Roger Stone celebrates General Michael Flynn's vindication and financial settlement, condemning the "Russian collusion hoax" and criticizing Ron DeSantis as a backstabber. He argues the Senate filibuster blocks vital legislation like the SAVE Act, citing Judge Loretta Biggs' ruling on North Carolina's voter ID law as constitutional proof against discrimination. Stone asserts Eric Swalwell lied about ties to spy Christine Fang, denounces Antifa violence at "No Kings" protests, and highlights an ethics complaint against AOC for misuse of campaign funds. He praises Trump's hardline stance on Iran while warning of European instability due to migration and "no-go zones." Finally, Stone demands Inspector General Michael Atkinson release testimony proving CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella fabricated intelligence that led to Trump's 2019 impeachment, exposing a deep state plot. [Automatically generated summary]
You are now diving headlong into the deep end of the Stone Zone.
After a brief bout of laryngitis, I'm delighted to be back with you with the good news that my good friend General Michael Flynn has now been fully vindicated.
Flynn, of course, was questioned by federal agents as part of the Russian collusion hoax in 2017 and later charged with lying to the FBI, charges that were a classic perjury trap set by the deep state operating under the show us the man who will show you the crime modus operandi.
It's interesting, President Trump once told me that after he was elected in 2016, when he was still president-elect, he went to the White House to meet Barack Obama, his predecessor.
And Obama told him, you can have anyone in your cabinet you want.
You appoint anyone your administration wants.
The one person I would recommend that you not appoint is Mike Flynn.
The president told me as soon as he left the White House and got back in the car, he called Michael Flynn on his cell phone and asked him to be the national security advisor.
Now, Flynn initially pled guilty, but later withdrew that plea, citing pressure from prosecutors who allegedly threatened legal action against his family to coerce him.
Internal records and later reviews raised serious questions about the unethical conduct of the investigators and the prosecutors.
In fact, the two FBI agents who actually questioned Flynn insisted that he hadn't lied, but they were overruled by Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
Department of Justice ultimately dropped the charges against Flynn, and Flynn was pardoned in 2020.
The Department of Justice has now reached a financial settlement with General Flynn, bringing to closure one of the most grotesque miscarriages of justice stemming from the whole Russia gate fiasco.
Flynn, who had served as a national security advisor under Trump, has sought $50 million in damages, arguing that he was the victim of a politically motivated prosecution tied to the now thoroughly discredited Russian collusion narrative.
Now, while the exact amount of the settlement has not been disclosed, it is believed to be over $1 million, although I don't think money is the point of this.
Both sides agreed to dismiss the case permanently once payment is finalized.
In a statement, my good friend General Flynn said no amount of money could make up for the damage done to his family, calling the ordeal a brazen attempt to weaponize federal law enforcement against political opponents.
His attorney described the agreement as a clear acknowledgement that General Flynn was seriously wrong.
The case traces back, of course, to the FBI's fake crossfire hurricane investigation, which targeted alleged but false ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.
The only real shame here to me is the taxpayers are the one who will be paying this settlement.
It should be paid for by those deep state lowlives who should be held criminally and civilly liable for the actions they have taken to destroy the lives of patriots like General Flynn, Donald Trump, and, well, myself.
All of those who claim that Flynn is part of some conspiracy to undermine the president.
I see this online, but I don't understand it at all.
In fact, the president personally signed the agreement of the announcement of an agreement with General Flynn and sent it to him, which shows the high regard that the president has for General Flynn.
Now, here's what I will say.
In 2023, when it was unclear that President Trump was going to run for president, and it was a reasonable question whether he would be legally allowed to run for president, I said if for some reason Donald Trump could not run, well, I prefer General Flynn as a candidate to Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida, who I view as an egregious backstabber.
He only got to the governorship essentially because of the endorsement of Donald Trump.
Ron DeSantis was a largely unknown and undistinguished congressman who zoomed ahead of the competition when Donald Trump endorsed him to snag the Republican nomination for governor, only having to require Donald Trump to come to Florida three times in the last two weeks of the 2018 election cycle to drag Ron DeSantis over the finish line.
I considered his candidacy an act of disloyalty.
He owed his rise to Donald Trump, and then he betrayed him.
The other possibility was the globalist Nikki Haley.
Yes, I stand by my assessment that Mike Flynn would have been preferable to either one of those, but only in the event that Trump decided not to run.
Fortunately, President Trump did run.
He ran almost a letter-perfect campaign, and he defied the odds to essentially accomplish the greatest single comeback in American political history.
So justice has finally been done.
God bless my friend Michael Flynn and his family for what they have gone through.
I've been through it myself.
It's very hard to understand if you have not really experienced being the target of a vengeful federal government with unlimited resources and unlimited legal authority.
I've been there.
Meanwhile, the filibuster continues to be a problem in the U.S. Senate.
You see, I've talked extensively here on the show in the Stone Zone about the SAVE Act.
The president's redubbed this the Save America Act.
It's really not complicated.
It's a federal law that would require that a person has to be a United States citizen in order to vote in our federal elections.
And that person must be able to produce his or her photo ID.
It doesn't seem complicated, does it?
But the Democrats don't like it.
Why would that be?
Could it be because they want illegals to vote in our elections?
In any event, it has 50 votes in the U.S. Senate, which means theoretically Vice President JD Vance could break the tie if it were put up for a vote.
But the Senate has a tradition called the filibuster.
By the way, it's not a rule.
It's not a law.
It is a tradition that says that unless 60 senators favor moving any nomination or legislation to the floor, it cannot be considered.
Now Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin is urging his colleagues to eliminate the filibuster to break this ongoing Department of Homeland Security funding deadlock as well as the fight over the SAVE Act.
Appearing on Fox News, Johnson accused Democrats of refusing to support critical Department of Homeland Security funding, particularly resources for immigration and customs enforcement, or ICE, at a time when the Trump administration has a mandate for mass deportations.
The Democrats are obstructing and trying to run down the clock on President Trump's time in office, and thus far, to some extent, they are succeeding.
Senator Johnson warned that Republicans cannot afford to play by outdated rules when Democrats have shown every intention of scrapping the filibuster tradition themselves once they regain power.
Senator Johnson of Wisconsin laid out a strategy to bypass partisan gridlock by using the reconciliation process, which would allow Republicans to pass critical Department of Homeland Security funding with a simple majority.
Senator Johnson's proposal includes securing funding through fiscal year 2029 and preparing additional reconciliation efforts if Democrats continue to stall.
If they stall the broader appropriations process, while acknowledging the filibuster has historically blocked some harmful legislation, Johnson argued it is now preventing necessary action, including in this case a question of national security.
Johnson described the Senate's current rules as broken and increasingly ineffective in the face of partisan resistance.
And the filibuster, Senator Johnson argued, would expose the Democrats' hypocrisy and potentially deter them from dismantling the rule when they're back in control.
This is essentially a battle for the nation, and it is at hand.
Getting rid of the antiquated filibuster will change the trajectory of our nation and show the Republicans are strategically savvy for once.
Meanwhile, the FBI is now looking into the case of Congressman Eric Swawell.
You remember him.
He was a troubling national security story.
During the Trump administration, the first term, FBI investigation involving the California Democrat now running for governor and who they ruled last week was allowed to remain on the ballot despite the fact that he does not own a home and does not live in California.
You see, when it comes to the California Supreme Court, the rules, the law, none of those things matter, but it is indisputable that federal agents reported directly and compiled records to prove that Sua Wow had an affair with a notorious Chinese national spy named Christine Fang, also known as Fang Fang.
This potentially compromised the law maker, who is, I say, attempting to become the next governor of California.
Fang Fang reportedly embedded herself in political circles.
Let's put it this way: I think Falwell penetrated her and she penetrated Falwell's office, which is troublesome because he was on the House Intelligence Committee, where he was able to have classified documents and information.
It is about time that we reopen this investigation.
She would later die mysteriously in a plane crash, but when she found Falwell, she hit the jackpot.
Intelligence officials have long warned that such tactics are consistent with the Chinese Communist Party's influence operations.
Swalwell has acknowledged contact with Fang Fang during his time in the California City Council, but he claimed he suffered ties with her after being briefed by the FBI in 2015.
That's not true.
Fang Fang subsequently fled the country as the investigation and testified, only to later die, as I said, in a plane crash.
Despite the seriousness of the allegations, the Justice Department declined to bring any charges, and a House ethics review ended up without taking any action.
Now, with federal authorities taking yet another look, Justice May actually be served in this situation.
Swalwell is, of course, dismissing this renewed scrutiny as politically motivated.
But what's really happening is he's no longer above the law.
So what the Democrats call revenge and retaliation is really just justice and accountability.
It is about time, in my view, that this be done.
but in the Trump area, era, those days of some being above the law and others not, is no longer with us.
If Swallow is not charged for allegedly lying about his residency to illicitly attain a congressional seat, perhaps he'll be behind bars for being compromised by a communist Chinese spy.
I'm Roger Stone.
You're listening to the Stone Zone.
Don't go away because we'll be right back with some more hot politics on the other side.
This is the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
He likes politics and he's a professional.
At the highest level, Roger Stone is the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
Roger Stone, who's the very, very, one of the smartest political minds.
Roger Stone was persecuted.
People forget he's actually a brilliant, brilliant political analyst now.
Get in the zone.
It's the Stone Zone.
Here's Roger Stone.
Welcome back into the Stone Zone.
Well, a very disturbing scene unfolded in Los Angeles this weekend, showing how the radical left wishes to inflict violence and terror on law enforcement.
During the so-called No Kings protest in favor of an open borders anarchy, a mass agitator vandalized a federal building with the message, kill your local ICE agent, spray-painted.
An explicit call to murder federal officers.
This incident comes as thousands of demonstrators took to the streets on Saturday, many of whom were pretty laughable, your typical pink-haired leftist freak show you'd come to expect, but others were the extremely dangerous Antifa-style black block anarchists bent on bringing an end to America and the capitalist system in general.
It's kind of laughable to have the people behind the No Kings movement be the very same people who put Kamala Harris forward as a presidential candidate without a single Democrat primary or caucus voter voting for her.
Who is it who anointed a queen in this particular case?
According to the Department Homeland Security, attacks on ICE agents have skyrocketed up more than 1,300% since 2025, along with an alarming surge in death threats.
Officials say this wave of hostility is being fueled by inflammatory rhetoric from pro-sanctuary Democrat politicians who want to protect their illegal voting base and a fake news media that demonizes law enforcement and uses inflammatory rhetoric to describe President Trump and his supporters.
ICE responded forcefully, of course, making clear that threats against agents or their families will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Meanwhile, law enforcement officials on the ground faced an escalating unrest.
Police in Los Angeles made at least 74 arrests after protesters refused to disperse, with officers deploying tear gas near a federal detention facility as tensions boiled over.
Failure to confront this rhetoric now risks further emboldering dangerous actors while putting America law enforcement directly in harm's way.
Time's to initiate a nationwide crackdown against Antifa, and I believe Secretary of the Treasury Scott Besant and Vice President JD Vance will get to the bottom of how much of this violence and how much of this inflammatory pro-violence rhetoric is being paid for with your tax dollars.
TSA Workers Deserve Pay00:02:07
Kelsey Gabbard indicated over the weekend that she would soon declassify documents that demonstrate that as much as $3 billion, that's right, $3 billion in our tax money was used for the planned re-election of Joe Biden.
I'm anxious to see those documents.
Despite continuing to show up and protect the traveling public, our TSA agents are still on the job.
And the good news, there's finally some relief in sight for the thousands of these airport security workers thanks to decisive action from President Donald Trump.
Borders are Tom Homan announced that the TSA administration's officers, who've been working without pay for weeks, will begin receiving paychecks as early as Monday or Tuesday at the latest.
That would be tomorrow.
The move comes after President Trump invoked emergency powers to redirect funding and ensure these essential workers are properly compensated.
Homan, who's a good friend of mine and a straight-spoken guy, didn't mince words calling the situation ridiculous and pointing out the stark contrast between unpaid TSA officers struggling to feed their families and members of Congress who continue collecting paychecks while out of recess.
I think this is outrageous.
TSA agents who earn an average salary of around $49,000 a year haven't received a full paycheck since mid-February with no pay at all since the end of the month, yet Congress, it's about to take a vacation break, continues to get a full paycheck, not to mention free health care and free access to the House and Senate gyms.
It's time to end the privileges for our elected and let them operate like every other citizen.
My hats off to President Trump to finally getting these brave and I think extraordinarily hardworking federal officials their pay.
I've got to fly tomorrow.
My flight is only 45 minutes, but I have to get to the airport two and a half hours in advance because of the TSA backup.
Does that make sense?
Not to me.
AOC Ethics Complaints00:03:18
You listen to the Stone Zone.
I'm Roger Stone, and we'll be right back.
This is the Stone Zone.
Now, get in the zone.
It's the Stone Zone.
A man who's gone through hell, but he's kept going and he's smart and he's strong and people love him.
Not everybody, but people love him and respect him.
Roger Stone Wizards.
Here's Roger Stone.
Welcome back in Two from the Stone Zone.
Well, a new ethics complaint is raising very serious questions about Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, better known as AOC, and how she may have funneled campaign contributions to a doctor known for providing a controversial psychoactive substance.
A government watchdog group, the National Legal and Policy Center, has filed a formal complaint alleging that almost $19,000 in campaign funds were paid to a Boston-based psychiatrist, put in her federal election commission report as leadership training and consulting.
The payments made through 2025 are now under scrutiny over whether they were actually used for personal therapy sessions.
According to the complaint, the doctor in question specializes in treating depression, PTSD, and anxiety and does not seem to be advertising any political consulting or leadership training services.
He also is known to specialize in the use of the controversial ketamine treatments.
Ketamine is a substance that was first known as an illicit party drug, but is now being used with some success to treat depression and mental illness, as well as PTSD.
That has led investigators to question whether these expenses were improperly classified and whether campaign funds were used, in this case, for AOC's personal benefit.
Federal election law is clear that campaign money cannot be used for personal expenses.
The key legal standard is whether the costs would exist regardless of the candidate's campaign.
So if these campaigns were for ketamine therapy, critics argue, they would represent a direct violation.
The complaint is now before the Federal Election Commission and the Office of Congressional Conduct with calls for a full investigation and potential penalties if wrongdoing is actually confirmed.
So far, AOC and her campaign have not responded to the allegations, but she may have gotten her hand caught in the cookie jar here.
These Democrats believe they're above the law, but finding out the hard way that perhaps their shady actions could have serious consequences.
In the meantime, however, the Federal Election Commission currently does not have a full board of commissioners and therefore they lack a quorum.
Therefore, any complaint filed by Republican or Democrat against any candidate, Republican or Democrat, is unlikely to go anyplace at all.
Iran Confronted by Strength00:02:36
It's an extraordinary lack of accountability.
We'll follow this story as it develops.
Meanwhile, there's growing signs that President Trump's hardline foreign policy towards Iran is beginning to produce results despite continued resistance from Tehran.
Iran is once again rejecting the U.S. demands as excessive, but behind the rhetoric, the regime appears to be increasingly pressured.
President Trump has pointed to great progress in dealing with what he describes as a more reasonable Iranian leadership, suggesting that sustained military and economic pressure is forcing this shift.
The administration is making clear that all options remain on the table.
Reports indicate U.S. forces, including special operation units, are positioned in the region, while officials are weighing a high-stakes plan to seize Iran's enriched uranium stockpile if Tehran refuses to negotiate in good faith.
At the same time, Treasury Secretary Scott Besson signaled a long-term strategy to reassert control over the vital Strait of Hormuz, a key artery for global energy.
Approximately 20% of the world's energy flows through the states of Hormuz.
Iran, meanwhile, is lashing out due to desperation, launching missile strikes, fueling regional instability, and issuing threats against U.S. forces and allies.
But critics of the regime say this escalation actually reflects weakness rather than strength as sanctions bite and military pressure amounts.
Really, not since Richard Nixon was president have we had a president who has used the trifecta of military strength, economic pressure, and diplomacy to move the country's foreign policy forward.
Even regional leaders are acknowledging America's new leverage.
Egypt's president recently stated that only the United States has the power to bring this conflict to an end, underscoring Washington's dominant position.
The broader message is clear.
After years of failed appeasement, a strategy root in strength is putting Iran on the defensive.
For those who don't remember, Donald Trump has said since 1988 that there was no circumstance under which Iran should be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.
While challenges remain, the Trump administration's approach is steadily reshaping the balance of power and is forcing Tehran to confront the new reality that their support for terrorism and their pursuit of nuclear weapons will just not be tolerated.
Voter ID Victory00:07:40
Meanwhile, in North Carolina, a major, major victory for voter integrity after seven long years of legal battles, a federal judge has confirmed what most Americans have believed all along, that requiring a voter ID to vote is just common sense and not racist or discriminatory.
U.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs, notably an Obama appointee to the bench, has upheld North Carolina's voter ID law, rejecting claims from left-wing activist groups that the measure was designed to somehow suppress minority voters.
The ruling reaffirms a 2018 constitutional amendment passed with 55% of North Carolina voters voting yes, making it clear that the will of the people will remain intact without judicial interference getting in the way.
Even an Obama judge was forced to acknowledge this case was never really about whether voter ID should exist.
That question, she wrote, was settled at the ballot box by the voters.
And despite repeated allegations, the court found no evidence whatsoever that there was a discriminatory intent behind requiring a photo ID.
In reality, legislation was crafted to ensure access to all voters.
IDs are provided free of charge.
Multiple forms of identification are accepted under the law, including military IDs and passports.
And voters without ID can still cast provisional ballots until they can produce an ID.
Still, it took years of litigation, delays, and political games to reach this conclusion, highlighting how aggressively the left has fought against basic election safeguards and how their lawfare taxes just gum up the works, preventing important reforms from ever being implemented.
The decision comes as Democrats in Washington continue to block the Save America Act, as we discussed earlier, which would simply require a voter ID and proof of citizenship to vote in a federal election.
Policies consistently receive strong bipartisan support among voters.
The polls actually show that support for these measures are in the mid-80s.
Why is there a controversy here?
This ruling in North Carolina is more than a legal victory.
It's a reaffirmation that election integrity measures are both constitutional and necessary.
Now, when you combine this with last week's Supreme Court ruling that Election Day means exactly what it says, that votes received by election boards after the election will not be counted and that votes should all be counted by Election Day, those two simple decisions will go a long way towards solving the election integrity problem in this country.
That attempt to label these as voter suppression certainly don't hold up in court, nor do they hold any water with the American people who soundly reject that nonsense regardless of where they stand, whether Republicans or Democrats.
Meanwhile, there are alarming warnings that are emerging from Europe's own political institutions as experts say decades of mass migration and failed multicultural policies are pushing the continent towards serious internal conflict.
At a conference held in the European Parliament, analysts and lawmakers warned that Europe is facing what could become widespread civil unrest, even civil war, driven by collapsing social cohesion and rising parallel societies.
Professor David Betts of King's College in London delivered a blunt assessment, which I read about.
He said, Europe is on track for major internal conflict as trust between citizens continues to erode.
The event highlighted growing concerns over so-called no-go zones where Islamic militants reign supreme, enforcing Sharia law, with reports identifying hundreds of these areas marked by high crime, gang activity, and anti-white discrimination and violence.
Leaders at this conference pointed to rising violence, unrest, and a breakdown in shared national identity as key warning signs.
French leader Marion Marchal and Swedish lawmaker Charlie Weimers emphasized that once stable societies are rapidly transforming under the weight of mass migration with integration efforts failing and divisions only getting deeper.
In many areas, newcomers are forming isolated communities with little connection to the broader culture, raising serious questions about long-term stability.
Critics say Europe's political elites ignored these risks for years, prioritizing open border policies as they pushed the notion that Europe would become a multicultural paradise.
Now, even insiders admit the situation is becoming a dangerous disaster.
What Europe needs to do is adopt a brand of populism and adopt the policy of mass deportations, otherwise they too will lose their civilization and be overtaken by barbarians, which is just what the psychotic globalists hope for.
Meanwhile, the World Health Organization has announced it is expanding its digital health certification system, originally created during COVID, to force on migrants and displaced populations.
Once again, the globalists are posing as a savior for the crisis that they themselves cause, with their solution giving more power to their budding Orwellian technocracy.
The program known as Global Digital Health Certification Network is allegedly designed to verify vaccination status for international travelers, but officials now openly admit it's evolving into something much, much broader.
With the International Organization for Migration joining the effort, the system will now track and store migrant health records across borders, allowing governments and international agencies to access personal data in multiple countries.
The World Health Organization, from which the United States has withdrawn, describes this as an improving coordination and continuity of care, but in actuality it is Big Brother and a permanent expansion of global digital infrastructure that controls human movement.
This is no longer a temporary pandemic tool.
It's being built into a long-term system governing migration and humanitarian response.
And it won't be used to close borders or to get migrants out where they don't belong, where they are illegally, it'll be used to give migrants more welfare and more accommodations as they settle into Western host nations that they're actually invading.
This is part of a growing web of international control where unelected international bodies play a larger role in managing cross-border populations and personal data.
This is why we must never accept infringement upon our rights under the guise of national security or keeping us safe.
Every time, it's always been just a power grab that comes permanent.
We saw it in our country after 9-11.
We saw it again after the COVID pandemic.
And then after the next crisis, they'll make another push for more totalitarian control.
I, for one, as a lifelong conservative, don't like the idea of government having a file and a number on every American citizen, including me and the members of my family.
We must say never and no more and stand up to these tyrants because no matter what the cost of our founding fathers, we should never submit to this idea of national tracking.
Meanwhile, here's some good news.
Intelligence Community Whistleblower00:06:43
The Federal Reserve Governor Stefan Mirin is once again pushing for lower interest rates, arguing that policymakers should not overreact to recent spikes in energy prices.
Speaking on CNBC, Mirren discussed concerns about rising oil and gas prices, saying there is no evidence of a broader inflation problem taking hold.
According to the Fed board governor, these key indicators like inflation and unemployment remain stable, and fears of a so-called wage price spiral have just not materialized.
In other words, what he's saying is it's time to cut interest rates on the American people, commensurate with the level of unemployment and inflation, which are the two measures the Federal Reserve is supposed to use in making such decisions.
Once that is done, which the director of the Federal Housing and Finance Administration, Bill Pultey, has been pushing for, wait to see a housing boom bigger in this country than we have ever seen.
I'm Roger Stone.
You're listening to the Stone Zone and will be right back.
This is the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
That is a great, great person, Roger Stone.
The Stone Zone.
This is The Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
Roger Stone, who's the very, very one of the smartest political minds.
Roger Stone was persecuted.
People forget he's actually a brilliant, brilliant political analyst.
Now, get him a zone.
It's the Stone Zone.
Here's Roger Stone.
Welcome back into the Stone Zone.
Back in 2019, an impeachment effort against President Donald Trump was triggered when a member of the National Security Council named Alexander Vindeman coordinated with a member of the National Intelligence Council named Eric Sierra Mella to fabricate a false claim that President Trump leveraged his power and authority to demand that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky release information on Joe and Hunter Biden's corrupt financial dealings.
in Ukraine.
At the time of the 2019 impeachment construct, Eric Ciamella was working for the CIA as an analyst within the National Intelligence Council.
Prior to that, he worked for Senator Adam Schiff, then Congressman Adam Schiff, and guess where he works today?
He now works for Senator Adam Schiff.
See, before 2019, CIA analysts were allowed to anonymously make claims against political officials.
Because of the sensitive information they handled, any allegation of wrongdoing based on intelligence had to be made with their name attached to it.
Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson changed or modified those rules, which permitted Cieramella to remain anonymous and make a claim that ultimately led to an impeachment effort.
Eric Ciaramella allegedly fabricated intelligence information, shared it with Congress and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, also known as the HBSCI, and then, of course, continued to remain anonymous.
The House Committee Chairman at the time, Adam Schiff, was said to have assisted him on October 4th.
As part of the House impeachment inquiry, Intelligence Community Inspector Hackinson gave closed-door testimony to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence as part of their impeachment investigation.
One of the key questions to the Inspector General Atkinson surrounded the authority of his office to change the CIA whistleblower rules that permitted this anonymous attack on President Trump.
It is worth re-emphasizing that Eric Ciaramella was both the analyst behind the disputed 2017 intelligence community assessment that director of the CIA John Brennan used in the fake Russian collusion hoax, including it in the president's daily intelligence community assessment.
That became the basis for the Russian collusion hoax.
It also became the rationale for the spying on President Donald Trump by the FISA court, as well as the impetus for the appointment of a special counsel.
In other words, there was no probable cause for the Russian collusion investigation.
If Congress, or more importantly, the American public had known that CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella was both the author of the fraudulent 2016 steel dossier claim jammed into the president's intelligence community assessment, as well as the later 2019 CIA complaint, it's doubtful that any impeachment effort would have moved forward, but he was allowed to be anonymous, you see.
Inside the intelligence community oversight system, the Ci Mella connection to both IC operations could have been made.
His anonymity as a whistleblower served its purposes.
The transcript of Inspector General Michael Atkinson's testimony becomes a key document now to release because at its core we know that Atkinson testified that Ciarmella lied.
The Ciarmella lie is at the heart of the impeachment attempt.
Senator then Congressman Adam Schiff knew that he was doing and how the separation of powers violated his purposes.
The executive branch would not easily be able to reach into any legislative branch and extract information.
That's why the House Intelligence Committee Chairman, impeachment chairman, and now Senator Adam Schiff buried the Atkinson transcript in the vault of the House Intelligence Committee.
The committee has now voted to release the Atkinson transcript.
So the Department of National Intelligence under Tulsi Gabbard will now walk the unhidden transcript through the declassification process.
The fastest way, of course, is through President Trump's office.
Hopefully the redactions will be minimal.
We will get to see once and for all that the Russian collusion hoax, as well as the two fraudulent impeachments, the heisting of the 2020 election and the so-called documents case against President Donald Trump that ended up with the raid on the president's home in Mar-Lago,
Deep State Plot Revealed00:00:26
have landed this entire legal matter in the southern district of Florida, where the U.S. Attorney has the full authority to subpoena people like James Comey and John Brennan and indeed Mr. Ciara Mella.
You see, it was a deep state plot from the beginning, but as the Bible says, all will be revealed.