All Episodes
Previous Next
May 1, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:00:03
WAIT…BIDEN, CIA & EPSTEIN | This REVEALS Everything! - #119 - Stay Free With Russell Brand
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It's a good thing I brought my phone today. I'm gonna be late.
I just got here.
I'm so sorry.
I'll call you later.
Ok, bye.
Bye.
I'm so sorry.
I'll call you later.
Ok, bye.
Bye.
I'm so sorry.
I'll call you later.
Ok, bye.
Bye.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
You're awakening.
You're wonderful.
You are an awakening wonder.
Welcome to Stay Free with Russell Brand.
It's another week.
We've got a lot of things to discuss with you.
Over the course of the show, there will be great vicissitudes and undulations in energy.
At some points, I'm going to seem incredibly calm and focused and mature.
At others, erratic, fast, fizzing, effervescent.
I'm starting off quite mature, Gal.
No, this is a nice, relaxed tone.
Very in control, I would say.
Thank you very much.
Very easy entry into the week's news.
We're going to look at some hypocrisy, in particular the hypocrisy of the Democrat party when it comes to claims around rigged elections.
If you're watching this on YouTube now, by the way, After about 10-15 minutes we will disappear into the annals, I said annals, of Rumble where we can speak more freely.
We're not there to discuss conspiracy theories, well a little bit, and we're certainly not there to do anything other than bring people together and to speak freely against the establishment.
We've got such an exciting week this week.
We're going to be learning more about Robert F Kennedy and why the mainstream media en masse are attacking him as an anti-vaxxer.
You're going to love it.
We've got a great guest on, Ryan Grim.
He's going to be telling us about Well, we're going to be talking a little bit about the White House Correspondents Dinner, which Ryan Grim, who has the nerve to call himself a journalist, was chucked out of last year for brawling.
And I think one man said the back of his hand was scratched.
Another fellow said he received, and this is a direct quote, a Chinese burn.
And I'm not even sure that you can say that anymore.
I don't think so.
It's probably not the sort of thing that people should say.
We're going to start by looking at the White House Correspondents Dinner.
Why I like the White House Correspondents Dinner is because it's a living embodiment of the corruption and collusion that exists between the state and the mainstream media.
Joe Biden, your president, had the out-and-out nerve to quote Jefferson and Jefferson's views on the media.
This is absolutely fantastic.
Watch this.
If you're not watching us on Locals, by the way, join us on Locals because we do extra content on here and we can see your questions.
Blessed El Bird, for example, saying rug burn or American burn.
Yeah, that's right.
Like the you know suggestions of script alts actually is what's coming through there now, but let's look at Joe Biden Do you think Joe Biden's even got the right to cite Jefferson one of the founding fathers?
We interact with our audience whilst the White House Correspondents, what they do is they just bleach out your There you go.
Consciousness we like we're listening to you. What do you think guys? We care about you. We love you
No, like old Fox News is expressing opinion You're out the door not like MSNBC where they're just
trying to turn you into a drone and not an NPC without a view
To see not a chance to be free Let's have a look at this where Joe Biden has the audacity
to cite Jefferson look at it serious. No Jill Kamala Doug and I and members of our administration
Are here to send a message of the country and quite frankly to the world
time.
I'm not pausing, I'm just showing you that this don't work no more.
The free press is a pillar, maybe the pillar of a free society, not the enemy.
Thomas Jefferson wrote Of course they're cheering that, because they are the press.
You know, they've just had like four years of Trump saying, you know, fake news, fake news.
They're essentially applauding themselves.
I put it to you, whether you're watching this on YouTube or Rumble, where we'll do the whole show unexpurgated, that this is a sort of an onanistic circle jerk, a media masturbatory circle of self-congratulation, where everyone is drenched, not in news, but in...
Ugly sputum.
Nice, I'm glad you said that.
I wondered where you were going there.
I was always, as I often am, heading towards... Sputum.
Just the word sputum.
The word sputum is never far from my lips.
Note that I said the word sputum.
I know.
Simply a linguistic sign.
So like, you can't say that, but this isn't even the best bit of the clip.
This isn't even the best bit.
By the way, other things we could be talking about in the news this week.
We could be talking about US corporations cashing in on Ukraine's oil and gas.
What a surprise.
Who would have imagined that?
US corporations cashing in on... But don't worry about the free press that's holding power to account, to complete Jefferson's quote before dear old Doddery Joe does.
Let's see the rest of Joe.
You all know this quote.
Thomas Jefferson wrote, we're left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government.
I should not hesitate to prefer the latter.
Right, so he's saying that a free media is more important than the government.
How many of you agree with that?
But how many do you think that we have a free media?
Right now, there are stories that we can't discuss on YouTube, which is a media platform that's regulated in a variety of ways.
When we come off, we're going to be talking about an Epstein story that's going to... I'm not going to use my usual metaphor, like knock your knickers down, because it doesn't seem appropriate with regard to that particular story.
But we're going to be talking about Epstein's calendar.
And it's not a calendar where Epstein's posing like February's a fireman with a kitten.
March, he's got a little apron on and he's whipping up a cake with a bit of batter up his face.
All batter spattered up his noggin.
You've done the fireman, have you?
Yeah, I started with fireman.
Now I'm going through the film Calendar Girls with my head.
And then maybe a football calendar is probably next in mind.
I said well since I've had a calendar but like apparently Epstein had meetings in with some people that are quite surprising and we'd like you know we don't know if those meetings took place and we certainly can't discuss it on YouTube.
No.
We can't discuss Epstein's calendar on YouTube can we?
You can barely say his name on YouTube to be honest.
What if it was the one that's the Beatles manager?
Oh, let's go with that one then.
Was it that one?
It's not that one.
He was a lovely man.
The way he got those boys to come together as a band, he took them to the top of most, the top of the pops, as they used to say amongst themselves in happier times.
So listen to this bit as well, back to Joe Biden's White House circle.
Can I finish it?
You know what I mean.
Have a look at this.
Have a look at this bit.
Look at the question.
In your mind, prepare right now for the question that this begs.
Journalism is not a crime.
Evan and Austin should have written... Woah!
Woah!
Woah!
Journalism is not a crime?
Guess what this is the anniversary of?
Julian Assange, journalist, is still in Belmarsh, since the 50 weeks by British court on May the 1st, 2019.
Wait a minute, what's the...
What's the date now?
Is this 2023?
That's more than 50 weeks.
Yeah.
Right.
I see what you mean.
Well, he's waiting potential extradition, isn't he, for trial in the US.
So his dad is 50 weeks.
He's still banged up in there.
Journalism is not a crime, says Biden.
Journalism is not a crime.
Listen to the end of it.
Immediately, along with every other American held hostage or wrongfully detained abroad, He's quite excited now.
I know that he's scrotum tightened during that bit.
I can tell from his face that he sort of went... He saw his snout.
He's pushing the snout forward.
He's going up into the paddock.
Every journalist abroad.
Like, what about dear old Edward Snowden?
What about Julian Assange?
What about Chelsea Manning?
Now I know Chelsea Manning isn't a journalist.
Edward Snowden's not a journalist.
They're both whistleblowers.
But Julian Assange is a journalist.
The hypocrisy is outlandish and outrageous.
Do we care about the Chi Chi thing?
You know about that by now, right?
You've all seen that.
Yeah, everyone's seen that.
You've seen that.
We don't need to see that.
Do you know what the White House dinner, the point of the White House dinner is?
Well it's about freedom of speech essentially it's about the relationship with government and the press and free or so-called freedom of speech but on whose terms is this freedom of speech?
Because if that freedom of speech was the type to which Jefferson was referring Assange will be out.
That's what he's referring to.
He's talking about the type of journalists that want to challenge power, not the type of journalists that essentially promulgate and propagate the messages of the state, who themselves, in my view, are just the managerial class of a globalist corporate cartel.
Yeah.
That's not what Jefferson wanted, is it?
No.
So he said journalism is not a crime.
What about publishing?
But publishing is a crime then.
If you're Julian Assange, publishing is a crime.
You mustn't publish.
No.
And Jefferson was clear on that.
You can journal.
Journal?
That's fine.
What are you doing?
Journaling.
What are you going to do after that?
Nothing.
Don't you publish, you son of a gun.
We'll have you.
The White House correspondents didn't, because we wondered what it was.
I was confused.
It's an event held by the White House Correspondents Association to celebrate journalism and freedom of speech.
The event gathers journalists, politicians and celebrities to put their differences aside while raising money for journalism scholarship.
Why don't you just go to Bill Gates and get your journalism scholarship from him and do your reporting in alignment with his views?
You can't have real journalism, because real journalism, I feel like, is Barry Weiss, who's coming on the show later this week, Matt Taibbi, been on the show, coming on the show again, Schellenberger, and might I even venture, little old us, I think so, trying our best to keep you informed about stories that we believe matter, like the candidacy of Robert F. Kennedy, who indeed, if you notice, the two emergent smears of our time are your right wing, or your far far far far far far far far
far far far right wing, or you're an anti-vaxxer. Two terms that have almost had to
be created to smear people.
Now RFK, because he is running for the leadership of the Democrat party, or the presidential
candidacy for the Democrat party, I don't think they can use far right without making the whole
Democrat party sound bad, can they? No, probably not. They're going to have to go anti-vaxxer,
and by god have they. Good job they've got that though, isn't it? Got anti-vaxxer though,
We've got something.
We're not going to be able to do it far right, but what about that?
What's your attitude towards vaccines?
Well, under certain conditions, I would take them.
Under certain other conditions, I would... Whoa there!
No, you don't on Alphabet!
No, you don't on Google!
No, you don't on Oodtube!
That's why you have to join us on Rumble, when we'll be talking not only about issues like that, but also Epstein.
Epstein's calendar girls.
Not necessarily calendar girls.
It was a variety of genders.
It was.
Mainly very important men.
Oh, what the hell's drawing all these important men?
Taiwan now has real-time intelligence sharing links with Five Eyes.
So that means Five Eyes, which are the anglophonic countries and their various secret service agencies that I believe were part of the exposures of Snowden, actually.
And we learned about that, the extent of like, well like, because America ain't meant to spy on Americans.
Britain ain't meant to spy on British.
Australia ain't meant to spy on Australians.
Yeah, but what if we spy on yours?
Yeah, keep talking.
And we were to spy on yours?
Oh, I like your stuff.
That's fantastic.
So, it's like, I would call it deep state wife swap.
It's deep state wife swap.
You do mine, I do yours.
Isn't it?
Isn't it though?
That's why Epstein's always involved.
Because there's always saucy swinging.
Saucy swinging in the deep state, baby.
I spy with my little eye, says the unicorn plug, and I'm not even going to ask what that name's supposed to mean.
I didn't.
You mustn't.
Not on YouTube.
I can see you're tromping at the winkle to make a point.
Obviously, like, we're talking about the hypocrisies of that, you know, White House correspondence.
It is hypocritical.
So obviously all the things we've spoken about loads of times, but when they're talking about freedom of speech, freedom of the press, we've had the Twitterphile revelations recently.
We know about that.
Even when the press do get it right, as with Hunter Biden, laptop story, that was when that was actually censored by the government.
So that's even when the press are doing their jobs and reporting something that's true, that then gets censored.
You've got the warrantless surveillance that we're talking about, which Five Eyes actually fits into.
Protest laws, which are on the rise massively in the United States.
So when it's all talking about freedom of speech, it's whose freedom of speech is this?
It's certainly not the public's freedom of speech.
When they want to protest against things, they're going to get shot down in that respect.
Silence is on the rise.
You sound like this is actually all starting to get on your nerves.
It is a little bit, Ross.
They've actually gotten to the point where they're getting on Gareth's nerves.
So that's something that I don't like to hear.
This is what I did get on my nerves, actually.
So in the coverage of the Correspondents' Dinner, no mainstream production made any mention of Assange or the contradiction between Biden's declaration fidelity to the First Amendment and the continued drive of his administration to extradite and jail Assange.
That's what the collusion, I suppose, is about.
A kind of consensus to double down and reiterate the framing.
These are the stories we talk about.
These are the ideas that we support.
We don't talk about Assange.
That's what the collusion I suppose is about, a kind of consensus to double down and reiterate the framing.
These are the stories we talk about, these are the ideas that we support.
We don't talk about Assange, we don't question surveillance, we don't talk about how the mainstream media, in particular
TV networks, could generate the majority of their revenue by bundling
together your data and selling it to other companies even more than porn sites
do.
Isn't that astonishing?
They don't talk about surveillance.
In a way, it's a bit like the WEF.
How the WEF operates is by PR-ing for globalist interests and making sure that the agenda stays within an acceptable framework that will never challenge the interests of the powerful.
We've got to do something about the environment, but we're never going to meaningfully change what powerful organisations do.
We've got to do something about pandemics, but we're never going to say, for example, start exercising all the time or eat healthy.
That's not the kind of thing that's going to be on the agenda.
The White House Press Correspondents Dinner is essentially a coming together, as many circular, onanistic ceremonies are, Yeah.
Nice.
Thank you.
To establish what's discussed and what's not discussed.
And actually that recent story about Biden's cheat notes shows that.
It shows that they discussed the questions in advance.
At least Donald Trump wouldn't go to it because there's bad That means it's just rhetoric.
him in the media. Would you not prefer a degree of animosity between the state and those that
are supposed to hold them to account? Wouldn't that be necessary? Particularly when you know,
you know for a fact, whoever you are and whatever you believe in politically, that prior to
the 2020 campaign, Biden told the donors of the Democrat Party nothing will fundamentally
change. That means it's just rhetoric. Who do they work for?
Is it you?
So let us know in the chat what your concerns are, and let us know why you think these stories are continually repressed.
What would it cost to have a free media?
Because the possibility for a free media plainly exists.
The journalists are out there now.
The Twitter files shows that.
The outbreak of new organizations such as Rumble, I have to say, and even YouTube at its best with like organizations like breaking points and Jimmy Dore and obviously the kind of stuff that Joe Rogan talks about and even Organizations that are left of center like what are we like we like redacted and even people that are Like don't don't like me like what's that one called minority report majority report?
They're all out there being independent voices.
But what I would say is if you find yourself parroting the views of the establishment,
that's a problem.
They seem to think it's a greater problem if you find yourself attacking the establishment
alongside people that they define as right wing.
But I don't think that's as big of a problem.
Take the Tucker Carlson story.
You can see that Tucker Carlson does have concerns about demographics.
And me, that's not what I'm about.
I'm about the ordinary people from all cultures, all backgrounds, all identities should find new alliances
and ways of loving one another in order that we may confront establishment power.
Put aside your differences.
Allow people to express themselves freely, whether that's traditionally or progressively.
These are just simple terms that I use to try to avoid getting mired in this stuff.
What I don't think we should be doing is finding ourselves on the same side as the Defense Department and the Pentagon and massive corporations.
If you're doing their dirty work for them, you ain't on the right side.
You can't be.
When did being anti-war become right-wing?
How does freedom of speech and supporting Assange become right-wing?
It doesn't make sense.
No.
When the Department of Defense Celebrating the fact that Tucker Carlson's gone vocally, letting it be known that they're pleased that he's gone, whether the Pentagon are pleased that Tucker Carlson's gone, is obviously because he was doing something that they didn't like.
And are there any other voices as big as his at the time saying those things?
There weren't.
Let us know if you can think of any voices.
In the mainstream media, who?
Is there anyone at CNN, MSNBC, that's willing to come out and be anti-war?
The war discourse is being limited, so where's your free press there?
A White House Correspondents' Dinner worth having would go.
Even though we're greatly at odds when it comes to the funding of this war and the continual flow of American taxpayer dollars into Ukraine, Who do deserve to be supported from a humanitarian perspective, of course, but a diplomatic solution ought be sought.
That's not even being discussed, is it?
No, I mean, you couldn't get a better example recently of the kind of collusion, literal kind of physical collusion between the state and the press in that Jack Teixeira or He's called Buddy Boy Texera.
Buddy Boy Texera the whistleblower.
Go on.
Well the New York Times, as we've kind of spoken about before, they like got 12 of their best journalists together to like uncover his name and reveal it before like setting the FBI to go and actually arrest him.
The New York Times are actually involved in the investigation.
No one with Buddy Boy Texera, the recent Pentagon papers whistleblower, no one is correctly covering except organizations like Grayzone and we've got, who have we got on tomorrow?
Max, is it?
Yeah, Max Blumenthal.
He's coming on tomorrow.
None of them were talking about, oh it's a bit weird that this dude's saying that there are American troops in Ukraine even though we've been told again and again that there aren't.
It's a bit weird that privately the American government admit that there's no way that this can be won and that it's pointless and they're never going to get the territory back.
No one talked about that.
When they lined up to have that conference, like when they do those press conferences where Joe Biden's got the questions in advance, it's theatre.
Like the White House press conference is theatre.
This is what I want to talk to you about on an emotional level.
Nothing's real anymore.
We're not, we're engaged in a spectacle and I feel like I can feel I feel it on some level.
Even in my actual life, everything that you participate in, life has become like a theme park.
Politics has become a theme park.
When you hear authenticity in the voice of a narrator, or in the voice of a TV pundit, it chimes with us.
Even if you don't agree with what they're saying, at least you can agree with their authenticity.
Let me know in the chat, in the comments, whether you're on Rumble, or whether you're on Locals, and if you're not on Locals yet, join us there.
We do weekly meditations, and by God, you're going to need them.
This crazy, crazy world that we're living in.
I'm sure Glenn Greenwald, right-wing fascist Glenn Greenwald, would think the same thing.
I mean, obviously for him, going back to the revelations around Snowden, that they were partnering with, like, The Guardian, and then that spread to other publications.
Now, would there be a publication that would facilitate them in that way?
There wouldn't, would there?
What do you think?
Like, if Edward Snowden, what, came forward now and went, oh my god, I've got these revelations, the American government are spying on their citizens in ways that are unconstitutional and illegal, Do you think the New York Times would publish that?
Yeah.
Do you think that the Guardian would publish that?
No, they wouldn't, would they?
I don't think so.
Do you think so?
I mean, I feel like it would be down to us.
Yeah.
And that's a worrying trend.
What's going on?
The mad thing is that that is actually going on, this section 702, which sounds really boring because it's meant to sound boring.
It does sound boring, Gary.
You better Well it is about the warrantless surveillance of Americans so it's all done in that oh we're trying to stop terrorists but it's about collecting apparently more than 3 million backdoor searches which I knew you'd be interested in.
Gareth I've had personally over 3 million backdoor searches and I've passed Every single one of them.
Every single one of them.
Every one of them I emerge with flying colours.
Squeaky clean.
Another day, another back day or so.
I don't think I've ever flown into America without a backdoor surge.
No, no.
You've got quite used to them, haven't you?
I like it.
That on-go the blue gloves.
I'm grinning from ear to ear like that.
I'm like, OK, got the cream!
Mr Brand, we're going to need to take you to secondary immigration.
Mr Brand, come back!
Do your belt back up, Mr Brand!
Get out of there!
Mr Brand, you will have to leave now.
You've been here for hours.
You've not checked round the corner!
I could have all sorts of gubbins up there!
Do you know?
That's the sort of thing that people say, isn't it?
So in the news this week, this was a hearing last week, heads of federal intelligence agencies were not willing to reveal how much data they collect on US citizens.
Expert witnesses were also not able to say how many can conduct the unlawful and warrantless searches.
So it's like, not only do they not know how many searches are taking place, but how many people have access to these searches.
It's pretty worrying.
So it's a bit like that Pentagon audit.
They don't know how many searches, like with the Pentagon failing their audit, last five at least, these dudes don't know how much data they're collecting and they don't know how many people are accessing it.
This is your private data.
And what about this?
The WAF calls on leaders to make good use of mass data collection.
One of the recent proposals to come out of the World Economic Forum It's to develop ways to harvest and monetize satellite data, biological data, you saucy devils, and citizen generated data.
Penned by the MIT Media Lab, the proposal calls for putting all this spuriously collected in the first place data to good use now.
So there you go, that's the intersection between a globalist organization like the WF, a national organization such as Gareth just described, And even the Five Eyes set up, where now Taiwan are in league with international deep state agencies, presumably in order to spy on citizens, to develop narratives that will be beneficial to the cultivation of war.
Now, pretty soon we're going to head off of YouTube, if that's where you're watching us.
You'll find a link in the description where you can flip over onto Rumble, and we'll be talking a little bit about Epstein over there, plus we've got Ryan Grimm.
I call him Grimmy.
Nice.
Or Grimesy, like in that episode of The Simpsons.
Or Grimbo!
Like that.
And I'm going to be asking him about his White House correspondent dinner brawl.
Right.
Like where he scratched someone's eyes out and he kicked someone straight up in their nutbag.
I'm not sure he did that.
He told me privately that he gave someone a wallop in the perineum so they didn't sit down for a fortnight!
That's the British word for two weeks.
Do you want to see a little bit more of the White House thing?
Or do you want us to slink off of YouTube like a...
Excuse me, Joe!
Excuse me!
I miss that guy, don't you?
Saucy little devil.
Are you ready to go on to Epstein and talk about... No, are you ready to go on to Rumble and talk about Epstein?
Sure, okay, alright.
Or should we go on Epstein and talk about Rumble?
No, not that one.
Where did they bury him?
I don't know, let's go off to...
How?!
Why is there no security footage of the night he died?
Hmm...
What's going on in that there prison?
Well, we'll get into it as soon as we cross over.
You can't keep just doing um.
Can't I?
No.
Right, come in.
Let's see what's going on with Epstein.
I'm starting to feel sorry for him.
Epstein's private calendar reveals prominent names including CIA chief and Goldman's top lawyer.
That's a nice calendar.
You're meeting some top-notch fellas there, aren't you?
Yep, certainly are.
Who else was he meeting?
Let's have a look at some other people scheduled in.
William Burns, from the CIA.
Yeah, not just... this is the now Director of the CIA.
That's a pretty important position, now Director of the CIA.
It's a good job of the CIA, because they've got a lot of power.
For example, say Joe Biden needs 50 people to sign a petition saying that the Hunter Biden laptop stories are... There was some disinformation, yeah.
Then, you know, you probably have to organise that.
When you watch the film Gangs of New York, starring Daniel Day-Lewis, what you realise is that the sort of crucible out of which America, and indeed, presumably, all nations grew, is one of corruption and primal interest as expressed through individuals.
Like William Cutting, William the Butcher, played by Daniel Day-Lewis.
Hmm, oopsie-daisy!
I like Daniel Day-Lewis.
Do the milkshake one.
Well, that's a different film.
I know.
I drink your milk!
I like people that are in that sort of mood.
Don't you?
People that are intense like that.
But can you be around them?
No.
No.
On a personal level.
No you can't.
Someone's like, I drink your milkshake!
Mate, I'm actually getting a bit unnerved by you now.
I wonder, why did Epstein have so many friends? Was he charismatic as hell?
I mean, he looks nice, doesn't he?
Or do you think it's mostly because he could facilitate liaisons with extremely attractive women?
Uh...
Potentially non-consensual, potentially underage.
Ultimately it's power, isn't it, in whatever format.
Yeah, I mean, yeah.
What was his actual job though, Epstein?
Like, where's the money coming from?
a White House counsel under Barack Obama, had dozens of meetings with Epstein over the years
after a White House service before she became top lawyer at Goldman Sachs.
What was his actual job though, Epstein?
Like where's the money coming from?
Is it like he's also, what, has he got an ice cream van?
Yeah, that's right.
What's he doing?
What's his actual job?
Leon Botstein, president of Bard College, invited Epstein, who brought a group of young female g... hmmm... to the campus.
Noam Chomsky, right, we're going to give Chomsky a pass.
What was Chomsky doing?
Chomsky can't have been interested in any of that.
No.
To fly with Epstein to have dinner at Epstein's Manhattan Tower.
And that's not everyone's...
No, well look, Chomsky was teaching at MIT and Epstein was donating lots of money to MIT.
So, you know, that's the way the world works, isn't it?
Is you scratch my back, I scratch yours.
I don't want my back scratched!
I know, I know, I know.
If my back's itching, I'll do it myself.
Oh, is it because you can't reach bits of your own back?
Well, just be like Balu out of Jungle Book.
Go up against a tree.
Or rather than that, why don't we go and challenge Jeffrey Epstein's house?
You should tell Chomsky that next time you talk to him.
Chomsky, I've got an idea.
Next time you backstage it.
Yes, Russell.
Oh, Russell, it's actually not that practical to rub your back against a pineapple tree on a prickly pawpaw.
You know, if you look under the rocks and plants and still glance at those fancy ants and maybe try a few.
That's right, but they have bare necessities in life.
Chomsky, you're not making it any easier to listen to you by talking all the time like that as if what you're saying is not actually that interesting when you're revealing vital information.
Chomsky and Taka Taka Taka Can't You See are actually two of the only people that are willing to criticize the war.
So what is Chomsky then?
Is he anti-vax or right-wing?
Let us know in the chat because I can't know.
I don't know how to discredit Chomsky except for maybe that dinner.
But like, I mean, I'm hoping, where did he go?
He went What was it for?
It was because there was funding, that Epstein was giving funding to MIT.
So where's Epstein getting all this funding?
We need to talk to that woman again.
I guess he was just like a businessman, wasn't he?
Who's that lady we talked to?
Whitney Houston?
Whitney Webb.
Whitney Webb, because Whitney Houston... Well, she's not alive, and I don't know how good she'd be on it.
Whitney Houston believed the children were the future.
Jeffrey Epstein believed children were the present.
That was the problem, wasn't it?
Wait, Geoff!
Jeff!
Give it 10 years!
It's a good joke.
Good joke?
We're on Rumble?
You're allowed to do stuff like that?
Yeah, it was Ash X 3-1 and 3-X.
Disgraceful, disgraceful shitbag.
But talking about Epstein... Oh, not you.
No.
I once saw someone say about Fred West, who was a mass murderer in our country, he was well out of order.
That's what I said.
Yeah.
But like, but that's worse than well out of order.
Yeah.
To actually murder people and bury them under your patio.
That's what he done.
Good afternoon.
Probably some of the stuff he did was just out of order.
Right, yeah, like, what do you mean?
Like bad, reckless driving?
Yeah, or putting the bins in the wrong place or whatever, you know?
Probably, because the patio was uneven.
Right.
There you go.
Farting in the car.
Things like that.
Car farter.
Car farter.
Alright, so that's what Epstein's been up to.
Yeah, I guess all this does is just back up the fact that he had access to very, very important people and that maybe that could have been the reason for why he died in that jail.
Right, yeah.
I agree, mate.
Could be.
Hold on.
Allegedly.
Oh, now you use allegedly.
Yeah, that's right.
After all of that.
Excuse me, that's allegedly.
Allegedly.
Funny crap.
All right, sorry.
Allegedly.
Oh no, is that a meeting?
He's meeting the Pope now.
Someone on our chats just said he met the Pope.
He's got a good booker, hasn't he?
Bloody hell, yeah.
Whoever booked Epstein's bookings, can we get him to work here?
We'd finally get Jim Carrey on.
Hang on, what are you saying?
No, I'm not saying Jim Carrey went to... I'm just saying, no, Jim Carrey's clean.
I'm just saying he would be a good guest.
I'm saying that that is a good booker if you put aside the noncery for a moment.
So a good White House dinner will be talking about proper stuff.
They'll be talking about the war and anti-war.
They'll be talking about their Five Eyes gear.
They'll be talking about our Epstein's gift.
There he is, the Holy Father, giving Epstein and Ghislaine, if that's her name, Maxwell the same Oh, that's the old one!
Luckily it's not my favourite Pope.
I like new Pope, don't do that one.
That's the Pope when I was a kid.
Yeah, that's the Pope of yesteryears.
A very sort of cloud-like individual, isn't he?
Yeah.
It's too much.
All right, and also, like, so that's my problem with the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
They're citing Jefferson, saying that, you know, if you had to choose between government and press, you should take the press, but that's on the basis that the press Are intrepid and bold and willing to report on all manner of stuff.
Listen, we've got a fantastic show.
I hope you enjoyed that.
Well, I don't know if you enjoyed the Epstein stuff.
It sort of makes me feel sick and anxious.
It's an awful, disgusting story of exploitation, corruption, and also it sort of alludes to a level of deep state power that's sort of terrifying.
Yeah, I hear you, babe.
Some people saying, that's Illuminati shit!
They're saying in our chat.
Where we're going to go in a minute, right, is we're going to do our, we're going to do a presentation of Here's The News.
What's it about today, Gal?
Today it's about rigged voting, or apparently those pesky little machines that depend on what party you're in.
You're not saying Dominion machines don't work, because that's pricey, mate.
I'd like to go on record as saying, them Dominion voting machines, I've done a vote in one once.
Oh, did you?
Oh, my vote come out squeaky clean!
Did it?
Who did you vote for?
I don't know, a lady one.
I voted for a lady one, I think.
Yeah, like, it's not about that actually.
What we're saying is that the Democrat Party, who are like super excited and all stiff as boards and like doing sort of spattery little poops down their knickknacks on account of all this Fox payout, They themselves are always banging on about how bad voting machines are.
We've got, like, videos of it.
It's amazing that Democrats are willing to say that voting machines don't work when it suits them because no one's got any values, no one's got any principles, no one cares.
Well, I'm not saying no one cares about you.
Loads of people in your own life.
But no one in the political establishment cares about you.
We need a new orthodoxy.
We need an awakening.
You're right, Lady Midnight.
No one has a memory.
You've got to join us on this chat over here.
Some of the conversation.
Sorry about that little burp there.
Sorry about that.
We wait till I've got this down me.
Wait till I've got my fizz waters down me neck.
After that, we're going to be looking at old news of yesteryear to see how the media reporting has altered over the years in a new item called Back to the Future.
I don't think it's called that, is it?
Old News?
Something like that.
Turnback Time?
Yeah.
Something like that?
We'll go with that.
Sorry about my dog.
Sorry about my dog doing that.
Dan, get a shot of the dog doing that, darling.
That's right.
Zip across that floor like lightning, as if it was the big breakfast TV show from the 90s in the UK.
See him there?
Look at that lovely little dog.
Also, but before, can't we have, well, we'll judge the graphics before, because I want you lot to choose which graphic, because we've got a graphic for the item and everything.
Oh, look, there's this one.
Right, show it.
Can we hear the musical sting, aye?
🎵 Should you use that, Gret? Or should we use that?
That's the graphic with that musical sting.
This is musical sting B. And this is the one that young Jack who works here did before we intervened and told him to start having some references to his work rather than just creating mad random... He's deleted it!
He's like a proper artist, isn't he?
Yeah.
Like, oh, you don't like it, do you?
Well, that's it then!
Gone!
Just deleted it away.
That's petulant, isn't it?
Yeah.
We should dock him some wages, should we?
Tribunal?
Have a look at him through the window.
Defrost!
That's his tribunal.
Defrost!
There he is, yeah.
Why did you delete it for?
That's petulance.
Look at him, he's a petulant little sod, isn't he?
Maybe he was just ashamed.
Oh, it's shame.
Is it shame?
It's shame.
Shame will do that to you, Ross.
Because I've always said to him that his graphics that he makes, they don't have a cohesive image system.
Right.
But that's not a terrible attack on someone, is it?
No, no.
Your graphics don't have a cohesive image system.
Maybe you could be more encouraging.
Kelly P says he's a cutie.
There you go.
See?
That's not what we want.
That's encouragement.
We're trying to punish him.
Oh, then someone says, just say 2498.
He can delete if he wants.
It's his work.
He's paid for it, isn't he?
That's not getting... I mean, this is... We're getting bogged down.
We're getting bogged down.
All right, listen.
Tell us which one do you want.
He's no Lee Fang, says Pride Faults, who's the person who started the objectification of Pride Faults in the first place, actually.
Needs a spanking.
Oh, my God, it's getting dark on there.
Right, listen, buddy, you used to not belong on Epstein Island.
I tell you what we're going to do is we're going to have a look at this rigged election farrago, then we'll call it the one you want.
So have a little vote on there, would you?
All right.
Here's the news.
No, here's the F in news.
Thank you for choosing Fox News.
The news.
No, here's the F in news.
Pucker is gone and now we can get on with a proper democracy that functions well where everyone accepts the
results of elections Particularly now Fox has had to pay out to those brilliant Dominion machines because no one else has ever complained about electoral fraud ever before in the history of democracy.
Oh no, they always do.
Both sides.
Tucker Carlson's departure has predictably caused celebration in some quarters, grief in others.
Let's look at the claim that Tucker Carlson's departure is connected to the ongoing voter fraud stories and the Fox payouts to Dominion, and whether or not democracy is ultimately broken now, because whoever wins the next election, whether it's Biden or whoever the Republicans put forward, do you imagine that after the result the other party's going to go, Congratulations, let's work together now to build back better, or make America great again, or whatever catchphrase we've got that ultimately ends up serving powerful interests.
Or do you think they'll say, you never won that election fairly, the machines are broken, I saw her hanging, Chad!
Carlson's firing is somehow related to the Dominion lawsuit that was recently settled by Fox.
We can always rely on that guy's insights.
He's always absolutely impartial.
I'm the shiniest news reporter you ever did see.
Take that, Joe Rogan!
The story that we want to cover now is the state of American democracy.
For years now, the losing side generally alleges electoral fraud, dodgy voting machines, some kind of breakdown.
We're out of state now, but whatever the result of the election, there's only one thing you can be sure of, that the party that's in government will not fulfil the pledges that they made, and the party that loses will say that they are the victim of electoral fraud.
It's been going on a lot longer than since 2020.
They fired him because of messages that were found during the discovery process.
I believe there's material in those private messages that was incredibly ugly.
It gave Fox a reason to remove Carlson.
So, essentially, Stelter and other mainstream voices are saying that Tucker's departure is connected to Fox's fraudulent claim that the Dominion machines were faulty.
Well, let's make sure, then, that that is not a ubiquitous and perennial lament offered forth by either party in the event they lose.
In particular, I've got to say, the Democrats, who have been saying that there are rigged elections, problematic machines, problems with voting systems for a long time now.
But who are you going to believe?
The mainstream media?
Or your own lying eyes.
Let's have a look.
Virginia just stopped using touchscreen computer voting because it's so vulnerable.
We need to look at all the voting machines.
Every Secretary of State needs to be, you know, assisted in making sure that they are not being hacked and attacked.
I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable.
Researches have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible
to tampering.
So you don't like the voting machines?
What about the Dominion ones?
Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes.
So you see, in microcosm, democracy means we get a mandate for what we want to do anyway.
In the event we lose, we complain about the system.
The Republicans do it, and plainly, as you just saw, the Democrats do it.
I don't think the Democrat party are sufficiently different from the Republican party or the right to be able to complain in this way.
Loads of you think they're a lot worse.
Loads of you think they're better.
I'm telling you they ain't different enough and neither party is going to make a significant difference to your life.
In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switch votes from one candidate to another.
The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101.
Directing that you install remote access software which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers.
These voting machines can be hacked quite easily.
So the legitimacy of elections and the results of elections is something that's been queried for a long time.
Here are voices of the Democrat party in various settings making the exact same claims.
You know my position is different.
Whether or not the voting machines work is irrelevant because whichever party you end up voting for, that party is funded by, lobbied by, ultimately works for globalist financial corporate interests including
the military industrial complex, the financial industry and the conglomerates that own media
companies and they all work together to ensure that any legislative changes that do
take place don't meaningfully impact their ability to profit and generally do not allow ordinary
people to democratically change their own lives.
You could easily hack into them, it makes it seem like all these states are doing different
but in fact three companies are controlling this.
It is the individual voting machines that pose some of the greatest risk.
There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines.
Right?
Which are vulnerable to being hacked.
So basically they just say stuff unless they win.
Unless they win they say the problem is the machine.
You don't see any more politicians going listen we lost fair and square but ultimately we all love America and we want American people to succeed.
So it becomes this kind of quibbling around minutiae and technicalities ultimately because they've got nothing big to offer you anymore.
Neither party is going to say we are going to get this country And we are going to genuinely change it.
And how we're going to change it is by empowering you to run your own communities.
The only reason to have government at all is to protect you, yes, from potential foreign threats and to protect you from domestic and globalist corporate interests.
That's what we're going to do.
We're going to ensure that ordinary Americans have real power.
We're going to ban lobbying.
We're going to ban donations to our party.
We're going to ban people in Congress owning stocks and shares in the companies that they regulate.
Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine.
system. No one's gonna say that, no one's offering it, they just want to quibble
about the legitimacy of electoral results that ultimately if you ask me
don't make any bloody difference anyway.
Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. It was possible to switch votes.
43% of America's I think that Dominion needs to look into Ron Wyden.
He hates voting machines.
Backdoors.
have found have serious security flaws including back doors.
Back doors!
I think that Dominion needs to look into Ron Wyden.
He hates voting machines.
Back doors!
They've got bad breath and stinking little dicks.
We know how vulnerable now our systems were.
We know, I know the hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly.
Oh my god!
All of them!
They're all broken!
None of them work!
Is Dominion watching this?
I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the Capitol.
Um, where we brought in, um, folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines.
These are the same people that, after Trump made the claims that the election was rigmarole, that's impossible!
How dare you say that!
You, sir, are a disgrace to democracy!
And you keep causing insurrections, and your hair's ridiculous, and you're orange, and that's all there really is to discuss.
This once again shows you there are no ultimate values or principles, there's just rhetoric attached to achieving the outcomes that they would prefer to achieve that are themselves tethered to financial interests that they're personally affected by.
Look at all the nepotism, look at all the stock ownership, and look at the way they legislate on the behalf of big business.
Let me know in the chat in the comments if you think that the problem is rigged electoral machines or a rigged electoral system.
I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through.
You have 21 states that were hacked into.
They didn't find out about it for a year.
It is worth fighting for integrity in our election system, which means that they are free from interference by a hostile or an unfriendly Like Russia, for example.
No evidence of that at all.
Absolutely no evidence.
Completely cooked up media concoction in conjunction with the Democrat Party.
Perhaps all of us, if we're honest, recognise that we all tend, if the outcome is favourable to our own self-interest, Oh yeah, this is a good system.
Maybe sometimes you say like, I don't like that person.
Oh no, they really like you.
I do like that person.
We're all capable of that level of fallibility.
I'm not saying actually that politicians are uniquely bad.
I'm saying they're ordinarily corrupted by a corrupt system and therefore we should change the system.
We're all capable of nepotism.
We're all capable of acting in self-interest.
I know I'm capable of doing it.
Why don't we have systems that bring to the forefront the better aspects of our nature and and a reliant on congregation, the collectivism, and true democracy, rather than systems that encourage you to become self-centered, biased, just to argue for outcomes that suit you, to have no principles or values, to change your argument in order to meet the outcome that you want, as in the case of these machines.
If the election results go their way, these are some of the best electoral machines we've ever... How dare you criticize those machines?
This Dominion voting machine's been like a brother to you!
How dare you criticize it?
You lost the election, you little son of a bitch!
You little Russian racist son of a fuck!
I sit on the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate Homeland Security Committee.
And we receive all kinds of information about the vulnerabilities to our national security.
We are vulnerable in terms of foreign interference with our elections.
Did you see that?
On the road to the White House 2020.
So when they're on the way to the White House, oh my God, we could lose.
The voting machines, if we do lose, they are terrible voting machines.
They could be hacked by, you know, a Russian with a hat, with snow in their boots, with cancer, like Putin.
Bastard, son of bitches.
You've won the election.
Those are some of the best voting machines.
Look at this little guy.
I love it.
What a reliable voting machine.
How can I stay mad at you?
There's a saying that I'm sure many of you have heard, which is the, you know, the difference between being hacked and not being hacked.
Go on.
Is knowing you've been hacked.
Yeah, you know.
OK, don't do that joke again.
Hilary, how do you feel about voting machines?
Do you have a principled perspective on them that will not change depending on whether you win or lose an election?
The opinion will stay the same, right?
There are some tax experts in Silicon Valley with whom I have met who say that maybe what they'll do this next time is to really disrupt the actual election.
shut down the servers that you send results to, interfere with the operation of voting machines,
because still, too many of them are linked to the internet.
So we are still very vulnerable.
Why don't they just accept that some people vote for Donald Trump
because they're disillusioned with the political class?
Why don't we all accept more broadly that the problem is deeply systemic and is a result of the ability of powerful deep state and corporate interest to manipulate the congressional and democratic process to the point where democracy is sort of a facade.
That's the actual problem.
The actual problem is they can hack the internet.
There's hackers.
They're only the size of a Lego man.
They get in.
That's not the issue, is it?
The issue is the whole system's broken.
OK, so after the 2016 election, the Democrats said there's a problem with voting machines.
But after the 2020 election, there's no problem with voting machines.
What an amazing miracle!
After Republican victories in 2000, 2004, and 2016, Democrats in Congress used the formal counting of electoral votes as an opportunity to challenge election results.
Derek Muller, a law professor at the University of Iowa, wrote in a New York Times opinion piece in 2021.
In January 2001, Representative Maxine Waters joined several other Democrats challenging George W. Bush's victory, claiming Florida's electoral votes were fraudulent.
In January 2005, after Bush's re-election, Senator Barbara Boxer formally challenged Ohio's electoral Even though Bush won Ohio by more than 118,000 votes.
Wait, let's recount that because what they've done is that 118,000 votes could have been done by a little cyber Lego hacker that gets in the machine.
Did you see the Lego movie?
They're bastards.
In January 2017, after Trump's victory, Representative Sheila Jackson-Lee said there was the malfunction of 87 voting machines and Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat, Massachusetts said there were confirmed and illegal activities engaged by the government of Russia in the 2016 election.
Then as now, each member of Congress was within their rights to make an objection, Mueller wrote.
But the objections were naive at best, shameless at worst.
Either way, the readiness of members of Congress to disenfranchise millions of Americans was disconcerting.
And now there's Stacey Abrams, the Democrat who ran for governor of Georgia, who claims that Brian Kemp, the Republican who beat her four years ago, won under the rules of the game at the time, but the game was rigged against the voters of Georgia.
Fraudulent electoral votes, malfunctioning voting machines, rigged elections.
Sound familiar?
Well, yeah, it does, actually.
It sounds like exactly what's being claimed right now.
How is it different?
In September 2022, the Washington Post reported Democrats have spent nearly $19 million across eight states in primaries this year, amplifying far-right Republican candidates who have questioned or denied the validity of the 2020 election.
They're willing to fund people that make those claims.
In a decent, Fair, moral system.
You just wouldn't do that, would you?
It wouldn't be about tactics and strategy.
Wait a minute.
I disagree with those people and what they're saying is illegal and wrong.
Let's give them some money so they can say it more loudly because I think in the long run it'll pay off and then we'll be able to benefit from being in Congress and regulate companies that own stocks and shares in.
And that's the American way.
Strategy is part of modern life.
You have to understand strategy to function in the world.
So having a strategy where you amplify the voices of people that make claims that the election was fraudulent seems like it could be a good strategy.
But if you're simultaneously persecuting Trump for making those same claims and declaring that he oughtn't be able to run as president as a result of making those claims, then your strategy is so sort of contradictory and hypocritical that it's become unmoored from morality.
And in the business of government, where you actually hold sway over the lives of ordinary people when it comes to their healthcare, their education, judiciary matters, cultural, military matters, then morality and values and principles must be the very spine, the skeleton of it.
Decent values have to be present.
Fallibility is inevitable, but outright hypocrisy is unacceptable.
If Biden really wants to unite the country, which he doesn't, he ought at least try to do the difficult work of reaching out to the other side, which he won't.
But that would be risky since the left wing of his party isn't in any mood for making peace with Republicans, MAGA or otherwise.
He talks about MAGA Republicans and how they're a threat to democracy because it's one more weapon in his political arsenal, a way he hopes to win over those crucial swing voters.
As a cynical political strategy, it may work.
We'll know soon enough.
But please, Mr President, spare us the sanctimony.
It makes it really hard to take you seriously.
The sanctimony is laid on thick.
In fact, sanctimony is a significant part of their propaganda policy.
We are all together.
We care about the vulnerable.
We've done this.
We're trying to achieve that.
We would have done if it wasn't for those bastards.
You can't use that kind of mawkish language if ultimately you are a cynical careerist strategist who works on behalf of corporate interests.
That's just plain hypocrisy.
So whether or not there's electoral fraud isn't actually the issue.
The system is rigged, and whoever wins the next election, and I would argue whoever it is ain't gonna make no difference in your life, not significantly anyway, you might get some pyrrhic victory within yourself, essentially equivalent to your sports team winning.
I really do think it's that basic.
What we know is the losing side will go, oh, the game was rigged, it wasn't fair, because that's what they always do.
There is no morality, there are no values, there are no real principles in politics anymore, because they've set up a system that simply will not afford those type of values.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the comments in the chat.
See you in a second.
Thanks for watching Zik Fox News. I'm Joe Mike.
Now here's the fucking news.
Without our sponsors we simply can't keep making this world-changing, earth-shattering, revolution-creating content.
That's why I'm proud and pleased to tell you about this glorious product from Black Forest.
If you're looking for a supplement to dramatically improve your health and longevity, you want to live forever, right?
Then these three letters could be the answer.
NMN.
Not M&M, NMN.
Or to use its fancy name, Nicotinamide Mononucleotide.
A couple of capsules a day and you could be looking at improved energy, enhanced metabolism that can help reduce the risk of obesity, protection against age-associated diseases, all falling apart, getting older, revolting, increased endurance and strength.
Our old friends at Big Pharma, those guys, And the FDA are trying to get a piece of the action by labeling NMN as a drug instead of a supplement.
Not because of any concerns over safety or efficacy.
Oh no!
But so they can monopolize sales and of course, as you know already, raise the prices.
The scumbags!
So join the fight against Big Pharma and stay healthy.
Go to blackforestsupplements.com and get 10% off this bottle of NMN by using the code RUSSELL.
Now back to the video.
No, back to me right now.
Here I am.
Look, here I am.
This is me, baby.
Wow.
That's real you.
Where's that shopping channel version of you?
I'm good at that, am I?
I tell you what, you're getting better every week.
Look at it.
That bit where you got all the pills in your hand and then dropped them to the table.
That's the best bit.
That was excellent.
Could I encourage you, my good man, to take some M&Ms?
I'll have them right now.
None for you, my friend!
They're expensive!
What about that bit where you talk about getting old and like it's a really bad thing and then just show a picture of an old man?
That's my favourite bit.
I felt sad for him.
Is he gonna be alright, that old guy?
No, probably not.
This is sad, it's like episode 3 of Succession.
I can't take it no more, baby!
I can't take it!
Uh, okay, so voting is neck and neck.
The voting is so tight in the which one of the graphic sequences do you want for our item this week in history, old news, whatever.
Old news, whatever?
This is the item.
It's this week in history.
I mean, it literally says it there.
I see.
All right, mate.
Okay, okay.
You need to take some of them nem-nems because you've gone all funny.
I think I took too many.
I think you've had so many nem-nems that you've actually gone unusual.
Yeah, that's it.
I had a Tom Jones look-alike appear at my mother's birthday.
Wow.
What a collection of words that is.
He was good.
It's not unusual!
Like, he was excellent.
When you say appeared at, like, he was meant to be there.
He didn't just turn up.
Yeah, that would be an amazing story.
I'd be telling that on a Gaia channel if it was that.
Tom Jones came back to life while he was still alive as another him at my mum's birthday.
That'd be a much better, one weirder story.
We paid for it to spice up my mum's birthday.
So I went there, but I sent a Tom Jones lookalike, the next best thing.
Of course, yeah.
That's what every mother wants.
Tom Jones' lookalike, named Ian Stott, he's been sending me, like, he writes a lot of, like, quite radical literature about revolution and global conspiracies and religion and, like, it's a bit of an unusual combination of things to do, like, to write books about anti-establishmentism and appear as Tom Jones at my mum's birthday.
We've all got to have a day job, haven't we?
You've got to do what you've got to do to survive.
It's not unusual to do that, is it?
What's new?
No.
Yeah, how far will we go?
Okay, so look, wait a sec.
No, Tom Jones is alive.
That's what I'm saying.
Tom Jones is alive.
I said he can't come back from the dead whilst he's still being here.
Look, people are saying...
Erzmummy.
We are not a democracy.
Barry John M. Fox.
I'm still convinced 2020 was stolen.
Oh, Barry John.
That's going to cost you $758 million, believe it or not.
Peace, love, light.
It's fascinating where they put their energy.
It shows their vulnerabilities.
Erzmummy.
Again, I'm going to vote for my dog because I'm in Massachusetts and my vote don't count.
Oh, Unicorn Plug.
Again, politics is a horse and pony show.
All this kind of stuff.
Anyway, we're going to go with whoever says one of them next.
You know, one of the, uh, you can either have A, which was like a Back to the Future sounding one, or B, which is, uh... Cher.
Cher.
Right, which one do you want?
A was first.
All right, so we're going... I wanted Cher, actually!
Well, I mean, you are in charge.
Yeah, but you gotta democracy, you gotta respect it.
Oh, I see.
And A's winning, hands down.
Loads of people are saying A.
Alright, bloody democracy.
Are we doing this before or after Ryan Grimbo Grimmie?
I think we are.
We're going to have to do this only in locals, guys.
You're going to have to join us in locals.
Bring on Ryan Grimmo Grimmie!
Ryan, Grimo, Grimmy, we've got to bring you out.
Ryan, we invited you to a perfectly good White House Correspondents' Dinner and you disgraced us by brawling!
I believe you were filming someone called Jesse Waters from some other news channel.
Foxy, from Foxy Lady.
Then I heard, and this is a direct quote, that you kicked him in the dick.
Now, is that true, Ryan?
The tip of the dick?
This was a while ago.
There were a lot of feet and fists flying, so anything's possible.
Caught the tip of anything that day, couldn't you?
Thank you so much for joining us.
What do you think about Biden having the balls, the wrinkled gonads to declare that journalism isn't a crime?
What do you think about that with Assange banged up?
I don't think that that took balls at all because I think he knew that nobody would push back in that room against him.
So it didn't even take any courage.
I bet he didn't even register the hypocrisy, you know, as it came out of his lips.
And I doubt many people in that room even did.
That's how far apart they are kind of from the rest of the public on this on
this question.
Ryan, your analysis chimes with ours in that what they do in at events like that is they reiterate
what the status quo is, they reiterate what the framing for debate is, that when the press that
are supposed to hold power to account enter into a consensus that Julian Assange don't even register
in your mind when talking about the criminalization of journalists, that this is precisely the
problem we have. The zeitgeist is being determined by banalized institutions that are not interested
in democracy, that are not interested in transparency, that are not interested in free
speech. That event is pure theater. No wonder you got Uganda up and started kicking people on the
tip of the dick. What sort of journalists get invited to White House Correspondents Dinner
and why? Who gets invited, who don't get invited, Ryan? I mean, so DC is...
You know, probably more than most cities in the United States, very status obsessed because it's all about power and politics.
And so, you know, getting invited to it is a status symbol.
But then on top of that, you needed to then have the best celebrity.
this started around kind of the Obama years, that whichever news organization could get
Scarlett Johansson or whatever, like to be at their table, you know, that would be,
then they would be one upping the other ones, and then they would also invite their ad sales folks
and also then invite their big clients, like, you know, Dove Soap would be there,
or like the guy from GM, or the guy from Cadillac would be there.
And so you've got these news organizations that are attracting celebrities
with the access to the president, and then wooing the ad sales people
with access to these celebrities.
And it's just a gigantic kind of money-making operation.
Yeah it feels like that it feels it feels saccharine and theatrical and appalling and ridiculous and I feel like it cannot go on for much longer.
What do you think about the candidacy of RFK and the early surge there. We're going to have him
on our show, Ryan. How do you feel?
In fact, don't answer that, mate, because we are going to wrap here and head over to Locals.
There's a link. You can join us over on Locals right now where we conduct this conversation.
Plus, we'll carry out that game as well, you know, the old news game.
Ryan, perhaps you'll join us for a little bit of that game where we're going to look at old news and we'll marvel at the way that the news media has altered.
Click the red button, you can join us.
Remember, I do a festival every year from July the 14th to July the 17th, Community.
There's a link in the chat for that as well.
People like Vandana Shiva, Wim Hof, Satish Kumar will come, plus Callie Means who talked about all that food corruption stuff.
Tomorrow we've got Max Blumenthal on the show.
What are we going to be talking to Max about?
There's a really sort of relevant new story that Max was being incredibly vocal about.
I think I remember us being excited.
Yeah, we were going to talk about potentially 9-11 and the new revelations.
9-11 and CIA operatives.
I mean, can this even be true?
You've got to join us for that.
Join us tomorrow on Rumble, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
And join us on Locals with Ryan to play a kinky little game.
And you know the kind of games Ryan likes to play when he's out and about kicking people in the nether regions.
So join us right now on Locals with Ryan.
So see you tomorrow if you're watching us on Rumble.
See you on Locals right now if you're with us.
Stay free.
Man you switch it, switch on, switch off.
▲
Export Selection