All Episodes
Previous Next
June 28, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:48
June 28, 2016, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
I thought I had adjusted to it, but I haven't.
It just makes me sick.
It it depresses me.
It makes me sick all over again.
It is now this Benghazi thing.
It's so emblematic of what has happened to us as a country.
It is so enlightening as to what has happened to institutions that we used to be able to trust.
It exposes this administration as gosh, I don't know, incompetent, uncaring, totally self-focused.
It's just it I don't know, folks.
Greetings.
Great, great to have you here, Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone, telephone number if you want to be on the programs 800-282-2882, the email address L Rushbow M EIBNet.com.
We have two reports.
We have the full-fledged 800-page report put together by the committee chairman Trey Gowdy.
We have a couple of other Republicans, Mike Pompeo of Kansas and Jim Jordan, Illinois, and they've put together their own summary of the 800-page report, which is, well, as you might imagine, it's pared down and it gets in, gets it, and gets out.
It is uh both are really well done.
And I don't I even even without a press conference today, and even without the frustration of looking at the media trying to change the narrative of this thing, just the substance, the details of what went on and how we were all lied to over and over again about the cause being a video, and the end result being four dead Americans and not a finger lifted to help them.
And then ongoing lies for weeks and months in order to protect the re-election chances of Barack Obama and everybody in his regime.
And to watch the media today after uh Gowdy and his committee went out there and they they all made statements announced the substance of their report, summary-wise, and it was it was clear that the media is not interested in what's in the report, which doesn't surprise me.
I'm just telling you, they don't care what's in the report.
They're characterizing the report in two ways.
They're saying A, nothing new, and B, Hillary had nothing to do with it.
The committee does not indict Hillary Clinton.
The committee does not lay f lay blame at the feet of Hillary Clinton.
So CNN, Time Magazine, you name it, they're all running with the conclusion from this report that Hillary Clinton's innocent.
She has nothing to do with it.
And the reason that happened is classic.
So after all the Republicans speak and share with the media their their uh various takes on the content of the report.
Here comes a QA.
And the Q ⁇ A is all about re-establishing a narrative away from the substance of the report and toward the motivations of the of the members of the committee.
Such as you keep saying that your report's about what happened to four people, but is it really isn't it really about Hillary Clinton?
Trey Gowdy.
No, no, no, no.
No, no, no, no.
I challenge you to read it.
They're not gonna read it.
They don't care what's in it.
They think they already know there's nothing new in it.
That's the second narrative, but they're not gonna read it.
Gowdy says, read it, read it.
You you you won't find one name mentioned.
You'll find four.
And then he says, Speaker Boehner, Speaker Ryan did not tell me to go out and find out who is ultimately responsible in terms of one name.
They asked me to find out why four Americans are dead.
So the effort was made, and I I look at I understand it, but it's a it's a it's an illustration of how this stuff ends up happening the way it does.
The Republicans are taking the high road, and they are hell-bent on not being mischaracterized by falling into what they think is a trap of of aiming all of this at Hillary Clinton.
She's only the Democrat nominee for president.
But even today, the effort was made to not focus on her, because of course we don't want To taint the substance and contents of our report by making it look like there was any partisanship in it.
So we go out of the way to say, no, no, no, no.
It was not about one name.
It wasn't about two names, meaning it wasn't about Obama, it wasn't about Hillary.
It's about four dead Americans.
Well, that gives the media a free and clear open road to write that.
Hillary off the hook.
In fact, CNN's banner headlines said CNN says panel found no wrongdoing by Clinton.
No wrongdoing by Clinton.
She's up to her knees, her hips in this.
No wrongdoing.
Now I understand the committee.
Because I understand Republicans, and they start out on the defensive.
And they believe that the media is going to target them as being partisan.
And the guys that worked on this, the people who worked on this report are dead series about it.
It's very substantive.
They spend a lot of time on it.
Take it very seriously, and they should be applauded for that.
Don't anybody misunderstand here.
But the defensiveness is we don't want our work here to be mischaracterized as nothing more than a political attack.
So to prevent that, we'll go overboard, if necessary, to say it wasn't about Hillary.
It wasn't about the Democrat presidential nominee.
It wasn't about Obama.
When of course it's about both of them.
But they don't want to admit that, because then the report will be nothing more than Republicans attack Hillary in disguised report on Benghazi, which contains nothing new.
And they don't want that headline either.
So the answer that we got was read the report.
Read the report.
You'll see.
Read the report.
The media's not going to read the report.
The low information voters are not going to read the report.
The people that voted to leave the European Union in Great Britain are not going to read the report.
It does have some new things in it.
It has some new context.
It has timelines.
It is, folks, it is really s night.
You go to page 30 of this baby.
I've got it.
I've got I've got the Jim Jordan, Mike Pompeii.
I got both versions, but I've got this 56-page, 60-page version here.
And while there isn't a whole lot new in it, the way this has been put together in a succinct narrative showing how systematically over and over they all lied.
You focus in on page 30 for the security assessment nine months before the attack.
The security assessment not of the of the Benghazi compound.
Nine months before the attack, a State Department witness called to testify before the committee, bluntly said people are going to die in Benghazi.
We don't have any security.
We don't have any protection.
We don't have any nine months beforehand.
A State Department guy predicted people were going to die in Benghazi.
Hillary Clinton not only left them there after receiving that advice.
After being told people are going to die there, Madam Secretary, it's not set up.
We have no business being there.
But of course, it's about Hillary and Obama because Libya was supposed to be the diamond in the rough.
Libya was supposed to be the great illustration and example of Hillary Clinton's mastermindful statecraft.
We were going to use Libya to show how we had ousted a dictator.
We had gotten rid of a bad guy.
And we had done it all without firing a shot.
And we had converted Libyan population to supporters and allies of the United States.
And come hell or high water, nothing was going to change that narrative because it was setting up two different campaigns.
It was setting up Obama's in 2012 and now Hillary's in 2016.
And Libya was going to be the shining example of Mrs. Clinton's imminent qualification to be Secretary of State.
And so no amount of advice was going to get her to shut down Benghazi.
No amount of advice was going to get her to add security.
You can't go adding security and at the same time talk about what a great place you've got there and what a great job you've done and so forth.
It exposes the timeline of continuing with the lie that the video was responsible for this while lying to the parents of the four dead Americans, while lying to foreign leaders, or telling the truth to foreign leaders, lying to us, telling the truth to her daughter, telling the truth to foreign leaders that a video had nothing to do with it.
It was a planned terror attack.
They knew it.
Now all of this you think you know and you do, but to see it in this timeline is sickening.
It's infuriating.
It is sickening.
And it makes me regret that any of these people have ever ended up in power.
And it sickens me that one of them stands a good chance of being re-elected or elected president this year.
Hillary Clinton.
An absolute unqualified disaster.
In capable of telling the truth, never putting the country first, never putting the people who offer their lives in defense of this country, never putting them first, always putting herself first, always putting her party first, always putting her political calculations and desires and requests, dreams, what have you, always that comes first.
And in order to preserve that, anything goes.
And then you have a willing accomplice media right along with them, doing everything they can to shift the narrative of this thing.
So we've got two narratives.
A, hey, you know what?
This Republican panel found no wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton.
No evidence of any wrongdoing in a report that contains no new information.
And that's the news.
That's the way they're covering it.
It's sickening.
It is infuriating.
And it's also a sitting duck.
It is a sitting duck.
I mean, it's waiting for the right people to come along and run with this ball all the way to the goal line.
Whether or not people like that exist on our side, time will tell.
But if you had watched the press conference, I've got some audio sound bites.
Jim Jordan was fabulous, and he's coming up in just a second here.
Sound bites.
It pretty much explains all this.
He was just fabulous in this press conference today.
But watching the media trying to switch the narrative, knowing full well they don't care about the Gowdy was so intent that they know the stuff, so intent.
Please read it.
Just read it, and you'll find out your questions are baseless.
Read it and find out your questions have no point.
Read it and find out your premise is inaccurate.
Read it.
Just read it.
You won't find anything in it like you have just asked me.
They're not interested in the substance.
This is all about changing the narrative from the substance.
The whole point of the media covering this today is to provide cover for Hillary Clinton.
And they were given a boost by the fact that the Republicans didn't want to appear as though they were focusing on or aiming at Clinton.
So now the drive-bys are able to say that the Republican committee gave her a pass.
Which they didn't do.
If you read the report, they didn't do.
But that's the narrative.
So I want to take a timeout here.
We're going to come back, and I've got some sound bites of Jim Jordan, who uh put together a summary port, summary report of this with bullet point highlights, paragraph explanations, Jim Jordan from uh Ohio.
I said Illinois from Ohio, and uh Mike Pompeo of Kansas, but we'll be back and do that because I want to have some time after the break to play just more than one and a half sound bites.
So sit tight, folks.
It's all coming when we get back.
And there's the CNN banner headline again.
GOP led panel finds no new Clinton wrongdoing.
Jim Jordan went after Hillary Clinton, according to others in the drive-by media.
By the way, there's a Third report, the Democrats trying to preempt this today, issued their own report yesterday and they gave up something.
They revealed the relationship between Hillary and Sidney Blumenthal that he was advising her and being paid 200 grand for it.
And do you know this?
The Democrats' report on Benghazi mentions Donald Trump 23 times.
Well, you you laugh.
He had absolutely nothing to do with Benghazi, but they mentioned him 23 times.
And of course, since he's mentioned 23 times the drive buyers are going to focus on what Donald Trump had to do with Benghazi.
And probably what it's going to be is how Trump once again was out of his mind, making mindless, insane accusations about our brave Democrats in the administration trying to save American lives, and Trump once again illustrating his lack of temperament.
That's why they put Trump in the report to give the media freeway in going after it.
We, of course, no, no, no, no.
We will not do anything in this.
You want to know how bad this this is?
Try this.
Al Qaeda has sent out a memo to all of its jihadi fighters.
And the Al-Qaeda instructional memo.
Have you seen this?
Yes, and they're laughing about it.
Al-Qaeda is now telling its jihadists to target white Americans.
Avoid minorities, because the United States mislabels al-Qaeda attacks as hate crimes if they go after Hispanics or African Americans.
So hit whites because the American government finds nothing wrong with that.
Al Qaeda of the Arabian Peninsula has published a guide urging jihadis to carry out more lone wolf operations in the U.S. And the publication is called Inspire Guide, Orlando Operation, seeks to capitalize on the terror attack carried out by Omar Mateen, who pledged allegiance to ISILS.
While Mateen chose to target what the guide refers to as a homosexual nightclub, noting it killing gay people, is the most binding duty and closer to human nature.
They're all for it at Al Qaeda, wiping out gays, a bunch of attaboys for doing that.
However, the Inspire Guide suggests to avoid targeting places in crowds where minorities are found in America.
The federal government will be the one taking full responsibility.
Meaning, if you guys go out and you attack a bunch of minorities, we won't get credit for it.
The American government will blame Republicans and conservatives and the Tea Party, and we won't get credit.
So from now on, fellow jihadis, you go out and you kill white Americans, because the U.S. government's okay with that, essentially.
They won't call it a hate crime, and you'll get credit for your kill.
Yeah, 73 raises.
You'll get your 73 raises, not 72.
You got to get it right in there.
Tell me 72 raisins at 73.
You get your 73 raisins if you kill folks.
I know you think that this is brilliant humor, but I'm not making this up.
It's actually in something called the Inspire Guide, Orlando operation, and it's Al Qaeda telling its jihadist operatives, don't kill minorities because you won't get credit for it.
The U.S. government's gonna go out and blame conservatives and Tea Party people and all that.
So the only way to get credit to kill white people, because the U.S. government will never label that a hate crime.
They will never blame minorities for doing it.
You'll get full credit.
What the hell here?
We have a terror group who has a perfect understanding, a better understanding of how the American left and the Democrat Party operates than half of the people that vote in this country.
We have a terror group which is much more informed and clever than half the people that vote in this country about the Democrat Party and the American left.
Okay, Jim Jordan.
Here we have exactly what I didn't want to happen has happened, but I ran into that third story on the report by the Democrats.
So we'll use this as a setup for what's coming.
Jim Jordan this morning on Capitol Hill House Select Committee, Benghazi held a press conference to detail exactly what happened here in Hillary.
At 1008 that night with Tyrone Woods still on the roof of the annex fighting for his life, Secretary Clinton issues this statement.
The official statement on Benghazi, the official statement of our government that evening.
Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material on the internet.
We know that statement was misleading because an hour later she told her daughter, terrorists killed two of our people today.
The next day she tells the Egyptian prime minister, we know the film had nothing to do with it.
It was a planned attack, not a protest.
And this public-private contrast continues four days, publicly telling the American people it was a video-inspired protest, privately telling the truth that it was a terrorist attack.
Right.
After hearing that, you see a headline on CNN says GOP exonerates Hillary.
That's that's how it works.
Yep.
There's more.
You hang on, folks, be right back.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I'm gonna do it again.
I'm gonna play it again.
I'm gonna keep it in order here, and I wanna I I uh it's very powerful stuff.
Uh I wanna set it up here again.
I'm gonna play the soundbite from Jim Jordan again.
We've got, just to give you an idea, the minute when I saw him testifying, I got a little cookie, I said, I want this.
You got it, just Jim Gordon Jordan right now is awesome.
So we've got three of him, we got Mike Pompeo, we got a montage from the old days.
To put all this in perspective, gotta keep in mind now.
They go out and they think the members of this committee, particularly uh Jordan and Pompeo, their summary is fifty-one pages.
You know, uh I just told Coco to link to it up there at Rushlimbo.com.
It's not hard to read this thing.
It's a PDF, it's a word file, however you want to download it.
And it's not legalese.
It's pointed and direct.
Uh the Gowdy report's 800 pages.
You just need to read this 51-page job by Jordan and Pompeo.
But to put it in perspective, they come out today and they've got maybe not new information, although I think there is some new stuff in here, but they really assemble this in timelines and contextual ways that just nail this administration.
Just nail them as incompetent, uncaring, lying.
I mean, purposely strategically lying.
From Susan Rice on those five Sunday shows saying it was the video, to Hillary Clinton saying it was the video, to Barack Obama saying it was the video, when they all knew that it wasn't.
With that very same day it was happening, members of the administration from Obama and Hillary on down were characterizing it as a terrorist attack, not a protest.
They even lied about a protest in Cairo earlier the same day, spawning this.
And the root of both was that video.
They knew it wasn't.
They were lying to the teeth.
The report proves conclusively they were lying.
If that's not new, I don't know what is.
Then they've got the context and the timelines.
In in uh inarguable presentations.
It's just there's there's no way out of this.
But because in the QA, when the reporters demanded of Trey Gowdy that he admit that this is all about getting Hillary, oh no, no, no, we no, no, no.
Now the drive-by reports, our GOP panel finds no new evidence involving Mrs. Clinton, no wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton, and so that is the narrative out of this.
Nobody's gonna read it.
None of the people we need to read it are gonna read it.
None of the people who need to find out what a bunch of lying skunks this regime has in it.
None of the people who need to find out that they can't trust these people that they're entrusting their entire lives to.
They can't do it.
And it'll be the absolute biggest mistake we could all make to elect Hillary Clinton.
This document is just one bit of evidence that could lead anybody with an open mind to that conclusion.
But because it's reported that the panel found nothing here to be concerned about Mrs. Clinton, it's gonna be a ho-hom yauner.
So once again, up to us.
It's Up to us here in the alternative media to ring the bells and sound the alarms and plead and cajole and encourage and try to inspire people to go out and read this.
And in that vein, here are the Jim Jordan sound bites.
And again, we're going to play number one just to have them all three run as one, because he just went on and on.
We had to divvy this up into three different bites, and there's still more that we don't have here, but this is the nut of it.
And in this first sound bite, he is explaining inarguably how Hillary Clinton knowingly lied about the video and about the knowledge of what happened and who was behind it and why it happened.
And when you get down to that level and you find out that not a single finger was lifted to save four Americans who thought help was coming.
And then you realize you read page 30 of this of the Jordan Pompeo report, and you will see a State Department official warning the State Department, Hillary Clinton, somebody's gonna die in this place, Benghazi.
Somebody's gonna die, because you don't have any security set up.
Remember, Libya was the crown jewel.
Libya was Mrs. Clinton's foreign policy, and it was going to set the stage for her campaign to show how qualified she is.
So here we go.
Jim Jordan, number one.
At 1008 that night, with Tyrone Woods still on the roof of the annex fighting for his life, Secretary Clinton issues this statement, the official statement on Benghazi, the official statement of our government that evening.
Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material on the internet.
We know that statement was misleading because an hour later she told her daughter, terrorists killed two of our people today.
The next day she tells the Egyptian prime minister, we know the film had nothing to do with it.
It was a planned attack, not a protest.
And this public-private contrast continues for days, publicly telling the American people it was a video-inspired protest, privately telling the truth that it was a terrorist attack.
Now let me address something.
You in this audience, because you're in this audience, know that this excuse that all this happened because of video, you know it's bogus.
You know it is a lie, and you know that everybody who told a lie knew it was a lie.
You know that Obama knowingly lied, you know that Hillary knowingly lied.
You know that Susan Rice knowingly lied on five different occasions, you know that it went on for two or more weeks.
And all this time you might think, well, it's so obvious everybody knows.
No, they don't, folks.
See, that's the rub.
The people who consume only the drive-by media or only what they get on Facebook or Twitter or at Yahoo News.
President says it wasn't it was about a video.
That's what they think.
Hillary says it was about the that's what they think.
They don't they don't know that they're lying about it, and they don't ever assume their president lies to them unless he's a Republican.
They never assume it.
And if they find out their presidents lied to them, he had to do it in order to beat back the Republicans, and that's how it becomes justified.
And this is the epitome of the frustration you and I, and a certain number of millions of Americans know full well what a gigantic lie all of this is.
Never mind four Americans died.
The regime in charge of guaranteeing their safety and trying to protect them didn't lift a finger.
You know that.
And the frustrating thing is millions and millions of Americans still have no idea.
They believe it was a video.
They believe that Hillary and Obama did everything they could to save these people.
They have no idea that Hillary lied to the parents when the bodies were flown back to the United States, they were draped, the coffins draped with the American flag, and Hillary is lying to their parents that they were gonna get to the God about it.
They're gonna get the guy that did that video, and he's gonna pay for what he did.
And even though the family members are out saying, no, Hillary lied to us.
Sad reality is that millions and millions Of Americans, however you want to characterize them, have no idea.
They believe whatever comes out of Obama's mouth or Hillary's mouth.
With one caveat.
If Obama or Hillary lie in order to thwart Republicans, then it's okay.
Then it's fine.
In fact, we applaud that.
In the next bite, this is Jordan talking about how Libya was supposed to be the crown jewel of the Clinton State Department.
That they did everything they did to guarantee the legacy of Hillary and Obama, and that they found emails from Sidney Blumenthal admitting that.
Libya was supposed to be the crowning jewel of the Clinton State Department foreign policy and the Obama administration foreign policy.
This was their example of how it works.
No boots on the ground, oust the dictator, help the Arab Spring.
This was supposed to be how it works.
Sidney Blumenthal.
A few days after Qaddafi has been removed, he sends an email to the Secretary, and he says, This is a big moment.
You should do a press event, even if it's in the driveway of your vacation home.
And he finishes the email with this statement.
This is a big moment.
You are vindicated.
Don't wait.
Help Cleo now.
Cleo, of course, is the goddess of history.
So they were committed to this.
They were invested in this.
This was it.
This he's talking about things that happened before Benghazi here.
The the the Blumenthal email was sent to Hillary after Qaddafi was vanquished.
And that was where they were supposed to make the case that this is how smart diplomacy works.
This is how smart foreign policy works.
We got rid of Gaddafi with no boots on the ground, meaning no weapons, we didn't fire any guns, there were nobody killed.
We ousted the dictator, we helped move along the Arab Spring.
That's how it can happen.
We don't need to have boots on the ground everywhere to get what we've done to get done what we want to get done.
And Blumenthal was advising her to go out and take credit for it right now.
Help Clio, the goddess of history.
And so Jordan's point here is that Blumenthal was in hindsight, admitting what this was all about.
And that was establishing Hillary's legacy as the greatest Secretary of State we may have ever seen.
And that's why when Baz Benghazi came along, they had to lie through their teeth, because Benghazi blew up every notion of Hillary Clinton greatness.
Benghazi blew up every notion of Hillary Clinton competency.
Benghazi blew up every supposition about our foreign policy in Libya and how brilliant it was.
Benghazi blew it all sky high.
But to protect the legacy.
And you might say, well, but Rush Republicans would do the same.
And he would.
Yeah.
Maybe.
The point is, they wouldn't get away with it.
There would be investigative forces all over Washington trying to get to the bottom of this.
And they wouldn't dare let any Republicans get away with legacy building on the backs of four dead Americans.
But with Democrats involved, hell yes, we'll do that.
No big deal.
Not even a question.
Hillary Clinton, legacy, great Secretary of State versus four dead Americans.
Sorry, the Americans are dead.
What difference does it make now?
And that's exactly what Hillary's attitude was.
What difference does it make now?
Why they died, what caused it.
Why it's sickening.
It's sickeningly frustrating to relive this all.
So Romney blew up his chance to go after them on this.
And because of our desire to avoid appearing partisan, the media is able to run stories today that Hillary Clinton's off the hook, despite Jim Jordan.
Here's the next sound bite from Congressman Jordan.
A terrorist attack, and it's a terrorist attack on September 11th, 2012, days before Vice President Biden had said GM's alive, Bin Laden's dead, the President had this narrative that Al-Qaeda's on the run, but now they got a terrorist attack.
And they have to mislead the American people because it's 56 days before an election.
Their legacy's on the line, and she has the goddess of history looking over her shoulder.
So they mislead the American people.
You look at every step of this, and I am convinced, just as sure as I'm standing here.
It happened because of political concerns this administration had.
Yeah.
And he he again implored the members of the read it, just read our report.
Just read it.
Not gonna happen.
They're not gonna read it.
They don't want to read it.
They don't want to find out anything other than how can they get Hillary off the clock, uh, off the hook, which they are in the process of doing.
And we'll be right back.
Let me give you an example of what I'm talking about.
Press conference, QA with reporters, Dana Bash asking a question to Trey Bowdy, Trey Gowdy, who was the uh chairman of this subcommittee.
She says, Mr. Gowdy, because you chose not to draw conclusions.
Does that suggest that you don't have the goods on placing any blame on the administration, specifically the woman who wants to be the next president of the United States?
Let me repeat her question.
Mr. Gowdy, because this is designed to create the narrative for the rest of the day on CNN.
Mr. Gowdy.
Because you chose not to draw conclusions, because he'd previously said, I'm not into drawing conclusions here.
I don't do the why.
I do the who would win.
That's what he was.
I do the who what when.
It's just the facts, ma'am.
The conclusions you can draw your own after you read the report.
So he said that a couple three times.
So her question, Mr. Gowdy, because you chose not to draw conclusions.
Does that suggest that you don't have the goods placing any blame on the administration specifically?
If you had read the report, if you had the modicum of knowledge of what goes on, you couldn't ask this question.
Of course, everything that happened here is the goods placing blame on this administration.
Here's Gowdy's answer.
Dana, shockingly, that was not what the House asked me to do.
Look at the resolution.
The resolution doesn't mention Secretary Clinton.
Speaker Boehner nor Speaker Ryan have ever asked me to do anything about 2016 presidential politics.
Speaker Bohner asked me to find out what happened to four of our fellow citizens, and I believe that that is what I have done.
You are welcome to read the report.
I hope you will.
I know you will.
If you at the end of reading that report can conclude that it is about one person instead of about four people, I will be shocked.
So the answer, what us?
No, no, no.
No, no.
This isn't about politics.
No, no, no, no.
We're dead serious.
We want to get to the bottom of what happened.
No, no, no.
This is not about going after Hillary Clinton.
Oh, really?
You're not going after Hillary.
Okay, fine.
Because you you didn't find anything on her anyway, right?
Well, no, we didn't draw any conclusions.
Okay, so Hillary gets passed.
Panel found no wrongdoing.
Then there was an unidentified reporter got in on this, and here's how that sounded.
There are bumper stickers and t-shirts all over this country that say Hillary Clinton lied, people died.
Is that true?
You don't see that T-shirt on me, and you've never seen that bumper stick on any of my vehicles, and you've never heard me comment on that.
I'm asking you to read it.
I'm not, I'm not gonna tell you what to be on the lookout for.
I actually trust you to read the report for yourself.
They're not gonna read it.
They don't care what's in it.
All they want out of this press conference is to be able to walk out of there saying that they have no goods on Mrs. Clinton.
And like this their bumper stickers and t-shirts all over the country, Hillary Clinton.
Do you ever hear them worry about that when that was true of George W. Bush?
And Gowdy, he wasn't gonna go there.
No, no, no, no, I'm not saying she lied.
I'm not the report says she lied from beginning to end.
Finally, Mike Pompeo, he worked on the summary report with Jim Jordan.
He had a uh QA.
He said, Mr. Pompeo, is Hillary Clinton's leadership morally reprehensible?
Yes, it is.
Absolutely.
We worked our tails off to develop every fact we couldn't, to tell the American people everything we could possibly glean.
And we have been obstructed every step along the way in that effort, including by the very Democrats today who are calling us political with respect to my statements about Secretary Clinton.
I believe them in my heart.
Meaning she's reprehensible.
Morally reprehensible.
Why would she be characterized and morally reprehensible if they found no wrongdoing?
But that's their story, that's their narrative, and they're sticking to it.
Oh, yeah, there's all kinds of stuff besides this going on.
I just I wanted to focus on this because it's well, it's important.
It it fully exposes the Democrats as a bunch of frauds and liars and pose a great danger.
▲
Export Selection