All Episodes
Previous Next
March 23, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:11
March 23, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings and welcome back, folks.
Great to have you.
Here on the excellented broadcasting network, it's as fast as three hours in media, Rush Limbaugh here at 800 282-2882.
And the email address, L Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
I have a I have a question here for we got a couple of sound bites.
Obama has just weighed in on the Ted Cruz comments about increasing cop presence in Muslim neighborhoods.
Obama's outraged.
Everybody's outraged by this.
Trump's out there saying we should have used torture, and nobody's caring.
Nobody's even commenting on that because everybody is overwhelmed by what Ted Cruz said about having increased police presence in Muslim neighborhoods.
And I question about that.
Because Hillary is blown up over this.
She can't believe it.
Hillary Clinton calls Ted Cruz's proposal to patrol Muslim neighborhoods dangerous.
May I ask a simple, obvious question.
You would think that the moderate Muslims that we are told about, the moderate Muslims who want no part of jihad, and who who have no inclinations toward jihad whatsoever.
And they're not interested in it and they don't support it.
And you would think that moderate Muslims who we are told don't like the extremist jihadis, just like we don't.
We're told that moderate Muslims do not like the way their religion is being defaced and tarred and fettered and tarnished by the actions of the jihadis.
Hijacked, yes.
We're told that the moderate Muslims, uh peaceful, peace-loving, uh living in neighborhoods all over America, don't like the fact that their religion of peace been hijacked by the jihadis, the ISIS, the Al-Qaeda's, the militant jihadists, the San Bernardino II, for example.
So why why wouldn't they welcome help from law enforcement in keeping their neighborhood safe?
Why wouldn't they welcome law enforcement presence to root out the people who are hijacking their religion of peace?
I'm sorry, I'd need to be told, is that an offensive question?
Are some people going to think I'm trying to stir something up with that question?
Because I'm not.
I'm just asking, to me, it's, you know, mayor of Realville here.
We are told that moderate Muslims don't like any aspect of jihad.
They are they resent very much what's being done to their religion.
They think it's being hijacked.
It's a religion of peace.
They want no part of this.
And so Cruz comes along and says, you know, we need added police patrols of Muslim neighborhoods to root out the jihadists who are killing and attacking innocent people and giving a religion apiece a bad name.
Why wouldn't they support this?
May I turn around and may I ask that question a different way?
And again, I'm I'm really asking here.
I'm not, this is not rhetorical.
Somebody more informed than I on this is going to have to answer this for me.
Take your average gang neighborhood.
Do you think the mothers and the grandmothers in these neighborhoods who don't want their kids to have any part of gang life, don't want them to get anywhere near.
Do you think they would resent additional police presence in the neighborhood to keep the neighborhood safe?
Or would they distrust the cops no matter why they claim to be there?
Depends on the neighborhood.
Depends on some even parents, mothers, grandparents that don't want their babies anywhere near the Crips bloods or whatever game, don't want them anywhere near that life.
Even some of those neighborhoods would be suspicious of the cops coming in trying to keep the peace.
Some neighborhoods would welcome them, you're saying.
Depends on.
So yeah, quietly.
They might not throw a party for the cops, you know, wouldn't have an afternoon barbecue for them, but would quietly support them being there.
It's a common sense thing to me.
I mean, everybody's concerned about crime.
Everybody's always complaining about crime.
And a lot of people, you never get the cops when you need them.
Cops only show up after the fact.
We need more cops.
Then cops, somebody suggests that we have additional police presence to keep the peace, and in this case, to keep the religion at peace from being hijacked, jaundiced, criticized, impugned, whatever.
And it's this is considered an attack on the whole whole religion.
Stop thinking about this.
This is considered an attack on a whole religion by suggesting the cops have a greater presence in neighborhoods.
What is it?
I I know what they're thinking.
Discrimination by accusation or some such thing.
The very idea that you would suggest it means you're biased and discriminating against the human rights of members of the religion of peace.
You want to know how how what a spark this has become.
I mean, this is a fuse.
Even Obama weighed in on it in the middle of apologizing to the Argentinians for keeping secret files on them at a joint press conference in Buenos Aires during the QA.
The AP correspondent, his name is Josh Letterman.
So what would you say that it says about the state of our debate when you have a major presidential candidate calling for surveillance of Muslim American communities, Mr. President?
I've got a lot of things on my plate.
But my top priority is to defeat ISIL, as far as what some candidates have said.
I think I've been very clear on this.
We have an extraordinarily successful, patriotic, integrated Muslim American community.
They do not feel ghettoized.
They do not feel isolated.
Their children are our children's friends going to the same schools.
They are our colleagues in our workplaces.
They are our men and women in uniform fighting for our freedom.
And so any approach that would single them out or target them for discrimination is not only wrong and un-American, but it also would be counterproductive.
So President of the United States has just told Ted Cruz he's wrong and he's un-American, and his idea is counterproductive.
And Obama continued.
This is the tail end of his comments.
The notion of having surveillance of neighborhoods where Muslims are present.
I just left a country that engages in that kind of neighborhood surveillance.
Oh, no!
Which, by the way, the father of Senator Cruz escaped for America.
You hear this?
The land of the free.
You hear this?
The notion that we would start down that slippery slope.
Yes.
Makes absolutely no sense.
It's contrary to who we are.
Oh, yeah, it's contrary to who we are.
It's not our values.
It's not who we are.
Certainly not our values.
He just compared Ted Cruz to the Castros, folks.
From the guy who's conducting surveillance with drones all over the Middle East.
From the guy who's in charge of the kill list, from the guy who's pulling the trigger, killing Muslims all over the world from drones, Barack Obama claiming that he finds the notion of surveilling neighborhoods where Muslims are present offensive.
You know, you put things together.
Don't forget the story we had politico yesterday after Brussels.
First story from the political.
Why do they hate us so much?
None of this has made any sense to me within the sphere of common sense.
The sphere of common sense is this.
On 9-11, we're minding our own business, and the next thing we know, 3,000 Americans are dead because 19 militant Islamists have hijacked airplanes, flown two of them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
A third was in probably intended to White House.
There have since then been a few additional attacks.
But since 9-11, since 19 militant Islamic hijackers, many of them Saudi Arabian, under the direction of Osama bin Laden and other leaders of Al-Qaeda, Ever since then, it has been the obsession of the Democrat Party that there not be a single word of criticism of Islam.
Now, in the sphere of common sense, this is really curious.
After each subsequent attack by militant jihadists, radical Islamists, after each one, Brussels just being the most recent, the first thing that happens is that members of the Washington establishment,
predominantly Democrats, and certainly from the regime, stand up and tisk us and warn us to not say anything about Islam.
To not say anything about Muslims, to remain silent about radical Islam.
No, no, no, no.
You are being discriminatory.
You're being bigoted, or whatever you are, if you at all acknowledge the perpetrators, if you ask questions, you're not to go there.
In the realm of common sense, none of this computes.
If Mars attacked the United States, and we were told, do not dare say anything about Mars.
Do not say one word about Martians, everybody said, well, but but but but they don't care.
Not all Martians did it.
Just a precious few, and they by no means speak for the whole planet.
Or some silly comparison.
After every attack, every attack, we are not to verbalize what everybody knows.
We are not to ask questions.
We are not to make reference in any way, shape, manner, or form.
First person that does, powerful forces array themselves in line and single-handedly start attacking whoever it is that makes the obvious observation.
And it's always puzzled me.
We know who attacked the World Trade Center.
We know who did Brussels.
We know who did Paris.
We know where they came from.
We know who teaches them.
We know who inspires them.
We know where to go to find out what they think, and yet, don't you dare, don't you dare even bring it up.
Why?
In World War II, do you realize that we had all kinds of surveillance programs to find out if the enemy might have been lurking within our shores?
And when a famous Democrat president FDR said, you know what, I see some people look strangely like those people blew us up on Pearl Harbor, he rounded up 110,000 of them, and he put them in a same place out in California.
It is true.
No but but but it is but but it is true.
It's since been condemned, of course, but uh but it with any well actually hasn't been condemned when you get it, yeah, I know, but but in any other instance of law breaking, whenever you find out that there's a tendency of certain neighborhoods, certain people, certain wherever, even without profiling, just using statistics.
Anecdotal evidence when you have good intel, an idea something's gonna happen, we surveil, we've got drones flying all over the world.
We are surveilling who knows what kind of drones are flying over our own country and who they are spying on.
I'll bet you we got some drones flying over some good old Boys at NASCAR tracks.
I'll bet you we got drones surveilling all kinds of Americans.
If not drones, we've got agents surveilling.
But do not ever suggest surveillance of members of the religion of people don't ever don't even talk, don't go there.
It doesn't make any sense.
Obamacare profiles by race.
They believe certain groups don't receive adequate health care.
There's all kinds of I mean, this administration is obsessed with race.
This administration is obsessed with the differences between us.
And they profile and surveillance who knows what else.
But on this, this doesn't make any sense.
In the realm of common sense, this doesn't make any.
In fact, it's worse than not making any sense.
It is so pointedly purposeful that it's suspicious.
Why are we not to mention the obvious?
Why are we not to acknowledge the obvious?
Why are we not to see it?
What happens to those of us who do see it and comment on it?
We just want to make a neighborhood safe.
You can't, you you and then the whole world lines up, and we got the president of the United States equating Ted Cruz to the Castros.
And listen to this.
You all know who Roger Stone is by now.
He's a former Trump.
I guess he was on the staff.
He's no longer on the staff of the Trump team, but he was he still is a Trump supporter.
He has been a consultant and an operative for the Republican Party.
He was at one time married to Ann Stone, uh, who led uh Republican women for choice at the 1992 Republican convention.
Uh see, so I mean, he's a he's a well-known operative, and in some cases, he's a proud, dirty trickster.
Proud dirty trickster.
I'm not imputing him by saying so.
He has an op-ed.
Where's this run?
At the Daily Caller.
Another Bush has endorsed Cruz.
This one is Neil Bush.
Would you listen to Stone's opening paragraph of this story acknowledging this endorsement?
Get this.
Neil Bush, the son of President George H.W. Bush, who defrauded U.S. taxpayers out of one and a half billion dollars in a savings and loan scam, and later peddled influence for the Chinese government, who plied him with Chinese prostitutes, has formally endorsed Ted Cruz.
I mean, it is just vicious out there.
Poor Neil Bush.
Yeah, this is.
I mean, he did have a little problem in the savings and loan scandal, but what a paragraph.
Neil Bush, son of President George H. W. Bush, defrauded U.S. taxpayers, one and a half billion dollars, savings and loan scam.
Later peddled influencer the ChICOMs, who then plied him with ChICOM prostitutes, has formally endorsed Ted Cruz.
It couldn't just be Neil Bush, son of President George H. W. Bush, has endorsed Ted Cruz.
No, this endorsement says much, writes Stone.
And that's it.
I gotta take a break.
Just saw the clock.
Don't panic.
Back after this.
We are back on the cutting edge of societal evolution.
This is Ed in Greenville, New York, once we get back to the phones.
Ed, great to have you.
Hi.
Thank you, Rush.
Good afternoon.
What Ted Cruz is uh uh describing really amounts to nothing more than community policing in in uh Muslim neighborhoods.
Uh, you know, you look at what happened in San Bernardino, there were investigations into the mosques there, and Obama terminated the investigation, and it would have maybe uncovered this plot against uh these people in in San Bernardino.
So I don't understand how he thinks that he can somehow fight radical Islam without addressing the fact that there is radical Islam.
Well, is it I that's that's uh that's the the point here.
Uh there fighting radical Islam, Uh he won't even say it exists.
I mean, this is one of Ted Cruz's points that Obama will not even use those words.
And there have been drive-bys interviewing Cruz, you know, all snooty, saying, who wants that?
What is a manner when you call him?
And Cruz says it matters everything.
If you're not going to properly frame who it is perpetrating these acts of terror, there's no way you're going to adequately target them in trying to wipe them out.
It's folks, there's it's it's it's really strange.
Radical Islamic terrorists are radical Islamists, and yet saying that is considered to be insulting, prejudiced, discriminatory, and worse.
Anyone who makes reference, as I just did, somebody comes down on him, leans on him real hard, like is happening to Ted Cruz.
But the callers community policing has long been a standard operating procedure.
Meanwhile, Trump is out.
The political Trump torture could have prevented Brussels attacks.
Now stop and think of this.
Everybody's so worked up over what Cruz said about cops in Muslim neighborhoods that nobody's gotten around to Trump's pro-torture comment yet.
Yeah, hang on here.
If I did one more thing to print out here that I'll look like.
All right, everybody turn on the ditto Cam and welcome back.
Uh looky here, the uh police is from the Times of Israel website.
Police uncover high explosives in home of Brussels terror suspects.
Gee, I wonder how that happened.
It must have cops must have gone there.
You believe that?
A cops actually went to the neighborhood.
Wait till Obama finds out about this.
Wait till the media finds out about this.
You have civil rights violations, maybe.
The cops went to the neighborhood in Brussels where the bomber lived.
Belgian authorities uncovered 15 kilograms.
That's 33 pounds of high explosives and a mass of bomb-making material at a Brussels apartment shared by bombers of the city's airport and subway.
This amid growing suggestions that the attacks were the work of the same Islamic State cell that attacked Paris last year.
A Belgian prosecutor identified two of the Brussels attackers as brothers.
A suicide bomber at the airport.
Uh, and another one who blew himself up at the subway station.
30 people killed, 200 more wounded.
Investigators raided the apartment where the brothers had stayed in Brussels in Cherbeek, that neighborhood after the attacks, and they found 15 kilograms of explosive nails, other materials for making explosives, according to the prosecutor.
Right there it is.
Police uncover high explosives in home of terror suspects.
Vinny in Long Island.
Vinny, it's great to have you back on the program.
It's been a while.
It's it's uh it's good to see your name up on the board there.
How are you doing?
Hi, Rush.
Um maybe that's another Vinny, but I'm a first-time long time, and uh probably a 95%er, which means Oh, so you're not the usual Vinny.
Okay.
No, there's there's a lot of conservative Vinnies from Long Island, as you could imagine.
Well, I use a lot of people in Long Island, so yeah, it would make sense at a lot of names.
Yeah, a lot of Vinnies.
Right.
Um, two points.
And I want to answer that point about uh surveillance about Cruz.
But my first point was that um I have a hard time believing that of all those candidates up there, save for maybe Trump and Carson, that the GOP establishment didn't have some kind of connection to every single one of them, including Cruz, most likely Cruz, because he was a lawyer in the Bush administration going way back to 2000.
His wife was um on uh worked for uh lawyer, I think also for Condoleezza Rice, uh on various different programs, which you know is in doubt if she was for open borders or against open borders, you know, I don't know any of that stuff.
But um Cruz was definitely part of the establishment for a long, long time, and you know, he's made connections with uh he's a senator.
He's not as anti establishment as everybody would have him think.
I mean, um uh now the Bush endorsement Well now wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, let me let's just take these one at a time so I can interrogate you.
Uh yeah, ask us some questions.
Sure.
Hey, so you think because Cruz once worked for uh George H. W. or George W. Bush and uh Cruz's wife was with Goldman Sachs and Condoleezza Rice.
Right.
That all of that cancels out everything Ted Cruz says and means and means that he's really just fooling you that he's establishment as all these other blue bloods are.
No, no, no.
I I think i it's just like you know, he's he's one of them, but he has his own strong conservative values.
Why do they hate him, Vinny?
They hate him because he's uh he's against all their um let's call them deal making.
Well and uh but here's the thing.
Cruz is a lawyer himself.
And you've never heard of a lawyer that does not make deals, do you?
I mean, he's gonna make some deals on his own.
It's gonna be to his liking.
Wait a second.
That's all Trump's too.
Trump's you but deal making, that's what Trump is running on a platform of deal making.
Yeah.
But uh but I think it's uh anti establishment deal making Trump is wants.
Um and Cruz, you know, unfortunately for him, he's he had I mean, I liked him in the beginning.
I mean, I really loved him.
Well then what happened.
What happened?
I'll tell you what happened.
What happened if you liked him and he hadn't changed any what happened?
I'll give you a great explanation why probably ninety percent of Trump supporters now hate him.
Because he took out the long lawyer knives on Trump.
And what I mean by that is he started to cast aspersions, he started to uh He was the last attack.
He was the last.
He w he went longer than anybody.
Yeah, no, no, no, you're right.
You're right.
I'm not saying that that's not true.
It's true, very true.
But um, I guess when he reached a certain point, he thought, you know what, hey, I got a shot at this.
You know, I'm not gonna let this guy, you know, steamroll me.
I'm a lawyer.
And he just he really went after him in such a way that Trump is not a lawyer.
He's not gonna be able to respond to half of that stuff.
He's gonna stand there looking, you know, foolish, I guess.
You gotta be Vinny, you can't be serious.
You're telling me that because Cruz is a lawyer, he can go after Trump in certain ways that Trump can't react to and respond to because Trump's not a lawyer.
And a lawyer can make anybody look foolish, and you don't want him making Trump looking foolish because Trump's not a lawyer or Cruz is, and so it isn't fair.
He doesn't know how to respond in kind, I'm sorry.
I think that's I think that's the simple, simple explanation of it.
Um and Trump does his best with his New York um style, which is kind of like mine.
I mean, I'm I'm a New Yorker and I understand Trump perfectly.
I know he's not a liberal Democrat, otherwise he would have ran as a liberal Democrat.
Right now there would have the election would have been over.
He would have been a little bit more.
Wait a minute.
You gotta be as a liberal democrat.
You you gotta be very careful in this New Yorker business.
Because that's that's really what this is about, isn't it?
When Cruz came out and accused Trump of having New York that was it with you, right?
Because you're New Yorker, and Trump's a New Yorker.
And you New Yorkers, you hang together, you know how you talk, you know what you're doing.
You know what you mean when you say New York stuff.
And here comes Cruz.
Here comes Cruz castigating all you get.
That was the last straw bit, right?
Uh only because I knew that Trump has been a lifelong conservative Republican.
I mean, he was at the 1988 uh convention.
Yeah.
I forgot what that was, maybe New Orleans, I can't remember.
And he was interviewed on CNN by uh uh Larry King and he's uh conservative Republican Donald Trump.
That was nineteen eighty.
I have to step in here, Vinny.
Just a second.
For all of you listening, getting close to driving off the road, the nearest cliff, pulling your hair out, dial it back.
We got it under control here.
Um they're shouting at me out there.
What do you mean lifelong conservative Republican?
He donated it.
Hillary, what are you talking about, Vinny?
They're shouting the radios at me.
Peanuts.
He gave them peanuts.
Peanuts.
Okay, that folks, you see, there's an answer for everything here.
This is why I'm trying to demonstrate you cannot, nobody, and I'm not even trying to.
You can't break this bond.
You can hit with logic.
You can refute.
You can point out that the allegations being made about cruise are not true.
Ah, you're right, you're right.
But it doesn't matter.
I'm at peace with it.
I mean, that's you just it is what it is.
There have to be other techniques, roadmaps, routes uh to accomplish what needs to be accomplished here from the from the cruise uh standpoint.
Anyway, Vinny, I appreciate the call.
Uh, we now happily welcome you to the Vinny Club here at the EIB network, so you'll next time you call, you'll be the Vinny from Long Island, and we will be back after this.
So don't go away, folks.
Okay, get this, folks.
I'm I'm sorry, you know, but I've got I've got I've got to hit reality here.
I've got to hit this phoniness with reality.
Associated Press, August 23rd, 2011, five years ago.
Headline with CIA help, NYPD moves covertly in Muslim areas.
AP, August 23rd, 2011, the CIA, according to AP, helped the NYPD monitor Muslims.
Here is an excerpt from the story.
A month-long investigation by the Associated Press has revealed that the NYPD operates far outside its borders and targets ethnic communities in ways that would run afoul of civil liberties rules if practiced by the federal government.
And it does so with unprecedented help from the CIA in a partnership that has blurred the bright line between foreign and domestic spying.
You want to hear more from this article?
Well, here you go.
Many of these operations were built with help from the CIA, which is prohibited from spying on Americans, but was instrumental in transforming the NYPD's intelligence unit.
The AP reported that this started under George W. Bush, but it continued under Obama.
And it was still going on when the AP discovered it and reported on it in 2011.
This is the very program Ted Cruz is referencing.
And look, look at this irrational reaction that seems to be coordinated and combined from every vantage point in this country, from Obama down in Argentina, comparing Cruz to the Castros, to the drive-by media, to others in the Republican Party.
And I tell you again, the AP discovered and reported in 2011, August 23rd.
CIA help NYPD moves covertly in Muslim areas.
The NYPD was doing what Ted Cruz is talking about.
This is the program he was talking about.
It is happening.
Well, it was.
It continued under Barack Hussein O. Let's go to the audio soundbites.
Last night in Times Square, the mayor Bill de Blasio and the police commissioner Bill Brattnail, at a press conference, talk about the city's preparations in the wake of the Belgium attacks.
During the Q&A, a reporter said, Senator Ted Cruz said today that in light of the Belgium terror attacks, The city should return to monitoring Muslim neighborhoods.
Return.
This is the program he was talking about.
And here is what the mayor said.
I just have to say it's reprehensible.
We have peace-loving, law-abiding Muslim Americans in neighborhoods all over New York City.
To paint an entire community with that brush is absolutely counterproductive.
It's immoral.
It does not conform with American values.
Here we go again.
These leftists keep talking about that's not who we are.
We are not being consistent with our values.
Except I don't know if de Blasio, you never know where his head is.
He may not even know this happened.
But I wish he did.
I hope he does know it happened, and I hope he does know he's being hypocritical, and I hope he does know.
All of these people, here's Bratton.
This is the police commissioner.
He hasn't been the same since they shut a lanes.
So you have to, you have to cut him some slack.
Bratton then jumped in and said this.
The statements he made today is why he's not going to become president of this country because we don't need a president that doesn't respect the values that form the foundation of his country.
I take great offense at his characterization of that whole population, particularly with my intimacy with the population in my organization.
Muslim officers who are willing to sacrifice their lives in foreign countries and every day step up, willing to sacrifice their lives here.
This really is thin.
And it is transparent, and it's not believable.
You guys all acting like an entire population has been targeted here as being impugned.
This is where, again, in the realm of common sense, none of this makes any sense.
Who is it that blew up the World Trade Center in the Power?
Who is it that attacked in Brussels?
Who is it that attacked in Paris?
And damn it, you better not say so.
You had better not reference it.
You had because when you do, you are impugning an entire group of people.
You are attacking, you are painting with a broad brush, an entire religion.
No, we're not.
Just like you don't paint with a broad brush when you talk about any instance of crime and going after the perpetrators.
But this seems to be a protected group for some reason.
I know, folks, I get it.
I'm just raising the question here.
I know you can answer the question yourself here, fill in the blanks.
But it's still very curious.
It's still really peculiar here.
Here's more cruz from CBS this morning, Nora O'Donnell.
That program in New York, that was disbanded.
They they said it didn't lead to any leads and it didn't work.
It is true that the de Blasio political henchmen say that.
And it's also true that the NYPD said it provided valuable intelligence.
As I travel the city of New York and as I travel the country, police officers over and over again stop me.
And they say, thank you for standing up and having my back.
If you look at the attack in Brussels, it's a direct result of the failed immigration policies in Europe that have allowed vast numbers of radical Islamic terrorists to come to Europe.
And they've been ghettoized in neighborhoods that have become isolated, that have become separate.
And they become incubators for radical Islamic terrorists.
That was Nora O'Donnell as a little snooty.
I have news for you.
That's not that's not similar.
I have news for you.
This these people are so focused with their hatred of Cruz, and you know what?
He's violated.
Nobody's supposed to talk about this program.
Nobody's supposed to admit that it happened.
So Cruz acknowledges the program happened, he wants to reinstitute it.
And everybody in that was responsible for that program had any to do with it is trying to act like it never happened.
And then when they acknowledge that it did, well, it didn't work.
It didn't work.
So all these people are guilty of everything they're accusing Cruz of being.
They did it.
They constructed the program.
They implemented the program.
They administered the program.
They used the CIA to spy on these beloved neighborhoods.
And here comes Ted Cruz bringing it up, and it's as though it never happened.
And it's as though this guy is the worst reprobate that ever came down the pike.
Here's More Ted Cruz in charge.
You're painting one community with one brush.
No, I'm not.
There's a difference between Islam and Islamism.
Islamism commands that you either murder the infidels or you forcibly convert them, you wage jihad.
And here's the consequence of President Obama and Hillary Clinton and Bill de Blasio refusing to acknowledge what we're fighting.
You end up with policies that don't keep us safe.
President Obama and Hillary Clinton both still support bringing tens of thousands of Syrian Muslim refugees to America.
The first obligation of the president as commander in chief should be to keep America safe.
I will apologize to nobody for how vigorous I will be as president, fighting radical Islamic terrorism, defeating ISIS.
Ted Cruz, that was Gail King, that said, you're painting one community with one.
This is outrageous the way this is shaking out here, folks.
We'll be back.
Don't go away.
Listen to all these people say that all of this terrorism is in no way related to Islam.
Even though the terrorists all say they are doing it in honor of Islam.
It's breathtaking.
We gotta take another break.
▲
Export Selection