Rush Limbaugh Program - August 10, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #2

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 10, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program

37:25

August 10, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #2

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Did you uh you happen to see this?
	Baltimore police.
	Baltimore police officers fired as scathing federal report alleges excessive force.
	So a judge found every one of those cops not guilty.
	Doesn't matter.
	The Obama Department of Justice has once again gone in and commandeered yet another big city police department under the guise that that police department is racist and needs to have some training on spotting racism and dealing with it.
	And that this police department is using excessive force.
	And so the Department of Justice needs to go in and take control of the Baltimore police department.
	What they need to do is take control of the Baltimore mayor's office and the state's attorney's office.
	The Justice Department and Baltimore police agreed to negotiate reforms.
	There's no negotiating here, and there's no agreement by Baltimore.
	They're just under the boot.
	Justice Department, Baltimore police agreed to negotiate reforms that can be enforced by the courts after a scathing federal report released today, criticized officers for using excessive force and routinely discriminating against blacks in Baltimore.
	You black.
	Everybody that's anybody in Baltimore is African American, including three of these cops.
	The report, the culmination of a year-long investigation into one of the country's largest police forces, found that officers make a large number of stops, mostly in poor black neighborhoods with dubious justification, and unlawfully arrest citizens when officers did not like what those individuals said.
	Vanita Gupta, the head of the DOJ civil rights division, says these violations have deeply eroded the relationship between the police and the community it serves.
	This was during a news conference alongside Baltimore's mayor and police commissioner.
	The uh the report represents a damning indictment of how the city's police officers carry out the most fundamental policing practices, including traffic stops and searches.
	The police commissioner Kevin Davis said that officers who committed egregious violations have been fired.
	He and Mayor Stephanie Rawlings Blake promised the report would serve as a blueprint for sweeping changes.
	All this means is that the DOJ is going to turn another city police department into romper room.
	They're basically inmates are going to run the asylum.
	And this is like, I don't know, 2530 big city, well, big and medium-sized American city police departments that the DOJ has moved in and taken over.
	Um not allowed to say what.
	What the reason the cops stop in poor, this is the point of the report, you see, is according to the DOJ, the police stop mostly in uh in poor uh ghetto sections uh Baltimore uh because they're racist.
	And and they want to go out, they want to arrest more blacks than anybody else, and that's where you have to go to find them.
	That's what the DOJ claims is going on.
	That's what the DOJ claims is happening.
	That's yeah, the police want to do it.
	That's the point, and they've got to speak got to be stopped.
	The DOJ is gonna move it.
	The police want to, the police want to go into these bad neighborhoods and they want to arrest African Americans, they want to put them in jail.
	They want to do it because they're racist.
	Just like they said at Ferguson, they've taken over the police department, I think it's Seattle, maybe it's Portland, I forget which is a number of them this has happened to.
	They come in with their their consent decrees, they basically force these police departments to sign them and go along with it, or they miss out on federal money, and furthermore, they get tarden feathered as.
	No, no, no.
	The reason that there are high levels of crime in these neighborhoods is because the cops are making the people there behave like criminals because of all this unneeded attention.
	The cops are the reason that cities are experiencing unrest.
	That's the Obama DOJ's point of view, and they're sticking with it.
	It's black on black crime is a direct result of the cops making people feel unsafe in their neighborhoods.
	And it's that everybody's out for what look, whatever example you throw at me, I'm going to tell you that the DOJs claim that whatever your problem is, it's the cops who are more than likely responsible for it.
	And so they're going to go in there and they're going to clean it up.
	They're going to go in there.
	Fired a bunch of police officers.
	I don't know if it's any of the six that were exonerated.
	I got so mad reading the story, I didn't read it all.
	I didn't read the final two pages, so I didn't I didn't get to the names of the uh police officers were shot.
	One more audio sunbite here, back to guns for just a second.
	Bob Beckle, remember Bob Beckle?
	He of the suspenders.
	He was on Fox and he wasn't on Fox.
	He's now on CNN.
	But this is back on the Fox Business Network in 2010.
	This is December 6th, 2010.
	Eric Bowling is talking with Bob Beckle about Julian Assange and WikiLeaks.
	And Eric Balding says to Bob Beckle, Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has issued a warning that his supporters are ready to publish a deluge of leaked documents if his activities are curtailed or if he's killed or if he's arrested.
	What is the political implication, Bob?
	I mean, who gets hurt the most by Assange claiming he's got a doomsday bomb that if he's murdered or killed or whatever, that all kinds of stuff gets released?
	The dead man can't leak stuff.
	This guy's a traitor, a treasonist, and he has broken every law of the United States.
	The guy ought to be, and I'm not for the death penalty, so if I'm not for the death penalty and want to do it, illegally shoot the son of a b.
	So there you have it, a peace-loving liberal Democrat, Bob Beckle, advocating at the son of a bitch be shot.
	Just saying, folks, I'm just trying to, I'm just trying to make sure nobody loses sight of who is really who in all of these so-called issues that pop up.
	You know, Trump has said I didn't intend it.
	I didn't, I didn't mean what you guys say.
	Why is that not the end of it?
	I didn't mean it like you guys are saying.
	So they're now round tables being.
	Did Trump lie?
	Did Trump really mean?
	Does Trump not even know what he's saying?
	Could Trump possibly have meant that he wanted to incur violence and wanted to inspire violence?
	Trump says he didn't, but does he really know?
	And meanwhile, on the left.
	You want to what?
	Oh, yeah, I have it.
	Um Mr. Snerdley uh remembers the town hall story, Clinton body count, left-wing conspiracy, three ties, three with ties to DNC, miserious.
	You want to know the names of the two that are.
	Okay, here are the the um three people associated with a Democrat National Committee have been found dead since the Democrat National Committee's emails were leaked right before the convention.
	Seth Rich, who we mentioned in the first hour, and Julian Assange alluded to Seth Rich being his source for the emails that prove Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz and Hillary Clinton teamed up to sandbag Crazy Bernie.
	He was killed at 4.19 in the morning on a Sunday.
	What uh what is anybody doing up at 419 in the morning?
	He was leaving the house.
	Said to be on his way to a meeting with the FBI agents.
	4.19 in the morning.
	Now, he had if you schedule a meeting, say at 5 a.m., you're leaving your home at 4.20.
	You have to think maybe you're being surveilled and you would choose a time to leave where you think maybe nobody's watching.
	What in the world you're gonna leave your house at 419th?
	Well, that's when he was that's time of death, I think.
	So anyway, he was apparently Julian Assange and things he said about this man might well be the source for all that.
	And he was not robbed because all of his money and all of his ID and his phone were all found on his body.
	The second name is Sean Lucas.
	Sean Lucas, along with filmmaker Ricardo Viaba, served the Democrat National Committee on July 3rd with a complaint and a summons in a fraud action on behalf of supporters of Bernie Sanders.
	In the video, he can be seen grinning, happy to do it.
	On August 2nd, he was found lying on the bathroom floor dead by his girlfriend when she came home that evening.
	His girlfriend said that he was in good health.
	So he was part of a group that uh had filed a complaint and a summons and a fraud action.
	In other words, they were filing legal action against somebody for the fact that they had learned Crazy Bernie had been cheated.
	And then the last name, John Ash, ASHE, the former president of the United Nations General Assembly, John Ash mysteriously passed away on June 22nd, a few days before he was scheduled to begin pretrial meetings involving shady financial dealings regarding a former Clinton Crowdy.
	61 year old was supposed to testify against Chinese real estate developer Ng Lap Singh, who was implicated in the Chinagate scandal for funneling money to the DNC for Bill Clinton through the Arkansas restaurant under Charlie Tree.
	So those are the three.
	And then more suspicious deaths recently of people with ties to the Clintons.
	Victor Thorne, Joe Montano.
	Victor Thorne wrote four books exposing the Clintons, reportedly killed himself with a gun on his 54th birthday.
	Look, the point here is it's a town hall story.
	And as I said last hour, it's fascinating to watch these cycles repeat.
	Because here you have now Rachel Alexander writing for Town Hall, asking the question a lot of people were asking back in 1992.
	How many people do you know murdered?
	How many people you in your life do you know who have been killed?
	How many people do you know who have died?
	In violence, under suspicious circumstances.
	And most every one of us, the answer is going to be zero.
	Some people, depending, maybe one, maybe two.
	I don't think I know anybody.
	But when you ask that question of the Clintons, the number is double digits.
	No allegation being made here, ladies and gentlemen.
	I'm simply what I do here, chronicling what else is out there being said by others, and how fascinating it is that with the Clintons, it seems to never stop.
	It seems to never go away.
	Okay, I've got to take a break.
	I'm gonna get started with phones when we get back, but I'll tell you there's a lot of stuff to get through today.
	I want to tackle what has been learned in these Clinton emails that Comey said he couldn't find, that Judicial Watch and Citizens United got.
	We know that the State Department, that Cheryl Mills, and Huma Danger, Humo Wiener, were actively engaging, helping Clinton solicit speech producing income for Bill Clinton, and they were soliciting donations through the State Department while she was Secretary of State for the Clinton Foundation.
	I mean, it's clearly dirty as it can be.
	And it's stuff that Mrs. Clinton said she had deleted.
	These are from the emails that she said she got rid of because it was nothing to do with anything but yoga lessons and Chelsea's wedding and reception And so forth.
	And then in Italy.
	This is interesting for you vegans out there.
	Italy has decided to let's see, what is this?
	Italy wants to make it a violation of the law to put a child on a vegan diet.
	I'll have that.
	And we got other things like that out there too.
	You wouldn't Sweden.
	You know what's happening in Sweden?
	This, folks, I'm saying Europe is gone.
	It's it's only a matter of time now.
	It's just a matter of breeding now.
	They're going to be outbred and they're gone.
	This is the most amazing story.
	What's happening in Sweden is that wealthy people who have summer homes and winter homes that they use six weeks a year.
	The government is coming in and commandeering them in order to house refugees and illegal immigrants.
	Because the illegal immigrants and refugees are refusing the accommodations they're being offered.
	And so the government of Sweden is telling the wealthy, well, you know that house you've got out there on the lake, you only use six months.
	We're taking it.
	And we're going to put a bunch of refugees in it.
	I don't yet know what the reaction of the wealthy in Sweden is to it, but it is happening.
	Sweden.
	Not to be confused with Switzerland, but still Sweden.
	Anyway, that's just the tip of the iceberg of what we have here to get through.
	So take a break and come back with all of it after this.
	Oh, by the way, there's this too that we may get into the remember Jamie Weinstein's name, Jamie Weinstein Ringabel.
	No, no, no.
	He's a reporter for the Daily Caller.
	He's the boyfriend of the female reporter supposedly shoved to the ground by Corey Lewendowski.
	Michelle Fields, Michelle Fields was.
	Anyway, Jamie Weinstein has a piece, the Daily Caller suggesting that the Republican Party approach Hillary Clinton and negotiate a surrender and actually concede the presidential race to her right now.
	No.
	No, no, no, no, no, I am not joking.
	The headline, the case for a negotiated Republican surrender to Hitler.
	Hillary, sorry, was a faux pas.
	It's time for Republican leaders to consider a negotiated endorsement of Hillary Clinton.
	That's the lead.
	And his point is Trump's going to lose.
	And even if Trump wins, Hillary's better.
	Hillary would be less damaging to conservatism than Trump is going to be.
	And maybe he actually says this.
	Now look at me.
	Actually says that we might be able, if we actually, if we did this right, if the right Republicans like Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan and somebody went up to Hillary and her campaign, and actually surrendered, cancel a campaign, and concede that she's the winner and make her president in waiting.
	Maybe she would give us Antonin Scalia's replacement.
	Let us pick.
	And I'm not kidding you.
	She might be able to be talked into that.
	She might be amenable in exchange for us conceding the presidential election to her.
	Now this is not Trump involved in it.
	This is the Republican Party.
	Essentially going to Hillary and saying, okay, we're going to lay down our arms.
	We're not going to oppose you.
	We're not going to do anything.
	Trump's out there on his own doing what he's doing.
	We're going to concede the presidency to you.
	We will do everything we can to see to it that you win the election.
	And uh all we want is the chance to pick Scalia's replacement.
	Yeah.
	Right.
	I've got it here.
	There are a couple other things that he thinks we could get from Hillary if we did this.
	But I just that's coming up too.
	Let me get to the phones here.
	We're going to start with Wayne in Columbia, Missouri.
	Wayne, great to have you on The program, sir.
	Hello.
	Hi, Rush.
	Long time listener, third time caller.
	Great to have you, sir.
	Resh, I just wanted to point out the uh hypocrisy of the left.
	Uh, again, uh, that uh uh when George W. Bush was president, the left actually made a movie about his assassination, and nobody made a big stink about that.
	I mean, that that was oh, well, you know, that was just that was just a joke or something.
	You know, he's right, and there were there were two things.
	There was a book, some I don't remember who.
	I don't think I'd ever heard of the author, but he was nevertheless reputed as esteemed.
	Uh, wrote a book on how to assassinate George Bush.
	Uh, and it was received with a claim.
	That, yes, uh, left acknowledged that was sort of out there as a theme, the subject matter, but the literary effort was well worth our time.
	That it was it was rich and well done and certainly worth our delving into experience uh for the literary effort that it was.
	And then there was a movie made in Canada, actually made a movie depict the assassination of George W. Bush.
	And that movie was also acclaimed.
	And we were advised look, it may offend you, but you should watch this to understand how some people feel.
	So the advocacy of violence against the president was heralded twice by the drive-by media.
	So, as usual, I checked the email and a lot of doubters thinking I'm making it up about the movies.
	Okay, here we go.
	Death of a president.
	2006 British docudrama political thriller film from the UK Daily Mail, September 20th, 2006.
	George Bush assassination film wins top award.
	And from the article, British director Gabriel Range's Death of a President stirred up a strong reaction even before it premiered at the festival.
	But it won the prize of the international critics.
	The jury of film critics cited the film for the audacity with which it distorts reality to reveal a larger truth.
	So it was a it was awarded for telling a series of lies in order to justify the larger truth that Bush needed to be assassinated.
	And the the movie ended up winning a total of six awards.
	And there was a a book published by Randall Krause, 2007, The Assassination of George W. Bush, a love story.
	So there was a book and there were movies, a movie about assassinating Bush.
	Done by leftist artists.
	And I I point all this out.
	Once again, folks, this is not I'm not mounting a spirit of defense of Trump, although I'm happy to, but that's not what I'm doing.
	The hypocrisy.
	And if you want to ladle out some guilt, the guilt is all on the left in this.
	They know they're they're making a molehill here, a mountain out of a molehill.
	They know exactly what they're doing.
	It's a technique.
	In fact, in fact, in fact, I'm looking for the soundbite standby, stand by.
	It's all you grab soundbite number 11.
	It is exactly a tactic, and in fact, it's in the Democrat Party playbook.
	This is last night on the Kelly file.
	Uh all the Fox people are on vacation.
	So Trish Regan was filling in for Meghan Kelly, and she had on one of Trump's spokespeople, Katrina Pearson, about this uproar over Trump's second amendment people comment.
	And uh Trish Regan said, Hey, Katrina, starting with you, is the left overreacting to this in your view.
	Oh, absolutely.
	If you go back to the WikiLeaks release of the DNC emails, this is on the PowerPoint playbook on the messaging slide number six with the messaging theme number one, Violence.
	They were looking for an opportunity to pick up off somewhere to continue this narrative that somehow Donald Trump is violent.
	Let me repeat this.
	It was revealed in the WikiLeaks document dump of DNC emails that they have a PowerPoint presentation that they give out to all of their people that appear on TV and all of their consultants who devise strategy and then send out the memo to everybody else.
	Here's what to say, here's how to say it.
	And the PowerPoint presentation on messaging slide number six.
	The theme is violence.
	And whenever there is any opportunity to show that the Republicans or their candidate uses violence or advocates it, this is how you say it, this is what to do.
	And this is why everybody talking about this on the left sounds identical.
	Because this is in the playbook.
	This is a technique.
	This is something that is studiously planned for.
	They know exactly what the media is in on it.
	The whole thing is tromped up.
	And it's it's folks, it's for this reason that I get so frustrated with everybody falling for it.
	It's not genuine.
	This is the the the outrage is faux.
	It's rigged up, it's phony.
	They're pretending to be outraged over this.
	They're not really.
	It's just an opportunity to once again try to smear Trump or to cast him in a certain light.
	And all of their operatives and all of their commentators on TV have been presented this presentation and told what to say and how to maximize it and so forth.
	No, no, don't they're free to do that, and and if they execute it, well, more power to them.
	I don't care.
	I'm just telling you, don't fall for this.
	It's it's everything about this is fake in terms of how angry they are, how outraged.
	I mean all of them.
	Let me go to David Rodham Gurgen.
	Grab audio sound bite, because he's uh soundbite number four.
	Because this is this will illustrate what I'm talking about here.
	This is last night with Anderson Cooper 210, John Berman filling in because Anderson Cooper's on vacation.
	By the way, note, my friends, who is not on vacation.
	That would be me.
	So anyway, Berman is speaking with Gergen about Trump's remark that supporters of the second amendment might be able to fight any nominee that Hillary would throw up there to the Supreme Court.
	And so Berman says, look, on the question of whether Trump was inciting violence.
	Remember now.
	PowerPoint presentation, slide six, violence.
	How to suggest the Republicans use it, are in favor of it, inspire it, what have you.
	So he makes sure to get that word in there.
	On the question, David, of whether Trump was inciting violence, that's an extreme view of what Trump said.
	A middle view, which is also critical, is that he was careless in his words in talking about uh violence in a way dealing with presidential candidates.
	Some people, David, think that you should never even get close to that line.
	Most of us know what dog whistles sound like in politics.
	It's one of the clearest ones we've ever heard.
	I worked for two presidents, one of whom almost lost his life, Ronald Reagan at the hands of an assassin.
	This is a candidate who began by calling her crooked Hillary.
	This is a candidate who one of the rallying cries that he hasn't yet finished is lock her up.
	Those are the preludes for dehumanizing somebody, demonizing them, and making it possible for some crazy out there.
	And we're talking about crazies.
	Dog whistles go to crazies.
	And that they may feel, well, she's so bad you ought to be lock her up.
	Maybe we just ought to take care of her altogether.
	And that is the issue that's really.
	Wait a minute.
	Wait a minute.
	How come all the movies and video games are always poo-pooed as reasons for crazies to go nuts?
	Yeah, yeah.
	Whenever you want to drain pop culture, for example, for some wacko shooting up a school, David Gergen is the first.
	No, no, no, no, no, you can't say that.
	But let this happen, and now all of a sudden Trump isn't citing crazies.
	Lock I know locker up came from the people.
	It didn't come from Trump.
	And it's it's it's wider spread than even Trump supporters.
	But uh, you know, this is this is uh clearest uh dog whistles uh we've ever heard uh you don't do this, these are preludes of dehumanizing somebody, demonizing them, making it they didn't demonize George W. They wrote books about assassinating him, Mr. Gurgen, they did a movie about assassinating him.
	I don't remember hearing a peep from CNN about that.
	And then making it possible from crazy out there, and we're talking about crazy, yeah.
	These gun nuts, man, they're crazies, you see how this all works.
	I'm just again reiterating, folks, this whole thing is ginned up.
	They really are excited about this.
	They're not angry, they're acting mad, they're acting outraged, they're acting like this is so beneath them, it's so beyond the pill, this is beyond civilized discourse.
	This is something we should never ever tolerate in our camp.
	Meanwhile, it was Hillary Clinton in 2008 who actually referenced the possibility that Obama might be assassinated as the reason she was not drop out of the race.
	And they didn't say a word about that back then, and they knew it.
	Brief time out and we will be back.
	Don't go away.
	Fastest three hours in media.
	Man, they're just flying by here today.
	Here's uh here's Brian St. Augustine, Florida.
	Great to have you on the EIB network.
	Hello.
	Thanks, Russ.
	Um, so frustrated with this email situation with uh Hillary Clinton.
	She's got to be either the biggest liar there is or the stupidest person there is.
	How could somebody who is going to be who is the Secretary of State not think that there might end up being uh confidential or top secret emails sent to her or that she would send?
	So there's stuff that's missing that we don't know about at all.
	And no one's looking at it.
	Uh well, no, some people are.
	Um, but it's not in government.
	And I've I've uh I'm gonna get into this in detail in the uh next it gets kind of convoluted, and I need I need to just boil this down to its its essence.
	Uh because you're she's lying.
	She knew full well.
	She knew full well she's dealing with everything has to be assumed to be classified.
	And she said, well, it didn't say classified on it.
	How was I to know?
	And I didn't say it real big up there and all that.
	But there look there Brian, there are bombshells in the emails that have been found by Judicial Watch and Citizens United.
	And these are the emails that the FBI said they couldn't find.
	They were found with a Freedom of Information Act request, and they were obtained from the people Hillary sent the emails to, like Cheryl Mills or Huma Wiener or what have you.
	And and they are uh they're just devastating.
	But again, it it's so in the weeds.
	Uh you wonder to what extent drive-by low information people are gonna have any interest to uh understand it, take the time.
	That's why you have to try to make it as simple as you can explaining it, which and this stuff is multiple pages, but I'm gonna give it a shot in the uh in the next hour.
	Thanks, Russ.
	What else did you have something else you wanted to add opinion-wise about this?
	Well, I I I just think that how can she even claim that she was just um making a mistake or or something like that?
	Let me tell you something.
	Let me tell you how she can do it.
	This is important to understand, and it's something that people on our side will never ever experience.
	If if you are Hillary Clinton, and you know that they've got you dead to rights, but that They don't really, because you have the Obama administration on your side, meaning the FBI, the DOJ, and you've got the media on your side.
	When you realize that the largest organization in the world intended to hold politicians accountable, is actually working on your behalf.
	Why that makes lying fun and easy.
	The drive-by media is gone.
	The drive-by media is now part of the establishment.
	The drive-by media, they're applauding Hillary now at her press conferences.
	They're applauding her artful lying, they're applauding her campaign.
	When you have that kind of backing and that kind of uh confidence that every lie you tell is going to be supported or covered up, then it makes it easy to do.
	If, however, you think lying is going to get you in trouble, well, then you're much more guarded about it, and you do it a lot less.
	But if you know that your lying is going to be promoted, and the people that come after you for lying are going to be attacked for unfairly criticized, then you've got a free road ahead of you.
	And that's exactly where she and every other Democrat happen to be.
	I had a piece yesterday that I didn't get to.
	Chatsworth Osborne Jr., uh Tucker Carlson had a great piece on what has become of journalism, meaning it doesn't exist anymore.
	And it's being taught, it's just it's it's being destroyed as as a as a business, as an enterprise, as an institution.
	I think I kept it in my overflow stack.
	And one of the points that he makes, I think it was him, if not him, it's either myself or other people.
	The media now consider themselves to be the people they cover.
	They are the establishment.
	They party with, they hang out with, they socialize with, they do business with the Democrats.
	And the people in power within the established, they don't cover them, they cover for them.
	They don't report on them.
	There is no holding powerful people accountable.
	There's no, with this so-called speaking truth to power.
	They cover it up.
	They protect them.
	They think they're in the same league.
	They do, they marry them.
	They marry them.
	The drive-by media marries these people, or these people marry the drive-by media, you know, depending on who proposes to who.
	So at a typical White House press conference, it's people who think, the media who think that they're in the same club as Obama.
	There's certainly nothing adversarial.
	That only exists when the Republicans are behind the microphone, or in the crosshairs, or what have you.
	And as such, it was the opinion of Chatsworth Osborne Jr. that journalism's dead if this is what it's become.
	It's all rooted in the in the the society aspect of the social aspect of it.
	They don't dare really go after Mrs. Clinton.
	They're in the club.
	I mean, they're all they're all on the same team, which is stopping us.
	The objective is stopping us.
	So Mrs. Clinton knows this.
	She knows that everybody out there supposedly doing the news is actually covering for her.
	And if she lies, they'll cover it and they'll spread it and they'll amplify it as truth.
	And then they will belittle And impugn anybody who seeks to go after Mrs. Clinton under the pretext that she's lied.
	And they'll call them names or write them off as just partisans that you can't trust or believe, that have an unhealthy, lifelong hatred for the Clintons that is irrational and doesn't make any sense.
	And therefore you can't believe anything the Clinton critics say.
	And that's where we are.
	But it's going to be that it's not that they're not just tied specifically to the Clintons or the Obamas.
	It's to the leftist liberal ideology.
	That's the club.
	And then there's a subclub, which is comprised of people of wealth and certain financial standing.
	And that is another area of commonality.
	In a lot of cases, the media people are more highly paid than the people in government they're covering.
	But not that doesn't hold up until people in government get out.
	And then they end up earning more than the media does.
	But it evens out.
	Okay, bombshells in the emails of AIDS to Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin Wiener, Cheryl Mills, and the case for a negotiated Republican surrender to Hillary Clinton.
	That's not for me.

▲