All Episodes
Previous Next
June 22, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:49
June 22, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Now, folks, and don't get the wrong idea.
There's all kinds of other news out there today, too.
For example, this, a federal judge in Wyoming has made permanent a temporary block of an Interior Department rule setting stricter standards for hydraulic fracturing on public lands.
This is a dramatic blow to Obama's environmental agenda.
The judge, U.S. District Judge Scott Scavadal issued a ruling late yesterday invalidating the regulation saying the Interior Department lacked the authority to issue it.
Well, at least we got them on one.
They've gotten away with about 5,000 of these edicts that they are they are technically don't have the power constitutionally to make.
The EPA can't issue law, but they've been doing it because, again, there hasn't been anybody trying to stop them.
Because it's been feared that any attempt to stop the Obama regime would be seen as racism by voters, and we can't have that.
But uh finally a federal judge has spoken of you guys don't have the authority, you don't have the power to shut down this kind of operation on federal lands.
If Congress doesn't do it, you can't do it.
This is Obama trying to stop fracking everywhere he can and a federal judge.
There was a temporary stay, and it's been made permanent now, with a final ruling.
And we had a morning update today on the uh you remember we've talked about this a long, long time ago.
I'm just giving you a tease of some things that are additional.
We're not going to get to them in detail right now.
Back in the 90s, the left thought the way to promote safe sex was to give away condoms under the theory that you couldn't stop the kids from having sex anyway.
So the idea was to make it safe sex.
So he started giving away condoms, started demonstrating how to use them on cucumbers from the sixth grade on.
Remember that, Dawn?
I'm sure that excited you.
And so the theory was that since we taught them how to use condoms, and we're telling them that can't we can't stop them from having sex anyway, Mr. Limbaugh.
They're just gonna do it.
We can stop them from buying guns.
We can stop them from voting Republican.
We can stop them from doing everything.
We cannot stop them from having sex.
No matter what young age we're talking about.
So the best thing we can do is to make it clean, make it safe, and wall of the condoms.
Well, now they've had a bunch of years here to study whether or not free condoms actually helped anything.
What do you think the answer's gonna be?
There's that and much more coming up, but we stick now with the presidential campaign.
Back to the audio sound bites of Donald Trump's speech today.
And we are gonna get to your reaction to it, because you're I know you're eager to weigh in here as soon as we get a little bit more of it aired, because some people didn't hear it and didn't see it.
And before we get to your reaction, I want the audience here as informed as they can be on what was actually said.
Here is Trump quoting from Peter Schweitzer's book.
This is what so upset David Rodham Gurgen, went out there and said, You can't do this, you can't start slandering Hillary Hillary Clinton like this.
That book's been totally fully discredited.
It hasn't been.
The New York Times, the Washington Post have both quoted from it.
The book has not been discredited, nor has the movie that has been made.
The movie, they they actually they did something clever.
They made a docudrama movie type uh of the contents of the book, and they they rented a theater in Cannes in France on the first night of the Cannes Film Festival, and they ran it in that theater.
It had nothing to do with the Cannes Film Festival, but the way the way they ended up having it written about it made it look like if you didn't know that the Clinton Cash movie was part of the Cannes Film Festival.
It was not.
It was in a theater theoretically across the street, but it does have a wide national release, I think on the first day of the Democrat convention.
So here's Trump referencing it.
We're number six here.
Audio soundbite number six.
Hillary used the State Department to enrich their family and at America's expense.
Let's go back and play this from the beginning where people could hear what he actually said at the beginning, because that's where he mentions the book.
Three, two, one.
The book, Clinton Cash by Peter Schweitzer, documents how Bill and Hillary used the State Department to enrich their family and at America's expense.
She gets rich, making you poor.
Here is a quote from the book.
At the center of U.S. policy toward China was Hillary Clinton.
At this critical time for U.S. China relations, Bill Clinton gave her a number of speeches that were underwritten by the Chinese government and its supporters.
These funds were paid to the Clinton's bank account directly while Hillary was negotiating with China on behalf of the United States.
Tell me, folks, does that work?
She sold out our workers and our country for Beijing.
Here's the the next bite in which Trump sort of mocks one of Hillary's latest campaign slogans, in which she he points out, you know, with her, it's all about her.
A Hillary campaign slogan is what you need to be saying about her.
This is how Trump exposes it and responds to it.
Hillary Clinton wants to be president, but she doesn't have the temperament or, as Bernie Sanders said very strongly, the judgment to be president.
She does not have the judgment.
She believes, she believes she's entitled to the office.
Her campaign slogan is I'm with her.
You know what my response is to that?
I'm with you, the American people.
Let me tell you something.
That one is being quoted and repeated all over the Internet today.
Many of the emails that I have received cite that as a as a great sound bite.
And of course, he's right.
Hillary Clinton is so self-absorbed.
All of these people are.
It's all about them.
Obama's the same way, and that that's the way news coverage of these people is.
As I have so delicately and elegantly advised and explained.
So let's let's take the Trans-Pacific Partnership, just to pick a story.
They don't tell us what it is.
I'm talking about the drive-by's.
They don't tell us what it is.
They don't analyze it, good or bad for America.
They don't analyze it good or bad for the American people.
They don't tell us whether it's going to help or hurt job creation.
No, no.
They covered will Obama get it.
Will Obama get what he wants?
Or will he not get what he wants?
Will Bill and Hillary Clinton enable Obama to get what he wants?
That's the total spectrum of the coverage.
It's all about them.
They're the MacGuffin.
They never tell us the details of whatever the proposal.
Same thing with Obama care.
They didn't take the time to tell us what was actually in it.
Didn't matter.
It's Obama's, and he wants it.
And therefore our job is to help him get it.
And so the coverage every day, were the Republicans being mean to Obama, were the Republicans doing everything they could to stop Obama just because he wanted it, it was automatic, it should happen.
That's what Trump means.
She is so self-focused.
Just because she wants it, just because she's entitled to it, it should happen.
And his illustration is she has this campaign slogan.
You're supposed to run around and say, I'm with her.
And Trump says, no, no, no.
My sponsor my response, my slogan is I'm with you.
The American people.
We have uh just a couple of more from the speech.
We could do the whole thing, but ran about 45 minutes.
We just picked some highlights here.
Here's the next.
The Hillary Clinton foreign policy has cost America thousands of lives and trillions and trillions of dollars and unleashed ISIS across the world.
No Secretary of State has been more wrong more often and in more places than Hillary Clinton.
Her decision spread death, destruction, and terrorism everywhere she touched.
Among the victims of our late ambassador, Chris Stevens, I mean, she what she did with him was absolutely horrible.
He was left helpless to die as Hillary Clinton soundly slept in her bed.
That's right.
When the phone rang, as per the commercial at three o'clock in the morning, Hillary Clinton was sleeping.
She started the war that put them in Libya, denied him the security he asked for, then left him there to die.
To cover her tracks, Hillary lied about the video being the cause of death.
Okay, so you and I all know this, and we've said it ourselves countless times, but when have you heard such a pointed allegation slash criticism of her at this high a level?
Have you heard Mitch McConnell ever say?
Have you heard Paul Ryan?
I'm not trying to call anybody out.
I'm just trying to pick high-ranking Republicans.
Have you have you ever heard anybody try to discredit Mrs. Clinton on that?
Did they go after Obama on this?
Well, yeah, a lot of people did, but I'm not at this level.
And on this level is important because at this level is how everybody hears about it.
Not just in bifurcated media.
Here's the next bite.
We'll take a break after this one and get back to your call.
Hillary Clinton may be the most corrupt person ever to seek the presidency.
To cover up her corrupt dealings, Hillary illegally stashed her State Department emails on a private server.
Her server was easily hacked by foreign governments.
Then there are the 33,000 emails she deleted.
Well, we may not know what's in those deleted emails.
Our enemies probably know every single one of them.
So they probably now have a blackmail file over someone who wants to be the president of the United States.
This fact alone disqualifies her from the presidency.
Well, there's a little little tit for tat there because yesterday Mrs. Clinton's whole point was that Trump is temperamentally unfit.
He is saying she's legally and morally unfit, that she's the most corrupt person ever seeked the presidency, and focusing on these emails.
And he he mentioned in another bite today that it's clear something happened, but it looks like nothing's gonna happen to her.
And he the implication was that because everything's rigged, everything's rigged for the big power players, that nothing happens to them in ways that would happen to average ordinary people.
They escape this stuff and they're allowed to get away with it.
And here she is being called on it.
So that's a series of excerpts.
Uh the the Trump close to his speech, you might I've I've I've mentioned to you that uh all during last fall, during the campaign, when everybody was discombobulated, trying to figure out why in the world Trump was doing so well.
They thought Trump was out saying things that would disqualify him, is eventually going to step in it.
He's eventually going to put his foot in it and mouth too big and not be able to recover.
Everybody's waiting for that implosion and it never happened.
And I reminded everybody, I said, you don't know how to watch this.
You don't know what you're watching.
You're not watching a candidate with supporters out there.
You're watching something much, much different.
You're watching somebody appear who has a deep bond with his audience, whether you want to call them supporters or voters or followers.
As he's got a deep bond.
And if you listen carefully, you'll find out why.
It may take five seconds, it may take thirty seconds, but in every Trump public appearance.
He let it be known how honored he was they were there, how honored he was they supported him, and how grateful.
Sometimes he did it in five seconds, as I say, sometimes he spent 30 seconds, but he did it at every appearance.
Mrs. Clinton doesn't have the ability to do it because she doesn't feel it.
Mrs. Clinton doesn't is not humbled by support.
She's more of the royal queen mentality where you'd better support her.
That's your role.
She's entitled to your support, and it's matter of fact.
There's nothing special about it.
It's just you better do it.
If you doubt me on this, I want you to do something.
Maybe uh maybe I maybe Coco can do this.
Little little photo expose.
Coco, do this.
Go out and get some recent pictures of Kate Middleton and uh Prince whatever his name is Prince Andrew, not Andrew.
Prince Prince Prince.
No, it's not Harry.
Harry's the print Prince uh.
What I don't know the guy's name.
Showing no Andrew's Charles' son.
This is this is Niana, not Charles's son, but uh Prince, whatever his name is.
It will when they've when they have a baby, here's what you take a look at the first public pictures of them leaving the hospital with her holding the baby, and Prince, whatever his name is standing next to her, and then the family in the background.
I'm telling you the Clintons stage their photos identically.
When ch when Chelsea comes out holding her baby, and the husband who's nobody's name can think his name either, but Mark Mizvinsky, then you've got Bill and Hillary in the background, like like Queen Elizabeth and Prince Prince, whatever his name is, uh Prince uh Philip.
I mean, they stage these photos almost identically to the way the royal family stages their hey, look at our new baby pictures.
They think they're royalty.
And so Hillary doesn't take time to thank people for their support, and she doesn't she doesn't fundraisers, I'm sure.
But in public, nah there's nothing.
She doesn't have she didn't have the ability to.
She doesn't have a connection with people like that, so there's nothing for her to really appreciate.
Uh but Trump does.
And the close, this is my point, the close to his speech today exactly was that.
Yeah, a little bit longer than 30 seconds.
Okay.
Prince William, that's the guy's name.
I I was not trying to be insulting.
I really couldn't remember his name.
She runs the show in that in that relationship.
Anyway.
Okay, we're gonna start on the phones uh with Robert in Tampa.
Robert, I'm glad you called.
Great to have you with us on the EIB network.
Hello.
Nice to speak to you, Rush.
Good afternoon.
How are you doing?
Very well, sir.
Thank you.
Appreciate that.
I had a question about uh Donald Trump's uh speech this morning, and uh I was wondering that is this the beginning of a new tactic to come out swinging and uh trade uh insults back and forth with the Democrats and uh a race to the bottom, which was what I've heard time and time again.
Or are we gonna get specific in this race?
I know it's early, but uh it was refreshing to hear Donald Trump uh come out as plain spoken as he was instead of uh uh this kind of uh Wait a minute, I'm confused.
I th I thought you with your first question, are we going to continue to uh sink low?
We're gonna get specific.
Uh as though you're unhappy with this speech.
I am unhappy because uh the American people are uh suffering, and we're suffering greatly.
And uh what this comes down to is the electorate is what it comes down to.
Forget all the speech making and all the insults because they're gonna they're gonna be there.
But 270 is the number.
You know, why don't why do I never get calls like this when it's only Republicans being insulted?
When Democrats are insulted like I get calls like yours saying, when's this gonna stop?
When are we gonna raise the level of discourse?
But when Hillary Clinton and and and and uh Bill Clinton and and uh Obama were out there destroying Mitt Romney this time four years ago, I didn't hear a single person worried about the tone of the campaign.
In fact, when Harry Reid was lying about Romney, some friend told Harry Reid that Romney hadn't paid his taxes in ten years.
This is after Romney killed a family dog, making it ride on the roof of the stash wagon on family vacation, after Romney didn't care about some employee's wife dying of cancer.
And I didn't hear anybody complaining about the low ball nature of the campaign.
And all of a sudden Hillary becomes a target, and when are we gonna get back to specifics?
Rush the electorate, you know, we've got serious issues out there.
Um you you said it yourself out there, Robert, it's it's early, and uh the the official campaign hasn't even really begun.
But I think what's going on here is pushback perfectly timed.
Look, let me tell you something.
The Democrats, it is obvious if you listen to the media, You have heard Obama praise to the Hilt for how he destroyed Romney last June, June four years ago, when Romney didn't have any money to spend.
Romney had a lot of money, but not money he could spend before the convention.
And so you've had all these commentators praising Obama in his campaign for being brilliant for defining Romney in June.
You've probably read stories where that's when the election was won.
Okay, fine.
Democrats are doing it again.
They sent Hillary out there yesterday, and every other aspect of a Democrat campaign is aimed at marginalizing Trump or destroying Trump or defining Trump in a negative way.
And I look at this today as pushback.
Which we don't normally get on our side.
We got some pushback today.
And we got not just pushback.
Oh, yeah, it's what you say about me.
Well, here it's double for you.
I it may sound schoolyard, but that's exactly what is happening.
Today is long overdue.
You know, Hillary's speech.
Yesterday it was practically nothing but personal attacks on Trump.
When are we going to get specifics about issues?
Mrs. Clinton's speech yesterday was was fraudulent from the get-go.
Hillary Clinton began her speech yesterday under the assumption.
It was it was odd.
You know, I it tried to do two things.
It tried to portray a really solid growing economy while being critical of it at the same time.
I was listening to it and reading it on on two separate occasions, and uh I've always during this whole campaign been fascinated how the Democrats talk about how this country is in such bad shape.
They've been running it for seven and a half years.
They've been in charge of it.
Everything.
There hasn't been any serious pushback.
They've gotten everything they've wanted.
And they're continuing to whine and moan.
That's why I'm talking about selling pessimism.
I've never seen apocalyptic pessimism sold so well.
But they've they've mastered that.
And then at the same time, she's portraying herself as a great fixer as a as a great improvement.
But that was it.
There was nothing specific.
All we got was the same rigor morale about roads and bridges needing being repaired.
Well, I thought we fixed that with the first stimulus bill in 2009.
I know I'm being facetious.
There wasn't any money that went to Rhodes and Bridges.
That's the point.
We've already been bled dry for that.
Obama already said we need to rebuild roads, bridges, crumbling schools.
That's why we needed almost a trillion dollars, his second month in office.
He got the money.
He's gotten pretty much in the last budget, he got more than he asked for.
So the Republicans could be seen as cooperative.
So the Republicans would hope people would see them as making government work and making Washington work.
So Obama got even more than he asked for.
Tax revenue is coming in at a record clip, and the economy still has 94 points seven million people not in the workforce.
And Mrs. Clinton comes along and starts mouthing the same complaints about the economy that Obama mouthed during his campaign and even after he had been immaculated in office.
I'm sorry, inaugurated.
So I'm sitting here and I marvel at this.
How do they get away with this?
And I say to myself, it all comes down to one thing.
Good intentions.
They always get the benefit of the doubt on good intentions.
Their branding has been such that we are not supposed to examine the results.
We're not supposed to look at the outcome of their governance, of their policies.
Doesn't matter.
We're only supposed to look at their intentions, which is the same thing as looking at their big hearts.
They love people, they want the best for people, they want to never mind it, they never deliver it.
All that happens is the overall situation worsens for the greatest number of people.
So you listen to Hillary make her speech and just you just scratch her head.
So, but there weren't any real specifics.
It was all platitudinal things about how she's going to improve this and make that better.
And I'm saying, what needs to be better?
You guys have had seven and a half years of a run here at Utopia.
Why isn't it a utopia yet?
You've had seven and a half years.
How many more years do you need to perfect the human condition, which is what progressivism claims to be all about?
How many more years do you need to get the economy right?
How many more years do you need to accomplish what you want to accomplish?
You've had seven and a half uninterrupted years.
But she didn't get specific.
All she did was impugn and maligned Trump over and over again and con I didn't hear anybody after that speech whining and moaning about how Mrs. Clinton didn't get to the issues.
And I didn't hear anybody whining and moaning about how Mrs. Clinton didn't get to the specifics.
And I didn't hear anybody whining and moaning about how Mrs. Clinton took the campaign to the gutter.
No, all we got predictably saw from the usual drive-by suspects was what a great speech it was.
And how Hillary finally took it to that reprobate Trump.
So Trump answers in kind today, did get specific on some issues as well.
And all of a sudden now, as I say, here we are worried about the tone.
Here we are worried that the campaign is descended into the gutter.
Let me just tell you something.
Half of this country's in the gutter.
Have you ever spent any time on Twitter?
It's a sewer.
Sad to say a lot of people react to it.
Sad to say a lot of people think that's what daily conversation is, is combat.
I mean, you gotta deal with what is.
You can sit there and do one of two things.
You can sit there and lament that our culture has gone to total rot and criticize the people who are rotten and have taken it there, or you can try to relate to them.
However, you think you can to try to convert them away from the Democrat Party, or to at least expose the people there the support of the Democrat Party's bunch of frauds.
But look, everybody has millennials on their minds, don't they?
Everybody has the young vote on their minds.
It seems axiomatic in every campaign.
Well, I have to tell you, the millennials are a pretty pessimistic bunch.
They're pretty apocalyptic bunch, but the problem is they don't blame current officeholders for it.
They just think the country's run its course.
They need to be told something different.
You remember Thomas Sowell?
I interviewed Dr. Sowell for the Limbaugh letter within the past year, and he said something to me that totally surprised me, which doesn't happen much.
So much so that I gave it away before the issue was published and told you what he said.
He said, You remember this?
He said that he believed he was really scared that if Iran attacked us with a nuclear weapon that Barack Obama would not retaliate, that he would surrender.
And I remember reacting in a shocked and surprised way.
He said, Dr. Sowell, you surrender?
I mean, I can understand maybe not replying.
Surrender?
He said, I really think he would, Rush.
I think he would surrender.
I think there is no way Obama would ever reciprocate in kind.
There's no way Barack Obama would ever hit Iran in a similar way.
And since Iran had shown that they're willing to nuclear hit us to stop the next one, he would surrender.
And I said, You mean we would become a Sharia law satellite?
He's I'm scared to death that that's what would happen exactly.
Well, where do you think today's millennials are?
Let's take the universe of millennials and the 18 to 34 demographic, and let's say, let's compare it to World War II, just for the fun of it.
I'm not saying one's better than the other.
Let's come.
When the Japanese attacked us, Pearl Harbor, and when, of course, FDR decided we need to enter European theater, what happened?
We had people the whole the whole country mobilized behind the effort.
Women started working in the factories, that's where Rosie Riveter comes into being.
Our Our manufacturing engine just went into maximum high gear.
We started producing airplanes and weapons and tanks and armaments.
It was incredible the way this country ratcheted things up for the war effort.
And even after 9-11, what happened after 9-11?
How many young men immediately joined the military?
Well, do you think what do you think would happen here?
We are in Barack Obama's America in 2016.
We've had how many terrorist attacks here?
We've had at least one a year since Obama's been in office.
Now we've not had mass like 9-11.
We haven't had anything like Pearl Harbor.
But do you detect after any one of them any scintilla of emotion that says retaliate?
It's the exact opposite, is it not?
Do we not start looking at reasons why we're to blame for it?
Do we not looking for reasons to justify why, for example, Mateen did it?
Or the San Bernardino II?
Do we not start asking why do they hate us so much?
So the question is so alright, not just on Obama.
But if something like that did happen, do you think the military-aged segment of our population?
Look, you can't.
Okay.
Do you think that there would be a majority mindset for retaliating?
You look at World War II.
I went to the American cemetery at Normandy.
You go to the Vietnam Memorial, the one thing that's going to strike you is the number 19, the average age of soldiers who are killed.
By definition, they're the most fit, they're the most capable.
That's who gets deployed in a conventional war.
Now, having said that, I must also, you know, one of one of my great areas of appreciation is what happened at Pointeho on D-Day, where the Rangers repelled straight up the cliffs.
We don't fight wars that way anymore.
That kind of fighting is not necessary anymore.
Now we got laser guides that we can take, if we were trying to take France, take Normandy today, there wouldn't be a massive landing of troops on the beach.
We would have laser-guided bombs taking out those German guns if the German gun installations were the same.
But if they were, that's how we deal it.
We wouldn't have to put people on the beach repelling up the cliffs to take them out.
We could take them out in other ways.
But even if that, but the mindset, what percentage of the 18 to 34 population today, if we were seriously attacked by a genuine enemy that was without question an act of war, what do you think the mindset would be?
Surrender?
Or no, no, we can't, we can't re that would just make it worse.
We can't.
No, no, no.
If we retaliate, it's just it's just gonna expand it, it's gonna make it worse.
We whatever.
I I Dr. Sowell is of the opinion that we don't have a national mindset today that would mobilize in defense of the country that it's a cultural thing.
Now, this is a long circular way of getting back to these two speeches.
Hillary's and Trump's today, and our first caller thinking, when are we gonna get to the snaps?
It's not the name calling and so forth.
Name-calling is how people communicate today of a certain age.
It just is.
And if that's the group you want to reach, if that's the group that you want to learn what you think.
Take the high road and hope that the high road's attractive and they come to you, or you can Speak their language and start talking about your enemy the way they talk about theirs as a way of relating to them.
Hey, I'm throwing out possibilities here.
But my my point is, I don't think this was bad.
All this talk about when are we going to get this substance?
There's gonna be plenty of time for that.
The substance, by the way, people are living it.
People are living the misery.
People are living the doom and gloom.
The difference is they've been told it's the best it's gonna be.
They've been told our best days are behind us.
Not in so many words.
We've been told to manage our expectations.
There is no disceptionalism stuff?
Nah.
Get rid of that.
There isn't anybody out there inspiring people to shoot for the stars.
There isn't anybody out there trying to inspire people to be better than.
Well, they're actually we have a couple sponsors that do, John Maxwell and so forth, but I'm talking about in the in the political world.
When's the last time from the Democrats?
Is there any Democrat who ever spoke like John F. Kennedy spoke?
Is there a Democrat today speaking of upbeat optimism?
America can do spirit, greatness, and all that, and the future's in your hands, and you can make it what you want in the world is possible.
No.
It's the exact opposite of that.
Jeff, take a break.
Back with more.
Your phone calls coming after this.
And look, here's another question that I have.
If Hillary Clinton has the answers for the economy, why doesn't she tell Obama what to do now?
Why do we have to wait until she maybe gets elected and then gets inaugurated and then starts putting her ideas into practice?
If she's got the answers, why wait?
Why does she make an appointment with Obama, go into the Oval Orifice and say, Barack, this is what we need to do to fix the economy?
To which he's gonna say, uh, there's nothing wrong.
I understand what you're doing, uh, Hillary, but we're human.
I don't know what this is not who we are, what you're doing.
Well, I don't get it.
Now I'm being facetious.
Of course, she doesn't have the answers to what to do.
The answers that she wants to implement are gonna doom us.
It is it would be one of the final nails in the coffin that buries the United States of America as founded and would then carry on this transformation these people are trying to implement.
You see what the NPR headline, National Public Radio, did you see what their headline the Trump speech is?
No, I'm sure you didn't because you didn't go there, but I did during the break.
They headline at NPR, they just posted it.
Trump just gave the speech, Republicans have been waiting twenty years to hear.
It's the speech Republicans have been itching to hear in a crystallized way since the 1990s.
Trump gave them exactly what they wanted and likely quelled some fears about his candidacy.
They might not be totally behind him, but Republicans are vehemently opposed to her.
It's a pretty good observation on Republicans have been wanting to hear something like this for years.
You know what the Democrats are doing today in the House of Representatives?
They're actually conducting a sit-in.
I actually saw a picture, John Lewis and Nancy Pelosi sitting on the floor of the House of Representatives, like children, like Occupy Wall Street to protest the defeat of gun control bills in the Senate.
A moment of silence, a moment of relief, a moment of truth.
So many names to the men.
Don't do!
No break!
No break!
No mail!
No break!
I don't I don't know if you can understand it.
They're saying no break, no bill, no break, no bill.
And what they started was Pelosi saying a moment of silence, a moment of peace, a moment of truth.
And then there was a moment of silence for so many names to remember.
I think she was talking about Democrats gunned down in Chicago.
Kinda, kind of doubt.
Kind of doubt that's what was in her mind at the moment.
It is the fastest three hours in me to you.
Great to have you with us.
Rush Limbaugh.
First two hours are in the can.
They're on the way over to the Limbaugh Broadcast Museum.
Which is a virtual museum.
If you haven't visited it, you should.
In fact, if it's been a while since you've been to RushLimbaugh.com, you should go.
It's voluminous.
It's encyclopedic.
The content, not just reflecting the content of this show every day, but the accumulated encyclopedic content available on the pr on the website is uh unparalleled.
We're very proud of it.
We continue to be.
We'll be back before you know it.
▲
Export Selection