All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 26, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:05:16
You Were RIGHT! | Nord Stream, Jan 6th & Ukraine War - STAY FREE #274
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'm going to go ahead and get the camera.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
Thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand holiday festive special.
Yes, you're probably bored of your family by now.
You're sick of watching legacy media propaganda.
You know that even in the season of goodwill to all men, they're hating on you.
Well, today is part one of our special show, which is called Conspiracy theory to conspiracy fact, where we show you the number of times this year that you were right.
Not those people who try to tell you how to think.
You were right.
We're talking about Nord Stream, January the 6th, and the Ukraine war, where the legacy media and the state told you one thing, And then, oh, let's just wait a little bit of time, and here comes the truth.
The holy name of the truth.
The first part is available on YouTube.
Thanks, guys, for tuning in there, you awaken wonder.
We want you.
We're saving souls, baby.
As far as we see this is, we're fighting for souls right now.
This is the time, the spooky time of Christmas, the time of the awakening of the divine.
We're gonna be over there, participating, because this is the time where we gotta wake up.
This is it, because when the king was born, where did they look?
They looked in the palaces, but where did they find the king born?
Among the animals.
In the manger.
Down among the poverty.
This is where it's gonna come from.
This is where the revolution's gonna come from.
So, if you're watching us on YouTube, download the Rumble app, won't ya?
Get over a rumble, watch it at the home of free speech.
The manger of free speech, I call it.
Remember to subscribe, and give us a like over there, because it helps us in ways that I'm afraid I don't understand.
Now, this is our first conspiracy to fact, Nord Stream.
Do you remember when what they tried to tell you is that Russia blew up its own pipeline?
Do you remember that?
They went, you know who's blown up this pipeline that financially benefits Russia?
Russia.
What?
Hold on, that doesn't even make sense!
Well, do you remember that it wasn't Russia at all?
This is a funny, informative video.
Have a... Why don't you light up a Christmas... I don't know what you do.
Do you smoke?
Is it drugs?
Light... Do what you do within the confines of the law and watch this fantastic video.
Nord Stream Pipeline.
Who blew it up?
It's not as if Joe Biden literally admitted it on TV that they'd done it long before it happened, was it?
Here's the news.
No, here's the effing news on Nord Stream.
Now, we live in the age of amnesia.
Oh, you're not still going on about COVID, are you?
Oh, you're not still going on about Nord Stream Pipeline?
Oh, you're not still going on about the Holy War in the Middle East?
Listen, try to stay focused.
That's what we all have to do.
We can't all live in a TikTok mindset, where if something happened 30 seconds ago, you're not interested in it anymore.
Remember, when that Nord Stream Pipeline blew up, we all went, that's interesting, because here's why.
America have been talking about blowing up that pipeline to make sure that Europe are reliant on resources that they are able to control.
It's really odd that the legacy media are saying, Russia blew up that pipeline themselves because Putin, as we've been telling you every day now on the news, is crazy and this is an unprovoked attack.
Again, obviously that war is really bad and Russia's aggression and destruction of Ukrainian citizens and the ending and annihilation of the Ukrainian people, that's really, really terrible.
But 2014 was a really significant date in this conflict and the fact is the fact now, the actual fact, because the legacy media
are reporting it quietly.
Propaganda, very loud. Truth, very quiet. Extraordinarily interesting. Let's have a
look at how the government and legacy media reported on the Nord Stream pipeline at the
time to ensure that the truth didn't leak out like natural gas.
I think as Mr. Sullivan mentioned, there are three now national investigations being done
into the Nord Stream 2.
to expand that.
Sabotage.
United States not involved.
of our allies. We are not going to get ahead of that. That work is still ongoing.
We still do believe it was an act of sabotage. The United States was not involved.
Okay, sabotage, United States not involved, okay.
In any way contrary to some press reporting out there.
Oh, conspiracy theorists.
But we need to let the work of these investigators go on and it needs to go on unimpeded.
Can't impede their work.
Did the U.S.
ore a proxy for the U.S.?
Proxy?
That's weird.
What do you mean proxy?
Proxy war?
Hey, wait, what are you saying?
Are you saying that the US, because of the way that the popularity of international and foreign wars has waned since Vietnam, have to set up proxy states and fund foreign armies in order to meet their agenda and set up alliances with other countries and end, like, legitimised wars that facilitate their aims?
What are you... I'm actually offended.
I'm not even going to answer that.
I'm offended you'd even ask me that.
Have anything to do with the explosion on the Nord Stream pipeline?
The United States had nothing to do with it.
That's just Russian propaganda and disinformation.
Because that's the only people that do propaganda and misinformation.
Russia.
They're probably interfering with an election right now.
Look out your window.
You're trying to do an election.
I bet Russia... Oi!
Just let us vote for whichever one of these two basically the same parties we choose!
Bloody Putin!
Now we know it was an act of sabotage but there's an investigation going on right now.
We'll get to the bottom of this and at the bottom it'll be Putin.
I think we're going to get into credentialing that in terms of who was responsible.
But it was Putin.
We're going to let the investigators take a look at that until they come up with Putin.
But clearly this was an act of sabotage by Putin.
Alright, here's the Secretary of State.
This is why it has churned up all kinds of questions.
Take a listen.
It's a tremendous opportunity to once and for all remove the dependence on Russian energy.
Antony!
It's me on the energy now!
Are you an actual idiot?
Don't say that to the public, they will know that we did it!
Are you an actual- don't say that to the public, they will know that we did it!
He is a means of advancing his imperial designs.
That's very significant.
And that offers tremendous strategic opportunity for the years to come.
I don't know why he said that, he's out of control.
Cuckoo! Cuckoo!
Do you notice how with their suits and their badges and their logos and the flags,
whether it's the legacy media or the politicians that trot it out in front of you,
there's this kind of assumption of superiority that you're supposed to listen to them.
But I think many of them are actual verifiable idiots.
They're not better than you or more clever than you.
They have to just keep your energy really low.
Oh God, it's so exhausting being alive.
Oh God, there's no What's the point?
What's the point?
What have I got to look forward to?
Oh, just some food or just some distraction somewhere, some sort of little onanistic loop of living.
Because while these mighty people, these uber-mench, they run the world for us, they're not better than you.
They're actual idiots.
Talking about strategic opportunity about this moment, so you can officially say that the US was not involved in any way in this attack.
I'm already nodding because I've already decided.
I didn't in fact decide.
I was told what to say, so I'm just waiting for you to stop talking.
That's right.
That's correct.
So it must be half-past conspiracy.
Let's see what they're saying now.
The man in this picture is Colonel Roman Shevinsky.
According to an exclusive from the Washington Post and Spiegel, he was central to the controversial bombing of the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines last year.
Don't look well, does he?
Looks like he's been involved in blowing up some gas at the bottom of the ocean.
He looks knackered.
Sources have painted a picture of him managing logistics for a six-person team.
At the time, we spoke to Joko Willink, former Navy SEAL, and I goes, would Navy SEALs be able to do it?
Yeah!
Purely hypothetically, would it be possible for a special forces team to undertake the sabotage of a pipeline?
Yeah.
I certainly think it's really worth talking to actual military experts that are not somehow shepherded by the military-industrial complex, like people that have been high up in the military but now have no connection to it.
They'll look at it and go, yep, that's special ops.
To plant explosive charges on the gas pipelines.
They say he didn't act alone and that his orders ultimately came from senior military officials.
Of course he's not acting alone.
That'll be the next thing.
Lee Harvey Oswald did that.
Lee Harvey Oswald resurrected himself out of the grave, then he swam, went into that book depository place, got himself a couple of books on how to blow up pipelines, swam down to the very depths, and then he blew that bloody thing up.
And we'd asked him not to.
I mean, not asked him, because we have no connection with him.
He's never been a CIA agent.
What?
I've got a cold.
Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines run from Russia to Germany and provide energy to millions of people in Europe.
Critically, the Nord Stream bypasses Ukraine.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Lesensky has previously denied Ukrainian involvement in the explosion.
That guy!
What's next?
Weapons of mass destruction blew up that pipeline.
Doesn't it worry you?
Let me know in the chat.
This is a serious question.
How often do you sort of see a story on the news and go, I bet this is because of that.
And then you find out, oh yeah it is.
Like when that happened, Nord Stream Pipeline blew up.
It's like, well, is that because like it's advantageous to this alliance between the Ukraine and the United States after the 2014 coup that they want Ukraine to basically become a kind of Balkan state that they can use control to agitate one of their What's happened there is plain and simple.
Lee Harvey Oswald and Putin and Osama Bin Laden are sort of a supergroup now and they've done that together.
did it himself. Like, didn't you sort of just think that?
Not because you're some sort of strategic geopolitical genius, because it's obvious! And
then they can't be blinking or that other guy's a commentator. What's happened there is
plain and simple. Lee Harvey Oswald and Putin and Osama bin Laden are sort of a super group now and
they've done that together. They're like the Beatles but for blowing up pipelines. I get it.
Ukrainians are exactly this.
The Ukrainians definitely didn't do it.
You did, though.
It's amazing.
Not that you can particularly blame Zelensky, because you only need to see poor old Zelensky trotted out of the Golden Globes or begging for money on the television to recognise that he's temporarily been hoovered up into the system, trotted around like a pawn.
Gaddafi was in that position once.
Colonel Gaddafi was once favoured and loved by Western leaders.
Like, oh, Libya.
Let's make Libya work out.
And they were like, I don't like that Gaddafi anymore.
White uniforms, medals.
He's like some sort of mad ice cream man.
Let's nut him off.
If Zelensky doesn't start singing the right tunes, bye-bye, baby.
What we're interested in is arms deliveries and our victory.
So, Lexic Media appear to have caught up with where you were a year or two ago.
What's next?
Covid's not as bad as they're saying?
A senior Ukrainian military officer with deep ties to the country's intelligence services played a central role in the bombing of the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines last year, according to officials in Ukraine and elsewhere in Europe, as well as other people knowledgeable about the details of the covert operation.
There's so much evidence of this.
Joe Biden has said stuff publicly.
Condoleezza Rice has said stuff.
It was just like Seymour Hersh, a decorated, respected journalist who I've had to reframe as a conspiracy theorist or whatever.
So bloody obvious.
There's so many of these now.
It's crazy.
James' role provides the most direct evidence to date tying Ukraine's military and security leadership to a controversial act of sabotage that spawned multiple criminal investigations and that US and Western officials have called a dangerous attack on Europe's energy infrastructure.
That is pretty dangerous and it's, I don't know if it's a war crime or whatever, I don't know how these words are used anymore, who gets to determine how stuff gets labelled, but what I will say is it was a total lie.
The media, without any investigation And then go, well, should we look into this?
It didn't sound like, right, guys, let's get a scoop now.
Let's find out.
Let's see what goes on.
No!
They're just like, the Russians did that.
Remember when that missile came out of Poland?
That was probably, oh, sorry, it was us.
Oh, OK, sorry.
Roman Chervinsky, a decorated 48-year-old colonel who served in Ukraine's special operations forces, was the coordinator of the Nord Stream operation.
People familiar with his role said, managing logistics and support for a six-person team that rented a sailboat under false identities.
I was going for a sailing holiday.
And what exactly have you got there?
Just some, this is fishing bait.
What, those canisters and this dynamite?
That's right, we're fishing for very big fish.
Bloody Vladimir Putin!
And use deep sea diving equipment to place explosive charges on the gas pipelines.
Incredibly brave and brilliant in one way, except for all the lying.
On September 26, 2022, three explosions caused massive leaks on the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, which run from Russia to Germany under the Baltic Sea.
The attack left only one of four gas links in the network intact as winter approached.
How's your energy bills lately?
Stravinsky did not act alone.
Good, right?
Cover that off.
And did not plan the operation, according to the people familiar with his role, which has not been previously reported.
The officer took orders from more senior Ukrainian officials, who ultimately reported to General Valery Zaluzhny, Ukraine's highest-ranking military officer, said people familiar with how the operation was carried out.
Ukraine has launched many daring and secretive operations against Russian forces.
They're even trying to propagandise this.
But the Nord Stream attack targeted civilian infrastructure built to provide energy to millions of people in Europe, while Gazprom, the Russian state-owned gas conglomerate, owns 51% of Nord Stream.
Western energy companies including Germany, France and the Netherlands are partners and invested billions in the project.
Amazing.
So it was an attack on something that belongs to a wide variety of European interests.
See how complicated this war gets?
Remember when it was just put a sticker in your window and don't ask any questions at all?
You're blowing blowing up like energy resources of like Dutch energy firms
and stuff.
That's really like weird and wild and off-grid activity, isn't it?
It's not like, look, see these Ukrainian children?
That's all this is about.
Nothing else.
Why? So you won't be blowing up any pipelines?
Why don't you mind your own business, you conspiracy theorist?
Ukraine had long complained that Nord Stream would allow Russia to bypass Ukrainian pipes, depriving Kiev of huge transit revenue.
So mad, isn't it?
Like, so many conflicts are about canals and ships and commerce and service.
It's worth paying attention to canals when it comes to geopolitical issues, I've learned.
Zhivinsky's participation in the Nord Stream bombing contradicts Zelensky's public denials that his country was involved.
I am president and I give orders accordingly, Zelensky said in a press interview in June, responding to a report by The Post that the US Central Intelligence Agency had learned of Ukraine's plans before the attack.
I wait to hear what the deep state of the USA and BlackRock executives want, and then I give those orders.
Nothing of the sort has been done by Ukraine.
I would never act that way, Zelensky said.
You know, you can't really blame him.
That's what politicians do.
The switch between actor and politician is not that much of a radical one, really, is it?
Let me know in the chat.
This is Jonathan Cook.
A year on, with world attention on Gaza, the Western media quietly reports that the biggest ever act of industrial sabotage and environmental terrorism was carried out by supposed ally Ukraine.
I didn't even think about that.
I didn't have time to think, did you?
Like, you know, these are the people that are always Hang on about the environment and everything.
We've got to do something about climate change, and here's what that is.
Stay in your house, have an ID card, shut up and do as you're told.
Meanwhile, we're just going to blow up this pipeline, mess with the economies of all Europe, the energy resources of the entire population, not to mention polluting the sea, which suddenly isn't relevant in this conversation.
When we blow up things in the middle of the sea, all of the little crabs and coral and that just go...
And it's all fine.
Now put a sticker on your car window and shut up!
That's the same Ukraine that has received untold billions of dollars in weapons and aid that could have been spent on alleviating hardship in the West.
Would you rather that your tax dollars, or tax pound, or tax whatever your currency is, is spent on infrastructure in your country, or are you happy supporting all these wars?
No one ever asks you, do they?
Do you notice that in a democracy?
We're going over there to defend democracy.
Can we have a vote on it?
Censor that son of a bitch!
The blowing up of the Nord Stream pipelines plunged Europe into a prolonged energy crisis, tipping its economies deeper into a recession from which they are yet to recover, and forced Europe to buy in more expensive US liquid gas.
Oh no, what a terrible side effect!
I guess, does anyone else anywhere around here have any gas for sale?
We got We've got some gas for sale, but I've got to tell you, it's expensive.
There's an energy crisis.
What do you mean, energy crisis?
Well, people keep blowing up all the pipelines, so, you know, that's just supply and demand.
Given the close ties between the Ukrainian and US militaries and the extremely sophisticated operation necessary to blow up the deep-sea pipelines, there is an additional conclusion to draw that the Western media continues to avoid.
If Ukraine did it, it was not alone.
The US must have been intimately involved, too.
Of course.
Of course, in a sense, you've got to start questioning what a nation is.
What is the United States of America?
If the United States of America is providing the training, is providing the military equipment, is providing the intelligence, is demanding that Starlink provide the hookups for guided missiles and stuff, like, how is it Ukraine?
In what sense is it Ukraine?
Because Ukraine, in the hearts of the individuals that are suffering, that believe in Ukraine, they're being sent to their deaths to avoid a PR crisis in America that's less inclined towards endless foreign wars that need not affect the domestic population.
And in fact, there's an argument for negatively affecting the domestic population because of the tax dollars, because of the ultimate death of military personnel, because there's an energy crisis that's been exacerbated, creating scarcity.
If it wasn't for independent media, you wouldn't be talking about this right now.
You would not be.
Once they've achieved their censorship goals, believe me, it's like, this is not about hate speech.
We have gotta stop that hate speech.
What do you mean hate speech?
I hate it when people speech stuff that I don't like them saying because it exposes that we're lying.
That's the hate speech.
So, does the Ukraine have long historic ties with the US deep state, in particular, the CIA?
The answer to that is yes.
Here's some evidence.
Ukraine's spy agencies have developed military capabilities over nearly a decade since Russia first seized Ukrainian territory in 2014, a period during which the services also forged deep new bonds with the CIA.
The missions have involved elite teams of Ukrainian operatives drawn from directorates that were formed, trained, and equipped in close partnership with the CIA, according to current and former Ukrainian and U.S.
officials.
Since 2015, the CIA has spent tens of millions of dollars to transform Ukraine's Soviet-formed services into potent allies against Moscow, officials said.
Alright, so there's just entrenching immersion.
I suppose like the way that you know that Barack Obama was funded by Wall Street, Biden's funded by Wall Street, the big tech have control through donations.
The deep state of the United States and Ukraine are so sort of interconnected that there's no independent action.
I mean, you can see that if you watch our man Zelensky begging on the TV set.
If you can't give us some financial support, OK, OK, please give us a credit.
It's pretty clear that's like no please can we have them resources back because independently we don't really have much of a chance against Russia and Russia's considerable might unless we have access to the CIA and Navy SEALs and people know how to blow up pipes, lines and the like.
So in what way is it Ukraine?
It's clearly integrated.
There's a degree of integration that negates their sovereignty anyway.
Of course we sold the narrative that we're assisting them and on that bandwidth, if you kept your consciousness, which is what they want you to do, on that bandwidth, that all makes sense.
Yeah.
Do you want children to die?
No.
I've got children.
I love children.
I want anyone to die.
I wish all these wars would stop.
Good.
Then just let's do what we're going to do.
You're telling us the truth, aren't you?
The agency has provided Ukraine with advanced surveillance systems, trained recruits at sites in Ukraine as well as the United States, built new headquarters for departments in Ukraine's military intelligence agency, and shared intelligence on a scale that would have been unimaginable before Russia illegally annexed Crimea and fomented a separatist war in eastern Ukraine.
But other than that, we have no involvement whatsoever.
And to say we do is a conspiracy theory.
And we did not blow up that pipeline either.
The CIA maintains a significant presence in Kiev, officials said.
The extent of the CIA's involvement with Ukrainian security services has not previously been disclosed.
Presumably because if it was disclosed, it would make you so happy that you'd skip out into the street and maybe get hit by a truck or just accidentally blow up a pipeline in an act of sabotage.
The CIA-Ukraine collaboration took root in the aftermath of 2014 political protests that prompted Ukraine's pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych to flee the country, followed by Russia's annexation of Crimea and its arming of separatists in the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luansk.
Training sites were located outside Kiev, where hand-picked recruits were instructed by CIA personnel, officials said.
This used to be lefty stuff, this.
This used to be like, oh you know what the CIA do, they go down to Nicaragua or they go down to Panama, they're all involved in causing coups, Argentina, Chile, all of that, Iran.
It just used to be sort of a thing that everyone knew and then politics went all different and turned into a television show and people forgot that this is plainly still happening.
The plan was to form units capable of operating behind front lines and working as covert groups, said a Ukrainian official involved in the effort.
From 2015 on, the CIA embarked on such extensive transformation of the G.U.R., Ukrainian Military Intelligence Service, that within several years, we'd kind of rebuilt it from scratch, the former U.S.
intelligence official said.
We only rebuilt it from scratch.
We were hardly involved at all.
All there was was a scratch, and then we rebuilt it.
So, I don't know, is that being involved?
You tell us.
One of the main architects of the effort, who served as CIA Station Chief in Kiev, now runs the Ukraine Task Force's CIA headquarters.
Barely involved at all.
The GUR began recruiting operatives for its own new Active Measures Department, officials said.
At sites in Ukraine and later the United States, GUR operatives were trained on skills ranging from clandestine manoeuvres behind enemy lines to weapons platforms and explosives.
And you think that training them on clandestine manoeuvres behind enemy lines with explosives could somehow be connected to the North Stream Pipeline?
Those clandestine manoeuvres with explosives were a surprise for your birthday!
And you've ruined it.
You're just like...
The CIA helped the GUR acquire state-of-the-art surveillance and electronic eavesdropping systems, officials said.
They included mobile equipment that could be placed along Russian-controlled lines in eastern Ukraine, but also software tools used to exploit the cell phones of Kremlin officials visiting occupied territory from Moscow.
Ukrainian officers operated the systems, officials said, but everything gleaned was shared with the Americans.
So it's a collaborative effort.
This is what proxy war is.
You can't trust Joe Biden.
You can't trust the legacy media.
They're not telling you the truth.
What they'll do is make a load of loud racket for the propaganda and then little pipsqueak farts like escaping gas when the truth leaks out.
Polluting the Baltic Sea.
Concerned that the G.U.R.' 's aging facilities were likely compromised by Russian intelligence, the CIA paid for new headquarters buildings for the G.U.R.'
's Spetnaz paramilitary division and a separate directorate responsible for electronic espionage.
The new capabilities were transformative, officials said.
In one day, we could intercept 250,000 to 300,000 separate communications from Russian military and FSB units, said a former senior G.U.R.
are official. There was so much information we couldn't manage it ourselves. My god, they're
inundated. They're just being flooded. Ah, it's too much information.
Literally.
Troves of data were relayed through the new CIA-built facility back to Washington where they were scrutinized by CIA and NSA analysts, officials said.
We were giving them the ability through us to collect on Russian targets, the former GUR official said.
Asked about the magnitude of the CIA investments, the official said it was millions of dollars.
But if you've got some sort of peculiar remnant belief in this system, if you think that whether it's Covid or the war and presumably current events that they are telling you the truth and that you're probably morally in alignment with the systems that control what you think, how you speak, What you eat, what you wear, where you go, what you do, and are asking for more and more power of that nature every single goddamn day, here are a series of powerful American figures declaring publicly, prior to the explosion of the Nord Stream pipeline, that they would sort of like to do that.
Just to just blast away, as if it's an explosive up against the pipeline, any remnant belief that you might have in this system and its reliability.
Let me answer the first question first.
If Germany, if Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2.
We will bring an end to it.
But how will you do that?
Exactly.
Since the project and control of the project is within Germany's control.
We will, I promise you, we'll be able to do it.
If I was Trump, it would have said, we'll train Ukrainian secret services to blow it up.
With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have very strong and clear conversations with our German allies, and I want to be clear with you today.
If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.
What did you mean by one way or another?
What's one way?
Well, we asked them to stop.
And what's another?
We asked them to stop with explosives.
Now we need to have tougher sanctions, and I'm afraid at some point this is going to probably have to involve oil and gas.
2014, when there was some pretty significant social and political upheaval in Ukraine, which the USA were involved in.
People say, well, the Europeans will run out of energy.
Well, the Russians will run out of cash before the Europeans run out of energy.
And I understand that it's uncomfortable to have an effect on business ties in this way.
Uncomfortable to have effects on business ties.
Business is the sanctified territory that you don't want to breach.
Uncomfortable is military action to reorganize commercial relationships.
But this is one of the few instruments that we have to help in the long run.
You simply want to change the structure of energy dependence.
We're just going to change the structure of that energy dependence.
That's all changed now.
You want to depend more on the North American energy platform, the tremendous bounty of oil and gas that we're finding in North America.
You want to have pipelines that don't go through Ukraine and Russia.
You don't want pipelines going through Ukraine and Russia.
But there are pipelines and plans to put further pipelines.
Yeah, you don't want that.
But how do you do it?
You just rearrange those financial relationships.
For years, we've tried to get the Europeans to be interested in different pipeline routes.
It's time to do that.
Could you be interested in this different pipeline route?
No, no, we like this one.
This is good.
It's convenient.
It's inexpensive.
It was very reliable.
Okay, well, it's time now to do that.
And so some of this is simply acting, and acting as quickly as possible.
All we're doing is acting.
You've just witnessed a lot of acting.
There was a bit when we were acting like Russia blew up that pipeline.
Then there was a bit where we acted like it was something in Scandinavia.
Then there was a bit where we acted like Seymour Hersh was a liar, even though he's a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist.
Then there's the bit where we acted like we didn't say all of this stuff in advance of the Nord Stream Pipeline.
Then there's the bit where they act as if these wars are humanitarian and for goals other than strategic, resource-based or hegemonic goals.
Then there's the bit where they tell you that if you criticise this or oppose their agenda, you're the problem, that you should be silenced.
Then there's the bit where they introduce censorship and surveillance.
Then there's the bit where they shut down dissent.
All of it is just acting.
Lovely old acting, pretending everything's okay in the world when we're governed by liars who are trying to destroy us while telling us that they're in our service.
When are we going to intervene?
When are we going to stop complying?
When are we going to find within ourselves the spiritual resources to firewalk?
Across the opposition we might feel for people that have different political, social or cultural views in order that we might align and unite.
Diversified but unified.
Decentralized but united against the greatest powers the world has ever seen.
A true global hegemony that wants you to be just like a little blob of larvae with no power other than the power to consume presumably rather expensive gas that's come via a pretty inconvenient route to your home.
We have to unite.
We have to unite now.
And critically, we have to remember that whenever the legacy media is talking, to bear in mind a few of the events of the last few years.
Hmm, they told us this about the pandemic, but it turned out this was true.
They told us this about that medication, turns out this was true.
They told us this about that pipeline, turns out this was true.
Hopefully, that was the only examples of them ever lying to meet their own agenda.
I don't think it was.
Do you?
Okay, we gave you that, you awakened wonder.
Let us know in the chat, in the comments, what you think.
And remember, consider becoming an awakened wonder, joining our Locals' Conversation, where people come together in community to talk about solutions, and you get access to our interviews.
Plus, why don't you get yourself... Say it like that!
Why don't you get yourself like a little hat with a crow on it?
The crow, the figure of the trickster, the figure that moves between worlds.
Now, before we debunk the next conspiracy, we're going to have to say goodbye to you.
It's the January 6th episode.
You're going to love this.
How many deep state agents were in that crowd that day?
Was it an example of a false flag?
Was it an example of an event that would never have gotten, let's call it insurrectionist, Without certain instigatory agents.
Goodbye if you're watching this on YouTube.
You've got a few seconds left now.
Just a few seconds.
Click the link.
Join us over on Rumble.
Now, remember when they said Trump and MAGA supporters violently stormed the Capitol?
After the mass footage has been released, it seems, you know, and remember that's when Rumble got cyber-attacked.
Remember that?
Seems like the FBI were involved in the events that took place.
Hmm.
January 6th.
Here's the news.
No, here's the effing news.
We're talking about the FBI who have literally committed hundreds of thousands of crimes.
We're going to list those for you, not individually.
That would take too bloody long.
Also, when people try to blow the whistle on them, they shut that down.
They ignore them and mistreat them.
Are the FBI and the CIA protecting Americans and the people of the world, or are they protecting the interests of the powerful?
Let's get into it.
What are your thoughts about what the activities are going on at the FBI?
The FBI has sort of evolved from what we expect it to be, which is federal law enforcement.
And after 9-11, when the national security branch was grown exponentially, the FBI has now essentially evolved into a domestic intelligence agency with a law enforcement capability, which is what I expressed in the hearing.
Okay, so the FBI has mutated into something other than what it was intended for at its inception.
What you have to fundamentally ask yourself is, have many of our institutions evolved beyond the point where they are relevant?
And in many cases, are they literally doing the opposite of what they were intended to do?
Governments that don't represent the people, Media that behaves more like propaganda, security agencies that make you insecure.
Why does this happen?
Is it possible for all these agencies and organizations have been co-opted by elite power?
It appears on the basis of the testimony of these whistleblowers that the FBI isn't engaged in a process of up And that's a problem because the nature of law enforcement investigations are linear, they have a start and an end, and the nature of intelligence operations are circular.
actually supporting the interests of powerful groups.
Let's have a look what else they've been doing and how it plays out.
And that's a problem because the nature of law enforcement investigations are linear,
they have a start and an end, and the nature of intelligence operations are circular.
They just gain more intelligence to gain more intelligence and they never end.
What a brilliant piece of analysis.
They ought to be like, right, there's this crime.
Will you solve it?
Like a little film.
There's been a murder or a crime.
Solve it.
It's done now.
But the process of gathering information is infinite.
That's what we're learning now.
We learn through the revelations of Snowden that they were stock piling information, keeping it in case they needed it in
the future. This practice still goes on, they're prolonging it, as our man there said. It
began with 9-11, that legitimised it, but also the technology existed at that time, and as
soon as that technology exists, there's a momentum and a motive to ensure that it's used by
the powerful. We'll see the same thing with AI. Oh, look at this!
Oh, no, is it bad?
Will children use this to write their essays?
Oh, it's gonna reduce the number of people in work.
These are both problems of varying degrees, but the real problem will become what happens when these powers become co-opted by and utilised by the powerful?
What was the tipping point for you, Garrett, when you decided, though, hey, I need to talk about what's going on in the FBI?
I don't know if there was any firm tipping point that I can reach to, but it was more a summation of things that had been adding up and just over and over again saying, this doesn't seem right.
This isn't what I was taught in constitutional law courses, or this isn't how you implement people's constitutional rights.
What Garrett O'Boyle whistleblower appears to be saying is that these institutions now have an inertia.
They've made their choices.
That's how they function.
This is what they're going to do.
They are not going to change.
It's down to us to change individually and collectively in order to hold them to account.
We must remain capable of discerning truth from fiction.
We must remain bold and like him, We must remember the oaths we've made to ourselves, to our gods, or to our systems of ideals, to our families, and to one another.
We must believe it's possible to change the world.
Once we become hypnotized and bound in bureaucracy, we're just sheep, cattle to them.
For decades after the FBI was caught spying on Martin Luther King Jr.
and abusing its powers for political ends, Democrats emphasized strong constraints on domestic spying and the importance of whistleblowers.
Now Democrats are savaging these former public servants as threats to national security.
Why is that?
Well, presumably because their interests have changed and they're utilizing these deep state agencies in order to control the population and the narrative.
Well, let's find out.
At least two FBI whistleblowers are being persecuted for concerns over how the January 6th protesters were treated.
Now, it can be difficult to talk about the January 6th protests and some of the theories and ideas that surround it, but it seems clear that the FBI have targeted and surveilled protesters from January the 6th, but also George Floyd protesters.
It seems that it doesn't matter what the issue is per se, but whether or not your protest is at odds with the interests of the powerful that they represent and operate on behalf of, i.e.
what I'm saying in case you haven't picked it up yet is Put aside your political differences and start working together for God's sake!
Steve Friend expressed concerns about the FBI's use of SWAT teams to arrest January 6th subjects.
Within a month of these disclosures the FBI removed Friend's security clearance and removed him from active duty.
Garrett O'Boyle disclosed that the FBI pressured him to violate the law by opening domestic violent extremism investigations without sufficient basis.
In addition to an indefinite unpaid suspension, the FBI initiated a campaign of humiliation and intimidation to punish and pressure me to resign, Friend testified.
The FBI's campaign of personal destruction included leaking Friend's private medical information to a New York Times reporter.
Before you start listening to that whistleblowing, you might want to know a thing or two about this guy's Verrucas and his troubling athlete's foot.
His feet are a goddamn mess.
Yeah, but what about all this whistleblowing?
Don't worry about what's up here.
Worry about what's down there.
These guys, you can't trust them.
They're sharing articles that are true.
Well, actually, look, we wrote this one.
Yeah, but, you know.
Listen, did I tell you about his feet?
articles, including one apparently based on a report by the New York Times.
These guys, you can't trust them.
They're sharing articles that are true.
Well, actually, look, we wrote this one.
Yeah, but, you know, listen, did I tell you about his feet?
They stink.
Federal law enforcement had a far greater visibility into this sort on the Capitol,
wrote the Times last fall, even as it was taking place than was previously known.
Allen's intentions were plainly constructive.
He'd apparently forwarded an article to other FBI investigators to caution them that, if they were looking at footage, they should be aware that there were informants in the crowd.
Court documents indicate that there were at least eight FBI informants, known as CHSs for Confidential Human Informants, in the Proud Boys, which was one of the groups that organized the January 6th protest.
There is evidence that the FBI also had CHS in the Oath Keepers, another January 6th activist group.
That's really interesting, isn't it?
Because if you think of how you're told the story of January 6th, it's like, Donald Trump caused it, his rhetoric was incendiary, look at those tweets, it's terrible.
And then when you see People usually on the internet, alternative independent media like this, some of the people that we share this space with say, there were FBI informants!
And the mainstream media go, oh, that's ridiculous, that's a conspiracy theory.
Well, this whistleblower is saying, no, there were FBI informants within those groups.
Former FBI supervisory intelligence analyst George Hill told the subcommittee that when the Boston office asked for the video footage from January the 6th protest, the Washington field office said they could not give access to the 11,000 hours of video footage available because there may be undercover officers, known as UCs, or CHSs, confidential human sources, on those videos whose identity we need to protect.
And it wasn't just the FBI who had undercover informants and agents in the crowd.
There were undercover agents and informants from other law enforcement agencies, including the Washington D.C.
Metro Police, who were acting like Trump supporters.
Four more years!
Donald Trump!
I'm actually FBI.
Oh, I'm actually the Washington D.C.
Does anyone here even like Donald Trump?
I don't like him.
Have you seen how orange he is?
And his hands are a bit little.
Indeed, there may have been hundreds of undercover government agents and informants, both local and federal, in the January 6th crowd.
According to one January 6th witness, there were 100 to 200 Secret Service agents alone at the Capitol before and during the breach of police barriers.
Hundreds!
Hundreds?
That doesn't seem like the world we're trying to create.
Can we get to a point where we have a degree of objectivity around these matters, rather than, OK, this story, before I get involved, is it my side or is it the other side?
Well, this one is actually your side.
Well, then it's a disgrace!
It should be stopped!
Oh, it's actually the other side.
Oh, well, look, people have got to do what they've got to do.
Of course there are informants.
No one's got any objectivity or clarity or good faith in these conversations anymore.
One court filing alleges that there are at least 20 FBI assets at the Capitol.
Another court document from the Proud Boys trial suggests there are at least 40 undercover informant or agents doing surveillance among defendants on January the 6th.
So this isn't just hearsay at this point because there are whistleblowers testifying in front of Congress.
So it seems like there's the need for a conversation, a conversation that people are unwilling to have and even that suggests that particular outcomes are likely.
In a motion to compel disclosure of all confidential human sources of Homeland Security, the defence alleges that in addition to the 8 confirmed FBI CHS's, the DC Metro Police had at least 13 undercover plainclothes agents, and there appear to have been some 19 CHS's on January the 6th belonging to an agency called Homeland Security Investigations.
There's even agencies that are so secret, we don't know that they exist!
And they're there!
Donald Trump!
Donald Trump!
You are under arrest.
I'm arresting him.
No, I'm arresting him.
No, we're gonna arrest him.
I'm gonna pretend to be his friend and then arrest him in a couple of months after I've got him to come up with a terrorist plot that I'm thinking about.
One such individual is alleged to have been in the crowd screaming, stop the steal, stop the steal, and pushing the protesters toward the Capitol building.
Boo!
Stop the steal!
Stop the steal!
Come on!
Actually, I was here just for a peaceful protest.
While I recognize that we have a variety of views, we're all Americans, and ultimately, we're gonna... Boo!
Stop the steal!
Stop the steal!
Come on, go in there.
Here, I bought you a witch doctor's hat.
Why don't you wear this?
Here's some face paint.
I don't know.
Don't I look stupid?
No, you've got a great body.
And you're gonna have plenty of time to work out in prison for four years.
It is unsurprising that many agencies would send dozens of officers and informants to the Capitol in anticipation of 10,000 to 30,000 people attending a highly charged political rally.
However, it is troubling that the public has not been given a full accounting of law enforcement officers' activities on January the 6th, given the fact that Democrats have likened the riot to Pearl Harbor and 9-11.
Well, I don't know!
You can do your own jokes in the chat and the comments, baby!
How like Pearl Harbor and 9-11 was it?
What this is, at very least, is when people are going, oh, they're conspiracy theorists, maybe have a little closer look before dismissing that information.
The real problem with Allen and Friend is that, according to the FBI, they espoused an alternative narrative about the events at the US Capitol on January the 6th, 2021.
So why did the FBI and Democrats attack the FBI whistleblowers?
Perhaps because they are revealing, at a minimum, the FBI's failure to stop the riot, and more maximally, its role in instigating it.
Oh, no.
That's the key, isn't it?
It could have been prevented, because a lot of people said, oh, they were being ushered in.
And it was instigated.
It's starting to look like there is at least cause to examine the possibility that this event was made worse by operatives, You can, in a sense, inform your own opinion by looking at what has happened subsequently.
Has it been used to spend more money creating a capital police force?
Has it been used to introduce more surveillance and police laws?
Has it been used to shut down conversation?
If the answer to all of those questions is yes, and then additionally there were FBI operatives, there are FBI whistleblowers, then you And they don't use the phrase hard right in this context.
friend and O'Boyle all commented on the chilling effect of the FBI's retaliation.
Too many in the FBI aren't willing to sacrifice the hard right over the easy wrong.
And they don't use the phrase hard right in this context.
They'll use that against you.
I think we have to follow the hard right.
Well, yes.
Do you see?
This is the problem with these guys.
They're all hard right.
No, I'm incorrect.
Too late.
You're already in prison.
They see what becomes of whistleblowers, O'Boyle said.
This is by design.
It creates an Orwellian atmosphere that silences opposition and discussion.
Perhaps that's what's happening more broadly in our culture.
Ask yourself the question, do you imagine that these powerful elites really care about what they would deem and term vulnerable people from a variety of backgrounds, who in my view all have the right to freedom of expression wherever they are on the political spectrum, whether it's traditional or progressive.
Freedom means freedom and it certainly means other people's freedom.
Or are they interested in creating a climate of silence and control?
Let me know in the chat.
O'Boyle said that the FBI's action against him had rendered him and his family homeless and that they could not access their personal effects, including clothing, because they were in FBI storage when he was suspended.
But throughout the hearing, it was obvious that the Democrats were trying to distract and derail the subcommittee, refusing to engage with the whistleblower's allegations that the FBI has intentionally exaggerated the threat of domestic terrorism through padded statistics and illegal investigations.
Padded statistics?
Illegal investigations?
Prejudice and bias?
That doesn't sound like the America that we've been living in for the last couple of years.
What's more, the hearing made clear that the FBI is working with the Democrats, which underscores the agency's increasing partisanship.
Democrat Stacey Plaskett, who savaged the FBI whistleblower's previously threatened journalist Matt Taibbi with prison for supposedly lying to Congress under oath.
Do you remember that sham kangaroo congressional hearing where Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger, good men, good journalists, were subject to criticisms, accusations, and threatened, eventually, with jail time, simply for presenting facts?
It seems like there's certain information that people just don't want out there.
The Durham report last week revealed that the FBI's Russia collusion investigation was cooked up by Hillary Clinton to denigrate Donald Trump by tying him to Russia as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.
And that despite knowing it was bogus, the FBI went ahead and launched the ill-fated Crossfire Hurricane investigation while dropping four probes into the Clinton Foundation.
So some things they really investigate, other things they ignore.
That's not objective justice, is it?
This reveals an agenda.
You can just sort of see the outline of the agenda from all of the actions and behaviours.
On Friday, a FISA court order revealed that the FBI has been misusing a surveillance tool
almost 300,000 times in 2020 to 2021, including doing 23,000 searches on January the 6th suspects
and 20,000 searches on a congressional candidate's donors.
This is what we continually say to you.
As long as they have the ability to surveil you and look at your information, then the possibility exists that at some point, you will do something that's at odds with the establishment.
And given that there are no principles, and given that this is an ongoing circular problem, as our man there earlier described, it could come to you at some point.
You know, when people say, if you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide, what they should now say is, as long as you're willing to continually obey centralised authority, then you've got nothing to worry about.
The FBI also refused to comply with a subpoena from the House Oversight Committee to hand over documents alleging that Joe Biden accepted bribes to change US policy while he was Vice President.
In the light of just one week of FBI shame, the latest Harvard-Harris poll showing deep public mistrust in the FBI comes as no surprise.
Not only do 69% of voters believe the FBI violated its own standards in the Russia collusion probe, 70% are concerned the Bureau will interfere in future elections.
So now you know, when people say deep state, this is what they're talking about.
When they say deep state collusion, they're talking about stories like this.
While the January 6th stuff is still under investigation, based on the testimony of these whistleblowers and some of the information here about informants and assets in the crowd, it seems to me that a conversation is required before we march forward in the way that we did with the Russiagate stuff into making conclusions that might be convenient to a certain set of agendas.
Conspiracy theory to conspiracy fact.
Time now for the invasion of Ukraine.
Remember that?
Oh, like, Putin's just mad.
He's an expansionist.
He's a lunatic.
He's always blowing up pipelines and invading things.
Was it that, or did NATO impede upon former Soviet Union territories in ways that was agreed they were not, would not, excuse me, and indeed, was their US involvement in the 2014 coup also complicated?
NATO, after months, finally admitted it was due to NATO infringement.
Let's have a look.
Conspiracy theory to conspiracy fact.
Here's the news.
No, here's the effing news.
We are talking about the extraordinary revelation that NATO have acknowledged that they were warned by Putin's administration that continuing to expand NATO would lead to an invasion of the Ukraine, and yet they did it anyway.
This is not simply to say, oh, aren't NATO bad and isn't Russia fantastic?
Of course, this is a geopolitical issue.
It's not that simple.
What we're interested in Is why are the mainstream media not covering the fact that NATO have acknowledged that they knew that their actions and expansion would lead to this war?
Why are we continually told this was an egregious, unprovoked attack?
What is the truth behind this war?
And why is it that when someone publicly says the quiet part out loud, the legacy media still doesn't cover it?
Whose agenda are they pursuing?
Is it ours or do they have a different intention?
Let's have a look at this story together.
Use our innate wisdom to deduce the truth as one.
President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021 and he actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement.
That was what he sent us.
So it seems that had they been willing to sign a treaty to not expand NATO, this war could have been avoided.
So what is the advantage of expanding NATO?
That's one question.
Secondly, of course, many of you are aware that at the climax or indeed conclusion of the Cold War, pledges were made to not expand NATO into former Soviet territories.
We all know this now, don't we?
It's not something that's broadly covered because, again, it's not favourable to the preferred narrative.
And most importantly, as far as I'm concerned, is why are the legacy media, when reporting on the subject of this ongoing war, this drain and strain on human resources and indeed human life, this decimation of Ukraine, half a million people dead so far, why are they not saying, well of course NATO have now acknowledged that they were warned that if they continue to expand Then Putin would invade, and they did it anyway.
So who caused this war?
What is the reason this war is happening?
And significantly, how could we end this war?
And that was a precondition for not invade Ukraine.
Of course we didn't sign that.
The opposite happened.
He wanted us to sign a promise never to enlarge NATO.
He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe.
We should remove NATO from that part of our alliance.
In a sense when you listen to this speech it becomes clear that this war has been a long time coming.
Probably with the membership of each of these former Soviet nations, in the case that they were former members of the Soviet Union, it has encroached further on the agreement not to expand NATO.
So it's not It's not like a war that began all of a sudden.
It's part of the ebb and flow of history.
And perhaps you will agree with people like Jeffrey Sachs that this war has come about to a degree as a result of the unipolar agenda of centralist American interests.
Because they have an agenda to deplete Russia, because they have an agenda to create a unipolar world where Chinese interests and Russian interests are challenged, they were willing to agitate Russia to the point of war.
And the reason I mention that is because, of course, we're continually told this is a humanitarian crisis.
Remember what you're supposed to believe.
This is what you're supposed to believe.
Russia, basically for no reason, started to wage war on Ukraine.
It's terrible.
It's egregious.
Putin is the new Hitler.
And again, this is not to advocate for Putin.
It's not to advocate for the actions of Russia.
This is simply to say, if the intention, the aim, the goal was to end war, these are probably the sorts of things you'd have to take into account, I imagine.
We're not a pro-Russia channel.
This organisation is not pro-Russia.
I'm sure that were we doing this in Russia, we would experience a lot more censorship.
Although, hey, who's to say, huh?
more NATO presence in the eastern part of the alliance.
We're not a pro-Russia channel. This organization is not pro-Russia. I'm sure that were we doing
this in Russia we would experience a lot more censorship, although hey, who's to say, huh?
But what we are saying is that everything this man is inventorying here seem like unwise moves
from a diplomatic perspective if the intention was to have a harmonious relationship with Russia,
to acknowledge that Russia have their own sovereignty, have their own nation, have their
own history, have their own trajectory.
This seems like, well, hold on a minute, aren't you, like, provoking a nuclear superpower for reasons, again, that don't seem that clear, because he's not at any point going, of course, we have to have all these countries as members of NATO in order what?
What happens?
Is it going to help global warming?
And he has also seen that Finland has already joined the alliance, and Sweden will soon be a full member.
Also, we have plans to put cellophane over Vladimir Putin's toilet, so when he go pee-pee, it splashes all over him.
I got one of these puzzles.
Stop provoking Vladimir Putin.
Some of us don't want the world to be destroyed.
This is good for the Nordic countries, it's good for Finland and Sweden, and it's also good for NATO, and it demonstrates that when President Putin invaded a European country to prevent more NATO, he's getting the exact opposite.
And now we've got a massive war in which half a million people have been killed.
Let's have a look at Jeffrey Sachs' perspective so we can understand this with a little more detail.
How do we get into this war and how do we get out of it?
During the disastrous Vietnam War, it was said that the US government treated the public like a mushroom farm, keeping it in the dark and feeding it with manure.
The heroic Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers documenting the unrelenting US government lying about the war in order to protect politicians who would be embarrassed by the truth.
A half century later, during the Ukraine war, the manure is piled even higher.
According to the US government and the ever-secret New York Times, the Ukraine war was unprovoked, the Times' favorite adjective to describe the war.
That is continually what you are told.
If you only watch the mainstream media, if you only read the New York Times and someone said to you, what's this war about?
Well, it was an unprovoked attack.
People don't do unprovoked attacks!
People do provoked attacks.
That's what this is.
This was provoked.
In fact, we've just heard NATO.
This is not Russian propaganda.
This is NATO saying, well, Putin said that if we kept expanding NATO, there would be a war.
And so we just like kept expanding NATO, which seems to me to be an extraordinary decision for an unelected body funded somewhat by your nation and my nation to have made on my behalf.
I don't remember being asked whether I wanted to provoke Russia into war.
Do you remember Who's agenda is being fulfilled?
Why is it not being responsibly reported on?
What kind of cultural curation is taking place that certain ideas are just not allowed to be in the space of public communication?
Why is it that the media continue to be so obedient To an agenda that plainly is bringing us to the edge of an extremely dangerous situation.
Let me know in the chat.
Let me know in the comments.
If you're watching us on YouTube, you 6.6 million Awakening Wonders, we're only putting half the video up here for reasons that are surely obvious to you.
The majority of the content will be up on Rumble.
If you're watching us on Twitter or X, Elon, thank you.
We appreciate you.
But we will be doing the rest of the content on Rumble because that is our home and that's where we're looked after.
Putin, allegedly mistaking himself for Peter the Great, invaded Ukraine to recreate the Russian Empire.
Yet last week, NATO Secretary Jens Stoltenberg committed a Washington gaffe, meaning that he accidentally blurted out the truth.
This is what a gaffe means these days, an inability to sustain the deceptive narrative that controls the public sphere, that controls the augmented reality that we're invited to live in.
This is why independent media is under threat, because we can say, hey, look at this thing, NATO said that, does that help you to draw a different conclusion?
In testimony to the European Union Parliament, Stoltenberg made clear that it was America's relentless push to enlarge NATO to Ukraine that was the real cause of the war and why it continues today.
Here are Stoltenberg's revealing words.
That's why these things are challenging, that's why it's important to stay with us.
In testimony to the European Union Parliament, Stoltenberg made clear that it was America's
relentless push to enlarge NATO to Ukraine that was the real cause of the war and why
it continues today.
Here are Stoltenberg's revealing words.
Again, The background was that President Putin declared in the
in the autumn of 2021 and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign
to promise no more NATO enlargement. That's what he sent us and was a precondition to
not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn't sign that. Well, well done you, because now Ukraine
is being devastated, half a million people are dead and the situation shows no sign of
improving and actually no one at all benefits from it except for the military industrial
complex and centralist authoritarian systems that want us to be in a perpetual state of
fear and unable to question authority in our own lives because we're terrified of continual
pandemics and what knows, some people do benefit.
Thanks for this.
The opposite happened.
He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO.
He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure and all allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO.
All the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our alliance, introducing some kind of B or second class membership.
We rejected that.
Can you see why a figure like Donald Trump, who says we'd withdraw from NATO or we'd stop funding NATO, is a kind of wrecking ball to globalist infrastructure?
Over the last eight years the United States spent more on defence than all other NATO countries combined.
Because this is the kind of thing that can continue unquestioned.
Like when in your life do you have time to go, hey I'm not sure if we should be supporting NATO anymore?
You're being overcharged for your energy, you're being overcharged for your food, you're working too hard, you're living in a nihilistic culture that has no vision for improvement, you're living amongst fracks Fischer, thrashed around by bad ideas and bad lies most of
the time.
When are you ever going to be able to say, hey, is there an alternative way of living?
Do we need NATO? Are the WHO actually helpful? How are they funded? Where's all this information
coming from? Is there the ability to pose counter-narratives?
You've not got time for that, have you? Well, we're going to have to make time,
because it seems to me that we're on the precipice of some pretty significant changes.
But what we're moving to is a technological dictatorship where there is the ability to shut down your money, shut down your life, un-person you, if you even dare to question the trajectory of global or national events.
Or if you want to have a conversation, if you want to have cultural differences.
You are going to be able to be eliminated.
This seems to me to be the terrain that they're trying to create.
And organisations like NATO, WHO, I'm not saying they're entirely malign or malevolent or were created even for the wrong reasons.
I'm saying that now the way they're operating is certainly beyond the remit of democracy and you're funding for it and you're not voting for it.
That's the opposite of democracy.
So he went to war to prevent NATO.
More NATO close to his borders.
He's got the exact opposite.
I mean, stop provoking Vladimir Putin in the middle of a war.
Do you remember when Tucker said that within a year we'll have a hot war with Russia?
Does that seem more or less likely?
Let me know in the chat right now.
To repeat, he Putin, went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders.
When Professor John Mearsheimer and I, and others have said the same, we've been attacked as Putin apologists.
So at this point, this is sort of I suppose where we get into a degree of complexity.
In this video we're not saying to you Russia are really great and NATO are bad even though I can feel myself getting agitated on behalf of sort of the concept of Russia by the bureaucratic disingenuity of this unelected administrative official.
But actually what Sax is saying and what he's saying his colleague Mearsheimers are saying is we told you this And we were dismissed as conspiracy theorists.
Now think about the last couple of years.
How many times have things been said that are true that you're dismissed as a conspiracy theorist for believing?
Think of all of the major world events, the pandemic, I mean the litany, it just goes on and on.
What is happening, in conjunction with very significant geopolitical moves in order, I believe, to create a unipolar globalist world where democracy and sovereignty and community are completely eroded, is the inability even to challenge on any individual issue.
Dissenting voices shut down, alternative voices annihilated.
The same critics also choose to hide or flatly ignore the dire warnings against NATO enlargement to Ukraine.
Long articulated by many of America's leading diplomats including the great scholar statesman George Kennan and the former US ambassadors to Russia Jack Matlock and William Burns.
So it's not all crackpots and whack jobs and people on the internet that are hippies with an axe to grind that believe in community and autonomy and democracy.
This is a really dangerous and unprecedented time.
the answer and you have to find God within yourself, find God now. It's like actual diplomats
and people that broadly speaking are in the general ebb and flow of international geopolitical
discourse. It's not like Willie Nelson and Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix have decided
that we're being lied to. It's like Jack Matlock and William Burns and George Kennel, that's
like dudes in suits in oak panelled rooms. This is a really dangerous and unprecedented
time, let me know if you agree. Burns, now CIA director, was US ambassador to Russia
in 2008, an author of a memo entitled, Nyet means nyet.
In that memo, Burns explained to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that the entire Russian political class, not just Putin, was dead set against NATO enlargement.
We know about the memo only because it was leaked, otherwise we'd be in the dark about it.
How many other things do we simply never have revealed to us?
How much is clandestine?
What do you imagine is behind those walls and doors of secrecy that they claim are there to protect us from terrorists?
It's just more information than you can... Oh man, we can't trust this lot.
Start dismantling NATO.
Get rid of that.
Just completely radically re-evaluate all of our democratic systems to first and foremost disable these gargantuan monoliths of horror that are guiding us gently to Armageddon.
Let's get rid of them straight away.
That's what you would understand if you were to have access to those classified documents, innit?
Oh no, these classified documents!
It was a surprise birthday party and you spoiled it.
Remember them days, guys.
Yeah, why is that?
Well, he's abandoned that.
How about a treaty?
No missiles.
Why is that? For the simple reason that Russia does not accept the US military on its
2,300 kilometer border with Ukraine in the Black Sea region.
Russia does not appreciate the US placement of Aegis missiles in Poland and Romania
after the US unilaterally abandoned the anti-ballistic missile treaty.
Well, they just abandoned that. How about a treaty? No missiles. How about fuck your treaty?
Russia also does not welcome the fact that the US engaged in no fewer than 70 regime change operations during the
Cold War between 1947 and 1989
That regime change was a surprise for your birthday!
They've got a country and an institution in the shape of NATO on their borders.
Armed, who they know have engaged in regime change 70 times since the last war.
They know that they are explicitly their enemy.
And they're saying, do you mind not doing that?
I mean, it essentially amounts to a polite request eventually followed by a war.
I know there's a deep and troubling history between Russia and Ukraine that I'm plainly not an expert in.
What this is about is, why didn't the media simply report accurately on this subject so I can answer my own rhetorical question?
Because if they did, you'd make up your own mind.
And when you make up your own mind, you will be less compliant and Less obedient, and they cannot have that.
And countless more since, including in Serbia, Afghanistan, Georgia, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Venezuela, and Ukraine.
Yeah, but we're not going to do any more.
Nor does Russia like the fact that many leading US politicians actively advocate the destruction of Russia under the banner of decolonizing Russia.
That would be like Russia calling for the removal of Texas, California, Hawaii, and conquered Indian lands, and much else from the United States.
Imagine that for a moment.
Imagine that Hawaii, with good reason these days, said, you know what?
The United States haven't been incredibly helpful to us.
They're just using us as a missile base when we actually need them.
They give us derisory payments while they send incredible sums elsewhere, apparently to support a war that it seems like they, to some considerable degree, participated in the provocation of.
Texas took their oil.
What's the benefit of the United States?
Who benefits?
Start asking yourself that question.
Love America, love your history, love your nation, love your traditions, love your forefathers and your foremothers, but who benefits from there being one centralized government that plainly operates in the service of military-industrial complex, big pharma, uses the legacy media to whitewash and bleach the cultural space free of independent thought and independent conversation?
Are you benefiting?
Is it helping your energy bills?
Is it helping your food bills?
Is it helping your freedom?
Is it helping your children's education?
Is it helping your family's health?
Thank you for joining us for that festive special.
We are going to do it all again.
Conspiracy Theory to Conspiracy Fact on Thursday the 28th of December, where we're looking at, yep, it's the big one, COVID.
Pandemic conspiracies that are now verifiable facts.
We're going to go deeper together.
Don't take that the wrong way.
Watch part two with us on Thursday.
Then We've got Chris Hedges on the conflict in the Middle East.
Chris Hedges, the Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, has very strong views on the Middle Eastern conflict.
You're going to love him.
He's available on January 6th.
Cali Means on child obesity, big food and big pharma.
That's January the 3rd.
And then Vandana Shiva on Bill Gates, on the subject of Bill Gates, I should clarify, and big agriculture on the 4th of January.
The Great Mother, that is Vandana Shiva, attacking them where it hurts.
You're going to love that.
Remember, click the red awaken button to attend our interviews and conversations live and to participate in the building of new communities.
Become part of this movement.
We need you.
We love you.
We want you.
Stay free.
Man, he's switching, switching, switching.
▲
Export Selection