Here’s the News: Texas Files Lawsuit Against Pfizer for Misleading The Public
As Texas files a lawsuit against Pfizer for misleading the public about its COVID-19 Vaccines, a physician who had her licence suspended for not following vaccine orders during the pandemic has spoken out about the WHO's proposed pandemic treaty, which inches closer.--💙Support this channel directly here: https://bit.ly/RussellBrand-SupportVisit the new merch store: https://bit.ly/Stay-Free-StoreFollow on social media:X: @rustyrocketsINSTAGRAM: @russellbrandFACEBOOK: @russellbrand
Hello there you Awakening Wonders on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you download your podcasts.
We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content.
We will be delivering a podcast every day, seven days a week, every single day.
You'll get a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they are covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth.
Once a week we bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate and many more.
Now enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
Remember, there's an episode every single day to educate and elevate our consciousness together.
Stay free and enjoy the episode.
Hello there you awakening wonders, thanks for joining us on our voyage through truth
and freedom.
I'm so grateful that you're here today as we continue to awaken together.
You'll notice that there is an awakening taking place because things that were regarded as unsayable and heretical just a couple of years ago are now right there in the legacy media, not by choice but because of necessity, because independent media has brought these ideas to the forefront.
One such example is the state of Texas suing Pfizer for being misleading about vaccines.
And yet, the WHO are still pushing a treaty that will mean that if your country, if you happen to live in a country that's a member state, and you probably do, then if the WHO say you've got to take vaccines, your country's got to do lockdowns, then that is what will happen.
And your government will be able to abdicate responsibility entirely.
You may have forgotten how many times during the pandemic Period.
You heard the words, well, this is the W.H.O.
recommendation.
This is what the W.H.O.
thinks.
In fact, policies like lockdown and masking and social distancing and, of course, vaccines all came via the W.H.O.
No matter how they arrived at your nation, they are all measures that happen to be recommended and could soon be mandated by the W.H.O.
So let's have a look at that lawsuit.
Let's have a look at a physician whose license was revoked during the pandemic period for vaccine misinformation that turns out was simply foresight.
And let's have a look at this new WHO treaty and what it will mean if it's passed and why we should oppose it.
New at four, Attorney General Ken Paxton suing drug maker Pfizer.
Paxton posted about it to social media, accusing the company of misrepresenting the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine and conspiring to censor public discourse.
The federal government long ago, back in I think the 80s, passed a law that gave protection to pharmaceutical companies when they provided vaccines.
There's no liability, complete protection.
However, under state law, they don't have those same protections.
We have a Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and that's what we're suing them under, arguing that they did not tell our consumers in Texas the truth.
And therefore there are damages because they didn't tell the truth about the effectiveness or the potential side effects of the vaccine.
We think the number 95% was not a true number.
It wasn't an accurate number.
It wasn't a reliable number and they knew it.
That's our argument.
They knew that it wasn't a reliable number and therefore they misled consumers about the effectiveness.
So people are making health care decisions that are pretty important And they're taking on a vaccine that hasn't really been tested, and we don't know the long-term effects, yet they knew some of those potential side effects, and they knew that it wasn't 95% effective.
And so people are making their decisions based on believing that Pfizer is telling them the truth.
And of course, then the Biden administration came in and started threatening people with their jobs, And we had other cities and states doing the same thing, forcing people to get this vaccine, and it was based on false information, and that's a real problem because it has long-term consequences for consumers in Texas.
One of the good things about this litigation is it's going to bring out information that the public hasn't known, and we're going to make sure that information gets out, so at the very least, Whether we win or lose, I think we're going to win.
And potentially we'd have other lawsuits.
But at the very least, the public can go, wait a minute, I'm going to be a little, I'm going to be a lot more hesitant to trust the Biden administration next time or any other government entity that tells me I have to get it or I'm going to lose my job or I have to get, that pressure didn't add up.
So you've obviously witnessed this narrative evolve from a point where these are simply matters that couldn't be discussed to the point where there's legislation taking place at the level of the state.
And yet the WHO treaty, if passed, will mean that your entire nation will be mandated to follow measures that they suggest.
Thankfully, it is at least being publicly discussed.
And at the moment, we have the opportunity to potentially oppose it.
This is Dr Meryl Nass, who had her licence revoked during the pandemic, articulating exactly why we should be sceptical about this new WHO treaty, which seems to be just one of those insidious pieces of legislation that characterises globalisation.
It just appears, passes, and all of a sudden you edge a little closer to autocracy without ever having voted it, which I suppose is the nature of tyranny.
We're undergoing a soft coup.
And the idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda.
Is it me or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?
Wars, pandemics, lies, trickery, my cats keep having kittens, the last one's personal.
For those who are in the United States there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
American Heart for Gold make it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.
With one phone call they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door Or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.
American Hartford Gold is the highest rated firm in the US with an A-plus rating from the BBB and thousands of satisfied clients.
Right now, they will give you up to $5,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.
This offer is only for US customers.
Call 866-505-8315.
That's 866-505-8315.
Or simply text BRAND to 998899.
505 8315.
That's 866 505 8315 or simply text
brand to 99 88 99.
Get up to five thousand dollars of silver and protect your future
in this crazy, crazy world with some solid, precious metals
literally made in stars.
The WHO is developing through all its nations, but
with the WHO directorate in the United States in charge, a
pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing International
Health Regulations that will remove the human rights
protections currently.
embedded in the IHRs, will enforce surveillance, censorship, get rid of
freedom of speech, require governments to censor and only push a single narrative.
Also, we will be subject, if they can make this work, to vaccines developed in a hundred days.
I think that the rise of populism is a response to this kind of globalist bureaucracy that the doctor here is describing.
While the legacy media may continually, with great dread, tell us that Trump will lead us into a future dictatorship
or the rise of this right-wing faction or that group is responsible for the decline of society,
I am more concerned about the insidious creep of global legislation that will mean
that your media is controlled, that medical choices are taken,
that taxation is taken from you, none of which is ever gonna be voted for.
In fact, you have to go online right now and sign a petition to oppose it.
That's literally the only thing you can do.
You've gotta go and seek out democracy on the internet like you're looking for pornography.
Which the organization CEPI is planning to do.
And one of the people who founded CEPI was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO
to bring this forward.
[BLANK_AUDIO]
Other things that amendments do is to bind the state so they're no longer recommendations but enforceable edicts.
I heard Dave Martin describing this treaty and he said they just make minor amendments like this doctor is describing.
It might have previously said these measures will not be...
Mandated.
And all they have to do is take out the word not.
It was like just a minor amendment but this changes everything from will not be mandated to will be mandated.
A pretty significant change.
This woman is not engaging in histrionics.
She's simply telling you about a treaty that she's reading on.
Oh my god if they make those changes that means that if the WHO say this is a pandemic they'll be able to say you can censor this kind of dissident information or misinformation or malinformation whatever is the en vogue Term at that time.
These medications should be mandated.
These lockdown measures should be enforced.
And imagine in a world where we've all got digital IDs, what other measures might be proposed?
You know that during the pandemic, vaccine passables became a hot, hot topic, legitimized because of the necessity of it.
But now we know, because of the Texas lawsuit, that they were wrong about the efficacy of those vaccines.
They were wrong about it stopping transmission.
It was wrong in so many ways.
All of this is kind of being lost in a morass of misinformation, malinformation and increasing cultural conflict around the world now.
But the truth is that global regulations are currently being discussed and may yet be passed that will mean that the same and even worse could happen again.
Imagine the Canadian trucker convoy, people just protesting You can't do that.
That's Nazi.
Oh, there's a report on it.
You can't report on that.
That's Nazi.
Well, do we have to take this medication and I've got a respiratory condition or some preference or some religious idea?
You do have to take it.
This is what's being presented to you, not via a political party that you voted for, not via some community action that you're a part of, but by a globalist entity that you do to some degree already fund, because that's where the WHO gets a significant portion of its money.
Of course, you know where else they get it.
Answers in the chat.
They're now looking to leverage even more power over your individual and national life.
Provide a liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from one country to another, enforce digital passports, and the Director General of WHO can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists,
he can just declare it with no standards and then countries around the world will have to obey.
Also, the WHO will tell you what drugs you can and can't use.
For a minute, I imagined it was The Band, The Who, and it was Pete Townshend and Roger Daltrey.
Can't trust them around drugs.
Those guys are crazy.
People try to lock us down.
Well, let's be honest, it's us trying to lock you down.
In your nation, once a pandemic is declared...
Obviously the budget will increase.
This is precisely what I mean when I talk about establishment globalism.
Unelected bodies proposing and then ultimately imposing regulation and laws on you as an individual and on your entire nation.
And the reason that your government is not vociferously, loudly and continually opposing it is because they broadly agree with it because it's part of a general neoliberal project to centralise power.
When people talk about a new world order, let me know in the chat, do you think this is what they mean?
One Health is another part of this.
One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO with these documents to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world.
It's a modest piece of legislation.
What do you want to control?
Oh, just everything in the wild side here.
By saying that climate change, animals, plants.
Animals, plants, minerals, you know, all those guys.
Water systems, ecosystems.
Boys to men, monopoly, cats, orphans, tears, old clock parts.
Are all central to health.
Also embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals.
That's a weird thing to suddenly put in.
Also, we value animals now as highly as humans.
What an extraordinary piece of legislation.
Let me know if you think that this is precisely what globalism is.
Is this why you've lost faith in neoliberal democracy?
Is this why you suddenly have an interest in demagoguery and populist figures that are able to harness the emotion of a nation and say, I will change things, I will stand up for the people?
Is this precisely the type of politics that we require?
Do we need to stand up against these kind of globalist measures?
And why aren't these things more widely discussed?
Why are the legacy media not saying, hey, hey, hey, this WHO treaty seems to be pretty significant, given that it's going to make you less important than a hamster.
It only wants to control things like animals, minerals and vegetables like it's some sort
