Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Hey, folks, how are you?
It's great to have you here.
And we've got another three hours of broadcast excellence headed your way.
Unpredictable, unknowing, flexible and flowing.
Whatever happens, we're ready for it.
And things are happening at a rapid pace.
It's exciting.
It's all about number.
Want to be on the program 800-282-2882, the email address, lrushbow at EIBnet.com.
I'd like to welcome you to the EIB network, the home, since I am America's real anchor man.
This is the home of the real alternative facts.
And in fact, it's probably a good way of identifying what we do here.
Drive-by media with their agenda and their lies, and we set the record straight on a daily basis.
You know, they're up in arms here, the drive-bys are over this alternative facts business, Kelly Ann Conway with F. Chuck Todd on Meet the Press.
And the media doesn't believe there can be any such thing as alternative facts.
If there are not alternative facts, why are there so many news outlets out there?
In fact, just look at the drive-bys.
Why do we even have ABC, CBS, NBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN?
Why do we have if everything is supposed to be the same?
Why all these different networks?
Why isn't there just an official government ticker, an official government TV station, an official government TV network that simply prints out all of the officially accepted ordained facts of the day as determined by, well, who do the drive-bys want to be determining who the facts are?
They want themselves to be determining who the facts are.
But if you look at CNN, CNN's still chasing the Malaysian airplanes.
CNN's got a guy, Don Lemon, who thinks that a black hole might have swallowed it up.
I'm sure there's nobody else in any other network that thinks that.
Does that mean we get rid of Don Lemon because he had an alternative theory versus alternative facts?
Or do we want the diversity that many varied news sources provide?
Now, Obama would have loved a single government ticker and for the most part had one.
But now that's all different.
If you look at, and by the way, there's a reason why the drive-bys focus on this alternative fact business, even though it was Kellyanne Conway who created the term and used it to explain to F. Chuck Todd why they see things differently at the Trump administration and the way they see things at NBC, for example.
Trump's comments on voter fraud, which, by the way, this is delicious.
I cannot wait to provide you details of this, what's really going on with this, in just a mere moment or two.
Now, the drive-bys, the mainstream media, focus on these minor little nitpicks where they can spend time accusing Trump of lying or accusing Trump of insecurity or accusing Trump of having a thin skin.
And they spend all of their time doing that instead of reporting what Trump is actually doing, which is one heck of a lot.
Executive orders freezing government hiring, freezing government grants, building the wall.
It's incredible.
Last night, there were three Trump tweets.
First one, big day planned on national security tomorrow, among many other things, we will build the wall.
Then the next tweet, if Chicago doesn't fix the horrible carnage going on, 228 shootings in 2017 with 42 killings up 24% from 2016, I will send in the feds.
I imagine heads exploding as the drive-bys read this stuff.
I will send in the feds.
Who are the feds?
Well, the feds in this case, I assume, would be the FBI.
But here's the thing.
What has the Obama administration been doing to every police department it could get its hands on the last eight years?
They've been sending in the feds.
And the drive-bys applauded it.
So you'd have an incident, say, like in Ferguson, Missouri, the mythical it never happened, hands up, don't shoot.
And then there would be a civil rights investigation by the Justice Department into the police department at Ferguson, Missouri.
And the Justice Department would determine that the Ferguson Police Department is hopelessly racist and bigoted, which would then result in a consent decree from the Department of Justice to the Ferguson Police Department mandating the police department make changes and institute racist, whatever it is, or racial this in order to remain in operation.
And basically, this is how Obama took over local police departments.
Heather McDonald's written about it extensively in her books on the cops, but I mean, it's like 25 or 26 major police departments.
It's Seattle, I think, and Baltimore, Ferguson, Missouri, other such places.
If that's not sending in the feds, what is it?
In fact, that's worse than sending in the feds.
Trump's talking about sending in the feds to shut down the violence.
Obama sent in the feds to take over local police departments.
Then the next Trump tweet, excuse me.
Congratulations to Fox News for being number one in inauguration ratings.
They were many times higher than fake news, CNN.
Public is smart.
This is a president of the United States doing this.
Can you see the heads exploding out there?
It's delicious.
And then they started reacting to all of these tweets, and they were not happy about it.
Let's see, here is one from Robert Costa, who is, of course, at the Washington Post reacting to all of this.
Let's see what it is, Robert, confirmed, first reported New York Times, start of border wall project will be one of orders signed by Trump on Wednesday.
What a minute.
I thought Trump was just yapping his gums about all this stuff.
I thought Trump really wasn't going to do any of this.
He wasn't going to really build a wall.
All the experts said he's not going to build a wall.
He's not going to build a wall.
He's just saying that.
And they furthermore, his supporters know he's not going to build a wall.
It's symbolic.
He's not going to build a wall.
He's going to build a wall.
And he's still maintaining that whether they know it or not, Mexico is going to pay for it.
So they are trying to get their arms around the fact that he actually meant it and is doing what he said he was going to do.
And he's doing it at a breakneck piece, or pace, I should say.
Here's the AP, Julie Pace, gobsmacked.
Trump moving forward with border wall waves refugee cuts.
President Trump will begin rolling out executive orders on immigrations today, beginning with steps to build his wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.
According to two administration officials, he also expected to target so-called sanctuary cities and is reviewing proposals that would restrict the flow of refugees to the United States.
Now, wait just a second.
Because I distinctly recall the drive-bys and the pundits all telling us over and over again that none of this was ever really going to happen, that Trump's a novice.
And when he gets to Washington, if he ever gets there, if he gets into office, he's going to find out he just can't do this stuff.
This is not the kind of stuff a president walk in and do.
He's going to have opposition on Capitol Hill.
The American people are not going to put up with any of this, even though they elected him.
They said that Trump's campaign promises were just pipe dreams.
In fact, that the building of the wall was supposed to be even more impossible than Trump getting elected.
So they are still, they're blindsided each and every day because they refuse.
They still do not understand what has happened.
They do not understand why it has happened.
They don't understand their role in it.
And really about that, they don't understand why they are ineffective.
They can't figure out why they haven't been able to destroy Translation.
You know, Trump's approval numbers are skyrocketing now.
Dow Jones Industrial Average, plus 20,000.
Paul Krugman, New York Times, a number of others said, oh, no, after the election, this means the market's going to crash.
Investors aren't going to want any part of this, and they're all going to bail.
It's going to be bad.
Wall Street, Main Street.
Oh, my God, said Krugman.
It's just horrible.
He's never been right about anything.
I don't know how long.
So we've got the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the NASDAQ as well, skyrocketing.
Trump's approval numbers are skyrocketing.
The media continues to try to take him out, which is what they're trying to do, in the ways of the past, the way they've always been able to take out primarily Republicans.
But if there was ever a Democrat or liberal that needed to be taken out, they were able to do that too.
But they're not able to do it with Trump.
It's all backfiring.
Everything that they think is going to nail the guy or cause his supporters to get mad and abandon him.
It's the exact opposite.
You know, a classic illustration of this.
Ladies and gentlemen, remember the press conference yesterday, and we highlighted this, spent many, many minutes talking to you about this.
Sean Spicer doing the press briefing, and the previous night, Trump had once again alluded to the fact that there had been some number of millions of illegals, aliens, or whatever, voting.
And of course, that's a dog whistle of the media.
When they hear that, they go baddie.
Because the last thing in the world they want is for anything like that to be true.
So all during the press conference yesterday, first Cecilia Vega at ABC News and then Mara Lyason picking it up at NPR.
What if it's that bad?
If it's that bad, why don't you conduct an investigation?
I mean, this is a serious, serious scandal.
If that really happened, if there are 2 million, 3 million, if there were 5 million illegals who voted, that is a real scandal.
Where is the evidence?
Why don't you investigate?
Bingo.
The Trump administration has announced that they are going to investigate using Jeff Sessions at the Department of Justice voter fraud.
Trump to launch major investigation into voter fraud.
Here is the way the AP reports this.
Once again, Julie Pace.
Donald Trump holds the most powerful office in the world, but he's dogged by insecurity over his loss of the popular vote in the election and a persistent frustration that the legitimacy of his presidency is being challenged by Democrats and the media.
Aides and associates say.
Now, that is a preposterous headline.
The headline, actually, Trump dogged by insecurity over popular vote media coverage.
It is a preposterous headline in lead, even by the AP standards, because now they're getting into psychoanalysis.
Trump's fixation has been a drag on the momentum of his opening days in office with his exaggerations about inauguration crowds and false assertions about illegal balloting, intruding on advisors' plans to launch his presidency with a flurry of actions on the economy.
So what we're led to believe here is that Trump is so insecure that when the media runs around and keeps talking about how Hillary won the popular vote, that he loses his mind.
And he gets mad and starts stomping around the Oval Office, demanding that somebody go out there and fix it.
And the media is lying about him.
I won and I won big.
And if the illegals had not voted, I would have won even bigger.
The AP says that Trump's aides cringe each time he goes there.
They cringe every time he brings this up because they want to continue with the announcement of all the policy initiatives, the major changes that are coming, and it's all being sidetracked by this kind of stuff.
I think they're missing it entirely.
I don't know about Trump's insecurity.
I don't think it matters because I don't think that's what's driving this.
I think there are people who really believe it.
We have reported on it a couple of different times.
I went back to the archives of all the show prep in the last number of years and found a couple of salient stories that we've used to highlight the idea that there is massive voter fraud going on.
I'll share them with you here in a moment.
But while Trump supposedly is dominated by his insecures, the press, well, where's the investigation?
Okay, you want an investigation?
We're going to get investigation.
Now, the tables are turned because the left does not want such an investigation.
After all, any such voter fraud is going to end up, if they find any, it's going to be tagged right on them.
They don't want any part of this.
They never thought Trump would do this.
Well, where's the investigation?
If it's so big, okay, you want investigation?
I'll put my main man, Jeff Sessions, on it.
By the way, another tweet from Robert Costa at the Washington Post who says that insiders in the Trump administration say the most relevant and powerful member of Trump's team right now is Jeff Sessions, the Attorney General.
So, with Trump's announcement that he's going to investigate this voter fraud, and make no mistake, there is voter fraud all over this country.
Now, we don't know if it's in the millions and if it's illegals, but there's voter fraud all over the place.
And if Trump's going to investigate it, it's going to be found.
And I'm telling you, whatever the degree the Democrats are engaging in it, they don't want it uncovered.
And so they are now doing their best to besmirch and impugn the whole idea, but they ask for it.
Now, while they're running around, so Trump's insecurity is driving him to do this.
I think it's pretty smart strategically and politically because it's now got them all, they're not talking about Russia at the moment.
And they're not talking about crowd size.
Now, all of a sudden, voter fraud is front and center.
And believe me, it is.
It always has been.
John Fund at the National Review and books that he's written has found incredible evidence of massive amounts of voter fraud.
And the vast majority of it takes place in Democrat strongholds.
And it hasn't stopped him from doing anything else.
He's still the executive orders on the wall.
Executive orders on shutting down the EPA.
Well, not shutting it down, but really, there's all kinds of stuff.
We have the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
We have the unions.
The auto execs came in to see Trump and they left the meeting overwhelmingly impressed and said so.
So it's not that Trump is sidetracking himself and putting up roadblocks for himself.
He's doing all of this at a pace everybody in Washington always told us was not possible.
We'll be back.
And we will continue after this.
On CNN's New Day Today, the former chairman of the Democrat National Committee, Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz, by the way, we're following the campaign of Sally Boynton Brown, the chairwoman of the Democrat National Committee, the woman who said that it's her job to shut up white people at the Democrat National Committee.
We've endorsed, we've thrown our hat in the ring there for Sally Boynton Brown.
I really hope it helps and not hurts.
We really want her to get that gig.
This is the previous chairwoman.
They had to fire her because she had rigged the Democrat Party primaries for Hillary Clinton.
She cheated the nomination away from crazy Bernie Sanders.
She was on CNN today with the co-host Allison Camerata, who said, you know, President Trump just tweeted about voter fraud.
He's simply asking for a major investigation into voter fraud, including those registered to vote in two states, those who were illegal, and even those who registered to vote who were dead, and many for a long time.
And depending on results, we're going to strengthen up voting procedures.
Is this an investigation Congress would go along with Ms. Blabbermouth?
What's more frightening is that this is an investigation that through the Department of Justice, the president can actually conduct without Congress's authority.
I mean, the Department of Justice has the ability to launch investigations.
Now, of course, we can always stop them from doing that, but that's quite unlikely.
I mean, what's the most disturbing about this is the president's penchant for lying, also known as alternate facts now, from the trivial in terms of how many people showed up to watch his inauguration to him perpetrating the lie that three to five million people fraudulently voted in his presidential election.
I mean, anything that makes him look bad or doesn't make him look good is something that he is willing to just tell bald-faced lies.
Well, you ought to welcome an investigation then.
What is there to fear?
If it didn't happen and all it's going to do is prove Trump to be an insecure, egomaniacal, narcissist piece of scum, why don't you let it happen?
In fact, Ms. Blabbermouth, why don't you Democrats join in the effort and get to the bottom of this and prove that Trump is lying?
Prove that Trump is insane.
Prove that Trump has got all these security problems.
Prove that everything you're alleging here is true, because it apparently is.
Apparently, this investigation is pointless.
It doesn't matter whatsoever.
It's scary that you can't stop it in Congress.
But what is there to fear if there is no voter fraud to be found?
In fact, I would think you would want to have led the investigation yourself when first Trump ever mentioned this.
I would think the Democrat reaction would be, let's investigate, because it's apparently going to be evil, easy to prove that Trump is making it all up, right?
Except they want to instruct.
Now, why?
Hi.
How are you?
Rush Limbaugh, executing assigned host duties flawlessly, zero mistakes.
Look, I will admit there's another reason why Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz and the Democrats are scared out of their wits by an official Trump investigation into voter fraud.
They're scared of any Trump investigation into anything.
After all, who are they?
Let's examine what their primary fear is.
There are two of them, and it's six of one and a half dozen of the other.
There is voter fraud.
It's been documented.
The Jill Stein recounts.
Remember, in those investigations, in those recounts, we found in many places there were many more Democrat votes than there were Democrat voters.
There were more votes than people in some precincts.
In all of those investigations, Trump ended up gaining votes.
In some cases, Hillary did too.
But the point is, there is voter fraud.
And we've never had a deep, deep, deep official look into it.
We've had journalists like John Fun do good jobs looking into it.
So that's one fear, that there's obviously voter fraud out there and that it's going to be found.
And you find that the Democrats are opposed to any kind of voter ID.
What could possibly be the reason for this?
What in the way?
And here's Obama in one of his final, in his farewell address or something, talking about voting rights and making it's harder to vote in America today than it's ever been or something like that.
It's asinine.
It's stupid.
These people are laying the groundwork for excusing voter fraud when they engage in it in order to level the playing field because they like to have as many people as possible believing that if you're black, if you're minority, America doesn't want you voting.
Yeah, just like back in the 50s and 60s in the pre-Civil Rights Act days.
Well, that was all Democrats denying blacks the right to vote.
That was all Democrats refusing to let them into universities.
It was all Democrats making them sit at the back of the bus or use different restaurants.
Democrats ran the show back.
It was all Democrats or the segregationists.
But of course, the Democrats have flipped that, and people think otherwise.
There's obviously voter fraud, and most of it probably occurs with them.
They are a minority of people and a minority of thinking in the country.
We know this.
They already can't win campaigns by being honest in what they believe.
So they lie about their intentions like Obama did in two different campaigns.
If they're lying here and lying there, would they think nothing of cheating here or there?
But the second reason that they might fear an investigation is because they know how they conduct them.
When they investigate police departments and find wanton racism, say in Ferguson or in Baltimore, who can say otherwise?
Here's an officially sanctioned Washington investigation.
Everybody believes Washington, right?
Everybody believes the government.
Since the Democrats know how you can phony up the results of any investigation you want, how you can phony up unemployment numbers, how you can phony up gross domestic product economic numbers, the Democrats have to know that if Trump wanted to fake the numbers, he could.
They have to know because of what they themselves do.
It's sort of projection in reverse.
If you use existing systems to put out phony survey results and phony polling data and phony investigation results in order to advance your cause, might you also believe the Republicans would do the same thing?
So they're sitting, Debbie Blabber Schultz is afraid of two things.
The real evidence of voter fraud being uncovered, or the fact that the Republicans might give the Democrats a dose of their own medicine and make it up, like the Democrats do.
And then what would they do?
Run around and say, you can't do that.
You're making it up.
Or you mean like you guys did on the unemployment numbers?
And they would say, well, tit-for-tat doesn't work here.
And then the Trump regime would say, we're not making anything up.
Demand you to prove otherwise.
There'd be an investigation into the investigation to find out if the investigation was, and then it would become a joke.
That's, I think, what they are primarily afraid of.
Those two things.
Now, interesting, I was watching cable news last night, and they were talking about Trump, as everybody always does now.
They were talking about Trump.
They were talking about Trump and the focus on crowdsize, the inauguration, and the focus here on voter fraud.
And various members of various roundtables offered their opinions as to what this meant.
Why does Trump do this?
Is Trump insecure?
Is Trump really so insecure that he just can't live with the idea that somebody might have gotten more popular votes than he did?
Cannot live with the idea that fewer people attended his inauguration than attended Obama's.
And then they got somebody.
I forget who it was.
And no, no, no, no.
It's character.
This just proves it's character.
Trump just is deficient in character.
This is silly.
It's a waste of time.
It doesn't mean anything, but it does to Trump.
This is character defect.
Now, I want to share with you what I have always thought this was.
I don't think it's insecurity.
And by the way, just because you're insecure, it doesn't mean somebody's not out to get you.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean that they're not coming for you.
You can be insecure and right at the same time.
I'm not saying that's the case.
I think instead, Trump, who is not from the political world, but he is from the business world and the art of the deal, the art of the repeal, the art of negotiation, he has had to develop superior skills and techniques.
And I think he's running rings around these people.
And the thing that I offered yesterday as an explanation for all of this focus on voter fraud, because it worked.
I mean, it was magical.
I'm sitting here watching the presser.
I'm watching the illusion once again to vote fraud.
And here's the press dropped everything else they cared about.
They dropped it because it's like a dog whistle.
Because they can't get past this narrow vision that Trump is sick, mentally sick, that Trump doesn't deserve to be there.
That Trump cheated, that Hillary should be.
They can't get out of this mindset.
So it doesn't take much of a dog whistle.
Here came the reference to voter fraud, and two reporters spent practically the next 10 or 15 minutes on it.
And I made the point here on the EIB network yesterday: what is no longer front and center in the drive-by media?
Answer: Russia stealing the election for Trump.
Bye-bye, vominos not there.
Now we're back to discussing voter fraud, which there is some.
Now they demanded an investigation.
Trump, you want an investigation?
Fine.
I'm going to put my man Jeff Sessions on it.
And now Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz and the rest are quivering, cowering in the corner.
They've been called out on this.
And here's a little headline at thehill.com: DNC, Colin, Trump voter fraud fantasy, a distraction from Russian help.
Bingo!
I think the DNC is listening to this program.
And this is why I want to remind them that I have endorsed Sally Boynton Brown to be the new chairman of the Democrat National Committee.
The DNC said in a statement, quote, everyone knows there was no massive voter fraud in the election.
He can't let go of his voter fraud fantasy, both because he can't bear the thought that millions more Americans voted for Hillary Clinton than for him, and to cover up the real crime, Russian efforts to help him win.
So that's the DNC statement.
Now, I don't know if anybody else offered that as what really was going on.
I know I did.
That the focus on voter fraud by the Trump regime has now taken the focus off of Putin and the Russians cheating Hillary out of her glory.
The DNC thinks that's what's going on.
Everybody else thinks that Trump's got a security problem.
He got an insecurity problem.
Trump's got a character defect.
Trump's focused on things that don't matter.
Come back to bite him.
I think there's something much more skillful going on here because the Democrats and the media, look, I'm sorry to be redundant, folks, they still haven't figured out what happened and why.
They still haven't figured out why they can't damage Trump.
They can't figure it out why they can't tarnish him, why they can't harm him politically, reputation.
They can't, and they're continuing to try.
There's a new poll out, by the way, Political Morning Consult.
A majority of Americans loved Trump's inaugural address.
Contrast that with the analysis of that address by most in the drive-by media and the establishment.
They said it was an embarrassment.
They said it was beneath the dignity of the office.
They said it was disrespectful.
They said it was pedantic and sophomoric.
They said it was selfish and self-focused and small.
Majority of the American people loved it.
There's a huge disconnect that continues.
There's a huge part of the establishment remains out of touch.
They don't know it.
Now, the two stories that I alluded to earlier, one is from the Washington Post, and it's October 2014.
And the Washington Post caught hell from their other buddies in the drive-bys for even publishing the story.
Headline, could non-citizens decide the November election?
This was October 2014.
This is about the midterms, folks.
This was the liberal media worried about the Republicans winning big again in the midterms.
And right here.
Washington Post, could non-citizens decide the November election?
Could control of the Senate in 2014 be decided by illegal votes cast by non-citizens?
In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey data sets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections by Jesse Richmond.
Jesse Richmond, associate professor, political science, international studies at Old Dominion University and director of ODU Social Science Research Center, David Ernest, Associate Professor, Political Science, International Studies, Old Dominion University, the Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Studies in the College of Arts and Letters.
And at the conclusion at the bottom of this piece indicates they don't appear to be conservatives.
In fact, their solution to the problem seems to be let everybody vote, whether they're citizens or not.
So here you have in the Washington Post in October of 2014 an acknowledgement that illegal citizens vote and a deep worry that these non-citizens are going to elect Republicans and they were going to win the Senate.
I didn't hear anybody shouting, alternative facts, alternative facts.
I didn't hear anybody shouting.
P.S. I didn't hear anybody say, wow, Washington Post really insecure.
I didn't hear anybody say, Washington Post really has a mental disorder here.
Or these three researchers.
Story says most non-citizens don't even register, let alone vote.
But enough do, enough do.
Washington Post, October 2014.
Enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races.
And then Daily Caller study claims up to 2.8 million non-citizens voted in 2008.
Yes.
The evidence is all over the place.
People have written about it, discussed it, analyzed it.
The left demanded an investigation.
We're going to get an investigation by honest forthright people, Jeff Sessions and the gang, and Debbie Blabbermouse Schultz, a proven knowing trickster and liar, worried, and all get out.
It's going to happen.
By the way, the authors of that study on voter fraud that we just quoted, they said the numbers of non-citizen voters, this is from the article.
They said the number of non-citizens voters could range from just over 38,000 at the very minimum to nearly 2.8 million at the maximum.
Study was done in 2012, and they projected it's possible 2.8 million illegal votes.
This happens to be close to the margin of Hillary Clinton's popular vote victory, but I'm not drawing any conclusions.
But it's not, Trump's not the guy that put the number three to five million out there.
2.8 million from official social scientists looking into it.
Anyway, let me grab a call, get one in here before the hour expires.
This is Jim in Brooklyn.
Great to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
I was just going to say that in New York City, throughout the boroughs, it's been reported by Alan Shulkin, Commissioner of the Board of Elections for Manhattan, that there is voter fraud going on.
And after he made this statement, almost, I think it was the next day, actually, he was asked by Mayor de Blasio to resign from office.
The type of voter fraud was that people were being bussed to different voting locations in order to vote more than one time at the various locations.
But he also said that there's other types of voter fraud going on.
It was a very detailed statement that he made.
But they tried to get him out of office.
And then when it came up for him to be re-elected, he was actually re-elected again.
The mayor could not get him out.
And he's a Democrat.
So even the Democrats are admitting that there is fraud going on.
Well, of course, a Democrat in New York admitting crime is going on doesn't imperil the Democrat.
I mean, they're going to do it.
He got re-elected, you just saw.
But that's the point.
It goes on.
It happens.
Look, I know you're sitting there saying, Rush, why?
Well, because the drive-bys couldn't let it go, folks.
Remember what we do here?
We react.
We study the left.
We study the Democrats.
We dissect them for you.
In addition to talking about all the other positive aspects of the Trump administration, what's happening out there, they're the ones that put this up.
They pretty much at a press briefing yesterday demanded an investigation under the belief that there's no way Trump can be right.
There's no way it's happening.
Well, now that there's an announced investigation, they're all backtracking.
No, no, no, no, no, wait, wait, wait, wait, no, no, no, no, it's a waste of time.
We don't need to, we need to get back to abortions and health care and whatever the standbys.
But it's clear that it happens.
The extent to which, that's what the investigation will uncover.
Anyway, Jim, I appreciate the call.
Brief time out here, folks.
Back with more.
Says some more progress to report to you.
Centers for Disease Control.
The Centers for Disease Control have canceled a major climate change conference.
And what the heck is the CDC doing conducting a climate change conference?
And by the way, the Babe March, the Feminazi march, was so successful that now a bunch of scientists are planning a march on Washington.
Man, are they going to admit they politicize science?