All Episodes
Previous Next
May 25, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:45
May 25, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 247 podcast.
Greetings, my friends, and welcome.
Great to have you here.
Yet another excursion into broadcast excellence, hosted by me, Rush Limboy, your guiding light.
Times of trouble, confusion, murkiness too moat, millennials still living at home, not wanting to get married, not able to find work.
All of that, plus even the good times, I am your guiding light.
Happy to be here.
Telephone number 80082-2882, the email address, L Rushmo at EIB net.com.
Now I mentioned the end of the program yesterday, there really wasn't much, if anything out there, but you would never have known it based on the quality of this program.
Nobody makes lemonade out of sour lemons better than we do here.
Nobody turns chicken, you know what, into chicken salad.
Yesterday was one of those days.
Now today we're a little bit more loaded than we were yesterday.
There's a little bit more out there today.
In fact, there's quite a bit more out there today, and we're going to be touching on all of it, plus uh chatting with you about it.
Your host, ladies and gentlemen, I just found out as a trending the top of the fake book, whatever they call it, trending, trending, whatever they call it, I'm at the top of it.
And you know why?
Here's here's what it says.
Rush Limba, top of the trending, Rush Limbaugh host says he won't endorse Donald Trump because what difference does it make now?
I wonder if anybody.
We had a call yesterday.
All right, are you gonna finally now get with it?
I mean, the primaries are essentially over.
Are you gonna bite the bullet or you're gonna I said, no, what difference does it make now?
Clearly a playoff, Hillary Clinton and Ben Ghazzi.
I don't know how many people picked that up, and I don't know how many fake book um uh curators, news curators, or readers.
Uh Susanna Martinez Democrat group urges new New Mexico governor to break silence on Trump.
That's number three.
Yeah, there was another riot at a Trump rally in New Meiko last night.
The drive-by's are trying to portray it as a protest, but it was the usual leftist suspects rioting.
Uh and it it didn't, it didn't affect Trump.
I mean, they got inside.
Trump dealt with them the way he deals with all of these protesters.
He was unfazed.
He was not impeded at all in getting his message out.
And Mrs. Clinton, Mrs. Clinton has decided to pick up uh uh Elizabeth Warren as a surrogate.
You know something folks have to tell you we have the soundbites coming up here, but I'll show it.
Elizabeth Warren went out there and attacked Trump for Hillary.
And just here putting my objective analyst head on, it was good.
Particularly when compared to Hillary.
I think the more they have Elizabeth Warren out there, the more buyer's remorse there's gonna be on the Democrat side that she's not the nominee, or that Crazy Bernie's not the nominee.
Now, don't misunderstand, I'm not suggesting that Elizabeth Warren is right or anything, it's just that she sounded much more genuine and much more real and actually I think had more credibility.
As I put myself in the in the shoes of a liberal watching this, I mean, compared to Hillary's asleep compared to uh Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sands.
She's just going through the motions of it.
She's sleepwalking.
You know, Hillary is in one of these defensive modes where you don't want to say the wrong thing, so you you shut up.
Plus, Hillary knows the more she talks, the worse her numbers get.
The more she shows up, the worse her numbers get.
The less we hear from her, the better her numbers get.
That's demonstrably true.
Um, but nevertheless, Trump was unfazed.
He said, Hey, did you see they sent Pocahontas out to attack me?
Can you see Paul Ryan doing that?
Can you see Mitt Romney doing it?
Can you see George W. Bush or Jeb Bush?
Hey, they sent Pocahontas out to attack me.
Yeah, Pocahontas.
You know what they call her?
Because she said she's got it, she's an Indian.
She wanted to get special treatment at Harvard, so she said she had the high cheekbones of an Indian.
So we call her Pocahontas Focahannes.
I mean, it's just he's just unfazed.
Whatever they hit him with, Trump's philosophy, if I'm wounded or if I think I'm wounded, I'm gonna fix the wound.
I'm gonna unwound myself.
And these people, remember where the Dems and the media come from on this.
Everybody is subject to their training.
Everybody becomes a prisoner to their conditioning.
And on the Democrat side, one of the things, whether they know it or not, that they have become conditioned to Republican incompetence and ineptitude in replying to allegations and charges.
They are used to getting away with it.
They are used to the media standing by them.
So your average Democrat candidate can like like uh Dingy Harry can go out and accuse Romney of not having paid taxes because some invisible friend told him.
And the media says, Well, what was your proof?
I don't need proof.
You need to go ask Romney.
Why hasn't he paid his tax?
And they dutifully marched off and began to ask Romney why he hadn't paid his taxes.
Same thing with Romney and the war on women.
Romney's in the middle of a debate, doesn't know what's going on.
George Stephanopoulos asked about contraception.
What?
Yeah, what do you think about contraception?
No, George, bam, answer war on women was born.
So the Democrats, my contention is my theory, Democrats and the Liberals get used to being able to get away with this stuff.
They can't help it.
It's part of their conditioning.
They level an allegation to the Republicans, the media pick it up and amplify it, and the Republicans stumble around trying to figure out how to reply to it, usually turning to us on talk radio to limit the damage.
But they don't know what to do themselves, so they just sit around and ignore it.
Well, that doesn't happen.
Now they launch their salvos like they have become conditioned to getting away with.
So Hillary sits out, starts insulting Trump about how he profiteered during the housing crisis.
And Hillary and her buddies, I'm sure, think that that's going to be the end of it.
They're going to launch this devastating attack on Trump.
And the media is going to amplify and back up that attack on Trump.
And Trump, the Republicans, are not going to know what to do about it.
And even if they do reply, the media's not going to cover it, so they'll get away with shaping the narrative.
But Trump does reply.
And the media does carry what he says against their own instincts.
They don't want to, but they do.
They cover Trump 24-7.
They don't want to, they don't like to, but they do it.
And so Elizabeth Warren had all of this stuff thrown right back at her.
And Hillary is having this stuff thrown right back at her.
They are not accustomed to it.
They do not have the experience or the condition of the third reply.
They get away with the initial charge and the subsequent Republican silence and embarrassment and Republican prayers that nobody will hear it and it'll all go away.
Trump hears it, replies, throws the ball back in the Democrat Court in his case, Hillary or Elizabeth Warren, and they don't have a lot of experience dealing with the third reply.
Now they'll get with it, but it's, you know, everybody's a product of their conditioning.
And this is going to come back to harm the Democrats because their conditioning for years, for decades, is they get away with this stuff.
For example, they can go around and they can talk about Romney back in prep school, giving a guy an underwear noogie.
How many years ago was that?
Forty?
They can go back and they can talk about Romney putting the family dog in the top of the station wagon.
And it's covered, and it's gone and researched and long stories about Romney's history in prep school and the fact that he was a little rich kid and how he got away with all this stuff.
Reams and reams of stories.
And yet, with somebody wants to talk about the Bill Clinton 90s, the CNN hosts circle the wagons, shut the guests down.
No, we're not going there.
It's old news.
It's torturing.
We're not reliving.
Why not?
Why don't you want to re- I mean there's there's no limit on what in a Republican's past you will go back and investigate and report.
But why when it comes to Bill Clinton?
Will you, and it happened four or five times yesterday on CNN alone.
We're seeing in hosts and hostets attempted to shut down any reference whatsoever to Bill Clinton in the 90s.
Now the Inspector General of the State Department, I think issued a report here, and we've got a bunch of different takes on this.
State Department audit faults Hillary Clinton in emails.
That's the Associated Press.
The Washington Post State Department Inspector General report sharply criticizes Clinton's email practices.
Now I had a plethora of reactions to this today.
There are many of my friends in my circle who think Rush, I told you it was not gonna amount to anything, and this is nothing.
This is big deal, yada yada, get it nothing's gonna happen here, Russia.
You were right, and then other people think, wait a minute, no, this is more than I expected.
You want my take on this?
I cling to my theory that Obama does not want to be seen as the person who takes Hillary out.
But he is toying with her big time.
And this drip, drip, drip is continuing because Obama is permitting it.
If Obama wanted this email thing buttoned down, shut down, and dispatched, it would have been however long ago he wanted that to happen.
The State Department IG would have concluded the investigation would not have much to report.
The FBI would have continued to do what they do, but the Department of Justice would not have acted on it, which still hasn't happened.
But no, there continues to be a drip, drip, drip, drip.
And the important aspect of this one, ladies and gentlemen, you may think Rush, this is nothing.
They soften the blow out there.
You start rush, they uh they they say that Condoleezza Rice did the same thing, and they said it Colin Powell said they did the same thing, and so they said Hillary's not alone here.
Uh-uh, uh uh uh.
All true, however, there is no way that the Hillary Clinton campaign can say any of this is coming from the vast right-wing conspiracy.
Well, she may try to say it, but there's no way she can even get close to having any credibility with this.
The inspector general, State Department Inspector General, very careful to say that Hillary violated the rules rather than the law.
By the way, if you want the truth, I watched a big round table on CNN and a bunch of leftists, and they're beside them that they think this is not going to weigh, that it's gonna be around the entire campaign, and that it is serious.
And it doesn't matter whether Colin Powell did it or Condoleezza Rice did it, because they're not running for president.
And they are been there done that.
They are long ago.
They have nothing to do with today, but Hillary does, and it just won't go away, and they're very much aware of it.
And I think Obama is kind of like the wizard of Oz there behind the curtain deciding when the drips and the drops happen.
But don't be discouraged by the fact that the uh State Department Inspector General said that she violated the rules rather than the law.
Because if you read it elsewhere, the inspector general explained that the rules were implemented in accordance with the relevant law, the Federal Records Act here, so that means that if you connect the dots, she violated the law.
They haven't said so, she's violating the rules, but the rules spring from the law.
She violated the law.
That is conclusive.
And here's something that is just as important.
All of her top aides refused to cooperate with this Inspector General investigation.
Cheryl Mills, whom a danger, the whole crowd, none of them participated.
None of them cooperated with the government investigation.
When you are asked to cooperate with the government in an investigation into potential law violations, and you refuse, that refusal is implicitly a claim of legal privilege, not speak.
The only such legal privilege which applies in this context to the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
The IG report obscures this point, but it still is amazing.
You had.
I mean, that that is what the refusal to participate, that's how it legally is interpreted, or interpreted by the investigating agencies.
If uh if one of Hillary's aides refuses to talk for whatever reason, the legal assumption is okay, they're asserting the fifth, you know, want to incriminate themselves, and it's an amazing point.
Why else would they refuse to cooperate?
Remember.
She didn't say she did anything wrong.
There was nothing what difference does it make now how those people died?
Nobody thinks that anything illegal happened.
So why not answer questions?
Why would they refuse to cooperate?
Hillary's aides.
Remember when the guy that set up her um the IT guy set up her whole system, Pugniano.
Remember when he refused to cooperate with the FBI unless he got immunity?
It was a huge story because it was obviously an admission that he believed truthful answers would tend to incriminate him.
Same thing going on here with Hillary's AIDS.
So what are they going to say?
See, this is the bottom line.
The Obama State Department is not part of the vast right-wing conspiracy.
Hillary Clinton can get she can caterwall all day long that it's just the rebirth of the vast right-wing conspiracy, but this is the Obama State Department.
That's my take.
And I think it's going to be around throughout the campaign.
Because Obama, I don't know why, but this drip drip-drip is obviously continuing, and if they wanted it to shut down, they could do that.
Here's Dana Bash on CNN.
Uh that this is uh this morning, not long ago, in the last couple of hours, the co-host John Berman, talking with her, she's a chief political correspondent for CNN.
He says, this is gonna play in politics, basically immediately.
Donald Trump has already been calling Hillary Clinton crooked Hillary, and it's sticking.
And Hillary Clinton, by the way, still running in a primary against Bernie Sanders.
So, Dana, what about this uh this report in the IG?
How's it going to affect her?
This feeds directly into the narrative that her opponents, Bernie Sanders on the Democratic side, and ultimately uh Republicans led by Donald Trump uh in a general election, uh, will be hammering her on.
The narrative, of course, is you're hearing Donald Trump do it in only a way that he does, calling her crooked Hillary.
The fact that she didn't comply with the rules, that she appears to have been uh doing things that were not maybe she thought she was above the rules, or she's different from the way everybody else should be.
That's gonna help her opponents in a big way.
All right, exactly.
And they're worried, Dana Bash and the CNN crew very worried about this because what is Hillary's defense been?
Hillary's defense has been that she complied with all regulations, and that what the FBI's doing is just a security review.
There's nothing that's gone on here.
I mean, everybody's done it, just like Clinton and sex in the 90s.
It's private, it's personal, everybody does it, and it didn't get in the way of her doing her job.
But you heard Dana Bash.
She didn't comply with the rules.
She said that she did.
She said that's that's her defense, that she complied with all State Department regulations.
And what the FBI is doing is a security review.
Wrong.
The FBI is investigating her.
And I'll tell you something else.
The FBI is investigating the Clinton Crime Family Foundation along with the punk, Terry McCauliff, the governor of Virginia.
Now, why did Hillary want an off-site private email server?
People say it's to avoid Freedom of Information Act requests.
And it is for privacy.
Mrs. Clinton doesn't want to be hassled.
She didn't want to have to anybody know what she's doing.
Well, my opinion, once again, I think she had to do this in order to cover up how she was selling influence to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars to foreign governments, foreign people, foreign entities.
She did that.
If that had been part of the State Department Internet email system, subject to discovery of Freedom of Information Act, that would have been devastating.
This is how she kept all of that selling of access private.
Half my brain tied behind my back, just to be fair about things.
It's something we've done from the beginning of the program.
Nobody can say we're not into fairness here.
We do it each and every day.
We go above and beyond to be so.
800-282-2882.
Hillary Clinton has uh let this get into this this whole Hillary using Elizabeth Warren and Trump reacting to it a bit.
Uh this is Hillary's latest ad or campaign website.
New ad says that Trump rooted for the real estate crash.
And it's uh uses 2006 audio of Trump where he talks about making money off a housing collapse.
I sort of hope that happens, because then people like me would go in and buy.
If there is a bubble burst, as they call it, uh you know, you can make a lot of money.
From beginning to end, it's totally true.
From beginning to end, it is a businessman describing how he is going to take advantage of things that occur in a natural business cycle.
There are bubbles, bubbles burst.
There are housing bubbles, there are tech bubbles, there are any number of bubbles, real estate, you'll name it.
There are highs, there are lows.
People that invest always want to buy what they think is the lowest price, and that means they wait till something crashes, they wait till something bursts, and then they move in.
And Trump is simply talking about it here.
Now, to a liberal, oh no, there's just none of that is fair.
There should never be a burst.
There shouldn't be any low.
There shouldn't be any high.
There shouldn't be any competition.
There shouldn't be there shouldn't be any pain.
There shouldn't be any suffering, there shouldn't be any exaltation, there shouldn't be any happiness.
That market should just be steady as a rock so people can depend on it, and nobody would ever get hurt, and everyone that's the way they look at it.
And anybody knows how markets fluctuate, taking advantage of them, obviously is a heel.
Obviously he's a mean reprobate.
And so, after playing that audio from Trump in 2006, Hillary Clinton then says this.
He actually said he was hoping for the crash that caused hardworking families in California and across America to lose their homes.
All because he thought he could take advantage of it to make some money for himself.
Yeah, Trump said I sort of hoped that happens, because then people like me would go in and buy.
If there's a bubble burst as they call it, uh hey, folks, welcome to the real world.
I can remember I was in Kansas City, and it was the early 1980s.
Ronaldus Magnus had just been inaugurated, and we are in a horrible recession that had its roots in the late 70s, the Jimmy Carter administration.
And it was bad.
It was bad.
I I I was working for the Kansas City Royals at the time.
I wasn't making any money whatsoever.
It was bad.
And I can remember having conversations with people who said, you know what?
Just instead of trying to stop this, let it happen.
Just let the plunge happen, and let's just start from rock bottom and rebuild everything, which is essentially what happened.
All kinds of people got got hurt.
The fact that there are people out there like Trump's and investors and so forth is nothing new.
But people don't get hurt because of Donald Trump.
The bottom line is people get hurt because of people like Hillary Clinton.
People get hurt because of economic policies related to people like Barack Obama and Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren.
People are harmed by liberalism demonstrably and provably each and every day, each and every year.
The evidence in the last seven and a half years in this regime alone is mountainous.
Liberalism hurts.
Liberalism causes suffering all the while promising to alleviate it.
All the while, promising to end it.
Liberalism spreads misery equally.
Or tries to.
Liberalism doesn't seek to elevate anybody.
Have you ever seen it do that?
Liberalism punishes people at the top.
Liberalism punishes achievers.
Liberalism stigmatizes people to achieve.
Either in the classroom, in the business world, the athletic field of play, whatever.
They are stigmatized.
It's unfair.
They need to pay a penalty for it, or they need to be penalized in some way, because it isn't fair.
Liberalism doesn't raise anything.
Liberalism doesn't lift it.
By definition, it doesn't do so.
Liberalism acknowledges that misery is the best you can hope for, and that everybody ought to experience it.
Liberalism promotes the idea that there isn't any exceptionalism.
Liberalism promotes the idea that there isn't any real greatness, as Elizabeth Warren's, you didn't build that, you didn't make that happen.
You business owner, you factory owner, you big success story, you didn't make that happen.
You didn't build that.
You couldn't have done that without us.
They deny success each and every time they can.
They, therefore, have a deep resentment for people like Trump.
Who know how to capitalize on cycles in business?
So Hillary runs her attack ad, claiming that Trump cheered on the housing collapse, which by the way, her husband caused.
It's kind of an important point, folks.
The subprime mortgage crisis, Bill Clinton, Janet Reno.
Bill Clinton, after he's fight is following the leader, Jimmy Carter, demanding that all of these banks lend money to people, mortgages to people that can't ever pay it back.
Because the dream, the American dream of home ownership, was being denied by low-income people.
It wasn't fair.
And how can we have low-income people in homes when they can't afford a mortgage?
We give them the mortgage.
We make the banks give them the mortgage.
We end redlining, we end all this.
Anyone wants one gets one.
Then the banks, unable to collect because they made loans to people that couldn't pay them back.
They were forced to.
What'd the banks do?
Well, they created new products.
And they repackaged all of these worthless loans into things called mortgage-backed securities.
What they really did, they'd go out and package hundreds of these subprime loans into a single package and go out and sell that package to, in many cases, unsuspecting buyers, whom were told, look at this income stream we're selling you.
We're selling you've got hundreds of people making mortgage payments.
You can't lose on a deal.
And they kept doing that until there were no suckers left to buy the worthless paper, and that's what it blew up.
It really isn't any more complicated than that.
It is, but if you want to know what happened, that's exactly it.
Bill Clinton, federal government demands banks lend money to people that can't pay it back.
Some cases the banks wanted to, other cases they didn't, but it was government policy that made this happen.
The banks are sitting there with worthless money.
They've got people that have mortgages and homes that can't pay it back, so there were foreclosures left and right.
They sold these worthless mortgages to unsuspecting buyers who then when they realized what they had bought, they repackaged them into some other new kind of product and sold them to other unsuspecting buyers.
It took about eight years, and there were no suckers left.
And poor houses like Lehman Brothers couldn't move their worthless paper, and so they don't exist anymore.
And all of this happened under the guidance of the Clinton administration, under the premise that it's unfair that people who can't afford a home don't have a home.
That's not right.
It's not fair.
That's not how Mrs. Clinton saw it.
Let's go back to 2007, December 5th.
NASDAQ stock market, Senator Clinton speaking about the foreclosure housing crisis.
Now who's exactly to blame for the housing crisis?
And I think there's plenty of uh blame to go around.
Home buyers who paid extra fees to avoid documenting their income should have known they were getting in over their heads.
Oh, so now it's the citizens' fault.
It's the home buyer's fault.
That's Chutzpa.
When's the last time you ever heard a Democrat blame the people for anything?
Actually, they do it a lot, but I mean, this was blatant.
Now we get to Pocahontas.
This Elizabeth Warren.
And I want you to listen.
Forget what she's saying for a minute.
She's she when they when the left, the media and everybody else, when they hear Elizabeth Warren out there on the uh, what would you call it?
The uh war path.
Pocahontas, she's on the war path out there, going after Trump, they're gonna compare the way she sounds, going after Trump the way Hillary sounds, and they're gonna have buyer's remorse.
So here is Elizabeth Warren last night in Washington, the Center for Popular Democracy's annual gala.
And she rips into the Trumpster.
What kind of a man roots for people to get thrown out of their house?
It is a man who cares about no one but himself.
A small insecure money grubber who doesn't care who gets hurt so long as he makes a profit off it.
What does she think Bill and Hillary Clinton are for crying out like what?
Is anyway, Trump reacted to it by calling her Pocahontas.
This is during his campaign event in Albuquerque last night.
Hillary Clinton has somebody, did you ever hear Pocahontas?
Huh?
It's Pocahontas Elizabeth Warren.
She said she was an Indian.
She said because their cheekbones were high, she was an Indian, that she was Native American, and you know, we have these surrogates, people like her, total failures.
And I'll tell you what, our country is getting wise to what's happening.
It's a big scam, and we're all being scammed together, and we're not gonna take it anymore, okay?
We're not gonna take it anymore.
Pocahontas.
The housing crisis was a big scam.
That they're trying to now lay off on people like Trump.
And they're trying to lay off on the buyers.
And then Trump, by the way, you will never see any other Republican candidate get anywhere near first place.
She's a woman.
We can't attack the woman.
We can't oh no, we can't make fun of the woman.
We can't do that.
Well, uh Trump did.
You know, I've got a story in the stack here how Hillary has been advised by Emily's list to drop the woman card.
Did you know that?
She'd been dropped, she'd been advised drop the woman.
That's like somebody telling Obama drop the race card palace now working.
Why do you think they're telling her to drop the woman card?
Well, it isn't working, but but but why?
Anyway, one more from Trump defending himself, mocking Hillary on the housing attack.
It's very fast, 11 seconds again the Albuquerque rally.
I see this low life.
She puts on an ad.
Donald Trump is a terrible person.
And he wanted to buy housing when it was at a low point.
Who the hell doesn't?
And we will be back.
At least right.
Who does want to?
Oh no, Hillary's been selling this woman card.
She's been selling it.
It's a miserable failure.
It's a fundraising angle.
They're selling it for a dollar.
And uh and that's one of the things that that that they're being told uh Emily's listeners saying, drop it, drop it, get rid of it.
Is not worth it.
Did you see that?
This is this headline.
Bright uh plan it's from Breitbart, planned parenthood evacuates after finding unknown substance in building.
It was baby food.
Is that not classic?
They saw some Gerbers and didn't know what it was, and they evacuated.
A Florida planned parenthood abortion business was evacuated yesterday.
Seven people were taken to hospital for medical evaluation, and hazmat teams responded to emergency calls over the discovery of an unknown substance, and it turned out to be baby food, and they sent hazmat teams and they sent people to hospital.
Baby food, Gerbers.
Well, I don't know if it was Gerber's.
I don't even know what kind of baby food there is anymore.
That's just all what I remember from when I was uh growing up.
But is there still Gerber's and I know it's a it's an eternal, it's a it's a never-ending brand.
Gerber's gonna be around as long as there are people.
Mike in Washington, D.C., let's get started on the phones here.
Great to have you with us, sir.
Hello.
Just one second, please.
I didn't think you were gonna get the tower.
Okay, I'm good.
I'm outside.
Sorry, I apologize.
I wanted to say that I'm reminded so much of the 90s after this IG report.
You know, there are a lot of good reasons people wouldn't want to cooperate that have nothing to do with guilt or innocence.
Look at all the people in the 90s that were bankrupted over legal fees.
The cheapest way to avoid that is to say nothing to the prosecutors.
They don't tell you what they're investigating.
You know, knowledge of the uh law is no excuse.
Uh the cheapest thing to do is just say nothing.
I mean, this is kind of like you not announcing the uh price of your next contract is a tacit admission that Frost Ross got you bad, man.
Um yeah, what you the I I gather what you're talking about here is the uh uh back back to the the uh uh the Clinton scandals in the nineties, uh and and the drip drip, I guess you're talking about tort reform somewhere in there, but um again, here's here's the the point about this is and I've got the audio sound bites coming up.
Whenever anybody it was CNN, some guests wanted to talk about Clinton in the 90s and all of the women they they see and hosts and hostess just shut it down, and they got mad about it.
We are not going there.
That's old news.
That's tawdry, we're not going there.
And yet Bill Cosby has been dragged into court for things that he did l much longer ago than the 1990s.
I mean, Cosby is actually facing charges over this stuff, and nobody is saying, what are we doing here?
Why are we focused on Bill Cosby?
It's old news.
Nobody cares anymore.
Been there, done that.
And the same thing with with any Republican, uh it doesn't matter how old the news is, they'll go back and investigate anything if they even have to make it up.
Like Harry Reid making up the fact that Mitt Romney hadn't paid taxes in ten years.
And the media says, Well, who told you that?
And Harry says, it doesn't matter.
You need to go ask Romney why he hasn't paid his taxes in ten years.
And so the media dutifully marches off and they go and do that.
And when the campaign's over and somebody goes to Harry Reid and asks him about it, he said, hey, we won, didn't we?
Romney lost, didn't he?
So mission accomplished.
I mean, it's just it's it's more of the of the double standard, but it also indicates the fact that that these drive-by media types do not want to go back and relive.
If there's nothing that's any big deal, what's the problem?
I mean, after all, Clinton survived it.
He's got this big foundation.
He and Hillary are multi-multi-millionaires.
They are highly respected around the world for their charity work.
What is the big deal?
I mean, if if if if what happened in the 90s was no big Deal then.
Why is it a big deal now?
And obviously, it was a big deal then, and they had to work overtime to cover it up.
And they don't want to have to try to do that again, because I think they probably doubt their ability to run that same cover-up operation twice.
Let's not forget, by the way, wait till you know Trump is going to get on this.
If if they keep sending Elizabeth Warren out there, and maybe even if they don't, Elizabeth Warren was one of these house flippers.
You know, she watched these shows with these guys driving around at Rolls-Royce's telling everybody how they could be millionaires.
She bought into it.
She was flipping houses.
She was flipping foreclosed houses for personal profit.
▲
Export Selection