Eric Weinstein critiques the "cult of personality" surrounding Elon Musk and rejects forced loyalty to Donald Trump, arguing that Gen X uniquely resonates with Trump's narrative of societal betrayal despite his Baby Boomer birth year. He condemns the administration's dual signaling on Israel, the destruction of scientific institutions, and the Boskin Commission's manipulation of the CPI, warning that this political trajectory exhibits high variance and catastrophic risk. Ultimately, Weinstein refuses symbolic loyalty tests like the YMCA dance, insisting on substantive economic reforms over triumphalism to avoid cruelty while addressing systemic failures. [Automatically generated summary]
All right, the return of the Eric Weinstein— There's many different ways I could go here, Eric.
We've been doing this for, as I said on stage last night, about a decade, which is completely insane.
We've been having these conversations.
Yes, to our credit, it's not for us to bat ourselves on the back, but we've...
If not us, then who?
We've been directionally right about a lot of this stuff.
But I want to mention something that you brought up in the panel that we did last night, or yesterday afternoon.
Which was this Gen X concept because it's something that I've mentioned on the show for quite some time that we desperately needed to shift.
Most people understand the shift away from the boomers that, okay, you guys had a great run.
You ran it probably a little longer than you should.
But then everyone got focused on the millennials or the zoomers or everything.
And they skipped the people who are basically upper 30s into...
Mid-50s, let's say.
That's our crew.
Who are in the prime of their lives, physically, mentally, probably have a little money, have garnered a little success that, remember the world, pre-internet.
It seems like right now, largely through Elon, we're getting our moment here.
Do you think we're going to take it and do something good with it?
We have four groups of people, generationally speaking, that are arguably not reality-based at a generational level.
The Silents, the Boomers, the Millennials, and Gen Z. For whatever reason.
Some grew up too much with the screens.
Some got a chance to milk the system and basically broke things for their own benefit.
And so we are the odd ones out.
Everybody's dependent upon us for some degree of reality, which is why so many of the talking heads of the podcast circuit are Gen X. But everyone's a little scared to see them in power.
And so partially what you're seeing is this kind of righteous indignation of...
Highly capable, reality-based people at a generational level.
And the thing that we don't have is we don't have a history of being able to do much.
And even Elon is really using much younger people to actually carry this out.
So, although you don't know, I suspect you think it would be good for a series of reasons, right?
Like that we did grow up pre-internet, some of what I just laid out there, just literally in terms of the age, the wherewithal of a certain set of people to go ahead and do something.
So I could make the argument that Donald Trump went from being one of these three presidents to come born during the three summer months of 1946. Along with W and Bill Clinton, right at the beginning of the baby boom.
And, you know, he was a builder, but on the other hand, you could say that he was, you know, a very glib salesman and was selling things that weren't entirely what they claimed to be.
I think that what happens is that when they shoot at you and that they don't give you your two and they take every opportunity to drill holes in your boat, you start to resonate with Gen X. I know you're not a team guy.
It's not a question of whether I'm on Team Trump or not.
I mean, the first thing is that I just sat through a bunch of years of being asked to kiss the woke ring and to bend the knee to the woke and all this kind of nonsense.
And I don't like bending knees, and I don't like kissing rings.
I don't want to bend a knee, and I don't want to kiss a ring.
I want to come and bring the full force of what I know how to do, what's singular about me, the history that I know about how these things got screwed up.
I've been fighting this war at some level since the late...
So short of getting a laminated card with the big T on it in gold, in essence, the idea set that you're talking about and the world that you're trying to create, would you say that broadly fits within the trunk?
And I don't want to bend the knee, and I don't want to kiss the ring.
I want Americans to walk erect, and I don't want cults of personality.
I don't want to genuflect every time Elon's name gets mentioned, nor do I want to be asked, are you on the Trump train, yes or no?
Because quite honestly, I was on this train a long time before Trump ever boarded.
And this idea that a bunch of, you know, in particular, like the tech right, they just jumped on this thing four seconds ago, and now they're acting like, you know, they've been here the whole time.
It's incredibly disrespectful.
Way too much emphasis is being placed on the market.
Even free market economists know that there's certain things that the market can't do, like public goods or principal agent public, what have you.
So there's this sort of simplicity and this bravado and triumphalism that I find repellent.
But when it comes to the reforms, do I want these people to succeed?
Oh my God, you have no idea.
Do I want to help?
You have no idea.
The problem is that I don't want to do it in terms of these cults of personality.
I don't want to do it in an ugly way.
I don't want to be triumphalist.
I don't want to just stick it to people.
And there's way too much of that energy.
And I'm also going to just be very honest.
We have a situation in which anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry are tolerated by both the left and the right to get votes.
And if either of these groups would just kick out bigots, Like the Groypers or, you know, the pro-Hamas left, they could have at the middle.
And it's completely alienating that these two sides won't call out their problem.
See, I don't see the symmetry on that in that, to me, the left has been largely, and the Democrat Party largely has been overtaken by, let's say, the Hamas thing.
On the right, I don't see Trump really placating those people.
Yeah, I mean, we've discussed this for years, but I'm just not that concerned about that, and it seems to me that Trump has grabbed those people in the middle, as illustrated by, say, Bobby Kennedy and Tulsi and Rogan and me, et cetera, et cetera.
Look, I don't want this to become exclusively Jewish, but it's just, I am getting so much abuse out there from people on the right and nobody on the right stands up.
I'm just like, wow, you guys are a bunch of cowards.
You can't even stand up for your friends who you fought shoulder to shoulder with.
And in particular, I'll be entirely honest, one of the most off-putting things I ever heard in my life is that when you look at people who have been fighting the war longer than you are, and then you say, well, You know, you didn't endorse.
But the current group of people doesn't know anything about what they're destroying.
You know, the USAID stuff.
Well, that's a laundry list of weapons.
We're trying to destabilize regimes.
And now you can see that, you know, we were trying to destabilize our own people, right?
You have to ask, can I at least get a hearing with, like, what are these things?
If you just go line items, as I said, you wouldn't want to do it after October 7th if you were auditing Israel, say, why are we providing pagers, walkie-talkies, and tech support to Hezbollah?
And, you know, because that's part of, like, the secret statecraft that we were up to.
And the fact that it's cancerous, the fact that it's wasteful, the fact that it's immoral and illegal and all these sorts of things, those are very important facts.
But you do have to realize that you can't just keep saying sunlight is the best disinfectant in Vox Popula Vox a day.
So are you more, does it make you more concerned or are your feelings, let's say, moderated by the fact that so many tech bros are now involved in this because these are not, say...
I have the paper that tried to figure out how we get American business the best and the brightest without hurting.
American Capital, how it gets the best and brightest without hurting labor.
I have the history of what H-1B came from and the conspiracy between the National Science Foundation and National Academy of Sciences.
They don't know that they've got a huge problem that the CPI was directly broken by the Boskin Commission, and it uses a modified Les Pares Index called a Lowe's Index, and it's supposed to be using a seasonal path-dependent index because...
An error in the CPI affects all tax brackets and entitlements.
So the error in the CPI was supposed to be the fourth largest program after, like, defense, Medicare, and Social Security.
The error in the CPI. You know, so it's like, do you guys know how this thing works or runs?
Do you care?
Do you just want to move fast and break things?
You tell me.
If you want to move fast and break things and you want a map of where things are, I don't need a job.
I don't need to be in the administration or anything.
These guys are swinging like crazy, and they're going to do all sorts of weird stuff, and some of it's going to work, and some of it's going to be a disaster.
It's negatively skewed, which means if it goes wrong, it's a thermonuclear planet that's very fragile.
And it's got high kurtosis, which means that it's not a normal distribution.
The extremes are more likely than usual.
Put that in a sentence.
It's probably going to be a really beautiful spring day with a low probability of accuracy of the forecast and a very higher than normal but still low chance of an apocalypse.