All Episodes
Previous Next
May 13, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:31
May 13, 2016, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
I mean, what did they expect was going to happen?
Did they expect that Trump was going to go in there like that email from my friend that I read, go in there and read Ryan the Riot Act and all that?
You know, greetings, folks.
I told you you'd be back on Friday.
Here I am.
Oh my gosh, it's Friday.
I almost forgot.
Live from the Southern Command in Sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Well, it's a good thing I remembered that, or I would have forgotten it.
I remember here we are open line Friday, Rush Limbaugh back at it as promised.
Whatever you want to talk about's fine and deadly.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882, the uh email address L Rushbo at EIB net.com.
So the uh the media reports on uh Trump and his meetings with various Republican congressional leaders.
And these reports are hilarious.
Reports make it sound like members of Congress, the uh members of the House and the Senate were amazed at how calm and thoughtful Trump was.
They were shocked.
I mean, that's a total of the stories.
These guys were, I guess, were ready for Trump to come in there and tell them to go to hell and what to take with them on the way.
And instead they say he came in and he was willing to listen to them.
He was calm.
He was thoughtful, and it's exactly, folks, precisely what the drive bys do in every such circumstance.
They try to prepare everybody that Mr. Republican X or Mr. Conservative X is an off-the-wall, loud, bombastic extremist.
And then when he's not, it's an it's it's like the exception to the rule, and everybody supposedly shocked by it.
Um and maybe the drive-by's were hoping that Trump would go in there and read them the Riot Act or what have you.
Harry Reed's reaction, if you have you seen Harry Reed's reaction to the he's he had another one of his patented meltdowns in the in the on the floor of the Senate.
He practically called Trump and Mitch McConnell and every Republican Congress, every name in the Democrat playbook.
Because McConnell came out, he was supportive of Trump.
And so Dingy Harry goes to the Senate for, so I guess McConnell also thinks women are pigs.
So forth.
I'm I uh you know, who knows what's gonna happen with all this, but one thing is patently obvious that they still don't know how to deal with Trump.
They still don't know how to explain it.
Look, we'll get into all that in in um great detail as the program unfolds.
There's some other things going on out there as there always are that I want to touch on here, because if I don't, they might end up being obscured by our focus on all the campaign stuff.
Could somebody explain to me why transgender people have become so important to Barack Hussein Oh?
I'm serious from these edicts that transgender bathrooms and not have to be built in public schools, but how does it look now?
Remember back when a lot of people took their kids out of schools to start teaching them at home?
And remember how they were called a bunch of fruit cakes and extremists and paranoics and all kinds.
How do they look to you now?
They look somewhat prescient, do they not?
I mean, you look at what's going on in the American public school system, but what what is it with this transgender?
I know that most of the story is that the gay movement has realized its agenda, so they've got to they've got to transfer that energy somewhere, and transgenders is an explanation.
I mean, I warned you of that way back in April of last year.
And I'm gonna remind you of that warning in moments, but beyond all that, what what is this?
I mean, these are really, really extreme actions.
It's it's the equivalent of asking or suggesting that men should have visitation rights to girls' bathrooms.
I mean, to go all out here and make this trying to claim it's Title IX in one instance and then title seven of the Central Civil Rights Act in another one, it's not even mentioned.
Civil Rights Act and all the Title IX legislation.
There's not a single reference to transgendered people.
They're less than one half or one percent of the population.
So what's going on?
Is all this being used as a smokescreen to distract us from other things the regime is doing?
And do not doubt that one.
Do not doubt this is designed to get all the social issues people all ratcheted up and loaded for bear and energetic, start writing pieces going on TV to talk about it while the regime is over here, unobserved, doing whatever it is that's really on their mind.
So is this just a distraction?
But I mean, why impose this on school children?
Now, look, I I can hear some of you screaming.
Rush, you know the answer to this.
You're the one that's told us.
This is Obama trying to transform the country.
This is payback.
This is cultural overthrow.
Yeah, I know it's all that.
But why?
And who put Obama in charge of sexual education?
And why this issue?
Is it about continuing to get gay money for the Democrat uh convention and the election?
Is this about fundraising?
Is this about because there's not much more to do on the gay agenda.
I mean, they got gay marriage, uh, and and we're close to putting you in jail if you won't bake a cake for a gay wedding.
Uh we've got we've got pretty much everyone but you have to keep the group happy.
I mean, the militant leftist gays, so you need their money.
Is this is that what this is?
I mean, this obviously is important to Obama.
For some reason it affects every public scrubel in the country.
And as you sit around, you know, I I I analyze people's ideology, and I know leftists and liberals like the back of my hand.
I mean, I but I still want to throw this out because this is way, way over the top.
This, I mean, this is you want to talk about Trump or anybody on the right wing being extreme.
What the hell is this?
This is so far out of the mainstream that obviously they're trying to bring in and make the mainstream.
But I mean, this is bizarre.
Don't tell me, for example, that somebody like Trump is not presidential when this kind of stuff is going on.
Obama is presidential as defined by this kind of stuff.
Ordering open bathrooms in schools, and demanding that a new bath is a little bit different than than what's going on in the States, North Carolina, for example, they're actually in the in the schools demanding that the districts build a third bathroom.
One for boys, one for girls, and the other was whatever you think you are today.
I guess.
Is this an effort on the part of the left to encourage people who might be confused about their sexuality to remain confused because there's some sort of political benefit?
You're confused about your sexuality and government's got all the answers.
Is that what this is?
Why isn't this offensive?
We hear this is Trump says this, or any other Republican take your picks, say this and it's offensive, that's over the top.
Why isn't this?
I mean, this is so far out of the mainstream.
And yet there aren't a lot of people that want to seem to um buck this.
I had a story, I've actually done it twice.
I had it in the stack on Wednesday.
Let me see if I saved.
I did.
I'm sure here it is.
Is it second and yeah, I mentioned this.
This goes back to um June of 2015.
This is almost a year ago.
It's it's a Cybercast News Service story.
John's Hopkins psychiatrist, transgender is mental disorder.
Sex change biologically impossible.
You remember when I did this story originally, it's about a doctor, Paul McHugh, and I said, this guy has no idea what he's in for now.
And nothing's happened to him.
He made the story ran.
I don't know that anybody's taken a shot at him.
I frankly thought that they would zero in on this guy And try to ruin his career, but nothing's happened.
So I dug the story out again to refresh my memory.
Dr. Paul McHugh, the former psychiatrist in chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital, and its current distinguished service professor of psychiatry, said that transgenderism is a mental disorder that merits treatment,
that sex change is biologically impossible, and that people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder.
Dr. McHugh, an author, the author of six books and at least 125 peer-reviewed medical articles, made his remarks in a recent commentary in the Wall Street Journal is where this all originally ran.
Cybercast News Service just saw it and decided to do a piece on it.
It was an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal last year, last summer.
And in the op-ed, Dr. McHugh explained that transgender surgery is not the solution for people who suffer a disorder of assumption.
That's in quotes, medical term, his term disorder of assumption, the notion that their maleness or femaleness is different than what nature assigned to them biologically.
Dr. McHugh also reported on a new study showing that the suicide rate among transgender people who had reassignment surgery 20 times higher than the suicide rate among non-transgender people.
Dr. McHugh further noted studies from Vanderbilt and London's Portman Clinic of Children who had expressed transgender feelings, but for whom over time 70 to 80% spontaneously lost those feelings.
Aha!
We may be on to something here.
Dr. McHugh and his boys have studied all this, and young kids, 70 to 80% of them, eventually grow out of this confusion, Maybe that's what they don't want to happen is for kids to outgrow.
I think whatever is going on here, folks, one part of it has to be that this is a made-to-order issue for the left and for the Democrat Party to be able to point to Republicans once again as intolerant and insensitive and unfeeling, because these are human beings and they can't help who they think they are.
They can't help who they love.
Why shouldn't I be punished for it?
And it's a built-in, they might say it there's a built-in opportunity to once again trash Republicans and conservatives.
But whatever, it's over the top.
And I'm just asking, what the heck?
Why is this so important to Obama?
Also, have you heard about this book written by Congressman X?
An anonymous Congressman has dropped a bombshell election year book that confirms why Americans hate their national government and have rallied to anti-establishment presidential candidates like Donald Trump.
The veteran politician, a Democrat, right?
He's a Democrat, and calls himself Congressman X. The book is anonymous.
It's 65 pages.
An essay, a manifesto.
But he lays bare a rotten and corrupt Congress enslaved by lobbyists and interested only in re-election.
He said, like most of my colleagues, I promise my constituents a lot of stuff I can never deliver.
But what the hell?
It makes them happy hearing it.
My main job is to keep my job.
Well, it's what Ted Cruz told me.
First time I had lunch with Crew Cruz laid out for me what it was like when he arrived in the Senate, what he thought it was going to be, and what he found.
And he was stunned.
He couldn't find very many people that cared about issues of substance at all, that the first and second priorities re-election, which meant fundraising, and everything that goes along with it.
And if you want to be re-elected and you want to raise money, you don't make waves.
You don't rock the boat.
And he was expecting, naively, I guess, That he would find himself a member of a bunch of big movers and shakers.
And it's not what he found.
And this guy, Congressman X, is uh is confirming that.
He's a Democrat, admitted Democrat.
He's either still in Congress or served some time over the past 20 years.
It's not clear.
He says more time is spent fundraising than reading bills.
He calls Washington a sinkhole of leeches.
The title of one chapter, Harry Reed is a pompous ass.
Remember, it's a Democrat that wrote this.
The book is published by the small mill city press.
It's based on years of transcribed private discussions with the Congressman last November.
But nobody was willing to identify who the Congressman is right now.
He said, he said, this you know what this place is?
We're doing running a casino here.
That's all the House of Representatives is.
That's all the U.S. government is is a casino.
And we're the House, and we never lose.
We spend money we don't have.
We blithely mortgage the future with a wink and a nod.
Screw the next generation.
It's about getting credit now, looking good for the upcoming election.
He said his colleagues and he often lie to try to be all things to all people instead of tackling the nation's problems.
I contradict myself all the time, but nobody notices.
X says, I mean, one minute I'll go out and I'll rail against excessive spending and ballooning debt, and the next minute I'm demanding more spending on education, health care, unemployment benefits, conservation products, yada yada yada, and voting for all of it.
Voters, i.e., us, are described as gullible, know nothing jerks.
Well, the only people who count are the big donors who pour billions of dollars into lobbying.
Well, we all know this.
You and I know this, but there are a lot of people to whom a lot of this is going to be news.
Well, we know the donor class has been running the show.
We figured that out with amnesty.
And uh a couple of other things.
Voters are incredibly ignorant, writes Congressman X. It's far easier than you think to manipulate a nation of naive, self-absorbed sheep who crave instant gratification and a four-bar sell signal that they are not paying for.
He says money corrupts, and House members are puppets to lobbyists who bankroll their campaigns.
America's on an irreversible decline.
No one in Washington seems to care.
God help us.
Another pull quote from Congressman X. Well, he obviously cares, but not enough put his name to it.
He said business organizations and unions fork over more than three billion dollars a year to those who lobby the federal government.
Does that tell you something?
We're operating a freaking casino, he says.
Describes himself as a closet moderate who supports charter schools and tax vouchers to allow poor kids to go to private schools, but he can never vote that way.
He's a closet moderate.
He's a liberal Democrat by reputation.
Got to take a break, folks.
Hang in there, be back in just a second.
It looks like the uh conventional wisdom on the author of this book, Mr. X, is New York Congressman Steve Israel, Democrat Long Island.
They described here as a moderate who uh announced that he's retiring who has complained about the constant need to fundraise to finance uh re-election campaigns.
Also claiming he's a novelist.
Now, look, uh, I don't a moderate.
My dealings with this is anything but moderate.
This guy ran the the uh Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee.
This is the outfit that the Republicans have one too, but it is the outfit that tries to re-elect as many Democrat members in the House and get new ones and they defame people and they do all kinds of their fundraising.
Nothing moderate about Israel.
Anyway, uh he says, not true, never heard of it before.
Frankly, not I'm leaving Congress.
If I were to write a book like that, I'd put my name on it.
Israel said in a statement, it probably won't cause too many ways, because you know when you get right down to brass tax, it's gonna surprise anybody.
see, this is quite this the kind of thing, this thing comes out, and a lot of people go, all right.
We're gonna blow the lid off the joint.
We're gonna have the low information people finally figure out what's going on.
And it never happens, does it?
The low information crowd, the fake book, fake news curators, they never get the message.
Nothing ever changes.
And to those of us in the know, this is nothing we haven't suspected.
Nothing that we haven't really been convinced already is going on.
Uh big loss.
No, I have not what what fake book?
No, why would why would you why do you think?
Zuckerberg did.
You know, I'm stolen.
I from the time I left here on Wednesday until last night, I was off the grid.
So I'm even now as the program begins, I'm still getting caught up.
Zuckerberg said he's going to do it.
Uh sit down with leading consumer.
Oh, to flush out the problem at fake book with with the oh, well, no, I haven't been invited to that.
Zuckerberg says no problem that this is that that the censorship of conservatism not happening at fake book.
Right.
Well, see, it's we just blew the lid off.
Yes, there is censorship at fake book.
I mean, the people that did it admitted it.
But of course, no, there isn't any of that.
So Zuck says he's going to have a meeting with conservatives, trying to smooth the water.
Well, no.
I uh since I don't, I mean, I have a website where what I say is transcribed and written, but I'm quote unquote not a writer, so I would suspect that I wouldn't be part of the mix since I'm not part of the fake book news feed anyway.
Obama lost a court case.
Well, he lost a ruling in an ongoing court case over the constitutionality of how Obamacare is being funded, and then it turns out the judge properly ruled that it's unconstitutional.
You know, in every court except the Supreme Court, Obamacare's taking a lot of constitutional hits because so much of it is constitutional.
But it's never, it's never ultimately ruled that way.
It just adds up to people losing faith in yet another institution.
And of course, the judiciary was never intended to have this kind of power in the political world in the first place.
More on that as the program unfolds.
The LA Times has the story.
House Republicans won round two.
In a potentially historic lawsuit yesterday, a federal judge declared that the regime was unconstitutionally spending money to subsidize health insurers without obtaining an appropriation from Congress.
Now, what this makes the short version of the story is Obama comes up with the employee mandate that everybody has to buy insurance.
And the reason for this is they want young people who will never make claims, being forced to buy it.
That's on paper, that's how they were going to pay for actual health care for seasoned citizens and the catastrophically injured or sick.
Well, a lot of young people are not buying.
They're paying the fines.
The money has fallen way short, as it was always going to.
There isn't enough money.
We don't have any money anyway.
We're $19 trillion in debt.
But there was never enough money, either appropriated nor available to fund all of these various aspects of Obamacare.
So what did Obama do?
He just went in, essentially by executive order, and said that we're going to subsidize insurance companies who are losing money in order to keep them on board with Obamacare.
And that was the unconstitutional.
You can't spend money without Congress authorizing it.
And Obama didn't wait around for that because he knew he would lose.
So they just essentially went to the Treasury and started writing checks, whatever it took to subsidize insurers.
The regime was unconstitutionally spending money to subsidize health insurers without getting an appropriation from Congress.
Now, last year, U.S. District Court Judge Rosemary Collier broke new ground by ruling with the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, saying they had legal standing to sue the president Over how he was enforcing Obamacare.
Now, you notice something here.
This is classic.
LA Times, little media example here.
Last year, U.S. District Court judge Rosemary Calder broke new ground by ruling the GOP controlled house.
Had legal standing to sue the president.
This is designed to gin up anti-republican sentiment.
These evil Republicans, they denied Obama the money.
And this cockamamy judge went along with it.
That's the way the reader, according to the LA Times is supposed to interpret this.
The GOP controlled house.
Then yesterday, same judge ruled that the regime is violating a provision of the law by paying promised reimbursements to health insurers who provide coverage at reduced cost to low-income Americans.
The judge's ruling, comma, while a setback for the regime, comma, was put on hold immediately, and of course, as is the case with everything with Obama, it stands a good chance of being overturned on appeal.
Paul Ryan called a ruling of historic win for the Constitution, the American people.
The judge ruled the administration overreached by spending taxpayer money without approval from the people's representatives.
Flat out, how can this thing be overturned on appeal?
It can't be legally.
Somebody's got to go outside the Constitution to do it.
And see, this is remember the little explanation of a couple of weeks ago about what the McGuffin is in a book or a movie.
It's technique.
The McGuffin is what the hero in a book wants, or a movie, any story, the hero wants.
And of course, there are villains trying to deny the hero, or trying to get also for themselves what the hero wants.
And what it leads to is the media never getting down deep, digging down deep to report what actually say the details of Obamacare are.
They just cover the story.
Will Obama win?
Will Obama get Obamacare passed?
Will Obama beat this judge?
Will Obama succeed in overturning a court ruling?
Don't spend any time at all telling you why.
Obamacare is a disaster.
Don't get into any detail explaining why this is a slam dunk court ruling.
Because the regime cannot do what they did.
And to overturn it on appeal means they're going to have to find an Obama-friendly judge or appellate court, which is entirely possible.
But if this is overturned, the law is not a factor.
Politics is.
And once again, the judiciary finds itself as the final arbiter in political matters, which was something never envisioned by the founders.
And this is just one of a dozen or more examples where Obama is spending money in ways Congress has never approved, and for which there is no legal procedure.
Obama is behaving unconstitutionally.
The health care law says that insurers, i.e.
insurance companies, who enroll eligible low-income Americans shall cover the costs of their deductibles and co-payments.
But promises the federal government shall make periodic and timely payments to cover those costs.
The law does not spell out where the money will come from, though.
So the Obamacare law itself is unconstitutional.
Yeah, we're gonna we're gonna find money to subsidize insurance companies.
So you want everybody to have health care.
You want it to be said everybody's got health insurance, so here come low-income people can't afford diddly squat insurance companies forced to insure them, because over here on the side the regime's gonna subsidize them.
And how they're gonna because the insurance companies are gonna pay.
See if you can get this deal.
The insurance companies are going to pay the deductible and co-payments of what are called here low-income, the poor.
But they're not, because over here, in the next door, in what has been described today as a casino, the government's simply gonna go grab another stash of Money and reimburse the insurance companies, and in this way Obama keeps them on board.
And public supporters of Obamacare.
At first the administration asked Congress for an appropriation to cover these costs, but that request went nowhere.
It was turned down, meaning no, you can't spend the money.
You don't have the authority.
But never mind.
Officials at the Department of Health and Human Services said they're just going to keep paying these required reimbursements.
The law says we're going to pay, we're going to pay.
Congress says no.
We didn't authorize this money.
You can't spend it.
The regime said, screw you.
They said the payments were like other appropriate entitlements like Medicaid that are covered by permanent federal funds and are not subject to an annual appropriation.
Well, if that's true, and of course it's not, but if it if that's true, why'd they try to get appropriations from Congress for this?
Why if you can fund any entitlement simply because it exists without supplemental appropriations, then why even?
And that's the answer.
That's right.
Why do we even have to mess with Congress?
We can just spend it on our own.
Hello, statism, or worse.
Time out.
Another obscene profit break will continue after this.
Are you welcome back?
It's open line Friday.
Rush Limbaugh, cutting edge of societal evolution.
Reuters has a story.
America's engineers say our bridges and highways are in big trouble.
Well, uh, didn't we?
What was the stimulus bill for back in 19 or in 2009?
If I remember right, Obama's stimulus bill, didn't they sell that?
Roads and bridge repair, school repair, a basic infrastructure repair.
Now look, I'm being facetious.
I know that absolutely nothing went to that.
Most of it went to Union employees.
They wouldn't be fired during the Great Recession.
But the legitimate question, America's engineers say our bridges and highways are in big control.
Who's been in charge of bridges and highways the last seven and a half years?
And who's had a bunch of legislation and a bunch of money appropriated to fix roads and bridges?
And why hasn't it been done?
And then there's this.
Is Islamophobia accelerating global warming?
That was the actual title of a lecture given earlier this week at MIT.
An MIT professor did a lecture on the proposition that Islamophobia is accelerating global warming.
The professor's name was Gasson Haig.
Born in Lebanon before moving to Australia, several books he's written exploring race in Australia, including White Nation and Against Paranoid Nationalism.
And he's out there actually trying to make the case that Islamophobia is accelerating global warming.
I mean, it's looney tunes out there.
It's absolute unadulterated insanity.
And that is a sign of how desperate the global warming crowd is.
You know, we had our Al Gore countdown clock, ten years Al Gore gave everybody.
Somebody went back and took a look at all the areas Gore said were going to be destroyed, such as the North Pole would have no nice, no ice by now in the summer, it'll all melt, which meant the polar bears are gonna die out.
Everything Gore predicted has not happened.
Everything.
He didn't get a single thing right.
Sea levels have not risen, destroying islands or cities.
The polar bears are flourishing.
There are more polar bears than there were ten years ago.
Arctic ice is not melting away.
It's not melting.
Everything in Al Gore's movie for which he won an Oscar, and everything in the book on which the movie was written, just totally fraudulent.
None of it was true.
You let that book be written by a Republican.
You know, you've seen the story the Washington Post has assigned 20 reporters to dig up every speck of dirt on Donald Trump they can find.
Can you say backfire?
That's the kind of thing your average Trumpist learns that, and the only people gonna get harmed when this is all over, the Washington Post.
They're gonna lose subscribers, they're gonna get trolled like crazy all over Twitter and fake book.
When's the last time you heard Bob Woodward admitted it?
Bob Woodward, we're uncovering everything.
Bob Woodward said that the New York real estate market is more complex than the CIA.
And that's why we need all these reporters digging for all this dirt on Trump.
When's the last time you heard the Washington Post suggest that even two reporters are going to be in sign to find out whatever they can find about the Clintons?
You want to find out you want to do some digging, digging, dig into the Clinton Crime Family Foundation.
Dig into what's happening with that.
You don't need 20 reporters to do 20 reporters to dig up all the dirt they can find on Trump.
The problem is Trump has been a widely known and greatly loved public figure for 11 or 12 years.
I'm telling you, I don't know what's going to happen in the election, but I'm just telling you.
This is part of the playbook that everybody uses, and this kind of stuff, I don't think is the kind of stuff it's going to work against Trump.
They can try it, but this is all they know.
Got the Republican nominee.
The objective is to destroy the Republican nominee.
Well, it's a playbook.
Democrat Party has a playbook, how you do it.
And the media working in conjunction, because they're really not media, there's a branch of Democrat Party.
They work together and they employ these systems that they've perfected over the years.
And the systems have been built around working and being successful on traditional conventional politicians.
Traditional conventional Republican politicians, none of which is applicable to Trump.
So it's like Hillary's ad.
That we ran the Super PAC, Hillary's ad, all these statements Trump's made about women.
It's supposed to scare women, supposed to anger women, supposed to guarantee that no woman would ever vote for Trump, but it backfires on the super PAC.
And they don't understand why.
Because it would work on any other Republican.
Why is it not going to work on Trump?
Because they're trying to plug Trump into their system that they've perfected, and he's outside it.
And the reason he is supported is outside the realm of the political system that has evolved.
Let me grab a call here.
We try to do that in the first hour on Open Live Friday.
It's Rufus in Glastonbury, Connecticut.
Rufus, great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hello.
Hi, Mr. Limbaugh.
And um thank you so much for having me on your call.
Well, it's great to have you here, Rufus.
I appreciate your taking the time to call.
Yeah, it's an honor to be on this show.
Well, thank you again for that.
How Rufus, how old are you?
I'm 11.
11 years old.
Yeah.
And um, I'm a huge fan of your book, Rush Revere.
You know, you're a very polite young man.
You have you you you uh you're well mannered.
Uh it's it's really it's nice to talk to somebody like you.
Obviously, respect people.
You respect your elders like me.
Um it's you're you sound like a really, really fine young man, Rufus.
So I'm not surprised you'd like these books.
Thank you so much, Mr. Mr. More.
Welcome, Rufus.
And um, I calling to thank you for your books and help me be one of the state finalists in the national history be.
Really?
Yeah.
When did this happen?
You were one of the or is that going on right now?
I it finished um a long time ago, and right now I'm going to Chicago, where it's the National History B will be, and it's in June 9th.
And to June 12th.
Well, I bet you're really looking forward to that.
Yeah, I love history.
All right.
So uh it it the Brave Pilgrim's book, that's the first one.
That's the one that you really want.
Yeah.
Brave Pilgrim's first page.
Um, and I forgot the other two.
So have you read them all?
Yeah, I have I have all of them.
I get them for my Christmas presents and my birthday presents.
You get them for Christmas presents.
Well, that's just Rufus, you're making my day here.
I um I uh let me let me ask uh uh you probably don't have the audio versions, but I'll tell you what.
Rufus, if you hang on, I want I want Mr. Snerdley to get your uh address if you're if it's okay with your parents.
I'd like to send you a little goodie bag of stuff from uh Rush Revere and Liberty Headquarters.
Just little stuff to add on to the books that make them even more fun.
We'll have the audio versions, read of course by me very professionally.
And uh it's a great way to revisit the books without reading them again.
So it's the least I can do.
Uh do you have a sister by any chance, Rufus?
Yeah, her name is Jenica Jasper Abraham.
How old is she?
She is six.
She's si oh, well, then we're gonna throw in.
We have a great stuffed uh doll uh animal of Liberty the horse that that will send you, and you can give her, and she will love it, and it'll set her up for when she learns to read well enough to read these.
Oh, that'll be great.
So just don't don't hang up the phone, Rufus, and thank you for the call.
Donald Trump said that he is not gonna release a tax returns at George Stephanopoulos or anybody else till his audit is completed.
Stephanopoulos kept pushing.
Trump said, No, none of your business.
I'm not gonna let me see this till the audience.
Why is he reluctant to display his tax returns?
What do you think?
What is he?
▲
Export Selection