All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 7, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:17
November 7, 2016, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, my friends.
Great to have you with us.
The Rush Limbaugh program and the EIB network.
And in the minds of many the day to be listening to the Limbaugh program the day before the election.
The televote number, if you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882, and the email address, lrushma at EIBNet.com.
I want to call your attention to something Pat Cadell has been talking about.
Pat Cadell, of course, the pollster for Jimmy Carter, working back in 1980.
And we all remember what happened in 1980.
1980, much like today, but with one big difference that I will get to in mere moments.
Pat Cadell and actually a couple of other people have said that this election feels a lot like 1980.
What do they mean?
What they mean is all the polling data leading up to the election had Jimmy Carter winning and winning handily.
And the Republican opponent, Ronald Reagan, was not very well thought of by the media and by the Democrats.
They thought he was an amiable dunce, not a serious politician.
He was really known for being a B-grade actor, even though he'd been governor of California.
He was a conservative.
Many in the Republican Party didn't like Reagan.
They wanted no part of Reagan because Reagan was a conservative.
They associated Reagan with Goldwater, which meant landslide defeat.
And to this day, by the way, I should tell you that the Republican Party thinks of conservatism that way.
Republican Party, when they hear conservative, think Goldwater landslide defeat.
They don't think Ronald Reagan, two-term landslide, win.
They don't.
They think Goldwater, landslide, loss.
But back in 1980, they didn't like Reagan.
Democrats made fun of him as not being serious, not being too bright, dangerous, can't have this guy's finger on the nuclear button.
I mean, a lot of similarities in the way Trump is being treated and the way Reagan's being treated.
Now, the difference is that Reagan did come from the political system.
He was elected twice, governor of California, Screen Actors Guild president.
So he had political pedigree.
Trump's got Zilch Zeronada.
Trump has not.
By the way, can I make a, let me interrupt myself here.
Don't worry.
I don't lose my place.
But can I make a point?
If you're going to, let's say you're in this election, I want to talk to those of you, and I know you're out there.
You're not crazy about either of these two people.
You're not crazy about Hillary because of the obvious reasons.
She brings three decades of baggage, dishonesty, scandal, and no end in sight to any of that.
You question her qualifications and her achievements, and you realize that she's being rammed down our throats by the Democrat Party strictly for ambition.
The only reason Hillary wants to be president is ambition.
She's not qualified to be.
She hasn't done anything to earn the job within even the political world other than be married to a guy who has achieved as president.
So you're not crazy about Hillary.
On the other side, you don't know what to make of Trump.
I mean, the guy said some things you can't believe.
He does some things you can't believe.
He's got this history that's nothing like you expect people in politics to have, so people you're used to voting for.
And some of you are intrigued by that, and others are off-put by it.
Some are scared by it.
The bottom line, you got two candidates here.
And to those of you that are not really jazzed about either one, let me pose something for you to think about.
One of these candidates has a track record of utter disaster.
Hillary Clinton, starting in the early days of the 1990s with her own health care proposal that fell flat.
It's now been realized under the name Obamacare, and it is a disaster, and it's exactly what she wanted back in 1993 and 94.
We have the Benghazi circumstance where Americans are dead.
We've got the Middle East on fire after her foreign policy initiatives were implemented.
We have the scandal.
We have a serial liar, somebody who cannot tell the truth.
But as you assess the state of the country today, if you're honest with yourself, you know that this is not how things are supposed to be.
We're not on an upward mobile track here economically.
They might tell you the unemployment rates At a low since 2008, they might try to tell you the economy is going great, but it isn't.
You're not earning much more than you earned 10 years ago.
You're really, really worried about your kids' futures.
You don't know what kind of opportunities they're going to have.
They're graduating from college if they even are fortunate enough to do that with so much college debt, student loan debt, that it's going to take them years to pay that off and even start getting ahead.
There are just a number of things that alarm you.
And the thing to keep in mind as you assess these two candidates is that there's one of them that's got nothing to do with any of it.
If you are a person trying to decide between two people who you think are essentially negative propositions, understand that one of them has fingerprints all over much that is wrong in this country, is actually attached to it, and that would be Hillary Clinton.
You have another candidate who is a legitimate outsider who hasn't had one thing to do with whatever you think is wrong in America today.
Not one thing.
By voting for Hillary Clinton, you are voting to essentially continue the malaise and the confusion and the misery and the unhappiness that you have felt for I don't know how many years.
I assume it's all of Obama's and maybe even longer than that.
If you're voting for Hillary Clinton, you're voting for a continuation of this.
You're voting for the party that has implemented the policies that have created the student loan debt that's inserviceable.
You're voting for the party that has made an absolute mess of American foreign policy and has destroyed the stature of the United States as a world superpower.
You are voting for a party that believes people should recognize that the country's better days are behind us.
In terms of superpower, you are voting for a party that believes it was never justified that the United States be a superpower because we are immoral and unjust from the days of our founding on, that we are a superpower only because of what we've stolen from other nations and how we've imprisoned other people and how we've enforced our way of life on other people.
I mean, that's who the Democrat Party is today.
The Democrat Party is a party that wants our borders wide open so that people of very little education, no skills whatsoever, and don't even speak the language are able to flood our job markets.
If that's what you want, Hillary Clinton's your vote, if you want more of the same, which is going to make sure we continue our decline and a downward spiral than Hillary Clinton, if you want to vote a known quantity, somebody's been in politics all their life and doesn't have a whole lot to show for it, other than these things gnawing away at you that you know just are not right, then Hillary Clinton's your girl.
Hillary Clinton's your vote.
Donald Trump has nothing to do.
In the tale of two negatives, if you look at this this way, you can't attach, you cannot attach anything that is bad or going wrong in the country to Donald Trump.
He hasn't had a thing to do with anything.
All Donald Trump is saying that he wants to reverse all of this.
He wants to stop it.
He wants to change the direction, make America great again, and that's what you have to decide.
Does he mean it?
Can he do it?
What are the odds of either one of these two improving circumstances for this country?
And by association, you.
I don't think that is a tough choice, but for some people it is.
But I think if you look at it this way, you look at it resume-wise, if you look at it experience-wise, if you look at it just from the standpoint of excitement, what might it be like for a genuine outsider to win the presidency?
Somebody that doesn't have the traditional political tie-ins, commitments, connections that come first before you do.
He's assuring you that you will come first with him and in his administration.
I don't think that if you're one of those people looking at this as the choice of two negatives, I don't think there is a choice.
You've got a known quantity that is dishonest, that is flirting with criminality seemingly every month that is going to cause this nation to be never unified.
I don't care what this, if you want this country to be unified, if you're tired of the acrimonious arguments, you need to know for certain that Hillary Clinton's not even interested in that.
I could go further and tell you the Democrat Party is not interested in it.
They don't care what you think.
They only care what they are able to make you do.
They're not interested in the true democratic nature of things.
They don't really trust elections.
That's why they play so many games.
I don't think there's any choice.
It's a non-question, which is why I wanted to present it to you this way.
And I'm doing this sincerely from the bottom of my heart.
We will never be unified as a nation.
We'll never come together under Hillary Clinton.
Now, the Democrats may never come together under Trump either, but Trump is going to try to reverse the direction of this country and have it be something that everybody wants to be proud of and be part of, and therefore it will grow and prosper.
And the Democrat Party, that's not, I mean, they say it is, that's not their agenda.
They don't succeed when you do, unless your success is directly tied to whatever benefits they're giving you.
But if you're independent, if you're able to go through life without needing a politician to help you, the Democrats look at you as a potential threat.
Now, back to Pat Cadell and Doug Shoan and the similarities in 1980 and today.
There are many.
Reagan was seen much as Trump is seen by both Republicans and Democrats.
The polling data going into the election in 1980, the last poll, which was like a week out, had Carter winning by nine.
Now, Cadell tells people that he knew going into the weekend that poll was wrong.
They were, I guess, doing internal polling, and he knew before the election even came that it was over.
Now, nobody is saying that now as they were privately.
Nobody said that publicly in 1980, by the way.
In 1980, we went to election night, everybody thinking Carter was going to win.
And an hour into election night coverage on NBC, they proclaimed Reagan a landslide winner.
Basically 10 minutes after 8 p.m., before California had even closed.
So Cadell and Doug Schoen were on Fox on Friday, and they were saying to both this feels exactly like 1980.
You've got the similarities in the way Reagan and Trump are being regarded, the way they're being treated.
You've got similarities in the polling data.
But the one thing they said that makes this vastly different from 1980 is early voting.
There wasn't any early voting in 1980.
And so Election Day voting was it.
There was no way.
You had absentees, but they weren't counted.
There was no early voting.
So you had no indication at all, other than exit polling, how 1980 was going to go.
They say that early voting throws all of that comparison to 1980 out the window.
Essentially, they say that the existence of early voting and the volume of early voting eliminates the possibility of a late surge for anybody.
The late surge is the early voting, they say.
And the difference is early voting is known.
It's a known quantity.
It's known by virtue of party loyalty.
We don't know how early voters are voting, but we know how many of them are Republicans and Democrats.
And so they concluded, Caddell, which was a change of heart, concluded that, yeah, okay, when you factor that in, Hillary's probably going to win.
After having believed that we were on a trajectory that made this a potential 1980 again, which meant a surprise, massive number of people coming out for Trump that weren't counted.
They say early voting eliminates that possibility.
They're the experts.
I'm not so sure.
I don't, the assumption there is that if there is this giant groundswell, if there is this late-breaking surge, that it's already shown up.
And you can see who it is in the early voting.
Well, that's not exactly what the drive-by has been worried about.
The drive-bys and the Democrats have been worried about a late surge of unregistered voters all these years.
People who've never voted or very rarely voted because they're so fed up.
They don't think the system is affected by elections.
They don't think their vote matters.
They think that the people that run the show are going to do what they do no matter what the people want.
And so they've tuned out.
And there are, of the adult population, about roughly 50% that do not vote every election.
And it's been a fear on the Democrat side that Trump is connecting with those people and it waves and waves of them could show up on Election Day.
So Cadell and Sean said, no, no, no, no, no, no.
They've already shown up.
Maybe for that to be true, that this wave, this surge of voters, unregistered, that's poised to vote for Trump would have to have been so inspired that they would have already shown up and registered and early voted so that there is no late surge to happen.
The late surge is what defeated Carter.
There was a late surge that showed up that just rendered the nine-point Carter lead meaningless.
They say early voting means that can't happen.
We will see.
Despite all of that, folks, and despite, and they tell us that Hillary's got this awesome ground game that Trump can't compete with, well, that awesome ground game, early voting Democrat turnout is down.
As I just mentioned in Florida, early voting overall turnout is down.
Rally attendance.
Hillary's got a great ground game.
Where is that ground game getting crowds for her rallies?
There aren't any.
The attendant is this way.
She is at Pittsburgh today.
It doesn't compare to Trump in Sarasota.
Soundbites coming up.
Hillary's social media.
It literally pales in comparison to Trump's.
Talk to people in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
You can't find a Hillary sign in a yard anywhere, but Trump signs are everywhere.
And primary turnout on the Democrat side was way down.
Does any of that cancel out what Cadell and Schoen were saying?
We don't know.
We just have to wait and find out.
Okay, the Trump soundbites from Sarasota are coming up, and we just got a couple of Obamas in.
Obama's Obama's going crazy in his appearances with Trump.
It's disgusting that Trump is comfortable with the KKK and something.
Just bottom-of-the-barrel kind of stuff that seems to me panic-oriented.
Certainly doesn't seem to be coming from feelings of confidence.
Anyway, we have Amy in Fort Myers, Florida up next.
I'm glad you waited.
Great to have you here.
Hello.
Thanks, Rush.
Thanks for having me on my show.
I love your show.
I love it.
I just wanted to prove your point.
I am a female, college-educated mom of five, deplorable Democrat who voted for Trump here in Florida.
My vote already is in.
We need better.
You are a college-educated female deplorable.
You're a Democrat voting for Trump.
Why are you voting for Trump?
I voted for policy.
I didn't vote for personality.
I also didn't believe the media.
I didn't believe all the hype around how mean he is or how horrible he is.
I voted for policy.
I've actually voted for America.
I voted for my kid's future, and it is not with her.
Well, good for you.
You know, the Democrats are putting out, they're like reporters, analysts on TV are saying that it's only people that didn't go to college that vote for Trump.
Absolutely.
It's only people that didn't go to college.
They're implying that are dumb enough to be duped by Trump, but that college-educated women, especially, don't want any part of Trump.
And I think you got a great slogan.
We need better.
We need better.
We deserve better.
My kids deserve better.
America deserves better.
And we don't need more of the same, which is what the Clintons represent.
And by the way, it is the Clintons.
Just like in 1992, it was blue plate special, buy one, get one free.
Here's another one.
BOGO.
Buy one, get one free.
The Clintons coming at us again.
And it's more of the same.
And I think that's a serious question for people that have doubts about either of these candidates.
Thank you, Amy, and we will be back.
Donald Trump in Sarasota today was over the top.
It was another massive crowd filled with energy.
And we've got four soundbites.
Let's just get started.
Isn't it amazing that when Jay-Z and Beyonce use the filthy language that they use in the songs, using words that if I ever said those words, it would be the reinstitution of the electric chair, right?
Right?
It's true.
It's true.
And they use these words, and then she comes on and hugs them like everything's right.
And yet, with me, he's very lewd.
It's a new word, you know, lewd.
I mean, I've never seen anything like it in my life.
She is such a phony.
She is such a phony.
I've had people say to me, stop dealing with it.
Come on, get back to the issues.
No, respond to this stuff.
Look, I also, for my entire career, folks, I've had the same thought Trump has about the overall cultural rot that's happening here and how it gets celebrated by people on the left.
And when they engage in actually taking our culture down to the gutter, they are applauded, they are given awards, they are heralded as great artists and so forth.
And then you let one of us come out and have a slip of the tongue and say something, and they're all over us and want to take us out and destroy us.
And nobody ever stands up to them on it.
And Trump is.
And it's one of the reasons that Trump has this legion of support is that he fights back against these things that people all over the country who do not think their voice is heard are also saying.
I mean, let's take a look at this.
Let's take two events.
You heard about the male soccer team at Harvard.
Wendy, did you hear about this?
You got to hear this.
Last Friday, the news, the male soccer team at Harvard was keeping a scouting notebook on the incoming female soccer team players.
They were raving them on scale of one to 10 and other scouting report aspects of these young arriving female soccer players.
When the Harvard administration found out about this, they canceled the remainder of the male soccer season as a way of penalizing the men on the Harvard soccer team for daring to objectify women like this.
Who rates women on a scale of one to 10?
They said, try everybody.
They even made a movie.
Do you guys remember the movie that Dudley Moore was in called 10?
Yeah.
And you know who the star it was?
It was Bo Derrick.
They even made a movie.
She was at 10.
Whether people want to admit it or not, this kind of thing happens.
So, and it's largely human nature.
I have seen, I have seen male sports writers today supporting what the Harvard administration did and pointing out that this is unseemly.
And if I had a daughter on the soccer team at Harvard, I wouldn't want her written about this way or talked about this.
It's just, it's a different, it's a different era.
We have to accept it.
The male soccer team basically had her season canceled for daring to do this.
Scout.
Okay, fine and dandy.
Think about that as you will.
Here comes a Hillary Clinton political rally in Philadelphia on Friday night.
Jay-Z and Beyonce attend.
Before that, they were in Cleveland.
And the lyrics of the songs they're singing include the word B-I-H, the N-word, the C-word, and the F-bomb.
The lyrics.
And they're singing these songs that are wildly popular, by the way, on many formats.
They cross over top 40, RB, rap, hip-hop.
I mean, we're talking Jay-Z and Beyonce here.
And they're celebrated as great artists and so forth.
And Hillary Clinton, Trump's right, Hillary Clinton comes out and hugs them.
And they're using these lyrics.
And it's degrading to women.
It objectifies women by another woman and by the top male rap artist in the country or RB.
How would you classify Jay-Z?
He's a rap artist, RBA.
What would you say he is?
Just an entrepreneur across many venues.
Huge celebrity.
Okay, so it comes out and he sings about his own wife in words like this.
And Hillary comes, hugs them both and thanks them.
Meanwhile, the guys at Harvard on the soccer team, they have a little scouting book on the incoming FEMA.
They got to go cancel a season.
So I think Trump has a point here.
You know, it's a two-way street.
And which actually is more degrading and harmful.
Popular songs with lyrics like that, even beyond that, just the fact that here comes Hillary Clinton embracing them and accepting their support.
And meanwhile, Trump's out there, or Obama's out there lying about Trump being supportive of the KKK.
Anyway, my point is that people have noticed this for decades now, and they're fed up with the hypocrisy, and here's Trump reacting to it.
So I think on balance, he helps himself with it.
Here's the next bite from Trump Sarasota.
We're going to win Michigan, by the way.
Tell you, we're going to win Michigan.
You know what we're going to win?
We're going to win Minnesota.
We're going to win Minnesota.
We're leading big in Ohio.
We're leading in Iowa.
We're leading in New Hampshire, where I'm going in a little while.
We're leading in North Carolina.
We're doing very, very well in Pennsylvania.
Very well.
You watch what's going to happen in Pennsylvania.
The miners are going to come out.
The workers are going to come out.
The steel workers who lost their jobs are coming out.
By the way, lots of people surrounding Philadelphia are going to come out in their voting because they want to vote.
And you know who's going to come out?
The women are going to come out.
You watch.
The women.
The women are going to come out big.
It's all a phony deal.
They're telling you a lot of phony stuff.
They are so worried.
Media telling you a lot of phony stuff.
So worried.
I'm going to win more women and blacks than they think.
We are one day away.
Here's the next bite.
This is Trump just this morning in Sarasota.
One of the things they're seeing in a couple of these states like Florida, African Americans aren't turning out.
And when they do, there are a lot of them voting for Trump.
This is very disturbing to the other side.
They're not turning out because they don't care about her.
She's got not a lot of inspiration.
She used a term called super predator to define black youth, right?
Super predator.
And they're not turning out.
They're not turning out.
And then they're worried because when they do turn out, I'm getting so many more than was anticipated.
I think the same is going to be true with Hispanic.
He's trying to fire up the base.
He's trying to, not the base, he's trying to fire up everybody supporting him.
He's trying to give them confidence, keep them engaged, keep them.
He's got to do it, folks, because the drive-bys are out telling an entirely different story.
I mean, it's amazing, but there is an entirely different picture being painted by the mainstream media today.
Here's the last bite from Trump Sarasota.
You have one magnificent chance to beat the corrupt system and deliver justice.
You will deliver justice for every forgotten man, forgotten woman, and forgotten child in this nation.
Do not let this opportunity slip away.
We are fighting for every citizen who believes that government should serve the people, not the donors and not the special interest.
And we are fighting to bring us all together as Americans.
Just imagine what our country could accomplish if we started working together as one people under one God, saluting one American flag.
Holy smokes!
One God!
Yeah, and let's compare.
We happen to have the BAMSTR.
Barack Hussein Obama.
He was out there today, and he was in Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Well, I don't know why they're sitting right here.
This ought to be wrapped up.
What am I doing here?
Where's the script?
What do I say?
And here it is.
Michigan, all that progress goes down the drain if we don't win tomorrow.
What prize?
This race will be close here in Michigan, just like it will be in a lot of parts of the country.
What progress?
And I know it's been a long campaign.
And the end of every campaign brings all kinds of craziness and negative ads and noise and distractions.
And for those of you who are voting for the first time, what prize?
I know sometimes you think, well, this is kind of strange.
What progress?
It's not always like that.
I want you to tune all out all the noise.
And I want you just to focus because the choice you face when you step into the voting booth, it really could not be clear.
Donald Trump is temperamentally unfit to be commander-in-chief.
After all of this.
After all of this, that's all they've got.
They can't tell us how Trump's policies here.
They're bad.
Remember, Trump's fingerprints aren't on anything, folks.
Really, if you're not happy with the way things are going, you've got one candidate in this race whose fingerprints are all over it, whose policies have been implemented and have given us this.
Okay, here now, this has now become obligatory, the obligatory Obama mention at every rally he attends.
If you accept the support of Klan sympathizers, if they say they really like what you're doing and you're kind of slow to denounce or separate yourself from them, that's what you're going to do when you're in office.
He's trying to say that Trump has been courting the KKK and the KKK has been responding, KKK supporting Trump.
If you accept the support of the Klan when you're campaigning, well, what's going to change?
When you get into Oval Office, when Klan comes calling, you're going to let him in.
That's what he's trying to tell people.
Klan are going to be regular visitors to the Oval Office if Trump gets elected because what you do on a campaign trail only gets amplified when you're in the Oval Office.
This is disgusting, folks.
It's despicable.
It's bottom-of-the-barrel kind of, and may be the best they've got.
I don't doubt they have focus group this.
I don't doubt that they've tested.
Maybe they haven't.
Maybe they're just winging a prayering at here as we wind down.
But this is beneath everybody.
They don't care.
It's like Harry Reid lying about Romney not paying his taxes.
When it was finally exposed two years later, you know what Harry Reid said?
I don't care.
We won, didn't we?
He actually said, okay, he lost.
So it must have been okay.
Reid made up the fact that a friend told him Romney hadn't paid his taxes in 10 years.
And the media went out to investigate.
And it took him two years after the election to find out it wasn't true.
They went back to Dingy Harry.
You told us that Romney hadn't paid his taxes in 10 years.
It's not true.
Well, he lost, didn't he?
That's who they want more of that?
Then Hillary Clinton is your girl.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have Rush Limbaugh serving humanity simply by showing up.
Okay, back to the phones.
James and Tulsa, it's great to have you with us, sir.
Hello.
Good job, Brush.
I just want to say that I'm kind of ticked off at the Republican leadership.
I think it's time to call our Republicans to the carpet.
When Trump actually said that he wasn't interested in taking the election results as a final, you know, as a final story, here we are.
We're at the 11th hour, and Trump has a chance to win.
And our Republican leadership is turning their backs when they're basically saying they don't even trust the primary results.
He won the primary.
Come on, support our guy.
Okay, so your basic point is that you're still ticked off that Republicans will not support Trump.
You're talking about the Never Trumpers, even here at the 11th hour.
Well, I think it's the pot calling the kettle black.
I mean, you know, he has a right, you know, maybe to not trust the election results, but at the same time, you know, the Republicans aren't supporting him because, you know, he's the most popular guy.
Wait, you're confusing me here on not trusting the election results.
You're talking about this election tomorrow.
Trump is saying this is stuff he said during the primaries.
Are you saying Trump's got a point there?
Well, what am I missing?
I think that it's, you know, it's the same thing.
The election results, you know, if he's, you know, got an inkling that the election results need to be challenged, and yet at the same time, the Republicans are challenging, you know, their own candidate by turning their backs on him.
Okay, I'm not, I'm, I'm not sure that those two things are the same thing.
Here's something I can address.
I've not heard Trump say he doesn't trust the election.
What Trump has said, it was in a presidential debate, and they tried to make a big deal out of this.
And they wanted him on that night to concede the election.
wanted him to say that night, which was two weeks out or three, whatever the last debate was, that he would abide by the election results.
And he reserved the right to wait and see what happened, which is the only sensible thing to say.
If Trump had said that night on stage in the debate with Mrs. Clinton that he accepts, that he will accept the outcome, the headlines of the next day, Trump concedes defeat.
Trump concedes election.
It was a setup.
It wasn't so much a setup.
I'm not accusing Chris Wallace of a setup.
But the question was, it was aimed to try to get Trump to say publicly that he thinks the election's rigged because he's been saying it on the trail.
They wanted him to say it in the debate, and he didn't say it in the debate.
So he's not saying that by fiat or automatically he's going to challenge the results of the election.
Now, you are saying that the Republicans by not supporting him is the same thing, and that's what I don't get.
I don't get the analogy there, but it could be I'm just too thick today and looking in different directions than you are.
But I don't even think it's a factor yet.
We're not going to know what it could be the Democrats that challenge.
Hell, they're the ones that challenged the election outcomes.
The whole thing, it was wise that Trump answered the way he did, because I'm telling you, if he had, oh, no, I'll be perfectly fine with the, of course, I will concede if I lose.
Well, they would have reported, Donald Trump has just admitted he's going to lose the election.
He's agreed he will concede, is what they wanted to write.
And now these people are running around.
He's not going to concede.
That's what he said, Rush.
He's going to charge its rigging.
I don't think that's the case.
If he genuinely loses this thing, he's going to concede it.
The fact they're out there trying to tell people that he won't accept defeat no matter what is, again, another attempt to taint the guy.
It's Hillary Clinton who is tainted.
It's the Democrats who are tainted.
And by virtue of historical experience, I can say that.
It's a non-story, non-starter.
Now, the lack of Republican support for Trump, now that we can get our teeth into.
And I'm telling you that no matter whether he wins or loses, folks, there is a civil war coming on the Republican side of the aisle.
And it's going to be big.
Whether he wins or loses, it'll take a different form or direction depending on whether he wins or loses, but it is going to happen.
But I didn't have time at the moment to explain it to you.
So have to wait, I guess.
It's the fastest three hours in media, and there's only one left today, folks, one hour left.
And we say more in five seconds here than your average show will say in an entire hour.
▲
Export Selection