All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 3, 2023 - The StoneZONE - Roger Stone
58:06
EMERGENCY REPORT: The Deep State's Attempted Takedown of President Trump w/ Roger Stone
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And now, Lindell TV brings you The Stone Zone, with legendary Republican strategist and political icon, and pundit, Roger Stone.
Stone has served as a senior campaign aide to three Republican presidents.
He is a New York Times best-selling author, and a longtime friend and advisor of President Donald Trump.
As an outspoken libertarian, Stone has appeared on thousands of broadcasts, spoken at countless venues and lectured before the prestigious Oxford Political Union and the Cambridge Union Society.
Due to his four plus decades in the political and cultural arena, Stone has become a pop culture icon.
And now here's your host, Roger Stone.
Come, I'm Roger Stone, and welcome to this emergency broadcast.
Addressing the reasons why President Donald Trump has been subjected to the latest round of lawfare, a four count indictment against him in the District of Columbia by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Although the release by the Special Counsel indicates that there are six ultimate co-defendants, only five of them have been identified.
They have not yet been charged.
We're told the reason for that is a desire by special counsel Jack Smith to turbocharge the schedule for the trial of Donald Trump.
They're calling this, he is charged with election interference, when in actuality this is the election interference.
Indicting the sitting, pardon me, the leading Republican candidate for president, Just before the filing for next year's primaries, after he has filed with the Federal Election Commission, and not coincidentally, at a time that he consistently leads incumbent Joe Biden in the polls, is in itself an act of election interference.
But what we're actually experiencing here is a strategy of distraction.
And let's face it, the Democrat media cabal has a lot that they need to distract us from.
First, of course, there was the epic announcement that they had found a bag of cocaine in the White House.
But it was only days before the FBI concluded that they could not determine where this bag of cocaine came from and who it belonged to.
That despite videos in which it sure looks to me like Hunter Biden is taking a two.
This is one of the most heavily surveilled areas under the control of the federal government.
President Donald Trump told me literally every square inch of the White House, the living quarters, and even the old executive office building is subject to security cameras, but evidently the security cameras either malfunctioned or perhaps they were turned off, but more likely they malfunctioned, you know, like when Jeffrey Epstein allegedly killed himself.
Then there is the very curious and I think suspicious drowning of the chef who worked as a private employee for former president and first lady, Michelle Obama.
Now, I think this needs to be seen within the context of my continuous and I think consistent contention that ultimately Joe Biden will not file for re-election only to be replaced by Michelle Obama.
Let's roll that clip.
Now, as a veteran of many years in American politics, I'm going to tell you something somewhat shocking.
Joe Biden will not be the nominee of the Democratic Party in 2024.
Kamala Harris will briefly become president, but the only way in their party they can replace a woman of color is with another woman of color.
And yes, you heard it here first, the Democratic nominee for president will be Michelle Obama.
They have already rigged their primaries.
The reason that they have cancelled the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary is to put South Carolina, a state where a majority of the Democratic primaries, or primary voters, are African Americans.
And they will allow Gavin Newsom to purchase the vice presidential nomination, but the Obamas will hold him up for six or eight hundred million dollars to do so.
You heard it here first.
When Steve Bannon says it in three weeks, remember I said it first.
So now the question is, did the events in Martha's Vineyard that took place evidently on Sunday, July 23rd, and became public on July 24th, change that trajectory?
It's interesting that we were told in the immediate aftermath that President Barack Obama declined to make a statement, declined to be questioned by the police.
We were first told that the Obamas were not on Martha's Vineyard, then that was amended to say, well, they were on the vineyard But they were not at home.
The police report does not record who it was who called the police to report this tragic drowning.
Then we were told that the call came from a home down the lane from the Obama's home.
But then this story ran in yesterday's New York Post.
The fellow paddleboarder who was with Barack and Michelle Obama's personal chef when he drowned near their Martha's Vineyard Compine is also a staffer to the former president and reportedly tried to save the chef from drowning.
The female staffer, you notice they are not identified by name, whose name was not revealed, tried desperately to save her colleague but couldn't reach him in time.
Massachusetts State Police previously told Mass.Live.
The woman, again unnamed, then rushed back to shore where she asked for help with a Secret Service agent calling for emergency services from the Obama's estate in Edgar Town, that's Martha's Vineyard, sources told the Daily Mail.
So you see there's already a change in the narrative.
Insiders told the outlet that the woman, unidentified, was lucid and clear, but did not appear to be intoxicated.
The witness said Campbell, Tufari Campbell, that is the name of the chef, struggled to stay afloat, but wasn't wearing a life jacket while out of the water.
We have seen videos from his Instagram account that demonstrate that he was a strong, and a proficient swimmer.
The chef leaves behind a wife and two kids, as reported by NBC News.
We do not make light of the death of any of God's children.
The 45-year-old's death does not appear to be suspicious based on the evidence collected in the now closed probe.
A toxicology report is pending.
That we will never see or hear about that toxicology report, I'd confidently predict.
Campbell was found in eight feet of water, roughly 100 feet from the shore of the former Commander-in-Chief's property, after first responders received a call from the incident Sunday night.
The Obamas, who were not at home at the time of the drowning, said in a statement last week that Campbell was a Beloved part of the family.
Campbell was a sous chef at the White House while Barack Obama was president and joined Obama's personal staff after he left of the Oval Office.
Here's the problem with this narrative.
They lied about the conditions.
They lied about how deep the water was if Tafari Campbell was indeed found 100 feet from the shore.
I have studied the bathyometric map Put out by the Massachusetts state government that shows that the water at 100 feet is only 1 to 4 feet deep.
In other words, 100 feet off the shore.
I could understand it if it were 8 feet, but it reaches a depth of 8 feet well beyond 100 feet from the shore.
So, while I don't know the exact location where they found, the Daily Mail suggests that it was 100 feet from the shore.
That's a very, very strange thing to lie about.
So we need, if you are part of the Democrat-Liberal cabal, particularly if you're part of the cabal that intends to remove Joe Biden or, more precisely, to replace Joe Biden when he quite potentially announces at the end of November, just before the filing for the various Democratic Party contests, primaries and caucuses, that he will not be a candidate.
This is a story that needs to be buttoned up quickly, thus the need to distract.
Then there is the decision, which is shocking, by the Department of Homeland Security not to give secret service protection to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
This would be egregious enough if it were not just true that Robert Kennedy's father, Robert F. Kennedy Sr., Former U.S.
Senator from New York and Attorney General and his uncle, President John F. Kennedy, were not brutally murdered.
But on top of that, there is an ongoing media campaign to generate both hatred and animus of Robert Kennedy, which increases the security threat to him.
By law, in 1968, any presidential candidate can request and is eligible for Secret Service protection.
Secret Service was under the U.S.
Treasury Department, but that changed when the Department of Homeland Security came into being.
And therefore, Joe Biden's Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security has decided not to afford Secret Service protection to Robert Kennedy.
In view of the many threats against him and the climate being stirred up against him, I find this both outrageous and immoral.
That's why we need to distract from it.
Then you have, of course, in the House oversight, the confirmation Of the wires from Burisma to Joe and Hunter Biden.
Now we understand the entire Ukrainian impeachment inquiry and the articles of impeachment voted by House Democrats against President Donald Trump.
Put this the most succinct way, Donald Trump was impeached by House Democrats for the crimes Committed by Joe Biden.
Every one of us have seen the video in which Biden actually brags about pressuring the Ukrainian government by withholding $1 billion in aid unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating both Burisma Energy and his son's involvement with Burisma.
But what we now know, according to The former head of Burisma, who claims, by the way, that he has 16 audiotapes of phone calls, some of which he alleges include Joe Biden, they wired, Burisma wired $5 million to both Joe and Hunter Biden in individual payments, but that those payments were run through as many as 10
LLCs in order to conceal the source of the money and the fact that the money was sent to the Bidens.
This is a gigantic problem because Joe Biden has specifically said that he knew nothing about Hunter's overseas business dealings.
He also said that he had never spoken to any of Hunter Biden's clients.
We have a video of Joe Biden.
Let's show that.
Any reaction to House Yopi's memo about your family feelings, sir?
Any reaction to House Yopi's new memo about your family feelings, sir?
Family feelings.
Yes, you're reviewing that Hunter Biden's business associates sent over a million dollars to three of their family members.
Any reaction to that report?
Do you have any reaction to the Russian man who took down the U.S.
President?
Uh, that man looks lost.
I actually think this is elder abuse.
He seems completely and totally confused.
But what is not confusing is the fact that during the debate with President Donald Trump, Trump specifically said that Hunter had received $3.7 million from the wife of the mayor of Moscow that was alleged to buy the mayor's Trump specifically said that Hunter had received $3.7 million from the wife of the mayor of Moscow that was And, And Joe Biden called Donald Trump a liar.
We now know that President Trump was wrong.
It wasn't $3.7 million.
It was $40 million.
And it went to Hunter's Real Estate Company.
That's another issue that we need desperately to distract from.
Now we learn, in addition to this latest Biden scandal, That the Chinese Communist Party is funding public college institutions in Texas, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Washington.
Yet another item we need to distract public attention from.
And then, of course, there is the devastating testimony of Devin Archer.
Now, there was some intimation by Chairman James Comer that Devin Archer may have been targeted for arrest by the Justice Department because he and his lawyer received a letter from DOJ seeking to schedule the date for his incarceration based on his conviction on charges unrelated to the Bidens.
And that letter, which is unusual, was written on a Saturday.
Trust me, folks, no one in the federal government works on a Saturday.
When I wrote about this on Twitter, I was corrected by a community notes insertion that said that there was no evidence that he would be arrested Prior to his testimony before the House Committee.
Testimony that, in my opinion, should have been held in public instead of being held behind closed doors.
I actually now want to amend my comments.
Seems to me that the purpose of the letter was not to keep him from testifying, but to intimidate him from testifying.
Nonetheless, it seems Highly improper.
So for all of these reasons, rather than arresting any member of the Biden family, rather than having 29 heavily armed FBI agents storm, say, the place that Hunter Biden sleeps, they have decided to indict President Donald Trump.
Yesterday at about five o'clock, we learned that there were four charges relating to election interference filed against President Trump.
That's ironic because it is this indictment that is the actual election interference.
As Donald Trump himself said on Truth Social, why did it take two and a half years to bring this indictment?
Why did they wait?
Until he was a declared and legal candidate for president.
Why did they wait until after the essential collapse by the threatened candidacy of Governor Ron DeSantis?
Why did they wait until Donald Trump was leading Joe Biden in virtually every poll?
And that despite an attempted news blackout by most of the media of the Biden scandals.
And a hyper-implification of any allegation against Donald Trump.
Well, I think it's because the Democrat media cabal is increasingly hysterical.
Here is Donald Trump's reaction to the charges against him.
Former President Trump and CBS News correspondent Skylar Henry joins us now to talk about this Skyler, how are Republicans first responding to this latest indictment?
Hey, John, good to be with you.
Well, as you can imagine, Trump allies certainly coming out in full force in support of the former president.
We've seen several tweets, including from congressional leadership, pointing out what they feel as if is a double standard in terms of the investigations into the former president.
Some have even called for the defunding.
All right, that's not the clip we thought we were going to bring you, but we will continue.
So what does this indictment mean?
Well, it means that if you interfere with an election, if you object to the election and you question whether the election is honest and fair, that is a crime for which you can be sent to prison.
Unless, of course, you are Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris or Nancy Pelosi or Jerry Nadler Or Jamie Raskin or Stacey Abrams.
In that case you can question the outcome of an election and nothing whatsoever will happen to you.
Let's roll that video.
How can you win with Russian interference though?
That's the real thing.
That's what I'm scared about in 2020.
But rightly.
Because I think he's an illegitimate president that didn't really win.
So how do you, you know, fight against that in 2020?
You are absolutely right.
He's an illegitimate president in my mind.
Would you be my vice presidential candidate?
Folks, look, I absolutely agree.
Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016.
He lost the election and he was put in the office because the Russians interfered.
Trump knows he's an illegitimate president.
The president-elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate.
I don't see the president-elect as a legitimate president.
You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the election.
I do.
We have a president who, if in fact it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may in fact not be a legitimate president.
The one thing that Trump is fearful of when it comes to his being president is that finally we will see how illegitimate his victory actually was.
I have an objection.
I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina.
I object because people are horrified.
He's an illegitimate president.
Do you believe Trump is a legitimate president?
What I believe is that there's no question that the outcome of this election was affected by the Russian interference.
There absolutely is a cloud of illegitimacy.
So that legitimacy is in question, yes.
So that was a very tainted election.
And in that sense, it's illegitimate.
Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you?
Because he knows he didn't.
He knows he's an illegitimate president.
Stolen emails.
Stolen drone.
Stolen drone?
Stolen election!
Welcome to the world of unprecedented Trump.
So do you believe President Trump is an illegitimate president?
Based on what I just said, which I can't retract.
In the Russian attempt to have the election, and frankly the FBI is weighing in on the election, I think makes this election illegitimate.
There was a widespread understanding that this election was not on the level.
We still don't know what really happened, Isaac.
I mean, there's just a lot that I think will be revealed, history will discover, but you don't win by three million votes and have all this other shenanigan stuff going on and not come away with an idea like Whoa, something's not right here.
The outcome of the election was affected by their interference, and now we need to know to what degree, if any, the Trump campaign was actually in collusion with Russia.
He knows he's an illegitimate president.
So of course he's obsessed with me, and I believe that it's a guilty conscience.
We actually won the last presidential election, folks!
They stole the last presidential election!
If Al Gore won that election, I think he won it anyway.
Actually, I think I carried Florida.
Bush versus Gore.
A court took away a presidency.
If all the votes were counted in Florida, then Al Gore would be president today and George Bush would be backing off.
I come from Florida, where you and others participated in what I call the United States coup d'etat.
There's no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president.
I rise to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes.
I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of official misconduct.
Delivery for all in an attempt to suppress the vote.
It is signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote count.
The Supreme Court, not the people of the United States, decided this election.
Speaking to a Democratic group in Chicago to say, he made it clear he thinks Al Gore was the winner.
By the time it was over, our candidate had won the popular vote, and the only way they could win the election was to stop the voting in Florida.
Catherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Jim Baker, and the Supreme Court hadn't tampered with the results.
Al Gore would be president.
The Supreme Court elected the president.
Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency.
But the Supreme Court tampered?
That's a large charge.
The Supreme Court stopped the counting of the votes, and if they'd let the count go on, Al Gore would have got the necessary votes.
The Supreme Court selected George W. Bush as the president.
He was not elected.
There is overwhelming evidence that George W. Bush did not win this election.
What I observed as a voter, as a citizen of Illinois, I don't think that George W. Bush won the election.
of the fact that not every vote was being counted.
Don't think that George W. Bush won the election in 2000 against Al Gore because I think he probably lost Florida and also nationwide.
If you invite me back on this show in about eight weeks, I think you're going to learn that Al Gore actually did get all the votes in there.
The court has been thwarting formation of the popular will.
The most spectacular example being Bush versus Gore, where the majority by a 5-4 vote enjoined the counting of more than 100,000 ballots in Florida and essentially gave America its first court-appointed president.
I think in 2000, everybody thought, well, he did win the election.
After the election, when you stole the election, you came back here and said, get over it.
No, we're not going to get over it.
You know it.
I know it.
They know it.
We won that election.
Constantly shifting vote tallies in Ohio.
And malfunctioning electronic machines, which may not have paper receipts, have led to additional loss of confidence by the public.
The right to vote has been stolen from qualified voters.
In 2004, the democratic process was thwarted.
The 2004 presidential election in Ohio was riddled with unnecessary problems.
Some machines malfunctioned, causing votes to be counted more than once, or not at all.
Based upon an inordinate number of allegations suggesting gross voting rights violations and misconduct, I join with my colleagues in objecting to counting the state of Ohio's electoral votes.
As in 2000, the votes of many who wanted to vote were not in fact counted.
This last Friday night, I arranged to meet Senator Kerry at a fundraiser to give him a copy of my book.
He told me he now thinks the election was stolen.
And the wife of John Kerry said she has lingering doubts about the legitimacy of the election.
Her theory goes like this.
Two brothers, she calls hard right Republicans, own 80% of the voting machines in the U.S.
Therefore, it would be easy to hack into the mother machines that control the electronic voting.
There were numerous irregularities in Ohio, including large percentages of rejections of provisional balloting, problems with voting machines.
As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions.
About its accuracy, about its integrity.
There are still legitimate concerns over the integrity of our elections.
I agree with tens of millions of Americans who are very worried that when they cast the ballot on an electronic voting machine that there is no paper trail to record that vote.
The numerous irregularities That occurred with the electronic voting machines in Ohio on November the 2nd of last year point to an unresolved national crisis.
We cannot declare that the election of November 2nd 2004 was free and clear and transparent.
And real.
There must be independent testing of the voting machines used in Ohio.
I'm not confident that the election in Ohio was fairly decided.
We know that there was substantial voter suppression and the machines were not reliable.
The members of Congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their aggrieved constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process.
Treating today's electoral vote in Congress as a meaningless ritual would be an insult to our democracy unless we registered our own protest against the obviously flawed voting process that took place in so many of our states.
Voters who wish to cast a vote for president or vice president can't approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be counted.
One of the most significant problems in Ohio and in many other states ...was the lack of measures to ensure the integrity of electronic voting machines.
In 2004, they caused Democratic voters in Ohio to wait for eight hours before they could cast their ballot.
They turned the Department of Civil Rights and the Justice Department into the Voter Suppression Division with voter ID laws, voter purging, voter caging, voter intimidation.
There aren't going to be any more election stealings.
And ID.
Final tally and the inauguration and the situation we find ourselves in, I do have one very affirmative statement to make.
We won.
Without voter suppression, Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia.
Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida.
You refuse to concede and say that you lost.
Do you stand by that decision today?
Absolutely.
The election was not fair.
The process was not fair.
If Stacey Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they stole it.
It's clear.
It's clear.
I think that Stacey Abrams' election is being stolen from her.
It was not a free and fair election.
Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams.
But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters?
I will not say that.
So there you have it.
Now, you saw a Democrat after Democrat after Democrat questioning the results of the 2016 election, the 2018 elections, the 2000 elections.
I actually think they have a First Amendment right to do exactly that.
Why were none of them charged with election interference?
It's because we have a two-tiered justice system.
You see, once the media Let me remind you, for example, of the whole Russian collusion hoax, something that I know a little bit about.
come off it except for when they have to.
Let me remind you, for example, of the whole Russian collusion hoax, something that I know a little bit about.
Let's roll that.
Voters in America should decide who our president is, not Vladimir Putin.
The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help, the Russians gave help, and the president made full use of that help.
And that is pretty damning.
I believe he knows he's an illegitimate president.
The bottom line of this dossier, the bottom line allegation, the point of it, the point of this is they colluded, they helped, they were in on it.
What does Vladimir Putin have on President Trump?
And they've also decided who they want to see become President of the United States, too, and it's not me.
Secondly, I found out that Vladimir Putin doesn't want me to be President.
We need to make it very clear, whether it's Russia, China, Iran, or anybody else.
This election, that Russia has been involved, China has been involved to some degree, and now we learn that That, uh, that, uh, Iran is involved.
As 17 of our intelligence agencies have confirmed... 17 intelligence agencies said... 50 national security officials who served in Republican information, in, in administration... Two minutes has expired.
...have said that Donald is unfit to be the Commander-in-Chief.
There are 50 former national intelligence folks.
Who said that what this he's accusing me of is a Russian plan.
You mean the laptop is now another Russia, Russia, Russia hoax?
That's exactly what- Is this where you're going?
That's exactly what it's going.
This is where he's going.
Well, we know that this whole smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin.
I don't understand why this president is unwilling to take on Putin.
When he's actually paying bounties to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan.
When Russia puts bounties on the heads of our soldiers in Afghanistan.
That Russia has bounties on the heads.
On the heads of American soldiers.
There are several factors that contributed to the low to moderate confidence in the judgment, including the difficulty of...
Those are the exact same people who today say that Donald Trump interfered in an election.
We now know, based on the five-year investigation by Special Counsel John Durham, that there was no evidence whatsoever of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.
There was no probable cause, no rationale for the opening of the FBI's crossfire hurricane counterintelligence investigation into Donald Trump.
There was no rationale or probable cause for the appointment of Robert Mueller as special counsel.
There was no probable cause or legal rationale for the approval of FISA warrants that were used to spy on Donald Trump and his key staff members.
That is now beyond dispute.
We also know there was no bounty put on the murder of American soldiers by the Russians.
Every bit of it, disinformation.
Every bit of it, an egregious lie.
In my own case, I was convicted of lying to Congress about Russian collusion that never actually existed.
In fact, on November 3rd, 2020, the Department of Justice was forced to make public the final long-redacted copy of Robert Mueller's final report In which even he could not sugarcoat the fact, to quote Mueller exactly, he had found, quote, no factual evidence, close quote, of Russian collusion or WikiLeaks collaboration or any other crime on my part.
You won't read that in the Washington Post or the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal.
They have yet to report it.
It was reported by BuzzFeed.
also reported by Zero Edge, but for some inexplicable reason, that media report has disappeared.
There was no crime committed by me.
So the other parlor game that became extraordinarily popular after these charges were levied against President Trump was the fact that five of the defendants were identified, although not yet charged by Special Counsel Jack although not yet charged by Special Counsel Jack Smith, but the sixth defendant is not yet identified.
Perhaps this is why I saw this on Twitter yesterday.
I was trending last night based solely on baseless, meritless speculation that I was that sixth individual.
I am most definitely not.
The Washington Post concluded after their own investigation that at least three sources said that I was not involved in the efforts by Rudy Giuliani and others who were named yesterday in this outrageous indictment.
In their efforts to delay the certification of the Electoral College, nor did I visit any war room in the Willard Hotel.
Yet if you simply go on Twitter, you will see hundreds of tweets insisting that I was in some war room that I literally know nothing whatsoever about.
Nor was I at the Capitol on January 6th.
having never left the grounds of my hotel.
The media uses guilt by associations.
Oh, Stone came in contact with members of the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys.
Therefore, therefore, nothing.
That proves nothing whatsoever.
Any claim or assertion that I knew in advance about, participated in, or condoned any illegal action, or even any allegedly illegal action, on January 5th or 6th, or on any other date, on January 5th or 6th, or on any other date, is categorically false.
And there is no evidence to the contrary.
I am not number six.
The speculation is that number six who has not been identified by Mr. Smith is a political consultant.
That leads many to say, I hope it's Roger Stone.
I bet it's Roger Stone.
Well, those who like to bet, I wish I could take them up on that bet.
But because I could candidly use the money.
That's a perfect segue into this.
We are brought to you here every day, five days a week by the great people at MyPillow.com.
Now, MyPillow.com is, of course, the enterprise of America's number one entrepreneur, capitalist, and advocate for both free speech and election integrity, Mike Lindell.
Mike Lindell himself is under assault.
He has multimillion dollar Lawsuits filed against him by voting machine companies.
The FBI has, for whatever reason, seized his phones, refused to return them.
But unlike Fox, who should have defended the Dominion lawsuit, Mike Lindell refuses to settle the suit, and he chooses to fight.
So you can have kind of a threefer here.
You can help Mike Lindell in his epic struggle.
You can help this great platform, Frank Speech.
And you can help Roger and Nydia Stone by going to MyPillow.com.
Let's talk about some of the amazing products there.
First, let's throw up our promo code so people can remember it.
It is quite simple, promo code STONE.
There I am in the famous V for Victory pose.
Now, there are a lot of great products at MyPillow, but there are some that I really particularly like.
I would be remiss if I did not mention the new revolutionary MyPillow 2.0.
This is different than any other pillow you may have gotten from MyPillow.com because embedded in these pillows is a proprietary Cooling technology so that the pillow always remains cool to the touch.
Mike Lindell says that the two keys to the best night's sleep you've ever had are both temperature and height, and these pillows are designed to provide the correct amount of both.
And therefore, right now, if you use promo code STONE, you get one pillow for $89.98, but Mike Lindell throws in a second Revolutionary new pillow absolutely free.
I've received mine and I must tell you it's amazing.
I had some MyPillow pillows that I had ordered in the past and was still using.
I have basically given them to friends.
These are the pillows that will give you the best night's sleep you have ever had.
I urge you to order them and to use promo code STONE.
Now everybody knows that Mrs. Stone and I are dog lovers.
We have cats as well, so I guess you'd call us animal lovers, but that leads me to tell you about the great MyPillow dog beds.
There are My Little Rascals, Mimi and Peewee, male and female, from the same litter, brother and sister, and they are luxuriating in their MyPillow dog bed.
The dog beds come in small, medium, and large.
There's the large size one there.
They start at $19.99, the price rises to $69.99.
They protect your furniture, your rugs, your floors, and your pets get to sleep or lounge in absolute luxury.
Check out the fabulous MyPillow Dog Beds, also suitable for cats.
Now, if you like the dog beds, I have to recommend the MyPillow Pet Blankets.
The pet blankets keep your animals, your pets, warm at night.
So Mrs. Stone and I like to crank down the air conditioning at night, and it gets a little chilly for our fur babies, and therefore we cover them with their very own MyPillow pet blankets.
Again, the pet blankets start at $19.59 for small, $20 I'll get this exactly right.
$29.99 for medium, $59.98 for large, and then there's a special car-sized one that was originally $113.98, but with promo code STONE, is a mere $69.98.
And then there's a special car sized one that was originally $113.98, but with promo code stone is a mere $69.98.
Some other great products there, the six piece towel set.
Now I learned this from Mike Lindell himself.
The secret to a great bath or shower towel is absorbability.
The terrycloth cotton that you normally get from other purveyors or say in a department store Treats the cotton with an oil that makes the terrycloth more durable, but much, much less absorbent, thus defeating the whole purpose of your towel for drying off.
These were originally $99.98, then they were reduced to $49.99.
Now they are on clearance for $25.
$49.99.
Now they are on clearance for $25.
That's a set of six of these great towels.
As you can see, they come in multiple colors.
Again, use promo code STONE.
Then there are the men and women's moccasin slippers.
These are also reduced.
They were originally $149, essentially $150, then reduced to $25 today.
They come in multiple sizes.
Officer Salvatore Greco, formerly of the New York Police Department, Loves his he bought them in multiple colors.
He swears by them as both being comfortable and durable.
You can get those now at this special price by using Promo code STONE.
So it doesn't really matter whether you go for the pillows, the blankets, the waffle blankets, another item I didn't have time to show you, the mattress toppers, the great Giza dream sheets using the most luxurious cotton literally in the world, Or the Procal Sheets.
So many of these products are reduced right now.
Go to MyPillow.com and be sure when you do to use promo code STONE.
Here is the very best roundup regarding the charges against Donald Trump.
This is in today's The New York Post by Andrew McCarthy, a former U.S.
attorney.
Of all the outrages in Biden's special counsel, Jack Smith's latest indictment of Donald Trump, and there are many, the worst comes at the end of the 45-page screed, count one, the section entitled, The Defendant's Exploitation of Violence and Chaos at the Capitol.
This is where Mr. Smith waves the bloody shirt.
Smith intends to try Trump for a Capitol riot, even though he has not charged Trump for specifics regarding the Capitol riot.
No rioting charge, no allegations of criminal incitement, no seditious conspiracy, no insurrection, no crime of violence of any kind.
To levy such an allegation may have been untenable.
Smith's indictment hides the ball, as did the like-minded, unabashedly partisan, monochromatically anti-Trump House January 6th Committee hearings.
I can tell you firsthand that was Kabuki theater, where a witness named Cassidy Hutchinson specifically perjured himself regarding me claiming that White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows was directed by President Trump to call me and General Michael Flynn on January 5th to, quote, find out what would happen on January 6th.
Hutchison told the committee under oath that that call was completed.
She went on to say that Meadows was going to attend a meeting in a war room at the Willard Hotel, that she dissuaded him from attending this meeting, but that he later called Stone and Flynn to get a rundown on how the meeting had went.
There never was any such meeting, at least not one that I attended.
And if there was a war room at the Willard, I am completely and totally unaware of it, as three separate sources confirmed to the Washington Post.
So.
Smith's indictment, pardon me, in his ellipse speech, Trump explicitly called for a march on the Capitol to be peaceful.
That video, of course, was on Twitter and long suppressed.
Like the Democrat-controlled House Committee, the prosecutors admit an inconvenient fact.
In American constitutional law, violence is our bright line.
A section of special counsel Jack Smith's indictment focuses on, quote, the defendant's exploitation of the violence and chaos at the Capitol.
The First Amendment protects expression and especially political speech that is aggressive, obnoxious, and even false.
As Robert Kennedy said before the House committee last week, the First Amendment is designed to protect that speech that is most repugnant, that speech that is most objectionable.
The remedy for such speech is more speech, corrective speech, not criminal prosecution.
Unless, of course, the speaker willfully conveys an intention to cause violence that is either real or imminent.
At that point, federal penal law forbids solicitation of violent crimes and all manners of conspiracy to use force.
Trump cannot be charged with soliciting violence based on the facts of January 6th.
That is why, despite charging over a thousand people in connection with the Capitol riot, the Justice Department not only refrained from indicting Trump, but prosecutors never named him as an unindicted co-conspirator.
Indeed, they fought tooth and nail against efforts by January 6th defendants to shift the blame to Trump for their wrongdoing.
Yet, Smith seeks to inject the Capitol riot into a case in which he has not charged the Capitol riot.
What's more, although Trump cannot be held criminally liable for the violence of the uprising, the Capitol riot is the prism through which Smith, the Biden Justice Department appointed prosecutor, would have the public view the case He is charged against Biden's 2024 campaign rival.
In one of the most demagogic performances ever by a federal prosecutor in a high-profile case, Smith's post-indictment press conference remarks on Tuesday evening barely mentioned the charges he actually filed.
Instead, Smith proclaimed, the attack on our nation's capital on January 6, 2021, was an unprecedented assault on the seat of government.
He went out of his way to laud the men and women of law enforcement spotlighting the heroism with which they fought off the rioters.
Donald Trump, in two different postings on Twitter, called on those at the Capitol to stand down and also to respect those involved in law enforcement.
But again, Smith did not charge Trump with a crime stemming from the violent attack.
Instead, he includes the aforementioned exploitation aside at the tail end of the indictment.
It details how a mass of people broke through barriers, cordoning off the Capitol grounds, and advanced on the building, including by violently attacking law enforcement officials trying to secure it.
Unmentioned is just one itsy-bitsy detail, Mr. McCarthy writes.
Smith has no evidence that Trump intended them to do that, much less that he directed them to do so.
How could he?
to repeat in a thousand cases against rioters and demonstrators, by Justice Department prosecutors have made no such allegation.
Therefore, the new indictment is a political document.
Smith's charges are weak, what he describes as fraud, obstruction, and civil rights violations, which actually target a constitutionally protected free speech.
And it is secondarily a legal theory.
The vice president is empowered to discount electoral votes, which Smith cannot transmogrify into a crime by dint of it being legally cockamamie.
I am not a lawyer, but I am familiar with the alternative electors that were filed by John F. Kennedy in 1960 when the outcome of the election in the state of Hawaii was in doubt.
First, he hopes to incite a Democrat-friendly Washington, D.C.
jury into convicting Trump despite the affirmative of the fraud, obstruction, and civil rights allegations in the case.
In other words, to convict him for the Capitol riot despite failing to charge him in connection with the Capitol riot.
Secondly, and more significantly, Smith hopes to push the case to trial in time for the crucial stretch run of the 2024 campaign.
To infuse the electorate with Capitol riot imagery as they cast their ballots, Turning a criminal trial into one long Biden campaign ad.
That's the plan.
The question is, will the courts let the Biden-DOJ-appointed prosecutor get away with it?
Timing, of course, is the entire issue here.
In other words, we already have pending indictments against President Trump in New York.
And you have what I think will be a coming indictment from Soros-funded prosecutor Fannie Wills in Georgia.
So what is this really about?
Would they like to incarcerate Donald Trump?
Sure, they would.
But more importantly, they want to make sure that he cannot win the next election.
Now, I had incorrectly predicted that they would ultimately bring some seditious conspiracy charge, some charge essentially of treason.
Under the 14th Amendment, that would make Trump ineligible to be a candidate for president.
In other words, his name would not be allowed to be on the ballot.
Thus far, lacking some superseding indictment, which is certainly still a possibility, they have not done so.
But the timing of all of this, it took John Durham five years to make sure that Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and their criminal retinue could not be prosecuted for the lie that is the Russian collusion hoax.
Yet it seems to me that Mr. Smith has moved at warp speed.
Both in the Mar-a-Lago documents case, where superseding indictments were filed recently, Largely to distract the people again from the growing storm over the Biden's corruption.
But again, in this case, Mr. Smith wants to move to trial before the election.
And so the backdrop of the election is Donald Trump in the dock.
The purpose here is to defeat Donald Trump and to ensure that he does not become president.
Why?
Well, because he is an existential threat to the two-party duopoly, to the political establishment, to the Washington swamp.
That is seeking essentially to cancel the U.S.
Constitution.
It was amazing to lay in bed last night and scroll through Twitter to see the epic torrent of hatred directed towards me and the number of people who seem to support censorship.
Like, why is Stone allowed to speak?
Why is Stone allowed to opine?
That is the First Amendment.
There was a time in this country When liberals believed in civil liberties, liberals believed in war, liberals believed in free speech.
That seems to have gone out of the window.
Now liberals believe in anything Big Pharma tells them.
They believe in a very authoritarian national health industrial complex.
They certainly believe in war because anyone like Robert Kennedy or Donald Trump who questions the wisdom of continuing to ship billions of dollars to Ukraine at the same time that it is the Biden Justice Department that scuttled two highly promising peace deals that would have stopped the killing.
It is amazing the way the parties, or I should say the philosophies, have changed position.
That is where we are in America today.
This entire episode is an epic exercise in election interference.
We have a brief video, I think, by Donald Trump addressing this.
This country is in a very dark place now.
But even after everything the deep state has done to me, I will never give up on America.
Mark my words.
In 2024, we will win back the White House.
We will make America great again.
I have no doubt about it.
They come at me from left.
They come at me from right.
The rhinos, the communists, the Marxists, the fascists.
We will not only survive, we will be stronger than ever before.
We're fighting a fight like nobody ever thought possible, and we're winning.
We won in 2016, we had a rigged election in 2020, but got more votes than any sitting president.
We're going to win like never before, and we're going to make America great again.
I can truly say, I believe, Better than ever before.
Thank you for all of your support and for all of your prayers.
That was, of course, Donald Trump.
I had the high privilege of traveling with him a couple weeks ago.
I can tell you that he is determined, he is resilient, he is resolved to save this nation.
And even in the face of this horrific abuse and this election interference, his spirit Uh, and his belief in the Lord has not flagged.
This has been Roger Stone and the Stone Zone.
Tomorrow, Darren Beatty from Revolver.News and Kim Guilfoyle from the Kimberly Guilfoyle join us here at the Stone Zone.
Until then, God bless you and Godspeed.
You're watching Lyndell TV.
You're still looking good!
I'm still feeling good!
You know, I've got all your MyPillow products.
Mattress topper, bed sheets, MyPillows, towels, slippers, blankets, sleepwear, dog bed... Whoa, whoa, Charles!
Everyone now can get MyPillow products at huge discounts at MyPillow.com!
That's right.
Now's the time to go to MyPillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to take advantage of our 3-in-1 sale.
We're bringing you exciting new products, overstock specials, and closeout deals you won't find anywhere else.
For example, when you buy one of our brand new MyPillow 2.0s, you get another one absolutely free!
And with our overstock sale, you save 50% on our luxurious Giza Dream bedsheets.
That's as low as $29.99 for the best sheets ever!
And with our biggest closeout special, you get our all-season slippers for only $35!
Or our sandals and slides for just $25!
▲
Export Selection