All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 5, 2024 - The StoneZONE - Roger Stone
01:00:13
Biden Harris Caught Red-Handed Spying on Tulsi Gabbard | The StoneZONE with Roger Stone
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The Stone Zone with legendary Republican strategist and political icon and pundit Roger Stone.
Stone has served as a senior campaign aide to three Republican presidents.
He is a New York Times best-selling author and a longtime friend and advisor of President Donald Trump.
As an outspoken libertarian, Stone has appeared on thousands of broadcasts, spoken at countless venues, and lectured before the prestigious Oxford Political Union and the Cambridge Union Society.
Due to his four-plus decades in the political and cultural arena, Stone has become a pop culture icon.
And now, here's your host, Roger Stone!
Welcome, I'm Roger Stone, and yes, you are back in the Stone Zone.
Incredible breaking news late last night, in an exclusive by DC Undercover, We learned that former four-term Hawaii Democrat Congresswoman, former national co-chairman of the Democrat National Committee, currently an independent, Tulsi Gabbard, is under federal government surveillance.
This is extraordinary.
Tulsi Gabbard, of course, a lieutenant colonel in the U.S.
Army Reserve who served her country in combat, both in Iraq and Kuwait.
Very hard to understand why the deep state has focused on her other than perhaps her clash with Kamala Harris.
Could Tulsi Gabbard be the secret weapon that the Trump campaign is looking for?
In their exclusive breaking story, evidently several federal air marshal whistleblowers came forward with information showing that the former congresswoman who ran for the presidential nomination in 2020 is currently enrolled in the Quiet Skies program.
Quiet Skies is a TSA surveillance program with its own compartmentalized suspected terrorist watch list.
This is the same program that's being weaponized against the January 6th defendants and their families.
The whistleblowers first shared this information with a woman named Sonia Labasco, who is the Executive Director of the Air Marshals National Council.
According to Lubosco, at least one of the whistleblowers is ready to go on the record with pertinent documentation.
Lubosco shared that Gabbard is unaware that she has two explosive detection canine teams, one transportation security specialist in explosives, one planes close TSA supervisor, and three federal air marshals on every flight she boards.
LaBosco has attempted to contact Gabbard, and I understand they have now connected.
LaBosco and the president of the Air Marshals Association, David Londo, have repeatedly testified on behalf of others who have been targeted in this program.
They've also written countless letters concerning the classification of innocent Americans as Terrorists to the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs as well as the House Homeland Security Committee.
They're also in front of the Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government and the House Oversight Committee.
Because of ongoing whistleblower information, Labosco believes that TSA And Homeland Security are clearly, in this case particularly, I believe, violating citizens, Tulsi Gabbard's, constitutional rights in what could be a giant domestic surveillance grab that seems to be targeting people who are critics of the current regime.
Because of this ongoing whistleblower information, they believe that there are many, many other individuals who've been targeted in the same program.
But I want to stay focused for a moment on Tulsi Gabbard.
Tulsi Gabbard has a terrific new book out that explains why she left the Democrat Party.
Today, she remains an independent.
And of course, although she has urged people to vote for President Trump, she has not yet formally endorsed him.
I suspect that the reason that she has been targeted is because of her epic clash with Kamala Harris, then a U.S.
Senator, uh, in the 2020 presidential debate.
Let's take a look at that, if we may.
Senator Harris says she's proud of her record as a prosecutor and that she'll be a prosecutor president, but I'm deeply concerned about this record.
There are too many examples to cite, but she put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.
She blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so.
She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California.
And she fought to keep the cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way.
Thank you, Congresswoman.
Senator Harris, your response?
As the elected Attorney General of California.
I did the work of significantly reforming the criminal justice system of a state of 40 million people, which became a national model for the work that needs to be done.
And I am proud of that work.
And I am proud of making a decision to not just give fancy speeches or be in a legislative body and give speeches on the floor, but actually doing the work of being in the position to use the power that I had to reform a system that is badly in need of reform.
That is why We created initiatives that were about re-entering former offenders and getting them counseling.
It is why, and because I know that criminal justice system is so broken, that I am an advocate for what we need to do to not only decriminalize but legalize marijuana in the United States.
I want to bring Congresswoman Gabbard back in.
You're responsible.
The bottom line is, Senator Harris, when you were in a position to make a difference and an impact in these people's lives, you did not.
And worse yet, in the case of those who were on death row, innocent people.
You actually blocked evidence from being revealed that would have freed them until you were forced to do so.
There is no excuse for that.
And the people who suffered under your reign as prosecutor, you owe them an apology.
Senator Harris.
Now, Now, the evidence is that this surveillance of Tulsi Gabbard began shortly after July 23rd of last year, when she criticized Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, and the national when she criticized Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, and the national security state in an interview with Laura Ingram.
This program was weaponized against her on the following day, According to whistleblowers, July 24th and assigned to her very first flight on July 25th.
Gabbard had posted that Twitter on her own personal account.
In the context of what's transpired since 2020, there's ample reason to believe that Gabbard was placed on the so-called Quiet Skies program because of her viewpoints and because of her fallout of the Democrat Party.
In addition, she has continued to be extraordinarily critical of U.S.
interventionism and endless war.
Has been an outspoken critic of shipping billions of dollars more to Ukraine.
And you may recall that during the 2020 Democrat process that Hillary Clinton herself publicly accused Kelsey Gabbard of being a Russian asset simply because she opposes an expansion of the war in Ukraine.
Gabbard filed a defamation suit against Hillary Clinton back in January of 2020 and we don't know the current status of that lawsuit.
This is really extraordinary because there is no reasonable rationale for the surveillance of someone Who has a lieutenant colonel in the U.S.
Army Reserve actually has a security clearance, someone who has served their country with distinction.
I was shocked by this story last night.
I have shared it widely and I ask you to do the same.
Also in this same vein is a story that I find extraordinarily curious.
Reported by Fox only about a week ago, top U.S.
intelligence officers claim that Iran is trying to infiltrate and sabotage President Donald Trump's presidential campaign through online influence operations.
And this came as an actual briefing from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, who said that spy agencies observed Tehran working to influence the presidential elections, likely because Iranian leaders want to avoid increased tension with the U.S.
Well, there's a little bit of editorial there.
The officials didn't directly say, this is Fox reporting, that Iran was trying to undermine Trump, but the American spies haven't observed a shift in Iran's preferences since 2020, claiming therefore that Trump was being targeted because he's perceived as being Most strongly anti-Iran.
The permanent mission of Islamic Republic of Iran to the United States specifically and formally denied these allegations of election interference to Fox News Digital.
Their quote, Iran does not engage in any objective or activities intending to influence the U.S.
elections, a spokesperson said.
A significant portion of such accusations are characterized by psychological operations designed to artificially pep up election campaigns.
I think that's pretty ridiculous.
So, it is also interesting that the Iranians, days after the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, the same officials announced that their Was an Iranian plot to shoot President, or pardon me, assassinate President Trump.
How much of this, of course, is disinformation from our own government, and how much of it is reality, we will have to see.
They are, of course, above recycling the same broken, false Russian interference claim.
Once again, on July 10th, the office of the Director of National Intelligence said that Russia was yet again the preeminent threat to our election.
Let me remind you, we found a ineffective small bot farm and Robert Mueller brought charges against the Russians allegedly involved, unaware that they would counter sue and show up for court.
Those cases, of course, went nowhere.
In the end, I'm sorry, there was no evidence of widespread Russian interference in our election.
And then, of course, the claim that the Russians hacked the Democrat National Committee has now been proven to be indisputably false.
The FBI admitted, actually in my trial, that they had never actually inspected the computer servers for the DNC, leaving that to a third party, in this case a security IT firm that you may be familiar with.
It's called CrowdStrikes.
CrowdStrikes was a full participant in a two and a half year public relations campaign to claim that their inspection of the DNC servers had proof of a Russian online hack.
But then later, Sean Henry, who just happens to be a former deputy of FBI Director and Special Counsel Robert Mueller,
Uh, testified before the House Intelligence Committee under oath and finally admitted that, in fact, his famous memo, which was denied to my defense attorneys at trial and which he now says was just a draft, included no proof whatsoever that the Russians had hacked the DNC.
So in this case, I think history is once again repeating itself.
The Kamala Harris PSYOP is in full swing.
You can see the mainstream media seeking to boost her candidacy to try to create the impression that she is wildly popular or that her candidacy is surging.
There's a number of different legs to this stool.
Polling in this period, I think, has to be extremely suspect.
Any poll that shows her ahead, I would Question just based on the history of the trajectory of the polling.
And we've talked extensively here about the $310 million that her campaign has collected through a payment processing website called ActBlue.
Now, we know based on just cursory research that in 2022, Millions of dollars that were money laundered through ActBlue found their way into the coffers of Democrat Senate candidates or statewide candidates like Val Demings, who challenged Marco Rubio for the Senate in Florida.
Also, Raphael Warnock in Georgia.
Attorney General Letitia James in New York.
Even the odious Adam Schiff.
So now the task before us is to look at the tens of millions pouring into Kamala Harris's campaign and see if we have the same pattern.
I'm told by those who are already deep into the research that that is the case.
We call them smurfs, if you're not familiar with how this works.
Individuals allegedly using their credit cards make multiple small contributions, which of course end up totaling up to large sums, through the ActBlue app.
The problem with this, of course, is twofold.
In some cases, when the donor is contacted, they have made a small, even nominal, one-time contribution.
But once their data has been captured, then a number of other Donations are made successively, attributing it falsely to them.
In some cases, the alleged donor has never given at all.
In fact, they're not involved in American politics or not involved in the process.
The reason of course they get away with this Is because the Federal Election Commission is split down the middle with three Republicans and three Democrats.
Because they have three Republicans and three Democrats, no formal complaint there will ever be acted on.
In other words, nothing will happen.
Nothing whatsoever.
So even if the Republicans prove that the Kamala Harris campaign is taking in tens, even Hundreds of millions of dollars of laundered money, whether or not a lawsuit could uncover that and adjudicate it prior to the election remains to be seen.
We're going to stay very closely focused on this issue and we'll talk to you about it down the road.
As we sit here, we were told that Kamala Harris would announce her running mate, By today, Monday, as of a few minutes ago, when I checked, she still had not done so.
Now, the three names under contention continue to be Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, Mark Kelly, the United States Senator from Arizona, and a new focus evidently on the governor and a new focus evidently on the governor of Minnesota, Tim Walz, but now a new focus on, I guess it is the governor of North Carolina.
My information as of this morning was that two weeks ago, this was essentially wrapped up for Governor Shapiro, but Barack Obama has now inserted but Barack Obama has now inserted himself in the process.
And Obama has made the case to Kamala Harris and her team that the selection of Shapiro will deeply hurt the ticket in Minnesota and Michigan with very, very large Muslim American populations.
And therefore Shapiro, who is once volunteered to fight in the Israeli armies, also obviously Jewish, would cause a major rift in the Democrat Party.
I'd go a step further to say that the current developments in the Middle East, where we seem to be on the brink of war, where Israel, on the eve of what appeared to be a likely ceasefire, actually arranged for the murder, the drone attack, which killed the head of Hamas.
That leads me to believe that Israel's not interested in a ceasefire.
Or, at a minimum, they, rather than Washington, D.C., are dominating the policy of the Biden-Harris administration.
This is going to, of course, take up the news cycle.
So I'm a great believer that politics runs in cycles and that we had a succession of Positive cycles here first for Donald Trump.
First, of course, there was the US Supreme Court's decision granting immunity to former presidents.
That was followed very quickly by the debate in which Donald Trump went into the CNN debates Under extremely disadvantageous circumstances and triumphed not only because of Trump's tight and extraordinarily focused presentation, but also because we saw Joe Biden melt down right there on the stage.
That was followed, unfortunately, by the news of the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump, which, of course, elicited enormous sympathy for him with the American people.
And then, of course, was followed almost immediately by the extraordinarily successful Republican National Convention.
Then a very strange thing happened.
Suddenly, a company that I just mentioned to you, CrowdStrikes, claimed that an online glitch had caused a major outage which closed down essentially every major airline, every railroad, many, many, many banks and other retail outlets.
All of this, of course, detrimental to this head of steam that Donald Trump was getting with the American public.
Now, of course, the narrative shifted to the drama surrounding Barack, pardon me, surrounding the efforts by Barack Obama to force Joe Biden from office.
That played out exactly as I told you it would here.
I believe I predicted on the Friday before Biden threw in the towel that he would do so late that weekend.
And of course, that is exactly what happened.
This now begins a series of positive news cycles for Kamala Harris.
First and foremost, of course, is the announcement that she had secured enough delegates to become the Democrat nominee.
Now, I yet predict to you that was done virally, by the way, no formal convention as we and on the floor vote as we had in Milwaukee.
I predict to you that in the end there will be no Democrat convention, at least not the old fashioned bricks and mortar type, because the Democrats fear 1968 style protests that will really Exhibit for the American people the deep split in their party over the situation in the Middle East.
Now, of course, we will go to the controversy, which may or may not play out shortly regarding a vice presidential nominee for Kamala Harris.
That, of course, will be followed by her acceptance speech, which I think, again, will be broadcast, although I'm still betting against an actual in-person convention.
Then and only then will the poll numbers be meaningful.
So taking a poll here in the eye of the storm, I think is difficult.
All poll numbers need to be seen with a certain grain of salt.
We have an extraordinarily volatile electorate.
We have two extremely polarized candidates.
Donald Trump is extraordinarily popular, but those who dislike him dislike him intensely.
It's not clear that Kamala Harris is actually popular.
The last time I looked, she had a 38% approval rating, the lowest rating of any vice president in history, and only three points above Spiro Agnew at the time that he resigned in a corruption scandal.
But again, the media would have us believe that she's wildly popular.
Now, her campaign just got caught spending $20,000 for media influencers, and we know that when she went to the same rally location that Donald Trump went to triumphantly this past weekend in Atlanta, she had to book an extremely popular rock band.
In order to draw a crowd.
Now we come down to the question of the debates.
Now, she's been calling Donald Trump out saying that he's a coward because he will not face her in the April, pardon me, in the September 10th debate that he had accepted with President Joe Biden.
Well, the point here is obvious and that is Donald Trump never accepted A debate with Kamala Harris.
He accepted a debate with Joe Biden, who is no longer in the race.
He has counterproposed a, I believe it's a September 3rd debate with Fox News.
Now if Donald Trump had the courage to go to the CNN debate, despite the fact that the rules were extremely disadvantageous to Donald Trump, Why is it that Kamala Harris does not have the courage to go into the Fox debate?
There's a couple of possibilities here.
They could both end up debating an empty chair, meaning if Trump does not show up for the ABC debate, she could show up and they could move ahead.
The whole thing would be a giant Corporate in-kind contribution for Kamala Harris.
Not sure about the legality of that.
Just as of course Trump could go debate an empty chair at Fox.
That may serve the Democrats in their strategy.
Pardon me.
Simply because, like Joe Biden, I'm convinced that Kamala Harris really does not want to debate Donald Trump, despite what she says.
The idea that she is some kind of good debater.
Yesterday, David Axelrod, the Democrat strategist who really is the driving force behind Barack Obama's A successful election and re-election said that Kamala Harris was an agile debater.
Really, Dave, what planet do you live on?
Certainly not this one.
It is therefore, I think, obvious we're going to have to have debates.
Since the Nixon-Kennedy debates, debates are a part of our American political culture.
Anybody who knows Donald Trump, as I do, knows that he has no fear, certainly no fear, of Kamala Harris.
In fact, I would argue that since she won the nomination, actually since Joe dropped out, she has yet to give any one-on-one interview with an individual reporter.
She is unwilling to do a full press conference.
So I think President Trump should begin thinking about goading her about that.
There was a story in the UK Daily Mail this weekend that I thought was extremely unique in the sense that every single word of it was incorrect.
That means that Donald Trump is not shook.
That his campaign is not in disarray.
And what happened at the National Association of Black Journalists was not in any way a gaffe.
Donald Trump made the case that Kamala Harris has shifted her ethnicity claims based on political expediency and benefit.
No, sorry, that's not racist.
As Trump made it clear, it didn't matter to him whether she's black or Indian, but it seems that she has used this shifting narrative about who she is to raise the entire question about how inauthentic she really is.
We're going to see that play out, but I am among those who continues to believe that the way To defeat her, the single best way to defeat her is to focus on her record.
Even though they attempt to deny it, she was the Border Czar.
She is the Border Czar.
She has been responsible for illegal border crossings, which have been at an all-time high.
And more precisely, I think she's extremely vulnerable on her proposal to have U.S.
taxpayers Pay for the healthcare of all 20, probably more than 20 million illegals in the country.
These are among the issues where I think she has her greatest single vulnerability.
Anyway, speaking of vulnerability, I want to talk to you about my satellite phone because, well, it saved me more than one occasion.
Remember several months ago when the AT&T cell phone network went out entirely?
You were without cell phone coverage.
You couldn't reach family, friends, business associates.
You couldn't even call for emergency services.
I was among the millions of people who were cut off from cellular communication.
That's because the cellular tower system is extremely vulnerable.
Extremely vulnerable to terrorists.
Extremely vulnerable to hackers.
Extremely vulnerable to adverse weather conditions like hurricanes.
If the cell phone goes down, or if the entire grid goes down, how will you communicate?
Well, for me, the answer is the Iridium 9-5-5-5 phone and the Iridium satellite phone network service.
The satellite phone service operates from a proprietary satellite so that you are not reliant on any other source of information so you don't have any requirement to depend on cell phone towers and so on.
Now you may ask how you recharge your Iridium 9555 phone if there is no electricity.
The answer is there is a very inexpensive cellular based charger that comes with your phone.
So, let me explain how this works.
If you sign up for a 24-month service contract with the Iridium satellite cell phone system, they will send you the phone absolutely free.
That's right, absolutely free.
That is what I urge you to do.
Again, this will cost you about $95.95 per month.
There also is a family plan that allows you to have multiple phones.
Again, the phone itself is free when you sign up for the service.
So, let me urge you to, as soon as you can, to go to SAC.
1-2-3.com slash roger that's sat 1-2-3.com slash roger to get your Iridium 955 phone but more importantly to sign up for their extraordinarily secure system.
The other key thing I should mention is that all your text messages, all your cell phones, are completely and totally encrypted.
In other words, they cannot be hacked by Big Brother.
They cannot be hacked by Silicon Valley giants seeking to steal your data.
Therefore, I strongly urge you to sign up for the satellite cell service offered by the great folks at Iridium.
All right, enough crass commercialism.
We continue to hear disturbing things coming out of the Butler, Pennsylvania, attempted assassination of President Donald Trump.
We have a new phenomena in the country.
We call them assassination deniers, people who say there was never any attempt on President Donald Trump's life.
The leader of this, incredibly, has been Joy Reid.
Joy Reid has a position as a talking head at MSNBC.
Incredibly, she actually claims that there was no real attempt on Donald Trump's life and that the blood is explained by some kind of capsule that he allegedly bit that supplied the blood that you saw smeared across his face and ear.
This is the height of irresponsibility.
MSNBC should fire Joy Reid for this kind of speculation, but of course they will not do so.
This is giving, I would say, strength to an entire movement—you can go on social media—of people who say there was no attempt on the president's life.
We also learned today that a federal judge has ruled that Google, who is the number one manipulator of information on the internet going into this election, is in violation of antitrust.
This is an extraordinary development.
The question is whether or not a case can actually get to court before this election.
So just let me give you a perfect example.
Let's say that you are a subscriber to the Stone Zone at StoneZone.com, but we do a weekly blast to everyone who has subscribed.
But let's say that you have a Gmail address.
Well, despite the fact that you approved our emailing you, Any blast that we put out, any email that goes to your Gmail address will either go to your spam file or more likely not show up at all.
So we've had an extraordinary number of people who've complained that they subscribe but they do not get our weekly email telling them what's on the site this week.
I just list that as one perfect example.
Dr. Robert Epstein, who's been a guest on this show, has outlined the extensive manipulation of data by Google.
Google is the number one offender when it comes to election interference.
Also troubling is the fact that the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, CISA, and the FBI actually put out an announcement, which they called a public service announcement.
You can't make this stuff up, folks.
Saying that it is likely that there will be a denial of service attack On election infrastructure and adjacent infrastructure that supports election operations, which could hinder access to election information, but they go on to say would not impact the security or integrity of the election process.
This PSA is part of the agency's ongoing commitment to provide the government with information And to ensure that the election infrastructure community have the support they need.
So with less than 100 days before the election, they're already telling us that there's going to be election interference.
These are the same people, of course, told us that the voting machines were not interconnected to the Internet, that they were freestanding.
That, of course, has been disproven.
Also, I think encouraging was the decision by the Ninth Circuit, which overruled an Arizona court in their requirement for proof of citizenship in voting.
Why do I think this is good news?
I think it's good news because it could get that case before the U.S.
Supreme Court.
Why the Ninth Circuit could possibly rule that one in Arizona does not have to have proof of citizenship in order to register and vote, that is a bit vexing.
But now, hopefully, that case will get to the Supreme Court.
This could be, without any question, a striking important blow for real, true election integrity.
For two years, we have fought for a voter ID, a photo ID, for a requirement to vote.
But we don't have federal standards for elections.
We only have state standards, and that is something that would have to be done by the states.
But citizenship is a broader question, and we have to hope that this gets very quickly before the Supreme Court.
If you are continuing to follow the news that is dribbling out of Butler, Pennsylvania, it seems that every day brings some new outrageous component.
But it's particularly concerning to me that Speaker Mike Johnson has appointed a committee to investigate the things that happened on the ground the day
There was an attempted assassination of President Donald Trump, but the committee appointments seem to me largely to be rhinos, with the exception of Clay Higgins, who's a former law enforcement official from Louisiana.
Why?
There has not been the two sharpshooting experts, the two counterterrorism Sharpshooting experts in the Congress, Eli Crane of Arizona, I believe, and of course, Corey Mills of Florida, two obvious members of this committee, were not appointed.
In other words, the two men with the most expertise on the matter that is going to be investigated will not be serving on the committee.
So Crane and Corey Mills have announced that they're going to conduct their own investigation.
This is very good news indeed.
I don't know Eli Crane, but I do know Corey Mills.
He's a man of enormous integrity, but also somebody who has extensive experience in this area, particularly since he has been an advisor to the Defense Department on these questions.
And as we look at the situation, In Butler, we're getting more questions than we are answers.
Before we talk about that, let me also say that if this topic of assassination interests you, well, I want to suggest that you check out my book on the Kennedy assassination, The Man Who Killed Kennedy, The Case Against LBJ.
In this New York Times bestselling book, I make a really, I think, comprehensive case that a cabal that included President, Vice President Lyndon Johnson, the Central Intelligence Agency, organized crime, the mob, big Texas oil, international interests, as well as banking interests,
We're involved in an extensive plot to murder John F. Kennedy.
I use eyewitness evidence, fingerprint evidence, and deep Texas politics to make my case.
There you see the photo of Lyndon Johnson on Air Force One being sworn in as president.
Did you know that that ceremony was completely legally and totally unnecessary?
In fact, the sitting vice president automatically becomes president at the time that the president is declared officially deceased.
So, Lyndon Johnson staged that swearing in for two reasons.
One, well, we know from his recorded phone calls that he called Attorney General Robert Kennedy to ask him to get the exact words of the oath.
That was his way of twisting his knife into his arch rival.
That would be Robert Kennedy.
And then also to get the imprimatur of the Kennedy administration, he insisted that Jacqueline Kennedy, whose dress was still smeared with her husband's blood, stand next to her for this alleged transfer of power.
minutes after being sworn in, you can see the broad grin on the face of Lady Byrne Johnson.
And of course, LBJ gets caught winking at his colleague, the fellow with the bow tie, who's a segregationist congressman from Texas.
You see him off there to the left.
Anyway, if the Kennedy assassination fascinates you as it fascinates most Americans, there's the book cover.
You can go to themanwhokilledkennedy.com.
TheManWhoKilledKennedy.com and get your autographed copy.
Now, you could buy it on Arms and Noble.
You could buy it on Amazon.
You could pay some multinational corporation that hates your guts for your copy.
But if you do that, I urge you to at least get the paperback edition because the hardcover lacks three additional chapters that I wrote after the initial release of the book.
So let me urge you, I'm going to put that up one more time.
The Man Who Killed Kennedy.
TheManWhoKilledKennedy.com.
Yes, not only will your copy be autographed, but it can also be personalized if you include that in your order.
It makes a great birthday gift, or if there's anyone in your family who's interested in history or politics, it is an extraordinary read.
We continue to learn more disturbing things about the Butler, Pennsylvania attempt on Donald Trump's life.
First of all, we spoke already about the rise of assassination deniers, those who incredibly claim that no one shot at Donald Trump.
Now, online, a number of people, I mean hundreds, have said this was a PSYOP, And the whole thing was set up by Roger Stone.
In other cases, people actually say that I paid the family of the man, Thomas Matthew Crooks, who the government tells us at this point was the shooter who killed Cory Comparatore, the firefighter wounded two others, and obviously also grazed President Trump's ears.
My family is now being harassed about this, as am I. So given Alex Jones's situation where he was sued because he made, allegedly made, claims, claims I should point out that he denied that he said, but claims regarding Sandy Hook, that brought pressure on the families who sued him for hundreds of millions of dollars.
Let me just put folks on notice.
If you continue to say that no one shot Donald Trump, and you continue to say that I am somehow involved in a psy-op to create this fantasy, well, I too will be able to sue people who say that, using Alex Jones's case as the model.
So I urge you not to do so.
Let me just see what else we have on the agenda here.
Again, looking at the situation in Butler, Pennsylvania, we find out a number of disturbing things.
I've tried to synthesize this, but every day there are new facts.
Here are the things that I find most disturbing, though.
It's now clear that the Secret Service and the Pennsylvania State Police, as well as the local police, We're well aware of the fact that there was a man on the location with a gun who'd actually been seen using a rangefinder and that they knew this for 92 minutes.
So not evacuating President Trump immediately from the site, not even informing him, well that's a violation of the Secret Service Manual of Regulations and Protocols.
Then, secondarily, we know that local police offered to conduct a drone surveillance of the entire location.
Not one time, but they offered three times, and three times the Secret Service declined.
We also know that the shooter was able to conduct drone surveillance, and he also surveilled the location three times.
The shooter was known to be on the location because he actually harassed people over near the magnometers.
Those are the machines you have to walk through in order to get into the public event.
They detect whether you have metal or a weapon of any kind on you.
There were complaints to the Secret Service about the shooter because he was acting suspiciously.
But there were no acts upon those complaints.
We also know that the shooter was confronted on the rooftop by a local police officer who knew, based on his own eyes, that the shooter was armed.
He backed away and left the shooter, allowing the shooter to target President Trump.
Who did he report this to?
And what was their reaction to it?
No answers to that question.
The state police urged the Secret Service that the alleged shooter was on the rooftop of the Rage Founder, and they even texted a picture of the man to a number provided to them by a federal agent.
Police, local police, we're told, also had their eyes on four other suspicious-looking individuals who may or may not have been Handlers or Confederates.
of the alleged shooter.
The Secret Service nor the FBI director has yet answered whether there are any other suspects or individuals of interest in this case.
More stonewalling.
The Department of Homeland Security denied specifically that they had turned down requests from President Donald Trump for additional Manpower, personnel, and resources for his security detail.
They had turned those down for over two years.
When I reported that, days after the attempted assassination, there was a formal response released, a written response released from the Secret Service first denying it.
Now they admit it.
Now you also have the Dichotomy between what they tell us at one time and what they tell us later.
So, they told us that there was no social media footprint for the alleged shooter, who they claim is a man named Thomas Matthew Crooks.
But then they tell us, the FBI director tells us specifically, that Crooks was online researching The distance between Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged shooter of John F. Kennedy, who the Warren Commission insists shot from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository building, and of course his victim, So, which is it?
We either know about his Google searches or there is no online footprint.
Now, it's interesting that Gab, which is a social media outlet where I have a profile and where I'm still quite active, it is a site for those who seek free speech and free expression.
By the way, there's a lot of vile, objectionable stuff on there.
That I don't agree with, but I also believe in free speech.
So it's real simple.
I just don't read it.
But they tell us that we now learn that Crooks did have a profile on Gap.
Not sure how the Secret Service or the FBI missed this, but on his online profile, he appears to be pro-Biden and also pro-COVID-19 lockdown.
So, the claims that he had made anti-immigrant or anti-Semitic postings turns out to be false.
That's, in fact, disinformation.
The Secret Service, as I'm sure most of you saw, urged President Trump not to do any of these enormous outdoor rallies.
He has refused to change what for him has been an extraordinarily successful campaign style.
My real question is whether we will ever, ever learn about who really shot President Donald Trump and why, but we thank God that his life was saved.
As I said earlier, Speaker Johnson appointing a committee is a good idea, but the fact that Cory Mills and Eli Crane are not on it is troubling.
And then I hear that the Democrats under consideration include Dan Goldman, the congressman from Manhattan, who only days before the attempted assassination said that Donald Trump must be, quote, eliminated.
Also a Democrat allegedly on the verge of being appointed to the committee is Benny Thompson of Georgia.
Benny Thompson, Mississippi, pardon me.
Benny Thompson, of course, was the chairman of the completely bogus January 6th committee, which we have learned is largely a hoax.
the January 6th committee suburned perjury, suppressed witnesses that could have told us what really happened on January 6th.
In my case, I can tell you they fabricated testimony from Cassidy Hutchison, who claimed falsely that I was in touch with Mark Meadows, the president's chief of staff on the 5th or the 6th.
Testimony from Cassidy Hutchison, who claimed falsely that I was in touch with Mark Meadows, the president's chief of staff, on the 5th or the 6th.
I've never talked to Meadows in any mode of communication.
Also claimed that General Flynn and I had been in touch with Matthews.
That's a lie.
Claimed that Matthews was supposed to go to a war room in the Willard Hotel, a meeting that she said she dissuaded.
He didn't get him from attending, but that he later called Roger Stone and General Michael Flynn for a debrief of that meeting.
Folks, there was no such meeting.
If there was a war room, I was not in it.
The Washington Post, of all people, have completely confirmed what I'm telling you.
So, the idea of Benny Thompson, a man who filed a civil action against President Donald Trump, charging him with insurrection, before withdrawing it when he was appointed to chair a committee that is supposed to conduct a nonpartisan, bipartisan, honest investigation into what happened on January 6th.
Well, that is an outrage.
If those two are appointed, it is only further evidence that we will never really find out what happened on January 6th.
This idea that the Trump campaign is shook, that they are in disarray, that they were not planning for this moment, well, that's entirely false.
But there is one public claim that I've made I want to revisit.
Is the one that I sadly think may be accurate.
Obviously, I believe that the federal government and elements of it played a key role in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
I also believe, based on the research I'm doing for an upcoming book, which is entitled Bushwhacked, the true story of the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan, in which I will prove that the Central Intelligence Agency and others were involved in the attempt on Ronald Reagan's in which I will prove that the Central Intelligence Agency and And I now believe those same elements of government have been involved in this effort to kill President Donald Trump.
And therefore, it occurs to me that Joe Biden could be a target.
Now, I want to be very clear.
I do not wish this on him.
I have no proof of what is only a theory.
But people who killed one president, tried to kill another president, tried to kill a former president, I think that is pretty indisputable.
They're not above trying to, I don't know, take out Joe Biden.
That Biden dies in his sleep.
If you go back to the church committee hearings in the late 70s, there's a discussion of a drug developed by the CIA in which can induce a heart attack, but leaves no trace in the bloodstream.
So it is not so far-fetched that Joe Biden could be taken out in a way to elevate Kamala Harris.
So now she is not Vice President Kamala Harris, but she is President Kamala Harris.
Again, I'm not wishing this into existence, but having watched the deep state for 30 years, having watched the epic corruption of my own trial in Washington, D.C., which I truly did nothing wrong,
having watched the judicial lynching having watched the judicial lynching of President Donald Trump in New York and in Florida and attempted in D.C., I think that these folks are capable of absolutely anything.
Now, I hope I'm wrong about that, but we shall see.
Joe Biden is an amazingly stubborn person, yet I think after being threatened, probably with the 25th Amendment, perhaps with something even more draconian, he very quickly dropped out of the race.
That was completely out of character.
Folks, they're desperate to win this election because it's not just an election, it's not just power.
In this case, there are people who may not have immunity because they weren't president, but surrounding Barack Obama and the Russian collusion hoax, who may fear prosecution for the crime of treason.
Treason, a crime for which there is no statute of limitations.
And that's why I think that these folks are desperate.
It's why they dumped Joe, because they saw Joe as Un-electable.
It's why they're creating the Kamala Harris psy-op in which they're trying to convince you that she's popular and beloved and respected.
She's an agile debater.
That's what David Axelrod, the Democrat consultant, said only yesterday.
It would be funny if it wasn't all so serious.
So I hope that I'm wrong about that.
I also hope I'm wrong about the prognostication, I should say, the prophecy revealed right here on the Stone Zone by the Christian prophet Robin Bullock, who believes, based on the book of Samuel, Samuel 1, verses 15 and 16, which tell the story of two kings, that there will be multiple attempts on Trump's life.
If you believe this is allegory, if this is If the story is analogous that Donald Trump is King David, that Joe Biden or Biden-Obama amalgam is King Saul, well, then it would mean that the Bible foresees and tells us of another attempt on President Trump's life.
I urge you to check out the Stone's Own Show.
We did that.
You can do it by going to rumble.com.
Speaking of that, folks, before we sign off here, please go to Rumble.
Download the Rumble app to your phone.
Make sure you're following us right here at rumble.com slash rogerstone.
It is The Stone's Own with Roger Stone.
Please follow the show.
Then set your notifications so you will know when we're on.
And I just want to remind you, you can see us every weekday at four o'clock central.
5 o'clock Eastern at worldviewtube.com.
And if you missed the Stone Zone there, you get a second chance.
You can see it at 8 o'clock Eastern at rumble.com slash Roger Stone.
Until tomorrow, I'm Roger Stone.
This has been the Stone Zone with a political update.
God bless you, my friends, and Godspeed.
A man who's gone through hell, but he's kept going and he's smart and he's strong and people love him.
Not everybody, but people love him and respect him.
Roger Stone!
▲
Export Selection