All Episodes
Previous Next
June 3, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:25
June 3, 2016, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So Snerdley just said, maybe you could call into the show if something big happens next week.
Do you know what time I would have to call in?
No, try like 4.30.
Try like 5 a.m.
If I wanted it at 5 a.m., yeah, maybe even earlier.
And with that, you may try to figure out where I'm going.
I know I'll, well, still be up?
No, maybe.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's Open Line Friday.
Well, yeah, I'd have to be up for it to do show prep for the call.
All right.
Anyway, yeah, I know.
If you would have told me 27 years ago that still doing this by this time, being gone a day or two or a week wouldn't be any big deal.
I have more guilt being away today than I did in the first 10 years.
Anyway, greetings to have, great to have you here, folks, and greetings to conversationalists, music lovers, thrill seekers all across the fruited plane.
It's Open Line Friday, and whatever you want to talk about, that's what we talk about.
800-282-2882.
We had a great Open Line Friday caller last guy.
Want to know about why I thought RB music that I played as a DJ doesn't exist anymore.
You know, what happened?
It was a great, great call.
It was fun.
Things like that.
I'm not trying to solicit anything.
I'm just trying to impress upon you that it does not have to be the campaign or politics or anything else.
That's the point of Open Line Friday.
Okay, we're going to take a break from the San Jose riots and the campaign because I've still got Mrs. Clinton's speech and the sound bites from it.
I'm going to get to those in a minute or later on.
But I want to get to the stack that's got nothing to do with this because there's some really, really, really cold and bad economic news out there.
It isn't that par for the course here.
So Obama goes out to Elkhart, Indiana and tries to bask in the glory of this phantom recovery that does not exist and has not existed.
Goes out and tries to claim credit for all this great economic activity, saying things like things are better now than when he took office.
And spending is down.
The debt is down.
Wages are up.
Employment is up.
It's just one lie after another.
38,000 jobs created in May.
And what kind of jobs do you think they are?
38,000.
Have you seen the stories, folks, about robots?
A lot of times people see a story about robots taking over at fast food restaurants.
They'll just zoom past it thinking, you know, that's just, that's not happening.
That's one store they're trying something.
That's so far away.
And you ignore it.
I'm going to tell you something.
It is happening.
It's ramping up fast.
And I'm going to give you three words to explain it.
Minimum wage increase.
It's the same old saw.
Here you have a bunch of central planners, command and control economics experts sitting in national and state capitals deciding that the market is essentially unfair and this needs to be corrected.
And the unfairness of the market is manifesting itself in the fact that nobody's earning enough in the middle class.
People aren't seeing any wage increases, no standard of living increases.
And of course, these central planners never stop to think that it was their previous central planning that has led to this.
Their lack of trust in the market.
Corporate cronyism involving government and various corporations, all kinds of reasons, the phony trade deals.
There's any number of reasons to explain this.
And so their solution is not to back out and let the market make the correction.
Their solution is to tinker and fix it again.
And the minimum wage comes in.
And bamo, here we're facing a $15 minimum wage.
And as usual, the central planners and the command and control economists at central planning say we're just going to mandate a $15 an hour minimum wage and the businesses out there are going to have to suck it up and pay it.
They've got the money.
They've all got a stash of money in the back room they're not using.
They're just hoarding it for themselves.
We know it.
They know it.
Well, it's time that money was paid to their employees.
So they mandate a $15 an hour minimum wage.
And immediately people start becoming unemployed.
Businesses who can't afford it fire people.
Businesses budget.
Responsible businesses budget.
Labor is usually the largest or second largest expense in any business.
You want to get your fixed costs known for as much time in advance of the future as you can for other budgetary planning.
You also budget what you think your revenue is going to be, what your expenses are going to be.
Then you calculate what you hope your profit's going to be, and you start shooting and aiming for it.
And then you hope that the market activity that you're counting on happens.
And if there's an interruption in anything that you plan, then you have to adjust.
That's called dynamics.
Central planners don't understand dynamics.
Central planners think everything is flat, static.
You mandate a $15 an hour minimum wage, that employers are going to pay it.
And people making $10 an hour are going to get a $5 an hour raise, and it's a beautiful thing.
And they can't believe it when that doesn't happen.
Back to the business, any business that responsibly budgets, it's got its fixed costs for labor.
It's a percentage of revenue.
There isn't a stash of money hoarded away that the owner or the CEO is keeping for himself.
Talking here in the case of most small businesses.
So the central planners mandate a $15 an hour minimum wage, which is, let's just say for sake of argument here, $5 an hour increase.
Well, they have now got to figure out the small businessman, okay, I've got to pay people that are currently making $10.
I've got to pay them $15, but my entire expenditure on labor cannot increase because I can't afford it.
So I'm going to have to fire X number of people.
If everybody's going to get $15 an hour instead of 10, I've got to fire whatever number of people to keep my budget the same because I can't afford to spend.
And that's what happens.
And the central planners scratch their heads and they chalk it up to racism and bigotry and bias and who knows what else, unfairness.
They call it the evils of capitalism.
Because to them, the private sector economy is a golden goose.
There's all kinds of money out there.
That's why they can keep robbing it, stealing from it, raising taxes on it, regulating it, whatever.
It's a never-ending producing golden goose as far as they're concerned.
These are people who have never met a payroll, never owned a business.
In the case of Obama's cabinet, there's not one person in his cabinet that's ever had a job in the private sector.
Certainly never wanted to run a business.
Stunning.
Stop and think about that.
And they're commanding everybody how to run their own businesses.
So it gets to the point where small business owners, you know what?
They say, not only are they mandating I pay $15 an hour, and I can't really afford it, I'm going to have to fire some people.
You know what?
Even at $10, $15 an hour, I got people calling in sick.
I got people working halfway.
I mean, not everybody's a model employee.
Not everybody is trying to impress the boss and get a promotion.
You give some people in dryballs.
And so robotics are being tinkered with and invented as part of our tech advancement.
And lo and behold, somebody discovers that he can hire a robot to serve burgers and fries at a fast food restaurant.
You know what?
You don't have to pay the robot.
You have to make the original investment, whatever the robot cost.
It may be six figures, but you amortize that over whatever number of years you finance it.
You have a fixed cost on your robot.
It's going to cost you exactly this year what it's going to cost next year.
And you know what you're going to be paying for this robot over the years, but it's never going to demand a raise.
It's never going to get sick.
It's never going to get pregnant.
It's never going to get a sexually transmitted disease.
It isn't going to steal from you.
It's going to do any of those things.
All you've got to do is put it in there.
And if the tech has been perfected, the robot can handle a drive-through and the robot can handle one of the cash registers, then you are good to go.
And whoever was manning those places ended up getting fired.
And the command and control central planners scratch their heads and say, what is going on?
And the small business, if you had not raised the minimum wage, I wouldn't be doing any of this.
But your minimum wage was unfair.
It was too low.
No, the minimum wage is what the market dictates.
These are entry-level jobs.
We're talking about people who've never worked before, have very low skills.
They're trying to learn things about working.
We're teaching them.
This is entry-level.
We're not feeding a family for their minimum wage.
So that's just one reason why this happens.
38,000 new jobs.
The unemployment rate, I haven't seen what they reported it at, but it's probably about 5.1, whatever.
4.7.
Are you kidding me?
That's what they've reported.
4.7, that's not possible.
The only way you can get to 4.7% unemployment is if you stop counting the 95 million not in the labor force because the labor force participation rates reach an all-time high or low, depending how you look at it.
There's a record 94,708,000 Americans not in the labor force.
Some of them don't want to be.
They've retired.
Some of them don't want to be.
They can't.
Some of them do want to be in the labor force.
They can't find work.
They can't find a job, pays more in $30, 30 hours a week because of Obamacare.
4.7.
That's just an outrage.
The last time it was legitimately 4.7 was in, I think, George Bush's first term.
And that was a legitimate.
We had an economy coming out of a recession following 9-11, and it was booming.
We do not have a booming economy, anything of the sort.
And everybody knows it.
When Obama goes out and tries to talk about it, everybody laughs because you can lie about it all you want, but people are not feeling it because it isn't happening.
4.7.
Yeah, exactly.
458,000 people left the workforce.
What does that mean?
458,000 people can't find a job.
And so the unemployment rate 4.7%, yeah, as a percentage of a shrinking labor force.
But if you throw in these 94.7 million that want to work, there's no way we're looking at 4.7% unemployment.
How can you have 4.7% unemployment when you create 38,000 jobs in the month of May?
And that's the smallest, that's the least number of jobs created in a month in five years.
It's an utter disaster in just seven and a half years.
Look at the surprising amount of change for the worse everywhere you want to look, culturally, economically, politically.
It is astounding how much damage has been done in seven and a half years.
Yet people don't think that's fast.
That's a long time, Rush, and the change has been gradual.
No, it's really a short period of time.
But the amount of change that has taken place is stunning.
38,000 jobs added, worst since September of 2010.
Let's unpack this.
This could give Crazy Bernie a huge boost before the California primary, even though it won't matter if he wins.
I know some people think if Crazy Bernie wins California, that crooked Hillary may start hemorrhaging superdelegates, but that's not going to happen.
And if they do, if she starts, just telling you right now, if she starts hemorrhaging superdelegates, they're not going to go to Crazy Bernie.
Joe Biden chomping at the bit over there, stage left, wanting to get in.
Remember Obama's State of the Union speech?
Anyone claiming America's economy is in decline is peddling fiction?
Anyone wonder why Make America Great again works as a slogan?
I have to take a break.
Oh, there's one other thing.
Find a way to work this in.
Let me hold it.
There's going to be a better way to transition into this.
It's just a little interesting something I realized to explain manufacturing losses or shifts or what have you.
Let me just tell you, just find a way to transition to this.
When we finished World War II, what had we done?
We had destroyed two industrial giants in the world, Japan and Germany.
We became the industrial giant of the world.
We were it because we had vanquished two of the biggest manufacturing economies and industrial economies in the world, Japan and Germany.
The number, according to Yuval Levin, a little book he's written, is 60% of all manufacturing and industrial activity post-World War II and for 20 years after took place in the United States.
Now, that's part of what people remember.
Those were the good old days when America had lots of manufacturing jobs and most of the products in the world were manufactured in America.
And they think trade deals and a number of other things were the culprit in changing that.
And they had a role, of course.
But we had no competitors for 20 years after World War II because we had beaten the smithereens out of them.
But eventually, Japan came back and Germany and other vanquished economies.
And so when people remember the post-war period in America as Ozzie and Harriet, great, Leave It to Beaver, great was.
We didn't have any competitors.
We had wiped them out.
But now they're back, and you have to throw others in the mix, the CHICOMs, and there are all other kinds of – so it's a different global situation now that we would have to, again, eliminate, similarly to World War II, competitors to actually recreate the similar circumstances of that era.
Back in just a second, don't go.
You know, I've got some emails.
Why haven't you talked about the story about the State Department eliminating a portion of an interview about the Iran nuke deal?
James Rosen and Fox News and Jen Pisanca.
Folks, I knew about it.
I'm sorry.
I didn't spend any time on it because it didn't surprise me.
The government's lying.
So the Obama administration's editing tapes.
So the Obama administration is destroying evidence.
Have anybody heard of the Hillary email story?
But I didn't think it was news.
I mean, it didn't surprise me.
It's not that it's not news.
It just, it didn't rank to the top because it happens every day.
We have edited 911 call tapes on NBC.
We get Katie Couric lying and editing B-roll into a specialist she did on gun control.
Of course they're going to eliminate things on the State Department website about the Iran nuke deal to make them look bad.
It just didn't seem, I don't know, I'm getting cynical.
The fact that this regime lies, doctors, edits, to me, it isn't news anymore.
Tom in Columbus, Ohio, we go back to the phones.
You're it.
Great to have you, sir.
Hello.
Oh, hi.
How are you doing?
Very well.
Thank you.
Okay.
Well, this is a brief introduction.
You know, I've heard your radio show for just about as many years as I've been alive.
I was born in 1987.
I want to just apologize for a second.
I was a little lazy in getting to the phone because I was getting ready to get my hair cut because my dad said my hair was too long.
All right, well, you've been listening the whole time.
I mean, we started in 1988, and if you were in Sacramento, it's 87.
So you're a lifer.
Oh, yeah.
Well, thank you.
Did we lose him?
The line went...
Did the line go dead or did you disconnect the guy because you didn't like the fact that I made you put that call up first?
I'm kidding.
You know what he wanted to ask me about?
And I don't know what specifically.
He said, I know that you replaced Morton Downey Jr., which is true on the radio in Sacramento.
Morton Downey Jr. got fired.
I was the replacement.
So he wanted to know if I knew Mort and what kind of guy Mort was and the fact that Morton Downey Jr. and Trump were buddies.
He wanted to know if I had any insight on that.
So that's perfect open line Friday kind of call, but I don't know why he wanted to know that stuff.
That's why we're going to take the call.
But we'll forge on here.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, I'm telling you, it was seedy stuff.
Seed, seedy, seedy stuff.
It's amazing I came out of there unscathed.
Amazing, I was able to hold on to my own identity coming out of there.
It was a pit, man.
It was a real pit.
Anyway, greetings, welcome back.
Open Line Friday.
Rush Limbaugh here behind the golden EIB microphone.
You know, this, this, I just saw a drive-by news report.
It's CNN money.
U.S. Job Creation Week, even as unemployment rate falls to 4.7%.
This is a.
The only way that the drive-bys get away with this is because math education is so woefully inept.
I mean, this is a laugher.
This is an absolute, it's a joke.
It's so unserious.
There is no way the unemployment rate as people understand it is 4.7%.
And yet, the low-information crowd is going to eat it up and think it is.
We create 38,000 jobs.
It's the smallest job growth since 2010.
485,000 people left the workforce, a record 94.7 million not in the labor force, adults.
Stop and think of that.
We have a population of 220 million adults, roughly.
94.7 million not working?
I'm sorry.
With that alone, you have to understand that economic growth is simply, well, it's not impossible, but it's unrealistic to expect any massive economic growth.
It's not possible.
Because every one of those people is eating.
Somebody has to feed them.
Somebody has to pay to feed them.
They're not producing anything on their own.
I'm not being critical.
I'm being analytical here.
You've got 94.7 million Americans.
Let's add to that the legitimate retirees.
We're not counted in that number.
And let's count dependent children in there.
They're all eating and they're all moving around and they've all watching television and they've all got cell phones.
Somebody's paying for it.
And that money has to go come from somewhere, go to somewhere.
We're $20 trillion in debt, and they want to tell us that the unemployment rate plummeted.
I mean, the drive-bys can't even report this as a great economic month.
They have to tell the truth because there's no great news here other than the number.
And they're doing their best to hype the number because it's all about protecting Obama, but it's an absolute joke.
It's mathematically impossible unless you change the universe against which you are making the calculation.
If you're going to not count the 94.7 million Americans who aren't working, if you don't count them, you throw them out of the universe and then you calculate how many people want to work but aren't and are still looking for work.
The 94.7 million by definition are not.
It's the only way you can get to 4.7% unemployment is by throwing out and not counting the almost 95 million not working.
And yet that's what the government's doing with the full confidence that there are enough uninformed, ignorant Americans are going to soak it right up and believe it.
It's just an out-and-out lie.
This State Department story, briefly, here's what happened.
Back in 2013, there was a press briefing over there at the State Department.
Jen Pasaki, who for want was a boss of Marie Harf.
Pasaki did her job so well.
She's now over at the White House running the communication shop there.
Well, one day, James Rosen of Fox News was interviewing her about the Iranian nuke deal, and she told a lie.
She's claiming she didn't a lie, just had misinformation.
But the lie was that we don't have anything to worry about because we have found moderates in Iran that we can negotiate with.
We're not negotiating with the Mullahs and the Ayatollahs and the death to America, death to America crowd.
But that was a lie.
There weren't any moderate Iranians, and we were negotiating with the Mullahs.
Anyway, a significant portion of that interview, all of these interviews are posted on the State Department website.
They're kept forever.
They are part of the official government record.
When a department spokesman goes out and talks to the press, that stuff is preserved.
If it's video, preserved, audio preserved.
If it's text, it's preserved.
Lo and behold, somebody found out that a crucial portion of the Rosen QA with Pasaki was ordered deleted.
John Kirby, also a spokesman there, admitted, yeah, we don't know who.
We don't know how, but there was an explicit order to eliminate that section of the interview, to delete it and to throw it away, to erase it and make it look like it never happened.
And they admitted that earlier this week.
They're claiming they don't know who ordered that done.
Well, when that news hit, I didn't think it was anything unusual.
Who are we talking about here?
We're talking about people who've told us if we like our doctor, we can keep it.
If we like the plan, we can keep it.
We're listening to people that have misrepresented things at Benghazi.
Nothing went wrong there.
This one thing after another that's not true.
Abandoning the Constitution here, subverting it there.
I mean, I'm sorry.
It just didn't strike me as something to come in here and act outraged about because it's not out of the ordinary.
This is what not only this admunch does, folks, this is what liberal Democrats do.
They get rid of the evidence, they hide the evidence, they trash it.
Well, this is not unusual.
Maybe I am getting cynical.
I've been explaining this stuff for 27, 28 years, and I've said, you know what?
I'm going to move on to other things.
I'm tired of even explaining this to people.
Now, look, I've had to do it again here because people, why haven't you talked about it?
And this is the explanation.
Do you remember?
I'll tell you another one.
The Obama administration tried to secretly continue Obama's executive amnesty for illegal immigration.
And one federal judge after another told him, stop it.
There's a stay.
You cannot continue this until this case is adjudicated, wherever it ends up, Supreme Court, what have you.
Judge's name is Hannon.
He found out, the judge found out, that despite his order to stop, they were continuing.
In open court, he admonished Obama administration lawyers and officials at the Department of Justice.
He was livid, and he said so, and he commanded that every one of them who had defied his order and had broken the law go to ethics class, which made me laugh.
I didn't think that was much of a sanction.
I didn't think that was much of a punishment.
Well, the Justice Department is resisting a judge's order to provide ethics training for its lawyers and is objecting to turning over to the court the names of illegal aliens who were granted administrative amnesty in stark violation of an injunction issued by the court.
Back on May 19th, Judge Andrew Hannon of the Southern District of Texas issued an order imposing sanctions on the Justice Department and its lawyers for unethical conduct, which included repeatedly lying to him in open court.
U.S. versus Texas, the immigration lawsuit filed by 26 states against the regime over its plans to provide deferrals, work permits, and other government benefits to almost 5 million illegal aliens against the law.
They were not permitted to do it.
This was executive amnesty.
The court struck it down.
The regime continued to do it, lying to the court at the same time, claiming they weren't doing it.
They were obeying the court order.
They weren't.
So the judge sent them all to ethics classes.
Ethics classes weren't going to make them.
These people needed to be stripped of their law licenses.
They need to be disbarred for crying out loud.
Well, anyway, they're not now going to the ethics classes.
They've actually, for the third or fourth time in this case, they've looked at the judge and they've gone, you.
Hansen issued a preliminary injunction in February preventing the implementation of Obama's executive amnesty for these 5 million illegals.
His decision was then upheld by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The case is currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, but the regime said, screw you, screw you, judge, screw you, court, screw you, Fifth Circuit.
We're going to do it.
And they've kept doing it while lying about it.
Judge said, you're openly lying to me.
I'm issuing sanctions.
You've all got to go to ethics classes.
They say, screw you, judge.
We're not going to ethics classes.
We're going to continue to implement the executive amnesty, and you can't stop us.
So why would I be surprised if they eliminated a crucial portion of a tape, making them look bad on the Iranian nuke deal?
You see, the judge is used to people respecting the rule of law.
A judge issues an order, and you damn well abide by it if you're a lawyer, if you're a client, if you're a defendant, whatever.
The judge rules, and that's it.
And everybody obeys.
Otherwise, the system falls apart.
Well, this bunch doesn't obey because they don't care because they think the judge is full of it.
And they've got a political agenda, amnesty for illegals, and they're going to implement it no matter what.
And they're doing it despite what the court says.
Now, the judge obviously is not used to this.
Open defile or denial, open defiance, rather, by the nation's leading lawyers, leading Department of Justice.
Judges are used to being obeyed.
They're used to panning out sanctions when they are disobeyed.
They're used to they're not used to this kind of just what do you do now?
Okay, they're not going to his ordered ethics classes.
This is how systems break down.
Glenn Reynolds was writing about it USA Today a couple of weeks ago.
What is the Constitution?
Why has, for over 200 years, it been obeyed?
It's just a piece of paper.
What is it about that that has?
Why in 200 years have we not had some dictator type basically tear it up and say, screw it, I'm implementing my own government?
Because we've had honorable people, respect for law, the rule of law.
It's really been a miracle, in fact, that we have not had some banana republic guy get elected and try to shred the Constitution.
But we may be at the throes of something like that happening, and nobody knows what to do about it.
Republicans clearly don't.
A judge doesn't know.
The judge doesn't seem inclined to disbar these people to put them in jail.
He just seems inclined to continue to express his outrage over their behavior.
Even Bill Clinton lost his law license for a number of years over the fact he lied under oath, Paula Jones' case.
And now he's a hero.
There was no black mark, no tarnish whatsoever.
And of course, the drive-bys are not even reporting this.
The drive-bys, mainstream media, not even getting anywhere near this story.
Because all that matters, again, is will Obama get what he wants?
He wants executive amnesty.
He wants illegal aliens coming to America.
Will he get what he wants?
So the judge has joined the Republicans.
He's one of the villains.
He's the enemy.
He's trying to stop Obama from getting what he wants.
Bad guy, bad guy.
Obama's a good guy.
Obama's a hero, see?
Anyway, the obvious conclusion, and you wonder why Trump has the support that he does.
Anyway, I got a call coming up after the break.
We'll get back to Open Line Friday in just a second.
Stay with us.
The Daily Caller is now reporting the State Department doesn't know if more videos have been edited like the one involving James Rosen.
Of course more have been edited.
And it's also asinine that they don't know who did it.
The computer from which the order was sent would know who did it.
The person who actually did the edit and destroyed the peace would know that they did it.
The idea that they can't find out who did it means they either know and are not going to announce it or they don't care to find out because they don't think it's any big deal.
And all they have to do is get past this for a couple of days.
People forget it.
No big deal.
State Department video.
Who cares?
Who watches State Department press conferences anyway?
Just get past it.
The last thing they're going to do is act like this is anything.
And now Jen Pisaki is running around claiming that Rosen is insulting her.
The sooner this bunch is gone, folks, but we don't want, if Hillary Clinton shows up, it's just going to be more of this.
There's not going to be any change whatsoever.
Here's Richard in Port Orange, Florida.
I'm glad you waited, sir.
You're next in Open Line Friday.
Hi.
Good afternoon, Russ.
It's an honor to speak to you, sir.
Thank you very much.
Just a comment here.
It's something I thought of quite some time, and that is I know the reason why the left despises you so much.
And that's a strong word, but I think it's apopoe.
And that is that nobody, that nobody, not even the late, great William F. Buckley, is better at deconstructing the fetid, rotting liberal psyche than you.
Nobody has ever done that better than I've listened to.
I've heard George Will and Dr. Crawfame and so forth.
Pretty sharp folks, and even Thomas Sowell, who's great.
But none of them, none of them, take apart deconstructive.
I don't know.
Dr. Sowell has written a whole bunch of books deconstructing the vision of the anointed.
He's done great work.
I appreciate your comment.
I really do.
And I think I am despised.
I am universally hated by people on the left.
I mean, it is irrational.
It has to be something due to what Richard here is saying because it's irrational.
I mean, this, you know, what I'm trending on Facebook, the hatred in the comments over stuff that has nothing to do with any.
It's purely personal.
And it's never, ever going to change.
That's why I've had to learn to take all that stuff as a sign of success.
If I ever stop ticking them off like that, you know I'm in trouble.
True.
But I appreciate your kind words.
You know, I have endeavored to do that in my never-ending quest for people to try to understand them, to be able to spot them right off the bat.
I have found when people really know what liberalism is and what it leads to, they don't support it.
But it's tough to get over that hump.
And people don't naturally look at things and people ideologically, particularly today when identity politics is the big thing.
But boy, you're on the money.
I don't think the people you mentioned, I don't think they even try much to do that.
I don't think that's another thing.
There's not a whole lot of liberal deconstruction going on out there.
There's some, but you're quite shrewd.
You know, you're very perceptive out there, Richard.
Well, thank you.
You bet.
Thank you very much.
Keep up the great work.
God bless you.
Oh, no doubt that I shall do, and I thank you very much.
See, he knows.
He knows.
I wonder.
I sit here and wonder how many of you people in this audience really understand.
But I guess a lot of you do based on that call.
I have to go, however.
Would love to continue this.
Another great Open Line Friday call.
Not that the others haven't been any good.
Don't anybody get a complex here.
I'm just pointing it out.
Fast as three hours in media.
We're two down, and we have one more to go.
And I still have the sound bites of the Hillary so-called economic speech with just an attack on Trump.
We'll play some of that.
And of course, much more of you on the phones on Open Line Friday.
So take a little break here.
Back quickly.
▲
Export Selection