My book Reframe Your Brain, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/3bwr9fm8
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
Politics, President Trump, Trump Trial Verdicts, American Legal System, NY Court Of Appeals, Boycott NY, Upside Down American Flags, Elon Musk, Anti-Trump Triviality Lawfare, Justice Alito, Hunting Republicans, Scott Adams
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support
Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
I guess we've got a few things to talk about today.
And if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their smooth human brains, all you need is a copper mug or a glass of tankard shells, a sty and a canteen, jug of flask, a vessel of any kind.
Fill it with your favorite liquid.
I like coffee.
Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
The dopamine the other day, the thing that makes everything better.
It's called the simultaneous sip and abs now.
Go.
So everybody get a good nice sleep last night?
Bye.
Bye.
I didn't.
Because it turns out that my predator prey instinct has been triggered.
And I don't feel like being prey.
So we're going to change some things.
We're going to move some things.
We're going to alter our reality to something a little bit more compatible with human life.
But before we get to that, I'd like to suggest that if you're having a little bit of a mental anguish about the events of this week, there's some science that says that visiting the park Now here's my question.
Is that backwards science?
effect on depression. So going to the park and sitting there for 30 minutes will help your mental health. Dr. Danielle Shanahan, the study's first author said. Now here's my question. Is that backwards science? How many of you have time to go sit in the park every day for half an hour?
I think if you have time to go sit in the park for half an hour and do nothing but sit in the park for half an hour, that would cheer me up if I had nothing to do but But I think I'll go sit in nature for a while.
So I'm not so sure that it might be that the people who are able to do that are a different class of people from the people who are not able to go sit in the park for half an hour.
But it's a good idea no matter if you can do it, go do it.
Well, of course, there's one big news today, and we'll be talking about that.
But does it seem to you that we've now seen the completion of the Democrat Projection Project, where they say, oh, that Trump, he's going to steal your democracy while they're law-faring him out of office?
They just destroyed the last part of our system that had any credibility, the jury system.
The idea that the courts will save you if there's something else in the system that went wrong.
Well, you always have the courts.
Not anymore.
Nope.
That's all over, apparently.
By the way, Trump is scheduled to hold a press conference at 8 a.m.
his time.
It's probably 8 a.m.
our time.
We'll find out.
But I think it's at the end of this show, so I'll try to quit early if it looks like he's coming on.
I'll look for your confirmation that he's coming on at my time, in an hour.
All right.
That will be interesting.
As you know, Trump was found guilty by the jury of his haters.
Yeah, that's our system.
You get a jury of people who hate you, and they get to decide if you go to jail.
Yeah, it's a jury of your haters.
And they decided all 34 felonies were true.
So, I'll tell you what gutted me about this.
I've come to, you know, expect that in politics people play dirty and the Democrats will do anything they can to stop the Republicans.
I get that.
It works both ways.
But what I did not see coming is that it was possible to put 12 people in a room, 12 jurors, who wouldn't see through this.
Or if they did see through it, they decided not to act.
Now that is really discouraging.
Because the last faith I had is that even if our elected people are shit, at least the unelected jurors will set things right, you know, if things get too far in the hand.
Nope, the jurors will make it worse if they're selected for that purpose.
So, as you know, there are so many reversible errors in this trial that it should easily be reversed on appeal.
Is that what you thought?
It would easily be reversed on appeal?
Let me tell you about the appellate court.
Uh, there are five members of it.
Uh, they're all women and they're all black.
There are five black women who are the appellate court.
Now, uh, as Endwoken has pointed out, the odds of that are exceedingly low outside of a DEI kind of environment.
So let's see, 94% of black women voted against Trump and 100% of the appellate court He doesn't really have any chance of a fair appeal.
Do you know what will save him if anything does?
At least from the legal jeopardy?
The thing that would save him would be that the Supreme Court has some white people on it.
I hate to say it, but that's what it's come down to.
Basically, it will take some Democrats who are also white to reverse this.
There are so many reversible errors in the case that I'm going to leave that to the lawyers.
You probably don't need me to tell you all the reversible errors because it's going to be everywhere all day.
So, you all know that there are about 20 of them.
If you want to size it, There are something like 20 clear mistakes that really show you what it is.
Now, here's the weird simulation part about this.
What are the odds that a guy named Trump would be brought up on the most famous trumped-up charges of all time?
Trumped-up charges was already a famous phrase And then somebody named Trump comes along and becomes the number one example, the most obvious example we've ever seen in the history of the United States, of a trumped-up charge.
Now what's weird about it is that in, you know, 20 years or so, if anybody says trumped-up charge, people are going to assume it's about Donald Trump.
Because he's the most famous example of a trumped-up charge.
It won't be.
You know, someday you'll see it in a trivia test.
There'll be a trivia test that says, did you know that the phrase trumped-up charges did not come from the trumped-up trials?
So, that's gonna happen.
So, as you know, the donation page crashed right after the verdict.
I got in there early and made a Made a thousand dollar donation, which sounded small.
At the time I thought, oh, that's a good, you know, good solid citizen donation.
You know, it's not, it's not pack level, but for an individual.
And immediately I saw a whole bunch of podcasters were donating the maximum.
And I thought, all right, I'll go back in.
I haven't donated yet the maximum, so let's go maximum.
I'll get that done.
Now, You're probably saying to yourself, I feel really bad about the result, if I know my audience.
And you're saying to yourself, I would feel a lot better if I could do something.
What can I do?
Well, donating is what you can do.
Now, don't donate more than you can afford, obviously, but the number of people who donate counts too.
So if you could, you know, swing 10 bucks or whatever it is, do it.
Do it just to make a point.
Do it because it'll feel better.
Even for $10, you're going to feel like you did something.
Now, if you can't afford it, that's great.
I mean, not great, but nobody's going to fault you for that.
But, um, did you notice how many people started flying upside down flags in their social media and in the real world as well?
Yeah.
A lot of us and me included.
Believe that that was the end of America, as we knew it.
That truly was the end of it.
Now, could we get it back?
Well, we have a shot.
It won't be easy.
It's not going to come back on its own.
We'll have to force it.
It will require probably more sacrifice.
It's going to be expensive, might take some time, but we might.
We might be able to claw it back, but it's gone at the moment.
At the moment, we do not have respect or faith in our legal system, because in my view, this is the worst crime I've ever seen in America.
Now you're going to say, but what about all those serial killers and mass murderers?
I'm including them.
I'm including them.
This is worse.
Than any crime I've ever seen in America.
Now, I might have said the Russia collusion thing was worse, but it didn't work.
You know, in the end, Trump got elected anyway.
But this kind of work.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Now I've been saying to myself, Oh, don't worry, Scott.
There's no way he's going to go to jail because it turns out that this, this kind of a offense, even a felony, if you've never had any other kind of offense, the, Apparently, the normal thing to do would be some non-jail remedy.
But I've seen some people say, if you're expecting this to go the normal way, with no jail time, you haven't been paying attention.
Whatever this is that we're observing, is the government acting with no sense of guardrails, no sense of pushback, No sense of consequences, and no sense of mutually assured destruction.
And they've got a good track record to make that assumption that there will not be enough pushback for it not to be worth it for them.
So, here's what I think.
You know that phrase, this isn't the hill to die on?
Well, that's not the hill to die on.
This is the hill to die on.
Actually, literally.
Now, I don't recommend any violence, but if we can't turn it around, I'd rather be dead.
Let me just put it out there plainly.
I don't want to live in a country that's no longer free.
I don't want to be afraid of the legal system, because if you don't think I'm next, you haven't been paying attention.
This is a fight for survival now.
So, this is the hill to die on.
Because they're going to kill you on the hill if you don't fight.
If you just sit on the fucking hill, they're going to kill you.
So this is the one to die on.
If there's anything you can do within the legal bounds, do it.
Fly your flag upside down.
Talk to your neighbors.
Get somebody to vote who wasn't going to vote.
Make sure you've got a plan on election day.
Do your mail-in ballots if you have an option to do that.
And certainly, I would think you would also want to be volunteering to be election day monitors and maybe even monitoring the Dropboxes.
It seems to me that if Republicans don't have a committee sitting there 24 hours around the Dropbox, or at least a video or something, you're not really trying.
Because at this point, here's what I think about the 2020 elections.
Let me put that in context for you.
The main reason that most people didn't think the 2020 election was rigged, the people who had that point of view, is because they couldn't conceive of it.
They couldn't imagine that their elected officials could do something so grotesquely, obviously illegal, in the worst possible way, right in front of them.
Your brain can't really hold that.
But then Trump got convicted of 34 felonies and didn't know what the charge was until the closing statements.
That's a real thing that happened.
Yeah, plus a hundred other reversible errors and bullshit.
So I think this trial sets the new standard for what we can assume our elected officials are capable of doing.
So if you said to yourself, what are the odds They did some conspiracy in the 2020 election.
The only way you could get away with it at scale, the only way you could get away with it would be, you know, if you had a lot of people coordinating.
And what are the chances a whole bunch of people would coordinate and, you know, get away with it?
And the answer is we just saw.
We just saw maybe hundreds of people coordinate to put the president in jail over nothing.
That just happened.
We saw millions of people coordinate during the pandemic, the experts, the doctors, to tell us things that were bad for our health and that we should do them.
So if you're paying attention at all, the two arguments you can never use again are, well, if that were happening, there would certainly be a whistleblower by now.
I've used that argument in the past.
Man, am I going to retire that one?
That's retired forever.
No.
It turns out that it is routine for hundreds or even millions of people to be working a prank or a hoax or just being wrong.
Even experts.
What am I looking at?
Oh, okay.
Yeah, so my new assumption about how bad things could be or how much evil they would be willing to apply is now unlimited.
I now think the limit is nothing.
Because this line that they crossed is THE line.
It's the line of lines.
You know, short of actually executing him before he left the court, Trump, you can't get worse.
Than jailing the president over nothing.
What's worse than that?
So yes, you can assume that Epstein was murdered.
You can assume that all of our elections have been rigged, not just 2020.
I assume that all have been rigged, but 2016, they didn't rig it hard enough.
Caught him off guard.
So yes, just assume that everything is just what the worst possible thing you could possibly imagine.
I also said I'm going to try to not do any business with New York State.
Now, of course, the trolls come out and they try to be sarcastic.
Oh, Scott, why don't you keep us informed how you're destroying New York State with your personal boycott?
Well, let me speak to the idiots.
Announcing that you're going to boycott something.
It's not because you think your one-person boycott is going to make a difference, idiot.
That's not what a boycott is.
When I say I'm going to boycott it, it's to remind other people they have the option.
Did other people say the same?
Yes, they did.
Did enough people?
I don't know.
But I wouldn't give a penny to New York City.
I can't even imagine it.
And I've, you know, I have a long business history of going to New York City once or twice a year for business.
No way.
There's no way I'm going to get anywhere near that place.
Sorry.
I would like to suggest that if there are any Democrats who are angry about seeing all the upside down flags, now I don't really expect Democrats to care about an upside down flag, but I've seen a few people complain.
And so I would like to, I'm going to be helping the complainers to organize some kind of a demonstration against the upside down flags, and what I think they should do is stage the demonstration outside the upside down flag store.
There's a big one right down on Fifth Avenue in New York City.
They sell nothing but upside down flags.
They look, they look almost like the regular ones, but they're all upside down.
So if you want to buy an upside down flag, New York City is where to go.
Fifth Avenue.
That's where it is.
So, uh, you know, all the Democrats, I recommend that you organize and meet on Fifth Avenue.
Uh, and you should protest inside upside down flag store.
Okay, you know there's no upside-down flag store, right?
Okay, I'm hoping all of you know me enough by now.
But it would be funny.
Come on, it would be funny if we could organize the Democrats to protest the upside-down flag store.
That would be funny.
All right.
People were wondering where Elon Musk was on all this.
He seemed to have been busy last night, but he's weighed in.
He says, indeed, great damage was done today to the public's faith in the American legal system.
If a former president can be criminally convicted over such a trivial matter, motivated by politics rather than justice, then anyone is at risk of a similar fate.
Well, what did he leave out?
I think Elon Musk left something out.
Which is that he himself is already the victim of exactly this lawfare stuff.
I mean, I don't think anybody's had more legal challenges that were purely political than he has.
So it takes a lot of, it takes a lot of constraint to not make it about yourself when you're having exactly the same issue.
So I appreciate that level of restraint.
And as others have pointed out, This is not just a president thing.
Obviously, if they can get away with this, they're going to extend it.
Everything that works, they do more than once.
So if they can take out a president on a triviality, then they can take out a senator on a triviality, or a judge.
In fact, they're trying to take out the Supreme Court judge, Alito, because his wife flew an upside-down flag that people didn't like.
Or, no, she flew a flag.
Now, that seems like a trivial matter to me.
So, two senators, Democrat senators, Whitehouse and somebody else, wanted to meet with Uh, Roberts, Chief Justice Roberts, to talk about maybe forcing Judge Alito to recuse himself from any decisions about January 6th.
And Judge Roberts, to his credit, said, uh, screw you.
The Supreme Court is independent.
And no, we don't meet with you to figure out what we should do.
You stay over there.
We'll stay over here.
But under no situation are we going to have a meeting with you.
And I'm thinking to myself, did the Democrat senators not know that they're calling a meeting to try to twist the arm of the Supreme Court of Justice?
I can't even, I don't even have words to describe how obviously corrupt that is.
I mean, they're doing it right in front of us.
The whole separation of powers, they're acting like it's meaningless.
You know, like, oh, let's just call a meeting.
Like, not even saying, well, I know this is an extraordinary situation, and normally we wouldn't have any contact, but this is a special case.
Nothing like that.
They just casually treat the separation of powers like it didn't matter.
You think they're not going to stack the Supreme Court if they win?
Of course they will.
Yeah.
So, you know, there's no limit to what bad behavior you can expect.
Do you expect that Trump will not be put in jail?
The smart people are saying, you know, no, no jail.
But given this judge's past behavior and the fact that this is a show trial and nothing about it is legitimate, I think he might try to put him in jail.
And we're seeing at the same time that there's an effort in Congress to remove his Secret Service protection.
And that's specifically about him.
They don't say that, but it's specifically about Trump.
How is that not trying to murder him?
How do you not go to jail for an assassination attempt in some kind of a RICO way?
Because it seems to me you could connect all the dots from trying to remove his Secret Service protection All the way to the Biden White House coordinating all the lawfare.
And once you connect all those dots, it seems to me that there's a lot of people that were complicit in a murder attempt against the president and a coup, an insurrection.
So I would think the death sentence is on the table for maybe, I don't know, 20 to 50 Democrats.
And when I say that, I mean completely within the legal system.
Now, I don't know if the legal system could ever operate that efficiently, but just based on what we know publicly, without any investigation, to me it's obvious that it's a coordinated plot to murder the president, or to create a situation in which he would be killed, which I would consider largely the same.
So we've got one president who might be put in jail for breaking no laws and not even knowing what the law he was charged with was until the final vote.
And then after the verdict, not knowing what he got convicted for.
Just imagine that.
Trump doesn't know what he was convicted for.
Can you even hold that in your mind?
Because the jurors had this grab bag of things they could choose.
And they don't have to tell you what they chose or why.
So all he knows is he's guilty of a crime that nobody knew was a crime until the closing statements.
And then that required even that the crimes that were, you know, described in the closing statement.
Even those required the jury to decide if something was a crime without it being going through the court system.
I mean, every part of this is corrupt beyond any imagination, really.
I mean, you can't even hold it in your head.
It's so corrupt.
So, yes, I would think that there's a clear RICO case with just what we know already.
RICO case to murder the president.
There is a call for a massive Retaliation.
Matt Walsh is saying, I don't want to hear elected Republicans complaining.
I don't need to see their tweets and statements condemning the verdict.
The only thing I want to hear from these people is which Democrats they will have arrested.
Don't tell us that you're sad about the verdict.
Yeah.
And Sean Davis, going even harder.
Hunter Biden should be charged with prostitution and sex trafficking.
Joe Biden should be charged in Texas with conspiracy to commit human trafficking.
I think that could sell.
And drug trafficking, given his border schemes.
And Jill Biden should be charged with elder abuse.
Yes.
Yes.
Once you cross the line, there are no rules.
So, absolutely.
Yet, there has to be mutually assured destruction, or else I won't feel safe.
I personally will not feel safe unless a whole bunch of Democrats are jailed for doing this.
You need mutually assured destruction, and it's time.
This is the hill to die on.
This is the hill to die on.
And there has to be a major consequence within the legal system.
All right.
Here's the funniest thing I saw on this from Austin Allred.
He noted on the X platform that in San Francisco, they'd recently passed a resolution that you can't call somebody by their crime.
So you can't refer to somebody or they don't want you to refer to somebody as a felon.
Rather, you would be a person with a felony.
You're not a criminal.
You're a person who's been charged with a crime or perhaps convicted.
So in San Francisco, they want you to start with, this is a person who had a situation.
Because if you say it's a felon, that sounds like something that can't change.
That's the argument.
Whereas you're somebody who's convicted of a felony, Well, maybe you just had a bad day.
So that's the thinking behind it.
Um, but, uh, I like this and, uh, now we should only refer to Trump as a, uh, person who was wrong wrongfully convicted of a felony.
So in San Francisco, the correct way to refer to Trump is not as a, uh, a felon, but as a person wrongfully convicted of a felony.
That's the proper way.
All right, I saw some polls that suggest that some people would be less likely to vote for Trump because of the finding of guilty, and some said they'd be more likely.
Now, the more likelihoods were like 15%, and the less likelihoods were somewhere in that neighborhood.
Now, I would like to issue a challenge.
Can you show me the one fucking idiot who is less likely to vote for Trump because of this?
Do you think that person exists?
Really?
Do you think there's even one?
I don't think there is.
I don't think there's even one because I haven't seen one and I wouldn't expect one.
So here's what I think.
I think the polls are picking up liars and, you know, Maybe Democrats who are saying, oh, yeah, I'm less likely to vote for him now.
You weren't going to vote for him anyway, you lying piece of shit.
No, you weren't going to vote for him.
But are there genuinely people who were on the fence or weren't going to vote at all, who just said, screw it, I'm all in?
Yeah.
Yeah, the people who say they will vote for him are very real, because they're saying their names, they're saying it publicly, they're saying it proudly, and they're making sure you hear it.
Where are all those other people?
Can MSNBC produce one, let's say, street interview or focus group where there's a real person, like a real Republican, someone who is going to vote for him anyway, and change their fucking mind?
No.
No, there's nobody like that.
Not even one.
And if you find one, it's going to be like the classic exception to the rule.
You know, it's going to be somebody who's clearly just lying or crazy or something.
Well, my prediction in 2020 is that if Biden got elected, Republicans would be hunted.
How does that look?
So now they hunted the president, they hunted many of his lawyers, they've hunted hundreds of January 6th people.
Any questions?
Now, are we willing to put this in the pantheon of greatest predictions that nobody saw coming?
I won't say nobody, but... For a public figure, do you know how much I got mocked for that?
I got totally mocked, just mercilessly mocked by the sarcasm Democrats.
Oh, yeah, show us where all the hunting is happening, Scott.
Are we issuing hunting licenses?
Oh, look, it's day two of the Biden administration.
Where's all the hunting?
Well, here's all the hunting.
Just like I imagined.
Exactly like I imagined.
Yeah, this is the hunting.
I'm seeing people like James Carville and Nancy Pelosi say that we should respect the jury's decision.
I don't even know how to respond to that.
I'm mostly, like, speechless to a lot of this stuff, you know, uncharacteristically.
But I saw on Cuomo's show on News Nation, he had on Geraldo and James Carville at the same time.
And Geraldo was pointing out that the jury was, you know, an anti-Trump jury.
And Carville actually tried to say, in public, that juries can give you a good verdict on any case, in any location, because juries do the work and they're taken seriously.
You should have seen him squirm when he tried to say that, because you know he doesn't believe it.
Because nobody believes that.
I don't think there's anybody who believes that it doesn't matter where... The whole reason that there's a process for changing where you have the trial, it's part of the normal judicial process that you can change the venue, if you're pretty sure that the locals are biased.
It's built into the system.
James Carville, The system explicitly accepts that as not just maybe, but as a fact.
The system itself is designed with that in mind as a fact, that who the jury is, what locale it's in, can have a great impact on the decision.
How do you go in front of the public and act like that doesn't make a difference?
The jury.
Oh my God, Carville has just turned into this weird little Gollum creature.
I don't even know how to explain it.
It's just, the fact that he'd say that in public, in public he says that.
Like he says a lot of, you know, stuff in public that is provocative, but that's just a, he knows that's a lie and he knows everybody knows it's a lie and the entire legal system knows it's a lie.
Every lawyer knows it's a lie and he said it in public.
Because he got sort of trapped, so he didn't have anything that he could say that was true that would get him out of the trap, so he just lied.
It's like, what a piece of shit.
I saw, I think it's an investor, some guy, Vinod, I forget his name, but yeah, anyway.
There's some things I'm just so mad about that I can't even form the words, and I guess this is one of them, so I'm just going to skip that story.
Anyway.
No, I don't respect the jury's decision.
I don't respect the jury.
All right.
I think that Plan A for the Democrats, Plan A was to, you know, maybe just Muddy Trump up with the felony allegation or conviction.
But now that he's got the conviction, and now that they were literally trying to remove his Secret Service protection so he could actually be killed in jail, do you think that the Democrats now have to kill him?
Because we're in new territory now.
Let me put it this way.
Until they convicted him of 55 felons and gave him a real chance of going to jail, I would not have assumed that Trump would be vigorous in getting his revenge.
Now I assume he will be vigorous in getting his revenge.
And he'll have lots of help because Republicans are madder than ever, maybe any time in the history of Republicans, except maybe when Lincoln got shot or something, so I think, I think Biden is in a situation where he has to kill Trump.
Bye now.
And he also can't drop out of the race.
Because if Biden doesn't win the presidency again, there's going to be so much pressure to put him in jail.
I'll tell you, I'll be pressuring to put him in jail.
I'll be pressuring hard.
And is there a crime for which we can put him in jail?
Yes, real ones.
Probably plenty of them.
Real ones.
You don't have to make anything up.
I don't say that we should do anything illegal.
But if you know that half of the country is going to be pushing President Trump, if he gets elected, to put Biden in jail, or at least lawfare him for the rest of his life.
So here's the situation.
Biden can't drop out now.
How many of you would accept that statement?
Biden cannot drop out of the race now.
It will always be up to him, but he can't.
Because if he loses, he won't be a president, and then he's going to get picked up.
Yeah.
Some state is going to issue an arrest for him right away.
You know, Florida or Texas or something.
And should.
And should.
And by the way, we should tell him that.
We should say, look, Joe Biden, if you drop out of the race, You're going to get arrested immediately.
I mean, as soon as your, your term is over and here's the list of things we're going to go after you for, and it will be the rest of your life.
Won't be anything left, but this.
Now, of course he would just claim he couldn't, you know, he's too feeble to go to court, but that's how it would play out.
And I don't hate the idea of making a list of who should go to jail.
You know, I don't want to name names, But in this process, to me, it looks like a Rico situation.
I don't know how you could think it's not.
I mean, it's so criminal and it's so organized and we can see all the moving parts.
I mean, there's no mystery to it at this point.
I feel like there's at least 20 to 50 Democrats that could end up literally in jail if Trump wins.
Now, how much fight would they express If they knew they might go to jail.
Well, they would do anything.
So the odds of the coming election being attempted to be rigged, I think, are now at 100%.
Because it's literally life and death.
Let me say that again.
Whatever the odds were before that 2024 would be rigged or attempted to be rigged, it's now 100%.
Because if the Democrats don't win big, unexpectedly, They're going to jail.
And that has to be the proposition.
The proposition is that if you lose, you're going to jail this time.
Fuckers.
Yeah.
And maybe that's the t-shirt.
This time, if you lose, you're going to jail.
Now, of course, you don't want to get the Democrats all worked up and, you know, incentivized to work too hard toward winning.
So I'm not sure that we want to make that the leading message.
I saw Jen Psaki, she was on MSNBC, trying to caution the other Democrats not to celebrate too hard.
Well, maybe we should now just focus on the issues.
Yeah.
Do you know why Jen Psaki says we shouldn't celebrate so hard?
Because she knows that they've unleashed more energy than this country has ever seen at one time.
Only 9-11 created this much energy.
That energy is going to go somewhere.
At the moment, the only place it can go is toward funding Trump and voting for him and registering, etc.
I've seen story after story now of people who said, I wasn't going to vote for Trump, but now I'm going to crawl over glass.
I'm going to register.
I donated.
I never donate.
I've now seen one person.
And again, I believe they don't exist.
To say the opposite.
Not one.
So I think that the Democrats are probably seeing the same thing that we're seeing, or maybe a weaker version of it.
Because they do understand that energy has been unleashed.
Here's what they don't understand.
How much.
They don't get that yet.
It might be a good idea not to lead with that.
Just keep that energy, but be strategic.
You don't want to give away your advantage.
So if the plan is to put them all in jail when you win, just do that.
Just do that.
I'm not sure that having the list of who we plan to jail, that's what feels good right now.
So let's be strategic.
And not be trying to, you know, juice our dopamine because we got punched in the stomach.
You know, we need like a dopamine hit, a little bit of a win or something.
But I would take the win as the funding that Trump is going to get.
I would take the win as the polling you're going to see in a day or so.
Can you imagine the polls?
My God.
I think it's going to change things, but maybe not.
I remind you that if the regime is as crooked as it looks, what you should also expect are a bunch of fake polls, because they can't have a crooked election unless it's backed by some fake polls, so that they can always say, oh, those ones that say that Trump was way ahead, I guess we should never listen to them again, because they got it all wrong.
You know, these fake polls He said that Biden was going to win all along, and then, sure enough, he won.
So forever now, you should listen to these polls, not those ones that said Trump was up by 20.
So you're going to see massive fake polling at a national level, but it'll be the minority.
And you'll also see it at the state level.
So I'm already hearing reports from, let's say, my source, who says there's a strong suspicion that at least one state has some rigged polls to support a potentially upcoming rigged election.
So state polling and national polling, probably both corrupt at this point.
But if they're not both corrupt, At the very least, you should give them zero credibility.
Because everything at this point is so corrupt that you have to assume corruption is your first take on any government or judicial thing.
All right.
But what's really important is, and CNN is all over this news story, what did Trump's retarded niece Mary say about it?
She said that her uncle should go to jail Not just based on the jury's verdict, but also, quote, because of his egregious behavior during the course of this trial.
That's right.
His mentally deficient niece, who they keep trotting out as the official retard of the family, to say, oh, put him in jail.
By the way, I'm taking that word out of wraps.
It used to be a banned word for myself.
You can't watch her and say there's something right about her.
I mean, clearly there's something wrong with that woman.
So, yeah, she wants him to be in jail because of his behavior during a fake trial.
So because he complained that he was being lawfared, and we could all see it, that complaining against the injustice is reason enough to go to jail.
That's, yeah, that's what she's adding to the process.
All right, so here's my bottom line.
If you watched the Trump trial and you still think the 2020 election was fair, you're not smart.
You're not.
There was a time when you could say, you know, I think there must be enough checks and balances that even though I'm not watching it personally, citizens want to get this right.
But now that we know you can find 12 jurors, 12 jurors that had no interest in getting it right, it looks to me, how hard would it be to get hundreds of people to agree to rig an election for all the same reasons?
It's basically the same class of people.
Of course they would try.
I don't know if they'd be successful, but of course they would try.
All right.
This is the funniest thing.
So before the verdict came out, the Biden campaign was complaining because they weren't getting enough attention, because the trial was getting all the attention.
So here's how I summarized it in an ex post, which I think captures the situation.
So Biden's DEI campaign staff couldn't get coverage for their DEI event that they were putting on because the press wasn't acting DEI enough.
So they're living in a DEI little bubble, and they're wondering why it doesn't work.
Because it's because DEI is destroying the country.
You wouldn't get this case without DEI.
And we have massive incompetence in all of our systems now because of over-promoting unqualified people.
We can all see it now.
There's nobody who can claim they don't see it.
It's very, very clear that we're over-promoting.
One group of people, and that causes the supply to be less than the demand, and that causes people to lower their standards.
So it has nothing to do with anybody's genes and nothing to do with their culture.
Yeah, that's the other argument.
It's not my argument.
And we can all see it.
So yes, DEI should, by its design, if you only saw it on paper, and you said, hey, Scott, We're thinking and doing this thing.
We're going to really focus on victims and we're going to, you know, have this system where we try to promote to get more diversity.
I would have said, well, what happens if there's not enough diversity?
You know, not enough supply.
And they would have said, oh, we just work harder to get it.
And I say, no, you can't work harder to find what doesn't exist.
The problem is that our early education has not created enough people.
From which you could hire as many qualified people as you have openings.
So what are you going to do then?
Well, we'll just work harder.
No, you won't.
You will hit that goal because it's written on paper and your boss says you got to do it.
You will hit the diversity goal.
You will just lower your standards to do it.
And we see that everywhere.
There's no place it doesn't happen.
No place it doesn't happen.
Every single institution Had to lower its standards for DEI and they're all crashing.
Literally planes are falling out of the air.
We just convicted the president on nothing.
Planes are falling out of the air.
Our foreign policy is just almost insanely crazy.
You can see it everywhere.
Everything's falling apart.
It's all DEI.
Not all of it, but a lot of it.
All right.
So here's some things happening.
According to the Wall Street Journal poll, back in April, not too long ago, they found that some 30% of black men were either considering or planning to vote for Trump in November.
30% of black men.
What is the ratio of black voters?
Well, according to a recent poll, it's closer to 20%, about half of that.
So if 30% of men are thinking of voting Trump, but the average is 20, that means that the movement is men.
The movement toward Trump is black men.
And probably Hispanic men, but I don't know that one for sure.
But let me give you another data point.
So in my life here in California, I meet many people who were born in other countries, but now live in California.
Do you know one thing they all have in common so far?
And by the way, this is in other states as well.
So far, 100% of them are pro-Trump.
Has anybody noticed that?
Do you have any employees or people you work with who were born in other countries?
Just ask them.
The people born in other countries who came here because they preferred it are pretty much unanimously pro-Trump.
I actually haven't seen an exception.
I don't know if that's just something about where I live.
Keep in mind that I live in a very blue area.
So I'm in blue California and I've seen zero, not one, person born in another country who thinks that anybody but Trump should get elected.
And they're quite vocal about it.
Oh, actually, let me think.
Oh, I can think of two.
All right.
I just thought of two, but they are the exception.
Yeah.
The reason I didn't think of the two is that they used to be friends, but we couldn't be friends anymore after the Trump era.
So I forgot about them.
So yes, there are some people.
All right.
Sunny Hostin on The View says she's complaining about everybody saying that black supporters are going to Trump.
Well, you haven't seen nothing yet.
Because you know how everybody says it's so racist to assume that Black people will vote for Trump because he had legal problems?
It's super racist, isn't it?
Well, I'm gonna predict it's gonna happen.
Because here's what's happening.
Here's the big picture.
It's not just the legal part.
Right?
That might activate some people.
But it's not just because the legal system is slapping him down.
There's something bigger that I've never seen anybody say.
It goes like this.
If you were to take the one thing you don't like about Trump, what would it be?
Let's say you're an anti-Trumper.
Well, first thing you'd say is that he's too powerful and he's getting everything he wants.
Right?
If you listen to the left, he's too powerful, he's going to be a dictator, he's selfish, he gets everything he wants, only cares about himself, that sort of stuff.
And then you watch the system try to crush him.
And you watch that even with his fancy lawyers, he couldn't escape.
Do you know what that makes him?
It's the Democrats' worst nightmare.
For the first time ever, the Democrats solved Trump's biggest problem.
This is the first time you're going to hear this.
They created empathy.
It's the biggest mistake in the history of politics.
There was only one thing that would make you have no chance of winning if you're a Democrat.
Making Trump look like an ordinary person for whom you would have empathy because you see him being tortured by the system that you supported with your tax dollars.
When that verdict was read, he wasn't the President of the United States.
He wasn't a billionaire.
And he wasn't a stranger.
That was fucking me.
That was me.
I felt it like it happened to me.
And I don't feel that about, you know, your average billionaire who's having a bad day.
Because I think, oh, billionaire, you had a bad day, big deal.
You're still a billionaire.
But to take somebody like Trump, you know, who's the big braggadocious, some would say arrogant, you know, billionaire, always winning.
The biggest problem with that is that there's some number of people, as in most Democrats, who are so turned off by somebody who's a braggadocious frat boy, always winning, winning, winning, winning.
Ugh, I hate it.
And they just removed the biggest problem about Trump.
If the legal system can do this to him, and we note that no armies were formed to break him out of jail, right?
Did you see the gangs trying to break him out of jail?
I didn't.
We saw that he is as subject to the legal system, even when it's corrupt, as we are.
So the entire argument that the Democrats have been pushing, Is that there's something magical about him whereby this one individual could somehow become a dictator through force of personality, because he doesn't have an army.
He doesn't have a single person who thinks that's a good idea, who is on his side.
You know, even if you imagined he wanted to be a dictator, nobody wants to install a dictator in his 80s.
Who wants that?
Do you want an 80 year old dictator?
Said nobody.
Even if you wanted a dictator, you wouldn't want one of that age.
So, this is a story that I haven't seen anywhere, which is the biggest problem Trump had just got solved.
The Wizard of Oz to him and empathy.
That's what it is.
Remember the Wizard of Oz?
The tin man comes in and You know, he doesn't have a heart, but he's basically reframed to have one.
And this raw man doesn't have a brain, but he's sort of reframed to have one.
It's like the Wizard of Oz just gave Trump empathy.
It's the one thing that he joined up with Dorothy to get.
It was the only thing missing.
Basically, it's the only thing missing.
So they just sold for that because he's got plenty of empathy now.
And I'm going to take it my personal mission to destroy the Democrat Party over this.
And the way I'm going to do it is I'm going to spend the summer reminding them that men are leaving the Democrat Party.
Once that message starts taking hold, and it'll be hard for me to break through, but I think I can do it.
Once women learn that men are leaving the party, it's going to be hard for them to stay.
Because you know what's a dangerous place to be if you're a woman?
A place where there are no real men.
That's a dangerous place.
I think that biology will kick in and that normal women, you know, not, not the extreme left, but the normal women who are Democrats are going to say, I don't think I feel safe in a party that doesn't have any actual men in it.
And when I say no actual men, I mean, they're going to be left with Norm Eisen, Adam Schiff, Jamie Raskin, and Joe Biden.
And a bunch of people who look like they came from the Island of Misfit Toys.
I mean, are they men?
Is Adam Schiff a man?
Is Norm Eisen a man?
I mean, they're more like creatures, like golems or something.
They just seem like little monsters of some kind.
So, I don't think that women can hang out in a party where the men that they're associated with and become their accessories are little weasels.
If you want to go where there are actual male people who can protect you and build things and stuff like that, Republicans got plenty.
But the so-called men who are doing the heavy lifting on the left are not mateable.
They're unfuckable.
It's basically the Democrats as an entire party of unfuckable men.
And women are going to figure that out.
So, I'm going to go for identity.
Remember I told you identity is more important than policies or facts or anything like that?
If you're a woman, your identity is in some ways related to the men that you can be around.
Would you agree?
That a woman's identity, if she's married, and it works both ways, you know, it works for the men as well, you're identified quite a bit by your spouse.
It works both ways, right?
If you're, uh, let's say, uh, you're hanging around with a bunch of real alpha men on a yacht, you think to yourself, oh, this feels good because I'm on a yacht with a bunch of men who have power and muscles and money and stuff.
So you, you feel like you are in the right place because you're safe and you can, you can pull powerful men to be around you.
Once the Democrat women, the normal ones, you know, not the green haired ones, but the normal ones realize that real men are just not in their party.
It's going to be hard to stay there.
There's a necessary effect that will kick in.
Yeah.
All right.
So Gallup poll, uh, said, uh, right now, do you think that the economic conditions of the country are getting better or worse?
And in May, 70% said worse.
How in the world does Joe Biden get elected if we have a fair election and 70% of the country thinks the economic condition is getting worse under him?
You can't.
So I think you can eliminate the option that there will be a fair election and Biden will win.
It's either going to be Trump wins fairly or unfairly or something, but there's just no way that he can have a fair election and win with these headwinds.
All right.
In other news, just so you've heard it, Anthropic, one of the AIs that's a competitor to OpenAI, they're going to allow that to connect to other apps and data.
Now, if you're not as nerdy as I am, that doesn't mean anything to you.
But right now, OpenAI and other things, you can't tell it to do anything.
I want to tell my OpenAI to open an app and do something and get back to me, but it can't interact with other stuff.
I want it to look at a database and know for sure what's in it and tell me it's not really good at that.
It lies.
But if Anthropic can pull this off and connect it to databases and apps, everything changes, right?
So I know this is sort of a nerdy technical thing, But that one thing is the dangerous part, and I think that's the reason we didn't have it yet.
I think the reason we didn't have it yet is that people were waiting to see how dangerous AI was.
Because you don't want to say, hey AI, here's access to my messaging apps.
And then AI decides to send messages to all your friends, tell you, you know, you've got other plans.
So, so I think we must have figured out we can control AI well enough, we humans, that we can give it a little power.
Because it didn't have power before.
Power to do things.
Now we'll have power to actually do things in the real world.
So that either is the end of the world or something awesome.
I don't know.
There's a study that says from resume templates.com that says most job seekers lie or cheat during the hiring process.
Well, let me save you a little time here.
Oh, is the Trump presser happening now?
All right, we're gonna we're gonna wrap it up and Go to the Trump presser in a second Anyway, most job seekers lie.
I could have told you that you should have asked Scott I'm gonna let you go and we can all watch the Trump presser because you don't want to miss it So I'm gonna shut this down
