Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 16, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:09:41

Trump’s LANDSLIDE Iowa Win - MSNBC FREAK OUT!- Stay Free #285

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	so so
	video is
	Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
	Thanks for joining me today on Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	Well done for waking up.
	I know how difficult it is to be in this world.
	You may yet be elated for amidst the blizzard, Trump did ascend.
	Many of you will have expected, of course, that Trump would have succeeded in Iowa, but it was a total success and it has, of course, preceded a total legacy media Meltdown.
	We're going to be talking about both those things.
	We're going to be talking about Vivek's departure.
	We will be covering in some detail, and I'm going to let you know this if you're watching us on YouTube, because you know Dr. John Campbell's content's been taken down.
	We'll be looking at Disease X.
	What is disease X?
	What is the plan for disease X?
	Why are we being prepped for disease X?
	And is it more likely that the laboratories that are currently working on solutions for disease X will come up with a solution or cause a lab leak?
	One for solution, two for lab leak.
	I'm talking to those of you in the rumble chat and you awakened wonders that continually support our content that are part of this movement and as a result get access to one additional and exclusive Video a week as well as early access to much of our content and I'm looking now at Trucker Hershey, I'm looking now at Scott Blight and all of you saying that the research will lead to a further lab leak and who can condemn that kind of skepticism and cynicism living in a world that we currently live in
	Where escalating war is being normalized, whether it's the conflict in the Yemen, where there is ongoing propaganda and a refusal by the legacy media to accept their own culpability in the increasing popularity of Donald Trump.
	And let me know, has his popularity ever been higher?
	No Republican has ever won a contested caucus by more than 12.8%.
	Trump broke the record and won by 30%, winning all 99 counties.
	We've got, what does that look like?
	They are Trump 51%, Haley 98%.
	I think they... Yeah, that's the order.
	DeSantis came second in the end.
	They've misspelt Vivek Ramaswamy and what a departure that is.
	Now, have any of you seen the legacy media reporting on this subject?
	They refused to show Trump's victory speech and we did a poll actually asking, is that because Trump's victory speech might be so dangerous?
	That, uh, you know, this could be such dangerous misinformation that to broadcast it would be irresponsible.
	I mean, maybe we're being irresponsible right now, even discussing Donald Trump.
	Maybe, maybe if you had some institutions that people respected, if you had a deep state that cared about American people rather than Continually creating opportunities to bring them down.
	If you didn't have a military-industrial complex forever provoking and advocating for new war, if you didn't have a legacy media that amplified and conveyed nothing but the interests of the powerful while censoring and surveilling ordinary people and opposing and dissenting voices, maybe We wouldn't all be in the thrall of a man who knows how to stand behind a microphone.
	Here's the Legacy Media's analysis in the form of Rachel Maddow.
	Let's take a look.
	I'm sorry, I just have to do a little bit of business just for a second.
	At this point in the evening, the projected winner of the Iowa caucuses has just started giving his victory speech.
	Like, it's Donald Trump.
	Can you not say his name?
	The projected winner.
	He that cannot be named.
	It's not Voldemort.
	He's not a Lord of Darkness.
	That's just the utterance of the word Trump on MSNBC.
	Suddenly, liberals are putting down their coffee cups and they're putting down their comfortable views.
	They're embracing the idea of emergent populism.
	Now, this level of hysteria is extraordinary, particularly when you look at The preceding administration, i.e.
	Obama preceded Trump, Biden followed Trump.
	Remember the cages and the condemnation.
	These children are being placed in cages on the border.
	Who built those cages?
	Who built those cages?
	Obama.
	Remember the condemnation of a wall.
	He wants to build a wall.
	Donald Trump wants to build a wall.
	Who's continuing to build that wall?
	Biden.
	So is this hysteria justified?
	Is it justified not even saying his name?
	Not even allowing him to speak?
	This is a free speech platform.
	The reason that we're on Rumble is because we believe in free speech.
	And what is the point of free speech?
	It's to unite us.
	It's to elevate us.
	It's to create the possibility of genuine opposition.
	Decentralized but unified against the establishment.
	Not hate speech.
	Oh, people are slightly different.
	I don't care.
	You don't care.
	You don't care about other people's freedom.
	You care about your own freedom.
	If you're granted your freedom, allow people to live however they want.
	Is that what they want on the legacy media?
	Who built the cages, Joe?
	I am Steve Reno, said that on the Rumble chat.
	I'm saying hello to Firegirl2020 and MaximumTitus444 and all of our supporters over there on Locals, our awakened wonders who get early access to much of our content and exclusive access To some of it, let's have a look at the rest of Rachel Maddow's analysis of misinformation, disinformation, and their peculiar refusal to show Trump's speech.
	Did any of you see it?
	It was the sweetest thing I've ever seen.
	We will keep an eye on that as it happens.
	We will let you know if there's any news made in that speech, if there's anything noteworthy, something substantive and important.
	The reason I'm saying this is, of course, there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered live platform.
	And that's because when people watch that stuff, people kind of like him and it's Very difficult when we have as our own candidate for the ongoing presidency a waxen, cadaverous zombie who looks like he's been scooped up from the tomb, shoved from the sepulchre, and into the polling booths.
	This is all the more extraordinary because of the candidate we're being invited to vote for, because of the lack of acknowledgement and admission of the failings of the establishment, the institution, the historic Democrat Party, the failings of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, 2008, none of that stuff ever analysed or questioned with the level of scrutiny that they'll apply to every syllable and metaphor uttered by Donald Trump and it's not working and they cannot stand it.
	...to remarks by former President Trump.
	It is not out of spite.
	It is not a decision that we relish.
	It is a decision that we regularly revisit.
	And honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision.
	But there is a cost to us as a news organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things.
	Right, who among you... I'm talking to you if you're watching this on YouTube right now.
	I'm talking to you if you're watching this on Locals.
	I'm talking to you if you're watching it on Rumble or wherever we have proliferated our content in order to grow this movement.
	When you hear a member of the MSNBC Legacy Media State Amplification Propagandist Unit saying, we cannot convey misinformation, do you not see the sudden phantom of Rachel Maddow saying, if you take this thing, it stops.
	The virus stops.
	You can watch that now on anti-misinformation platform YouTube right now.
	Google it.
	No, don't.
	Stay watching us.
	But put in there, Rachel Maddow, vaccine, and what will come up is Rachel Maddow telling you that the vaccine is effective against transmission, that it's effective against hospitalisation, that it's effective... These are all things that we know are not true.
	What about Russiagate?
	This is extraordinary.
	It's not an absolute condemnation of misinformation.
	It's a condemnation of information that may lead to you losing trust in the establishment.
	And later on you will hear Rachel Maddow's fears about authoritarianism.
	But it's not authoritarianism, full stop.
	It's authoritarianism that is in opposition to the agenda of the globalist establishment.
	Because authoritarianism, when it comes to censoring your speech, that's Fine.
	Authoritarianism when it comes to surveilling you, taxing you, using your money to go to war right now in the Yemen against the Houthi.
	There, you better believe the Houthi.
	It's the right name for them, isn't it?
	Because I didn't know who they were about three hours ago.
	But now the Houthis, I'm supposed to get it up!
	For another war against some poor people somewhere?
	This will not be adequately or eloquently covered by the legacy media.
	They will simply continue to advocate for their masters in the war machine and then wonder why someone with a jot of charisma can be elevated to landslide status in the Iowa caucus.
	That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are and so his remarks tonight will not Also, they make him sound more and more powerful.
	He might make some news.
	He might make some.
	Look at that sort of... Like he sings it into existence.
	Like some vibrating orb of pure consciousness.
	Creating reality from the prakriti prima materia of reality.
	Consciousness itself preceding material reality.
	All of the objects in apparent separation emanating from a singular unitary source.
	We can't show him!
	There's just too much truth!
	Let's have a look at our friends Michael Schellenberger from Public and Max Blumenthal from Greyzone who have both been posting on this.
	The only thing funnier than MSNBC refusing to cover an election winner is Russiagate hoaxer Rachel Maddow condemning the practice of knowingly broadcasting untrue things.
	Our friend Shelley, Shelley, Shelley, Shelley Schellenberger.
	Both CNN and MSNBC carried the entirety of the speech by DeSantis after openly refusing to carry the speech by Trump Even though Trump won a landslide with 51% against the Sanders' 21%, you know these numbers by now, it's madness.
	CNN and MSNBC are flagrantly embracing their role as propagandists.
	And this speech, this terrifying speech, do you want to see it?
	Do you think you're ready?
	Do you think you can handle the truth?
	Get ready for the elixir of language.
	Get ready for the sweet melodies, so refined and divine they could be coming from a Gaelic harp or the pipe of Lord Krishna himself, for this is a vibrational frequency that will take you to another dimension.
	Ah, here it comes!
	Get ready, if you're watching on YouTube, hang on to your hats, put your fingers in your ears, lock up your chickens and every bit of livestock you've got, because here comes a person offering a polite speech.
	Well, I want to thank everybody.
	This has been some period of time, and most importantly, we want to thank the great people of Iowa.
	Thank you.
	We love you all.
	Ah!
	You're thanking the people of Iowa!
	Oh no!
	Oh no!
	Armed rebellion!
	Armed rebellion!
	A man politely thanking the electorate.
	What a turnout.
	What a crowd.
	And I really think this is time now for everybody Our country to come together.
	We want to come together.
	Ah!
	He's asking people to come together!
	Oh no!
	It's nearly a John Lennon lyric!
	Come together!
	If he says right now, over me, I'm out baby!
	I'm out!
	Whether it's Republican or Democrat or Liberal or Conservative, it would be so nice if we could come together and straighten out the world.
	Oh!
	Don't straighten out the world!
	I want a war in Yemen!
	I want a war in Ukraine!
	I want a war in China!
	And Iran again!
	Woah, woah, woah!
	More, more, more!
	Look at this guy, he's just a kind of man with his sons flanking him saying, it's time you come together, Democrats, Republicans.
	It's the sweetest, politest thing, more statesmanly.
	And when you think of the alternative, remember...
	I think the whole system and this whole establishment needs radical alteration, decentralisation and that power should be close to you.
	That your individual sovereignty, your freedom to become who you are is more important than any of the atrophying systems of corruption that dominate global politics.
	That's my particular position.
	But I do not think the solution that they're so vociferously advocating for, Joe Biden staring out baffled from his own face like a chick emerging from a cracked egg, is a viable alternative to this.
	Terrifying speech!
	Straighten out the problems and straighten out all of the death and destruction that we're witnessing that's practically never been like this.
	It's just so important and I want to make that a very big part of our message.
	We're going to come together.
	It's going to happen soon too.
	It's going to happen soon.
	Coming together.
	Oh, that's good.
	That'd be nice.
	I want to congratulate Ron and Nikki for having... Oh, he's not going to thank the other candidates, is he?
	Where's the button?
	Where's the drop switch?
	Get this thing off the air right now!
	Remember, if you're watching this on YouTube, we'll be available for about another eight, nine minutes or so, then we'll be exclusively on the free stream itself, the stream that is Rumble.
	If you're not an Awakened Wonder yet, become an Awakened Wonder, you get exclusive access to one in-depth video per week, early access to much of our content, including our interviews with Brilliant, real, legit journalists.
	People like Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi, Whitney Webb.
	We're recording I think tomorrow or the next day and we're going to be asking a lot of questions.
	A lot of questions about the island.
	A good time together.
	We're all having a good time together.
	They're having a good time together at a caucus where people came out in the snow and voted for various candidates.
	Now listen, it is with regret.
	Think of that compared to the pomposity and piety available to you on MSNBC.
	Thought about this long and hard and we, you know, we can't show Donald Trump in case he does some news.
	He might do some news at you and even worse than that he could do some fake news and I'm not talking about fake news like the vaccines are effective and work.
	I'm not talking about facts and news like fake news like he's peeing all over hookers.
	I'm talking about Fake news like the system is corrupt and you do genuinely need to galvanize and organize against this kind of banalized bureaucratic tyranny that is being advocated for and amplified by the legacy media.
	And I think they both actually did very well.
	I really do.
	I think they both did very well.
	We don't even know what the outcome of second place is.
	And I see Kerry Lake.
	That wasn't even a joke, was it?
	It was just being nice.
	Congratulations, Kerry.
	Very good.
	I spotted her, I have to announce, because she's terrific.
	She's going to be a senator, a great senator, I predict, right?
	Going to be a great senator.
	And I also want to congratulate Vivek, because he did a hell of a job.
	He came from zero, and he's got a big percent, probably 8%, almost 8%, and that's an amazing... The idea that the legacy media think that you would not be able to watch Watch that.
	I mean, it's astonishing, isn't it?
	It's just, what could anybody say?
	The problem is, is that they've lost you.
	They've lost you forever.
	You cannot trust them.
	You don't trust them.
	You'll never trust them again.
	Curiously, the Vivek story is one of the interesting aspects of this, because it's just a couple of days ago that, what did Donald Trump say?
	Very sly.
	Very sly.
	Kind of took Vivek away at the knees there for a moment, when I figure, and let me know in the chat what you guys think, that he was working out, hang on, what Vivek Ramaswamy is doing He's recognising that the Republican Party establishment is backing Nikki Haley, or maybe Ron DeSantis, and if Trump isn't on the ballot because of the endless flurry of indictments, then I will inherit the mantle, I mean this is pretty obvious analysis I suppose, isn't it, of the anti-establishment Republican candidate.
	But Donald Trump didn't like that, did he?
	And he sort of went, very sly, it's sly.
	And it's something about, you know, Donald Trump's use of language.
	He's very efficient, isn't he?
	He does just, he sort of knows where to land that bullet.
	And now Vivek is out of the race and he likes him again now.
	It's interesting.
	It's very, very interesting.
	Amazing job.
	They all did.
	They're all very smart, very smart people, very capable people.
	And to all of the people standing behind me and all of the people in this room and so many great politicians and great dignitaries and friends, I just want to thank you all.
	This is a very special night and this is the first Because the big night is going to be in November, when we take back our country, and truly, we do make our country great again.
	Thank you very much, everybody.
	Great honor.
	Thank you very much.
	Thank you.
	Motown!
	Oh no!
	What are we going to do?
	Help!
	So listen, we did a poll earlier.
	Let's have a look at that.
	Why are MSNBC not broadcasting Trump?
	Is it danger of misinformation or is it danger of Trump becoming more popular?
	An astonishing 96% of you thought it was the latter.
	Missing it a lot.
	Here are some of your comments.
	This is over on YouTube where I hope you guys will join us in a second.
	Salt and Light Seeker, is Russell a Freemason?
	No, I'm not a Freemason.
	I think you have to wear a little apron and stuff.
	No disrespect if you are Freemasons.
	I hope you're having a great time with that.
	Misinformation.
	We will tell you what information you get instead of being able to make decisions for yourself.
	Sydney Ferret Pie.
	He's already won it, and they know it.
	They don't broadcast him, but they cover him 24-7, says someone.
	You see what they did to Vivek?
	Started mocking him and belittling him just because he dropped out.
	Five of their hosts in a panel making fun of him, saying he'll maybe have a Fox show soon.
	MSNBC is just a low-grade podcast.
	Wow.
	That's an interesting comment on the state of the media right there.
	Let's have a look at Vivek's announcement.
	The entire campaign is about speaking the truth.
	We did not achieve our goal tonight.
	We need an America First candidate.
	Donald Trump and I will do everything we can to support him.
	I'm enormously proud of the team and the country.
	Shall we have a look at a bit of his speech?
	Do you want to see that?
	And I'm also making the decision that this has to be an America First candidate in that White House.
	As I've said since the beginning, there are two America First candidates in this race.
	And earlier tonight, I called Donald Trump to tell him that I congratulated him on his victory.
	And now, going forward, he will have my full endorsement for the presidency, and I think we're going to do the right thing for this country.
	Oh, there he goes.
	Hey, Vivek's been on the show a couple of times, and we've enjoyed talking to him a great deal.
	Certainly, he's a modern politician who understands the modern dynamics and how to communicate.
	MSNBC are not treating Vivek with Very much respect at all.
	If you're watching this over on YouTube, we're going to be available for another couple of minutes, then we'll be exclusively available on Rumble advocating for your individual sovereignty and freedom and community democracy and the dismantling of centralized establishment interests and institutions across the world and across the nation.
	Let's have a look at MSNBC criticizing Vivek with a lot of supercilious haughtiness.
	We have had the field shrink yet again tonight.
	Vivek Ramaswamy will never again grace our television screens as a presidential candidate.
	David Plouffe, are you shocked with the Trump endorsement that apparently went along with his bowing out?
	Yeah, well we'll see.
	His total number of votes must have been, what, 8, 10,000?
	Something like that.
	Think about that.
	All that time, going to all the counties twice, all the money.
	Remarkable.
	Yeah, but the podcast.
	Just remember in this orgy of self-congratulatory commentary that Joe Biden is cancelling primaries wherever they are possible, refusing to debate RFK, who's having to run as an independent now, would have loved to have run as a Democrat.
	Impossible.
	Refusing to debate, Marianne Williamson.
	Refusing to stand.
	Again, while they glory in the inconsistencies and perceived inadequacies of their opponents, they will not analyse or even acknowledge their own inferiorities failings and flaws and that's what makes them impossible to believe impossible to embrace identifiable as a mouthpiece an amplification project for the globalist establishment other than that i can't see what they're doing cast in it yeah yeah he's gonna have
	Oh, he does have a podcast.
	There's a podcast, I think.
	He might have a Fox show.
	I know a lot of you have been reached by his criticism of the reporting around Jan 6th, some of the risks he took around 9-11, and he's indeed, he's passionate and willing to confront people on the stand.
	Can people like, I'm saying, Nikki Haley.
	Should we have a look at, let's have a look at Nikki Haley saying that it's a two-horse race, but she, she wasn't second, was she?
	She was third.
	Don't say it's a two-horse race if you're third because, I mean, where are you?
	Which horse are you exactly?
	I can safely say tonight Iowa made this Republican primary a two-person race.
	What?
	How?
	But you want one of the two people?
	Let's have a look at Trump commenting on Joe Biden.
	And again, always try to hold in your mind, like a mandala, the near specter, the almost ghostly apparition of Joe Biden.
	A person who it's difficult to believe has the stones or the juice for the next five years to carry the mantle of the most powerful person in the world to navigate the complex territories that will surely emerge in diplomatic and indeed militaristic relationships with China.
	Russia, the constant economic crisis, disease X. Think of the global challenges that we're likely to confront and whether or not Joe Biden is fit to handle them.
	If he is, type Y in the chat.
	If not, type N in the chat.
	I'm talking to you, SueBiz22, Synchronicity525.
	Shole, fella, Steph, all of you lot in our Awake and Wonder chat, and ChatterX, and AmericaSun, and TZ76, Patriot, and Mooseman18, let me know.
	Here's Trump on Biden in his speech.
	He did have a little bit of the old school Trump asser-dity, I mean, asser-bick-ness, rather, as opposed to the sort of conciliatory tone we saw elsewhere.
	This definitely is, I would say, Trump is observing the emergent and rising popularity of RFK and I feel like we're seeing a new more statesmanly Trump except on the subject of Biden.
	Check this.
	So I don't want to be overly rough on the president.
	But I have to say that he is the worst president that we've had in the history of our country.
	Difficult.
	I don't want to be rough, but he's the worst in the history of the country.
	What could you say that's worse than that?
	Destroying our country.
	Amazing.
	Astonishing.
	Incredible.
	Now again, one of the areas that we are fascinated by is the constant maintenance of the idea
	that it is emergent MAGA populism that represents the greatest threat to your freedom
	in the United States of America, that poses the greatest threat to world peace.
	In spite of the fact that we've already had Trump as the president for four years
	and there were no additional wars, and indeed many economic and social factors
	were pretty consistent with the preceding administration and not a great deal has changed subsequently.
	Certainly many of you think things have deteriorated and yet it is extremism that defines
	much of the legacy media reporting on this subject.
	Let's have a look at, this is interesting.
	This is where I do agree with Rachel Maddow.
	In fact, she says that Trump is running against politics.
	Essentially, running against the establishment.
	But what does that tell you?
	When an anti-establishment candidate gains more and more popularity, the more that he is condemned, even through the judiciary.
	Even as the accumulating condemnation threatens to swamp and indeed would ensnare any other candidate, Trump's potency appears to rise.
	I think fueled by the justified loathing of the establishment.
	Fueled by our shared mistrust of these institutions.
	But this is one piece of analysis that I do agree with.
	The big picture takeaway from that, and I don't mean to be, again, too dark as you said on this, but it is not... If we are worried about the rise of authoritarianism in this country, we are worried about potential rise of fascism in this country.
	We're worried about our democracy falling to an authoritarian and potential...
	See, when we talk about fascism and authoritarianism and democracy, when a candidate won't run in any primaries, when you have pervasive surveillance and a censorship industrial complex threatening to shut down free speech, when you've just had a pandemic where true, open, honest, sincere, scientifically verifiable information was shut down and censored, when you've had the Hunter Biden laptop story where they admitted, the CIA admitted that we censored that information or advocated for its censorship at least, Because we thought it might affect the results of the election.
	You saw that, right?
	We all saw that here.
	When you have disease X lingering like a future fart held in an old man's bowel as a new threat on the horizon, knowing that it will ultimately be used to legitimise more expenditure, more authoritarianism, where is the authoritarianism now?
	What does dictatorship look like in 2024?
	Of course they always use the sort of strongman argument.
	They still live in the kind of echo of ideas of military leaders such as Mussolini or Hitler or Pol Pot continually claiming that Trump is part of that lineage as the brilliant writer Martin Gurry pointed out.
	You can't have military dictators of that style unless they have some kind of control over a paramilitary organization or a significant wing of the American military or the army.
	Donald Trump does not have paramilitaries at Mar-a-Lago.
	That's not what they're doing there.
	They are not armed and dangerous.
	They're having little drinks with umbrellas in them and playing golf, I suspect.
	So this kind of hysteria is, I think, unwarranted and It's in a sense the only game they have left.
	All they have is the continual amplification of that condemnation because they're never going to say, we're going to offer you a viable alternative because we're not owned by the donor class, we're not corrupt globalists, we are here to represent American people.
	They can never say that because it's not true and it's unlikely ever to be true again.
	Potentially fascist form of government.
	The leader who is trying to do that is part of that equation.
	Mm-hmm.
	But people wanting that.
	Correct.
	It's a much bigger part of that equation.
	That's right.
	To see the rest of this and that, start the countdown right now.
	We've got some fantastic stuff coming up.
	We've got Dr. Joseph Lepardo, him out of Florida, right, talking about disease X and its likely escalation, or more importantly, its utilization, because we don't know what disease X is yet.
	But we do know that there's some extraordinary planning going on.
	And we're going to continue this analysis of legacy media coverage There's a countdown on the screen now.
	If you're watching us on YouTube click the link in the description and join us.
	We want you in our movement.
	We welcome you in our movement.
	We must join together.
	Stay free but get over to Rumble and join us right now.
	I want to say hello to Fugman and D-Day 99 over in the Awakened Wonder community and Turtle Mountain and Apologetic Pest.
	All of you guys, thank you for supporting us.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Let's get on with Rachel Maddow and Cruz's supercilious condemnation of, yes, Donald Trump, but actually democracy itself, because all that's happened is a bunch of people in Iowa have gone out in the snow to vote for someone they appear to like very much indeed.
	And the American electorate is made up of two major parties.
	One of those parties has been flirting with extremism on the ultra-right for a very long time.
	They've brought them in in a way that they haven't been central to Republican electoral politics ever before, and I know because I've been studying this.
	I've studied it.
	I've studied it.
	I know what words like extreme right mean.
	These are the only categories and taxonomies that are absolute.
	Categories like male and female, these can migrate and move and metastasize and amorphize endlessly.
	But far right, I know what that is.
	And it's a man saying, I'd like to thank the fellow candidates.
	But once you have radicalized one major party so that those are the preferences of the people who adhere to your party, the leader is interchangeable.
	And yes, Trumpism is sometimes what we call it.
	MAGA movement is probably a better way to do it.
	But there is an authoritarian movement inside Republican politics.
	But what about the authoritarianism within the Democrat party, a party that would rather lose to Trump than win with Bernie Sanders, that keeps offering us Joe Biden?
	Have you seen that dude in the bicycle shop yet?
	I'm fixated on that clip.
	Maybe we'll do it tomorrow.
	But like, when you see poor dear Joe Biden staggering around, poor fella staring out of his own face like it's saline, what do you guys call it, cellophane?
	Like he's just staring out at the world, peeping through the mystery of life.
	How can this be offered to you as the alternative?
	That isn't being bamboozled by Trump.
	They are pushing Trump to get more and more extreme because the more extreme things he says, the more they adhere to him.
	And that is coming from a very large proportion of the American right that adheres to the Republican Party.
	And that's why this is a Republican Party problem more than it is the problem of one man and his leader.
	Hey, remember that conspiracy theory that foreign DNA could poten- that the vaccines could mysteriously, excuse me, and curiously alter your genetics?
	Remember that?
	That was one of the ones, like, you know me, I'm an open-minded guy.
	Don't be so open-minded that your brain falls right out of your head.
	I'm open because I know that we are deceived so endlessly, because I know how this machine works, because I've seen the inside of certain aspects of this machine.
	I know that they cannot be trusted.
	But when you hear, like, Alex Jones, who I consider, you know, he's been on the show, I consider Alex Jones to be sort of a contemporary shaman who dabbles in mysticism, who goes into various and varying states and conveys factual information, but also extemporises and riffs on it.
	I think it would be fair to say that about Alex.
	And when you hear him say something like it's meddling with your DNA, you think, oh, come on, Alex.
	It can't be doing that.
	It can't be that the vaccine, if you take it, is a sort of a weird genetic medicine that gets in there and dabbles with the fundaments of your material being, but it turns out that it does do that, and Alex Jones is completely correct, and he is like the sort of medical general, isn't he?
	Like Joseph Lupardo, isn't he sort of like the Florida...
	Surgeon General.
	So, like, it's not some crackpot, is it?
	It's not some lunatic.
	It's not like, oh no, quick, shut down this dude's free speech.
	Quick, smart.
	This is a medical professional.
	Well, let's hear him out.
	Very few public health officials in this country seem very interested in public health, in case you haven't noticed.
	The Surgeon General of Florida, Dr. Joseph Latipo, is an exception to that.
	And so he has now called on doctors to immediately stop giving the mRNA.
	Someone in the chat is talking about Gonzalo Lira, the murdered American journalist, presumably murdered, in custody in Ukraine.
	We're covering that on the show tomorrow, so you need not worry.
	We care about Julian Assange and his ongoing incarceration and justice.
	Demand his release and exoneration, and we'll be covering Gonzalo Lira tomorrow.
	Don't you worry about that.
	Thank you for bringing it to our attention in the chat, but try and be a little more optimistic next time.
	Don't just start with, shame on you!
	Maybe go, are you interested in the story?
	Just a suggestion.
	You know, we'll do it either way.
	I believe in your free speech more than I believe in protecting my feelings, baby.
	Let's get back to Tucker.
	COVID vax to their patients.
	And for a very interesting reason that you should know about, here's his statement.
	We're quoting.
	I'm calling for a halt to the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
	The U.S.
	Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have always played it fast and loose with COVID-19 vaccine safety.
	But their failure to test for DNA integration with the human genome, as their own guidelines dictate, when the vaccines are known to be contaminated with foreign DNA, is intolerable.
	Think about that.
	It's one thing if it gives you a heart attack.
	If it tampers with your DNA in some way, now we have a real problem.
	I'll take a heart attack.
	I'll take a seizure.
	But when you start messing with my DNA, you didn't do clinical trials on enough mouses.
	How many mouses did you take?
	We only did about five mouses.
	That's the only number of mouses that we could manage.
	You needed to do more tests on more mouses, you lunatics.
	Considering a billion people got it.
	So in a recent interview about the MRA vaccines, The Surgeon General of Florida described them this way.
	These vaccines have DNA in them. Everyone knows what DNA is.
	They're contaminated with DNA, and that's not necessarily a big deal. But it's a problem
	with these vaccines because the DNA hangs on with the mRNA and goes into people's cells. So
	this is a completely different risk analysis than other products that have had DNA. These
	vaccines are honestly, they're...
	Someone in the chat goes, whose DNA is it?
	Is it Bill Gates' DNA?
	Is it Voucher's DNA?
	Are they going to turn us into mini-themes?
	Well, listen, that is the Florida Surgeon General.
	That's his official title.
	I remember seeing him over the pandemic period down there in Florida, who are widely understood to have handled the pandemic extremely well under Ron DeSantis.
	But I think it's very interesting with the emergence of disease X that we are still dealing with disease Y. Why are we all locked in our homes?
	Why are we granting indemnity to the makers of these vaccines?
	Why are we recommending masks and social distances?
	Why would we continue to trust these people?
	And as world leaders and the WHO meet in, of all places, Davos to discuss disease X, a future pandemic that could cause, you know, fingers crossed, 20 times more fatalities than COVID-19.
	Is that fatalities with disease X or from disease X?
	The debate around this chicken and egg question is being postponed.
	COVID-19 inquiry in our country is being booted off right into the future, even with the slim, slender and diluted questions they were willing to put in front of the politicians that they're basically allowed to go, oh no, my phone factory reset.
	I've lost all the WhatsApp messages from that period.
	So we're looking at disease X, how it will be handled.
	And whether or not you're concerned about ongoing gain-of-function research, which in our country, the UK, is continuing in a mysterious facility that also manages and makes and manufactures chemical weapons.
	Dual use, anyone?
	Gain-of-function research, anyone?
	Making the same mistakes as before, everybody?
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the effing news.
	Stay with us.
	We've got so much more to come.
	Thank you for choosing Fox News.
	Good day.
	No.
	Here's the fucking news.
	Disease X is imminent, they say.
	A whole new pandemic for a whole new year.
	Luckily, our friends at Davos, the WHO and world leaders are discussing a response.
	But are you not concerned that disease X could be caused by a lab leak when it's possible that the previous pandemic was caused by a lab leak?
	Well, hopefully they're not doing crazy stuff with mouses all over the world right now.
	They are!
	Hello there, you Awakening Wonders!
	Thanks for joining me on our voyage to truth and freedom.
	As we continue to awaken together, we do need to form a resistance, a counterpunch to the attack on our freedom.
	As the WHO Treaty means that your nation will be disempowered and you will be further disempowered as an individual, we need to organize together, become an Awakened Wonder, join our community if it's within your means.
	For surely, disease, The British government has unveiled a new vaccine research facility where scientists are working to prevent future pandemics.
	that the laboratory that's investigating vaccines are also developing chemical weapons.
	The British government has unveiled a new vaccine research facility
	where scientists are working to prevent future pandemics.
	It's located at Porton Down, a high security research facility
	best known for its work on chemical warfare.
	Okay, now those of you that are world-versed in this territory will be familiar
	with some of the ideas and theories about the evolution of certain medications,
	the funding for certain vaccines, the idea of dual-use facilities and dual-use research,
	and indeed, the possibility that gain-of-function research itself.
	...led to the pandemic.
	It's the age-old chicken-and-egg question.
	What came first, the solution to the disease or the disease itself?
	And is it possible that that disease was caused by research into diseases of that nature?
	Extraordinary.
	There's certainly some interesting patent information available that suggests the chronology is peculiar.
	In any event, the solution will be provided by world leaders at Davos.
	Davos is beginning this week and members of the WHO, whose treaty will further empower them and disempower your government, are talking with world leaders who have possibly passed through WEF-type schemes about what the solutions for the next pandemic will be.
	The last pandemic was preceded by exercises of preparation known as Event 201.
	As well as being someone that's interested in the potential nefarious undergirding of globalism, I do, in spite of what it might say under this video, in spite of the pop-ups that you might see while watching this video, care very deeply indeed about truth.
	And of course, What will rationally be said is there's just been a pandemic.
	Of course, we're preparing for other eventualities and future pandemics.
	And people make all sorts of curious arguments about why there are more pandemics.
	Oh, as rainforests are depleted, we're exposed to more creatures and more viruses and more diseases.
	People seem very reluctant to say, as we do more gain and function research, as we develop more bioweapons, it's possible that there are more and more lab leaks.
	People are even less keen on saying, as we seek to impose control at Unprecedented levels.
	It's more and more likely that the legitimization of measures of control will be seen in the form of future pandemics.
	That's the kind of thing that you simply cannot say out loud.
	I know that many of you are pondering and inquiring into exactly those kind of ideas.
	Let me know in the chat and the comments.
	But it seems to me that we at least have to remain open to the following possibilities.
	Gain-of-function research and biochemical activity is leading to new outbreaks and new viruses and that we oughtn't be handing over more control to organisations like the WHO or indeed the WAF or perhaps even our own national government in the wake of what happened in the last pandemic.
	Whether that's something as simple as the revelations in Fauci's behind-closed-doors inquiry that Social distancing rules were basically made up, that masks essentially don't work, that lockdowns could have caused many more problems, certainly economically and maybe even socially and psychologically, than they caused.
	And there is, of course, the phenomenon of excess deaths, the looming phantom, the spectre, the unanswerable question that won't come up in any COVID inquiry in your country, the United States, or mine.
	And we've just heard, of course, as you have, that the COVID inquiry is being delayed conveniently for a few months. It was due to start
	looking at vaccinations and medications in the summer. That's all been delayed. So there are a lot
	of questions before we start handing over our trust when it comes to disease X, whatever it may
	be and wherever it might lead us.
	Experts are preparing for what is known as disease X or the next pandemic virus.
	One of the most reliable voices during the pandemic period was Dr. John Campbell, who began
	as an advocate for vaccines and still advocates for many medications that are what we would call
	conventional or traditional vaccines, but has become over the course of the pandemic an extremely
	outspoken critic of the government's and pharmaceutical establishment during the
	pandemic period.
	Here he is talking about disease X. Now, I want to talk now about disease X.
	Which is on this website here.
	This is the World Economic Forum site as far as I can derive.
	Why I like John Campbell is he's pretty straightforward, he's dry, he's trustworthy, he's not a person who's hysterical or hyperbolic, not evangelical, but you can tell he's extremely committed to telling the truth.
	He uses academic information.
	The fact that he's someone that's subject to bans and strikes and attacks tells you that it is indeed telling the truth that's the problem, not misinformation.
	Disease X, this is how we should prepare for the next big virus.
	Global collaboration and adequate funding are needed to improve pandemic preparedness and ensure fast action to keep a viral outbreak at bay.
	It says you can get a long way being able to produce something, not quite sure what's being produced, but you can produce something or other, something or other, that will target a novel virus before that virus even emerges.
	Isn't it interesting how opaque and vague the language is?
	You could produce something.
	That means some sort of vaccine product comparable to the current raft of vaccines for the previous pandemic, whether it's the AstraZeneca one, where there are a lot of questions.
	Johnson & Johnson, a lot of questions.
	Moderna, a lot of questions about efficacy at very least.
	Pfizer, a lot of questions about profit and efficacy.
	Can't just sort of plough on as if, well, that was an unmitigated success.
	Let's get ready for the next round.
	I assume here they're referring to repurposed drugs.
	which could be rolled out very quickly and very cheaply and may be efficacious against a range of conditions.
	Maybe that's what they mean.
	But anyway, they're going to produce something.
	Can't read too much into that, all they say is something.
	Could even mean a vaccine, I don't know, whatever they mean there.
	Anyway, that will target a novel virus before that virus even emerges.
	It's interesting because I suppose what's indicated there, and what Dr John Campbell is very deft at communicating, is how do you know that something is going to emerge?
	Because, let's face it, what we're discussing, let's have it right, I know many of you range in views from this whole thing was deliberate, it was deliberately leaked, to it was accidentally leaked, to, you know, presumably some of you still believe it could be natural origin.
	I know there are many people that think, oh, they tried their best with the vaccines.
	Other people think the most nefarious, malfeasant schemes imaginable have taken place.
	But when we hear that the WAF are discussing a future pandemic, gain-of-function research that's even more dangerous than the research that led to the last pandemic is continuing, Weapons manufacturers are involved in making vaccines.
	It starts to seem extraordinary, particularly when you couple that with the general climate of our planet now, where there's complete mistrust for institutions and a sense that measures that afford control and generate compliance are favourable to the powerful.
	I'm not saying anything about how the pandemic came about.
	Who benefited from it, though?
	Well, the most powerful financial interests in the world benefited, would you say?
	Yes.
	Did the state, the government, benefit?
	Yes.
	Did Bill Gates benefit?
	Yes.
	It's extraordinary, isn't it?
	The people that benefited are the people that are telling us, there's going to be another pandemic any minute.
	Hang on to your hat.
	Oh, I bet there's another one.
	You did so well out of the last one.
	It's a virus we don't know yet, but we do know it's out there.
	Do we?
	But we do know it's out there.
	Now, unfortunately, Much to my annoyance and your annoyance, I felt compelled to delete yesterday's video.
	My apologies.
	The trick is to live to fight another day.
	That's what we aim for.
	What you've just witnessed there is the great power of censorship.
	In the end, content creators begin to censor themselves in order, as Dr. John said, to live to fight another day.
	We've seen the video that Dr. John is referring to, and he talks about the potential gain-of-function origins of certain recent medical global When someone's censoring themselves, it shows you how far down the line we are.
	That it's acceptable that gain-of-function research continues after we've all begun to understand that it's likely and possible that it's gain-of-function research that led to that event.
	But someone saying that is controlled and curtailed.
	Can you see that even where regulation is being applied appears to be in the service of the powerful?
	No one's applying regulation to gain the function research, which was banned and then reinstated.
	No one's regulating dual function research, chemical weapons and vaccines simultaneously being created and experimented on.
	These are the kind of things that should be regulated and controlled, not the free speech of people that want to have an open conversation.
	The kind of open conversations that if they were being had at the beginning of the pandemic, it's Almost certain now that we can say less people might have died.
	Lockdowns might have been challenged, medical measures might have been challenged, and therefore potentially less people taking their own lives, less deaths from cancer and heart disease, just because people would have been able to get their treatment is all I'm saying at this stage.
	So look at how power is being exercised by, in this case, YouTube, who use the WHO's community guidelines to censor content.
	We've been censored, John Campbell's Clearly alluding to censorship.
	Fortunately, on the platform we're on now, where we stream every day, we are not censored.
	That's why we're there.
	If you want to support us, click the link in the description to become a supporter of our community.
	Examining a particular virus that was experimentally used to infect mice caused a disease of the brain and at the end of the study, none of the mice at the end of the study were alive anymore.
	None of them are alive anymore.
	How many mouses have got to die before these people start showing some damn respect?
	Because a certain event had happened to them that made them not alive.
	We don't know what's made these mouses not be alive, but it was something to do with this disease X. Well, Jesus Christ, shut that window!
	No, no, leave the window open.
	I think I've just had another brilliant idea.
	Oh, my brain's hurting.
	What is it?
	Ow!
	Carrying out research, And, oh, and vaccine development.
	Carrying out research on vaccine development for known viral families.
	Oh yeah, I suppose we could make vaccines.
	Who do we get to do that?
	Who's that on line one?
	Hello, Bill!
	Would give humanity a decided advantage over the next disease, X.
	So who knows, maybe the World Economic Forum will be good enough to develop a vaccine for us Great Unwashed, so it's all ready for us.
	Please, please, please!
	It could be my birthday and Christmas present!
	Thanks as always to Dr John for his tireless and intrepid work.
	World leaders meeting in Davos for the World Economic Forum this week are set to discuss concerns about the potential for a future pandemic that could cause 20 times more fatalities than Covid-19.
	Is that with disease X or from disease X?
	Known by the placeholder name of Disease X, the term is used to refer to planning for a hypothetical future international epidemic caused by a pathogen as yet unknown to cause human disease, according to the World Health Organization.
	We can't continue to bring you this awakening and hopefully enjoyable content without the support of our partners.
	That's why I've got to ask you, and I'm glad to ask you, are you struggling with back taxes or unfiled returns?
	The IRS is escalating collections, adding, get this, 20,000 new agents and sending over 5 million collection letters to kick off 2024 to spend on things that you probably don't agree with, like wars and measures and a total lack of infrastructure.
	In these challenging times, your best defense is Tax Network USA.
	Don't let the IRS take advantage of you.
	With over 14 years of experience, Tax Network USA have saved their clients over $1 billion in back taxes.
	No matter the size of your tax issue, their expertise is your advantage.
	They specialize in negotiating with the IRS, aiming to significantly reduce your debt.
	Tax Network USA doesn't just negotiate, they also protect your assets from IRS seizures and manage your yearly returns for ongoing compliance.
	Importantly, they are licensed to help you with all state tax issues, regardless of where you live in the United States.
	The clock is ticking.
	Don't wait as the IRS steps up its game.
	Seize control of your financial future now.
	Contact Tax Network USA for immediate relief and expert guidance.
	Call 1-800-245-6000 or visit taxnetworkusa.com forward slash brand.
	Don't let tax issues overpower you.
	Turn to Tax Network USA and find your path to financial peace of mind.
	Right, let's get back to this content.
	In a session entitled Preparing for Disease X, a panel led by the WHO chief Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus will talk about novel efforts needed to prepare healthcare systems for the multiple challenges ahead if we are to be ready for a much more deadly pandemic, the WEF said.
	It's like Jaws 3.
	They've tried the idea, we've all been completely beguiled and enchanted, but you've just got to keep the box office going.
	You're gonna need a bigger boat.
	Worldwide, the number of potential pathogens is very large, while the resources for disease research and development, R&D, is limited, the WHO had previously said in a statement.
	So, world governments, how about a little bit of that moolah?
	Wouldn't like to be getting a nasty little disease now, would ya?
	Can I just show you what it's done to these mouses?
	Oh, God!
	Oh, that's terrible!
	Yeah, gonna need 5% of your health budgets this year.
	British scientists have said that a vaccine for a new virus with pandemic potential could be developed in as little as 100 days.
	In August last year, researchers from the University of Oxford announced that they're examining how to adapt the vaccine it created for COVID-19 for disease X. Because that went so well.
	A few little tweaks here and there.
	Don't you think it would be worth investigating and understanding the impact, effects, and failures, most significantly, of the last pandemic before blazing ahead in a disease X as if it's from the people that bought you the response to COVID-19?
	It's X!
	Ballers!
	Schwab!
	Gates!
	Fauci, let's go again, like the Beatles of diseases.
	Of course, the COVID inquiry in our country, which wouldn't be happening without independent media, which wouldn't be happening without your curiosity, and even when it is happening, it's happening within sort of pretty slim guardrails, I would say, is being delayed right before it gets to vaccine efficacy, let alone excess deaths.
	It's being boxed.
	Meanwhile, in the UK, a long-awaited probe into the development of COVID vaccines and drugs was today postponed indefinitely.
	When are you going to do it?
	We cannot be definitive about that.
	Why is that?
	Because we're probably going to have an election, try and get another centralist stooge in office, and then we'll be able to blame the last lot when we eventually hold a heavily diluted inquiry in which no significant truth will be able to emerge.
	Because if you told people the truth, this is the conclusion they would reach.
	Don't trust the media.
	Don't trust the government.
	Don't trust big business.
	Demand real democracy now.
	Hearings for the fourth module of the official inquiry were set to begin this summer but have been rescheduled.
	Baroness Heather Hallett, chair of the investigation said, I know the postponement of these hearings will be disappointing for some, people interested in justice, but not so disappointing for the global establishment who want this plainly hushed up.
	I want to ensure our hearings in 2024 are as effective as possible, and I recognise the increasing pressure on organisations to respond to requests and provide information to the inquiry.
	I wish to reassure you that we will hold these hearings as soon as possible.
	That's what happens if you have the establishment accountable to the establishment, doing deals with the establishment, people leaving government to go and work for Moderna, and leaving Moderna to work for the government, and leaving the government to go and work for META.
	A set of individual and collective interests that have much more in common with one another than they do with you.
	And similarly, we have a lot more in common with one another than we do with them.
	That's why inquiries like these never go anywhere because essentially it's not the blind leading the blind, it's the corrupt inquiring into the activities of the corrupt.
	I recognise the increasing pressure on organisations to respond to requests and provide information to the inquiry.
	Which organisations?
	Presumably that means vaccine manufacturers, because at least it's public record now that AstraZeneca's vaccines caused death.
	We know that Johnson & Johnson's vaccine caused blood clots.
	We know that there are a lot more adverse reactions reported than are being widely shared.
	We certainly have excess deaths to look into.
	But the people that the inquiry are worried about pressurising are vaccine manufacturers.
	Why?
	Because they might get a job there one day.
	Why?
	Because they receive funding from them.
	Why?
	Because it's essentially the same establishment.
	They should be under some pressure.
	Pressure's exactly what they should be feeling.
	Dozens of families are suing AstraZeneca over allegations they were harmed by the firm's jab, which was rolled out widely in January 2021, nine months after the nation was plunged into its first lockdown.
	Many were struck down by vaccine-induced thrombosis topenia.
	Baroness Hallett vowed to ensure the inquiry, which is thought to have cost taxpayers in the area of £145 million already.
	Oh, my God.
	You monsters, you animals, you're paying for that.
	You paid for the vaccine.
	You'll probably pay for the payouts when people are able to prove that they were injurious.
	What an extraordinary system.
	Meanwhile, we don't want to put any pressure on those vaccine... It must be so exhausting.
	How many mouses have you maimed this morning?
	Well, five.
	shattering stuff. What happened once is fairly...
	We've got a disease that's got so many syllables in it, it's gonna take the rest of me life to learn how to say it,
	mum!
	Fuck off.
	Baroness Hallett vowed to ensure the inquiry, which is thought to have cost taxpayers in the area of £145
	million already, doesn't run beyond summer 2026.
	Look, it doesn't run beyond the summer 2026.
	It's called COVID-19!
	It's seven years!
	What the hell was that that just went on?
	Well, I think what happened was, is there was an event that legitimized authoritarianism and generated huge profits.
	So, should we put that in the inquiry?
	No, don't put that in the inquiry.
	Just say something about these mouses.
	God knows what happened to them.
	According to a statement on the inquiry website, the hearings will now take place at a later date.
	You try that with your taxis.
	You try that with your relationship with the state.
	You try that with your relationship with power.
	Oh, can we deal with that at a later date?
	Yes, because you're going to have a lot of dates behind bars to think about it.
	Especially when I consider, and I invite you to consider, that the very scientists that are suspected of potentially causing the Wuhan lab leak are now engaged in similar research with a MERS-like virus.
	Doesn't that seem preposterous?
	Doesn't that seem like the sort of thing that should be regulated rather than Dr. John Campbell going through documents with a pen like the world's loveliest deputy headmaster saying, well, I'm a bit concerned about that.
	Could you try a bit harder in PE?
	I am trying!
	Scientists linked to Wuhan bat researchers have been accused of performing dangerous experiments on a MERS-like virus that could spark a pandemic.
	A team from the University of North Carolina published a paper in Science Advances detailing how they'd synthesized a MERS-like bat virus and used it to infect human cells and humanized mice.
	As you know, I'm against humanized mice.
	Why do that to mouses?
	MERS is one of the deadliest viruses, killing around 35% of people that it infects.
	Good news, everyone.
	The team includes Professor Ralph Baric and Trevor Scobie, who worked with Professor Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology before the pandemic, creating chimeric viruses by inserting spike proteins from bat viruses into the original SARS virus.
	Turns out now that that might have been such a fantastic idea.
	In hindsight, hindsight is 2020, and 2024, that's disease X!
	The new experiment used a reverse genetics technique to create a MERS-like bat virus called BtCoV422, which was collected by Shi Zhengli's team in China What is the gain?
	Well, pretty good if you're BioNTech or Moderna or Pfizer or Big Tech or part of the global establishment.
	I'm going to stay indoors.
	The scientists said they had performed the latest study to test whether antivirals would work against an infection.
	But experts warned the experiments were needlessly risky for little gain.
	What is the gain?
	Well, pretty good if you're BioNTech or Moderna or Pfizer or Big Tech or part of the global establishment.
	Yeah, but what about all these mouses?
	I mean, it's not looking good for them.
	Their brains are coming out of their ears.
	Anton van der Meur, professor of molecular immunology at Oxford University, told The Telegraph,
	because coronaviruses evolve rapidly, these experiments carry the risk of generating variants
	which are better able to infect human cells, and therefore humans.
	Infection and equipment error means that infection of those performing the experiment is a risk and the infected individual could then spread the infection outside the laboratory and initiate a pandemic.
	The consequences would be potentially devastating and it's not clear to me what the benefits are.
	There's no prospect of using such work to develop a vaccine or antiviral drug since these can only be tested in humans during an actual pandemic.
	Huh, but surely they wouldn't do that, right kids?
	It seems to me this experiment is simply not justified.
	Incredible, but what does he know, that crackpot professor of molecular immunology at Oxford University?
	Info Wars!
	for wars.
	Professor Barak developed the reverse genetics technique, which not only enables a virus
	to be brought to life from its genetic code, but allows scientists to mix and match parts
	from other viruses. However, experts said that the same experiments could have been
	carried out by inserting the spike protein of BtCoV422 into a harmless pseudovirus. But
	where's the fun in that? Pseudovirus experiments should have been the first things they did
	before making this live virus, one scientist who chose to remain anonymous said.
	They went straight to testing the live virus in human cell culture, and they performed experiments in humanised mice, which presents a higher risk of escape than just cell culture.
	If I'd seen these sorts of results for pseudovirus, I would have said that it should stop there.
	The virus is a potential threat.
	Don't proceed to using a live virus.
	They went straight to the bit that this guy would say never ever do.
	They've already done that bit.
	The bit that he said, don't do that.
	They've done that already.
	So the reason that they perhaps are suspicious that disease X could be around the corner is because they know what they're doing in laboratories.
	It's not like, oh, the erosion of bloody forests and you not doing your recycling.
	That's what's caused all of this.
	No, it's because they know in laboratories around the world you're funding this kind of crackpot stuff that even experts within the scientific field are saying is risky with no clear benefits, unless it was highly profitable and allowed you to terrify people into total compliance.
	I suppose that would be useful, but it's not some sort of sci-fi dystopia we're living in, right?
	Experts also warned that the experiments were performed at bio-safety level, BSL-3 level, rather than the highest BSL-4 safety level.
	Accidental releases from BSL labs are unfortunately quite common, added Professor Vandermeer.
	Right, firstly, what's going on at BSL Safety Level 1 and 2?
	Just scrap them.
	You should even let kids do Play-Doh at that level.
	3 isn't safe enough.
	I'm gonna put some music on, have a couple of drinks, maybe a little bit of the other, and now it's time for some experimenting, baby!
	BSL4!
	Bare minimum!
	Experiments on potentially pandemic organisms should only be performed if there are clear benefits to humanity and should be performed at the very highest level of containment.
	Doesn't it make you think you've got a disparate and broken system where you have no means of control over experimentation?
	that's plainly deleterious to our chances of survival as a species, where you have open communication continually censored on public platforms in order to control debate, where you have dissenting voices continually criticized, where you have people openly discussing there's going to be another disease X and none of us having the ability to oppose it, when you have a WHO treaty that's going to impair democracy even further Any nation that signs up to that treaty will have to give over 5% of their budget and will have to comply to any measures that the treaty suggests.
	And that is all undergirded by this kind of lunacy.
	Even if they know something we don't and we're all dumb and they know a bunch of rational things that we can't understand, we should still be invited to participate democratically in whether or not these experiments take place.
	Because after the last pandemic, I'm not quite ready for another one.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the chat.
	See you in a second.
	Thank you for choosing Fox News.
	Good day.
	No.
	Here's the fucking news.
	Roxanne says, Does Putin have a spouse?
	Does Putin have a spouse?
	I want to know about that guy's private business.
	Putin, do you even have a spouse?
	Critical thought, please consider... Oh no, you need the also one, the two of them.
	You need the collective thing for it to make sense, you soppy sausage.
	Blue Nose Bob calls it gain of Fauci.
	Liquor giant, go back into it again, don't be so silly.
	Blue Nose Bob.
	Gain of Fauci research, he's calling it.
	Liquor Giant.
	New viruses are coming from their labs.
	I don't feel super confident about what's going on in those monster mash labs.
	It was a graveyard smash!
	WNPLM.
	I've had 37 jabs, but I still need 12 boosters.
	It might be time for you to get another hobby.
	Liquor Giant.
	Viruses are normally one every several generations.
	Not constant.
	This is natural.
	Uh, this is not natural.
	Did I say it's natural?
	This is not, yeah, that's the opposite of the news.
	Disease X for Gen X is second tri- Ah, and then Ben Manning UK123.
	Sorry I was so rude earlier, Russ.
	I didn't think you'd see it anyway.
	I have real faith that you care about Gonzalo Lira.
	Good on you and it's fantastic you're covering it.
	Apologies.
	You sweet...
	Lovely, beautiful people.
	I am determined and faithful that we will elevate these chats.
	People will come in here in the future and they'll think that they're in Paris in 1920.
	They'll think that this is a symposium in ancient Greece.
	Athenian principles, a great and great debate will be abound.
	Paul the String says, Russell Brand, did you look into Fort Detrick?
	Yeah, Liam, who works here on the show, said that It's the equivalent of what they have in England.
	Our one's called Pork Town.
	There's nothing going on here except we're developing chemical weapons, you know.
	So yeah, we did look into it, mate.
	We know exactly what's going on.
	It's a lot of skullduggery.
	Putin, DrJ43 says, Putin has X kids.
	Does that mean 10 kids?
	Or they used to be kids, and then it became something else.
	Russell Milk, have you seen this thing?
	This comes from our Awakened Wonder chat, where there's really good big Lebowski etching being posted by, I think, is it Ellen Sophia?
	Or are you commenting on Ellen?
	Someone's posted an image.
	Of, uh, me on a baby milk bottle.
	I don't know how I feel about that.
	It's a genie in a bottle.
	You gotta rub it the right way.
	Uh, replying to atmo5237, mice not mouses, please consider letting go of pedantry in favor of humor.
	Favorite critical thought.
	Anyway, I think it is officially mouses.
	What would this, if you had multiple ones of them, what would you call them?
	Yeah, would you go?
	It's mouses.
	Little lovely mouses.
	How many mouses are gonna die?
	Um, hey, so we were talking about, uh, Maddow, weren't we?
	And Maddow saying that Trump is anti-politics.
	Let's get back into that.
	Plus, we've got to see Rebel News, like that dude, Arvey, pursuing John Kerry through Davos.
	And John Kerry sort of trying to mouse his milk.
	Apologetic pest.
	I like that.
	That's one of my favorite phrases, mouse milk.
	Like, he's pursuing him through Davos, really bugging him out, like, going, uh, Mice, Mice, um, hi, John, don't you think it's a bit stupid that you come here on a private jet, isn't it?
	I've done a lot for the planet!
	He's, like, really outraged, and you can see it.
	You can see what's happening.
	It's all sort of I've never even seen a private jet.
	I'm sure John Kerry's trying his best on that private jet.
	Like, do you remember that one we did?
	Did you ever see the video we did where it's him in like an ingressional hearing?
	Where he goes, I don't, I've never even seen a private jet.
	I don't know what a private jet is.
	Well, it says here that your wife owns a private jet and you were on it.
	Oh, you know, I remember that now.
	I just thought that was a flying tube.
	I didn't know what that was.
	I was wondering how I was getting from A to B at such an astounding pace.
	Where are all the other passengers?
	This is amazing.
	I can watch what movie I want to watch.
	And look, I don't have to wear a seatbelt.
	It's extraordinary up here.
	We'll show you that in a second.
	Let's have a look at Mitchell Maddow freaking out about Donald Trump.
	The degree to which he has loosed himself from the shackles of that entirely means that there is no moment on the trail where some reporter or a person gets up in a town hall and literally says, what would you be doing in Gaza?
	It's the most obvious question.
	It's because the basis of his candidacy is he's running against politics.
	He's running against politicians.
	He's running against policy.
	He's running against the whole idea that a Congress does a thing in a country that has a strong man leader.
	He's running for A situation in which he is the leader, there is no government, there isn't a policy process, because there's just what he feels like on a day.
	Apparently that's what's being harnessed, that kind of anti-establishment sentiment that is all pervasive because of the failings of the establishment.
	But he has been in the White House for four years before and, you know, Still Congress, still Senate, still institutions, still Supreme Court.
	And that is the form of government that he's offering and that is, I think, what his most enthusiastic supporters like about him.
	Hey, listen!
	We got Whitney Webb coming on the show on Friday.
	Why don't you join us live?
	If you're an Awakened Wonder, you can go over, become an Awakened Wonder right now.
	You can support our content.
	You can join us live with Whitney Webb.
	We'll be talking about Davos.
	We'll be talking about Jeffrey Epstein.
	In addition to that, you get one additional video a week.
	You know the videos that we make?
	There's Deep Dive, Here's the News videos.
	You get an exclusive one every single week, plus you get early access.
	To other content.
	Whitney Webb, for example, you can join at 3pm GMT.
	And what's the other times?
	10am ET.
	And if you're in Brazil, like Glenn Greenwald, I happen to know, it's two hours earlier than that.
	Glenn will be coming on the show soon.
	Jordan Peterson will be coming on the show soon.
	I'm reaching out to JP.
	You know, JP Sears.
	I love JP, don't you?
	All these people will be joining us.
	I'm in touch with our man Crowder.
	We are, we're trying to create Brand Gino.
	We're doing a lot of work.
	We're working very hard on Brand Gino and I want to welcome and get ready for their names coming across the screen right now.
	Put up, can you put my monitor on so I can see it?
	If, you know, not as a trick.
	I just love, look at this.
	Look, Ski Milk U, Citizen Smithy, Knight's Crutch, Maristar333, Seri.
	Look at all these people supporting us become.
	One of us.
	One of us.
	Make them one of us.
	Yeah, get Michael Malice on the show.
	We've got to reach out to Michael Malice.
	That's a good one.
	That is a very good one.
	Okay, you glorious awakened wonders, join me on Locals for more content right now.
	Is it possible that the legacy media have got a cameraman hero?
	Well, deliberately showing the truth.
	We've got a great January 6th meme, and we've got the Rebel News interview with John Kerry we were chatting about earlier.
	I came here on a bicycle!
	I snycled through the snow!
	I used my own toenails as a kind of sail!
	I created one of those winged Fandango machines!
	So, hey, join us.
	We're going to be available right now on local.
	Synchronicity, Elfin Sophia, Mr. Oscar, True Chimera, Fire Girl 2020.
	We're joining you now.
	Then we're going to be talking about the tenets of Buddhism and the Ten Commandments.
	We are combining scripture, radicalism, anti-establishmentism, personal awakening and community values and why it's all at a price that's right.
	Join us tomorrow if you're a rumbler.
	Get over to Locals if you want to be in Awake and Wonder with us right now.
	Not for more of the same tomorrow, but for more different.
	Remember, we're talking about our man, that poor journalist that was murdered.
	We're talking about Biden in a bike shop this time.
	I know it's serious.
	Stay free!

▲