Rush Limbaugh Program - October 17, 2016, Monday, Hour #1

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 17, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program

36:40

October 17, 2016, Monday, Hour #1

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
	Let me ask you a quick question here, folks.
	If a Democrat campaign headquarters office, say a Hillary for president campaign office in a sizable left-wing university town had been blown up, you think you'd hear about it.
	Nothing but that, kind of right.
	If a Democrat headquarters, a Hillary campaign headquarters have been blown up, do you think that drive-bys would be blaming Hillary's rhetoric for it?
	Kind of doubt that.
	Do you think that that may be all you would be hearing about if a Democrat headquarters were blown up?
	Do you think that you would hear anybody say, well, you know, Hillary's responsible?
	She's out there saying all these irresponsible things, the Hillary campaign, no.
	And then they'd be tracking down every potential Republican suspect, starting with Trump, and then Trump's family, and then Trump's campaign staff, and then some of Trump's redneck supporters and some of these uh some of these uh whoever you would be devoting every waking moment to finding out if the Tea Party did it,
	if some conservative mad cap group did it, if somebody on a hate crime list did it, that's that they would be and then they would be wringing their hands and they'd be talking about the threat to democracy posed by all of this.
	And if Hillary Clinton were claiming that the election were rigged, do you think that they would be investigating her claim?
	If Hillary Clinton or Tim Kane, the I, or anybody else on the Democrat side were complaining of any aspect of the election being rigged, or if they were if it's discovered that uh the media was dramatically in favor of Donald Trump.
	Do you think that they would be talking about it?
	Damn right they would.
	And if if Hillary were claiming the election were rigged, they would assume it is rigged and they'd be looking for Republican suspects, and Obama would be enacting the Justice Department to conduct an investigation, the civil rights division would be impaneled, and they would pull out all stops to go out and find out who in fact is rigging, and then they would find somebody, just like they found the guy that produced the video that caused the outright uprising in uh in Benghazi.
	They would find somebody, they would charge somebody, they'd try to put them in jail right now, they would find their family, they would do they're doing none of that.
	And yet both of those things have happened.
	Except it was a Republican campaign headquarters, a Trump headquarter office in uh in in North Carolina in the same county where you'll find a University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, and just across the border boundary line from Duke University.
	You can't find any reference to this outside the so-called conservative media.
	The drive-by media not concerned with it at all.
	What they are concerned with is Trump's allegation the election is rigged.
	They are acting like that this is the greatest threat that our country has faced recently.
	This unhinged allegation, challenging the legitimacy, the authenticity, the synchrosect nature of our elections, and Trump's out there accusing them of being rigged.
	And the drive-by is a righteously indignant, they are offended, and they can't get over it.
	Meanwhile, people are wondering if Julian Assange is alive.
	Supposedly his connection to the internet has been terminated.
	Uh, I think Julian Assange is alive, but I'm gonna tell you there's a one percent out there that everybody needs to refocus on.
	And it's been exposed by WikiLeaks.
	WikiLeaks has exposed a vast left-wing conspiracy made up of the Democrat Party, Wall Street, and the media.
	That's the top one percent that Americans should worry about.
	Instead of the top one percent of the rich, which is a standard ploy every two years, every election year.
	The Democrats yank out of their playbook.
	The rich aren't paying their fair share, but the one percent, the top one percent that Americans should worry about as exposed by WikiLeaks, this vast left-wing conspiracy.
	Democrats, Wall Street Media.
	Now back to this Trump charge, the election is rigged.
	Mr. Snerdlay, interrupt for a moment your screening of calls and then ask you.
	Off top of your head, what do you think Trump is talking about when he says the election is rigged?
	What is he talking about?
	Exactly.
	He's talking about the media.
	He's talking about the fact that 95% of the media is stacked against him.
	He's talking about all the dirty tricks the media are playing.
	He's talking about that.
	Rudy Giuliani's talking about the dead vote.
	It can't be denied.
	Dead people vote and they vote Democrat.
	They did it for JFK in Illinois and West Virginia in 1960.
	But the righteous indignation coming from the media and the Democrats as though some precious thing has been violated here that's just unacceptable.
	I even saw on TV today a Republican official lamenting this, that this is such an unnecessary and such an unfortunate assault on one of the greatest God-given acts that humanity engages in.
	That is the presidential election, and to taint it this way is.
	You know, folks, uh I actually think.
	This some of the stuff seems out of purport.
	By the way, welcome Rush Limbo.
	I didn't tell you my name because you know who I am.
	And I didn't tell you the phone number because it you already know what that is.
	800-282-2882.
	Um the proportion here's out of whack.
	For a bunch of people that think they've got this election in the bag and it's over and Trump's toast.
	These people are acting.
	I don't know, like they don't think that.
	And I'm I'm look, I'm not the guy sitting here trying to offer you false optimism.
	I don't engage uh in that.
	Uh I just something's not right here.
	I I can't put my finger on there.
	They're the left for having something in the bag, they're not happy.
	They're not, they're not they're not pre-celebrating, they're not pre-popping champagne court, they're out there angrier than ever.
	They're they're acting, which is not new.
	I mean, they're angry all the time.
	And and they do get angry as they succeed.
	It's one of the craziest psychological things about them.
	That there's a guy out there now as an account on social media.
	By the way, I didn't get a social media into this top one percent of deceit, this intricately woven web of deceit.
	You have the Democrats, Wall Street media, and social media.
	I would throw them that that's the top one percent that everybody needs to be concerned about.
	There is an account on social media from a guy claiming to work for the post orifice, who is bragging about how he is destroying Trump absentee ballots.
	Let me ask you this.
	If a postal worker went on social media, I don't care where it was Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, you name it, and was bragging about destroying Hillary absentee ballots.
	Do you think they'd be trying to hunt this guy down and put him in jail with the guy who made the video about that started Benghazi?
	They wouldn't be stopping.
	They'd find this guy, they'd hunt him down, they'd put they'd give him to Marilyn Mosby and say, have at him.
	Charge him here, charge him there, put him in the back of a Baltimore police van, and let's see what he looks like when he comes out.
	Whatever it takes, they would be unearthing everything to find out who this guy is.
	I don't know if it's true.
	I'm just what Trump is talking about with rigged election is is the the without doubt completely in the tank for Hillary media, which isn't media again, and it's not even journalism anymore, and that's the nature of rigged.
	Now, in terms of polling places and things being done with early voting and this absentee ballot stuff here being destroyed, uh Trump absentee ballots being destroyed.
	How would you know, by the way, an absentee ballot cast for who?
	How would you know how would you know which ones to destroy, which ones not.
	I've not I've never seen an absentee ballot, I've never filed one, I've never done one.
	I've never been at the voting office when they come, so I don't know what they look like.
	How?
	So you'd have to open it.
	You'd have to open the abs.
	So you got a postal worker out there admitting that he's opening absentee ballots that have been mailed in, and he's just destroying the ones.
	I guess, but then what happens when he opens one for Hillary's got to reseal it, make it.
	I guess they don't care.
	It doesn't matter.
	As long as it's Hillary on it, what are the Democrats care where it came from?
	Could be postmarked Mars, you know, take it.
	Anyway, how are you, folks?
	I just I can't uh I can't tell you so many people I know.
	And I I heard I heard Newt say this on TV over the weekend.
	He thinks that, and I've got friends, I've smart, engaged friends who think that everybody is going to go to bed on election night, prepared for a massive surprise and shock and wake up to find one, and that is Trump winning.
	And they're basing it on real evidence.
	Well, not you call it evidence.
	They're basing it on things that they see, Trump's rallies.
	By the way, in the stack of stuff today, I had a story from somebody, I think it's the Hill.com.
	If it's not the Hill, it's something like that.
	Anyway, somebody, a writer there, actually went to a Trump event, wanting to document that it's a bunch of toothless gummer deliverance types out there shouting all kinds of insults at Hillary.
	Basically, Hayseed Hicks, combined IQ in a Trump rally of a pencil eraser is what they think.
	And the guy or the girl who had it is stunned, shocked at what she saw or he saw in terms of the substance in terms of Trump's supporters.
	In other words, it was another glaring example of how the media creates these images that they then believe, and then when confronted with reality, they are in absolute shock and don't believe what they see.
	And in this case, the writer saw a Trump rally that was at total variance what he or she expected on the plus side.
	In the audio soundbite roster, we've got an info babe who went somewhere and talked to a woman that loves this program.
	And you know what?
	I've got to find out why.
	I've got to find out why this woman and the reporter that you'll hear in the soundbites coming up was shocked at what she had heard.
	So the Trump rallies continue to be huge.
	I mean, I can't tell the number of emails I get from people who are either at these rallies or watching them on the web, and who say if the media were covering these, Trump would be up by ten points.
	If the media were televising these rallies with what Trump is saying and the way the public is reacting to him, then it would be an entirely different campaign.
	And by contrast, Hillary is in hibernation.
	Hillary's hiding, can't find anybody that uh can find her.
	She's not out there doing personal appearances anywhere.
	The outward signs, you got the polling data.
	By the way, by the way, Washington Post, ABC poll, latest one out.
	Hillary up by four.
	That is margin of error.
	In fact, you could call it a dead heat given the margin of error in the uh in the Washington Post poll.
	And I think this is when ABC, Washington Post, when the Washington Post reports their poll, they discredit their own poll in a way by calling our attention to other polls that show Hillary much farther ahead.
	But this poll has to have some of the people in the media distressed, where we are three weeks out.
	And the ABC Washington Post poll shows Hillary leading Trump by four.
	Even if they're, even if that were outside the margin of there, stop and think of this now.
	This is four points.
	And here's what the Washington Post says.
	The poll was conducted during one of the most tumultuous periods of Trump's candidacy after the release of a video in which he spoke about taking sexual advantage Of women, and during a time when numerous women have accused him of sexual misconduct.
	Nonetheless, the controversy appeared to have had only a minimal impact on his overall support.
	Let me translate that for you.
	We thought we had him this time.
	We had made him out to be the next Bill Clinton.
	Bill Cosby, not Clinton, sorry.
	The timing was perfect.
	The same kind of October surprise we used to destroy Romney, Bob Dole, Herman Cain, you named it.
	We turned that goody two shoes, Mitt Romney into a monster.
	If it wasn't for 9-11, we could have taken out Bush 43 like we did his dad.
	They can't, but in other words, if Trump is at four points after with withstanding this barrage, then they have to be scratching their heads.
	Now I want to remind you of one more thing.
	We're getting close now to the period of time where the pollsters are going to have to start showing the race as it is.
	Now, I'm of the opinion they're not yet.
	I'm of the opinion that they're still using their polls to make news, to shape public opinion, rather than reflect it.
	But as we get closer to the election, we're not there yet, by the way.
	But as we get closer to the election, all of these polling companies are going to want to be right when it's all over.
	And so the polls that we get a week prior, the last polls before the election from all of these different outfits, probably will be closer to what they really think is going to happen.
	And because they have their reputations to predict, uh protect after the election is over.
	Nothing's going to happen to them if they blow it.
	But there still is this professional reputation.
	We'll still so we'll see if other polls start to tighten.
	And uh and get closer as we near election day.
	But the conventional wisdom is that Trump's toast, he's had it.
	He's unhinged.
	He won't stop talking about these women.
	He won't stop reacting.
	He won't stay on issues.
	Except when you go to one of his rallies, he's totally on issues.
	And the people are as revved as they've ever been.
	And more people are showing up at Trump rallies than ever before, and more people are being turned away because they can't fit in than ever before.
	And everybody tells us you can't judge it by that, Rush.
	That's not scientific data.
	That's uh anecdotal.
	It's just people talking.
	Well, it's not just people talking.
	I mean, we see it.
	Yeah, but we don't know who those people are.
	We don't know how many of them are actually Hillary supporters that are just rubber necking.
	You know, I doubt that is the is the case.
	Anyway, we have audio soundbites.
	Obama, once again, I am living rent-free in Obama's head.
	Well, I didn't even know about it till this.
	Well, I knew, but Catherine Canthor walked in, uh, what was it?
	Friday night.
	I guess you just Obama can't stop talking about you.
	So what did he say?
	And she told me what he said.
	I haven't heard that anywhere.
	Cookie didn't have that, I haven't heard that anywhere.
	She said, Well, I just heard it.
	I'm just not a surprise, I hear it all the time.
	Not a word of it over the week in a soundbite roster.
	And he was it was Thursday night in Columbia.
	Here, play it real quick and we'll go to the break.
	Audio soundbite number one.
	Here's Obama again, and this is at a uh Democrat Party dinner.
	So kind of a fundraiser where he speaks honestly.
	This is in the swamp of crazy that has been fed over and over and over and over again.
	It's a whole kind of ecosystem.
	You know.
	And look, if I watched Fox News, I wouldn't vote for me.
	I understand.
	If I was listening to Rush Lemon, I'd say, man.
	That's terrible.
	Gotta go to a break, folks.
	Be right back.
	Okay, so ABC News Washington Post has the race at Hillary plus four.
	NBC News is just out with a new poll in the Wall Street Journal, Hillary Clinton ahead of Trump by double digits.
	It's uh 11 points with just over three weeks until election day.
	This according to brand new.
	National NBC News and Wall Street Journal poll conducted entirely after the second debate.
	Four-way race.
	Clinton holds an 11-point lead over Trump among likely voters.
	48 to 37, Libertarian Gary Johnson, 7%, Jill Stein at 2%.
	In a two-way contest without Johnson and Stein, Clinton is ahead by 10, 51 to 41.
	Look, I have a little bit of a question.
	I mean, it's obviously rhetorical, but you know, the drive-by's are prohibited from announcing the winners in various states on election day till the polls close, right?
	They observed this.
	It started back in 1980, by the way, I'll tell you why.
	My question is how come they can run article after article after article claiming that Hillary has won certain states already when early voting is already taking place.
	But you can't report on election returns before a state has closed, yet early voting doesn't have any prohibition.
	Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day, Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone at 800-282-2882.
	Folks, I want to remind you again that what is happening here with this obviously out of balance media coverage of Trump.
	I mean, I I don't I'm not trying to do a C I told you so, but I have mentioned countless times that this is what it's always going to look like.
	whenever an outsider attempts to defeat and oust the establishment.
	It's going to look like this no matter who the nominee is, if the nominee is a genuine outsider.
	The establishment owns the establishment.
	They are the media.
	They are Wall Street, they are some major corporations in terms of his donors.
	And they are elected officials in both parties.
	And they have worked hard, and it's it's been the establishment's been around as long as there's been humanity.
	Every organization of human beings has its elite members from a town to a town council to a sports team to a there are always the special few elites.
	And they know it.
	And they work hard to protect it, and they work very hard building walls to keep people out of it, particularly people who want to overthrow it.
	So this is what it's always going to look like.
	The people who are members of the established, the elite 1% here that make up the establishment are going to circle the wagons and join forces, and they are going to not, they're just not going to trust their fate to a normal, everyday, standard operating procedure election taking place under the auspices of democracy.
	They're just not going to.
	They didn't get power by randomly winning things.
	They didn't keep their power by hoping that random events continued to fall in their favor.
	They got power by taking it.
	They keep power by engineering the outcome of events that keeps them in power.
	It's the nature, you could almost say the human nature, the psychological aspects of this.
	So it's it's understandable in in that sense that they're not just going to sit by and watch a campaign happen and then deal with whatever the results are, especially if they lose.
	They're not even going to give that a chance.
	They're going to go to every length possible to eliminate any possibility that any outsider is going to succeed.
	So they have, in this case, done so, and they join forces, and it's all out destruction.
	Personal, career, political, you name it, all out destruction of anybody who joins the outsider in His, in this case, Trump's effort.
	Now, even within the establishment, you have groups.
	Even within the establishment, you've got your top dog ruling class, and then people that are not yet at that level, but they're still in the group.
	And they want to stay in the group.
	And they want to climb the ladder that exists in that group to get to the pinnacle.
	Some of them do.
	In this case, I'm describing Republican members of the establishment.
	They want to stay there.
	They don't want to be ousted.
	They don't want to find that that's why they're not in any way, shape, manner, or form supporting Trump, because they don't want outsiders to take over the vaunted positions of power that run the world.
	And that's what these positions do.
	The people in the establishment, the elite establishment in the United States, not only run America, they run the world.
	In consort with other establishment members around the world, United Nations and various other friendly nation states.
	And they all circle the wagons for each other, and they will protect each other when they're under assault.
	When they have staved off an assault, they'll go back to internecine battles among their own cells and their own group, but they're circling the wagon.
	This is what it looks like.
	It was never going to be easy.
	It was never going to be fair.
	The media was never going to roll over and just let this happen.
	They're part of it.
	The media is part of what I call the media establishment complex, or they the top one percent.
	And I think a lot of people would have crumbled by now if they had been dished the treatment Trump has gotten.
	I think a lot of people would have caved and said, you know what?
	I've got a life after all this is all over, and I don't want these people destroying everything I'm doing here, and they would have caved, they would have quit, they would have ceded or what have you.
	Trump has not done that.
	And I think the establishment is kind of surprised and shocked and little not sure what's going on here.
	Because the one thing they know is that their hold on power is as this is demonstrating.
	They are a minority.
	They govern against the will of the people.
	Once it is discovered who and what they are, it's very obvious that they are not us and that they do not share our concerns, and that they're not nationalistic Americans the way we are.
	They view America in an entirely different way as part of a global organization and arrangement.
	And their power goes way beyond their positions in the United States.
	So here comes an outsider, and they're going to destroy the outsider, whoever he or she is.
	This is what it looks like.
	And it is always going to look like this until it happens.
	And if it does happen, if an outsider ever really wins, I shudder to think what the aftermath is going to be.
	We'll deal with that should it occur.
	But I just want to remind everybody that's what this is.
	And there never was going to be.
	There's no pretense of objectivity, and there was never going to be.
	There's no pretense of anything but rigged, you know, in the sense that Trump means that When I say rigged, the establishment is using every asset it has to ensure that they win this.
	They're not leaving it up to just a vote.
	Like you're taught in Civics 101 that elections are taken and that take place and the winners win, the losers lose, and you have campaigns and fundraising.
	They're not leaving it up to any of that.
	And they were never going to.
	So in that sense, if if the powerful using every aspect of their power to hold on to their power equals rigging the game, then I mean there's no doubt that that's happening.
	But it's also not surprising.
	Shouldn't be anyway.
	I mean, many of the people in the establishment are not there because of the Democratic process.
	The elected ones are.
	But there are vastly many more people within the elite, the establishment that have never been elected to anything.
	They got there an entirely different way.
	They stay there entirely different ways.
	And many of them have much more power over elected officials, as we are seeing.
	I'm going to give you an example of that after we take a brief time out.
	Don't go away.
	You'll enjoy this.
	Hi, how are you?
	Welcome back.
	Rush Limbaugh.
	Making more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying.
	clap
	And saying in a couple of minutes, what most people take a week to say.
	It's great to have you here.
	I want to go back to this Obama sound by the minute.
	I didn't get a chance to, I just had enough time to play that for you.
	Again, now remember, it's it's in a fundraiser.
	Obama says different things at fundraisers than he says in public.
	He does not usually mention my name.
	Sometimes he will Fox News.
	But he's out making a speech to the general public, whether it's a campaign appearance or not.
	Very seldom will he mention my name because he does not want to elevate me and amplify me or promote me, but to a Democrat fundraiser where I equal money.
	Democrats hear my name and they write checks.
	They have uh within their circles, quote unquote, demonized me to the point that there's genuine fear that I my ideas will prevail.
	So Obama mentions me and they write checks.
	Donors donate big when my name is mentioned.
	That's what he does here.
	But I want to ask what he's talking about at the end of this bill.
	This is in the swamp of crazy that has been fed over and over and over and over again.
	It's a whole kind of ecosystem.
	You know.
	And look, if I watch Fox News, I wouldn't vote for me.
	I understand.
	If I was listening to Rush Limba, I'd say, man.
	That's terrible.
	I wouldn't like me either if I listened to Rush Limbaugh.
	What is it that I'm saying?
	That people wouldn't like him for.
	Is it the fact I accuse them all of lying about Obamacare?
	The fact I point out all the lying about Benghazi, all the lying about the Iran deal.
	Uh talk about how the stimulus was not a stimulus.
	I mean, what is it specifically that I say that Obama could understand him not being liked.
	He I'm not making anything up, and he knows it.
	This is just, he's just using this to raise money.
	He probably, I don't think he cares.
	Well, I don't know, sir.
	That may not be true.
	It's just from his ego standpoint, but that's why he throws my name out.
	You gotta make book on the fact that when he does it, he's talking at Democrat donors.
	I consider this a great honor, my friends, that that I equal check writing.
	They're so afraid of me that they go out there and write money, write checks.
	Um there is a bombshell in the WikiLeaks document dump that has been discovered.
	It has just been made available.
	Now, T T 2 and me, it's a bombshell.
	I need to qualify.
	It's not going to be a bombshell to anybody else.
	It's not it's not, by the way, anything that you haven't considered.
	It's just that this is confirmation.
	What the wiki leak email dump, these are the leaked emails that pedestin from the Hillary campaign, actually via email chains, shows the Clinton campaign, openly debating in emails how to cover up the Benghazi emails.
	And it it shows them talking about giving the story, the whole Benghazi story, to a friendly reporter so that they can shape the narrative before Republicans on the Benghazi committee realize how explosive the real story is.
	In other words, this email document dump indicates that the Clinton campaign Knows their Benghazi story is a bunch of horse hockey, that the video and all that is a bunch of horse hockey.
	They know how bad it is.
	And they want to get a false narrative out about this as soon as they can before the Republicans on the committee find out just how bad it is, and before the Republicans on the committee maybe find out how much collusion's been going on here.
	So they gave it to a friendly reporter to shape the narrative before committee Republicans were able to learn about it and realize how explosive the real story is.
	It just got to me, and and I that's a summary of what it is.
	I haven't been able to print it out and get into the actual verbatim aspects of the of the email chain.
	That's what I meant the other day.
	This it it's show prep is almost getting the point of being pointless because it just continues while the program is happening.
	Got to be flexible and fluid to be able to incorporate it as it uh as it flows in.
	Also, just now John King.
	We did we're talking about polls.
	We've got the ABC News Washington Post poll, which is taken after the debate, second debate, and with all the allegations from these women, these many of these allegations, by the way, being blown smithereens.
	Many of the allegations from women saying Trump abused them have been blown to smithereens.
	Drive-by's not covering any of that.
	They're sticking with the original theme, which is that Trump is a reprobate, and it doesn't matter what Bill Clinton did.
	The NBC News Wall Street Journal poll is out showing Hillary up 11.
	Same time frame as the Washington Post ABC poll, it shows Hillary up by four.
	Here is just moments ago, John King inside politics on CNN.
	Battleground state of Ohio, good news for Donald Trump.
	Trump up 48% to 44%.
	North Carolina poll shows Hillary Clinton with the narrowest of lead, a one-point lead.
	So statistically, a dead heat go west to Nevada.
	This one's a bit of a surprise.
	4644.
	Again, a very narrow Clinton lead.
	The statisticians would say that's a dead heap.
	If you look at those numbers right there, and you're a Trump supporter, well, after a tough couple of weeks, reason to see the glass is half full, right?
	But if you look at the other map, the electoral map, Clinton's state-by-state advantage, it's still pretty overwhelming heading into the stretch.
	The hard truth for Trump is she can afford to lose all three of those states and still win the election.
	So you see how this works.
	They have new polling data.
	Great news for Trump in all these states, but it doesn't matter.
	Because Hillary is still going to win.
	I think they're not sure of that.
	In fact, I know they're not sure of that, because that's what's shaping the way they are continuing to report on this.
	And if you look at the polling data, there's an interesting aspect to all of these polls, and that is that Hillary Clinton is not at 50% in any of them.
	And nobody's talking about that aspect.
	Largely because in many of these polls now they're there are four people.
	You have Hillary and Trump, and then this uh what's it, Gary Johnson and Jill Stein, so you get four people there, Dibby's the vote up.
	Uh I know Bill Clinton didn't win with 50%, but they're making Hillary out to be slam dunk massive landslide winner.
	She's not at 50%.
	She's back below it.
	She has been at 50% or over.
	They really ballyhooed that.
	I think what was it?
	The Reuters Ipsos when she was up 11 and had her 51%.
	They just went bonkers.
	They were ecstatic, 51%.
	But she's back below it now.
	And to people that pay attention to polling, that's weird.
	That doesn't jibe with somebody running away with this.
	And the fact that she is projected to be this landslide winner, and she can't get to 50%.
	I think might give some of them on her side pause, might concern some of them, because she's not demonstrating any upward movement.
	You might say that whatever polls are being taken show is that Trump is losing around.
	She's not gaining any.
	She's not likable.
	She doesn't have charismatic type uh personality.
	I don't know, folks.
	it just I don't know anything.
	It just doesn't seem that the people on the winning side of this who think they've already won it and in a landslide they just don't seem happy and confident about it.
	I don't know.
	No, no, I did not forget the example I was gonna get.
	It was just it was just overwhelmed by late arriving show prep.
	I finally got to meet this data on how they doctored the Benghazi data for a friendly reporter.
	And I got that, so we'll try to make sense of that when we get back here.
	James O'Keefe with another video that I just learned about.
	So we are fluid here, folks.

▲