Dave Rubin hosts the March 30, 2026, episode where Trump threatens to obliterate Iran's power plants and oil wells unless a ceasefire occurs, while Marco Rubio outlines objectives to destroy Iran's air force and missile capabilities. The report details the House voting 213-203 to fund DHS for 60 days, rejecting Senate efforts to defund ICE, alongside JD Vance confirming Ilhan Omar's role in a Medicaid fraud scheme targeting autistic children. Ultimately, the discussion highlights deep political polarization over immigration enforcement and foreign policy aggression, framing current events as a clash between established order and radical disruption. [Automatically generated summary]
On this Monday, we're going to do some more updates, some DHS shutdown updates, a little bit of racist Democrat stuff, some JD Vance clips because he did an interview with Benny Johnson and he's been making the rounds.
He's going to lead this sort of anti-fraud task force that the White House is putting out there.
And then we've got some Elon stuff and a black and white clip to end the program.
We're going old school today.
But let's just dive right in.
A little war update for you.
This is from the BBC.
Donald Trump.
We already lost 0.2 points.
The best I can do is a 9-7 today.
Donald Trump threatens to obliterate Iran's power plants and oil wells if a deal is not reached shortly.
Trump says the U.S. is in serious discussions with the new and more reasonable regime in Iran, but warns if a ceasefire is not agreed, the U.S. will hit sites it is purposely not yet touched.
He also repeats his threats against the major fuel hub of Karg Island.
Meanwhile, the price of oil hits $115 while new attacks are reported in Iran, Lebanon, and Israel.
So as I mentioned last week, you know, one of the strange things about negotiating at the moment is so much of Iran's military and political leadership has been decimated.
It's like, who are we negotiating with?
It's a little unclear to me, and you should be doing some Googling or some groking yourself and see if you can figure it out.
But it sounds like there was sort of the original layer of the Iranian people, you know, the Ayatollah and the Molas, they're all gone.
Then there was this sort of secondary layer of people.
They're pretty much all gone.
And now we're at the third layer.
I don't know how many layers deep Trump is willing to go to figure out who we can negotiate with, but it does sound like whoever we're talking to right now that can speak for the regime is at least a little more willing to play ball with us.
I guess you realize that when you look around and you go, boy, all my friends are dead.
The office is blown up.
I better talk to this guy and maybe we can make a deal here.
And Donald Trump is known to make deals.
One of the criticisms of Trump throughout this, and I don't think it's been a legitimate criticism, but one thing that I've seen certainly from the left and a little bit from what people call the woke right is that the objectives of the war have not been made clear.
Even though I think Marco Hegseth and Trump from day one, nukes, ballistic missiles, et cetera, et cetera, I think it's been pretty damn clear.
However, here was Marco Rubio on one of the Sunday shows explaining once again what the objectives are.
We're going to test that proposition very strongly because we always prefer to settle things through negotiation and diplomacy.
But we also have to be prepared for the fact that that effort might fail, that we are dealing with a 47-year-old regime that still has a lot of people involved in it who aren't necessarily big fans of diplomacy or peace.
It was so that they wouldn't be able to protect themselves as they were trying to make nukes.
So as I keep saying, everyone keeps getting hung up on this word imminent.
Were they an imminent threat?
And as Rubio has pointed out repeatedly, we knew they were a threat.
They've been launching rockets across the Middle East.
So obviously they have some capability or had some capability to do this sort of thing, funding terrorists and terrorist groups all over, quite literally all over the world.
And the question about imminent is: do you wait till they have more military power?
How many more ballistic missiles should they have?
How many more drones should they have?
How much more uranium should they be able to enrich?
How much stronger should their proxies be, et cetera, et cetera?
Now, you don't have to agree that we should have done anything.
You don't have to agree with Trump, but the argument that we haven't laid out why we did it and when we did it, I think Rubio just, you know, totally poked a hole in that right there.
Okay, so we will see what you how do you make a deal?
Like this is sort of diplomacy 101, right?
You keep military pressure on so that the guys over there who again are looking around going, boy, we don't have any of our friends left.
Our house is destroyed.
I can't go to the office anymore.
There's people on the streets that want to kill us because we've been repressing them for years.
Maybe we should make a deal.
So that's Trump saying there's a deal to be made out there, but we're going to keep pushing and pushing and pushing until you are willing to do it.
And by the way, if that top layer is gone and the secondary layer is gone and we're negotiating with the third layer right now, well, if Trump realizes these guys aren't the ones to negotiate with or they're not coming to the table or I don't like what they're offering, he'll figure out a way to negotiate with the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, or ninth layer at the same point.
I thought this was interesting.
It's a little sidebar from the specifics of what's happening in Iran.
But you know, the big story at the beginning of last week was that Joe Kent stepped down and he was working under Tulsi over at DNI.
And suddenly, he stepped down and then immediately went on a PR tour, which to me, that's a little bit of a tell, right?
Like you can be a conscientious objector.
You could be someone in the administration and not for the war.
And you can voice your opinion on that.
You have every right to free speech and all of those things.
The next day, the guy's showing up on Tucker Carlson and doing all of these and basically doing a press junket, right?
And to me, that shows you sort of where his intentions are.
Also, he's repeatedly talked about how he wasn't allowed to investigate the Charlie Kirk murder, even though it had nothing to do with his department.
So he's doing some strange things.
But the main accusation that he's been laying at Trump is somehow that Trump isn't making the decisions and that other countries and other people and podcasters like Mark Levin are actually controlling Trump.
I think the president and I have both strongly responded to the criticism by Mr. Kent, who unfortunately resigned in disgrace and accused the president of basically being controlled by foreign countries and foreign manipulation, which is a ridiculous and laughable assertion.
So his accusations have zero credibility as far as this White House is concerned.
Yeah, and you know, the thing is, everyone can tell a story.
Everyone can make things up.
Everyone can have feelings about things, right?
Like working, you can work for the government and have your feelings about things.
You can be a private citizen, have your feelings.
You can be the president of the United States.
But if you're going to make those accusations, right?
You're going to make those accusations.
Somebody stopped me from investigating the Charlie Kirk murder.
Well, it had nothing to do with your department.
That's one thing.
Well, we were tricked into or manipulated into this war, contrary to everything the administration is saying.
You got to have some evidence for it.
Otherwise, congratulations.
Now you're just in the podcast circuit.
And I guess that's an honorable job to some extent.
But I guess good luck with that next career.
Now, the strange thing of all of this is that for the last month, people have been trying to also make it seem as if Trump has not been wildly consistent.
And you guys know I love going back into the time machine and looking at these old clips.
Here is Trump in the late 80s talking about Iran and potentially taking their oil.
Watch this.
unidentified
But as far as Trump is concerned, our allies are only part of the problem.
We're never going to have another one of these guys.
So ideologically consistent over the years, it's absolutely crazy.
You're going to have a war by being weak.
That's what the guy is saying 40 years ago.
And then what happened?
Well, we got Democrat administrations like the Obama administration that quite literally sent the mullahs and Iran billions and billions of dollars, which built up a war machine, which in essence funded Hamas, funded Hezbollah, kept the repression of the Iranian people going.
We propped up the mullahs.
That's what the Democrats did.
So Trump has been incredibly consistent on this.
And you know, the other interesting part of this is the rhetoric with the Dems used to be more anti-Iran.
Now, because they have Trump Derrangement Syndrome and as you guys know, the main symptom of Trump derangement syndrome is that if Trump says something, your position obviously has to become the complete opposite.
So Stephen A. Smith was on real time with Bill Maher on Friday night.
And he's a, what I would call, you know, in that sliver of people who is a last remaining moderate liberal, kind of in the Bill Maher milieu, right?
And here he is pointing out how the Democrats used to say all of the freaking things as it relates to Iran, as Trump is saying right now.
So what's interesting about that clip is Stephen A., I actually don't know that much about his general foreign policy, right?
And the guy, again, he's an ESPN guy.
He's a sports guy that's kind of translated that skill into the political world.
But he's just calling out the hypocrisy.
This is what you guys used to all say.
And now you're pissed because Trump's doing something.
And Bill, who's agreeing with Stephen A., Bill has been anti-war, to whatever extent that that's like a position.
He has been anti-war his whole career.
Go watch his HBO specials during the Iraq war, and there were many of them.
And he was wildly against George W. Bush and wildly against nation building and all of those things.
Now, he has an ability to do that and then also call out radical Islam because Bill is actually smart and a true liberal.
So he can do several things at once.
Where again, most of these people just make their decisions as it relates to being counter to Donald Trump.
But the hypocrisy, I know it's sort of pointless to point out the hypocrisy, but if you're only making your decisions because someone else thinks something and you think they're bad, you're probably not using your brain.
Let's pause war stuff for a moment, jump back to our shores, which, as you know, we've been in this partial government shutdown, which 100% is the Democrats' fault.
They have decided that in an effort to defund ICE, which is already funded through 2029, they will defund DHS, cause you a headache at the airport by not paying the TSA workers and creating general chaos.
So the chaos really kind of peaked over the weekend.
And then finally, the Senate sort of, kind of, maybe did something, but not really.
We've got some info here from the Daily Wire.
Washington, the House of Representatives voted late Friday to fund the Department of Homeland Security for 60 days, rejecting a compromise the Senate passed earlier in the day.
The vote was largely along party lines, with three Democrats crossing the aisle to fully fund the department through May 22, May 22nd.
The final tally was 213 to 203.
The vote was a rebuke of the Senate, which early Friday morning passed a bill that carved ICE and Border Patrol out from the rest of the funding.
While House Democrats fought to take up the Senate's proposal, the measure seemed dead on arrival after President Donald Trump expressed his disapproval of the measure.
You can't have a bill that's not going to fund any form of law enforcement, Trump said on Friday.
This whole thing is about the Democrats wanting to have open borders, no ICE, no border patrol.
These people are crazy.
Trump's comments came after House Speaker Mike Johnson and other House Republicans trashed the Senate proposal and subsequent departure of senators for a two-week Easter recess.
With both chambers heading out for Easter without a deal, the shutdown is on track to become the longest in history, now in its 42nd day.
Trump signed an executive order on Friday to pay TSA agents as travelers have faced long wait times at airports nationwide due to officer callouts and resignations.
So look, as I've said from the beginning of this thing, the Democrats are preying on the fact that you, the public, will not realize what's going on here.
They want you to feel the pain at the airport and then just be like, well, I'm not a real political insider.
I don't really pay attention to the Senate voted on this and the Congress voted on this.
Who's the president?
I'll be pissed at him.
And that is a political strategy.
It's deeply dishonest and it's quite awful and everything else, but it is a political strategy.
Now, the Senate kind of tried to do something, but it seemed pretty crappy.
And Trump has an incredible way of just cutting through the BS, right?
Trump's just, he's telling the truth.
Look, they want the open border.
They don't want ICE funded.
They don't want DHS funded because they want maximum pain.
So Republicans stop giving them an inch.
Here is House Speaker Mike Johnson, right?
So Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson basically going after the Republicans in the Senate, questioning if they even read the freaking bill they were signing.
I'm quite convinced that it can't be that every Senate Republican read the language of this bill.
And I'm going to just read you one excerpt of it.
It's an actual copy of the bill, that excerpt.
It says, quote, the contents printed under the headings of this bill, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Security Operations under the heading of U.S. Customs and Border Patrol and Protection shall have no force or effect for purposes of this act.
Let me just be completely unequivocal and put this out here in the open and in the beginning here to make clear the Republicans are not going to be any part of any effort to reopen our borders or to stop immigration enforcement.
We are going to deport dangerous criminal illegal aliens because it is a basic function of the government.
The Democrats fundamentally disagree.
The Senate Democrats have hoisted upon this appropriations process their radical, crazy agenda.
We call it crazy because that's what it is.
They want to reopen the borders and they want to stop the deportation of dangerous criminal illegal aliens.
As Phoenix just said to me, Mike Johnson's pretty good.
He's pretty good, right?
The guy is pretty clear in what he's saying.
And the Republicans on the Senate side, did they read what they were signing?
Why is it that the Democrats simply want an open border?
You must think, if you don't care about politics, but you're just like, all right, America's a country.
That means it's a contiguous place.
You know, it kind of looks a little something like this, right?
How's that for Florida over there?
That's pretty good.
I did that on the fly.
It looked a little something like this.
And if you don't have borders, you don't have anything.
And why is it that the Democrats want that?
And why are some Senate Republicans being bamboozled into signing something that the Senate Democrats want?
It is rather strange.
Here's Florida Representative Randy Fine, Congressman, talking about how the Senate proposal was rushed because they basically just wanted to get out and shut down.
They wanted to take their Easter vacation and it doesn't end the shutdown.
So the Republicans on the House side said no.
unidentified
Why are you so opposed to this bill that your Senate colleagues worked really hard to get across the line?
We've been told many of the senators didn't even know about it because they started writing it after midnight.
So I don't know how hard it was.
Now, clearly they wanted to get on vacation, and I think that was the focus.
But it didn't do what you claim.
That bill does not end the shutdown.
The shutdown was going to continue for thousands and thousands of federal employees who work at ICE and border protection, including those who investigate child trafficking of little girls.
So it wasn't going to end.
It was just going to be less.
And we said, no, we either take care of the country or we keep on fighting.
So it's a little unclear to me what's going on with the Senate Republicans.
Thun basically bolted out of town.
We'll have something on that in just a second.
But here's a little bit more from Randy Fine, talking about how the Senate Republicans are so weak that basically the House Republicans are going to have to be a little bit stronger.
unidentified
Let's also talk a little bit about this video you posted of Senate Leader Thune at the airport leaving.
If you want one guarantee on today's program, nobody's going to be missing their vacation over this.
That is not what these people.
They're going to cash their checks and they are going to take their vacation.
Now, some of you may be going, Dave, the last five minutes of this, it's a little insider baseball.
You don't love that insider baseball stuff.
You love the narrative stuff, right?
And that I do think, unfortunately, in a weird way, the narrative stuff, like what really is going through everyone's minds is more important than the minutiae of, oh, we lost a couple Senate Republicans here, blah, blah, blah.
So let's do the narrative part of this.
The narrative at the end of the day boils down to the fact that the Democrats are completely insane.
It's just not much more difficult to that.
They are completely insane.
They don't want funding for our immigration laws.
They don't want a border and they want to flood the country.
But don't take my word for it here, Scott Jennings.
What concession can the Republicans give to the Democrats that the Democrats would accept?
The Democrats are telling you.
Well, first off, they're basically telling you, they don't fully say it, that they want open borders.
A lot of them kind of do say it.
But I think at this point, there's enough proof in the pudding that we know the Democrats want open borders.
But let's move that aside for a second.
What do the Democrats want?
For sure.
Every single Democrat, ICE is a criminal organization and we want them on masks and we want to prosecute them.
We'll have more on that in a second.
They don't want us to be able to kick illegals out.
Like, that's a non-starter.
That is a non-starter.
You've got to go.
And Donald Trump was duly elected by the American people to do it.
So the Republican or the Democrats, all they're doing, as Jenning points out, they're just having a little hissy fit.
That is all they are doing.
Tom Homan, a man who does not have hissy fits, he just goes on shows and says what he thinks.
Here he is with Jake Tapper explaining that, yeah, if you guys are going to keep the government shut down, well, ICE, which again is funded, we're going to send them to the airport and they will do the job that you ding-dongs won't.
I think first and foremost, we're making clear that no one is above the law in this city, that everyone has to follow the rule of law.
And I have made clear to the president, both in our private conversations and our public conversations, about the fact that I believe that ICE is a rogue agency.
It's a reckless one.
It's one that delivers nothing towards the furthering of the cause of public safety.
And I've also been public about my belief that ICE is an entity that should be abolished.
And that is critically important in our city where we've seen too many New Yorkers living in fear of even going to what would otherwise be routine immigration check-ins.
The easy analysis of this guy is that he's evil and he's a jihadist and all of those things.
Okay, fine.
But listen to the double speak there.
No one is above the law.
He's pissed because no one is above the law.
The illegals who are illegal, who show up to your sanctuary city where you create conditions for illegal people to live off the dime of the legal people, that means the illegals are above the law.
Once you create a sanctuary city, you have said those people who have broke the law are now above the law and they will get better treatment than the citizens whose money we will take to protect these programs.
If there are any journalists in New York City, you might want to ask that question.
How is it that a sanctuary city in and of itself is not above the law?
Of course it is above the law because it should be illegal.
We've talked about this with the supremacy clause.
Here is Victor Davis Hansen, who is just one of the great thinkers on the right, talking about really what is driving sort of the crazy ideological lunacy that is taking over in the Democrat Party right now.
We emailed this team again this morning to get them on, but that's completely right.
The average American is not left enough for them.
The average, it's why, for example, when you look at the numbers on the SABE Act, should we have national ID for voting in federal elections?
It's something like 85% of the people say yes.
So a political party that would be against that, you would think that would make no sense, unless actually what their goal was was to import new voters to replace the ones who won't go on with their radical ideology.
And that obviously is exactly what's happening.
It's also why, as he points out, the reason that no Democrats talk about Lake and Riley, the reason that no Democrats talk about, what's her, what's her last name is Gorman.
What was the girl's first name?
I'm sorry, I can't remember from Chicago at Loyola, the 18-year-old who was killed last week.
We'll get her name in just a second, Sheridan Gorman.
The reason that no Democrats will tweet about her or say anything, because it's an acceptable level of murder and mayhem and violence in order for their revolution to come.
So, of course, the ground zero for much of it, you know, it's hard to tell where the ground zero for like sheer Democrat lunacy is.
If you would have asked me 10 years ago, you know, pre-COVID, it was definitely San Francisco for wacky lefty views and gender lunacy and drugs everywhere and everything.
Then through COVID, it's spread in so many different places that it's hard to see.
You could argue it maybe is in Minnesota now.
It's all over the place, but Chicago is a special version of it.
We showed you this video.
We'll just show you this again real quick.
This is Mayor Brandon Johnson, who after the murder of 18-year-old Loyola student Sheridan Gorman by an illegal who not only was, so he had broke the law once by coming illegally, but then had been arrested in 2023.
This tragedy is not going to deter us from our work.
While he's standing with the sign behind him that says ban ICE, ICE is the thing that was doing the work to make sure that young girls like Sheridan Gorman wouldn't be killed.
So when Victor Davis Hansen says that the Democrats don't, they don't mind a certain amount of dead young girls, he just told you that is that, that is it right there.
They have my condolences.
The family has my condolences.
That's meaningless.
What he's really saying is, well, now we just have to keep on going because they care more about ideology and their ideology is the destruction of the United States versus truth.
So now let's jump.
So we did show you that one last week.
So now let's jump to the weekend.
So as you know, there were these ridiculous no-kings protests.
And these, Donald Trump was elected.
These people, almost everything, like if you think of them more, I don't want to say the R word, but if you think of them as they were called no kings protests, if you think of them more as moron parades, that there were just a series of moron parades all over the United States, then it makes a lot more sense.
But here is Brandon Johnson at a no-kings protest being asked what's important and listen to this.
unidentified
Tell me why you wanted to come out and what's your message for the community here?
So he's telling you, I don't want ICE here because what they say is immigrants, but he means illegal immigrants.
We want illegal immigrants here because we need them as voters, which is also why we don't want them to have IDs.
They are telling you it is right in front of your face and you better start screaming it from the top of the bell tower because more and more people have to understand this.
Of course, the next thing that they will want, and here's the woman who from 2022 to 2025 won scariest, like, what was it likeliest to scare small children in bad lighting?
This is Washington Representative Pramila Jayapal, and she wants taxpayer-funded reparations for illegals.
unidentified
Then we also need offensive actions around prosecutions.
We need real accountability because at the end of the day, the people that have been inflicting this harm need to be prosecuted.
They need to be brought before us and they need to be held account for the trauma that they have created and we are going to have to have some form of reparation.
Well, it's allowed, you are allowed to hate people that are murdering young girls like Sheridan Gorman.
You haven't said a word about her.
Phoenix, could you do a quick check of his Twitter account and look at his last 20 tweets?
Anything about Sheridan Gorman?
I'm going to go ahead and say no.
Which we already did that on Friday, but we'll double check right now.
No hate.
No fear.
Well, you are allowed to fear that you're losing your country if it's being flooded by illegals and you have a political party that cares more about those illegals than it does about the citizens.
And immigrants are welcome here.
Well, this is where you guys, you give up the game because immigrants, well, America is a nation of immigrants.
And we've got the Statue of Liberty with her little huddled messes thing and the poor and everything else, except it was supposed to be done legally and orderly.
And you guys don't seem to make a distinction between legal and illegal.
And then when you do that, and then when you have a media that lies about everything and tells you that Donald Trump's a Nazi and everything else, well, then you get this on an LA federal building over the weekend.
For those of you listening on the audio podcast, that was a guy spray painting on an L.A. federal building killed.
What was it?
Kill an ICE agent?
Yeah, kill an ICE agent.
Kill your local ICE agent.
Now that guy, go back to it for one second, one more second.
Like somebody, there's so much video these days between cell phones and everything else.
That's a federal building.
There are cameras everywhere.
Find that person.
The federal government can find that person, obviously.
These LARPing lunatics who jump into vans after and are likely being paid and everything else, find that person.
That is not protected free speech to call for the murder of federal agents.
Okay.
It is not.
On top of the fact that it's a crime to be spray painting a building.
And I know they don't have laws in LA, but like there's some things you could do to that guy.
We did check Dan Goldman has not tweeted about Sheridan Gorman, so he doesn't care about the young girls who are being raped and murdered in this country, but he does care about the quote-unquote immigrants and that we shouldn't fear or hate them, even though no one fears or hates legal immigrants.
You get the point.
Let's jump back to Scott Jennings.
Here he points out how this whole intersectional alliance of competing interests makes no sense that the Democrats have put together other than it is to destroy everything.
I'm going to give you a little bit of a white pill right now.
And the white pill is this.
This series of competing interests that the Democrats have, you know, I always say queers for Palestine is very different than Palestine for queers, that these people, like the trans people who are hanging out with the jihadists and the communists who are making, you know, common cause with like the good progressive at the moment, quote unquote, good.
And if they, and they combined, one of them was the foot, one of them was the hand.
We're going deep today.
They combined into Devastator.
Voltron, you get it.
But this thing is so competing.
At some point, it is going to collapse.
So, and that's also why it's been so frustrating over the last couple months to see so much infighting on the right.
All we have to do right now is basically be sane.
Basically be sane.
Try not to burn each other down and destroy each other and lie about everything and handicap Trump all the way.
You don't have to agree with everything Trump says, but try not to destroy him and the incredible coalition he's made.
And then everyone will look at the Democrats, just like on State of the Union night when they couldn't stand for, are you here for the American people or not?
And everyone will be like, you guys are bananas.
60% of America, I kid you not, will be for that.
So we shall see here, and I would say for to the people on the right that are trying to take out Trump all the time, like, guys, okay, so you want to usher in that?
Is that what you're going for?
Because that's what you're going to get.
Tim Walz, a man who was almost vice president, who's now not even running for re-election as mayor of Minnesota because he's caught up in a massive fraud scandal, deeply tied to the Somali community over there.
Here he is, a governor of Minnesota, I should say.
Here he is talking about how he will never leave the side of those Somali Minnesotans of whom the, well, the GRIFT has been so impactful in his career.
If you were here legally and you're not creating immigration fraud or you're not, you know, doing, say, the learing center where you're laundering money and sending it back to Somalia, if you're living here as a legal Somali immigrant, it is true if you abide by the laws of the United States, your children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren will be here.
But of course, that's it's the worst sort of pandering ridiculousness.
The only reason that Donald Trump was focusing on Minnesota in the first place is because of the money laundering scheme that this guy's caught up in that was deeply embedded in the Somali community there.
And when it comes to, I don't know, maybe some people whose grandchildren won't be here, this is spectacular.
For years, those of us online have been screaming about how Ilhan Omar married her brother.
You shouldn't marry your brother or your sister.
Pretty simple stuff.
That's not how we do it in this country.
But she did it as a way of creating immigration fraud for his citizenship.
I think she's now on her third marriage and somehow went into Congress worth about $50,000.
She's now worth about $30 million.
That's a little bit of a sidebar.
Anyway, as you know, JD Vance is now going to head up this anti-fraud task force.
That's where Trump is having him focus his energies on.
And here is Vance flat out saying that Ilhan committed immigration fraud.
So we actually think that Elian Omar definitely committed immigration fraud against the United States of America.
And I talked to Steve Miller about this actually recently.
We're trying to look at what the remedies are.
That's the thing that we're trying to figure out is what are the legal remedies now that we know that she's committed immigration fraud?
How do you go after her?
How do you investigate her?
How do you actually do the thing?
How do you build the case necessary to get some justice for the American people?
There's a related issue, Benny, which is she has been at the center of a lot of the worst fraudsters in the Somalian community.
So I'm also worried about what did Elian Omar know about what was happening in the Somali community and why was nobody looking into it until frankly, Donald Trump came along.
So this thing has now, you know, there's an airlock.
I always describe real time, the show Real Time with Bill Omar as the airlock.
Like there's all these things that happen online.
And then often for some reason, they can hit real time.
And when they hit real time, like very fine people, then it kind of breaks free into the rest of the world.
To me, that's a break-free moment right there.
The vice president of the United States has now officially said, and I quote, that Ilhan Omar definitely committed immigration fraud.
So the question is, as he's pointing out, is what is the remedy?
At the very least, the Democrats, you'd think the Democrats would censor, censure her.
They might say you have to step down.
You're going to be involved in a major criminal investigation right now.
Should she lose?
Well, should the brother lose his citizenship?
Probably for sure.
Should she lose her citizenship?
Likely.
So will her grandchildren be here?
I hope not, but we shall see.
But put a pin in that one because it is actually one that is going to matter.
Here's a bit more from JD explaining that the Somali autism fraud, right?
So there was all of the, you know, the kindergarten fraud and the early school fraud that they were doing.
And that's separate, by the way, than the LA fraud, which mostly is hospice care.
They seem to love doing fraud when it comes to little kids and really old people.
But that they've been looking into this.
And one thing that they are going to stop is that the government years ago decided if fraud is less than 1.5 million bucks, we're not even going to do anything about it.
I mean, even that right there, it's like the government, what have you people been doing all these years?
So if someone commits $1.4 million of fraud, the government will just let you get away with it.
But you throw in that extra $100,000, you're in trouble.
It's sort of like the law in LA.
You're allowed to steal $799 worth of stuff from a retail store.
But if you get to that $800 threshold, they're going to get you.
So you can take that PS5 with those four games.
You take that fifth game.
Give me a game.
Give me a game.
Give me not a just generic Call of Duty.
Give me something a little more specific.
Resident Evil 7, there's a lot of them, right?
It's got to be at least on 7.9?
Jesus, man, I'm getting old.
Anyway, you take Resident Evil 9 and you're going to the slammer, M Efer.
Here's a bit more JD and the fraud that actually not only does it hurt the taxpayer, but it's hurting the actual Autistic Child who needs the help that the money is then being siphoned away from.
This is also theft of critical services that the American people rely on.
Some of you have heard me tell the story before, but I think that the autism scam that we've seen in the Somalian parts of Minnesota really illustrates well what's been going on across whole layers of our government.
So you have a program set up under Medicaid to help autistic children and their families get the resources that they need.
Because of course, we know that when you have a kid who's on the spectrum, it requires a little bit more help, a little bit more services.
And so the government, you know, enforcing the mandate from the American people to be kind and compassionate to our citizens, has set up this program to help families who are dealing with these particular struggles.
Now, what we've seen is Somali fraudsters at an industrial scale taking advantage of that program to the tune of millions and millions of dollars.
You know, you might think, oh, it's just a fraud thing.
Okay, so they're just stealing money.
Like you don't really connect where the money is supposed to go, but the money is supposed to go somewhere.
So when these Somali fraudsters come in and maybe they don't have any children in the first place, or maybe they do have three kids, but only one of them is autistic, or maybe none of them is autistic, as he pointed out in the previous clip.
What you're doing is you're siphoning money away from them.
And then the kids who are actually autistic, whose parents are legally here and paying taxes, they don't get the help that they need.
Now, what's interesting by Trump getting that this thing kind of went to critical mass, right?
The Nick Shirley story around Minnesota fraud and then everyone talking about it, it got to critical mass enough that Trump has now assigned JD to deal with fraud in the government, really fraud across the country.
And it'll be with the NGOs and nonprofits and everything else.
And it's not just going to be JD.
Here's Scott Besson, Treasury Secretary Scott Besson, talking about how the Treasury will launch its own investigation and there will be rewards.
If you, you watching this right now, you know of something going down right now that is illegal.
think there's something shady going on as it relates to, I don't know, a child care facility in your neighborhood or a hospice or something else, there'll be a reward in it for you too.
And that's actually a bottom-up way of fixing things.
It's so that you, the person who's just living life, you see something wrong?
Well, now you can go to a website.
Look at that.
The government can create websites.
Pretty good.
They can go to the website.
And then when there's a fine that hits, you're going to get some percentage of that.
So you're incentivized to do good work.
You're incentivized to stop fraud, stop the bad guys from getting away with everything.
Just one more on this.
This is JD talking about how Cali, when it comes to, and this is something that Dr. Oz said a couple of weeks ago, if you think the fraud in Minnesota is wacky, wait till you see what they uncover in Cali.
However, it seems to be that most of the fraud is in a lot of these blue cities.
And when you go out and expose the fraud, I mean, I think Gavin Newsom, he posted a photo of me the other day and had 10 cameras on me, an AI generated image saying, where are the kids trying to depict me as a pervert for exposing fraud?
How sick does a governor have to be to say that the kid exposing the fraud is the bad person versus the fraudsters are stealing the money?
He's not a polished speaker up there going off the prompter like with the stump speech.
He's just like, hey, I just uncovered some fraud.
And why is the governor of California going after me for that?
Which is exactly what Newsom is doing.
And Newsom, Newsom, in some sense, is the best example, I should say, of what Trump derangement syndrome is, because everything that Trump does, Newsom is now against.
And what that causes you to be is sort of crazy because Trump is directionally right about almost everything.
Someone else who's been directly right about almost everything is Elon Musk.
So of course, Gavin doesn't like him either.
How does someone sit like this unless they don't have testicles?
One of the great innovators of our time is Addison Our Time.
It breaks my heart.
I was the first, got one of the first Teslas off the line.
been one of their biggest proponents, supporters, was regulation in California that created the conditions that allowed him to take the risk to become the multi-billionaire, maybe trillionaire that he's become.
But right now he's allowing, and I think this is Trump, not just Elon Musk.
He's going to allow the greatest ongoing, I think, one of the most significant ongoes in the next decade is ceding the evil space to China.
What is an ongoing I've never heard of an ongol before?
Is that a word?
Also, it's the lizard trying to break out of the skin suit.
You know, I do occasionally sit with my legs crossed.
And part of the reason I do it is because from all the basketball that I play, my right hip is a little stiff, actually.
So I find if I'm sitting, particularly if I'm given a talk for an hour, if I sit with my legs crossed, somewhat crossed, it actually offers like a little bit of a stretch there.
But that's one thing to sit with your leg a little bit crossed like this.
He sits in a way that if he had testicles, they would be destroyed.
Can you find that video?
We're going to cold close with something hilarious today.
There's a video, the guy who, it's just some random guy like at a conference, and he sits down and he crosses his legs and he crushes his own testicles.
We're going to end with that today, which that's the proof right there.
Oh, an angle.
Oh, okay.
An ongol is a prominent city in Andhra Pradesh, India, known as a major agricultural trade center and the origin of the renowned Angol cattle, prized for their strength, white color, and disease resistance.
The name refers to a village of red earth in Telugu, historically also called Vanagabulu.
What just happened?
I don't know.
All right.
Anyway, maybe he is dyslexic.
He just made up the word.
I don't know what he's saying.
Kevin O'Leary, you know, Mr. Wonderful from Shark Tank, here he is giving the complete reverse analysis of Elon.
You want to be either Gavin Newsom who wants to, first off, he's saying that it's the regulation that made Elon rich.
Yes.
Like any creator of anything was like, you know, if it wasn't for those regulations, this never would have happened.
Completely, just completely and utterly absurd, right?
So you can either be on the side of Gavin Newsom, who wants to take down Elon Musk, who's quite literally trying.
He's devoted his life to making interplanetary travel possible, amongst all the other cool things that he's doing and free speech and everything else.
Or you can take the side of Mr. Wonderful right there, who's like, yeah, this is the guy.
He does the things that nobody else can do.
And you might want to be on board his little adventure.
So I thought we would end with this.
I thought this would be a fitting, I've had this video sitting in my inbox and I've been trying to figure out when to use it.
But, you know, after watching so many of the No Kings videos this weekend and seeing so many angry people, like we do have to acknowledge, as crazy as they are, they're angry and they want to destroy things.
And what really is the danger in that?
Well, we've built some great things in this country, right?
I mean, America is the gem of the world.
We still are for whatever, for all our warts and everything.
We still are.
And that's why one of the things that I think we have to do as we fight this is we have to have a positive vision.
It's why I always try to end the show with some sort of positive vision because they can't posit something positive because they want to destroy things.
And I thought this was a perfect video.
This has got to be from 60 years ago at least.
This is 20th century Western philosopher and mathematician Bertrand Russell talking about Karl Marx and why ultimately this ideology of Marxism cannot work.
unidentified
Now, Marx is not inspired by kindly feeling.
Marx pretended that he wanted the happiness of the proletariat.
What he really wanted was the unhappiness of the bourgeois.
And it was because of that negative element, because of that hate element, that his philosophy produced disaster.
A philosophy which is to do good must be one inspired by kindly feeling, not by unkindly feeling.
They pretend they're for the poor people, but they're not really for the poor people, right?
They're actually for destroying the bourgeois, let's say the upper middle class and rich people, right?
It's why Bernie used to go after millionaires, then he became a millionaire, he goes after billionaires.
But really what he's saying is a movement based in jealousy and hate can never bring anything good.
So it is incumbent upon us as they spin out of control to do better and base our movement in good.
And what would be good?
I don't know, freedom, individual rights, everything that America has been for for 250 years.
Fight for that earnestly and honestly and without jealousy and bitter and division.
And then ultimately, now I can bring it back to the transformer thing, that group of constructicons that they're trying to create into Devastator or Voltron, it can't hold because it will be so angry and bitter and competitive that it will not hold.