All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 10, 2017 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:39
January 10, 2017, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, yeah, that's right.
I forgot.
Tonight is Obama's swan song speech.
Oh, yeah, the farewell address.
What do you think that's gonna be?
What do you greetings and welcome back, folks?
It is great to have you here.
And it is great for me to be here.
Happy to have you with us.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program is 800 282-2882 and the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.us.
So what's Obama gonna I just from I just saw that I just saw a little promo up there on CNN Obama farewell address tonight.
They got a countdown.
Seven hours, 53 minutes, 43 seconds to the Obama farewell address.
Big whoop.
But what do you think it's gonna be?
Well, oh yeah, yeah, I I do think he's gonna mention the media.
I think I I tell you what I think it's gonna be.
I think Obama's farewell address is gonna have the following tone.
Now he's not gonna say it in these exact words, but the the message from Obama is gonna be you didn't realize how good I was.
You didn't realize how good you had it, and one of the reasons you didn't is because we have an out-of-control media.
We're not all dealing with the same set of facts like we used to before 1988.
Now we got all kinds of different facts.
Everybody bring their facts and make up whatever they want and put it out there, and I am so good, but you never knew it.
I'm the best thing that ever happened to this country, but most of you don't know it.
And it's a shame for you.
I gave it my best, but you never realized what you had in me.
It's gonna have that kind of tone.
Do not doubt me on this.
And he will.
You're right, Snertley.
He will talk about the filters.
Filters is the code word for talk radio.
If you hear him talk about filters, I want you to think my name.
Because that's what's in his mind, folks.
I mean, we have this on tape over the weekend, the Axelrod podcast and a couple of other interviews, he's actually said so.
He actually mentioned my name is being one of these people responsible for the uh different set of facts than what everybody else is.
In other words, we used to have a media monopoly where all of us on the left got to define and determine what everybody knew.
And since 1988, that hadn't been the case.
We lost our monopoly in 1988.
Now people get to bring their own facts in, and uh people are confused.
And it's it's it's shame because I'm the best thing that ever happened to this country, but nobody knows it, or not enough people knows it, know it because of me.
And there's gonna be, I guarantee he's not gonna be able to help himself.
There's gonna be, I could have been even better if you'd have just realized what you had.
Meaning, you the American people, if you'd have realized just how brilliant and good I am, I could have been even better.
But for some reason I wasn't able to overcome, I won't blame himself.
He'll blame the filters.
And then he'll give a shout out to his Hollywood.
Have you seen this pathetic, have you seen this pathetic video?
Going away present from these Hollywood celebrity types, the so-called A-listers have done a video that is, I don't know what it is.
Obama's greatest hits.
It's uh it's a thank you, Mr. President, for all you've done type thing.
And the purpose of it is to relive the highlights of the Obama administration, and there's some things that none of these celebrities mention.
For example, Obamacare is non-mentioned by any of them.
As in, thank you, Mr. President, for saving Americans' health care.
Thank you, there's none of that.
There's nothing about the Iran deal.
Not one of these celebrities mentions the greatness of the Iran deal.
And I say that because Obama thinks that's one of his greatest achievements.
You've got you've got uh what is it, Leonardo DiCaprio.
And he thanks Obama for everything he's done on climate change.
Uh let's see, what else is in there?
Uh they got Tom Hanks in this thing.
They've got Samuel L. Jackson.
Uh oh, you know who else?
They don't mention bin Laden.
They don't mention, and this is one of Obama's signature moments, right?
He beat bin Laden and saved General Motors.
They don't mention that.
It's pure surface gook that these A list celebrities mention in their in their video.
I think what's happening, you look at this story I mentioned here right before we went to the break top of the hour.
This from Reuters.
Democrat members of the U.S. Congress called yesterday for the creation of an independent commission to investigate Russia's attempts to intervene in the 2016 election.
And they want it to be like the 9-11 Commission.
What they really want is Watergate style hearings.
What they really want is to put somebody on trial for what happened.
And again, look, I don't mean to be a broken record.
I just have learned that it takes repetition.
Even if you're writing, so it takes repetition for something to drill down and be understood to be remembered.
And this inability to accept reality.
I think to me, this is so important because many people on the right are constantly trying to figure out how to deal with, how to do battle with, how to beat the left, how to understand them.
And it's never understood properly because we assign to them the same characteristics that we assign to ourselves, which is understanding, uh, reason, common sense, acceptance.
They have none of that.
And so our efforts to build bridges to them for common understanding and so always will fail.
Because if you look at this demand here for a 9-11 style commission, what is its root?
Its root is that they can't accept that they lost.
In their minds, they didn't lose.
Reality is that they got schnookered, folks.
They were schlonged in the Electoral College.
They were schlonged.
They were defeated.
There's no question about it, but not to them.
To them, that is a construct.
The majority has put together this set of circumstances that resulted in Trump winning, but it isn't real.
And so they want hearings to expose whatever the construct is.
They want hearings to find out who did this.
And in their minds right now, it's it's the Russians.
Russians working together with Trump.
That's what they hope to uncover.
They want to find the link between Putin and Trump that ended up defeating them.
That's what they think exists.
So they live in an alternative universe.
They do not live anywhere near reality.
They are unable to accept reality because there is no reality to them.
In this case, they got Stucker.
You know, I actually think if you put yourself in their shoes right now, I'm watching this sessions hearings, and uh a thought came to mind.
I would look at the New York Times front page story today on sessions, as I mentioned, and it's a puff piece.
This is so, so extraordinary.
It's so out of character.
Normally, on a day like this, the New York Times would write a piece savaging Jeff Sessions, and they would bring up every false allegation ever made about the guy, and they would try to pass it off as real.
And the allegations would be rooted in that he's a secret member of the Klan, that he's a racist pig, that he hates minorities.
This would normally be what they did, but today they write a glowing puff piece.
Now the reasons are clear to me.
They realize they can't stop him, so they're holding their fire, they're keeping the powder dry, so to speak, and they'll launch this other stuff after he's confirmed, and when they're about to do something in the Trump administration the left doesn't like, they'll try to sabotage it and stop it.
If you look at the hearings today, we had a caller.
Rush, you've always said that the liberals, when they're in power are dangerous when they're out of power, they're funny.
Don't you think they're pathetic right now?
And the caller has a point.
Because I'm watching these hearings today, and it was pitiful.
It was pathetic.
They didn't have, They launched their best ammo.
They launched the tactics that have always worked for them.
They had Code Pink in there.
They had people dressed up like members of the Klan.
They have they have some group of black activists somewhere doing a sit-in at one of Sessions' offices, the stuff that's always worked for them.
The stuff that has always garnered them favorable media coverage, the stuff that has always successfully been implemented to frighten and scare Republicans into cowering in the corner.
None of it's working.
And in many ways, it's all they know.
They don't know how to prevail on ideas because they can't.
Their ideas.
There was another poll I saw by the way when I was away.
And it's not new.
It is that self-identified conservatives equal 35% in America, self-identified liberals 26%.
And that's been the case, plus or minus a couple points either way, for 30 years.
The liberals are not the majority, at least when you ask people to self-identify.
Now, in their minds, they are the majority, but but they they know in their minds they can't win in ideas because they don't have the support of enough people for their ideas.
Folks, this is something we can never forget.
This in fact is what we were all questioning during the eight years of Obama.
We're sitting here, have we finally been overtaken?
Have we lost the country?
People actually agree with this garbage.
And it turns out they didn't.
They didn't have the guts to say they disapproved of Obama, but if you're asking them about his agenda, a clear majority disapproves of his agenda.
But when you put him on the question or in the in the palette, the question, they will not go negative because of race, I'm sure.
But the fact of the matter is they are a minority.
And that didn't change in the 80s.
They were able to make themselves look like the majority with the assistance of the media and a successful cowering by the Republicans.
I mean, it was it was, and it it uh infected everybody.
So many of us were asking, have we lost the country?
Are we now officially outnumbered?
I can't tell you the number of people I know who thought that we had finally lost the country, that we were outnumbered.
We aren't.
And when you get right down to it, uh, other than the state of California, New York, we're not even close.
They're not even close.
So the tactics that they have used, they never triumph with superior ideas because theirs aren't.
They triumph via bullying.
They triumph with uh well, phoniness.
I mean, they they they make it look like you you look at this.
Look at gay marriage.
A majority of people in the states, when referendums came up opposed it.
But the Supreme Court comes along and says it's constitutional and so it's the law of the land.
But it is not supported by a majority of the American people.
In that way, it's forced on everybody.
Same thing as Roe vs.
Way.
It's forced on everybody, and it's made to look like the American people support it when they don't.
And so the left is in a situation here because they're up against somebody they don't know how to deal with, Donald Trump.
Donald Trump's not an insider, he's not a typical Republican who cowers in fear at all of their attacks.
I mean, if you if you're a Democrat, if you're a liberal Democrat, you have to have some things in your mind that the Republicans are going to always cave.
And all you have to do is call them racist or sexist and no cave, that uh all you have to do is is call them uh people have no compassion, or whatever it is, and their experience is the Republicans cave, and the experience is you can bully your way to power.
And then once you get there, you can put all kinds of your people in these cabinet-level positions, these regulatory agencies unelected regulatory positions so that they continue to implement the liberal agenda even though they haven't been elected to do it.
It makes it look like they're a majority when they're not.
But when they have to win with ideas, they can't, and it's on display right here in the sessions confirmation.
They're they're overmatched.
They come at Jeff Sessions in the way they always go after re In fact, they're even pulling back on that because they know they don't have the votes.
So they're going through the motions of trying to categorize Sessions as a former Klan member in hiding or a racist or what have you, but that's even half-assed.
They just they can't beat Sessions debating the Constitution.
They can't beat Sessions by discussing the Constitution and making him look like he doesn't believe in it because they're the ones that behave outside it.
So their natural tendency is to bully and to threaten and to allege and to accuse.
And that isn't working.
It's not intimidating.
Like Merrill Street, people are laughing at Meryl Streep, except Hollywood people.
People are laughing at her, or they're they're telling her to shut up, or we're tired of it.
We don't hear it.
Code Pink has not changed anything in there today, didn't change anybody's minds.
Um an association of black activists with a sit-in at Sessions office, not changing anybody's mind, and this is all they've known.
They can't win with ideas.
So they've got to be.
I actually think that they're depressed.
I think if you if you could drill down into the pit of the soul of each of these leftists, you would find that they're in utter panic and uh in a deep depression because they can't stop anything the way they've always been able to.
Not now they can that doesn't mean they're gonna give up and go away.
That's my whole point.
They're not.
But they do look pathetic.
They look outclassed.
I mean, to watch Diane Fine, it was pathetic.
Diane Feinstein in her opening statement on Jeff Sessions bringing up Roe vs.
Wade and clearly trying to say that Sessions was going to force women to the back alley.
Nobody's buying it.
That's not who the guy is.
They get away with lying about people and mischaracterizing them when the media piles on and helps them.
But even and the media didn't pile on and help them with sessions today in the New York Times.
So I I just I think that they're trying to figure out what happened is since they're in denial, since they have not come to grips with the fault that they have been rejected.
And by the way, nobody wants to think that.
Nobody wants to think they've been rejected, either in a personal relationship, at work, wherever.
Nobody wants to feel rejected.
And that's something that whenever it is happening to you, you'll you'll try to convince yourself that it's anything but reject.
Rejection's so utterly personal.
And they have been rejected.
They have been clearly, they have been politically policy-wise rejected after what they think is the historic presidency of Obama, the Hope and Jane's greatest president ever, and then Hillary to follow, and all of that's been rejected, and they haven't come to grips with it.
So there has to be a reason this was stolen from them.
So they want these hearings now.
And in fact, from the politico, this headline, former Clinton campaign manager compares the hack of the Democrat National Committee to Watergate.
And this would be, who is this?
MOOC.
Hillary Clinton's former campaign manager wants America to take cyber crimes more seriously, writing in the New York Times that the effects of such crimes.
I told you, they want Watergate-style hearings.
They need to find a way to get their power back.
They can't win it back right now.
They can't find enough people to vote for them, so they've got to find a way to criminalize the people who beat them and get them thrown out of office.
It's fascinating to watch.
We will be right back.
Don't go away.
Back to the phones we go.
This is uh Ronald in Riverside, California.
Glad you waited, sir.
You're next on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
How are you doing?
Meryl Kiddos from Janice, Gwyn and Hale.
Um what I'd like to ask is how all of our senators, everybody in the government blame us for bringing the illegal people here.
We didn't bring them here.
They came.
How come they didn't have that discussion with their family saying that one day we may have to be divided up and sent back home?
They divide each other's brother, but they don't pop.
Um we've got a horrible connection, either that or you're So I think what he's asking me, and you're gonna have to cut me some slack on this, because I'm deaf.
Uh but but I think what he's asking me is that these illegal immigrants are here, and I'm sure he's he's bouncing off of the Durban question to uh Jeff Sessions today in the hearings, what about the children?
What about the DACA dreamers?
There's tens of thousands, what are you gonna do?
What are you gonna do about them?
And and I think caller is saying, why is it our responsibility?
We didn't bring them here.
They came here on their own.
Why is it our responsibility in the face of them breaking the law?
Why is it our responsibility to provide for them?
Why isn't it theirs?
Is that pretty much what he's asking?
And why don't there why don't their parents because we are talking about the dreamers of kids?
And you know, why why is it up to their parents?
Why are these kids parents?
Well, because here's a dirty little secret about this.
Am I the only one that gets this?
How am I getting deep doo doo for explaining this?
Well, okay, here goes.
Uh Ronald, the whole point of the kids coming here without their parents.
You know, this this train that came up from Guatemala, Salvador, Central America, the whole point is for the kids to get here, and then for compassion to take over and say, how can we have these kids here without their parents and bring the parents here?
That is the purpose of all the from the Democrat Party's angle.
That's why this happens.
Here's an example of what I was just saying, an AP story of all places.
It's another poll, an associated press poll.
Obama won nation's approval but didn't unite it.
No kidding.
More Americans feel Barack Obama's presidency divided the country than feel it brought people together, according to an AP poll.
Yep.
And so Obama's swan song speeches tonight.
If I I wouldn't want to be the person that's telling about this poll.
They probably won't.
But there's no doubt about this.
He won the nation's approval but didn't unite.
You know, there's no reason for disapproval, folks.
If you look at polls on what people think of Obama's agenda and policies, not very many support now.
If you look at this concept, did Obama unite America?
No, he didn't.
And yet you look at his personal numbers and they're what, 55?
I don't know, it's it's it's a majority.
No logical explanation for this.
I mean, there's no correlation.
If people think he did not, in fact, it's not just that, if people think that his presidency led to a more divided America, what the hell is there to support about that?
And if people don't like Obama care, and by the way, a majority of Americans want it repealed.
I mean, you can't find an Obama policy that has majority appeal, and yet he does.
What explains this, I ask rhetorically.
He's likable.
Okay, I'll accept it.
He's likable.
He's all likable guy.
Yeah, okay, fine, fine and dandy.
Eight years after Obama's historic election, twenty-seven percent see the U.S. as more united as a result.
Like to know what they're smoking.
Twenty-seven percent think it's more united.
Forty-four percent say the country's more divided.
Well, how can you think otherwise?
If if you if if you watch the news, uh you can't help but realize the country's the most divided it's been since Lincoln freed the slaves.
And that's the last time I've seen a Democrats as mad as they are now.
You can't, I mean, I don't care what the drivebys do.
They try to paint this country's unified and happy and kumbaya, they can't because it isn't.
But now we've got all these optimism polls coming off what Trump's victory, which equals Obama's and Hillary's defeat.
So the audio sound bites we go.
We're gonna start here at the top.
This morning on Washington Journal on C SPAN, the guest is, and this is good, by the way, a Republican congressman from Alabama named Bradley Byrne.
And in the old days, this might have gone the other way, but it's a new day out there.
We have a caller from a guy named Mike in Ohio.
And he had a complaint about me and Sheets Byrd.
Could you look to the cab rep?
You and Judge Sessions say a word to both Russ Livbaugh and Sean Hannity, because every time those two people mentioned the deceased Robert Byrd, the KKK in the middle of his name.
Would you please look into the cab?
Let's say, please, Russ Limbaugh, please stop doing that.
The guy's passed away.
He cannot defend himself, and he did apologize for any thing he did with the KKK when he was a young man.
I never call him KKK.
I may say Grand Kleagel, but I don't say KKK.
I call him Sheets.
This guy's confusing me with somebody.
I call Robert Sheets Byrd.
Okay, so you have a Republican congressman here, uh again, his name is Bradley Byrd, and here's a caller from Ohio.
Would you tell Rush Limbaugh to cut it out?
Do you agree with Rush Limboy?
And most in many cases the Republican would kind of waffle and get out of the way.
Not condemn me because they're supposedly afraid to do that, but they wouldn't come out and tell the caller to take a hike.
But listen to this.
There were people in the South who were racist, who were members of the Ku Klux Klan, White Citizens' Councils, who did change their minds.
I'm glad Senator Byrd said that.
But to come out and attack Republicans without understanding the history of the Democratic Party is not fair.
And it's appropriate for us to bring that up to make sure we all understand the history of it.
Amen.
The guy didn't back down.
He told the caller, hey, look, it's the Democrat Party.
That was the Ku Klux Klan.
It was the Democrat Party that was the party's segregation.
The Democrat Party, the party of Bull Connor and fire hosing and throwing the dogs on the protesters' film.
It wasn't Democrats that did that.
It was the Democrats that blocked the doors of their universities, Democrat governors.
And Sheetsbird was a Grand Kleagel in the case at Ku Klux Klan.
Now he did apologize for it.
And in one of his apologies on Fox, he actually uttered the N-word.
And he was applauded for having the courage to do so in the context that uh that he so mentioned it.
But this is uh this is another, I think, positive sign that there's less tendency, not a cower, from these kinds of assault, verbal assaults that the Democrats and their unhinged accolytes are known for.
I mentioned earlier there was uh real news made at the session's confirmation hearings.
Well, real news in the sense, if you are a Democrat, this is this is real news, Rob not audio soundbite number four.
And the question here comes from Senator Grassley, who's the chairman of the Judiciary Committee conducting the hearings.
He said, during the course of the presidential campaign, you made a number of statements about the investigation of Hillary Clinton relating to her handling of emails and regarding certain actions of the Clinton Foundation.
But now you've been nominated to serve as the AG.
In light of those comments that you made, some have expressed concern about whether you can approach the Clinton matter impartially in both fact and appearance.
How do you plan to address those concerns?
I, like a lot of people, made comments about the issues in that campaign with regard to Secretary Clinton and some of the comments I made.
I do believe that that could place my objectivity in question.
I've given that thought.
I believe the proper thing for me to do would be to recuse myself from any questions involving those kind of investigations that involve Secretary Clinton and it will raise during the campaign.
Or could be otherwise connected to it.
So there you go.
So Sessions said, hey, I'll recuse.
That's the way to deal with it.
He's right about this, by the way.
He was during the campaign trail among those thinking that the Hillary needed to be investigated, this whole email thing and the Clinton Foundation become attorney general, the proper thing to do for him to be would be to recuse himself while the Justice Department conducts the investigations.
Grassley.
Grassley said, when you say that you will recuse yourself, you mean that you will actually recuse, and the decision will therefore, I assume, fall to a deputy attorney general.
I ask, because after Attorney General Lynch met with President Clinton in Phoenix, she said she would quote unquote defer to the FBI, but she never officially recused.
So while news was made here, what really happened is they knifed Lynch.
She did not officially recuse, and there's a procedure for that which I would follow.
And I believe that would be the best approach for the country because we can never have a political dispute turn into a criminal dispute.
That's not in any way that would suggest anything other than absolute objectivity.
This country does not punish its political enemies, but this country ensures that no one is above the law.
Well, it does punish its political enemies.
The Democrats do.
They try to, and that's their modus operandi.
They've been trying to criminalize conservatism for as long as I've been alive.
That's that's inarguable, folks, that they've been trying to criminalize conservatism.
But Sessions did the right thing, recuse himself, but it was great.
Because in the process, he pointed out how these vaunted civil libertarian and judging go straight by the law Democrats.
She didn't recuse herself, but I will.
One more here, and then we'll be free to move on to other things.
This is the question from Senator Diane Feinstein.
She said, I want your response to this.
And I want your answer to this question.
How do you intend to put behind you what are strongly felt personal views?
How will you take off the political hat and be an attorney general who fairly enforces the law and the Constitution for all?
Because this question is rooted in a myth that Sessions was some racist uh segregationist type guy when he was an attorney and attorney general in Alabama.
So the premise of this question is, well, how do we know that you're not still secretly supporting the Klan?
How do we know that you're going to be fair?
How do we know that you're going to enforce the law for everybody regardless of whatever perversion they have?
And here's how that well, that's what she means.
And here's what Session said.
I would direct their attention first to the remarks of Senator Spector, who in his entire career said he made one vote that he would regret, and that was the vote against me.
This caricature of me in 1986 was not correct.
I had become United States attorney.
I supported as the civil rights attorney said, major civil rights cases in my district that integrated schools that prosecuted the Klan that ended single member districts that denied African Americans the right to hold office.
The complaints about the voter fraud case and the complaints about the Klan case that I vigorously prosecuted and supported are false.
Bingo, and that was the end of that.
Do you do you know, for those of you that may not, there's one thing.
One thing that the Democrats and the media have been going back to when Sessions was a young man in Alabama to try to disqualify.
One thing, and that one thing was a joke he told about the Klan.
And they've tried to make it as though he wasn't joking, that he was actually telling the truth.
Because they have no sense of humor themselves, aside from that.
And there's certain things in their world you can't laugh about, only they can.
And I may I'm paraphrasing this.
But he was in a conversation with people about the Klan and how bad they were.
And um, his joke was to finally act outraged when he found out the Klan smoked marijuana.
And so what they wanted people to believe was that Sessions was perfectly fine with the Klan.
Whatever they were doing, perfect.
But when he found out they smoked marijuana, that was it.
No more support of the Klan.
He told a joke about it, uh, and it was with another person that was a typical type of humor.
And they tried to zero in on it as Sessions telling the truth.
And he really didn't like the Klan until he found out they smoked marijuana.
And this comes from their own prejudice, by the way.
Not any on the part of Sessions.
And they tried to turn that joke.
By the way, I have personal experience with this and people on the left.
And they tried the last three, four weeks have been about trying to make that one comment the reason to disqualify Sessions.
And it blew up in their face appropriately.
But that's what this is all.
Other than that, they've got nothing on him, is the point.
The joke the joke the joke was that that Sessions was thinking about joining the Klan until he found out they smoked marijuana.
USA Today ran this as recently as yesterday.
They said at least one former colleague, and that's all it was, was one former colleague.
Uh one former colleague noted that Sessions was uh until he found out the Klan smoke marijuana.
It's the same misunderstanding that these people have when Trump stood up there and said, hey, maybe the Russians can find Hillary Zima.
Hey, you people of Russia, if you find the emails from Hillary, would you please let our media know?
And they thought they said that Trump was asking the Russians to hack Hillary's email account.
And Trump was lampooning these people.
He was making fun of them to their faith.
About how hard it had been to find Hillary's emails when somebody knows where they are.
It was the same thing with Sessions.
They tr actually tried to make people think that Sessions was perfectly fine with the Klan until he found out they smoked dope.
And that that that that was the straw that drove me.
Of course, it's pure caca.
But that's what they base their opposition to.
That's what they've been trying the last four weeks to get drummed up.
They tried to sell that joke to the American people as reality.
Here is Joe in Glen Rock, Pennsylvania.
Great to have you, Joe.
How are you doing, sir?
Hi, Rush.
Uh they told me to get right to it.
Uh Fox News.
Boy, my wife and I have been loyal viewers, but it's getting harder and harder to watch it.
Uh Meghan Kelly, never watched her after that debate question.
Uh even Brett Bear a couple weeks before the election referred to Donald Trump's sexual assaults and Bill Clinton's affairs.
If I didn't love my TV so much, how to put my sho shoe through it.
What kind of TV do you have?
What kind of TV do you have out there, Drew?
Oh, it's a Samsung smart 55 minutes.
You should have thrown a shoe through it.
Just kidding.
Samsung makes good TVs.
I'm just kidding.
I got a couple of them here.
They were bought for me.
It's just the anti-Trappers, you know, the Star Waltz, the Goldbergs, the Steve Hayes.
Uh I felt like the entire pre-election I was being uh insulted.
Well, now wait a minute.
Though those those guys work at Fox, they're they're not they're not they're analysts, they're Fox contributors.
I may it it this may be a thin line of differentiation, but they all work elsewhere.
They're uh Hayes is the Weekly Standard Goldberg at National Review.
Uh, Stewartz works there, you're right, Chris Dyerwaltz.
But then are you are you happy, for example, then that there have been some staff changes over there?
Oh, I love Tucker Carlson.
You like Tucker.
Oh, yeah, he's great.
Okay.
Well then then Meghan Kelly, you know.
What about loss there?
Uh George Will.
I gotta be careful what I say on the air.
Why?
Are you thinking of going profane on us here?
Yeah, I could I could get real profane with some of those those uh people.
Uh I quit watching a Raleigh, for instance, in like a year ago.
I listen to you every day, and what he comes up with is three, four days old.
It's like he's phoning it in.
Oh geez.
You know, this is a this is tough for me.
I I um uh uh Well you know them all.
I understand.
Uh Chris Wallace.
Look at the people he has on on Sundays.
Near Tandon uh l week before last uh gave her the lead off and let her jump all over Carl Rose and didn't say a word.
Well um I don't know if you're gonna ask me what I thought about all this, but if you were you forgot.
And now we're out of time.
I'm really sorry.
I'm glad you called though.
No, I have not forgotten.
I have not forgotten that I promised yesterday to dig deep on the Russian hacking evidence, the story of the fact that there wasn't any Russian impact on the election outcome.
I haven't I haven't forgotten about that.
Whether I'm gonna get into it today is another matter.
But I did not forget that I was nah I'm gonna do it.
I'm gonna do it.
Um there's still lots of the stuff in the general infostack, as uh as I call it.
Young people having problems.
▲
Export Selection