?
13,000 across a population the size of Canada doesn't represent anything at all.
There's more to life than quantifying things through statistics.
There's this other thing called governments killing members of its own population because they're depressed.
Probably because they're a member of that population.
Psychiatrists are trained to deal with people in crisis.
But some are now having their own crisis of confidence when it comes to medically assisted dying.
Our role as therapists, as psychiatrists, is in suicide prevention.
And so to ask us to then facilitate suicide is very dissonant.
You're a psychiatrist.
Yes.
And so what is your main function as a psychiatrist?
To help people to be grateful and happy to live.
And haven't you found that difficult?
Yes, it is difficult, but it's very rewarding on those occasions when you're able... I'm gonna stop you there.
Why don't we just let them kill themselves and in fact encourage them and do it for them?
What?!
The laws around medical assistance in dying, or MADE, are set to expand, including Canadians with mental illness.
That's everyone!
One in four people, I think, right now, suffer from mental illness, and at some point, it's everybody!
How did you feel during the pandemic?
How do you feel about these escalating wars?
How do you feel about fuel prices, grocery crisis, existential ontological crisis?
How do you feel about living in a world where suicide's being turned into someone's job?
But medical experts across the country warn Canada's healthcare system is not ready.
Yeah, because I spent I suppose it is a bit of an inversion of your best practices to go from keeping people alive to killing people.
Instead of selling you apples and bananas, we're gonna shoot you!
I mean, it's such a radical change of what the function of everything is.
Isn't it odd?
This is emerging out of a country like Canada, which until about like, you know, five, ten years ago, I just thought, what's Canada like?
Oh, it's probably a bit like America, but just less mad and less intense.
America's got the obligation and pressure of Policing the world and generating the global culture.
Go Canada now.
How you feeling?
A bit down in the dumps.
Oh, really?
What are you doing?
We already know there's not really clear consensus on a definition of, for example, what it means for someone to have a mental illness that is incurable.
Isn't that Dr. And Don't Be Childish About Her Name's analysis very interesting?
That it's too amorphous, diffuse and difficult to determine.
It's a spectrum, it's a scale.
And do you notice how Often, the culture is creating these weird things that are difficult to define.
Like, oh, mentally ill.
What is hate speech?
We'll tell you later.
Doesn't it seem like the opportunity for extraordinary authority is being created?
Because we started with, oh, this person is terminally ill.
There's no foreseeable future for them.
Would you agree?
Yeah, there's no foreseeable future.
And what about if there is a foreseeable future?
Oh, Can't you see, and sense at least, that there's a kind of rational, data-driven desire to control areas of reality that aren't the business of the government?
their bank accounts, they're hungry now and they're depressed.
When does this end? Why does this begin? Can't you see and sense at least that there's a kind of
rational, data-driven desire to control areas of reality that aren't the business of the government?
That's what I'm trying to say.
Tricia Nichols told a parliamentary committee that her brother Alan was suicidal when he
checked into the Chilliwack Hospital, July 16th, 2019.
Ten days later, he died with medical assistance.
Oh my god, it's actually happening to people.
I know people in recovery.
When you're an alcoholic and a drug addict, once you've stopped drinking and taking drugs, you don't even really think about drinking and taking drugs.
Until you think about it, it's like, I don't want to live anymore.
It's normal.
It happens all of the time.
I speak to people every single day.
I've felt it myself loads of times.
We talk to each other.
That's what you do, is you connect with one another and you tell people, I don't think I can do this anymore.
Don't worry about it.
You're not always going to feel like this.
It's going to be okay.
We're going to get through it.
There are principles that go beyond the fulfillment of yourself.
You're part of something bigger.
There's a way through this.
There's a way through it.
Oh, well, see you then, Alan.
That's not the answer.
It's broken.
That means we've got nothing to live for.
I see this as a step towards the end of a reason for living for all of us, in a way.
How can our government even be looking at expanding made laws?
Because this is the same country where they introduced those emergency laws as well.
Like, we felt it was a bit of an emergency, so we thought we might invoke the Emergencies Act.
They're all cool things like Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland.
Like, everyone's names would make you think of them in some, like, cuddly hobbit world.
This is an emergency.
They should be killed.
It's amazing.
There's a Nazi in Parliament.
What the hell's going on in Canada?
There are currently no laws protecting the vulnerable.
Here he is, Justin Trudeau.
Before you think that he might be an extraordinary creature of globalism facilitating dystopia, I invite you once again to look at how nice his hair is before you don't leap to any conclusions.
We understand that making sure we're respecting people's rights and their choices.
Rights?
Choices?
This is mental.
We're off track.
at the same time as we protect the most vulnerable.
Vulnerable.
Gotta protect the most vulnerable.
Is a very important but challenging balance to establish.
Psychiatrists fear that balance will be even harder to strike with the healthcare system under immense pressure.
Telling my patients that you will make it easier for them to die has enraged me.
They will die because of lack of services.
They will die because psychiatrists will now have legal permission to give up.
Yeah, it's an indication that there's been a subtle shift towards the preservation of life, the celebration of life, the sanctity of life, towards a kind of rational discourse which naturally concludes that it's okay to execute on behalf of the state people that can't participate.
Actually, like, an anthropological version of Skynet.
One day, Skynet realised it didn't need people anymore.
One day, the system realised it didn't need poor people anymore, it didn't need depressed people anymore, it didn't need mentally ill people anymore, and it just slowly started to dispatch with them.
That's what this is.
It's a window into something more horrifying.
You know, the people that are behind this stuff will go, look at Russell Brand, it's hyperbole.
They're missing what my diagnosis is.
I recognise at the moment it's 13,000 people a year.
I watch the statistic, I watch the graph, I can see at the moment it's incremental and compared to the number of people dying of cancer, although that's gone up a lot lately.
Other people dying from heart disease, although that's gone up a lot lately, it's not significant.
or people taking their own lives anyway.
Jesus Christ.
She's stuck in a cycle of poverty and despair.
Think about what's going on in Canada.
Think about what we're spending our time doing.
Can't we all be talking to one another and communicating with one another and helping and loving one another?
Or is our purpose here to just be sort of cellular drones receiving censored information from the state, putting stickers in our windows and blindly complying?
So she's planning to end her life.
Up!
With the government's help.
They can have me dead in 90 days.
That's what I was told.
What?
These people are openly saying I can't afford to be alive anymore, so I'm going to allow the state to kill me.
Les Landry is in the same position, wanting to live but seeing no other option than death.
Since when did we stop looking at the value of human life in this country?
My God!
We do this stuff all the time and sometimes you see things that make you recognize that what we're talking about is real.
There is a shift in values.
There's something nefarious and terrifying taking place that's going to require a kind of transition, a change of spirit to countenance it.
Okay, let's get into some reporting.
And what I want to point out here, some of this reporting is from the Washington Examiner, which is very right-wing.
And some of the reporting is taken from Jacobin, which is very left-wing.
Which shows you when it comes to basic human principles, actually, those kind of categories are irrelevant when compared to things like the sanctity of life and our integral connection to one another.
Canada's immoral decision to encourage people who are inconvenient to society to kill themselves seems to have finally found a line that Canadian citizens may not want to cross.
Canada has rapidly pushed towards handing out euthanasia like handing out candy on Halloween, but the country is being forced Forced to delay its latest expansion because it does not have enough doctors and psychiatrists to sign off on killing the mentally ill.
Again, it's only had cause for pause and thought because of the implementation of this policy, not because of the implications of this policy.
The decision to include mentally ill people as eligible for euthanasia comes from the idea that anything that is incurable, even if it won't lead to that person dying, should be enough of a reason to allow someone to consider euthanasia.
How long before you go, Everyone dies anyway.
Keep talking.
How about we kill people we don't like right now?
Like truckers!
This isn't the first expansion and death-happy Canadian officials will certainly find enough doctors or cut enough corners to ensure the latest one can go through as well.
People with anorexia have already been given the green light for suicide and a growing number of young Canadians think that poverty should also be included as eligible criteria.
In social Extraordinary. Anorexia is so serious and confusing and I
know loads of you have been affected by it.
But the challenge is, why is this happening and how do we stop it?
And as for poverty, same question. Why is this happening and how do we stop it?
Not, well, I suppose if those people were rubbed out.
This is where the function and role of the legacy and mainstream media is called into question.
When you think about Tucker Carlson's interview with Vladimir Putin, the assumption was that that shouldn't take place because we don't have the right to hear what Vladimir Putin might say to Tucker.
What if he's lying?
What if he's using his own propaganda?
Well, what if we want the right to decide for ourselves, given that we're collectively spending billions and billions of dollars and pounds perpetuating that war?
Look at the way that this issue is being created and presented and curated.
These people, they're so poor, it's so sad, it's so dreadful.
Well, think for a moment about how your country is being built, how your tax dollars are being spent, how a legacy media averts your attention from certain issues and presents you information in a particular way, when what is clearly required is a radical overhaul of how society is organised.
Right, hold on a minute.
I'm giving nearly half my money every single week, every single month, every single day to the government.
Because they're supposed to be investing it in infrastructure and society and creating even the concept of Canada.
There is no Canada without the population, the land mass and the collective resources and the sets of ideals and laws and governance that are derived from it.
And if it's leading to the normalisation of suicide or killing people because they're poor, do you think it might be time to have a look at what our values are?
You sound like you might be a bit depressed.
I am depressed.
90-90?
As well as depressed, you're a bit of a Putin apologist.
No, no, I just sort of thought I might like to hear... No, no, too late!
Night, night!
Hearing loss has also been included.
Sorry, what was that?
I said hearing loss has also... Too late!
And medical bureaucracies have been accused of pushing patients to agree to kill themselves.
Of course they bloody are.
Of course they are.
Of course.
They're like, you know, from COVID, with COVID, take the vaccine... I mean, this is what these mad bureaucracies are plainly generating.
Canada's culture of death has caused its euthanasia policy to snowball from the ever-debated concept of allowing people with terminal health problems to end their lives, to pushing for suicides for people who aren't going to die but have mental health troubles, or if a large chunk of young Canadians get this, say, people who are poor.
People with mental health problems are just too inconvenient for Canada's healthcare industry, apparently, and you can imagine that this plan will continue to move forward once Canadian politicians scrounge up enough doctors to start signing death certificates.
This should be a red flag for Canada to stop this policy and re-evaluate every word of it, especially given that Canadian doctors were the sixth leading cause of death in the country in 2021 due to this policy, and they put down over 13,000 people in 2022.
Oh my God, they're putting down people now.
They're putting down people.
Fast-tracking patients into graves to save money under the guise of helping them is a disgrace, especially when the volume is so large that you need to find more doctors to keep up with the state-approved killings.
My god, that's out of control, isn't it?
They actually can't keep up with the rate of executing their own unhappy people.
No wonder so many people are so unhappy.
This is a real Cash22 situation they're generating.
We don't have enough doctors to kill all the people.
Why are the people so unhappy?
Because they're living in Canada.
The legalisation of MAID brought to the fore some disturbing moral calculations, particularly with its expansion in 2019 to include individuals whose deaths aren't reasonably foreseeable.
That's everyone.
This change opened the floodgates for people with disabilities to apply to die rather than survive on meagre benefits.
Euthanasia in Canada represents the cynical endgame of social provisioning within the brutal logic of late-stage capitalism.
We'll starve you of the funding you need to live a dignified life, demand you pay back pandemic aid you applied for in good faith, and if you don't like it, well, why don't you just kill yourself?
That's the language of the state now.
What used to be the sort of language of a taunting juvenile playground is a discourse you hear from your own government.
I'm over on the subject of pandemic aid.
Guess who made the most money during the pandemic?
The very same pharmaceutical organizations that are probably even now working on a new vial, in every sense of the word, to eliminate poor people.
Tim Stainton, director of the Canadian Institute for Inclusion and Citizenship at the University of British Columbia, told the Associated Press that Canada's MAID policy is probably the biggest existential threat to disabled people since the Nazis' program in Germany in the 1930s.
It can't be a coincidence that Canada and Nazism keep somehow correlating, can it?
Like they're bringing Nazis into Parliament, Christy Freeland's granddad's a Nazi.
There's just something weird going on over there, under the sort of peculiar aesthetic of liberalism.
And you heard Trudeau there, helping vulnerable people.
It keeps leading to killing vulnerable people.
This sounds hyperbolic, but there are endless examples of people with disabilities
who are offered euphanasia as an alternative to living a life of pain and exclusion.
And with the impending expansion of MAID to include people with mental illnesses, the problem is only going to get worse.
A piece from Global headlined, How Poverty Not Pain is Driving Canadians with Disabilities to Consider Medically Assisted Death notes the excruciating cycle of poverty that leads disabled people to choose assisted death rather than live a life filled with barriers to their existence.
The result is that according to a 2017 report from Statistics Canada, nearly a quarter of disabled people are living in poverty.
That's roughly 1.5 million people, or a city about the population of Montreal.
Whilst 13,000, I suppose, dreadful though it is, is a comparatively low number, it's already 13 times as high as it was like a few years ago.
And if it exponentially grows at that rate and could include all poor people and that Seems to be part of the plan.
It's pretty easy to see how you could get to a place where you're just executing swathes of the population, curating reality.
Know how comparable, similar, and how easily affiliated this kind of discourse and reasoning is with the kind of transhumanist, we don't need people no more type argument.
The way that we're sort of just rationalizing ourselves into excluding and eliminating, in the most literal terms, great sections of the population, rather than re-evaluating the set of values that determine behaviours and policies of globalisation.
Because they actually can be changed.
It's not like, oh well, you better all learn the code.
Why don't we change everything using our collective power?
When people are living in such a situation where they're structurally placed in poverty, is medical assistance in dying really a choice or is it coercion?
That's the question we need to ask ourselves, Dr. Nahid Dasani, a palliative care physician in Toronto, told Global.
policies that have consigned disabled and immunocompromised people to a life of perpetual
self-isolation, a lack of funding for people on disability assistance makes MAID an increasingly
palatable solution to ending their suffering. In this context, the cavalier way in which
MAID has been implemented in Canada serves as a form of eugenics where only the able-bodied
survive. Hmm. Many countries which allow MAID have far more safeguards than Canada in ensuring
situations like those above don't occur, making it extremely puzzling as to why Canada didn't
implement them from the outset.
Chief among them is the requirement in Belgium and the Netherlands that doctors must have exhausted all treatment alternatives before offering MAID.
Both countries also have monthly commissions to review potentially troubling cases.
In the Australian province of Victoria, doctors are prohibited from bringing up Maid at all, unless a patient inquires about it.
In Belgium, doctors are discouraged, although not prohibited, from doing so.
It's cruel to refuse Maid for people on the verge of death with no prospects for recovery, but it's even crueler to offer death as an alternative to a support system.
We've let the May Genie out of his bottle.
There's no going back.
We must ensure that our healthcare systems have sufficient resources to guarantee everyone, regardless of their ability or mental health, a dignified existence.
Very important story, I believe, even though at the moment the numbers are relatively small, and even though it could be argued that in its current form, this is simply a form of assisting vulnerable people, however Justin Trudeau would say it.
But in the context of our ever-widening set of dystopian possibilities and our ever-narrowing chances of evading that clear plan.
It seems that this is yet another of those stories that provides you with an understanding of what the overall agenda is.
I, through the mist, sometimes glance the idea that there are nations that are piling in ideas, territories that are being purchased and acquired, a vision of what we do is we get rid of all those people In a way, we saw it in the pandemic.
Ultra-rich people just were bombing about on planes going to Ireland.
They weren't bothered.
They carried on.
I know that.
I didn't experience it.
I live in the countryside.
I'm all right.
You know, it wasn't that bad for me.
But I know some people were annihilated and destroyed by it.
And the pandemic was a kind of a piloting in itself in some ways.
I'm not suggesting it was false flag or any of those things.
But it was a piloting of what happens when you increase measures of control, when you increase stress, when you reduce the financial possibilities.
It's just that it was an extraordinary period.
And it's just so odd to me that a country like Canada, who along with Australia I would have seen as a sort of anglophonic, not so fuddy-duddy and mental and imperialistic as old-school Britain, not so warmongering, and no offence if you are American, I mean, you know, the elitist establishment of America, not American people, as America, and that these countries are sort of where it's at in a way, like sort of Scandinavias of English-speaking people.
But actually, this isn't the reality, is it?
They're tied up in Five Eyes ideas.
They're globalists.
They're practicing Klaus Schwab's wildest dreams.
They're signing up to WHO treaties.
They're executing the poor and the disabled.
I mean, they're actually quite avant-garde in many of their policies.
Whoa, what are you guys doing?
If it was art, you'd give them a pat on the back.
But it's not art.
It's politics.
It's people's lives.
It's the very type of people that they often claim to represent.
The vulnerable.
The poor.
We need to have a radical re-evaluation of the values and principles that generate these kind of conditions and then solve them by killing the people that are a consequence of those policies and ideas.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
See you in a second!
Thank you for choosing Foxy!
No, he's the f***ing loser!
Obviously we got some amazing comments because the subject is so emotive.
So many of us have experienced depression or suicidal ideation.
So many of us have experienced poverty.
So many of us know what it is to feel at odds with this system, with this society.
Our oft-repeated refrain is, is it maladjustment to be maladjusted to a maladjusted society?
Or maybe that John Lennon And I'm the one that's called a mad mum, that one.
It's pretty crazy.
Some great quotes from you lot.
Dirty Diana, 78.
Things are frighteningly slippery.
It's a literal doom and gloom death spiral.
Ruby C. Kinglet.
I suffer suicidal ideation.
I'm ungrateful.
I was given help until hope returned.
Sameh.
What happened to the saying, suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem?
Dean Pyre.
Apparently de-population is more important than propping up the pharmaceutical industry now.
This has nothing to do with kindness, it never did.
Great Plains drifter, suicide boobs, coming to a Walmart near you.
Apply today.
It's a disturbing and macabre story.
Over there in the locals chat, a lot of you Awakened Wonders are thankfully sharing compassionate, kind stories and indeed the kind of rapport that I believe to be the antidote to that kind of suffering.
What's required are values, principles, community and unity to save us from this kind of policy and the conditions that make this policy even seem plausible.
Wouldn't you agree?
A kind of despair, nihilism, loss of meaning.
Hey, listen, have a look at some of this stuff.
This is Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, who apparently, apparently, we don't know this for sure, maybe you guys do, but might have given like a bunch of money to defund the police type groups.
If that's true, this is a kind of hypocritical image.
The tech tycoons come, look, he's running, he's got his own personal security army that runs with him.
When I wrote that book, actually, this one, Revolution.
One of the ideas that someone suggested is that you should ban private security.
If you banned private security, people would be forced to live differently.
And it's a pretty novel and interesting idea.
This is a book where I sort of talked about revolutionary ideas that I believed might change the world.
I've not looked at it for a long, long time.
God knows I've changed since then and the world has changed, but I've always been pretty And the establishment.
The tech tycoon's company has spent more than 40 million dollars on Zuckerberg's personal security over the past three years, while at the same time his family-run foundation has donated millions of dollars to groups that want to defund or even abolish the police.
Oh, I see, so it's true.
Since 2020, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, CZI, has donated three million dollars to PolicyLink, the organization behind defundthepolice.org, according to the great Li Fang, who we Absolutely adore.
Meanwhile, getting ahead of the dystopia that possibly he's contributing to the creation of, he's created a bunker.
Check it.
Mark Zuckerberg and his family are building an underground bunker.
Work is underway on the Hawaiian island of Kaui.
Kaui?
For a 1400 acre complex for the Meta founder and CEO.
Now look, I suppose he is a genius that presumably came up with an idea That's changed the world.
I'm sure some of you think that there might have been intervention from deep state actors when it comes to the establishment of Facebook.
Is that a credible theory or is it a conspiracy theory?
I don't know.
Let me know guys.
But what is interesting is this is a pretty good litmus test of where people that would have access to pretty esoteric information think the world is heading.
The property will ultimately cost over 270 million dollars, the publication reports, and will include a 5,000 square foot underground bunker.
If you're not cynical, I suppose you might say that it's because of...
Like earthquakes or fires or something?
I don't know.
The property on the island's north shore is also said to have its own energy and food supplies.
Doesn't inspire too much confidence.
You remember when Steve Jobs, God rest his eternal soul, once said that he didn't let his kids use a...
iPhones and stuff.
He said, oh my god, no, you can't let kids near those things.
It'll dement them.
It'll rob them of their connection to reality.
It'll trap them in a cellular loop, a carousel of imagery that will deteriorate their sense of self and sense of well-being.
You know, when you see stories like Canada, a country beset by malaise and suicidal despair, institutionalizing euthanasia, you wonder if our Life models are fundamentally failing, that we're in a deep spiritual crisis, and how unlikely it is that the solution to our problem will be the kind of technologies that seem to be advancing despair.
I know a lot of you love Elon Musk, and certainly Elon Musk's contribution to free speech is incredible, phenomenal, but I believe that technology is a wonderful tool, but a pretty terrifying master.
There's Zuckerberg, a drug dealer who doesn't use drugs himself.
Nice, nice meme.
Hey listen, we've got plenty of stuff but you know like tomorrow's a big day for us because of course we're going to be covering the Tucker Putin interview.
What we're going to be primarily looking for is the sort of information that we imagine
the establishment would most want us to be protected from.
We're going to be looking out for how they react.
Presumably, what do you lot think?
There will be a moment where Putin offers a pathway to peace and say, well, listen,
if under these conditions, the war would end.
Now, I suppose that in a democracy, we would all participate in a conversation about whether
or not we would like the war to end, or at least whether or not we wanted to participate
I suppose in a democracy we would have open conversations about where our taxes went, the degree to which we are taxed, whether or not we wanted to opt out of the system altogether.
That's in a democracy.
What we're clearly living in, if that euthanasia video is to be taken seriously, and I've got no reason to believe that anything in it is anything other than 100% true, is a Dystopia.
And I think we're able to see now the tiles that will make up the mural of hell that they are plainly planning for us all.
I'd love you, if you can, to become an Awake and Wonder.
Press the red button, join our locals community.
You can watch our conversation with Tucker right now.
We talk about spirituality, community, connection, depth, politics.
You can join us live when we talk to real journalists like Glenn Greenwald or Michael Schellenberger or real leaders like Vandana Shiva.
You can join the likes of PawPaw7 and TrueChimera and BlessedOldBird and HeelLightLove speaking beautifully.
These are many of our other beloved community members.
We love having you on Rumble.
You stay with us on Rumble, but if you want to go deeper, if you want extra content, as well as these spontaneous appearances that I do, little live forums and dog walks with my beloved bear, then consider becoming an Awakened Wonder.
It certainly helps us to fuel this movement against advancing dystopia.
We will be back tomorrow live to discuss the fallout of the Tucker-Putin interview.
Is Tucker, as has been suggested, even in danger?
Is his life in danger?
What will be the legal consequences?
What will be the geopolitical consequences?
Why exactly is it that the globalist establishment are so keen to censor this conversation?
Are we indeed at an epochal moment where the power axis between Elon Musk and Tucker Carlson means that whether or not you agree with them, They are certainly regarded as dissidents by the establishment and together they are able to crack us out of the hard and deceptive shell of legacy media control.
We'll be talking about all that and so much more tomorrow.
I hope you'll be with us at the same time for that conversation.
Muddy Yuppie and Cruising Buns and Phoenix Boy and Brandon Let's Go and Go Start.
I love you all.
See you tomorrow, not for more of the same, because it'll be a different world by then, so it will be more of the different.