Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
All right, oh, back we are, ladies and gentlemen, El Rushbo here at the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, the nation's most listened to radio talk show.
By far, great to have you with us.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882.
The email address, L. Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
So Trump has gone there.
Trump has gone to all of this Clinton conspiracy stuff.
And I got people saying, why is he doing this, Rush?
Why doesn't Trump just stick to the issues?
He's got this Make America Great 3 theme going.
He's got the wall in Meiko.
He's got a why is he deviating from it?
And I want to remind you, I predicted this.
I got nothing to do with a Trump campaign.
Zilch zero, not a lot of other people do, but I don't.
And I told everybody way back when that Trump's going to go where nobody else goes with the Clintons.
He's going to go there.
And it's not unusual for Trump to rely on tabloid data for his attacks.
He's been doing it since the campaign began.
You've got to remember there's lots of people that read those things.
There's lots of people that think those things are gospel.
I mean, it is what it is.
It may not make you happy.
It may make you disappointed for the future of our human race and so forth, but it's not unusual.
Tabloids, there's no difference in e-entertainment television or TMZ or what have you.
I mean, they have various locations on the strata, but that kind of gossip, what have you, it's always going to have a big audience.
And Trump is getting to it, I think, early for a reason.
He's getting it out there.
He told everybody he was going to get it out there and he's getting it out there.
Nobody else will touch it.
Nobody else has wanted to touch this stuff ever, any of it.
You know, I had a story in the stack yesterday.
I suspect that somebody was in here monkeying with my desk last night because I left a whole stack of stuff here from yesterday's show that I didn't get to.
As I do every day, I left it there.
And there's a stack there, but it's from two weeks ago.
It's not from yesterday.
I said, what the heck happened?
Cleaning crew not engaged enough to lay it off on them.
Anyway, even though the stack is here, I remember there was a story in the stack.
I don't remember where it was from.
I'm not sure the source, but it was a subsidy drive-by media house.
And the point was in any presidential campaign, at this stage of the presidential campaign, there is always a staple that is part of the campaign that is not part of this one.
And that is criticism of the sitting president.
Evidence.
Go back to 2008.
The entire Obama campaign was about how rotten George W. Bush was.
Remember that?
I mean, it was incredible.
Everything Obama stood for, he told us, was the opposite of George W. Bush.
From the Iraq War to the war on terror to the economy, the economic collapse, you name it.
George W. Bush and his regime were the entire campaign of 2008.
Obama ripping into it and McCain trying in various different ways to defend it.
Now, as I say, that's not unusual.
It's a staple of campaigns.
And in fact, the Democrats had spent the last four years of Bush's two terms doing nothing but, I mean, it's soft-selling it to call it criticism.
They were engaged in political manslaughter, I think, what they were doing to the Bush administration.
I mean, for four years, the body counts in Iraq, the never-ending Bush Lied, People Died, Bush Hitler, movies on how to assassinate Bush, books on how to assassinate Bush the media told us were important works of art that we needed to read.
We needed to understand the rage, all this.
There has been none of that about Obama at all in eight years.
The Republican Party won't go anywhere near criticizing Obama.
The point of the story yesterday was that they won't even do it now.
That Obama is still hands off now and due entirely to one thing, his race.
There is such fear, so much fear, langering fear, lingering fear of Obama's race and being called a racist that nobody, Trump, nobody's going there.
Nobody on the Republican side.
And in fact, the entire reason that we have Trump leading this campaign right now is precisely because of what Obama has done in the last seven and a half years.
Now, Trump is focusing on Hillary, admittedly.
She is the opponent, will be, and that makes total sense.
And he's focusing on things that Hillary did while she was Secretary of State and so forth, and things Hillary did when her husband was president.
But strangely missing is anything about Obama.
And I have to admit, it's frustrating to me.
I don't care what color he is or gender or trans or any president of the United States.
The guy has attempted to subvert the U.S. Constitution every day of this presidency, it seems like.
And nobody's willing to go there very much.
Trump does some, but it's amazing how insulated the Obama presidency is.
I mean, you could, there are all kinds of ways to criticize the substantive policy initiatives that have come from this administration that have given us this rancid economy.
I mean, just the things happening with open borders that continue to happen.
Do you know now that arriving illegals are being separated into three different categories?
Adults, children, and trans.
I'm not kidding you.
There's separate facilities for transgendered illegal aliens now.
One-tenth of one-tenth of one percent of the illegal population, and we're making special accommodations for them.
I'm not saying you zero in on that, but I mean, the point is, there's no end to this.
There hasn't been any slowdown.
The invasion is continuing.
And Trump talks about it, of course, in the generic sense.
But nobody goes directly to the source.
Nobody, when talking about our rancid economy, equates it to Obama.
It's the most amazing thing.
The fear is palpable.
Don't go there because of Obama's race.
It's pure and simple.
And I'll tell you this.
And the Democrats wanted to gain the same kind of advantage with Hillary, first female president, therefore make her immune to any criticism because it'd be sexist.
But there doesn't seem to be any fear whatsoever on the part of anybody to go after her.
The fact that she might become the first female president is irrelevant.
It's not stopping anybody.
But there's a gold mine of things out there.
If you, you people upset with Trump for going after this Vince Foster type stuff that the Clintons are known for in their past, and you want Trump sticking the issues.
I'm telling you, there's plenty of stuff Trump can hit on.
And he probably will, but it was still earlier.
We haven't even had the conventions yet, folks.
And I do remember telling you that he was going to be the only guy to go after this Clinton stuff, and he is.
And he's doing it early on in the campaign, maybe to get it out of the way and say he's done it.
But he also, I think, may believe it.
I still think people are having a tough time really understanding what Trump's all about, even now.
So out of the box, so unconventional is he and his personage, if you will, when attached to what we consider to be the norms of a political campaign, presidential or otherwise.
Now, the drive-bys, the drive-bys, they're not down with this in any way, shape, man, for you don't do what Trump did yesterday and get with it at drive-bys.
And this is something that the drive-bys are circling the wagons on.
I'm not going to let Trump get away with it.
They're criticizing him in ways that they've kind of been hands-off up to now.
We have a little montage here to illustrate.
Trump's fascination with conspiracy theories continues.
Trump told the Washington Post the 1993 death of Clinton family confidant Vince Foster was, quote, very fishy.
Trump is also willing to discuss some conspiracy theories.
Trump drudged up another Clinton controversy, this time the 1993 suicide of Clinton staffer Vincent Foster.
In some dark corners of the internet, I think maybe the Vince Foster story still has some currency.
To narrow the gender gap among women, you don't do it by dredging up conspiracy theories.
Once you've got to, Vince Foster might have been murdered.
Where else do you go into the land of Clinton conspiracy?
And even that is mild.
I mean, that's the drive-bys acknowledging it, but they're not calling Trump a kook.
They're calling people that lurk in the dark corners of the internet kooks for buying into this stuff, but they're not calling Trump a kook.
Now, here Trump's put together an ad.
You know, this ad has a nice touch.
It's got Bill Clinton, black and white photo of Clinton on the golf course with a cigar in his mouth.
Nothing more said about it, just Clinton and the cigar.
We have the audio.
This is an Instagram page type ad.
It's 15 seconds, and this is how it sounds.
I was very nervous.
No woman should be subjected to it.
It was an assault.
He starts to find out my talk there.
And I try to pull away from him.
And that cackle is over a screenshot of Bill and Hillary smiling or clapping with a Chiron saying, here we go again.
The voices in the ad Kathleen Willey and Juanita Brodwick, who said he starts to a bite on my top lip and I try to pull away from him.
And what's not in the ad that, and by the way, that comes from the Lisa Myers interview that Juanita Broderick did on NBC, actually televised audio on NBC.
Kathleen Willey, no woman should be subjected to it.
It was an assault.
I remember how the Kathleen Willey stuff got started.
We were doing, well, I don't know if Kathleen Willie, was she second-term stuff or first-term stuff?
I forget when, but there was video.
Clinton had arrived on the tarmac, some airport in Virginia.
And there was this attractive woman that was seen in the camera shot.
And you can see Clinton calling some guy over and talking into his ear and pointing at that woman.
And we later came to learn that Clinton was asking, who was that?
I'd like to meet her.
And that's how the Kathleen Willey stuff got started.
So I'll tell you how this stuff attaches itself.
Clinton's out in, Bill Clinton's out in California.
He's dredging up, sorry, he's stirring up support for Hillary in advance of the California primary.
And I got an email today from somebody commenting on this.
So Clinton's out there.
He's telling everybody, he's got his big audience out there trying to get everybody worked up for the election.
And he said, hey, look, I just want to just relax.
All right.
Just relax.
Everybody's going to be okay.
And the emails I got from people, you know who says this to people, right?
Rapists.
Rapists are what?
That's the first thing they say is relax.
And I said, holy smokes, look at how people, I mean, out of the clear blue.
So Clinton, with some people, is this Juanita Broderick story has attached itself in the minds of some people.
But nevertheless, there is concern that Trump's out there focusing on all this stuff while there are bigger issues and fish to fry out there.
And they're getting concerned that this kind of attention to the fringe areas of conspiracy theoried them are going to derail Trump.
I don't think that's the case.
I think it's just Trump following through on things that he said that he would do.
Now, remember, Trump will tell you, hey, there's stuff in the National Choir that's been true.
I mean, you have to accept it until somebody disproves it.
So there's that.
And we'll see.
Trump has not run out of substantive issues to discuss, and he's not said everything about them that there is to discuss.
We'll just find out.
We'll see if time goes on if this stuff becomes a distraction and therefore a focal point for Trump or if he just makes it like a one-off.
Well, I don't know.
Question from the official program observer.
Do I think young people who've never heard of this stuff are going to be intrigued by this and thus pay more attention?
Well, I'll just tell you, let me find the Trump is moving dramatically.
The ABC Trump surge in the polls due to a massive 36% millennial swing.
Support among millennials has swung to Trump by 36%.
That is huge.
That would be the group of people you're talking about, right?
When they find out about this.
It is true.
There are a lot of millennials who do not have any idea about the Clinton 90s.
They were not born or they were not old enough.
At the same time, that means they were not captivated by the media treatment of the Clintons, which was fawning idolatry.
They were not part and parcel of that.
They didn't live through it.
If they did, they don't remember it.
And many of them are learning about this for the first time.
And you couple that with all this safe spaces stuff on campus and the fear that students have that rape is around every corner and behind every tree.
I do think that it stands to be harmful to Mrs. Clinton, to a lot of people.
Drive-by's inoculated baby boomers from this.
I mean, because of Clinton, you know, it was taught in school that Lewinsky's are not even sex.
But the people you're asking about have not even have not been, they're not immune.
They are immune to that.
They've not been exposed to it.
So I do think that it is possible to have a very negative Clinton impact on that group.
I do.
Let's take a brief time out.
My friends, we'll roll right on right after this.
You know, I'll tell you the way to look at this.
If you really want to know how to look at this, it's versus as far as the millennials are concerned that you brought up.
Donald Trump is running negative ads about Hillary, or is Donald Trump doing the job the American media refuses to do?
Is Donald Trump telling people who don't know things, things they don't know, that the media won't tell them, or is he engaged in just smears?
And I think the odds are it's going to be seen as the opposite.
I think it's going to be seen as Trump doing the job the American media and the Republican Party won't do.
Look, folks, I predicted long ago that millennials would be appalled to learn about the Clintons past.
To me, that's a no-brainer, especially women millennials and how Trump is reaching out to them, educating them.
By the way, according to that ABC Washington Post poll yesterday, Trump has just swung a lot of millennials over to his side.
36% swing.
Now, Clinton's support among young voters, 18 to 29, has dropped 19% since March.
And Trump has gained 17% support from the same demographic group.
It's a 36% swing among millennials.
And here's another thing.
What is so wrong about people being reminded of the legitimate past of Bill and Hillary Clinton?
You know what?
The reason why people are shocked and go, oh, it's because the media wouldn't do it.
And way back in the 90s, when the media wouldn't do it, a message is conveyed that it would be improper to discuss these things.
After all, the man is our president of the United States and his wife tried to save every American with health care.
It'd be terribly bad form to do this.
The media wouldn't report on it.
It conveys a message that it would be uncool to talk about these things.
But what is so wrong about people being reminded of the Clinton past or in some cases being told about it for the first time?
I mean, is anything in the past ever out of bounds for a Republican candidate?
The media go back 25, 30 years.
The media will quote sources that are 20, 25 years old that have personal grudges and so forth in their efforts to destroy Republicans.
When it comes to the Clintons, no reporting of any of this stuff ever went on.
And that conveys the message that we shouldn't discuss it.
So Trump comes along and discusses it.
And people of a certain age go, ooh, ooh, ooh, we're not supposed to, we're not supposed to talk about this.
Ooh, ooh, and they get the papers.
But millennials and other young people say, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, what's this?
I want more, whoa, whoa, whoa, we didn't know this.
Now, it's hard for people to think that people don't know this.
You didn't know about Bill Clinton and all the women.
You didn't know about Bill Clinton when he brought me.
You didn't know.
No, no, we didn't know.
And they don't know.
And the drive-bys clearly are not going to tell them.
We heard claims about Mitt Romney giving noogies to freshmen in high school, putting his dog in the roof of the car.
We don't hear a thing about the Clintons past.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
El Rushbo, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, always in a good mood, except when I'm not.
And I tell you then, sometimes people enjoy the show even more.
Look at this.
This is a story from Breitbart.
New Jersey man arrested for using mirror to look up women's skirts at Target.
A New Jersey man's been arrested and accused of using a mirror secreted in a basket to look up the dresses of women at a local Target store.
Ocean Township, New Jersey police charged 56-year-old Julius G. Reynolds with invasion of privacy after Target department store workers said they saw him placing a basket with a mirror attached to it on the floor next to female shoppers and using the mirror to look up the dresses and skirts of unsuspecting female shoppers.
Julius J. Reynolds, Julius G. Reynolds, 56, arrested May 16th, being held at the Monmouth County Correctional Institution on a $7,500 bond.
He already has a police record for such inappropriate behavior.
The subject suspect, I said, was arrested in 2007 for using his cell phone to take inappropriate photos of women.
This guy just, there's a solution for his problem.
Doesn't need to go mirrors and baskets anymore.
Just needs to change the way he identifies.
Anyway, he has a criminal history, including credit card fraud, drug offenses, and one conviction of child endangerment.
He's only being held on a $7,500 bond.
New York City, this from the Daily Caller, New York City lets you choose from 31 different identities.
Individuals living in New York City can choose from a minimum of 31 different gender identities, many of which allow them to fluctuate between some version or combination of male or female identities.
And businesses that don't respect and accommodate an individual's chosen gender identity risk incurring six-figure fines under rules implemented by New York City's Commission on Human Rights.
The list of protected gender identities available online includes options like gender bender, two-spirit, third-sex, androgynous, gender-gifted, and pangender.
A city official speaking on background confirmed that all the listed identities are protected by the city's anti-discrimination laws, but said that the list was not exhaustive.
Two-spirit individuals are Native Americans who have attributes of both men and women, have distinct gender and social roles in their tribes, and are often involved with mystical rituals.
If you identify as two-spirit, that's who you are.
Who would even know that?
Who would even know that that's what the definition of two-spirit is in terms of gender identity?
A transgender teacher, also in a daily caller, transgender teacher, has been awarded $60,000 after co-workers will not call her they.
A transmasculine teacher in an Oregon elementary school has been awarded $60,000 by her school district as compensation for harassment she claims to have suffered on the job, including being referred to with the wrong pronoun.
According to the Oregonian, Leo Sowell was born a woman, but now prefers to identify as transmasculine and quote gender queer, unquote.
After getting breast cancer in late 2014, she had her breasts amputated to create a more masculine appearance, changed her name to Leo.
Once she returned to work, Solo claims she fell victim to relentless harassment from her co-workers.
She says employees persisted in calling her hurtful terms like Miss Sowell, lady, and she.
That's what it says here.
She says employees persisted in calling her hurtful terms like Miss Sol, lady, and she.
Now, I've already forgotten how does this person identify?
Let me go back to the beginning.
Transmasculine teacher, born a woman.
No, now prefers to identify as transmasculine or genderqueer.
Right.
So if you identify as transmasculine or, quote, genderqueer, unquote, then I guess you'd be offended if they called you Miss or lady or she.
And that degree of offense was worth 60 grand.
Some teachers were even worse.
Sowell said she claimed that one teacher screamed at her in the hallway that her gender choice was offensive to God.
And she said that teachers conspired to use the school's only gender-neutral bathroom so Sowell would have to wait a half hour or more to use it.
The school conducted an internal investigation after Solo complained, but found no proof of harassment.
Eventually, Sol was able to cut a deal with the scroll to have her Apologized to and awarded $60,000.
So she purposely identifies as transmasculine and gender queer.
And we're supposed to just automatically know this.
We're supposed to just, we're walking around in school minding our own business.
Here comes the trans person who's self-identifying in these ways that we never heard of, and we're supposed to know it.
And we see somebody who looks like a woman.
We say, she, hello, miss, whatever.
And it's, you have offended me.
I am outraged.
And they get paid off for $60,000.
Moving on to Baltimore, Freddie Gray, prosecutor, criticized after officer acquitted.
Is the AP, also upset.
After two trials and zero Zipnada convictions, Baltimore's top prosecutor, Marilyn Mosby, is facing criticism that she moved too quickly to file charges against six officers in the death of Freddie Gray without first ensuring there was enough evidence to bring them to bear.
Even the judge overseeing the cases said the state failed to prove its case on any of the charges.
Is this really AP?
Who hacked this website?
When does the AP or anybody else in the drive-bys cared more about evidence when it comes to social justice?
I don't believe this.
The AP's actually concerned here that no evidence?
It's never about the evidence.
It's the seriousness of the charge.
Evidence never matters, except now it does.
So she went too soon, didn't have the evidence.
She never did have the evidence.
That's the point.
This never was about evidence.
This is a railroad job to begin with.
It was about everything but evidence.
It had objectives that had nothing to do with evidence.
The cop made a wise decision foregoing a jury trial, choosing a bench trial with just the judge, who delivered his verdict in the racially charged case before a PAC courtroom yesterday.
Noticeably absent, however, was Mosby.
She didn't show up for the reading of the verdict.
She was present in December when Officer William Porter trial hung jury and a mistrial was declared.
After announcing charges against the officers last May, Mosby did not shy from the spotlight.
She posed for magazine photos.
She sat for TV interviews.
She even appeared on stage at a Prince concert in Freddie Gray's honor.
Oh, yeah, she went all A-list on everybody.
She just bought into it, hook line, and sinker.
And now that the verdicts are coming and going against her, she can't be found.
Meanwhile, the Reverend Sharpton is not happy.
I knew this was going to happen.
I referenced this yesterday.
The following is a statement from Ebony Riley, Washington, D.C. bureau chief of the National Action Network.
Quote, we are disappointed in the decision of the court, but unfortunately not surprised, as we have seen throughout the years.
When officers opt for a trial by judge rather than by a jury, acquittal is the result.
We've been through this with Sean Bell and far too many other cases in the past.
It's exactly the reason we are calling for lowering the bar for federal prosecution and greater involvement of the federal government in cases like this.
In federal court, a jury trial cannot be weighed without the consent of the prosecution.
And we believe that is a fairer, more just process.
We continue to stand with the Gray family, blah, blah, blah, blah.
So the Reverend Sharpton and his group are now demanding that crimes like this can never again be tried by a judge.
That's what they're demanding.
Even a black judge.
So it becomes clear, real justice is the last thing these people want.
The dirty little secret of the civil rights movement.
The last thing they want is justice because they just got it and they're not happy.
Hang on, I'm waiting for something to print.
Just a minute.
There it is.
I got it.
Now we're going to start on the phones here.
Because what I just printed is going to relate to the first call here.
This is Renee and Corpus Christi, Texas.
Renee, you're first today.
Great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Thank you.
Rush, what an honor.
If I sound nervous, it's because I am.
You're such a giant.
And thank you for taking my phone call.
You do not sound nervous at all, and I'm very appreciative of your kind words.
Well, thank you so much.
Rush, I'm calling because I am a Hispanic woman, and I just want everyone to know that those polls are totally wrong.
You know, there's more people, more Hispanic people that are for Trump for the exact reasons that you're talking about.
We're tired of the Wussies, of the GOP, not calling Clinton on anything for years.
They've never done that.
And Trump is popular exactly for that.
And I hope that all your callers and all your fans are initially.
Wait, wait, wait, wait.
Renee, hang on, hang on, just what?
What polls are you talking about here?
He's getting tawdry or whatever.
Well, you know what?
You are absolutely correct earlier in that.
I got confused because you started telling me how much Hispanics like Trump, and I hadn't seen a poll.
I've seen a poll that Asians, Trump's not doing well with Asians, but I didn't see any of the Hispanics yet.
But you're saying that it's good that Trump's going after the tawdry stuff because he's the only guy who will.
Somebody has to, and the Republicans happen.
That is correct, yes.
And it doesn't make you nervous.
It doesn't make you think Trump is doing himself some damage by doing it.
You're supportive of it.
Well, I mean, I like most people, to be honest with you, I like Trump.
He wasn't my first choice, but, I mean, I think he's the only one that can beat her.
He's not afraid of saying what's really true.
And the GOP is.
But if I may, I'd like to make really one of the main points that I've been wanting to get to you for the last time.
Well, that's right.
Have at it.
Is that people that are very disappointed, the people that refer for Cruz, of which I was one of them.
My preference was Cruz, but we've got Trump, and I have no problems with him whatsoever.
But I want to remind everybody, everyone, and I have a lot of friends like myself, that Cruz would have never gotten as far as he did, nor would have Rubio had Trump not thrown his name into the ring, because we were programmed to vote for Jeb Bush, and Jeb Bush could never have beat Hillary.
But all of my friends say the same thing.
Had it not been for Trump, Cruz and Rubio would have not gotten as far.
Interesting theory.
Let's stop for a moment and think about this.
There was that pack.
I forget the name of the pack.
Mike Murphy ran the pack, GOP consultant, $115 million raised for Jeb.
Jeb was, before this whole thing began, he was the GOP presumptive nominee.
Everybody in the establishment, it was a done deal.
And remember, let's remember, one of Jeb's objectives was to win the nomination by losing the base.
You remember that?
What that meant was that the Republican establishment finally going to win this nomination, and the base of the party was not going to be happy.
They were not going to have been a factor.
That money was going to be how they were going to do it.
They were going to divide all the conservative opposition to Jeb, making sure that no conservative candidate got anywhere near enough votes to win.
That money was going to be used to promote Jeb and rip into conservatives, and Jeb was going to be the nominee because of that money, the old political playbook and rules.
Now, her theory here is that had Trump not entered the race, that's what would have happened.
And that Cruz and Rubio would not have gotten anywhere near as far as they got.
Now, that may be true.
I haven't heard a whole lot of analysis of that.
So I'm pondering this for the first time.
And I've got to be careful.
I don't want to insult anybody.
She's a cruiser, by the way.
You heard her say she was a cruise supporter, but she now likes Trump.
But it's an interesting thing to think about.
Imagine that GOP primary starting last July with no Trump in it and $115 of Jeb money being spent against Cruz.
The establishment hated Cruz.
They despised him.
They would have not wreaked as much havoc on Rubio.
Of course, Rubio had to split with Jeb anyway.
But they were all factoring.
Jeb was going to be the guy.
It didn't matter whether he's a good candidate or not.
The money was going to make the difference.
It didn't matter.
He could be a dryball on the campaign trail.
He could be a stiff.
He could be exciting.
It didn't matter.
The money was going to make it possible.
And even after Trump got in, they still thought that.
They continue to miscalculate.
They thought Trump would implode.
Steady Eddie.
Cruz said, you know what?
I'm not going anywhere near Trump.
If Trump explodes, I want to get his voters, so I'm not going to rip into him.
It's an interesting theory that Cruz and Rubio would not have gotten nearly as far as they did had it not been for Trump.
I was mistaken about what she was going to talk about.
That was her big point.
I have a story here that I was going to tack on to what I thought she was going to say.
I thought her call was primarily to praise Trump for daring to go after Bill Clinton and all of their stuff.
Because this story I have here is going to tick so many of you off.
AnthontheHill.com, you want the headline?
You don't want to hear what this is?
Ken Starr heaps praise on Bill Clinton.
Let me just leave it at that because there's not nearly enough time here before the broadcast segment ends to get into too much detail.
So I'll just leave it with this.
Ken Starr, now president of Baylor University in Waco, Texas, and under heavy investigation for looking the other way when black football players raped co-eds, now heaps praise on Bill Clinton.
Ooh, wait till you hear this.
And I have a point to make when we get there.
Don't go away.
And then there's this.
Do you know what starts on June 1st?
Hurricane season.
Try this headline.
Now listen carefully.
Tropical system May Brew near southeastern U.S. coast Memorial Day weekend.