Rush Limbaugh Program - May 16, 2016, Monday, Hour #3

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 16, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program

35:29

May 16, 2016, Monday, Hour #3

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Yes, America's Anger Man is away and this is your undocumented anger man, Mark Stein.
	No supporting paperwork whatsoever.
	Thrilled and delighted to be with you for the start of another week of excellence in broadcasting.
	Rush will return live on Wednesday.
	He's at a charity golf tournament and I hope he is enjoying his time on the links today.
	Well deserved.
	These are tough times for American conservatism.
	I said it's I've had all these, you know, it's breaking down into all this factionalism.
	I've said it's like that Monty Python, Popular Front of Judea, Judea, and Popular Front thing in the Monty Python movie.
	And I'm getting these emails saying, well, why don't you say something about this third-party run that Mitt is going to be sponsoring?
	I don't even get that.
	It's not going to happen.
	Why doesn't Mitt run himself?
	What's the idea of Mitt trying to find a sock puppet?
	If Mitt wants a third go at it, why doesn't he just do it himself?
	Why doesn't Bill Crystal do it himself?
	You can't find someone to hand a presidential nomination to.
	It's not, so we can talk about it.
	If you want, if you want to have a chat about it, give it your best shot.
	1-800-282-2882.
	I'll gladly give you my two bits worth on it.
	But it isn't going to be happening any more than all that contested convention stuff we spoke about for six months is going to be happening.
	Life is short.
	And as things stand right now, the Democrats are more likely to have a contested convention.
	I mean, Bernie Sanders has won 10 out of the last 15 competitions in state primaries.
	Barbara Boxer got booed.
	Barbara Boxer.
	Barbara Boxer, who's a lady, if you'll forgive the expression, who gets upset if you call her Madam.
	Some general addressed her as Madam in one of those Senate hearings and she said indignantly she wanted to be called Senator.
	This is a woman who gets on a high horse if you call her Madam.
	And she's being booed.
	She's being booed.
	Bernie's guys are booing her.
	Booing her.
	There's a civil war on the on the Democrat side.
	And these guys really I saw a poll.
	I saw a poll the other day.
	A third of male Democrat, registered Democrats, male in New Hampshire, 30% of them of Democrat males in New Hampshire are planning to support Trump.
	Hillary is a weak candidate.
	Bernie is a glamorous candidate who has enthused the base.
	They might well be the ones with a, and they've got a rotten corrupt system there.
	They might well be the ones with a contested contested convention.
	But as this, this whole, I just can't take seriously people that are saying, oh, you know, we're going to get John Kasich.
	Mitt Romney has called John Kasich and urged him to run as an independent third-party candidate.
	It's like, have you seen that Avengers movie that's out?
	My kids love it.
	Captain America Civil War.
	It's where half of the Avengers gang up on the other half of the Avengers.
	It's made a bazillion dollars in its first two weekends.
	And my kids love this movie.
	And this is basically what's going on on the Republican party is basically with Bill Crystal and Co.
	It's like the policy wonks version of Captain America Civil War.
	You've got like Captain America.
	Donald Trump is Captain America.
	He's gone to Avengers headquarters in Washington for a showdown with Ryan man, Paul Ryan, over his plan to make America great again.
	And meanwhile, Rhino man, Mitt Romney, and Super PAC man, Mike Murphy, who has the amazing superpower of being able to take $100 million and shrink it to a buck 79.
	Now that low energy man, Jeb Bush, he's bit the dust.
	So they're urging the mighty sass, Ben Sass, and the world's oldest boy sidekick, Buckeye.
	That's John Kasich, whose superpowers don't work beyond the state borders, to jump into the fight against Captain America.
	And meanwhile, Captain America has the support of Newt Mann, Newt Gingrich, and the incredible bulk, Chris Christie, and the reformed evildoer, Low Key, Ben Carson.
	But nobody knows which way the black widow, Carly Fearina, she mates, she kills.
	Nobody knows which way the black widow is going to jump.
	And tomorrow night, Captain America has a romantic evening planned with the Scarlet Witch, Megan Kelly.
	None of this matters.
	None of this matters.
	None of this.
	As I said, this is just the Avengers for policy wonk nerds.
	Nobody cares about this.
	In the real world, none of this has any meaning.
	So as I said in the first hour, let's take it as read that we all hate each other and try to figure out where we go from here.
	You know what does matter today?
	This day, I don't want to let this show go without mentioning this.
	It's the 100th anniversary today, May 16th, 1916, 100 years ago today, the Sykes-Picot Accord was signed between Sir Mark Sykes for His Britannic Majesty's government and François Georges Picot for the French Republic,
	under which Britain and France carved up the middle, agreed to carve up the Middle East once they defeated the Ottoman Empire.
	So in a sense, today, and this is what they did when they did defeat the Ottoman Empire, more or less.
	So 100 years ago today, Sir Mark Sykes and Monsieur Georges Picot met to invent the modern Middle East, whose consequences we live with to this very day.
	And Sir Mark Sykes was a, I think he was a fifth or sixth baronet.
	I knew his son, Christopher.
	I knew his son Christopher quite well at one point in his life.
	And Sir Mark Sykes never lived to see the results of his work because at the Versailles Peace Conference in 1919, while he was making plans to carve up the map, he contracted the Spanish flu that was going around after the, in the wake of the Great War, and he died in his hotel in Paris during the Versailles Peace Conference.
	But the Sykes-Picot Accord created what we now know today as Syria and Lebanon and Jordan and Iraq and essentially the territory that is now occupied by Israel and the Palestinian authority in Gaza and the West Bank.
	The modern Middle East is 100 years old today.
	And what ISIS is doing on the Syria and Iraq border is effectively erasing the Sykes-Picot Accord.
	And they're saying, to hell with it, we're dissolving these borders and we're creating a new superstate.
	And this anniversary is more significant for the fate of the world than whether, you know, Mitt persuades Ben Sasse to run.
	One of the reasons why this idea isn't getting any traction is because the national security right, and as you can tell, I'm basically a 19th century imperialist 100 years past my sell-by date, but the national security right does not have a lot to show for the last 15 years in Iraq and Afghanistan.
	What remains of the official state of Iraq is basically an Iranian protectorate, and the rest of it has gone over to the head choppers.
	And what's going to happen in Afghanistan 10 minutes after the last American soldier leaves is that the Taliban are going to be swarming all over the place and you won't even be able to tell we were ever there.
	So instead of saying, instead of getting outraged at why people are no longer responsive to the urge to intervene in Syria or in Yemen or wherever the next place is, a certain amount of circumspection after the last 15 years, I think is necessary.
	I don't think it's anything to do with military force or military capability.
	It's nothing to do with what's actually happening on the ground.
	It's to do with all the other elements of state power that you use when you go to war or when you go adventuring overseas.
	If you don't go into these adventures with strategic clarity, then you do what we've done.
	You're just like tourists in the heart of darkness and 15 years and a huge pile of corpses and a huge, even bigger pile of horribly wounded people who will live with the pain of that adventure every day of their lives.
	Nobody can remember what the hell it was for or whatever you were intending to accomplish.
	And if you look at what people, particularly in the Arab world, don't like what Mark Sykes and Monsieur Georges Picot did 100 years ago today.
	They don't like that agreement.
	It chafes with them and they resent it to this day.
	But the fact is, those guys had some kind of strategic clarity about what they wished to accomplish and about what the world after the Ottoman Empire was going to look like.
	And they didn't go in there under any delusions about the fact that you could suddenly turn the plains of the foothills of the Hindu Kush into Vermont or Massachusetts.
	They didn't go into it like that.
	And the one reason, as I said, there are two big issues that the disaffected part of the Republican Party has to have a think about.
	They have to think about this immigration issue.
	There are no takers in the Republican base for more mass unskilled immigration driving down American wages.
	There are no takers for that.
	So at some point, guys like Paul Ryan are going to have to change their mind on that.
	And on the other side of the equation, on foreign policy and on what one might loosely call our way of war and the reasons we go to war and what we wish to accomplish when we wage war, again, I think after the last 15 years, it's not unreasonable to understand why the base is no longer persuaded by the arguments being made by Washington think tanks on that score.
	And I've had these things saying, you know, oh, you're just a shill for Trump.
	No, I'm not.
	I happen to think Trump is going to win.
	I happen to think Trump is going to win.
	And I think he might win big or he might win narrowly.
	And I think there's a possibility that if Hillary does win, it will be extremely narrow and would be an extremely narrow victory.
	But I think the fact is that Trump is going to win, and he's not a Conservative.
	So you have to do, in that situation, you have to do what political parties do.
	When Mrs. Thatcher won the leadership of the British Conservative Party, most of her fellow party bigwigs weren't with her.
	That's why she presided over a cabinet in which there were all kinds of squishy people who found her a bit strong meat for their tastes.
	If you look in Australia at the moment, basically the right of centre party is in government, but the prime ministership was kind of hijacked by a guy who's not conservative in any way.
	He has a sort of liberal technocrat view of things.
	So the trick is to surround him by, make sure that in cabinet, at least in his ministry, that there's conservative figures represented there.
	So what would be more useful?
	If you're a disaffected conservative and you think Trump is someone who is at odds with all your Conservative principles, then you should do what the Bushies did with Reagan in 1980.
	They got their guy as the vice president, as the counterweight to the ticket.
	You should start thinking about who you want to start maneuvering into position for Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense or other key figures in a Trump administration.
	But Trump is going to be the candidate.
	So do you want to find the Reagan-Bush ticket in 1980 was like a balance ticket.
	That was the idea of it.
	So do you want to make sure you have a voice in this guy's team, or do you just want to pursue a fiction like persuading John Kasich to mount a Kamikaze-Kasich independent run?
	That isn't going to go anywhere.
	That isn't going to go anywhere.
	You know, these guys are supposed to be the realists.
	And the realist is that either Clinton or Trump is going to be the president next January.
	So do you want to have some influence?
	And if so, which side do you want to have influence on?
	That's the choice.
	That's the choice.
	Mark Stein in for Rush.
	We'll take your calls straight ahead.
	Mark Stein in for Rush on America's number one radio show.
	I was talking about all the fractiousness in the Democrat Party with Barbara Boxer being booed by the party faithful at the Nebraska Convention because she's a Hillary supporter.
	It got even worse at the Lowe's Atlanta Hotel.
	Wendell Pierce, who plays Detective William Bunk Moreland on the hit HBO series The Wire, was arrested after he got into it with a woman called Maggie Backer.
	They began a conversation about politics, which got Mr. Pierce upset.
	Mrs. Backer stated that Mr. Pierce began to push her.
	And at this point, she and her friends began to walk to their room.
	Mrs. Backer stated that Mr. Pierce followed them to their room, stuck his arm in the door, tried to enter the room.
	She accuses him of hitting her in the head and grabbing her hoodie as she and her friends allegedly attempted to push him from getting into the room.
	The argument here is that Wendell Pierce is a Hillary supporter, a Hillary supporter, and this poor woman, Mrs. Backer, is a Bernie Sanders supporter.
	So Wendell Pierce was going full bill on these Bernie supporting women and just taking it to them a little more forcefully than he should have.
	He was charged with simple battery by the Fulton County Sheriff with bond bail set at $1,000.
	This is what's happening on the Democrat side.
	A Hillary supporter is following a Bernie Sanders supporting woman to her room and hitting her in the head and grabbing her hoodie and trying to pull her out of the room so they can continue their discussion on who the superdelegates should vote for at the convention.
	This is what's happening on the Democrat side and everyone is just fussing about Trump never Trump.
	There's a whole Hillary Bernie thing going on on the Democrat side that could get even more lively if it comes to the convention.
	No, well, maybe I think he should have them over to a beer summit, Mr. Snerdley.
	I think that's the way you deal with that.
	He should have Wendell Pierce over to a beer summit with Mrs. Backer in the Rose Garden, and then Wendell Pierce can smash the beer glass over Mrs. Backer's head and reenact the whole thing for the president.
	That's how that'll go.
	Let's go to Gary in Diamond Lake, Washington.
	Gary, you're live on the Rush Limbaugh show.
	Great to have you with us.
	Yes, Mark, I wanted to comment on these talking heads who think Trump is not presidential.
	They obviously think only their view of what's presidential is what Americans should think.
	Right.
	Fed up with these people.
	Look at what we have now as a president.
	A president who lies to the American people about Obamacare.
	A president who lies to the people about Iranian negotiation on nuclear weapons.
	A president who always comes down on the wrong side of a racial issue even before all the facts are known.
	That's presidential?
	I don't think so.
	You make a good point, Gary.
	Go ahead.
	Well, that's why people are fed up with the PC stuff.
	They're fed up with the one-way politics.
	And that's why Trump's winning the GOP nomination, and that's why he will win the presidency.
	Yeah, there's a lot to be said for that.
	There's nothing terribly presidential if you look at – he had some 9-11 truther, this rap guy, Macklemore, who made a statement saying that George W. Bush took down the Twin Towers.
	He thinks Bush somehow got the plane to fly into the buildings on 9-11, but he was just fated at the White House by Obama.
	That doesn't seem terribly presidential.
	Obama likes to hang out with Beyoncé, who outsources her clothing line to Sri Lankan slave workers who make six bucks a day.
	That doesn't seem terribly presidential.
	Obama can't even go to give a commencement address, as he did this weekend, without politicizing it, not on any issues, not on any policies, but against a specific candidate, so that if you happen to be graduating and you happen to be a Republican or your parents happen to be a Republican, you're excluded from one of the great transitions from childhood to adult of your family's life.
	The president is saying, no, you're not part of this because he can't even leave.
	That's not terribly presidential.
	Taking $100 million from sleazy, fat, corrupt, misogynist Saudi princes as Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton have done.
	What the hell is presidential about that?
	Hey, great to be with you.
	Rush is taking part in a charity golf tournament today, and he will be golfing tomorrow as well.
	But he will be back Wednesday for the real deal, authentic, full-strength excellence in broadcasting of the all-American variety, except no substitute.
	If you go to rushlimbaugh.com, don't forget you can sign up for Rush 24-7, and you need never be discombobulated by any sinister foreign guest hosts ever again.
	You can get Rush at any hour of the day or night you so desire him in any form you want.
	You can get the audio, you can get the Ditto cam, you can get transcripts, you can sign up for the Limbaugh letter, you can do it all at rushlimbaugh.com.
	Mark Stein Inforush, I began by talking about this Weird scene that ought to embarrass any First World country of people sleeping on the concourse of the airport.
	Not because there's been a disaster, not because the planes aren't there or the pilot's not there or there's a strike of air traffic controllers, but because the Transport Security Administration can't process them through the check-in lines within three hours.
	Now, it's not just O'Hare it's happening at.
	It was happening at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport today.
	That's one of the busiest airports in the world.
	I believe it certainly was at one point actually the busiest airport in the world.
	I don't know whether it still is now because there's a lot of airlines that sort of connect through there to other places.
	So it's an important airport.
	It's not a small thing if Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport is not functioning.
	And it's not.
	The airport recommends travelers now arrive three hours early on what they call high traffic days like Monday.
	Okay?
	Once upon a time, they used to talk about high traffic days like it was the day before Thanksgiving.
	It was a special occasion.
	Now Monday is a high traffic day and you have to arrive three hours early.
	Airport officials are passing out snacks and water to those waiting in the line.
	So you think about it.
	You're like an 87-year-old and you're going flying across the country to visit your grandchild.
	You've got to stand in line for three hours.
	Three hours at the airport.
	And if you're lucky, whatever lousy airline or whatever guys are running the airport will come by and give you a bottle of water.
	You better drink that bottle of water because you won't be able to, because it'll be more than three fluid ounces.
	So you won't be able to take it through the line with you once you start snaking your way through.
	It's not, imagine if you're a mother with a newborn baby.
	You've got to stand in line for three hours at an American airport.
	At an American airport.
	Obama.
	Actually, let's take John on this because he wants to talk about the Rutgers commencement speech by the president.
	So let's go to John in Crofton, Maryland, because you want to talk.
	I'll talk about, I've got a point I want to make about this, Rutgers.
	Mark Stein, you son of a gun.
	I always wait for you to come on so that I can talk to you.
	I got some knowledge of the Vermont, New Hampshire area.
	When I applied for college in 1958, I applied to just two schools.
	And one was Rutgers in New Brunswick, the fancy school, the state university, and to Dartmouth.
	And I said to my father, I got accepted at both.
	He said, well, where do you want to go?
	And I said, well, you know, Dartmouth is twice as expensive as Rutgers.
	He says, well, if that's where you want to go, I'll get another job and you're going there.
	So that's where I went.
	But anyway, I still remember my contact in those days when Rutgers was all male.
	And a lot of people thought it was an Ivy League school because the first collegiate football game was between Princeton and Rutgers.
	That's right.
	And since Princeton was Ivy League, they figured Rutgers was, but it did have, you know, higher standards and everything.
	Now, I saw the president there at the commencement, and he was talking about this gender-neutral or transgender thing and how everybody's got to be treated equally and you shouldn't bully people.
	And he mentioned some 10-year-old girl that fought bullying.
	And then I'm thinking, hey, not too long ago, I'm probably a member, would have been a member of this graduating class, was this gay guy that his dorm mates or his roommate put a camera in his room screening him having sex with another guy, and then they put it on the internet, and the guy freaked out, and he went up to the George Washington Bridge and killed himself.
	And so is Rutgers really the best place to be telling them, you know, this is the way to go and you've got to be tolerant and, you know, this is a wonderful school.
	The school sucks.
	You know, they might call it the state university.
	It's not what it used to be.
	I don't know whether they still have the girls' school there.
	In my day, you went to Douglas if you're a female.
	If you're male, you went to Rutgers.
	But the president is such a hypocrite.
	I mean, this is a diversion, but it's just another thing in his bucket in the next eight months to screw this country as bad as he can.
	Well, you know, John, the thing about this whole transgendered business, the bathroom thing, it's not really about bathrooms.
	What it is, it's about crushing dissent.
	It's about another area of life that you're not allowed to have a dissenting opinion on.
	Basically, this transgendered bathroom business that no one gave a thought to a year ago when mysteriously the New York Times began running a big bunch of pieces about it.
	What it is, it's a way of saying that there's only one official position on this, and if you disagree with it, you're a hater.
	And so don't bother to disagree with it.
	Even if you feel a thought rising in the gullet of your throat to express a mild concern about this, keep it to yourself because otherwise you'll be damned as a hater, the way the state of North Carolina is.
	And it's the same thing with climate change, where 20, I've got a thing about this at my website today.
	I wrote a whole book on this business.
	Climate change, again, in fact, I testified to the United States Senate in front of Ted Cruz's committee about this, too.
	Climate change is about the state now is criminalizing dissent.
	There's one correct position on that.
	There's one correct position on climate change.
	There's one correct position on transgendered bathrooms.
	And if you disagree on this ever-lengthening list of subjects to which free speech no longer applies, you're a hater.
	And that's the point of what the president was doing there.
	The thing I found, you know, he had all these kind of liberal bromides, these things that sound bland and unexceptional.
	You know, the things that Hillary Clinton says, you know, oh, building walls is not who we are.
	Building walls is not who we are.
	We're better than that.
	You know, we're building bridges.
	No, they're not building walls.
	These guys live behind walls.
	You can't get into the presence of Hillary Rodham Clinton without undergoing a background check.
	You can get into the United States without a, you can get into the United States without a background check.
	You can just walk in.
	But you can't get into the presence of Hillary Rodham Clinton without undergoing a background check.
	They're making the wall at the White House, the people's house, the people's house, they're making the wall at the White House higher because the President of the United States, Barack Obama, didn't feel the wall he lives behind was high enough.
	So they're making it higher for him.
	These guys live in the in these guys live behind the walls and they venture out in their 40-car motorcades to tell us that we don't need a wall.
	We don't need these security barriers.
	We need to build bridges.
	We need to reach out.
	We need to reach out to that guy with the looks slightly bulky around the waist and what is that he's saying, Allahu Act something or other.
	We need to reach out and embrace him.
	And they tell us that in their commencement speeches at Rutgers and then they go back and they live behind their wall at the White House.
	That's what they do.
	It's interesting to me how fast moving Obama is right now.
	This transgender bathroom thing, which basically means that if you identify, if you claim to identify as a particular sex, you can go into that sex's bathroom.
	So if you're a 14-year-old boy and you want to shower with the 12-year-old girls, you can do that.
	I took part in a debate in Toronto a couple of weeks ago with the former UN High Commissioner of Human Rights, Louise Arbor.
	And we were talking about all these migrants in Germany.
	And I made the point that they've got all these gang rape gangs in Germany now.
	It's a crime that actually didn't exist.
	And now they have these migrant gang rapes taking place in public, in parks, on railway stations, even in City Hall in one German town, in swimming municipal swimming pools.
	And I made the point there that effectively the German state has decided that multiculturalism trumps women's rights.
	Same in Austria.
	The police chief in Vienna says it's not safe for women to go out unaccompanied in the evening.
	Same in Sweden, where they cancelled Earth Day, where the environmentalists turn off all the lights because it was not safe to turn off the lights with all these migrant gangs going around town.
	Yeah, so multiculturalism trumps environmentalism and it trumps women's rights.
	And if I was a woman, since we're all going to be talking about women, since the New York Times is fascinated by women's rights and thinks that women's rights are something to do with Donald Trump saying, hey, get a look at my piece of arm candy when he's at Mar-a-Lago in 1972, they think that's what women's rights are.
	No, women's rights are in Vienna where the police chief says it's not safe for a woman to go out unaccompanied.
	So in Germany, in Europe, multiculturalism trumps women's rights.
	The Justice Department has just announced that transgendered identity politics trumps women's rights.
	That if you're a 12-year-old girl and you don't want to shower with a 14-year-old penis standing next to you, tough, you're the bigot.
	You're the bigot.
	Because only a bigoted woman would be offended by the sight of another woman's penis.
	How ridiculous is that?
	So we now have transgendered rights trump women's rights.
	If I was a woman, like if I happen to be, hypothetically speaking, the first woman candidate running for the presidency of the United States, I'd be getting a little steamed at the way women are being forced further and further to the back of the bus.
	So in Vienna, they can't go out at night.
	In Cologne, they get groped en masse on New Year's Eve.
	In what's it called, Osterberg or Ostengard in Sweden, they have to have Earth Hour cancelled because it's not safe to switch the lights out.
	And just to add to the final indignity, if the woman in the shower with you has got the old meat and two veg swinging around around there, you're a bigot if you decide you don't want to shower for her.
	If I was the first female candidate for the presidency of the United States, I'd be thinking women are gradually being forced further and further to the back of the bus.
	And that this might be, if we're going to talk about women's issues, then this might be more relevant than what Bikini Donald Trump picked out for his date in Mar-a-Lago in 1968.
	Mark Stein for Rush, more to come.
	Mark Steiner for Rush.
	Mr. Snurdley took a call from someone who couldn't stay, but he actually made a very thoughtful point.
	He wanted to know, because these are turbulent times for investors, and you never know what's a good long-term bed or short-term bed.
	And he wanted to know whether this was a good time to invest in property in Canada, given the number of people who are threatening to leave and move to Canada in the event that Trump is elected.
	I'm just interested, speaking as a Canadian, why Americans always want to move to Canada rather than Mexico, by the way.
	I don't kind of get that.
	As far as I can understand it, Liberals want Mexicans to move into the country, which indicates they are well disposed towards Mexicans.
	But then when Liberals threatens to leave the country, they always want to go to Canada.
	I don't even get it.
	I don't know what's up with that.
	But anyway, lots of people are threatening to leave the country if Trump is elected.
	So this is a good time to invest in Canadian real estate, because if you buy, say, a shack on the shores of Hudson's Bay or James Bay, say, not too far north, you don't want it to be inconvenient because presumably some of these celebrities will be flying back to do movies occasionally.
	But just south of the Arctic Circle, say, in James Bay, if you were to buy a shack for a piece of, say, beachfront property in James Bay, just south of the Arctic Circle, for about $2,000, you could then sell it to Lena Dunham for maybe $12 million.
	So this actually is an excellent time to invest in Canadian real estate.
	And we do encourage you to take advantage of that investment opportunity.
	I was talking about the tax on women in Germany.
	And the German government has now issued a manual.
	By the way, America will be issuing this manual once Bill Clinton's back in the White House.
	It's a sex manual for immigrants.
	And they had one originally a few months ago, and it had things like a man pulling down a woman's bathing suit and then a big X over it.
	So, for example, if you see a woman with an attractive bottom, don't remove her bathing suit until you've at least said, hello, I'm going to remove your bathing suit now.
	So it had a big X over it.
	And it had a picture of a woman's breast and a hand groping it and then with a big X over it saying, that's not something you do.
	You wait until, you know, you should wait at least a good six or seven minutes before putting your hand on her breasts.
	But it wasn't sophisticated enough.
	So they've now done another one that they're issuing to migrants, which has got far more graphic pictures about how you are about sex with virgins, sex during it after pregnancy.
	And then there's a whole lot of other sexual acts that this newspaper report has blurred out and explaining that these are things where you're required to get consent.
	As I said, they'll be issuing it to Bill Clinton once he's back in the White House.
	But this is what it's come from.
	That is what it's come to now.
	They're issuing, they say, oh, it's a cultural difference.
	It's a cultural difference.
	It's multiculturalism because in some cultures they just say, ah, a woman, I yank down her bathing suit and admire her bottom and then jump on it.
	And in other cultures, you have to leave it until, you know, you usually have to buy a movie and make boring chit-chat during dinner before you get anywhere near that.
	And this is the multicultural world that they're building for us and which women are expected to put up with.
	So there are women's issues, and they're nothing to do with stupid stories in the New York Times.
	Mark Stein for Rush, back in a moment.
	We're going to need a bigger wall.
	A swarm of aggressive bees has been attacking a town in California.
	That's huge aggressive bees attacking California.
	I think it's the plague of locusts that should be showing up any day now.
	Maybe we'll get to that tomorrow.
	This has been Mark Stein, your undocumented anchor man sitting in.

▲