All Episodes
Previous Next
May 16, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:25
May 16, 2016, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, America's anchorman is away today, and this is your undocumented anchorman, Mark Stein.
Honored to be here live from Ice Station EIB in far northern New Hampshire.
If you're fleeing the country, and many people are these days, if you're fleeing the country, do swing by and say, Hi, you can't missus.
There's a big sign on the highway saying Last Rush guest host before the border.
We always love to see you.
I was talking about how I was stunned by this side of people sleeping on the concourse at O'Hare because the lines to get into Homeland Security are now so long at O'Hare in Chicago that their flights left and the airport had to provide them with cots to sleep on the floor overnight.
There's a lot of this kind of stuff about.
Manchester United, 20 minutes before kickoff, they found a supposed bomb in the toilet.
Manchester United for red-blooded Americans is an English football team, which you chaps call soccer, I believe.
Manchester United, they had to scrap the match 20 minutes before kickoff because a bomb was found in the toilets.
It wasn't, in fact, a bomb.
It was a fake bomb that had been accidentally left there during a terror exercise in the stadium at Old Trafford in Manchester earlier this week.
So it's like, yeah, you don't have to worry about this.
This is an official bomb because they've been practicing what might happen in a terrorist strike on Manchester United.
And they accidentally, while they were practicing the terrorist strike on Manchester United, the exercise went terrific.
It just went fabulous.
It was perfect.
The exercise was incredible.
It was brilliant.
It was wonderfully timed.
Everything went well, except they accidentally left the bomb in the toilets at the end of the exercise.
So 20 minutes before the big match for Manchester United, they have to cancel it.
And all these thousands of fans go home.
They're all out of pocket.
The match is scrapped.
Millions of pounds lost.
It's set to cost Manchester United £3 million.
As club sources admitted, the idiot who left the fake bomb behind is in for a right kicking, as they put it.
This is the state of the world now.
As I said last hour, the terrorists have won.
The terrorists have won.
They've changed the way we live.
We now take it as read that the big security state has the right to do this to us, to take hours of our time.
Even if you're a minimum wage guy, you know, you're a minimum wage.
What does Bernie want to make the minimum wage?
15 bucks?
Even if you're a minimum wage worker, if you've got to spend three hours trying to get through to the secure zone at O'Hare Airport, that's $45 of your life that the big security state has taken away from you.
If you pay for a big ticket to this Manchester United game, just the theater of terrorism.
It doesn't have to be a real bomb now.
At this rate, the terrorists don't have to blow up anything.
We're just going to go broke chasing phantoms.
And this, well, we're secure from what, Mr. Snadley?
We're secure from what?
This is again the way I would suggest on the reason we have Trump.
Bill Crystal, as I said, I really like Bill Crystal.
I don't know him well, but when you meet him, he's an awfully nice chap and delightful company and all the rest of it.
But Bill is looking at this the wrong way.
Trump is the expression of dissatisfaction at, I would say, two elements of American life and Western life more broadly.
And I would say the first one is this, the immigration, the immigration issue.
Most people don't see the need for millions and millions of low-skilled immigrants pouring into the country all the time.
They simply don't accept the bipartisan consensus on that.
And they would like the Republican Party, they think in a two-party system where one party, the Democrats, are shrewd enough to import voters.
The other party ought to be shrewd enough to get on side with its base and defend the integrity of American borders and a realist approach to the security challenges that face us.
For example, if you take Europe, the continent of Europe, Americans always talk about Europe as if it's one country.
Oh, I'm going to Europe.
Have you seen what's happening in Europe?
They've got a lot of trouble in Europe.
But in fact, it's broken up into dozens of countries.
And the rate at which bombs go off and people get killed is roughly proportional to the number of the size of the Islamic community in that country.
That is a fact.
It's an unfortunate fact, but it's a fact.
So that in Paris, Paris, France has the highest proportionate number of Muslims in Europe.
So you have all that bloodbath in Paris.
You have the Charlie Hebdo guys being gunned down because a significant number of people in the French state no longer believe in free speech.
Brussels is 25% Muslim.
So you have subway stations and you have airports attacked because that community provides enough of a comfort zone for people who want to blow up and destroy the infidel to move about in.
On the other hand, you have a place like Poland, which has statistically an irrelevant number of Muslims, so nothing gets blown up in Poland.
So there is some kind of correlation between the rate of Muslim immigration and the amount of bombs going off in your society.
So when Donald Trump says, Rush quoted me on this a few weeks ago, I think I said it on TV somewhere.
When Donald Trump says we should have a moratorium on immigration from Muslim countries, to the average person, that sounds a lot less nutty than John Kerry standing up as they're still swabbing the streets in Paris of blood.
John Kerry standing up in Paris and saying this has nothing to do with Islam.
Or Barack Obama saying this has nothing to do with Islam.
Or Paul Ryan saying, that's not who we are.
That's not who we are.
You know, a prudent state has to take security measures seriously.
Or you look at that three-hour delay at O'Hare and people sleeping overnight on the concourse and think how long that's going to be without a change in policy in two, four, five, ten years' time.
That's a long way to go.
In fairness, you know, I was talking about the sclerosis of the Republic, the way everything seems to be seizing up.
And I suppose I ought to put in a good word for American innovation because I see this headline from CBS News on the first U.S. penis transplant, which happened in Boston.
It happened in Massachusetts.
Massachusetts hospital has performed the first penis, successful U.S. penis transplant.
I don't know how it is.
I guess all around the world, maybe people listening to this show in Uzbekistan are saying, ah, those Americans, we have been transplanting our penises for years.
I bet in Yemen, you know, Yemen, they have a lot of workplace accidents where the jihadist suicide bombers accidentally prematurely self-detonate before they get out to blow up the train station.
So they've got a lot of need for penis transplants in Yemen and Raziristan.
But anyway, there's apparently been the first successful penis transplant in Massachusetts.
I don't know many details about that.
I don't know.
Was it Mitt Romney?
Did he transplant his penis to Ben Sas to run third party?
I don't know.
We'll try and get more details as they come out.
But it, of course, raises a lot of questions with healthcare.
I gather with Obamacare that they'll only, if you've got an Obamacare plan, they only cover the first three inches.
But on the other hand, with Blue Cross, Blue Shield, you've got like a nine-inch deductible.
So it's all, it's swings and roundabouts on these things.
But anyway, there's the first U.S. penis transplant.
That is about the only good news of the day completed in a Boston hospital.
I don't know.
There's a lot of it going around.
I don't know.
How's Caitlin Jenner doing these days?
Rush was talking about detransitioning the other day, so I don't guess hers will be coming up any day soon.
Anyway, there we are.
That's breaking news on the medical innovation front.
To go back to that healthcare situation, though, those guys laughing it up.
I would urge you, if you could find that Charlie Rose clip on PBS, what's fascinating to me is these two 12-year-old speechwriters for Barack Obama.
They're laughing.
One of them comes up and goes, don't give me credit, it's the other guy who came up with the, if you like your health, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.
And they're laughing, and Charlie Rose is laughing.
They're laughing at the ease with which, and maybe they haven't rationalized it, but that's actually what they're doing.
They're laughing at the ease with which they were able to put one over on the American people to the point where healthcare in this country is completely wrecked now.
It's neither public nor private.
It's some hideous monstrosity that's neither that's got the worst elements of both systems.
So you no longer have the universal access of a public system, but nor do you have the freedom and customer choice of a private system.
It's the worst of both worlds.
My company has the misfortune to be insured by Blue Cross Blue Shield, who are like, they're in the witness protection program, so they change their name every few months.
In New Hampshire, when they entered the witness protection program, what are they called?
They're called Anthem, is that right?
Anthem.
So they're calling themselves Anthem.
But then in Vermont, they call themselves something else and Massachusetts something else because they've entered the witness protection program.
But Blue Cross Blue Shield sent me a thing saying, oh, we've that and they send you 47 pieces of mail every week.
And 45 of them are irrelevant.
So you get into the habit of not opening them because they're just junk.
And then the 46th is one.
They sent one to my son the other day saying they'd accidentally given his social security number and released all his personal details to some hacker.
So some guy now is going to get a hernia operation on my son's tab.
And then they sent one, that's the 46th piece.
The 47th piece of mail they sent the other day saying, oh, we've just renewed you for another year.
We've changed the conditions of your plan.
You now have a $20,000 deductible.
And who needs insurance if you've got a $20,000 deductible?
You know, if you were in Switzerland, that would be enough for three fatal illnesses.
You could die three times over with long chronic diseases for a $20,000 deductible in Switzerland.
So who the hell needs insurance?
So we had to get it changed.
We got it into some fancy schmancy plan that's only got a, you know, what's the deductible now?
Is it a, are we below five figures?
We've got a below five figure deductible.
No?
What is it?
What is it?
Go on.
I'll take a guess.
This is like the price is right.
What is it?
$12,000 deductible?
$9,000?
Oh, we've got, oh, we're down to a $3,000.
Oh, we've got a platinum plan.
Oh, right.
Well, yeah, we've got a, oh, wow, yeah.
Oh, put me down for a penis transplant this afternoon.
I'm going to take advantage of that before they change the terms.
Mark Stein in for rush.
We'll take your calls straight ahead.
Mark Stein in for us on America's number one radio show.
While we're talking about innovation, I was talking about the first U.S. penis transplant, which took place in Massachusetts.
I believe the Republican Party is on the waiting list for one.
We now have more innovative news.
A Washington law firm, Baker and Hostettler, I'm actually in a lawsuit with them at the moment.
They're representing one of my co-defendants on the thing, but they have apparently started using the first robot lawyer, which will use the AI lawyer Ross in its bankruptcy division.
So if you're going bankrupt, and many of us are these days, you can now go to a lawyer and they will assign you a robot lawyer.
If you're scared of lawyers and you're scared of robots, they've now got a robot lawyer.
Objection, your honor.
And this is at this firm Baker and Hostettler, who happened to be counsel for one of my co-defendants in an interminable climate change case that would depress me too much to mention right now.
Let's go to John in Alcoa, Tennessee.
John, you're live on the Rush Limbaugh Show.
Great to have you with us.
Thanks, Mr. Stein.
I was curious to get your opinion on which do you think is worse for the party?
The never Trumpers who say that they're just going to outright vote for Hillary, the people that are so-called conservative Republicans that have switched loyalties, or the people who just back off and say they're not even going to vote in an election so they can wipe their hands clean if Hillary should win.
Well, I don't know that their hands will be that clean if Hillary wins.
The Never Trump movement, which is waning by the day simply because of the reality of the facts on the ground, that most of the state Republican parties are now living with the results of the primary system and have decided to.
And so there's a few holdouts like Mike Murphy, the guy who blew $100 million of his donor's money getting Jeb to 2.8% in Iowa and is now going back to them to ask them to fund a third-party run, which will have the effect of delivering the White House to Hillary.
And then, as you said, on the other side of it, you've got people who are just outright voting for her straight up.
Like I mentioned, P.J. O'Rourke, my fellow granite stater three hours south of me, and Max Boot, who was my editor at the Wall Street Journal, and various people who've said, well, we've looked at Hillary and we've looked at Trump, and they've made the argument that the PGO Rourke does, that Hillary is a disaster within conventional political norms, whereas Trump for PJ O'Rourke is just a leap into the unknown.
So he's decided he's a Republican who's going to be voting for Hillary Clinton.
And in a sense, I think that, given that it's a two-party system in America, there's only two people on the ballot who have a prospect of being president when all the numbers are counted.
Then in a sense, it's a more principled position to say, instead of pretending to be part of some never Trump principled, I don't want to dirty my hands thing, to do what PG O'Rourke is doing and just saying, I'm going over to the other side like that.
Boom, I'm done.
I'm out of here.
I'm voting Democrat.
Because it's not, as I've said on this show before, John, you know, in other countries, parties ebb and flow and come and go.
And there's all kinds of parties for all kinds of positions.
And in the last Canadian election last year, where the Conservative Prime Minister called an election, it was in the course of the couple of months of the campaign.
In the midpoint, it looked as if it was going to be the new Democrat socialist guy who was going to be prime minister.
And then the Conservatives came back again and the socialist guy fell back.
And then in the end, it went to the Liberal guy, Justin Trudeau.
But any one of those three people could have come up at the end of it, at the end of the day, as Prime Minister.
In France, which is a presidential system too, they have a runoff.
But here, there's only two parties and there's only two names and there's only two people who are going to be president, Hillary or Trump.
So pick your poison.
As Lindsey Graham said of Trump or Cruz, it's a choice between being shot or being poisoned.
And that's what for a lot of people, for a lot of people in November, you're going to be facing.
But you can't run a third-party system and have any third-party candidate and have anything happen other than delivering the White House to Hillary Rodham Clinton.
That will be what Bill Crystal achieves if he goes ahead with this, which I don't think he will.
And so in a sense, the PGO Rourke types, we had this last time round.
They never liked that.
There's always a certain number of people who never like the candidate.
Last time round, there were all these Obama cons.
Do you remember them?
Christopher Buckley, the son of William F. Buckley, voted for Obama because he thought he had this temperament that was presidential and they thought he was a moderate.
And there were all kinds of people who thought that Obama made a lot more sense than that hothead McCain.
And it'll be exactly the same.
It'll be exactly the same this time round.
And in a sense, that's the principled position.
The problem here, the problem here is that under the rules of the Republican nominee, this is a, for us foreigners, this is a not-cricket situation.
Under the rules of the nominating process, this guy won.
You may not like him and you may not like the rules, but it's not cricket to then say we're going to ignore the result of the competition and ignore the rules and we're going to find some way around them.
And that's why John Kasich and Ben Sasse, in the end, they won't get mixed up with this thing.
They're not going to go there.
Because under the rules, he won.
And that's that.
Yes, Rush is at a charity golf tournament today.
He's immensely generous with his time like that.
And he enjoys it, of course, but he's also doing good stuff to raise money for charity, real charity, too, not the Clinton Foundation diarrhea in Africa racket.
But if you are missing Rush, don't worry.
He will be back on Wednesday to take you through the end of the week with authentic, full-strength, all-American excellence in broadcasting.
And if you go to RushLimbaugh.com and you become a Rush 24-7 subscriber, you can get Rush any time of the day or night you want in any form you want, in audio, on the Ditto cam, print transcripts, the lot.
Any distribution medium now known or yet to be invented is there at Rush 24-7.
Bill Clinton, according to Mrs. Bill Clinton, who's running for president, Bill Clinton, who is going to be America's first, first gentleman, said in Fort Mitchell, Kentucky yesterday that she was asked what her husband's role would be in a future Clinton administration,
and she says she plans to put the former president in charge of economic revitalization because he knows how to do it, Mrs. Clinton told the crowd at an outdoor rally.
So this, again, to me is the corruption of the Republic.
First lady is not an office.
It's not a job.
It's just someone who happens to be married to whoever the president is.
And it's become a kind of a job in that you get provided with a small staff, which you shouldn't be provided with.
You should have a social secretary if that, and the rest shouldn't be there.
It's not a job.
It's not an elected position.
It's not a government position.
It's just someone who happened to say, I do, to the guy who got elected.
That's all it is.
But it's become a kind of job because under the kind of monarchical tendency, it's taken on a pseudo-monarchical character.
So you have now they have a staff of 22, which is completely ridiculous, and they're expected to do things.
And normally they have an interest, like Laura Bush had early childhood education.
But that's not going to be enough for Bill Clinton.
Bill Clinton, according to Mrs. Clinton, is going to be in charge of revitalizing the economy.
This is what I meant by the corruption of the republic.
This is absolute.
This guy had his law license taken away because he lied under oath.
This guy has been credibly accused of rape with Juanita Broderick.
And young people don't know anything about this.
All the so-called young voters who are enthusiastic for Bernie.
They don't know about what Bill was doing in the 90s.
They don't know that when Kathleen Willey came to see him on the day her husband committed suicide, that he grabbed her breasts.
They don't know that he dropped his pants to Paula Jones.
They don't know that he said to Juanita Broderick, you might want to put some ice on that.
And they don't know the stuff he's been doing since he left office, like these 26 flights, these 26 flights, according to the flight logs of the Lolita Express owned by the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
They don't know anything about this.
Democrats aren't particularly interested in the $100 million that he's taken, his foundation has taken from these shifty governments in the Arabian Peninsula.
They don't know that he's taken, his charity gives money to companies owned by his current girlfriend or recent girlfriend.
It's hard to keep up with this guy.
But that's who's going to be coming back as the nation's first, first gentleman if Hillary Clinton wins in November.
Bill Clinton will be in charge of revitalizing the economy.
As I said, let's take it as red that everybody hates each other.
The reason we're in this situation here is because the Republican Party grew complacent about the gap between the people who run it in Washington and the base.
If you look at the Democrat Party has its idiosyncrasies.
It's like little weird things.
It's like suddenly something nobody's ever heard of, like transgendered bathrooms, is suddenly the biggest issue in the land.
In the Democrat Party, the importance of the issue is inversely proportional to the number of people affected by it.
But that works well for them.
They take care of their interest groups.
On the Republican side, the gap between the base and the people running the party, the people running the think tanks, the people running the magazines, widened to the point where on two key issues it became unbridgeable.
And not to repeat what I said last year incessantly, but I said the thing then, which was obvious, that if you don't like Trump, you should steal his issues.
The fact is, we have all this argument about who's conservative.
Oh, Trump isn't conservative.
Trump isn't conservative.
He's not actually interested in political philosophies, not in the least bit interested in political philosophies.
Couldn't care less.
So he's not conservative.
On my issue, freedom of speech, he's not good at all.
His inclination is always to sue.
His inclination is always to demand that people shut down or be shut down.
He's terrible on that.
But nobody cares about freedom of speech except me and a few.
It's a boutique issue.
It's not a first order issue for the average voter.
Whereas Paul Ryan became unconservative on a first order issue.
Paul Ryan, who's a nice, perfectly nice fellow, but who couldn't win a debate against Joe Biden, Paul Ryan is basically an open borders guy.
Lindsey Graham, who wants to have, is in favor of this insanely schizophrenic policy whereby he's in favor of intervening with boots on the ground in every crummy, imploded, failed state around the planet.
But at the same time, he wants America's doors to be open so that anybody from the planet can come here.
Those are two contradictory positions.
If America's national security is such that we have to intervene all over the planet, then we shouldn't be letting people just wander into the country to blow up San Diego.
Those two issues, those two issues, the gap between the leadership of the party and the base widened and became unbridgeable.
And most of the leadership has now gone quiet on that issue.
And the people who are chafing at what's happened are mostly the intellectual caste in the Republican Party, the people who are running the think tanks and the political magazines and writers such as PJ O'Rourke and so forth.
And they have decided that in PJ's case, they're going to vote for Hillary Clinton.
And in the case of Bill Crystal, that they're going to find somebody that they can run as a third-party candidate.
don't understand how you can, in good conscience, ask John Kasich, who lost, who lost, who only won Ohio.
He came second in Vermont, and he did quite, where did he come in New Hampshire?
Did he come second in New Hampshire?
I think he did.
But by the rules of the game, he lost.
And that's just the fact of the fact of life.
They had the Eurovision Song Contest in Europe, which is where ABBA came from.
And apart from ABBA, pretty much everything that's come out of the Eurovision Song Contest is lousy.
You have these continental pop acts singing la la la boom banga bang ding ding-a-dong, ridiculous songs sung in this pathetic version of sort of kind of rock and roll English.
Ya ya, baby, mit the rock and roll.
They have this weird thing.
Who was it?
Ukraine won yesterday with a song about the Crimea, a pop song about the Crimea.
That's great.
Be coming to a radio station near you in about 30 years' time if you're unlucky.
There's no point.
They had the competition.
This stupid Ukrainian song about the Crimea won, and that's it.
Under the rules of the Eurovision Song Contest, Ukraine are the creators of the best pop song on the planet.
Likewise, the Republican nominating process, which was designed explicitly to prevent crazy guys like Ron Paul hijacking the process again, has now delivered it up to Donald Trump.
They created a process designed to enable a Mitt Romney Jeb Bush candidate to win easily, to win about 20 minutes after the close of polls in New Hampshire.
And instead, it dragged on for another couple of months and wound up going to a reality show guy with strange hair.
That nevertheless is what happened.
He is the Ukrainian pop star of the Republican Party's Eurovision Song Contest.
And you have to live with the result because either he's going to be the president or Hillary's going to be the president.
So pick which one of those you like.
We'll take your calls straight ahead.
Hey, Mark Stein, in for rush.
Let's go to Linda calling from Marshall, North Carolina, reeling under the transgendered bathroom boycott of the world.
But Linda is bearing up.
Great to have you with us on the show today, Linda.
Hi, Mark.
It's nice to talk to you.
I always enjoy you when you fill in for rush.
Thanks.
Thanks a lot.
What's on your mind today?
Well, my question to you is don't let me just make a point.
I think this is all a diversion that the administration is this HBQ bill.
I believe it's a big diversion.
I think there's more going on.
There's a cover-up.
I think this whole thing with Ben Rhodes is a lot of people who are talking about Obama lying.
You know, you were just talking about Bill Clinton.
Bill Clinton was impeached for lying.
You know, what is going on here?
Worried about where 0.03% of the population is going to relieve themselves.
It's ridiculous.
It's just mad.
It's sick.
Well, you mentioned, well, yeah, and it is ridiculous that the Attorney General of the United States is apparently the national bathroom commissar.
But you mentioned Ben Rhodes, who's the Obama foreign policy guru, who was the subject of that piece in the New York Times.
Rush was talking about him last week.
And he was doing the same thing that the speech writers were doing with Charlie Rose when they were yucking it up about those rubes fell for the if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor line.
The Ben Rhodes thing was he was basically laughing it up at how gullible the press was over the Iranian situation.
And that's and you're wondering why, I mean, in a sense, what's happened is they've all turned around and clobbered the guy Samuels who wrote that piece for sort of giving the game away, where Ben Rhodes was sneering about these 27-year-old reporters who don't report anything.
They've never been anywhere.
They haven't been, you know, foreign correspondents in Tokyo or the jungles of Papua.
So they don't actually know anything about the places they're writing about.
So increasingly, they're just printing the Obama spin on the Iranian situation rather than actually looking at the nature of the Iranian regime.
And it's exactly what they were doing with the healthcare business.
They're actually measure political success in how brilliantly they can sell these lies to, first of all, the media and then to the public.
And that's what ties Ben Rhodes and those two 12-year-old speechwriters together.
But you think this ought to be a bigger deal, Linda?
Oh, I do.
I definitely do.
Yes, I definitely do.
Get on.
We have to get our heads out of the toilet.
You talk about the Clinton Foundation.
They speak about diarrhea in Africa.
Well, what are we speaking about here?
There's all these, it's all a big distraction, divert and amplify.
And I think we know there's a lot more people.
You talk about Trump and how he really speaks for people who are just disgusted.
You're speaking out to the frustration and the disgust that people see.
You see this happening, and you're shaking your head.
You talk to your neighbors, and they're thinking the same thing, and they're saying, why is this not a bigger deal?
Turn on the regular TV, you don't hear anything about it.
You just talk to being censored.
It's scary.
No, and I think there is a general.
What's interesting is the way they all play this game in which, and Ben Rhodes was brilliant at that, where the Iranian nuclear threat, which is what it is, it's about crazy guys who don't respect the norms of prudent states, even like the Soviet Union.
Nobody had to worry about the Soviets seizing the U.S. embassy.
Nobody had to worry about the Cubans seizing the U.S. interest section in Havana.
The Iranians aren't like that.
They issue mob hits on novelists like Salman Rushdie, and they seize embassies and they blow up community centers in Argentina.
They don't carry on like a normal state.
And supposedly, we're asked to believe that the people now in charge of Iran, when they go nuclear, they will behave with the same prudence that the Soviets or the Chinese behave with when they go nuclear.
And if they're wrong on that, you know, in other words, if someone dies as a result of all the clever finessing that Ben Rhodes and Barack Obama do, if we wake up one morning and there's a mushroom cloud on TV somewhere in the Middle East or somewhere else because of the fecklessness of Ben Rhodes,
the idea that it's all sophisticated and it's all political spin and that all that matters is putting one over on the other guys and that it's all just beltway talk and there isn't actually a real place in Iran where real people are developing real bombs.
This idea that it's just the Washington shadow play that counts.
If you listen to the way Ben Rhodes and those 12-year-old speechwriters on the Charlie Rose talk show were speaking, it's actually a sign of decadence.
They're not dealing with anything real.
They're just dealing with kind of artful perception and clever lines, like some kind of late-night sorority debate in which you come up with some devastating witticism that impresses everybody in the room.
But it has no real-world meaning that concerns you.
And the real world meaning of Obamacare, where there are millions of people who are having to pay more and more, more, more, more for worse, worse, worse health care every year, or the real world meaning of the Iran deal, which is that you're empowering a millenarian state that does not respect the most basic norms of state relations.
None of that matters to thee because these guys are so clever.
They've got such clever lines, and the rubes just fall for them.
And that's all that matters.
And the real-world consequences of that, Linda, will be hung around this administration's neck, and history will not look kindly on them.
Thanks for your call.
We've got lots more straight ahead on the Rush Limbaugh Show.
I think Hillary may finally have secured the nomination.
Burlington College in Vermont has just announced that it will close for good next week because it's unable to recover from the crushing weight of debt run up by Bernie Sanders' wife, the college's former president Jane Sanders.
So Jane Sanders was the president of Burlington College and she takes the Bernie view of life and she spends, spend, spend.
There's no spending that's too high enough for her.
And she has now delivered such a crushing amount of debt to Burlington College in Burlington, Vermont, that the college is going to close next week.
By the way, look for that.
If Bernie is inaugurated as president next January, look for the entire United States government to have a grand close down final weekend going out of business sale around about May the 27th next year.
That's Jane Sanders.
Bernie Sanders' wife did it to Burlington College, Vermont.
It's God for good next week.
▲
Export Selection