All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 7, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:22
October 7, 2016, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
On the cutting edge of societal evolution, especially for those of you with the courage to hear the truth.
Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone on Friday.
Live from the left post at our satellite studios in Los Angeles.
It's open line Friday.
It's a rebub, and that means that if we take calls, we will, I promise you.
Now you can call about whatever you want.
I'm looking at the call roster here, and um it's good.
It's good.
I'm looking forward to getting.
I just have a couple more things here on this, and then we're gonna move on.
The telephone number if you want to be on the program is 800-282-2882.
The email address L Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
There have not been in 11 years, there has not been a single major hurricane strike land in the United States.
And you point that out, and they will run stories on how you are a denier.
And because you are upsetting the narrative that the state wants you to hear.
But isn't it settled science?
You don't even need a consensus here.
Isn't it settled science that there have been zero major hurricanes striking the U.S. in the last 11 years?
Why aren't the people denying this called deniers?
Why are people like me pointing it out to you held up for ridicule and challenge when it is inarguably true?
And the reason is it doesn't advance the agenda.
When they've been out there for decades trying to tell you that global warming is causing all of this, and then there are 11 years that go by, and there's not a single damn major hurricane, it just blows their whole narrative to Smith Arena.
You're not supposed to do it.
You're not supposed to challenge the state.
And somebody comes along like I do and do it, and they just get ticked as hell.
Now, just these two things.
I had to read this very quickly before the previous hour ended.
These next two things come from our own meteorologist, Dr. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville, who is a noted expert on climate change on the science side of it, not the political side, on the science side of it, has his own uh website, weather abnormalities, normalcies, hurricanes, what have you.
There are several published papers by noted academics who do not follow the line of the state that have analyzed lake bottom sediments in Florida.
And here is a quote.
And I will translate this for you, no sweater.
It is instructive to note that over the past century and a half, that's 150 years of ever-increasing fossil fuel usage and atmospheric CO2 buildup, which is what they claim is causing everything.
Climate change, global warming, all of it because your SUV added CO2 and all of that.
After a hundred and fifty years of ever-increasing fossil fuel utilization, the industrialized development of the country.
The frequency of the most intense category of hurricanes in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico has been lower than it was over the past 5,000 years.
So these people are saying that increased CO2 has reduced the intensity of hurricanes.
You remember some of the excuses three, four years ago when we hadn't had a major hurricane.
You remember some of the excuses that the learned meteorologist told us?
Sahara Desert Sandstorms.
Yes, my friends, Sahara Desert Sandstorm is so much sand was whipped up in the atmosphere that it totally screwed up the formation of hurricanes.
And it it led to wind shear, which has caused the tops of these hurricanes to be whipped right off of them, and it retarded the formation of hurricanes, sandstorms, Sahara Desert.
Hey, Mabel, do you hear the sea store?
Well, we need more sand in, don't we, Mabel?
Now, the Space Sciences Guide, the Goddard Space Center guy was known by Judy Woodruff, PBS.
Judy, it's not just uh climate change, it's not just global warming, of course, problems involve the ever-rising sea levels.
A couple of sea level rise with storm saves, and you have potentially catastrophic right.
Sea level change.
You know what it is?
Sea level change has averaged one inch per decade.
So the 10 to 15 foot storm sturge is still 10 to 15 feet.
One inch per decade.
Negligible.
You couldn't even measure it.
They're lying to you, folks.
Some of them don't know they are.
That's this is the this is the crazy thing.
The ones that buy into it, some people, you know, Rush, I you say so many different things and like people have college degrees.
That's right.
I think in college, people they're not teaching critical thinking.
College has become a propaganda exercise, mind control exercise, whatever.
I mean, it's it's an indoctrination.
It's not an education.
And I didn't get one.
I I didn't go to quit college after a semester because they flunked me in speech of all things.
And then they made me take ballroom dance throughout my drill sergeant in the wax.
I said, this is not for me.
As a result, I've I've I've learned to think and doubt and try to prove to myself what people are.
These people are just robots.
They just come along and whatever the state says, they echo it, and furthermore, don't doubt it.
They're afraid to.
Particularly if they rely on on grant money for their lifestyle.
If your entire lifestyle is built on government funding, well, you damn well better believe that you're going to have to echo whatever the state wants you to say.
And that's exactly what we have going on.
Now, just one more soundbite, move forward to number nine.
Because I'm I'm just going to obliterate all this, people thinking I'm making it all up and exaggerating.
I'm not, I just listen to what people say and I attach meaning to it and share it with you.
This is back on September 6th in Tampa, Florida, the one and only Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Another threat to our country is climate change.
Last week's hurricane was another reminder of the devastation that extreme weather can cause, and I send my thoughts and prayers to everyone affected by Hermine.
But this is not the last one that's going to hit Florida, given what's happening in the climate.
If it affects people who lose their homes or their businesses, it took a lifetime to build.
You're a bigger threat to that than when it comes to protecting our country against natural disasters and the threat of climate change.
Once again, Donald Trump is totally unfit and unqualified to our president.
You see, Hillary Clinton is the greatest, clearest threat to your small business, anybody out there next to Obama.
And yet she's out there telling- Do you remember Hurricane Hermine?
There was a hurricane out there.
Do you remember all the devastation from it?
No.
It was not a major hurricane.
Hurricane Hermine.
You remember it?
This is back in September, she's talking about this.
And she's predicting that now she can say, I told you global warming.
Look at Hurricane Matthew.
I predicted it global warming, and this is how it happens.
People eat it up, it suck it up, and don't challenge it, don't question it.
And the only problem with this, you can't be proved.
Is there any global warming itself is look, I've said enough on that.
I want to move on to the things.
The presidential campaign, we're going to get to your phone calls and so forth.
The AP has a story here.
Trump did a town hall.
A big debate coming up Sunday night.
And a lot of people have a lot invested in the debate.
The Trump supporters hope that Trump is different.
They wish he would go prepare.
They wish he would rehearse.
Trump's saying, screw it.
I'm not going to rehearse.
I'm not going to have somebody pretend to be Hillary.
I'm just going to do what I do.
He's not listening to advice.
He never has, really.
He's he's confident in who he is and how he does things.
And uh he's he's got these advisors that advise, but it doesn't mean he's going to listen to them.
And the word I get is that he doesn't listen to most of it anyway, which frustrates the advisors, which I kind of like.
I mean, if you really know your stuff, why would you need- I don't need an advisor to tell me what I think about things.
Can you imagine if I run for president one day and I get this cadre of advisors?
You're gonna say, why do you need them?
You ought to be telling the advisors what to think.
Exactly right.
If you're really into this stuff, why do you need advisors?
Now, maybe advisors strategy and all that, but not to tell you what you think.
And Trump doesn't need them and doesn't use them.
So he's he's claiming he's not gonna do anything special.
In fact, he's saying he's not even gonna bring up Bill Clinton and the endless parade of bimbos.
He's made a point, which I find strange because Trump's out there ripping to shreds everybody that's telegraphing our plans, say in Syria, telegraphing our plans against ISIS.
He says, why would you telegraph your military out?
Well, why would he tell Hillary what he's not going to talk about?
Unless, of course, he is.
But the headline of the story, the AP, Trump gets softballs at town hall ahead of Clinton showdown.
And it's by our old favorites of the AP, Jonathan Lemur and Julie Pace.
It had the trappings of a town hall debate.
There was a moderator, the audience members had questions.
There was a two-minute countdown clock for answers, and Donald Trump carried a microphone while patrolling a small stage.
But the similarities between what Trump faced Thursday night in New Hampshire in a warm-up town hall and what he'll see Sunday night in St. Louis and there.
Which is true.
Because on Sunday night, the moderator will be a Hillary supporter.
The moderator is going to be from the state controlled media.
Trump is going to be, it's going to be two against one like it was last time.
It's going to be two against one this time.
At his little town hall in New Hampshire, there wasn't a Hillary supporter as the moderator.
So he's going to be facing that.
And in fact, there's two moderators on Sunday.
It's Martha Raditz and Anderson Cooper.
She's going to have two Hillary supporters from state-run media, which Trump didn't face in his uh in town hall.
And all the questions were not aimed at discrediting Trump in New Hampshire, like they will be on Sunday night.
And the questions that Trump did in New Hampshire were not scripted by the Hillary campaign or some other Democrat operative like her town halls are.
The AP says that Trump didn't actually interact with the audience, instead only conversing with a friendly moderator who read the questions, nearly all softballs submitted from the invitation only crowd.
Okay, fine.
That's in the AP.
Can I share with you the details of another story about another candidate who's also preparing?
Hillary Clinton, the last two days had been doing her own public appearances and her own town hall type things.
She was given this week, she was given all the questions she would be asked while being interviewed by Steve Harvey, the comedian, who's also one of these great defenders of the state.
Steve Harvey, comedian, was given all the questions.
By the way, there's no dispute.
I'm not telling you something you don't want known.
It was no dispute that Steve Harvey was given all that Hillary was given all the questions by Steve Harvey that he was going to ask.
This is the guy that does family feud TV show.
That's the hardball moderator Hillary's rehearsing with.
Then there was a little girl who asked Hillary a question in a forum concerning body shaming.
What was she?
15?
There was a little 15-year-old girl who asked Hillary a question concerning body shaming and Trump, something along the lines of, what can young girls all over the country do when Mr. Trump is making us ashamed to be little girls by making fun of our bodies and Hillary, that is such a serious and great question.
And it's time this kind of bias and sexism come to a screech.
Is an actress, and her father is a lifelong Democrat political operative and officeholder who coached her.
But nobody was told that.
People watching this thought that it was a random selected 15-year-old girl in the audience who came up with that question on her own.
The reason I think Trump ought to unload, I don't think there has ever been a more coddled and comforted candidate in the history of time, short of Obama, than Hillary Clinton.
It's where the first 30 minutes of the first debate, Trump owned them.
She was she was reduced to her robotic, politically tainted oriented answers to everything.
She clearly had deer in the headlight eyes, and why he changed pace and uh dropped the I don't know, dropped the energy.
But she's not used.
No one, none of them are.
Hillary's not used to it.
Obama's not.
These people couldn't stand one day of the kind of media treatment Republicans get.
It's softballs here and there because it's all they're all on the same team, and they all have the same objective.
In a companion story from the what is this was that?
This is academia.org.
Of course, it's institution of higher learning, the academy, academia.
The headline, Trump baffles academics.
You know, like that would be hard.
The best and the brightest in academia.
This is by Malcolm Klein, just to give you a byline here.
The best and the brightest in academia have been trying to unravel the Trump phenomenon for about as long as this election season is run.
Some guy at Wright State University devotes about three blogs a week to the subject on the academe blog maintained by the American Association of University Professor.
Here's a clue.
You can only convince people that we have a good economy if they actually have a job.
Pairs of scholars, a pair of scholars of fairly diverse backgrounds has figured this out.
They are a minority in academe.
In other words, you can only convince people that we have a good economy if they have jobs.
We have written about the phenomenon today in which more budding businesses failed and succeeded.
It turns out that we aren't the only ones who noticed.
Nowadays, more businesses die every year than are started, says Angelo Code Villa, writing in the Claremont Review of Books.
In this century, all net additions in employment have come from the country's 1,500 largest corporations.
Now, while all of this reality is going on, academics, the pointy headed, supereducated, can't figure Trump out.
They don't know why people like him.
They can't figure out what his appeal is.
He's an embarrassment.
He's a clod.
The guy's a bull in a china shop.
He's coarse.
He's bombastic.
He's rude.
He's crude.
Why would anybody like they can't?
So they are delving deep within each other's blogs to try to explain why Trump is succeeding.
And they don't understand why Trump is selling this trade that's making him popular and all these other on the economy because to them they all have jobs.
They're working in universities, and no matter what, they have jobs, and they can't, they're the ones that can't relate to people who don't have jobs.
They're the ones that can't relate to people that do not think the economy is just chugging right along.
Because in their world, which is the only world they ever experienced, they never venture outside it.
Everything's fine.
The alumni continue to donate.
The football team continues to sell out.
The money is uh flush at the university.
What do you mean we've got a bad economy?
And they claim to be the smartest in the room.
Let's take a break.
We'll get back, and your calls are next.
Okay, finally, we get to the phones.
We're going to start with Jimmy in York, Pennsylvania.
I'm glad you waited, Jimmy.
Great to have you, sir.
Hi.
Hey, thank you, Rush for taking my call.
Uh, briefly, I was wondering um if you think a storm might have an impact on the uh election.
Um, what I mean uh is you know, is is uh the storm really bad.
Um, if it could take weeks to get power restored down there, you know, the cities will come back up before the counties in the suburbs, and uh that's just sort of how the uh power companies operate.
So a few weeks from now, you know, the cities could be restored and you know, right cleaned and polling bits up and running, and out in the counties and the countryside, the polling places could be dark, you know.
And all it takes is a few precincts, maybe a couple of counties in a state to, you know, switch the election.
Well, no, wait a minute.
I I I think whatever damage is done by Hurricane Matthew here on uh October the 7th will be fixed by a month from now.
But you know, you you you raise an interesting question, and that is will the hurricane have any effect on the election?
I'm trying to find it here in the stack.
Mrs. Clinton has already called for advanced voter registration opportunities.
Advanced, relaxed, advanced, early voting.
For people that haven't been able to register, we need to give them more time.
Uh for people that have an early vote, give them more time because of the hurricane.
So and she was running ads on the weather channel yesterday.
She finally pulled that that by off the air because it was not she was getting big, big blowback from it.
Uh but at in in terms of there being no power at the uh at the polling that uh that n can't imagine that.
Certainly not in relation to this uh hurricane, and I don't think I've heard any of them say that climate change might affect electricity supplies at voting places that are traditionally Republican.
Uh wouldn't put it past them at some point, but I haven't heard anything like that.
No, this is just that that won't have an impact at all, other than uh Mrs. Clinton attempting now to expand deadlines for people to register or to early vote uh on the premise that the hurricane has been such a disruption that they will not even be thinking about it now, so we need to accommodate this.
And that would be the only impact on this that I can think.
I may be missing something, but I don't think so.
Yeah, Grab Sunbites 10 and 11.
This illustrate what I just said in uh reply to our previous caller.
This is uh Hillary's campaign manager, Robbie Mook uh yesterday at a conference call with state-controlled media.
Our hope would be that a little bit more time will be given uh for people who were expecting to be able to uh get registered before the election, and we certainly expect that the governor and local officials will make that possible.
Uh, of course they do.
The governor's Rick Scott is a Republican.
Of course, we fully expect that the governor local officials will uh uh a little bit more time out there uh for people who were expecting to be able to get registered to maybe not be able to get because of the devastating effects of climate change.
And here's Clinton operative George Stephanopoulos, who also uh is a state-controlled media personality in ABC News.
He's asking Rick Scott, the governor of Florida.
See, here's what happens.
So MOOC, Hillary campaign manager goes out, we really expect, we really think the governor of Florida will expand voter registration so that people have been impacted by this latest example of global warming will have an extended chance.
So, right on cue, George Stephanopoulos, Clinton operative at ABC gets the governor on Good Morning America and asks him next.
The state of South Carolina's extended voting registration because so many lives have been disrupted.
Why won't you do that?
Look, we've had plenty of time to register.
Look, this is politics.
Right now I'm focused on getting it I've I'm getting this done.
I'm focused on saving everybody's life.
The biggest issue for me is I want everybody to survive this.
So, but no, no, no, Governor.
No, no, no.
Saving lives now, second place.
Second place to making sure people get registered to vote.
Saving lives.
Come on, Governor, don't we not we don't we're not falling for that.
Governor South Carolina, Nikki Haley, she's fallen in line.
Oh, yeah, she's extended voter registration.
Why won't you do that?
Stephanopoulos is asks.
And the governor says, look, people have plenty of time to register.
The election, everybody's known when it is.
I'm out saving lives, which is what he thought he was supposed to say.
But no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Saving lives subordinated to registering people to vote in parentheses for Hillary.
Grab somebody 23 just in.
Uh Vice President Bite Me is in Bristol, Pennsylvania, during campaign event for Hillary.
I know some of you, and some of the people you're trying to convince aren't crazy about Hillary.
I know that.
I think she's gotten an unfair deal.
The truth of the matter is there's a lot of people.
And find out we lost Pennsylvania by two thousand votes.
I know.
I know some of you and the people you're trying to talk to aren't crazy about Hillary.
I I know that.
We all know that.
I think she's gotten an unfair deal, but the truth is.
So they just they acknowledge, they acknowledge her negatives, and admit that it's giving them a problem.
Now look, I don't want to alarm anybody.
I just got a note here.
Um it's it's from Maggie Haberman at the New York Times.
Excuse me.
Trump campaign, make of this what you will.
Trump campaign is canceling hundreds of thousands of dollars in advertising in Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, and possibly other states, according to two buying sources.
That'll be advertising agencies or others who broker advertising buys.
Now, the first thing we have to ask is, is it true?
It's in the New York Times.
Now, to most people, that's automatically makes it true.
Not me, because the New York Times is, again, state-controlled media.
So is it true?
Then if it is, if it is true, what does it mean that Trump is canceling?
Because he needs two or three of those.
He needs if it's Ohio and North Carolina, Florida, he needs two of those three to win.
Can't win it without winning two of those three in the Electoral College.
And if he's canceling advertising buys one month out, what does it mean?
Does it mean that they hope the third party people are going to continue to buy and therefore they can pull back?
Does it mean they think it's over and they're saving money?
They're not going to waste money.
A lot of this is his money, some donors.
Or does it mean they think it's over and they've won it?
It could be any of those three possibilities.
But I will guarantee you the way it's going to be played in the drive-by media that Trump is admitting defeat.
They won't say it exactly that way.
They'll they'll they'll present it as I did and uh create the conclusion that they want you to draw that uh Trump is already conceding.
Uh that's what this means.
So be prepared for that if if you run into this, or if you hear this mentioned later on in the day and through the weekend.
Here is uh Bob in Las Vegas.
We had back the phones.
Great to have you, Bob.
Hi.
How are you doing, Rush?
Nice to talk to you today.
Thank you very much, sir.
Uh I have a question.
Uh I'm not sure, but when Haiti, I looked on the news today, and there was like 600 people died from this hurricane.
Well, what happened to the two billion dollars that went to them in the earthquake?
They could have built themselves houses that were earthquake proof, hurricane proof, and everything else.
What happened to that money?
Oh, why do I get why do I why do I you know the answer to that?
You're just calling because you want me to say it rather than you saying it yourself.
Well, was it the foundation, Hillary Clinton Foundation?
See, there's the he didn't want to say it himself.
He wanted me to put the onus on me, because I can take the arrows, I can take the slings.
Um the Clintons did indeed, folks, siphon much money that was that was sent down to Haiti in relief, and they they did it through their foundation.
They went down there.
Uh, and and the the Clinton Foundation really scored.
I'm looking for the story in the stack because I just happened to have it here.
Um it's it's part of my show, but I'm looking for it now, and I forget the exact how it worked, the machination, and they didn't take they didn't take nearly all the money that was sent down there, but they found a way to get themselves in the in the money river.
They got themselves in the flow, the money stream, and they were able to uh collect some of it on the basis that they were going to further distribute it.
But they didn't have to say when they were going to distribute it.
They were able To get some of that money for their foundation.
Do you remember, by the way, thank thanks for the call, uh, Bob?
You I don't think people remember this.
The Washington Examiner has the story they ran it uh two days ago.
And it re I had forgotten it too, but I remembered it when the story Clinton Foundation officials quietly re-filed three years of tax-related forms this week after the New York Attorney General acknowledged that the charity had failed to disclose all of its donors in accordance with state law.
And even beyond that, the Clinton Foundation has had to refile their taxes.
And I remember when the first report came, the reaction had, well, how come they get to do it again instead of being penalized for it?
You file wrong, and you make a mistake, and they're gonna come at you and demand penalties and what is it?
Clintons made a mistake three times and they were allowed to refile.
And then we realize what the IRS did to Tea Party fundraising groups, denying them status.
So again, it's different treatment for different people.
And there's another story here in the stack that the Clintons are trying to make a big deal of how great their charity is and how many.
In fact, what was it?
Uh oh, it's Cain.
You know, I shouldn't say this.
When I was looking at Cain the other night, Tim Kane had a debate, I could have sworn I was looking at a Dr. Seuss character.
I couldn't, it's green.
I couldn't remember what the care.
Maybe it was the Grinch.
But the Grinch wore a hat, didn't he?
Yeah, well, this character did have a sand a hat on.
It might have been the Grinch, but it was the raised eyebrows that that did it, not the green face, don't misunderstand.
But it was the eyes and the eyebrows that it reminds me of this Seuss character, but I couldn't remember which one.
Anyway, he was going on and on and on about all the what did they say?
We've cured 10,000 cases of AIDS, or we've donated a million cases, or whatever it is.
Do you know what the actual percentage of money the Clinton Foundation has raised that they donate so far to charities, like 5%?
5% of what they have collected, they have uh donated.
And of course, nobody reports that either.
That's just the Clintons get the benefit of the doubt that they're nothing but a pass through.
In other words, 90, 95% of what you donate goes to charities.
And that's do you know 7%?
Ready for 7% of the Clinton Foundation, the money raised goes for travel and entertainment expenses for people that work at the Foundation, including a lot of Clinton family people.
So 7% travel entertainment, whatever else, housing for employees of the Foundation, 5% donated a charity.
Which is fine.
Look, they're not breaking any law doing it.
My only point is they get the benefit of the doubt for being deeply compassionate and caring greatly about people when there are lots of other charities that pass 80, 90, 95, in some cases 99 percent.
One of the charities we support here is the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation, 99% pass through.
You give them a dollar, 99 cents goes to the beneficiary.
Nobody makes a dime.
Personally, at the at M. Cliff and a couple of others, but the Clinton Foundation's 5% gets passed through.
Anyway, brief timeout is openline Friday continues, much more on the other side.
Don't go away.
I am reminded, uh, ladies and gentlemen, that the the TE, not TNA, the T and E expense, the Clinton Foundation, that's that's travel and uh entertainment, does not include the number of trips President Clinton took on the pedophile express, the Boeing 727 owned by noted sexual predator, Jeffrey Epstein.
Clinton flew over the world with the guy.
That did not come out of the Clinton Foundation.
That came out of Epstein, whatever.
Clinton just was he was a hanger on.
Well, more than a hanger on, but he was flying on the plane with Epstein.
Now, uh a little bit more on the on the on the Trump ad by, it it did this whole thing started with Maggie Haberman at the New York Times, it's been picked up by a guy named Sam Stein At the Huffing and Puffington Post.
And this guy, Sam Stein, has tweeted that, and he's confirmed that Trump is canceling ad buys in Florida and North Carolina and Ohio, worth a total of one and a half million dollars.
Says it could be higher.
But that the campaign may reinvest.
And then the next tweet was a clarification.
Trump is not leaving the states entirely.
He's canceling ad buys in certain smaller markets within the states.
Well, that's a big difference.
But how many people are going to hear the retweet?
You know, the New York Times is a Bible, and they have reported that Trump's pulling out of Florida, North Carolina, and Ohio.
That's all anybody's going to hear.
The retweet.
Well, no, no, no.
He's he's not buying in some of the smaller markets.
He hasn't pulled out.
So we'll see.
I bet you you'll find big stories sometime this afternoon and tonight about Trump pulling out of those three states.
And hopefully somebody on the cable channel you're watching will.
Well, no, no, no, no, he's not pulling out.
He's canceling the small city, small market buys.
In fact, he might be increasing his spending, is now been referred to.
Now, as to our last caller and the foundation, the Clinton Foundation in Haiti, it's a Breitbart story.
I'm just going to read from it.
The last time that tragedy struck the tiny Caribbean country of Haiti, Bill and then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, according to scores of angry Haitians, used their billion-dollar charity and leveraged their global connections to enrich themselves and their money cronies.
While then Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton State Department was funneling billions of dollars in relief money to rebuild Haiti.
The Clinton Foundation was leveraging its influence to guide high dollar contracts to longtime Clinton cronies.
So what was happening?
The State Department was authorizing money to go to Haiti.
The Clintons were she's Secretary of State.
She's directing that money go to contractors and builders who had donated to the Clinton Foundation.
So Hillary's in charge of the money that goes to Haiti.
And what the the beef is that so much of the money went to the contractors and the builders, not the residents.
And angry Haitians saw this happening, and they expressed their anger about it by leveraging the money that the State Department via Hillary donated or directed to go to Haiti hurricane relief.
Then the money redirected to the Clinton cronies who did the work.
This is how Clinton cronies reaped millions of dollars of profits off of the catastrophe.
That was the hurricane in Haiti.
And one of the people involved that did well was Hillary's brother, guy by the name of Tony Rodham.
And he was quoted in the story and said, hey, don't come to me about this.
I deal through the Clinton Foundation.
He was brought into court about this.
This actually ended up going to court because of the money that was sent to Haiti, way too much of it didn't stay there.
It got funneled to Clinton donors and others who had given money to the Clinton Foundation.
Now that in turn leads to more money coming back to the Clinton.
It's kind of like a money laundering scheme.
State Department donates money to Haiti.
Clinton runs the State Department.
She directs the money, go to Clinton donors.
Clinton donors, wow, this is so cool.
So they take the money, they do their whatever they're rebuilding, and they make sure to continue their donations to the foundation.
And over here, there might be some work done to rebuild destroyed Haitian property and so forth.
That's how the game is played, and that's what connections are for.
That's cronyism, if you want to know what it is.
And it's why if if you're one of these contractors, you couldn't care about liberalism, conservatism, ideas, and constitution.
You see money.
You see an opportunity via cronyism and connections to be rolling in dough.
and now Hillary's running for president, imagine the amount of money she's going to be able to direct as president for whatever reason, you know, come up with a couple of uh executive orders that send money to this place or that place.
There's always disasters happening.
And it wouldn't even have to be disasters.
But that's that's basically what the story was that our caller wanted the uh answer to.
Now we have another profit break that we have to take.
Ours are legit, folks.
Just so you know, our profits legit.
Okay, more detail on the Trump advertising buys, and now it's starting to make sense.
It's another tweet.
Trump has trimmed $200,000 in ad buys in basically rural areas.
Colorado, Florida, Iowa, and Maine.
Rural ad buys.
He already owns those areas.
That's one of Trump's major support areas, is rural America, rural Pennsylvania.
He owns outside the big cities in Pennsylvania.
So he's canceling ad buys in those areas because he doesn't need to spend money there.
And that's apparently what's going on.
▲
Export Selection