All Episodes
Previous Next
June 20, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:53
June 20, 2016, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Hello, man.
I'm still recovering here, folks.
It was out in Los Angeles over the weekend.
I played golf Saturday or Sunday.
Yesterday it was approaching a hundred degrees out there.
I can't tell you how many bottles of water and diet coca with it.
I just ran out of gas on the, what was it?
The 17th T. Just totally ran out.
And on the on the plane home, I must have consumed every bottle of water we had.
Anyway, we're back.
Great to great to be with you here.
And it and it's uh uh gonna be a great week of broadcast texts.
What do you want to start with here today?
You what you want to start with Trump?
You want to start with uh that what I know this this whole thing with with with redacting the the 9-11 call from the uh from the Islamic terrorist.
If you you want to get a let me just give you a preview of what's coming on that score.
Grab audio soundbite number 23, number 2324.
I mean, this will set everything up that's coming, uh, including on a fascinating email filled with questions about things I said last week about who the left really considers to be their number one enemy.
Um, not militant terrorists, not people who want to murder us, not people they hate us, they're scared of us, they're whatever despise us more than they despise uh Islamist letter writer.
Well, how in the hell can you say that?
How in the hell can it be?
So I've got to prove it again today.
But here, they said a FBI assistant special agent in charge in Orlando Ron Hopper, and he went out there to address the media today.
This is after Loretta Lynch's TV shows yesterday.
So he went out there.
So the bottom line here is here's where we are.
No one can draw pictures.
The religion of peace needs protection is the bottom line.
The religion of peace needs to be protected because there's so much mean-spirited extremism aimed against them.
So much bias, so much present uh prejudice, so much hate extended toward the religion of peace, they need to be protected.
Nobody can draw pictures of the Prophet Mohammed.
Obama cannot publish the words of a believer who is trying to follow the rules, guaranteeing safe passage to 73 raisins.
Well, yeah, it's not virgins.
We got a new interpretation a couple weeks ago.
It's raisins, it's not virgins.
But anybody what is why how did they confuse that?
I mean, what what do raisins have to do with virgins?
How in the world was that confusion?
Where did that start?
Anyway, so we can't draw, nobody can draw pictures of the Prophet Muhammad.
Obama cannot describe militant Islam for what it is.
Obama cannot publish the actual words stated and used by a believer while committing an act of terror who was trying to follow the rules guaranteeing safe passage to the 73 raisins.
Now, not to nitpick here, but how does how does jihad fit in with the religion of peace?
I mean, if if if if we now have to go to these great lengths to protect them.
And just to show you where we are, Ronald Hopper today, this is in Orlando, mere moments ago, speaking about the investigation, which he said could take years, by the way.
Did you hear that?
This incident, the investigation of this instant could take weeks, it could take months, it could take years.
Here's the first of two sound bites and standby.
The killer of 49 and the shooter of 53 others identified himself as an Islamic soldier who pledged allegiance to a terrorist organization which was bent on killing Americans.
He does not represent the religion of Islam, but a perverted view, which based on what we know today was inspired by extremist killers.
We currently have no evidence that he was directed by a foreign terrorist group, but was radicalized domestically.
So, man, oh man, they've even gotten down to the special agent level of the FBI, they send these guys out and say, here's what you're gonna say, and you're gonna say he doesn't represent Islam.
He was he was he was uh it was in he was not inspired.
Uh see uh it does not represent the religion of Islam, but a perverted view based on what we know today was inspired by extremist killers.
But you see, the extremist killers have nothing to do with Islam.
No, no, no, no, no.
The extremist views have nothing to do with Islam whatsoever.
And this special agent of the FBI is telling us, even though the guy pledged support for ISIS, we currently have no evidence that he was directed by a foreign terrorist group, but was radicalized domestic.
What's the difference?
I mean, when you get right down to it, what's the difference?
Here's the next bike.
Part of the redacting is meant to not give credence to individuals who've done terrorist acts in the past.
We're not going to propagate their rhetoric, their violent rhetoric, and we see no value in putting those individuals' names back out there for cowards like this one, people like that influence them, so we're not going to continue to put their names up front.
So we're not, we've redacted everything the guy said about the reasons he did it.
We're just going to redact it.
Because this is almost verbatim for what Loretta Lynch was saying all over TV yesterday.
So the orders have gone out from on high.
How this is going to portray it.
I think what you need to remember are the audio sound bites we had last week from James Calstrom, who was the former head of the New York office of the FBI.
And he explained in his own words the practical application today of countering violence extremism or violent extremism, as we detailed it for you last week.
It is the latest directive from Obama, which does not permit the FBI to gather intel directly from Muslim communities, neighborhoods, what have you, mosques, you name it.
The FBI is not allowed.
They can only, in fact, they're not allowed to con to investigate the social media accounts of uh Muslims who who act commit acts of terrorism and describe it on social media.
They're not allowed, even though they broadcast it far and wide, why they're doing what they're doing, to whom they're going to do it, not allowed to use any of that in the investigation.
Calstrom made it clear our hands are tight.
We cannot.
We can we cannot presume, we cannot accept what we learn.
The only way that the FBI can utilize any intel is if it happens to come from inside the community delivered by somebody there, like a uh rogue informant or somebody in a neighborhood or in a mosque who hears something and then calls the FBI, then they can deal with it.
But they can't go in there and find out on their own.
They cannot look at social media.
And this is the this is the manifestation of it.
Here comes this FBI agent.
This guy was not who he says he was.
This guy, and so we're not gonna publish the words he used because we're not gonna allow this guy, this guy to tar and feather an innocent religion.
We are not gonna allow this guy to do it.
So we're not gonna allow him to continue to propagandize.
These people redact a lot.
They redacted the Benghazi uh hearings report, number of uh the phone calls that that went on that night.
So, I mean, this this is insane.
There's there's no other way to describe this is insane, folks.
It's literally insane.
It is one of the countless number of things that just fly in the face of standard, ordinary, everyday common sense.
And it's things like this that make people start asking questions.
What in the world is going on?
Why in the world is it going on?
What?
You start you start asking these questions, start getting very close to it, uh, and then you have to back off for fear of what might descend upon you.
But it doesn't make any sense.
I mean the the answers to the questions that everybody asks, Why this desperate desire to protect obvious intent on the part of obvious association.
Why protect it?
Why try to go to the effort to make everybody not see what is plain as day?
Why?
You start asking that question, and the answers get very dangerous very quickly.
Well, they do.
That's why, you know, I I myself even said I'm backing off.
I had a guy tell me he wrote a column, trying to answer that question based on my uh frustration with with trying to get right up to it and backing off for fear that literally they may not be any future in going there.
Well, no, I don't think it's that cutting of snurly says only one conclusion we can we can come to now, but we can't say it.
I don't think that's it.
Uh we we would we could go the benefit of the doubt route.
You're you're talking about the president, right?
Right, right, right.
Well, we'd have we'd have to go to the benefit of the doubt uh route if if we wanted to touch on this at all.
Maybe I will get you know, give me some I uh I I I know he's I pledge allegiance, but but see, he he wasn't being ordered by ISIS.
That's that they're saying that he was radicalized by the wall by the internet.
He was radicalized, but he's not really one of them, see.
He's not really one of them.
He just he's just a looney to he got radicalized by radicalized by who?
Who radicalizes?
Other extremists that have nothing to do with Islam?
Who radicalized the guy?
I know, but because you take you take the Allah uh references out, because as I just said, this administration is doing everything it can to protect the religion of peace.
This guy's words of motive, you know, everybody went why when some of this happens, why?
Why did it happen?
Why did the alligator snatch I actually saw speaking of that?
I'm not kidding you.
Over the weekend, I actually saw a serious story somewhere.
I was I was driving, I was not in the position to print it out.
I actually saw a story.
What was the alligator thinking when it snatched the two-year?
I'm not kidding.
What was it was written I shouldn't, well.
What was the alligator thinking?
Serious, serious story.
I didn't have time to read it, so that's a frustrating thing.
I just saw the headline, and I was I was it was time to get out of the car.
I had reached my destination.
So it's time to get out of the car, and I I forgot all about it till just now.
But we're going out our way to protect the religion of peace.
Guy uses the word Allah, guy uses everything that we're accustomed to hearing.
No, no, no.
We're gonna redact that because we're not gonna allow this guy the opportunity for his propaganda.
Now, turn this on any other group, Tea Party, talk radio, you name it, they will do anything, including lie to try to link innocent people to the commission of certain acts of terror.
But with this group, it's the opposite.
Do everything you can to delink it.
Which raises all of these questions.
And then a letter lynch all over TV yesterday explaining this, and the drive-by interviewers listening to it, just accepting it.
Oh, yeah, it makes sense.
Yeah, we must not engage in uh prejudice.
You must not engage in any of that.
And then I know Trump's fired Lewandowski.
We're gonna get to all that here in just a second.
Can't do it all in the opening monologue as I'm now becoming it's becoming necessary to say.
Um, but we got it, it's coming up.
But the official attack on Trump over the weekend, and it's related to this now.
The official Attack on Trump over the weekend was the focus on Trump saying he thinks Muslims should be profiled.
See, you see how this stuff works.
They come out, you have an actual act of Islamic terror stated, responsibility taken, phone calls made, the effort just just as the as the rules of of uh jihad state when you're in the act of committing jihad and you are making the sacrifice for the 73 raisins, you gotta call it in.
You have to proclaim it.
A guy did everything that he was taught to do.
He's the guy we're trying to protect.
He's the guy, and what he did we're trying to redefine.
In the meantime, we're going after Trump for profiling.
In the meantime, we're gonna go out and try to kill Trump for profiling, kill his campaign.
Which another point here.
The polling data on Trump is not as bad as it has been reported.
But let me get to that in in um in due course.
The official attack on Trump over the weekend was to focus on Trump saying that he thinks Muslims should be profiled.
But notice he didn't bring it up.
It was a reporter.
This is kind of like what happened to Romney with that question out of the blue by George Stephanopoulos on uh uh contraception.
Nobody was even talking about it.
It was John Dickerson of CBS, I think it's CBS, who was uh interviewing Trump, brought up the subject of profiling.
Trump didn't bring it up.
But not that there should be anything wrong with profiling.
How in the profiling is common sense, which continues to be the number one victim of our cultural evolution in this country.
Common sense is dying, common sense is under attack, common sense is being slayed, common sense is being silenced.
Good enough for Mayor Bloomberg and the NYPD and even Obama's CIA, they've all worked together to profile Muslims in New York City until later in 2011.
I guess it depends on.
I mean, hasn't Trump even been profiled as a radical extremist by the drive-by media endlessly?
How about Obama?
Do you think Obama doesn't profile?
What was Obama doing when he's complaining about bitter clingers, private fundraiser 2008 San Francisco?
Was it he profiling?
Was it he engaging in prejudice?
Maybe even a little bigotry.
Yeah, they're just a bunch of bitter clingers meaning a bunch of no-nothings, ill-educated boobs, when things start changing for the better, and they don't like it and they don't understand it, they cling to their guns, their religion, and beer busts at the VFW hall.
Isn't that profiling?
And now Hillary Clinton's doing the same thing.
I guess profiling is only wrong when it might save lives and help protect us from a terror attack, then we're not allowed to profile.
Oh, and we're not allowed to profile anybody.
It might be an illegal immigrant.
How do people get on the no-fly list, by the way?
How do people get placed on the terrorist watch list if we don't profile?
But that's okay.
That's okay as long as those lists can be used to keep law-abiding citizens from being able to protect themselves.
But if Omar Sadiki Mateen succeeds in helping the government take away guns from Americans who want to defend themselves, then haven't the terrorists won?
And isn't that perhaps one of the objectives here?
I gotta take a break.
I just saw the clock.
Sorry, back here in a second.
Okay, so you just heard the sound bites from the FBI special agent, assistant agent in charge, Ron Hopper saying that uh we redacted because the shooter does not represent Islam, and we're not gonna go there.
We're not gonna allow him to propagandize things.
I want to remind you what Calstrom said last Thursday night, Fox News Channel.
Megan Kelly said, why is the FBI not getting these guys, even though they're on the radar?
Get this wet blanket of political correctness off the backs of law enforcement, off the backs of the FBI.
Last time I was on you, Megan, I got about 35 calls from agents who are on the job now at different levels saying, boy, you hit the nail on the head.
The rules of engagement.
What the Bureau is being told about what they can do and what they can't do.
They can't go sniffing around.
Anything to do with Muslims.
They can't go around to Moss.
They can't do things that they would normally do.
I'm not talking things that are off the charts.
I'm talking about things that normally would be done, but the orders have come down from the White House.
What about Comey?
He's a director.
Yes.
But Comey can't talk about it either.
I'd like to think if I was the director, I would talk about it.
Comey needs people.
Okay, that's enough to compare that to what we heard from Ron Hopper, who said the killer identified himself as an Islamic soldier.
He does not represent the religion of Islam, but look, the orders have gone down from this regime.
And if you stop and think of it, why would Obama and Lynch allow Mateen to do the propaganda on this?
They set the narrative, not Mateen, and they're gaining control of it.
There are four gun control measures in the Senate today that are going to be voted on.
Oh, because of this attack in Orlando that had nothing to do with it.
See, if it had nothing to do with Islam, and it had nothing to do with Muslims, and it had to do with what?
The easy availability of guns.
You see the magic here?
Yes, my friends, the guns are so easy.
The gun show loophole.
Do you know there isn't a gun show loophole?
What do you think the gun show loophole is?
You think people can go buy a gun at a gun show and not have to get a background check, right?
That's what everybody thinks the gun show loophole.
It's BS.
Do you know this guy?
Who was it?
Uh no, CBS.
It's our morning update for tomorrow.
CBS tried to show how easy it is to get an AR-15.
Which was not what this guy even used.
This guy used a Sig Sour.
Or Sigsawar, I'm not sure to pronounce it.
So they sent this woman into a gun shop to buy an AR-15, and they thought they'd be able to walk in there, panned over the money, and walk out when it starts shooting people.
It took 38 minutes, and they found out that unless she did a couple specific things, she wouldn't get the gun, that it would be turned over to a federal agency to further review.
The whole thing blew up in their faces.
But the gun show loophole, well, you can go to a gun show and some black market dealer will sell you whatever you want.
You'd have to pass the vessel.
It's BS.
It doesn't matter.
Increasingly the facts and truth and none of that, uh none of that matters.
By the way, folks, I found what it was about a reporter at wondering what the alligator was thinking.
It was actually on CNN.
And it was Brooke Baldwin as last Wednesday afternoon, Brooke Baldwin was speaking with Gatorland alligator rescue expert Tim Williams about that incident with the Gator and the two-year-old baby at Walt Disney World in Orlando.
Man, that's just gotta be.
Those poor parents, I can't not.
I cannot imagine.
That's something that they're never gonna forget.
I mean, never gonna leave their minds.
The whole anyway, boy, your heart just goes on to them.
That do you ever forget the mental image you conjure when you hear what happened?
Anyway.
Here's Brooke Baldwin asking a question to Tim Williams of the Gatorland Alligator Rescue Outfit.
He's an expert there.
Number 27.
Audio sound by 27.
Three, two, one.
I guess we don't have it.
There were signs, no swimming.
Uh, you know, I don't know if there were no wildlife signs.
I realize that when you come to Florida, Florida has a lot of gators.
What do you think?
I mean, if the child was walking around the periphery of this lagoon, it was nighttime.
What would the gator be thinking?
you know how big a gator's brain is?
It's about the size of a pee.
I mean, it's tiny, it may be bigger than that, but an alligator is nothing but a pure predator.
They don't think.
Animals don't think.
You know what this reminds me of?
There was a story once in.
Oh, we've got the answer coming up.
Just a second here.
You remember, Snerdley, we had this story.
It was a story out of Pennsylvania, and a couple of cows fell in the ice.
They were walking around.
They didn't know they were on a frozen body of water, and a couple of them fell in.
And the news report had the other cows looking on hopefully.
Hope and fear, hoping that their friends could be rescued in fear that they would fall into.
And the cows just sit there chewing their cud.
They couldn't know a clue.
Clueless.
Okay, one minute the cow's there, the next minute it's gone, big whoop.
I mean, it your dog doesn't think, your cat doesn't think.
They don't think.
They don't have animals don't have any sense of their own self.
I'm getting into deep do-doo here with the pet owners, and I'm there's no bigger one than me.
Folks, but you have to.
An alligator, particularly.
There's no, it's just a predator.
It's just a full-fledged one on.
So is your little cat.
No, no, no.
The alligator's not weighing odds, and the alligator's not deciding, oh, that boy looks so cute.
I think I'll leave him alone.
No, the alligator's not thinking.
It's what happens when you humanize.
These are I, you know, I I we run into alligators all the time on the golf course.
I mean, they're out there, and they're just idiots.
They're sitting around when it's time to eat, they get up and move and go swallow something, and then they go go back and just lounge there like whatever they do.
We sometimes throw golf balls at them just to see them move.
One day, there is a giant.
You've seen some of these videos lately of giant alligators walking on the fairways of golf courses.
Well, one of the golf courses I'm a member of here, there is a giant gator out there, and we know where it is.
And sometimes it's just barely viewable on the surface, sometimes it's on the bank.
Uh when it gets up and starts walking, we stop what we're doing to watch it, because it's the most amazing looking thing.
And then we all, you don't get too close, it think it'd go 20 miles an hour for for like 20 seconds.
You know, gator chases you golf course rules, you have to understand.
Gator gives chase zigzag, that they can't do.
They can catch you if you go straight line.
For 30 seconds, those things can do like 20 or 25 miles an hour.
After that, of course, you know, it's time to go back and grab another bud.
But they don't think.
It's pure instinct.
They just anyway.
Here's what the gator rescue expert said when asked what the gator was thinking as the boy was roaming the beach.
Splashy is a big attraction for these animals.
They could sound like some animal struggling in the water.
They come over there to see what it is.
They think they have a chance to take that animal, they will.
So there's a lot of things that play in on this.
You mean he didn't know?
It was a little boy.
He just thought it was an animal.
Yeah, like an alligator knows what a human being is.
An alligator doesn't even know that it is an alligator.
An alligator has never seen itself.
It doesn't know what it is.
They don't have mirrors.
Alligators can't lick themselves like dogs can't.
They don't know what they know.
Well, okay, they see other yeah, yeah, yeah, they mate, they see other alligators.
I take it back.
They'll know what another alligator is.
But that's instinct too.
You know, that's just typical male predator behavior taking over in an alligator.
That is just like humanity.
You know, men humans, male humans are nothing but predators.
Okay, uh, let me read this letter.
We'll get to the Trump stuff.
Let me say what very quickly.
It apparently the news is coming down that it was Trump's adult children who got Lewandowski fired.
Apparently there is a weekly meeting, strategy session with Trump and his adult.
I don't like the word children, but that's so that's what they are.
Apparently it was Ivanka, Eric, and Donald Jr.
And at the meeting this morning, it was first alluded to by Maggie Haberman in the New York Times, it's since been confirmed.
Well, I don't think I don't know that it's actually officially confirmed, but that story has been uh repeated by the Hill.com and a couple other places.
And apparently it was Eric and Ivanka and Donald Trump Jr. who told their dad, look, he's not serving you well.
You need somebody that knows what they're doing.
Uh it's not a general campaign now.
And so Trump listens to his uh his kids and and Lewandowski was fired, which means that Paul Manafort now has by virtue of this assumed all the campaign management uh power.
Look, we'll get into the Trump stuff here in just a second, but I I want to get to this little email that I got this morning before the program began.
Somebody who heard me last week pointing out that to understand what's going on, you have to understand the modern day Democrat Party from the top down.
Progressives, liberals, whatever, consider us to be a greater threat and greater enemy than even Al-Qaeda or ISIS or any organized terror group.
And I have been of this opinion for years.
And I simply arrived at my opinion by watching, observing.
We see it now.
Here we have an obvious act of terror by an obvious Islamic extremist.
So what the regime is doing is trying to tell no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
There is no terrorism in Islam.
This guy's a pretender.
He was radicalized by others who are not Islam, they're pretenders, and this is the religion of peace, and there is no terrorism there, and we're not going to allow this nutcase to go out and propagandize a bunch of lies.
Right?
Well, uh, let a five-year-old show up in kindergarten with a Confederate flag t-shirt and see what happens.
The kid gets sent home, or let some little kid make a gun out of his thumb and index finger.
kid gets sent home, punished, what have you.
There is zero tolerance for anything that has to do with conservatism.
But with this, we're willing to deny utter cold reality.
Not we, the regime.
Look at that.
Would you look at it's too late now.
Was that Hillary?
Nobody knows it's gone.
Holy smokes.
Was that a burqa?
I realize it's unfair for me to ask, and you can't see what I saw, and neither can I now, because it's gone.
Here's the email.
Dear Maha, I need you to explain this to me.
I don't get how any American can actively lie to themselves and to us about the obvious threats of Islamic radical Muslim terrorism.
I know that you've told us that liberals and progressives hate us more than they hate the real threat of terrorism, but that doesn't fully explain their behavior.
I know the number one tenet in their playbook is to never let a crisis go to waste in advancing their agenda.
But that pales when we are considering lives of Americans.
Well, it should, but it doesn't.
Here you have, and she's right, this was a, you know, Ram and Manuel never let a crisis go to waste.
So here you have an act of terror.
It's a crisis that they want to exploit, but the letter writer here says surely they wouldn't try to exploit a crisis at the expense of defending innocent Americans' lives.
What do you think else is happening here?
So, Mr. Limbaugh, they're now scrubbing the 911 calls made by the Muslim who killed homosexuals in Orlando.
Loretta Lynch goes on Sunday shows, and as the attorney general blames the guns and the gun sellers.
All elected Democrats are deflecting the real issues to get us all focused on gun bans.
The FBI, the CIA, ICE, Homeland Security, are as in the dark and hamstrung from stopping anything as they were when we were attacked a decade ago on 9-11.
They are able to totally ignore the fact that Muslims hate us.
They hate homosexuals.
They hate women, they abuse children, they hate Jews, they want us all to die.
By doing so, they put every American's life at risk.
Islamic terrorists.
Every single person within the government, the entire drive-by media are in agreement with this.
And this is the thing that the emailer is having trouble with.
Okay, so maybe you've got a radical view of this by Obama and Valerie Jarrett, and they order this radical view to be promoted by Loretta Lynch and other people that are going out and publicly speak, like from ICE or the FBI.
But Mr. Limbaugh, every Democrat, every progressive, everybody in this country that votes Democrats agrees with this.
See, the emailer can't believe that there aren't some Democrats who don't think this is all a bunch of caca.
I just do not get, Mr. Limbaugh, that gays can look at what we know to be facts and continue to vote for Hillary Clinton.
It's worse than that.
There are homosexuals in various parts of the country who are saying that they place themselves at risk of danger and violence if they admit they would vote for Trump.
And I look, I understand the sentiment.
Do I owe you I we took the break at 42?
I owe you the break, is what you're saying.
Okay, here I'm just losing track of time.
I'm sorry, folks, this is frustrating for you, because when I got on a roll, there's no one better.
But I have to stop here and interrupt myself.
Be patient.
We'll be right.
Okay, back to this email, Mr. Limbo.
I just don't understand how gays can look at what we know to be facts in this gay bar massacre and continue to vote for Democrats.
I don't get that millennials can look at how Muslims treat women and continue to vote for Hillary.
Now, the the point here is maybe the millennials don't know that maybe the millennials don't know how Muslims treat women.
Now, the gays, that's not the gays, obviously now know, but that's why Obama and the boys are out there saying, eh, it's not Islamic terrorists.
Oh no, no, no, no, no.
And remember now, keep in mind, if they're trying to say that Mateen was just doing nothing but spreading propaganda, was not being honest, he's not really an Islam terrorist and Islamic terrorists, not really even a Muslim.
He was making it all up.
And they're gonna deny him the opportunity to get engage in his propaganda.
Well, why not?
I mean, they are the ones who set the narrative, after all, right?
Why should they allow this guy to set the narrative?
And this from their standpoint, from their point of view.
You know, Obama isn't gonna sit there and let this guy wreak havoc on his administration.
Here's Obama hands off, won't say anything derogatory, and then these militant acts of terror continue to happen, and they continue to happen when the people that commit the acts admit exactly what they're doing.
It flies in the face of Obama's narrative.
So he's not gonna let this guy set the nerves, so of course they're gonna redact these tapes.
Of course they're gonna tell us that this guy was a fraud.
He's not really being honest, because there is no terrorism in Islam.
That's Obama's line, and he's sticking to it.
I just don't get, Mr. Limbaugh, the entire Jewish community would vote for Hillary Clinton, knowing full well what the Democrat Party view on Israel is.
I don't understand that any American can look at the massive illegal immigration from Muslim countries and Continue to vote for Hillary.
I guess I'm trying to apply logic to irrational people.
I guess I'm trying to lay my common sense on the liberals who don't have any.
All the while, the mere fact that Democrats refuse to acknowledge the situations which force the rest of us to go out and buy more guns.
They leave us no choice but to protect ourselves and our families because our government refuses to do so.
There's more, but unfortunately, we are out of busy broadcast moments.
It will continue.
Let me sum up where I was going with this.
Try this headline, details coming up.
Brooklynites.
People live in Brooklyn.
Your average ordinary American Democrat progressive say Orlando was 100% the Republicans' fault.
Why do they think that?
How in the world could they possibly think?
But they do, is the point.
▲
Export Selection