All Episodes
Previous Next
June 21, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:48
June 21, 2016, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 Podcast.
Hey, look, folks, I don't care how you slice it out there.
There is a degree of panic and concern on the Democrat side about Trump versus Hillary.
And I have the telltale signs to back that up.
They've got the CNN poll out there.
And they're not happy about it.
Now the drive bys are trying to present it as though it is just wonderful news for Hillary, but it isn't.
When you factor everything in, it is not good news.
And if you go to the right places in the drive-by media, you will see that certain members give it all up, give it away.
Um the way to look at this is given the apparent.
See, everything here is apparent.
Everything's being judged.
They're judging Trump by the same old standards that you judge every other normal politician by.
You can't do that.
So they're looking at Trump and the fact he didn't have any money compared to Hillary.
They're looking at Trump and they don't see a campaign organization.
They look at Trump and they say, big deal if he fired somebody.
Big whoop.
People get fired in campaigns all the time for all kinds of different reasons.
But they're looking at all this stuff and they're thinking this guy isn't even serious.
Then they go over to the Republican side and they see that there's a near mutiny in there at the convention.
They're still plotting ways to overthrow Trump, given that Hillary ought to be up 7030.
And she's barely up above the margin of error.
And in certain areas of the CNN orc poll, Trump is cleaning her clock.
This poll is not satisfying.
It is not uplifting.
It is not pleasing to the Democrats.
They're only acting like it is.
And I tell you here's the dead giveaway.
This is a this act, the CNN headline on their own poll.
Clinton tops Trump, but neither prompts excitement.
That's the dead giveaway that this is not going the way the Democrats thought it would go.
They have been thinking since last June.
By the way, greetings, Rush Limbaugh here.
Notice that I'm so interested in getting strict to the issues.
I don't even have to get into the ego aspect of this and mention my name, because you all know who I am anyway.
And by now you all know the phone number 800-282-2882.
They figured the Democrats night now.
And some of the establishment Republicans who cannot take themselves out of the mold.
They cannot get themselves outside the box and look at this in the right way.
They've never been able to.
You can't plug Trump into the standard ordinary everyday procedures of party politics.
But they're trying to.
And when they do, of course, Trump's look he looks terrible when you plug him into that playbook.
But the polls are not showing that.
Now, as I say, the way they're writing the polls would uh make the average ordinary low information voters think it looks bad.
But to us seasoned veterans here, uh the Democrats, excuse me, Democrats have been thinking privately.
There have been some exceptions to this.
Privately, the Democrats have been thinking ever since Trump first insulted Mexicans and McCain that this is going to be a cakewalk.
They have believed it's going to be a cakewalk, and they've been biding their time, and they've been biting their tongues.
They have been doing everything they can to make it look like they consider Trump to be a serious opponent, but they never have thought that.
In the bowels of the Democrat Party advisory caucus, like with Carville and with uh Bigala and these guys.
Now, Carville, Carville may have been up to speed on this in the beginning.
He may have had a proper level of concern about it.
But I guarantee to most of the other places they have thought this could be a slam dunk.
And the Democrats, you know, they've gone through their own ups and downs.
You get crazy Bernie over here.
Hillary couldn't close that out without monkeying with the rules and the using the elites playing their power card over there.
So the way they look at this, Hillary should have been running away with this should be over.
The polls that are upright right now should show Trump with no chance whatsoever.
That's just not the case.
And they're all in a state.
I wouldn't call it panic, but they're concerned.
Let's go through some of the some of the data points here.
Just to uh just to illustrate.
And yeah, some of the things were uh this is one of the greatest.
I'm just teasing you with some of the other things coming.
A columnist for the Chicago Sun Times.
Oh, this is so good.
This guy is a columnist, and he was assigned the task of showing how easy it is to get a gun.
You know, we had the morning update today about this CBS reporter at who wanted to do the same thing.
They're all going in the gun shops and trying to show how easy they're they'll sell a gun to anybody.
You don't need to get a background check.
It's all a bunch of BS.
You walk in, you fork over the money, they'll give you a machine gun if you want it, is the image that they're trying to portray.
Wait till you hear the details on this clown from the Chicago Sun Times.
I'll just cut to the chase.
The guy, his application was not approved.
They found out he's an alcoholic, and he's got a couple charges of wife abuse or spousal abuse or something, and they would not give him the gun.
He wanted to leave that out of the column.
And his editor said, no, you got to put it in there.
So he put it in there.
But he said that wasn't the real reason they'd let me have a gun.
They didn't let me have the gun because they knew I was a reporter and they knew I was going to try to shaft them.
No, the background system worked.
The guy didn't deserve getting a gun.
He couldn't pass the background check.
He's alcoholic or has had alcoholic issues, I don't know, and spousal abuse issues, charges.
System worked, and it's just classic.
And we got to show you what we're up against.
We have some Kim Kardashian tweets on this that that the problem is Kim Kardashian is thought of as an oracle by I mean, by low information people.
And she's got a series of tweets on how easy it is to get a gun, and background checks don't exist.
It's all wrong.
It's a "no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no"I'm not reading Kim Kardashian tweets.
I don't follow anybody on Twitter.
I'm not no, no, no, no.
The guy who reports to me, I read his report yesterday on his daughter is a millennial.
And he tracks her and her friends and reports to me.
He's the guy that told me that sustainability is a big deal to them.
He's the one sent me this.
He's the one out there following this stuff, trying to keep me up speed so I don't have to do it.
I wouldn't go following Kim Cardin.
Anyway, it's gonna fit right with a Chicago Sun Times piece.
It's gonna go perfectly with it.
So don't worry how I got it.
What does it matter how I got it?
Are you prepared to sit in there and say that your opinion of me might change if you found out that I was following Kim Kardashian?
Don't even go there.
Then there's this uh Secret Service agent who has written this tell all book about Bill and Hillary and so forth.
This is dynamite.
Uh well, Secret Service is mad, and some former agents are mad, but you know, who is this guy?
I can't remember his name, O'Neal, Robert O'Neill.
The Special Forces guy who claims to have pulled the trigger shot, the bullet that killed Osama.
Well, he came out and identified himself and a bunch of people in the special forces community, the SEAL community said, You just don't do that.
We don't, we don't have it's never been done before.
We've had all kinds of secret missions and great heroic acts, and you've never known which seal did it.
So there was it didn't mean he didn't do it.
See, my point is O'Neal went out and said, and he's now a Fox analyst.
He says he's a guy.
He's the one that encountered Bin Laden.
He pulled a trigger, he killed him.
He's made a big deal of it.
His fellow SEALs, when he first did this, let it be known they thought this was a violation of tradition, decorum, propriety, and all that, but that nobody said he didn't do it.
Well, it's the same as this guy writing a book.
Yeah, you got all kinds of people.
Oh, this is horrible.
I can't believe he did it, but nobody's denying it, are they?
Oh, some of them are saying he couldn't.
He he he couldn't been where he would have needed to be to see some of this stuff, right?
Okay.
Um you look, the Secret Service's job is to protect the president.
They're gonna circle the wagons on him.
It doesn't mean the stuff isn't true.
I mean, some of it reads believable.
Like Hillary found out about Monica.
They're having sex there on the desk of the Oval Office, so she put her over in the West Wing, and Clinton hired her back.
Actually started paying her so that he could get her back in the East Wing.
No, Hillary's in the West Wing.
East Wing.
She was in the West Wing.
Hillary took her to East Wing, and then Clinton started paying her, not an intern, paying her so you can get her back in the West Wing.
And then there's all sorts of Bibles and Bibles being thrown and ashtrays being from McGovern's daughter.
What was the McGovern's daughter?
But he knew that.
I mean, that's not Earth-shattering news.
Neither is Barbara Streisand.
That's not news either.
Although this guy may not mention stories.
I haven't read the book.
But we have it coming up.
What else do we have here?
Oh, yeah, there's more in Mateen.
Omar is the Dicky Mateen and the whole ramifications on the Democrat Party, Republican Party, and gay voters and so forth.
So we've got that.
But I didn't spend a lot of time yesterday on Lewandowski folks.
I'll tell you why.
You didn't need there was nothing here that you weren't going to hear anywhere else.
It's not that big a deal.
People get fired in campaigns.
Well, we told you what was important about it, and that is that Trump children were the primary movers and shakers.
And they're out there saying today, yeah, it would not be wrong to say that.
Lewandowski's being a loyal soldier.
He's still out there being uh uh loyal and talking up Trump and so forth.
I'm sure he's hoping he's gonna be hired back somewhere down the road, even if Trump gets elected, uh, or maybe even later on during the campaign.
But the drive buys are looking for Lewandowski to start throwing dirt and dig down.
It wasn't gonna happen.
Lewandowski is uh is loyal to Trump and uh so they're just they're they're they're trying to to do anything they can here to uh uh destroy Trump in June, which is another thing that apparently now we are learning happens to be in the playbook.
June is where campaigns are won or lost.
Who knew?
But now all of a sudden we're finding out that this is how uh Obama beat uh uh Romney did it in June, just like Hillary is now beating Trump in June, ad buys Romney couldn't reply, didn't have the ability to spend the money.
Trump doesn't have the money, and there are other historical uh aspects of this being brought to bear.
But all of this is the conventional wisdom on things, and I still maintain with Trump here, you can't plug him into all of these formulas and systems that you can plug a standard ordinary everyday politician into.
Now they're trying to make Trump into that.
Even some on the Republican side are trying to make sure that Trump starts following the playbook rules and so forth.
But he's uh he's resisting it.
He's on the Today Show today, and he apologized to Elizabeth Warren uh for calling her Pocahontas.
He said it was an insult to Pocahontas.
So he apologized to Pocahontas.
He apologized for calling her Pokemon.
He didn't apologize to her.
He apologized.
So he's uh he's not backing out.
Look, let me take a break here.
We'll come back because I don't want to have a two or three-minute segment on their side of this, start into the polling data.
But it adds up to something that's um uh oh, climate change.
We have more on that today, and there's John Carey, who uh the former uh Vietnam war veteran served in Vietnam, uh, has come out, finally admitted that ISIS is a bigger threat than climate change.
This I know it's funny because but but Kerry admits all this time uh he and Obama and everybody in the regime have been claiming that climate change represents the biggest threat, but now it's ISIS.
Now, why change?
Why do this?
I mean, climate change and the Democrat Party are inseparable.
And And the Democrats making it the number one issue.
There are reasons for this absurd, of course, because there isn't even any evidence that it's happening.
All we have are computer models.
But see, here we have this little heat wave out in the Southwest the past three or four days, and everybody, see, see, it's never been.
I'll bet you you go look at historical temperatures, you'll find days at this time of year, since records have been kept where temperatures are as high, maybe even higher, than what they've been.
But to young people who don't have that historical perspective.
Oh my God, it's never been this.
Oh my God, climate change.
Oh my god, global warming.
Oh my god, we're frying.
Oh my god, we're broiling.
Oh my god, it's over.
Oh my God, the climate change people are right.
And they're not.
They're no closer to being right because of the weather this weekend anywhere than they've ever been closer to being right, because all they've got is computer models.
They don't even have any data.
Climate change is not even about science, it's all thorough.
100% politics.
And the Democrats have found the way to make millennials and young people believe that it's true, and that is by convincing them that their future is inexorably tied to it.
Hello, sustainability.
And uh it's it's a shame what's been done to these people.
The millennials have actually touched on this yesterday.
Liberalism never seen doom and gloom and pessimism so successfully sold.
Now I know that negativism and pessimism are human emotions that are natural.
You know, in other words, you don't have to work hard to be negative.
You don't have to work hard to be a pessimist.
You don't have to reach a certain level of consciousness in order to be negative.
We all can easily do it.
Being optimistic and positive is what takes work.
But the Democrats are not selling optimism.
When you get right down to it, they're not, they're selling pessimism and doom and gloom, and then they link the only hope you have to survive is by voting for us and keeping us in power and expanding our power so that we can go out and punish the people who are ruining your future.
And that's the pitch to young people, and it's worked.
So we've got our work cut out, peeling all that away.
One of the many objectives of this program, day in and day out.
We'll be back.
Hillary Clinton's doing her much anticipated, eagerly awaited speech on the economy.
And it's it's well-timed, by the way.
Her speech is designed to uh portray Trump as an economic novice and neophyte.
The CNN orc poll that has now taken everybody's attention away from the what was it a Bloomberg polar reuters?
I can never get this straight.
The poll that showed Trump down uh 11 points last week.
I'm who was it?
Was it Bloomberg reported a Reuters poll or the other way?
I don't care what it was.
It was that what everybody was feeding off of.
Now we've got this new CNN poll, and it's not good.
And in fact, here's the lead in the CNN poll.
The lead is that the respondents in this poll prefer Trump handling the economy over Hillary 51 to 43.
Way outside any margin of error.
The people in this CNN, or this is why, when you look at CNN today and you watch some of their anchors and analysts talking about this, you're gonna see long faces.
I mean, the economy in their playbook, don't forget, that's the number one voting issue, back pocket stuff.
And to see that the people of this country prefer Trump and and and the way he would deal with the economy over Hillary.
51 to 43, that's not even close.
You're gonna see a lot of long faces, and you might even hear some of them admit that they are not happy with this poll, that they're bothered by it.
Anyway, Mrs. Clinton's out there making a speech right now, and it's just filled with gobbledygook.
One of the things she said is that Donald Trump has so little economic knowledge that he has no idea how President Obama and I grew the economy.
Because you Haven't grown the economy.
Look at the GDP numbers every quarter.
They are revised down.
It's pathetic.
There isn't any economic growth going on.
The government's getting bigger.
The government's collecting more revenue than ever before, but the American people are not earning more, and whatever more they're earning is being taxed.
Then she went on to say that Donald Trump wants to strip away all the protections we have built in to once again make sure the banks can no longer crash this economy by making risky investments, such as the subprime mortgage.
And this is one of the biggest lies the Democrats continue to tell and get away with.
The subprime mortgage crisis is traceable right back to Democrats in the Oval Office.
Specifically Jimmy Carter, but primarily Bill Clinton.
They gave it to us.
They are the ones still in bed with rich bankers and Wall Street firms, and we will continue.
Folks, I'm I'm telling you, Hillary Clinton ought to be the equivalent of a sitting duck in this campaign.
If anybody on the Republican Trump side would just go into this with a little confidence instead of being afraid of her.
Since the Clintons came on the scene in the 1990s, everybody has talked about the Clintons as though they fear them greatly.
I mean, fear them, not just worry about them as opponents, but literally fear them.
And I sorry, I don't see it.
They're not unbeatable.
She's a she's a s she she's a walking contradiction.
She she's not a good campaigner.
She's not a good candidate.
She's here, I just heard something else in the break.
She's out there, once again, the whole theme of this speech how Trump is economically unfit, temperamentally unfit, said danger and so forth.
Part of this is because of the CNN poll showing the public much prefers Trump to deal with the economy than Hillary, 5143.
But she just went out there and said, Donald Trump made a fortune filing bankruptcies and ignoring creditors.
How did you make your fortune, Mrs. Clinton?
Making speeches to bankers.
Now here's the thing.
To me, Hillary Clinton just got through trashing the banks, right?
And she does it every time she opens her bow.
Whenever the economy comes up, Hillary Clinton just trashed the bank.
She accused them of nearly crashing the economy.
She accused them of being selfish and self-focused.
She accused them of taking risks that they should not have been permitted to take, and that she will no longer permit them to make those risky things like subprime loans and so forth.
It's sitting duck.
Her husband demanded that they do it.
Her husband sicked his attorney general on the banks to comply with the demand that they make loans to people that would never be able to pay them back, which is what a subprime loan is.
Hillary Clinton crashes the banks every time he opens her mouth.
And yet she made twenty one million dollars in two years making speeches to those very banks that she trashes every day.
Now you tell me there isn't some kind of a game being played here.
You tell me the fix isn't in.
She just said we can't let Wall Street wreak uh uh wreck Main Street again.
Well, what does that mean?
That means she's gotten all the money from Wall Street she needs for her campaign and her bank account, and now she can go out and start ripping them.
This is the the thing that gets this to me would be so easily refuted.
If we had an opposition party.
And you don't need just the presidential candidate to do it.
The whole Republican Party could be engaged in this.
The banks.
Yeah, yeah, I mean, I look, I don't want to come across as a as a blanket defender here, but there's cause and effect.
The bankers were doing what the Democrat presidents and the Democrat pardon the Washington establishment wanted them to do.
The bankers were forced to implement Democrat policies to secure votes from low income people.
That's all the subprime mortgage was.
It was another rigamarole trick to convince the low-income crowd that the Democrats are looking out for them.
Bill Clinton had a name for this plan.
Every American in his own home or some the American home middle of the American Dream Act or whatever the hell they called it, based on the premise the American dream was owning a home.
Well, everybody knows not everybody can afford a home, but that didn't matter.
The fact that everybody couldn't own a home was one of the signs of how unfair America is.
And the Democrats are going to fix this.
And the way they did it was demand that banks loan money, mortgage money to people who had no way of ever paying it back.
And so what did the banks do?
They found ways to sell that paper as investments.
They packaged all these worthless loans into something called mortgage-backed securities.
They were called brand new innovative products in the financial industry.
And they packaged all of these loans.
You know, it happened to me.
In the 1980s, I bought a home I had no business buying because I I fell prey to the advice of real estate people.
Oh, yeah, you gotta buy a home.
You're throwing money away renting.
Well, they bought I had no business.
I didn't have enough money to buy a home and keep it up and all that.
And I noticed about six months after I had gotten the mortgage and had been making payments, I got a thing in the mail saying my mortgage was now under the control of some other bunch of people.
I had I didn't even, I don't know who they were.
And I didn't know what had happened at the time.
It was only in retrospect I figured out my mortgage and a bunch of others had been packaged and sold to some other firm.
And the way it worked, I didn't know any of this then.
I had no idea what was going on.
It didn't matter, all I had to do was make the payments, and nothing from my end was going to change.
But what was happening was they're packaging all these mortgages and selling them as gigantic pools of guaranteed monthly income.
Because the odds are that most homeowners are going to make their mortgage payment because they don't want to be foreclosed on.
So it was considered guaranteed monthly income.
So they'd package these things together.
Now, this is pre-subprime, but it was still happening.
Well, so when the subprime thing came and they were forced to loan money to people who couldn't pay, but I barely qualified.
And it took some hijinks to do it, but people that couldn't qualify, their loans were packaged and they were sold unknowingly.
It was it was such a scam.
And it was all done so the Democrat Party can run around and tell the low-income crowd, we are your champions.
We are the ones making these evil bankers be fair with you.
We're the ones enabling you to finally own a home and be part of the American dream when normal American capitalism will not permit you to do it because it's unfair and blah, we're your championship.
All that rot got.
And they used pressure, the the threat of government sanction against banks to make them comply.
Now, I don't want to portray the banks as entirely innocent here.
There's there's enough guilt to go around the time you get Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
But look at all this stuff rises to the top of my anger reservoir when I hear Mrs. Clinton talk about it.
She does a lot.
She's out there talking about how the big banks nearly wrecked the economy, and yet she's in bed with them.
Twenty-one million dollars in two years, making speeches of twenty minutes.
You think the fix isn't in here?
What in the world can she say in 20 minutes it's worth a quarter of a million dollars?
The answer to that is nothing.
What's happening here is that access is being purchased.
These banks are buying access to Mrs. Clinton on the cum in the hopes that if she is elected, she will leave them alone, not come down on them, and maybe better grant them favorable policies in forthcoming future legislation.
Who knows?
But this is what the game is.
What galls me is that she gets Away with running around ripping these people as though they are her number one enemy that she's got to attack in order to defend the average Democrat voter.
They throw the average Democrat voter overboard every day.
They condemn them to poverty.
They keep them in poverty.
It's a it's absurd.
It's obscene what the Democrat Party gets away with.
Go talk to any Democrat constituent.
Go talk to African Americans.
They've been loyally voting Democrats 50 years.
Ask them how it's been working out for them.
It seems to me they're angrier than ever.
Seems to me they're more divided than ever.
And every group in this country, ditto, particularly if you're voting for the Democrat Party, because Democrats are promising them utopia.
They're promising them you uh unity, they're promising them all the nothing but it's getting worse.
But because they've done such a successful job of demonizing Republicans and conservatives, their voters stay with them on the premise that the only chance they've got is the Democrat Party.
I just I it's 21 million dollars.
She's out there attacking Trump for making a fortune filing bankruptcies and ignoring creditors.
She makes a fortune by strong arming people and selling access to her future presidency.
I have to think, I could be wrong.
I have to think if some of these low information people, I uh I I know I could be wrong, but I as she starts beating up on these bankers and trashing them and blaming them, what do you think would happen if we had a massive information campaign to make sure that every Democrat voter knew she made 21 million dollars in two years making speeches to these people?
What do you think would happen if we could successfully inform all of these Democrat voters that she and her husband and the entire Democrat Party are in bed with these bankers and quontary to the Democrats ravishing these bankers and keeping them honest and all that, that they're in bed with them.
Because it's true, the average Democrat voter hates these banks.
They hate Wall Street, they hate the big banks, they make the assumption that these are all Republican ties.
There is no economic growth.
Everything she's saying can be exposed as untrue, dramatically untrue.
If there's anybody in this race that's unqualified, it's Hillary Clinton.
Now, some of you, well, she look at all the experience she's don't give it experience.
Let's talk about smart.
She's not smart.
She's wrong on everything she believes.
Why isn't that a factor?
Screw experience.
She's wrong on everything.
She's dangerous.
She hasn't done anything to earn this job other than be Mrs. Bill Clinton and be loyal by making sure the things he's done outside the home have not come back to haunt him or her or the Democrat Party.
That's why she's running for president, plus this quest for power that the Clintons all have.
Anyway, the CNN poll shows that despite all this, Trump is preferred dealing with the economy 51 to 43.
And well, as we go through the program today, you're going to hear some CNN infobabes uh talking about it.
They know this is not good.
This whole CNN poll, despite how they're trying to turn chicken you know what into chicken salad, they know it's not chicken salad.
They know that they're a big problem because Mrs. Clinton ought to be already elected based on their assumptions and views of Trump and the campaign as it has developed up till now.
Let's take a brief time.
I want to start getting your phone calls in this hour.
We'll do it next.
We get to go to Ohio, California to start with.
I love this a great place.
This is Christine.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hi, Christine.
Oh, hi, Rush.
You know, it's like everybody else.
It's a pleasure to have the opportunity to talk to you.
Listen, I um unfortunately caught some of Hillary's speech.
Um that she gave us a little bit ago, And she was citing an agency um to talk about the the the list of things that were going to be most devastating to our economy.
Uh the first one being terrorism, the second one being the devastation of Europe, and the third thing, of course, being Donald Trump.
What caught my ear was that she was talking about the devastation of Europe, given that all of the policies that uh this past administration has have been implementing, and the idea of single payer, etc.
etc.
What does she mean?
What did she specifically did she say what she means by the devastation of Europe?
No, she was literally going down, she was trying to get to the number three reason uh of things that would harm our economy.
So number one was they were citing things like terrorism, the devastation of Europe, and then it would be Trump.
So just the fact that she mentioned that Europe is devastated, and these are the policies that she wants to continue and implement in this country.
I thought was rather interesting.
Well, how did you interpret her meaning the devastation of uh of Europe?
Um I know it's hard.
She didn't specify, so what do you think she's talking about?
Um I happen to interpret it that she was just reading off of a list, and she didn't realize that what she was saying is that Europe is devastated economically.
There all the countries are overwhelmed by their immigration policies, their socialist policies economically, um, the deterioration of um their their way of life.
That's how I interpret it, and I don't think she realized that.
She no, she didn't, because I guarantee I guarantee you, Christine, whatever she's talking about in terms of the devastation of Europe, it's not that.
Because she doesn't think anything's wrong with that.
You know, we haven't talked about it on this program.
The Brexit vote, which is coming up Thursday.
This is a vote in Great Britain to exit the European Union.
And folks, this thing is a microcosm for things happening in this country.
The people of Great Britain across party lines want out of the European Union, and the elites in Great Britain and the elites in the European Union do not.
The elites are the only ones doing well, both in individual countries and throughout the European Union as a as a whole.
The elites want it to remain as it is because it's a consolidation of power, and it is the delineation of borders.
It turns Europe into a uh amalgamated set of real estate.
They've got borders in there, but they don't really matter much to anything anymore.
You're stripping away sovereignty, you're stripping away uh national identity and languages and so forth, and all this being done ostensibly to compete with the West economically, but they haven't the foggiest idea how to do it because they don't have any capitalists anywhere to be found in the European Union that have any say-so or power whatsoever.
But what the real dividing line is in the Brexit vote in Great Britain and throughout the European Union is exactly what it is here.
The people of Great Britain are sick and tired of illegal immigration.
They're sick and tired.
Well, and it over there it hasn't been illegal.
They're sick and tired of their culture being watered down and practically disappearing.
They're sick and tired of never-ending immigration and what it means culturally and what it means economically.
Not everybody, because you've got a bunch of liberals in Great Britain like you have here.
But it's uh it's a uh larger number than you might think, and the Brexit vote is closer than anybody wants it to be.
It's gotten to be so close that people are now asking, okay, what are the elites going to do to stack this deck and make sure that they don't lose this.
It is, and it's all rooted on on uh immigration issues and how these countries have growing members of the population who are now aware that every one of these countries in the European Union is at risk of losing their own identity and sovereignty.
They're still gonna have borders, But they won't matter.
And uh it it it's you you've heard the globalists and their desire for new world order and and uh the end of nation states.
That's that's really what the elites in the European Union want, and they've got their supporters here in the U.S. could spend a little bit more time on this if I have time today, but I've still I've got to I've got to stay focused on this uh CNN poll and other aspects of it.
So hang on, there's much more straight ahead.
Clinton leads Trump in Florida, but not by much.
They are tied in Ohio and Pennsylvania.
That's a Quinnipiact poll.
That's not CNN, it's another poll, and it's another example of Democrats not feeling secure and as happy as they expected to at this point in the campaign.
▲
Export Selection