All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 23, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:45
December 23, 2016, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, go ahead and hit that thing so that we can get going here.
Just hit it.
Just hit it out.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open live.
It's a new program, whatever you want to talk about.
And win back, we've got the audio soundbite here.
We got a clip from the Buckley-Gorvidal debate.
It happened August 28th, 1968.
It was on ABC-TV.
And I Buckley did not use the F-word.
He used a Q-word.
Called him a GDQ.
You'll hear it here coming up in just a second.
Now, I did a little research.
This thing's running on Netflix.
I remember when it came out.
I haven't seen it.
It's got all kinds of people thinking it's great and it's wonderful and it's not a hit piece and it's fine and dandy.
But what I've read some things about it, there was a review by James Rosen at Fox News and a review by a guy named Michael Lind, L-I-N-D.
A little bit about him, not that it's relevant to anything.
But Michael Lind at one time was thought to be the new Buckley.
He was the brand.
He was the wonderkin.
Henry Kissinger thought he was the greatest thing in the world.
Buckley thought he was the greatest thing in the world.
National, a bunch of people, L-I-N-D, and then he went and disappointed everybody.
He was not what they thought him to be.
They thought he was brilliant and incisive and analytical.
It's a very rare bunch of air that people in this group breathe.
Kissinger was in it.
Buckley was in it.
Some others.
And he was identified.
And it ended up being a disappointment.
Now he's more of a moderate slash progressive, if anything.
And he wrote a review.
And his was at Politico.
And I've read these two reviews.
And the National Review article on this is about 50 pages long.
And I haven't been able to go through all of that.
But what I can't find anybody by name who has said that this was one of the greatest regrets of Buckley's life.
Now, what the documentary did have was a bunch of modern day pundits weighing in on their thoughts on both Vidal and Buckley.
And maybe one of those people who claim to know Buckley told the producers of the documentary that Buckley regretted this more than anything else in his career.
And so the narrator, the scriptwriter, put it in.
I can't find anybody in the documentary actually having said that other than the narrator, but I'm not through with my, because there are people at National Review that'll know.
And I just, I don't have time to get hold of them here.
I can't.
Not that I can't.
I just don't have time right now.
But I'm going to find out about this.
Only to satisfy the caller, not because I care about the documentary.
Here is the bite.
It runs a little over a minute long.
The famous exchange the caller was talking about.
You must realize what some of the political issues are here.
People in the United States happen to believe that the United States policy is wrong in Vietnam and that Viet Cong are correct in wanting to organize their country in their own way politically.
This happens to be pretty much the opinion of Western Europe and many other parts of the world.
If it is a novelty in Chicago, that is too bad.
But I assume that the point of the American democracy and some of the people who are not in the world.
Somebody shut up a minute.
No, I won't.
And some people were auto-Nazi, and the answer is that they were well-treated by people who ostracized them.
And I'm for ostracizing people who egg on other people to shoot American Marines and American soldiers.
I know you don't know you.
And the only pro or crypto-Nazi I can think of is yourself.
Failing that, I will only say that you might have.
Now listen, you've written me a crypto-Nazi.
Let's stop.
Let's stay plastered.
Gentlemen, let's go back to his pornography and stop making any allusions of Nazi infantry in the last war.
It's Buckley there, going after Gore Vidal.
I, I'm just, I have to tell you, I've not ever heard anybody, nor Buckley himself, say anything like that.
This is the most regretable event in his career.
But there are people who would know better than I. So we will find out.
But that's what the caller was talking about.
It was on ABC TV.
I don't think it was Dick Cabot that was moderated.
It might have been, because he had a show back then on ABC.
They were going up against the Tonight Show and Johnny Carson, Dick Cabot.
Dick Cabot's like about 5'2.
If he played third base, well, he couldn't because he couldn't see over the pitcher's mound to throw to first.
But tiny little guy back there, and he was highly, highly, you know, Hampton's intellectual.
And they were going up against the Tonight Show with this.
But I think this was a special, it wasn't a, it might have been a firing line thing, but that was on PBS.
At any rate, that's that.
Now, folks, back to what I had promised an hour ago.
And that is this whole thing of the nuclear arms race that Trump says, let's have one.
Let's have one.
And the left now quaking in their boots in fear.
This starts with the naming of Sean Spicer as the White House press secretary.
He has been the spokesman for the Republican National Committee most recently.
And he was on Fox News last night on the Kelly file, but Kelly wasn't there filing.
It was Sandra Smith filing on the Kelly file.
And Sean Spicer said in an exclusive interview that Donald Trump is going to hold the media accountable, and Donald Trump is going to correct the record.
Spicer says Trump is unique among politicians because he's not having to put everything through the filter of the mainstream media.
He says it is absolutely fascinating.
It makes every day, every hour, just unbelievable because you never know what's going to happen.
You know you're having that conversation with the American people and they can have it back with him.
And by virtue of this, we are not needing the media.
We are edging the media out.
We're going to go over the heads of the media.
But when he said we are going to hold the media accountable, that's when they started having cows and kittens and everything else.
Because in their world, they hold people accountable.
It's not the other way around.
And what Spicer's talking about here is Trump's tweeting.
And I think he makes a great point.
It's Trump's way of having a conversation with everyday Americans.
It's Trump's way of letting everyday Americans know what he thinks.
You know, when Bush didn't have a press conference every other day, the media was just beside themselves being critical.
Don't you think you need to address the American people?
Let us question you so the American people find out what's on your mind.
And Obama goes all these days without one.
They don't care.
Hillary goes almost a year and a half without one.
They don't care.
Now Trump is letting the American people know what he thinks four or five times a day.
And they can't deal with it.
So this takes us to MSNBC this morning.
We are up to audio soundbite number five.
Sean Spicer, after having been on the Kelly file last night, then goes over to MSNBC.
And they end the segment.
And they're talking about all this media stuff and Spicer's comments about how Trump's going to hold the media accountable.
They go to a break.
And during the break, Trump called Spicer.
Trump is watching.
Trump is one of the five people that watches MSNBC.
And so he was watching this and he saw Spicer on there and he saw what happened and he called Spicer and wanted to talk to Mika Bzinski, the co-host, during the commercial break.
This just isn't done.
So Spicer put her on the phone during the commercial break.
And after the break is over and they come back to the program, Scarborough and Zezinski have this little exchange.
Sean Spicer.
He just left, but he was on the phone.
With the president-elect, Mika asked the president-elect while we had the opportunity what his position was on trying to clarify the tweet yesterday regarding the nuclear arsenal and the president-elect told you what.
Let it be an arms race.
We will outmatch them at every pass.
And outlast them all.
And outlast them all.
All right, you can put that down as breaking news.
There you go.
There you go.
And this just caused panic throughout the media.
Up next is Spicer over on the Today Show.
And he's being interviewed by Matt Wauer.
And Matt Wauer said this president is going to reverse 40 years of policy in this country where presidents since Reagan pledged to reduce the number of nuclear weapons and warheads we have.
We're not going to sit back, Matt, and watch other nations threaten our safety.
If another country wants to expand their nuclear capability, the U.S. is not going to sit back and idly buy it.
But just to be clear, the president isn't saying we're going to do this.
He said unless they come to their senses.
It's a warning to them that this president's going to take action.
Exactly right.
So Putin's out there.
What Putin does?
He huffs and puffs and so forth.
And in the midst of congratulating Trump and talking about how the Democrats are sore losers, you know, Putin starts huffing and puffing about the Soviet Union, well, Russia reviving and starts talking about weapons.
And Putin has been flying bear bombers and otherwise other military aircraft very close to U.S. borders for quite a while now.
And Trump said, okay, well, let's have an arms race.
You want an arms race?
Let's have an arms race.
Putin backed down immediately, which is the point.
And what Spicer is saying, that he was issuing a warning.
And see, the left does not communicate this way.
The left, don't forget, they come out of conflict resolution 101.
They come out of ringing their hands and political correctness where you never say anything to offend anybody and you don't taunt.
I mean, that's childish.
You don't make fun of them.
You don't do any of that.
They come from a very cocoon-like world where the way people really talk to each other gets penalized.
And so Trump is the president of the most powerful nation in the world.
And he says to Putin, who thinks that he's going to be the leader of the most powerful nation in the world, Russia, Trump's, well, you want to have an arms race?
Well, let's have an arms race.
Meaning, you don't have a chance, Vlad.
We already decked you once in this regard, and that's why you lost it over.
You want to do it again?
We'll be glad to do it again.
It's a warning.
Spicer is exactly right.
The left does not recognize this kind of talk, except in Western movies, which they hate.
They think Western movies and cowboy kind of stuff.
That's why they insult Bush by calling him a cowboy, insulted Reagan by calling him a cowboy.
Because this is how cowboys talk.
This is how gunslingers talk.
This is how guys do duels talk.
This is how guys that wear guns around their belt and pull guns out and start shooting.
It's horrible.
These are the people who want to get rid of guns.
And here's Trump.
Say, you want an arms race?
Bring it on, dude.
Let's have an arms race.
And they think, because they're so sheltered and because they come from a world of political correctness, they really think that Trump now is promising and committing to one rather than issuing a warning.
So Spicer makes it clear to Matt Wauer, but Matt Wauer is not getting it.
He doubled down this morning, Sean.
Speaking to Mika Brzezinski, he was asked about this, and he said, I'm paraphrasing here, let there be an arms race.
If this is the result, let there be an arms race.
We will match them at every turn.
He's saying he is preparing for an arms race.
Since he was elected November 8th, he has had one success after another with Carrier, with Boeing reduced to the United States.
This is very cultural.
This is nuclear proliferation.
But other countries need to be put on notice that he is not going to sit back and allow them to undermine our safety, our sovereignty.
He is going to match other countries and take action.
Now, the one thing you have to know or keep in mind as you listen to these is that in minds like Matt Lauers or Mika Dzynski, Putin is not the enemy.
Trump is.
Trump is the enemy.
The American nuclear arsenal is the problem.
We have to reduce it so that we don't threaten these other people.
It is because we're so big and threaten these other people that they do terrorism, that they have their own nukes.
It's all our fault.
That's from the Democrat Party standard operating manual procedure.
And they've believed this my whole life.
It's the American people's fault.
It's the United States' fault for being a superpower.
That is the unstable, destabilizing element in the world.
We have to be cut down to size.
So when Putin ramps up, they understand it.
When Putin wants to increase his arsenal, they understand it because, well, he's got to stay even with us.
I mean, it's only fair.
And that's why Obama was talking about Iran getting news.
Well, who are we to tell them that they can't have them?
I mean, we've got them, and nobody told us we can't have them, so who are we?
So the left has this really, do not doubt me on this, really convoluted view of the world and the United States' role in it.
And they really think that we're the problem.
And that our size and our military might, now economic might, threatens all these other people.
And that if we weren't this big and powerful, these other people wouldn't be as mean as they are.
They wouldn't be as aggressive.
So it's only understandable that Putin would want nukes.
And it's understandable that Iran would.
But we should be getting rid of ours.
That's how to deal with the threat according to these pansies.
Well, Trump is not a pansy.
And if Putin's going to start huffing and puffing about it, Trump's, you want an arms raise, bud?
Fine.
We'll be glad to get into one with you if that's what you want.
This is, I'm looking for a way to describe this.
It's not.
The left just doesn't get it.
This is nope.
I know exactly what I want to say, but I don't want reaction to me to cloud your understanding of this.
Well, Snertley is urging me on here.
Just say it, right?
No, because it's going to be totally lied about and misrepresented, and they're going to turn it into something totally irrelevant to what I'm talking about.
Suffice it to say that Putin ramping up nukes, the Iranians, fine.
We understand it.
We're so big, we threaten them.
They've got to take steps to protect themselves.
Therefore, the burden is on us to make the world safe by getting rid of that which threatens these people.
They have no concept of the fact that Putin's a bad guy, except for the fact, he's a bad guy now because he got involved in a campaign.
Before this, Obama and Putin were buddy-buddy, and the media thought it was cool.
But now, since Putin is reputed to have screwed Hillary in the election, not literally, now they hate Putin.
They've never been bothered with the Iranians getting nukes because they think it's totally understandable.
I'm telling you, folks, they're children.
They are dangerous.
These people being in power, people like Obama or Hillary or Matt Lauer, the way these people think, it's bad for us.
And there's even more to this.
Spicer comes back and reacts, but I have taken break, so we'll do that and continue in a moment.
Okay, talk to Rich Lowry over at National Real.
Buckley did regret it.
It was special election coverage 1968.
Howard K. Smith, remember Howard K. Smith?
I'm Howard K. Smith.
He was the moderator.
ABC special election coverage, the 68 campaign.
That's why the reference to Chicago and in the clip.
And what Buckley regretted was the use of the word queer and tried to write his way out of the episode is what I was told.
So the documentary was correct.
I don't know to what degree.
I mean, the document, the lady that called, the caller, said that Buckley's lifelong regret that he never got over.
And don't know if that was the case.
I mean, when I was around him, he didn't seem to regret it.
Wasn't carrying it around as a burden.
But nevertheless, he did regret it.
Apparently, the use of the word queer in talking about Ms. Vidal.
So, yeah, that word, well, it's not even used anymore.
I mean, they do.
It's kind of like there's no point in.
Don't even suck me into this.
There's no reason going there.
Explain the answer to the question.
That's it.
This nuke stuff with Putin, it all got started because Putin yesterday called for Russia to reinforce its military nuclear potential.
Putin got this started by saying we're ramping up, and that's what Trump was reacting to.
The left is so off-base about this.
It's our Christmas Eve Eve show here in the EIB network.
Last program live for me this year.
When I'm back next, it'll be 2017.
By the way, you should know I am being forced to take the next two weeks off.
Some on the staff are concerned.
I haven't had taken any time off for the most part.
It was in March.
Well, yes, I have.
I've taken Christmas off every year, but they're forcing me to take this since I work this week.
I think next week and the first week of January, since the only thing really happening that week is Congress comes back on June 3rd to formally reorganize, but nothing of any significance.
And if it does, no matter where in the world I am, I'm within a moment's reach of the microphone here.
So I think, I don't even know the dates.
January 10th, is that when I'm back?
9th.
You know, folks, not only is Biden dumping on Hillary, Joe Biden's out there saying, well, you know, she never really knew why she was running.
You got to cut her some slack.
She didn't really know.
Maybe wasn't even really sure she wanted to.
She did it because she thought she had to to break the glass ceiling.
And they're trying to cover for her loss.
They're starting to dump it on her now.
This is only a matter of time.
You can only blame the Russians for so long.
Now they're starting to blame Hillary.
Some people are.
Not everybody yet, but some are.
And Biden, as an agent of Obama, Biden's purpose is to make sure that Obama remains the power figure in the Democrat Party going forward, not Hillary.
In the normal scheme of things, Hillary would be the power figure.
She ran for president, even though she lost.
And Obama's leaving the office.
But he wants to be the power figure.
He wants to be the face of the Democrat Party going forward.
So all this stuff that is designed to blame it on Hillary for whatever reasons is designed literally to take her out as the face of the party.
And there's another story about this that is, I think this is the Clinton camp fighting back because the headline, this is the Wall Street Journal.
Candidates for the top job at the DNC are blaming Obama.
I love this, folks.
The long knives are coming out.
Now, here, let me give you a dirty little secret.
Everybody in the Democrat Party knows this.
They would never say it while Obama is still in office, and many wouldn't say it even after he left.
But there isn't a Democrat in politics alive who does not know what the Obama presidency has meant for the Democrat Party around the country.
They've lost 1,500 seats.
The Democrats only have five states, ladies and gentlemen, where they control the governorship and the state legislature.
Only five.
This election, this presidential election, was supposed to cement Democrat rule for two generations.
The Supreme Court, it was supposed to wipe out the Republican Party.
This was going to be the end of it.
Trump, as the nominee losing, was to be the end of the Republican Party.
The Democrats were going to have basically one party rule for 50 years.
And look at what actually has happened.
It's practically the reverse.
The Democrats are not a national party.
They have lost governorships, state legislatures, mayoralties.
They have lost 1,500 seats since elections 2010, 12, 14, and this one.
It's been devastating.
And it's all Obama.
It is the rejection of the Obama agenda.
And it's inarguable because he campaigned on it for Hillary.
If you want to protect my legacy, you'll vote for her.
It was incredible what he did.
He really put his agenda on the left because he believes he has the same kind of connection with the American people that Trump has.
He thinks he's universally loved and adored because that approval rating, which is a lie or a misrepresentation, it's mainly people that don't have the guts to tell a pollster that they disapprove of the job because of the racial component.
Because whenever Obama's policies are on the ballot, they get skunked.
If he's on the ballot with them, not so bad.
Well, this story in the Wall Street Journal, the painful truth is that despite Obama's victories in 08 in 2012, a Democrat Party has lost enormous political ground over the last eight years, said Bernie Sanders at a rally for the socialist Muslim Keith Ellison, who wants to run the Democrat National Committee.
Whatever the leadership of the Democrat Party has been doing over the last many years has failed, and we need fundamental change.
Mo Elethy, a top DNC official under Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz, said of party officials they don't want a chair.
Get this now.
Mo Elethy, we don't need anymore a chairman who's going to disrespect or critique Trump.
We need somebody that recognizes things have not been going well for us and we have to fix some things.
The future is not about destroying Trump.
The future is about rebuilding a Democrat Party.
This is all coming out now.
And some people, you know, as the race for power in the Democrat Party intensifies, this is where the honesty begins to surface.
Obama destroyed this party, folks.
Literally has destroyed this party while elevating himself to whatever heights.
If he's really achieved them, I still don't believe it.
But I'll go along with the flow for now.
But the party has bitten the dust.
And it was happening right in front of our faces.
And we didn't have the confidence to believe it because of the media.
We believe the media was convincing 80% of the American people of the opposite.
And it turned out that wasn't true either.
Here is Kevin, Elkhart, Indiana.
Welcome, sir.
Great to have you on Open Line Friday.
Hi.
Merry Christmas, Rush.
Same to you, sir.
I was wondering, the way the deranged liberals are treating President Trump and his family right now, do you think they will have a negative impact on the Independent and swing voters?
Do you know how many electoral votes the Independents got?
How many?
Zero.
Well, they say that the Independents are key to winning elections.
Yeah, the Independents mostly broke for Trump, and they broke for Romney.
You know, this is one of these old saws that he who wins the Independence wins the White House.
That's a liberal Democrat trick, by the way.
But here's your question.
Is all of this stuff like is being done to Ivanka Trump?
I think it is having a devastating effect on Democrats.
We know this by virtue of the election in November.
I don't think that, Kevin, there's any doubt that it is.
These people have been under the same illusion that we have, that they are the majority and that everybody agrees with them or the vast majority agrees with them.
And that's what has emboldened them to act so reprehensibly.
But I think the truth of the matter is that most of America, when they hear about this, look, you've got some deranged and unhinged leftists that applaud this, and a lot of them are on social media.
But I'm telling you, the bulk of the people, when they hear about it, there's no reason to disrespect Ivanka.
In fact, if you get right down to it, Ivanka is for climate change.
Ivanka is all for single-parent families, and so she's as close to a liberal as there you're going to get in her dad's inner circle.
These people are just, they're deranged.
But I think that most people, I've got confidence that most people in this country still have a decent sense of manners, propriety, morality.
And I'm confident that most people, when they hear about this, are disgusted by it.
The real question is how many people hear about it as it actually happened.
And the media is trying to sanitize this, Kevin.
The media is not describing this guy and his husband as the provocateurs that they are.
They are not reporting that the guy and his husband were tweeting an hour in advance that Ivanka was getting ready to board the plane and let's go harass her.
They're not reporting any of that.
The media knows full well how damaging this is, and so they're trying to clean it up a bit.
But again, the media is not nearly as monolithically successful as we think, as evidenced by this last election.
So I think you can feel better today than you would have six months ago that incidents like this are not helpful to the Democrat cause and do indeed irritate average ordinary voters.
I don't have any doubt about it.
I have a renewed confidence on that, in fact.
That's good to hear.
I don't, I really do.
I'm like you, I know why you're asking because it's been part of the frustration that attitudes like this go unpunished, that attitudes like this have gone rewarded, that actions like this have gone rewarded.
We've been banging our heads against the wall.
It doesn't make any sense.
How could the country have become such mass reprobate?
And it hasn't is the bottom line.
I mean, it's still got problems, don't misunderstand.
But I think we still have a majority of the population paying attention to these kind of things that this is not helping the Democrats.
It's not helping them get independent voters down the road or whatever.
Look, every caller gets an iPhone 7 or 7 Plus, your turn.
Which one would you like?
Oh, 7 Plus.
plus and your carrier is Sprint Sprint Fine and dandy.
So do you have a color preference?
Gold.
Gold.
Got it, dude.
So what you're going to get, you're going to get a gold iPhone 7 Plus that has no SIM card in it.
It is unlocked, which means it'll work on any carrier, including Sprint.
Hang on.
Mr. Snirdley will get your address.
And if you want us to send this, I think FedEx is doing Saturday Delivery tomorrow.
So if you want it, Saturday delivery, we will try to make that happen.
It's up to FedEx, but we'll send it that way.
So hang on.
Do not hang up and go away.
Are you going to stick with the phones here, Rushland Boy, and the EIB network, 800-282-2882?
If you'd like to join us, this is Rachel.
She's in Charlotte, North Carolina, 17 years old.
Welcome and Merry Christmas.
Great to have you with us.
Oh, Merry Christmas to you, too.
Thanks for taking on the call.
You bet.
Anytime.
I'm glad you did.
All right.
I just had one question, and I also wanted to thank you.
So first, I'm going to thank you.
I just want to say that Trump will make probably one of the best presidents ever.
And I want to thank you for helping me learn how to better present myself and my conservative views among my peers.
You've given me news and information that the mainstream media ignores.
And you definitely helped me talk to others about what's going on in politics.
So I just want to thank you for that.
Let me ask you a question about that.
If I heard you correctly, you're able to speak confidently about the things that you believe.
Yes.
And you have learned some of that from this program.
Is that right?
Let me ask you a question.
Pardon?
I rush, baby.
My dad has listened to you my whole life.
This explains it.
I need you to answer a question for me so other people can hear you.
All right.
Is it safe to say that you being confident in who you are and what you believe makes it easier to explain it to people and to talk to people in general when you have no defensiveness about what you think, but rather you totally believe it.
You're passionate about it.
You actually enjoy doing it, I'll bet you.
Definitely.
And the more confident you come across, the more likely people are to believe you.
If you are articulate and you can put your points out and you seem very logical about it, they're most likely to believe you.
Well, how many people, because this happens to me, so I want to find out what happens to you.
How many people say, they may not say it in exact words to you, but how many people say to you things like, nobody's that sure of themselves.
Nobody's supposed to be.
Don't you have any doubt?
Don't you think you could be wrong about you ever get hit with that?
Yes, I have, but I always say, if I am wrong, there's always more I can learn and then correct myself.
Right.
So there's no problem being wrong.
It's a learning opportunity.
Yes.
Well, I am so honored that you picked up all this from this program.
That's fabulous.
Yeah, thank you so much.
And I also had one quick question.
Well, ask it.
What is it?
All right.
I know that you write books for children, but have you ever thought of writing books for teens, possibly?
In fact, this has been suggested.
One of the requests that we have gotten is to change the focus and do a couple of history books where there is a little bit more detail about some of the events that we have written about for young people.
Look, anything's possible.
I don't have a roadmap, and I'm not a goal-oriented person in the sense that I have nothing in front of me that says by June of 2017, I want to have accomplished X. I have an overriding goal, and that is to be successful at whatever I do, because I figure if that happens, I'll love it and enjoy it.
And then that's when opportunity, you know, presents itself.
So I don't goals happen to be restrictive to me.
Goals can cause me to maybe miss out or make a wrong decision on an opportunity that pops up.
But to answer the question, yeah, we've had a lot of people asking us to do this, and we are flattered by that because it means that people would very much like to read it and find value in it.
But whether it'll actually happen, don't know.
But I appreciate your interest in it.
Now, what kind of iPhone do you want?
Oh, the iPhone 7, I guess.
Well, you can take your choice of that or the 7 Plus.
Do you have an iPhone or any kind of a cell phone now?
Yes, I have the 6S.
You have a 6S.
Do you like the size?
Yes.
Yes, sir.
Okay.
Well, then you can, the iPhone 7 is the same size.
It's got a much better camera.
It has a much better display.
It's got about two hours additional battery life in the same size.
What is your carrier?
Verizon.
Verizon.
And you have a color preference?
Is it rose gold?
Rose gold.
I think I've got a rose gold in the iPhone 7.
If I don't, would gold work?
Yes, sir.
Okay.
Well, then you hang on here, Rachel.
Look, thank you so much.
That is a compliment that I really appreciate, that the program has given you enough information that you now feel confident about things you're discussing with people.
It changes everything.
It changes the entire way you deal with people is when you're not ashamed of what you think and when you can answer questions about what you think and when you can explain why you think what you think.
That's power.
It's comforting power.
So hang on and Mr. Snerdley will get your address.
We're going to make you a one-year subscriber, by the way, to the Rush Limbaugh website, rushlimbaugh.com.
That's an encyclopedia.
It's just chocked with data and information.
You will not believe.
I mean, it's everything that's happened on this program and then some for the past 20 years.
So hang on.
Get all your data right after this.
Don't go away, folks.
Hey, Rachel, we found one.
I had a Rose Gold iPhone 7 unlocked.
No SIM card.
You can take the SIM card and your iPhone 6S and put it in the iPhone 7 that you will get tomorrow.
And it'll be up and running.
Make sure you learn how to back up what's on your iPhone 7 or your iPhone 6S.
Learn how to back that up, preferably to iTunes.
Do an encrypted backup to iTunes and then simply restore it.
Restore that backup when you set up your new phone after you get your SIM card switched over.
▲
Export Selection