All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 10, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:52
August 10, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24 7 podcast.
All right, now, folks, we're gonna get into this today.
And I want to preface it by making sure that you understand something.
As it's the same today as it is every other day, the focus of this program is on the Democrat Party and on the American left and not letting them get away with what they get away with.
Sometimes that is misunderstood as me defending crazy behavior, crazy language, and it's not.
I just sit here and I watch and I get frustrated at how easily these people get away with changing focus when the bias is theirs.
Greetings, it's great to have you with us.
The uh telephone numbers 800 282 2882 and the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Let me tell you what the ardent Donald Trump supporter is saying about this controversy.
And I have not talked to a single Trump supporter, so I'm not quoting anybody.
I'm telling you what I think they are saying.
I just saw their discussing on Fox.
Is this going to have an impact on the presidential race?
Who knows?
You can even ask that about the convention.
The conventions usually happen in August.
Are you wear that?
These conventions happen so early, nobody's going to remember anything from them.
And the reason they went early is because the Olympics.
Normally the conventions are right before Labor Day, so it's fresh on your mind.
But I'm telling you that the average Trump supporter is out there screaming at every TV network, trying to turn this into something that it wasn't.
And they're saying it doesn't matter what Donald Trump says.
Do not be distracted from what we face, the current condition of the country and our decline and the need to stop the people who are responsible for it.
And that's the Democrat Party, of course, politically.
That's what they're saying.
The media is trying to convince everybody that Trump was out there advocating violence.
Look, I probably am the best interpreter of Donald Trump there is.
And I know exactly, I know exactly what he meant with that comment.
I know exactly what inspired the comment.
And it was not the advocacy of violence.
It was the recognition of a reality that exists in the minds and hearts of a lot of the American people about the Democrat Party.
There is no doubt.
Make no mistake, it's free and clear and abundant every day.
If they could, the Democrat Party from Hillary Clinton on down would take away every gun from every law-abiding citizen in this country if they could.
And that is the quote-unquote danger.
That's not arguable.
That is not a matter of debate.
I don't care what they say.
I've even got Hillary Clinton quoted as saying she would use executive action, quote unquote, to stop this out of control violence.
What does that mean?
She's not talking about taking guns away from criminals because it's very, very hard to do that.
We all know what the Democrat Party wants.
We all know what the American left.
I'm just going to tell you the reaction to this.
And you know, at worst it was a bad joke, uh, which, again, when the left has no sense of humor.
Everybody is so tightly wound about words that we are letting all kinds of destructive action take place against this country that has to stop.
Words aren't hurting anybody.
Words are not causing any damage.
Uh not expressly and not directly, but we're so focused on the words, and I'm just going to tell you, folks, the this this reaction from everybody in the media, and a lot of Republicans too, because everybody's so tightly wound and so afraid of what somebody's going to say.
It tells us more about what the media think of gun owners than what gun owners intend to ever do with their guns.
If you want to put I told you at the top, this is not.
Do not misunderstand me here.
I imagine some of the drive-by are going to say that Limbaugh mounted a spirited defense of Trump.
It's not what I'm doing.
It's not my primary purpose.
That's up to Trump.
It's up to Trump and his campaign to defend himself.
I'm telling you how the left goes about taking out our candidates.
I'm telling you how the left goes about defeating us.
I'm telling you how the left and the Democrat Party working together with the media, which is one of the same, do their dirty work, in the hope that people can recognize it and learn to spot it and not be affected by it.
That's my objective.
It always has been.
To alert, to educate, to inform people how the left wins, how the left seeks to expand its influence.
And this is a classic.
This is a textbook case of it.
And in the midst of it, my point is that this incident and the reaction to it from the predictable quarters tells us more about what the media think of gun owners.
And let's be honest, we already know what that is.
We know the media and the Democrat Party is obsessed with, they're obsessed with the Second Amendment.
They hate it.
And if they could, they'd write it out.
If they could, they would confiscate as many guns as they could.
If they could.
And so the reaction to this is far more illustrative of what the left thinks of gun owners than what gun owners ever intend to do.
Now, where is the bias in this gun debate?
You know, the gun debates like anything else.
You have a bunch of average ordinary Americans who own weapons and do not violate the law with them.
They're running around minding their own business.
They're doing whatever they do to try to get through each day.
They're trying to succeed, they're trying to raise their kids.
They're trying to enjoy life.
They're doing everything that they're supposed to do, and they just happen to own guns.
But they're not running around committing crimes with them.
On the other side of it, they are assaulted.
These people are assaulted regularly by the media and by the Democrat Party about what danger they pose and how they can't be trusted and how they are responsible for whatever gun violence takes place.
So what do you expect them to be if not defensive?
So where is the bias in this?
The bias, the true energy in all this, can be found on the side of this debate that wants to eliminate an amendment to the U.S. Constitution if they can and confiscate as many guns from the law-abiding as they can.
Pure and simple.
So along comes Trump at another sold-out rally, at another overflowing rally.
Another rally filled with energy and excitement and a lot of people outside that couldn't get in.
And he's talking about Hillary Clinton.
He's talking about the Supreme Court, he's talking about nominations, he's talking about the future and what we face, what we're up against.
If Hillary Clinton wins, grab audio soundbite number one, and this is what got all of this started.
By the way, and if she gets to pick.
If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks.
Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know.
Was that the whole bite?
Because my transcript says what he said at the beginning, we didn't have here.
Okay, here it is.
Here's the whole bite again.
Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish the Second Amendment.
By the way, and if she gets to pick.
If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks.
Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know.
Now I know, I know exactly where that comment comes.
I know the thought process.
I know exactly what synapsees and neurons fired in Trump's inner cratium, and I know exactly when they were firing.
And my guess is that the vast majority of people do too, understand exactly what he's talking about.
And it isn't assassination.
The only person's ever used that word in this kind of context, by the way, is Hillary Clinton.
Two thousand eight, the campaign against Barack Hussein, oh.
A lot of people were urging her to get out of the race.
That it was over, that Obama's lead was insurmountable.
Hillary said no.
We can never forget Los Angeles when Robert Kennedy was assassinated.
You probably don't remember that.
Do you remember this now?
Of course it rang a bell because you are daily aware and informant.
I don't know how many people know this.
I don't know how many people even remember it.
But she is the one.
Here's here's what here's what she said.
This is in 2008.
And she said this is when Obama had this big delegate lead, and the superdelegates were lining up behind him and looked over.
Hillary Clinton said, my husband didn't wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary sometime in the middle of June, right?
Well, we all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.
I don't understand it, meaning why people are urging me to get out.
That is a direct reference to her opponent falling victim to a plot.
Does anybody remember this kind of hand ringing and oh my God, oh my God, we can't have this.
Does anybody recall the media going amply bonkers and bringing one guest in after another to ask if this is something that we should disqualify Mrs. Clinton over?
She actually brought up the very thing that Trump did not.
Trump was not talking about you know what Trump was talking about?
Do you need me to tell you what Trump was talking about?
If you yourself have heard this once, you've heard it.
When you talk to gun owners, when they are asked, what's so important to you?
What's the big deal?
Why is the Second Amendment?
They'll tell you why the Second Amendment's there, don't you?
And you'll say to the gun owner, no, no, why is it there?
Because the founders understood tyranny.
And if that government, if that government's going to take our guns away, they got to get past our guns first.
The Second Amendment, as far as a gun owner, many is concerned, is designed to make sure the government cannot put them in tyranny.
It's about rising up against the government.
It's about the guns being available to stop government from taking away people's rights.
It's has nothing to do with what the drive-bys are trying to make.
Now you may think that's a kook view.
If you're not a gun owner, if you're not a big NRA type, you might think it's a kook view that people want to have guns to make sure the government doesn't take them away from people, to make sure the government doesn't.
You didn't able to mount a reverse coup against the American people, this kind of thing.
But you'd be surprised at the number of people with the knowledge of history of the country and the Second Amendment and what it all was about and what the founders were about where they came from.
It's a serious, and that's all Trump was referencing.
He was he's been talking to gun owners ever since he went to the NRA, and ever since he got their endorsement, and he's heard them talk, he knows what they he's know, he knows what's important to him.
He wasn't talking about anything to do with Hillary Clinton.
Now, should he have said that's in a whole nother thing, folks.
I we can debate, you know, whether these things hurt Trump or not, but remember my focus.
I don't want to, I don't want to let this go by, because I'm I'm I'm doing arguably here what Trump is doing.
In many people's minds, I'm misspeaking here, and I'm not misspeaking.
And I'm not mounting a defense of Trump.
I'm again doing what I do every day on this program and trying to alert people to how the left operates, how the media operates, how they intend to do damage to people on our side, to do damage to our issues, to do amage to our causes, and so forth.
And this is classic how this is happening.
Trump just off the top, you know, he's he's he's a total improv.
He loves getting a laugh.
He loves, he loves pushing the boundaries.
That's what that's what this was.
But Hillary Clinton's the only person in the uh president of the race today that's actually talked about actual.
Uh Assassination.
It's not what Trump meant.
So, as usual, folks.
With Trump, everything he says gets examined under the microscope because many people don't understand it.
If Trump is trying to be funny, the people on the left are going to be totally lost because they don't have a sense of humor, particularly when they are the ones being laughed about, laughed at, joked about, mocked, or what have you.
He may have an odd way of speaking in your mind.
Trump may have a, you know, people that that that uh speak their conscience.
I know a lot of people, stream of consciousness.
Whatever pops into their mind, they say it.
They literally don't have any boundaries at all.
They're fun to be around.
You never know what's going to come out next.
From you ever get constipated, I'm constipated right now.
Do you ever take any four?
What do you take for it?
Well, you I'm sure you get you're sitting there.
What I listen to Trump all the time.
This is who he is.
I've known Trump a while.
This is how he speaks.
He does not.
He's not mean.
He's not evil.
He's not any of these things that people are trying to attach to him.
Maybe coarse.
I don't know how people would scribe it.
But I understand his cadence.
I understand how he thinks.
Understand how he speaks, understand his confidence where it comes from.
And he did not in any way, shape, manner, or form mean to say that people with guns ought to start aiming them at anybody.
But I totally get that the Hillary campaign and the Democrats and the media would take that and run with it.
I totally get that.
And anybody in a Trump campaign ought to understand that they're going to try to make hay out of it.
And they're gonna they're gonna go all in on trying to make hay out of it.
Why?
Because this to them is another way to move forward in the objective of getting everybody's guns away from them.
If the Republican nominee is as out of control and risky and dangerous, then can't you understand why we've got to get guns out of people's hands?
So they'll use this as a means of advancing what their real agenda is.
Meanwhile, while all this is going on about words, take a look at the rest of the news that has to do with Hillary Clinton's actions.
Guess what, James Comey?
The Hillary emails that you couldn't find have been found.
And you know by who?
Citizens United, who Hillary wants to abolish.
Dave Bosse and the Boys, Freedom of Information Act.
You know how they got the emails that Comey couldn't find?
They went and got them from Huma Danger.
They went and got them from Cheryl Mills because Hillary's emails were sent to people.
And what they reveal.
Ho ho.
Boy, oh boy, oh boy, it pales.
It makes whatever we're talking about with Trump pale.
We're gonna get into it on the program today.
We've got much more.
I've got to take a break here because of the uh I've got no choice.
I have to take it down.
We'll be back, though.
Okay, here's why you didn't know about Hillary Clinton back in 2008, because it comes from an interview that she did with the Sioux Falls Argus Leader editorial board.
Did an interview with the editors of that newspaper, and they had tape running, and this is what she said.
This is May 23rd of 2008.
Between my opponent and some in the media, uh, there has been this urgency to end this.
Now, my husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June.
We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.
I don't understand it.
What do you think that's a reference to?
They're urging her to get out of the race, and Obama's got an insurmountable lead.
No.
Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June.
And it's not even June yet.
It's May here.
So somebody may be assassinated in June, so I'm staying in.
I mean, folks, what Trump said yesterday doesn't even compare.
And I doubt that hardly anybody's aware that Hillary even said this back in 2008.
We played the audio.
That's why we got the clip.
And by the way, here's one more from Vice President Bite Me.
September 20th, 2008.
This is before the election.
He's out there in Castlewood, Virginia at a campaign event.
And as part of his remarks, Vice President Bite Me blurted out this.
I guarantee you, Barack Obama ain't taking my shotguns, so don't buy that, Melarkey.
Don't buy that, Melarke.
They're going to start pedaling that to you.
I got two.
If he tries to fool my barretta, he's got a problem.
Okay, now what is that?
Well, all that is is the Second Amendment guy.
He might have been impersonating one, but that's a Second Amendment guy saying, You're not taking my guns, dude.
That's what Donald Trump said.
When he starts talking about Second Amendment people might have, you're not taking my guns.
No matter who you appoint to the court, you're not taking my guns, is all it means.
Pure and simple.
Everybody can just take a breath here.
And let's get back to who's really doing damage to our country.
I want to listen to these two bites again without the pressure of time.
Hillary Clinton.
Now, this bite that you heard and you're going to hear again.
Drudge eventually posted it back in 2008.
It went viral on some conservative sites.
The drive-by media totally ignored this.
Hillary Clinton's comment about, well, no, I can't get out of the race yet.
Don't forget Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June, the year he ran.
The New York Times, the Washington, none of them.
None of them carried it, ran it.
None of them were interested in this at all.
It remained an alternative media phenomenon.
And again, it's Hillary Clinton in May of 2008 in an editorial board meeting with the Sioux Falls Argus leader.
Between my opponent and some in the media, uh there has been this urgency to end this.
Now, my husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June.
We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.
I don't understand it.
I don't understand why people are telling me to quit.
I don't know if it's over yet.
My husband didn't windle June.
It's only May now, and Bobby Kennedy got assassinated in June, and it's only May now.
So why are you telling me to quit?
Now, here's Bite Me.
Now, this was September of 2008.
This is just a little under two months to go before the election.
And what what when you listen to this?
The context is that Biden is attempting to say that all of these gun nuts who think Obama wants to take their guns away from him, they're just crazy.
These gun nuts, these NRA types, these Second Amendment goombas, they're just a bunch of paranoids, because that's not what Obama wants to do.
This is Biden's unique way.
I mean, there's a guy that never makes a gaff, right?
Hey, Chuck, stand up, Chuck, let him see.
Chuck's in a wheelchair when Obama asks him to stand up.
This is Mr. Walking Gaff.
And whenever he commits one, ah, that's just old Joe.
When Joe commits plagiarism, hey, you know, that's just Joe.
He's just trying to help people.
So here's Biden, and this is this is his uh, he's actually trying to get through the gun aficionados that Obama has no designs on taking away their guns.
I guarantee you, Barack Obama ain't taking my shotguns, so don't buy that, Melarkey.
Don't buy that, Melarkey.
They're gonna start pedaling that to you.
I got two.
If he tries to fool my beretta, he's got a problem.
So you see, he's even alluding to the fact that if Obama comes for his guns, his barrett is coming out.
So who's Biden talking about shooting here?
So you got Biden and you've got Hillary both talking about actually shooting somebody, or somebody being shot with guns, something that Trump did not do.
And yet you don't know that those two things happen.
Many of you are probably hearing them for the first time.
You'll be able to revisit them constantly at rushlimbaugh.com.
When we update the website today, you'll hear all the audio.
if you're a member, you get to keep it forever.
And then there's this.
This is from October 16th of last year.
The headline, Hillary Clinton, Australia gun ban worth looking at in the U.S. Now, this is for all of those of you who think that I'm wrong when I openly proclaim that the design that the Democrats have is taking people away, taking their guns away from people and eliminating a second amendment.
And if you don't think that's true, you need to get wise, and you need to get wise fast because that is the objective, and they've been had they've had this objective for years.
It's a wet dream these people have.
They can't get over it.
They're not going to give it up.
It's as important to them as abortion is.
It's a close second.
They despise the Second Amendment.
They despise people having guns.
I can give you the psychological reasons for that, too, but we don't have the time.
I want to move on to other things, but I want to share with you this story.
During an October 16th town hall meeting last year at Keene State College, K-E-E-N-E.
Democrat presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton said that Australia's confiscation of firearms via a national buyback provides a good example for how other countries responded to mass shootings,
and she said that it's worth looking at when considering gun policy in the U.S. She made these statements in response to a questioner who asked if we could ban handgun ownership to Town Hall.
And a typical leftist pansy stands up and says, Mrs. Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, can we ever ban handguns?
Can we get handguns taken?
Well, you know, you know, she said they have a wonderful program in Australia where they're banning guns there.
It's worth looking at.
She said, this is verbatim.
You know, Australia's a good example.
Canada's a good example.
The UK is a good example.
Why?
Well, because each of them had mass killings.
Australia had a huge mass killing about 20 or 25 years ago, and Canada did as well, so the UK.
In reaction, they passed much stricter gun laws.
In the Australian example, there was a buyback program.
The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns and basically clamped down going forward.
So the Australia gun ban, yeah, worth looking at.
I only mention this to try to keep this focused on where the bias in this gun debate actually is.
You have a bunch of people who are gun owners, who are law-abiding Americans, who are going about their day not bothering anybody, and they have to be aware every day that big government, big liberal Democrat, big media wants to take their guns away.
And so they are constantly prepared and defensive about this.
They're not wanting to do anything, but they're just, they just have their guns.
There's the Second Amendment, but they're aware that there's a whole party and a whole media that wants to take their guns away, and if they could would erase the Second Amendment.
So where's the gun bias?
And why is Trump the guilty party?
Why is the NRA the guilty party?
You know, it's often been said that if the left looked at the Second Amendment the way they look at abortion, then gun ownership would be mandatory in this country.
That's how contradictory their positions are on this.
Anyway, as I was effectively pointing out, while all of this is going on, the latest effort to cast Trump as dangerously unsuited, incompetent, unhinged, imbalanced, whatever.
Look at the headlines in the news since Monday about Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party.
We have a rape victim who has come out to say that Hillary is a liar, the big champion of women failed a 12-year-old rape victim when Hillary Clinton defended the rapist.
We have, this is incredible.
We have Julian Assange of WikiLeaks, who is come out and said, hey, the Russians were not our source.
The Russians did not leak Hillary's emails to us.
And then Julian Assange suggests that it was somebody at the Democrat National Committee who provided him with the emails that proved they had rigged the game against Bernie Sanders.
Twenty-seven-year-old Democrat staffer, Democrat National Committee staffer guy by the name of Seth Rich.
Seth Conrad Rich was murdered in Washington.
At 4-19 in the morning on July 10th.
It's a Sunday morning.
He was gunned down at 4-19 in the morning.
Shortly after the killing, social media users were pursuing a lead saying that Seth Conrad Rich was on his way to the FBI at the time, intending to speak to special agents about an ongoing court case involving the Clinton family.
Seth Rich's father, Joel Rich, told reporters, hey, look, if it was a robbery, gone bad that killed my son, it failed because he still has his watch.
He still has his money.
He still has his credit cards.
He still had his phone.
So if this was a robbery, it was a totally wasted effort, except we lost my son's life.
Julian Assange has indirectly in an interview with Norwegian, it's actually Dutch TV, and we've got the audio of this.
And I'm looking now.
Hang on here a full.
It's audio soundbite number 12.
I want you to listen to this, and if you miss it, I'll point it out to you.
This is yesterday in a Netherlands Dutch television program called Newser, and they're interviewing Julian Assange of WikiLeaks a question.
That stuff that you're sitting on.
The other emails, that stuff you're sitting on is stuff that Trump's hoping that the Russians find.
Is there an October surprise in there?
WikiLeaks never sits on material.
Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks.
As a 27-year-old that works for the DNC, who was shot in the back, murdered just two weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.
So that was just a robbery, I believe, wasn't it?
No, there's no finding.
So uh what are you suggesting?
I'm suggesting that our sources take risks and they become concerned uh to see things occurring uh like that.
Okay, so he's talking about this poor guy that got gunned down at 4.19 in the morning on on uh July the 10th, named Seth.
Seth Rich, and then happens to say at the end of the interview, I'm suggesting our sources take risks.
That's why we don't tell anybody who they are.
He brings up this staffer at the DNC, murdered, gunned down, cold blood 4.19 in the morning and July 10th, and then it doesn't it does not leave it for us to infer.
He implies directly that this guy was their source.
It's a DNC staffer.
The WikiLeaks release had to do with Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz rigging a game against Crazy Bernie.
And this guy was supposedly en route to an interview with the FBI to provide more of what he knew, and he shot and killed.
You you would think the guys at the Democrat National Committee just on that basis alone, somebody being murdered that works at the DNC.
Don't you think the drive-bys would be interested maybe to find a way to blame that on Trump.
But they're not touching this.
They're not touching it.
It's it's it's Julian Assange and whoever else wants to make anything out of it.
But the clear implication is that this poor guy was a source of data that WikiLeaks has released.
Gotta take a break.
We will Continue after this.
Don't go away.
You know, this entire latest Trump controversy is rooted in one thing.
And that is that Mrs. Clinton and the Democrat Party in the media will not be honest.
We all know that they hate the Second Amendment.
We all know that they want to take guns away from people because they've said so at various stages of their careers in this campaigner or that campaign or on that Sunday show or this Sunday show.
They've all said it.
But at this moment, when Trump comes out with his statement acknowledging what everybody knows, why would Hillary want to put justices on the court to take away to take away people's guns to somehow say you get a majority on the court to say the Second Amendment's unconstitutional or some such thing?
If the Democrats and the media would stop acting like they don't think what they think, this wouldn't even be a controversy.
But my point is this is a controversy because one side happens to be lying or omitting the truth.
I mean, I find it, I find it fascinating to watch this.
Trump says what he says, as impolitic as it was, and is I don't know, call it characterized however you will, but the fact of the matter is that over here, the media and Hillary and Biden and Obama and the whole Democrat Party in the media do indeed want to take away guns from law abiding people.
They're acting like what?
We've never said that.
What?
Anybody thinking that's crazy.
What?
That's insane.
We wouldn't ever try to do it.
They do, and they are dreaming about it, and it is something that they would try to get done by virtue of nominating the right people to the Supreme Court.
Make no mistake about you know, folks, it's amazing with the Clintons.
There are benefits to racking up years of experience.
There are benefits to having a phenomenal memory to go along with those years of experience like I do.
And therefore, there's something to be said for getting older, because you cannot accrue experience without getting older.
And I have a story here today from Town Hall.com.
And I could swear, I could swear I saw these stories back in 1992, back in 1993, 94.
Can I share with you the headline?
Here it is.
Clinton body count or left-wing conspiracy.
Three with ties to the Democrat National Committee mysteriously die.
I can remember reading magazines back in 1992 that cataloged all the people the Clintons knew who had died.
And their itinerant, the the uh uh not itinerant, but the inherent conspiracies that were associated with this.
And lo and behold, here we go again.
That's by Rachel Alexander at Town Hall.
Since a Democrat National Committee emails were leaked a few weeks ago, three people associated with the DNC have all been found dead under what could be questionable circumstances.
Well, I'm sorry, folks, this is exactly the kind of stuff that we saw back in 1992 and 93.
And what we saw it back then, the drive-by's reared up, and they how dare you this is beneath the scope of decency.
How dare any of you bring this?
Uh troopers and Arkansas was all over the place.
And back then, whenever the controversy arose and it came up on shows like Nightline.
I mean, Ted Capcopel routinely routinely had discussions or roundtable discussions about it.
And one of the things I was on one of them.
And one of the things I said, you know, I who knows what happened here.
But let me ask you a question.
I said, Ted, how many people do you know in your life have been murdered?
Ted, how many people do you know in your life that have died in the suspicious circumstance?
Of course, the answer is zilt zero, not a nun, very few.
Ask the Clintons that question.
And it's a significant number.
It's a lot of people they know who have died and murdered, and the same question here from Rachel Alexander.
It's amazing the cycle that exists with the Clintons.
When it comes down to is this.
How many other politicians have you heard of who've had so many mysterious deaths associated with them?
You don't hear of a Bush body count.
You don't even hear of an Obama body count, but there is a Clinton body count.
Town Hall, respectable.
Highly reputed.
Journalism Center.
Back after this.
Don't go away.
We have to take a um a break here, top of the hour, to regroup.
No, we have to regroup, we're on a roll here.
Everything's falling out exactly as prepped, in fact.
So what's next in these stacks is what's next, and it's coming right up.
▲
Export Selection