All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 12, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:01:37
The Truth About Fauci - #057 - Stay Free With Russell Brand
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, so
so so
so you buy
You're going to see the future.
Hello there you awakening wonders.
You're watching Stay Free with Russell Brand.
Me and my online assistant Gareth Roy will be bringing you a unique take on world events and of course today we are sponsored by Vanguard.
Not the storage facility on the A4, not them, We're actually sponsored by Vanguard, the investment firm, who, along with BlackRock, are one of the best investment firms in the world.
Vanguard won't be participating in the redevelopment of Ukraine like BlackRock will be.
They're an investment firm.
Actually, probably quite a lot of BlackRock is owned by Vanguard.
This gets complicated.
Anyway, the one we like is Vanguard, best investment firm in the old world.
Now, of course, Biden's been involved in more classified documents.
We'll be talking about that later.
We'll be talking to you about Zelensky's Golden Globe speech and the nature of US propaganda.
In our item, here's the news.
No, here's the effing news.
We'll be talking about the privatisation of Ukraine with BlackRock, who aren't as good as Vanguard, our mates.
And we've got a brilliant guest today, Adam Andrzejewski from Open The Books.
Brilliant organisation.
He's going to be talking about Fauci's money.
The money in particular that he's made from medications.
Particular medications that I will not be talking about on YouTube.
If you're watching us now on YouTube, remember when we flip over to Rumble, We've got all sorts of truth.
We're going to radiate truth at you like a glorious sun of optimum data.
And what better time to do it because next week, did you know, are you excited?
Can you feel it?
It's the WEF Davos Conference Monday.
That's why we're going to be doing our Royal Rumble WEF Watch Along.
It's going to be a fantastic event.
We're going to see how the most powerful interests in the world from big We're gonna be watching along with you with some fantastic guests.
to come up with edicts and ideas, whether it's solar panels or eat bugs
or stay in your house for whatever reason it is this week.
We're going to be watching along with you with some fantastic guests.
That's on Monday.
I'm excited about that.
You're excited about it, aren't you, Gary?
I'm excited, yeah.
I think Will.i.am's going to be there.
Would you think Will.i.am will be there?
No, apparently, apparently he is.
It's not even a joke.
Will.i.am's going to be there.
I told you.
I knew you'd have at least one fact about it.
And it was Will.i.am, the masked singer, the voice.
Will.i.am's going to be there.
We're all pretty excited.
And I bet Klaus Schwab's pretty excited, aren't you, Klaus?
It is so exciting.
Klaus Schwab is excited, but how excited are you, Klaus?
It is so exciting.
And I just can't hide it.
I'm about to gain control.
And I think I like it.
That is the kind of entertainment that we'll be offering you next week.
Now it's time for our item.
The system is fine.
Don't collapse into existential despair.
The first thing not to be terrified about, and if you're watching this on YouTube, remember in a minute we're going to be talking about Bouchy and the money that was earned during a particular medical emergency.
Royalties.
Royalties.
It's not as simple as money.
They're royalties.
They're simple royalties.
And we're going to be talking about BlackRock's redevelopment of Ukraine in the post-war environment.
So presumably this war is going to end at some point when it's expedient, when the military-industrial complex is about to go, then it can end.
That's not to say that Russia's invasion of Ukraine isn't criminal.
It is.
That's not to say that Putin ain't a tyrant.
He is.
But guess what?
Multiple things can be true simultaneously.
And I've noticed, I don't know if you've noticed this, let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments, that often world events appear to be dictated by the interests of the powerful, almost as if that's what power is, the ability to set and enact an agenda.
Now, in case you was thinking of getting a little bit of work on the doors at a strip club, them days are gone, baby.
The world's biggest strip club hires robot suits that turn bouncers into Terminators.
Let's have a look at those robot bouncers.
It's a bit like Overkill.
Why do they need to move around like that?
Oh yeah, they're like participating in the stream.
Do you find me sexy now?
Do you?
That was only one dollar.
You put at least five dollars down my robo bra!
Hold me closer, robot bouncer!
There you are.
One drink minimum!
No touching allowed!
Stop wanking!
That's what's going on.
We're on YouTube at this point.
That's an English swear word, they won't know what that means and I don't think it's a proper curse word anyway.
Are we allowed to use that word on WH Sky?
I've seen Emma Simpsons, let me know in the chat.
I've seen Montgomery Burns call I think The Edge out of YouTube.
Wankers!
I've seen him do that, so I think it's permissible as a matter of fact.
Hey, the secret documents keep appearing in Biden's numerous homes.
Let's have a look.
What new documents have arrived now?
This is some normal news stuff.
Well, let me share some news that just broke.
We just received a statement from the President's Special Counsel about these classified documents.
You know, we'd seen reporting that there was an additional batch of documents found at his private home in Wilmington, Delaware.
We just received confirmation of that in a statement from the Special Counsel saying that lawyers did search his two homes in Delaware and also in Rehoboth Beach.
Excuse me, Wilmington and Rehoboth Beach, obviously both Delaware.
But they did find some classified documents in the garage Well, let me share... Why they got all of these classified documents in their houses?
And also, what's the real issue?
There's a few things I think this brings to the forefront.
One, when Trump had all of those classified documents, they went crazy, didn't they?
Remember that?
So, okay, so it's bad to have classified documents.
When Biden does it, they try to mitigate it and justify it a little bit.
But what's in these classified documents?
Why is it an assumption that there's all of this data and information that we are unable to access?
Of course, usually the example or the justification for it is that it's matters of national security.
If this information should fall into the hands of our enemies, we would all be in jeopardy.
But do you think it's really that?
Do you think it's primarily that?
Or do you think that much of the information would inhibit their ability to meaningfully govern
and control us because we'd be astonished by the depths that they will stoop to
in order to keep us in the dark?
Look at how CNN, part of the old mainstream over there, presented this information yesterday
in an attempt to sort of clarify that Donald Trump's much worse.
And remember on this channel, we are transcended.
So they're gonna have to amend that a little bit because now, look, Joe Biden had like 10 documents,
some top secret, he's cooperating, or look at Trump. 325 documents.
But even in the last hour, more documents have been revealed.
Look, there's some in the garage, 12 in total now.
In the end, it starts to look like they just are people that keep classified documents.
We're not asking the right question, really, are we?
No, we're asking, the real question is, why are things classified so much?
Do you notice that you're always invited to remain within a particular framework?
That's what I think is the challenge, to get beyond the framework that you're offered.
Or which one of these people do you prefer?
Which one's worse?
I've got another question.
Why are they classifying all of this information in the first place?
Look at some examples of classified documents historically and look at, you need glance only at the great hero Edward Snowden to recognize what happens when people make revelations that I don't understand that.
of the powerful Snowden tweeted, worth noting that the president seems to have absconded
with more classified documents than many whistleblowers.
For comparison, Reality Winner was sentenced to five years just for one document.
That's a weird name, Reality Winner.
I don't understand that.
I think his name is that, his handle, Reality Winner.
They're internet people, they're nerds, they have little handles, don't they?
Meanwhile, Biden, Trump, Clinton, Petraeus, These guys have dozens, hundreds, no gel.
Let's look at the top five examples of leaking classified documents and the consequences that those people face for just that act.
Number five, the NSA files.
Of course, that was Snowden's leak.
Highly classified information on the NSA.
The US Department of State revoked his passport.
He now has to live in Russia, which you know by now is the worst country in the world.
They like that.
the rights for asylum there. Number four, the Pentagon Papers, Daniel Ellsberg released those,
it was about defence information, particularly pertaining to Vietnam. Ellsberg was charged under
the Espionage Act, that's an act that they really, they reserve that, whether it's Obama or Trump,
they're always using that one, they really want to do someone over. 115 year sentence,
the Iraq war losses, WikiLeaks released hundreds of thousands of documents and Julian Assange is
in Belmarsh prison in the UK, which is a pretty leery nick, as we say over here.
That's not a walk in the park, it's not an open prison, it's not a tag on the ankle and a job in the town.
No, no, it's serious time.
23 hours a day, 15 minutes yard time over there.
Number two, Chelsea Manning's WikiLeaks.
Hundreds of thousands of docs again, and she was imprisoned for seven years.
And at number one is the JFK files.
Congress ordered that the JFK files, that they've been booted off into the future.
Once again, we're still not allowed to know what's in those documents.
One thing we haven't thought about, Ross, maybe Biden's going to be the next whistleblower.
Maybe that's what this is about.
I don't know if he could get his lips around a whistle.
I think he would struggle with that.
With the gusto that it takes.
Yeah, I think what would happen is he'd go to blow a whistle, a little fart would I think so.
Shake hands with a Salvation Army volunteer thinking it was a member of the Secret Service.
Dose off, drift off to the smell of his own farts.
Now listen, we want you to stay with us for a bit longer if you're on YouTube, but remember a bit later we're going to be talking to you about the revelations, the Twitter revelations around censorship with our guest Adam Andrzejewski.
Yeah, that's who we're going to be talking to.
The Golden Globes was on the other night.
When is it?
Last night?
A couple of nights ago?
I don't know.
Keen observer.
I try not to watch too much of that stuff in case it makes me go more stupid.
I'm going to remind you of your own award ceremonies.
I've done some good, like, you should see me when I'm doing award ceremonies.
They're top-notch.
I'll show you award ceremonies.
I used to use it to attack the powerful, me.
Not to sort of, like, just to churn out propaganda.
Now, look, Sean Penn, as an actor, is someone I've always liked and admired, and I don't have a personal opinion on Sean Penn.
I'm just saying that the Golden Globes, if this is a war, and I know that America are
adamant that they are not involved in a proxy war, but you perhaps wouldn't bother having
a Golden Globe ceremony in a genuine and legitimate war, would you?
Have a little look at this, I'll call it a farrago, because Zelensky obviously, in some
propaganda it says that Zelensky interrupted the Golden Globes, but he was very much part
of the Golden Globes.
And what we want to draw your attention to and what we'll be talking about in our presentation,
here's the news, no, here's the effing news, how there are already deals being done by
Zelensky between Ukraine and Black Rock for the redevelopment and reconstruction of Ukraine
Black Rock don't get involved in things unless there's profit to be had.
So using the Golden Globes to present only the humanitarian aspect of this conflict is reductive.
Have a little look.
Those nominated films are proof that regardless of language spoken, cinema at its best is
an art form that can speak to all the aspirations.
To generosity, to integrity, to empathy, to love.
Again, there's a lot of sanctimony and a lot of sentimentality here.
Can we have a look at the bit where Zelensky actually speaks?
Can we go to that bit?
Stay on YouTube for now.
Don't go off YouTube yet.
Thanks.
Ukraine is not over yet, but the tide is turning and it is already clear who will win.
There were still battles So it's not, like, really a message for peace.
It's a rallying cry for an ongoing conflict, which we know is profitable to the military-industrial complex.
Look at how the mainstream media are reporting this.
If you're watching us on YouTube, get ready to click over on Rumble, because we're about to convey information to you that we would be censored for conveying on YouTube.
But we really want you to stay with us.
Look, the New York Times, Zelensky thanks the free world in a video message at the Golden Globes.
There'll be no third World War.
Oh, thanks!
Let's have a look at some of the other headlines.
Zelensky offers message of peace during the Golden Globes.
It wasn't a message of peace.
The only way to ensure that there's not going to be a third world war is for there to be peace.
What doesn't seem to be implied is that there's going to be any end to this war.
We've heard from Putin himself that the way that this will get escalated is if it keeps going.
It's part of PR.
Well, the only way to ensure that there's not going to be a third world war is for there
to be peace.
And so what doesn't seem to be implied is that there's going to be any end to this war.
And so you would, I mean, we've heard from Putin himself that the way that this will
get escalated is if it keeps going.
But that's not what they're saying, is it?
They're talking about escalation.
They're saying that they're close to victory.
And without diplomacy and peace talks, which it seems to be forbidden to even discuss, there's no way of reaching meaningful peace.
Evidently, peace is going to happen at some time.
We know this because a deal has been done with BlackRock for the reconstruction of Ukraine.
So that means it's almost a guarantee.
But we also know that companies like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon have said to their shareholders, for the next quarter at least, things are looking good because the Ukraine conflict is going to continue and we're going to be able to it continues to sell weapons. Now, if you're watching us on
YouTube, we're about to show content that is explicitly and literally Russian propaganda,
which we obviously can't show on YouTube. It's banned. We would be booted off the channel.
That's specifically why we are on Rumble, so we can give you balanced messaging. Our
nations create propaganda and, of course, Russia creates propaganda as well.
But what's astonishing are the similarities between the propaganda that we create in our nations and the propaganda that they use.
So if you're watching us on YouTube and you'd like to have a look at some Russian propaganda and you want to stay with us for our fantastic guest who's going to be making revelations around They do that thing, don't they?
What's that?
On the adverts for Vanguard.
Is that what they do?
Yeah, that's the thing.
Vanguard.
That's it.
Yeah, I thought you might start doing it.
I will.
If there's a sign, I'll do it.
You know I like anything like that.
that you can rely on, then stay with us.
Click over right now to watch us on Rumble.
Now, watch- They do that thing, don't they?
What's that?
On the adverts for Vanguard.
Is that what they do?
Yeah, that's the thing.
Vanguard.
That's it, yeah, I thought you might start doing it.
I will, if there's a sign, I'll do it.
You know I like anything like that.
They'll pay you more for that.
Vanguard!
God.
Let's have a look at some Russian propaganda.
♪ La, la, la, la, la, la, la La, la, la, la, la, la, la, la ♪
♪ La, la, la, la, la, la, la ♪ ♪ La, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la,
la, la, la, la, la, la ♪ No sort of mental, because it's a bit different, isn't it?
Look, what is it? It's not even entirely just nostalgic and retrospective.
It's distinctly different. Weird fabrics, weird light, weird sound.
Like, we showed some stuff from it the other day where they're saying,
will, you know, where you're gonna be without any gas and stuff like that,
and that weird advert they made where they give a gerbil as a gift first to power the electricity,
which is what they're saying is that's what will be required in Europe without Russian gas,
and then the next Christmas they eat it.
So there are sort of distinct harsher messages but there are similarities between Russian propaganda and our propaganda as well.
Just watch a little bit more of it just to really soak in the tones of Russian propaganda.
People, there's some really interesting sort of characters show up.
That's Russian future me is participating there.
Russian bridge, Charles.
Sort of weird stuff.
But if you look at our propaganda, just with a few tweaks, you could see that it's not so different as you might
previously have assumed.
Have a look.
Maybe we ain't so different after all.
Maybe we should not have all these crazy resource wars one after another.
I'm not saying, of course, that Russia's invasion of Ukraine isn't criminal.
Of course it is.
Or that Putin ain't malevolent.
Just saying that ultimately there are oligarchical interests at play within both narratives and you tend to be presented with the most convenient narrative depending on the whatever interests are in control of the machinery within which you operate.
Biden deepens involvement in war by inviting Ukrainian troops to the US for weapons training.
Now remember this is a war that the US are explicitly not involved in and have spent
more money than Russia on.
I think it's bigger than the Russian defence budget.
The Biden administration deepens its involvement in the Ukraine conflict Tuesday by inviting
up to 100 Ukrainian troops to the US for weapons training on the Patriot missile defence system.
So listen...
It doesn't sound like we're...
Well it doesn't sound like the Third World War is impossible when you read something like that.
There's no way!
All we're doing is training a hundred guys to operate a Patriot missile defence system.
I also can see why they have to work so hard to control the narrative.
With all of the Twitterphile revelations about how much information is censored, with the overdrive people go into to demonise dissenting voices, you've probably experienced it on a personal level.
You're a conspiracy theorist, you're in that case, that's That's the system catching up with the technological revolution that means that information can be immediately conveyed, that we have the ability to organise now.
If only we have the discipline not to yield to their ongoing and constant propaganda, the possibility for change exists.
When you feel disheartened, when you feel down, when you feel alone, remember how hard they work.
to prevent you from awakening. Remember how hard they work at commodifying your consciousness,
at deluging you in commerce and take heart from that.
Remember that awakening and revolution remain continual possibilities. That's what I offer people,
Gail.
I agree with you and actually in our presentation that we'll be going to in a minute, I think
what you'd like to see, if Zelensky gets to have another speech in the Golden Globes,
We're pro-Ukraine.
But the same way that whenever the IMF and the World Bank offer these loans, they come with strings.
you know, post-war, they're going to cripple their citizens for years to come.
We're not anti-bloody Ukraine, we're pro-Ukraine, but the same way that whenever the IMF and
the World Bank offer these loans, they come with strings.
Ukraine is being privatised.
That's what's happening.
Precisely what Russia feared after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Soviet Union, that NATO would encroach on surrounding territories one way or another, even through the agency of global organizations such as NATO, or through economic imperatives, i.e.
Black Rock are going to charge with the reconstruction of Ukrainian territory.
That is happening.
That's not happening.
The military industrial complex received 50% of Pentagon budgets.
The Pentagon failed their own audits.
70% of these weapons, no one knows where they've gone.
These are all things that should be on the mainstream media.
Why are they not telling you?
Because they don't want to upset you.
Because they don't want to ruin your birthday.
What do you think is the reason for them not telling you this?
We're going to go now.
Who won Best Actor though?
Yeah, that one.
Why would you have a Golden Globes?
I mean, it was good when Ricky Gervais did it.
Then it's worth watching when he's firing off home troops at that rate.
But, like, why would you bother having a Golden Globes if you're... Like, look at the sincerity of, like, this guy's a hero, he's a spearhead.
Then Lenny comes out with that bad voice.
Is that wrong to do that?
Am I encroaching on the borders of Europe?
You're the new NATO.
I'm the new NATO!
I'm going up to the border!
Thank you for all of the weapons money!
I am so grateful!
It's just an unusual way to talk.
I'm not having a go at him.
Hey, he's a comedian who's running a country now.
He is the icon I look up to because, you know, Oh, you've not got designs, have you?
I've got designs.
I'm going to tell you a story about a little boy growing up in Gray's Essex.
A simple lad, a humble fella, but with a glint in his eye.
Born midnight, 4th of June.
That guy hoped one day he would grow up to run a country and it hasn't happened yet because of the bloody system.
Maybe one day it will be allowed.
Before we go, can we turn up the levels in here and just have one more look at Klaus Schwab singing I'm So Excited I Just Can't Hide It, because it really cheers me and lifts my heart to hear it.
Turn up the levels in the room, though, so we get it.
And remember, the next week, it is Davos week.
That is globalist Christmas.
We are going to be live for three hours, aren't we, Gal?
Brilliant guests.
Providing you an alternative story for the crazy stuff they're up to with them insect crunching solar panel made in a concentration camp making loonies over at Davos.
Klaus, are you excited?
It is so exciting.
And I just can't hide it.
I'm about to gain control.
And I think I like it.
Perhaps I like it too.
We all like it.
Now let's see how the globalist agenda is being carried out in the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
Not because Russia's invasion isn't criminal.
It is not because Putin isn't a monster who can't walk a yard without doing a poo down one of his trouser legs.
But because BlackRock, a massive, enormous investment firm, have met with Zelensky to do a deal for the reconstruction of Ukraine.
We ask you, in our hero presentation, is Ukraine about to be privatised and is that what freedom means?
Here's the news.
No, here's the effing news, mate.
Here's the news.
No, here's the fucking news!
Good news, everyone!
BlackRock has done a deal with Zelensky to reconstruct Ukraine after the war.
But don't start thinking that a taxpayer-funded war where billions of your dollars end up in the military-industrial complex means that there's anything to consider or anything to think about when it comes to the origins of this conflict or the desired outcome.
Because that would make you, uh... Oh, where's my bloody hat?! !
Today's story is that BlackRock and Zelensky have done a deal to reconstruct Ukraine after the war.
Who's going to benefit from this situation?
And does that present us with the possibility to inquire about the origins of this war, the nature of this war, the funding of this war in a way that in any way contradicts the Putin is evil, Russia is bad, their invasion is criminal, all of which is bloody true.
But surely the best way to handle things is openly and honestly.
Is it?
Tell me in the chat.
Tell me in the comments.
Let's get into this thing.
Last week, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky agreed to coordinate investment efforts to reconstruct Ukraine.
Let's coordinate these investment efforts.
What do you mean we could conspire together?
How to do it?
No, not conspire, just collaborate, collaborate.
And again, I'm not saying that Zelensky is anything other than a Heroic leader of Ukraine.
I'm saying that BlackRock's involvement in the reconstruction of Ukraine means it's ultimately going to be profitable because the investment company BlackRock don't do things that aren't profitable the same way as Pfizer don't do things that aren't profitable and if you have the media unwilling to give you balanced reporting on a subject, a subject upon which massive powerful interests stand to substantially benefit, Maybe this is just another one of those crises that's hugely profitable for some of the world's most powerful interests, but what they're trying to do is humanitarian.
You know, like the pandemic.
By accident, it was really profitable for everyone, but what they were trying to do was help, and then just by accident, they're just like sort of someone from a fairy tale, just wandering down the street, helping people, and just a load of gold ends up in their pocket.
Vladimir Zelensky and Larry Fink agreed to focus in the near term on coordinating the efforts of all potential investors and participants in the reconstruction of our country, channeling investment into the most relevant and impactful sectors of the Ukrainian economy.
If I try to be devil's advocate, and I mean the devil, for a moment, of course, after a war, Ukraine is going to require reconstruction.
But don't you remember like about 20 years ago Iraq after the Iraq war required reconstruction and like Halliburton were right there to sort it out weren't they and to profit from it and had relationships with people.
Do you think that in the last 20 years things have got So much better!
So much better and more honest!
You know, there's so much more transparency now, isn't there?
There's so much more access to secret files and such a lack of ability to surveil and censor that obviously nothing like that could ever happen again.
Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments.
Critics have complained that BlackRock's new role in Ukraine could draw accusations of corruption.
When did you become so cynical, man?
With some noting that the company's managing director, Eric Van Nostrand, was hired straight into a senior advisory position in the Biden administration's treasury department just this past August, explicitly to shape US economic policy on Russia and Ukraine.
Oh, you think just because the company's managing director Eric Van Nostrand was hired straight into a senior advisory position in Biden's administration and now BlackRock are actually going to be actively involved in the reconstruction of Ukraine that there's some sort of corruption?
Eric Van Nostrand is a party coordinator that we booked to give you the best birthday party ever and all BlackRock has ever wanted.
It's for you to be happy!
Others have noted that BlackRock is a top beneficial owner of shares in major arms manufacturers who are reaping immense profits from the war in Ukraine with tens of billions invested in Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon.
OK, so what we're going to be doing is we're going to be spending a lot of American taxpayer dollars on buying arms to defend Ukraine from Russia, which will obviously escalate this conflict, meaning Ukraine will suffer critical damages and will need reconstruction.
Oh, my God, that's going to be expensive.
Yes, that's part of the beauty of the plan.
Because we sell the weapons that mean that they get more bombed, and then when they need to rebuild Ukraine, guess who rebuilds it?
Someone else?
No, not someone else.
Us!
And guess who funds it?
Someone else?
Yeah, someone else.
But BlackRock are not just profiting from the war in Ukraine that you're funding, they're also profiting from your poverty in the housing market as well.
So whether it's in foreign overseas wars that America are not involved in, or in your inability to afford a home, BlackRock are benefiting.
Here's how.
A report from the Wall Street Journal over the summer claimed that BlackRock was one of several major investment firms causing distortion in the housing market.
The report laid out how BlackRock and firms like it are using their massive amounts of capital to buy up single-family houses, jacking up prices in the process.
So if you can't afford a home, if you suddenly find yourself owning nothing and not being
quite so happy, recognise that's not just happened by accident, it's happened because
the convergence of interests has orchestrated it.
In Houston, for example, the billionaire Fink reportedly accounts for one quarter of recent
home purchases.
He's simply buying up entire neighbourhoods and using them as rentals.
Blackrock is helping create a permanent renters class, though it's long been understood that
home ownership is one of the key elements to building wealth and maintaining the American
middle class.
We spend all of our time arguing about the culture war, arguing about whether your values
are traditional or progressive.
Arguing whether you want to be left alone because you're libertarian or you want to be left alone to identify in whatever way you want to identify.
Do you note that there is not much mainstream coverage of BlackRock acquiring entire neighbourhoods, negatively impacting the housing market for ordinary Americans?
Not only are the government not representing you by preventing something that could be prevented through the exertion of democratic power, if democratic power meant a centralised authority that acts on behalf of the people, that's what I thought it was meant to be, I don't know.
Not only do they not do that, They're also employing party planner and friend to the poor Eric Van Nostrand to work right in the heart of the organisation.
That's how tightly the convergences interlock.
It's a lockstep system that disempowers you.
So BlackRock gets paid by US taxpayers via the Ukrainian government to devise a plan that ensures the success of their future investments in Ukraine.
Made from money gained by making American housing unaffordable.
With a deal like that for our financial and political elite, why would they ever want peace?
Yeah, why would they?
Why would they ever want peace?
They're benefiting from every single angle.
How many times do we do stories on this channel?
Tell me, can you count them up?
I'd love the research.
Where it's like, oh, you pay for it when it's being funded, and then when it comes to the profits, you don't participate.
How's that free market?
How's that free market capitalism?
That's Communism, right up until the bit where there's money involved.
Then newslot, F off.
In case you think you're listening to the words of a madman who was once in the film Sarah Marshall, have a look at Mitch McConnell, who I don't believe was in that film.
And let's be clear, the reason that a big bipartisan majority of the American people and a big bipartisan majority in Congress support continuing to assist Ukraine is not primarily about inspiring speeches.
Well, if I can say that, you're the most boring person I've ever seen in my life.
You're like a grey ice cream melting into my mind.
President Zelensky is an inspiring leader, but the most basic reasons for continuing to help Ukraine degrade and defeat the Russian invaders are cold, hard, practical American interests.
Actually, you've got to respect that.
I thought they were covering it up.
I thought we'd discovered it, but they're actually just saying it on the television.
Cold, hard, practical American interest.
When they say American, you might think, well, I'm American.
They don't mean that.
They don't mean you.
You're not going to benefit.
In fact, it's going to be worse for you because you're not going to be able to afford houses because BlackRock will use their investments elsewhere to bias housing markets not in your favour.
There is no America.
There's an elite strata of people that benefit from these things and then there's American people and English people and Senegalese people and people all over the world getting royally fucked.
Helping equip our friends in Eastern Europe to win this war is also a direct investment in reducing Putin's future capabilities to menace America and threaten our allies and contest our core interests.
I think Mitch McConnell is using boringness to conceal the fact that he's just actually revealed centralist globalist conspiracy.
Actually really we can't lose here because we won't have troops involved we'll use Ukrainian troops and of course we've been agitating Russia through NATO infringement on decrees that were made with Gorbachev.
Later 90s, and we're all gonna profit from it because we don't want a powerful Russia.
We want a unipolar world.
And when I say unipolar world, we don't mean American hegemony that means the American way of life will benefit ordinary Americans.
I mean American elites and American corporations will benefit, and I'll just be able to drizzle away and melt into a pool of gray sperm just there, quivering on the ground.
In October, the IMF executive board approved the disbursement of 1.3 billion dollars to Ukraine.
So, the IMF are involved as well.
That's good.
It's good to know that there are unelected globalist bodies orchestrating this from,
not actually behind the scenes, from in front of the scenes.
Ukraine's total external government debt amounts to $54 billion.
The country paid $7.3 billion in debt repayment in 2022 alone.
More than half of it is due to private lenders like banks and hedge funds, while most of
the rest is owed to multilateral institutions such as the International Monetary Fund, the
World Bank and European Investment Bank.
So when you're watching all this stuff on the news about the humanitarian disaster and
people are huddled and people being bombed and Zelensky being braved and that flag in
the bloody Congress being kissed, behind the stage is all hedge funds.
There's people on phones literally going, listen, you should probably invest right now
in the reconstruction of Ukraine.
It's going to be really profitable.
Like, I'm not 12, so I recognise what capitalism is and I know that sort of stuff happens, but shouldn't that sort of just be plainly stated on the news by the mainstream media instead of them going, Hey listen, Putin just shit in his nappy while coming down the stairs, is that evil?
Here's Zelensky rescuing a kitten in a blue and yellow flag.
You're moronising us.
We're being imbecilised.
We're being turned into total morons.
We're being reduced to a state where Mitch McConnell can drizzle out a wad of doldrums and we don't even spot it as evidence that the whole system is corrupt and cracked.
Since the invasion, Ukrainian dollar-dominated bonds, which were issued as part of its 2015 debt restructuring, have been trading at around 25 cents on the dollar.
This reflects the high risk of default, but also means that if Ukraine continues to make its debt payments, Western bank and hedge funds could make profits of 300%.
The response of multilateral institutions has been to give even more loans to Ukraine.
These new loans have been piled on top of Ukraine's already unsustainable debts.
If Ukraine are leveraging that amount of debt, you know, seems like some of it's going to be profitable for the lenders, based on what we're discerning here.
But also, Ukraine's just been co-opted by Western interests.
There was a deal not to allow that to happen in order to ensure world peace between the former Cold War powers of Russia and the United States.
So essentially, they've co-opted Ukraine financially through this conflict.
Putin didn't just out of nowhere go, we're invading.
This has been a process of agitation that's involved regional disputes.
It's a complex thing, and you can look into it.
Jeffrey Sachs will tell you about it in more detail.
But once it becomes profitable and observable, you can see that there is a Western interest.
And if that's not being reported on mainstream media, then you also know that the mainstream media can't be relied upon.
The IMF leverages aid loans to push governments to adopt policies friendly to foreign investors.
The IMF is funded by and represents Western financial capital and governments, and has been at the forefront of efforts to reshape economies around the world for decades, often with disastrous results.
Now the results were disastrous there, but... We're gonna give you another chance.
Oh, thanks guys.
In Ukraine, the IMF had long planned to implement a series of economic reforms to make the country more attractive to investors.
Following the Russian annexation of Crimea and military conflict in Donbass in 2014, Ukraine faced economic and financial crisis and was forced to take on more foreign loans from international institutions.
IMF loans came with strings attached.
No shit.
Which pushed Ukraine to accept punishing conditions involving public spending cuts, privatisation and market liberalisation.
This prescription of foul policies is familiar to many lower income countries across the global south where the IMF has imposed similar conditions on loans for decades, unleashing long lasting damage on their economies.
20 years ago, when I was a wee lad growing up, you could read about stuff like this in books like Naomi Klein's No Logo, where often Latin American countries would be destabilised and then would be offered loans of this nature in exchange for favourable economic conditions.
It used to be an issue that belonged to the cultural left.
Now that their liberal establishment has relationships with the military-industrial complex and the financial industry, they don't talk about that stuff anymore, almost as if they don't care about other people at all, they just care about being in a position of power, and that's why suddenly you get people criticising the left from positions that traditionally would have been regarded as the left, and now those people, like me, have to be called conspiracy theorists or nutters, because the alternative to all of us being nutters and conspiracy theorists would be for them to have some principles, and to have some morals, and to have some values, and there ain't no way they're doing that.
If Western governments were serious about helping Ukrainians amid a devastating war, they would push for those debts to be cancelled.
And they are serious, because you see it on the mainstream media every night.
So soon, they'll be pushing for those debts to be cancelled, right?
Still... Just... No, I'm sure they're pushing for the debts to be cancelled.
Perhaps a brief glance at history will tell us that things of this nature continually happen.
Here's your friend and mine, Hillary Clinton, offering up economic opportunities in the aftermath of the illegal and devastating, duplicitous and deceitfully achieved Iraq War.
Iraq has one of the largest customer bases in the entire Arab world.
Customer bases?
They just had a war where they said there was weapons of mass destruction.
There were no weapons of mass destruction.
This is one of the best customer bases.
What about all these dead children?
Dead customers?
It has one of the world's largest supplies of oil and it has one of the best educated workforces in the region.
Oh my God, that's so disgusting, isn't it?
They're really well educated.
Also, a lot of them are feeling a bit vulnerable and a bit bombed at the moment, so they'll be extra keen to really put their shoulder to the grindstone.
Today, Turkish, Chinese, French, Jordanian, Iranian companies are lining up to do business.
But very honestly, we see too few American companies alongside our soldiers and our diplomats.
Get in there and exploit those poor people!
Iraqis are looking to rebuild every sector of their economy.
Uh, not only their oil sector, but agribusiness, transportation, housing, banking, and many others.
And so it's time for the United States to start thinking of Iraq, uh, as a business opportunity.
Start thinking of it as one?
I think you've been thinking of it as a business opportunity from the beginning.
But that don't happen anymore.
No one's thinking of Ukraine as a business opportunity.
And to say that that's even a possibility makes you, and me, conspiracy theorists.
And the sacrifice that the Iraqi people have made for your freedom is one that we highly respect.
The sacrifice Iraqi people have made?
That's, I think, a million children, certainly people, died in that conflict.
That's a sacrifice for your economic freedom.
Justin Trudeau now says that violence is violence against the economy.
Way back there, that trailblazer, that glass ceiling shatterer, Hillary Clinton, was saying that freedom means freedom to make money from dead children.
So when you're accusing people of being conspiracy theorists or whack jobs, It's all on the internet.
They're saying it out loud.
This is not made up.
I'm just reading these things out.
I don't even do the research.
I simply read it.
According to the IMF, Iraq is projected to grow faster than China in the next two years.
And they should know, because they stand to make a lot of money on those loans they've given them.
And when I say loans, I mean loans.
It's time for the United States to start thinking of Iraq as a business opportunity.
The quote was included in an email released by the State Department that specifically mentioned J.P.
Morgan, heard of them, ExxonMobil, heard of them.
J.P.
Morgan was selected by the U.S.
government to run a key import-export bank in Iraq and in 2013 announced plans to expand its operations in the country.
ExxonMobil signed a deal to redevelop Iraqi oil fields.
JP Morgan has collectively paid the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation at least $450,000 for speeches.
And ExxonMobil has donated over a million dollars to the family's foundation.
Oh, that's interesting co-existence.
Over here, Hillary Clinton's giving them opportunities.
And over there, they're giving her money.
But to suggest there's a connection between those two things because it's the same person makes you a conspiracy theorist.
In the aftermath of the Iraq war, the Bush administration pushed to privatise wide swathes of the Iraqi economy.
Many prominent political voices charged that the conflict was not about national security or a humanitarian mission against the dictator, but was instead an attempt to use military force to open up Iraq's closed economy to foreign corporations, including oil giants like ExxonMobil.
But nothing like that that could ever happen again, you know, like if there were
any prominent political voices saying the conflict was not about national security or
humanitarian mission. It's almost like they have to really emphasize national security and
humanitarian mission because if you were to just put your eyes there, you'd see, oh look,
there's a lot of economic opportunity emerging almost in the way that Mitch McConnell said on
your television.
In the email that referred to Clinton's portrayal of Iraq as a business opportunity, the Clinton
run State Department called Iraq a market where your companies can make money.
What do you mean business opportunity?
Yeah, what you do is you take the tax payments of American public, and then you say it's because of a what?
Yeah, yeah.
And then all these companies make a load of money.
Oh, thanks Hillary!
And said that in meetings with corporate executives, US government officials returned to the theme that the US government stands ready to help US firms operate in Iraq.
And they certainly did.
But that's history.
That's 20 years ago.
None of those people in positions of power now, and none of those systems continue to exist.
The IMF.
Black Rock, all of those kind of secretive clandestine relationships, big organizations, unelected global bodies.
None of that's going on anymore.
All you need to know is Putin is a really, really bad person.
That's basically all you need to know.
Don't think anymore.
Stop thinking.
Sit down.
Eat some food that's bad for you.
Watch some TV that's bad for you.
Forget about joy.
Forget about God.
Forget about love.
Forget about ever having a connection to nature or building a life that has any purpose or meaning.
Just sit down and shut up and eat You're bills!
All of the same questions keep arising almost as if there is an ulterior system that's operating that leaves clues and traces that are available to anyone if you watch them on the TV saying it.
But that's just what I think.
What's more important is what you think.
Individually and collectively.
Let me know in the comments, let me know in the chat.
I'll see you in a second.
No.
Here's the fucking news!
You're not very passionate in that Mac.
Mac of yours.
Mmm, yeah.
No, I know.
It's a shame I've got to be in the same room though.
Who's this little guy?
Hello there, my little friend, my little foamy pal, my little conduit of vibration.
It's not often in this crazy world, is it Gal, that we get to bring people some...
Good news, with that we get to welcome a genuine hero.
Someone who is a crusader for truth, justice and the American way.
Not Superman or Batman or any of those people.
In this case, it's Adam Andrzejewski, founder of Open The Books, who are an organisation that filed 50,000 freedom of information requests last year to help people find the truth.
You know when stuff's classified and you simply can't find out the truth because the truth is not expedient to the interests of the powerful?
Well, Adam is a person that ensures, as best he can, that we have Thanks for having me on.
truth which means of course he was cancelled by Forbes for making revelations about Anthony
Fauci who you might have heard of. He's a person who works for the government. He's
got a lot of knowledge around medicine. Adam, thanks for joining us.
Well, Mr. Brand, thanks for having me on. It's great to be here.
I really like you already. I don't get to meet.
I don't get to meet very many Hollywood stars.
You know, I'm from the Midwest.
I'm from Illinois.
It's the Super Bowl of corruption.
So we meet a lot of corrupt politicians.
We do our best to hold them accountable to hard facts, but it is great to be on your program here today.
Thank you for acknowledging me as a genuine star.
Now, Fauci was the highest paid government employee in 2019, so well done Fauci family.
We are of the understanding that his daughter used to work at Twitter, we're waiting for confirmation of that.
Musk, Elon Musk I mean, suggested that Fau... because you know Musk is, it's never another Musk is it?
Like not a Musk dear.
No.
Musk, or Musketeer, Musk suggested Fauci should be prosecuted.
What do you think?
And why do you think Elon Musk said that?
And, you know, come on, mate.
Well, Elon Musk has been throwing some bombs lately, that's for sure.
I think one thing about OpenTheBooks.com that I just want to lay on the table right away, we're all about hard facts, no spin.
Mr. Brandt, think of us as a Public Information Act machine, and you've got millions of your awakening wonders in your audience, and you're on a discovery voyage with them.
We want to provide the fuel.
So like you said in the introduction last year, we filed 50,000 Freedom of Information Act request to capture, over the course of the last two years, $19 trillion worth of federal, state, and local spending.
And we do this primarily so regular people can follow the money.
So we, ourselves, your listening audience, so we can hold the powerful accountable.
Republicans, Democrats, and unelected bureaucrats.
So I think there's like three keys to the public health space in America.
Number one, the first key is, is that it has a culture of secrecy.
And today we'll talk about the secret revenue stream that our auditors at openthebooks.com uncovered, $1.4 billion of these secret hidden third party royalties over at the National Institutes of Health.
The second key is just what you put on the table with the Fauci's.
So if US public health was a game show, If it was a reality TV show, I think we'd have to call it Meet the Fauci's.
Dr. Anthony Fauci and his wife, Christine Grady, most people don't know that she is the chief bioethicist at the National Institutes of Health.
Here's the third key.
It is a target-rich environment for waste, fraud, corruption, and taxpayer abuse across the entire public health complex.
And today, we've got some ridiculous examples of just how bad it is.
My God, you're brilliant.
I was thinking, we should have you on every week, every day, really.
It should be me.
Just come here and stuff.
Get out, you.
It's Adam now.
Adam won't surprise me.
Well, he will surprise me with saddening facts.
He's just hit me so hard with so many facts.
All right, mate.
So how come you got kicked out of Forbes magazine after eight years?
And how come people at the National Institute of Health were getting in touch with you to shut you down?
Is it because you were revealing information that was not helpful to the interests of the powerful?
That's true.
So Forbes didn't want anything to do with our oversight of Dr. Anthony Fauci.
So I was, you know, Forbes treated me well for eight years until I started writing about Fauci.
I wrote three columns over the span of three weeks, and those are the last columns I ever wrote at Forbes.
So, you know, I was there eight years.
I put up 206 investigations for about 20 million page views.
These columns were very popular.
And as a testament to the quality of the work, Forbes has left my author archive live.
Extraordinary, mate, that that's happened.
What I suppose I want to understand, mate, is that can you just tell me a little more about the NIH's 30 billion government grants and the 56,000 recipients and the way that these royalties operate and how they are distinct from, I don't know, bribes?
Well, Mr. Brand, I think during the pandemic, the American people, we kind of got the sense, the feeling, that big government was very close to big pharma.
And because of our work at OpenTheBooks.com, now we know just how close they are.
NIH, the National Institutes of Health, is actually a revolving door.
Every year, they dole out about $32 billion worth of grants.
To about 54,000 healthcare entities across the United States.
Think pharmaceutical companies, universities, research outfits, the entire public health complex.
That buys you a lot of friends, that buys you a lot of allies.
And now because of our Freedom of Information Act request, followed by our federal lawsuit to enforce it, We now know, coming back through the other door, over the course of the past 12 years has been $1.4 billion worth of these hidden secret third-party royalties that enriched the agency, its leadership, and 2,400 of its scientists.
So I suppose this is comparable in a sense to the FDA's ability to regulate the pharmaceutical companies that it is funded by, or at least in large part funded by, that when there are so many financial incentives, it's difficult to maintain the idea that these organizations are in any way objective, and ultimately it appears that These organizations are interlocked, so they have the same agenda.
And when that is coupled with the consequences that you suffered for your free columns, it seems like information is being controlled.
It appears that people are being financially rewarded.
It starts to sound very much like corruption.
Can I ask you, Adam, I would start calling you mister, because I'm loving this Midwest manners thing.
I'm loving it.
And it's getting a lot of love in the chat, let me tell you.
I hear that Moderna plans to a 4000% markup for its COVID vaccines.
That seems a bit expensive.
What do you think about it?
So Moderna is actually suing the National Institutes of Health.
You know, the National Institutes of Health, I guess, is suing Moderna because Moderna left three NIH scientists off of its patent application.
So this is a big dispute between the health care agency and Moderna.
I read the 2021 annual report At NIH.
And they profited big time through the license to Pfizer for the COVID vaccine.
Their third-party royalties in 2021 doubled to $127 million in 2021 because Pfizer licensed COVID vaccine technologies invented at the taxpayer-paid labs over at the National Institutes of Health.
NIH is claiming that Moderna actually did not recognize that technology and they're
suing them to get on the patents at Moderna.
So stay tuned.
This is going to be a big legal fight unless they can work it out.
And it doesn't look like they can work it out because this has been going on for the
last two years.
Now look, and this is why we need transparency on that third party paid royalty database.
Incredibly, although NIH produced 3000 pages of information, they redacted key information
that we need to follow the money.
We still can't follow the money.
They redacted the name of the third-party payer, so we don't know which pharmaceutical company actually paid the individual scientists.
We don't know the amounts the individual scientists Like the leadership, like Fauci, like Collins, like 2,400 scientists received, and they also redacted and blacked out the inventions, the license numbers, and the patent numbers.
Those scientists were paid by us, the American taxpayer.
They invented these things in taxpayer-funded labs, and NIH is redacting this.
Yeah, I mean, it's redacted so much that if we didn't employ forensic data scientists, these disclosures would have been absolutely worthless.
I dislike the paternalism inherent in these behaviours.
Gareth, what do you think?
Well, I was going to say, Fauci's denied so far, hasn't he, about these royalties.
And I guess the reason that he's been able to deny them so far in Congress to other, you know, other congressmen, other politicians, is because of these redactions.
And I just, it's incredible, isn't it, that these can still take place when we know now that there's a relationship where people like Anthony Fauci are getting paid money from pharmaceutical companies and we are not We're not being given the data on that.
How does that happen in a world where questions can be asked in Congress and yet these documents can still be redacted in the ways that they are?
So we launched our report on the third-party royalties in May, and that's when Mr. Brand did that great podcast, 15 Minutes, on the situation, and it immediately led, 36 hours after our release, to congressional hearings.
A powerful hearing in House Appropriations, where the acting director, Lawrence Tabak, he was there to get his budget from Congress, but he had to face questions on the third-party royalty report that we issued.
And he admitted that, yes, Every single one of those 56,000 payments over the course of the last 12 years has the appearance of a conflict of interest.
And that's actually our position.
Mr. Brandt, you can doubt if I say something, but when the government official says it, it's got to be the truth.
And so that's why Congress, you know, in the hearings with Fauci with U.S.
Senator Rand Paul, He is saying that Congress wants to make sure that we get an unredacted database.
And in 2005, the Associated Press got an unredacted database.
That was 17 years ago.
And they found that Fauci had burned down all the firewalls.
He had received $45,000 worth of royalties for an AIDS therapeutic that he had invented.
As the director of the agency he had invested another 36 million dollars of taxpayer money to enhance his invention and he once this was exposed He said he would donate his royalties to charity.
His deputy director, Clifford Lane, said he wouldn't donate his $45,000 of royalties to charity.
He was going to keep it.
So look, that's just one instance, one example of the last time when we were able to follow the money.
We can't follow the money now, and we need congressional action.
Signora Andrzejewski, I could see why they have to tightly control the narrative when so much of the information that's revealed through your intrepid research and tenacity is so detrimental to the version of reality that they would have us believe.
When I think of the way that Fauci has been celebrated, lauded, presented as a counter-cultural figure almost, as a truth-teller, as a legitimate scientist and doctor, that is deeply at odds with many of these revelations.
I wonder if you can take a little deeper, Monsieur Andrzejewski, into the nature of these COVID aid programs, the 3.6 billion COVID stimulant payments, and where some of those payments ended up.
So, the COVID aid bills that passed through Congress very quickly, they had the law of unintended consequences.
Mr. Brand, they were basically a license to steal from the American taxpayer.
It is the largest public fraud in the history of the country on what was stolen from our unemployment insurance when the When Fauci and the politicians locked down the economy, it threw 40 million people out of a job at the peak of the pandemic.
Obviously, these people had real needs.
Congress authorized $800 billion worth of unemployment aid.
And now we know up to half of it Four hundred billion dollars was stolen by criminals, con artists, and crime syndicates from around the world.
Mr. Brandt, it is an open question as to whether the Chinese military and Russian military hackers stole enough of our unemployment aid that was supposed to help people who had real needs, obviously, The Chinese military budget is $200 billion.
The Russian military budget is $80 billion.
It is an open question as to whether those countries stole enough of our unemployment insurance to cover a full year of their military budgets.
With US debt as high as it currently is, why are US taxpayer dollars being wasted on packages such as those as you have outlined and a ludicrous project to blow lizards off of trees?
Is that real or is this something I've dreamt?
No, I mean Harvard University.
They don't need taxpayer help.
They have a $40 billion endowment.
They got $75,000 for a project to go find 100 lizards by leaf blowers and literally blow them off the trees to see how they reacted during hurricane winds.
If that project had merit, Harvard could have funded it themselves.
They need to lighten the load on the American taxpayer.
You know, over the course of the last couple of years, here are just some examples of what we found worth of taxpayer abuse.
We found that NASA received a million dollar grant to prepare the nation's religions for the discovery of extraterrestrial life.
We found that Cornell University, Ivy League University, they received a million dollar grant on a study where it hurts the most to be stung by a bee.
And my favorite study comes out of Health and Human Services.
They gave 1.4 million dollars to California prostitutes for sex education.
And they could probably teach the class.
Mr Adam Andrzejewski, sir, you claim to be from OpenTheBooks.com and yet I challenge you to open a book at random from behind you and read a passage purely at chance to see what it says.
Will you do it, Mr Adam Andrzejewski?
Aha!
So this book, you asked about the national debt.
This book was written by the legendary U.S.
Senator from Oklahoma, Dr. Tom Coburn.
It's called The Debt Bomb.
And Coburn, after he left the U.S.
Senate, he term limited himself.
He was the honorary chairman of our organization at OpenTheBooks.com.
So let's just, we'll open it and we'll read a sentence.
It goes to military healthcare, $115 billion, I guess.
And the last area of the budget Washington politicians want to reform is veterans healthcare.
And Coburn basically probably made the argument that that, like everything else, needs reform as well.
Mr. Andrzejewski, something must be done.
All of you should find out more.
Thank you so much.
I hope we'll see you again soon.
about Adam Andrzejewski's fantastic work and endless endeavors to expose the truth to us
and to expose those who would conceal the truth to true justice.
Thank you so much.
I hope we'll see you again soon.
It's such a joy to speak with you.
Thank you, Mr. Brand.
Thank you, Mr. Andrzejewski.
What a fantastic contributor.
I'd like to speak to him more often, wouldn't you?
If you think I'm calling you Mr. Brand.
Would you?
You've got another thing coming.
It doesn't hurt, gal.
Manners costeth none.
What a lovely, lovely man.
Manners don't costeth none.
No, they don't.
They don't.
I liked him a lot.
Wonderful, I loved him.
Do you know what it's like?
It's when, like I was saying, like talk sport, they have people on that talk you through bets and that.
Well, you can get five to one, Neymar's gonna score first.
I liked his, I was into it.
So much knowledge.
So much knowledge.
I mean, what do they think the result's gonna be?
If the project had merit, then they should pay for it themselves to blow lizards off a tree.
But if the lizard's just gonna fall off the tree, isn't it?
Now what happens when these sex workers blow me?
Oh man!
Oh mama!
This public money's paying off now!
We've got some fantastic stuff for you coming up.
Over the next few days, Rick Rubin will be joining us on the show.
He's a radical thinker, he's a spiritualist, he's one of the greatest record producers that's ever lived.
He's worked with Jay-Z, Eminem, the Chillies, Johnny Cash... And now!
And now me!
He's going to remix my audio book.
That's what I want.
He might remix that Klaus Schwab.
Put a few beats behind it, Rick.
That's what I'll be asking.
Yeah, I need another hit.
On this Monday, it's our WF Royal Rumble special.
I've got to show you a trail.
You've got to see the trail for this.
It's a fantastic... You don't want to miss this on Monday.
It's a marathon extended live show with me, my associate, Mr Roy.
We will all be here.
Have a look at it.
Get your whistle wet.
January the 16th is round again.
It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
They include all of these World Rumble!
See you there!
Who will be representing Pfizer?
Who will be representing Big Tech?
What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
Who will be the Undertaker?
Who will be Hulk Logan?
Who will be the ultimate warrior?
And who will be the ultimate victims?
We already know who that is.
Join us for an extended stream, 7 a.m. PT, 10 a.m. ET, and 3 p.m. GMT.
W-E, W-E, I can't think of a sign for it.
You get the idea, W-F, Royal Rumble.
See you there, stay free.
There you go, that's on Monday.
So make sure you join us for that.
Plus, for those of you that are members of our special Stay Free AF community, me and Mr Roy will be doing... I'm going to call you that for a while, I wear off eventually.
I like it.
It's good, isn't it?
We're going to be doing a special show based on your comments and inquiries.
You have to of course join our membership community to gain access to that too, so why don't you do it now?
Our coverage of WEF Royal Rumble starts 7am PT, 10am ET and 3pm GMT.
So join us then, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
Rick Rubin tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection