Rush Limbaugh Program - October 10, 2016, Monday, Hour #3

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 10, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program

30:24

October 10, 2016, Monday, Hour #3

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	No, I guess I guess what I'm saying is I don't understand.
	Well, that's not true.
	I do understand.
	That's let me put it this way.
	It just it it's very frustrating to see all of these Republican leaders act like the most important thing they have to do is make Democrat voters happy.
	They have to say things, they have to do things that are going to meet with Democrat voter approval.
	I I don't get it.
	That's the thing in all of this that's the most, I guess I was going to say perplexing, but it isn't perplexing because I know exactly why.
	They've got PTSD, they're on defense.
	They uh they they they think that the media Democrats have been successful for generations, defining conservatives, so they think their mission is to uh do things and say things to convince these Democrat voters that they're not all these horrible rotten things.
	To what end, I don't know, because they're not going to change the way people vote.
	Look at Paul Ryan, for example.
	Paul Ryan is not going to convince Democrats that he can take position whatever he wants on Trump in order to satisfy please whatever Democrat voters, but how's that going to help him keep the Republican majority?
	Well, you're missing the point, Mr. Limbaugh, as usual.
	What he's doing is trying to make sure that angry Republicans don't abandon the party.
	Angry Republicans.
	Look at I just do not believe that the vast majority of Republicans want to see Hillary Clinton elected.
	I just don't believe it.
	Do you, Mr. Snerdley, am I off base here?
	Do you think you think you think most mainstream Republican voters coast to coast in order to save the party want Hillary to win?
	So that's I don't either.
	I don't think they've either.
	So I don't what what is to be gained by saying things, doing things that are aimed at pleasing and satisfying Democrat voters.
	Well, uh it's two things.
	We can never forget the donors.
	Because it is the donors who are really determining what Republican leaders are saying about Trump.
	And there's the this is also inarguable, if you ask.
	I think most of what I say is inarguable, but there is the posturing for losing.
	If you are a Republican in the leadership of the House or Senate, if you're just a re consultant, if you're uh a Republican in politics, and if you are convinced that the election is over, that Trump cannot possibly win, then what do you want to do?
	You want to have a position that you can claim you occupied all along, said you knew so.
	If there is to be a defeat, you want to be able to say you knew it all along, and you tried to prevent it, and you stood up to it.
	You try to tell people that Trump was going to lose, you try to tell people it was a mistake to not nominate Trump.
	So there's this post-defeat posturing that's going on.
	In neither case is there any energy being expended toward winning.
	And they still are trying to figure out why Trump got the nomination in the midst of all this.
	Audio sound bites, uh, take you back December 5th, 2014, me on this very program.
	You wait until these millennials find out how she enabled her husband to sexually whatever, abuse whatever all of these women.
	They weren't alive when that happened.
	They weren't alive during Paula Jones and Jennifer Flowers and Kathleen William.
	They weren't old enough to remember it.
	Lewinsky and all that, wait till they find out.
	Let me put it to you this way.
	Today's millennials, if, if, don't misquote me on this.
	If they found out that Obama was run around serially involved in adulterous relationships, and Michelle Obama was in charge of ruining the reputations of the women involved.
	you think the millennials would put up with it?
	Well, wait till they find out that Hillary ran the bimbo eruptions.
	This generation of young people, gay marriage, all of this stuff, fine and dandy feminism totally runs their show.
	You wait till they find out Hillary's role in what she did to other women.
	I'm telling you.
	Now, for those of you who have listened to this program for years, what Trump did yesterday, he pulled another trick on the media.
	He called a pre-debate press conference.
	So they showed up.
	I don't know if they thought he was going to announce that he was getting out of the race.
	Who knows what they tell themselves?
	But when they showed up to his press conference, there they were.
	Juanita Broderick, Kathleen Willie, Paula Jones, 12-year-old girl raped by a guy that Hillary defended, got off on the charge of raping the then 12-year-old.
	And Trump let them tell their story.
	The media was fit to be tied.
	They'd been, they'd been roped into tricked into what Trump did for the first time in 20 years got those women's stories on CNN.
	Now 90% of the drive-by media did nothing more with it.
	They're still obscuring it, not covering it.
	But for the first time, those women's stories reached mass media.
	And that means for the first time, a bunch of millennial-aged women found out about this.
	From the sources, not from media that they may have a problem with, or not trust or believe, but from the women themselves.
	Hillary claims that the millennial vote is very important to her, very crucial.
	They always say this.
	I and the millennial vote's probably going to be what it usually is, not nearly as big a turnout as everybody predicts that it's going to be.
	But this is one of these things that might not be showing up right now in polling data.
	The polling data right now looks horrible for Trump.
	I saw moments ago on Fox that Hillary's up 11.
	I guess it's their poll.
	I don't know.
	The poll was not.
	It's at NBC News Wall Street Journal poll.
	And Hillary's up 11 in a four-way race.
	And they're concluding that uh that that's it.
	It's over.
	Um so forth.
	And you can probably expect, folks, that there's going to be more Trump audio or video.
	I'm sure the people that have been collecting this share.
	Why didn't they do this back in uh August?
	They've had this Billy Bush audio.
	They've had this for months.
	Why didn't they use it in September?
	Why didn't they use it to affect the Republican nomination?
	They have been waiting for just the right time.
	And I think what's going on now is they're letting all of this be reacted to by Trump.
	And when it settles down, which it always does, there will be even more.
	And the cycle here is going to continue.
	And they'll find things of uh in Trump's past where he will probably be accused, probably maybe even sided with the Clintons or with Bill Clinton, a couple things.
	They're going to do whatever they can to point out what they think is Trump hypocrisy and so forth.
	So this stuff will continue.
	There'll be more of this before the next debate.
	Uh mark my words.
	But I do want to play a soundbite here from Kayleigh McIntyre, who is a Trump uh supporter.
	And she is uh one of Trump, I think she's a spokeswoman for Trump.
	She's on TV occasionally last night CNN.
	Debate night in America, pre-debate coverage, Jake Tapper speaking with Trump supporter Kaylee McEnaney about Trump's press conference with Juanita Broderick, Kathleen Willie, and Paula Jones.
	And Jake Tamper said, how many voters does this add to Trump's voters?
	I mean, how does this little trick that Trump pulled here?
	How many votes is it gonna get him?
	Because I believe all the people who know these stories are already probably voting for Trump anyway.
	So what does he expect to get out of all this?
	You know who doesn't know these stories?
	It's the millennials.
	It's millennial women.
	One in five women on a college campus are the victims of sexual assault.
	And Hillary Clinton tweeted out a year ago, every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported.
	For her to put out a statement right now, calling it a stunt when three women have the courage to take the national stage and before all of this country share their stories of sexual assault.
	That is sick, Hillary Clinton.
	Did they not think through this isn't a stunt?
	Ask Juanita Broderick if this is a stunt.
	Ask these women if it is a stunt.
	It is courage.
	These women are courageous, and we need to recognize that.
	All right, so that was that was Kaylee McKinney claiming that legal women are going to find out about this.
	One in five don't know about it, and there might be some bad news for Hillary in it.
	Later on on CNN, as we're staying in order here on the audio sound bites, CNN's special pre-debate edition of Aaron Burnett Out Front.
	She had on Jeffrey Lord from the American Spectator talking about Trump's press conference with Juanita Broderick, Kathleen William Paula Jones.
	Aaron Burnett said, you now have them sitting in the audience of the debate.
	They went from the pre-debate press conference to the audience.
	You have Bill Clinton sitting in the same room that they are sitting in.
	How does this play out, Jeff?
	What they've just done here is get this out into the conservative media stream, whether it's picked up and obviously it is picked up right here on CNN.
	And to get this everywhere, you can be guaranteed that tomorrow morning or tomorrow noon when Rush Limbaugh hits the airwaves, that this will be topic A. Trump, topic Away.
	Did you hear what happened to the mention of my name?
	They all started talking.
	Every damn one of them on the panel.
	You know who that was?
	That was Paul Bagala, David Axelrod, Gloria Borger, and Van Jones.
	And the very here, play it again.
	The very mention of my name, and they all go bonkers trying to stop Lord from what he is saying and making sure that no further communication happens.
	What they've just done here is get this out into the conservative media stream, whether it's picked up and obviously it is picked up right here on CNN.
	And to get this everywhere, you can be guaranteed that tomorrow morning or tomorrow noon when Rush Limbaugh hits the airwaves that this will be topic A. Is that not hilarious?
	That's hilarious.
	The mention of my name is a trigger.
	And they all just go nuts.
	The Wall Street Journal NBC poll, Clinton 52, Trump 38, 446 uh respondent margin of error 4.46%.
	I don't care how you slice.
	That doesn't look good, 5238.
	That's not 11 points.
	That's 12.
	No.
	That's that's that's 14 points.
	That's not the I saw a poll had 11.
	This is worse than the one I saw.
	And I don't know are these pre-debate polls?
	These have to be.
	Oh, post-audio tip, but pre-debate, post-audio tape.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Dear Frank Lunz did a focus group last night on uh on Fox with the with Meghan Kelly.
	Well, here I've got those bikes.
	Let me find I got time to find it real quick here.
	Frank Lunz was shocked.
	Study seven.
	What?
	Starting at seven.
	Okay, and I went past them.
	Uh yes, okay.
	The Lunz focus group on Fox loved Trump last night, and they didn't want to, and they didn't expect to.
	So Lunt says I want a word or phrase to describe Donald Trump's performance.
	I feel he was much improved.
	Calm and strong.
	He had practice.
	Is he more presidential?
	Much improved.
	Sure for himself.
	Much improved.
	The bar set so low for him.
	More researched.
	So after asking the group what uh what they thought after the debate, Lunch then offered this bit of analysis.
	This is the first time of the three debates that there has been any genuine movement.
	I have to acknowledge something here.
	I thought that it was all over for Donald Trump.
	And when these people walked in here, I was pretty sure of it.
	Based on their response, and I hope to bring some more of it to you later on in the show.
	I have to change my mind.
	Frank Luns and his focus group last night.
	It kind of goes against these polls that the drive-by's are presenting out there.
	To whatever extent you want to apply credence to uh to any of this.
	But that debate last night, I I don't want to be repetitive.
	I spent the first half hour of the program today on this.
	But it was remarkable because the purpose of last night was to finish Trump off.
	And not just this campaign.
	Last night was about totally destroying Donald Trump in his business, his character's reputation, everything, as a warning to the next person that might try it.
	Remember what happened to Trump.
	It is classic establishment.
	The media and the Democrats working together.
	And last night was, and Trump, if you want to say the debate was a draw, if you want, no matter how you slice this, when you realize what the objective was, this was a huge win for Trump.
	Whether he wins the election or not, last night was huge, personally, for Trump.
	That he pulled it off, that he was able to pull it off, that he pulled it off so decisively.
	It was a big, big moment for him personally, because this was, in addition to all the political noise, an effort to destroy the man as well.
	For daring to even try this.
	Okay, time to go back to the phones.
	Uh Christine in San Clemente, California.
	Welcome.
	Great to have you here.
	Oh, thank you, Rush.
	You are such an inspiration to so many of us who need to be comforted and uplifted after the news media hits us with all of these issues.
	Um greetings from sunny San Clemente in Orange County, California.
	It's beautiful there.
	It's beautiful.
	I'm uh I'm it's great to have uh people in the audience from there.
	It's a beautiful place, and I thank you very much for what you said.
	Oh, you are very welcome, Rush, because every morning I'm depressed about what I hear, and I'm turning you on, and you come you just explained.
	No, no, no, these these uh three hours of this program are the only three hours anymore when life seems normal.
	You're right.
	Uh Rush.
	Yes, you know what?
	I'm proud to say that I am an evangelical Christian, and I'm proud of it.
	I'm a Trumpster completely all the way through and through, and plus I'm a woman.
	Rush, I don't fit into this mold.
	I don't have the the outrage, and I'm not a hip hypocrite.
	Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
	What mold do you not fit into?
	You are you telling me you're not upset with what Trump said?
	I I am not an outraged woman over what Trump said.
	Oh and I'm not embarrassed to tell people that.
	Oh, well, you're a Christian.
	Yes, I'm a Christian, but I'm not a hypocrite.
	You know, there's only one person who was sinless, Rush, and we know who that was.
	Yes, we do.
	Uh Rush.
	Do you know that Saturday Night Live said the P word on Saturday night?
	Are you kidding?
	That's the least of what it's everywhere.
	The P word.
	In fact, Cookie said, look, it we it's in so many sound bites today.
	She said, Do you want me to uh let it go, or should I edit it out, bleep it?
	And I said, this program has standards, we're gonna bleep it out.
	Rush, why aren't we hearing about that?
	The very people who are attacking Trump for his words are saying the same thing.
	Hollywood has been saying this for years and years.
	I know.
	I did a whole monologue of it because they are allowed to.
	Rush.
	Um, you know the important thing of what you're saying here is that you're you're a you're a Christian and you're not bothered by it.
	The Republican Party thinks people like you are petrified, angry, and ready to leave the party over this.
	That's why I was so encouraged by your words today, because you identified the hypocrisy.
	And it's not true.
	We are not outraged.
	You know, this happened 11 years ago.
	He's given an apology.
	I've accepted it, and you know, anyone else who doesn't want to accept it, then so be it.
	Can I ask a question?
	Can I ask the questions of everybody?
	I know I'm running a risk.
	I'm walking along a narrow precipice here when I ask this.
	But to how many women is language like this coming from any man a surprise?
	Now, I mean, I just asking.
	I mean, my I'm trying to imagine this.
	Okay, the the tape is released on Friday, and all the cable networks are playing the tape.
	And I'm trying to imagine millions of women in front of the TV standing up in outrage and shock and saying, Well, I never is that what he thinks?
	I have never, I would, I don't know a single guy who talks that way.
	How many women like that are there?
	Oh, how many women are stunned and shocked by the Well, Rush, I mean, we're talking about a presidential candidate.
	I gotta point you to Bill Clinton, the Democrats.
	I'm sorry, but you've already elected a guy.
	Back to the uh WikiLeaks.
	I mentioned a bunch of times here on the program that this is what I think are some bombshells in this release, as it relates to the impact on Democrat voters.
	And Sunday, yesterday, CNN's inside politics.
	Uh the round table was asked about Hillary Clinton telling bankers behind closed doors that she wanted open trade and open borders.
	Uh this is according to transcripts of her Wall Street speeches.
	This is what WikiLeaks got and has released.
	And Hillary tried to blame this all on the Russians last night.
	She tried to blame it on Putin and didn't say that Trump was working with Putin and so forth.
	We don't know how this leak happened.
	Uh Julian Assange is not saying so.
	It doesn't matter.
	Hillary's not denying any of it.
	Glenn Frush, who is a drive-by leftist activist in the media, said this is really damaging stuff.
	You want some shocking private words.
	Everybody's focusing on Trump and the Pusa and all this other stuff he's talking about.
	How about a candidate for president saying in private that she's not for enforcing immigration law?
	Well, that's guys, it's not really shocking when you hear a Democrat say this.
	I understand this.
	Behind closed doors, Hillary Clinton promised to violate her oath of office, and she will appoint thousands of people to be instructed to do the same.
	She made this promise to her Wall Street donors and her cronies.
	And there are a number of examples.
	From Breitbart, WikiLeaks reveals Hillary lied about the Marines, rejecting her because she was a woman.
	Do you remember the story that she tells that she goes into uh the Marine office when she was 26 or 27 in Chicago, and she says that they turned her down because she was a woman and that maybe the dogs would take her.
	Well, turns out that's not the story she told the bankers in her speeches.
	According to transcripts released by WikiLeaks in a speech at the annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Pathology in September 2013, and a couple of banks just said the same thing too.
	Hillary had a completely different story than she gave in 1994.
	When asked by a member of the audience if in 1975 she was rejected from the Marines because she was female, Hillary said no.
	That had nothing to do with it.
	She said she was rejected because she was too old.
	Question from the audience Is it true that until 1975 you applied for the Marines and they told you no because you're a woman?
	Hillary, no.
	Here's what did happen.
	I was actually, there was a recruiting station, and I thought, you know, maybe I should consider serving my country by joining the military.
	So I walked at a recruiting station, and the person on duty was a Marine.
	I think I was 26, 27, so an older potential recruit.
	And I said to the young Marine, I said, Well, you know, I'd be interested in getting some information to see whether I can maybe serve.
	I'm a lawyer.
	Maybe I could help in some way.
	And he said, Well, I think you're too old from the reines, but maybe the dogs will take you.
	And I said, The dogs?
	And he goes, Yeah, you know the army.
	And Hillary says, Well, I doesn't sound like I'm going to be welcome.
	But the difference is that when she told this story numerous times in public, she said that the recruiter told her no because she was a woman.
	And she always tells this story within another story about how it's unfair for women out there, how women are discriminated against, and how women are mistreated.
	And the and when she told this story in public the first time in 1994, she said the primary reason the Marine recruiter told her no is that she was a woman.
	And somebody in the audience at one of these speeches asked her, no, no, no.
	It didn't have anything to do with the fact that I was a woman.
	It was too old.
	It's no different than Mrs. Clinton claiming that she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary.
	Sir Edmund Hillary, the first man to climb Mount Everest.
	The only problem with that is that he didn't climb Mount Everest until Hillary was six.
	Her mother and dad could not have known of Edmund Hillary.
	Nobody knew of him.
	He wasn't from America.
	So she could not possibly have been named for him.
	But she stuck with the story.
	Another email leak in the WikiLeaks trove indicates a cozy press relationship.
	One January 2015 strategy document designed to plant stories on her decision-making process about whether to run for president, singled out reporter Maggie Haberman, who was then at the Politico.
	She's now the New York Times.
	Maggie Haberman was singled out as a friendly journalist who has teed up stories for Hillary in the past and never disappointed.
	Nick Merrill, a campaign press secretary, produced the memo, according to the document metadata.
	And it's right here in the email about how Hillary, January 2015, is just a year and a half ago, planting stories on how she decided to run for office with somebody at the political because they've really helped us in the past.
	Not news to you and me, but this is the kind of she's admitting this in speeches and in other documents that are in the treasure trove from WikiLeaks.
	There's much more.
	Hillary's leaked speeches confirm Russia-funded anti-fracking groups.
	You know how crucial this is?
	Hillary Clinton confirmed to an audience behind closed doors what national security experts have warned about for years, that the Russians are pumping money into anti-fracking environmental groups.
	Clinton told an audience in Edmonton, Canada, hosted by the PR firm Tyne Public, that Russian oligarchs were propping up against phony environmental groups, opposed to pipelines and hydraulic fracturing, according to emails published by WikiLeaks.
	Clinton said in a June 2014 speech, we were up against Russia pushing the oligarchs and Others to buy media.
	We were even up against phony environmental groups.
	And I'm a big environmentalist, she said.
	But these were funded by the Russians to stand against any effort on that pipeline, fracking, whatever will be a problem for you, and a lot of money supporting that message was coming from Russia.
	Well, it just happened to be exactly what her position was.
	She's opposed to fracking.
	And fracking is what has gotten us our energy independence.
	Fracking is shale oil.
	It's a way to get oil that previously was unreachable.
	We have gobs of it.
	It's led to our overwhelming natural gas reserves.
	Fracking has been a great thing.
	And the environmentalist wackos in this country have been running story after story, creaming fracturing, causes earthquakes, causes global warming, poisons, the water, all this stuff.
	Hillary agrees with them.
	If we we learn that it was Russian oligarchs.
	Well, the Russian wealthy, the Russian elite, that were funding all these efforts.
	And she knew it.
	And she tries to pass herself off as somebody really on the prowl against Russia.
	We can't let Trump into office.
	He's in bed with Putin.
	Here's Hillary Clinton essentially knowing full well that the Russians were trying to undermine fracking in this country.
	They were paying for the PR campaign that the Democrat Party, whether by accident or by design, agreed with.
	And there's much more.
	One email leak shows that Clinton may have revealed the details of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.
	You want to talk about blabbing and sharing classified data.
	It's just over the top.
	She admits in an email she's out of touch.
	She talks about the need to have private and public positions on policy.
	She talks about holding Wall Street accountable only for political reasons.
	In other words, she's talking to bankers and she winks at them.
	And she says, Look, I for political purposes, I have to appear to be holding you accountable.
	It's exactly what we knew was going on.
	While she publicly reams them and rips them to shreds, she's already winked at them.
	Don't worry, I have to do this.
	You know I have to do this, and they are cool with it.
	When she made speeches to Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street banks, she suggested that Wall Street insiders are what is needed to fix Wall Street.
	Now you wait till the Bernie Sanders voters find out about this.
	Bernie Sanders voters believed in Bernie because they believed he hated Wall Street, that they were the big problem.
	Bernie was gonna was gonna fix him, he's gonna punish him.
	And Hillary is out there trying to say the same thing.
	In fact, she's met with them and she said, Look, I have to say these things publicly, but in truth, I think you're the only people that can help fix what's wrong, you Wall Street insiders.
	They're in bed with one another, is the point.
	I've got to take a break.
	Back with more.
	Well, another exciting excursion into broadcast excellence is over, but we'll be right back here tomorrow, folks.
	Revved and ready to do it again.
	Thank you so much.
	As always, for being with us.

▲