The Stone Zone dives into Roger Stone’s clash with Democrats over Houthi military strikes, while Callie Means exposes $6B pharma ad revenue and SNAP program corruption via influencers like Ian Miles Chong. Falun Gong’s Levi Broud counters NYT attacks on Shen Yun, framing it as a bulwark against CCP censorship. Means’ "Make America Healthy Again" movement targets crude oil dyes in cereals, $10B soda subsidies, and FDA inaction on banned chemicals, linking chronic disease to cell phone radiation—echoed by Stone’s fears after Atwater and Sawyer’s brain tumors. Trump’s $50B NIH shift under Jay Bhattacharya signals a pivot from drug profits to root-cause research, but partisan battles over CDC nominees like Susan Monarez persist, exposing deep divides in healthcare reform. [Automatically generated summary]
Rural Americans deserve access to the best of what our nation has to offer, especially health care.
Across every state and every community, America's rural hospitals are the first line of defense, protecting our families, neighbors, and loved ones.
No matter where you live, hospital care doesn't clock out.
They're there 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.
Each year, America's over 5,000 hospitals care for millions of patients, providing 24-7 emergency care, delivering babies, cancer treatments, and other life-saving care that patients rely on.
Behind every one of those patients are doctors, nurses, and caregivers working tirelessly to keep people healthy and safe.
Hospitals are our community's lifelines.
They employ our neighbors and keep our families healthy.
But now, some in Congress are threatening access to care.
Tell Congress, protect patient care to keep America strong.
Don't cut rule health care.
This is the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
People love him and respect him.
Roger Stone.
Now, get him a zone.
It's the stone zone.
Here's Roger Stone.
Welcome.
You are entering the Stone Zone.
Here we talk politics.
The Democrats and their handmaidens in the media have their panties in a twist over a leaked Signal chat that included the top appointees and advisors to President Donald Trump, in which they discussed an order by the president to attack the terrorist Hooties.
The Houthis have been terrorizing and shooting at attacking U.S. vehicles, I should say, vessels, in the Black Sea.
Attacking Tesla: Uncovering Trillions00:10:19
And the president has decided that we will no longer be terrorized and to guarantee free passage and free commerce on the high seas.
It's strange because Signal is approved as a secure platform for internal government communications.
And actually, no top classified information was revealed here.
There's always going to be debate and discussion in any administration, but Democrats like Senator Mark Warner, who are really raising cane today, they didn't seem to be too upset when Hillary Clinton used utilized classified documents on her illegal computer server.
Hypocrisy abounds.
Meanwhile, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has announced plans to ban pharmaceutical advertisements on television.
Kennedy has proposed that President Trump sign an executive order to enact this ban, although legal challenges will definitely be posited under the First Amendment, sure to be argued by the major drug companies as well as some of the major media outlets.
Since the 1970s, the courts have held the view that advertising is a form of commercial speech guaranteed by the First Amendment.
On the other hand, there's precedent for overriding such concerns in the advertising area.
As FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, a new appointee of President Donald Trump, noted during a recent podcast appearance, the Nixon administration was able to ban cigarette ads in early 1971 after Congress passed a law banning tobacco products from appearing on television and radio.
That proved to be a windfall for print media, but erased an estimated $150 million then, that would be $1.23 billion today, from broadcasters' budgets.
Back in 1980, the Supreme Court created a multi-part test to determine whether the government can restrict commercial speech.
Assuming the speech concerns lawful activities and isn't misleading, a regulation of commercial speech would be upheld only if the government's interest in regulating the speech was substantial.
The regulation, quote, directly advances that substantial government interest, and the regulation is not broader than necessary to achieve then substantial government interests.
During the first Trump administration, a federal judge prevented the Trump administration from requiring that commercials for prescription drugs include prices for all drugs that cost more than $35.
Three major drug companies, Merck, Eli Lilly, and Amgen, sued to block the rule, in part on First Amendment grounds.
The judge didn't take a view on that question, although instead ruling that the Department of Health and Human Services, now headed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., lacked the regulatory power to implement such a rule.
Actually, back then, more recently, the chairman of the FCC, Carr, said, I think it probably requires a two-step process where Congress must first pass a law, and then maybe the Department of Health and Human Services can do it.
But there is a precedent where that can happen, and the FCC endorses the concept.
Now, Robert Kennedy's plan does not align with the general public's feeling about big pharma.
According to a recent Gallup poll, 58 to 60% of Americans have a negative view of the industry.
As an additional bonus, this move would also be a crushing blow to news networks across the country.
Big pharma ads are a significant revenue stream for television networks.
In 2024, big pharma companies spent $6 billion on TV ads, accounting for 10 to 12 percent of total TV ad revenue.
Networks like CNN, CBS, ABC, and NBC benefit heavily from the spending, with prescription drug brands contributing nearly half of their current ad revenue.
This ban could cripple the networks that are already laying off employees en masse due to the low ratings since the election and the erosion of their credibility, largely thanks to, well, President Donald Trump.
Meanwhile, we see on the internet social media influencers have been caught posting coordinated messages opposing proposed nutritional guidelines for the so-called SNAP benefits.
That's the government assistant program formerly known as food stamps to most of you, after receiving payments from public relation firms.
The campaign emerged as HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy explores limitations on using these food stamp SNAP benefits for sugary beverages.
During fiscal year 2021, the program dispersed over $121 billion in benefits, with a significant portion being spent on ultra-sugary drinks that provide minimal nutritional value.
Kennedy has previously argued in an opinion column that it is, quote, nonsensical for U.S. taxpayers to spend tens of billions of dollars subsidizing junk that harms the health of low-income Americans.
In response, several high-profile accounts on the internet began posting nearly identical messages criticizing Kennedy's proposed reform.
Ian Miles Chong, who has over 1.2 million followers on X, claimed that this was a new war on soda.
This post and several like it were orchestrated by a company called Influenciable, a public relations firm offering influence up to $1,000 per post to oppose the SNAP food stamp reforms.
This incident, I think, highlights a long-standing pattern in the beverage industry's approach to policy debates over sugary drinks.
For more than two decades, soda companies have quietly funded scientists, advocacy groups, journalists, and community organizations to counter proposals limiting sugary beverage consumption.
Now, I must say, nobody offered me money to post on my social media pages in favor of these drinks that I think have no nutritional value and, in my opinion, also may be harmful to your health.
But had they offered, I don't think I would have accepted.
Meanwhile, there is enormous controversy over the president's new appointee, the Center for Disease Control, appointment of Dr. Susan Monarez, is extraordinarily controversial.
Monarez worked for both the Biden and Obama administration.
She supported all of Anthony Fauci's policies, including COVID-19 vaccinations for six-month-old babies.
She also has praised Bill Gates' controversial foundation for their, quote, incredible impact on global health.
Monarez is a staunch proponent of the World Health Organization, which President Donald Trump rightly pulled this country out of.
Now, many Republicans, many conservatives, many free thinkers are calling for President Trump to withdraw this nomination of Monarez in favor of Florida's Attorney General, Dr. Joseph Latipo.
Latipo was the only state attorney general to speak out against the COVID-19 vaccinations issues with both safety and effectiveness.
Joining us shortly is Callie Means, an informal advisor to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, the author of a terrific book, The Surprising Connection Between Metabolism and Limitless Health.
This is a book that actually changed my life.
I'm going to ask him about this when he joins us shortly.
This appointment seems to run counter to Robert F. Kennedy's Maha efforts, the effort to make America healthy again.
I'm going to ask Callie Means what he thinks about this coming up.
In the meantime, the FBI is investigating multiple incendiary devices found at Tesla dealerships in Texas.
That's exactly right.
The Austin police have located suspicious devices after responding to a Tesla dealership at just 8 o'clock a.m. local time, and they called in their bomb squad to investigate.
The devices were determined to be incendiary and were taken into police custody without incident.
The FBI announced yesterday that a new task force to combat this domestic terrorism targeting Tesla properties has been established.
The FBI will be relentless in its mission to protect the American people.
Act of violence, vandalism, and domestic terrorism, like this recent rash of Tesla attacks, will be pursued within the full force of the law, the FBI said in a statement.
Yesterday, I played for you audio recordings of Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett advocating violence against Tesla dealerships, charging stations, and individual Tesla owners.
There is no place in America or our political discourse for violence, and I reject all of this, but I also point out substantial evidence that these are coordinated attacks on Elon Musk and Tesla because Musk is uncovering not millions, not billions, but trillions of dollars of waste, fraud, and corruption in our current federal spending.
Congresswoman Advocates Violence Against Tesla00:15:14
You're tuned in to the Stone Zone here on the Red Apple Audio Networks.
Whatever you do, don't touch that dial.
This is
the Stone ZONE with Roger Stone.
I'm not a stepping stone.
Rural Americans deserve access to the best our nation has to offer, especially when it comes to health care.
Across every state and every community, America's rural hospitals are the first line of defense, protecting our families, neighbors, and loved ones.
No matter where you live, hospital care doesn't clock out.
They're there 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.
Each year, America's over 5,000 hospitals care for millions of patients, providing 24-7 emergency care, delivering babies, cancer treatments, and other life-saving care that patients rely on.
Behind every one of those patients are doctors, nurses, and caregivers working tirelessly to keep people healthy and safe.
Hospitals are our community's lifelines.
They employ our neighbors and keep our families health.
But now, some in Congress are threatening access to care.
Tell Congress, protect patient care to keep America strong.
Don't cut rural health care.
This is the stone zone.
Now, get him a zone.
It's the stone zone.
Here's Roger Stone.
And we're back in the stone zone.
Joining me now is Levi Broud.
Levi is the executive director with the New York-based Falon Daffa Information Center, an organization dedicated to ending the human rights abuses against people who practice Falon Gong in China.
He's also involved in the Chinese entertainment extravaganza, Shen Yun, which opens in Lincoln Center tomorrow, I believe it is.
Levi, welcome to the Stone Zone.
Thank you so much for having me.
So, look, many Hollywood stars and celebrities are welcomed in China.
In fact, they roll out the red carpet for them.
But Shen Yun is banned in China and constantly attacked by the Chinese Communist Party here in the U.S. soil.
Why is that?
Two main reasons.
For decades, the Chinese regime has been trying to destroy authentic Chinese culture because they wanted to instill Marxism on people.
And so Shen Yun recognized that, revived real Chinese culture, and put it on stage to share with the world.
And that demonstrates that the Chinese regime is not the authentic or legitimate shepherd of the Chinese people, its culture, or the nation.
And the second reason is that it was founded by people who practice Falun Gong, which is a spiritual Buddhist-based practice that the Chinese regime has been demonizing and trying to, in their words, eradicate for 25 years.
And here they are putting on this great show and showing the tyranny of the CCP for millions of people to watch.
And that's not a message Beijing wants anybody to see.
I'm very familiar with Falun Gong.
My wife is a Buddhist practitioner of it.
The New York Times recently published a series of scathing attack articles against Shen Yun.
What is your response to these allegations?
What would you like to say to correct the record in regards to these attacks on this Chinese entertainment extravaganza, which frankly I've seen and I highly recommend to my audience?
Well, it's a couple things.
One, the picture they paint is a complete distortion of reality and represents in no way the culture of the company, its mission, and what the people are like.
My two sons, actually, who used to play baseball, now dance with Shen Yun, and it's completely opposite of their experience and our experience.
I think that's one thing.
The second thing is it's interesting that if you look over the last 25 years, the New York Times has never spent nearly this much time and resources dedicated to the Falun Gong topic, the torture and murder and detainment of millions of people across China.
And suddenly they spend all this time and resources on Shenyun.
That's very curious.
It's especially curious because this is happening right at the same time that the Chinese regime, this is over the last year and a half or so, has escalated a brand new campaign to try and eliminate Falun Gong globally.
And a key part of that is to sabotage and take down the Shenyun company.
So right as Beijing is trying to do that, at the same time, that's when the New York Times got interested in the story, and that's when they started publishing these hit pieces.
So if our listeners go to the Shen Yun show at Lincoln Center or any place across the country, because you do perform, the performance group does appear across the country, what will they see?
They'll see what China really looked like before the rise of communism, which is a very beautiful and profound and spiritual culture.
It's incredibly uplifting.
It's incredibly inspiring.
And there's even a couple pieces.
Normally it goes through different dynasties throughout Chinese history, but there's a couple pieces of modern China.
And they'll see the heroism of people who practice Falun Gong and others standing up to that tyranny.
So overall, a very beautiful show and a very inspiring show.
All right, that is Shen Yun opening at the Lincoln Center.
I want to thank Levi Brout for joining us today and correcting some of the disinformation coming from the New York Times.
You're tuned in to the Stone Zone here on the Red Apple Audio Networks.
Whatever you do, don't touch that dial.
This is the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
This is the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
They went after a guy named Roger Stone who's sitting in the office.
And I'll say this to Trudder Rogers.
He's no baby.
And right now he's cleaner than anybody in this place.
Now they treated him very unfairly.
Now, get in the zone.
It's the stone zone.
Here's Roger Stone.
And you're back in the stone zone.
Joining me now is Callie Means.
Callie Means is an informal advisor to HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy and was one of the key people involved in the political alliance between Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., which changed the political landscape in America.
I think this is a new realignment of right-thinking Republicans, Democrats, Independents, free thinkers, libertarians, and others committed to making America both great again and healthy again.
Callie Means is the author with his sister, Dr. Casey Means, of a book, Good Energy, The Surprising Connection Between Metabolism and Limitless Health.
I must tell you, this book literally changed my life.
It was sent to me by Susie Wiles, who was President Trump's co-campaign manager, now the White House chief of staff, long before the Trump-Kennedy alliance was formulated and they came together.
This book changed everything about the way I eat.
It is an amazing book.
You're tuned into the Stone Zone here on the Red Apple Audio Networks.
And, well, we'll be right back with Callie Means to talk to us about the effort to make America healthy again.
Whatever you do, don't touch that dial.
We'll be right back with Callie Means.
This is the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
Not just stepping stone.
The Stone Zone Zone.
is The Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
They went after a guy named Roger Stone, who's sitting in the office.
And I'll say this to Trudeau Rogers.
He's no baby.
And right now, he's cleaner than anybody in this place.
Now they treated him very unfairly.
Now, get in the zone.
It's the stone zone.
Here's Roger Stone.
And you're back in the stone zone.
Joining me now is Callie Means.
He is an informal advisor to HHA Secretary Robert Kennedy and the Trump administration on health policy and was a key player in the political alliance of the two men that I think has changed the face of American politics.
You may have seen or heard him on the Joe Rogan podcast or with Tucker Carlson.
Callie, first I want to thank you because your book, Good Energy, The Surprising Connection Between Metabolism and Limitless Health, literally changed my life.
Susie Wiles, the Trump campaign manager, now the first woman White House chief of staff, gave me this book long before the Kennedy-Trump alliance was realized.
And I was mesmerized by it.
I changed my eating habits.
I feel much better.
I've lost weight.
I sleep better.
And I give you and your sister enormous credit for this.
Roger, thank you for that intro.
And I appreciate everything you said, but the listeners need to know when it came to this historic unity party that formed, the Bobby Kennedy, Tulsi Gabbard, and others.
I mean, the history books will remember you as a person that worked behind the scenes, in front of the scenes, to bring that together.
And I can tell you from seeing inside the administration a little bit, it is just amazing watching these former Democrats watch the halls mesh in so well and really here to just drive transformational change.
So thank you.
And on the book and your point about Susie, I think it's spiritual what happened.
I mean, my sister and I wrote this book after our mom died of a preventative disease.
I actually, Susie reached out.
I connected with her well over a year before the election.
And President Trump was talking about these Maha issues well before the Bobby Kennedy endorsement.
And I think that's why this union was so natural.
They really bonded over, as I know you saw, just what's happening to kids.
This is not a partisan issue.
For whatever reason, the left has abdicated care about what's happening to kids.
Yeah, it is really extraordinary.
I really think that the division between Republicans and Democrats is almost an anachronism.
It is a relic of the past.
That is not the major division in America today.
As I see it, the division is between the globalists, those who believe in war, those who believe in censorship, those who think it's fine for big pharma and big food to really do whatever they want without ever questioning the drugs and food that we're giving our families, and those who favor peace, those who favor free speech, and those who think that, well, we ought to look at how drugs in America are approved, whether they're safe and effective.
We ought to look at processed food, particularly in this country, and why the health statistics for America, the wealthiest country on the face of the planet, are so bad.
Clearly, we have an epidemic of chronic childhood disease that does not mesh with our education levels or our income levels.
It is an epidemic, and we have to question why this is happening.
This is why we have this historic alliance.
It's unbelievable.
And I think it's the core historical trend why President Trump is the most important political figure of our lifetime.
It's because he represents the shift from a left-right axis to the American people versus the UNA Party.
And for whatever reason, the Democrats are the party of the experts, the party of trusting big food companies, big pharma, the military-industrial complex.
And President Trump has the Marshall Coalition, where people are saying something isn't right.
And it's much larger than party.
I mean, I grew up as a young conservative.
You know, you remember this, 15, 20 years ago, you didn't question big pharma or big food.
To be a Republican, you know, was to go to the country club and not question any of these industries.
But you're exactly right.
And President Trump's pointing this out.
Out of 212 countries, Roger, 212 countries, developed and developing, we have the worst pediatric cancer rates in the world.
We are dead last among every country in the world.
38% of teens have pre-diabetes.
I mean, these are just foundational questions that clearly are the result of corporate capture of our systems.
And we haven't even gotten a policy yet.
But the fact that President Trump and Bobby Kennedy are even just acknowledging this reality, you know, actually acknowledging the frustration that every mom in this country feels when they walk into a classroom and see the majority of kids overweight or obese.
I mean, that's a historic development.
And I think 2024 will go down at the time, I think the traditional party structure got destroyed.
Corporate Capture of Health Systems00:12:41
It's really about one side questioning our institutions that are letting us down, getting that corruption out of the way to let Americans thrive, and one side defending these institutions, which have demonstrably failed.
When I heard Bobby Kennedy advocating that fast food chains use beef tallow to fry their french fries, it occurred to me that I haven't been to a McDonald's in, I don't know, 20 years.
But I do remember when I was a kid how great the French fries were.
So just as an experiment, I went by McDonald's.
I bought a large order of fries.
They tasted like plastic.
They actually had no taste whatsoever.
I remember them being so good.
I'm not sure they were good for you, but I remember their being so good.
Now, in all honesty, they have no taste whatsoever.
It is, I think, one of the more important arguments that he has made.
I want to ask you about his efforts to ban pharmaceutical companies, big drug companies from advertising on television and radio.
We don't allow advertising for cigarettes.
We don't allow advertising for alcohol.
Some people say that such a ban would violate the First Amendment.
I don't agree with that.
I think it is a great idea.
Well, President Trump and Bobby Kennedy have talked about that during the campaign.
They haven't announced anything yet, but I think we can absolutely expect a flurry of great Maha announcements.
Let me just speak to that real quick, high level.
In 1997, pharma companies were required to disclose more on the ads.
There's a clear constitutional precedent that consumers need to be informed.
And through some corporate cronyism, that was relaxed.
And then we had a flurry of pharmaceutical ads.
And since then, pharmaceutical rates have exploded.
We have 4.9 billion prescriptions a year in the United States with the most medicated country in the world.
And we've become, since then, the sickest country in the world.
So I think there's a clear constitutional argument, not necessarily to ban, but absolutely have more disclosures.
They used to require the companies to read much more of the risks.
Clearly, nobody can argue that patients are being informed correctly right now when it comes to pharmaceutical products.
So I know President Trump and Bobby have talked about looking at that very closely.
It's something that I really think can be done.
The courts have ruled that it is allowable when there's a significant public interest.
I think that the epidemic and the health statistics for the country demonstrate that there is a significant public interest.
Look, for years, I have been a devotee of Eastern medicine, acupuncture, herbs, exercise, which is centuries old, rather than Western medicine, which is only a couple hundred years old.
My friends, some of them laugh at me, but I remain pretty healthy.
And I don't think the answer to everything is popping a pill, which seems to be the prescription of both our medical industrial complex and the drug companies that pay doctors directly to advocate certain drugs.
I also think that should probably be outlawed.
I think doctors should make recommendations on the basis of what's in the best interests of their patients, not the best interests of the big drug companies that are paying them to push specific prescription drugs.
What do you make of this controversy over the SNAP program?
I saw that Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola make approximately between five and six billion dollars a year from taxpayers from the SNAP program, which replaced the food stamp program.
How has this subsidy of soda been allowed to exist for so long?
You know, President Trump is at, he's really interested in these European comparisons, how we're such an outlier versus every other country in the world.
And one thing we noticed, we're the only country in the world where our low-income nutrition program subsidizes soda.
And as you just said, it's shocking.
20% of Coke's U.S. revenue, roughly, comes from the American taxpayer for a program that's supposed to be giving nutrition to lower-income folks.
I just will repeat that again.
We send over $10 billion a year from the federal treasury to soda companies.
President Trump loves his Diet Coke.
He presses the button.
Nobody's trying to ban Coke, but I think we can all agree.
Everyone listening can agree that there should not be a federal subsidy for Coca-Cola for kids.
Tying to the medical industry, Rogers, you were talking about and how our codes and our medical guidelines are corrupted.
You had the American Heart Association, who's paid millions of dollars to this day by food companies.
Actually, they sent a lobbyist to Texas on one of these state bills for SNAP.
They lobbied four government subsidies for soda for kids.
Based on public outrage from a lot of Bobby's Maha warriors and President Trump's warriors, they actually renounced that move.
But you have really evil incentives right now where the American Heart Association is supporting government-subsidized Coca-Cola.
And I think that's where Bobby and President Trump are starting.
It's like, let's cut the subsidies for bad stuff and let's get the science right.
As you said, I'm not pro-drug, anti-drug, pro-Eastern medicine, anti.
We should just have the best guidelines that aren't corrupted.
And often, Roger, that is when somebody's obese or pre-diabetic.
You know, we're pushing Ozimpic on six-year-olds right now.
Literally, the American Academy of Pediatrics is recommending Ozimpic as the first line of defense for kids to jab them for life.
That's just not medically accurate.
What President Trump and Bobby are saying is, look, just get the subsidies corrected and let's get the guidelines corrected.
I mean, look, I think you have to balance libertarianism, because I consider myself a libertarian, with a good public policy.
So I'm for health freedom.
That means if you want to drink a Coke, that's up to you.
But nobody should mandate that you have to drink a Coke, just as I don't think anyone should mandate that you have to take a specific vaccination.
If you choose to do that, that should be your right, but you should know the risks.
And the government should be honest with you about the risks, about the efficacy of the drugs that they are making publicly available.
Now, you've said that 60% of U.S. foods contain chemicals that are banned in other countries.
I noticed that cereals specifically, that are the same brand name in this country as they do in Europe, but here they have a number of chemicals in them that are banned in Europe.
Tell us about this.
Yeah, you get to cereals, demonstrably different ingredients.
You know, something that's been a flashpoint, Roger, is these food dyes, they're made from crude oil.
They're called a possible carcinogen by medical authorities, and they're highly tied to ADHD and behavior prompts for kids, which you can imagine if kids are chugging raw oil, literally.
These dyes are banned in every other country.
And when you look at a box of cereal that's made in America, they make the cereal with juice and carrot juice and ship it up to Canada over to Europe.
In America, they make it in America, and they make it with crude oil coloring in the United States.
So actually, this is one of the big wins already for Bobby Kennedy.
He said we're going to review the generally recognized safe standards.
Right now, the food industry self-polices.
Now, that's not libertarian.
That's crony capitalism.
Literally, the FDA not even knowing what's in our food.
And what Bobby's asked for as a start is we should just know what's in our food and have studies on that so we can make informed decision As consumers and for lawmakers, you mentioned McDonald's French fries, just real quick.
In Europe, they have three ingredients.
In the United States, they have 17 ingredients.
There's just something happening, I think, where American voters want to be healthy.
They want the correct information, but they're just not getting it.
And it's this devil's bargain where we're clearly being poisoned by a variety of factors, and it's profiting the medical system.
And we need to get that back under control.
I could not agree more.
I really think that the entire Make America Healthy Again movement, the Maha movement, when you add it to the Make America Great movement, is the wave of the future in American politics.
Forget Republican and Democrat.
It's no longer about that.
It really is a coalition about common sense.
I think that is what binds us together.
Common sense in every regard.
Common sense when it comes to war and peace, common sense when it comes to free speech, common sense when it comes to the health and the safety of our families.
The president is a stout warrior.
The attacks on him continue.
But I don't really understand it because the hard, hysterical left in America acts like they're surprised at his agenda.
He laid this all out, as did Robert Kennedy, as did Tosi Gabbard, one of the most effective surrogates and now our director of national intelligence.
They laid it out chapter and verse on the campaign trail.
Yet the Democrats act like this is all a major surprise.
He has a mandate.
He won the popular vote.
He won all seven swing states.
He is, in fact, going to usher in a golden age of peace, prosperity, security, and yes, better health.
You're listening to the Stone Zone on the Red Apple Audio Networks.
We're talking to Callie Means.
He is the founder of Trumed, a company that enables tax-free spending on food and exercise.
I knew two great political strategist consultants in my day, both Lee Atwater and David Sawyer, a Democrat.
They both died with a ring of brain tumors around their right ear, and they were both incessantly always on a cell phone.
You have said that you believe cell phone radiation is damaging to humans.
Can you talk to us about that for a minute?
I'll take it one level higher, Roger.
There's no curiosity in the medical system right now about why cancer rates, particularly among children, are at an all-time high right now.
And I want to point you to the executive order President Trump signed.
In about 70 days, he's going to be releasing a report with Bobby Kennedy on why kids are getting sick, why American adults are getting sick, why chronic disease rates are at an all-time high.
And one of the taboo subjects, one of the subjects we're told not to talk about, is electromagnetic radiation.
I always say with this, you know, no parent would enroll their child in a study where half the children had a phone strapped to their head for two years.
And I think that kind of points to why it's just common sense.
There's clearly something going on.
So, Roger, the truth is I don't know whether it's our food, whether it's our intoxins in our environment, whether it's cell phones.
But President Trump is going to get to the bottom of this.
And I'll also just tell everyone, we should all be excited about Jay Bhattacharya, the Stanford professor who was shunned, almost fired from Stanford by questioning lockdown orthodoxy, is now coming in this week to take over the $50 billion research budget of the NIH.
And he will be fulfilling President Trump's mandate to take this study, to take these hypotheses, and study these things.
We don't study this right now, Roger.
We don't study why we're getting sick.
We study how to profit pharma once we already are sick.
All right.
I'm afraid we have to leave it there.
I want to thank Callie Means, who, again, the author of an amazing book, a book that changed my life.
That is good energy, the surprising connection between metabolism and limitless health.
That book, by the way, debuted at number one on the New York Times and the Amazon bestseller list.
I commend it to you.
He is doing huge service for this country to make America healthy again.
A key player in the political alliance between Robert Kennedy and President Donald Trump that is changing the entire face of American politics.
You've been listening to the Stone Zone here on the Red Apple Audio Networks until we meet again.
God bless you and Godspeed.
And God bless America.
The Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
Not just stepping stone.
24/7 Lifelines00:01:00
The Stone Zone Zone Zone.
Not just stepping stone.
Rural Americans deserve access to the best our nation has to offer, especially when it comes to health care.
Across every state and every community, America's rural hospitals are the first line of defense, protecting our families, neighbors, and loved ones.
No matter where you live, hospital care doesn't clock out.
They're there 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.
Each year, America's over 5,000 hospitals care for millions of patients, providing 24-7 emergency care, delivering babies, cancer treatments, and other life-saving care that patients rely on.
Behind every one of those patients are doctors, nurses, and caregivers working tirelessly to keep people healthy and safe.
Hospitals are our community's lifelines.
They employ our neighbors and keep our families health.
But now, some in Congress are threatening access to care.
Tell Congress: protect patient care to keep America strong.