All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 21, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:02:54
Ohio Vs. Ukraine - What’s Your President’s Job? - #085 - Stay Free With Russell Brand
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
so so
in this video we're going to see the future In this video, you're going to see the future.
Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
Thanks for watching Stay Free with Russell Brand.
Wherever you're watching it, YouTube, wherever, you can only see the whole show on Rumble.
Click the red button to join if you're watching on a laptop.
If you're watching on your phone, there's a little green line there that helps you to watch it on locals.
That's where I watch the comments.
Watching from Ohio, don't drink the water, Danny S. Don't drink the water.
Not till you've heard everything that we've got to tell you.
If you're watching on YouTube, you'll probably just see COVID misinformation coming up.
Probably there's a way of clicking over just under that.
We've got a great show for you today.
We're talking about Biden in Ukraine.
Where should the President of the United States be right now?
You can tell us in the chat.
Should it be in Ukraine?
Should it be in Ohio?
We've got a great guest on the show coming from the leather.
She's talking about the hypocrisy of Biden's handling of the Ohio train wreck and the way that he's lined himself up with corporations rather than ordinary Americans precisely at the chance when there's, at the moment, there's an opportunity to show how much you care about the environment.
We all say we care about the environment.
Look how easy it is.
I care about the environment.
How about this?
Stand up for ordinary people when there's an environmental disaster that's going to be costly at corporate interest.
Where are you now?
Where's the caring for the environment now?
I'm in Ukraine.
What are you in Ukraine for?
For the humanitarian crisis?
Or is there going to be some... What's that?
Profits in the future?
Blackrock, who's your president?
Who's he the president of?
The American people or American globalist corporations?
These are some of the questions we'll be asking.
We've got another fantastic guest coming up as well in the show.
Two guests.
Gareth, we've got so many guests.
There's hardly time for me to have an on-screen assistant producer as part of the show.
Dan Cohen's coming on.
He's going to be talking to us about the NIH's search for the new Fauci.
Please God me get the job.
Please God me get the job.
I've been a lobbyist for Big Pharma.
I've worked hard at Pfizer.
I am a friend with Albert Baller and by God do I wish I was a little bit taller.
It's likely though that it's going to be a man called Dr. Peter Hotez, who's made a lot of nice WHO propaganda comparing people that don't like taking certain medicines, remember we're still on YouTube, to actual terrorists.
But what are they these days?
So, once we click over onto Rumble, we'll be talking to you about some new research around the estimates of COVID deaths.
We can't tell you too much, but you know what you thought anyway?
It's that.
Albert Baller, though, he'll surely tell us the truth sooner or later.
Remember this tweet from Albert Baller.
Transparency is important.
We all know that.
So I'd like to provide greater clarity around the timelines for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine and the three key areas where we must demonstrate success in order to submit for emergency use authorization or approval.
OK, so it's transparency that interests Albert Baller.
He prefers that to profit.
You give Albert Baller a simple choice.
What do you want, mate?
A big pile of money for the shareholders?
Or is it that principle of transparency?
Albert Baller, same every time.
Transparency, transparency, transparency.
That's why when his emails have been released, the Israel court has ordered the Ministry of Health to release the agreement with Pfizer.
Here's the transparency, guys!
Look at that!
That is not that transparent.
This is the liability and indemnity provision, so this is pretty important to know.
I wonder what kind of indemnity provision Pfizer were granted.
Um, well, listen, I can tell you everything about that.
Will we give an indemnity?
What, so if there were any consequences, we wouldn't be?
And I'm not saying there are.
Not saying there are any consequences.
There are no consequences.
Only good ones.
Good consequences.
I don't think you can even say good ones.
There are no consequences.
Nothing is neutral.
Can you say that?
Not sure.
It's difficult to know with the WHO.
Can you just tell me all of the things you did around the Democracy?
Sure.
Here you go.
I've got nothing to hide.
There you go.
It's just that.
That's the answer to it.
Also, we'll be talking to you a little bit more about, well, you know Victoria Nuland.
If you don't know her, you should because she's been working for successive American administrations.
She was around when it was Bush, W and Cheney in the White House.
She says that The US supports Ukrainian attacks on Crimea.
Now that, for us, presents a little bit of a problem.
It's what I call the circle of death.
Let me talk you through the circle of death right now.
Joe Biden, you all remember him saying, the idea we're going to send in offensive equipment to Ukraine, that's called World War 3.
Now Putin, as you know, said Russia could resort to nuclear weapons if Ukraine tries to retake Crimea.
Zelensky says, we have always kept the goal in mind to seize Donbass and liberate Crimea.
Now, Victoria Nuland says, we are supporting Ukraine hitting Russia's military in Crimea.
That is what I call the circle, the circle of death.
death but instead of like little Simba getting held up, it's just
us holding up our little baby what's all ashes now
I don't know what it would be like.
Maybe one of those little dogs with, you know, the robot dogs.
Hold up a robot dog.
Get back in your house!
I like that you basically collaborated with Elton John there.
Not for the first time, my friend, in ways that I'm not prepared to share with you.
Jen Stoltenberg has admitted that the war between Ukraine and Russia began in 2014.
Where's he from?
Jen Stoltenberg?
Sweden?
Finland?
Infowars or something like that.
Yeah, no, well he must be one of Alex Jones's mates over there at Infowars.
I think, oh no, it's NATO.
He's from NATO.
So remember when we're told like, oh don't be, you're a conspiracy theorist, you're unpatriotic, you don't care about Ukrainian people losing their energy, losing their lives, being used as pawns in a globalist scheme.
We do bloody well care.
Well this conspiracy theorist over at NATO admits that the war did begin in 2014.
Have a look at this.
The war didn't start in February last year.
The war started in 2014.
And since 2014, NATO Allies have provided support to Ukraine.
It's just very interesting to hear that, because that's what we've been talking about.
I just had a conversation with Chris Hedges.
He's going to be on the show tomorrow, where he talks about how the American military-industrial complex requires an economy of ongoing war.
We've seen it in Afghanistan.
Previously, we've seen it in Vietnam and Korea.
Of course, we saw it in Iraq.
And he was telling me, mate, that ultimately what we are witnessing is a kind of The decline of empire and a frantic attempt to retain a degree of control by doing stuff that I said to Chris Hedges seems counterintuitive, like engaging some of the most powerful superpowers in the world in potentially military nuclear conflicts.
Yeah, unless they're just all so much more clever than we are.
I wonder that, like, sometimes when I'm watching football, I think, take him off, sit deeper, why are you not using the whip?
And I think, I don't know anything about this, so probably they know more.
And of course, when it comes to geopolitics, you sometimes wonder, don't you, if the things that you intuit, like Accepting that Russia has been a country for ages and ages and you can't just get rid of it.
You can't just make Russia disappear.
It's an actual country.
Intuitively that feels true.
Don't agitate China.
Don't continually campaign for a unipolar world.
Accept that there are other nations, other incentives.
Don't try to create endless division.
Don't put profit ahead of human life.
I mean, all of these things seem like plain old common sense to me, but we've got much more informed guests than me coming on the show.
And stay with us for that.
And remember, if you're watching this on YouTube, in a minute, we'll be clicking over exclusively to Rumble, where we can tell you some startling facts about deaths during COVID.
And, you know, it's basically what you think it is, but it never hurts to hear that stuff confirmed, does it?
Certainly not.
No.
How long are we away from doing that?
OK.
We're going to be doing it in a moment.
Before that, let's have a look at Donald Trump talking about the conditions in Ukraine and how we could handle things differently.
Donald Trump, of course, predictably thinks that he could solve this conflict in a couple of hours.
And sometimes when I see how confident he is, I wonder if he could.
Let's have a look.
And that's what they're doing now.
They're knocking out all the power plants and people are freezing to death.
Surely not a good thing to freeze to death, is it?
And it's a very bad thing.
People are dying.
The country is being obliterated.
Obliterated, you say?
Obliterated.
There he goes, old Donald Trump.
He didn't do that last bit, did he?
What, that little dinging noise?
I don't think that was Trump.
I don't know if Donald Trump has somehow combined his consciousness and very being with some AI masterpiece.
Who knows?
AI Trump?
AI Trump.
Who could stop him?
Only perhaps Ron the Sanctimonious.
Meatball Ron.
A lot of different nicknames.
I like it when he said, I don't spend any time thinking about nicknames.
I'm busy.
I've got a lot of stuff on my plate.
Okay, I think we're going to click over to being exclusive on Rumble now because I have to tell you about something extraordinary.
There's new revelations around deaths within coronavirus.
And also, I want to tell you about that attempt to keep the information about the clinical trial period concealed for another 75 years.
So if you're watching this anywhere other than Rumble, please click the link in the description right now and join us because I'm about to get into all sorts of stuff.
Natural immunity, COVID deaths, it's going to get conspiratorial.
Join us, join us where we can speak freely Bring all communities together against establishment power, that we may be free.
Okay, we're off now.
Cool.
So, okay, let's have a look at this.
This is like, for a start, I thought this was pretty funny when people started talking about natural immunity on mainstream media.
They talk about natural immunity as if it's like a made-up word, you said earlier.
They've combined a tiger and a lion to create a liger!
They talk about natural immunity as if it's like not something that everyone was talking about because That's how we're all here already because natural immunity has evolved since we were single cellular creatures right up to advanced primates.
Listen to them talk about natural immunity.
It's as if it's some sort of new light-up hoverboard.
In today's Daily Health, there's a new study that looks at our body's immunity after getting COVID.
Yeah, it finds the immunity that naturally builds up in our bodies after a COVID-19 infection is as protective as the two doses of the mRNA vaccines against severe illness and death.
You notice they really still don't want to say natural immunity.
They use the words natural and immunity in there but they don't want to put the two together.
Whenever mainstream media discuss these topics they tiptoe around the revelation of long understood truths like Maybe there are consequences to these vaccines that were unanticipated.
That natural immunity could be beneficial.
That vitamin D is beneficial.
Even less controversial stories like the efficacy of steroids was kept out of the mainstream for a long time.
And I still feel nervous just saying the word ivermectin.
Someone in the chat has created a liger.
Stone Owen, well done.
That's brilliant that you've done that.
That's what you get.
If you join the locals community, it's really worth it.
Even if just to see someone illustrate a liger.
Look at this story.
Judge orders FDA to hasten release of Pfizer vaccine docs.
It could take 75 years, meaning that the data would only be available to the public by the year 2097.
How come they need 75 years to tell you how they made the vaccine, but only six months to make the bloody vaccine?
Yeah, you don't like that, do you?
Because you think, oh, they took ages.
No, no, I was thinking of you.
I was thinking of the legal consequences.
The strikes, baby, the strikes.
They'd probably say, you know, BioNTech were developing the mRNA vaccine.
Coronavirus.
That's interesting.
So before there was coronavirus, you were developing a vaccine for coronavirus.
Can I just ask you a little question?
How did you know it was going to be a coronavirus?
How did you know?
Who told you?
What are you up to?
Do slippery heels to you?
The information we wanted to talk to you about is that a new study suggests that the chances of people under 50 dying from coronavirus was One in 45,000.
This is in Holland, or the Netherlands, as you meant to say.
Yeah, call it the Netherlands.
Call it their proper name.
Like, I don't think the English were ever right to do that, call countries things that weren't their name.
Like, Germany, they're Deutschland.
They don't call themselves Germany.
No one's ever says Holland over in Holland.
They call it, as you just said, the Netherlands.
Even Paris, Paris.
Let's give these guys a break.
Okay, sure.
Call their countries and towns the things they want them to be called, for God's sake, especially in this climate.
So look at that, one in 45,000.
That means if you had a stadium full of, well, with 45,000 people in it, only... Maybe Ajax or something.
Yeah, you're watching Ajax v Feyenoord.
It's a domestic top flight arriva-der-sea-oon.
Whatever it's called.
You're a linguist.
Oh, I'm a linguist, baby.
Like, that means only one person would die.
And you could die of just falling down the stairs, eating a hot dog, eating a bit of botulism in a pie.
This is Europe.
A lot of our food is very, very unhealthy.
Well, we had Cali Beans talking about processed food.
I would imagine more than one out of 45,000 died from eating a hot dog.
If you're eating big food, big agri-dinners, you're going to be tumbling down those stairs in your thousands.
I mean, we had a look at some of the things that are more deadly than coronavirus, according to those odds.
So coronavirus, 1 in 45,000 chance of dying.
You've got more chance of dying in a canoeing accident, sunstroke, slightly less chance, choking on food, one in 2,000, just over, and obesity kills one in 11 people.
So obesity should be focused on a lot more than coronavirus.
So what about those crazy days when it was like, have a vaccine and we'll give you a free hamburger?
Yeah, but who does that harm the interests of, Russ?
Tell me.
Big food.
Big food.
Big farmer.
Big system.
Big club.
And you ain't in it, as George Carlin, God rest his eternal soul, would no doubt say.
We did a little poll on Twitter earlier.
Where do you think Joe Biden should be focusing his efforts right now?
Ukraine.
A tiny number of you thought that he should be doing that.
Ohio.
The vast majority of you thought that Joe Biden's time would be better spent Ohio but he's got that incredible ability Joe Biden to go
missing when required it's almost like his absence is his greatest gift
the campaign for the presidency was notorious for the invisibility of Joe Biden
the best thing you can do Joe Biden is get out of fucking way it doesn't
Larry is at the moment he's either in Ukraine or on holiday
Spends a lot of time on the war deck.
Also the idea is, of course, that this is not a proxy war, that there's only aid that's being given to the Ukraine by you, by American taxpayers.
I think it's about $860 per American household that's gone to Ukraine.
And I'm certainly not suggesting that Ukrainian people don't need support and that Ukrainian people aren't suffering.
It's obvious that they are.
I believe, as the Rage Against the War Machine march stated just last week in your country, America, that a peaceful solution should be what we're pursuing.
Yeah, well that was on the cards, that was on the table at one point.
It was on the cards, but then dear old Boris Johnson, British Prime Minister, he had a little go, he got stuck in.
So it seems that where the interests of the powerful are at odds with ordinary people, there's only one solution.
We talked a little bit about the Ohio train crash earlier this week and the consequences for the environment.
Often we criticise some of the rhetoric around environmentalism not because the environment isn't an important issue it seems pretty obvious to me that polluting our planet and not treating our planet with respect is a fast cut to an apocalypse and is idiocy and is disrespectful and lacking in honor but what the Ohio train wreck reveals to me at least is that that rhetoric is empty devoid of any real meaning particularly
If it happens to trespass on the interests of the powerful.
We made a presentation about that earlier in the week.
Here's a little bit of it.
Could this Ohio train wreck be another opportunity for us to demonstrate how ineptitude, profiteering, broken promises by the Biden administration have led to more suffering and an environmental disaster that some are saying is the next Chernobyl?
Let's have a look at how the mainstream media are conveying this.
Tonight, outrage growing.
Less than two weeks after that massive train derailment and the controlled burn of hazardous chemicals sent up a toxic plume of black smoke in East Palestine, Ohio.
Two weeks?
Do you think they kept it out of the news in some sort of way?
Has there been anything weird floating around distracting us?
Residents demanding answers, complaining of burning eyes, nausea, headaches, and a pungent odor, and reporting dead animals.
Officials confirming 3,500 fish killed by the chemicals.
State officials now suggest drinking bottled water.
After telling evacuated residents it was safe to return home.
It's safe to return home.
Don't drink the water.
And don't look at those fish.
Crews now work to remove soil and wreckage, possibly contaminated by chemicals like vinyl chloride, suspected of causing cancer.
So it's not all bad news.
Again today, officials saying constant tests and monitoring of the air and water show the environment is safe.
Hmm, I don't feel totally reassured, do you?
Don't know whether it's the cancer or the dead fish, but something tells me this water isn't A-OK.
What?
Tastes a bit dead fishy and cancery.
Shut up, you conspiracy theorist!
Local community members and activists across the country have sounded the alarms regarding the impact the incident could have on public health and environment.
Many have pointed to reports of animals dying en masse as evidence.
I don't know, maybe these animals all just decided to take their own lives because of Putin.
Yet despite the public outcry over the environmental and public health catastrophe, the actions of Ohio authorities reflect an attitude of concealment.
That doesn't seem like state authorities.
Many concerns of East Palestine residents, as well as those of the rest of the nation, stem from the fact that the derailed train had 20 cars carrying hazardous materials.
Oh, you think because there's 20 carriages of hazardous materials that that could cause an environmental disaster and carcinogenic materials and 3,500 dead fish in the water?
Those carriages full of carcinogenic materials were a present for your birthday and you've spoiled it.
You're just like your father, who actually seems a bit unwell at the moment.
Don't know what's causing it.
Rogue Nation said, Acid rain coming soon.
This is on our local chat that you can join.
Makawaikwe says, Erin Brockovich should have gotten there by now.
Joe's Dog says, Bet the bugs died first.
This could be a cascading event of ecological death.
Thank you for joining us on Locals.
If you want to join us on Locals, you can click through and become a member of the community.
Alarmed, I think, by the situation, even my dog Bear has risen to his feet.
And we are blessed now to be joined by Julia Rock, investigative journalist at The Leather, talking about this scenario.
Thanks for joining us, Julia.
We're so grateful to have you here.
Yeah, thanks so much for having me on.
The thing that we're most surprised by among the numerous interlocking cataclysms that we're currently describing is that Biden's Department of Justice are backing Norfolk Southern's bid to block lawsuits.
I feel that's a story that you were instrumental in disseminating.
Can you tell us a little bit more about that, please, Julia?
Yeah, so this is a story about a Supreme Court case, a U.S.
Supreme Court case that had oral arguments last fall.
And it basically has to do with sort of a series of technical issues about jurisdiction.
But the case involves a former Norfolk Southern employee who moved to sue the company under a federal law that protects railroad workers injured on the job.
And He sued in the state of Pennsylvania, which is not the state where he had been working, and Norfolk Southern is trying to block the lawsuit.
Unusually, last fall, the Biden administration got involved in the case.
They filed a Friends of the Court brief.
They argued on the side of Norfolk Southern during oral arguments, and it was sort of unusual that they took the side of Norfolk Southern in this case that could help corporations prevent civil lawsuits.
So this this all played out before the recent disaster in East Palestine, but but it sort of shows that the Biden administration was already taking the side of the railroad against people who had been poisoned by chemicals on the job.
What worries me, Julia, is how environmentalism is showcased as a defining issue and a divisive one at that in some political circles.
But when the opportunity comes to act on behalf of the environment in a situation where it's
evidently needed, it feels to me that the response to this has been largely botched,
not to mention the case that you just outlined, where there was an opportunity to support
a railroad worker and, indeed, the hypocrisy of Biden campaigning aggressively that he
would be a pro-worker president, that he would be in support of unions, all promises that
have come to naught, and the fact that railroad workers have been unable to get the necessary
pay rises or sick days that they were promised.
And the fact that all of that equipment weren't updated.
And I heard somewhere, Julia, is it true that they've got some like civil war equipment on those trains?
I didn't even know they had trains then.
Confused about the whole chronology of this thing.
So what do you feel, broadly speaking, about the hypocrisy around environmentalism and opportunities to support working people that this story represents?
Yeah, so you're exactly right that it's interesting how the railroad industry, more so than maybe any other industry except perhaps the fossil fuel industry, has really highlighted sort of the Biden administration's position sort of between workers' rights and protecting the environment on the one hand, and then sort of backing corporations, the administration's corporate donors on the other.
And there have been a lot of situations in which, you know, when pitted Between the two, the Biden administration has chosen the side of the corporation.
So as you mentioned, you know, there was the administration urging Congress to step in and block a rail strike, which basically took away all the power that rail unions had to negotiate a better contract.
There's the Biden administration intervening on the side of Norfolk Southern in this Supreme Court case.
And now it has taken a really long time for the administration to sort of say anything critical of Norfolk Southern after this recent train derailment in Ohio.
Also, they've been cutting expenditure, I feel, for a long while, cutting back their workforce, not investing in the railroads, and it's difficult not to make a connection between that kind of cost cutting driven by the pursuit of profit and now these consequences for the people of Ohio.
We heard recently that not only is the Ohio River dangerously polluted, which I think provides 10% of America with its water supply, but that 80% of American rivers are currently polluted.
Is that true, mate?
Uh-huh.
A lot of research.
We're a big organisation.
Just feel free to comment on the things that you're confident commenting upon, like the pollution of the Ohio River and its significance as a supplier to American people.
That's important to us, and we'll do some more research on the 80% of American rivers which have been polluted, because we've done a story on it already this week.
But sometimes I'm just pulling these things out of the air, assuming that everyone shares my mind, and thankfully people don't.
Well, I hadn't seen the 80% statistic, but it doesn't come as any surprise to me.
But you're right that the Ohio River provides a huge amount of drinking water to people.
It's a massive watershed.
And residents in East Palestine and in other places have been ordered to drink bottled water.
Because the toxic chemical that was released during the derailment, vinyl chloride,
sort of dissipates from the air somewhat quickly.
But it lingers for a really long time in the water and in the soil.
And so there are a lot of concerns about contamination.
And there was just a story this morning about how the EPA has ordered Norfolk Southern
to be in charge of the cleanup in the area.
And they are going to monitor the cleanup.
And that's sort of a massive step forward.
It's one of the most aggressive moves the administration has taken against Norfolk Southern since this derailment, but there are a lot of concerns about contamination.
Norfolk Southern should be in charge of it.
I didn't like that bit where the solution was to blow it up and to send it up into the sky in black plumes.
That seems to be like what a child would do.
That's how I used to keep my bedroom tidy, throwing things out the window, setting them on fire.
It doesn't seem like an appropriate response to it.
Yeah, I mean, it's completely wild that, you know, if a train, as you had mentioned before, the railroad industry has slashed its workforce by nearly 30% in the past decade.
They've lobbied against safety regulations.
They're carrying hazardous materials on trains with antiquated technologies.
And then, of course, a derailment happens.
And what do they do?
They blow the stuff into the air.
It leaks into the water.
It leaks into the soil.
Yeah, you know, it doesn't seem Isn't it fair or reasonable at all?
Julia, I feel like I read in your article that the complete list of chemicals on board that train hasn't yet been released and my assumption is that that's not because they're such lovely chemicals that we'll all get excited and start drinking Ohio water and sucking the soil over there.
It's presumably because they are dangerous contaminants.
Yeah, so initially when the train first derailed, first responders didn't even know what hazardous chemicals were on board the train because the train was not being regulated as a high-hazard flammable train despite, of course, the fact that it started on fire when it derailed and the chemicals were released and burned off.
So there was not good information about what chemicals were on board.
Slowly, as federal agencies have begun their investigations, a more complete list of the chemicals has been published.
And I believe now all the chemicals that were on board sort of have been made public.
But initially, there was not a lot of information about what was on the train, which made it very hard, of course, for first responders to know how to conduct a safe response.
Very much for clearing that up.
Joe, am I right saying that Joe Biden hasn't visited Ohio yet but is currently in Ukraine?
Do you think that that is a visit driven by humanitarian care or by the potential economic
ties that this war might yield economic opportunities that it might grant and the ongoing profits
gleaned by the military industrial complex as the aid given to Ukraine takes the form
of products made by Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, BAE Systems and Northrop Grumman?
How do you feel about that?
Well, you gave a great answer in your question, which I appreciate.
But yeah, you're right, he hasn't been to East Palestine, which is pretty striking, you know, just given the amount of public attention it's gotten, the amount of sort of conspiracy floating around the incident, the amount of environmental contamination, sort of the fact that he has not been a great watchdog of the railroad industry, sort of to say the least.
And so, you know, obviously there are geopolitical reasons as well as, you know, the the profits
of the military industrial complex for Biden to go to Ukraine.
But it's pretty striking that he he didn't go to East Palestine.
The lever is widely regarded as a sort of left off center organization.
We have David Sirota on our show and we really admire the work that you do there and that
others working at the lever do.
Do you feel that this is a time where alliances beyond the usual political consensus have
to be formed, given the centralized establishment power seems indefatigable and is in a way
Incapable of responding to the evident need for change, whether it's, you know, it's just some of the issues that this case and story brings up, i.e.
meaningful environmentalism, representation of the rights of workers, end to corporate lobbying.
What do you think about that aspect of this, Juliet?
I mean, absolutely.
You know, in the fall, the rail unions and rail workers got a lot of news coverage and attention for issues that have been going on for years, which was, again, sort of the slashing of the workforces, their really draconian attendance policies, their lack of paid sick leave, understaffing on trains.
And those workers, you know, had been warning about a derailment like this.
And I think there's sort of a way in which people really seeing the consequences, not just for workers, but also for themselves.
The health and safety consequences, the environmental consequences of corporations sort of decimating their workforces will hopefully give broader public support to some of the demands that the rail workers were making, which included Safety concerns.
And you know, at The Lever, we report critically on anybody who has the power to change things or should be held accountable when disasters like this happen.
We've gotten a lot of flack for reporting critically.
On the Biden administration, because people like to point out, you know, that Trump rolled back a lot of train safety regulations, which is completely true.
It's also true that Biden is the president now and that he has sort of a vast administrative apparatus at his disposal to regulate industries like the railroads.
And so I think it's pretty unreasonable to sort of claim that there's nothing he can do.
Julia Rock, you're getting a lot of love on our chat over on Locals that you can join now by clicking the button.
Not you, Julie, you've got a lot of work to do at the leather.
Mac Wackwy says, Norfolk Southern is already running trains over the same tracks and double stacking cars to make up for losses.
Elsewhere on the chat, a lot of people seem to be obsessed with llamas and alpacas, which I don't think is helping the conversation move forward at all.
Unless I'm missing something.
Julia, thank you so much for joining us for this conversation.
You can follow Julia and her work at leathernews.com.
Julia, thanks for coming on the show.
It's lovely to talk to you and I hope we get to see you again soon.
This is great.
Thanks for having me.
Take care.
Bye.
Bye, Julia.
Thanks very much.
Thanks for joining us.
You will be astonished to learn that the NIH need a new leader.
I know what you're thinking.
Fauci, can't he stay forever?
He did such a great job of advising us during the pandemic in an unbiased way.
You've done a narrative shift, haven't you?
I do shift narratives!
Wow!
What do you want me to do?
Immediate shift, very nice.
I'll try and shift narratives.
A 180.
What do you want me to do?
Talk about Julia and the Leather and the Llamas and Alpacas down on the chat?
I thought you might want to.
Well I'm actually interested in how they've gotten onto the subject to tell you the truth.
But I think it's going to have more impact on the lives of ordinary people if we work
out who's going to be the next person running the NIH.
I also think it's important that when we have Dan Cohen joining us from Redacted that we
have an idea of what we're discussing.
Now maybe we can talk about alpacas and llamas and glory in the conversation with Julia Rock from The Lever and her revelations about a corrupt railway industry and a lack of real care for environmentalism and Joe Biden, a potentially corrupt president, Visit in Ukraine because of economic interests rather than Ukrainian people's need for support and aid and ignoring the plight of the people of East Palestine.
But Gareth!
No, absolutely right.
I'm under a lot of pressure.
I can tell, yeah.
A lot of pressure in the workplace.
I think that was a nice link.
Yeah, one thing you can say, we're literally talking about the kind of corruption and the ways in which Biden has done nothing to tackle the railroad industry.
I mean, came to power saying we're going to give workers all these Sick days didn't happen because of lobbyists, because the railroad industry is basically too powerful for him.
He's completely impotent, only in that regard.
I imagine in other regards as well.
Potentially so.
You'd think so, maybe, at his age.
I don't want to disparage Joe Biden's reproductive capacity particularly, but I imagine at the age of, what is he now, 109, that to maintain an...
I thought it was a relationship with the pharmaceutical industry.
To maintain a relationship with the pharmaceutical industry, we've got, listen, Dan Cummings here.
Look, we're just going to show you now, so that you understand what we're talking about within the NIH, the person they're proposing as the new Fauci, Fauci part two, Fauci squared.
What's the name of the fella?
Peter Hurtes.
Peter Hurtes.
Let's have a look at Peter Hurtes and let's have a look at some of his propaganda.
Have a look.
Let's have a look now at the WHO's brilliant piece of propaganda.
We have to recognize that anti-vaccine activism, which I actually call anti-science aggression.
That's what I call it, because that sounds worse.
Anti-science aggression.
Because science, that means objectivity.
That means empiricism.
That means experimentation.
That's what science is.
And of course, if science was funded in a particular way and had a particular desired outcome or agenda, like, for example, to accrue profits and revenue, it would still be science.
That wouldn't mean that it was a subset of a corporatist, globalist movement.
No way.
It's still science.
It's science till I say it's not science.
has now become a major killing force globally.
It's a major killing force.
Are there any other killing forces you want to discuss?
No.
During the COVID pandemic in the United States, 200,000 Americans needlessly lost their lives because they refused a COVID vaccine.
Okay, well, let's make sure there's data on that.
Even after vaccines became widely available, and now the anti-vaccine activism is expanding across the world, even into low- and middle-income countries.
Even those people, poor people, even poor people are anti-vaccine now.
I mean, that's not as bad because we won't give them vaccines anyway because Bill Gates won't allow them to have the patents, so that's not as bad.
But it shows you how bad that even people that can't afford the vaccines don't want the vaccines, and that's a problem!
It's a killing force.
Anti-science now kills more people than things like gun violence.
It's worse than guns.
Global terrorism.
Worse than terrorism, that's bad as well.
Nuclear proliferation or cyber attacks.
The worst thing you could have in this world is Putin and not being vaccinated.
My God!
Just imagine an unvaccinated Putin!
And now it's become a political movement in the U.S.
It's linked to far-extremism on the far-right.
Far-right as well, you know, similarly, there's two things.
Not wanting to take a medicine for reasons that we'll be talking about in a minute, and also being a racist.
Somehow those things have been combined, almost as if you want to smear people who dissent to ensure that that message can never reach people.
Same in Germany, so this is a new... Literally got the word propaganda repeated again and again and again, because it is propaganda!
What, like censorship, misinformation, disinformation, malinformation?
The subject of the current WEF Davos Convention?
What a coincidence!
Yeah, it's almost like they're trying to create an appetite where people really want censorship.
That's interesting, isn't it, that they're doing that?
Primal Colin 2 says unvaccinated equals Nazi is next.
Oh Primal Colin 2.
So cynical.
Don't be so cynical.
The world's a beautiful place.
Go fly a kite.
Not if there's a lockdown in a 15 minute city.
Better a kite than a balloon anyway.
At least it might survive.
People don't like to see a balloon.
They've gone radically out of fashion.
Joining us now is Dan Cohen, a correspondent for Redacted, who is fascinated by the NIH's search for the new Fauci, a man called Dr. Peter Hotez, who we have just seen.
So thanks very much for joining us, mate.
Thanks for coming on.
Thanks a lot for having me, Russell.
Appreciate it.
A hell of a backdrop you've got there.
I'm coming to terms with it even now.
It's just a bunch of letters all thrown together.
I mean, technically it says Uncaptured Media, which is my outlet that I do in addition to Redacted, but...
It's kind of a work in progress, I guess.
No, I like it.
I think that you should be proud of it.
Now, tell us a little bit more about Peter Hotez and what's going on with that dude.
We watched that bit of propaganda that he made for the WHO a while ago, and I frankly took a bit of a dislike to him.
I imagine you're coming on here to tell us that he's the best thing since sliced bread.
It's going to be a radical change from Fauci.
And finally, we've got the voice of the people within the NIH.
Well, fingers are crossed now.
They're crossing.
Well, fortunately, we're on Rumble.
We're not on YouTube, so we don't have to say those kinds of things.
We can speak freely.
I mean, Peter Hotez, he really personifies the biosecurity regime that we've all been subjected to for the last three years in terms of completely unscientific reasoning for lockdowns, for vaccine mandates, for coercion that has destroyed so many lives.
And he is now being, he's rumored, it's sort of speculative that he's going to be Dr. Fauci's replacement as head of the NIH, basically the most powerful doctor in the world.
And so I did a two-part investigative series for Redacted, basically looking at his history from the beginning of his career in the mid-1980s Up until essentially the present day, and what I found is just truly shocking in terms of not only his willingness to lie and deceive the public, but his medical experiments that he has conducted on unsuspecting populations in Latin America, in Africa, in South Asia.
And he's just a dangerous character, and not only is he... Dan, Dan, can I stop you right there?
What about these medical experiments that he's conducted on people in Latin America?
I mean, that sounds like sci-fi, that sounds dystopian, that sounds like Mengle.
Now, what are these experiments that he carried out?
Well, so in the 1980s, he began treating what he called, he coined this term, neglected tropical diseases.
It's sort of like, you know, the responsibility to protect or something like that, that military doctrine.
He coined this term as a marketing thing.
Basically, for the Rockefeller Foundation, and he got money from the Gates Foundation, the Clinton Global Initiative, and spawned a neglected tropical disease industrial complex, where all of these maladies in countries that have been exploited by Europe and the United States, Where there's no infrastructure and people are living in literal sewage and they get sick.
Well, he says, instead of cleaning that up and building infrastructure, what we'll do is test drugs on people and none of them ever succeed.
And that's his whole thing.
And there's been all kinds of horrible, horrible results.
So now that's a $10 billion industry.
All of the big pharma companies, Pfizer is into it, the Gates Foundation, the U.S.
government through USAID has put $10 billion into it.
And it's just enormous.
Samantha Power tweets about it.
So that is basically the doing of Peter Hotez.
That seems like an extraordinary practice in itself.
All profits in that.
It's a profitable endeavour.
Forgotten tropical diseases, bring them up, bring them back, like flared trousers.
Flare ups though.
Oh no, that's a terrible story.
Also Dan, there seems to be a trend to promote the idea, like sort of new narratives that Offer opportunities for censorship and smearing.
Of course, unvaccinated people took a lot of hits during the pandemic and increasingly it seems that there was very little legitimacy to that kind of judgment, whether it's the figures emerging around death, The new heart attack information, the adverse events stuff, the efficacy of vaccines.
I mean, the list just goes on and on.
And yet we're entering an era where we're told that misinformation is worse than terrorism.
In fact, that's one of Peter Hotez's... What do you want to say?
Catchphrases?
Catchphrases.
Maxim's... Yeah, let's stick with catchphrases.
So, what do you reckon about that, Dan?
Well, Peter Hotez wants censorship.
He wants to criminalize anyone who sort of dissents from the biomedical regime that he subscribes to and that he's a mouthpiece for.
So he has called for, in the United States, the Department of Homeland Security, the State Department, the Pentagon.
All of the departments of government to come together, but not only government departments in the United States, but also across the world, the United Nations, NATO, all of them to come together to censor anyone who has questions about this.
So if you're a parent who says, well, maybe I want to get some more information about this injection that they want to put in my four-year-old's arm, You are now considered someone who should be censored.
You're even considered a terrorist.
And so he says, he admits that he works with the U.S.
government in order to carry out this censorship regime.
We've seen the incredible amounts of censorship all over social media.
That's why we're talking about this on Rumble and not on YouTube.
Suppose the ability to disseminate and share information and the ability to connect that these new technologies have granted us presents a major problem and a necessary dynamic shift for centralized authority.
They need to control this ability to present cohesive counter-narratives.
One of the things that's been astonishing for us is that throughout the pandemic we've been given information mostly By our audience, by people watching this right now.
They've been very diligent in sending us stories, collating and curating various facts as the narrative evolved.
Watching out for experts that were willing to speak out.
People that were actually pro-vaccine but wanted to discuss the particularities of mRNA vaccines and the nature of vaccinating huge populations without what they described as due diligence.
And I feel that We are seeing now that even a short period of time after it was impossible to talk about something, let's just take one example, like natural immunity, the mainstream media are necessarily discussing it because they know that there is a challenge to be met, that people are aware.
And I think that it's interesting that we're already talking about Peter Hotez.
It means that he's unlikely to have a halcyon period where he's regarded as a credible doctor
or to be lionized as an irreproachable medical professional because all of this stuff will
be available for a lot of people immediately.
I think we're out of the point, aren't we, Dan, where it's not even about condemning
individuals, but looking at such entrenching systemic corruption that without meaningful
change to those systems, we're not going to get meaningful change in our lives.
When you talk about organizations like NATO, the WHO, WEF, World Bank, all of these unelected,
extremely influential bodies that either offer loans in exchange for regime change or have
the ability to pass laws are causing a great deal of fear.
And what you really need in order to ensure that their evident agenda isn't interrupted is the ability to cause division at the domestic level, confusion.
You need to invent terms like misinformation and disinformation.
Dan, has your research thrown up similar findings?
Yeah, exactly.
I mean, you know, I don't even mean to fixate on Peter Hotez.
It's just that he is the figure that's been promoted and pushed forward and he's been on CNN and MSNBC almost daily for the last three years pushing the sort of mainstream the establishment's COVID agenda but obviously he is a mouthpiece for a much larger power and as the narrative has fallen apart they've become more desperate and that's why they want to censor anybody who dissents from
The narrative has really fallen apart.
It's been absurd from the beginning, but for those of us who didn't question from the start, it's become totally obvious that we've been lied to.
I mean, if you look at just Peter Hotez's statements, without any kind of analysis or color, You can just see that he lied again and again and again.
First he said that the emergency use authorization was dangerous for the mRNA shots, and then he said it's perfectly fine, and then he said two shots are enough, and then three shots, four shots, five shots.
So he completely changed what he was saying depending on the kind of political situation.
What Dr. Pierre Khoury told me is that He's not a medical figure, he is a political figure completely and that's exactly what we have been subjected to.
It's not medical, it's obviously, it's completely bogus.
It is purely political.
That's a fascinating observation that science and medicine have become subsets of corporatist ideals.
We saw in the pandemic how politicized this conversation became to the point where truth was obfuscated to the point of Invisibility.
What do you think, Gareth?
Yeah, so interesting, Dan.
I mean, I just wondered, like, in terms of Peter Hotez and his involvement in some of the earlier decisions in the pandemic.
So obviously we're hearing a lot about how ineffective and potentially damaging, actually, lockdowns were for one.
And I wondered, in light of, you know, some of the information that we're we're discovering now, what was his involvement or what was the kind of narrative that he was involved with at the time around lockdowns and how kind of stringent was he on that?
Well, he pushed lockdowns extremely hard.
Basically, part of that was, of course, to implode the economy for the benefit of the ultra-wealthy.
We saw that Silicon Valley had the greatest period of growth.
It was the largest upward transfer of wealth in human history.
But it was also a way to scare people and to sort of terrorize them into wanting the fix to get out of this lockdown regime.
And so it was all about fear mongering.
And so Peter Hotez was on TV saying that You know, if you're anywhere near someone who might have COVID, who is outside, then you might get infected.
I mean, we all experience when you walk by someone, everyone puts the mask on immediately, and there's just this general fear of your neighbors, and it really turns people against each other.
And I think that was the point, to prevent people from talking to each other, to prevent any kind of Exchange of ideas.
God forbid, political organization.
And it was all, you know, just watch MSNBC and Rachel Maddow and Peter Hotez.
And, you know, that was the idea behind, I think, a lot of what happened with COVID.
Dan, is it true that Peter Hotez wrote an article conflating hesitancy around vaccine with racism and, in particular, anti-Semitism?
Is that true?
Because we did a story recently about how the word freedom is Currently being branded a far-right term.
And here on this channel, we are about absolute inclusivity, absolute diversity, absolute democracy, the ability to express yourself as an individual, whether you have a traditional orthodox background or a progressive background and ideology.
We believe in individual and collective freedom and decentralization where possible.
These attempts to conflate various ideas seems like an interesting new maneuver.
So I wonder what you thought about Hotez's claims and how Yeah, well, I completely share that ideology, that perspective of inclusivity and freedom.
And Peter Hotez wants to use, you know, in this case, he used Judaism as a human shield for the COVID agenda.
He has teamed up with the Anti-Defamation League, which is an Israel lobby outfit, in order to conflate criticism of ...of the COVID measures with anti-Semitism.
So anybody who has questions about these mRNA experimental injections is an anti-Semite, is what he said.
And so he's done appearances with the Anti-Defamation League, which actually awarded Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, it's like a courage award, And he actually also authored a recent paper saying that he's a victim of antisemitism, and he put out four emails in this paper that he has received.
Three of them don't say anything about being Jewish, and one of them, he says, it calls his father, it calls him a son of a kosher pickle eater, which You know, I mean, I've had some anti-Semitic, I'm Jewish, I've had some anti-Semitic comments in my life.
That's about the most mild possible.
And so that's his entire evidence for this whole kind of phenomenon of anti-vaxxers, anti-Semitism.
And like I said, it's just using the Israel lobby's approach where the Israel lobby always says anybody who criticizes Israel's treatment of Palestinians or supports Palestinian rights is an anti-Semite, and so Pfizer and the Anti-Defamation League thought, oh, well, we'll just apply that to the same kind of model to the COVID agenda, and anyone who disagrees is an anti-Semite.
That's a great answer, Dan.
My hope is that spaces like this grant us an opportunity to come together and find new alliances and unions, to move beyond individual hatred, bigotry and prejudice, to fight the very necessary war against centralized power and global corporatism that doesn't really care about ideology and religion, just power, dominion and profit.
Dan, thank you so much for your excellent contributions to our conversation and for your brilliant work in describing the nature of Peter Hotez and the kind of threat that this globalism and propagandist model presents to normal people across the world everywhere.
I really appreciate you taking your time.
And I will reiterate, I love your backdrop.
Thanks very much for having me.
I look forward to doing it again, Russell.
Thank you.
We'll definitely have you back, Dan.
You're fantastic.
Dan Cohen's a correspondent on Redacted, and he just told you about his own deal there, Uncaptured.
That's available on Substack, and it looks like he has some video content as well.
Shall we revel in it for a while, Gal?
You don't want me plowing forward.
You like to spend a little bit of time.
This is like the post-coital chat.
A bit of pillow talking right now to you, mate.
Where's your cigarette?
All right, darling, was that okay for you?
Well, I'm impressed!
Are you impressed with how I've done the interview?
It's very good.
Never seen moves like that, have you?
Absolutely.
Never been on the end of that sort of interviewing?
No chance.
Covered a lot of ground.
That was lovely.
Nice, wasn't it?
I like it.
Well, you know, nice is probably the wrong word.
Absolutely terrifying.
Terrifying.
Terrifying and nice.
A little while ago we were talking about Project Veritas because I think we all enjoyed that sting operation on a Pfizer employee.
A honey trap method where after three or four dates they sprung it on this dude that, you know, that they'd been getting him to say stuff about Pfizer and they talked about that.
They say something that sounds a bit like... Directed evolution.
Directed evolution.
That's the kind of thing.
But that sounds to me like, God, That's my religious beliefs described right there.
But we learned a lot more about James O'Keefe subsequently because it was kind of a smear campaign against him and he did some stuff that sounded pretty off-key like, I don't know, he ate a pregnant lady's sandwich, he took his whole team to see Oklahoma, maybe there was some legit serious stuff but when we spoke about it on this show we were saying is what he has done as important as what Pfizer and generally speaking what the pandemic response
has been, the profits that have been gleaned, the suffering that has been inflicted.
The redacted emails.
The redacted emails man! Like you know ideologically I'm sure there's a lot of
clear blue water between us and Project Veritas. I understand they're kind of
libertarian and looks like they've got some funding from some traditional
right-wing organizations, stuff that involves the Koch brothers and all that
But I believe that, as I keep saying, this is a time of alliance and looking at new ways to come together, not ways to be divided.
We must find new unity.
We must be willing to listen to people we disagree with.
That's certainly our approach.
You should see some of the shows I'm going on when I'm in America.
Also, he was great in Oklahoma, wasn't he?
But people forget, when discussing James O'Keefe, that he did the best Best bloody lead role in Oklahoma that I've seen for a very long time!
And his resignation speech very rewardingly and touchingly does reference his appearance in Oklahoma.
Would you guys like to have a look?
Join us.
Remember, we're on Locals right now.
We read the Oklahoma.
That's character zero.
He wrote the sandwich into it.
Nice.
Very funny, you lot.
Okay, let's have a look.
He looks great as a cowboy, says PrideFault.
And SensitiveHeart25, giving us a lot of love, seems to like you more than me, Gareth.
I'm not sure if I like the way that dynamic's developing.
Let's have a look at James O'Keefe's resignation speech.
There was also some truly bizarre grievances, including an allegation that I stole a pregnant woman's sandwich.
That will have to get read in court.
That was in fourth grade!
It's all on the list.
That's a Simpsons joke for you guys there.
laid his sandwich, he picked up a dog by its back legs and pushed it around like a vacuum
cleaner.
That was in fourth grade!
It's all on the list.
That's a Simpsons joke for you guys there.
That Project Veritas paid for James O'Keefe's down payment of his wedding.
I gotta chuckle out of this.
I'm not married.
That's weird.
So they just made that up then.
Yeah.
So they've sort of come for him.
I guess the reason we were interested in this story, because we thought, is it because he's exposed Pfizer to some embarrassment?
Sure.
Like someone's gone.
We did find, in one of our episodes, we found a connection, didn't we, between Pfizer and the Koch brothers, that some of the funding, there was some organisation that funds Project Veritas that Pfizer donate money to.
You should watch all of our episodes because we talk about stuff like this.
After you've watched this episode, stay on Rumble, watch some more of the stuff.
There was a financial link there that could be made but it does seem oddly coincidental that this is happening after that massive Sting operation that the mainstream media wouldn't touch either.
Why didn't the mainstream media report on that?
I don't know man.
In a way I suppose it's good because it means we get an opportunity to create this movement where we initially start by doing news reporting but ultimately move into political spaces.
I think he probably didn't... If it's true, and it's alleged that he did steal that sandwich, that didn't happen like the other day, did it?
It's not like he did that sting, and he was like, brilliant, I'm so happy with that sting, and now for your sandwich!
Or on the way in, I'll take that!
Now here, my man, what's this you're saying about Pfizer profiteering?
I mean, this is delicious.
Stop crying over there!
It's my hormone!
It's my sandwich!
So what else have you got to say?
I've never been married.
I do hope to get married one day.
In fact, I got married to you in Oklahoma.
But that was pretend.
Everyone enjoyed it.
We rented a charter bus.
We all went down.
Everyone enjoyed that musical.
Or at least I thought.
It's like he's upset at the end.
I also like that he's obviously got some of the cast of Oklahoma here at his resignation speech.
They're still there.
I wonder if they wanted him to stay and maybe have a go at Annie Get Your Gun or Rent or another Grease.
I feel kind of bad for the guy.
I don't know, man.
I didn't hear the full story.
I didn't have time to hear the full story.
You may not know this, but by God, it's Shrove Tuesday, Pancake Day, Mardi Gras on the streets of Rio de Janeiro.
Here in Britain, we eat little thin fatty snacks.
Do you want to see two of the world's most powerful people chowing down on a fish pancake?
Of course you do!
That's why you come here for.
We've told you about Ohio.
We've told you about Ukraine.
We've bought you fantastic guests that will expose the infrastructure behind real power.
We've brought you together from across the political spectrum and told you explicitly that without individual spiritual awakening, we cannot change the world.
The one thing we've not yet done, It showed you Putin and Xi Ping making and then eating pancakes together in a sort of an item that I think goes on too long for either of their comfort and ends up with them sort of pushing fish eggs in a pancake.
Yeah, I also wonder if Putin's a bit annoyed that he's not very good at it.
His pancake ain't as good as Xi Ping's.
Let's have a look at these guys making pancakes.
we're just a couple of communists making pancakes together.
He's like...
I think he's burned it.
You reckon?
Some of his pancake has spilled into another territory there.
Yes, it has.
I'd say that the centre bit, that's old Soviet Union Russia, but then it's definitely straight into Ukraine.
Well, neither of them are doing the old flip technique.
Like, hopla!
Yeah.
That's hard, though.
Have you done that?
I've done that, yeah.
Yeah, my kids are obsessed with pancakes.
They bung themselves up on them.
They get up early, they go downstairs, they make them on their own.
I worry about it.
Yeah, you should.
It's not my responsibility.
Oh, no.
No, it is my responsibility.
Let's go one more time.
I feel is like, because they're not like I'd like, you know, Western leaders, I'm used to their propagandist nonsense where they're trying to pretend to be normal.
Look, you're just like us.
And I know they are normal and just like us.
And that's why them having such absurd amounts of power and privilege is so ludicrous.
But I've seen them people like they're frightening people.
Like they have people killed.
Legit.
I mean, I know Donald Trump would say, well, you think we don't?
Who's naive now?
You know, I mean, of course, we're so innocent.
I don't think we're innocent.
But like, it's just odd to see him doing something so mundane and time-consuming.
Yeah, exactly.
Who sold this to them as a thing to do?
It's still going on.
It goes on for a long time.
Why is Putin commentating over there?
Like he's looking at the other guy's one.
Russian wheat.
Russian wheat.
There's a bloody great hole in that pancake.
I know.
He's as bad as everyone says he is.
How nervous would you be if you were those chefs next to him?
I don't know if I'd intervene.
No.
Or not.
I'd just say, oh it's brilliant that.
I think like if Joe Biden was doing it, like if Zelensky was there, Joe Biden would be behind the scenes making the pancake.
Fucking ghost.
Oh, my love, my darling!
It has become eroticised.
I mean, did you see that cuddle with Zelensky's floundering panhandle scrambling about?
I think all other leaders are eroticising Zelensky because of his jumpers.
Now, I know that Ukrainian people need a good leader.
Ukrainian people need representation.
And I love that comedian has risen to the top in the way that Zelensky has.
And I think this war should be stopped.
But what I don't agree with is the likes of Rishi Sunak, our Prime Minister, and Justin Trudeau.
most beautiful haired libertarian liberalist leader in the world like are all like sort of pouring over him and crushing on him and fangirling.
They really are.
They love him don't they?
They do love him.
They've got a little club out of it, those two.
Yeah, Rishi Senak shouldn't be in charge of a country.
You can see the way, like, I say that, like, Putin, like, this is not, like, ideological, because I disagree with the level of tyranny, power, and control that these men have, right?
I believe in decentralization.
But at least they're old-school tyrants.
Decentralization wouldn't go down too well with these guys.
Hey, guys, we just want to, like, why don't you let every province, like, be sort of an independent anarcho-syndicalist group, and they democratically...
Nape, Sonny Jim!
Game over, pretty quick smile.
They just eat their fish pancakes while I flounder on the floor.
Hey, listen, we've got to wrap this up.
We can't spend all day talking about Xi Pin and Putin making pancakes.
Doesn't seem right, does it?
Doesn't.
Seems like an odd thing.
There's a war on.
Hey, we've got a great show for you tomorrow.
Darren Allen, author of 33 myths about the system, an anarchist, a natural anarchist who's got ideas.
He's coming on to talk to us about artificial world conditions and how we've been ultimately Conditioned into a state of numb conformity and how to reawaken ourselves.
All sorts of unquestioned myths that define our perspective on reality.
He's a fantastic writer.
I think you're going to really enjoy him.
On Thursday, I'm talking to Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Chris Hedges.
On Friday, we've got Jeremy Corbell coming on talking about UFOs, spy balloons, the deep state.
If you are a member of Locals, you can watch some of these conversations happening Live, because some of those things are recorded early in the day, and you can join us in our chat and ask us questions.
Wherever you are in the US of states right now, you've got to consider, is it worth making the trip to LA to see me live?
March the 2nd at the Vermont, because I'm going on Bill Maher over there.
Then, on March the 6th, I'm going to the Bilheimer Capitol Theatre, because I'm appearing on Tucker Carlson.
And between those things, I'll be on Joe Rogan again.
But if you want to see me live, you can join me at either of those places.
For tickets, go to RussellBrand.com.
Join us on local so you can be with the chat.
We do a weekly meditation where you can tell me whatever it is you're feeling will help you.
Heartbreak, grief, loneliness, dealing with corruption and oppression.
Hmm?
Pancakes.
Pancakes!
You need a meditation about pancakes?
I'll whip one up for you and we'll flip it over together.
We will be, and also my new stand-up special, that's going to be available on Locals exclusively for at least a month or so.
Okay, join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, because that would be, I mean, that would be very tedious for you.
We're moving forward fast, but for more of the different.
Until then, stay free.
Many switching, switch on, switch off.
Many switching, switch on, switch off.
Switch on.
Many switching, switch on, switch off.
Many switching, switch on, switch off.
Switch on.
Switch on.
Man, he's switching.
Switch on.
▲
Export Selection