Dave Rubin hosts a roundtable with Jillian Michaels, Sage Steele, and Russell Brand to dissect Tulsi Gabbard's confirmation hearings, where she faced "puppet" accusations regarding meetings with Assad that Michaels defends as fact-finding. The panel analyzes Kash Patel's "deep state museum" comment as theatrical exposure, debates RFK Jr.'s vaccine skepticism against Big Pharma hypocrisy, and rejects DEI blame for a Black Hawk crash caused by an incompetent controller. Finally, they evaluate Trump's immigration orders targeting sanctuary cities, contrasting Steele's security focus with Brand's data-driven caution before concluding on Selena Gomez's perceived hypocrisy. [Automatically generated summary]
You know it takes a lot to get me excited, but I am very excited about today's roundtable extravaganza because we have three absolute internet all-stars, good friends of mine.
And people who make some sense.
We've got Jillian Michaels all the way from Los Angeles.
It's early over there and she's a little upset that her hair is not exactly the way she wants it to be.
We have my good friend Sage Steele from the free state of Florida and we have the British but now Floridian Russell Brand on the other side of Florida.
And guys, before I have you chime in, I realized that we are now live against The View.
We're four people in boxes here, but there are people on this planet that are watching The View right now.
And I guess as I'm the moderator here, that makes me whoopee.
So my first question to all of you is, which member of The View are you for our purposes today?
And I want to start with some of this Senate confirmation stuff because we know, I know that all of us know some of these people.
Personally, and the circus that we saw this week was just such a perfect example of the type of politics that people are over with.
So why don't we start with Tulsi Gabbard, because she obviously is going in to be head of director of national intelligence, and she's getting hit really from both sides.
Bobby is too, which we'll get to that in a moment.
But here we go with Tulsi.
Who is just an absolute class act, explaining why she's getting attacked and why she even wants a gig that is, you could say, less than something you're going to be loved for.
Before I close, I want to warn the American people who are watching at home.
You may hear lies and smears in this hearing that will challenge my loyalty to and my love for our country.
Those who oppose my nomination imply that I am loyal to something or someone.
Other than God, my own conscience, and the Constitution of the United States, accusing me of being Trump's puppet, Putin's puppet, Assad's puppet, a guru's puppet, Modi's puppet, not recognizing the absurdity of simultaneously being the puppet of five different puppet masters.
The same tactic was used against President Trump and failed.
The American people elected President Trump with a decisive victory and mandate for change.
The fact is, what truly unsettles my political opponents is I refuse to be their puppet.
Sage, let me start with you here because first, everyone knows Tulsi is a friend of mine.
I love and adore her.
I know how much she loves this country.
You were there yesterday.
We also, just two or three months ago, we were at the MSG rally.
That Tulsi spoke at the big Trump rally, and we had dinner with her after.
This is a woman who loves this country, who was doing this all without being paid, just like you did when you were on the campaign with Trump, and to just watch them go after her in the nastiest possible ways.
I, first of all, had never been to any kind of confirmation hearing, had never been in those rooms, those buildings.
Felt sick to my stomach.
And I was just sitting there trying to support her along with some other friends and family.
I do love that opening statement that you showed.
And to me, that was the key part of it.
I thought it was really, really smart as well.
To give people a little bit of a precursor to what might be coming.
And I think that it, I wonder how much it affected some of their questions.
Because she kind of, it was a preemptive strike.
I did think that was smart.
Obviously, the headlines, I know we'll talk about it, is how they...
They crushed her.
They kept going hard on Edward Snowden.
And I'll just say this.
No matter what the topic, the question, the tone, Tulsi Gabbard is unbreakable.
You know her.
Many of us know her.
And you can't crack that woman.
So I had a view where I was able to see the monitor as well.
And you could kind of see her smirk a little bit no matter who was coming after, including the senator from Colorado, Bennett, who went through a tantrum.
She wouldn't crack, and I think that ticked them off.
That's what calmed me down, is to see her so calm.
Russell, what do you make of the fact that they're going after somebody who is a current member of our military, who was a Democrat her entire career until this last year?
She, in essence, was one of them, and now they want to paint her as an anti-American stooge or in the pocket of Assad.
In her preemptive remarks, she used the ridiculous image of a puppet that was operated by five masters.
But what's become clear over the course of these confirmation hearings is you can feel the insidious seeping influence that is behind each and every senator.
For example, Bernie Sanders seems to be...
Dreadfully opposed to onesies.
He loves those onesies.
I don't know what vested interests there are there.
So, in a way, what I feel like when I'm watching those confirmation hearings is that it's no better than something like The View.
People that are...
Paid to express particular opinions attacking in the case of both Tulsi Gabbard and Bobby Kennedy, politicians with integrity, which typically we take to be a paradoxical statement and an impossibility.
Jillian, your political evolution, which you, on this show, in this very room just a couple months ago, for the first time publicly said you were going to vote for Trump, it mirrors Tulsi's.
It kind of mirrors mine, I think a little bit of all of us to some extent, but it definitely mirrors what so many people are seeing in the country right now, that you take a moderate like Tulsi, you paint her like a maniac, and then everyone else is like, well, I guess I'm a maniac too.
I think we should address the top criticisms that they are throwing at her and why she would engage in this behavior like meeting with Bashar al-Assad.
I think that's really important because when you hear, oh, she sat down with Bashar al-Assad and she essentially said that she didn't think he was responsible and she's a Putin apologist.
People really don't know why she did this.
And I've had to take a deep dive myself just in order to defend her.
And I often thought, well, surely it's because she'd rather talk to people than fight them.
She's a combat veteran.
She's trying to find solutions for peace.
She's on fact-finding missions.
But it appears to go far deeper than that.
And my understanding of it at this moment in time is that she has seen the way I am not anti-American, but there are certain special interests that encourage the United States interventionist foreign policy and engagement in regime changes so that a select few of the extraordinarily powerful get extraordinarily rich.
And that is why she was sitting with Bashar al-Assad to try to find out.
Why the United States was encouraging a regime change there and whether or not you think that she's overly skeptical in similar ways to Bobby Kennedy, she has seen some extraordinary corruption that has cost the lives of millions.
And she talks about it with Iraq, for example.
And that is why she was there.
This is a woman who does love her country, doesn't want to see anybody suffer or die, so that a handful of powerful people become trillionaires instead of billionaires.
And I encourage everybody to do their homework.
And the last thing I'm going to say on this, if you're thinking, oh, come on now, the CIA has an NGO and it's called the National Endowment for Defense.
I actually interviewed a historian.
Who understands the way that we've participated in these regime changes.
And that's basically what these guys do, is they go in and they fund this.
And that's all I'm gonna, I'll stop there because I could go on a whole tirade about it.
But I really encourage people to take a deep dive before you make any judgments or opinions on her.
Well, it's interesting because that line of questioning went on after the intros, et cetera, for about two and a half hours.
It was so intense.
And then there was a little bit of a break, and then she had to go behind closed doors for those confidential.
I mean, the questions continued for another couple of hours.
Then everybody met up at someone else's house there on Capitol Hill.
She was in great spirits.
Her mother had flown over from Hawaii, as well as many other family members coming in from across the country.
Got to talk to her husband, Abe, who sat right in front of me there.
And I loved getting his perspective.
I said, how is she?
I did ask Tulsi as well, how are you?
And she's like, I'm actually really good.
I said, do you get to sleep?
And she said, a lot.
Yes, tonight and into today.
Last night and into today.
And real quick.
They're going to give a whole other line of questions to her later today.
And during that time, she has like 24 hours to submit the answers to all these questions.
So this is not over.
It is far from over.
She was tired, understandably so, because the process, as I understand now, to get to this point, the preparation every single day, hours and hours to get to this point of yesterday, is indescribably intense.
But it's not over yet.
She, Dave, as you know, is as calm, cool as collected as anybody I've ever been around.
She is meant for this moment and is certainly confident going forward after yesterday.
But she knew.
We all knew coming in of the three most controversial people that are nominees with Kash Patel, Bobby Kennedy, and Tulsi, she won 1A as far as the people that they say, ah.
This is going to be really tough.
She knows what she's up against, but you know what?
She's seen bigger things.
She has fought wars and represented this country in bigger ways.
Could he just answer the question if he said that the FBI headquarters, where they investigate cybercrime and terrorism, should be shut down and open as a deep state, as a museum?
Did he say that the headquarters should be shut down?
I deserve an answer to that question.
He is asking to be head of the FBI, and he said that their headquarters should be shut down.
If the best attacks on me are going to be false accusations and grotesque mischaracterizations, the only thing this body is doing is defeating the credibility of the men and women at the FBI. I stood with them here in this country.
In every theater of war we have, I was on the ground in service of this nation.
And any...
Accusations leveled against me that I would somehow put political bias before the Constitution are grotesquely unfair.
And I will have you reminded that I have been endorsed by over 300,000 law enforcement officers to become the next director of the FBI. Let's ask them.
So, Russell, as I understand it, he did kind of say that as a joke, obviously.
He's not turning it into a museum, but it illustrates a point, which is, boy, you guys have been pretty freaking corrupt, and maybe there should be a wing in this building where we look at some of that corruption.
But I just like, to me, that's a masterclass on direct, here's what I am here to do, and I'm not going to put up with this nonsense.
unidentified
Did you say, did you say that it should be a museum?
Again and again, you see people deploying rhetorical devices that if they were being deployed solely on the basis of entertainment, you'd question their credibility.
But as part of a legislative process, to see such puerility and foolishness and sort of personal grievance expressed as the part of the process of government is ridiculous.
I see them work on my friends in California all the time.
And for that reason, I have to steel man my positions.
And I did a deep dive on Kash Patel because one of the criticisms that I have lobbied at Trump is that he chooses loyalists, right?
So I thought, OK, well, is this guy not qualified?
And I spoke to John Cardillo about it, actually, who you were kind enough to introduce me to.
His experience in counterterrorism, intelligence and law enforcement has been going on for years now.
He's worked in the Department of Defense, the National Security Council and the House Intelligence Committee.
Now, I want to address one thing that Klobuchar said, where she talked about how they go after serial killers.
So this is what John just taught me.
He goes, she's talking about the behavioral sciences unit, and everybody loves these guys, and this is the to-catch-a-killer guys that you watch on your favorite Netflix show.
He goes, where there is corruption, and he said they're too powerful, they're too partisan, and there's little to no oversight, is the national security branch of the FBI. Is what Kash Patel is coming in to perform a complete overhaul upon.
And that thing colliding into itself, Russell, it reminds me of that clip that I've played on this show a zillion times of you on Bill Maher when they're asking you about MSNBC and you're like, there was no one named Joe here.
It wasn't the morning.
And it's like, it's basically just the more they get out there and do these ridiculous theatrics, the more everybody can see through it.
You're seeing the old order with its last blast of incredulity at these new people that have been voted in under a popular mandate.
It would have been ridiculous two years ago that conspiracy theorists and terror of Fauci...
Bobby Kennedy could be granted dominion over a $1.6 trillion budget.
It's outrageous, but someone like Tulsi Gabbard with her evident credibility.
When you see Tulsi on the view, it looks anomalous to see someone with pronounced and vivid credibility in that environment.
In the theatre of change, we just saw, I suppose, the epitomising moment where...
All these figures, and not everyone in the Trump administration is perfect, but some of the figures that represent the countercultural moment of MAGA meets MAHA are now under review.
And I think your analysis is correct, that there eventually had to be the kind of molecular repulsion or explosion of the two worlds meeting.
That's when people actually are forced, in many ways, to start using our brains.
I go back to that UFC fight at Madison Square Garden a week or two after the election, and that picture I thought was an iconic picture, right?
You've got Dana White there, you've got Donald Trump there, and who is the picture with?
It's with Elon Musk, Robert Kennedy, and Tulsi Gabbard.
These are people who are, like...
To say, opposing Trump at the very least, right?
So when we talk about puppets and loyalists, okay, maybe, but right there, these people that he has front and center, just a couple of months ago with RFK, were on the exact opposite side.
We're trying to bring him down.
So I do think we have to give Trump some credit for evolving and letting go of bygones, past bygones, because he doesn't have a bunch of yes men and women right now lined up with him.
And if I'm not mistaken, they'll check me on this, but Tulsi voted to impeach Trump, didn't she?
I mean, that right there tells you.
Like, wow, you people really have done this to yourselves.
Let's jump to the one that was the real fireworks, which of course was Bobby Kennedy, who has been nominated to be the head of HHS. And Russell just hit on this, but this is just a beautiful, beautiful moment.
70% of pharmaceutical profits globally come from our country, which has 4.2% of the world's population.
We're the only country that allows full-scale pharmaceutical ads on TV. And we're all being told you can make yourself, you can eat anything you want, you can smoke anything you want, you can do anything you want, and there'll be a drug to fix you in the end.
And it is not a good formula.
And our kids are getting sicker and sicker.
They're not getting better.
Nobody here.
All the people here who are defending this current system and defending these pharmaceutical industry profits, many of whom are taking huge amounts of money on the pharmaceutical industry, millions of dollars for many of these senators.
And this is not making our country healthier.
It's making us sicker.
We need to get rid of these conflicts.
We need good science and we need good leadership.
It's able to stand up to these big industries and not bend over for them.
So Tulsi voted present for the impeachment, but the point still stands.
This was not somebody that was, let's say, in bed with Trump just, you know, a couple of years ago.
Jillian, let me start with you there, because you've been on the forefront of eating right and taking care of yourself and having those tight abs for many decades now.
The fact that they have tried to make this man who is literally trying to get poison out of children's cereal into some comic book bad guy, man, you got...
You started this by saying that even us lot are all in some way or another associated with the left and one by one are either taken out by the left or leave the left.
And all of us are, all of us surely think, how come when Bobby Kennedy joined that movement, the legacy media didn't say, well, this can't be that crazy right-wing Confederate flag.
I hate everybody, homophobic Trump movement that we're claiming is tiki-torching its way to power.
Because now this dude who takes on big corporations, who takes bold stands on pharmaceuticals, on autism, a man who by any merit is a kind of hero, even if that was just by the merit of his surname.
When the legacy media didn't address that, that's when you know that they're kind of amplifying points that are relevant and ignoring points that would detract from their argument.
Sage, I mean, as someone that stepped through the fire yourself, career-wise and everything else because of, you know, going through the COVID nonsense and BLM nonsense and everything you had to do with ESPN, I mean, you watch somebody like Bobby and then hearing what Russell just said right there, it's like, that's what we need more of.
And somehow they've framed it that this guy is a conspiracy theorist.
That was the phrase that they said more than anything else yesterday.
This, and this is what I was thinking while watching him the last couple of days, this is why people stay silent.
This is why they just say, you know what, forget it.
This is why you don't come out of the closet when you're a Republican or a conservative and you're a member of the media.
This is exactly why.
I think, and I know that it's tough, right, when somebody's been a lifelong Democrat, especially with the last name Kennedy of all last names, and then there's a switch.
Like, I get why the family members would be upset.
I understand that.
To choose to go to the levels that they have gone to to try to crush him, I think it speaks volumes about them, the entire family, frankly, but also as a society.
And I want to point out, we talked about evolving.
Donald Trump has been at the forefront of that and he even talked on Joe Rogan's podcast about how he has evolved and he has changed and he's doing things differently this time around, right?
With the type of people he chooses for the cabinet, whether or not he vets them in a different way and doesn't stay as loyal to people.
I think we've got to give people credit for evolving and changing and learning and acknowledging it.
When RFK Jr. came on my podcast last summer, he talked for 20 straight minutes about his heroin addiction and how that That changed his life.
The vulnerability to say, yes, I made these mistakes.
I'm better now in whatever way, personally or as a politician.
And one final thing, RFK is just like Donald Trump.
He doesn't need this crap.
Why?
Donald Trump, RFK, they've got how many millions and billions in the bank.
They could be in their chateaus and the golf courses and all the different places.
I believe, even though I don't agree with everything RFK says, and Donald Trump either, but I believe the love of country for Bobby, the love of human beings and trying to make us healthier, that is what's leading here.
Let's not forget, it would have been easier and maybe smarter for them to just stay silent, but they have chosen not to, and we've got to commend them for that.
Let me ask you guys, I want to ask you the same question we can hit kind of quickly before we move on on this, which is, I think the other part of this that was bothering me was just the lack of curiosity by everyone that was questioning him.
Like, shouldn't you be a little curious what we did during COVID, or why did we do some of these things, or what the vaccine schedule should be for kids?
It's not just like, oh...
It's too easy to say, oh, you're just sold out so you don't care.
It's just like an intellectual lack of curiosity that really bothers me with these people, Jillian.
I do think it's important to play devil's advocate here because some of the things they throw at this guy sound insane.
And if we're going to be honest, he's eccentric.
And in some cases, he can be overly skeptical.
But right now, we have a system that says everything is safe until it's proven unsafe.
He tends to err on, it's unsafe until it's proven safe.
And if I could simply use this example that I've used a million times before, and you saw Rand Paul talking about it, this would be the hepatitis B vaccine.
This is a perfect illustration of what Bobby Kennedy is talking about.
And also, let me say, he has promised not to take away anyone's vaccines.
Never once has he said he's going to do that.
He is...
For the MMR vaccine for measles, yet they mentioned measles like 25 times.
It didn't mention type 2 diabetes, obesity, heart disease, cancer that is on the rise by 79% of people 18 to 49. Okay, now then, hepatitis B. This is a disease that is passed on through intravenous drug use and risky sex.
They give this shot to a newborn baby, okay?
Is a newborn engaging in those behaviors?
No.
Okay, then why do it?
Well, the mother could have hepatitis B. Can you test the mother for it before you vaccinate the child?
Yes.
Well, then why are you giving it to the baby?
Still, why is it on the schedule?
Here's the answer.
That's not science.
It's a billion-dollar business when you get a vaccine on the schedule.
And now that the drug companies, which are essentially criminal cartels, period, end of story, quite literally.
They have paid billions out in fines for criminal offenses.
When you give them no downstream consequences, do you actually trust them?
And the last thing I'm going to say on this, and this should really freak you out, is that when you look at this robust safety testing, let's look at hepatitis B, okay?
They monitored these kids, 434 doses of vaccines that they gave in three studies to 170, I think, three children.
They monitor them for five days after each injection for adverse events.
Does that sound like gold standard safety and research to you?
I was curious about her thoughts on the terrorist attack in New Orleans.
I'm heading to New Orleans in a couple of days for the Super Bowl.
You know, tragically, the plane crash happened the night before.
I landed at that airport 10 minutes prior to the tragic crash.
I want to know what would her role be in something like that.
It's all relevant as DNI. So yes, let's go hard on some of the Snowden questions, but I think for the overall American public, let's see what these nominees would do in these very real situations.
There was none of that because they were just trying to create internet moments and be sexy with their, and then pile on.
Let's just be more thorough.
To me, it was very disappointing to not tee up the most obvious issues that have affected our country, have been, and probably still will.
Yeah, well, you gave me a perfect segue to the next portion here, which is this horrific crash.
So a Blackhawk, everyone knows this already, of course, but a Blackhawk helicopter crashed into a commercial airliner over the Potomac River outside of DCA Airport.
We're going to get to that in one second, but first, Rumble Premium.
As you guys know, the war against free speech is in full swing.
Rumble, a leader in defending this fundamental human right, has taken a bold stand.
Recently, they joined forces with X to sue a cartel of advertisers and ad agencies who conspired to block ad revenue from platforms like Rumble.
Even Dunkin' Donuts refused to advertise on Rumble, citing so-called right-wing culture.
To push back and rally support, Rumble has launched Rumble Premium, an ad-viewing experience packed with perks for both viewers and creators.
By upgrading to Rumble Premium, you're not just enhancing your experience, you're actively supporting the fight for free speech.
Now's the time to join the movement.
Rumble's offering $10 off when you purchase an annual subscription.
Just go to rumble.com slash premium slash Rubin and use promo code Rubin.
Like I said, if you have the means and believe in the cause, now's the time to act.
And if you don't, we're just grateful to have you watching us right here on Rumble.
All right, so let's take a look at two new angles of the plane crash, and then we'll get into some of the specifics.
unidentified
These videos obtained exclusively by CNN show previously unseen angles of the collision between an American Airlines flight and a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter.
In the first video, the Black Hawk can be seen flying at speed over the Potomac from the left side of the screen.
The American Airlines plane can be seen flying towards the airport before the two collide causing a mid-air explosion and fall into the river.
In a second video you can see the Army helicopter and American Airlines plane travel toward each other.
After the collision and subsequent explosion the airliner can be seen spinning into the water and the Black Hawk is also seen falling into the water.
I actually did do some research on it, because if I could push back on this one thing, I do not like throwing out DEI all the time.
I think this is a mistake that the Republicans are engaging in, and it's going to alienate people.
Because every time there's a disaster, if you're like, ah, DEI, then what Democrats hear is that you're saying a person of color or a gay person or a woman is responsible for this, and they push back.
Went down a rabbit hole to kind of find out what happened.
We have no idea who the air traffic controller was.
Nobody knows right now.
It's a man.
We can tell by the voice.
Sounds like a white guy, not to stereotype, but, you know, sounds a bit nasally, kind of like a white guy.
unidentified
No offense to everybody, but it doesn't sound like a brother.
It's certainly not a woman and not a trans person.
Saying DEI, people automatically are going to think a person of color is somebody gay.
If it's an inclusion piece and it has to do with mental illness, I guess there was something that suggested that you could have limitations with regard to your mental abilities.
That is outrageous and should not happen.
Obviously, the focus in cases where safety is involved should always absolutely be merit.
And not, you know, your orientation or the color of your skin or your gender.
But there's no question that the air traffic controller was utterly incompetent.
And if I could run down a few of the things that I ended up learning, number one, the air traffic controller should have given the helicopter very specific instructions.
You know, drop down a thousand feet or very specific in the way that they communicate instruction.
Not, hey, just swoop around behind the back.
When the helicopter didn't answer the second time, they should have automatically established a connection between the American Airlines plane as well as the Blackhawk helicopter.
We do know that they were understaffed, and this is a problem that's been going on for a long time.
There should have been two people in the air traffic control room.
There was only one.
But there are just a host of things that could have and should have been differently by air traffic control.
I think it's a mistake to blame it on DEI. This is just a person that is frighteningly bad at their job and many people lost their lives because of it.
I'm going to show you a video now of Trump talking about DEI as it relates to this.
And I'm actually with him on the sort of meta version of this, which is I don't know that this had anything to do with DEI. And as you said, we don't know the person's skin color or sexual orientation or anything else.
But over time, if you just hire people, which we know the government was doing, based on those attributes, you will degrade systems over time.
That may not be applicable to this, but here's Trump on that.
I do want to point out that various articles that appeared prior to my entering office, and here's one.
The FAA's diversity push includes focus on hiring people with severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities.
That is amazing.
And then it says, FAA says people with severe disabilities are most underrepresented segment of the workforce, and they want them in and they want them — they can be air traffic controllers.
I don't think so.
This was on January 14th, so that was — A week before I entered office, they put a big push to put diversity into the FAA's program.
The FAA, which is overseen by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, a real winner.
That guy's a real winner.
Do you know how badly everything's run since he's run the Department of Transportation?
He's a disaster.
He was a disaster as a mayor.
He ran his...
He's sitting into the ground, and he's a disaster now.
Russell, I want you to chime in on this because I don't, in principle, I don't disagree with you that there should be respect for the people that are mourning.
And obviously, if there are people that are still down there, we want to wait.
The problem is we move so fast in the news cycle that by next week to start bringing this up as it pertains to this crash, we're on to 10 other stories.
So it's sort of like it's a speed issue, I guess I would say.
It shows that there's such a total lack of trust in any event that we're incapable of not politicising it or seeing it as potentially being rendered inaccurately.
So it's, I suppose, and you're right, if you don't immediately...
Analyze it at a molecular level.
You know you've got 48 hours before the blizzard of the news cycle has roared onwards.
So I can see that there's almost a requirement that everything gets picked apart immediately in order to find some meaning or a deeper demonstration of ineptitude.
But when you actually watch an explosion happen, and as Sage says, recognise that there are actual...
As yet unclaimed dead bodies shows that we've got a very warped understanding of how we're even supposed to react to tragedy.
Well, whether we all agree on it or not, clearly that wasn't what Trump, and let me show you this video of J.D. Vance, who also spoke at the press conference, was talking about.
Something the president said that I think bears reemphasizing, which is that when you don't have the best standards in who you're hiring, it means, on the one hand, you're not getting the best people in government.
But on the other hand, it puts stresses on the people who are already there.
And I think that is a core part of what President Trump is going to bring and has already brought to Washington, D.C., is we want to hire the best people because we want the best people at air traffic control, and we want to make sure we have enough people at air traffic control who are actually competent to do the job.
If you go back to just some of the headlines over the past 10 years, you have many hundreds of people suing the government because they would like to be air traffic controllers, but they were turned away because of the color.
That policy ends under Donald Trump's leadership because safety is the first priority of our aviation industry.
All right, so I don't think we have to belabor the point about whether that was the right time to talk about it or not, but I would say I think we probably all at least agree on that it's refreshing hearing the desire for competency again in government, right?
Ah, now we know how you got asylum in the United States.
All right.
Well, actually, let's just hit one more thing, because obviously the real story since the Trump presidency has kicked in has been all about immigration.
And then, of course, Selena Gomez, which is the bigger, bigger than anything that we can possibly imagine.
Let me read something from Forbes.
Trump said he will sign an executive order instructing the departments of defense.
Homeland Security to construct a facility capable of holding 30,000 deported migrants at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base as immigration officials have made approximately 6,000 arrests since Trump took office, including about 1,000 on Wednesday, straining Homeland Security's network of detention facilities that were already nearing capacity before the Trump administration ramped up arrests.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement said it arrested 1,179 people on Monday.
The largest figure since Trump took office compared to 308 arrests on Trump's first full day in office and 282 arrests per day in September before Trump took over.
Trump at a conference for House Republicans in Miami said he wants people who have been arrested many, many times to get the hell out of our country, suggesting he could pay foreign countries a small fee for them to maintain American prisoners so the US could cut spending on government owned and private prisons. suggesting he could pay foreign countries a small fee for The Trump administration is reportedly aiming to make examples of sanctuary cities, which have policies not to cooperate with the federal government on immigration enforcement by conducting mass arrests there first.
According to the Wall Street Journal, NBC lists Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, Denver, and D.C. as possible early targets.
Cities with large immigration shelter systems including Los Angeles, Denver, and Miami are also targets, the Journal reported.
Sage, I mean, this is what he was elected to do, and he's doing it.
I know the media is not happy about it, but here we are.
When so many people come after me and it's like, how can you support them?
First and foremost, national security, which to me begins at the border.
That is the most obvious answer right now.
And listen, is it perfect?
No, of course not.
There's no way to make it perfect and satisfactory for everybody when there are between, what, 10 and 20 million illegals here.
Yes, you do your best to go after the most dangerous ones first, but this is what happens when you are so careless over the last four years.
I say whatever it takes, whatever funds we need to spend, because inevitably it will still be less than the funding that it takes to keep illegals here.
And let me just remind you.
Illegal, illegal, illegal.
Do we need to define this for people?
They are here illegally and taking away from others, men, women, children, veterans, etc.
Do whatever it takes.
That is the reason why, Dave, I began my love affair with Donald Trump is because I knew that he was literally going to make us safer again.
I don't care what the sanctuary cities say.
And actually, if you look at that, and I'll be quiet after this.
More and more, we're seeing videos of people, especially in the city of Chicago, and residents are saying, hell no, enough.
You're giving money to them.
What about us?
What about our children?
The schools are suffering.
And the funding issues that go super deep within the school districts, and they're not getting enough money unless they keep the enrollment numbers up.
But everybody's taking their kids out.
They're American citizens.
How do they keep the numbers up?
They bring illegal kids in there.
To continue to receive those funds.
It goes so deep.
I love what he's doing and I'm a very empathetic person.
You have to treat this as a business and that is what he and his administration are doing.
Jillian, you're talking with three people who live in the free state of Florida where we abide by laws and we are not a sanctuary state.
We have no sanctuary cities, although there is a little bit of a fight right now between DeSantis and the legislature as far as how they're gonna do deportations.
I have so many different feelings about this, and I know a little bit about it.
First, if we could just address Selena Gomez.
She is open about having mental health issues.
She is bipolar.
It is clear that she is obviously in the middle of something that is far bigger for her than immigration and deportation.
And if I could simply point out that Bill Clinton deported 12 million people.
Obama deported three million people and those were Obama's cages.
Where's the outrage?
And this is when I suggest that The left left me.
The left was never the party for illegal immigration.
I do believe in legal immigration, and I think that immigrants will help stimulate the workforce.
And we have the baby boomer generation that is living for a really long time.
It's a huge generation.
All of these different social programs that are going to go bankrupt if we don't start having more bodies paying into them.
And there are people far more intelligent than me that explain why we need migrants.
They should be properly vetted, and they should be supporting their host community in the way that they come in and the work that they do here, not draining, taking away from it.
And last thing I'll say is that I had interviewed Brandon Judd, who ran the border, and he told me he thinks roughly 14 million people came in over the past four years.
And if 1% of those 14 million are bad guys, You got 140,000 bad guys.
And that's just not a risk we can take.
So, again, I'm going to have to lean into what Sage is saying, that safety comes first.
Putting the taxpaying American citizens first is imperative.
And then once you've done that, you can circle back around and figure out how to facilitate legal migration so it serves the American people.
When there's a mandate to control a border and then immediately and urgently border controls are implemented, that is an indication of a functioning democracy.
It seems that that issue is only not prioritized when there isn't a political party that will significantly represent the interests of those who see border control and sovereignty as an issue.
So in my country, we're on a kind of slightly different timeline in a parallel world where the judiciary is being subverted.
But what is true is only the stories get amplified that are beneficial to the interests of the powerful.
As Gillian was just saying, migration figures or deportation figures or border controls weren't alarmingly different under Obama and Clinton.
So I suppose all of us that have any kind of public profile have to be careful that we're just sort of not used like a kind of an instrument of emotion in the way that appears that Selena Gomez has been, whose sort of understandable feelings of compassion and outrage and...
Pain can just be sort of amplified and utilized in order to tell a very particular story.
Seems like in a way migration being acted upon on the basis of a mandate is generally positive.
To show that again, because she deleted it, it turns out that her father, I guess, was Mexican who abandoned her.
She's American.
It was just like a litany of stuff, and then the way the mob comes after everybody and everything else.
But Sage, I guess that's the challenge for all of us.
If we're going to deal with this issue, it's going to be messy at times because they're going to catch some people who aren't, let's say, they might be illegals, but they are not doing criminal activity here in the States and they've been here for a while and families.
This is going to be tough.
It's one thing right out of the gate, but it's going to lead to a whole bunch of other stuff.
She needs to be mad at the former border czar Kamala Harris.
She needs to be mad at Joe Biden for allowing this to happen in the first place in a way that was not even good living conditions for these people who are coming to these sanctuary cities.
We've all been there.
New York City, I mean, I'm shocked at the change and everybody is suffering, including the illegals.
My issue, Ms. Selena, and others who are acting like that, acting, Did you cry?
Did you make a social media post when that woman was burned on the New York City subway by an illegal?
Just living my best redneck Riviera life out in my Ram Longhorn, having cookouts, shooting, fishing, just all American activities in the sweet name of old glory.