Roger Stone critiques former Governor Chris Christie's potential 2028 run, highlighting the controversial timing of U.S. Attorney David Kelly's decision to avoid criminal charges for Christie's brother Todd amidst civil fraud allegations and the Bridgegate scandal. The discussion expands to national security, citing recent terror attacks linked to ISIS and criticizing Mayor Eric Adams for ignoring radical Islam while advocating for the SAVE Act. Stone further alleges deep corruption within the Biden-Clinton family, including Hunter Biden's Burisma ties and Hillary Clinton's alleged roles in Russian collusion and Benghazi cover-ups, before concluding with praise for Trump and Rubio's hard-line stance against Cuba's economic crisis and Chinese espionage networks. [Automatically generated summary]
The Long Island Boat and Fishing Show is back at the Nassau Coliseum, March 13th through 15th.
Long Island's top dealers will be there with huge savings on boats, tackle, personal watercraft, and the latest electronics.
This show has it all.
Children will be entertained by Twiggy, the water skiing squirrel.
Enjoy free face painting.
Plus, on Saturday and Sunday, the first 100 kids get a free life vest, free parking all weekend, and Friday it's free Heroes Day admission for military and first responders.
Three days only.
March 13th through 15th.
Visit nyboatshows.com for details.
The Stone Zone.
Entertaining and informative on the Red Apple Podcast Network.
You are now entering the Stone Zone.
Well, former Governor Chris Christie back in the news.
He's been attending Republican events suddenly, and some are speculating that he may be thinking of running for office again.
He clearly take a look at him.
He needs to run.
Not for president.
He just needs to run.
But Chris Christie, of course, famously prosecuted Charles Kushner in a dispute with Kushner's brother.
Charles Kushner had legal problems.
Charles Kushner of New Jersey, of course, is the father of Jared Kushner, who is President Donald Trump's son-in-law.
Christie would launch his own presidential campaign in 2016.
It would quickly fizzle.
Christie then endorsed Trump, briefly serving as the head of his transition team, but now claims that Jared Kushner fired him from that job, claiming that the dispute between the two brothers should have been handled by the rabbis in rabbinical court.
Charles Kushner was ultimately charged and convicted with essentially blackmailing his brother and was pardoned on the same day that President Donald Trump pardoned me.
But the idea of Chris Christie as some kind of Mr. Kleene is pretty laughable.
New Jersey politics has long resembled a carnival midway where the games appear simple, the prizes glitter enticingly, and the operators insist everything is perfectly legitimate.
But the more closely one looks at the mechanics of the politics in the Garden State, the more one will begin to suspect the odds have been arranged very carefully.
Few stories, in my opinion, illustrate this curious arithmetic of power better than the story of Chris Christie and his younger brother Todd.
Christie brothers were raised in Newark, later Livingston, New Jersey, in a middle-class household.
Their father, Bill Christie, worked as a Wall Street accountant, while their mother, Sandra, served as a receptionist.
Like most ambitious families in New Jersey's upper mobile suburbs, the Christie's encourage achievement and advancement.
Chris Christie chose the path of law and politics while his brother, Todd, gravitated towards the high-velocity universe of Wall Street.
Both brothers attended the University of Delaware.
Chris built the resume for a future political combatant.
In fact, made an earlier race for the Morris County Board of Freeholders.
They call them commissioners today, a race that he lost, while Todd entered the trading pits where fortunes are made and lost at a speed that would make a casino blackjack dealer dizzy.
Todd Christie eventually rose through the ranks of Spear, Leeds, and Kellogg specialists became its chief executive.
When Goldman Sachs purchased the firm in 2000 for more than $6 billion, Todd Christie reportedly walked away with approximately $60 million.
Now, $60 million is an enormous amount of money.
In 2005, however, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged 20 specialist traders connected to the Todd Christie's company, Spear, Leeds, and Kellogg, with civil fraud for engaging in trading practices that enriched their firms while disadvantaging the customers.
Todd Christie was among those initially charged.
Regulators alleged that between 1999 and 2003, that Todd Christie participated in more than 1,600 improper trades involving major corporations including IBM, AOL, Time Warner, AIG, and others.
According to the SEC, these maneuvers produced approximately $1.59 million in profit for the firm, while investors absorbed about $1.4 million in additional costs.
Well, one might expect that this would come to the attention of criminal prosecutors.
Indeed, 15 of the 20 traders were indicted on criminal fraud charges by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
Those charges carried potential prison sentences up to 10 years.
Todd Christie, however, was not among those charged.
In fact, Todd Christie faced only civil enforcement.
In 2008, he settled the SEC case without admitting wrongdoing, agreeing to disgorge profits and pay penalties while acknowledging hundreds of improper trades.
Criminal charges against Todd Christie never materialized.
The official explanation offered by prosecutors was simple.
The evidence, they said, supported civil enforcement, but not criminal prosecution.
That decision was made by the office of U.S. Attorney David Kelly in the Southern District of New York.
Chris Christie was serving at that time as the U.S. Attorney for the adjoining district in New Jersey and therefore had no formal jurisdiction over his brother's case.
Yet politics like common E depends heavily on timing.
Two years after Todd Christie escaped criminal prosecution, Chris Christie's U.S. Attorney Office awarded David Kelly's a lucrative corporate monitorship connected to deferred prosecution agreements involving biomet orthopedics.
The assignment required Kelly to oversee corporate compliance reforms following allegations that the company had paid kickbacks to doctors for using its hip and knee implants.
Now these monitorships are the sort of thing that make men wealthy.
These are not some modest consulting gigs.
They generate millions of dollars for legal fees.
The exact value of Kelly's appointment has never publicly been disclosed, but such arrangements frequently produce enormous revenue streams for the firms and the lawyers involved.
Christie's defenders insist the selection of Kelly was based solely on merit.
They noted that monitors paid by the companies involved rather than taxpayers.
They also observed that the practice of appointing outside monitors was common, but no one argues with that.
Why, however, this particular lawyer.
This is not the first time this has happened with Chris Christie, as the optics would cause even the most charitable observer to poise and say, hmm, isn't this strange?
A politically connected Wall Street executive voids criminal prosecution.
The prosecutor who made that decision later receives a lucrative assignment from the executive's brother, who happens to be a powerful U.S. attorney.
And we're truly expected to believe that there's no curious eyebrow that should be raised about this strange sequence of events.
Chris Christie, who has always portrayed himself as a crusading corruption fighter during his term as U.S. attorney, prosecuted more than 100 public officials in New Jersey, had a reputation that served him well, helped propel him to the governor's office in 2009.
Yet, this strange pattern of monitorships under Christie's watch did not end with the very suspicious one by David Kelly.
In another prominent case, he appointed former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft as a corporate monitor in a settlement involving medical device manufacturer Zimmer Holdings.
Ashcroft's firm reportedly ended up with $52 million from that assignment.
Christie also appointed David Sampson, a close political ally, to another monitorship role.
Sampson would later be forced to resign from the New York, New Jersey Commission over financial improprieties.
One might ask whether New Jersey's celebrated corruption cider had inadvertently created a comfortable patronage system for well-connected legal heavyweights, particularly those who might have presidential ambitions.
Meanwhile, Todd Christie continued to prosper.
His Wall Street fortunes migrated into real estate investments and private financial ventures.
He founded Big Blue Trading, remained active in business development and advisory roles.
His wealth spread across properties in Harrison, Mendem Township, and Point Pleasant Beach.
Political contributions followed as well, with hundreds of thousands of dollars flowing from Republican causes and campaigns to the campaigns of Chris Christie.
Yet the Chris Christie story still does not end there.
Chris Christie's tenure as governor eventually became overshadowed by the most infamous political scandal in the state's history, Bridgegame.
The Bridgegate scandal, in which traffic lanes on George Washington Bridge were closed in apparent retaliation against a Democrat mayor who had refused to endorse Chris Christie's re-election.
Although the Supreme Court later overturned the criminal conviction of two of Christie's aides who were allegedly involved in the scheme, the episode left a lingering question about the culture that had developed within the governor's office.
Having known every one of those people who were convicted in this crime or known others who did, and knowing Chris Christie's zeal as a political control freak and one with a mean spirit, I have little doubt that Chris Christie did know about the George Washington Bridge closing as an act of political revenge.
I have long believed that had we taken him for vice president, people forget this, but after Trump was nominated, he was facing a choice of Chris Christie or Newt Gingrich.
Newt Gingrich, in a race against Hillary Clinton, would have made the entire campaign about the past because Gingrich had tried to impeach Bill Clinton.
It would have just been yesterday's war.
It was way too 80s.
And if Chris Christie had been the nominee for vice president, well, the George Washington Bridge scandal broke in October, just before the election that Donald Trump won.
Chris Christie can continue to whine, but I don't think anyone takes him serious as a political force.
He has the lowest approval rating of any former New Jersey governor, and that includes some very, very unpopular governors who raised taxes and made the state the basket case it is economically today.
Chris Christie's continuing pot shots at Donald Trump are fun because he always holds himself out kind of as Mr. Clean, Mr. Integrity.
And as I've told you, basically he gave a multi-million dollar conservatorship to a prosecutor to give his brother a pass on insider trading in a case in which everyone else went to jail.
The Republican Party has a bench for 2028, that's for sure.
JD Vance would certainly still have to be considered the favorite.
Republican Party nominates sitting vice presidents, and Vance does a very effective behind-the-scenes job.
The job does not lend itself to being out front.
There is, of course, Secretary Marco Rubio, whose popularity grows as he takes a hard line against narco-Marxist drug trafficking in this hemisphere, and as he and Donald Trump seem to be closing in on the prize of a free Cuba with news today that the Cuban agreement, Cuban government has agreed to open negotiations with the United States.
This is a historic act.
This is a country on whom we have an economic embargo.
So he is, of course, a possibility.
I've long said Tulsi Gabbard has impressed me with the courage to declassify all the documents pertaining to the Russian collusion hoax.
And now she has uncovered even more internal government plots, unconstitutional plots against the Trump administration.
But more importantly, she's now studying the issue of election integrity, the integrity of mail-in ballots, the manipulability, and the integrity and security of electronic voting machines.
And she will report to the president on that.
So I think she is in the circle.
I just named three that are.
Governor Chris Christie is not in that circle.
But then again, Chris Christie could probably not fit in the circle.
I'm Roger Stone, listening to the Stone Zone, and we'll be right back.
The Stone Zone.
Entertaining and informative on the Red Apple Podcast Network.
And we're back in the Stone Zone.
With the president's lightning-like attacks on Iran comes my concern about the many terrorist sleeper cells that may very well be in the United States.
After all, I think Joe Biden's open borders policy let as many as, I don't know, 36 million into the country.
We know that at least 312 of them matched some terrorist database, but we have no idea how many other terrorists have entered the country.
We've already had multiple attacks.
ISIS Bombing Blamed on Supremacists00:03:01
The Austin bar shooting on March 1st in Austin.
A immigrant from Senegal opened fire near a crowded bar using a firearm, wore clothing with religious messaging and imagery connected to Iran.
Sadly, the police shot and killed him during the incident.
Then there was the attempted bomb attack in Manhattan.
Both of the suspects from Bucks Council, Pennsylvania, as I think most New Yorkers have now heard, they threw improvised explosive devices near the mayor's residence during a protest.
Police say the suspects were inspired by ISIS ideology.
Both suspects were arrested and the bombs failed, thank God, to explode.
Now, a shooting at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia.
Mohamed Baylor Jalal, a U.S. resident originally connected to Sierra Leone background, entered an ROTC classroom and opened fire, shouting Ali Akbar during the attack.
Previously convicted in 2016 in other action of supporting ISIS, was ultimately killed by students who subdued him.
And now the attack at the Temple Israel Synagogue, which is in West Bloomfield, Michigan, I know West Bloomfield, a man named Ayman Mohad Ghazali, born in Lebanon, later, however, a U.S. citizen living in Michigan, rammed a truck into a synagogue and opened fire.
This is very clearly yet another hate crime.
And then, of course, the Chabad headquarters vehicle attack in Brooklyn, New York.
The attacker not yet underidentified the event.
We have very little information still under investigation, possibly an anti-Semitic hate crime.
If American politics were not this dangerous, it would be funny, but only in the surreal circus of contemporary New York City could an ISIS-inspired bombing attempt be blamed on white supremacists, which is essentially what Mayor Ayatollah Zoram Mamdami did when he learned the news about the attack on the taxpayer-funded mission on the East River.
It really is the circus of the absurd.
Mayor Mamdami wants to talk about how evil the landlords are, but he certainly doesn't want to talk about the dangers of radical Islam, both at home and abroad.
You're listening to the Stone Zone here on the Red Apple Audio Networks, and we'll be back with more politics on the other side.
Whatever you do, don't go away.
The Stone Zone.
Entertaining and informative on the Red Apple Podcast Network.
Election Integrity and Voting Rights00:05:36
You know, I think when people look at the issue of election integrity, they sometimes get lost in the weeds arguing about mail-in ballots, early voting, and of course, the question of whether these electronic voting machines, which are not supposed to be connected to the internet, but are, can be trusted and whether they are secure.
But all of that, I think the largest problems regarding election fraud, but first of all, most of them exist in the voter lists.
This is where it begins.
Most of this could be solved by passage of the SAVE Act, now up before the U.S. Senate.
The SAVE Act just very simply requires that one be a U.S. citizen in order to vote in our federal elections, and that one have a picture ID, a reasonable form of identification that proves their citizenship.
To say that that is somehow racist is to say that black people or other minorities are too stupid or incapable of getting an ID when everybody I know that's black and I have black friends, they all have IDs.
So this is really the answer.
The problem is that the hidebound rules of the U.S. Senate don't seem to be letting a bill that has 50 committed votes move to the floor.
Now, normally, when there is a Thai vote in the Senate, let's assume every Democrat votes against it and a few Republicans vote against it, has at least 50 votes.
If it were a Thai vote, that Thai vote would be broken by the presiding officer.
In this case, that is Vice President J.D. Advance.
But because of the rules of cloture, an antiquated rule, a custom of the Senate, the current Senate majority leader, John Thune of Nebraska, who's kind of a Karl Rove puppet, says that he's playing to lose, essentially.
He keeps insisting that he will bring it to a vote, but he knows the Republicans lack the 60 votes needed to overcome a Democratic filibuster.
He is apparently unwilling to force the so-called talking filibuster.
This is a procedural battle that keeps senators on the floor, but allows them to circumvent the Democrats' filibuster.
Thun and the Senate rhinos would rather be getting courted by lobbyists, taking in special interest money at elite fundraisers, perhaps even enjoying a pizza party or two on the hill rather than stand and fight for the American people.
So they give you rhetoric.
Oh, Thune says I'll bring it up for a vote.
But he knows that it requires not 51 votes, but 60 votes to proceed to a vote.
So it's a trick comment.
Right about now, I suspect that President Donald Trump is probably sorry that he agreed to Thune being the Senate majority leader instead of Florida Senator Rick Scott, who very bravely vied for that position.
Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer, have lined up in opposition to the bill, claiming, of course, that it would restrict voting rights and that it would suppress the vote.
Look, we get the joke here.
This is a red herring.
Nobody actually believes.
The legislation simply ensures that only American citizens can vote.
So why do Democrats have a problem with that?
Well, because I think we know.
Given this giant influx into America of lower socio-economic illegals, they hope to wave a wand at some point and give them all citizenship, therefore give them all the vote.
The sad question is how many of them who are illegal are already voting in our elections.
One can register to vote in Florida by going to the Department of Motor Vehicles.
You're not asked for proof of citizenship.
You're not asked for your birth certificate.
You're not asked for anything other than your name and your address.
So we already have illegals voting in our elections.
There are the Republicans now looking at alternative ways to pass the SAVE Act, which by the way, Trump calls the Save America Act.
I think he's right about that.
I've written and talked about this quite a bit, including attaching voter integrity provisions to a budget reconciliation bill, which could allow passage with a simple majority.
So if the SAVE Act does not pass now, there are still some alternatives.
But whether the Republicans in the U.S. Senate have the belly for such a fight really remains to be seen.
So I have said for some time, Donald Trump's problem is, and the country's problem, are not the leftist, Marxist, progressive Democrats.
At least you know where they're coming from.
Better a snake in the grass than an asp in the bosom, as the Bible says.
But our problem are the feckless, gutless, weak-kneed, lily-livered, white wine-swelling, brie-cheese-eating, country club-belonging establishment Republicans in both the House and the Senate who have no belly for a fight.
Clinton Scandals and Corruption00:07:48
They don't want to look into the corruption of Vice President and then President Joe Biden.
It certainly looks to me like the House Oversight Committee uncovered multi-million dollar payments to Biden's son, his brother, other Biden family members, as well as the money trail in which that money went to Joe Biden.
But no talk about prosecuting him, no referral to the Justice Department for prosecution.
They've been excellent at trying to get at the bottom line of the Russian collusion hoax.
And this week was kind of a treat because Bill and Hillary Clinton, two of the greatest liars in American history, were both under oath.
You can always tell when Bill or Hillary Clinton is lying.
You know how?
Their lips are moving.
Hillary Clinton famously told us that it just no longer mattered why the men died in Benghazi.
She kept insisting that the attack on our facility in Benghazi, Iraq, in which three American diplomats lost their lives in the most horrific way amidst gang violence, was caused by a video that was offensive to Islam that had somehow gotten released in a country where very few people are on the internet,
when in fact it was a planned, deliberate, military precision attack on our facility.
And then she lied about whether there were any classified documents among the 33,000 documents that for some reason she had illegally on a home computer server, a server that she ordered be destroyed with both hammers and beach blitz.
Beach blitz, bit bleach, pardon me.
If you have any doubt about her desire to bury evidence of the crime, she insisted that she has few ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
Failing to mention that Jeffrey Epstein provided all of the seed capital for the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative.
Hillary also says that she's only met Ghislaine Maxwell, essentially Epstein's pimp, casually, failing to mention that the Clinton Foundation funded millions of dollars to a nonprofit called the Tara Marr Foundation, founded by Jeffrey Epstein but run by Maxwell.
This was essentially they had a program for young women interns for this environmental program.
Essentially, it was a grooming pool paid for by the Clintons.
I always believed, and this is the theme of my 2015 book, The Clintons' War on Women, that Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton had a marriage of convenience.
His philandering was famous.
I've never criticized him for those consensual affairs.
They are not as serious as his serial record of sexually assaulting women.
Juanita Broderick, Kathy Willey, Paula Jones.
I've detailed 38 women who have come forward and accused Bill of sexual assault.
I'm not speaking of Jennifer Flowers, the former nightclub singer that had a long-term affair with him, or even Monica Lewinsky, who he appears to have taken advantage of.
At least those were consensual events.
Also detailed in my book, but also in Yahoo.com's reporting, Bill Clinton, as in the case of Juanita Broderick, had this horrific tactic of biting through the upper lip of the woman he was assaulting on the theory that a woman who's trying to stop blood from gushing from her upper lips is less able to cover her genitals when she's being attacked.
Bill had the tremidity as he left the hotel room to say to Juanij Broderick, I put some ice on that Azu, which kind of tells you the callousness of Bill Clinton.
But it was Hillary who hired the nasty detectives and the heavy-handed lawyers who threatened all of these women into silence.
Bill's claim that he was never on Epstein's island, disproved in my book in 2015.
In the testimony of Virginia Jaffrey, Virginia Roberts, then later Virginia Roberts Jaffrey, one of Epstein's victims who never settled with him and who proceeded with her lawsuit against him,
she testified under oath that she saw Bill Clinton in the island on multiple occasions, but on one occasion he was chatting up to 17-year-olds that he believed had been flown in by Jeffrey for Bill's amusement.
And when she asked Jeffrey Epstein why Bill Clinton was on the island, where he would, by the way, always duck his Secret Service detail, Epstein said, let's just say he owes me a favor.
So a lot can be said about the Clintons.
I thought that the scandal, the Laurel scandal, never got the necessary coverage.
It was absolutely proven that in his final reelection campaign, Clinton took money from three Chinese nationals.
This was CCP money.
He also, I believe, sold our military secrets, including missile targeting technology to the communist Chinese.
If he were going to be impeached, that is what he should have been impeached for, not his distasteful dalliance with Ms. Lewinsky and his curious use of the cigar.
Will the Clintons be prosecuted?
I mean, Hillary Clinton is at the vortex of the Russian collusion hoax.
This is the greatest single dirty trick in American politics.
The documents that were declassified by Tulsi Gabbert prove that Hillary Clinton proved the entire operation.
In fact, in the meeting in which it was agreed to, it was referred to as the Clinton plan to blame Donald Trump with non-existent Russian influence on his behalf as an excuse as to why he won the election, but more precisely, to undermine his abilities as president.
And it is an ongoing conspiracy that takes you through the 2016 campaign immediately afterwards, utilizing both the phony steele dossier and the false claim that the Democrats had targeted the Democrat National Committee in an online hack stealing documents.
No evidence of that either.
But it continues through two completely fraudulent impeachments.
The second one, the so-called Ukrainian impeachment, both an offensive and defensive move by the Democrats, who know that Joe Biden is the one who pressured the Ukrainians, said he'd withhold a billion dollars if they didn't fire the prosecutor who is investigating his son, Hunter Biden, in burisma.
It continues through the 2020 election, which now I'm happy to see Tulsi Gabbard is digging deeply in because I never believe Joe Biden got 81 million votes and as a rule ran 20% better than Bill Clinton in the African-American community.
Venezuela Oil Regime Collapse00:06:39
I'm glad to see that that is going to be investigated.
Doesn't matter how good our economy gets, doesn't matter how quickly the president can bring this war against Iran to an end.
Doesn't matter how many peace deals he's made, doesn't matter how low the cost of groceries drop, the price of food drops, the availability and affordability of housing drops.
None of that will matter unless we have free, fair, honest elections.
That is an absolute requirement.
The SAVE Act would do it.
I really think it is time to bust the filibuster.
John Thun needs to be a man, say goodbye to these rules, because the instant Republicans lose control of the Senate, the Democrats will do away with the filibuster rule and they will jam through all kinds of crazy left-wing appointments and legislation.
I'm Roger Stone.
You're listening to the Stone Zone.
It's been a heck of a week.
We'll be right back with more.
The Stone Zone.
Entertaining and informative on the Red Apple Podcast Network.
As I think most people know, my wife, Anidia Bertran de Espinoza Stone, is a proud Cuban American, and her story is a horrific one at the hands of the regime.
Her father, Joaquin, was a lieutenant colonel in the Cuban army, was the military attaché at the U.S. Consulate for Cuba when Batista fell.
He was ordered to return to Havana for briefings, but on the night that he was to return, he was tipped off by a friendly CIA man that he should not return to his native Cuba, where he was on a list of people to be liquidated.
He stayed in the United States, of course, fired from his job now that the government was run by Fidel Castro El Jefe.
He worked as a fuller brush man, a house painter, a printer, and he struggled to learn English and to live a subsistence because of the horrific results of communism.
So they've seen it up close.
Cuba's communist leadership is now incredibly, quietly admitting that they're in talks with the United States.
This is an extraordinary piece of history that comes as the island faces perhaps the worst crisis in its history due to the heavy pressure from the Trump administration.
Recognized that 20% of the oil from Venezuela, which was 80% of the oil that was contained, was going to Cuba.
They are now without oil, at least cheap oil, oil they can afford.
They have sources, but no access to cheap oil.
Cuban dictator Miguel Diaz-Canal confirmed on state television that regime officials have recently engaged in what he described as sensible discussions with representatives of the U.S. government.
This is a country that we are actively embargo and boycott.
So this is very big news.
Now you see why President Trump and Secretary of State kind of look like, you know, they've got big grins on their face.
The president keeps saying that perhaps they will come peacefully.
I think that may be too much to wish for, but their economy continues to collapse.
They're plagued by poverty, shortages, brownouts, lack of electricity, crumbling infrastructure.
The crisis is intensified since the collapse of the regime's long-standing oil lifeline from Venezuela, as I say.
For years, Cuba relied heavily on subsidized oil shipments from their fellow Marxists in Venezuela.
The other problem for them, for the United States, is that Cuba has become a spy station for communist China.
They have very sophisticated spyware on the island.
The Trump administration is well aware of it.
It is not acceptable to them.
In fact, military sources tell me that they have defensive missiles on the island, missiles that could be made offensive with a simple computer readjustment and reprogramming.
Donald Trump has recently suggested the Cuban regimes reached out because they're quickly running out of options.
Clearly, they see what happened in Venezuela and they see what is happening in Iraq.
So the president says they have no money, they have no oil, and right now they have no hope.
Is it too much to ask for that this could be solved peacefully and that we could take the kind of control in Cuba that we have?
This is one of the most brutal regimes in history.
Don't get the idea that this is some benign democratic society.
These people are kept in line through the brutal tactics of the police state.
The chief state, as they lost control in Iraq, as they were beginning to lose control in Venezuela, they're beginning to lose control even in Cuba.
And that despite the Cuban government's ability to have a monopoly on all information for the last 40 years, because everything that's wrong in Cuba, if there's not enough food and not enough gasoline, not enough new tires, not enough of anything, well, that's all because of the Yankees.
That's all because of the United States.
I say Cuba Libre and salute to President Donald Trump and to Secretary of State Marco Rubio for taking a hard line on narco-Marxism in our hemisphere.
They call it the Don Row Doctrine.
Now, it used to be the Monroe Doctrine.
Now it's the Don Row Doctrine.
Knowing the president for 50 years, I bet he loves that.
Thanks for tuning in to the Stone Zone until we meet again.
God bless you and Godspeed.
Thanks for listening to the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
You can hear the Stone Zone with Roger Stone weeknights at 8 on 77 WABC.
If you like the podcast, share it with your friends and listen anytime at wabcradio.com and download the WABC Radio app.
Hit that subscribe button on all major podcast platforms.
Plus, follow WABC on social, on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and X. See you next time for a new episode.
So you never have to Wonder what the heck is going on here?