All Episodes
Previous Next
March 10, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:30
March 10, 2016, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
No, it's not complicated.
What I'm saying is a Democrat Party always needs somebody to blame for their failures because that's what they have.
Everything they try doesn't work.
Even their successes are destructive.
However, you want to call their successes, but let's put those aside.
Let's look at Obamacare.
They're touting as a success.
Do you know, by the way?
Did I put this on the bottom of a snack?
I bet I did.
There's a new story out from yeah.
Of all places, NPR and Harvard say that Obamacare is a complete failure.
I ran I saw this story last night.
Excuse me, folks.
National Public Radio collaborated with Harvard's T. H. Chan School of Public Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to survey Americans' recent experience with health care.
As to the Affordable Care Act, Obamacare, the survey's findings are damning.
They suggest that Obamacare has been worse than a complete waste of money.
This is the survey's only question.
That is related directly to Obamacare.
Most respondents say Obamacare hasn't affected them.
Where it has, most say the law's impact has been harmful.
There's a bunch of charts here.
The promise that Obama made about cheaper premiums, lower copays, lower deductibles, better coverage, failed.
Failed.
Failed.
None of it has materialized.
They were just lies.
Now, my point here is, because you already know that.
Who do they blame for this?
That's why they need, that's why Obama needs a Republican Party.
They need somebody to blame for their failures.
They never blame themselves.
Whether they utilize the limbaugh theorem or just lie.
That's why I exist.
I exist as a foil.
They blame me for their failures.
They blame me for opposition.
They blame me for ginning people up and then disliking them or opposing them.
And they blame me for their failures by convincing people that things that uh are true aren't true, and vice versa.
And that's why Obama wants a GOP around.
He doesn't want an effective GOP.
He needs a villain and he needs a scapegoat.
If talk radio ever went away, who would they blame for their failures?
The GOP.
If the GOP went away, who would they blame for their failures?
It would have to be you.
Because leaders, authoritarians, like Obama, never are at fault.
They never blame themselves.
They never blame their party.
They never blame their henchmen.
Name something else besides Obamacare.
How about the stimulus?
The stimulus didn't work.
They don't blame themselves.
In fact, they don't even proclaim these things as failures, but everybody knows they are.
So when they hear complaints about it, they have to blame somebody.
They blame the Republicans.
And they blame the Republicans for not helping them, for not working with them.
They blame the Republicans and talk radio for ginning up opposition to them.
But it's never them.
There isn't anything they've done.
Even you might say, hey Rush, they succeeded in Indian Ramrod and uh gay marriage down our throats.
Well, yeah, but that's not good.
That's not a cultural positive.
And and and the anger there, and there's plenty of it, folks.
It's not a universally supported issue.
The opposition to it, they needed somebody to blame for that.
They sow discord.
The Democrat Party, liberalism sows chaos.
They thrive on it.
They need chaos.
They need people angry.
That's why every day there's always a crisis of something going on.
Because what they do doesn't work.
This is why they never campaign on what they really want to do.
Everybody knows that what they really want to do won't work and doesn't work.
So they lie.
And they use grandiosity to explain their great plans.
Hope and change gonna make America change from its its rotten founding racism, sexism, bigotry, all these sort of things, and all that happens is that various groups of Americans end up at war with each other, which they love.
They love to feed off of that because that gives them enemies and villains.
Because none of liberalism works.
Take a look at liberals themselves.
Take a look at the people that voted for Obama.
Do you see happiness there?
You see them running around all jocular and happy and having a great time.
No, because they know that it doesn't work.
They're faced with seven years of evidence.
Now into our eighth year.
It doesn't work.
It makes things worse.
We got 94 million Americans not working.
Wages stagnant.
People working fewer hours because of Obamacare requirements.
We have an absolute mess.
As they try to transform this country because they resent the founding principles.
They resent much of the founding documents.
So they're trying to transform it and get even.
They hate American foreign policy.
They hate American domestic policy.
They love dictators.
They love the Kestros.
They admire the Stalins and the Brezhnev's and the Gorbachev's, and they're even fascinated with Mao Tse Tung, some of them.
And what they envy is the total power.
What they envy is the authoritarian total power that all of those people had.
And they don't have that.
And in their sense, I mean in this sense, I don't think they actually want that full-fledged because they're still we still behave under the guise of democratic principles.
They need a foil.
They need an opponent, they need a villain, and they need somebody to blame for their failures.
Now, concomitant in this is Obama's arrogance when he says that he wants an effective GOP.
Let's play the soundbite.
It's number 30.
Let's actually hear this from his mouth.
What you're seeing within the Republican Party is uh to some degree all those efforts over a course of time, creating an environment where somebody like a Donald Trump can thrive.
He's just doing more of what has been done for the last seven and a half years.
What I'm not going to do is to validate some notion that the Republican crack up that's been taken place as a consequence of actions that I've taken.
There are thoughtful conservatives who are troubled by this, who are troubled by the direction of their party.
I think it is very important for them to reflect on what it is about the politics they've engaged in that allows the circus we've been seeing to transpire and to do some introspection.
Because ultimately I want a an effective Republican Party.
Oh, God bless him.
Let's say he wants a nice child.
He wants an effective, successful child.
Yeah, he wants this this arrogance and this condescension, in order to have that attitude where you can just say, I want an effective Republican Party.
You have to believe that the Democrat Party and your way of thinking are so fast and so large, it's such a majority that the Republicans are almost on the verge of not existing.
They're that tiny, that few in numbered, they're that ineffective, and and so that's that's this arrogant condescension he has about the success and the widespread tentacles of the Democrat Party, which have woven their web of deceit throughout our culture.
And I think it's a myth.
I don't think the majority of this country is anywhere near like Obama.
I don't think the majority of this country is anywhere near like the Democrat Party.
We are being governed by a very powerful and effective minority with a president who can't be criticized because of his race.
Now, Obama's right about one thing.
Look, I can't, I'm not gonna be a hypocrite here.
The Republican Party has in its own way, by not opposing Obama, set the stage for a Trump.
I've said that.
I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna back off of that.
There's absolutely truth to that.
But which came first?
Republican Party in action or Obama.
In this case, Obama's at the at the top of whatever has gone wrong here.
It's all coming from there, and Obama is at the top.
Everything is descending from Obama.
The Republican Party's ineffectiveness, its Behavior, its choices are all because of Obama and Obama's policies and his executive orders and his transformation of America is all happening essentially unopposed.
Because the Republican Party, for reasons we previously discussed, is afraid to stop the guy.
They're afraid to even say they want to stop the guy.
We don't need to rehash that.
That's why we're getting Republicans for amnesty.
But do you note here?
Obama's saying there are thoughtful conservatives troubled by this.
How proud are you conservatives of yourselves today?
Who's he talking about?
David Brooks is in the world who marveled at the crease in Obama's slacks.
Who are some of these other conservatives in Obama is all of a sudden heralding as bright lights?
And how proud are you conservative?
And I'm I bet you that these conservatives he's talking about know who they are.
And I'll bet you they're proud.
But look at this.
They are the ones that find themselves now cited by Barack Obama.
They are the ones telling us that what's going on in the Republican primaries, what's going on at Republican presidential election process, demeaning and it's embarrassing and it's beneath this.
Obama is now siding with those guys.
I am so happy I have never ever be considered to be in that group.
Snerdley, can you imagine what would happen to my audience if I were perceived.
At any rate, folks, this illustrates the vast divide that we have here.
And I think these two sound bites of Obama actually indicate the I think there's a little, I think there's little fear on the Democrat side of what's actually going on here.
They'd be crazy not to be alarmed at this.
Let's look at their turnout again.
Let's get back to that.
There is no enthusiasm on the Democrat side.
There's no enthusiasm for Hillary, certainly.
You might be able to say there's some enthusiasm for Bernie Sanders, but it's not showing up in turnout.
You might have a bunch of rabble rousers showing up at Bernie Sanders' appearances, but the turnout of the Democrat side is near record lows.
That means there is no energy.
There is no excitement.
There is no immediacy, there's no desire to continue whatever it is Obama has done.
Nobody is happy.
Nobody actually wants any more of this.
The Democrats campaigning have to promise more of it.
But even if you listen to Hillary and Bernie, they're ripping Obamacare.
They're ripping everything that's happened here as though the Republicans are to blame for it.
But they're not touting it.
They are not praising any of it.
They're not saying elect me to continue it.
They're still saying elect me to fix it after they've been in charge of whatever it is, everything for seven and a half years now.
So I saw this story at the Huffing and Puffington Post.
I missed it originally, March 3rd.
Fewer Democrats are voting this year in surprise states or in states with strict new voter laws.
But Republicans don't appear to be hurt.
It's not good for Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders, as voting rights advocates predicted loud and often new voter ID laws seem to be hitting Democrats harder than Republicans.
Republican voter turnout in this year's presidential race up sixty-two percent relative to 2008.
Democrat vote turnout down 29%.
Do you realize what that range adds up to?
That adds up to 89% differential in voter turnout.
Evidence suggests that new voting restrictions are at least a contributing factor.
Eight out of the 16 states that have held primaries or caucuses so far Have implemented new voter ID or other restrictive voters.
See, you know what really is happening here?
I'm sure you can figure this out.
If voter ID laws are to explain for low Democrat turnout, it has to mean that the fraud and cheating has been nipped in the bud.
That's all it can mean.
All voter ID laws do is identify the voter and confirm the voter is who he says he is.
That's all it is.
Now to the Democrat Party, that's a scandal.
To the Democrat Party, that is something that they opposed photo IDs, official IDs of any kind.
They fought them, they've gone to court over them.
Why?
Because I think at the end of all of this, this country is not dominated by a massive or majority number of Democrats.
There's only one reason to oppose voter ID laws.
And again, all a voter ID law is a means by which you prove that a voter is who he or she says he is.
Voter ID laws are not used to discriminate against people.
But that's what the Democrats tell their voters.
The Democrats, you can't trust these people.
You go down and get your picture taken, they're just setting you up to be put in jail, or whatever kind of scare tactic they use, it's absurd.
And yet they have gone to the end of the earth to try to stop these, and there can only be one reason why.
And that is because they know they have been getting away with people voting multiple times, and they can't get away with that with voter ID requirements or laws.
And the end result is that we find out there really are fewer Democrat voters than we have been led to believe by virtue of election results for years.
there is no intellectual reason to oppose voter ID laws when When you have to have an ID for virtually everything else, you can't get on an airplane, for example.
You can't make a purchase with a credit card.
You can't get a credit card.
You can't do 90% of the things you do need to do to transact business without an official ID in this country.
And yet when it comes to voting, the Democrat Party says, nope, nope, nope, tisk tis tis no way.
Why?
Now I know what the Reverend Laxon says and others.
They go and they panic minorities, and what they tell them is, don't you dare go down there and get your photo taken.
Don't you dare go down and get it in a photo ID.
All they're doing is trying to find out who you are so they can deny you your welfare check.
All they're trying to do is find out where you are and who you are so they can deny you pension or whatever it is, and that's they scared the Jesus out of them.
With a crock of garbage that is all made up in lies.
This is one of the simplest things to understand in the world.
You need an ID to prove who you are when you vote.
If a party makes a federal case opposing that, they have to be engaging in widespread fraud that official voter ID requirements would catch.
And so now here we are with Democrat voter turnout plummeting, coinciding with new voter ID laws in a number of states.
One in one equals two here, folks.
It's not hard to understand what's happening.
Okay, time to get started on the phones.
This Patty, Columbus, Ohio.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Are you a cre a KSIC supporter?
No.
Oh, you're not?
I think he's a great governor, but I think him and Rubio both are being very selfish.
Um he's a really great governor for Ohio.
But there's no way that he can win the nomination, the same way with Rubio, and I just think they're being selfish to the people and to the party by staying in and causing a chaos at the end.
I heard you in in the beginning of your show, so you explained a lot of things to me in the beginning.
And I understand that.
I guess they're being very selfish to the people and the party.
All right, so you you you think Kasich and Rubio should get out.
What is that?
You're your Cruz obviously supporter or you're anti Trump.
Well, uh I'm I'm a true supporter.
Um if I if Casic would have done well in the beginning and had a chance, I would be back in Kasich.
But I think Cruz has a very good chance if they would just get out and not cause a chaos for the people or the party.
Well, but Kasich is leaving in Ohio.
He's up by five right now, and there is a feather to be had here for your cap.
I mean, winning your home state in a presidential campaign.
I mean, you ha you have to do that.
Uh it it it it will be a resume enhancement for him for whatever else he wants to do later in politics.
So it it's it's kind of hard to to uh expect Kasich to get out of this when he's leading in Ohio.
I know your point is he's not a prayer of winning a nomination, right?
Right.
And so he's being selfish by just hoarding that one state's delegates because what's it gonna matter in the presidential race?
But you know, there is a scenario you're like with Hillary and Bernie Sanders, Hillary was winning by 21% going in, and she lost in Michigan.
Yeah, that that's uh that that's true.
That was one of the biggest polling errors since uh 1984.
But just because it happened once doesn't mean it's gonna it's gonna happen again.
But there's a scenario here that involves Cruz winning with Kasich staying in.
Welcome back, El Rushbo.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day here at the Excellence and Broadcasting Network of the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Now, Governor Kasich.
Governor Kasich is obviously angling for more than just winning Ohio.
I think that his dream is to become Postmaster General in in uh a future administration, even though Postmaster General is not really a cabinet level position any longer.
Uh there's uh there's family history there.
It might be relevant.
Some think that Governor Kasich is is uh attempting to secure vice presidential nod by uh from uh from Donald Trump, maybe uh Ted Cruz.
But in addition, Ohio, Governor Kasich says that he can win the rust belt, and he thinks that he can do well in places like uh California, New York, New Jersey.
That's what he says.
And now all of this in the context of him getting out, and he would tell you don't compare me to Rubio.
Ruby had won anything.
Rubio in Minnesota.
But uh Rubio's trending nowhere, and I still have a legitimate chance here, and I'm a working governor, and I have these accomplishments, and I know how to get people working together, and and all these uh other aspects.
And as those two scenarios that I that I described, the second scenario that the Cruz people have look, I don't know this for certain.
I'm just assuming that if that if there are only two ways this can happen.
The only two ways that uh pardon the sniffles here, folks.
Only two ways that that cruise can get there.
And one way, as I said, was for everybody to get out.
Kasich Rubio get out now, before Florida and before Ohio.
Well, maybe afterwards.
But no, the the the the key here, they have to get out.
And and and everybody has to unify behind Cruz, and that would include the establishment.
And I think just to repeat the thing, Lindsey Graham has opened a door.
But remember how he did it.
What Lindsey Graham said was we may be getting to the point where getting behind Ted Cruz looks doable or attractive or what have you.
But he was not sending that message to other members of the establishment.
He was saying that for for for Cruz's benefit.
What he was saying was, Senator Cruz, there is an opening here to get us back on your side.
But you're going to have to do some things for that to happen.
Because there's still a lot of animosity for you.
All of this is unstated.
But I just don't see Lindsey Graham stepping outside the establishment and going rogue and aligning himself with Cruz.
Yet that's not what he was doing.
He was essentially saying, Senator Cruz, there's a chance here to mend fences.
There's a chance here to bury some of these wounds, but that's going to be up to you.
Now who knows what that would be.
Mitch McConnell supposedly knows still out of joint over what Cruz did to him on the floor of the Senate, calling him a liar about any number of things.
So that would have to be patched up.
And then the if if I'm telling you, Cruz people, if you go that way, you have got to go for the whole thing.
You've got to go for 1,237.
That scenario, with Rue with Krubio, Kasich and Rubio getting out, you cannot show up second at the convention with neither you or Trump having 1,237.
You can't show up in second place.
You have got to go all the way.
Under this scenario.
That means you've got to win 1,237.
That means you've got to beat Trump the rest of the way.
And getting Rubio and Kasich out.
The theory being that all of that Republican opposition to Trump will unify behind you.
You've you better rework your math or look at your math, because you can't go in there in second place with neither you nor Trump having the required number of delegates.
If Trump goes in there in first place and is only 50 or 60 delegates short, he's going to get the nod.
They're not going to throw it open.
That would cause chaos, and and and I know that Senator Cruz has said that no, that wouldn't be chaos.
What would be chaos is if they throw a situation like that wide open and the establishment uses it to give it to Romney or some such thing.
The other scenario involves keeping Kasich in.
Rubio is going to drop out at some point.
The other scenario, keep Kasich in for as long as he can stay in and hope that he wins some.
And deny Trump the 1,237, and you go in there and the and the convention is thus contested, and you win it on the second or third ballot by then unifying everybody behind you.
That I don't know which of these two scenarios is the better of the two.
The Cruz campaign obviously has a preferred scenario if they're looking at one of these two.
What do you folks think?
What do you think is the most if if you want if you want to beat Trump, you want Cruz to be the nominee, which way do you think is the best way to go about it?
Getting Kasich and Rubio out, everybody, including the establishment unifying behind Cruz, keeping in mind that the establishment is not going to all of a sudden overnight start loving conservatives, and they're not all of a sudden going to start actually loving Cruz.
This is all going to be about stopping Trump.
It does not mean the establishment is what is once again welcoming conservatives.
It won't mean that at all.
The other scenario is that keep Kasich in this as long as you can go to a convention, deny Trump on the first ballot, have it contested, and then all bets are off after that.
Then you have a fun, exciting, unknown outcome at the convention, unlike we've had in a few.
One of those two scenarios has to be what they're working on.
But if they're if they're in the in the cruise being the only nominee from this four day forward involving uh Kasich and Rubio getting out, uh you can't show up in second place in that theory, in my way of thinking.
You've got to beat Trump before you get to Cleveland if you go that route.
Here's uh here's Bill Chicago.
Bill Great that you uh waited.
Welcome to the program.
Hello.
Hey Russ, thanks for having me on.
And uh before I get started, thank you for your lifetime of service.
I don't think I can express enough to you just how much you've mattered to me personally, and I know I speak for a lot of other people as well, so thank you and thank you for letting me on today as well.
Well, I really appreciate that.
I I I I really do thank you so much.
Hey, Rush, the reason for my call is I wanted to ask if you saw it was up on Drudge earlier, um, where Cruz had referred to Trump supporters borrowing a term from you as low information.
Yes, I saw that.
So as a Trump supporter, just to put it out there, you know, for me at this point, um, I've kind of had two issues watching Cruz up until now.
I've heard him lecture a lot about you know what's a real conservative and what does it mean to be a real conservative, and he lectures there.
And I'm looking at, you know, the discharge papers on my wall from the U.S. Army.
I'm looking at my time in the private sector that says, hey, I think I know what it means to be a conservative number one, and now he just called me dumb.
So here's my recommendation to to Ted Cruz, and I think he can take a note from a guy like Donald Trump.
You want my vote, Ted?
Earn it.
Trump is out there as a leader earning votes.
Cruz is out there trying to make me feel like I do or don't qualify for his definition of what it means to be a conservative, and at the same time stealing a page from your playbook about Democrats calling me a Republican dumb.
Not the way to earn my vote, Ted.
Let's play the audio sound by happens to be Soundbite number nine on the roster today.
It uh was on the CBN website, the Christian Broadcasting Network website, the Brody file is the name of the show.
David Brody, interviewing Senator Cruz said if it's if it's not for evangelicals in the deep South who are keeping Donald Trump alive, you're on your way to becoming a nominee.
The question was how are you not winning all the evangel?
How in the world is Trump winning some of these?
I tried to explain that in great detail yesterday, and I did so in a way, and I know the Cruz people are not offended by this.
I'm I'm actually doing helpful analysis here.
I think Senator Cruz, by targeting evangelicals, has limited his appeal.
He's he's got a much broader appeal than than than uh just evangelicals.
But his belief has been that those are the people not voting.
If you can energize them, turn them out that you'll win.
And there's truth in that.
But you can't take for granted the other people that did vote for Romney in 2012 that they're automatically going to show up.
So everybody's puzzled.
How come Trump Trump forgot you're kidding me?
Trump uh how is he winning evangelicals?
And this is what Cruz responded.
He does well with a certain demographic of voters.
Donald gave a press conference where he said to quote him, I love the poorly educated.
Donald is taking advantage of his voters.
Donald does well with voters who have relatively low information, who are not that engaged and who are angry and they see him as an angry voice.
Where we're beating him is when voters get more engaged and they get more informed.
When they inform themselves, they realize his record.
So you're a Trump supporter, uh, Bill, uh I'm assuming from what you said.
I am, Rush.
Right.
And you you uh understandably taking offense uh at at this.
The what I I don't take it personally, but I do think it's insulting to himself if he thinks the way to win the election is to insult right now what is the larging ba largest base in the Republican Party.
Yeah.
But I don't take it personally.
It's it's a it's every Republican in this race, other than Trump, every elected Republican, every candidate, every lot of Republicans are stymied.
They don't understand how Trump has done this.
Uh they're not sure just who the Trump voters are.
I've tried to tell them that, that Trump is reaching a broad-based coalition that includes let me tell you who's in that group.
I don't know if this describes you, but I'm gonna tell folks there there is, and I know this undeniably.
There is a significant contingent of people in the Trump camp who have been ticked off since NAFTA, since 1992.
When you hear Trump talk about free trade in his town hall meeting last night with Hannity, free trade, free trade, free trade, and everything related to it, had to make up 30%, if not more, of what Trump said last night.
He knows who a large contingent of his voters are, and what free trade, they don't think it's free trade at all.
They think it's rigged trade, and the result is factories they used to work at are closed, jobs they used to have are gone, and more factories are closing and more jobs are leaving, and they don't see anybody concerned about it.
The last guy that was concerned about it was Buchanan.
And here comes Trump.
Now that's not his base.
I mean, it's not the sole contingent in his support, but it's a huge number of people.
And they're not ignorant.
They are personally affected by what they think the elites have done.
And Trump is the only guy talking to them on that on that issue.
But in addition to that bill, Cruz and Rubio, I don't get every Jeb Bush, they've all been trying to figure out how to get Trump supporters to leave him.
And nothing they have tried has worked.
They have tried insulting Trump.
They have tried frightening Trump's voters.
They have tried telling Trump's voters that Trump is a fraud, that he's not a real conservative, that he's really a Democrat, Hillary donor at heart.
They've tried everything, and they can't break the bond, no matter what they do.
In fact, when Romney comes out and says what he says in that speech last week, it drives even more people to Trump, but it solidifies Trump support.
The traditional ways of beating a candidate are not applicable here.
So Senator Cruz comes along and says, well, you know, it's kind of like the low information voters and uses Trump's quote.
He loves the low educated.
That's not what Trump meant by that.
But what's going on here, as I have also stated over and over again, and this bill, I'm sure does apply to you, for whatever reasons, and they probably differ from person to person.
It's it's one of the things you can't, it's an intangible.
There's a bond.
The Trump supporter has a bond, a connection with Trump that only Trump can break.
Only Trump can violate it.
Nobody else created the bond.
Therefore, nobody else can defeat it or break it.
The media can't.
The media did not make Trump.
People are not supporting Trump because the media has sung his praises.
Oh my God, he's just on the clock.
Folks, I'm sorry.
I got to take a break.
All right, I apologize.
The segment here shorter than usual because I lost track of the clock there.
Look, here's the here's the bottom line.
Cruz is going to have to realize that he's not going to accomplish much by trying to take voters away from Trump.
They're locked.
There's a bond there you can't break.
The only guy that can is Trump.
The Republican Party cannot take Trump's supporters away because they didn't put them there.
Well, they're responsible for it, but they haven't promoted Trump.
There's no reason.
Trump's the only guy that can break that bond.
Therefore, what Cruz has to do is get Rubio's voters.
He's got to get Kasich's voters.
He's got to go out and get people who were for Ben Carson in the process.
If that peels away some Trump people, fine.
But you're never going to get Trump voters by telling them that Donald is this or that, or that they are low information, or that they don't.
And you're going to need those voters if you succeed.
If the tr if the Cruz people succeed, and by the way, I will acknowledge there's a third scenario.
The third scenario is that neither Cruz nor Trump get 1237, but that Cruz goes to the convention with a bigger number than Trump.
That, but if you're going to do that, you may as well go all the way, but but I understand the thinking, and it's valid.
If either one of those two scenarios happens.
If you get to 1237 to get the nomination, or if you beat Trump but remain short of 1237, once this convention's over, you're going to need those Trump voters.
A lot of those Trump voters, don't know what percentage.
People are saying it's anywhere from 15 to 25, maybe 30%, are Democrats.
Moderates, independents, liberals.
They are white working class voters who are not enthused by Hillary or Crazy Bernie.
And they are with Trump on this free trade immigration stuff.
You're gonna have to, you're gonna have to keep those people on your side.
So don't, you know, don't go out and and tough talk to them now because you're going to need them if you get.
There are plenty of votes in the anti-Trump quadrants or sectors, if you will, of the Republican Party.
It would be probably more beneficial, productive to focus on those, because nobody's gonna talk Trump voters out of supporting him right now.
No, no, no, no, no.
I have not forgotten, nor have I been taken off track.
We still have some sound bites in the Democrat debate that we're gonna get to.
And there's still tons of other stuff to hit in advance of another Republican debate tonight, this one on CNN.
▲
Export Selection