Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 21, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:13:43

Jordan Peterson CALLS OUT TRUMP! Plus Moderna’s Multi-million dollar payout! - Stay Free #194

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Brian's sister was the real...
	Quiet down, suicidal asshole.
	In this video...
	In this video, you're going to see the future.
	Hello there, you awakening wonders.
	It would be impossible for me to love you any more than I do right now.
	You are the very vision of perfection, if you ask me.
	We're going to be talking about Trump ignoring the Republican debates.
	He's going to talk to Tucker instead, and we've got some exclusive news about Rumble.
	But first of all, let's have a look at that moment where Trump got so hot and sweaty on the telly that he knew Let's have a look at Trump.
	Tell me first, is he sweating profusely and does he correctly predict what the mainstream media's reaction will be?
	right now. We will be exclusively on Rumble in just 15 minutes because we're going to
	speak so freely about Moderna and all manner of other matters. Guys, go full screen on
	this because we've got a little audio issue in the studio that we need to resolve with
	you. Let's have a look at Trump. Tell me first, is he sweating profusely and does he correctly
	predict what the mainstream media's reaction will be? Let's go with this clip.
	And by the way, I want to say officially for the press, it's about 110 degrees in this
	room.
	Nice job with the air conditioning, whoever.
	But you know what the press will say?
	You know what they'll say?
	Trump didn't look well.
	He was extremely wet.
	It's 104 or 5 degrees in this room, but we're okay with it, right?
	There's the prediction.
	We've got some fantastic guests coming up on the show today.
	Faz Shakir.
	You might not know about Faz Shakir because you've not been paying attention to the mainstream.
	He was one of the people that advised Bernie Sanders in his 2020 campaign.
	Now, what I want to ask him about is, will the Democrat Party respond to the obvious interest in populist outsiders?
	And would you describe RFK as a populist outsider, my on-screen assistant and friend, Gareth Roy?
	Yeah, I would.
	He's also head of More Perfect Union, i.e.
	very pro-union, so it'll be very interesting to hear what he's got to say about Joe Biden.
	You will never find, I'll tell you this now, you will never find a more pro-union president than Joe Biden.
	That's not my words, that's Joe Biden's own words.
	Tell that to rail workers.
	I will.
	Get one.
	Get one in here.
	If they can get to work on time.
	Get me a rail worker in here and I'll tell them.
	Well, they're not allowed to because they don't have any sick days.
	That's a shame.
	But you've got to be healthy if you're driving a train.
	I'll tell you this.
	This is why I backed Biden.
	That's why I backed Biden in 2024.
	You do not want someone wheezing, coughing, driving a bloody train.
	You're going to love this story a little bit later as well.
	Joe Biden, do you know about all of his aliases?
	Do you know about, did you know about all of this?
	I did, yeah.
	He's got so many, I know you know because actually it was you that told me.
	He's got so many aliases, this guy.
	Do you want to know them?
	Hold on, I think I've memorised them.
	There's J.R.B.
	Peters.
	J.R.B.
	where?
	J.R.B.
	where?
	That's beware, because guess when he was using these aliases?
	When he was talking to his son about certain little energy dealings.
	Am I allowed to say this on YouTube?
	I think so.
	So when he was dealing with his son's energy business interest, business energy interest with Ukraine and China, where Trump said, as a matter of fact, on a live debate, your family's been paid millions, Joe Biden said that's absolutely not true.
	Do we even have that footage today?
	Are we going to cover that today?
	We certainly do.
	We do.
	Well, first of all, there's so much to tell you.
	Can you see I'm excited?
	I mean, we haven't even gotten to Jordan Peterson.
	I am.
	I am sweating like Trump.
	But I'll tell you what, one of the reasons he's probably sweating is he's sweating because he doesn't want to debate the other primary candidates.
	And do you even care about that?
	Because Trump ain't debating his primary candidates like Vivek Ramaswamy, guest on the show.
	Ron DeSantis, guest on the show.
	Joe Biden, he won't debate his bloody other candidates, will he?
	Like RFK, guest on the show.
	Are you seeing a theme developing?
	In short, if you want to run Merricky, You better come on this show, innit?
	That's the only way you can be sure of doing it.
	JP, Jordan Pearson, says that Trump should be debating.
	We asked you what you thought.
	Here is his tweet, or X, or whatever you have to call it now.
	There's no excuse for this.
	Biden's doing it.
	Trump's doing it.
	Cowardly.
	Face the people.
	And then Trump's going to talk to Tucker.
	That's definitely going to get more eyeballs, eye sockets, skull holes, irises, jelly balls.
	That'll do.
	Because in a minute I'll start saying weird stuff, won't I?
	Like body porridge.
	Right.
	Yeah, not that.
	No one needs to hear that.
	That doesn't make sense.
	Not out of the world.
	Oh?
	Come on.
	Can it?
	So, we've got a lot to talk about because I tell you what, the mainstream media has taken one hell of a beating.
	Even the presidential primary debates are going to be held not on CNN.
	Not even on Foxy Lady News.
	Oh, they are on Fox as well.
	Also Fox.
	But also though, and perhaps more significantly, and I'm going to undo my zip, a couple of inches for this one.
	Oh my word.
	Rumble, but you won't be seeing those guys again.
	Don't pull to the wide!
	I see you pull to the wide.
	These guys, these are the money makers!
	Dempster money makers!
	How do you think we got this deal?
	We got a Because itchy and scratchy!
	He's prostituted himself!
	I went up there, all over Canada and Florida, to get Ernest and Honest Bob off Chris Pavlovsky and the guys over there at Rumble HQ.
	And you're not grateful, are you?
	Not one bit.
	How about you just say thank you?
	He had to do that in every meeting!
	To Vivek and De Santis!
	This one, this is my rapping boobie.
	I'm like a head trip to listen to, cos I'm only lactating when I need to.
	And then this one, a bit more statesmanly, but, you know, it doesn't seem to be going well in the old post.
	Like a member of the royal family, that one, isn't it?
	A lovely droopy old soppy old royal silly old... Taking the state money for very little.
	So you can watch the presidential primary debates will be streamed on Rumble this Wednesday at 9pm.
	Shall we do a watch-along, Gail?
	We've sit like eating popcorn now.
	Yeah, like it's the footy.
	Like it's the football itself.
	Yeah, a little watch-along.
	Surely your fans of football is nice.
	One of the best podcasts.
	Remember, you can listen to this as audio.
	That means you can carry on with your dirty, stinking business.
	Presumably you've all got deals with Burisma.
	You could all be doing your jobs for Burisma while simultaneously watching this show or listening to it down your ear holes.
	Okay, let's have a look at whether or not, now we saw Trump predict that he would be condemned for perspiring that way and sure enough he was.
	This is MSNBC talking about Trump's bodily functions.
	There's new reporting this morning on a secret memo.
	You think he's well?
	No.
	I mean I'm sweating, I'm just saying I'm sweating that much.
	Do you think he's...
	In a million different ways, I don't think he's well.
	You think he's unhealthy?
	I mean, Marco Rubio didn't sweat that much.
	Correct.
	Ron DeSantis doesn't sweat that much.
	Anyhow.
	That was a lot of sweat.
	Don't talk about the amounts of people swear.
	I suppose when Trump continually preempts and predicts things that will happen on the mainstream, or is able to declare publicly that Hunter Biden's business dealings are shady, or at least lead to millions of dollars in revenue, they've not been proven to be shady yet.
	Perhaps because the person that's investigating them is Pal of Moderna.
	David Weiss.
	Let's have a look.
	That's true.
	That's what David Weiss was doing before he was investigating.
	Let's call it investigating Hunter Biden.
	He was exculpating Moderna.
	Now some people, we had a little vote.
	Should Trump be made to debate?
	38% of you said he should be made to.
	How would you do that though?
	19% said don't make him.
	And 42% of you, you mad giddy nihilists, say it doesn't matter anyway.
	You wild children of the Lord.
	Hey, if you're watching this on Rumble right now, why don't you press the red button and join us over on Locals?
	It's a fantastic place to watch.
	There's a beautiful community in there like Blessed Old Bird and Jim Earth.
	We're C137 chatting away.
	Purple Revolution says, I deeply respect Jordan Peterson on many things, but he does not seem
	to be able to wrap his mind around the 100 year moment we're in with Trump the destroyer.
	What do you think?
	Why don't you get involved in that conversation?
	And I would suggest in a loving way, because free speech is being attacked, curtailed and
	closed down in myriad new ways, whether it's the WHO's rules there over YouTube, their
	community guidelines will be expanded to include all medical matters.
	And if you're one of our 6.5 million awakening wonders over there, in order to maintain for
	free speech, after just a few more minutes, we're going to slink off into rumble, the
	shadowy world where free speech flourishes, where it grows abundantly, like them hanging
	gardens of Babylon, baby, tumbling down honeysuckles of truth.
	When you have a look at this bit of, let's call it broadcasting from CNN, it sort of elides almost effortlessly into what we, me and Gareth here think is insidious hypnotism.
	They start reporting on Trump being right about Hunter's business dealings in the 2020 presidential debates with Biden.
	Look at this.
	Now look, if you were trying to indict Donald Trump right now, This would be some very unhelpful footage because you see on camera it looks to me like Donald Trump telling the truth and Joe Biden lying.
	Look at how the mainstream media cover this.
	It's fascinating.
	Glenn Kessler from the Washington Post had a fact check about Joe Biden from earlier this month noting that Hunter Biden admitted in court in July That he was in fact paid substantial sums from Chinese companies.
	Kessler wrote Hunter Biden reported nearly $2.4 million in income in 2017 and $2.2 million in income in 2018, most of which came from Chinese or Ukrainian interests.
	And this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump.
	Take a listen.
	My son has not made money in terms of this thing about, uh, what are you talking about, China.
	None of that is true.
	He made a fortune in Ukraine, in China, in Moscow, and various other places.
	That is simply not true.
	How good is it?
	Simply not true is the claim made by Biden, and yet it is true.
	It's interesting to see how CNN mitigate this, but what do you say, mate?
	Yeah, no, obviously we've got nine seconds left for this.
	There's a longer clip that we'll probably need to get to, to fully make your point.
	Really?
	Let's get the full clip, guys.
	How did that transition take place?
	You get on there.
	Young Putin is the one.
	Show gallery cam.
	Not clam.
	Jesus, that's disgusting.
	Show gallery cam, because Young Putin's in there.
	Young Putin, I want you to face the camera and apologize, because you are responsible.
	Also, future you should apologize for your needless invasion of Ukraine.
	That's the very least you can do.
	Although, let's face it, NATO did meddle in that 2014 coup.
	But we'll get to the bottom of that, as long as the YouTube guidelines don't prevent it from happening.
	Let's have a look at how CNN begin to tackle this, and sort of, in a sense, what do I want to say?
	Mitigate and provide contingency?
	Well, it's all using the phrase blind spot, isn't it?
	Oh, that's lovely, that stuff.
	Two different debates, but, I mean, Trump was right.
	I mean, he did make a fortune from China, and Joe Biden was wrong.
	Glenn Kessler from The Washington Post.
	Whoa, hello.
	Did you see that?
	We nearly stopped playing the titles again, which will be trouble on YouTube, because Tricky, the great British Bristol-born genius that wrote those lyrics and that entire song that's our theme tune, we're not allowed to play that on YouTube.
	No.
	Every time I hear it, I get a little bit angry.
	Well, it's medical misinformation.
	That is medical misinformation.
	A lot of things he says in there.
	He makes all sorts of claims about a particular three-syllable drug, four-syllable drug, that could fend off the Naughty famous cough with barely any effort.
	Hey, listen to this.
	So Joe Biden, one of the ways he's handling his peculiar business arrangements with his little lad is by having a multitude of pseudonyms.
	Now, I will say as a famous person, there are any number of reasons a person might have a pseudonym.
	You might use a pseudonym, for example, to mask your involvement in some illegal activity.
	That's it.
	There are no other reasons.
	That is the sole reason.
	VP Joe Biden used pseudonym Robert L. Peters in Emails to Hunter about Ukraine business, but that is not the only pseudonym he used.
	Some of the others are really stupid.
	Robert Peters, Robin Weir, and my favourite, J.R.B.
	Weir.
	It's me, J.R.B.
	Weir.
	You better give my kid a job.
	My name's not J.R.B.
	Weir.
	Your name's not JR Beware.
	I mean, he can't remember his own actual name!
	How's he remembering this string of aliases?
	He's got more aliases than Ethan Hunt!
	But it's a mission impossible for him just to remember which direction to walk off stage!
	Now that's a joke, baby, in anyone's language.
	How does he come up with that?
	It sounds like a building suppliers or something doesn't it?
	Do you need gas from Ukraine?
	You better believe we need gas from Ukraine than my boys the fella that provided.
	He knows how to work a pipe I'll tell you that now and for nothing.
	Listen we can't stay on YouTube with this kind of free speech can we?
	Surely not.
	Speaking freely in this manner, don't be daft.
	It's not possible.
	We've got to talk about Moderna making that $400 million payment to the NIH.
	We've got to talk about in our country, the UK, this fella, former British medical officer, who goes by the name of Jonathan Van Tam, whose name is too similar to both Jean-Claude Van Damme And Jonathan Van Ness, our Queer Eye, you've got to have a name that's a bit more unique and a bit less confusing.
	But old Van Tam, Chief Medical Officer, part of his job during the pandemic was recommending that we all take Moderna vaccines.
	Guess where he's gone to work now?
	By some extraordinary giddy little coincidence, he's gone to work at Moderna.
	Well, he also worked before he took on that role with the government.
	But the idea that that involves some sort of corruption or a revolving door would make you and everyone you love a conspiracy theorist.
	We're going to get into that story with a little more depth.
	If you're watching us on YouTube, remember, we've got Faz Shakir coming on, and I'm going to be asking Faz about how he feels about a Democrat party that shuts down populist and even popular candidates like Bernie Sanders.
	We know for a fact The Democrats would rather have lost to Trump than won with Bernie.
	They push legacy career politicians and it seems now that these career politicians, if you look around them, they've got all sorts of aliases, they've got dodgy funds, there's Russiagate scandals, not Russellgate scandals, that's one thing we can learn.
	Allegedly.
	Just gonna give that a little allegedly, baby.
	We're gonna leave you now.
	If you're watching on YouTube, click the link in the description.
	Join us over in the home of free speech.
	As mainstream media declines, we grow stronger.
	Join us there for the conversation.
	And if you're watching this on Rumble, why don't you press the red button?
	Enjoying these beautiful people in the Locals conversation.
	That's not all you get.
	As well as being part of a free-speaking community over there in Locals, you get podcasts, you get access to a special... I'm actually, even now, involved in the design of a pair of underpants that you will be sent.
	Certainly the first 1,500 people to join... that become Awakening Wonders will be sent.
	Pictures of your nipples?
	I can't offer that anymore, Gareth.
	That was alleged and adjudged to be inappropriate.
	There's a line, isn't there?
	And some people said it's disgusting.
	There's no line here except for the sweet line that runs between these guys.
	That's the last time you'll ever see them.
	So I hope you drink it in, guys.
	Drink it in.
	There's no more of that, let me tell you.
	So Moderna's paid the government $400 million.
	dollars. Should we have a look at that? Should we have a look
	at that hearing in Australia? One of the things you'll love if
	you're a global citizen is the easy casual way that Australia
	do government. Yes, of course, they're willing to pilot peculiar schemes. Like what were they piloting last week in
	Australia? World coin or something like that? Oh, yeah, they're shutting down people's currencies. Also, they sort
	of piloted some pretty shady internment camps during the
	pandemic period. Certainly a lot of our community said they were
	treated appallingly in Australia. Well, now those chicken to come home a root.
	There's an inquiry going on about Moderna's conduct at expenditure, and in particular, Moderna's liability, i.e.
	if Moderna's products, in particular the vaccine, caused injury, and there's significant reports that they did and do, did they put aside any money for liability to compensate the variously injured Australians affected by that product?
	Let's have a look at that hearing now.
	...needs your profits.
	Does Moderna plough back into helping people who are injured by the vaccine?
	Thank you.
	I was going to say, um... Watch this.
	This shows you how the system works.
	The answer to that is none.
	Now look how long it takes them to not get to none, right?
	The answer is, like, in a very Australian... Now listen, mate, I'm going to lean in and I'm going to ask you in a slightly woozy way, like we're at a barbecue.
	And we could be chatting about cricket.
	We could be chatting about Kylie.
	We just happened to be chatting about Moderna.
	Now, how much money did you put aside for vaccine injuries?
	The answer is, we didn't put any aside, because all of it's profits, and you remember, when we manufactured the vaccines, deals were done to grant us indemnity, so in the event that there were injuries, the government would be liable, and taxpayers would have paid for the development of those drugs, the purchase of those drugs, and now, out of court, presumably, settlements for the injuries caused by those drugs.
	That's the actual answer.
	Look how much prevarication and nonsense goes on.
	We're aware that there is sort of an indemnity for COVID-19 suppliers, but indemnities are a policy matter for government to decide.
	I can't comment.
	So Moderna doesn't put any of its profits back into helping the victims of injuries from the Moderna vaccine, is that correct?
	So Moderna is a company that's focused on manufacturing vaccines.
	Really good answer, isn't it?
	Oh, I know what you're asking me.
	When you said, did you put aside any money to help people that were damaged by vaccine injury, you must have meant, is Moderna a company?
	Moderna is a company.
	That's what that... Alright, well that clears that up then.
	That's just the whole of the world we live in, isn't it?
	A world where you know that people take jobs in government after working at Moderna, then get another job after being in government recommending Moderna products and going to work for Moderna again.
	You recognise all this.
	You know that the world's made up of hearings like this, where there's prevarication, obfuscation and avoidance instead of plain justice.
	So when you see someone like Donald Trump, and in particular Donald Trump, on your TV set saying, Hunter Biden was given millions of dollars by That is a lie!
	That is a lie!
	But don't take my word for it!
	Talk to my friend J.R.B.
	Buxtaville!
	He'll tell ya!
	I'll tell you now!
	Now that boy is a good kid!
	And it turns out that Trump, the one that's currently being indicted, was telling the
	truth.
	I'm not saying that Trump should be indicted, I know loads of you will be saying that, but
	guess who else should be indicted?
	Let us know in the locals chat right now, press that red button and let's watch out
	for a little bit more of this corporate doublespeak over there in Australia.
	The matter of indemnity for vaccine suppliers is a matter for government itself.
	So you're not prepared to underwrite the risk of your own vaccine?
	You're not prepared to actually put money where your mouth is when it comes to vaccines?
	Mayan drummer on the chat says, put another Pfizer on the barbie, mate.
	For the safety of your vaccine, is that correct?
	So just before you answer this question, Senator Rennick, I'll have to go to Senator Antic after this.
	He's on the committee with him, isn't he?
	And he's shutting him down.
	Or is he a lawyer for Moderna?
	He's doing sort of dual function.
	Mate, before you go any further, look, you're getting perilously close to revealing the truth of the degree of corruption that's been involved in this entire pandemic for Argo.
	So could we talk about something else?
	I mean, Oh, what's the point in this anyway?
	Should we just all go outside and enjoy ourselves?
	What's Australia founded on?
	Getting bloody chlamydia from koalas and having prisoners rise through the ranks to offices?
	No.
	No, I mean, what we know, you know, there's only a certain amount of politicians who will be asking questions like this.
	We've got the same situation in America.
	Rand Paul is one of very few politicians who are actually asking questions to vaccine manufacturers.
	Bernie Sanders asking about the kind of financial side.
	Rand Paul asking about side effects and things like that.
	He's like this, isn't he?
	He's like that.
	That's what Bernie Sanders is like.
	I'm going to do that for Faz Shakir.
	We've got one of Bernie Sanders' advisors coming on.
	We're going to say, why has the Democrat Party become so sort of largely defunct?
	How are they ever going to serve unions when they clearly only operate according to the whims and will of their corporate sponsors?
	And we used to have a sponsor, not sponsor, an MP over in this country.
	He mentioned vaccines.
	I just said, you can't have a job no more, didn't they?
	Or was he called Marcus Brigstocke?
	Uh, yeah, that's a comedian.
	Someone like that.
	Andrew Bridgehead.
	Brideshead Revisited.
	That's it.
	He was called Brideshead Revisited, and this kid had a bright future, but then he went out of line, and he mentioned vaccines, and do you know what he's doing now?
	Flipping pennies for blowjobs under a bridge, oh man!
	Andrew Bridgeton was his name, it's up on the screen now.
	Let's have a look at these Aussies mucking around with sweet lady justice.
	Just the last question there.
	Back to you.
	Just yes or no, you're not prepared to underwrite the safety of your own vaccine?
	We take safety of our vaccines very seriously.
	We have a very good pharmacovigilance process in place, in fact a comprehensive one.
	However, I would only reiterate that indemnities are a matter for policy makers.
	But what about a moral social conscience of putting some of your profits back in helping victims of the vaccine?
	What about your morals and stuff like that?
	Why don't you got no morals?
	What's wrong with you?
	Why don't you care about morals and stuff like that?
	Ain't you ever caught chlamydia off a koala before?
	How'd you even get it?
	What'd you do, drag them down from that eucalyptus tree?
	You know they're half-drunk.
	You know that their claws look like duffel coat buttons, don't they?
	Of Paddington Bear's coat.
	That's what their claws is like.
	You don't want one of them going crazy, gotcha?
	You're bloody lucky you only got chlamydia, mate, because they could slash off your gengangoo as soon as they look at you.
	And I say that as an investigative reporter.
	That's me now.
	That's the news!
	We're all done!
	Time to wrap it up!
	Time to wrap it up!
	Join us over on locals, you beautiful bastards, why don't ya?
	What are we going to talk about now?
	Mandy Cohen, CDC director.
	What's she saying lately?
	Yeah, we can talk about that.
	Have I told you lately to learn to love ya?
	Have I?
	Course I haven't.
	Or should we do some free speech?
	Because I love freedom of speech.
	And where freedom meets speech, you get free speech.
	And where free speech meets, you get freach.
	Yeah.
	Well done, everyone!
	Let's see what your free speech is about.
	HeyNavigator says, morals are for people, Moderna is a company.
	Yeah, using that psychopath analysis.
	Love it.
	NoDuggar... I always struggle to say his name.
	NoDugganoko.
	Can you hyphenate your name, mate, so I can read it easier?
	NoDugganoko says, I think it may be best if everyone just goes to DC one at a time and does a real insurrection.
	Whoa, baby!
	That's insurrectionist talk, wasn't it?
	No, Duggan, oh, co you free speech mean right into a corner there. You've salty little bastard
	Oh you dirty sod right? Let's have a look at these people's free speech
	I was remember when I had dr. Paul Saladino come on the show and he's telling us that we're mad to be vegans
	We're mad that we should just end any time a cow goes by Kick it up its tit hole and drag it down and bite a lump of
	it off That's basically what he said was near Paul Saladino kick
	its tits in and and go on there was exactly that All right, I admit I'm paraphrasing. I can't I've got time
	to do verbatim reports and everything Paul Saladino I says particularly when I think we're about to see a clip
	of him saying When you and I don't I get no pleasure from doing this when
	you shit yourself, you don't even need to wipe your bottom That's what he says.
	I don't think he meant shit yourself as in accidentally.
	You're out in the street, you've been out You're Australian, perhaps.
	You've been out on the booze, you've snogged a koala, you've ridden with chlamydia, you've shat yourself in your undies, mate.
	And you don't even have to wipe your own asspipe.
	That's what Saladino's saying.
	But why take my word for it?
	Here's that happening now.
	Come on, I'm gonna show you guys how I poop.
	So, obviously I sit here.
	but i actually i'd like to think you take your shorts off mate i mean like there's maybe you were right after all see he's just gonna do it i'd like maybe paul saladino just a little crystal orb comes out of his bum like an entirely transparent crystal orb comes out of his bum hole And yes and someone's commented in the gallery you should also generally lift the lid when you do shit otherwise it's gonna just smudge up under there and you'll get what you'll get is like a mask sort of like a papier-mâché mask of your own ball bag or labia but it would be like an imprint of them as if he was going to make a model of them
	It'd be a very different video though if Paul did actually take his trousers and pants off and I mean it would, you'd start to get uncomfortable pretty quickly.
	I wouldn't.
	I'd just watch it and watch that crystal orb come out of his bum hole and I bet he's got really lovely organs.
	I bet they're in real good nick.
	Of course they are.
	Look at that stance!
	Look at that, it starts like a buffalo stance.
	Spread those legs, doesn't it?
	Spread them up, get them shorts right tight around your legs.
	Don't use toilet paper, this is just for the guests.
	I have a bidet.
	Get away, what if a guest comes in, Paul?
	...on this toilet, because I learned that toilet paper, paper towels, all kinds of paper products that we use contain BPA and other xenoestrogens, and I don't want to rub my butt with that.
	No way, I don't want ecosestrians up my pipe, do you mate?
	God no, absolutely not.
	Not after the last time.
	Some of them are still up there.
	So I just use a bidet and I rinse... Bidet, mate.
	Sorry, I don't know why I said that, I was wrong.
	But like, the thing is, I thought he just left it.
	Now he washes it out.
	Come on, we've been mis-sold on this.
	I thought he just leaves his bumhole alone.
	It's just a bidet if I does that.
	We thought exactly.
	That's no big deal.
	Or he just washes it in a different way.
	Why's he all proud of this?
	He's not the new king of rock and roll, is he?
	He's not revitalised the music.
	No, I thought the point was that he doesn't require anything else.
	He doesn't require anything.
	I thought what we were... What we were sold, Gareth, is this guy... Basically, he's shit don't stink, weren't we?
	We were sold that this guy, what comes out of his butthole is so pristine, he doesn't even need to wipe it.
	Just a fully formed, perfect little...
	not even touch like he can relax his bumhole so open like that it just sort of drops out
	like as if he's doing a drug run like he's just been down to El Salvador
	picked up a key and then just drops it above the Louisiana swamps and then the hillbillies can pick
	it up there and distribute Paul Saladino's poop and nothing's hit the sides nothing's hit the sides
	you could eat your dinner off Paul Saladino's bumhole That's what we were promised, that you could sit down there and eat your dinner out of Paul Saladino's... And yet, is that the fact?
	It doesn't seem to be, does it?
	He's gotta wash all the shit off the edges with hose pipe!
	It's disgusting!
	He'll be out there for ages!
	Do you know what it's like after Paul Saladino's done a poo?
	It's like in Pulp Fiction, when they kill that lad by mistake.
	Marvin, I think he's called.
	They have to put blankets down his trousers.
	Oh God, it's worse than regular poos!
	Let's have a look at how he winds this up in 20 seconds.
	He's basically a pervert.
	But with that, I'm like, so that's how I poop.
	But be aware that paper towels, printer paper, toilet paper, tampon... It's printer paper!
	Or a tampon!
	I'm not using a tampon to wipe my... I'm not using a tampon to wipe my bottom!
	I thought you were not animals!
	What have you done to your anus that you have to put a tampon up there?
	Well...
	That's his business, isn't it?
	Of course it is!
	Let's not pry.
	Paul, you and your anus... You do you.
	You do you.
	You do what the hell you want up there.
	If you want to see that as a little party pipe, that's your lookout, isn't it?
	Absolutely.
	Who are we to judge anybody?
	A lot of these paper products contain BPA and other xenoestrogens that can be absorbed
	into your body and we don't need more of those.
	We have tons of xenoestrogens in our environment and I'm trying to limit that as much as possible
	to protect my hormonal health.
	Right, okay, fair enough.
	He doesn't, he doesn't, he uses that thing.
	That's fine.
	But I'd use that.
	It's a good idea.
	It comes out like everyone else's, is what we're saying.
	We better find, look.
	He doesn't use bills to wipe his arse with.
	Yeah, like, yeah, like, he's living, Paul Saladino's trying to turn a few quid out of living a regular life.
	When I clean my teeth, I don't use a toilet brush.
	I don't just drag plaque off my teeth with my fingernails like Cruella de Vil.
	I use a toothbrush!
	How's everyone doing that, Paul Saladino?
	You lunatic.
	Listen, we better provide some cartilage because I can't go straight to Fad Shakir, a serious political figure who's organizing unions, who brokered the deal between Christian Smalls and Joe Biden's government, who advises Bernie Sanders.
	I can't go straight from Paul Saladino's Butthole party straight to a serious political figure.
	Let's get RFK on now as you know, unless you've been living in a cave with Paul Saladino Like you will be aware that me and RFK are locked in a battle not only of wits But a battle of biceps and lats we're raising money in order to like for his campaign fund I'm supporting him and I'm gonna have a pull-up competition against him.
	He's trying to goad me He trash-talking me pretty bad.
	He trying to trash talk me.
	Let's have a look at his trash talking video.
	I want you to note that he's doing those pull-ups with his fingers.
	Like a mountain climber, like Alex Harnon or whatever he's called, that geezer that does free climbs up El Capitan without even trying his hardest.
	Yes, exactly like that.
	It's effortless.
	Effortlessly.
	Look, he's not even sweating, is he?
	No.
	Not like Paul Saladino or Trump, sweating themselves senseless, straining out poop after poop.
	He's completely relaxed.
	I took a break to practice my pull-ups.
	We're already at $50,000.
	I don't have to remind you we had a $100,000 deal here.
	If we raise $100,000, you and I are going mano a mano on the pull-up bar.
	I have already, to a degree, committed to help raise funds for your campaign, Bobby, through a pull-up challenge, which is seeming increasingly ill-advised.
	We're already at 50,000.
	Tell your followers to go to kennedy24.com slash pull-up.
	And when I'm president, we're going to finish building homes like this for every American.
	Well, that home's too close to the road, so I think I need to move that into a bit of a sidewalk, I would say.
	Jolly good windows.
	Yeah, come on.
	He's going to thrash me in that pull-up competition.
	If you've not donated yet, donate now.
	The link's in the description, guys.
	He's going to annihilate me.
	He's powerful.
	Is this him being more powerful?
	Is that Bobby Kennedy doing something else mental?
	Or is that someone else?
	Robert F. Kennedy.
	Santa Monica date night continued.
	Redemption on the rings.
	Just have a quick look at this there.
	What's going on there?
	Let's have a look at this.
	Have we got that footage or is it just a tweet?
	We don't have the actual footage.
	That's from Primal Collin.
	Oh, is it?
	Oh, it's Primal Collin.
	I was a member of our own community saying that they're going to back RFK rather than me.
	Disgusting.
	OK, listen, one of the things that's becoming plain is that the world is demanding alternative political candidates.
	And even though Bobby Kennedy comes from a legacy family, his rhetoric is anything but.
	Being aware of the Bernie Sanders campaign the last time and how it was, I would say, shut down by the Democrat Party establishment is, I would say, a serious obstacle to their ongoing electability.
	And even if they are elected, what does it mean for ordinary people who care about America?
	Seems to me that you get an institutionalized, donor-led political establishment that can't respond to the will of the very Americans that apparently elected it.
	We've got Faz Shakir on the line.
	He is the advisor to Bernie Sanders and head of non-profit More Perfect Union, an organization that champions workers' rights and their voices, which is obviously extremely important.
	Thanks for joining us, Faz.
	It's a pleasure to have you.
	All right, Russell, I'll try to match your energy.
	I'm not sure I can, but good to see you.
	I'm actually exhausted just from watching Bobby doing those fingertip pull-ups.
	What do you feel about the state of the party that I assume you align with?
	Of course, because of their attitude to unions, the way they reneged on their commitment during the East Palestine crisis, the way that Joe Biden publicly claims to be the friend of the unions, while in practice does very little to help ordinary working Americans.
	And more broadly how do you feel about a Democrat party that seems married to legacy politicians from the Clinton dynasty in particular and unwilling to respond to what seems to me to be a huge appetite for real change?
	How do you feel about that?
	Frustrated, but I'm involved in this effort to stay invested in the system, Russell.
	Like I'm here to try to make it better.
	Like if you get cynical and you get depressed and you just start to say, oh, everything's bullshit,
	we're done with this, it leaves you in a place of anarchy.
	And so we got two party system in America.
	Bernie Sanders ran in the Democratic Party to try to change what he saw as the best vessel
	to care about working people in America.
	You could debate them and argue with them that the Democratic Party is better than Republican one.
	I still believe that that is the case.
	That's why I'm invested in it.
	But yeah, you got to be realistic that is it what we want?
	No, but I'm invested in trying to make it better.
	I understand that, and I actually deeply respect it as a matter of fact.
	But Bernie, of course, was independent for the longest of times.
	Do you feel that what's happened to Bernie ever since he's become a member of the Democrat Party demonstrates the efficacy of bipartisan politics, or exactly the opposite?
	Russell, isn't that what happens anytime you get involved in trying to transact power?
	You make a decision that you have to engage in the institutions as they are, and they do by their nature.
	A lot of the status quo is corrupting of a kind.
	You have people who take Make money from big donors.
	You have people willing to cater to corporate lobbyists.
	And then here comes Bernie as an iconoclast saying, I don't give a shit about any of that stuff, but I got to work with these bastards who do.
	I got to work a way to transact a paid sick days or minimum wage increase or whatever it might be.
	I have to transact within a system.
	So I get that for anybody who wants to jump in and say, I got to play within the sandbox.
	It's dirty in here.
	It's messy in here.
	But you can't stay outside of it and assume you're going to get anything done.
	To my views, people have to get it into the sandbox and try to fix the damn thing.
	It's dirty in that sandbox. I'd check whether or not Paul Saladino's been in there
	practicing his extraordinary manner of defecating, which we've covered in extraordinary detail
	in this show. Whilst Bernie was willing to confront publicly Moderna on the basis of
	their profits, and I'd be fascinated to learn what his views are on this 400 million NIH
	payout, Bernie has been willing to vote alongside Joe Biden, broadly speaking.
	And in a sense, hasn't he been not just, I would say, sort of compromising with the Democrat Party, but entirely subsumed into his agenda?
	What good is Bernie able to do when he votes alongside Biden when it comes to funding this war in the manner that it has been?
	And where are you seeing meaningful change brought about by the compromises you're describing?
	That's the question right there.
	For all of your disagreements that you posit, has there been anything of value?
	Has there been any progress to be made for working people?
	And you say, okay, well, here's an administration that puts $2,000 checks into people's pockets in the midst of COVID.
	They negotiate drug prices on Medicare for the first time ever.
	They increase the corporate tax rate.
	They institute a stock buyback tax.
	They start to figure out, okay, we're going to stand with some working people and go to a picket line and send the Secretary of Labor there.
	We're going to stand with Amazon organizing workers.
	Some of those things, in my mind, are worth it.
	They are worth investing in that direction as opposed to a different one that says, I don't give a damn about any of that stuff.
	The whole system is for shit.
	And I think you do have generally a Republican Party that doesn't believe that we want to invest in government doing these kinds of things.
	I mean, if you take like Medicare price negotiation right now, you've got four drug makers and
	Chamber of Commerce and Pharma all filing lawsuits saying it's unconstitutional, you
	can't lower prescription drug prices.
	And you're like, okay, well, there's a choice there.
	Whose side are you on?
	And I'm very much on the side of, yeah, we're going to negotiate drug prices down.
	You mentioned Moderna, and Bernie Hall, the CEO of Moderna, into that committee hearing, said, you know, they jacked up the price of COVID vaccine by 400 percent, charged American taxpayers billions of dollars to create the vaccine, screwed basically public investments, said, we don't give a damn about you.
	The question this day and age is, are you willing to stand up to corporate power?
	That's the fundamental question.
	The role of government is to be a bulwark for people against profiteers.
	And if you don't serve in government to give a damn about standing up, you have to have that courage.
	You have to have some degree of spine.
	I think Bernie has it.
	I want more of those types of Bernies.
	Unfortunately, there aren't many of them.
	From our chat now Faz, Purple Revolution says Bernie Sanders is largely seen as a sellout these days and I think that's someone that would broadly speaking being a fan of 2016 Bernie.
	Miles Driver says anarchy has a bad rap.
	I think that's because of the sort of constant correlation of anarchy with disorder rather than a truly democratic and decentralized model.
	And PrideFault says the system must be changed.
	Why do you think prominent progressives, Faz, like AOC and Bernie, won't endorse Cornel
	West despite his obvious emphasis on progressive ideals, albeit while standing outside of that
	system?
	Well, Russell, you know the answer to that.
	I think for all of the concern that they have about a Democratic Party that they don't find is standing up against corporate power and standing up for workers enough, it's a better choice than one in which, you know, you have a two-party system, so the choice is dis-Democratic Party or Trump-led Republican Party.
	If a third party like Cornel West or anybody else enters the fold, In my view, and people can feel free to disagree with it, it just facilitates one or the other.
	And I think you've got, in that case, Trump having a very hardcore base of people who I don't think believe him.
	So then you're, I think, pulling votes from a Democratic Party and enabling Donald Trump.
	When you... I know loads of people in here just absolutely adore Donald Trump because they precisely believe that he is the anti-establishment voice and with every rolling indictment they just see that as a sort of a further medallion on his credentials as an anti-establishment figure and I feel like when a democrat party plainly operates at the end of a string pulled by a donor class when Joe Biden says to a room full of donors nothing's gonna fundamentally change if you elect me In a sense, they're right to opt for a Berserker candidate, whilst I strongly believe what's required is systemic change, and I don't think there's anyone in the political landscape except, you know, I love RFK, I love Cornel West, I was, you know, inspired by Bernie in 2016, and I recognise, Faz, that you know a lot more about this stuff than I do, but what's required
	is a kind of marriage between the radicalism of independent media and political spaces like this
	one and meaningful change within the system. Now one area, Faz, where you are plainly committed
	based on that unions for all banner or t-shirt that's in frame is rights for workers. How do
	you advocate for unionism and unions to our audience here?
	Can you tell us about some of the successes?
	We had Christian Smalls on the show.
	He did very well as a guest and it's an inspiring story.
	Someone who was an Amazon worker starting a union and having this kind of success that he did against Amazon and their malpractices.
	What else can we do?
	What else should we do to support the union movement?
	See, you know, this time massive income inequality, the only way in which people get their fair share of workers, they have to organize in solidarity and fight for it.
	And we've got class warfare in this damn country.
	It has been the rich class dominating and controlling a working class.
	And unfortunately, the elites have driven the working class to a place where the only way in which you can get anything is with a damn fight.
	And so unionization in this country, although it could be more amicable and peaceful, I wish it were, that you could have peaceful labor-management relations.
	Right now, we've gotten the middle finger from most corporate CEOs towards the working class, the working class saying, hey, take a look at UPS workers, right?
	They just say, we have to threaten to strike.
	United Auto Workers right now, they're right in the midst of a contract, they're threatening to strike.
	Hollywood workers right now, actors, writers, all On strike because they know.
	We all felt it during the pandemic.
	You saw rich getting richer.
	You felt contempt towards working people, contempt towards essential work, contempt, dishonor, disrespected for the fact that you were putting yourself out there.
	And now the only way in which you can do anything to improve your lot in life is take matters into your own hands.
	Don't rely on politicians.
	Say, hey, in this damn Starbucks here, in this damn Staten Island warehouse here, in this Apple warehouse, we are going to Talk to our colleagues and demand more.
	Demand better, demand respect.
	And thankfully, in this last two years, we've seen a rise of that.
	You get Trader Joe's, you have, as I mentioned, Apple and Starbucks, Amazon.
	But they're not getting first contracts because the domination of the corporate sphere is unbelievable.
	It's not only of the economy, it's of the political class.
	So there is not a fight, and people just don't talk about these damn things.
	You know, the whole purpose of a union and worker solidarity, Russell is like, What is the purpose of life?
	Is life just to generate profit or is it to have a sense of meaning and accomplishment, to feel respected, to feel like I do something purposeful and then I get paid for it?
	And we've lost that thread in civic society.
	Yeah, we really have.
	And I agree with you that decentralized and democratic models and control over workspaces and a life of meaning that goes way beyond what you have to do just to survive in the face of a nihilistic and increasingly amoral cultural environment is an important part of that.
	If you're watching us on Rumble right now, give us a rumble!
	But for God's sake, subscribe to our channel!
	Join us over on Locals and you can ask whatever questions you want And I'll do my best to get through as many as I can.
	What do you think, Faz, about the alleged corruption between Hunter and Joe Biden when it comes to his business dealings with Burisma?
	What do you think about the way the Democrat establishment kept those things off of social media?
	And how can we restore any faith when there's, you know, in particular, just relating to this story?
	What do you think is going on?
	And how can we support a president that won't even debate progressive candidates, truly progressive candidates like RFK?
	Russell, it's not complicated what's going on.
	You got a guy who made tens of millions of dollars in Hunter Biden off of the fact that his last name is Biden.
	And it's like, this kind of, the scandal is that the corruption is always there.
	A rich class, an elite class, a well-connected class, their sons, their daughters, take, you know, the Bush family sons, the, you know, you take the, you know, obviously the Trump family son, Jared Kushner's got a $2 billion deal with the Society of Royal Prince.
	This kind of access to capital, to money, is always there for people who are in the well-connected, connected political elite class.
	That's what should be angering to everybody that they don't have an access to this
	and people are taking advantage of them.
	So it's obviously Hunter Biden is just one case, Jared Kushner is another, there's a lot of them.
	And so like to my mind, this is where maybe you and I disagree,
	is that Joe Biden's own ethics, I think are better than his son's.
	I think when he was in Congress from 73 to 2008, right?
	Never traded a stock in that whole period of time.
	Think of how rich he could have gotten off of trading Lockheed or owning Amazon.
	Never traded stock.
	Why?
	Because he's like, no, my service is to be for the public and I can't, I won't be compromised by owning stocks and making money off of that.
	So you end up becoming one of the poorer senators.
	But his values are not reflected in the way Hunter goes about his, And so, you know, it's a travesty, but I also think there's a little bit of a both sides-erism there, Russell, to be honest with you.
	It's like, you know, is Hunter making tens of millions of dollars as bad as, you know, X, Y, and Z?
	And you see these kinds of like apples and apples types of comparisons that don't really line up, but it's bad, right?
	It's a corrupt damn system.
	Baz, I really admire your determination to do something positive within the system, and I strongly support the work you're doing to get workers to organise and unionise and take power back into their own hands, because I agree with you, the establishment elites aren't going to do anything about it.
	I obviously don't agree with you about Joe Biden, you know, because I just, I've been sort of blown away by the level of corruption that I've witnessed, but I completely obviously respect your perspective.
	Can we still disagree?
	I mean, I appreciate everything you just said, Russ.
	They won't come on our channels.
	And so, you know, by the association, we just end up drifting more into libertarian spaces.
	And it starts to seem like the democratic establishment doesn't want to talk to ordinary working Americans.
	That's what it starts to feel like, you know?
	So put a word in for us, if you will.
	Can we still disagree?
	I mean, I appreciate everything you just said, Russ.
	The way you framed it and the way I firmly believe.
	If you said something, talking about somebody's bumhole or whatever, and that might not be my cup of tea, I'm saying, I can respect disagreement.
	Who gives a damn?
	We're in a civil society.
	If you're going to live with real people out in the world, they're going to have different viewpoints.
	And my view has always been persuasion.
	There's somebody with whom you disagree.
	Talk to them, and maybe share the way in which you think, and respectfully say, hey, maybe we just disagree about this.
	You go on your merry way, you go on mine.
	But I bet you and I can find areas of common agreement a lot of the times, and then reserve, OK, well, we disagree on this.
	That's fine.
	We can continue to have a decent debate.
	But I think that is being lost in these alternative channels like yourself.
	We're trying to do it.
	Can we just have honest disagreement?
	That's fine.
	Bullshit, like, rancorous, partisan disagreements that are nonsense, but just, like, honestly, having an honest conversation is so hard to have now.
	I agree with you, Faz, on so much, and thank you very much for taking the time, unlike many people that are part of the establishment that you are, you know, whilst being critical of, you are being optimistic about.
	I respect that very much, and I appreciate you coming on, and you can support Faz's work by going to perfectunion.us, particularly if you, you know, like, remember what he said about every Starbucks, every Staten Island warehouse?
	Those things, I think, are Very important.
	And, you know, like he said, we should be able to disagree with one another.
	What's the alternative?
	Siloed, federalist, autocratic, well, no, autonomous communities.
	Also, as has been pointed out by the gallery, Faz did say bumhole to his credit.
	That's not even an American phrase, is it?
	Like, you would say butthole.
	It also seems like that was the thing that he most disagreed with you about.
	Look, I love some of the stuff you're seeing there.
	I can disagree when you say things about bumholes.
	I think Paul Saladino is doing a good job trying to shit clean.
	Paul Saladino has simply managed Discovered B-Days.
	That's all there is to it.
	We have got some fantastic content coming up for you this week.
	I'm almost... I can't even bring myself to say this.
	I've got to say it in Australian.
	On Tuesday, we've got Alison... I'm just doing normal.
	We've got Alison Young coming on.
	She's an expert on lab leaks.
	Why is that relevant?
	You'll find out if you watch her on Tuesday.
	Critical Drinker's on!
	And I'm going to say, what the hell is going on on Rotten Tomatoes?
	And who owns Rotten Tomatoes?
	And what is the success of Sound of Freedom?
	And should we make a movie together?
	Me and Gareth as a couple of cops who might see the world different, but by God, we get the job done with a little help from my friends, y'all.
	And also on Friday, Dr... Bumholes.
	It's a new movie.
	Bumholes.
	Faz Shakir, will you join us in our new project, Bumholes?
	Oh, no, really, Russell, I think I want to stay within the establishment and help Brony to try and get these positives.
	No, no, Faz.
	Bumholes.
	That wasn't the question, Faz.
	Faz, stop trying to obfuscate.
	We want a clear... Bumholes!
	Bumholes!
	And Dr. John Campbell's coming on.
	What?
	Oh, it's nothing to do with bumholes.
	Yeah, no, he's not.
	Dr. John Campbell's not coming on Bumholes.
	No, no.
	What kind of show you're trying to get us to make here, Gavin?
	I'm trying my hardest to create a revolutionary movement.
	I misunderstood, sorry.
	An independent media space where we can create new glorious alliances, where free speech can flourish.
	Look at this on January the 6th.
	This is from Becky from Bemidji.
	Russell and Gareth are hitting the nail on the head as usual.
	January the 6th and the ensuing propaganda is part of the Deep State's ongoing campaign to exert ever more authoritarian control.
	True that, baby!
	And this is just the interview for Faz Shakir.
	I've already done that and it went exceptionally... Bumholes!
	Bumholes to everybody!
	Remember, if you click that little red button, not the bumhole, and join our locals community...
	You get all of this!
	Early access to interviews like Dr. John Campbell.
	Wouldn't you like to be sidling up to Dr. John tomorrow?
	You get live guided meditations.
	Maybe you're, uh, it could be to do your bum or could be an entirely different matter.
	I'll guide you through meditations.
	And also you join our behind the scenes meetings.
	You can get stuck in, tell us what to ask.
	Tell us what to do.
	Have you been curious, Gareth, about those, you don't know what to say yet.
	Bio weapons, isn't it?
	Actually it was that, yeah.
	Are you curious, Gareth and everyone else, about bio weapons being developed in Ukraine?
	Are you curious to see yet another conspiracy theory migrate from the periphery right to the center?
	Because guess what?
	There are biolabs in Ukraine.
	RFK, he didn't tell me so, but by God did he tell Tucker.
	We've had both those people on this show.
	This show is becoming... I'd say this is very much in danger of becoming a cultural hub.
	I'm glad it followed Ultral Hub.
	Yeah, what did you think I was going to say?
	Cult.
	Ural hub. It's becoming a cult. Who knows? Why don't we start our own independent communities?
	What's wrong with that? You're meant to be my anti-cult campaign manager, aren't you?
	You're meant to say, not a cult. Not a cult. If it were a cult, you'd get regular access to them babies, I tell you
	that!
	Here's the news. No, here's the effing news!
	No, here's the fucking news!
	Fire weapons!
	Was Ukraine some kind of silicone valley for bioweapons?
	And what's the connection between gain-of-function research and bioweapons?
	RFK's got some interesting things to say.
	Today we're talking about Tucker Carlson's conversation with RFK in which RFK spoke about the biolabs in Ukraine.
	Now remember at the beginning of the Ukraine-Russia conflict in conspiracy land lots of people saying there's bioweapons over there, there's biolabs, people are making bioweapons and that was one of those things that got sort of shut down.
	Then it started to be incrementally built upon in a slightly more diplomatic way like what about that That Victoria Nuland, she's worked for successive administrations and she was involved in the 2014 events in Ukraine that led to that change of government, don't call it a coup.
	So we're starting to see more and more, I believe, the intersection of giddy wild conspiracy theories and then sort of rather more mundane bureaucratic manipulation and frankly what amounts to American foreign policy.
	Using various sites across the world to create either pharmaceutical opportunity, let's call it, or bioweapons.
	And is there an intersection between gain-of-function research and bioweapons?
	In short, is gain-of-function research essentially about creating bioweapons?
	As I understand gain-of-function research is by taking something that goes an horrible nasty little virus.
	I go, yeah, there's a little virus.
	You know what I think?
	Go on.
	It's not bad enough.
	Let's make it worse.
	Let's have a look at Tucker Carlson and RFK's conversation and get into this in depth.
	The factor means there are US biolabs in Ukraine.
	Why would we have biolabs in Ukraine?
	We have bio labs in Ukraine because we're developing bioweapons.
	And those bio-weapons are using all kinds of new synthetic biology and CRISPR technology and genetic engineering techniques that were not available to previous generations.
	And they can make frightening, frightening stuff.
	A top line consideration is whether or not you want bioweapons being developed.
	Are we not already in a precipitous state when it comes to global warfare?
	Don't we already have enough nuclear weapons to annihilate the planet many times over?
	Have we not recently seen the dangers of meddling in nature's domain?
	If you believe the Wuhan lab leak theory, for example, which hasn't been proven yet but seems increasingly likely, Is probably in some way or another funded by your tax dollars, bioweapons.
	I don't know how else they're functioning.
	I don't know if they're doing fun runs or sort of car washes to raise money for these bioweapons.
	Presumably it's coming from American taxpayers at some point.
	When do we get to ask fundamental questions about how we want our civilization to be run?
	We just accept the fact that we're subject to the whims of global corporatism.
	That's what much of the frustration and tension is, I believe, that's not even articulately expressed.
	When you're dismissive of, like, MAGA people in their caps or people protesting for a whole host of reasons in the streets of the United States, there's a sense that things aren't right, things ain't fair, these institutions don't care about us, they're not listening, I'm angry.
	And just because you can't say what it is really is global corporations have taken over our democratic institutions, spend money abroad on things I don't care about and might actually be detrimental not only to my life but the life of the planet itself and I'm sick of it.
	Why don't I ever get to vote for it?
	How come I'm paying $700 towards relief for the Hawaii fires and yet $900 per annum so far on funding the Ukraine war?
	How much of that goes to biolab technology?
	Why did they lie about it in the first place?
	So many questions.
	You know what they'll say publicly?
	These biolabs, they're not dangerous, there's nothing to worry about.
	Why don't you want the Russians getting your hands on them then?
	Well, the Russians, you can't trust those guys.
	If in those biolabs all they're doing is racing mice through a maze, why are they so worried about the Russians getting in?
	Do you know what the Russians getting in there?
	What if they meddle with my most favourite mouses?
	They can't simultaneously be doing innocuous and innocent mouse experiments in those biolabs and be really worried that the Russians are going to get in there, can they?
	When the Patriot Act reopened the bioweapons arms race in 2001, the Pentagon began putting a lot of money into bioweapons, but they were nervous at that time.
	Because if you violate Geneva, the Geneva Convention, it's a hanging offense.
	And they weren't sure that that Provision in the Patriot Act would actually hold up as a loophole to treaties that had been ratified by Congress.
	So they were nervous about actually going full force into bioweapons development.
	So they transferred the authority for biosecurity to one agency in the HHS, called the National Institute for Infectious and Allergic Diseases, run by Anthony Fauci.
	So Anthony Fauci got all the responsibility for bioweapons development.
	He got at that time a 68% raise from the Pentagon in order to do that work.
	When you hear a story like that you realize there's more to political corruption within American governmental institutions than just Donald Trump saying that he won an election that other people say he didn't win.
	It seems there's more complexity to it because you don't I really want someone who's in charge of a medical and health organization, taking huge funds, getting huge pay rises, involved in gain-of-function research, involved in things that might be bioweapons that take their funding from confusing agencies, that have relationships with big pharma.
	That's not the kind of clarity that we could have in our institutions, and I would argue should have.
	This is a health organization, so what do they do?
	Well, they're solely focused on the well-being, welfare, and good health of American people.
	Also on the side, they're making terrifying weapons.
	That's not how you want it run.
	And do you notice that the Patriot Act was almost like the COVID of its age?
	There was a massive crisis and emergency in the form of the 9-11 attacks, and it was utilized to introduce a raft of regulation that meant that we could be surveilled, that meant that we could be censored, that meant we could be observed, that meant that people could be arrested for espionage under what increasingly looked like questionable circumstances.
	And also, somehow, they went we're going to start a bunch of biolabs.
	Is it likely, let me know in the comments in the chat below, that the Covid pandemic was
	used in a similar way to introduce regulations, legislations and ideas that previously people would have
	rejected out of hand as being an infringement on our civil rights. When there's an emergency
	or a crisis it's used to create opportunities and the Patriot Act, you know, which pertains
	to an event 22 years ago now, is still being utilised to respond to what? Saddam Hussein
	still might have weapons of mass destruction?
	every bioweapon needs a vaccine.
	So you develop them side by side.
	Because in 100% of the cases, when you deploy a bioweapon, there's blowback.
	Your side also gets sick.
	So in order to deploy one offensively, you need a vaccine to counter it.
	So you need to vaccinate your team before you deploy it.
	Is this one of those moments where we could step back as a species and say, are we heading in the right direction?
	We've got laboratories where one part of the laboratory goes, we're going to invent the most lethal, deadly, awful weapons to destroy the lives of innocent people abroad who we temporarily at this time don't agree with.
	You guys over there, come up with a vaccine for that because it's inevitable, 100% likely in fact, that we're all going to get sick from this crazy thing.
	Who's funding this?
	You are!
	We spray her with the hose, leaving us relatively dry.
	Relatively?
	Well, there's bound to be some splashback.
	Those two things are developed through a field of science called gain-of-function science, where you take an infectious microbe, and you amplify its infectivity.
	Or you make it jump species, so it may kill monkeys, now you make it kill humans.
	And you adopt it that way, and there's all kinds of methods, and then you make it immune When I hear that explained, it's like if someone explained the concept of the monarchy to me now.
	Like, you know, what we're going to do is we're going to get a microbe that's deadly, that's killing monkeys.
	Yes, and cure those monkeys, right?
	Because we all love monkeys.
	No, we're going to make it worse.
	Oh, poor monkeys.
	I've not finished yet.
	I make it infectious to the mouse and our children.
	Yes, us and our children.
	Don't worry, there's some guys over there working on a vaccine.
	How's it going, guys?
	It's going expensive!
	If someone said, should we have kings and queens that we fund, I'd go, no, don't bother.
	Don't bother.
	It's a waste of money.
	Should we have a review around how we're organizing society?
	No.
	Let's keep it as it is.
	Maybe we can have it a bit different, but not much.
	For 2,800 years since Hippocrates, doctors have been trying to figure out how to make microbes less infectious and less deadly and develop antibiotics and therapeutics to do that.
	Well, the guys who are involved in this, there's 36,000.
	What are called life scientists, but they're actually death scientists, um, who are now employed full-time in developing, you know, microbes that will, can be used to kill people.
	How was work today?
	Quite good.
	What did you do?
	You know deadly viruses?
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Well, I made them much worse.
	Night-night!
	Did you wash your hands?
	No need.
	We've developed a vaccine.
	You can have it for free.
	I bought one home.
	But everyone else...
	Let's have a look at this in more detail.
	The US military outsourced some of its biological weapons research to the government installed
	by the 2014 coup in Kiev, Democrat presidential hopeful Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has said in
	an interview.
	Isn't it ridiculous that we can't go, no, they would never do-
	The American government?
	Create biolabs in an unstable territory adjacent to a historic enemy?
	You can't rule it out, can you, as a possibility?
	This will probably get called conspiracy theory, fake news.
	It certainly did a few years ago, or at the beginning of the pandemic era, and the beginning of the war, and all this constant rolling, never-ending crisis that will seem to be snowballing into one another now, like gain-of-function research.
	It's like, get a news story, make it a bit worse, here's your new news story!
	According to Kennedy, the bioweapons program has operated under the guise of life sciences research, such as gain-of-function experiments on viruses and other pathogens, ultimately overseen by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who headed the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases between 1984 and 2022.
	At the beginning of this, he gave so many public speeches and appearances that were sort of conciliatory and consoling, like he was just sort of Uncle Anthony Fauci.
	How are we gonna handle this?
	How are we gonna handle this?
	Well, you know, wash your hands, keep distance, wear your mask.
	If you need to go out, you can go out.
	Like, you know, it's all very sort of kind of friendly and avuncular.
	It's demonstrable that this is someone who's involved in gain-of-function research, serious and heavy payments.
	Dr. Fauci!
	You're not the kind of shaved Santa Claus that we represent.
	People were dancing around singing songs about him.
	We think he was on talk shows as a sort of celebrity.
	It's ridiculous.
	This is what happens when you have massive, centralised, authoritarian, globalist, corporatist systems that never ask people, the very people that are funding it, whether what they're doing is what those people want.
	And that applies to this ongoing war between Ukraine and Russia, research of this nature, the response to the pandemic, institutions like the WHO and NATO.
	You might not want them, but you're funding them.
	I think we should have political parties that are going, listen, do you want this stuff?
	Because some of it seems very corrupt.
	Because I don't know anyone who's like, I love paying taxes!
	At best, you're like, I pay my taxes because it's the law.
	And I hope on some level it's helping people, like kids or hospitals or something.
	You work all day.
	You don't even get an invoice, do you?
	You don't even get a breakdown of... So what did you spend it on, guys?
	Let's have a look.
	Bio what?
	You're racing mice through mazes in Kiev.
	When some of these bugs escaped from laboratories in the US back in 2014, the Obama administration banned gain-of-function research, Kennedy added, so Fauci outsourced it overseas.
	Well, that can't lead to any problems unless there's a war and it leaks out of the labs because they're not properly looked after.
	Hopefully, all that information isn't somehow being lost.
	2019, we've had.
	A lot of them went to Ukraine, Kennedy told Carson.
	I don't really want to hear Ukraine connected to anything other than there's this war there where Russia criminally invaded them and there's a humanitarian effort to support the people of Ukraine.
	Who's not down with that?
	We're all down with that, right?
	But then you sort of hear, oh god, another thing about Ukraine you should know, the president's son's got all sorts of really favourable deals with their energy company.
	Oh, another thing.
	The American government have got a bunch of biolabs over there.
	I mean, like, what's next about Ukraine are we going to learn?
	A lot of them went to Ukraine, Kennedy told Carlson, while some of the researchers moved to Wuhan, China Laboratory, the suspected origination point for the COVID-19 pandemic.
	Like, these are the sort of places that are on the news a lot, aren't they?
	Like Wuhan, Ukraine.
	What's the first thing you think of Ukraine?
	Uh, there's this war there where American taxpayers are funding it.
	Good.
	What's the first thing about Wuhan?
	Well, I've only really heard of Wuhan.
	Terrible wet markets.
	Do be careful in those wet markets.
	You could pick up something disgusting.
	But at a price that's right!
	Most of the research was funded by the Pentagon.
	That's weird, isn't it?
	Or by USAID, which Kennedy described as a CIA cutout.
	That's extraordinary.
	So the deep state fund secondary agencies to subcontract out to opaque, obscure Endeavors that are difficult to understand and inventory.
	Certainly it's not the kind of transparency and clarity that Joe Biden was promising when he marched gleefully into office, is it?
	The US has long dismissed claims about the biological research laboratories in Ukraine as Russian propaganda, until senior State Department official Victoria Newland confirmed their existence at a 2022 Senate hearing.
	The Pentagon continues to insist the research is neither illegal nor intended for military purposes.
	Okay, so it's just, we're just doing some research in Ukraine.
	Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?
	Ukraine has biological research facilities, which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to Isn't it odd what malevolence looks like these days?
	Just a nice friendly looking woman in a cardigan talking about biolabs in Ukraine and the concern that Russia might get hold of it while nervously fiddling with her pen.
	In this also is the modern assumption that there's nothing wrong with biolabs when America's in control of them, but if Russia's in control of them, suddenly they're bad.
	Either cluster bombs and biolabs are bad, or they're not.
	And we have to recognise that this is the kind of nihilism and lack of principles that's leading to the general dystopic feelings of a society falling apart that many of us are experiencing even beyond the confines of this mad conflict.
	If there's nothing to worry about in those biolabs, why is it a problem if Russia gets there?
	So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach.
	What you're being asked to believe is that there's some fundamental difference between American research and Russian conduct.
	Like the Americans Come on, guys, let's just create some new medicines to help everybody.
	Let's make this virus a bit worse, then make a vaccine so we can just help people.
	Wait a minute!
	We could use this to create a superweapon!
	It's not like it had an...
	Innocent purpose and then Russia is the agent of change and malevolence is plainly a pretty secretive and Malfeasance endeavor that takes place on foreign soil because under the Obama administration it was decreed to be too dangerous to do in America So they as part of their deal presumably of supporting the 2014 coup that Victoria Newlands was by coincidence involved with They're able to continue doing at least gain-of-function research, which, according to RFK, is synonymous with creating weapons.
	And in a way, if gain-of-function means you take a biological substance and you give it the ability to cross species, or you make it more infectious and bad and just hope to God that those guys in Wuhan are washing their hands and keeping the windows shut, that is a type of weapon.
	It's certainly irresponsible.
	Where I like to invite you to come with me is brawl down and go, do you want this even happening?
	Can't we be doing something else?
	I find it offensive.
	Nuland's bizarre admission that Ukraine has biological research facilities that are dangerous enough to warrant concern that they could fall into Russian hands ironically constituted more decisive evidence of the existence of such programs in Ukraine than what was offered in 2002 and 2003 to corroborate US allegations about Saddam's chemical and biological programs in Iraq.
	Wow, that's more evidence than the world went to war on 20 years ago.
	That's a good way of putting it.
	Any attempt to claim that Ukraine's biological facilities are just benign and standard medical labs is negated by Newland's explicitly grave concern that Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of those facilities and that the US government therefore is right this minute working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces.
	What we're being invited to believe is with an entirely innocent enterprise, but actually though,
	the Russians, they'd be able to put this in that jar and switch that on and turn on
	the Bunsen burner and knock over the mouse's cage and oh no, they've got a missile.
	That's what we're being invited to believe.
	And there's no doubt that a bad person or a bad set of people could use almost anything
	to create chaos, but what I'm arguing is that the bad people are already doing that and
	you're funding it.
	The only reason to be quite concerned about these biological research facilities falling
	into Russian hands is if they contain sophisticated materials that Russian scientists have not
	yet developed on their own and which could be used for nefarious purposes, i.e. either
	either advanced biological weapons or dual-use research that has the potential to be weaponized.
	You see how we're all having to develop this new vocabulary and get this new education?
	When I first heard dual-use research, it was reading RFK's book, and at that point it was like, oh god, this is a bit out there, isn't it?
	Even though it's obviously really thoroughly researched and actually quite dense, it's not a frivolous piece of writing, it's just some of the concepts and ideas in there are so out there, you think, that can't be true.
	And then you just, a few weeks later, you read it in the news or you see a congressional hearing and you go, we're a bit I'm worried about some of the stuff in the labs we might have left over there if that fell into the wrong hands.
	I guess what I'm saying is now my starting point is they're probably up to some malevolent shit and they're probably gonna lie about it.
	We probably have to break down all of these agencies and have a real overview of what it means to be America or the United Kingdom or whatever your country is.
	Is this what you want?
	Who is it now we're supposed to be scared of?
	Who's scarier than these lunatics that are there doing gain-of-function research and dual research and creating these labs and then having to admit oh sorry we were involved in 2014 and oh yes we did have bio labs?
	The only way you could trust them is if on day one of the war Joe Biden had gone listen this is a bit mental actually because like Ukraine and Russia you can see there's an escalating tension there and Well I think, morally, we should support Ukraine because they're decent people and Russia are the aggressor in this instance.
	I've got to be honest though, we provoked them in 2014, we reneged on a deal we had not to infringe on former Soviet Union territories, we've got biolabs in Ukraine we're going to have to be double careful of, and one of my kids has got a cracking job at Burisma.
	He didn't say that, did he?
	So now that it's all coming out I think, you fucking liars!
	What is in those Ukrainian biological labs that makes them so worrisome and dangerous?
	And did the US assistance extend to construction and development to the biological research facilities themselves?
	All we're doing over there is making L'Oreal lipsticks for little mice.
	And those labs are just mice and rabbits smothered in lipstick.
	But if the Russians get hold of those sexy mice and rabbits, there's no telling what they'll do.
	The indisputable reality is that despite long-standing international conventions banning development of biological weapons, all large powerful countries conduct research that At the very least, has the capacity to be converted into biological weapons.
	The work conducted under the guise of defensive research can, and sometimes is, easily converted into the banned weapons themselves.
	Recall that according to the FBI, the 2001 Amfrax attacks that terrorized the nation came from a U.S.
	Army research scientist, Dr. Bruce Evans, working at the U.S.
	Army's infectious disease research lab in Fort Detrick, Maryland.
	The claim was that the army was merely conducting defensive research to find vaccines and other protections against weaponised anthrax, but to do so, the army had to create highly weaponised anthrax strains, which Ivins then unleashed as a weapon.
	The lesson about the severe dangers of so-called dual-use research into biological weapons was relearned over the last two years as a result of the Covid pandemic.
	While the origins of that virus have not yet been proven with this positive evidence, Though remember, fact checkers declared early on it was definitively established that it came from species jumping and that any suggestion of a lab leak was a conspiracy theory.
	What is certain is that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was manipulating various coronavirus strains to make them more contagious and lethal.
	The justification was that doing so is necessary to study how vaccines could be developed.
	But regardless of intent, cultivating dangerous biological strains has the capacity to kill huge numbers of people.
	All of this illustrates that research that is classified as defensive can easily be converted, deliberately or otherwise, into extremely destructive biological weapons.
	Does any of this remind you of another story?
	Are there some names that keep recurring?
	Let's go a little deeper into this.
	Senator Rand Paul has referred Dr. Anthony Fauci to the Justice Department for investigation into possible criminal prosecution for allegedly lying under oath to Congress about his knowledge of gain-of-function research conducted at China's Wuhan virus lab.
	So there you have it.
	Two of the most preeminent, dominant news stories of recent times appear to have peculiar and confusing elements.
	No wonder there's a march to censor and control independent media and the ability to communicate and discuss all facets of complicated stories like these, when continually we see stories that are first dismissed as conspiracy theories down the line become more and more demonstrably True, or at least worthy of consideration.
	As Glenn Greenwald demonstrated there, the story of the Wuhan lab leak went from being something that was simply dismissed to something that seems increasingly plausible.
	As with Tucker's conversation with RFK.
	Biolabs was once the preserve of nutjobs like you and me, sat in our tinfoil hats wondering about why the world seems so unfair and how certain disasters appear to benefit certain interests while annihilating life for ordinary people.
	But don't these laboratories give you the perfect metaphor Irresponsible, for-profit research that advances the interests of the military-industrial complex that, if it fell into the wrong hands, could be devastating for the world.
	Isn't that the very kind of unchecked power that we need to stop through new democratic processes, through a new manifesto of politics, through new changes, through new politicians, I hope like RFK, that would bring these practices to an end right now.
	They're costly.
	They're dangerous.
	They should stop.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the chat.
	Until next time, if you can, stay free.
	That is why I'm recommending GenuCell skincare.
	We need sponsors like GenuCell skincare.
	It's hard for us to get sponsors because we're radical and we're anti-corporate and all that stuff.
	Now these guys at GenuCell want you to look and feel your best.
	You're going to look young and gorgeous.
	That's why they've introduced their three-step dark spot luxury system that works in just three minutes.
	Have you got three minutes?
	Stay there.
	If you're bothered by dark spots on your face or liver spots, On your hideous hands, neck and chest.
	Then this is the way to watch them disappear.
	Safely and quickly.
	Just before this video, I was just one enormous liver spot.
	I've smothered myself in Genucel.
	I've drunk down a pint of the stuff.
	I've never looked more beautiful.
	Their luxury system contains a dark spot corrector.
	Correct, it's those dark spots!
	Some fancy sounding microdermabrasion and collagen builder thrown in for good measure.
	That's why I look so cool.
	And if you're not blown away by the results, you get your money back, you might go, hold on a minute, I'm still as hideous as I was yesterday morning.
	So, go to Genucel.com forward slash brand to order their new dark spot treatment system today and say goodbye to those pesky, stinking, wretched spots tomorrow and As a special bonus, all three products are included in GenuCell's most popular package for August.
	So you'll get their Bags and Puffiness Serum, also included.
	All for 70% off the retail price.

▲