All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 30, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:40
September 30, 2016, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
You know, so yesterday I uh I make the point, and actually a couple days before that, I made the point that Hillary has pulled out of Ohio.
She's basically suspended campaign operations in Ohio.
And I said, that's kind of shocking.
I mean, that Ohio, you can't win without winning Ohio.
You know what's in the New York Times today?
It doesn't matter.
Our old buddy Jonathan Martin used to be political.
Ohio, long a bellwether fading on the electoral map.
It doesn't matter anymore.
Ohio, you're too white.
Too many white people to be in any way meaningful in a presidential election.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Now, somehow Ohio still remains crucial.
No Republicans won the White House since the Thoracic Age.
Without winning the White House, without winning Ohio.
But for the Democrats, it doesn't matter.
Hillary pulls out.
Now big deal.
Greetings, great to have you.
Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, 800-282-2882, the email address.
L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
Okay.
I have to tell you, I am being inundated.
Well, being inundated may be a bit of an exaggeration, but not by much.
I'm I'm I'm getting a lot of emails from a lot of people who are getting full fledged panicked.
I mean, it's time to keep the sharp objects away from some of these people.
They are convinced that two things are happening.
They are convinced that Trump is blowing this as badly as anybody could blow anything by not forgetting about this porn star.
Tweeting out about this woman, this Alicia Mochado babe, even at three o'clock this morning, while other issues are much more important.
The issues that frame and define Hillary Clinton as unqualified and unfit and as corrupt.
And they wish Trump would stop this.
There are too many other things.
It's getting too close to the election ought to be sidetracked by all this.
And especially this Alicia Machado thing is a setup.
It was it was a fix that has been in and has been planned by the Clinton campaign for a long time, just like Sandra Fluck was.
In fact, Molly Hemingway has a terrific story, and it doesn't even mention me.
I don't know how that's possible, but it doesn't.
A terrific story on how the Democrats set up this whole fluck thing.
I'm not going to review too much of this, but it was it was made to look like it was a spontaneous event that the Republicans were engaging in their war on women and so forth.
when in fact it was scripted and planned as a trap, as a setup, for Republican candidates.
And Molly Hemingway claims the same thing's happening here with this Alicia Machado, which I think is true.
And thus people are...
They're just scared to death that Trump is blowing it by falling for this and spending so much time on it.
And taking it all personally and wishing he would just forget it and move on to other things.
And they are forgetting.
Well, I'm not going to excuse it.
I'm just, I'm just, I'm sure look, I'm sharing you with what I'm inundated.
There's another thing, too.
The panic is not just about that.
The panic is about the debate.
The panic is around the post-debate polls are coming in, and it's clear that in the scientific polls that uh that Hillary prevailed.
And there are accompanying stories that Trump refuses to believe it.
And that some Trump surrogates refuse to believe it.
And that the Trump team actually likes these flash polls.
They don't discredit the flash polls.
You know, the drive-by's and the and noted uh conservative intellectuals poo-poo those flash polls that take place, these online polls where you click on who you think won as many times as you want.
They they trash those polls being inaccurate and unreliable and meaningless.
In favor of scientific polls, because the scientific polls are scientific.
The Trump team is out there saying, we love these flash polls.
That shows how popular the guy is.
You can't, you can't discount those flash polls.
They're not hearing talk.
They don't want to hear talk about the flash polls, don't mean anything.
To the Trump team, they mean everything.
They are a window into the vast popularity Trump has, which is much greater than the popularity Hillary has, and that I don't doubt.
But popularity is not the single determining factors we all know in how people uh how people vote.
So, but there's all kinds of conflicting information.
But what I have gleaned, see, I don't watch the stuff anymore, folks, and I'm not depressed, and I'm not panicked.
And I thought long and hard before opening this line of communication today with you.
I thought long and hard about telling you this.
I mentioned this to Mr. Snerdley.
He said, Go ahead, they're not gonna think that you're you're phoning it in.
I said, I'm not worried about that.
I said, I'm worried they might think that I, by not watching TV every night, might think that I'm not fully as informed as I should.
Oh, come on, Rush.
There's nobody in the world that's gonna think you're not informed.
True, I understand.
But folks, I have, and it's not just in this campaign.
I think I've mentioned a number of times.
I've I finally have had my fill.
It's like the Sunday shows.
Years ago, they stopped being appealing to me.
There was a time in my life where the McLaughlin group was appointment television.
The McLaughlin group, I was in Sacramento, it's in 1980s when that show started.
And when I saw the McLaughlin group, I had dreams of being on the show like that someday when I'm planning my career rise and climbing my career ladder.
Uh I was never invited to be on that show, but it doesn't mean anything.
I was invited to be on Novak's show and a bunch of others.
My point is, don't want to sidetrack myself here.
At some point, they stopped, and this is not a criticism of them, it's a comment on me.
At some point, they stopped excitingly.
They became predictable.
I knew based on the guest panel what was going to be said.
I knew I who needs to watch Eleanor Clift every day to know what she says.
Or what she's going to think.
So and the same thing with the Sunday shows.
I you couldn't pull me away from this week with David Brinkley.
They had the round table there with Cokey Roberts and Sam Donaldson and George Will.
And then Brinkley was the straw that stirred that drink.
And you just couldn't, you couldn't pull me away from it.
Now, I mean, even if those same guys were on it, I doubt that the you reach a point where you don't learn anything, you're as informed and as knowledgeable, and you have your opinions, and uh it it's it's it's not that I'm not open to other opinions or ways of thinking.
It's just the shows in the broadcasting sense.
Meet the press.
Uh I never did watch the stuff on CNN, but I don't watch any of it, is the point.
I don't watch cable news at night.
So I can honestly tell you that I am not in a funk.
I am not depressed.
I'm not suicidal, I'm not thinking it's over.
And I told Snerdley today, maybe I'm making a mistake, maybe I ought to be watching this stuff so that I end up being depressed and as fatalistic as everybody else and come in here every day and reflect it.
But I'm sorry, folks, I can't.
I don't want to get depressed.
I don't want to get down on the numbers, and I don't want to get teased with the idea that everything's rigged and everything's fake.
You wouldn't believe the stuff's going around now.
You know me.
I see everything.
I do my own show prep, and I've never stopped doing my show prep.
And then there are all kinds of little helpers that send me stuff trying to help.
I got one this morning.
I didn't see this on my on my own.
Some website I never heard of has done a narration of the post-debate video to prove that Hillary had assistance in her podium.
She had maybe a secret teleprompter and other things because her cleaner, her guy, when nobody was looking, some guy came out and snatched a bunch of stuff like papers and stuff from Hillary's podium while nobody was looking and vanished off the screen, and nobody did that to Trump's podium.
And so the theory is that Hillary was cheating.
Hillary had some assistance in there, and that nobody knows about it, nobody cares to find out about it, but this one website, I got people sending me this.
And then the usual bromides about all the election locations that are rigged and fixed now.
And I just don't spend a lot of time focusing on that.
If elections were rigged, the Republicans wouldn't win any.
I understand the Democrats attempt fraud left and right.
I'm not, don't misunderstand, I'm not being naive.
But the overriding point here is, folks, that I don't immerse myself in the media narrative every day.
I establish my own media narrative on this program, and that's what I live.
I'm aware that.
I'm aware of what the drive-by's are doing.
I come here report on it and tell you every day, but I don't immerse myself in it.
And as such if if you are feeling fatalistic and defeatist and depressed thinking it's over, I don't.
And if you do, I think I understand why, depending on how many of you might be immersing yourself.
What am I talking about?
CNN every night, Fox News every night, MSNBC, whatever it is.
If you're watching television, I don't care what you're watching.
If you're watching cable news, you are going to get a distorted picture.
Even on Fox, don't forget now, Trump is so unusual and so outside the norm that having a perspective, a proper perspective report on Trump network-wide is going to be difficult.
You're going to have individual guests or commentators that may be able to put this all in in proper uh focus.
But I just don't even subject myself to it.
So I've got my stacks of stuff here.
I mean, I don't misunderstand.
I'm not living in denial about things.
I've got all the news here.
There's further day uh further uh polling data on Hillary Post-Debate having won it.
The conventional wisdom on Trump just not being able to get past this Alicia Mochado story, tweeting at 3 a.m. about it, a tweet storm uh as it was, and people wishing he would get back to the uh to the issues and so forth, and various other stories relating to what the Trump campaign is doing.
In fact, here's one.
There was a uh I I guess the New York Times had had a uh a story featuring unnamed members of Trump's campaign, admitting he lost the debate.
And Trump is apparently livid about that, and are as are members of his campaign, and they are telling surrogates, such as the people who go on TV to speak for Trump in the campaign, to stop saying he lost the debate.
Trump doesn't think he lost the debate.
Do not say that, do not agree with it, do not go along with it just to make it look like you're thinking the right way.
We didn't lose the debate.
There are three of them.
We used the first debate to set Hillary up.
They've got their own chatter here about what their strategy is with these debates.
And so they're a little bit upset that some even some Trump campaign people going on TV and admit, yeah, Trump Trump lost the debate, or admitting that the flash polls afterwards don't tell an accurate uh or full story.
The the truth of the matter, as I see it here, I don't see the Democrats acting like this is in the bag.
I I don't see them acting like uh it's over and it's smooth sailing.
I see them panicking.
See what the UN did?
The UN sent out a story from their I didn't even know the UN had a news agency.
The United Nations has a news agency.
They ran a story begging the eight million Americans that don't live in the country, scattered around the world to sign up and vote against Trump.
We can't have Trump.
Trump is the word, the USA-to-day newspaper, which has not, and I didn't know this, but that's what they say.
They say they haven't endorsed for the presidency in 34 years, but they have now.
It's too important.
Nobody should vote for Trump.
We can't have Trump.
You got to vote against Trump.
We got to get rid of Trump.
Trump must go.
New York Times, same thing.
Trump must go.
Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, pulls out of Ohio.
Hillary Clinton is not pulling ahead, even in these post-debate polls, where it is indicated by the numbers that she won the debate, it doesn't mean anything.
She's not getting a boost.
She's not getting a bump in the other polls.
And even the people responding to these who won the debate in your opinion polls, most of them are not saying it matters in terms of changing their mind or influencing how they're going to vote.
Gallup has a new report today that young people, a greater percentage of young people in the last, I think, 10-15 years are now saying they're not going to vote.
And that's got the Democrats panicked.
The youth vote, Obama got it.
Obama got a vast majority of the millennial type youth vote.
The same cohort is claiming in polling data anyway that they're they're less interested in voting this year in greater numbers than we've seen.
That's got the Democrats bothered.
They're bothered by the fact that Hillary is not 50 points ahead.
They're bothered by the hack by the fact that Hillary can't pull away that she doesn't have.
The media is upset.
F. Chuck Todd, a number of media people are expressing frustration at their inability to take Trump out despite everything they've thrown at him.
They know they have abandoned the principles of journalism.
They know they're making no pretense at anything journalistic.
Fair, objective, all out the window.
They're throwing the kitchen sink at Trump, and they're admitting it doesn't work.
It isn't taking him out.
No matter which poll you look at.
You also have to keep in mind that it is an objective of the media Democrat Party complex to dispirit you, to depress you.
It is their purpose, the Media Democrat Party complex objective is to get you so depressed, so dispirited that you think it's over now beyond help.
It's beyond fixing.
They want you to lose your enthusiasm.
They want you to begin to think of Trump the way they think of Trump.
And you notice the thing that they are not doing.
For all this talk about what Trump's not doing and what he ought to be focusing on instead of the porn star, whatever she is.
The Hillary campaign's not talking about what great stuff she's got planned.
The Hillary campaign is totally devoted to Trump.
They're not exactly running a big positive campaign, only great things that lie ahead of America if only Hillary Clinton is elected.
They're not going there, folks.
Now, folks, there was a piece.
I've talked about this, but I'm going to re me I'm going to read you an excerpt of it again.
Thomas B. Edsall used to uh write for the Washington Post.
And I think is something to do with the Obama campaign now.
If I'm wrong, but it doesn't matter.
This ran in the uh this one ran in the New York Times, actually.
It was July 23rd, 2012.
The headline, The Politics of Anything Goes, and here's an excerpt from the article, and it is directly applicable to right Now.
Here we go.
Now faced with a tough re-election fight, President Obama has in fundamental respects adopted the strategy he denounced eight years ago.
Obama is running a two-track campaign, 2012 here.
One track of his re-election drive seeks to boost turnout among core liberal groups.
The other aims to suppress turnout and minimize his margin of defeat in the most hostile segment of the electorate, and that is whites without college degrees.
My point is back in 2012, this guy in the New York Times wrote of Obama's re-election strategy, which means the Obama campaign had told him what it is.
The Obama strategy was to dispirit to depress to suppress vote turnout of white Americans without college degrees, primarily white men.
And it's the exact same thing that they're doing now, the exact same thing they're trying now.
And you have to have a stiff upper lip and resist this.
Okay, we're back.
Now, before that 2012 story in the New York Times, there was a 2011 story in the New York Times by Dan Bolt.
Now wait, Thomas B. Edsell.
Ed Sol wrote both of them.
The 2011 story in the New York Times, Indy was in November, and it acknowledged that the Obama campaign for 2012 was going to write off white working class voters.
Their research, their internal polling data told them they already had.
So instead, what they were going to do, acknowledging the loss of white working class voters, which went big for Obama in 2008, they were going to focus on minority outreach and registration, and there began the focus on such things.
James, gay marriage, go after that group of people, then amnesty and so forth, because they made the determination they were going to lose the white working class vote.
One year later, Ed Soleil writes another piece.
They didn't just write off white working class voters.
The Obama campaign embarked on a strategy involving the media to depress and dispirit turnout.
Essentially to suppress turnout of white working class.
These are old Reagan Democrats, blue-collar people who all of a sudden stopped being termed blue-collar people and became white working class.
When they're blue-collar, that means they're in the Democrat camp and they're pro-union and they're the greatest guys on earth.
But when they're not going to vote the Democrat, the media changes the description and calls them white working men without college degrees.
And this is an important thing to remember because you're being bombarded by the Clinton campaign when you turn on CNN, MSNBC, when you read any newspaper, when you go to over half the websites out there, you are not reading the media.
You are not reading the news.
You are reading the Clinton campaign and a coordinated effort to distract you, to depress you, to dispirit you, and to suppress your interest in voting.
The objective is to make you think you have no chance.
That everybody else is aligned against you.
The real world is a common phrase they use.
The real world, and that's not Trump's world.
The real world is not you people supporting and voting Trump.
The real world is everybody supporting Hillary.
The real world is everybody watching NBC CBS ABC in terms of the way they they speak and write in the drive-by media.
And it's all aimed, it's all oriented toward making you think that you are part of some small irrelevant minority trapped in the past, being overrun by a bunch of progressives who want to modernize and take the country in a different direction, and you're just an old footy duddy, and you're uneducated, therefore you're not smart, and you just want to stay rooted in the past where you used to run the show.
All of this is coming from the Clinton Campaign.
I don't care you turn on NPR.
I don't care if you even even Fox News portions of Fox News.
I mean, depending on the show you're watching, you're going to see a commentator from the Washington Post.
You're going to see a commentator from the New York Times.
You're going to see a guest from the drive-by media.
And you're probably going to recognize it, you're going to get miffed.
But the point is you cannot escape it except listening to this program.
Because there's not one syllable of this program that is influenced by the drive.
Well, as I said the other day, it's hard to succeed in constantly always avoiding it.
It's a daily effort to avoid getting sucked in.
Because there is so much.
And it makes it look like, gee, everybody thinks this.
And who wants to be an outlier?
You don't want to be an outlier.
You don't want to think that you're the oddball or in a group of oddballs.
And that's exactly how they present everything.
I give you another example.
That religious freedom law in Indiana.
The way that was covered, if you supported the religious freedom law in Indiana, the media made you think that you were a member of 10% of the population, in terms of your thinking.
Along with the way they report on it, they also adopt a tone that includes an assumption that everybody watching them agrees too with whatever they're saying about something.
So in this case, the news of the day is that Trump has lost it.
The news of the day is that Trump's gone full blown nutty.
The news of the day is that Trump has lost his focus, that Trump doesn't know what he's doing, that Trump's rank amateur status has finally surfaced.
And since wherever you go in the drive-by media, that's what you're going to hear or see, or a flavor of that.
You are supposed to think, my gosh, I don't think that, but seems like everybody else does.
Oh no, oh no, we're losing their community.
And it's all a myth.
You just have to, you just have to resist it.
And you have to look at ways that you can disprove it in your own mind.
The way I do it is to look at how they're presenting Hillary.
There isn't anything positive about the Hillary campaign.
Every aspect of the Hillary campaign is focused on destroying Trump.
And this is what they always do.
Now Obama was different because he had, he was an empty canvas, and people could make him whatever they wanted him to be.
It was an unknown.
He had been a senator for a couple of days, didn't really have a record.
First African American president did not get particularly partisan in public, only in private did he do that.
And so most people didn't see him as a radical.
They saw him as a wow, such a positive change from Bush, who they had succeededly generated hatred for and the war in Iraq, so people could make Obama be whatever they wanted him to be, which was always going to be positive.
Hillary's not that.
Hillary's not an empty canvas.
She's not an empty slate.
Hillary's got higher negatives than she has positives.
They know it.
So they're taking the focus off of her.
They're taking the focus off the fact she doesn't have an agenda.
She doesn't, well, not one that she can ballyhew.
The things that she wants to do are just double down, triple down on what Obama's done.
Nobody wants more of that, so they don't talk about that.
They focus exclusively on Trump.
And now this Alicia Machado thing has been has been blown up into the biggest thing that has happened in the campaign so far.
Now, do I have a soundbite on this?
I do.
Let me find it.
This it's not number one, so it may be on the next page.
Yes, grab audio soundbite number four.
Show you how this works in a Modified way.
Yesterday, when the Alicia Mochado story took off on board a rocket booster and just occupied every news story for seemingly every hour of the day.
I opened my program, figuratively scratching my head.
I said, is this right?
Trump is a bully.
Is that the story here?
We had this poor Miss Universe who 20 years ago put on 60 pounds.
She became unattractive, which is not really what you want for a Miss Universe pageant winner who's wearing the crown for a year.
And the story was that Trump bullied her and laughed at her and made fun of her and called her Miss Piggy and it was horrible and see what a reprobate he is and see how he hates women and see this.
And I said, How in the world can we ignore Mrs. Clinton?
You want to talk about bullying women?
So I went on to make the comparison to Hillary Clinton protecting the Democrat Party and her husband with all these women that Clinton did have affairs with, and some of these women who claimed he sexually abused or raped them.
Mrs. Clinton was the one that came up along with James Carville and had a policy of destroying, intimidating, and bullying these women.
And I asked a simple question.
How in the world can you do a story on Trump the bully with one woman twenty years ago, Miss America, and ignore a genuine, actual, real bully who has been bullying and mistreating women for 20 years.
Now, in my world, that was a good counter.
It was an excellent way of putting things in perspective and trying to point out the phoniness of this campaign that Trump is a bully because Mrs. Clinton beats him in that category every day of the week.
She doesn't pay the men and her off the women in her office the same thing the men make.
Here is a woman with irresponsible in her job as Secretary of State, four Americans died.
Here's a woman that ran the bimbo operations for her president when he was her husband when he was president and so forth.
Let's go to Fox News.
This is special report with Brett Baer during the all-star panel, columnist from the Washington Examiner, Lisa Booth, about Trump bringing up President Clinton's past at the next debate, because that would be if you're going to bring up Clinton's past, it's Lewinsky.
Then you bring up Hillary and the bimbo eruptions unit that she ran.
Brett Bayer says, what about bringing up the Clinton's past and the possibility that that's going to happen in the next debate as we take this down to a different level of the election?
I do think that it is fair to an extent, not for Donald Trump.
I don't think Donald Trump should be a messenger, but to bring it up, I think is fair to an extent, because Hillary Clinton can't say there and say that every victim deserves to be heard, deserves to be believed.
But then we know it's been widely reported that she went after these women, that she dragged their name through the mud.
So I do think that there's hypocrisy there that should be addressed from the Trump campaign.
But I don't think that Donald Trump should be the messenger, because I think that diminishes him and his candidacy.
And Rush Limbaugh talked extensively about that point all day today.
I did.
I did.
And so here's Lisa Booth on Fox News.
Yeah, yeah, it's a good point, but Trump ought not be making it.
Well, you know where Trump is?
Trump obviously is somebody who's not going to rely on other people to make it for him.
This standard operating procedure where a Republican under assault doesn't return fire because it's not considered mature, it's considered taking the Trump obviously doesn't believe this.
And Trump obviously thinks, look, if they're hitting me like this, I isn't going to be anybody defend me.
There isn't anybody outside of the people he's paying.
There aren't going to be people to defend him.
Well, other than me, but I do it different reasons.
But hasn't a complaint, hasn't a lament for many years, on the part of many of you been that when any Republican is under assault by a Democrat or the media that they don't fight back, and it ticks you off.
Bush never fighting back on a rock, the Bush White House never fighting back on any assault they made on him.
And it just it just it just hung in there.
And I heard his surrogates, talk radio and others trying to defend him, but the media just drowned that out for four years, 24 7, harping on it.
here's Trump actually fighting back on it, which a lot of people have wanted the Republican nominee to do for years.
And when it happens, all of a sudden we hear no oh oh Trump shouldn't be the one that no, no, no, that's not.
Well, I'm sorry, Trump's an alpha male.
He's not gonna sit there and let this kind of stuff go by and hope or count on other people.
He's not gonna oppose that, but I think his attitude is it isn't enough.
Anyway, I got to take a break again because I'm a little long in the segment, so bear with us all folks.
We'll be right back and continue.
It's Open Line Friday.
We're going to go to the phones.
We're going to start in Youngstown, Ohio.
And it's Michael, great to have you with us, sir.
Hello.
Mega Buckley, Ohio did us rush.
Thank you, sir.
Hey, listen, um, a couple days ago we had a nice pence rally in Letonia, Ohio.
About a thousand people showed up.
So Mike's talking, a wonderful talk, and he brings up NAFTA and brings up TPP.
Keep in mind we live in the rust belt.
He said, Did you hear Donald's uh remarks about NATO and TPP?
And the crowd was, you know, screaming joyfully.
And he said, Did you hear what Hillary said?
And they said, What'd she say?
And she s he said, she said it was the greatest thing ever.
The crowd went berserko.
The crowd starts chaining USA, they're going out of their mind.
People gotta realize this election's about one thing, one thing only, jobs.
If if Trump stays on focus with getting rid of PPP, keeping manufacturing in the rust belt, not only is he gonna carry Ohio, and I heard you mention that she's pulling out of Ohio, but how about Michigan?
How about Pennsylvania?
How about Western New York?
And you know, he she he he's already got a carry West Virginia because of the stuff she did with the coal.
So uh, you know, these little things they're doing on the side, they don't they don't mount the hill of beans if you're not gonna give the people jobs.
Did I hear you correctly in all of that express some uh shall we say dissatisfaction with Trump not being focused on those things while he is toying around with the former overweight Miss Universe?
Well, as far as that goes, shame on the media.
I I I'm gonna probably say her name wrong, but I I saw they were talking about a Megan Kelly the other night.
Is it Broadwick?
What Anita Broad where what is the woman that was raped by Bill Clinton?
Yeah, Juanita Roderick.
Juanita.
Now you have that.
And I heard about the tweeting thing she was going back and forth with Chelsea over.
Now, I had three younger people that worked for me that said, what is that all about?
They never even heard of these Bill Clinton scandals.
So th they want to go there.
There's a lot of dirt to go there, but the focus needs to stay on jobs.
The Ross Belt only cares about jobs.
Okay, so again, you think Trump is making a mistake by continuing the focus on the Clintons and fighting back, defending himself on these charges that he called this woman a pig.
Absolutely.
She's say focused on the jobs, focused on the Stay focused on the jobs and and you will win the day.
Okay.
So are you worried?
Oh, no, I'm not worried.
I I I think I think Trump's gonna win, and uh hopefully we'll have eight years of Trump and eight years of Pence.
So you're not worried about this.
Not worried.
You know, you know, Rush, if you came in I know you're from you would live in Pittsburgh for a while and about an hour from Pittsburgh.
If we get in the car and we drove around for an hour, you're gonna see a 95% Trump sign versus Hillary sign.
Yes.
Yes, I've heard this.
I've uh Selena Zito, who used to write for the Pittsburgh Tribune Review, seems to be making a uh uh project out of documenting the Democrat rural Democrat vote throughout the state of Pennsylvania, not just rural, just outside the cities.
Small town, medium sized town, and apparently Trump is Just going gangbusters in that state and has it in play.
There's so many things like that that defy the conventional wisdom.
The Republican ought never, I mean, Pennsylvania in a normal election would never be in play, but here it is for Trump, despite all of these foray's into the areas people think are a waste of time, such as this former Miss Universe or whatever.
I guess you can't even say she gained a lot of weight.
That's discriminatory.
Open line Friday, Rush Limboy and more of your input.
▲
Export Selection