God's Debris: The Complete Works, Amazon https://tinyurl.com/GodsDebrisCompleteWorksFind my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.comContent:Politics, VP Vance, Stranded Astronauts Rescue Mission, Joy Reid, Anti-Tesla Color Revolution, Reid Hoffman, Generic Complaints, Performative Democrat Protesters, Swatting Anti-Ukraine Conservatives, Sea Level Subsidence, Climate Models Hoax, ActBlue, Houthi Terrorism, Houthis Shipper Extortion Payments, Thomas Massie's Military Prediction, Houthi Inflation Impact, USAGM Shutdown, Kari Lake, Mike Benz, USAID Macedonia, J6 Pardons, One-Sided History Books, Jalisco Crematorium, Judge Boasberg TdA, President Bukele, Secretary Rubio, Biden ICE Arrests Fudging, James Carville, Rasmusson Polling Accuracy, Israel Iron Beam, Ukraine Peace Plans, Chinese Nationals Student Visas, Paul Weiss Security Clearance, mRNA Anti-Cancer Technology, Scott Adams~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better time.
But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that even the International Space Station can imagine, all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or chalice, a stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
Fill it with your favorite liquid.
I like coffee.
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better, it's called.
That's right.
It's called the simultaneous sip.
And it happens.
Right now.
Go.
Well, the Rumble Studio is working perfectly.
All the platforms are in place.
Everything's looking good.
I had a good night of sleep.
I think things are looking up.
I do.
But let's check on the news.
Anything happening?
Well, here's some studies.
People find, according to Live Science, Drew Turney is writing about this, people find AI to be more compassionate than mental health experts.
That's right.
They did a study.
And AI is more compassionate than mental health experts.
Now, the question that I have is, why is compassion always the right answer?
If you have mental health problems, Is compassion the right answer?
And the reason I ask is because compassion is a reward, right?
So if you want to do more of something, you would reward it.
If you wanted to do less of something, you would starve it or penalize it.
So what happens when you say, Doctor, I have this terrible problem.
And the doctor says, oh, oh, maximum empathy.
You have that problem?
Oh, I feel so bad for you.
Then don't you get a reward?
So why would you fix your problem if you're being rewarded for it?
But sometimes, don't you think you need the tough love?
Don't you think you need a kick in the ass sometimes more than you need compassion?
How about, you know, I have no compassion for that.
You need to just get your ass in gear.
Maybe you need to go to the gym.
Maybe you need to eat right and go to bed at 9 o'clock instead of 2 a.m.
Maybe you should do the same thing that everybody else does to be happy, and maybe you can come back.
And if none of that works, well, I've got a lot of compassion for you.
But I don't have any compassion for you if you're not doing the most obvious things in the world that everybody does to be happy.
And you've decided not to do them, and then you're complaining to me.
So, I don't think compassion is always the right answer.
I'm going to say the human might get the edge on this one.
So, too much compassion?
Bad.
But some compassion, yes.
Certainly there are problems where there's nothing you can do about it.
And for that, maximum compassion.
I'm all in for compassion on that.
All right, here's another study, according to the Daily Mail.
Luke Schaefer is writing about this.
Doctors reveal the alarming reason why you should never, in capital letters, never, go for long periods without sex.
Did you know, and this is going to shock you, that people who go for long periods without sex, they're not as happy as people?
As people who have a lot of sex.
Did you know that?
Well, if you didn't know that, you could have just asked anybody.
I'll stick with my theme of asking Scott.
But you didn't have to ask me.
You could have just looked around and said, is anybody, any of you, have you not had sex in a long time?
How do you feel about it?
Are you satisfied?
Do you feel like your life is complete?
No?
Didn't see that coming.
I don't know how anybody could have ever predicted that not doing the one thing that you're biologically maximized to do, how could that make you unhappy?
I don't know.
So, next time, just ask me.
Just ask me.
I could have saved you so much time.
Well, J.D. Vance is confident, he says.
That there'll be a deal for TikTok so that it can stay open, but it will have a non-Chinese ownership.
New York Post is reporting this.
And he thinks there'll be some, quote, high-level purchase of TikTok, and it could happen before April 5th.
But, you know, these big deals, they do take some time.
So maybe, maybe.
He must know something we don't know.
But he's, you know, J.D. Vance would understand this part of the world.
So he's not like Mike Pence.
Think about J.D. Vance analyzing the odds of TikTok being purchased by a bunch of investors.
Think about his qualifications to talk about that topic, which are very high because he's been in that business, versus Mike Pence.
What would Mike Pence have to say about this that we would care about?
J.D. Vance is way more capable and, I think, ultimately powerful than we might be understanding right now.
So he is really well poised for what comes next.
In other good news, so far it's half good news.
We expect more good news coming.
But the SpaceX crew has docked with the International Space Station.
Imagine if you were an alien and you were just reaching Earth's outer atmosphere and you're trying to observe what the locals are doing.
And you say, wait, hold on.
We see something happening up here.
Oh, there they are.
It looks like we see one of the people.
They seem to be able to float in space, and they look kind of made of metal.
Oh, here's another one.
Oh, we're going to see a mating practice.
I think they're mating.
Yep, they're mating.
They're mating.
No, they're not mating.
They're just docking.
It's called docking, not focking.
And that's the first step to rescue those stranded NASA astronauts.
So it seems to me that in normal times, this would be one of the biggest stories in the whole country.
And we'd be obsessed by it.
And every time you turned on the TV, they'd say, it's halfway done.
The rescue is halfway done.
Elon Musk is the hero that we needed.
He's doing it with nothing in return.
He's just amazingly created a company that can rescue astronauts in space when nothing else can do it.
Do you think that's what's going to happen?
Or will it be ignored because it's just so obviously positive, patriotic, inspirational?
Yeah, I think it'll be a little bit ignored.
Now, it won't be totally ignored.
They'll report it as news.
But I don't think they're going to be obsessing over how awesome it is.
And if you don't mind, I'd like to obsess for just a moment.
Now, they're not home yet, right?
So they've done the hard part, which is the docking.
I think that's the hard part.
So we're hoping that, you know, the other part is just as successful.
But can we just be impressed?
Just be impressed for a moment.
Just allow us to feel that at least some part of America can do something that's kind of awesome.
So let's just enjoy it.
And good luck to all of them.
And looking forward to all of your return.
Well, in a story that's almost the complete opposite, Joy Reid, who is, as you know, fired from MSNBC, according to Radar Online, who has an exclusive, they've got some kind of insider at MSNBC News who says that Joy Reid is really,
really mad about getting fired, and she's ready to scream bloody murder, and she might have insider knowledge about bad things that happened at MSNBC. See, she might seek vengeance.
She might seek vengeance.
Now, here's the funny part.
Did MSNBC not see this coming?
You know, I've wondered for a long time, like, why don't they get rid of her?
It's so obvious that she's bad for their brand, I thought.
And I thought, man, it's just taking forever for them to do the obvious.
To improve that slot.
And maybe now we know why.
Maybe they were afraid that she would be completely unpredictable and be seeking vengeance and have all kinds of insider knowledge so she could take down the entire network.
So how could MSNBC have seen this coming?
Well, they could have asked me.
I saw it coming.
So did most of you.
Could have asked anybody, but I think they knew it.
Yeah, she looked like trouble.
So, can you make a list of all the things that Scott would enjoy the most, and where would you put Joy Reid destroys what's left of MSNBC? Top ten, right?
I mean, even if it's a long list of things that Scott would enjoy, top ten.
So I've decided to go all in on supporting Joy Reid.
Joy Reid.
Joy Reid.
It doesn't get any better.
Anyway, let's check on the color revolution that's totally not a color revolution.
You know what a color revolution is?
It's all the dirty tricks that the U.S. uses to overthrow other countries.
You know, making it look like there's a groundswell for whoever we support.
And there's action in the streets and there's giant protests.
But, you know, of course, they're all organized and paid and, you know, completely artificial.
And then we control their media.
So the media acts like the challenger that we want to be in office is the only one that can do the job.
And the other one's a Nazi.
Sound familiar?
Well, that's what's happening right now in the United States.
But I asked perplexity AI. I said, given all the things that are happening, the protests and whatnot against Tesla, etc., I said, are we experiencing a color revolution?
And perplexity said, oh, no, no, no, I don't even know what you're talking about.
So I guess not, right?
Because AI couldn't identify it.
So it turns out that there are only...
Totally organic protests about, in this case, Tesla, because there are tons of young people who really, really care about the exact method that was used to reduce costs at the organization they'd never heard of called USAID. These are the least organic protests I've ever seen.
You thought Black Lives Matter looked a little suspicious?
You thought Antifa looked a little suspicious?
The people who are hating the electric cars, the very same people who would have killed their own children to make sure there were lots of electric cars to save the planet, suddenly they just hate the electric cars and the person who's doing it.
And boy, did they hate anybody who's trying to get rid of the waste and abuse and fraud.
And then Reid Hoffman just went on Colbert, like I think it was last night.
Reid Hoffman on Colbert.
Huh.
What does that sound like?
That sounds like somebody making sure that the media has a message that supports the protesters.
Hmm.
Exactly like a color revolution.
That's exactly what you'd expect to see.
But, you know, at least you can trust Colbert not to be part of any kind of what?
Okay, maybe you don't trust Colbert.
So Colbert asked Reid Hoffman, hey, you know Elon Musk.
What do you think about him doing all this doge cost cutting?
And what did Reid Hoffman say?
Well, he's smart enough, he's very smart, to say, Well, we like, you know, cutting the waste, of course, but we think that he could do it in a more compassionate and perhaps more legal way.
What's that sound like?
That's what I call a generic complaint.
You want to hear another generic complaint?
It should have been done sooner.
That's my ultimate...
Ridiculous complaint.
Well, it was a good idea, but it should have been done sooner.
Okay.
Shut up.
Well, it's a good idea, but it should have been done with more attention to the legalities of it.
Yeah, which would have stopped it from doing anything.
Shut up.
These are such generic stupid.
Ridiculous, pure propaganda complaints.
Does anybody know that the compassionate method would work?
Did we do a study?
Is there a way to fire massive amounts of people and make them feel good about it?
Oh, we're going to take your job, but we'd like you to feel good about it.
And although the people are not very compassionate, we have an AI you can talk to, and the AI has been proven.
To be more compassionate.
So here's the AI. Hey, AI, Elon Musk and his Doge team just fired me.
Oh, oh, that's bad.
Oh, he should have been more compassionate.
But I am.
I'm the AI. Oh, that's terrible.
Oh, what will you do?
So bad.
He's so incompassionate.
And I'm not even sure that it's all legal.
Oh, oh, the AI would say.
Oh, that's so bad.
It should have been done sooner, and it should be more legal and more compassionate.
And by the way, I'm going to tell you something you've never heard before.
Here's some advice you can take with you for the rest of your life.
This will serve you really well.
He should have used a scalpel instead of...
That's right, a chainsaw.
Yeah.
Those are my generic complaints.
And by the way, it reminds me of Hitler.
How exactly does it remind you of Hitler?
Well, Hitler, maybe he owned a chainsaw?
I don't think he did.
He probably didn't own a chainsaw.
But did he own a scalpel?
No, he probably never owned a scalpel.
See?
See?
So Hitler didn't own a scalpel, and Elon Musk is not using a scalpel.
You see, right?
Can you see?
It's kind of obvious now.
Everybody sees it now, right?
There's no point in hiding it.
And there was also that time he raised his arm above his waist.
Who does that?
Hitler.
Hitler does that.
By the way, Bill Burr says that was a Nazi salute.
So if you can't believe Bill Burr, who's the biggest frickin' idiot I've ever seen in my life, if you can't believe him when he interprets something to be absolutely ridiculous, well, who can you believe?
Yesterday I saw the ultimate, it's almost like this Russian egg within an egg thing, where somebody said that Musk was a Nazi because he supported the far-right party in Germany and said that they're the only ones who can fix Germany.
Now, I assume that that has something to do with immigration, that they must be opposed to mass immigration.
So I assume that's what he meant, that they're the only ones that can stop Germany from just being overrun, becoming a different country.
So the allegation was that the far-right party in Germany is pro-Nazi and that Elon Musk was supporting him.
So, I mean, that's proof, right?
That's proof he must be a Nazi because he's supporting a group that also is accused of being a Nazi.
So I said, hey, AI, perplexity.
Can you give me some examples of what this far-right party is?
Because I've never weighed in one way or the other about German politics.
But I thought, whoa, that's a pretty incendiary claim.
So what would be some examples of this far-right party supporting Nazis?
And so it gave me examples.
And listen to these chilling examples.
One person who was in the party said something that was similar to what the Nazis had once said without giving me the example.
What would be the example of what they once said that he also once said?
Because I'm not positive, but I'll bet you people say a lot of things that Nazis once said.
But don't we need some context?
Don't I need an example?
Then there was some other individual.
Now, keep in mind that these are not the party's platform, which has nothing to do with anything Nazi, but rather there were individuals who were blamed for saying something that reminded someone else, a critic, it reminded a critic of Nazis.
Do you know what else reminds the left of Nazis?
Everything.
Everything.
Everything reminds the left of Nazis.
So, the other was, some leaders said that not every person who was in the SS was a criminal.
So, therefore, he must be backing Nazis.
To which I say, I'm going to need a little context on that one.
Is it possible, and by the way, I'll be blamed of being a Nazi just for saying this, So I'm going to do it anyway because I don't give a, you know, I don't care.
Did it mean, and this is a question, not a statement, did it mean that there might have been some people who were just sort of pressed into it and didn't do anything especially illegal?
They were just trying to stay alive and play along during, you know, was there somebody who was in the SS who basically was just doing the bookkeeping and didn't want to be there, but, you know, it was easier than not.
I don't know.
So, wouldn't you like to know what that example was?
So, it sounded exactly like every leftist complaining about every Republican candidate for president.
Every Republican candidate for president has been compared to a Nazi no matter what they did.
Apparently, it's just the same thing happening in Germany, that there's people who will say, Hey, it looks like it's a sunny day.
Oh!
Oh, does it?
Does it look like a sunny day?
Well, did you know what today is?
No, I wasn't even thinking about it.
Oh, it's Hitler's birthday.
So you're saying that Hitler's birthday looks like a sunny day.
You obvious Nazi.
And then you wipe your brow like, this is terrible.
And they say, oh, there it is.
Your hand is above your waist.
What?
Yeah, your hand was above your waist.
That's called a Nazi salute.
And you say, but it wasn't.
It wasn't.
I was just wiping my brow because you made me so nervous.
No, no.
First of all, Elon Musk supports you.
And since he's a Nazi, why do you say he's a Nazi?
Well, obviously, because he's supporting the Nazis.
But why do you say they're the Nazis?
Because they say things that remind me of Hitler.
Well, wait.
Reminding you of Hitler is every fucking thing that happens every five minutes.
Everything reminds you of Hitler.
Why is that a standard for how somebody else is Hitler?
Well, don't ask questions.
So the color revolution is on.
And obviously the Tesla attacks are paid.
Obviously.
Does anybody doubt that?
Is there anybody here who thinks that suddenly all the people who were pro-electric cars and afraid of climate change, that suddenly they completely changed their opinion because they really liked the waste, fraud, and abuse, or that they're really worried about the compassion of or that they're really worried about the compassion of the people who are being fired from these ridiculous jobs where there should have been half as many people?
Does anybody think this is genuine?
Does anybody think that That the leftists woke up and said, wait a minute, he's using a chainsaw instead of a scalpel on things that have nothing to do with me and I didn't even know existed?
Nobody cares about this.
Well, the people getting fired care about their own lives, but nobody cares about it as a topic.
Nobody cares about it as a political problem.
It's basically every company, Oh, this is the other thing.
I think Reid Hoffman said that somehow Elon Musk didn't understand that the government is different from a private company.
I think he understands that.
Do you know who else understands it?
Everybody.
Everybody.
Literally everybody in the whole freaking world knows that the government doesn't operate like a private company.
Everybody knows that.
So there's your generic complaints.
Oh, he used a...
He's not using a scalpel.
It should have happened sooner.
Oh, should have used more compassion.
I'm not sure if it's all legal.
No, none of it's organic.
It's all performative.
By the way, have you noticed how many people are using the word performative?
It's now completely part of the Republican, let's say MAGA, Pro-Trump world.
We're seeing nothing but performance.
This is completely artificial.
And do you know how I know it's artificial?
Because nobody's asking enough questions.
Yeah, I saw one video where somebody talked to one protester and said, are you getting paid?
And then the one protester said, oh yes, definitely being paid.
But he might have been joking, meaning that it kind of looked like...
He might have been pranking, you know, just to send people off the scent.
And don't you think that's the biggest question?
Shouldn't the news be only about the organizers?
Shouldn't they be talking to as many individual protesters as they can to find out, are you being paid?
Now, I'm a little suspicious.
Of all the evidence that I'm seeing on social media that suggests they're being paid, I'm completely sure that these are not organic, but I worry that there might be some fake stories being planted that won't check out.
So there's like, oh, here's this advertisement for protesters.
And then you say, oh, there it is.
There's an advertisement right in the newspaper for protesters or online or something.
And you go, there it is.
There it is.
It's proof.
And then later they say, no, it wasn't.
We made that up.
That was just a meme.
Somebody was just joking.
You fell for it.
Obviously, it's not organized or paid for.
So I'm sure it's organized and paid for by all the usual bad guys who do color revolutions.
I'm sure of that.
These are fake.
There's no way in the world that people organically decided that Teslas are bad and that Elon is a Nazi.
Nobody would come to these opinions on their own by thinking through what they've seen.
Nobody.
This is purely brainwashing and or follow the money, some combination of those two things.
Anyway.
The swatting of conservatives continues and maybe even is increasing.
And now that people have the idea, I suppose it'll be worse.
I did see somebody did an analysis of the opinions about a Ukraine that the people who got swatted had.
So a lot of the people who got swatted seem to have a very clear anti-Ukraine messaging.
And do you think that's what it is?
Do you think it's entirely a Ukraine kind of a thing?
I don't know.
I'm going to say that is at least in my top three possibilities.
But don't you think the government should be trying to figure that out?
It would make sense because it is a chilling thing.
So, for example, if I knew that anybody who said anything bad about Ukraine was getting swatted, would it make me less likely to say something bad about Ukraine?
Well, if I were normal, yes.
But since I'm not normal, fuck Ukraine.
If you guys are doing this, we better not find out.
You know what I mean?
We better not find out.
Now, I'm not going to say that they're doing it because I don't have any evidence of that.
But if that were to come out, oh my God, that would not be for free.
If you think that's a free punch, you could have a real surprise coming because that's going to be super expensive for Ukraine and super dangerous because we would drop support really quickly.
So, Ukraine, if it is you, you better rethink this really quickly.
Now, and again, I don't have any evidence that it's Ukraine, so I'm not accusing Ukraine whatsoever.
But, if any evidence arrived, that's going to be really dangerous for Ukraine.
Maybe worse than Russia attacking.
It's going to be really bad.
Make sure you're not doing that, Ukraine.
Anyway, what else is going on here?
Randy Weingarten is still on TV doing her performative thing, which she does.
Was Randy Weingarten ever a theater major?
Did she have any background in the theater?
Because she really looks like an actress when she goes on TV. She emotes more than any normal person you've ever met.
She puts on quite a show.
So she's good at that.
Good at putting on a show.
And obviously good at retaining power and maybe even really good for the teachers.
I don't know.
Maybe she's doing a good job for teachers.
But it's not doing a good job for her students.
That's not her job.
Her job is not to make the students happy.
It's to make the teachers happy.
And to make the Democrats happy.
So she's really mad, really mad.
She's spitting mad, she says, about the Department of Education being wound down or decreased.
Now, let me do a quick survey since there have already been some changes there.
Does anybody have children that are getting dumber because the Department of Education is under attack?
Anybody?
Is there anybody who had children who used to be able to spell and do math, but suddenly they can't?
Is there anybody whose children benefited in any way from the Department of Education, as far as you can tell?
Is there anybody besides the people directly fired?
Who, in all of the different government Doge-related activities, is there anybody whose life has gotten worse because of anything that Doge has done?
So far, I haven't felt the impact.
Now, obviously, it's a big impact to the people losing jobs, but is it an impact to the rest of the country?
Because unfortunately, we do have a system where if things don't work, you lose your job, even if you were doing a good job.
So it's not an ideal system.
Capitalism is a brutal system, and competition is brutal, and evolution is brutal.
But it does get you to a better place in the larger picture, not in the micro picture.
Anyway.
So yeah, Randy Weingarten, she's really mad about that Department of Education, which some say is just another tool of the Democrats and not really something that was helping anybody get a better education.
That's what the critics would say.
Well, let's talk about climate change.
Anthony Watts of What's Up With That is writing about a New York Post story.
So New York Post wrote a story about the sea level Changes around our big cities.
So apparently the sea level is relatively higher in, let's see, New York City and San Francisco and Los Angeles and other cities.
And it's based on two things.
One, the sea level seems to be getting higher.
But it's also because there's, what's the word they use?
Subsidence.
Subsidence?
Subsidence.
S-U-B-S-I-D-E-N-C-E. How would you pronounce that?
Subsidence?
Now, what it means is that if you put a big city next to the water, there's a real good chance that it will just start sinking over time.
Now, part of it is because of excessive groundwater extraction.
So as the ground water is reduced under the city, there's just less there holding it up, so it sinks.
Some of it is infrastructure issues.
I don't know what that means.
Sediment compaction and tectonic shifts.
But climate change is not part of that story.
So with or without climate change, a city that just happens to be a city could naturally sink.
And we know exactly why and not because of climate change.
But the story got sort of conflated with the climate change predictions to make it look like, sure enough, climate change predicted exactly this.
But there's no evidence that climate change did anything.
And indeed, the change in sea level seems to be completely consistent with the last hundred years.
And not showing any signs that any kind of human activity, in terms of climate change specifically, had anything to do with anything.
So, here's what I like to say after a story like that.
Wait until Democrats find out about climate models.
Because at this point, there's very little holding the entire Democrat Party together.
But still one of them is climate change.
Once they realize that the climate models are completely ridiculous bullshit, and always have been, and couldn't possibly have ever told you the future, what do they have left?
I mean, there's not much left.
James Comer said the other day that they're doing some investigation into Active Blue.
So, ActBlue is the big organization that allegedly gets small donations from people and packages them up for Democrats.
Now, that would be completely legal if that's all they were doing.
But Comer and others and Doge have seemed to have discovered that ActBlue might be involved in something far more nefarious.
Comer goes so far as to say that the...
That the investigation that he's putting on into Act Blue will destroy the entire Democrat Party.
Now, that sounds like hyperbole.
It's hard for me to believe it would destroy the whole Democratic Party.
But he might know more than you know.
He might know a little bit more about how deep this Act Blue thing goes.
Because if it touches a lot of the leaders, and the leaders...
Let's say it could be demonstrated that the leaders knew exactly what was going on.
That actually could destroy the entire Democratic Party.
So I feel like I would bet against it, no matter what happens to Act Blue.
I feel like the Democrats would probably say, no, we didn't know anything about it.
Nope, nope, surprise.
You can't prove we knew anything about it.
And maybe it will go away.
But it could be such an important funding source.
That they might have a money problem.
And maybe the money problem would be enough to give them a big problem.
We'll see.
Anyway, Trump has ordered an attack on the Houthis.
Now, if you're not keeping up with this, the Houthis are a group in Yemen, and they're right there by the Red Sea.
And if you can't do shipping in the Red Sea area, you're going to have to go all the way around the Horn of Africa, which is really expensive.
Your insurance rates for your shipping will go through the roof, and apparently American shipping has been targeted.
It looks like some other countries perhaps have not been targeted, and we don't know if that's because they're allies of Iran that backs the Houthis, or is it possible that they're paying bribes?
Because I learned today that the Houthis are blackmailing some of the shippers.
So I'm guessing the Americans are not paying the bribe, and maybe, maybe some other countries are saying, you know what, we'll just pay the bribe because it's a lot cheaper than being attacked.
So I don't know how that works.
But remember I always tell you that the only thing that you can rely on that's real is that which predicts.
Those things which predict the future accurately probably are telling you that there's something real.
If something's an idea, but it doesn't predict, probably wasn't real.
So one of the things that's interesting here is that Thomas Massey had made the following prediction, and he said it publicly.
He said that, I recently said to watch for a new military engagement.
To compensate for the pullback in Ukraine.
Oh, this is good.
This is a very specific prediction.
The military-industrial complex demands about 50 billion a year from our government, above and beyond what's necessary to defend our country.
So, immediately after we got out of Afghanistan, oh, look, we better pay a lot of money in Ukraine.
And as we're winding down Ukraine, oh, look.
Coincidentally, there's a brand new military conflict with the Hoodies.
Now, we've bombed them before or attacked them before, but not as scale.
So, I'm going to give Thomas Massey the win for the correct prediction.
Right on schedule, another major military action.
Now, does that mean that we shouldn't do it?
No, that's a separate question.
But it also seems, again, to support Massey's prediction, there's always a reason.
Right?
There's always a reason.
The reason may not be one you agree with.
But we always have a reason.
Some kind of reason.
Oh, we better stop Russia there or it'll get worse.
We better be, you know, have a big...
And we better do a lot in Afghanistan because that's where the terrorist training camps are.
There are reasons, and they're not crazy reasons.
And attacking the Houthis, well, it's a really good reason.
It's a really good reason.
But then Thomas Massey went further.
He went to Grok.
And he said, expressed in billions of dollars, list the five countries and five corporations that will benefit the most from the U.S. military activity to eliminate shipping disruptions caused by the Houthis and the Red Sea.
And according to Grok, the countries that would benefit the most are China, Saudi, Germany, Japan, South Korea, and the U.S. is not in the top five.
and then of the corporations, None of the corporations are American, the top five.
So, this would suggest that America is just sort of creating another reason to spend another $50 billion because the old reason is decaying, the Ukraine war, and they just need a new military-industrial complex war to keep selling weapons.
Now, that's a pretty good prediction.
So I take it very seriously.
On the other hand, I went to perplex the AI and I asked the following question.
So it's sort of an AI battle here.
I said, perplex the AI, what would be the change in inflation rates in the United States if the hootie thing is not resolved?
And according to Perplexity, our current inflation rate is around 3%-ish, and that if things went the way they're going in the next year, the cost of shipping not just to the U.S., but to other places that might end up as U.S. products at some point, that our inflation rate from that alone could go from 3% to 5% in a year.
Because the shipping costs would just be outrageous.
Now, do you believe that?
Do you believe that perplexity AI is a good source?
Do you believe that when it says our inflation would go from 3% to 5%, which would be devastating, by the way, that would be a devastating economic problem?
That's not just a little percentage.
Going from 3% to 5%, that's pain.
That's some serious pain.
And that it would be by next year, which is pretty close.
So, here's my take.
I don't think you can trust the perplexity estimate, but I also don't trust Grok's estimate, because I don't think that it's understanding that some of those countries, like China, I don't believe China is being attacked by the Houthis.
And I'm not sure that Grok knew that.
And I think that China is not being attacked by the Houthis because they have a better relationship with Iran, and Iran is running the Houthis.
So I don't trust Grok on this question, and I don't trust perplexity on this question.
But the thing we know for sure...
Is it's really, really making our shipping prices go up.
It's creating delays, long delays.
And it's creating uncertainty.
And so I am in favor of the attacks.
But I'm not in favor of the attacks if they have a, you know, sort of a pinprick.
Hey, we'll stop doing this or we'll come back.
We almost have to completely destroy every technological capability they have, back to the point where you've just severely destroyed that part of the country.
If you don't go that far, I think we can say for sure it won't make any difference.
They'll just reconstitute and get new weapons from Iran, and as long as there's anybody alive, Iran will say, are you still alive?
Yes, I am.
Would you like something to do, and maybe you'll make some money too?
I don't have any other options.
Okay, here's some missiles and some drones.
Just send these at American shipping.
You almost have to get to the point where there's nobody left.
Now, I'm not in favor of genocide, but how else is it going to stop?
And do we have a legitimate self-defense?
I think it's legitimate.
And unfortunately, it's a part of the world where if anybody's left, they'll keep fighting.
It's not like traditional enemies of our past where if you give them a really serious black eye, they'll say, okay, I don't want to do that again.
So, you know, let's work something out.
It will never be like that.
It will never be like that.
If there's anybody left, that one person will be firing a missile.
I don't want to say that I'm in favor of just wiping out the entire civilization, but what's the other way that works?
Can you give me a better idea?
Because here's what we can't do.
We can't surrender in the Red Sea.
We can't surrender.
So I think that they get to choose whatever outcome they want.
And the outcome that they seem to have chosen...
Is complete destruction of their own civilization.
I feel like it's just their own choice.
And I feel like if they need some compassion, they should talk to AI because I don't have any.
And if they want to kill all of their children by screwing with shipping to the point where it just makes sense for the...
The people who don't want to be killed to kill all of their children.
I'm not in favor of it, but I'm not the one choosing it.
I'm not choosing it.
That is their own choice.
And if Trump wants to deliver to them exactly what they've chosen, I'm not going to complain too much.
All right.
Meanwhile, Trump has ordered the shutdown of something called the global media, USAGM, global media.
Now, that was the entity that oversaw the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty.
So these are all the media broadcasting things that we would broadcast propaganda.
But it was left-wing propaganda.
From the United States.
It was sort of anti-conservative.
So if we had a conservative allied country, we were even working against our own allies because they might have been more conservative and the radio was propaganda that was more left-leaning.
Now, Carrie Lake had been put in charge of...
I'm a little unclear if she was in charge of Voice of America or the entire agency that had some other entities.
But she did a video today.
And by the way, if she's in charge of the entire thing, we'll figure that out by the end of the show.
She's doing a great job because the whole idea was, you know, get in there and find out if any of this makes sense to keep alive.
And it looks like she has decided that, at least to a large extent, it doesn't need to exist.
And she did a video today about a brand new, really expensive looking building that was built for this entity that's empty.
And I guess the plan was to move from the existing building to this building.
But as she points out, this new building, it's empty.
And they would spend a quarter of a billion dollars per year on an empty building.
And they could have just fixed up the building they were in.
And now I think that option is going to go away and there won't be anybody to be in any building because it just wasn't a good enough reason.
So, yes, it does look like this was yet another situation in which there was not enough oversight and probably a lot of money got pushed to cronies and friends and well-connected people to build a building that didn't need to be built.
And maybe...
Maybe it wouldn't have made sense if we'd all known what was going on.
So, good job, Carrie Lake.
Mike Benz, he's having the time of his life, I think, watching Doge uncover all the things that he's been warning us about, but we didn't quite understand.
We couldn't kind of conceive of the larger picture because it's just so large, and you really have to wallow in it to get any sense of what's really going on.
But here's a little sample from Mike Benz.
Apparently, USAID gave George Soros' Open Society Foundation $5 million for its NGOs.
So Soros had some NGOs in a little country called Macedonia that has fewer than 2 million people in it.
And the money was going to train citizens with a little book.
A booklet that would train them to protest using Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.
You know what that is, right?
So American activist Saul Alinsky had his own book, Rules for Radicals.
And it would teach you to do things like, oh, I don't know, organize protests against Tesla.
Sound familiar?
And mock people and call them communists.
Sound familiar?
Or call them Nazis?
Sound familiar?
So, apparently, we were spending our money to train people in Macedonia to use Saul Alinsky's rules for radicals.
That's right.
We gave money to a billionaire to teach an Eastern European country how to do a rent-a-riot.
Rent-a-riot.
Which is exactly what you're seeing happening with the Tesla protests.
It's just a rent-a-riot.
Mike Cernovich had an interesting observation today on X. He said, remember when the, quote, smart people who write about politics for a living were saying the January 6th pardons were a huge deal and really would hurt Trump?
LMFAO, he says.
Remember that those people are losers.
They don't leave their bubbles.
They're always wrong.
Keep pushing.
That's a really good observation.
I have to admit that when the January 6th pardons happened, which I was fully in favor of, and fully in favor of pardoning everybody, didn't care what they did.
So I'm all in on that, completely.
But I did worry that maybe it would create a weakness that would be exploited by the left to say, there, you see those pardons.
But it's been weirdly quiet.
And I think it's partly because so many things are happening so quickly that the Democrats could never really aim at anything.
If it had been the only thing that happened and there had never been a doge, it probably would have been a target.
Maybe it would have made more difference politically.
But now it just seems like it was 10 years ago.
We're all on Trump time.
Every Trump year is seven years.
And I'm thinking to myself, who would care about the January 6th pardons?
Wasn't that at least seven years ago?
I almost can't remember them.
And it became so small, looking in hindsight.
But also, here's what I wonder.
And maybe this is something the Trump administration needs to look into, but I don't know how they could, because this would be totally a state's issue.
Who gets to control the history books about January 6th?
In other words, will the children of, let's say, a year from now or two years from now, are they going to learn?
That there was an attempt to overthrow the country by Republicans on January 6th?
Is that what the history books will say?
Because it's not true.
Or will they say that the protesters were trying to save the country from what they thought was an obvious insurrection by the left?
And they were trying to make sure that the election had not been rigged because it certainly looked like it had.
Or will the history books say, well, there are two points of view on this.
Some people say this, some people say that.
I don't remember history books ever doing that.
Do you remember any history that you've ever read where the history was, well, you know, some interpreted it this way, some interpreted it that way?
No.
They just sort of told you what happened, and then you got tested on it.
So what are they going to tell your children what happened?
And does the federal government have any way to control that?
Or should they?
Maybe the federal government should stay out of it.
But the state government gets to buy the textbooks, right?
So the market will decide.
And so if the state government in blue states decides, oh, we'll buy these textbooks that say Republicans are the devil, then they will.
And if Texas and Florida say, Get those textbooks out of here because we're not going to sell propaganda to our children.
Well, then that's what will happen in those states.
So I feel like we're at the verge of having two different histories, a blue state history and a red state history.
And I don't know, does the federal government have anything to say about that?
Should they?
I don't know.
I don't have an answer for this one.
It's just, it's a big problem.
If we can watch history being written incorrectly right in front of us, I think that's going to happen.
Meanwhile, in Mexico, a truly scary thing happened.
So Mexican authorities found some kind of fairly huge crematorium for getting rid of people.
Now, I can't tell if it was for cremating people who were already dead.
Or the worst thing, that maybe that's how they killed those people.
But apparently they just found hundreds of shoes and clothing, meaning that there were hundreds of people involved and there were human bones.
And obviously it was a cartel operation in the western state of Jalisco.
And it might be the...
I'm pronouncing the J as an H. Jalisco Cartel.
I don't know.
Maybe that's right.
But here's the big picture.
Apparently, there are 120,000 what are called forcibly disappeared people in Mexico.
120,000?
Now, this is over multiple years, of course.
But there are 120,000 people who presumably were rounded up by cartels and just disappeared.
Well, for that volume, you would have to have some way to get rid of a lot of bodies.
And horribly, this might be how they did it.
Incredible.
Anyway, you heard about the activist judge, an Obama appointee, of course, who said that Trump can't use the 1798 Alien Enemies Act.
To get rid of the Venezuelan gangs.
So apparently there was some kind of old law in the books that Trump was using to say, all right, you can deport all these gang members.
And some of them were already on planes.
And this judge said, nope, you got to take at least a 14-day pause.
So it's a pause.
I guess they got 14 days to work it out.
Even to the point of telling the airplanes to turn around if they were in the air.
Now, I'm getting just exhausted in talking about all the bad judges and the lawfare and how they're trying to stop Trump and every single thing he does, because they all sound the same.
Trump tried to do something that's common sense and good for the country.
An Obama or Biden-appointed judge...
Stopped him for reasons that sound ridiculous.
But eventually, a higher court overturned that stupid judge and then we're back in business.
But here's a new challenge from a new Obama-appointed judge and a new problem.
And then you just rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat.
So they all start sounding the same after a while.
But a related wrinkle.
Is that Marco Rubio is reporting.
He said, we have sent two dangerous top MS-13 leaders, plus 21 of its most wanted, back to face justice in El Salvador.
And so we've got a deal worked out with El Salvador, where we sent 250 members of this Trenda-Aragua gang to El Salvador, which has agreed to hold them in the El Salvador jails.
At a fair price.
So we're saving money and getting them held in a secure facility with a friendly country.
And Secretary Rubio says that President Bukele of El Salvador is not only the strongest security leader in our region, he's also a great friend of the U.S. Thank you.
Now, I gotta say, This Bukele guy, he does some amazingly smart things.
And one of the amazingly smart things is this.
Simply offering to use their existing facilities to handle some of the worst people.
And I don't think we asked him.
I think he volunteered it.
Which is such a strong move.
It would be one thing if we...
You know, tried to lean on him a little bit and said, well, you know, we're like your big brother, so maybe you should do us a solid.
All right, if I have to.
That's so different than we don't know.
We've got this problem.
We don't know how to solve it.
And then he raises his hand and says, I have a solution.
I can save you some money and take care of this completely.
And then he does.
That is so baller.
So, so baller.
And the fact that Rubio says he's the strongest security leader in our region, did that include the United States?
Did he just say that El Salvador is better in security than the United States?
Because I wouldn't disagree.
We're trying to catch up, but that's a hell of a thing.
Anyway, according to Todd Lyons, Who's the acting director of ICE? Apparently, Biden was cooking the books on his ICE arrests.
Oh, big surprise.
How many people didn't know that?
That Biden was lying about the numbers?
Of course he was.
But one specific way he was lying is that they were categorizing people that they processed and then released into the interior of the United States as ICE arrests.
Does it count as an ICE arrest if all you do is release them into the United States?
To me, that would be called ICE not doing his job or ICE not arresting them.
But if they were technically arrested and then they were processed and then released without any penalty into the United States, I'm not sure I would call that as an ICE arrest.
But Biden did.
Look at all those arrests we're doing.
Anyway, Mario Nafal was reminding us of this story.
Then, do you remember that one of the smartest people for the Democrats, one of their geniuses called James Carville, who's even smarter than Bill Burr, barely.
No, I'm joking.
Carville's actually pretty smart, but he did realize that the Democrats have no skill and no leadership and no plan.
So he came up with the genius idea of doing nothing.
We're going to call it the playing possum strategy.
Well, here's what you should do.
Since we don't have anybody who can do anything useful, we don't have any leaders, we don't have anybody with charisma, we don't have anybody who's got good policies, and we don't have anybody who's not a complete loser.
So what we're going to do is we're going to play dead in about 30 days.
The media will pick apart whatever Trump is doing, so his popularity will plunge.
So just do nothing, because the more you do something, the stupider we look.
So stop doing something.
Every time you do something, you look stupid.
Jasmine Crockett, Maxine Waters, Schumer, he had a point.
The people that the Democrats were putting out front, Not really the best look.
Not really the best look.
So in sort of a, you know, I've given up all hope, he decided that if they just did nothing, that might be their best play.
So let's check in on that.
It's been about 30 days, and Rasmussen just did a poll and found out, oh, his approval is 52%, the same as...
I think he's at a high point.
So Trump's success, according to Rasmussen, is at a high point.
Now, if any of you are polling nerds, if you've ever heard how the left talks about the Rasmussen poll, do you know what they say about them?
So the Rasmussen poll is often, let's say, a different result.
than the bulk of the other polls that lean left.
So the ones that lean left say, oh, the Rasmussen poll?
Come on.
You can't take them seriously because they're right-leaning, as if the others are not left-leaning.
So you can't take them seriously because they have this pro-Republican bias.
And by the way, we have questions about their methodology.
Now, since you and I are not pollsters, we don't really know what that means.
What's wrong with their methodology?
Why is your methodology right and there's a wrong?
But here's what they leave out.
Rasmussen consistently does better whenever you could check.
So one of the ways that you could check, well, let me give you an example of something you can't check.
If you are six months away from an election and Rasmussen says the Republicans are doing well, but all the left polls say, well, not that well.
You know, the Republicans are actually a little underwater.
You can't really check because the only thing you'd have to check are other polls.
So you don't have a result.
You just have something that pollsters disagree.
The only time you can really know if the pollsters are good or bad is on Election Day.
So if you were to check the Election Day...
Presidential results of Rasmussen versus all the other pollsters, where do you think Rasmussen would be?
Right near the top.
So whenever you can check, okay, now we know for sure, because we have the actual vote, Rasmussen.
I think they got the last three, one of the best for the last three.
So whenever you see that complaint, Just remind yourself, whenever you can't check, they'll say, oh, you can't trust them.
They've got bias.
They've got this methodology that we criticize.
Whenever you can know who was right, there they are.
And they're reminding people of that fact this week, so it's kind of fun to watch.
Anyway, but how are the Democrats doing?
Apparently...
Apparently there's a new survey that the Democrat favorability has hit a new record low of 29%.
So you know how the midterm elections pretty much always historically have gone against whoever the incumbent president is.
So if the president's Republican, you can largely depend, historically speaking.
That the midterm elections would put more Democrats in charge and they would have some control of at least one part of Congress.
This might be the first time that doesn't happen because that is such a bad branding for the Democrats.
It would be hard to imagine that they could somehow keep the historical norm and gain power compared to the president.
I feel like Doge is going to keep getting more popular the more corruption they find.
So we'll see.
Meanwhile, over in Israel, their defense minister says that they're only a year away from deploying what they call the Iron Beam.
It's this giant laser air defense system.
It's supposed to be operational by the end of this year, actually, so less than a year.
And here's what that means in terms of cost.
So the existing Iron Dome systems fire basically a missile to stop another missile or to stop a drone.
But every time you fire a missile, it's really expensive.
So that might be like $40,000 to $50,000 every time the Iron Dome sends up an intercept.
$50,000 for every intercept.
And there would be a lot of them.
So it gets really expensive really quickly.
But let's compare that to what it would cost per shot for this new radar system.
Closer to $3.
$3.
Compared to $40,000 to $50,000.
$3 per shot.
So they can spend $3 to knock down the enemy's Far more expensive missile.
Now, apparently it's not perfect.
If the weather is a certain way, it's not going to work as well.
So we'll see about that.
You know, maybe they need both because if the weather's bad, they need a different system.
Maybe the lasers are strong enough or will improve enough that they can just zip right through the fog and, you know, burn the fog out of the way before it hits the target.
Maybe.
But if this thing works, I'd like to order 100 of them.
I don't know what the base units cost, so it's probably pretty expensive to get the base unit.
But once you've got that, $3 per shot.
That's amazing.
You should read my book, God's Debris, The Complete Works, because the middle book of the trilogy, if you can call it that, It's about a future in which this sort of missile defense was already implemented.
But in the book, some of them were implemented on sea platforms because you want to stop the missile well before it reaches your shores.
So you'd put the platform well off the coast.
So it could get them as early as possible before they reach the coast.
And then, well, I won't tell you.
It's a great book.
You should read it.
It's called God's Debris, The Complete Works.
Just check out the ratings and the reviews online.
You're going to see some reviews that just blow your mind.
Some of the best reviews for a book you'll ever see.
Meanwhile...
According to Reuters, let's talk about Ukraine.
Macron of France has declared that Russia has no say in whether NATO troops enter Ukraine because Russia wants to have no kind of European peacekeepers in Ukraine.
But Britain and France are thinking about putting some there.
And Macron wants to know that it's just up to Ukraine.
If Ukraine wants some European peacekeepers, that's up to Ukraine.
To which I say, what would Trump's plan be for keeping Ukraine safe?
Is it only the mineral deals?
Like if we have enough economic entanglements, Russia won't attack?
Or does it trust that...
Russia won't attack as long as Trump's in office, and maybe that could extend to, hypothetically, a J.D. Vance administration?
Is that the only thing we'd be depending on, the personal connection?
Would it be...
What would it be?
Now, when I said something like this online, and somebody said, why do you think it's...
The United States' obligation to protect Ukraine.
And I said, I didn't say that.
Where did I say it's our obligation to protect Ukraine?
I've never said that.
What I do think is if you want a durable peace deal, it should make sense to the people involved.
And it's definitely the United States' benefit to end a war and get out of that region and just say, all right, we're done.
We ended a war, and we're not in favor of wars.
That's good, especially if it prevents some future Democrat from spending another $100 billion right back in Ukraine.
So we do have an interest in unwinding our entanglement, and that's going to depend on both sides thinking that the deal makes sense.
So what would be Trump's Response to, well, if Ukraine wants these peacekeepers, of course, that would prevent any kind of a peace deal.
But what would Trump do?
I think he needs to make a better case for why Ukraine would be safe.
Because I think that's missing.
Now, I think he could do it.
I think there's room there to do it.
But I'd like to hear it.
I'd like to hear a little more, you know, what would Ukraine do to protect themselves?
Now, some of it might be, we'll send Ukraine more drones.
I don't know.
Would that count as the same thing as boots on the ground?
I don't know.
But I'd love to know if Trump has a more innovative, you know, out-of-the-box concept for this, because he might.
I suspect he has an answer, but maybe it's just not revealed to us in full.
So we'll see.
Apparently, there's a bill being introduced now by U.S. Representative, a Republican, Riley Moore, West Virginia.
And it's a bill to ban Chinese nationals from getting student visas.
So there are about 300,000 Chinese...
Residents, not residents, Chinese nationals.
So they're not American citizens, they're Chinese.
And they come to the United States for student visas.
Now, my understanding is that the reason that our universities like to have foreign students is that they pay full price.
So it basically subsidizes the college.
And the American students often have scholarships and stuff like that.
They just make more money on the foreign students.
But I'm in favor of this.
I would have tied it to fentanyl, though.
You've heard me say it before, that we should just send home a handful of Chinese students for every day that there's a fentanyl death.
So I would tie it to fentanyl.
But I like where he's coming from.
Meanwhile, Gateway Pundit is reporting.
That Trump revoked the security clearances for yet another law firm, the Paul Weiss Law Firm.
And suffice to say that this law firm has done a number of things that seemed politically biased and or inappropriate to Republicans.
And one of them was, I'll just give you one example.
Back in 2021, one of the partners in that law firm did a pro bono lawsuit against patriots on the January 6th day.
So it was somebody who didn't even charge money to put together lawsuits against the protesters on January 6th.
Now, I assume it was the protesters who maybe did some violence or something, but that would be part of the complaint, is that they were...
Politically biased.
Now, I don't know too much about the law firm, so I don't have an opinion about whether they should be...
I guess the action would cut them off from any kind of government contracts and also gets rid of their security clearance.
So it would be a pretty big deal.
But here's my take on this.
Do you remember the time when Trump couldn't get...
Good lawyers to defend him against massive waves of lawfare.
And it was because the lawyers were afraid that if they got political, meaning just defending Trump, that it would cost them later.
The law firm would suffer, and they wouldn't be able to get regular clients except for that.
And that was a big problem.
And I thought to myself, that's one of the worst things I've ever seen, that you create lawfare for a candidate, That's already as bad as you can get.
And then?
And then you make it impossible for that person to get good representation?
Now, I think Trump ultimately got great representation because he did navigate the lawfare stuff really well.
So, I'm no lawyer, but just judging it from a layperson's perspective, it feels to me...
That the legal team that Trump eventually put together while he was out of office, I think they were great.
Does anybody have a disagreement with that?
The fact was that what they needed to do was stall and minimize the damage and play for him to get re-elected, basically, so that the rest of it could go away.
So I feel like they did a great job.
Now, I don't know if this will hurt them in the future if they can't get regular jobs again, but the fact that there was ever that much pressure on lawyers who were going to help Trump, I can't feel any sympathy for him getting revenge.
Now, I'm sure they don't call it revenge.
They call it something like getting rid of bias in the legal process or something like that.
I don't think it would happen if they hadn't gone after Trump.
So there is a price.
Yeah, the lawyers that helped Trump are probably red-listed.
That's probably true.
So as long as that's true, mutually assured destruction has been activated.
And I can't say that I'm opposed to it.
I hate that we're in this situation.
So I hate that lawyers had pressure not to help Trump.
And I also hate that there's pressure against anybody for what they did politically.
So I can hate both of it.
But it does look like mutually assured destruction has kicked in.
And I don't hate that.
I don't hate that.
Because sometimes it's just the only thing you can do.
I don't know that that can get us to a good place where people can just be lawyers and there's no lawfare.
But as long as there's lawfare and there's a red listing of people who help Republicans, then I think Republicans have a free pass to destroy every law firm that they can destroy that had some hand in it.
I hate it.
I hate the whole thing.
I hate it from top to bottom.
But sometimes, you know?
Sometimes you've got to pull a tooth.
Anyway, according to Neoscope and writer Noor Al-Sibay, that over in Great Britain, they've come up with a mRNA technology, stop it, listen, that has proven effective.
Well, no.
Take that part away.
They've created a vaccine for cancer.
Using the mRNA platform.
Now, apparently they're getting some kind of good indications that it works.
I don't have information that says it cured anything, but it must be curing something because they're pretty happy with it and they're taking it wider.
Now, apparently what it does is you have to take a biopsy.
And you have to adjust what they call a vaccination.
Why do they call it a vaccination?
It doesn't vaccinate because you've already got the cancer by the time you take it.
So I guess that word vaccination is getting kind of overused.
But they'll take the specific cancer from a specific person.
So it's not even just the type of cancer.
It's got to be specific to the person.
And then they design their, quote, vaccination.
Around that specific one.
And they think it's going to have great promise.
Now, I'd love to hear, was there anybody who had an incurable cancer that's already been cured?
Or did it just slow it down a little bit?
Or did it only work on cancers that maybe there was some other treatment to, but they think this would be maybe gentler?
I don't know.
So I have many, many questions.
It sounds promising.
Now, if you're going to say to me, but Scott, if they get the mRNA, it's going to cause other problems with them.
I don't think the people who are dying of cancer are worried too much about that.
So that certainly changes.
It's not like COVID, where you can say to yourself, all right, COVID barely killed anybody, so you don't want to take a chance on the treatment.
But if the cancer is going to kill everybody, let's say it's the kind where there's no treatment, then, I don't know, certainly the risk profile changes completely, right?
What are your other options?
Is there a second way to cure an incurable cancer?
If this cures any incurable cancer, and again, they don't say that, but they're sort of leaning in that direction.
If it cures any incurable cancer, I think the last thing the patient's going to be worrying about is that they got some, I don't know, mRNA badness in their body, whatever that is.
So we'll see.
Good luck with that.
The sooner the better.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, that's what I got for you today.
It's a fun Sunday.
The news is all kind of interesting.
But I think things are heading in the right direction.
Things are heading in the right direction.
So thanks for joining.
I'm going to say a few words privately to the people on Locals.
The rest of you on X and Rumble and YouTube, thanks for joining.
