Top Pentagon Brass Cheers Tucker Carlson's Ouster...Soldiers Not So Much
It speaks volumes about Pentagon leadership that they are, according to Politico, celebrating the end of the Tucker Carlson news program. Tucker railed against the "woke" absurdities of "leaders" like Gen Milley and they hated him for it. But he was extremely popular among those expected to actually do the fighting. Wonder why they can't meet recruiting goals? Also today, Congress looks to pass bill to ensure Ukraine victory. Finally: Fauci blames science for his own Covid failures.
It speaks volumes about Pentagon leadership that they are, according to Politico, celebrating the end of the Tucker Carlson news program. Tucker railed against the "woke" absurdities of "leaders" like Gen Milley and they hated him for it. But he was extremely popular among those expected to actually do the fighting. Wonder why they can't meet recruiting goals? Also today, Congress looks to pass bill to ensure Ukraine victory. Finally: Fauci blames science for his own Covid failures.
Hello, everybody, and thank you for tuning in to the Liberty Report.
With us today is Daniel McAdams, our co-host.
Daniel, good to see you this morning.
Good morning, Dr. Paul.
How are you this morning?
Doing well, doing well.
We have a couple things to go over before we can retire and say everything's fine now.
All the warmongers have disappeared.
Now we are going to have peace in our time.
But there's a few things going on that seems to be leading us to the perpetual wars forever.
But there's a little war going on, you know, within the big wars and the little war, which evolved and came about last week.
It was over Tucker Carlson.
And that's going.
You know, there's a lot more news about it and what was happening behind the scenes.
You know, the one thing was, you know, it was probably out, but I didn't catch me.
But he didn't know anything until 10 minutes before.
That doesn't say much about the people he worked for, I guess.
There's such a thing as courtesy even when you have to fire somebody.
But there were some people that were very, very happy to see him go.
AOC was happy.
She made a video and she was just giddy.
Oh, yeah.
Well, I imagine they're doing that at Boeing and a few other military industrial complex places.
So they're happy to see him go.
DOD people, admittedly, thought so, even though they were part of the problem leading up to the conflict on what to do, because they admitted, it looks like we can't ever win this war.
And they know that, and yet they're still doing the war, the warmongering.
And I think this is interesting that just the last week or so, we had an announcement by RFK to run for president.
And boy, there's an outburst.
Oh, he, you know, it's sad that he's from this family and they've had their problems.
But boy, does the establishment hate his guts.
Not only the military industrial complex, but the pharmaceutical industrial complex.
So here they go.
They get rid of, it's not so much they're all in one category, but they're in the category of being anti-war.
And therefore, they hit two of them this week.
RFK, they're really hitting hard, and they say he's over with.
There's no way, you know, he can do much good.
Of course, we think there's a lot of ways he can have a lot of influence and how the politics pans out.
There's nobody knows exactly on that.
But also, the next day, they thought, well, boy, are they excited now because the mouthpiece who was really reaching a lot of people and talking to a lot of people and certainly adhered to a lot of the things that we believe in that you have to be honest up front and admit some of the things that are going wrong.
And the more I read about some of his programs, he was not bashful.
He was willing to take on everybody, and that probably aggravated him.
In a way, that's sort of the attitude about Trump.
He takes on anybody, and nothing is sacred.
And he gets people, it's a different subject, but I think the attitudes were the same.
But Trump let him have it where everybody else said it, but they didn't want to say it out loud.
So anyway, I think it's a bad story.
Hopefully some good will come from it.
I can't imagine Tucker just fading away and you never hearing about him.
And I believe that he believes the principles that he had talked about for so many years.
Yeah, I mean, I think it says everything you need to say about America's foreign policy and who runs foreign policy.
And put that first clip up, please.
And this is a politico piece.
I think it says everything you need to know.
that the top brass at the Pentagon are cheering his departure.
If we have that first clip up there, there we go.
This is from Politico.
Good riddance.
Political Pentagon officials cheer Tucker Carlson's ouster.
The former Fox host ridiculed top DOD leaders over Biden-era policies.
Now, that's one thing they can't stand, Dr. Paul.
You know, they never win wars, but they get awfully angry if you remind them of that.
They've got all sorts of other things in place that are way more important than winning wars, the woke agenda and all this stuff.
So they're furious.
And we know through our discussions with Colonel McGregor how politicized the military is, the top brass of the military.
They don't focus on winning wars.
They focus on social issues.
And they also focus on something else, which I know you know very well.
Once they retire, these generals, they do one of two things.
Either they become top contributors at CNN and all of these places, all the spooks, all the top Pentagon people, or they go and work for the military-industrial complex, which produces things for a military that never wins war.
So either way, that top brass is looking out for the next tier when they start to really make the big bucks.
So having someone like Tucker Carlson with a huge audience ridiculing everything about them that weakens our country, really, and makes us incapable of fighting wars, that makes them furious.
And I think that's why they're so thrilled that he's gone, that thorn in their side.
You know, the establishment sometimes, they have the power and the money, and it looks like they have absolute control.
But there's evidence that they're not so smart.
And I think that last week's episode of the elitists came out and said that they were going to change the way they were going to advertise Bud Light.
And it turned out that they were completely wrong.
I think they were caught off guard, and the people were way ahead of them versus the elite who had all the money and the power.
I'm not even sure anybody got fired over that.
But that's sort of the way the people reacted to Tucker.
You know, the money people, they wanted to look like the politicians and the money people and everybody just hate his guts.
They probably do.
But the people loved it.
The vote for this.
You know, if you're going to, I talk about two types of democracy.
One where they take over the government and you become the dictatorship of the majority versus democracy in the marketplace.
So what was the market saying about Tucker?
They were voting for Tucker and all his positions he was taking.
And that's what drives people.
That's what drives the establishment nuts, you know, because they've gotten away with it for so long, even before they even talked about the military-industrial complex.
You know, it's been known throughout our history, really, especially since the beginning of the last century, or in the last century, that people recognize that the business people were always behind it, behind all the spending.
Yeah.
Well, here's an example of what the establishment thinks about him.
Let's put on this next.
This is a tweet from Max Boot, who, you know, is the top neocon, at least in his own mind, but he's definitely a neocon.
He's got his Ukraine flag up there.
And he quotes someone from the Politico article.
We're a better country without him bagging on our military every night in front of hundreds of thousands of people, said one senior DOD official.
Now, a couple corrections, not hundreds of thousands, millions of people every night.
And he's not bagging on the military.
He's bagging on the perfume princes who run the Pentagon.
And that's a huge difference.
But what does this tell you about these top officials, Dr. Paul?
The fact that the Pentagon, which is supposed to be apolitical, is cheering the silencing of a voice in American dialogue.
Actually, it's very anti-American to cheer the fact that one of your voices has been silenced, even if it's an opposition voice.
They don't want to have a competitive battle of ideas.
They want to shut everyone up who doesn't think like they do.
If we can put, here's a couple of quotes from that piece, the political piece.
If we can put that next one on, this lays up the bill of particulars for why Tucker Carlson was so unpopular with the top brass.
From military flight suits to diversity policies to Ukraine aid, the military was a favorite punching bag for Tucker Carlson.
And I would say military leadership.
That's key.
Now that he's off the air, some Pentagon officials are quietly cheering his departure.
Now, this is the part that's interesting.
Carlson's criticism of Biden-era personnel policies appealed to many of the rank and file, which has a large block of conservative members.
But at the upper echelon levels of the Defense Department, news of Carlson's firing on Fox News on Monday was met with delight and outright glee in some corners.
And Politico is doing a bit of a disservice because they're not making enough of a distinction between the politicized high leadership and the massive rank and file who are the ones that are going to bleed on the battlefield.
Yeah, and there's a couple areas where you can talk about the upper end, you know, in the financial area and who's making money off it.
But the upper end of the political parties, too, you know, they get together so often on this foreign policy, but they're looking forward to the future.
They too might get a job, just like a general might get a job as well.
And we have another example today that sort of interests me because they get together on big things and the military is the one thing, but they have to, you know, even when I made our, I consider a modest attempt to try to prevent some of the things going on in the Middle East, it wasn't like they gave me nice coverage.
Remember the one day, I think it started off by, the first thing we do is we cancel my appearance at the debate.
Oh, he's going to talk about non-intervention foreign policy.
And we know that's wrong.
That's unseemly.
It's unconstitutional not to defend your country.
Anyway, that's a little old history.
Well, if you do the next one, here's something that he said.
And he said many things in the show.
He criticized many things about Biden's military leadership.
And here's Tucker.
He says, so we've got new hairstyles and maternity flight suits.
Pregnant women are going to win and fight our wars.
It's a mockery of the U.S. military, he said.
And then that's when Kirby, you know, the spokesman for the National Security Council, a guy who is really one of my least favorite people on earth, Kirby fought back and he said, what we absolutely won't do is take personnel advice from a talk show host or the Chinese military in his typical dumb fashion because the Chinese military had nothing to do with it.
But I wanted to add this other thing, Dr. Paul, to what we're saying, because this whole thing that we're seeing is a military brass top people.
Well, the perfume prince is furious that Trucker pointed out all of their shortcomings, let's put it that way, to them.
But the other thing is at the same time that the military cannot meet its recruiting goals.
And here's an opinion piece from the Epoch Times.
If we can put this next one up, I think that addresses that perfectly, and it dovetails exactly what we're saying here.
It's can a woke military win wars.
And it's an interesting op-ed piece.
And I'm going to just do a couple of things from it, Dr. Paul, if you'll indulge me, because if you don't mind putting that next one up, this is what he's taking a point, and it's very, very important.
For a couple of years now, the U.S. military has had a serious recruitment problem.
This really isn't a surprise.
Our leaders have injected the entire menu of radical woke ideology into the issues of the military, into the tissues of the military establishment.
General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, worries about, quote, white rage and supports teaching critical race theory to the troops.
When Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin took office under Joe Biden, he issued a 60-day standdown order on the entire military in pursuit of battling extremism and achieving equity in the military.
And if we could do the next one, this is the last one on this, and this is like why they can't attract people.
In March 22, the Biden administration announced a new policy under which people suffering from gender dysphoria would not only be allowed to serve in the military, but would also have their gender reassignment surgery paid for by taxpayers.
And this is the last thing that's important.
Traditionally, conservative families, especially conservative working-class families, supplied a large percentage of military recruits.
Those families aren't thrilled by the intrusion of such politically correct sentiments into an institution hitherto marked by its commitment to traditional moral and martial values.
They aren't interested in sending their children to be catechized by American Marxists or apostles of sexual erotica.
So that's an intermedi point.
So on the one hand, you got the woke military.
Nobody wants to join it.
You know, isn't there a slogan or something they use in advertisement?
Join all you can be.
That used to be.
Now they don't believe that anymore.
You mean truth won out, and that's why the people aren't joining up.
So that is where we are.
Amazing Resolution Victory00:14:44
But I think that this is something that is amazing, and hopefully it'll turn people around and say enough of a interesting because Tucker's going to still be a leader.
He can't fade away, you know, no matter what they do.
You know, old talk shows just don't fade away.
So we'll see what happens.
But it's good to see those guys squirming, but you know, most of their activity is behind the scenes and it's sinister.
It's firing people and it doesn't get out in the open like this.
So I think a lot of people are going to say, hey, this is really a mess.
They've gone too far.
And, you know, even the people who might think that I don't have the right foreign policy might say that, well, you know, the foreign policy we have isn't the right foreign policy either.
And I think we've had some guidelines with a proper foreign policy.
And there's people out there and they've been in government and they will provide that.
But that's really a motivation behind here because it's interesting to me because, you know, the incident with RFK, when I think of the 1960s, how horrible that was.
And now we come along and there are several things with Tucker, but I will continue to believe that his position on foreign policy and the military and a war was probably the big one.
Yeah, for the most part, he was good on it.
But, you know, there's always this support to military.
And I know when you were running, the top military brass and the retired military brass did not like you at all.
However, as we know, and as is legendary, the rank and file loved you.
And in fact, even with their low salaries, they gave you the most money of any candidate.
So that just goes to show that when you have that kind of disconnect between the political leadership of the military and the people that are fighting the wars, I think that's dangerous.
But they don't obviously think so because they want to fight Russia and China at the same time.
So I don't know how they're going to do that.
But speaking of comical issues, let's put up that next clip because you noticed this this morning and sent it over to me.
We both got a good laugh.
House resolution would declare U.S. policy is to seek Ukrainian victory.
And this was introduced by none other than our favorite Representative Joe Wilson, who not long ago introduced a resolution to put a huge bust of Zelensky permanently in the capital.
But now he wants to put in a resolution affirming that our goals are victory for Ukraine.
I'm sure that'll do it.
Yeah, that sure will.
And he has a co-sponsor.
Oh, okay.
Good.
It's bipartisan, Cohen.
So Stephen, I think his name is.
Oh, yeah.
So they get together and show that we're coming together on this, and that's what the people want, bipartisanship.
And of course, I've criticized that in the past.
We want cooperation on issues that are correct and constitutional.
Yes, bringing people together, but not to put this pressure on only political shenanigans go on.
Well, we're coming together.
And of course, you're going to hear a lot of that when they come up with a solution about raising the debt limit.
They always raise the debt limit.
And I saw the other day one bank was in trouble and it borrowed for the Fed $100 billion.
We should try that.
Why do people say $100 billion?
And it's tiding them over, and they'll do whatever they need.
Where do they get the authority to?
Oh, the Fed defends the authority.
The members of Congress don't vote on this.
They don't even think about it.
And they're delighted that the banking crisis has been calmed down for another week.
So that to me is positively amazing.
But it will be bipartisan when they deal with this deficit and a war.
But we would like to encourage more people to be independent-minded.
And if they get a position where somebody will listen to you, you can present your ideas.
And somebody like Tucker, like we say, he wasn't with us on all the issues, but he was accomplishing a whole lot.
And made people stop and think.
That's why I'm very interested in RFK.
Because if you see an RFK saying the same things that a person like Tucker is saying, you don't say, well, each one gave up all their beliefs.
It would be that some of their beliefs crossed each other and they come together.
You know, the pharmaceuticals for that reason.
So what we want to get more people to join in rather than getting more people to join in because they've sacrificed what they believe in, but join in because they agree on certain issues.
Yes, absolutely.
Well, with this whole resolution of Joe Wilson, I have to say he's not the smartest guy, but that doesn't say much.
So all of our military equipment we sent over there is failing.
All of the billions we've shipped over there is failing.
So they've come up with a final idea.
We're going to win this war by passing a resolution.
And this resolution affirms that it's the policy of the United States to see Ukraine victorious against the invasion and restored to its internationally recognized 1991 borders.
They may as well pass a resolution, Dr. Paul, to give everyone a nice shiny rainbow unicorn in the U.S. because that will have about as much effect.
But if you go to the next clip, this tells you everything you need to know about congressional staffers.
And I can say this with direct knowledge as a former staffer.
This is from the same article.
A congressional staffer who supports the resolution told Yahoo that the bill, quote, demonstrates the wide support in Congress for Ukrainian victory.
We all need to move beyond as long as it takes and embrace Ukraine victory as our rallying cry in order for Ukraine to win the war this year.
I would suggest to this young staffer, and my guess is it is a young staffer, that if he or she wants to ensure Ukraine's victory, he or she could do more than sitting in Congress talking about resolutions.
I'm sure there are plenty of spots in the front line.
I can state this, even though I don't have proof of this, but I'd be willing to bet a couple dollars that she doesn't work for Thomas Max.
Yeah, yeah, I guess.
So that represents, of course, the boss's position.
And that's how most of them get their jobs.
Yeah.
Absolutely.
Well, we'll see.
The thing is, we were talking about before the show, as really dumb as this resolution is, I think it could pass.
Do you think?
I don't want to think about that.
That's too bad.
No, that is.
That is always possible because it might be seen as a sign of a weak approach to foreign policy.
You know, you don't want to, how are you ever going to confront China if you're not willing to sign on a resolutions like this?
We have to do this.
No, I really hope you're wrong on that possibility.
But that is a possibility, I guess.
Well, the final thing that we want to talk about a little bit is our old friend and foe, Anthony Fauci.
He went over to the New York Times, Dr. Paul, and gave an extensive interview.
He explained everything.
I feel bad that we were so critical of him all this time because he's really just a good guy.
And ultimately, we have some things from the interview.
But ultimately, the problem was he blamed us, but he also blamed science.
So even though he is the science, the science was the problem.
Yeah, they have a habit of doing that.
And they continue to do this.
You know, this whole thing about masks and everything.
There's some people you think, well, they would give up.
They should be embarrassed.
But, you know, a nihilist never gets embarrassed and they never have guilt and they never have shame because they work with an assumption that most everybody else who criticizes them, they don't know what they're talking about, and only they know what to talk about because they have the license to lie.
They really do.
And that's hard to understand.
But it took me a while to believe that could be true.
Then I got to thinking about how we got into wars.
You know, when I read in the early years, the history of how FDR maneuvered us into war, I considered that a treasonous statement.
It's no possible.
There's no way they could do that.
But when you read the details and then you see their justification and rationalization, oh, this is the best thing to do because we'll save lives by doing that.
And they'll rationalize this.
But that to me is so bad because they literally justify deceiving the people, lying and disobeying the Constitution.
They have no meaning whatsoever.
And that's why we have a struggle because I think most of the people would just assume that the members of Congress take their oath of office seriously.
But that's not the way it is.
No, unfortunately.
Well, let's put up this next clip.
This is Fox News.
This is a tweet from Fox News about the interview that Fauci gave.
Go back one if we can, please.
Fauci, back back.
There we go.
Fauci absolves himself of responsibility for lockdowns in testing new interview.
Show me a school that I shut down.
And if we do this next one, this is a quote from the New York Times interview.
He says, this is Fauci talking.
Certainly there could have been a better understanding of why people were emphasizing the economy.
But when people say Fauci shut down the economy, it wasn't Fauci.
I love how he talks about himself in the third person, you know, like he's God or a king or something.
It wasn't Fauci.
The CDC was the organization that made these recommendations.
It wasn't me.
It was the CDC.
It was Walensky.
I happen to be perceived as the personification of the recommendations.
It's so self-aggrandizing.
But show me a school that I shut down and show me a factory that I shut down.
Never.
I never did.
I gave a public health recommendation that echoed the CDC's recommendation.
And people made a decision based on that.
And this is the thing that gets me, but I never criticized the people who had to make these decisions one way or the other.
That's a bold-faced lie.
It sort of reminds me of how they curtailed First Amendment rights.
You know, the social media cooperated with the business community.
The business community works with social media.
And social media does the canceling.
But at that behest of the FBI and other people.
And I got to thinking, well, why that's convenient for them is because all libertarians like to think it through.
Well, if it's your personal house or your personal business or your personal opinion and your personal newspaper, that you don't want to immediately start regulating.
And there's a lot of that going on right now.
Some of them want to prohibit the use.
But that to me is amazing that they can turn it around and what would the government say?
We didn't do it.
We didn't regulate any First Amendment.
We're just a little sneaky about it.
We know how to do this and not get blamed.
And I think Bauci believes that's a matter of fact, I think they think that's pretty smart.
Yeah, yeah.
Look at what we've done.
I just hope that he finally wakes up and say, well, some morning, you know, maybe it wasn't so smart.
Yeah, maybe he will.
But punishment will not come to him in this life.
Probably if you did a search of our shows during the pandemic, I hate even calling it that, during the virus, and searched for Fauci and flip-flop.
We probably have 15 episodes, right?
But he claims that he never changed.
He never flip-flop.
But here's another bombshell that come out of this interview, if you can put this up.
I mean, this is just ridiculous.
So this is Fauci saying, it's a good point in general, but I disagree with you permanently.
Listen to this.
From a broad public health standpoint, at the population level, masks work and the margins, maybe 10%.
So he's admitting that masks don't work, only in the tiny margins.
And then he says, but I think anything that instigated or intensified culture wars just made things worse.
And listen to this.
And I have to be honest with you, David, when it comes to masking, I don't know.
Oh, did he tell the truth there?
Finally told the truth.
He'll have to address that and explain how he blurted out the truth.
It's amazing.
Well, there's one more that actually that I would put on to segue into our second part of our last thing.
If you look around, look at this one next one.
Actually, go ahead, one.
When you look around, I like this part, Dr. Paul, and you'll appreciate this too from the interview.
If we can put that next one up, it starts with, and I remember saying, go forward one.
There we go.
Okay.
So here's what Fauci said.
I can't believe we did the worst of any country.
We did so terrible.
I don't know, but well, no one else did that great.
He said, this is one of the outbreaks.
You're absolutely right.
When you look around, nobody did great except maybe one or two countries.
Dot, dot, dot, which were those, the ones we were talking about the whole time.
Sweden, basically all of Africa, which didn't have any restrictions.
You know, India, which didn't take the shot.
So, yeah, there were one or two, Fauci.
There were one or two.
And I'm going to put one last one up because this is a segue.
This is a medical doctor and a public health professional.
I think it's from the UC system, University of California system.
This is a great tweet.
If you can put this next one out, this is Vichy Vinay Prashad, and he makes a great point, Dr. Paul.
Why can't a reporter ask him, why did you run zero randomized trials of masking or any NPI?
You controlled the NIAID budget.
Why did you campaign against DeSantis' school reopening?
And those are some questions among many more that he should be asked.
Knew Generator Purposely Deceived00:07:25
Yeah.
He wouldn't have gotten a decent answer.
You know, this idea of doing less rather than more is sort of like in economics.
They did very little in 1921, and the downturn, which the Fed created, was over in a year.
And then they changed the rules with Roosevelt and Keynesianism.
And it lasted for 15 years when you add up all the years.
It didn't go away until after the war was over.
So doing less sometimes is very good.
Matter of fact, I think there's an oath that was around a long time ago.
First, do no harm.
Do no harm.
Politicians ought to listen to it.
But even the doctors now can't listen to it or they'll get canceled.
The ones who wanted to prevent the harm, they got into big trouble.
That to me is really sad.
Yeah, absolutely.
Well, as we move toward the end of the month, Dr. Paul, I do want to again mention our sponsor for this month, 4patriots.com, and we're very grateful for their sponsorship.
It helps us keep the show going.
But they want to let you know that you need a generator.
Our power system is aging.
It's subject to gunfire, to other attacks.
It only is going to take a couple of power plants being taken out that could put us into darkness for even months at a time and would cause great problems.
You won't be able to communicate.
You've got your medical devices.
You've got your telephones you need to charge.
Well, they've got some solutions.
The Patriot Power Generator 2000X is a new and improved solar generator.
It gives you 2,000 watts of power.
Now, it's not a whole house generator, but the advantage is that it is portable.
You can take it with you.
You can use it where you wish.
And you can keep yourself surviving for days, if not months.
Your fridge, your microwave, your CPAP.
The good folks over at 4Patriots.com are going to give you a discount if you want to look into this.
You just use the code RON and get 10% off your first purchase of anything in the store, not just a generator.
We talked about food last month.
You can get 10% off of everything, including, of course, this generator.
They're going to give you free shipping with every order over $97 and a legendary money-back guarantee.
Just go to 4Patriots.com and I will include the link here.
Type in Ron, get your discount, get your generator, and you'll be all set.
Very good.
I'm going to go back to the mask for a brief quote on this.
The new study, it says masks may, they didn't say they had absolute proof, but you point out why.
Nobody did any testing when they should have been doing the testing.
Yeah.
You know, in the midst of the epidemic.
The mask may increase cognitive decline in kids, still born, stillbirth, testicular dysfunction.
I think most people knew of that.
Their stories were out there, but it wasn't tested the way it should have been.
So that's why they have to say may have.
But there's just a lot, including myself, believe that there were a lot and continue to be because some people are still using these masks and mandating it.
But they're saying may have contributed significantly.
Stillbirths when worn by pregnant women, that you just shrimmy nuts to watch, watch the making those women wear that and hibit breathing air, breathing oxygen, as well as cognitive decline in children and testicular dysfunction, among other serious health processes.
That is so bad.
This is iatrogenic, which means it's doctor-created because we're writing rules and either in this we're giving them the wrong rules.
Iatrogenic usually means too that if you give them the wrong medicine or you give them the wrong treatment, this is the wrong treatment.
So those diseases are iatrogenic and it's just a sad story, especially, and I've already said it once, I hate to keep repeating myself, but the people who knew what was going on, and there were some doctors who lost their privileges and their research efforts and all this.
They did this and they lost it because they were telling the truth about this.
And then Fauci, I think he got paid pretty well for his, he was a pretty good fibber because he was able to deceive Republicans and Democrats and stay there.
He has to be a textbook example of how a bureaucrat can get, how the worst can get to the top, paraphrasing, you know, and they he was the worst and he got to the very top, but he's explaining himself, so we'll be reassured that it was not intentional.
Yeah.
Well, you make a good point.
They purposely deceived the American people.
They knew better.
They purposely deceived them.
But, you know, that's why I think we're in a crisis as a society because we know now they purposely deceived us on Ukraine with the Pentagon leaks.
We know they were saying one thing when they knew something else Ukraine couldn't win.
The Blinken Biden Russian disinformation hunter laptop, they knew better.
They still purposely deceived us.
It's a real problem.
But if we can go ahead, because this is the study, and I just want to read one sentence from it.
If we go next, this is the article about the study, but here's the actual study from Hellion.
Possible toxicity of chronic carbon dioxide exposure associated with face mask use, particularly in pregnant women, children, and adolescents.
And go to the next one.
These are the results of that scientific test they did.
And you know about this stuff better than I do, Dr. Paul.
I am not a scientist.
Fresh air has around 0.04% CO2.
Well, wearing masks more than five minutes, there is a possible chronic exposure to carbon dioxide of 1.41 to 3.2% of inhaled air.
Though the buildup is usually within the short-term exposure limits, long-term exceedances and consequences must be considered due to the data.
They talk about mammals chronically exposed to 0.3% CO2, increased risk of stillbirth, and a tetra, I don't know if you know the word, Dr. Paul, tetragenicity with irreversible neuron damage to offspring, etc., etc.
So those numbers are insane.
0.04 is what you usually get, and you get up to 3.2 if you keep this thing on.
You know, over the years, and just remembering growing up and the different diseases, quarantines were accepted.
And I accept under certain diseases, quarantines makes a lot of sense because some diseases are very infectious and they spread readily.
But if they don't, if they quarantine, it is different than putting on these masks.
I can't recall or write about any examples.
Why didn't they show us pictures in the last two or three hundred years where, boy, we really did the solution to this was to wear a mask.
Why not just the 20th century when they knew about math?
Please Pass the Show Around00:02:43
I don't know of any time where somebody had evidence that this was a good practice.
Yet they marched on and punished people who were willing to disagree.
And the real punishment was the destruction of the to allowing a debate and conversation, which is what medicine is all about.
Because, you know, and also tolerance, God, a lot of things have been learned almost not by accident, but by observant doctors who would say, oh, you know what?
I was doing ABC, and all of a sudden, for this, and all of a sudden something else happened.
And it's a lead.
It's a lead, and they get into it.
But oh, that would be hypocrisy.
Then you'd lose your license very quickly if you started talking like that.
It's a shame.
But hopefully, you know, as time goes on, because I think we're better off on the COVID thing than we were two or three years ago.
But the whole thing is, is if they're able, they have so much control.
Yeah.
You know, that if next month something comes out, they'll get the hysteria going again.
Unless we do a better job in exposing the heathens.
Yeah.
That's what I was going to say.
I just wrote a note down.
Get ready because they'll do it again.
So I'll just close by thanking our audience for watching the show.
Please hit like.
Please subscribe if you're not subscribed.
Please pass the show around so we can build our numbers and try to get the word out.
We do our best to try to get the best information out to you.
Go to RonPaulInstitute.org also and subscribe to free updates there and get your tickets for our conference on June 3rd.
We're going to probably at least probably announce a couple speakers tomorrow.
So it's going to be a great event.
Very good.
Back to you, Dr. Paul.
And I, too, want to make sure that the invitation is loud and clear to see as many of you as they can make it to the conference on the 3rd because we look forward to it.
It's beneficial to us.
Hopefully it'll be beneficial to all who come.
And all I like to hear about is people, you know, I met so-and-so at one of your conferences.
And every once in a while, they have long-term relationship at the conferences because it's sort of nice to be in a place where they're sort of like-minded people.
Now, you know, with the government being involved in speech and everything that we do and whether or not you're following the rules of diversity, you know, it's pretty tough.
But we certainly appreciate the benefits and the support that you give us by visiting our show.
Please pass a message around about the Liberty Report.
And please come back to view the Liberty Report soon.