All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 15, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:01:45
Oh SH*T…Has The Covid Pandemic Started Again In Australia?! - Stay Free #246
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
you do
do do
do do
do In this video, you're going to see the future.
Hello there, you awakening wonders, you great souls, you fire walkers.
While the rest of the world is trying to close down free speech, we are advocating for even more of it and granting it even to other species, like the hound.
I will not free the nipple, 709er.
I will not.
The nipple will remain in its own private bellmarsh.
Like a Julian Assange.
There will be no nippy leaks.
It will remain ensnared and in jail.
And Carl Reino in the Rumble chat.
Why is Russell Late?
He's still talking to his MI6 handlers.
After what I've been through, you still want controlled opposition?
Baby, they're trying to control me and it ain't working.
We are going strong.
Later we're going to be talking about how Tucker and Glenn Greenwald have been talking about censorship from the right and how the left now are demanding free speech.
It's been another old switcheroo.
As these conflicts escalate, as the Omnicrisis devours more people, as division is created and fracture is cleaved, where once there was an emergent new union, you're seeing people switching sides.
Rito says, yeah, my dog is pretty cute.
If you want to join us in the Rumble Chat, join us in the Rumble Chat.
If you're watching us on YouTube, you'll have to join us eventually, because the day will come where YouTube just simply will not allow free speech.
That day ain't here yet, and if you're one of our Awakened Wonders watching there, We love you.
If you want to support our content, press the red button, become an Awake and Wonder like MaximumTitus444, MyDogIsCuter, he's saying, Primal Collins talking about how will the Aussies deal with the new mask mandates.
We're covering that in a minute, but we will not be able to cover that on YouTube because Australian news media They took a swerve because you know how heavy they got during the pandemic times.
Well, the news media and the medical establishment ain't taking no more of it.
Remember, download the Rumble app if you ain't got it yet because then you'll get proper notifications and you'll be here from the start.
I think it's you that's late.
I think it's you that's late.
KRG0516, press this for the nips.
You are getting no nips.
You've had your nips.
You've had your last look at these because we I'm staying poised and dignified on Rumble and I'll show you now.
Rumble's not what it's purported to have been.
You won't believe how many Democrats and Independents are on this site.
Chris Pavlosky posted about it earlier today.
We'll cover it in a minute.
But Congress is falling apart.
It's one thing to see Trump riling them up at the UFC.
But to hear talk of actual fisticuffs in Congress, or is it the Senate?
You'll love this.
It's the Senate.
You'll love this.
This is... I'm into this.
Pretends like he's self-made.
What a clown.
Fraud.
Always has been.
Always will be.
Quit the tough guy act and these Senate hearings.
You know where to find me.
Any place, any time, cowboy.
Sir, this is a time, this is a place.
You want to run your mouth.
We can be two consenting adults.
We can finish it here.
Consenting adults as well.
That's what you say before a fight.
So you can't just have a fight, can you, in the Senate?
But this dude, Mullen, he's ready to go.
Check it.
OK, that's fine.
Perfect.
You want to do it now?
I'd love to do it right now.
Well, stand your butt up then.
You stand your butt up.
Oh, hold on.
Oh, stop it.
Mullin v O'Brien!
Who's the smart man?
I'm saying Mullin.
I'll tell you why Mullin.
Watch Mullin with a ring.
This ain't his first rodeo.
He's been through this before.
O'Brien, he's staying down.
O'Brien, you stay down!
No, no, you're a United States Senator.
Activate.
Sit down, please.
Can I respond?
Hold it!
That's enough of that!
You better, you better stop that!
Not on my Senate!
Oh no, you don't!
I've changed my positions on wars!
I've changed my position on the financial industry!
But I will not sanction this fight!
Bernie's committed, baby.
Hold it!
If we can't, no, I have the money.
I'm sorry.
This is what he said.
Hold it.
You'll have your time.
Okay.
Can I respond?
Oh, no, you can't.
Had I responded, this would have been offered out.
Proper offer for a row.
Amazing.
Amazing.
Like, do you see that just below the surface of the obfuscating language, the diplomacy, the idea... Right, think about this, January 6th.
How dare they!
How dare they storm the Capitol!
That is where we have our bare-knuckle fights!
That's where we run our corruption from!
That's where I get my money from Pfizer!
The idea that you would come in there with no zip ties!
Nancy Pelosi's in there right now, not telling her husband which stocks and shares to invest in, I'll tell you that.
The idea that there's any sanctity, it's a veneer, it's a performance, it's disintegrating and apparently it's pretty common because Tim Burchett is also saying that, I think it was Kevin McCarthy, elbowed him in the ribs.
It's like something from Huckleberry Finn.
It's like Mark Twain violence.
He came up to me, he tricked me into painting the fence and he elbowed me in my back ribs.
Explain to us what happened with you and Kevin McCarthy.
Well, I was doing an interview with Claudia from NPR.
A lovely lady, and she was asking me a question, and at that time I... A lovely lady, I was with Aunt May.
I got elbowed in the back, and it kind of caught me off guard, because it was a clean shot to the kidneys, and I... I was embarrassed!
That was a clean shot to the kidneys!
I'm pretty good, usually I can protect my kidneys, I can wind around with a sidewinder, and I would have been there, and the Adam's apple!
Turned back, and there was Kevin, and um...
And I, for a minute, I was kind of, what the heck?
Kevin, that little sneak, you snooping around a bank?
Just happened and then I, um, you know, I chased after him, of course.
Of course I did.
I pursued him over land on foot.
As I've stated many times, he's a, he's a bully with $17 million in a security detail.
You know, he's the type of guy that When you're a kid, would throw a rock over the fence and run home and hide behind his mama's skirt.
He's behind his mama's skirt right now, threw a rock over the wall.
Why is this mad Wonder Years violence?
You know, he, he, uh... The Speaker of the House doesn't have third most...
Third most important political figure.
Of course, many of you are saying in the chat over on Rumble, it's because it's a charade, it's because it's a performance and this is merely the revelation of the ulterior reality.
An ulterior reality we're protected from seeing.
From behind, that kind of stuff.
That's not the way we handle things in East Tennessee.
If we have a problem with somebody, I'm going to look them in the eye and talk to them.
Okay, so he was going to look them in the eye and talk to them in East Tennessee.
That's what I do.
Extraordinary.
Amazing.
In our country, the UK, you've heard of it, right?
When we're not happy with our Prime Minister, that's our President, And we never are, because they're always some sort of joke.
This one, Rishi Sunak, he's crazy.
He's only been doing it about two weeks.
He's ruined it already.
He's had to have six, like, when they're displeased, his colleagues, the other members of his party, they write letters of no confidence.
He's had six letters of, like, no confidence.
We have no confidence in you!
None whatsoever!
Please buck your ideas up!
Not elbows in the ribs or a smack in the mouth.
He's had six letters of no confidence but he has also had a fruit basket from Moderna thanking him for his wonderful time when he funded Moderna through his hedge fund and through the many Moderna employees that have come via the government.
There's two or three now.
Curious really.
Used to work for the government, now work at Moderna.
Extraordinary how that sort of stuff keeps happening and without independent media You wouldn't know nothing about it.
I wouldn't know nothing about it without other brave, bold voices in independent media from across the spectrum, the daddy of them all, our Joe Rogan.
But, you know, whether you like him or not, Jimmy Dore, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, from across the whole spectrum.
You might disagree with some of these people, but what we want, Tucker, Tucker, World King.
You know, what you want are voices that will openly discuss this stuff, and where they're going to increasingly be doing it is on Rumble.
Look at this surprising information.
Pavlovsky, the head of Rumble, he said, look, they've broke down.
We're using, you know, I guess it's a computer company.
They've got the data.
21% of people using Rumble are Republicans.
35% Democrat.
That can't be right, can it? 28% Independent.
I'm guessing you lot are independent, right?
We're sick of the system.
No affiliation, 12%.
Yep, that's me.
I'm in that category.
So there you go.
It's surprising, isn't it?
That rumble breaks down in that kind of way.
And a lot of people are trying to censor free speech, and particularly in online spaces, even more fervidly than ever.
Nikki Haley, who you will... Well, you know Nikki Haley anyway.
She loves the war, and she loves the profit.
And she loves getting gnarly with Vivek, don't she, on the TV set?
And she don't like people having her daughter's name by this, by her mouth hole!
Do not mention my daughter's on TikTok!
She's also now saying that TikTok needs to be controlled and she wants an end to online anonymity.
But online anonymity, as well as of course it does permit trolling and stuff like that, but It also allows people to make revelations, it permits whistleblowers.
Think about during the Covid pandemic period.
Many of the people denied anonymity that reported stuff that we now know is factual would not have had the opportunity to anonymously report their information.
Look at what Nikki Haley's proposing and also look how she talks about algorithms.
I don't think she knows what algorithms are.
When I get into office, the first thing we have to do, social media accounts, social media companies, they have to show America their algorithms.
Let us see why they're pushing what they're pushing.
The second thing is every person on social media should be verified by their name.
Made up laws like people make up without thinking about it, innit?
That's... First of all, it's a national security threat.
When you do that, all of a sudden people have to stand by what they say.
And it gets rid of... Good luck criticizing the establishment!
Now we know where you live.
We're surveilling you anyway.
That's why C702 is being reintroduced.
Section 702.
It's coming back, baby.
We'll be surveilling you.
You're being surveilled now.
Legitimate surveillance of American citizens using terrorism Global terrorism as the justification for spying on American citizens.
It's been going on since 9-11.
It continues still.
The Russian bots, the Iranian bots, and the Chinese bots.
There's different bots.
You got Chinese bots, Iranian bots, Russian bots.
I quite like the Chinese bots.
Those Russian bots, you can't trust them.
They try to maneuver the other bots and they meddle in their elections.
And then you're going to get some civility when people know their name is next to what they say.
Accountability.
And they know their pastor and their family member is going to see it.
It's going to help our kids and it's going to help our country.
Where do you live, man?
What year are you living in where people are worried about their pastor and that?
Society's fallen apart!
You broke it!
You've annihilated it!
It's not some sort of cute little village no more, white picket fences, people concerned about their neighbours.
That society was broken down when all of us were turned into mind-numb, mindless consumers with no connection to one another, turned towards hating one another senselessly, mindlessly, By career politicians that don't understand the consequences of their actions, that are willing to use liberal language when it's appropriate, but never met a country they didn't want to drone.
Here she is.
It's Hillary Clinton talking about Douglas Mackey.
Now, you know Douglas Mackey.
He's got a seven-month prison sentence for posting memes.
Obviously, the framing of this was that it was election interference.
But does anyone really think you can text a vote?
I mean, you can't make any impact on democracy if you actually bother to vote, you know, let alone if you start Texting it into cyberspace.
Have a look at this.
This is...
Do we include the bit with Tucker?
Tucker's chatting to that dude Douglas Mackey that's going away for seven months for posting memes.
This is why we're talking about online freedom.
This is what we're talking about, that dissent is being criminalised.
It's being criminalised.
If you speak out consistently against real power, you are in serious trouble.
Douglas Mackey, seven-month prison sentence, and here's Hillary Clinton normalising this.
There we just saw Nikki Haley from the other party saying there should be no online anonymity.
Look at how this stuff all ties together.
There was just a trial in Brooklyn where a guy who had been one of the main... I guess he was one of the main people running memes against me in 2016.
One of the main memers.
The main running memes against me in 2016.
If they had run a meme against you in 2016, it probably would have won.
He went from what you could consider free speech.
I mean, both Nancy and I have pretty thick skins.
I would say reptilian.
People say all kinds of things about us.
But he went from that to running a very deliberate effort to mislead people about where and how to vote.
So it went from speech to action meant to subvert the election because thousands of people who they targeted through their algorithms.
Oh, I can text my vote for Hillary Clinton.
So Hillary Clinton, we... I want to deconstruct that in some greater detail in a minute, but it... Hey, you come in and fix this thing.
I've pressed the wrong button on this.
This is not you, viewers.
You stay with us.
So, like, can you see how the normalization of censorship is continuing?
Can you see that the incarceration of someone for posting text this number if you want to vote for Hillary, which was apparently happening... Thanks, mate.
Young Putin there.
He looks like young Putin.
He doesn't agree with his policies.
That invasion was provoked by NATO, as a matter of fact.
He would never have crossed that border had NATO not for ages been ignoring his demand that Crimea remain independent.
Hey, so yeah, what I'm saying there is that But plainly, free speech is becoming criminalised.
Wherever you look, there is more legislation that legitimises censorship.
There are people being imprisoned for posting memes.
There's a cry to get rid of online anonymity.
All of these measures essentially facilitate centralised control, wouldn't you say?
So here's how the mainstream, the legacy media, are cynical when it comes to reporting from independent media, but compliant when legacy media uptakes it.
This is a story about Iran and a sort of a $10 billion, what you'll see from the video.
The US is about to issue a new waiver on Iran that will allow Iran to access $10 billion Why?
When?
How?
Anything you can tell us.
I think you certainly shouldn't expect me to comment on speculation on social media and I will decline to do so.
Go ahead and then we'll wrap it up.
Is it true though?
I think I just answered it or declined to answer.
Oh we're not having that and there's a distinction between social media and independent media I would say.
Like we try to do our very best to ensure that the information we give you is undergirded by Decent fact we fact-check it and not the kind of Reuters fact-checking That's got curious financial ties or the Facebook fact-checking that ultimately appears to be funding it funded in unusual ways We'll be telling you more about that over the coming weeks, and yeah sure enough the next day legacy media report
Biden admin renewed sanctions waiver, giving Iran access to 10 billion dollars from Iraq.
Extraordinary, given the escalating tensions.
It's almost as if war, from all angles, is beneficial to the truly powerful interests.
Meanwhile, independent media is further censored.
Like Mint Press, which is a sort of a UK-based online media organization, has been demonetized by YouTube.
Presumably because they've said something about the current conflict in the Middle East that whoever runs YouTube don't agree with.
And remember that YouTube are part of the Trusted News Initiative that includes the BBC, Facebook, a group that decide when something is disinformation and misinformation.
The same way that YouTube use the WHO to provide their community guidelines when it comes to health matters, the Trusted News Initiative ensure compliance in other Hey, we're still on YouTube right now, so I shouldn't be being so critical because I am grateful.
I'm grateful to all of you that are watching on that platform, but I do need to ask you to join us over on Rumble.
You've just seen now, in spite of what you've been told, it's not just like a sort of a crackpot, lunatic, hell hole for denizens of the conspiracy theory world, although We do like to discuss the odd conspiracy theory.
Chief 411 says free speech is becoming criminalized.
I'm not your buddy guy.
A $2 tip there.
Did you see the FBI leak where they're classifying anyone who questions vaccines, refuse to wear a mask, or religious as far-right extremists?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, they're commies.
That's nice.
Thanks for the couple of dollars.
Kate Leska.
That hat is driving my attention deficit disorder nuts.
Is it new?
Is it fleece?
It looks fuzzy.
I like the neutral color with the blue accent.
You will never know the details of my complex hat.
That is the simple truth of the matter.
Now we're going to talk in a minute about that manhunt that took place after someone was alleged to have assaulted a police officer on January 6th.
They'd go for it, man.
There's like about four or five agencies hunting this dude.
Also, someone commented earlier, he wanted to see about the return of mask mandates in Australia.
The legacy media over there are not having it.
If you're watching this on YouTube, come on over.
Come on over to the home of free speech.
It's a truly independent space.
No affiliation.
New movement.
Independent media leads to independent politics, which leads to revolution and change.
I mean, peaceful?
Of course.
We would not advocate violence, not under any circumstances.
In fact, our opposition to war is absolute.
Self-protection?
Yes, under all circumstances.
But aggression?
Oh man, where's it gonna lead?
Okay, so if you're watching on YouTube, click the link in the description.
Join us!
Join us!
Join us over here, over on Rumble.
Now, this is that manhunt story.
A dude who's alleged to have assaulted a police officer is getting pursued by, I don't know, like about 10 agencies.
There's the FBI are after him, anti-terror squads.
Check it out.
An all-out manhunt tonight in this small central New Jersey town just 40 miles southwest of New York City after this man, wanted in connection to the attack at the Capitol on January 6th, evaded arrest.
Gregory Yetman fleeing on foot into the wooded area near his home.
Police searching from the sky and on the ground.
According to USA Today, Yetman is suspect number 278 AFO, wanted for assault of a federal officer, pictured at the Capitol in these photos on the FBI's website.
Bill Burr wanted.
In an interview earlier this year, Yetman indicated he was at the Capitol that day, but said he did nothing wrong.
The FBI leading the multi-agency manhunt in the town of Helmetta.
Multi-agency?
Officers in tactical gear looking in vehicles, teams moving through backyards armed with long guns and canines.
There were officers running through everybody's yards, asking questions.
Even though the sun has gone down, we can still see joint terrorism task force agents going door to door.
They're doing worse things, like, in the Senate.
Instead of fighting each other in there, how dare you?
How dare you on January 6th come there and cause all that trouble?
Right, you!
I'll do you, son of a bitch!
I'll elbow you in the kidneys!
They're fighting in there anyway.
All that mad corruption.
It seems to me that they're making a clear example.
If you want to oppose power, if you want to protest, if you want to come together with your fellow Americans and oppose the establishment elites, There's a SWAT team coming for you.
Let me know in the chat if you think this is about making an example for him.
Yes, if you do.
No, if you don't.
It's about making an example of this, guys, which seems like, to me, anti-terror squads, canines, guns, even questions.
They're all saying yes over on locals.
Press the red button, join them over there.
It's a lovely little crew.
We do Bible readings.
We do meditations.
We've not done one for a while, have we?
Oh, no, we did one yesterday.
Yeah, we, like, join the community.
We're trying to make each other well in this crazy world.
Over in the Rumble chat, yes, yes, yes.
Yes, says Disco Duck.
I'm not your buddy guy.
Yes.
Hellcat164.
Yes.
Hellof.
Yes.
Lexaroney.
Big yes.
Centralscrutinizer.
You're all saying yes.
Balios.
Yes, yes, yes.
And then one that I think is a bot saying don't take the vaccine.
I think I've been pretty clear on that subject.
Bloody hell.
Then there's lots of mad stuff going on.
But, you know, it's a live chat stream.
There's a lot of craziness.
Hey!
Listen, we respect your free speech, right?
We love your free speech.
Speak freely over there in that chat.
We love you.
Speak freely over there in the Awake and Wonder chat.
Because, when you are divided, it's very easy to control you, and the left, that were complaining about censorship, like, well no, excuse me, when the left were saying it's not, there is no censorship, there is no censorship, a little while ago, and now acknowledging censorship is a thing.
Right?
Because it's shifted.
But then there are people on the right that are saying, no, you do need a little bit of censorship.
But where do you stand on free speech?
Are you a free speech absolutist?
Yes or no?
Tell me in the chat while we look at this conversation between Tucker and Glenn Greenwald who expose right-wing censorship occurring on the current Hamas-Israel war after three years of censorship on the subjects of COVID and Ukraine, which is wrong.
Does either of your American parties really believe in free speech or both simply favor speech for themselves and the censoring of their enemies?
Yes, yes, yes, says Kyle Reiner.
Yes, yes, yes.
Just yeses and a few fuck yeses over there.
River deep, mountain high.
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
Here's the news?
No.
Here's the effing news.
Stay with us, and by the way, if you've got any ideas for stories you want us to cover, post in the chat and we'll cover it.
And no more talk of all these nipples, because I will not show you any more.
You've seen the last of these.
Here's the news.
No, here's the effing news.
Thank you for choosing Fox News.
The news.
No, here's the fucking news.
Tucker and Greenwald exposed that the right is now pro-censorship when it comes to the Middle Eastern war.
We know that the left are pro-censorship because of the last three years of Covid and Ukraine censorship.
So does either party believe in free speech anymore?
Today we are discussing the legacy media and both political parties adverse reaction to your free speech and your free thought.
This comes off the back of a brilliant conversation between Glenn Greenwald and Tucker Carlson where they talk about the escalating Middle Eastern tensions and how that's created a kind of aptitude and even acceptance of censorship on the right that previously was not there at all.
Does being pro-free speech always mean being pro-speech that you're opposed to?
Willing to listen to alternative and opposing ideas that you're explicitly against but accept that in principle you have to hear.
Let's have a look at them talking about it and then let's look at the normalization of censorship that's taken place across the world in the last few years and has led to a spate of legislation, cancellation, shutting down of dissent and normalizing the unpersoning, canceling, de-financing and control of ordinary citizens and entire political movements.
What's so terrifying to me though is that The right, the American political right, which really was through this kind of weird transformation that's happened over the past dozen years, has become the lone defenders of the First Amendment.
They've abandoned that in the last month, like instantly.
So I think you could say, you know, I strongly support Israel.
I strongly dislike Hamas.
I'm rooting for, maybe I think we should commit troops to the region.
I mean, whatever, you can have any view you want.
However, American citizens have a right to express their opinion.
Period.
And that supersedes any other event in any other country.
It's like, that's a core right.
And I don't hear many conservatives saying that.
And so you sort of wonder, like, if they're not defending it, who will?
I mean, there are people who have built their careers, Tucker, over the last five, six years, standing up and saying, we can't have cancel culture, we can't have censorship, college students aren't entitled to feelings of safety, we don't censor in order to protect people from views they find threatening, mocking the notion that minority groups are vulnerable and we have to censor in order to protect them.
Turn on a dime!
Well, principles are expensive.
In the end, these principles and values ultimately might mean personal or ideological sacrifice.
In fact, if it doesn't involve that, it probably isn't a principle.
It's probably a kind of tribalist alliance, perhaps.
Let me know where you stand on that.
Ideological musing in the chat below.
Let's see how in the last few years, censorship has been normalized on the left.
It created a kind of new political movement.
And to tell you the truth, I feel like I'm part of it where it's, oh, I don't care anymore whether you think you're left or right.
What I believe in is your acceptance of other people's right to organize their own community and say what they believe in.
And I don't agree with harmful speech or hate speech.
Those things are abhorrent to me.
But I do agree with the view of people that I'm opposed to.
Otherwise, that means you don't agree with free speech.
Let's get into this in some detail.
It's true that during wartime, governments sometimes censor and restrict liberties, including on the basis of ideology, race, and religion.
But after governments have done so, societies almost always regret what occurred.
After 9-11, the FBI abused its powers and entrapped Muslims.
After Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ordered the rounding up of Japanese Americans.
These are moral stains on our history.
Keeping military secrets is one thing.
Demanding censorship of even ugly, awful and offensive speech is another.
People are saying revolting things.
They must remain free to do so, not just because the First Amendment requires it, but also because talking back to hatred is ultimately the only way to overcome it.
And while the suppression of free expression always starts with the least popular speech, it never ends there.
Yes, it does seem, just on my experience in the last few years, that certain figures were taken out of the culture, but over time that has escalated to include more people and more ideas and it's been a kind of expanding remit of ideas and speech and individuals that can be censored and shut down.
Have you noticed that yourself?
And in a way, even though free speech necessarily means hearing speech you don't agree with, that's An easier sacrifice to make than its alternative, the ongoing implementation of ever-increasing censorship, particularly when you suspect from movements of power elsewhere in the world that there's a desire to centralise authority.
I'm talking about legislation for censorship, online safety bills, the bill in Canada, the bill in Ireland, EU's proposals, the introduction of CBDCs that primarily seem to be beneficial because they can be controlled and shut down.
I suppose Taken in context with the apparent agenda to increase authoritarianism, this increase in censorship via challenging free speech on the basis of hate speech is a trend that has to be observed.
And I suppose it's surprising, isn't it, that people that had built their career around it, or people that were determined that free speech was everything, suddenly abandoning it.
That's curious, isn't it?
A month ago, France banned all pro-Palestinian demonstrations in the country.
On the same day, Germany banned a pro-Palestinian protest group.
In the UK, the Home Secretary instructed police to consider taking unspecified measures against such actions as chanting slogans and waving a Palestinian flag.
In the United States, such measures would clearly violate the Constitution.
Such state suppression of political speech is anathema to American values.
But in the United States too, our commitment to free speech is being tested.
Within hours of the attacks, a number of Harvard student groups signed a letter placing blame for all violence in the region on Israel alone.
The apartheid regime is the only one to blame, it read.
Bill Ackman, a billionaire hedge fund manager, demanded that Harvard release the names
of all the student members of those groups so that he could compile a hiring blacklist
for his CEO friends.
Someone on Twitter compiled such a list himself called the Terror List.
Later, a truck began circling the Harvard campus with digital billboards displaying the names and faces
of students alleged to have signed the statement under the title Harvard's Leading Anti-Semites.
Websites popped up listing student members' names, pictures, social media profiles,
classier hometowns and former employers.
Republican Senator Josh Hawley said he hoped the Department of Justice was investigating pro-Palestinian student groups like the ones at Harvard.
The Harvard students weren't the only ones who faced real-world retaliation for their views.
An NYU law school student saw a job offer rescinded for expressing a sentiment similar to the one in the Harvard student group letter.
NYU Student Bar Association voted to remove the student as president.
The Philly Voice fired a sports riot for tweeting solidarity with Palestine always.
Do you recall at the beginning of the assent of Jordan Peterson that he said, what's happening on campuses now will spread to the culture and you'll start to see this tendency towards cancellation and enforced speech and prohibition of speech?
And it was obviously, you know, you all know how Jordan Peterson is regarded in the culture.
Some of you now, because of Jordan Peterson's position on this war might have changed your perspective on him.
But I feel the principle that Jordan Peterson was talking about was essentially free speech and refusing coercive speech.
Now we're in a position where we're sort of normalizing cancellation.
We're normalizing actions that don't seem to have due process behind them at all.
It's just like these people signed this list and I don't know.
Wouldn't you be happy to be friends with someone who is pro-Palestine or someone that's pro-Israel?
Is that for you a line?
I mean, I noticed that this got exacerbated in Trump.
It was like a kind of joke thing.
Oh, what to do with your relatives that are pro-Trump at Christmas?
And already for someone my age, that was an exaggeration and an amplification of the Ordinary tensions that were in any family.
Any family would have people that were a bit conservative and some that were socialist.
Unless you're in a very particular community where everyone's a docker or works at a coal mine or something, then you live in a very sort of insular tribalized community.
But it was accepted that we didn't need to be so opposed to one another that we wanted the government to step in and censor speech on our behalf.
You know, like, when you show your kid a movie and it's like, oh, this is meant to be a PG movie or a 12 movie, and you think, well, this movie, I'm thinking it's particularly of Little Shop of Horrors, shouldn't be a PG movie.
It's too crazy.
But then I think, well, I am still in charge.
I can just stop my kid watching this movie if I want to.
We have power at the level of the individual.
We have power at the level of the community.
I wonder what is lost by empowering the state and other agencies to shut down, in particular, free speech on our behalf just because, in this instance, we happen to agree with it.
There's certainly been a lot of things said about me lately that I wish had been shut down, let me tell you, but hey, free speech.
All of this is legal in the United States, much of it is protected speech, but it's hard to deny at least without moving goalposts that the backlash is as clear an example as one can find of cancel culture.
The purpose of exposing and punishing each of them personally is the same as when left-wing activists dox and shame their enemies to make anyone who thinks of voicing even moderate dissent, such as criticising the scale or conduct of Israel's military response, think twice lest they be punished too.
Meanwhile, the same publications that have dismissed and denied the reality of government-funded, government-demanded and government-coerced censorship are raising the alarm about widespread censorship of progressive voices on social media platforms.
It's one thing we can agree on, that we all want to be healthy and stronger, and that's why we use Fielder Greens.
And it's finally here!
The FielderGreens.com Black Friday sale is on and it's incredible.
Right now you can get 30% off when you use the code VIP.
Guys, I love Fielder Greens and so many of you have been seeing incredible results.
More energy throughout the day, I'm energized.
Skin looking healthier.
Digestion, better than ever.
My stomach, hey wait a minute, it's magnificent in there.
Hairs and nails are growing faster and look healthier.
And overall, I feel better and more able to participate in reality.
I hereby pledge to you that this will be one of the best things you add to your life for better health.
Don't miss this massive sale and get up to 30%, that can't be right, 30% off your order.
That's an incredible discount, isn't it?
30%.
Visit BrickHouseRussell.com and use promo code VIP for up to 30% off.
So go to BrickHouseRussell.com and use the promo code VIP for 30% off.
Let's get back into this.
In its story on the censorship of pro-Palestinian voices, the Washington Post expresses great skepticism of big tech and sympathy for the people censored.
The exact opposite of how it treated the issue when it was non-leftists who were being censored.
In fact, the Washington Post, like most news media, spent years denying that censorship was occurring, even as they called for more of it.
To be sure, there has been a concerning increase in demands for censorship and blacklisting since the October 7th Hamas attacks.
Government officials are threatening to defund colleges for things students have said and are even demanding their expulsion.
The State University System of Florida incorrectly warned that calls for Israel to be wiped off the map are criminal activity.
And political officials, including the Attorney General of New York, are demanding greater censorship by social media platforms to stop the spread of violent rhetoric.
I'm reminded of how the Section 702 bill introduced as part of the Patriot Act after 9-11 is used to spy on American citizens using skullduggery and manipulation, and they've spied both on Black Lives Matter activists and participants in January the 6th.
When it comes to the deep state, When it comes to real power, what we regard as extreme and polarised position, like the example I just offered you, Black Lives Matter January 6th, that seems pretty extreme in American political culture.
Well, they'll be subject to the same kind of exploitation of surveillance and I would assume censorship and other measures of control that I strongly believe will be introduced if people aren't able to have open conversations about very contentious and in particular incendiary subjects like Palestine-Israel.
Unless people can have an open discourse about that without being censored, unless you can have a workplace where people that are pro-Palestine and people that are pro-Israel can find a way to work together, I don't actually see a way forward because in the end you'll have to say, well, we're not doing that and we're going to create more polarity, more tribalism and...
Ultimately in so doing, you empower centralised authority, which is garnering authority at an extraordinary rate in a bunch of ways that aren't initially obvious, but like the WHO proposed treaty is something you should look at, the legislation I've already mentioned around the world, the increasing surveillance powers, the tendency towards censorship, and many people believe, and I'd love to know what you think about this, that free speech is the fundamental right, because without free speech you can't have free thought, you can't have open communication, you can't have real relationships, you have to live in a kind of ongoing That's a real good way of exerting control.
And to tell you the truth, that's the kind of tyranny and authoritarianism that scares me more than the last iteration of militarized tyranny.
Although, I'm actually scared of all forms of dictatorship and tyranny, actually.
I suppose.
But this is what seems to be the trend.
A kind of sanitised, shutting down, an agreement in principle that that sort of speech is unsayable, that that sort of person should be cancelled.
Then once you legitimise that, then you've essentially empowered the establishment to kind of do what it wants.
But the alarm that the news media are raising is in striking contrast to the indifference at best and hostility at worst to the evidence of governmental and non-governmental censorship of a variety of disfavored views and voices relating to climate change, COVID, Ukraine, and the Biden family's influence peddling.
For years, the left has insisted that cancelling blacklisting, shadow banning, and censorship were legitimate actions to punish people with unsavory views, protect safety, and fight disinformation.
Now that the left may be on the receiving end of these tactics, they argue what many of us have been saying all along.
Censorship causes far more harm than good.
But the left is yet to acknowledge its double standards.
Why is that?
So everyone's just swatched sides.
So no one actually cares about anything at all.
I mean, isn't that worrying?
Doesn't that suggest that we're not going to be able to find a way for, let's just take the example of American democracy because it's such a significant one, to not bypass but to get through the 2024 election cycle successfully.
It seems that at best there's just going to be ongoing mudslinging by either side and isn't that the problem that's been in our culture since at least the build up to 2016 and it's getting worse and worse and no one's doing anything about it.
There are no solid principles where you say well at least we all agree on that.
Increasingly, that's disappearing from our culture.
The simplest explanation for the left's hypocrisy on censorship is simply that they favour free speech for themselves and censorship for their enemies.
Evidence of this can be found in virtually every mainstream news article about the Twitterphiles.
Last December, The Guardian even acknowledged that the Twitterphiles showed censorship, but that such censorship should be welcomed, because it was against the political right.
Like so much to do with American politics, opined Guardian's tech columnist Alex Hearn, the files fall flat if you view the American right as an outlier.
If you have rules against election misinformation and only one party engages in a systematic campaign of election misinformation, it's not an unreasonable outcome for one party to be the focus of moderation efforts.
But that's simply not the case.
We know that both parties engage in misinformation.
Misinformation just used to be called propaganda or campaigning or media manipulation or whatever you want to call it.
It's simply not a uni-party issue.
For years, Wired magazine insisted that misinformation and disinformation resulted in real-world harms, including the election of Trump, and that more social media censorship was needed.
But now, Wired says, it's censorship, not misinformation, that's causing real-world harm.
Palestinians claim social media censorship is endangering lives, reads the headline of Wired's piece denouncing social media censorship of Palestinians in Gaza and around the world.
TechCrunch dismissed the Twitter files spread by Barry Weiss on the shadow banning of disfavored voices because it only shows examples of moderation actions that affect a handful of conservative fringe accounts.
The so-called fringe accounts included that of Stanford University professor Jay Bhattacharya, a leading global thinker on how to respond to pandemics.
But such one-sidedness should be problematic for all journalists who claim to be fair and for advocates of free speech.
After all, it's not advocacy of free speech if the free speech is just for your team and not for your opponents.
Most people on the left do not appear to realize that they are contradicting themselves by lamenting censorship of pro-Palestinian voices.
Today, former President Barack Obama called for a respectful dialogue between people who disagree on Israel.
But just one year ago, Obama urged greater social media censorship of views with which he disagrees, and called for the US government to create a regulatory structure to limit speech online.
Since 2016, the left has increasingly espoused a tribal, rather than liberal, approach to politics.
In fighting what they viewed as the threat of fascism and white supremacy, the left decided to, in large part, do away with the basic principles of liberal democracy, and to apply different speech rights, and even legal rights, to different people on the basis of a friend-enemy distinction.
All of this is thus bad news for anyone who cares about free speech for all, and protecting liberal democracy.
It shows that many of the people who are ostensibly committed to free speech, whether on the left or right, really only support it when it's for their group.
It reveals that underneath our rationalist minds, there remains a highly tribal reptilian brain.
In the face of the horrors that have occurred and those to come, we must not lose our humanity and our principles.
It's possible for every one of us to have compassion for innocent people on all sides.
It's also possible for every one of us to defend free speech for the views we most abhor.
In so doing, we care more, not less, and keep the possibility of peace and security alive, however remote it may be at the moment.
I suppose the abandonment of generally accepted principles at a time of crisis can only exacerbate those sets of crises.
Long been obvious to me that principles and values were being weaponised, used to persecute people, to shut down debate, to create conflict.
What I suppose we have to look at is how our willingness to put aside our own principles and values when it's convenient to us are likely to affect society as a whole,
it's a very difficult thing to hold in your mind and in your heart
what it is to observe the sanctity of the individual, the beauty of your individual connection to whatever higher
reality or deeper purpose you believe in,
and all of our shared duties towards community, whether that's a local or a global level.
The problem I think we're experiencing as culture becomes banalizing,
anodyne, as well as curiously highly conflagratory and conflict-driven,
is none of us feel particularly connected to reality anymore.
When you are allotted a role in a culture that ultimately leaves you simply as a consumer or an online activist, it's easy to feel disconnected from reality.
It's easy to feel disconnected from principles.
It's easy to feel disconnected from the environment and conditions that we evolved in.
I feel that where possible, we have to look for ways to emulate the conditions we evolved in.
Communities where we understood one another, where we knew that we had a shared purpose, where we recognised there are different tribal groups with whom we have a broader shared purpose.
Recently I heard the phrase, curiously from one of the creators of Wikipedia, unified but decentralised.
It seems to me that if we have true democracy, if we have true individual freedom, if we have true freedom of speech, we are going to be able to create a culture where open conversation, civil disagreement, diplomatic solutions again become possible.
The more we are in conflict with one another, the more we're willing to put aside our principles because temporarily it's convenient for us, the more More likely it is that the advance of establishment elites that benefit from conflict will continue.
The example I used of surveillance being applied to what are regarded as outside, alien or undesirable groups, whether that's from the left, Black Lives Matter, or the right, January 6th protesters, No.
shows you that to the institutions and groups that are truly in power, our division is absolutely
vital. Our willingness not to hold fast and firm to principles is a great weapon to people
that ultimately benefit from censorship, shutting down of free speech, centralising resources
and passing edicts that bypass democracy entirely. But that's just what I think. Let me know
what you think. See you in a second.
Thanks for watching Zipbox TV. Here's the fucking news. Disco Duck 2, Chris Christie is a fat bastard. I-
I watched this rumble chat in something approaching or old, what's he called?
Wolfen... He ain't doing too well.
Wolfenblond.
Oh, not Wolfenblond.
You're getting some hate, Wolfenblond.
But this is a free speech platform.
So yous lot can chat about whatever you want to chat about in there.
What do you think about the US dollar again?
Decentralised by BRIC?
Yeah, that's the way it's going.
These are the sort of deep geopolitical trends that matter, aren't they, mate?
Sort of financial ones.
New relationships forming between, yeah, Brazil, China, Iran, all that.
That is the true direction of power.
There's no question.
Philippus, you should have Douglas MacGregor on.
OK, OK.
Is this live now, Jack Desponte?
How would I know about you, Jack Desponte?
How would I know that Thracian was the next person to post if it wasn't live right now?
I'm not your buddy guy.
A potentially fair litmus test speech for, excuse me, a litmus test for free speech and censorship should be, you defend the full speech of those who would defend free speech and refuse to defend those who are pro-censorship.
Cool, got it.
Russell, do an interview of the Lotus Eaters, says 709er.
Alright.
Vincius Prime, a $2 donation.
Thanks.
Remember, they're not fact-checkers, they're the Narrative Control Team.
That's what's going on.
Do you watch Merrick?
Do you watch Merrick Garland?
No, I've not watched that.
Would you consider having Jason Hincolons as No Jabbers?
Yeah, I would.
Wow, what do you think about my... yeah, I told you what I thought about that.
They told me about that time I was on Morning Joe.
Yeah, that was crazy.
That was crazy.
So listen, right, we're gonna show you this story about Australian media and an Australian doctor saying we're not having those mask mandates back.
We've had just about enough of that crap.
They do it different in Australia.
Hey, Ash Ella.
Hey, Tamara Spencer.
Hey, Christina Elise over in the Awake and Wonder chat.
Join us over there if you want to.
We're gonna do an extra 15 minutes on the We're going to stay here for a bit longer.
We're going to talk about this stuff in Australia.
The mask mandates are back and the Australians are pretty pissed about it, I'll tell you that.
Then, you've got to tell us.
Press 1 for a story about a dude in Congress who's been going to dog fights and setting up dog fights.
That's 1.
Dogs in America that are too cute to be used as sort of control dogs.
Three, uh, crows.
Clever crows.
And then there was one other one, wasn't there?
Was there one other?
Like clever crows is killing it over in the local shop.
Was there one?
Just those three.
So, one, dog fire in Congress.
Two, dogs that are too cute to do their jobs because they're so sweet.
Oh, three, clever crows.
The clever crow one is a video.
For a minute, we're going to, we're going to, three, yeah, a lot of you want the clever crows, but we're going to just talk about these mask mandates being back in America.
And why don't you lot See, yeah, I know Whitney Webb already.
I saw someone chatting about Whitney Webb.
I love Whitney Webb.
She goes there.
I get scared when I talk to Whitney Webb because she just sits there, very relaxed, playing this day, talking about people who went to Jeffrey Epstein's island.
Terrifying.
Very frightening to talk to her.
She's brilliant.
She's scary.
Okay, and a lot of you are saying free.
We're going to do a little bit about mask mandates, and then I'm just going to ask you all to see if you can peacefully discuss matters in the Middle East.
Try and come to a solution.
Look into Albert Pike.
Yeah, what is Albert Pike?
Is he Illuminati?
Is that what it is?
Alright guys, I'm going to get into this Australia mask mandate story.
Let's have a look at how they're reporting on the return of mask mandates.
It'll surprise you, they're not into it.
Masks.
Warning, it's time to cover up in public gatherings, hospitals and flights amid the nation's eighth COVID wave.
Let's bring in today medical expert Dr Nick Coatsworth in Canberra.
Doc, good morning to you.
Firstly, handsome.
If he was in Canada, they'd make him Prime Minister, wouldn't they?
Just on the basis of the haircut alone.
Amazing looking man.
Until they heard his views on COVID, then they'd be like, no.
To you, is it really necessary?
Carlos, if masks work at all, they only work when you wear them in all situations as part of a suite of measures, including social distancing and movement restrictions, which I can assure you we're not going back to.
Now, the AMA has quoted 240... Just eat, handsome.
No.
A suite of measures?
Yes.
...hospitalisations with COVID in this wave in Queensland.
But I want to remind our viewers that there are over a million admissions to Queensland hospitals every year.
So the suggestion that this is a wave is probably incorrect.
We don't need to go back to masks and we need to remind ourselves that the Australian... Meta-Analyst.
I finally made it to one of these.
Welcome Meta-Analyst.
We have a lot of fun.
We chat.
We're going to be showing you that crow clip in a minute.
I forgot that the farting crow is one of our icons from our friends at Sticker Mule.
And I see you lot saying that you've been eating fielder greens and it makes you fart.
It's a damn good, damn good drink.
The Medical Association is a political lobby group, not a group of...
Okay, you need to expand on that because I couldn't agree with you more.
And I think, you know, when you talk about waves, the language around all this can sometimes get fanned.
It's not right.
That's right, Carl.
Let's reassure the public that vaccination works, that COVID is now a milder disease because of what we call herd immunity.
We've all been exposed to it.
And there are other ways to manage the hospital pressures.
Here in Canberra, we use virtual care clinics, we use... That's right, Kyle!
...hospital in the homes.
And frankly, I was on shift yesterday and we had not a single patient with COVID in our acute medical unit.
Vaccinations work.
Yeah, I see you, Venus Siren, over there in the Awakened Wonder chat on Locals.
Remember, we're going to do an additional 15 minutes over on Locals afterwards.
Let's start.
Let me know what you want us to cover in there.
We'll be doing those crows in a minute.
They started off quite a hard line, didn't they, saying no masks, but they're getting on back on narrative pretty fast.
So I don't think that it's the disaster that's sometimes made out to be, and we need to listen to the right people.
Public health physicians, infectious disease physicians.
Good to talk to you, Doc.
Appreciate it.
Sarah.
Talk to your doc.
You're going to trust your doc, no doubt about it.
Let's now turn to Queensland's new COVID alert.
People are being asked to mask up.
Masking them again.
They're getting masked all over the place.
Nah, man.
I want to see some crows.
I want to see crows demonstrating that they understand water displacement.
Right now, and so do you, because you all voted number three.
Have you seen this video of a crow understanding water displacement?
No, I haven't, but by God, I want to.
That's what you voted for.
That's what you get.
No manipulation of democracy here.
No 40 Dominion voting machines here.
You cast the ballot.
That ballot matters.
Here's some crows.
It really is understanding it.
It's putting those in and it gets a little drink.
What a clever... Oh, that's so lovely, isn't it?
What a beautiful, intelligent bird.
Maybe we need to pay attention to these kind of details.
The gentle beauty of the world.
A crow understanding water displacement.
Helps us, doesn't it?
Helps us to go, no, hold on a minute.
We've lost our connection to nature.
And our inner thread of divine beauty that connects us to one another and to the universe.
We've become trapped in our individual identity, and that's what makes us malleable.
If we were just to awaken to the great glory within ourselves, we would be free.
We've allowed them to fill us up with hate.
Digitokano Hippie says crows do smart stuff than us.
Crows for Biden, someone posted.
Like Jones for Jones, like when they fart.
Beautiful.
But I have to show you now that story.
Let's have a look at this mad... That's lovely.
So cute.
Let's have a... Let's have a look at this... We got Hillary Clinton algorithm?
242. Preach Russell! Thanks, I am preaching, I'm preaching baby, I'm testifying right now.
Let's have a look at this mad... that's lovely, that's so cute. Let's have a look at this...
have we got Hillary Clinton algorithm? Did we not show that?
We missed it slightly earlier.
Ah, did we?
Well, maybe.
Do you want to see Hillary Clinton or do you want to learn about this person in Congress or the Senate who's been getting into dogfighting?
I just want to cover it.
Oh no.
Wait, no you don't.
Where is dogfighting guy?
This is from Carl and Sandy, Pentagon official charged with participating in dogfighting ring.
That's the nice dog.
There was just a trial in Brooklyn.
Don't you dare make a joke about that.
That's Hillary Clinton, she's trying her best.
Now, let's have a... What's that for?
Frederick Douglas Moorfield, Pentagon official, charged.
He's a Pentagon official, that's what he is.
Oh, well, mind you, war is his business.
And it's also his hobby.
Frederick Douglas Moorfield, Jr., 62, of Arnold... I don't know what MD is, you tell me in the chat.
Was a Deputy Chief Information Officer for Command, Control and Communications for the Secretary of Defense Chief Information... Oh God, that's a boring job.
He was arrested for a charge of promoting and furthering an animal fighting venture, along with a longtime friend who allegedly admitted his participation in dogfighting, Mario Diefleib.
There he is, a Pentagon official involved in dogfighting.
What's up with us?
Can we do better than that?
Can we improve on Pentagon officials that are into dogfights?
I sincerely hope so, guys.
Dogs of War Unleashed says more in the chat.
So, do you want to see the rest of that Hillary thing?
And what about interviewing Rainer Fulmich?
Who is Rainer Fulmich?
Someone said that in the chat.
I will do.
Hey, let's have a look at the rest of Hillary talking about Douglas Mackey.
Let's have a look at this.
I pressed the wrong button earlier.
There was just a trial in Brooklyn where a guy who had been one of the main... I guess he was one of the main people running memes against me in 2016.
He went from what you could consider free speech.
I mean, both Nancy and I have pretty thick skins.
People say all kinds of things about us.
Aw, she knows about it.
But he went from that to running a- Doesn't bother me.
Doesn't bother me what they say.
Very deliberate effort to mislead people about where and how to vote.
Very deliberate.
Did you see what Douglas Mackey did?
It was like some sort of dopey meme saying text this number to vote for Hillary.
There were other people doing sort of Trump ones.
It was basically not a crime against democracy.
What's a crime against democracy is I suppose the whole Russia gate hoax, the Steele dossier funded by the Clinton campaign or the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story.
So many actual crimes.
So it went from speech to action meant to subvert the election because thousands of people who they targeted through their algorithms.
They targeted them through their algorithms.
Oh, I can text my vote for Hillary Clinton.
So Hillary Clinton, I want to deconstruct that in some greater detail in a minute, but Hillary Clinton apparently took that very seriously.
You were using, quote, algorithms to subvert the election with that meme.
I don't even really know what she means by that.
What's worse is Douglas Mackey posting that meme on Nancy Pelosi's presumed insider trading.
You've seen, right, how often, you know, her husband makes big tech investments that are alarmingly successful.
I notice you, jiggly bits in the chat.
I notice you, says NoticeMeRussell, he or she.
I heard if you send $100 to the Prince of Nigeria, he'll vote for Hillary.
Tfunk.
Nice.
Nice joke.
So, yeah, there you go, guys.
What do you think?
Is it, like, what's less democratic?
Nancy Pelosi using her position within Congress to feed information presumably to Paul Pelosi, who then invests in the likes of, well, Alphabet or Amazon or Apple or whatever.
Or is it dear old Douglas Mackey posting harmless memes that... I don't think it matters if people post, like, memes about, like, Trump or Hillary Clinton.
What's more important?
Let me know in the chat, you lot.
Over in the Awaken Weather chat... Ooh, dawn one!
Nancy is a bitch sneaking around.
Sneaking around, I like that.
Nancy Pelosi, there's a unanimous condemnation of the crisis within systemic democracy, the inability of ordinary people to have any real access.
I'll tell you what, can we show the trailer?
Have we got the trailer?
Because...
Tomorrow, on the show, we've got Alex Jones.
Round one.
We're going to be talking to Alex about predictions he made that came true.
We're going to be talking to him about why independent voices get targeted.
And was Alex Jones the first of those voices that got targeted?
We talk about the mistakes Alex Jones has made.
All of us have made mistakes.
Everyone's made mistakes.
But we talk about Rogan and Tucker.
We talk about prophecies and mysticism.
You will love it.
Do we have a trailer for it?
Okay, well I'd love to show you that and we're going to do an extra 15 minutes over on Locals if you want to join us for that.
A lot of you are extremely impressed by the crows.
I think that crow, you want to see David Icke?
You want to see David Icke?
Is that what you want?
Well, let's see, let's see if we can get him.
Thank you for your efforts.
The left is psychotic.
I tell you what, I think what we have to do here in this chat, in this little forum, is we have to get beyond the divisions of left and right.
We have to acknowledge that there is a requirement for an independent movement, that we have to be willing to form alliances with people that have different cultural views than us.
We have to make democracy local.
We have to explore the principle of subsidiarity.
That means localizing power, creating true democracy, where centralized authority is limited and confronted and ultimately brought down.
Uh, hey, so, yeah, we've got, uh, that's my dog.
Come over here.
What's the matter?
Why are you doing that?
Come see me.
There.
Come over.
Come here.
What's the matter?
What are you complaining for?
What's the matter?
Come here.
At least be on camera if you're going to cause all this trouble.
Come here.
Come here.
Good boy.
Isn't he a beautiful animal?
So listen, you guys.
Do you have a trailer?
If it's not there now, then it's too late.
All right, listen.
We're going to go over to locals now, you guys.
All you've got to do It's ready.
Let's have a look at the trailer for tomorrow's show for Alex Jones.
A little taste of what's coming up.
You'll enjoy this.
Let's have a look.
will commence again if you try to take our firearms.
Come on!
I wonder if you ever feel fracture and crisis within yourself.
I wonder if you've ever felt hopeless and desperate.
God touched me and said, you really want to be evil?
And I had a lot of really intense nightmares and just a feeling of being alone.
But this and that is going to happen.
You're going to go through a lot of pain to do it, but you're going to help trigger the great awakening.
Piles of manipulative, lying crap!
To cowards!
Excuse me.
What do we do about the people that hear the name Alex Jones and then just think, oh, you know, Sandy Hook.
I can't imagine it's very easy to be you.
I didn't say that the name Sandy Hook for over two years before I was sued.
Do you feel that you arm your detractors by your mystical conjecture?
Or is that something you're deliberately doing in spite of the fact that it obviously enables people to attack you?
They were all obsessed with mysticism.
They were all obsessed with the occult, the CIA, MI6.
But this is why the CIA and the Justice Department used me as the first domino.
We're gonna get Assange and Jones.
Once we get them, all the other dominoes will fall.
That was six months before I got deplatformed five years ago.
What are we gonna do?
There is so much power that can be asserted through legacy media.
There is so much power of censorship.
There is such a strong will to shut down dissent.
You see it because we have nothing to hide.
Move your angle, relax your perspective, pull back, open your mind.
I wonder if you've ever been concerned that you are mentally ill.
It's a brilliant... It's a brilliant conversation.
It's happening tomorrow.
You're gonna love it.
He's a good dog, he's eight.
Alex, listen, why are you doing this to us?
Why are you causing these problems on our show?
This is about free speech.
It's not about free barking.
We only like free speech that we agree with.
Be a good boy.
Why are you like this?
Alex Jones.
Tomorrow.
Also, if you become an Awakened One, some of you are saying you need a monthly option for financial reasons.
Listen, we'll have to work out a version of this.
If it's difficult for you financially, we'll work out a deal.
We'll work out a deal.
It's more important that we have you in our community than we have your money.
Yeah, that's right.
Why are you suppressing Bear?
You're right, Mama Bear 2501.
He must not be oppressed.
Let's let him talk freely.
Listen, we're going to do an extra 10 minutes over in Locals.
Press the red button.
There's a red button on your screen.
Join us over there.
Become a member of our community.
Become a supporter like Olive Greensky, Josh27, Fay2050.
Muscle man!
Then, tomorrow, join us for round one of Alex Jones.
It's beautiful.
It's intense.
It's insane.
It's deep.
It's just like you, really.
It's a beautiful opportunity to awaken.
To see that there are new worlds waiting to be born from our imagination.
All things that are manifest are once in the unmanifest.
Become a firewalker with me.
Do not let them control you.
Do not let them limit, control and prohibit you.
I'm going.
He doesn't need the bathroom.
The dog does not need the bathroom.
He just wants treats.
He's getting out of control.
Listen, I love you.
I'll see you in a second over on Locals.
▲
Export Selection