All Episodes
Previous Next
May 26, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:45
May 26, 2016, Thursday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Here's another thing.
Katie Couric's question.
What are you going to do about these people that are felons?
You know, it's a bogus question.
The premise of the question is not even valid.
We've already got laws on the books that deal with that.
California has strict gun control laws and background check laws.
Didn't stop the San Bernardino 2.
The San Bernardino 2 had a garage full of weapons.
They had Howitzers, they had grenades out there.
They had RPGs, launchers, who knows what the hell they had.
It's all a crock.
Anyway, great to have you back.
El Rushbo here behind the Golden EIB microphone, broadcast excellence, fastest three hours in media.
Just to refresh your memory on how, you know, Katie Couric has roots at NBC, even though she's at Yahoo News, and she's also been the anchor for the CBS Evening News.
But, I mean, once you have experience in the drive-by media, you have experience in the drive-by media.
Remember the George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin incident.
NBC News purposefully doctored the 911 call tape.
The George Zimmerman 911 call tape.
I want to remind you of this.
This is the NBC Today Show, which, of course, where Katie Couric used to work.
March 27th, 2012, a little over four years ago, they played a clip of the 911 call George Zimmerman made to the police about Trayvon Martin.
Now, this is five seconds.
It goes by fast.
This is all they played from George Zimmerman's supposed 911 call to the cops.
Ready?
3, 2, 1.
This guy looks like he's up to no good.
He looks black.
So you are to think, if you're watching today's show, that this guy Zimmerman is a kooky neighborhood watch guy, and he sees this black guy in a hoodie walking around a neighborhood.
And because he's a racist thug, he picks up the call, a 911, and tells him that some black guy is up to no good.
This is after Trayvon Martin has been shot, of course, and they're calling George Zimmerman a white Hispanic.
Don't forget.
New York Times, for the first time, ever referred to him as a white Hispanic.
You want to hear how the call really went?
That's five seconds of it that NBC aired.
It was learned that an editor at NBC in Florida purposefully doctored the tape.
The guy said he did it for time constraint reasons, that they didn't have a whole lot of time.
So they had to cut to the essence of the 911 call.
Well, they can't make that claim on the Katie Couric gun control show.
They added nine seconds of nothing.
So they can't claim they did it for time constraint.
They did it out of pure political bias and a desire for certain outcome to be perceived by their audience.
At NBC, they did the same thing.
They wanted everybody to think that the Zimmerman guy is a looney-tuned neighborhood watch guy running around his neighborhood looking for black people to drop the dime on because he's a racist pig.
But here is the actual 911 call where you will hear Zimmerman offered nothing.
He was answering questions from the 911 operator.
This guy looks like he's up to no good or he's on drugs or something.
It's raining.
He's just walking around looking about.
Okay, and this guy, see what Dr. Spennett?
He looks black.
Now, in the tape they aired, they have Zimmerman saying, this guy looks like he's up to no good.
He looks black.
That required editing.
It required somebody at NBC to, as they say in the old days, splice these two bits of audio together.
But George Zimmerman did not offer that Trayvon Martin looked black.
He was asked for his interpretation by the 911 operator.
So the same premise, doctoring of the tape.
Now, let's give this NBC guy the benefit of the doubt because we can still make the case.
Okay, let's say that there were time constraints.
Okay, but the guy has built-in bias.
He obviously thought whoever did this at NBC and probably all of them without knowing anything.
Ah, see a guy in a hoodie, black who shot, and a white Hispanic neighborhood watch guy.
The neighborhood watch guy is automatically a kook, right?
The neighborhood watch guy is a pretend cop.
The neighborhood watch guy is one of these guys that couldn't pass the cop exam, but wants to be a cop.
So he arms up, gets an official-looking uniform, has a cheap little cracker jack badge, and runs around the neighborhood trying to pretend.
That's what they think of neighborhood watch people.
Then you add the black guy in the hoodie, and without knowing anything, aha, NBC concludes that this loony tune neighborhood watch guy shot the guy in the hoodie because he was black because it's racism.
Just like the Duke La Crosse case.
Well, you had these white lacrosse players who plays lacrosse.
Come on, that's the oddest sport.
We've got to be rich white guys play at who was who was injured by a harmless African-American single mother trying to make it in a tough world, having to dance at their fraternity party.
So, of course, when she says they raped her, of course it happened because that's what white lacrosse players do.
And the faculty just signed the letter.
Talk about bias.
Talk about this is it's worse than bias.
It's prejudice.
And it was existent here.
Katie Couric, same thing.
The prejudice is gun owners dangerous.
Anti-government conspiracy theoring tin horn tat fat wearing kooks.
And we're going to, well, oh, Timothy McVeigh times, and we're going to put on a show on gun control here to illustrate for everybody just what kind of dangerous wackos these guys are.
Same premise.
And that's how it works.
Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington.
On today's morning, Joe, an NBC chief correspondent for Washington, Andrea Mitchell, reacted to the State Department Inspector General report criticizing Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server.
Mitchell first dismissed the Clinton campaign's defense, comparing Clinton's behavior to that of her predecessor, Colin Powell, then declared the report to be hard to be seen as anything but devastating.
It's not allowed to not return those records before she left the State Department.
She violated the Official Records Act, according to her own State Department, IG, appointed by Obama.
What you've just shown now, Mika, it completely undercuts the argument Hillary's been making for more than a year that she was just trying to persuade voters that she's trustworthy.
I think the most surprising and shocking thing is their reaction, claiming this is the same as what former secretaries did.
Hillary Clinton was lying also by telling people it was nothing but a security review.
There wasn't any investigation, anything going on.
The IG report indicates the exact opposite.
So here's Andrea Mitchell on NBC today saying, gosh, there are so many flaws in Hillary's argument.
I don't see how this is anything but devastating for Hillary, given the fact they've been making a completely different argument now for more than a year.
If we had the audio, and we don't want the audio, we don't have enough time.
I'm just telling you that she wiped Hillary out, and Andrea Mitchell is a BFF of Hillary Clinton.
Andrea Mitchell wants Hillary to be president so bad.
That's why she's so devastated.
And we had these guys yesterday saying, this is not going to go away.
This is going to stay with us throughout the whole campaign.
Democrats will say, this is serious, serious stuff.
Because everybody knows, even though you try to soft-sell this and say she broke the rules, where do the rules come from?
The rules come from the law.
She broke the law, not violated some rules.
Back to the audio soundbites.
This is Charlie Rose and Mark Halperin and John Heileman.
You know, these guys make our cut every day.
Cookie must have a thing for Halperin and Heileman.
Don't get mad, Cookie, and I'm just having fun here.
These guys make our cut every day.
We have audio soundbites on these guys every day.
Well, they've got their show on Bloomberg TV.
Mark Halperin, John Heileman.
They were guests last night on Charlie Rose's show on PBS.
And Charlie Rose said to Halperin, Mark, how damaging is this?
This is not the worst thing ever done, but it's really bad.
And the report, scathing is not too strong a word.
It is an indictment of how she handled this and how her aides handled it.
She shouldn't have done it.
And it plays into hands.
A Republican opposition calls her crooked Hillary.
This was not an appropriate thing to do.
Yeah.
Trump calls her crooked Hillary not an appropriate thing.
Lied about it after she did it.
She did what she did.
She lied about doing that and got caught.
And now she's back to.
What difference does it make?
It was years ago.
What difference does it make now?
It's going to be her standard refrain.
So the next bite from the Charlie Rose show, again, Halperin and Hylam and the guests.
And they keep talking about this, as you will hear.
They are deeply, deeply concerned about the deep, long-lasting impact of this.
You have Donald Trump, who is now christened Hillary Clinton crooked Hillary.
Even for people who don't hate Hillary Clinton and are not partisan about this, they hear Crooked Hillary and there's something there that echoes Crooked Hillary.
That's a political matter.
That's a powerful argument and a narrative and a framing device that Trump is going to adopt.
You guys all know this better than I do, is that if the questions are raised go to the heart of your fragility.
That's the worst thing that could possibly happen.
Oh, that's the worst thing that can happen if questions are raised that go to the heart of your fragility.
It's fragility.
He said fragility.
Don't, he didn't say anything else.
Some of you might be confused about what Charlie was talking about there.
He said her fragility, meaning she's fragile.
Notice this now.
You guys, oh, this is Charlie.
You guys, you all know this better than I do.
Is that if the questions are raised, go to the heart of your fragility.
And these two go, yes, yes, that's the worst thing.
That's right.
The worst thing can happen.
Questions go to the heart of your fragility?
Is the worst thing can happen?
Fragility, the root of that is fragile.
Is that what they mean?
I don't think of her as fragile.
Do you?
Sorry.
That just doesn't.
Sorry, it doesn't work.
Gail King, CBS, this morning, they're worried about this.
Gail King said she went to a cocktail party last night.
And everybody was sick and tired of hearing about the emails at her cocktail party.
I was at an event last night, and both Democrats and Republicans were quoting Bernie Sanders saying, I'm sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails.
But that was a long time ago, and he's since changed some of that.
He has, but the people at this party last night haven't.
When you have something that is a controversy and it feeds, quote, on misgivings about you, that you don't play fair or you get away with things that other people don't get away with, it's damaging.
That's right.
It falls into a caricature or a characterization of you.
That's a problem.
Do you think it will affect her campaign?
I think it already has.
The Washington Post called this inexcusable, willful disregard for the rules.
Yeah, they didn't do anything.
That's Nora O'Donnell there in the bathwater.
The Washington Post actually supports her on this.
They get their obligatory, ooh, this is really bad.
How could she have done this?
But then they cover for her, or they try to.
You know who's got to be the single most ticked off guy in the world about all this today is Bernie Sanders.
Do you think he would have that night back if he could take it back where it was in Philadelphia as a debate, and he said, and I agree that we don't need to hear any more about Mrs. Clinton's emails?
Do you think he would love to have that back?
Think if he would have gone in heavy on her emails back then.
He would have been seen as a precursor.
But he gave her cover on this months and months ago.
And you know darn well if he could get it back, he would.
Trump's giving the first speech that he has given since de facto getting 1238 delegates.
Our microphones are there, I think.
And we jip a little bit of this just to get a taste of the public primary.
And Bismarck, North Dakota.
I'm going to pack your opponents for being funded by big donors, big money donors.
Started now fundraising, doing some really big ticket fundraisers.
How do you convince your supporters that you're not going to become the puppet that you think your opponents do?
Well, I'm no puppet.
And I'll tell you, I'm raising the money for the party, largely for the party.
And we intend to raise a lot of money for the party.
I have no idea how much, but we're raising it for senators, for congressmen, Congress, for a lot of the people that are running.
We want to go in.
We want to have majorities.
It's very important.
We have a tremendous staff of people.
We raised last night.
Actually, we raised in Los Angeles.
We raised a lot of money for the party.
And this is money that's going into the RNC.
And we are going to have, I think, a tremendous, we're getting thanked all over by the Republican senators, by congressmen.
And hopefully we're going to raise a lot of money.
But this is money that's being raised for the party.
And I think we're going to have a tremendous success.
I'm also continuing to fund big portions of my campaign.
Go ahead.
Mr. Nairport was also quoted as saying that if you did release your taxes, he wouldn't advise it because it would disturb to help your adversaries.
You seem to sound as if you're not going to release your taxes.
No, no, I'm releasing when we're finished with the audit.
I have to say the IRS has been very professional, and they continue to be very professional.
And when they finish, I've been audited, however, for 15 years, and I don't know of very many people that have been audited for 15 years all the time, so I don't know what that's all about.
But the IRS has been very professional.
And as we move along, as soon as that's finished, whenever that may be, and hopefully it's going to be before the election, I'm fine with that.
Okay?
Just to be very specific on this, you do pay some federal taxes.
I do.
Yeah, I do.
Yes.
David, David, go ahead.
Mr. Trump, in the wake of yesterday's Inspector General report from the State Department about Hillary Clinton's emails, you said that you have doubts about whether or not she was paying the race against you.
But are you prepared right now to effectively call on her to get out of the race so that Americans can have more confidence in the integrity of their actually I sort of like her in the race?
I want to run against her.
Look, she has bad judgment.
This was all bad judgment.
Probably illegal.
We'll have to find out what the FBI says about it.
But certainly it was bad judgment.
I just read the report.
It's devastating, the report.
It's devastating.
Very bad, very bad.
But there's no reason for it.
It's just, you know, skirting on the edge all the time.
And you look back at her history, and this is her history.
It's a very, very harsh report, done really by Democrats, if you think of it, appointed by Obama and done by Democrats.
So it's shocking to see it.
It's shocking to see what she did.
And really, more than anything else, it's bad judgment.
But that's going to be up to her whether or not she wants to continue running.
All right.
We've got to take a break here, folks.
That's Trump.
He's in Bismarck, North Dakota first press conference after crossing the 1237 delegate threshold.
And it's a good point.
They can't say what they always say.
This IG report, vast right-wing conspiracy had nothing to do with it.
You know, stop and think of this.
Back last June and July, Hillary Clinton was thought to be on the way to a coronation.
Her nomination was a perfunctory accepted thing.
It was just, it was automatic.
It was going to happen, just a matter of a calendar.
And Trump was going to implode and be sent packing in a mass moment of embarrassment.
He was going to implode.
Well, now, Donald Trump has secured the GOP nomination, surpassing the 1,237 delegate threshold.
And Mrs. Clinton cannot close a deal against Bernie Sanders.
That's why I tell you, you just never know.
It's a risky thing to start predicting long-range political outcomes, like it is in, because nobody knows what's going to happen, and nobody knows the things that are going to transpire in the timeframe in which a prediction is made.
I try to refrain from it as much as I can.
You just don't know.
Nobody would have predicted.
Well, I did, by the way, I predicted 80, 90% of this.
I got the audio soundbites here today to prove it if anybody wants it, but I want to waste time on that.
Here's Gary in Washington, D.C. Great to have you, sir.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
Good afternoon.
Thanks for having my call.
You bet.
I'm going to get right to the point.
I'm active duty military, and I'm undecided for the election right now.
It doesn't matter to me who wins because I'm going to have to work for whoever gets elected regardless.
But I just wanted to say two things.
I've been asking a lot of guys that are around my unit, you know, ask about the election who they're going to vote for, and absolutely zero personnel here.
I said Hillary.
That's one.
And two, if any of us active duty guys did what she did, we would have probably been court-martialed and sent out with a dishonorable discharge.
Now, you say that this is going to have a big impact on her election, but I disagree.
I think she's going to continue to brainwash the left and say that, you know, Trump hates Mexicans, Trump hates women, Trump hates Muslims, and it's going to keep her all the way until November.
That's my.
Well, you know what's interesting about this?
I don't think there is a lot of fatigue in this email story.
Gail King may running around a cocktail party people at her place where she goes to in Manhattan.
They may be retired.
I don't think there is that much fatigue on this, which is surprising.
You would think people would be empty.
Their emotional reservoirs are this being empty.
Come on, can we move on?
But there's such anticipation.
Will she be indicted?
Will the FBI recommend it?
How big a crime is it?
There's still a lot of interest in this.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
Rush Limbaugh, America's real anchorman, America's truth detector, and the doctor of democracy.
Oklahoma City is John.
Great to have you.
I'm glad you waited, John.
Hi.
How are you doing today, Rush?
I am doing well fabulously.
Thank you.
Good.
I was calling.
I'm of the opinion that possibly the worst thing that could happen is if Hillary gets indicted.
The reason being is I think that will lead to a Biden warrant ticket.
She'll bring on the Bernie people.
And then we'll have a contrast on stage of Biden, who will be kind of calm, cool, the Uncle Joe type.
Prone to gasp.
It'll be funny where Trump will come across sometimes as a raving lunatic and, you know, kind of a little out of control.
And maybe not the perception of it's just not going to be good, I don't think.
Plus, the fact that Biden tragically lost his son earlier, tragically lost his first wife.
So he'll, you know, that unfortunately people will empathize with him.
Trump will come across as a raving lunatic against Biden.
Is that what you're saying?
At times, sure.
He'll go off the handle.
Well, he has that propensity.
First thing, I don't think that Hillary is going to be indicted.
Because I don't think for that to happen, that would mean Obama okayed it.
And I don't think Obama wants fingerprints on whatever happens to Hillary.
That's why I think what's happening is that the IG report, further reviews, further interviews, FBI leaks, they're all going to continue.
I think Obama would very much enjoy Hillary losing the presidential election.
I don't think that Obama wants to deal with the...
Look, if she gets indicted, everybody knows the trail leads back the Oval Office.
The only way that can happen, because Loretta Lynch ain't going to do anything on her own.
She's not going to do this without the authorization of Barack Husseino or Valerie Jarrett, whoever really runs that show up there.
The second thing is, why does everybody automatically assume that Joe Biden's going to parachute in here?
What do you think Bernie Sanders supporters are going to do?
If anything takes Hillary Clinton out of this race and the Democrat machine moves in there to put plugs in, that means they've just, they've got to totally ignore Bernie and Plugs didn't have a single vote.
He didn't run.
He didn't have a single vote.
Crazy Bernie has won a slew of states.
Seriously, John, in your scenario, how could they get away with denying Bernie Sanders the nomination?
Oh, I think they could do it through the rules change or whatever, especially if he brings on Elizabeth Warren.
But you've got his supporters to deal with.
Even if you make a deal with Bernie, hey, Bernie, we'll pay you $2 million a year in retirement.
We'll give you all the Ben and Jerry's you want, whatever it is, you still have to deal with his supporters who are not going to just accept this.
And they're often voting for Trump if this happens.
They're not going to hang around and vote for plugs.
That's a possibility, or they'll let him write the fact one, which will be the same as electing him, maybe.
Well, look, the crux of your point is that you'd much rather see Trump versus Hillary than Trump versus Biden.
Because Biden is a sympathetic figure, Hillary isn't.
Biden, he does have this ability to BS people left and right.
I mean, Biden, if you listen, he knows everybody.
He's met everybody.
Everybody's his best friend.
He's had intimate conversations with everybody.
He's loyal to Obama to a fault.
Probably no more loyal person than Biden.
Speeches at conventions, bailing Obama out of hot water here and there, running the Jobs Council, whatever he's been given to do, he's done it.
Then he did lose his son.
And the word went out that his son's last words were close to run, dead, run or some such thing.
So your point is that Trump would probably fare worse against plugs because the sympathetic figure he is, whereas Hillary's not.
But I don't think it's going to come to that.
I mean, everybody thinks plugs will get thrown in there, but you can't just ignore what Bernie Sanders' supporters, even if you could buy him off, how do you buy off his supporters?
I don't know how you do it.
Because his supporters are really into what he stands for, which is this place sucks, and it needs to be overthrown from the inside out with us in charge.
I mean, there's no middle ground with these people.
And that's what, you know, plus free dope.
You've got to put marijuana in there, legalize that.
And Pluggs isn't going to do that.
I mean, they might even go into Libertarian Canada if that's the case.
This is Will in Shreport, Louisiana.
Great to have you, sir, here on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Megadidos, but you are way overblowing this whole amnesty for illegal aliens and voting.
It's not the disaster you think it's going to be.
We don't have 100% voter registration in turnout in this country.
We don't have an equal number of Republicans and Democrats dying every year and being replaced by new crop Republicans, Democrats, and that these illegal aliens, if they accept citizenship, which I don't think a lot of them are, are going to show up en masse and vote and shit to scale.
It just doesn't make any sense.
And I think you're getting way, I think you've blown it way out of proportion.
So there's nothing to worry about then with amnesty?
I don't, first off, and first off, if Hillary Clinton can truly come in there with a stroke of a pen, it's over.
You might as well just go ahead and start.
Don't cover anything political.
Just cover football and golf every day.
Well, Obama has done it, and the Republicans haven't tried to stop him very often.
But the next, okay, when the next Congress comes in, if it's a Democrat Congress, then, I mean, what do you, okay, let's just say it happens.
What do we do then?
Would you say it's over?
New Zealand.
What do you mean, New Zealand?
No, I'm just kidding.
I say.
Well, I know, I know what you mean.
Yeah, your plan B. If it comes to a point where that happens and the American people just go and tell a ho-hum, all right, then, I mean, there's literally nothing else to do.
But no, wait a minute.
Now, you just said there's nothing to worry about.
That even if they've granted amnesty, we did not guarantee that they're going to be overrunning the ballot box.
There's nothing wrong with that.
In that case, I'm taking it from your from you.
I'm taking it from your point of view on that.
As far as I'm concerned, you're assuming that they're all going to show up and vote, that we're aware of.
It doesn't take a minute.
It doesn't take all of them.
If you've got 11 million out there, that's the number.
And if they're granted amnesty, all it takes is 10% of them showing up and all voting Democrats.
And that's assuming no other Americans are going to vote.
No, it's including current vote patterns and turnout patterns now.
Demographic shifts and everything.
Do you think maybe that might motivate people?
So instead of 60% voter registration, and how the vapor run out, then we may go to like 80 or 90%.
Do you think that might be a motivating factor for people to get off their butts?
I mean, I'm 50.
I've got friends of mine, literally my age, who have never voted in their lives.
I mean, you know, let's just take, so you're factoring that there may be millions of Republicans who are not voting for whatever reason, but if Hillary were to do this, that would get them out of the sofa.
I'm not saying Republicans.
I'm just saying people in general.
We have overall, out of, what, 220, 230 million adults in the country, how many of them over the 18 with a pulse are actually registered to vote?
70?
And out of that, 70 how many votes?
Okay, wait, wait, if I'm really, I'm comfortable.
If we don't have to worry about this, then this is such a load off.
We don't have to worry about this, then what happened in California really didn't happen.
That's so wonderful.
Then California, it didn't happen.
I mean, you notice there's not a Republican Party in California.
There's not going to be an elected Republican in the Senate in California.
There isn't a Republican Party in California.
Why do you think that is?
Rush, if a century of 11 million people nationwide can come in and change that much, then it's over.
And yeah, maybe you should go to New Zealand.
I mean, I'm looking at how many people are in the country and how many people are actually voting.
We only have, what, 60% voter turnout?
I keep saying you can make it out like everything else is going to stay stagnant.
Really, if that's the case, if Hillary Clinton with a stroke of a pen, if you really just make them citizens and they're actually able to vote.
The fact of the matter is, if you want to see what's going to happen to America, look at California.
We used to own California.
Will we have governors like Reagan and Pete Wilson and George Duke Majin and Arnold Schwarzenegger?
There isn't a Republican at stake in elected anything.
The Republicans are irrelevant.
There aren't enough of them.
They have left.
A lot of people have left California while others have moved in from Mexico and Central America and so forth.
California is exactly what would happen to the United States.
Your theory is that there are a lot of people not voting, Republicans, Democrats, independents, whatever.
And when they see this happen, they're going to say, whoa, mama, and they're going to get off the sofa.
They're going to get out of the house.
are going to go register and are going to outnumber whatever number of illegals register as Democrats.
That's, there's no evidence whatsoever to support that.
But beyond that, beyond that, Will, let's not forget what really is at the root of this is the law.
It is illegal.
Mrs. Clinton will not have the power to do what her website is pledging to do.
She cannot, with a stroke of her pen, create federal law or wipe it out.
She cannot yet.
That's what she's promising to do.
And the fundamental aspect of this, the foundational aspect that's got really everybody, is the rule of law being obliterated.
The vote results are the result of the law being obliterated.
People are not racist on this.
People are not prejudiced or bigoted.
People are concerned that if the rule of law goes, why does anybody obey the law?
I should have pointed this out earlier.
Glenn Reynolds, who is a law professor at Tennessee, University of Tennessee, had a piece that ran in USA Today this week.
And it was all about why do any of us obey the law?
What is it in our nature that makes us independently obey the law above and beyond fear of getting caught and punished?
What is it that makes us obey the law?
And it is a many-factored answer.
The societal agreement and understanding of the rule of law being a foundational aspect of the country that we can't exist without it.
But his point further was that if leaders of our country in Washington routinely ignore it and routinely violate, break it, and get away with it, why should any of the rest of us obey the law?
It was a great column because it does, you know, the Constitution's there, but what is the concept?
A piece of paper.
You realize for 230 years, the Constitution has survived.
Why?
It's just a piece of paper.
Why have, up until Barack Obama, has the Constitution ruled?
It's because the people we've elected, for the most part, have had an understanding and a respect for it and what it means.
But if that vanishes, then all it is is a piece of paper.
And that's nothing.
The words on it will not matter.
It is, folks, in one sense, the idea, this country founded the way it was, and that Constitution is the document.
That Constitution is the glue.
And it's held this country together for 200 and some odd years because people have been willing to obey it.
But now we have people at the upper highest levels of our government willing not to obey it.
And the dissent from that, the indications of that are horrible.
Anyway, I wish I had more time to explore this, but I got to go.
I got to take a break.
We'll be back.
And by the way, one other thing.
I don't buy this idea that Joe Biden is untouchable.
That Joe Biden is somehow angelic and sympathetic.
And this guy's run for president on his own a couple of times, hasn't gotten past the first set of primaries.
There's something missing there that an open campaign demonstrates.
But we'll hold that in reserve in the event that that happens.
I don't suspect that it will.
And by the way, I'm going to be here tomorrow.
You work in a Morrow Rush and seeing so many businesses close.
We're open.
We'll be here tomorrow.
We're not going to be here Monday, but we'll be here tomorrow.
And as I say, back here tomorrow, tomorrow will be Open Line Friday, the Memorial Day weekend.
You might be thinking now what you want to talk about tomorrow because it doesn't have to be about all this.
Whatever you want.
Thank you so much, as always, for being part of the program today.
And see you tomorrow.
Same time, same place.
▲
Export Selection