Find my Dilbert 2025 Calendar at: https://dilbert.com/God's Debris: The Complete Works, Amazon https://tinyurl.com/GodsDebrisCompleteWorksFind my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.comContent:Politics, President Trump, Pete Rose Pardon, Democrats Zelensky Guidance, Lindsey Graham, Anti-X EU Censorship, UK's Ukraine Peace Plan, Norway's US Refueling Refusal, Elon Musk, Congressional Corruption, 75 Cities Budget Corruption, Professional Liars Leadership, Israel Hamas War, Scott Adams~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams.
The best thing that ever happened to you.
But if you'd like to take it up to levels that nobody could even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that would be a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
Fill it with your favorite liquid.
I like coffee.
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine at the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
Go.
Well, um...
Here's some good news from space.
There's a private lunar lander that's carrying a drill and a vacuum and just landed on the moon.
Now, I think this is a good idea.
So it's got a drill and a vacuum.
So when I look at the moon, the first thing I think is, God, it's dusty up there, isn't it?
So they put a vacuum on the moon.
I don't know if it's going to vacuum the entire moon or just the front side because we don't have to see the dark side.
So that's good.
Finally, somebody put a vacuum on the moon.
Wait, what?
Oh, okay.
Maybe it's the vacuum up samples and bring it back.
But I like mine better.
In other space news, Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin is getting ready to launch into space an all-women's flight.
Aboard their New Shepard rocket.
It's an all-women's flight.
And Katy Perry.
Katy Perry will be on the rocket.
Now, I would call that a good start.
If he could find a way to launch all of the annoying celebrities into space, just think how much a better world it would be.
I'd like to start a petition for...
Let's see.
Oh, you make your own list.
So many annoying people.
But at least if it's an all-women's crew, at least they won't feel shy about stopping and asking for directions.
Am I right?
Okay.
A sexist would say.
Here's a big one.
BlackRock has announced it's going to end its DEI hiring goals.
Now, BlackRock was the big death star of DEI. They're the ones who not only had DEI, But, you know, they were really super committed to it, like it was their main thing.
But they were also forcing companies that they do business with to also do DEI. So this one's like, this is not an ordinary company.
When BlackRock pulls back on DEI, and they're pulling back hard.
They're not just tweaking.
It looks like they're just getting rid of it.
And that means all the companies that they had browbeaten into it also now are free to do the same.
So if BlackRock does it, that sends a signal that everybody can do it.
And I think they're doing it just for purely practical reasons.
You know, there's a legal liability.
It's literally illegal and always has been.
It's just that now we have an administration that will follow up on it.
So I expect the rest of the dominoes to fall pretty quickly.
Meanwhile, over at Citigroup, according to Zero Edge, Citigroup accidentally credited $81 trillion to an account that should have been $280.
But they caught it before the person got to the ATM and withdrew the $81 trillion.
No, they couldn't have withdrawn $81 trillion.
Now, if you're worried that they could have somehow used that money or moved it around, not much of it.
Because any large transfers are looked at pretty carefully.
So it's not like the person with the account could have just said, you know, hey, I'll just take a billion.
I think they would have noticed right away.
Especially if they were dealing with numbers like $280.
You'd notice that.
But in related news, a lot more Zelensky has moved all of his personal accounts to Citigroup.
Just in case.
Yeah, you never know.
You might get that $81 trillion and you'd have something to spend it on.
No, I made that up.
That's not true.
Meanwhile, the House GOP is moving to remove a giant Black Lives Matter mural that I think is on the street.
I'm not sure.
From Washington, D.C. Plaza.
So this raises some questions.
If they remove the Black Lives Matter mural, how will I know if they matter?
Because I need written instructions on this stuff.
It's so confusing.
Wait, they're human beings.
Do they matter?
I'd better go read the street.
Oh, there it is.
There's the directions right in the street.
Okay, they matter.
But if they take that off, people like me will be like, I don't know.
I know, it's a little ambiguous.
Without any written instructions, what will I do?
What you will do is treat everybody as a human being and an individual.
Anything else is DEI. Meanwhile, Trump says he plans to add a ballroom to the White House.
He wants to add a big old ballroom.
Well, as you know, the White House under Biden had all the ballroom it needed because Biden had tiny balls.
So you don't need much space.
But Trump has gigantic balls, and so they're going to need a whole new structure just to hold his balls.
So he'll be building his own ballroom.
Yeah, true.
Trump is going to pardon Major League Baseball Pete Rose, who didn't get into the Hall of Fame because he was caught betting on baseball.
Now, as Trump explains, he only bet on his team to win, which is the least bad version of betting on your own sport.
But it's still not good.
And Trump acknowledges that.
That's not good.
But he was one of the best baseball players of all time.
And he made one mistake, which he probably did a number of times.
But it was basically one thing.
And obviously the fact that he only bet on his team winning.
Suggests that it was more just for fun.
And, you know, so I don't think he had much inside information that others didn't.
But maybe he did.
So if he did, or there's a presumption that he did, I can see why that'd be banned.
Here's what I like about this story.
I like the fact that Trump has an unbroken record of forgiving people for bad behavior.
Now, you might say that's the opposite of good for a president, but I don't.
Because what it signals to me is he's not going to judge you if you were generally a good person, but you made a mistake.
That's kind of the standard I like.
Now, did he pay for it?
Yes.
Yes, he paid dearly for his mistake because he's already dead.
So he died not being in the Hall of Fame, and it was a big problem.
So you'll see this over and over.
Trump will say, okay, if you did this one thing, whatever that one thing is, but you're generally a good person, how about a pardon?
I just love that.
Just sort of as a general way to approach the world.
Do you remember that story about the alleged FBI honeypot?
And the way it got reported was that Comey had some off-the-books honeypot that was an attractive woman.
And some people said that she was there to sleep with members of the Trump administration in the first term and to try to get their secrets through their sexual means.
Cash Patel just said, nope, nothing like that happened.
There were no FBI agents who tried to sleep with anybody.
There was a woman who seems to have been the one assigned to this.
So it's not good behavior because it looks like Comey did.
Tell her to go find out some secrets.
But Cash is fully backing her and says, nope, absolutely not a honeypot.
So he said that on X. And here's my question.
I told you that a honeypot didn't mean sleeping with.
It could have been more like the O'Keefe undercover videos where somebody goes on a date and just sort of suggests that, you know, if things went well, we could be dating.
So...
Did she do that?
Probably not.
Probably not.
But, here's my question.
If you introduce, I'd love to know what she looks like, and obviously we won't know that for privacy reasons, but if we did find out what she looked like, and she was young and attractive, does she need to be a honeypot for horny, lonely men to give up all their secrets?
So it's good to know that she wasn't giving out sex for, you know, the job.
Okay?
I like that.
But if she was attractive and female, and that's part of the reason she was chosen, because you know people are going to open up to the attractive woman a lot more than they are to somebody else.
So there might be a little bit of a fuzzy line there.
But I would agree.
I'm going to agree with Cash, which is a big deal because he went against the president.
So the president made this claim, and Cash said, looked into it, absolutely false.
Now, do you like Cash more?
I do.
I like Cash more, because he was completely transparent about that, and he backed his employees.
So Cash gets an A-plus for that.
President Trump is bragging that the border crisis...
It's basically over.
So February was the lowest number of crossings.
Now, here's the big deal about that.
The number of border crossings was literally an existential threat to the country.
And he just fixed it.
It was an existential threat.
And Biden didn't fix it.
He caused it, really.
But there are a number of other existential threats that Biden also didn't do anything about.
One is the debt.
And at least we've got Doge working on that, but that might get a little dicey.
We'll talk about that in a minute.
But at least there's something big and important, and the right person's working on it, and they're putting tons of energy and personal capital into it.
So at least they're addressing, in a very serious way, the other biggest existential threat.
And then there's Ukraine.
There was always a threat that would get into a nuclear confrontation.
I thought that was low.
But it was existential.
And now it looks like if Putin were to nuke the United States, it wouldn't make any sense at all.
Because the United States would say, hey, Europe, take care of it yourself.
And Europe is saying, hey, we'll see if we can.
So it basically takes us out of a war that we don't want to be in, don't want to be funding, and don't want Russia to attack us because maybe we did too good a job at giving Ukraine weapons.
I don't think it was a big risk.
And then, of course, there's the inflation and energy costs.
I don't know that enough is being done on that, but here's some hints.
So according to Reuters, U.S. drillers, oil drillers, they've increased their oil and gas rigs for the fifth week in a row.
Now, don't get excited because I think they increase it by one.
But in the prior years, like 2022 and 2023, I guess, the number of oil rigs was going down.
But here's what you need to know.
It doesn't seem to be driven by policy in any way.
It seems entirely driven by economics.
So when the economics are good, as in oil prices are high, you get more drilling.
And when the oil prices are low, you get less.
So we're not seeing any indication of a Trump policy change that's made any difference to energy prices.
I hope we do.
But it could be that there's nothing the government can do because the economics drive it entirely.
So I don't know what the government would do to change the economics of oil.
So we'll see.
Maybe he's got some tricks up his sleeve.
But there's a company, according to Interesting Engineering, there's an AI-driven robot technology that's...
There's a company that has AI and robots, and they're making them available to U.S. power plants, and apparently they've already got a $100 million deal, so it's a serious thing, in which the robots will crawl all over the power plant, and they'll have maintenance suggestions, and they'll tell how to optimize, and it'll predict when they need maintenance, and they'll do a bunch of things.
So they're looking at it as a way to decrease the overall cost of the power plants.
So that's good.
So let's say they could maybe decrease the cost of the power plants by 10%.
That's great, except that AI in other contexts will increase the cost of energy about 10 times because it's going to suck it all up for AI. So I think AI is going to be a net negative for energy prices because it's going to be competing with consumers.
So I don't know how that's going to work out.
So I would say that Trump does not have, as far as I can tell, I don't see Trump having any kind of plan for energy that would lower the cost.
And maybe there is none.
Maybe there's nothing you can do.
It could be just pure economics, and we're a capitalist place, and you just can't make people do low-return business.
They're going to do what they're going to do.
All right, here's the funniest thing that happened.
Now, I don't know if this story is true, so fact-check me on this.
Because if it's not true, it's still so funny I'm going to report it.
But allegedly, Trump signed an executive order that said that Zelensky is officially spelled with only one Y. Remember I was complaining yesterday that Zelensky, there's at least three different spellings I've seen.
There's two Y's on the end or one.
There's an I in the middle or an E. And it was driving me crazy.
So if it's true, That Trump did an executive order redefining Zelensky's name.
That's just about the funniest thing he's ever done.
Because it puts Zelensky in his place where, no, it's Gulf of America, Mexico.
There's nothing you can do about it.
No, we're going to call you Zelensky with one Y, and there's nothing you can do about it.
We didn't consult you.
It's an executive order.
That's your name now.
Now, that is just pure funny.
If you don't understand that, As hilarious, you probably have serious TDS. That is just flat-out hilarious.
If it's true.
If it's not true, it's also hilarious.
So, I don't care if it's true.
So, one of the reasons that we know that Zelensky rejected, I'll say rejected, or gotten a little tiff, with J.D. Vance and Trump in the White House, is apparently Democrats had this breakfast.
With Zelensky.
And according to Senator Chris Murphy, who's a Democrat and one of the worst people in the world, as far as I can tell, he actually said this.
So this is right for Murphy.
So this is from a U.S. senator.
And he said, a Democrat, said, just finished a meeting with President Zelensky here in Washington.
He confirmed that the Ukrainian people will not support a fake peace agreement where Putin gets everything he wants and there are no security arrangements for Ukraine.
And that was posted just before or maybe just during the meeting with Zelensky.
Now, have I ever mentioned that Democrats are bad at giving advice?
So this is what I imagine what the advice sounded like.
I wasn't there, but it's like, all right, Zelensky, go in there and sabotage Trump in front of the world.
That'll get you a better deal.
And don't wear a suit.
Like, I just imagine that was the advice.
Now, I've heard it said that Zelensky said he wouldn't wear a suit until the war was over.
Well, smarten up, idiot.
If you're going to try to get something major out of Trump, you better wear a freaking suit.
And that should be your exception.
You should say, no, this is important to the future of Ukraine.
I'm not going to get this wrong.
I'm not going to insult my host.
This is really, really important.
Do you think a Republican would have ever given that advice?
Now, the real problem is, why did he accept it in the first place?
Like, what was going on that he thought it was a good idea and then one breakfast with Democrats turned it into a bad idea?
I don't know.
But Lindsey Graham, as you know, is completely lost, so he's just totally done with Ukraine.
And, you know, you could argue that...
It's too little too late because he was big on Ukraine.
But I don't mind when people adjust.
I don't mind when they correct course.
So I'm more likely to judge him by the course correction than from the being, you know, you could argue, not so right before.
But here's what he said.
He said in a post, to the hand-wringing Europeans who felt offended by President Trump's rejecting being lectured by Zelensky, be my guest to defend Ukraine from Putin.
It is long past time for the Europeans to show that they are capable of defending their own continent.
And then he says, and this is a take I hadn't really heard before, but I guess I could have intuited it.
They've allowed, meaning Europe, they've allowed their militaries to be hollowed out, and when Europe speaks, no bad guys listen.
I say this with great sadness.
The last group of people that I would count on to defend freedom are the Europeans.
Wow.
So, let me tell you where I got off the bus.
Now, I was never a fan of the funding that war.
But where I got off the bus on defending Europe is when they turned on us for free speech.
And that was Europe.
Well, let's say Great Britain seems to be the biggest one, but the rest of them seem to go along.
Now, you know the story.
Europe created this fake...
Watchdog censorship structure whose main point, and they say it directly, was to destroy the X platform, the primary source of free speech in the United States.
So let me say it again.
If you attempt and you put real effort into it, like a lot of effort, and it's an actual policy that you're going to try to destroy free speech in the United States, I'm on Putin's side.
Sorry.
Putin didn't do that.
So I'm not really on Putin's side.
You know what I mean.
I'm being hyperbolic.
But I'm not going to defend with one bullet or one anything if they're trying.
And they're still trying.
They're still trying to destroy free speech in the United States.
So, no, you don't get anything.
I would pull completely out of any defense with them because they cross the line.
That's a line you do not cross if you're an ally.
That makes you an enemy.
Let's be clear.
If you're going after free speech, probably our most valued right in the United States, you don't get to be our friend.
Ever.
While the same people are alive.
And there's nothing you can do to make up to it.
You can't make up for that.
As long as the same people are in office and stuff.
There's nothing you can do.
That's game over.
You're on your own.
In my opinion.
Well, meanwhile, Zelensky's over in Europe trying to pass that and get them to step up and defend Europe.
And Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the UK says that his country in France and Ukraine have agreed to work on a ceasefire plan to present to the United States.
Why are they presenting it to us?
Why do you need to show us a ceasefire plan?
We're out.
We're out.
So, yeah, just go make your own whatever.
Make a deal.
Don't make a deal.
I don't care.
I have no interest in you whatsoever.
So you're all bad.
Anyway, so here's what I think is funny.
They're acting like the only thing that's preventing a ceasefire is that they didn't have a good plan.
Do you think that's the case?
You know, if we just had a better plan...
You know, if the UK and France work together with Ukraine, and we came up with a plan, then there'd be a ceasefire.
I don't think it's a problem of the plan.
I think it goes a little deeper than that.
But we'll see.
Meanwhile, Norway has this big company that's a major marine fuel provider, and the US uses them for a lot of their refueling in that part of the world.
But the big company called Haltback Bunkers, they decided they won't sell fuel to U.S. naval vessels.
So they don't want protection?
Because aren't they better off if fully-fueled American naval ships are sort of in the area?
Is this the dumbest thing you've ever heard?
So they're going to...
They're going to vastly decrease their profits and make their own country less safe because they didn't like what somebody said to Zelensky in a meeting.
That's the dumbest thing I've heard since sending Katy Perry into space.
Anyway.
So I saw a video.
Elon Musk was boosting this, so I don't know when it happened.
This might have been an older video, but it was Tulsi Gabbard doing a little video just, you know, with her phone.
And she was talking about how Zelensky is a dictator.
And her evidence was he's taken assets from his critics.
He took over, I guess, a TV station, the main TV station, and he canceled elections.
And that sounds pretty dictator-like.
Yeah.
And she says it might be a precedent if Ukraine can do it through martial law and just say, oh, it's a war, so democracy is over.
Doesn't that allow the United States to do it at some point?
Like, not in this administration, but in another administration?
Don't you think that somebody's going to say, well, Ukraine got away with it, so we're sort of at war a little bit.
It's in Europe, but it's sort of us.
So maybe we need some...
Anyway.
So that could be a problem.
I guess Moscow has asked the United States to reopen U.S. airspace to Russian aircraft.
I didn't realize that we had blocked direct flights.
Imagine what a pain in the ass that was to Russian diplomats who had to take a connecting flight to get the United States.
It must have been just such a pain in the ass.
So I assume this is more for the diplomats.
I don't know if this is going to happen, but they've requested it.
The scariest thing today, by far, is Elon Musk on Joe Rogan.
And I saw a clip where Musk said that the, I don't know if you would call it the scandal because it's not illegal, the fact that Congress can do trading, including insider trading, it's legal if you're in Congress, you can supplement your income.
Now he suggested, Musk has, that maybe we should increase their salary.
So that they have at least some disincentive to steal.
But I don't know if you could increase it enough.
Because the amount that they're stealing is generational wealth.
It would be great if they could afford to pay for school and a nice place to live for their family.
I think that's appropriate.
So I do think they're underpaid by quite a bit.
But I don't know if you could stop corruption by just making sure they could pay for their kids' private school.
But then he goes on.
He said, the real problem is more than insider trading.
The real corruption.
And then, of course, Joe wanted to know, what are you talking about?
And then Musk completely locked up.
And he said, they will kill me if I push too hard on this.
That means that Musk does know with certainty how the bad guys are stealing massive amounts of money.
And he believes that if he outed them, they would literally kill him.
Now, he wasn't joking.
It wasn't hyperbole.
He said he literally thinks that if he outed these powerful people, that he would be killed.
Do you think that's going too far?
I don't.
I don't think it's going too far.
And apparently Tim Burchett, you know, in Congress, he's a Republican, he had said in a video a while ago, That if anybody ever leaked where the money goes in the Pentagon, because they fail all the audits, they never passed an audit, so we don't know where the money goes.
He said if anybody leaked where the money goes, they'd be murdered.
That's Tim Burchette saying directly, if anybody told you where the money was going, really, they'd be murdered.
And now Musk is saying the same thing.
And he wouldn't give an example, even though he knows it.
Now.
I hope Musk is smart enough, and obviously he would be, that he's got some kind of a file that nobody could ever find that would basically activate if he got killed, so that it would all be released if they actually killed him.
Now, if he doesn't have that, he needs to get that going.
He needs to make sure there's somebody else who knows the exact story, or it's in a file, or it's in a...
Vault so deeply beneath the world that you can never know.
Maybe in multiple places.
In case they torture him and say, tell us all the places.
And he'll give them like five of the places, but they're really six.
I mean, I hope he's smart enough.
And every indication is that he is.
That he's done something so that we can definitely find that out someday.
Hope so.
So that's the scariest thing we've heard.
So there's some thinking that cutting the Pentagon budget is actually not possible because the people trying to cut it will be murdered.
Like, literally murdered.
Now, I believe that completely.
I completely believe that that's a risk.
Anyway, some people online are agitating that it's time to leave NATO and leave the UN, and Musk actually agreed with that in a post on X. Europe probably does need to defend itself.
That just makes sense.
It made sense to have NATO for a while, but it never made sense that we'd always have it.
So maybe this is the time to make sure Europe can defend itself.
And then the UN just seems like an anti-American institution that we're funding, doesn't it?
How often does the UN agree with us or do something useful versus thwart us and embarrass us?
So I will listen to an argument on the UN and NATO, too.
There might be a counterargument that's pretty good.
But I think they're both on the table.
I don't think it's crazy to think that we could get rid of both of them.
I just don't.
I know I have a firm opinion on that.
According to Just the News, we have evidence that Epstein had about $20,000 in cash, some of it in small bills.
The thinking is that maybe this is evidence of blackmail, because he had $20,000 in cash.
I would like to add some context.
If you're as rich as Epstein, $20,000 is just pocket change.
So probably that was the money he was using to pay girls, so it'd be off the books, probably tipping.
So I think that was the money he was giving to people.
I don't think that's the money he was collecting.
Because if he was doing this international blackmail ring and all he could get was $20,000, I don't think that would have kept his lifestyle up.
So if they had found $10 million, then I'd say, whoa, whoa, that looks like blackmail.
But if you find $20,000, it seems far more likely that that's related to what he's spending than what he's collecting.
Just my take on that.
Here's something that's no surprise at all.
How many times have I told you that every city is corrupt?
Everyone.
Well, also according to Just the News, a majority of the 75 largest cities are in financial trouble, according to a new report.
So a majority of the 75 largest.
But here's the interesting thing.
Apparently they have rules or laws that they have to balance the budget.
So how can it be?
That they have to balance the budget, which means on paper it's balanced, but that they're also in financial trouble.
How can both of those be true?
Corruption!
Apparently, they're just taking out of their costs a whole bunch of things that should be in their costs.
So they've not included the full cost of the government in their budget calculations and have pushed costs into the future taxpayers.
So basically, most of them are underwater.
But they're doing accounting tricks to look like they're not.
Now, what do you expect when professional liars, politicians, are the ones handling your money?
What do you expect to happen?
On paper, if you were to say on paper, how do you win an election?
Well, the most corrupt person, lots of times, because they can get the most support and money and stuff if they're corrupt.
So basically, the people who are the best liars often become the leaders because they did a better job of lying about their opponent than their opponent did.
So I don't think it's an exaggeration to say that at least city officials are professional liars.
Is that too far?
Wouldn't you say they're professional liars?
Because that's how they get elected, and then they lie about everything.
And we can watch it.
We can watch them lying in real time.
So if you take the most lyingest people in the whole country and you say, all right, the most lyingest corrupt people, manage my money, and there's going to be a lot of it.
How could this go any other way?
So I'm going to say again, we need to completely revise the who gets to determine where money goes.
That's just got to be taken out of the hands of mayors and politicians in the city.
The city can vote what they want to do, but when it comes to actually writing the checks and auditing, that's just got to be taken away from the city.
That cannot be.
You can't have the city auditing itself.
You just can't do that.
There's no way that works.
So we need something that, I don't know if you can do that with an executive order.
Seems like a little overreach, but I don't know.
Prime Minister of Israel just posted this on X. With the conclusion of the first stage of the Hasidil and in light of Hamas' refusal to accept the Whitcoff framework for the continuation of talks to which Israel has agreed, Netanyahu has decided, as of this morning, the entry of all goods and supplies to the Gaza Strip will be halted.
So that means he's starving the civilians out?
I think that's what that means, right?
Because the goods and services going in would be mostly food and medicine.
So it looks like the last stage of depopulating Gaza is in effect.
And one of the things I've noticed is that whenever Hamas acts, it's really bad for Israeli citizens, obviously.
So if Hamas does a terror attack like October 7th, it's terrible for the citizens.
You know, they're traumatized or killed or captured or tortured.
So if you're looking at it from a civilian point of view, Hamas is just all bad all the time.
But here's the ironic thing.
Every time Hamas does something big, Israel as a country gets stronger because it works to their narrative, and then they can capture more land.
It's not the first time that it's allowed them to just control territory that they wouldn't naturally control.
So Hamas has this weird kind of thing going on.
Which is the more they attack individuals that are Israelis, the stronger Israel as a nation gets.
And it's very consistent.
And this will be another example.
So it does look like, my guess is that they'll get rid of all the civilians.
Presumably, they'll say, if you leave, you can get food and medicine, I assume.
But if you stay, the big bombs, the bunker busters, are the next phase.
I think they're going to have to bunker bust.
The tunnels before they can do anything serious.
And I think at this point they might bunker bust them with the hostages in them because they're just running out of options.
So all the options are horrific.
So I'm not saying I'm in favor of it because it's all horrific.
I'm just predicting where it's going.
And I think Hamas has created this situation where Israel just has a free pass.
All right.
So that's all I'm about for now.
And since I usually stay and talk to the locals people privately, but we're only doing locals right now, I think this broadcast will be put on the other, it'll be uploaded to the other platforms a little bit later today.
