All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 23, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:24
November 23, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, sir Reebob, here we are back at it, executing a signed host duties flawlessly, Rush Limbo, America's real anchor man.
There is no fake news here.
Well, that's not true.
We do satires and parody, but it's obviously fake news.
We don't do fake news.
We don't lie.
We don't make things up.
We don't try to make you believe things that are not true.
And that is exactly what the mainstream media has become.
The mainstream media has become an enterprise designed to make you believe things which are not true.
800 282-2882, if you want to be on the program.
If there's any fake news out there, it is what they do now day in and day out.
The fake news stuff started because expert conservatives started doing satire and parody on Facebook that was effective.
It was it was it was satire and parody that exposed the lies and the fraud that is the left and their media and leftists and media.
That's fake news, you can't lie that's fake news.
And then he started claiming that these idiots on Facebook started believing the fake news.
When it wasn't fake news, it was effective satire, which was exposing the lying sacks of excrement that exist on Facebook and Twitter on the left.
That's where it started.
Who defines fake news?
The mainstream media is defining fake news as anything that's effective that busts up their attempt to lie to people.
That's all fake news is.
Now, there are some people who actually practice in in fake news, but it's all satire and parody.
It's all to one extent or another, an attempt to be funny.
Sometimes it's it's aimed at at uh uh rooted in reciprocity.
The the the real the few instances of fake fake news that are there are a reaction to the drive-by media.
Everything is a reaction to them.
And how they are the ones lying to people.
Their business today is making you think things that are not true.
I'll give the classic example is the mainstream media reporting of Trump's interview with the New York Times.
What do you think of that meet?
Trump, in that meeting with the New York Times, Trump changed his mind on climate change.
He changed his mind on going after Hillary, and if you read the transcripts, he didn't.
If you read the transcripts, he's he he spoke like Trump always speaks.
He didn't commit himself to anything.
And some of his answers were innocuous.
He's talking to Thomas Loopy Friedman about climate change.
By the way, in the transcript of that meet, you can see how important this is to these people.
I mean, even this little pinch, this Pinch Schultzberger is lecturing Trump.
Hey, we live on an island here, and these storms are getting worse, Donald.
They're getting worse straight up.
You can see them.
Trump says, Arthur, there have always been storms.
And that little pinch says, Not like this, not like this.
And then Friedman starts bopping you.
Well, what do you what do you think about?
What are you gonna do?
And and Trump refuses to accept their premise.
And it well, what what about man?
Well, I'm looking at it.
It could be, there could be an effect.
I don't know.
I'm looking at it.
He doesn't commit to anything, but so the meeting is over, and they report Trump changing Trump waffling Trump uh, and he's not doing that.
All he's doing is trying to satisfy these people, get in the meeting, get it and get out.
He doesn't have any more trust for the New York Times today or yesterday than before he went in the meeting.
But this is classic what is happening.
And the rest of the media picks it up, and that's why you're seeing stories about Trump waffling on things like climate change and prosecuting Hillary.
On the prosecuting Hillary thing.
This could go one of any number of ways, but folks, there's something very important about this.
And this is what I hope it is.
Frankly, I don't know if this is the case, but I hope it is.
Donald Trump has appointed Jeff Sessions to be the attorney general.
Jeff Sessions is going to head up the Department of Justice.
Jeff Sessions is the guy you need to be asking whether there's going to be a prosecution Of Hillary.
Donald Trump, if Donald Trump comes out and says there will not be, or if Donald Trump comes out and says there will be, then immediately Jeff Sessions has been rendered a puppet.
And I don't think Trump has any intention of doing that.
I think Trump knows the audience that he's with.
He's with a bunch of adversaries.
He's with a bunch of people that he wished liked him, human being, but he doesn't trust them.
So he'll say whatever he wants to say to them or whatever thinks he has to say.
And the thing they want to hear is he's not going to prosecute Hillary and he's not going to pull out of the Paris Accords.
And so they gleefully write after meeting with us, Donald Trump saw the light.
That that's the tone of their stories that they have the all-powerful mechanisms of making sure this Luddite Trump finds out what really is going on out there.
But for Donald Trump to come out and say one way or the other what's going to happen to Hillary Clinton totally undercuts his attorney general.
And I don't think he would do that.
That's one of the things we got mad at Obama.
Obama was his attorney generals were puppets.
Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch did whatever Obama wanted them to do.
It's one of the reasons the Democrats were sent packing.
I think if Donald Trump's going to if if there is an intention at the Trump campaign right now, or the transition to prosecute Hillary, the last thing they're going to do is say so right now.
There's another consideration.
If they want to prosecute Hillary and they say so, you think Obama might pardon her?
And if Obama pardons her, bye bye investigation.
So why telegraph you're going to investigate her if it would cause a pardon?
Wouldn't the smart thing to do to be say, eh, maybe not.
You know, they've suffered a lot.
I'd rather help her heal.
Then Obama might think he didn't have to pardon her.
And Obama may not really want to pardon for the historical legacy of things.
Obama may want her investigation.
There's the Obama, by the way, is already distancing himself from her by making snide comments about the incompetence of the campaign.
Look, I've got all this stuff coming up.
I'm jump starting my own stack of stuff here by telling you what's coming up here.
And I did it for a reason, because I don't want to not get to it.
So I'm at least alerting you to what's in the stack.
Let me just let's hit the stack and keep going here.
I mentioned the Bloomberg story before the end of the first hour.
The upshot of the Bloomberg story is it's a consumer confidence poll.
And the upshot is that Americans are telling Bloomberg they got more hope for the future of the country than they've had in the last ten years.
That's if you read the story, that's what you get.
You want to hear the headline?
Soaring consumer confidence.
But are Americans happy it's Trump or just happy it's over?
That's the headline of a story that says the American people have more hope than they've had in 10 years.
Yes.
On the surface, the message from the University of Michigan's final reading of consumer sentiment for November is that President elect Trump will fix what ails the nation and do it fast.
The consumer expectations index of the survey rose by 8.4 points from October to 85.21 a one-month gain last exceeded in December 2011, a testament to households' optimistic view on the outlook of the economy and their own pocketbooks.
Optimistic might be an understatement, according to the latest report in some cases, Americans are the most hopeful they have been in more than a decade.
For the first time since 2006, 37% of households said they expect their personal finances to improve next year.
Also hitting decade highs, real income expectations as wage growth continues to gain strength in a broadening swath of the economy.
So there's the news of how consumers have reacted to the election of Trump and the headline soaring consumer confidence, colon, are Americans happy it's Trump or just happy it's over.
What is it?
Is it Obama?
Or is it over the campaign?
You just have to know how to read these people from the Washington Post.
The Department of Justice is not going to conduct a vote audit based on your phoned in outrage.
There's something else happening out there in addition to the intimidation of electors.
Liberals across the country are phoning the Justice Department demanding that they do a vote audit.
They want the DOJ to audit the presidential election vote based on how mad people are out there.
I'm not kidding.
This is how deluded and deranged these people are.
You know, the looking for a way to actually characterize these people.
They're sick, folks.
They have literally been rendered sick.
Your average ordinary everyday liberal or Democrat is genuinely mentally ill now.
When it comes to matters of politics and current affairs, current events, and they've been rendered this way by the media.
They literally have believed all this fear mongering and scaremongering.
They believe campuses are places where rapes are happening, that they believe uh innocent black men are being gunned down multiple times a day by the cops.
They believe it Donald Trump's coming for everybody who's gay, lesbian, by gender, by transgender, bisexual, whatever, and going to be put in concentration camps.
I mean, there's people who believe this.
The Cast of Hamilton, they're scared to death.
And they think Trump's going to destroy the planet.
On purpose.
Trump and the Republicans want to destroy the planet.
And they want to do it so fast that young liberals will not even reach 65.
This is genuine mental illness.
That we have been up against and that we are up against.
And the mental illness extends to the editorial board in the New York Times and their columnists and the reporters and infobabes at CNN.
It's a I'm convinced it's a genuine mental illness.
I asked yesterday, you know, watching some 70-year-old, 60-year-old Democrat strategists that I've been watching on TV all of my life.
I mean, what happened to them?
They used to be, I mean, they've always been liberal Democrats, but there was none of this fatalistic fearmongering, scaremongering, apocalyptic, however you describe what they believe, and I'm asking myself, what happened to you?
Seriously, what has happened to you?
This is as close to insane, clinically insane as I have seen.
What the left believes.
Now you've got a bunch of liberals that are calling the Department of Justice, demanding that the Department of Justice do a vote recount based on how many angry liberals there are.
That alone should justify the recount.
And the Washington Post has a wake-up call for these people.
The headline, the Department of Justice is not going to conduct a vote audit based on your phoned-in outrage.
So stop it.
For supporters of Hillary Clinton, the post circulating on Facebook and Reddit offers hope.
The Justice Department, it claims, is tallying calls from people who want an audit of the 2016 election.
Given the small margins that Trump won by in Pennsylvania, Michigan, or Wisconsin, a shift of about 55,000 votes is all that would be needed to change the outcome.
Problem is, and the Washington Post even reports this is bogus.
The Justice Department does not count up calls to determine whether it should launch an investigation.
Oh, but there are prosecutors who have.
I happen to know this.
That's why they're doing it.
They're literally calling the Department of Justice, asking that their calls be tallied, and if enough people call expressing outrage, they think the DOJ will do an audit because of a couple of posts on Facebook and Reddit.
David Jacobs, DOJ spokesman, said the Justice Department does not tally the number of callers to determine whether federal action is warranted.
Investigatory decisions are based solely on the facts and evidence as they relate to the federal statutes, the department enforces.
And we don't review elections.
So that's going on.
But they they really think if they call in enough numbers, they can make the DOJ because they believe it.
They've heard, they've they've read these posts on Reddit and Facebook.
Sick.
Now here's the first story that I was referring to a moment ago.
Hill.com.
Trump signals softer approach in Times Meeting.
Donald Trump on Tuesday answered questions to the New York Times on his relationship to the alt-right, his web of business entanglements, and his relationship of the press in an extraordinary event, live tweeted by the gray ladies' reporters and editors.
The unorthodox meeting took place on the 16th floor of the Times building in Midtown Manhattan.
If I'd have had my way, Trump would have demanded this meeting take place on the deck of the USS Missouri.
Instead of at the Times headquarters.
If you're going to meet with them, you're going to go meet with the vanquished.
If you're going to go meet with the people that you've defeated, then do it on the deck of the USS Missouri.
For those of you who are curious, that's where the Japanese surrendered.
Signed the surrender papers in World War II.
Trump was solicitous, argumentative, evasive, joking, and defiant with the nation's most important newspaper, which has been among Trump's top targets.
And they go on to describe some of the things that Trump may have changed his mind on.
And he didn't.
If you read the transcripts, you can see clearly, Trump spoke to them like he speaks there.
Well, I'm looking into it.
It could be.
You know what?
I don't want it to have a bad effect on business.
Look, you you want to talk about climate change?
How about all those emails from East Anglia?
He mentioned this to them.
I know they've been faking the data.
The Times doesn't publish that.
The Hill.com doesn't publish.
If you get the transcript of Trump's interview, you find he threw it right back in their face.
But you're not seeing that.
You're seeing Trump waffles, Trump caves, Trump on climate change, and climate change is big to them, folks.
Climate change, if they could force Trump to capitulate on time climate change, that would almost be the equivalent of them winning the election.
Because climate change has all the elements they believe in big government, high taxes, limited liberty and freedom on the part of the people.
The United States is guilty.
The United States is to blame.
The United States must bear the brunt of punishment.
Everything that the left thinks about this country and everything they want to happen to this country is encapsulated in their beliefs in climate change.
This is why I knew I've known this for 30 years.
It's why I've been haranguing people for 30 years about it.
It's why they are so hell-bent on Trump agreeing to follow the Paris Accords and the United Nations because it contains elements of everything they want to happen in one issue.
That's why I said yesterday, I, you know, that Trump caving on climate change is a much, much bigger deal to me than whatever he decides to do or not do with Hillary Clinton or prosecution.
I'll tell you their heads are going to explode in Marshall, Wisconsin, and other educational centers.
Marshall, Wisconsin, by the way, is where the latest rush revere book has been banned.
Six-year-old boy took his uh rush revere in the presidency book to school and they bullied him, took it away from him, tell him told him the book was inappropriate.
Donald Trump has chosen charter school advocate, Betsy DeVos, as his secretary of education.
A charter school advocate.
This is gonna cause heads to explode in every teacher's union building and bunker that there is.
Holy smokes, this is big.
Betsy DeVos.
You know the DeVos family.
Staunch conservatives, rich divorce, Mway owns the Orlando Magic.
Great, great, great guy.
And this woman becomes the second woman chosen to fill a spot in Trump's cabinet.
Uh Nikki Haley, South Carolina governor, is now the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.
That's a good pick.
Yeah, Haley is a good pick, and so is Betsy DeVoss.
So this misogynist guy, Trump, he's really out there.
He's chosen a couple of women here, folks.
Strong.
That's absolutely right.
Strong women, Trump has chosen for his.
Let's grab a call quickly.
Marty in Reading, Pennsylvania.
How are you doing, sir?
Pretty good.
How are you, sir?
Thank you very much.
How are you?
I'm good.
I just wanted to give you a call.
And hopefully the Trump people listen to your program and realize how many people that voted for him.
Hope that he fulfills his campaign promises and that he goes after and prosecutes Hillary.
I mean, if anyone, a normal person would have done the thing she's done, we'd have been in prison without looking for daylight.
Right.
After she even after she did the Benghazi.
Oh, I know.
Well, maybe they won't.
Marty, I'm going to address this in great detail in the next segment.
But before you go, I'm asking everybody, would you like a new iPhone 7 or 7 plus?
Oh, wow.
Thank you.
Which one do you want?
Seven or seven plus?
Seven plus, if you thinkwood, what's your carrier?
Uh Verizon.
All right.
We could got you covered.
I'll make sure you get a jet black Verizon iPhone 7 Plus.
Do not hang up so Mr. Snertley can get your address so we can FedEx it to you.
If all goes well, you will have it on Friday.
And we will be right back.
This saga continues.
So, L. Rushbaugh.
Redefining hip on the radio.
Ladies and gentlemen, I really want you to try to do something, and that is to doubt everything that you see that has as its source the New York Times or NBC or CBS or ABC or CNN or the Los Angeles Times, the USA Today.
I can't tell you the number of stories I've seen with the theme, the premise, the narrative.
Trump walks back X. Trump walks back views on Paris.
Trump walks back views on prosecuting Hillary.
Trump isn't walking back anything yet.
They have not changed.
They tried to dispirit you during the campaign and depress you so that you wouldn't vote.
They're trying to make you think Trump is selling you out now.
It is who they are, and you are much better off disbelieving everything.
If you end up being wrong, fine.
But if you believe them and start acting accordingly, and you're wrong, you may end up causing damage to things.
Do not believe them.
They simply have gone over the edge.
Here's some of what Trump said on climate change.
This from the actual transcript is meeting with the New York Times.
He said it's a very complex subject.
I'm not sure anybody is ever going to really know.
I know we have, they say they have science on one side, but then they have all those horrible emails that were sent between the scientists.
Where was that?
Geneva or wherever five years ago?
Terrible.
Where they got caught.
You know, so you see that and you say, what's that all about?
I absolutely have an open mind.
I will tell you this.
Clean air, vitally important.
Clean water, crystal clean water, vitally important.
Safety, vitally important.
He's talking about the email scandal at East Anglia University in the U.K., where they discover somebody leaked emails there that were the scientists involved in this were openly admitting doctoring the historical record temperature data in order to make it look like it is warming now.
The whole issue is bogus.
The climate is always changing.
Humanity has to adapt.
It always has had to adapt.
We've done a marvelous job of adapting.
We've done a marvelous job of cleaning up the messes we make as we adapt.
We are not destroying the planet.
We couldn't if somebody ordered us to.
They want you to believe that you are doing it by virtue of living a life of progress.
They want you to believe you are culpable, that you are responsible for destroying the planet, and they've convinced every kid under 35, it looks like.
Looks like every kid under 35 believes that their parents have destroyed the planet.
And that it may not be habitable by the time the 25-year-old reaches 65.
They honestly believe this.
And yet, if Donald Trump convened his cabinet and ordered his interior secretary to take action that would warm the Earth's surface temperature by two degrees, there's nobody who would know what to do.
And if he ordered it, and you notice that all these predictions are for 30 years and 40 years down the road when nobody's going to be around to know whether they were right or wrong.
It's not about 30 or 40 years.
It's about affecting the way people live and vote now.
It's about accepting big government, big global government to run the world under the auspices of saving it.
These are the people destroying things.
These are the people this election just sent packing.
Trump isn't walking back anything.
This Hillary thing, we can't yet say that he's walking it back.
Again, folks, if Donald Trump announces that he's going to prosecute Hillary, I guarantee you he's done two things.
He's undermined his own attorney general as a puppet.
And he's guaranteed that Obama's going to pardon her.
And if Obama pardons her, there's not going to be an investigation anyway.
So when Trump or Kellyanne Conway go out there and say, well, you know, we don't, we they've gone through enough.
I'd rather, we Trump would rather help them heal.
They're smart people here on the Trump side, and he's smart.
They're not going to telegraph.
How many times during a debate did you hear Trump whine and moan about Obama announcing military strategy against ISIS?
He got into a knockdown drag out argument with one of the debate moderators about this, Martha Raditz, who tried to tell Trump he was an idiot.
Sometimes there's psychostrategic, Mr. Trump.
Sometimes you tell your it's a head fake sometimes.
And Trump's, I don't know why in the world you would ever tell your enemy what you're going to do before you do it.
It's silly.
I don't believe Trump's changed on that.
If he has plans, he's not going to telegraph it to the New York Times or to the media or to his targets.
But they want you doubting Trump, and they want you thinking Trump's abandoning you, and they want you thinking Trump's no different than any other person's ever been elected.
They want you to think you've just fallen for the biggest trick in a history of tricks.
They want you thinking that Trump's no different average ordinary politician that you hate.
That's what, and I'm telling you, do not believe them.
Do not let them even get to first base with you on this.
Be patient.
You'll know soon enough.
Trump's not even been immaculated yet.
Wait till that happens.
Wait till they start doing stuff.
I can tell you look at Trump's appointments.
The only one that concerns me is Romney, and I don't even know if that's going to happen.
He's got advisors who are ready to roll up their sleeves and get into fist fights every day if they have to with the opposition.
He does not have a bunch of milk toast around him.
He doesn't have a bunch of traditional insider establishment politicians around him.
He's got some, but he doesn't, his primary advisors are no-holds barred kind of people.
His nominees for these cabinet posts, a charter school expert, Betsy DeVos, Nikki Haley at the UN, Jeff Sessions at A, you couldn't come up with anybody better to run the Department of Justice.
And I guarantee you Trump's not going to undercut him.
Whether there's going to be an investigation of what went on to the DOJ, that's up to Jeff Sessions.
And you want to be very careful about demanding a special prosecutor.
The last time that happened, it was George W. Bush that buckled the pressure to nominate one.
And what do we end up with?
Scooter Libby going to jail for supposedly leaking the name of an operative we already knew.
Valerie Plain.
Independent prosecutors are the only ones that are truly independent.
And Trump's going to put attorney general in there and he can express his desires and so, but that gig is supposed to be independent.
That's a purpose.
It's in the executive branch.
But one of the reasons the Democrats are in trouble is because everybody knows that Eric Holder and What's Your Face, Loretta Lynch were just rubber stamping what Obama wanted.
The place became a lawless institution designed to advance the Democrat Party agenda.
You couldn't have anybody better at DOJ to root out what you consider to be the swamp than Jeff Sessions.
And Trump is going to let him do his job.
But he's not going to undercut him right now.
And he's not going to convert him into a puppet.
He's not going to turn him into somebody useless.
Presidents, when you get right down to it, don't decide these kinds of things anyway.
Not really.
Not supposed to.
Otherwise, we wouldn't have an attorney general.
President do all this stuff.
Now Reuters.
Conservatives bristle as Trump backs off Clinton prosecution.
There's another one.
Trump walks back.
Trump backs off.
Trump changing mind.
Trump relaxing.
Don't believe it.
He hasn't done anything yet.
He's just talking to a bunch of people at the media that he knows don't tell the truth about him.
But in this story, there's something of particular interest to me.
Conservatives who have reveled in the possibility of a Clinton prosecution were not pleased.
Breitbart News, the outlet once led by Trump's chief strategist Steve Bannon, published a story on Tuesday under the headline Broken Promise.
Trump doesn't wish to pursue Clinton email charges.
Stop and think of that.
Ostensibly we have the number one pro-Trump website, Breitbart News, now bitching and moaning about Trump.
I think all this is perhaps a headphase.
But that's not what I wanted to address.
It's what comes next.
Radio personality, Rush Limbaugh asked the two million people who like his Facebook page for a reaction and received more than 2,000 responses.
Now, I did yesterday on this program ask you what some of you thought about it.
We got a lot of people calling in about it.
I didn't specifically mention my Facebook page.
But it's interesting that Reuters went there and checked it out.
Two million people.
I don't even mention Facebook, and I've got two million followers.
And I never even talk about it.
Can you imagine how many followers we'd have on Facebook if I promoted it?
I don't even promote it.
We get, you know how many people would kill for a thousand followers?
Here I've got two million and I don't even mention it.
Half the time I don't even know I've got a Facebook page.
I'm not a social media guy.
I have people that post things for me under orders like Coco at the website and rear we got a revere Rush Revere Facebook page that's exclusive.
But we post a lot of things jointly at Rushlimbaugh.com on a Facebook page, but I never talk about it.
Two million followers.
That ought to be 32 million followers.
Make it happen, folks.
The point get in gear.
What is this two million?
That's embarrassing.
Two million followers.
And then the next number, 2,000 responses, should have been 20,000 responses.
What are you looking at me that way for?
You think I'm I can't either what do you mean you can't believe I'm saying this?
You can't believe that I'm embarrassed that I've got two million followers.
What is Trump change compared to what we ought to have?
And I don't even talk about it.
That's my whole point.
You know, I don't do hear it.
I don't sit here and do a lot of self-promotion like half the other people out there.
Yeah, I've got a Facebook page.
By the way, for those of you who found it, God bless you.
I mean, I'm I'm I'm I'm not I'm not here.
I'm just I'm actually dreaming.
Can you imagine what we'd have there if I actually pushed this?
What do you think would happen, Snerdley?
What could we get it up to?
It would explode.
Two million followers, and I never mention it.
And I'm thinking all these people out there that have a thousand followers and they get ten people reacting and they think they're cool.
Well, anyway, uh apparently, aside from all this, the 2,000 responses were livid.
Many of them, Reuters says you were livid.
The 2,000 of you that responded at my Facebook page.
I can't even tell you.
You can't believe I'm saying stuff?
I can't tell you what my Facebook address is.
I don't even know where to tell you to go to get to it.
Okay, let me clarify what may be some confusion on this on this Facebook business.
Because I just got an email.
Wait a minute.
Somebody calling themselves Rush Limbaugh just posted somebody 29 minutes ago, and you say that you No, no, it's not what happens.
People at Rushlimbaugh.com will joint post things.
We try to get things up as quickly as I can.
It wasn't long when I made the point that Hillary back in October 16th said that in reacting to Trump not willing to concede the election when it was over, I pointed out the irony that it was Hillary is now not conceding and her army is well, she's conceded, but her army's out there trying to overturn this.
Somebody at Rush Limbaugh.com takes that comment, a quote for you and puts it up there as a Facebook post.
This is the way it's designed.
I don't personally go there and post stuff on Facebook.
Um the people at Rush Limbaugh.com is called delegating the authority so we can get it up there immediately.
What I'm telling you is I never promote it.
I don't and I've got two million followers.
Actually, Reuters got that wrong.
I was just informed it's 2.2 million followers.
Thirdly, he can't believe that I am.
I'm just thinking it ought to be many more than see if if I did promote it, if I did drive people there, if I steered people there, but next week, get back from the holiday.
Next week I'll I'll uh I'll spend a little time promoting the Facebook aspect of the operation.
It's there.
And the stuff posted by me, the stuff I've said, folks, is just culled from the radio program.
And it's much faster that way, and it's direct, and it's it's done that way.
And it is it is me.
It's things I've said, but it's it's taken here from the uh official radio program and the transcript of what I have said.
I just I at the end of every day, there's so much in these stacks of stuff that I haven't gotten to content-wise, and I'm frustrated leaving here every day.
I can't tell you.
I don't bleed on you like this, but I can't tell you how frustrated every day I'm frustrated at the stuff that I haven't been able to get to.
And I don't spend much time plugging this or plugging that.
Uh in exchange for trying to get as much content in as I can.
But we'll focus on it next week, just see what happens.
In the meantime, Michael and Baltimore, Belmore, New York, I'm sorry.
Michael, welcome.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Thank you for taking my call, Roger.
You better thanksgiving to you and your family.
Same to you.
Um, I wanted your thoughts about these picks by uh President elect Donald Trump.
Yeah.
What what what are your thoughts about him not running after the four years?
Like he's never mentioned it.
Nobody's ever asked him.
And I think these picks are more towards Governor Pence.
In other words, after four years, I don't see him being in Washington.
Okay, so here's what you think that these you're obviously surprised that these picks are much more conservative than you think Trump is.
So you're thinking somebody's got to be making these picks, and it isn't Trump, or it's well it's it's Trump, but more with them in much more included like like Governor Pence is you could see he's very involved.
Yes, he is.
And that's a good thing, but what I'm saying is can you could you picture, would you be surprised in four years if he said I'm not gonna run and Governor Pence is gonna take over the run?
Would you be surprised?
Uh yeah, I uh if if he said that right now, yeah, I'd be stunned.
I would be totally stunned.
That'd be the he I can't believe he would undercut if he announces that he's leaving after four years.
That is the biggest message the left could get to shut him down on everything.
I don't believe he's even thinking that way.
I really don't.
Um look, we'll talk about this in greater detail, but look, I've got to ask you do you want a new iPhone 7 or 7 plus?
Time is running down, and I want to make sure I offer it to you too.
Yes, and I'm actually going to give it to my wife.
Okay, what kind?
Uh do you have a seven in like a girly color, like a gold rose gold?
A girly color.
Yes, I do.
What what carrier?
ATT.
Uh seven or seven plus?
Seven, the smaller one.
Yes, I can handle it today.
I have I have restocked.
I now have iPhone 7s in colors.
So we'll send her a rose gold.
I am telling you she will love it.
We'll be back here in just a second.
Don't hang up, don't hang up.
We can need to get your address.
Somebody just said, Well, why don't you use Facebook to put all the stuff that you don't get to?
Well, that's fine and dandy, but the stuff that I don't get to is worthless without people knowing what I think about it.
So at any rate, we have one big exciting broadcast hour left.
True story Thanksgiving coming up, or your phone calls.
▲
Export Selection